Next Article in Journal
Prediction Models for the Milling of Heat-Treated Beech Wood Based on the Consumption of Energy
Previous Article in Journal
SISGAN: A Generative Adversarial Network Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction Model Combining Interaction Information and Scene Information
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Machine Learning Model Trained with Finite Element Modeling Can Predict the Risk of Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

by
Mika E. Mononen
1,*,
Mimmi K. Liukkonen
2 and
Mikael J. Turunen
1,3
1
Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
2
Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, 70200 Kuopio, Finland
3
Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, 70200 Kuopio, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(20), 9538; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209538 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 September 2024 / Revised: 11 October 2024 / Accepted: 14 October 2024 / Published: 18 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering)

Abstract

Objective: Despite long simulation times, recently developed finite element analysis (FEA) models of knee joints have demonstrated their suitability for predicting individual risk of onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of machine learning (ML) to replicate outcomes obtained from FEA when simulating mechanical responses and predicting cartilage degeneration within the knee joint.Design: Two ML models based on the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) algorithms were developed. The first model (GPR1) utilized age, weight, and anatomical joint dimensions as predictor variables to predict tissue mechanical responses and cartilage degeneration based on FEA data. The second model (GPR2) utilized age, weight, height, and gender to predict anatomical joint dimensions, which were then used as inputs in the GPR1 model. Finally, the GPR1 and combined GPR1+GPR2 models were used to investigate the importance of clinical imaging when making personalized predictions for knees from healthy subjects with no history of knee injuries.Results: In the GPR1 model, R2 of 0.9 was exceeded for most of the predicted mechanical parameters. The GPR2 model was able to predict knee shape with R2 of 0.67–0.9. Both GPR1 and combined GPR1+GPR2 models offered equally good performances (AUC = 0.73–0.74) in classifying patients at high risk for the onset and development of knee osteoarthritis.Conclusions: In the future, real-time and easy-to-use GPR models may provide a rapid technology to evaluate mechanical responses within the knee for researchers or clinicians who have no former knowledge of FEA.
Keywords: knee; cartilage; finite element analysis; osteoarthritis; machine learning knee; cartilage; finite element analysis; osteoarthritis; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mononen, M.E.; Liukkonen, M.K.; Turunen, M.J. Machine Learning Model Trained with Finite Element Modeling Can Predict the Risk of Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209538

AMA Style

Mononen ME, Liukkonen MK, Turunen MJ. Machine Learning Model Trained with Finite Element Modeling Can Predict the Risk of Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(20):9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mononen, Mika E., Mimmi K. Liukkonen, and Mikael J. Turunen. 2024. "Machine Learning Model Trained with Finite Element Modeling Can Predict the Risk of Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative" Applied Sciences 14, no. 20: 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop