Preventive Maintenance Decision-Making Optimization Method for Airport Runway Composite Pavements
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Composite Pavement Performance Prediction
2.2. Preventive Maintenance Benefit Analysis
2.2.1. Performance Jump
2.2.2. Deterioration Rate Reduction
2.3. Long-Term Maintenance Decision-Making Optimization Method
2.3.1. Stage Variable
2.3.2. State Variable
2.3.3. Decision Variable
2.3.4. State Transfer Variable
2.3.5. Objective Function and Basic Equation
2.3.6. Constraint
2.4. Optimization Incremental Dynamic Programming Algorithm
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Performance Deterioration of Runway Composite Pavement Regions
3.2. Maintenance Benefits of Preventive Maintenance Maintenance Technologies
3.2.1. Performance Jump
3.2.2. Deterioration Rate Reduction
3.3. Application of Long-Term Maintenance Decision-Making Optimization Method
3.3.1. Decision-Making Model Parameters
3.3.2. Maintenance Decision-Making Solution
4. Conclusions
- The PCI deterioration tendencies of the middle runway, terminal runway, and taxiway in five airports with composite pavements were analyzed, and the corresponding PCI predictive models were regressed according to the long-term data of the investigated airports. The 13 coefficients an, bn, cn (n = 1, 2, 3, 4), and d in the PCI predictive models for different composite pavement regions are shown in Table 3.
- According to the LTPP database, PJ, DRR, and PCI deterioration rates of 33 composite pavement sections treated with crack sealing, 28 with crack filling, 21 with fog seal, 19 with thin HMA overlay, and 11 with hot-mix recycled AC were analyzed. Thus, the maintenance benefit of each maintenance technology was determined. The regression relationship between PJ and PCI immediately before maintenance is shown in Figure 5, using a logarithmic model. For sections treated with crack sealing and crack filling, the DRR is nearly 0, and the PCI deterioration rate is rarely influenced. For sections treated with fog seal, the average DRR is 0.2, and the reduced PCI deterioration rate returns to that immediately before maintenance after 2 years. For sections treated with thin HMA overlay and hot-mix recycled AC, the average DRR is 0.7 and 0.8, and the recovering time of PCI deterioration rate is 3 and 4 years, respectively.
- A decision-making optimization method for long-term preventive maintenance based on DP was proposed, and the DP model parameters include stage variables, state variables, decision variables, state transfer equations, objective functions, basic equations, and constraints. An optimization IDP algorithm was developed to reduce the calculation cost by optimizing the calculation processes of both non-inferior solutions and the optimal solution. A method was used for preprocessing non-inferior solutions, and a median approach algorithm was proposed to reduce the time needed to compute the optimal solution. The decision-making optimization method was applied in a five-year preventive maintenance plan for composite pavements in Sunan Shuofang Airport, China, which sufficiently meets the demand for pavement performance without exceeding the annual maintenance budget.
- In this study, which maintenance technologies to adopt and when to maintain the pavement were dependent on the condition and deterioration tendency of composite pavements. Furthermore, the treatment costs were dependent on the type of maintenance technologies and inflation. However, the treatment costs were assumed to be irrelevant to composite pavement conditions, although poorer conditions may require greater treatment costs for the same maintenance technology. Moreover, the penalty for the maintenance of aircraft because of poor runway conditions, which may exacerbate aircraft deterioration and increase airline company costs, was not considered. These assumptions resulted in yielding “no maintenance” as the optimal solution in the application. The aforementioned problems must be studied in future work, including the relationship between treatment costs and pavement condition, as well as the more comprehensive constraints in the maintenance decision-making optimization method.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ling, J.; Wei, F.; Zhao, H.; Tian, Y.; Han, B. Analysis of airfield composite pavement responses using full-scale accelerated pavement testing and finite element method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 212, 596–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Ling, J.; Wu, Z.; Li, P.; Zhang, J. A new set of indexes and thresholds of preventive maintenance decision making for airport runway composite pavement. J. Transp. Eng. 2022, 148, 04022001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nur, M.; Khattak, M.; Bhuyan, M.; Gaspard, K. Cracking models for HMA overlay treatment of composite pavements in Louisiana. Int. J. Pav. Eng. 2021, 22, 1821–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousa, M.; Elseifi, M.; Bashar, M.; Zhang, Z.; Gaspard, K. Field evaluation and cost effectiveness of crack sealing in flexible and composite pavements. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018, 2672, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, M.; Chen, W.; Ding, X.; Zhang, W.; Yu, S. Comprehensive life cycle environmental assessment of preventive maintenance techniques for asphalt pavement. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labi, S.; Sinha, K. Life-cycle evaluation of flexible pavement preventive maintenance. J. Transp. Eng. 2005, 131, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svenson, K. Estimated lifetimes of road pavements in Sweden using time-to-event analysis. J. Transp. Eng. 2014, 140, 04014056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almansour, A.; Sinha, K.; Kuczek, T. Effects of routine maintenance on flexible pavement condition. J. Transp. Eng. 1994, 120, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Q.; Huang, B.; Richards, S. Cost-effectiveness analyses of maintenance treatments for low- and moderate-traffic asphalt pavements in Tennessee. J. Transp. Eng. 2013, 139, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.; Smadi, O. How prediction accuracy can affect the decision-making process in pavement management system. Infrastructures 2021, 6, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khattak, M.J.; Landry, C.; Veazey, J.; Zhang, Z. Rigid and composite pavement index-based performance models for network pavement management system in the state of Louisiana. Int. J. Pav. Eng. 2013, 14, 612–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaya, O.; Ceylan, H.; Kim, S.; Waid, D.; Moore, B. Statistics and Artificial Intelligence-Based Pavement Performance and Remaining Service Life Prediction Models for Flexible and Composite Pavement Systems. Transp. Res. Rec. 2020, 2674, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandya, H.; Weideli, T.; Elshaer, M.; Mehta, Y.; Ali, A. Performance evaluation of composite pavements using Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Airfield and Highway Pavements, Chicago, IL, USA, 20 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Golabi, K.; Kulkarni, R.B.; Way, G.B. A statewide pavement management system. Interfaces 1982, 12, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Claros, G.; Hudson, W.R. Mixed-integer programming model for AASHTO flexible pavement design. Transp. Res. Rec. 1992, 1344, 231–242. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, S.; Kang, K.; Yoon, Y.; Hastak, M.; Ji, R. Systematic decision-making process for composite pavement maintenance. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2018, 144, 04018044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carnahan; Davis, W.; Shahin, M.; Keane, P.; Wu, M. Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management. J. Transp. Eng. 1987, 113, 554–572. [Google Scholar]
- Fwa, T.; Chan, W.; Hoque, K. Multiobjective optimization for pavement maintenance programming. J. Transp. Eng. 2000, 126, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Zheng, M. Multi-objective optimization for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation decision-making: A critical review and future directions. Aut. Constr. 2021, 130, 103840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, S.; Han, K.; Zhang, L.; Luo, X.; Chen, S. Pavement maintenance decision making based on optimization models. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meneses, S.; Ferreira, A. Flexible pavement maintenance programming considering the minimisation of maintenance and rehabilitation costs and the maximisation of the residual value of pavements. Int. J. Pav. Eng. 2015, 16, 571–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chootinan, R.; Chen, A.; Horrocks, M.; Bolling, D. A multi-year pavement maintenance program using a stochastic simulation-based genetic algorithm approach. Transp. Res. Part A 2006, 40, 725–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, W.H.; Ouyang, Y.F.; Samer, M. Joint optimization of pavement maintenance and resurfacing planning. Transp. Res. Part B 2012, 46, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, S.; Lee, J.; Urbino, I.; Lin, W.; Cho, Y. Airport pavement maintenance decision-making system with condition cases optimization. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Keoleian, G.A.; Lepech, M.D.; Kendall, A. Life-cycle optimization of pavement overlay systems. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2010, 16, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.; Garcia-Diaz, A. Cost-effective selection and multi-period scheduling of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. Eng. Opt. 2008, 40, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuhn, K.D. Pavement network maintenance optimization considering multidimensional condition data. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2012, 18, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, X.; Yuan, C.; Gan, J. Icorporating dynamic traffic distribution into pavement maintenance optimization model. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albatayneh, O.; Aleadelat, W.; Ksaibati, K. Dynamic programming of 0/1 knapsack problem for network-level pavement asset management system. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2021, 48, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D5340-98; Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys. ASTM International: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
- Sun, L.J.; Liu, X.P. Standard decay equation of pavement performance. J. Tongji Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 1995, 5, 512–518. [Google Scholar]
- MH/T5024-2009; Technical Specifications of Aerodrome Pavement Evaluation and Management. Civil Aviation Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2009.
- MH/T5010-2017; Specifications of Asphalt Pavement Design of Civil Airports. Civil Aviation Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2017.
- Lytton, R.L. Concepts of pavement performance prediction and modeling. In Proceedings of the 2nd North American Conference on Managing Pavements, Public Roads, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2–6 November 1987; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Rajagopal, A.S.; George, K.P. Pavement maintenance effectiveness. Transp. Res. Rec. 1991, 1276, 62–66. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, R.; Freeman, T.; Pendleton, O. Pavement Maintenance Effectiveness, Strategic Highway Research Program; National Research Council: Washington, DC, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Labi, S.; Sinha, K.C. Effectiveness of highway pavement seal coating treatments. J. Transp. Eng. 2004, 130, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labi, S.; Lamptey, G.; Kong, S.H. Effectiveness of micro-surfacing treatments. J. Transp. Eng. 2007, 133, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markow, M.J. Life-cycle costs evaluations of effects of pavement maintenance. Transp. Res. Rec. 1991, 1276, 37–47. [Google Scholar]
- Labi, S.; Sinha, K.C. Measures of short-term effectiveness of highway pavement maintenance. J. Transp. Eng. 2003, 129, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajek, J.J. Common airport pavement maintenance practices. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, USA, 9 March 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Ploeger, D.C.; Chapman, R.B.; Peshkin, D.G.; Speidel, D.J. Preventive Maintenance at General Aviation Airports: Guidebook. 2015. Available online: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/online-pubs/acrp/acrp_rpt_138v2.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2019).
Airport Code | Airport Region | Year of AC Overlay | Thickness of AC Overlay (cm) | Thickness of PCC Pavement (cm) | he (cm) | Years of Traffic Investigated | ESAL (/day) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZX | Middle runway | 2013 | SMA-13: 5 | 42 | 39.89 | 2013–2017 | 31 |
AC-20: 11 | |||||||
Taxiway | SMA-13: 5 | 56 | 51.58 | 8 | |||
AC-20: 12.5 | |||||||
DLC | Middle runway | 2005 | SMA-16: 6 | 32 | 34.11 | 2007–2011 | 93 |
AC-21: 15 | |||||||
Terminal runway | SMA-16: 6 | 37 | 35.95 | 47 | |||
AC-21: 10 | |||||||
Taxiway | SMA-16: 6 | 32 | 34.11 | 19 | |||
AC-21: 6 | |||||||
AC-25: 9 | |||||||
TAO | Middle runway | 2010 | SMA-16: 6 | 32 | 30.74 | 2013–2017 | 320 |
AC-20: 7 | |||||||
Terminal runway | SMA-16: 6 | 34 | 34.42 | 160 | |||
AC-20: 12 | |||||||
Taxiway | SMA-16: 6 | 34 | 34.42 | 54 | |||
AC-20: 12 | |||||||
XMN | Middle runway | 2008 | SMA-16: 6 | 30 | 32.95 | 2011–2015 | 135 |
AC-20: 16 | |||||||
Terminal runway | SMA-16: 6 | 30 | 32.11 | 68 | |||
AC-20: 14 | |||||||
Taxiway | SMA-16: 6 | 33 | 31.26 | 27 | |||
AC-20: 12 | |||||||
SHA | Middle runway | 2011 | SMA-13: 5 | 38 | 44.79 | 2012–2016 | 357 |
AC-16: 7 | |||||||
SMA-16: 6 | |||||||
AC-20: 19 | |||||||
Terminal runway | SMA-13: 5 | 31 | 40.15 | 179 | |||
AC-16: 7 | |||||||
SMA-16: 6 | |||||||
AC-20: 19 |
Region of the Airport | Airport Code | α | β |
---|---|---|---|
Middle runway | CZX | 167.6163 | 0.3366 |
DLC | 125.9302 | 0.3105 | |
TAO | 92.5086 | 0.2906 | |
XMN | 114.7053 | 0.3041 | |
SHA | 104.9870 | 0.3287 | |
Terminal runway | DLC | 187.4970 | 0.3074 |
TAO | 133.8690 | 0.2955 | |
XMN | 160.0943 | 0.2944 | |
SHA | 140.8225 | 0.3094 | |
Taxiway | CZX | 478.9010 | 0.2529 |
DLC | 264.9978 | 0.2108 | |
TAO | 196.3031 | 0.2037 | |
XMN | 226.6756 | 0.2021 |
Region of Airport | Regression Coefficients | ||||||
a1 | b1 | c1 | a2 | b2 | c2 | ||
Middle runway | 23.9802 | 0.8943 | −0.2087 | 194.3201 | −2.8224 | −0.0845 | |
Terminal runway | 24.1403 | 0.8423 | −0.2246 | 183.1502 | −2.1321 | −0.0912 | |
Taxiway | 31.9805 | 0.8217 | −0.2456 | 171.2804 | −1.8321 | −0.0972 | |
Region of Airport | Regression Coefficients | ||||||
a3 | b3 | c3 | a4 | b4 | c4 | d | |
Middle runway | 1.1020 | −0.2411 | −0.0803 | 0.0453 | 0.3349 | −0.0255 | −0.0981 |
Terminal runway | 1.4210 | −0.2121 | −0.0942 | 0.0557 | 0.3144 | −0.0211 | −0.0975 |
Taxiway | 1.5691 | −0.2033 | −0.0987 | 0.0418 | 0.3578 | −0.0311 | −0.0985 |
Region Code | Region of Airport | he (cm) | ESAL (/day) |
---|---|---|---|
1#/2#/3#/4# | Terminal runway | 36 | 39 |
5#/6#/7#/8# | Middle runway | 39 | 58 |
Maintenance Technology | Unit Cost | Maintenance Length/Area | ) |
---|---|---|---|
Crack filling | $2.4/m | 11,000 m | $26,400 |
Fog seal | $3.3/m2 | 9000 m2 | $29,700 |
Hot-mix recycled AC | $4.0/m2 | 9000 m2 | $36,000 |
No. | ($) | Benefit–Cost Rate (×10−5) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2] | 24,409 | 0.97 | 3.97 |
2 | [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3] | 27,460 | 1.11 | 4.04 |
3 | [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5] | 33,285 | 1.28 | 3.85 |
4 | [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 2] | 48,818 | 1.95 | 3.99 |
5 | [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 3] | 51,869 | 2.08 | 4.01 |
6 | [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 3] | 54,920 | 2.21 | 4.02 |
7 | [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 5] | 57,694 | 2.25 | 3.90 |
8 | [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 5] | 60,745 | 2.39 | 3.93 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ling, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Tian, Y. Preventive Maintenance Decision-Making Optimization Method for Airport Runway Composite Pavements. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3850. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093850
Ling J, Wang Z, Liu S, Tian Y. Preventive Maintenance Decision-Making Optimization Method for Airport Runway Composite Pavements. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(9):3850. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093850
Chicago/Turabian StyleLing, Jianming, Zengyi Wang, Shifu Liu, and Yu Tian. 2024. "Preventive Maintenance Decision-Making Optimization Method for Airport Runway Composite Pavements" Applied Sciences 14, no. 9: 3850. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093850
APA StyleLing, J., Wang, Z., Liu, S., & Tian, Y. (2024). Preventive Maintenance Decision-Making Optimization Method for Airport Runway Composite Pavements. Applied Sciences, 14(9), 3850. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093850