Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Prediction of Ore Block Shapes Based on Novel View Synthesis Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Insights into the Molecular Basis of HIV Glycoproteins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Co-Precipitation Synthesized Ag-Doped Ceria Redox Material (ACRM) for the Thermochemical Conversion of CO2 into Solar Fuels

by
Gorakshnath Takalkar
1,
Sayma Akhter
1 and
Rahul R. Bhosale
2,*
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Tennessee, 615 Mccallie Ave, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(18), 8272; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188272
Submission received: 10 August 2024 / Revised: 3 September 2024 / Accepted: 12 September 2024 / Published: 13 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical and Molecular Sciences)

Abstract

:
In this investigation, an effort was made to introduce Ag into the CeO2 fluorite crystal lattice to form Ce0.99Ag0.01O2-δ (ACRM) using an ammonium hydroxide-assisted co-precipitation method. The resulting powder obtained after the co-precipitation reaction, filtration, and drying was annealed at 800 °C in a muffle furnace to obtain crystalline ACRM. The phase composition and microstructure of the synthesized ACRM were analyzed using a powder X-ray diffractometer (PXRD) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The characterized ACRM powder was then subjected to multiple thermochemical thermal reduction (TR) and CO2 splitting (CDS) cycles using a high-temperature thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA). The TR step was conducted using Ar gas as an inert atmosphere, maintaining the temperature at 1400 °C for 60 min. Subsequently, the same powder was subjected to the CDS step by treating it with a gaseous mixture of 50% CO2 and Ar gas at 1000 °C for 30 min. ACRM displayed stable redox reactivity towards thermochemical CDS cycles by generating an average of 50.9 μmol of O2/g·cycle and 101.6 μmol of CO/g·cycle, respectively, over 10 thermochemical cycles.

1. Introduction

The escalating world population has resulted in an accompanying uptick in the demand for energy supply. Presently, this energy requirement stands at 18 TW, a figure that is expected to soar to 30 TW by 2050 [1]. The predominant fulfillment of the current energy demand is achieved using non-renewable fossil fuels. The limited reserves of fossil fuels, coupled with their excessive usage, lead to the release of a significant amount of CO2, one of the harmful greenhouse gases [2,3]. The concentration of CO2 in the earth’s atmosphere has risen from 325 ppm in 1970 to 420 ppm in 2022, and estimates indicate that it will surge to 525 ppm by 2050. Given that emitted CO2 is a significant contributor to global warming, there is a pressing need for carbon-neutral and renewable alternative energy sources to replace fossil fuels [4].
The efficient conversion of water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) into fuels using solar radiation presents a sustainable, long-term alternative for reducing fossil fuel consumption and exploiting solar energy [5,6]. Among the different methods for inducing solar thermochemical cycles, metal oxide (MO)-based redox reactions have shown efficiency in splitting H2O and CO2 into H2 and CO [7,8]. The MO-based thermochemical cycle operates at a relatively lower temperature compared with direct thermolysis [9].
Numerous nonvolatile metal oxides, including but not limited to ferrites [10,11], ceria [12,13], and perovskites [14,15], have been extensively researched for their capacity to facilitate isothermal and non-isothermal thermochemical splitting of H2O (WS) and CO2 (CDS), leading to the production of solar fuel [16,17]. In the realm of metal oxides, ceria (CeO2) has emerged as a promising redox material thanks to its enduring stability, rapid reaction kinetics, high vacancy concentration at elevated temperatures, and ease of accessibility [18,19]. The thermal reduction (TR) of ceria is achieved by releasing O2 at high temperatures during the first step, followed by re-oxidation with H2O or CO2 into H2 and CO in the second step. The resulting syngas (a mixture of CO and H2) can be converted into storable and transportable liquid hydrocarbons via the Fischer–Tropsch (FT) process [20]. Ultimately, the two-step thermochemical cycle using ceria offers a renewable, environmentally friendly, and long-term solution to meet future energy demand while mitigating CO2 emissions.
In 2006, Abanades et al. [21] explored ceria for WS in H2 via thermochemical cycles. They found that CeO2 can be thermally reduced to Ce2O3 at 2223 K under reduced pressure due to its favorable redox properties. Rhodes et al. [19] conducted a thorough examination of the degree of the redox reaction by using ceria in conjunction with CO generation via CDS for over 2000 thermochemical cycles. The results of their investigation revealed a significant elongation in thermal stability with an average non-stoichiometry of 0.0197 and retention of reactivity of 86.4%. Chueh et al. [22] demonstrated that non-stoichiometric ceria and a solar cavity receiver reactor can be used for thermochemical WS splitting for up to 500 redox cycles, achieving a solar-to-fuel efficiency of 0.7 to 0.8%. A study used an isothermal pressure swing reactor bed with ceria and CO2 as feedstock. The study demonstrated a total of 102 CDS cycles throughout 7.5 h, with an average CO production yield of 0.079 µmol/g·s [23].
Scheffe and Steinfeld [24] analyzed the impact of dopants such as Y2O3, Sm2O3, Gd2O3, CaO, and SrO on oxygen nonstoichiometry in ceria for splitting CO2 and H2O at different temperatures and oxygen partial pressures. Their research reveals that higher dopant concentration increases oxygen vacancies in ceria at lower temperatures. Kaneko et al. [25] have used a combustion synthesis method to produce ceria doped with transition metal ions such as Mn, Fe, Ni, and Cu. They studied the process of TR and re-oxidation for WS to generate H2. Their research showed that the doping of transition metal cations resulted in higher production of H2 compared with pure CeO2. Bhosale et al. [26] conducted a study on incorporating Hf+4 and Zr+4 dopants into CeO2 for redox thermochemical cycling. The study findings revealed that a 5% dopant concentration of both cations (individually) resulted in high CO generation, with thermal stability lasting over 20 multiple cycles as determined by thermogravimetry setup.
Meng et al. [27] studied the effect of metal cation doping on CeO2 for solar thermochemical WS cycles. Ce0.9Hf0.1O2 produced the highest amount of H2 at 500 °C and exhibited the least deactivation during the TR step at 1500 °C. It outperformed CeO2-MOx (M = Mn, Fe, Ni, and Pr). A recent study conducted by Takalkar et al. [28] investigated the impact of eight transition metal cations (M = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cr, Zr) as dopants into a CeO2 for multiple cycles towards CO generation by CO2. The study found that in most cases, the transition-doped CeO2 produced higher amounts of CO in ten cycles than pure CeO2. Rhodium-doped ceria [29] has been successfully employed for long-term methane generation, simultaneously splitting CO2 and H2O. The findings suggest that Ce0.99Rh0.01O2-δ materials possess an enhanced oxygen storage capacity and exhibit activity towards methane formation.
The existing body of research suggests that including various metal cations (such as transition, rare earth, and noble) into the structure of ceria leads to alterations in the thermal, chemical, kinetic, and physical properties. Most research efforts have been dedicated to doping transition metal cations in the ceria crystal structure. The outcomes have been less than promising, except for cases involving Zr and Hf. Consequently, the decision was made to redirect our focus toward utilizing noble metals as dopants for ceria to facilitate the solar fuel production cycle. To date, only Rh noble metal has been doped in CeO2 for the simultaneous splitting of CO2 and H2O into hydrocarbon through solar power [29]. In this study, we have used a more abundant and low-cost precious metal, silver (Ag1+), as a dopant in the ceria structure [1% Ag-doped ceria redox materials (ACRM): Ce0.99Ag0.01O2-δ] for the thermochemical redox cycle, which splits CO2 into CO and O2. We prepared the ACRM using a co-precipitation method and tested it for the CDS by performing multiple thermochemical cycles using a TGA set-up. The typical schematic of the ACRM redox CDS cycle is presented in Figure 1.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

To synthesize the ACRM (1% Ag-doped in CeO2: Ce0.99Ag0.01O2-δ) via the co-precipitation method, nitrate precursors of cerium and silver were procured from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). In addition to the metal precursors, Sigma Aldrich was also contacted for the purchase of a precipitating agent, an aqueous ammonia hydroxide (28%). Ultra-high pure Ar (99.999% purity, 2 ppm O2), and a 50/50 CO2/Ar gas mixture were ordered from Buzwair Scientific and Technical Gases supplier (Doha, Qatar). A de-ionized water production unit installed in the laboratory (Millipore, ultrapure Type 1) was utilized to supply de-ionized water for the co-precipitation synthesis of SCRM. All chemicals were used as is without any pre-treatment step.

2.2. Synthesis of ACRM

The co-precipitation method [30] employed for synthesizing ACRM is described in detail in Figure 2. The process involved weighing the cerium and silver nitrates and adding them to 300 mL of deionized water in a beaker. Subsequently, the metal precursor nitrates were allowed to dissolve in the deionized water with a continuous stirring mechanism. Aqueous ammonium hydroxide (28%) was used as a precipitating agent, adding dropwise to the aqueous mixture of metal precursors. The precipitation was achieved by stirring the aqueous mixture and adding the aqueous ammonium hydroxide (25%) dropwise while maintaining the solution pH at 10. The co-precipitation experiment was allowed to continue for 24 h while maintaining the pH at 10 to achieve the maximum possible precipitation. The beaker was then set aside overnight to allow the precipitate to settle. The following day, the supernatant liquid was decanted, and the wet ACRM precipitate was transferred to a vacuum filtration unit. The obtained precipitate was washed several times with deionized water to remove impurities and chemicals, and the pH of the water collected after washing was monitored. The washing process was stopped when the pH reached neutral. The filtered wet solids collected on the filtration paper were then scraped and transferred to a drying chamber operated at 100 °C. The ACRM powder obtained after drying was crushed using a ceramic mortar and pestle, and the fine powder sample was annealed at 800 °C for 4 h in a muffle furnace. The annealed ACRM powder sample was stored in a dry atmosphere for characterization.

2.3. Characterization of ACMR

The ACRM powder that was obtained after annealing underwent a comprehensive characterization process. The first step involved using a Panalytical XPert MPD/DY636 powder X-ray diffractometer (PXRD), which was operated using CuKα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm), with a voltage of 45 kV and a current of 20 mA. The pre- and post-reaction ACRM powder underwent scanning for 2θ in the range of 20° to 90°, with a recording time of 5 s. Additionally, to analyze the particle morphology of the ACRM particles, Scanning (SEM, Nova Nano 450, FEI) and Transmission Electron Microscopes (TEM, Tecnai G2 S Twin FEG, FEI) were utilized.

2.4. Thermochemical Redox Cycles

The functionality of the catalytic ACRM synthesized through co-precipitation was confirmed using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA, SETSYS Evo.,) sourced from SETARAM, France. The TGA setup (Figure 3), comprising a heating furnace with an enclosed alumina tube containing a graphite heating element, a temperature-regulating system, and a reaction chamber, was utilized for this purpose. A continuous flow of protective gas (Ar) was passed through the furnace to prevent damage to the graphite heating element from oxidizing gases. A chiller that provided ice-cold water to the furnace maintained the setup’s temperature. A balance was positioned in the top section of the TGA setup, and the carrier gas (Ar) flowed from top to bottom to prevent oxidation or contamination caused by sample vapors. Two mass flow controllers were employed to measure and monitor the flow rates of the gases used in the TGA experiments- one for Ar and the other for the CO2/Ar mixture. A Pt-Rh thermocouple (type B) was placed near the alumina crucible to measure and regulate the temperature of the powder sample. Prior to conducting any TGA experiments, the air or O2 trapped inside the hollow of the furnace was removed. This evacuation procedure was performed using a two-step mechanism: first, by applying a vacuum, and then by purging the hollow with an inert carrier gas (Ar).
To perform the TR and CDS experiments, a precise amount of approximately 100 mg of SCRM powder was loaded into a 100 µL platinum crucible and positioned accurately on a hanging balance. Several thermochemical cycles were conducted at temperatures ranging from 1000 to 1400 °C. The TR phase was carried out using inert Ar gas at 1400 °C for 60 min. Afterward, the CDS phase was performed by exposing the ACRM powder to a 50% CO2-Ar gaseous mixture at 1000 °C for 30 min. During the thermal reduction phase, the overall mass of the sample decreased due to the release of O2 from ACRM. On the other hand, during the CDS phase, the overall mass of the sample increased due to the re-oxidation of SCRM. The amounts of O2 released and CO produced during multiple thermochemical cycles were calculated using mass loss and gain values per the given equations.
n O 2 = m l o s s M O 2 × m A C R M
n C O = m g a i n M O × m A C R M

3. Results and Discussions

As explained in Section 2, ACRM was synthesized using a co-precipitation method. After synthesis, the calcined powder of ACRM was characterized using PXRD and SEM, and the characterization results were compared with pure CeO2 material prepared using the co-precipitation method. Figure 4 compares the PXRD patterns of CeO2 and ACRM. ACRM exhibits sharp crystalline peaks associated with a cubic fluorite crystal, similar to CeO2, as seen in PXRD peaks. According to the PXRD patterns, there is no evidence of metallic Ag or Ag-oxide impurities, as no peaks are associated with them. Upon analyzing the zoomed section of the PXRD (2θ = 28° to 30°), it has been observed that there is a noticeable shift in the peaks for the ACRM compared with the CeO2 due to the structural strain [31]. It is a well-known fact that such peak shifts can generally be attributed to the replacement of the Ce+4 cation by another metal cation. Therefore, based on the shift in the peaks recorded in Figure 4b, it can be inferred that the incorporation of Ag in the CeO2 crystal structure has been successfully achieved, and the formation of ACRM has been accomplished via the co-precipitation method.
The microstructural analysis of the ACRM synthesized through co-precipitation was examined using SEM. The SEM image in Figure 5a reveals that the particles exhibit a rough, spherical shape and appear agglomerated. The average particle size of the co-precipitation-synthesized ACRM was determined using ImageJ software (Version 1.54j). Figure 5b–e presents the particle size analysis across four distinct sections of the SEM image. The numbers on each image in Figure 5b–e indicate that the average particle size of the co-precipitation-synthesized ACRM falls within the 80 to 90 nm range.
The accurate particle size range for co-precipitation synthesized ACRM was determined while avoiding particle agglomeration through TEM analysis. The TEM image in Figure 6 provided further insight and confirmed that the average particle size for co-precipitation synthesized ACRM falls within 25 to 30 nm. Discrepancies between the SEM and TEM analysis results arose from the sample preparation method employed for TEM analysis, which prevented particle agglomeration and allowed for observing individual particles rather than agglomerated ones.
The ACRM powder, which was characterized, underwent a thermochemical CDS reaction test using a TGA setup. The Calisto software (Version 2.10), embedded in the TGA setup, was used to track the sample’s mass variations during the TR and CDS stages. The procedure for conducting thermochemical redox reactions is explained in Section 2. Consecutively, several thermochemical redox cycles were carried out, employing thermal reduction at 1400 °C (60 min) and re-oxidation with CO2 conversion into CO at 1000 °C (30 min). Blank TGA data were gathered under similar experimental conditions and utilized to subtract artifacts to eliminate the effect of buoyancy variation of gaseous components.
One thermochemical cycle was performed to estimate the redox reactivity of co-precipitation synthesized ACRM in terms of mass loss or gain percentage during the TR and CDS steps. A TGA profile obtained for the cycle is presented in Figure 7. In this cycle, 101.95 mg of ACRM was loaded in the TGA. During the TR and CDS steps, 0.652 mg of mass loss and 0.201 mg of mass gain were recorded. The TGA plot confirms that the TR rate was slower than the CDS rate. The mass loss and gain recorded during the TR and CDS steps were converted into the amounts of O2 released and CO produced using Equations (1) and (2). The amount of O2 released from ACRM during the TR step (199.8 μmol/g) was observed to be 152.3 μmol/g higher than that of the pure CeO2 material. Similarly, the amount of CO produced by ACRM at 1000 °C (123.2 μmol/g) was also higher than the CeO2 material (95 μmol/g). The results indicate that incorporating Ag into the CeO2 structures is advantageous in improving the O2-releasing and CO-producing ability of pure CeO2.
The findings illustrated in Figure 7 demonstrate that adding Ag into CeO2 structures is beneficial in enhancing the O2-releasing and CO-producing efficacy of pure CeO2. However, the amount of CO produced by ACRM via CDS was notably low compared with the O2 released. Moreover, drawing conclusions based on a single thermochemical cycle is not ideal, and therefore, we decided to evaluate the ACRM towards CDS in three consecutive thermochemical cycles. Figure 8 depicts the TGA plots obtained for the three consecutive thermochemical redox cycles carried out using ACRM. The amount of O2 released and CO produced during each CDS cycle was determined based on mass loss and gain data obtained from TGA, and the results are presented in Table 1.
Based on data reported in Table 1, it has been observed that the TR ability of the ACRM has significantly decreased during the second cycle. As per the published literature, the mass loss of the reactive sample during the first TR step can be attributed to the release of O2 and volatile components. Furthermore, during the calcination step at 800 °C, some of the chemicals used during the synthesis process were not wholly burned and remained unburnt. These chemicals were subsequently released during the TR step at 1400 °C. However, it was found that the amounts of O2 released and CO produced by ACRM materials, calculated based on the mass loss recorded during the first TR step, were misleading. Therefore, data obtained during the first thermochemical cycle were excluded from further analysis of the ACRM materials to avoid any misinterpretation. According to experimental data obtained from the second and third thermochemical cycles, it is evident that ACRM has shown an increase of 6.64% and 7.86% in the release of O2 and production of CO, respectively, as compared with CeO2. These findings confirm that incorporating Ag within the crystal structure of CeO2 positively affects both its TR and CDS abilities.
Ten consecutive thermochemical cycles were conducted to assess the ACRM’s redox reactivity, phase, and microstructural stability over the long term. The TGA profiles obtained during these ten cycles are presented in Figure 9, while the quantities of O2 released and CO produced for each cycle, excluding cycle 1, are illustrated in Figure 10. Based on the reported trends, it is evident that the redox reactivity of ACRM remained stable for ten consecutive thermochemical cycles. The average quantities of O2 released and CO produced from cycle 2 to cycle 10 for ACRM are 50.9 μmol of O2/g·cycle and 101.6 μmol of CO/g·cycle, respectively. The co-precipitation synthesized ACRM exhibited higher O2-releasing and CO-producing abilities, by 7.07% and 6.99%, respectively, across the entire ten thermochemical cycles compared with pure CeO2.
This study aimed to investigate the stability of ACRM in terms of its phase composition and microstructure, in addition to the redox reactivity. The post-reaction ACRM obtained after ten consecutive thermochemical CDS cycles was characterized using PXRD and SEM. The PXRD patterns of the pre- and post-reaction ACRM are depicted in Figure 11. As per the PXRD analysis, the phase composition of the ACRM remained unchanged even after undergoing ten thermochemical CDS cycles.
SEM analysis examined the ACRM samples obtained after 1 and 10 thermochemical cycles. Sintering of ACRM after the first cycle was observed in the SEM image presented in Figure 12a, indicating a significant increase in particle size from nanometers to microns. However, the SEM image in Figure 12b showed no further increase in particle size after performing 10 thermochemical cycles. This finding confirms that sintering of ACRM occurs upon exposure to high operating temperatures during the first cycle. No further sintering is observed once the material is stabilized after the initial thermochemical cycle. This is consistent with the levels of O2 released and CO produced by ACRM, as higher levels were recorded during the first cycle, while significantly lower amounts were observed during the second cycle, which could be attributed to ACRM sintering. Conversely, from the second to the tenth cycle, the redox reactivity of ACRM remained consistent, as no further sintering was observed.
The investigation conducted on the redox reactivity of CeO2 with Ag doping has shown promising results. Our research indicates that the amounts of O2 released and CO produced by ACRM are not extremely high compared with those produced by pure CeO2. However, it is important to note that we have only tested one composition of ACRM (1% Ag-doped in CeO2: Ce0.99Ag0.01O2-δ). Besides, the findings of this study provide a pathway to improve the redox reactivity of CeO2 by incorporating Ag in its crystal structure.
Our future plans entail investigating the impact of varying doping levels of Ag in the ceria crystal structure (ranging from 1 to 10%) on the thermochemical conversion of H2O and CO2 into solar fuels. Additionally, we will conduct advanced material characterizations, such as TEM mapping and XPS analysis [32], to analyze the elemental distribution and electronic structural characteristics of the Ce, Ag, and O elements.

4. Summary and Conclusions

A co-precipitation synthesis approach was employed to successfully dope Ag within the CeO2 crystal, forming ACRM, to improve the redox reactivity of pure CeO2. The PXRD peaks analysis revealed that ACRM manifests distinctive crystalline peaks consistent with a cubic fluorite crystal, similar to CeO2. Notably, no metallic Ag or Ag-oxide impurities were detected in the PXRD patterns, indicating their absence. Additionally, SEM analysis confirmed the formation of ACRM nanoparticles. In TGA-based thermochemical CDS experiments, the co-precipitation synthesized ACRM exhibited higher O2-releasing and CO-producing abilities, 7.07% and 6.99%, respectively, over ten thermochemical cycles, compared with pure CeO2. The PXRD analysis conducted on the reacted ACRM indicated that the chemical structure remained unaltered. However, SEM analysis confirmed that the sintering of ACRM occurred due to the high-temperature operation. The results of our research on CeO2 with Ag doping are promising, indicating that ACRM can enhance the redox reactivity of CeO2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.T. and R.R.B.; Methodology: G.T., S.A. and R.R.B.; Resources: R.R.B.; Original Draft: G.T. and R.R.B.; Review and Editing: G.T., R.R.B. and S.A.; Investigation: G.T., S.A. and R.R.B.; Data Curation: G.T. and R.R.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was made possible by the NPRP grant (NPRP8-370-2-154) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation) and the Ruth S. Holmberg Grant for Faculty Excellence from the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author (privacy).

Acknowledgments

This publication was made possible by the NPRP grant (NPRP8-370-2-154) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author(s). Rahul R. Bhosale also gratefully acknowledges the support provided by the Ruth S. Holmberg Grant for Faculty Excellence, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dincer, I.; Acar, C. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 40, 11094–11111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zoller, S.; Koepf, E.; Nizamian, D.; Stephan, M.; Patané, A.; Haueter, P.; Romero, M.; González-Aguilar, J.; Lieftink, D.; de Wit, E.; et al. A solar tower fuel plant for the thermochemical production of kerosene from H2O and CO2. Joule 2022, 6, 1606–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jia, B.; Xian, C.; Tsau, J.-S.; Zuo, X.; Jia, W. Status and Outlook of Oil Field Chemistry-Assisted Analysis during the Energy Transition Period. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 12917–12945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, D.; Xu, X.; Qin, Y.; Jiang, S.P.; Shao, Z. Rational Design of Ag-Based Catalysts for the Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to CO: A Review. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Herron, J.A.; Kim, J.; Upadhye, A.A.; Huber, G.W.; Maravelias, C.T. A general framework for the assessment of solar fuels technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 8, 126–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Loutzenhiser, P.G.; Meier, A.; Steinfeld, A. Review of the Two-Step H2O/CO2-Splitting Solar Thermochemical Cycle Based on Zn/ZnO Redox Reactions. Materials 2010, 3, 4922–4938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schäppi, R.; Hüsler, V.; Steinfeld, A. Solar Thermochemical Production of Syngas from H2O and CO2─Experimental Parametric Study, Control, and Automation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2024, 63, 3563–3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Amar, V.S.; Puszynski, J.A.; Shende, R.V. H2 generation from thermochemical water-splitting using yttria stabilized NiFe2O4 core-shell nanoparticles. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2015, 7, 023113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Agrafiotis, C.; Zygogianni, A.; Pagkoura, C.; Kostoglou, M.; Konstandopoulos, A.G. Hydrogen production via solar-aided water splitting thermochemical cycles with nickel ferrite: Experiments and modeling. AIChE J. 2013, 59, 1213–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Diver, R.B.; Miller, J.E.; Allendorf, M.D.; Siegel, N.P.; Hogan, R.E. Solar Thermochemical Water-Splitting Ferrite-Cycle Heat Engines. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2008, 130, 041001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhosale, R.R. Thermodynamic analysis of Ni-ferrite based solar thermochemical H2O splitting cycle for H2 production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mostrou, S.; Büchel, R.; Pratsinis, S.E.; van Bokhoven, J.A. Improving the ceria-mediated water and carbon dioxide splitting through the addition of chromium. Appl. Catal. A Gen 2017, 537, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Takalkar, G.; Bhosale, R.R.; Rashid, S.; AlMomani, F.; Shakoor, R.A.; Al Ashraf, A. Application of Li-, Mg-, Ba-, Sr-, Ca-, and Sn-doped ceria for solar-driven thermochemical conversion of carbon dioxide. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 11797–11807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bare, Z.J.L.; Morelock, R.J.; Musgrave, C.B. A Computational Framework to Accelerate the Discovery of Perovskites for Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Production: Identification of Gd Perovskite Oxide Redox Mediators. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2200201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takalkar, G.; Bhosale, R.R. Solar thermocatalytic conversion of CO2 using PrxSr(1−x)MnO3−δ perovskites. Fuel 2019, 254, 115624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Steinfeld, A. Solar hydrogen production via a two-step water-splitting thermochemical cycle based on Zn/ZnO redox reactions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2002, 27, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Scheffe, J.R.; Steinfeld, A. Oxygen exchange materials for solar thermochemical splitting of H2O and CO2: A review. Mater. Today 2014, 17, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chueh, W.C.; Haile, S.M. A thermochemical study of ceria: Exploiting an old material for new modes of energy conversion and CO2 mitigation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2010, 368, 3269–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rhodes, N.R.; Bobek, M.M.; Allen, K.M.; Hahn, D.W. Investigation of long term reactive stability of ceria for use in solar thermochemical cycles. Energy 2015, 89, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dry, M.E. The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950–2000. Catal. Today 2002, 71, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abanades, S.; Flamant, G. Thermochemical hydrogen production from a two-step solar-driven water-splitting cycle based on cerium oxides. Sol. Energy 2006, 80, 1611–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chueh, W.C.; Falter, C.; Abbott, M.; Scipio, D.; Furler, P.; Haile, S.M.; Steinfeld, A. High-Flux Solar-Driven Thermochemical Dissociation of CO2 and H2O Using Nonstoichiometric Ceria. Science 2010, 330, 1797–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Venstrom, L.J.; De Smith, R.M.; Hao, Y.; Haile, S.M.; Davidson, J.H. Efficient splitting of CO2 in an isothermal redox cycle based on ceria. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 2732–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Scheffe, J.R.; Steinfeld, A. Thermodynamic analysis of cerium-based oxides for solar thermochemical fuel production. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 1928–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kaneko, H.; Miura, T.; Ishihara, H.; Taku, S.; Yokoyama, T.; Nakajima, H.; Tamaura, Y. Reactive ceramics of CeO2-MOx (M=Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu) for H2 generation by two-step water splitting using concentrated solar thermal energy. Energy 2007, 32, 656–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhosale, R.R.; Kumar, A.; AlMomani, F.; Ghosh, U.; Al-Muhtaseb, S.; Gupta, R.; Alxneit, I. Assessment of CexZryHfzO2 based oxides as potential solar thermochemical CO2 splitting materials. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 9354–9362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, Q.-L.; Lee, C.-I.; Ishihara, T.; Kaneko, H.; Tamaura, Y. Reactivity of CeO2-based ceramics for solar hydrogen production via a two-step water-splitting cycle with concentrated solar energy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 13435–13441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Takalkar, G.; Bhosale, R.; Kumar, A.; AlMomani, F.; Khraisheh, M.; Shakoor, R.; Gupta, R. Transition metal doped ceria for solar thermochemical fuel production. Sol. Energy 2018, 172, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, F.; Rothensteiner, M.; Alxneit, I.; van Bokhoven, J.A.; Wokaun, A. First demonstration of direct hydrocarbon fuel production from water and carbon dioxide by solar-driven thermochemical cycles using rhodium-ceria. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2400–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, X.; Wang, W.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Recent Advances in Novel Nanostructuring Methods of Perovskite Electrocatalysts for Energy-Related Applications. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guan, D.; Zhong, J.; Xu, H.; Huang, Y.-C.; Hu, Z.; Chen, B.; Zhang, Y.; Ni, M.; Xu, X.; Zhou, W.; et al. A universal chemical-induced tensile strain tuning strategy to boost oxygen-evolving electrocatalysis on perovskite oxides. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2022, 9, 011422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Z.; Bai, Y.; Sun, H.; Guan, D.; Li, W.; Huang, W.-H.; Pao, C.-W.; Hu, Z.; Yang, G.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Synergistic dual-phase air electrode enables high and durable performance of reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cells. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of the solar-driven two-step thermochemical CO2 splitting cycle operated on the basis of redox reactions associated with the co-precipitation synthesized ACRM.
Figure 1. Schematic of the solar-driven two-step thermochemical CO2 splitting cycle operated on the basis of redox reactions associated with the co-precipitation synthesized ACRM.
Applsci 14 08272 g001
Figure 2. Step-wise synthesis of ACRM using the co-precipitation method.
Figure 2. Step-wise synthesis of ACRM using the co-precipitation method.
Applsci 14 08272 g002
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric Analyzer (SETARAM Setsys, France).
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric Analyzer (SETARAM Setsys, France).
Applsci 14 08272 g003
Figure 4. (a) Wide angle PXRD patterns of the co-precipitation synthesized ACRM and CeO2 and (b) shift in the peaks due to the incorporation of Ag in the CeO2 crystal structure.
Figure 4. (a) Wide angle PXRD patterns of the co-precipitation synthesized ACRM and CeO2 and (b) shift in the peaks due to the incorporation of Ag in the CeO2 crystal structure.
Applsci 14 08272 g004
Figure 5. (a) SEM image of ACRM synthesized by using the co-precipitation method, (be) images obtained from the ImageJ software (particle size analysis).
Figure 5. (a) SEM image of ACRM synthesized by using the co-precipitation method, (be) images obtained from the ImageJ software (particle size analysis).
Applsci 14 08272 g005
Figure 6. TEM image of ACRM synthesized by using the co-precipitation method.
Figure 6. TEM image of ACRM synthesized by using the co-precipitation method.
Applsci 14 08272 g006
Figure 7. A typical TGA profile obtained during the ACRM-driven thermochemical CDS cycle.
Figure 7. A typical TGA profile obtained during the ACRM-driven thermochemical CDS cycle.
Applsci 14 08272 g007
Figure 8. TGA profiles obtained during three consecutive ACRM-driven thermochemical CDS cycles.
Figure 8. TGA profiles obtained during three consecutive ACRM-driven thermochemical CDS cycles.
Applsci 14 08272 g008
Figure 9. TGA profiles obtained during ten consecutive ACRM-driven thermochemical CDS cycles.
Figure 9. TGA profiles obtained during ten consecutive ACRM-driven thermochemical CDS cycles.
Applsci 14 08272 g009
Figure 10. Amounts of O2 released and CO produced by ACRM during ten consecutive thermochemical CDS cycles.
Figure 10. Amounts of O2 released and CO produced by ACRM during ten consecutive thermochemical CDS cycles.
Applsci 14 08272 g010
Figure 11. PXRD patterns of ACMR before and after performing 10 consecutive thermochemical CDS cycles.
Figure 11. PXRD patterns of ACMR before and after performing 10 consecutive thermochemical CDS cycles.
Applsci 14 08272 g011
Figure 12. SEM images of ACRM after performing (a) 1 cycle and (b) 10 cycles.
Figure 12. SEM images of ACRM after performing (a) 1 cycle and (b) 10 cycles.
Applsci 14 08272 g012
Table 1. Amounts of O2 released and CO produced by ACRM and pure CeO2 during three consecutive thermochemical CDS cycles.
Table 1. Amounts of O2 released and CO produced by ACRM and pure CeO2 during three consecutive thermochemical CDS cycles.
MaterialsCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3
n O 2 Released (μmol/g) n C O Produced (μmol/g) n O 2 Released (μmol/g) n C O Produced (μmol/g) n O 2 Released (μmol/g) n C O Produced (μmol/g)
CeO247.194.247.895.646.993.8
ACRM199.8123.251.2102.450.9101.8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takalkar, G.; Akhter, S.; Bhosale, R.R. Co-Precipitation Synthesized Ag-Doped Ceria Redox Material (ACRM) for the Thermochemical Conversion of CO2 into Solar Fuels. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8272. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188272

AMA Style

Takalkar G, Akhter S, Bhosale RR. Co-Precipitation Synthesized Ag-Doped Ceria Redox Material (ACRM) for the Thermochemical Conversion of CO2 into Solar Fuels. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(18):8272. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takalkar, Gorakshnath, Sayma Akhter, and Rahul R. Bhosale. 2024. "Co-Precipitation Synthesized Ag-Doped Ceria Redox Material (ACRM) for the Thermochemical Conversion of CO2 into Solar Fuels" Applied Sciences 14, no. 18: 8272. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop