Next Article in Journal
Decrease in Incidence Rate of Hospitalizations Due to AIDS-Defining Conditions but Not to Non-AIDS Conditions in PLWHIV on cART in 2008–2018 in Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating Markers of Immune Tolerance and Angiogenesis in Maternal Blood for an Association with Risk of Pregnancy Loss
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Ireland’s First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on People Affected by Eating Disorders: ‘Behind Every Screen There Was a Family Supporting a Person with an Eating Disorder’
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Inflammatory Milieu of Amniotic Fluid Increases with Chorio-Deciduitis Grade in Inflammation-Restricted to Choriodecidua, but Not Amnionitis, of Extra-Placental Membranes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 15
10.3390/jcm10153384
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pre-Clinical Investigation of Cardioprotective Beta-Blockers as a Therapeutic Strategy for Preeclampsia

by
Natalie K. Binder
1,2,3,†,
Teresa M. MacDonald
1,3,†,
Sally A. Beard
1,2,3,
Natasha de Alwis
1,2,3,
Stephen Tong
1,3,
Tu’uhevaha J. Kaitu’u-Lino
1,3,4 and
Natalie J. Hannan
1,2,3,*
1
Translational Obstetrics Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg 3084, Australia
2
Therapeutics Discovery and Vascular Function Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg 3084, Australia
3
Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg 3084, Australia
4
Diagnostics Discovery and Reverse Translation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg 3084, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal contribution.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(15), 3384; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153384
Submission received: 4 May 2021 / Revised: 23 July 2021 / Accepted: 28 July 2021 / Published: 30 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic or Therapeutic Strategies for Pregnancy Complications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Despite significant maternal and fetal morbidity, a treatment for preeclampsia currently remains an unmet need in clinical care. As too does the lifelong cardiovascular risks imparted on preeclampsia sufferers. Endothelial dysfunction and end-organ injury are synonymous with both preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease, including heart failure. We propose that beta-blockers, known to improve endothelial dysfunction in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, and specifically known to reduce mortality in the treatment of heart failure, may be beneficial in the treatment of preeclampsia. Here, we assessed whether the beta-blockers carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol could quench the release of anti-angiogenic factors, promote production of pro-angiogenic factors, reduce markers of inflammation, and reduce endothelial dysfunction using our in vitro pre-clinical preeclampsia models encompassing primary placental tissue and endothelial cells. Here, we show beta-blockers effected a modest reduction in secretion of anti-angiogenic soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and soluble endoglin and increased expression of pro-angiogenic placental growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor and adrenomedullin in endothelial cells. Beta-blocker treatment mitigated inflammatory changes occurring after endothelial dysfunction and promoted cytoprotective antioxidant heme oxygenase-1. The positive effects of the beta-blockers were predominantly seen in endothelial cells, with a less consistent response seen in placental cells/tissue. In conclusion, beta-blockers show potential as a novel therapeutic approach in the treatment of preeclampsia and warrant further investigation.

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia is a serious pregnancy complication that affects 3–8% of all pregnancies. Because there are no effective medical therapies against the progression of preeclampsia aside from delivery, it remains a leading cause of maternal and perinatal deaths worldwide [1,2,3].
It is thought that preeclampsia develops after defective early trophoblast invasion and remodelling of the maternal spiral arterioles, causing significant oxidative stress [4,5]. Following this, excessive anti-angiogenic factors soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) [6,7,8,9] and soluble endoglin (sENG) [10] are secreted into the maternal circulation [5,11,12,13]. These anti-angiogenic factors sequester circulating pro-angiogenic factors placental growth factor (PGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), reducing VEGF-mediated upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide [14]. Without an upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide, endothelin-1 (ET-1) production is likely uninhibited, and systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction ensues [15].
Endothelial dysfunction characterises preeclampsia and is a significant driver of the multi-organ injury clinically observed with the disease [16,17,18,19]. Circulating ET-1, a potent vasoconstrictor, is significantly increased in women with preeclampsia [20,21,22,23]. Increased ET-1 expression in the vasculature is also a marker of endothelial dysfunction. ET-1 receptor B (ETB) facilitates endothelium-mediated vasodilation by clearing ET-1 from circulation [24]. Vascular adhesion molecule (VCAM), another marker of endothelial dysfunction is also elevated with preeclampsia [25].
Considering the pathophysiology of preeclampsia, targeting the reduction of sFlt-1 and sENG production and release into the circulation has potential as a therapeutic strategy for the disease. A medical treatment that is safe in pregnancy, able to restore the angiogenic balance, improve endothelial function, and reduce inflammation, would likely prevent serious, long term damage to the maternal endothelium, and would represent a significant therapeutic advance. As such, we have developed a therapeutic testing pipeline to investigate whether existing drugs from other fields might be able to be repurposed to restore angiogenic balance and prevent endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia [26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
Significantly, women who suffer preeclampsia are at increased risk of future cardiovascular disease, including a 4-fold increased risk of future heart failure [33]. Like preeclampsia, endothelial dysfunction and end-organ injury are also synonymous with heart failure and are associated with poorer prognosis [34,35,36,37,38]. The vasoactive peptide adrenomedullin (ADM) is a potent vasodilator with implications in both preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease [39,40]. In the management of heart failure, the beta-blockers carvedilol [41,42], bisoprolol [43], and metoprolol [44,45] have each been shown to reduce mortality to a similar extent [46]. As such, the use of any of them in treating patients with symptomatic heart failure constitutes standard therapy [47,48,49]. Beta-blockers while known to regulate blood pressure control, have also been shown to improve endothelial function when used in the treatment of cardiovascular disease [50]. While currently labetalol is the only beta-blocker used in the treatment of preeclampsia as an anti-hypertensive agent [51], in general many beta-blockers are considered safe in pregnancy based on their use in pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease [52]. The exception to this is atenolol, which is contraindicated given its association with small-for-gestational-age infants [52,53].
Given the relationship between preeclampsia, cardiovascular disease and heart failure at a pathophysiological level and in terms of subsequent lifetime risk, we hypothesised that the same beta-blockers able to modulate mortality risk in heart failure, might be of benefit in the treatment of preeclampsia. We therefore set out to evaluate the effects of carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol on the secretion of pro- and anti-angiogenic and inflammatory factors central to preeclampsia pathogenesis from placental and endothelial cells in vitro.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tissue Collection

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Mercy Health Human Research Ethics Committee (R11/34). Women presenting to the Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Australia, gave informed written consent for tissue collection. Placentas and umbilical cords were collected from normotensive term pregnancies (≥37 weeks’ gestation up to 41 weeks’ gestation) at elective caesarean section, where a fetus of normal customised birth weight centile was delivered. Samples were excluded where pregnancies were associated with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin, preeclampsia or hypertension, congenital infection, chromosomal or congenital abnormalities, or evidence of chorioamnionitis (confirmed by placental histopathology) (Table 1). Samples were collected within 30 min of delivery and washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

2.2. Primary Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell (HUVEC) Isolation

HUVECs were isolated from three or four individual umbilical cords per experiment, as previously described [54]. Briefly, the umbilical cord vein was cannulated and flushed with PBS to wash out blood cells. Next, 10 mL of collagenase (1 mg/mL, Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA was infused into the cord and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The dissociated HUVECs were recovered by pelleting and resuspension, followed by culture in M199 media (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% fetal calf serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Life Technologies), 1% endothelial cell growth factor (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) and 1% heparin (Sigma). Cells were used between passage 2 to 4 and cultured at 37 °C in 20% O2 and 5% CO2.

2.3. Primary Human Cytotrophoblast Isolation

Human cytotrophoblasts were isolated from three or four individual placentas per experiment, as previously described [55]. Primary cytotrophoblasts were cultured in DMEM GlutaMAX (Life Technologies) containing 10% fetal calf serum and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic on fibronectin (10 mg/mL; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States) coated wells. Cells were plated and allowed to attach over 12–18 h before washing with dPBS (Life Technologies) to remove cell debris. Cells were cultured under 8% O2, 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

2.4. Isolation and Culture of Placental Explants

Placental explants were isolated from three or four individual placentas per experiment. Small pieces of villous tissue were cut from the mid-portion of the placenta to avoid the maternal and fetal surfaces. These were thoroughly washed with PBS then dissected into small fragments of 1–2 mm size and three pieces put into each well of a 24 well plate. Explants were allowed to equilibrate at 37 °C for 12–18 h under 8% O2, 5% CO2 in DMEM GlutaMAX containing 10% fetal calf serum and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic.

2.5. Beta-Blockers In Vitro Experiments

Our in vitro models of preeclampsia recapitulate important characteristics of the disease pathogenesis, providing the opportunity to test therapeutic ability to target several key aspects of the disease, including excess secretion of anti-angiogenic factors (sFlt and sENG) and vascular endothelial dysfunction. These in vitro models of preeclampsia form the basis of our therapeutic testing pipeline [26,32,56,57].
Isolated primary HUVECs, cytotrophoblasts, and placental explants were treated with three different beta-blockers; carvedilol (1 uM and 10 uM, Sigma), bisoprolol (1 uM, 10 uM, 100 uM, and 1 mM, Sigma), and metoprolol tartrate (1 uM, 10 uM, and 100 uM, Sigma) in triplicate wells and cultured for 24 h. Media and cellular RNA were then collected and analysed by ELISA or quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR), respectively.
Endothelial dysfunction was induced in isolated primary HUVECs with TNFα (1 ng/mL, Life Technologies) for two hours prior to treatment with the beta-blockers (doses as above) and cultured for a further 24 h. Cellular RNA was collected and analysed by qPCR.
For HUVEC and cytotrophoblast experiments, a cell viability assay was run concurrently (CellTiter 96 AQueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions.

2.6. ELISA

Concentrations of sFlt-1 and sENG were measured in HUVEC, cytotrophoblast and placental explant 24 h culture media using the DuoSet Human VEGF R1/Flt-1 and endoglin/CD105 ELISA kits, respectively (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Optical density for ELISA was determined using a BioRad X-Mark microplate spectrophotometer (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA), and protein concentrations calculated using BioRad Microplate manager 6 software.

2.7. Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from isolated primary HUVECs, cytotrophoblasts and placental explants after drug treatment using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and quantified using a NanoDrop ND 1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc, Wilmington, DE, USA). RNA was converted to cDNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as per manufacturer guidelines. qPCR was performed using Taqman hydrolysis probes for ENG (Hs00923996_m1), VCAM1 (Hs01003372_m1), ET-1 (Hs00174961_m1), NLRP3 (Hs00918082_m1), IL1b (Hs01555410_m1), EDNRB (Hs00240747_m1), PTGS2 (Hs00153133_m1), IL6 (Hs00985639_m1), VEGF (Hs00900055_m1), PGF (Hs00182176_m1), HMOX1 (Hs01110250_m1) and ADM (Hs00181605_m1) on the CFX 384 (Biorad) using FAM-labelled Taqman universal PCR mastermix (Applied Biosystems) with the following run conditions: 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min (40 cycles). All data were normalized to a reference gene, YWHAZ (Hs01122454_m1), and the results graphed as fold change relative to control using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The sFlt-1 splice variants i13 and e15a were measured with Fast SYBR Green Master mix (Applied Biosystems) using primers specific for each variant as previously published [58], using YHWAZ as the reference gene with the following run conditions: 95 °C for 20 s, 95 °C for 1 s, 60 °C for 20 s (40 cycles). All samples were run in technical duplicate.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All in vitro experiments were performed with technical triplicates and repeated a minimum of three times using tissue or cells isolated from different placentas.
Data was tested for normal distribution and statistically analysed as appropriate. When three or more groups were compared a 1-way ANOVA (for parametric data) or Kruskal–Wallis test (for non-parametric data) was used. Post hoc analysis was carried out using either the Tukey (parametric) or Dunn’s test (non-parametric). All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. p values < 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Beta-Blocker Treatment Effects on the Secretion of Anti-Angiogenic Factors from Placental Cells/Tissue and Endothelial Cells

Treatment of primary HUVECs with the beta-blocker carvedilol significantly reduced the secretion of anti-angiogenic factor sFlt-1 (Figure 1A). The other two beta-blockers investigated, bisoprolol and metoprolol, did not affect sFlt-1 secretion from primary HUVECs. In primary human trophoblasts and placenta explants, all three beta-blockers had no effect on sFlt-1 secretion (Figure 1B,C, respectively).
Top dose metoprolol (1000 uM) resulted in a significant reduction in sENG secretion from primary HUVECs (Figure 1D), as did 100 uM bisoprolol in placental explants (Figure 1E).

3.2. Beta-Blocker Treatment Effects on the Expression of Anti-Angiogenic Factors in Placental Tissue and Endothelial Cells

In primary human placental explants, mRNA expression of the sFlt-1 isoforms, sFlt-1-e15a and sFlt-1-i13 were not affected by treatment with any of the beta-blockers investigated (Figure 2A,B, respectively). Expression of ENG mRNA in primary HUVECs was significantly increased with top dose carvedilol (10 uM) and metoprolol (100 uM), but not bisoprolol at any dose (Figure 2C).

3.3. Beta-Blocker Treatment Effects on the Expression of Pro-Angiogenic Factors in Placental Tissue and Endothelial Cells

Expression of pro-angiogenic factors VEGF, PGF, and ADM were increased by different beta-blocker treatment of primary HUVECs. VEGF mRNA expression was upregulated by metoprolol (Figure 3A), PGF by carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol (Figure 3C), and ADM by carvedilol and metoprolol (Figure 3E). Neither VEGF nor PGF mRNA expression was differentially regulated in primary human explants following beta-blocker treatment (Figure 3B,D, respectively).

3.4. Beta-Blocker Treatment Effects on the Expression of Inflammatory Mediators in Endothelial Cells

Expression of inflammatory mediator IL-1b in HUVECs was not affected by beta-blocker treatment (Figure 4A). Additionally, in primary cultured HUVECs, beta-blocker treatment with top doses of carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol significantly increased mRNA expression of PTGS2 (Figure 4E).
When TNFα was added to HUVECs to induce endothelial dysfunction, IL-1b expression was significantly increased from control levels and decreased with doses of bisoprolol and metoprolol, but not carvedilol (Figure 4B). TNFα induced endothelial dysfunction also significantly increased mRNA levels of IL-6 (Figure 4C), NLRP3 (Figure 4D) and PTGS2 (Figure 4F). Beta-blocker treatment with top dose carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol significantly decreased induced IL-6 expression (Figure 4C). NLRP3 mRNA expression was not affected by beta-blocker treatment (Figure 4D). PTGS2 expression increased with top dose carvedilol, decreased with 100 uM bisoprolol, and was unaffected by metoprolol (Figure 4F).

3.5. Beta-Blocker Treatment Effects on Antioxidant HO-1

Expression of the antioxidant enzyme HO-1 was significantly increased in HUVECs following top dose treatment with carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol (Figure 5).

3.6. Beta-Blocker Treatment Effects on Endothelial Dysfunction Markers

TNFα was used to induce endothelial dysfunction in primary cultured HUVECs. Compared to the no-TNFα control, TNFα significantly upregulated VCAM mRNA (Figure 6A). The top dose of each beta-blocker, carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol, significantly reduced VCAM mRNA expression (Figure 6A). In the same model of endothelial dysfunction, ET-1 and its receptor, endothelin-1 receptor B (ETB), mRNA expression was not affected by beta-blocker treatment (Figure 6B,C, respectively).

4. Discussion

We report that beta-blockers that successfully reduce mortality in heart failure, also exert effects consistent with a reduction in endothelial dysfunction in models of preeclampsia. Through our suite of in vitro studies, carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol demonstrated a modest improvement in angiogenic balance, and significant improvement in various markers of vasoactivity, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Treatments that address endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia represent a significant knowledge gap in our pursuit of preeclampsia therapeutics. While beta-blockers have exhibited a positive effect on endothelial dysfunction in a cardiovascular disease setting, the actions of beta-blockers in gestational tissues presents novel findings.
Most therapeutics being investigated for the treatment of preeclampsia are concerned with lowering excessive placental secretion of anti-angiogenic factors sFlt-1 and sENG. Here, beta-blockers had no effect on placental (isolated trophoblasts and placental explant) secretion of sFlt-1, and only a modest reduction in sENG secretion from placental explants with bisoprolol. This was seen at both the protein and RNA level. There was also no change in the expression of pro-angiogenic VEGF or PGF in placental explants following beta-blocker treatment. In isolated primary HUVECs, beta-blockers did help restore the angiogenic balance somewhat. They decreased sFlt-1 (carvedilol) and sENG (metoprolol) secretion, and increased VEGF (metoprolol), ADM (carvedilol and metoprolol), and PGF (carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol), expression. This is significant given that PGF is almost ubiquitously low in cases of, and even preceding the development of, preeclampsia [59,60]. If angiogenic balance could be restored with such a therapy, this might offer an important step forward in the treatment of preeclampsia, especially as these drugs are also used for blood pressure control. Given they exert the additional benefit of reducing injury to the endothelium this could be an important consideration for post-partum therapies also.
Aside from restoring the angiogenic balance, decreasing inflammation is also desirable in a therapeutic to treat preeclampsia. In isolated primary HUVECs, the beta-blockers did not significantly reduce expression of the inflammatory mediator, interleukin (IL)-1b. However, importantly when disease was modelled whereby HUVEC were stimulated with TNFα to induce endothelial dysfunction (and a state of inflammation), beta-blockers were able to significantly reduce IL-1b (bisoprolol and metoprolol) and IL-6 (carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol), but they had no effect on the critical regulator of the inflammasome, NLRP3. Interestingly, in isolated primary HUVECs all three beta-blockers, carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol increased expression of PTGS2, which encodes cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), an enzyme largely recognised to be pro-inflammatory. However, there is significant evidence to show that COX2 is bimodal; with its first peak initially driving inflammation, and its second peak (almost 4-fold greater in magnitude) coinciding with a resolution in inflammation [61]. Compared to normotensive controls, COX2 is decreased in the placenta [62] and circulation [63] of women with preeclampsia. Further, therapeutic inhibition of COX2 is associated with adverse cardiac events [64] and delayed inflammation resolution [61], suggesting beta-blocker treatment, by increasing PTGS2 expression may be both beneficial in the treatment of preeclampsia and also the long-term increased cardiovascular risks the disease imposes. However, this is less clear in the case of endothelial dysfunction, where following TNFα stimulation of HUVECs, carvedilol increased PTGS2 expression while bisoprolol decreased it. Further investigation is warranted to elicit the mechanisms at play behind some of the different responses seen to the three different drugs throughout our experiments.
Looking further into the endothelial dysfunction model, all three beta-blockers significantly reduced expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM), a critical factor in the inflammatory process involved in the recruitment and migration of leukocytes [65], and marker of endothelial dysfunction. Unfortunately, beta-blockers did not reduce vasoconstrictor ET-1 expression, nor upregulate its receptor, ETB, that acts as a vasodilator by removing ET-1 from circulation [24]. Given the potency of ET-1 as a vasoconstrictor, as well as being a biomarker of endothelial dysfunction and its intricate association with both preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease and heart failure, we expected that the cardio-protective beta-blockers may have reduced its expression. Importantly however, ADM, as well as having pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory effects, is also vasoactive, acting as a potent vasodilator and is significantly upregulated by both carvedilol and metoprolol. Interestingly, ADM is upregulated in instances of congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction, as a compensatory mechanism to protect the vasculature [66,67,68].
In addition, treatment with all three beta-blockers demonstrated an increase in the expression of the cytoprotective antioxidant enzyme heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1). HO-1 is an important enzyme regulated by nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2), that as well as protecting cells from programmed cell death, also inhibits the pathogenesis of inflammatory disease [69]. Given the inflammatory nature of preeclampsia, upregulation of HO-1 is a valuable characteristic of any potential therapeutic.
Our findings suggest that there may be merit in evaluating the beta-blockers carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol further for their potential in treating or preventing preeclampsia; or in decreasing the lifelong cardiovascular risk incurred by women who suffer the disease. This study suggests that any therapeutic benefits that they display are more likely due to increased endothelial expression of the important pro-angiogenic factors PGF, VEGF and ADM, and through mitigation of inflammatory changes that occur subsequent to endothelial dysfunction, rather than through regulation of placental anti-angiogenic factor secretion, which was only modestly affected at best. Moreover, the effects of the beta-blockers are primarily seen in endothelial cells, with a less consistent response seen in placental tissue.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effects of carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol on sFlt-1, sENG and PGF secretion and expression. Despite this novelty, our results in regard to the beta-blockers’ anti-inflammatory properties and reduction in endothelial dysfunction are supported by previous studies from the cardiovascular field in which the drugs have had comparisons made. While we saw many similarities in the responses to the beta-blocker treatments, some of the differences demonstrated may plausibly be due to the different types of beta-blockers that carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol represent. Carvedilol, a third generation non-selective beta-blocker has been found to demonstrate improved endothelial function [70] through antioxidant effects [71,72]; but the molecular mechanisms still require clarification [71,73]. Unlike carvedilol, bisoprolol is a second generation beta-1 selective beta-blocker. Despite these differences, carvedilol has not been shown to have benefit over bisoprolol in lowering oxidant stress [38]. Like carvedilol, bisoprolol has been found to improve endothelial function when used in the context of cardiovascular diseases; these include hypertension and angina [74,75]. Metoprolol is similar to bisoprolol in that it is also a selective beta-1 receptor blocker. Metoprolol has also been shown to benefit endothelial function and to have antioxidant properties in cardiovascular disease [76,77]. Given that all three beta-blockers significantly increased HO-1 expression in this model, we may infer that carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol may all act to increase endogenous antioxidant defences and thus may be of benefit in the treatment of preeclampsia. Metoprolol is available as both an immediate release (metoprolol tartrate—used in this study) and sustained release (metoprolol succinate) formulation. While the active ingredient remains the same, further investigation of sustained release metoprolol succinate, which has been shown to reduce mortality in heart failure [44,45] would be of great interest.
A further consideration is that safety data in pregnancy would be required for all of these medications if they were to be used to treat preeclampsia. Currently all three medications are classified as TGA category C—much like labetalol, a beta-blocker frequently used to treat hypertension in pregnancy. Promisingly however, carvedilol and metoprolol are considered safe in pregnancy based on their use in pregnant women with other cardiovascular diseases including heart failure [52], and the only beta-blocker which is actively contraindicated in pregnancy is atenolol [52]; it has been associated with small-for-gestational-age infants [53].
In conclusion, we have presented evidence for beta-blockers as potential therapeutics for preeclampsia, with the idea that along with mitigating some of the hallmarks of endothelial dysfunction associated with preeclampsia, these benefits may extend to combating the increased lifelong cardiovascular risks to which these women are subjected. Further evaluation of beta-blockers using whole vessel myography as well as animal models of preeclampsia are required prior to clinical safety and efficacy studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, N.J.H. and T.M.M.; methodology, N.J.H., N.K.B. and S.A.B.; validation, N.K.B., S.A.B. and N.d.A.; formal analysis, N.K.B. and S.A.B.; investigation, S.A.B. and N.d.A.; resources, N.J.H., T.J.K.-L. and S.T.; data curation, N.K.B., T.M.M. and N.J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, N.K.B., T.M.M. and N.J.H.; writing—review and editing, N.K.B., T.M.M. and N.J.H.; supervision, N.J.H., T.J.K.-L. and S.T.; project administration, N.K.B., S.A.B. and N.J.H.; funding acquisition, N.J.H., T.J.K.-L. and S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The NHMRC provided salary support (T.J.K.-L.; #1159261, S.T.; #1136418, and N.J.H.; #1146128). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, or decision to publish.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Mercy Health Human Research Ethics Committee (R11/34).

Informed Consent Statement

Women presenting to the Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Australia, gave informed written consent for tissue collection. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to patient privacy.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the research midwives, Gabrielle Pell, Genevieve Christophers and Rachel Murdoch, Mercy Hospital for Women Obstetrics and Midwifery staff and patients for participating in this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vest, A.R.; Cho, L.S. Hypertension in pregnancy. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2014, 16, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Redman, C.W.; Sargent, I.L. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science 2005, 308, 1592–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sibai, B.; Dekker, G.; Kupferminc, M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2005, 365, 785–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Labarrere, C.A.; DiCarlo, H.L.; Bammerlin, E.; Hardin, J.W.; Kim, Y.M.; Chaemsaithong, P.; Haas, D.M.; Kassab, G.S.; Romero, R. Failure of physiologic transformation of spiral arteries, endothelial and trophoblast cell activation, and acute atherosis in the basal plate of the placenta. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 287.e1–287.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Redman, C.W.; Staff, A.C. Preeclampsia, biomarkers, syncytiotrophoblast stress, and placental capacity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213 (Suppl. S4), S9.e1–S9.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Maynard, S.; Min, J.Y.; Merchan, J.; Lim, K.H.; Li, J.; Mondal, S.; Libermann, T.A.; Morgan, J.P.; Sellke, F.W.; Stillman, I.E.; et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in pre-eclampsia. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Maynard, S.E.; Karumanchi, S.A. Angiogenic Factors and Preeclampsia. Semin. Nephrol. 2011, 31, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nagamatsu, T.; Fujii, T.; Kusumi, M.; Zou, L.; Yamashita, T.; Osuga, Y.; Momoeda, M.; Kozuma, S.; Taketani, Y. Cytotrophoblasts Up-Regulate Soluble Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase-1 Expression under Reduced Oxygen: An Implication for the Placental Vascular Development and the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 4838–4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Holme, A.M.; Roland, M.C.; Henriksen, T.; Michelsen, T.M. In vivo uteroplacental release of placental growth factor and soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 215, 782.e1–782.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Venkatesha, S.; Toporsian, M.; Lam, C.; Hanai, J.; Mammoto, T.; Kim, Y.M.; Bdolah, Y.; Lim, K.H.; Yuan, H.T.; Libermann, T.A.; et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kim, M.Y.; Buyon, J.P.; Guerra, M.M.; Rana, S.; Zhang, D.; Laskin, C.A.; Petri, M.; Lockshin, M.D.; Sammaritano, L.R.; Branch, D.W.; et al. Angiogenic factor imbalance early in pregnancy predicts adverse outcomes in patients with lupus and antiphospholipid antibodies: Results of the PROMISSE study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 108.e1–108.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lee, M.S.; Cantonwine, D.; Little, S.E.; McElrath, T.F.; Parry, S.I.; Lim, K.-H.; Wilkins-Haug, L.E. Angiogenic markers in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, 212.e1–212.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Faupel-Badger, J.; McElrath, T.F.; Lauria, M.; Houghton, L.C.; Lim, K.-H.; Parry, S.; Cantonwine, D.; Lai, G.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Hoover, R.N.; et al. Maternal circulating angiogenic factors in twin and singleton pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 212, 636.e1–636.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Burke, S.D.; Zsengeller, Z.; Khankin, E.; Lo, A.S.; Rajakumar, A.; Dupont, J.J.; McCurley, A.; Moss, M.E.; Zhang, D.; Clark, C.D.; et al. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 promotes angiotensin II sensitivity in preeclampsia. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 2561–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Verdonk, K.; Saleh, L.; Lankhorst, S.; Smilde, J.I.; van Ingen, M.M.; Garrelds, I.M.; Friesema, E.C.; Russcher, H.; Meiracker, A.H.V.D.; Visser, W.; et al. Association Studies Suggest a Key Role for Endothelin-1 in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia and the Accompanying Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Suppression. Hypertension 2015, 65, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Powe, C.E.; Levine, R.J.; Karumanchi, S.A. Preeclampsia, a disease of the maternal endothelium: The role of antiangiogenic factors and implications for later cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2011, 123, 2856–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Young, B.C.; Levine, R.J.; Karumanchi, S.A. Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2010, 5, 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chaiworapongsa, T.; Chaemsaithong, P.; Yeo, L.; Romero, R. Pre-eclampsia part 1: Current understanding of its pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2014, 10, 466–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. O’Gorman, N.N.; Wright, D.; Poon, L.L.; Rolnik, D.L.; Syngelaki, A.A.; Wright, A.A.; Akolekar, R.R.; Cicero, S.S.; Janga, D.D.; Jani, J.; et al. Accuracy of competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 49, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rust, O.A.; Bofill, J.A.; Zappe, D.H.; Hall, J.E.; Burnett, J.C., Jr.; Martin, J.N., Jr. The origin of endothelin-1 in patients with severe preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997, 89, 754–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, Y.-P.; Hasan, A.A.; Zeng, S.; Hocher, B. Plasma ET-1 Concentrations Are Elevated in Pregnant Women with Hypertension -Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2017, 42, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Taylor, R.N.; Varma, M.; Teng, N.N.; Roberts, J.M. Women with Preeclampsia have Higher Plasma Endothelin Levels than Women with Normal Pregnancies. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1990, 71, 1675–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bernardi, F.; Constantino, L.; Machado, R.; Petronilho, F.; Pizzol, F.D. Plasma nitric oxide, endothelin-1, arginase and superoxide dismutase in pre-eclamptic women. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2008, 34, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ekelund, U.; Adner, M.; Edvinsson, L.; Mellander, S. Effects of selective ETB-receptor stimulation on arterial, venous and capillary functions in cat skeletal muscle. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1994, 112, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Austgulen, R.; Lien, E.; Vince, G.; Redman, C.W. Increased maternal plasma levels of soluble adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin) in preeclampsia. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1997, 71, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Onda, K.; Tong, S.; Beard, S.; Binder, N.; Muto, M.; Senadheera, S.N.; Parry, L.; Dilworth, M.; Renshall, L.; Brownfoot, F.; et al. Proton Pump Inhibitors Decrease Soluble fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase-1 and Soluble Endoglin Secretion, Decrease Hypertension, and Rescue Endothelial Dysfunction. Hypertension 2017, 69, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Binder, N.K.; Brownfoot, F.C.; Beard, S.; Cannon, P.; Nguyen, T.V.; Tong, S.; Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J.; Hannan, N.J. Esomeprazole and sulfasalazine in combination additively reduce sFlt-1 secretion and diminish endothelial dysfunction: Potential for a combination treatment for preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020, 22, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brownfoot, F.C.; Hannan, N.; Cannon, P.; Nguyen, V.; Hastie, R.; Parry, L.J.; Senadheera, S.; Tuohey, L.; Tong, S.; Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J. Sulfasalazine reduces placental secretion of antiangiogenic factors, up-regulates the secretion of placental growth factor and rescues endothelial dysfunction. EBioMedicine 2019, 41, 636–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Brownfoot, F.C.; Hastie, R.; Hannan, N.; Cannon, P.; Tuohey, L.; Parry, L.; Senadheera, S.; Illanes, S.; Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J.; Tong, S. Metformin as a prevention and treatment for preeclampsia: Effects on soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin secretion and endothelial dysfunction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 356.e1–356.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Brownfoot, F.C.; Tong, S.; Hannan, N.; Binder, N.K.; Walker, S.P.; Cannon, P.; Hastie, R.; Onda, K.; Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J. Effects of Pravastatin on Human Placenta, Endothelium, and Women With Severe Preeclampsia. Hypertension 2015, 66, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. de Alwis, N.; Beard, S.; Mangwiro, Y.T.; Binder, N.K.; Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J.; Brownfoot, F.C.; Tong, S.; Hannan, N.J. Pravastatin as the statin of choice for reducing pre-eclampsia-associated endothelial dysfunction. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020, 20, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J.; Brownfoot, F.C.; Beard, S.; Cannon, P.; Hastie, R.; Nguyen, T.V.; Binder, N.K.; Tong, S.; Hannan, N.J. Combining metformin and esomeprazole is additive in reducing sFlt-1 secretion and decreasing endothelial dysfunction–implications for treating preeclampsia. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0188845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wu, P.; Haththotuwa, R.; Kwok, C.S.; Babu, A.; Kotronias, R.A.; Rushton, C.; Zaman, A.; Fryer, A.A.; Kadam, U.; Chew-Graham, C.A.; et al. Preeclampsia and Future Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2017, 10, e003497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zuchi, C.; Tritto, I.; Carluccio, E.; Mattei, C.; Cattadori, G.; Ambrosio, G. Role of endothelial dysfunction in heart failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 2020, 25, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Franssen, C.; Chen, S.; Unger, A.; Korkmaz, H.I.; de Keulenaer, G.W.; Tschöpe, C.; Leite-Moreira, A.F.; Musters, R.; Niessen, H.W.; Linke, W.A.; et al. Myocardial Microvascular Inflammatory Endothelial Activation in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2016, 4, 312–324. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Paulus, W.J.; Tschöpe, C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Harjola, V.-P.; Mullens, W.; Banaszewski, M.; Bauersachs, J.; Brunner-La Rocca, H.P.; Chioncel, O.; Collins, S.P.; Doehner, W.; Filippatos, G.S.; Flammer, A.J.; et al. Organ dysfunction, injury and failure in acute heart failure: From pathophysiology to diagnosis and management. A review on behalf of the Acute Heart Failure Committee of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2017, 19, 821–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chin, B.S.; Gibbs, C.R.; Blann, A.D.; Lip, G.Y. Neither carvedilol nor bisoprolol in maximally tolerated doses has any specific advantage in lowering chronic heart failure oxidant stress: Implications for beta-blocker selection. Clin. Sci. 2003, 105, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Boć-Zalewska, A.; Seremak-Mrozikiewicz, A.; Barlik, M.; Kurzawińska, G.; Drews, K. The possible role of adrenomedullin in the etiology of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Ginekol. Polska 2011, 82, 178–184. [Google Scholar]
  40. van Lier, D.; Pickkers, P. Circulating biomarkers to assess cardiovascular function in critically ill. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2021, 27, 261–268. [Google Scholar]
  41. Packer, M.; Coats, A.S.; Fowler, M.B.; Katus, H.A.; Krum, H.; Mohacsi, P.; Rouleau, J.L.; Tendera, M.; Castaigne, A.; Roecker, E.B.; et al. Effect of Carvedilol on Survival in Severe Chronic Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1651–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Packer, M.; Bristow, M.R.; Cohn, J.N.; Colucci, W.; Fowler, M.B.; Gilbert, E.M.; Shusterman, N.H. The Effect of Carvedilol on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): A randomised trial. Lancet 1999, 353, 9–13. [CrossRef]
  44. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet 1999, 353, 2001–2007. [CrossRef]
  45. Hjalmarson, Å.; Goldstein, S.; Fagerberg, B.; Wedel, H.; Waagstein, F.; Kjekshus, J.; Wikstrand, J.; El Allaf, D.; Vítovec, J.; Aldershvile, J.; et al. Effects of Controlled-Release Metoprolol on Total Mortality, Hospitalizations, and Well-being in Patients With Heart Failure. JAMA 2000, 283, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fröhlich, H.; Torres, L.; Täger, T.; Schellberg, D.; Corletto, A.; Kazmi, S.; Goode, K.; Grundtvig, M.; Hole, T.; Katus, H.A.; et al. Bisoprolol compared with carvedilol and metoprolol succinate in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2017, 106, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ponikowski, P.; Voors, A.A.; Anker, S.D.; Bueno, H.; Cleland, J.G.; Coats, A.J.; Falk, V.; González-Juanatey, J.R.; Harjola, V.P.; Jankowska, E.A.; et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2016, 18, 891–975. [Google Scholar]
  48. Packer, M.; Cohn, J.N.; Abraham, W.T.; Colucci, W.S.; Fowler, M.B.; Greenberg, B.H.; Leier, C.V.; Massie, B.M.; Young, J.B.; Aaronson, K.D.; et al. Consensus recommendations for the management of chronic heart failure: Introduction. Am. J. Cardiol. 1999, 83, 1a–38a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). HFSA guidelines for management of patients with heart failure caused by left ventricular systolic dysfunction-pharmacological approaches. J. Card. Fail. 1999, 5, 357–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peller, M.; Ozierański, K.; Balsam, P.; Grabowski, M.; Filipiak, K.J.; Opolski, G. Influence of beta-blockers on endothelial function: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiol. J. 2015, 22, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Lowe, S.A.; Bowyer, L.; Lust, K.; McMahon, L.P.; Morton, M.; North, R.A.; Paech, M.; Said, J.M. SOMANZ guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 2014. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 55, e1–e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Halpern, D.G.; Weinberg, C.R.; Pinnelas, R.; Mehta-Lee, S.; Economy, K.E.; Valente, A.M. Use of Medication for Cardiovascular Disease During Pregnancy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 457–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bellos, I.; Pergialiotis, V.; Papapanagiotou, A.; Loutradis, D.; Daskalakis, G. Comparative efficacy and safety of oral antihypertensive agents in pregnant women with chronic hypertension: A network metaanalysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Brownfoot, F.; Hannan, N.; Onda, K.; Tong, S.; Kaitu’U-Lino, T. Soluble endoglin production is upregulated by oxysterols but not quenched by pravastatin in primary placental and endothelial cells. Placenta 2014, 35, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J.; Tong, S.; Beard, S.; Hastie, R.; Tuohey, L.; Brownfoot, F.; Onda, K.; Hannan, N. Characterization of protocols for primary trophoblast purification, optimized for functional investigation of sFlt-1 and soluble endoglin. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014, 4, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Brownfoot, F.; Binder, N.; Hastie, R.; Harper, A.; Beard, S.; Tuohey, L.; Keenan, E.; Tong, S.; Hannan, N. Nicotinamide and its effects on endothelial dysfunction and secretion of antiangiogenic factors by primary human placental cells and tissues. Placenta 2021, 109, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Onda, K.; Tong, S.; Nakahara, A.; Kondo, M.; Monchusho, H.; Hirano, T.; Kaitu’u-Lino, T.; Beard, S.; Binder, N.; Tuohey, L.; et al. Sofalcone upregulates the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2/heme oxygenase-1 pathway, reduces soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, and quenches endothelial dysfunction: Potential therapeutic for preeclampsia. Hypertension 2015, 65, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Whitehead, C.; Palmer, K.; Nilsson, U.; Gao, Y.; Saglam, B.; Lappas, M.; Tong, S. Placental expression of a novel primate-specific splice variant of sFlt-1 is upregulated in pregnancies complicated by severe early onset pre-eclampsia. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011, 118, 1268–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Macdonald, T.M.; Tran, C.; Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J.; Brennecke, S.P.; Hiscock, R.J.; Hui, L.; Dane, K.M.; Middleton, A.L.; Cannon, P.; Walker, S.P.; et al. Assessing the sensitivity of placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 at 36 weeks’ gestation to predict small-for-gestational-age infants or late-onset preeclampsia: A prospective nested case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Chau, K.; Hennessy, A.; Makris, A. Placental growth factor and pre-eclampsia. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2017, 31, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Gilroy, D.; Colvillenash, P.R.; Willis, D.K.; Chivers, J.; Paulclark, M.J.; Willoughby, D. Inducible cyclooxygenase may have anti-inflammatory properties. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 698–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, N.; Chang, X.; Bai, J.; Chen, Z.-J.; Li, W.-P.; Zhang, C. The Study of Cyclooxygenase 2 in Human Decidua of Preeclampsia. Biol. Reprod. 2016, 95, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cui, L.; Shu, C.; Liu, Z.; Tong, W.; Cui, M.; Wei, C.; Tang, J.J.; Liu, X.; Hai, H.; Jiang, J.; et al. Serum protein marker panel for predicting preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018, 14, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rajakariar, R.; Yaqoob, M.M.; Gilroy, D.W. COX-2 in inflammation and resolution. Mol. Interv. 2006, 6, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liao, J.K. Linking endothelial dysfunction with endothelial cell activation. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 540–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kobayashi, K.; Kitamura, K.; Etoh, T.; Nagatomo, Y.; Takenaga, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Imamura, T.; Koiwaya, Y.; Eto, T. Increased plasma adrenomedullin levels in chronic congestive heart failure. Am. Heart J. 1996, 131, 994–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nagaya, N.; Nishikimi, T.; Uematsu, M.; Yoshitomi, Y.; Miyao, Y.; Miyazaki, S.; Goto, Y.; Kojima, S.; Kuramochi, M.; Matsuo, H.; et al. Plasma adrenomedullin as an indicator of prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Heart 1999, 81, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Miyao, Y.; Nishikimi, T.; Goto, Y.; Miyazaki, S.; Daikoku, S.; Morii, I.; Matsumoto, T.; Takishita, S.; Miyata, A.; Matsuo, H.; et al. Increased plasma adrenomedullin levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction in proportion to the clinical severity. Heart 1998, 79, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gozzelino, R.; Jeney, V.; Soares, M. Mechanisms of Cell Protection by Heme Oxygenase-1. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010, 50, 323–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Bank, A.J.; Kelly, A.S.; Thelen, A.M.; Kaiser, D.R.; Gonzalez-Campoy, J.M. Effects of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol on Endothelial Function and Oxidative Stress in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Am. J. Hypertens. 2007, 20, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Silva, I.V.G.; De Figueiredo, R.C.; Rios, D.R.A. Effect of Different Classes of Antihypertensive Drugs on Endothelial Function and Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Matsuda, Y.; Akita, H.; Terashima, M.; Shiga, N.; Kanazawa, K.; Yokoyama, M. Carvedilol improves endothelium-dependent dilatation in patients with coronary artery disease. Am. Heart J. 2000, 140, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Virdis, A.; Ghiadoni, L.; Taddei, S. Effects of Antihypertensive Treatment on Endothelial Function. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2011, 13, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lin, Z.P.; Dong, M.; Liu, J. Bisoprolol improved endothelial function and myocardium survival of hypertension with stable angina: A randomized double-blinded trial. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 17, 794–801. [Google Scholar]
  75. Grigor’Eva, N.I.; Sharabrin, E.G.; Kuznetsov, A.N.; Mazalov, K.V.; Kontorshchikova, K.N.; Koroleva, E.F. Effects of beta 1-adrenoblocker bisoprolol on endothelial dysfunction in patients with stable angina pectoris in combination with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ter. Arkhiv 2009, 81, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yan, L.; Dong, Y.-F.; Qing, T.-L.; Deng, Y.-P.; Han, X.; Shi, W.-J.; Li, J.-F.; Gao, F.-Y.; Zhang, X.-F.; Tian, Y.-J.; et al. Metoprolol rescues endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction in diabetes. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Majidinia, M.; Rasmi, Y.; Ansari, M.H.K.; Seyed-Mohammadzad, M.; Saboory, E.; Shirpoor, A. Metoprolol Improves Endothelial Function in Patients with Cardiac Syndrome X. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2016, 15, 561–566. [Google Scholar]
Jcm 10 03384 g001a 550Jcm 10 03384 g001b 550
Figure 1. Beta-blockers had limited effect on secreted anti-angiogenic factors across different tissue types. Relative sFlt-1 secretion in HUVCEs (A) was significantly reduced with carvedilol (Carv) treatment, but not bisoprolol (Bis) treatment or metoprolol (Met) treatment. Relative sFlt-1 secretion was unchanged in trophoblasts (B) and explants (C) following beta-blocker treatment with Carv, Bis and Met. In HUVEC, relative sENG secretion (D) was decreased with treatment at the top dose of Met, but unchanged with Carv and Bis treatment. In explants, relative sENG secretion (E) was decreased with treatment at 100 uM Bis, but unchanged at the other doses or with Carv or Met. Data are mean ± SEM, expressed relative to control, n = 3–4, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 1. Beta-blockers had limited effect on secreted anti-angiogenic factors across different tissue types. Relative sFlt-1 secretion in HUVCEs (A) was significantly reduced with carvedilol (Carv) treatment, but not bisoprolol (Bis) treatment or metoprolol (Met) treatment. Relative sFlt-1 secretion was unchanged in trophoblasts (B) and explants (C) following beta-blocker treatment with Carv, Bis and Met. In HUVEC, relative sENG secretion (D) was decreased with treatment at the top dose of Met, but unchanged with Carv and Bis treatment. In explants, relative sENG secretion (E) was decreased with treatment at 100 uM Bis, but unchanged at the other doses or with Carv or Met. Data are mean ± SEM, expressed relative to control, n = 3–4, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Jcm 10 03384 g001aJcm 10 03384 g001b
Jcm 10 03384 g002 550
Figure 2. Endoglin mRNA is upregulated in HUVECs following beta-blocker treatment. Placental explant expression of sFlt-1 isoforms, sFlt-1-e15a (A) and sFlt-1-i13 (B) was not affected by treatment with beta-blockers carvedilol (Carv), bisoprolol (Bis), or metoprolol (Met). HUVEC expression of ENG mRNA (C) was significantly increased with top dose Carv and Met, but not Bis. Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of control, n = 3–4, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Endoglin mRNA is upregulated in HUVECs following beta-blocker treatment. Placental explant expression of sFlt-1 isoforms, sFlt-1-e15a (A) and sFlt-1-i13 (B) was not affected by treatment with beta-blockers carvedilol (Carv), bisoprolol (Bis), or metoprolol (Met). HUVEC expression of ENG mRNA (C) was significantly increased with top dose Carv and Met, but not Bis. Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of control, n = 3–4, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Jcm 10 03384 g002
Jcm 10 03384 g003 550
Figure 3. Pro-angiogenic factors upregulated following beta-blocker treatment of HUVECs, but not explants. VEGF mRNA expression in HUVECs (A) was significantly increased with metoprolol (Met) treatment, but not carvedilol (Carv) or bisoprolol (Bis). PGF mRNA expression in HUVECs (C) was significantly increased with the top dose of Carv, Bis, and Met. ADM mRNA expression in HUVECs (E) was significantly increased with top dose Carv treatment and Met treatment, but not Bis. VEGF and PGF mRNA expression were unchanged in placental explants following beta-blocker treatment (B,D, respectively). Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of control, n = 3–4, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 3. Pro-angiogenic factors upregulated following beta-blocker treatment of HUVECs, but not explants. VEGF mRNA expression in HUVECs (A) was significantly increased with metoprolol (Met) treatment, but not carvedilol (Carv) or bisoprolol (Bis). PGF mRNA expression in HUVECs (C) was significantly increased with the top dose of Carv, Bis, and Met. ADM mRNA expression in HUVECs (E) was significantly increased with top dose Carv treatment and Met treatment, but not Bis. VEGF and PGF mRNA expression were unchanged in placental explants following beta-blocker treatment (B,D, respectively). Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of control, n = 3–4, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Jcm 10 03384 g003
Jcm 10 03384 g004a 550Jcm 10 03384 g004b 550
Figure 4. Inflammatory markers are altered following beta-blocker treatment. Expression of IL-1b mRNA in HUVECs (A) was not affected by treatment with beta-blockers carvedilol (Carv), bisoprolol (Bis), or metoprolol (Met). When TNFα is added to HUVECs to induce endothelial dysfunction, IL-1b expression is significantly increased from control levels (B) and decreases with doses of Bis and Met, but not Carv. TNFα induced endothelial dysfunction also significantly increases mRNA levels of IL-6 (C) and NLRP3 (D). Beta-blocker treatment with top dose Carv, Bis, and Met significantly decreases induced IL-6 expression (C). NLRP3 mRNA expression was not affected by beta-blockers treatment (D). Expression of PTGS2 mRNA in HUVECs (E) was significantly increased following top dose beta-blocker treatment with Carv, Bis, and Met. PTGS2 expression is significantly induced with TNFα (endothelial dysfunction) (F), which is further increased with top dose Carv, decreased with 100 uM Bis, and unaffected by Met. Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of control (HUVEC) or TNFα control (endothelial dysfunction), n = 3–4, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 4. Inflammatory markers are altered following beta-blocker treatment. Expression of IL-1b mRNA in HUVECs (A) was not affected by treatment with beta-blockers carvedilol (Carv), bisoprolol (Bis), or metoprolol (Met). When TNFα is added to HUVECs to induce endothelial dysfunction, IL-1b expression is significantly increased from control levels (B) and decreases with doses of Bis and Met, but not Carv. TNFα induced endothelial dysfunction also significantly increases mRNA levels of IL-6 (C) and NLRP3 (D). Beta-blocker treatment with top dose Carv, Bis, and Met significantly decreases induced IL-6 expression (C). NLRP3 mRNA expression was not affected by beta-blockers treatment (D). Expression of PTGS2 mRNA in HUVECs (E) was significantly increased following top dose beta-blocker treatment with Carv, Bis, and Met. PTGS2 expression is significantly induced with TNFα (endothelial dysfunction) (F), which is further increased with top dose Carv, decreased with 100 uM Bis, and unaffected by Met. Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of control (HUVEC) or TNFα control (endothelial dysfunction), n = 3–4, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Jcm 10 03384 g004aJcm 10 03384 g004b
Jcm 10 03384 g005 550
Figure 5. Antioxidant HO-1 is increased with beta-blocker treatment. Expression of HO-1 mRNA is significantly increased in HUVECs following top dose beta-blocker treatment with carvedilol (Carv), bisoprolol (Bis), and metoprolol (Met). Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of control, n = 3–4, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 5. Antioxidant HO-1 is increased with beta-blocker treatment. Expression of HO-1 mRNA is significantly increased in HUVECs following top dose beta-blocker treatment with carvedilol (Carv), bisoprolol (Bis), and metoprolol (Met). Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of control, n = 3–4, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Jcm 10 03384 g005
Jcm 10 03384 g006 550
Figure 6. In a model of endothelial dysfunction, VCAM mRNA expression is decreased with beta-blocker treatment. In HUVECs treated with TNFα to induce endothelial dysfunction (A), VCAM mRNA is significantly reduced with top dose beta-blockers, carvedilol (Carv), bisoprolol (Bis), and metoprolol (Met). In the same model, ET-1 mRNA (B) and ETB mRNA (C) expression are not affected by Carv, Bis, or Met. Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of TNFα control, n = 3–4, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 6. In a model of endothelial dysfunction, VCAM mRNA expression is decreased with beta-blocker treatment. In HUVECs treated with TNFα to induce endothelial dysfunction (A), VCAM mRNA is significantly reduced with top dose beta-blockers, carvedilol (Carv), bisoprolol (Bis), and metoprolol (Met). In the same model, ET-1 mRNA (B) and ETB mRNA (C) expression are not affected by Carv, Bis, or Met. Data are mean ± SEM, expressed as a percentage of TNFα control, n = 3–4, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Jcm 10 03384 g006
Table
Table 1. Patient characteristics for term gestational tissue collection.
Table 1. Patient characteristics for term gestational tissue collection.
CharacteristicNumber
Maternal Age, years (median (Q1, Q3))33 (31, 38)
Fetal Sex (%)
  • Male
8 (73)
  • Female
3 (27)
Maternal BMI (median (Q1, Q3))22.7 (22.1, 25.4)
Smoker (%)0
Birth Centile (%)
  • <25th
0 (0)
  • 26th–50th
2 (18)
  • 51st–75th
6 (55)
  • 76th–97th
3 (27)
  • >98th
0 (0)
Diabetes (%)
  • None
10 (91)
  • GDM (diet)
1 (9)
Mode of delivery (%)
  • Elective caesarean (not in labour)
11 (100)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Binder, N.K.; MacDonald, T.M.; Beard, S.A.; de Alwis, N.; Tong, S.; Kaitu’u-Lino, T.J.; Hannan, N.J. Pre-Clinical Investigation of Cardioprotective Beta-Blockers as a Therapeutic Strategy for Preeclampsia. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3384. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153384

AMA Style

Binder NK, MacDonald TM, Beard SA, de Alwis N, Tong S, Kaitu’u-Lino TJ, Hannan NJ. Pre-Clinical Investigation of Cardioprotective Beta-Blockers as a Therapeutic Strategy for Preeclampsia. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(15):3384. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153384

Chicago/Turabian Style

Binder, Natalie K., Teresa M. MacDonald, Sally A. Beard, Natasha de Alwis, Stephen Tong, Tu’uhevaha J. Kaitu’u-Lino, and Natalie J. Hannan. 2021. "Pre-Clinical Investigation of Cardioprotective Beta-Blockers as a Therapeutic Strategy for Preeclampsia" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 15: 3384. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153384

APA Style

Binder, N. K., MacDonald, T. M., Beard, S. A., de Alwis, N., Tong, S., Kaitu’u-Lino, T. J., & Hannan, N. J. (2021). Pre-Clinical Investigation of Cardioprotective Beta-Blockers as a Therapeutic Strategy for Preeclampsia. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(15), 3384. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153384

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop