Previous Issue
Volume 13, September-1
 
 
jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

J. Clin. Med., Volume 13, Issue 18 (September-2 2024) – 4 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 2532 KiB  
Review
Redo Thyroidectomy: Updated Insights
by Luminita Suveica, Oana-Claudia Sima, Mihai-Lucian Ciobica, Claudiu Nistor, Anca-Pati Cucu, Mihai Costachescu, Adrian Ciuche, Tiberiu Vasile Ioan Nistor and Mara Carsote
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5347; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185347 (registering DOI) - 10 Sep 2024
Abstract
The risk of post-operatory hypothyroidism and hypocalcaemia, along with recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, is lower following a less-than-total thyroidectomy; however, a previously unsuspected carcinoma or a disease progression might be detected after initial surgery, hence indicating re-intervention as mandatory (so-called “redo” surgery) with [...] Read more.
The risk of post-operatory hypothyroidism and hypocalcaemia, along with recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, is lower following a less-than-total thyroidectomy; however, a previously unsuspected carcinoma or a disease progression might be detected after initial surgery, hence indicating re-intervention as mandatory (so-called “redo” surgery) with completion. This decision takes into consideration a multidisciplinary approach, but the surgical technique and the actual approach is entirely based on the skills and availability of the surgical team according to the standard protocols regarding a personalised decision. We aimed to introduce a review of the most recently published data, with respect to redo thyroid surgery. For the basis of the discussion, a novel vignette on point was introduced. This was a narrative review. We searched English-language papers according to the key search terms in different combinations such as “redo” and “thyroid”, alternatively “thyroidectomy” and “thyroid surgery”, across the PubMed database. Inclusion criteria were original articles. The timeframe of publication was between 1 January 2020 and 20 July 2024. Exclusion criteria were non-English papers, reviews, non-human studies, case reports or case series, exclusive data on parathyroid surgery, and cell line experiments. We identified ten studies across the five-year most recent window of PubMed searches that showed a heterogeneous spectrum of complications and applications of different surgeries with respect to redo interventions during thyroid removal (e.g., recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during surgery, other types of incision than cervicotomy, the use of parathyroid fluorescence, bleeding risk, etc.). Most studies addressing novel surgical perspectives focused on robotic-assisted re-intervention, and an expansion of this kind of studies is expected. Further studies and multifactorial models of assessment and risk prediction are necessary to decide, assess, and recommend redo interventions and the most adequate surgical techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Endocrine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 568 KiB  
Systematic Review
Uniportal Laser-Assisted Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy (U-LA-VATS) for Lung Metastasectomy: Technical Description, Peri-Operative Results and Pertinent Literature Review
by Carolina Sassorossi, Marco Chiappetta, Dania Nachira, Annalisa Campanella, Gloria Santoro, Giuseppe Calabrese, Chiara Scognamiglio, Antonio Giulio Napolitano, Alessia Senatore, Leonardo Petracca Ciavarella, Maria Letizia Vita, Stefano Margaritora and Filippo Lococo
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5346; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185346 (registering DOI) - 10 Sep 2024
Abstract
Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is a well-established treatment that is able to contribute to the cure of oligometastatic cancer. Surgery should adopt the most lung-sparing approach possible to preserve pulmonary function (and, consequently, the quality of life) and to spare the lung for potential [...] Read more.
Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is a well-established treatment that is able to contribute to the cure of oligometastatic cancer. Surgery should adopt the most lung-sparing approach possible to preserve pulmonary function (and, consequently, the quality of life) and to spare the lung for potential additional lung resections. In this framework, laser technology has been introduced in recent decades, but only few experiences combining laser technology with VATS approaches have been reported till now. The main focus of this manuscript is to report our institutional experience in performing lung-sparing laser-assisted PM by uniportal VATS (uniportal laser-assisted VATS: U-LA-VATS). The surgical technique and peri-operative results from our series of patients were herein presented and compared with the pertinent literature. Methods: Between March 2021 and November 2023, among 98 patients who underwent PM, a total of 24 patients (18 men (75%); 6 women (25%); mean age 61.4 years; age range 13–83 years) were treated with laser-assisted PM at our institution. Patients who underwent anatomical resection were excluded for the purpose of the analysis. The U-LA-VATS procedure adopted a modified laser-assisted lung resection technique for performing PM via VATS. Dedicated instruments are used, characterized by a long shape and a curved shape, with distal and proximal articulations. A surgical laser system (Thulium + Diodo OUTPUT 30–10 W, Quanta System S.p.a., Solbiate Olona, Italy) was used, and a 550-μm sterile optical fibre conducted through a specific thoracoscopic handpiece was introduced in the lowest part of the incision. Peri-operative results were analysed in all cohort and compared according to the surgical technique. Moreover, these results were compared with those reported in the literature. Comprehensive research of the literature was conducted on PubMed from 2000 to 2024. A review was performed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: In 12 cases (50%), thulium laser-assisted resection was performed using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), and in the other cases (12, 50%), a (mini)thoracotomy access was adopted. In the thoracotomy group, the mean duration of surgery was 95 ± 57.7 min; meanwhile, it was 73.5 ± 35.5 in the uniportal VATS group. At the univariate analysis, this difference resulted to be statistically significant (p value 0.025). We did not observe intra-operative complications or remarkable malfunction of the laser system. We also did not report major complications after surgery; also the air-leak rate was 8.3% and 0% after thoracotomic and VATS procedures, respectively. Surgical margins were free from disease in all cases. Major and minor post-op complication rates were similar in both groups. The mean hospitalization after surgery was 2.9 ± 0.3 days for the uniportal VATS group and 3.7 ± 0.9 days for the thoracotomy group, this difference being statistically significant at the univariate analysis (p value = 0.015). Conclusions: U-LA-VATS is a safe and effective procedure, able to combine a parenchymal sparing exeresis with a mini-invasive approach. This procedure is associated with a shorter hospital stay compared with PM performed by a thoracotomic approach. Compared with the selected works for the review, our series is the only one describing the use of laser resection combined with a uniportal VATS approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future Opportunities in Thoracic Surgery: The Cutting Edge)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1677 KiB  
Article
The Fate of the Aorta after Coarctation Repair: Open Surgical Replacement of Descending Aorta in a High-Volume Unit
by Ezin Deniz, Dmitry Bobylev, Heike Krüger, Jawad Salman, Alina Zubarevich, Andreas Martens, Tim Kaufeld, Bastian Schmack, Alexander Weymann, Arjang Ruhparwar, Aron-Frederik Popov and Florian Helms
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5345; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185345 (registering DOI) - 10 Sep 2024
Abstract
Objectives: Complications after aortic coarctation repair are associated with high mortality and require surgical or endovascular reintervention. For patients unsuitable for endovascular therapies, reoperation remains the only therapeutic option. However, surgical experience and up-to-date follow-up data concerning this overall rare entity in the [...] Read more.
Objectives: Complications after aortic coarctation repair are associated with high mortality and require surgical or endovascular reintervention. For patients unsuitable for endovascular therapies, reoperation remains the only therapeutic option. However, surgical experience and up-to-date follow-up data concerning this overall rare entity in the spectrum of aortic reoperations are still highly limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the short-term outcomes and long-term survival of patients undergoing surgical descending aorta repair after previous coarctation repair in a high-volume unit. Methods: We present a retrospective single-center analysis of 25 patients who underwent open descending aorta replacement after initial coarctation repair. The surgical history, concomitant cardiovascular malformations, and preoperative characteristics as well as postoperative complications and long-term survival were analyzed. Results: The mean age at operation was 45.4 ± 12.8 years. A proportion of 68% (n = 17) of the patients were male. The most common complication necessitating reoperation after coarctation repair was aneurysm formation (68%) and re-stenosis (16%). The average time between initial repair and reoperation was 26.3 ± 9.9 years. Technical success was achieved in all the operations, while recurrent nerve damage (24%) and bleeding requiring rethoracotomy (20%) were identified as the most common perioperative complications. The one-year mortality was 0% and the overall long-term survival was 88% at 15 years. Conclusions: Open surgical descending aorta replacement can be performed safely and with excellent survival outcomes even in the challenging subgroup of patients after previous coarctation repair. Thus, reoperation should be considered a feasible approach for patients who are unsuitable for endovascular therapies. Nonetheless, concomitant cardiovascular anomalies and frequent preoperations may complicate the redo operation in this patient population. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2463 KiB  
Review
Critical Care Ultrasound in Shock: A Comprehensive Review of Ultrasound Protocol for Hemodynamic Assessment in the Intensive Care Unit
by Camilo Pérez, Diana Diaz-Caicedo, David Fernando Almanza Hernández, Lorena Moreno-Araque, Andrés Felipe Yepes and Jorge Armando Carrizosa Gonzalez
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5344; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185344 (registering DOI) - 10 Sep 2024
Abstract
Shock is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment to prevent organ failure. In the intensive care unit, shock is a common presentation, and its management is challenging. Critical care ultrasound has emerged as a reliable and reproducible tool in diagnosing [...] Read more.
Shock is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment to prevent organ failure. In the intensive care unit, shock is a common presentation, and its management is challenging. Critical care ultrasound has emerged as a reliable and reproducible tool in diagnosing and classifying shock. This comprehensive review proposes an ultrasound-based protocol for the hemodynamic assessment of shock to guide its management in the ICU. The protocol classifies shock as either low or high cardiac index and differentiates obstructive, hypovolemic, cardiogenic, and distributive etiologies. In distributive shock, the protocol proposes a hemodynamic-based approach that considers the presence of dynamic obstruction, fluid responsiveness, fluid tolerance, and ventriculo-arterial coupling. The protocol gives value to quantitative measures based on critical care ultrasound to guide hemodynamic management. Using critical care ultrasound for a comprehensive hemodynamic assessment can help clinicians diagnose the etiology of shock and define the appropriate treatment while monitoring the response. The protocol’s use in the ICU can facilitate prompt recognition, diagnosis, and management of shock, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Critical Care Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop