Next Article in Journal
Cannabis Use Variations and Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Trends in Hospitalizations of Patients with Hepatitis C Virus in Poland between 2012 and 2022
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Three-Step Submandibular Retropharyngeal Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction: Is Less Always More?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Positive Cutibacterium acnes Intervertebral Discs Are Not Associated with Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 3 or 6 Months

by
Jael Camacho
,
Jake Carbone
,
Rohan I. Suresh
,
Shivam Khanna
,
Ivan B. Ye
,
Alexandra E. Thomson
,
Jacob Bruckner
,
Rohan Gopinath
,
Shane McGowan
,
Nathan O’Hara
,
Louis J. Bivona
,
Julio J. Jauregui
,
Daniel L. Cavanaugh
,
Eugene Y. Koh
and
Steven C. Ludwig
*
Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5619; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185619
Submission received: 31 July 2024 / Revised: 8 September 2024 / Accepted: 18 September 2024 / Published: 22 September 2024

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes), formerly known as Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes), is an anaerobic, low-virulent bacterium that has been associated with postoperative infections of the shoulder, knee, and cervical spine. Recent studies have highlighted an association between C. acnes and the development of degenerative disc disease (DDD). The aim of this study is to ascertain whether C. acnes increases the risk of subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: After IRB approval, consecutive patients undergoing elective ACDF for DDD from 2017 to 2018 were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Intervertebral disc samples were taken at each affected level and cultured. A total of 66 patients with radiographic follow-ups were included in the final analysis. The extent of subsidence and cervical lordosis was determined immediately postoperatively and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Results: No significant difference in subsidence was observed at 3 months (p = 0.07) or 6 months (p = 0.11) between culture-positive and -negative cohorts. Additionally, there was no significant difference detected in the change in cervical lordosis observed at 3 months (p = 0.16) or 6 months (p = 0.27) between culture-positive and -negative cohorts. For the most inferiorly fused segment, there was a significant difference in subsidence observed at 3 months (1.5 mm, 95% CI: 0.2–2.7 mm, p = 0.02) but not at 6 months (p = 0.17). Conclusions: Intervertebral discs with a positive C. acnes culture were not associated with greater levels of subsidence at 3 or 6 months following ACDF for DDD. Further research is necessary to endorse these results and to gauge the clinical significance of C. acnes infection.

1. Introduction

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes), formerly known as Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes), is a low-virulence, anaerobic, and Gram-positive rod often seen in sebaceous glands [1]. C. acnes is predominantly seen in the sebaceous glands of the face and neck, but the topographical presence of the bacterium is dependent on multiple factors and can be highly personalized to the individual [1]. Variables such as body temperature, pH, moisture, and sebaceous follicle density can all affect the presence of C. acnes on one’s skin [1]. C. acnes is one of the predominant organisms that constitute our skin flora and, due to its preference for sebaceous sites, it is currently being seen that this bacteria can infect other parts of the body and cause numerous inflammatory conditions such as endocarditis, endophthalmitis, systemic infections, and orthopedic infections [1].
Due to the abundance of C. acnes in skin flora and its recent emergence in the setting of wounds and deep-seated infections, a major debate has been sparked about whether or not C. acnes is present as a contaminant or a legitimate infection [2]. McLorinan et al. showed through immunofluorescence that the presence of C. acnes from surgical wounds in patients who underwent spine surgery was most likely linked to contamination, as it was seen in small aggregates [3]. Carricajo et al. further added to this study by sampling air from operating rooms in addition to demonstrating the presence of C. acnes.
C. acnes has been associated with both periprosthetic and postoperative joint infections of the shoulder, hip, and knee [4,5,6,7]. Furthermore, C. acnes can be seen in cultures from osteomyelitis and postoperative spinal infections [8,9,10,11,12]. However, multiple studies also demonstrate the presence of C. acnes in joint injections and disc degeneration [13,14]. Senker et al. found that coagulase-negative Staphylococcus Aureus and C. acnes were the two most predominant organisms seen in low-grade infections of intervertebral discs [12]. Similarly, in another prospective study, Coscia et al. also found those two to be the most predominant organisms in intervertebral disc herniation and discogenic pain [13]. Recent research is focusing on C. acnes colonization being a potential origin of intervertebral disc degeneration. Schmid et al. demonstrated that C. acnes exposure in the intervertebral disc space is seen to upregulate numerous inflammatory markers such as Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and upregulate the activity of Toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4 [2]. Clinical research studies reported that Modic type 1 changes on MRIs (endplate edema) were concomitant with a positive C. acnes culture [15,16,17]. A systematic review by Ganko et al. demonstrated that C. acnes was the predominant organism in 59% of disc infections in patients with symptomatic disc degeneration [18]. Nevertheless, the influence of C. acnes on the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains indeterminate.
Subsidence is a common process after ACDF with an incidence range of 29–54% [19,20,21]. This decreased intervertebral height can result in recurrent nerve root compression, pseudarthrosis, and instability [22,23]. Despite there still being deliberation over whether radiographic evidence of subsidence is clinically significant, several risk factors for subsidence have been recognized. Other risk factors, such as disc degeneration, smoking, low bone density, endplate damage during disc preparation, older age, and cervical malalignment, have each been associated with greater rates of implant subsidence [24,25,26]. However, there is a shortage of literature regarding the effect of C. acnes on the incidence of subsidence in ACDF.
This study’s primary objective is to examine the impact of C. acnes infection on subsidence after ACDF procedures. The secondary purpose is to assess if C. acnes influences postoperative cervical lordosis. Since C. acnes has been associated with increased disc degeneration, we hypothesize that positive C. acnes cultures from intraoperative disc samples will have an association with increased rates of subsidence.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patients

After obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (HP-00071677), the study began enrolling consecutive patients from 2017 to 2018 in a prospective cohort study. We adhered to the Strengthening the Report of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines to certify high quality of the study [27]. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients between 18 and 89 years of age with DDD scheduled for elective ACDF. Patients with active malignancy, infection, long-term antibiotic use, and a history of spondylodiscitis or vertebral osteomyelitis were excluded. All of the patients were scheduled for 3- and 6-month follow-ups which included radiographic injury imaging to evaluate the quality of the fusion, cervical lordosis, and the presence of subsidence.

2.2. Sample Collection

Every patient received prophylactic antibiotics before the procedure. Patients were positioned supine and standard sterile protocols were observed to avoid skin contamination. Subsequent to the presurgical scrub, the surgical area was sterilized three times with povidone-iodine prior to draping. A standard anterior approach for ACDF was utilized [28]. Once the cervical disc was observed, a sample of disc tissue was obtained with an unused sterile instrument, deposited in a sterile container, and transported to the lab for further microbiological analysis.

2.3. Microbiology

Gram-stain and aerobic and anaerobic cultures were ordered for all disc samples. For the aerobic cultures, the samples were homogenized and plated on 5% sheep blood, chocolate, MacConkey, and phenylethyl alcohol agars. For the anaerobic cultures, the samples were homogenized and plated on pre-reduced Brucella blood, Brucella laked blood with kanamycin and vancomycin, Bacteroides bile esculin agar, and thioglycolate broth. The plated agars were incubated at 37 °C in an anaerobic Bio-Bag (Type-A) Multi-plate system and inspected daily for growth. Gram-stain, subculture, and microbial identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) were performed to discover any detected colonies [29]. Agar plates were held for 7 days, while the thioglycolate broth was held for 14 days.

2.4. Radiographic Measurements

Radiographic measurements were completed independently by 4 separate raters (1 spine attending, 1 spine fellow, 1 orthopedic resident, and 1 medical student) using Surgimap (Version 2.2.15.4, Nemaris Inc, New York, NY, USA). Every rater was blinded to the patients’ culture results. Each rater examined the patient immediately postoperatively, as well as the 3- and 6-month follow-up results, lateral cervical spine radiographs, and measured the cervical lordosis and length of the fused segment. Within 1 month of the initial measurements, each rater also re-measured 20 random patients to confirm intra-rater consistency.
Cervical lordosis was defined as the cobb angle between the inferior end plate of C2 and the superior end plate of C7. The length of the fused segment is the distance between the superior end plate of the superior fused vertebrae to the inferior endplate of the inferior fused vertebrae at the anterior edge of the vertebral body, excluding osteophytes. Fused segment sizes were analyzed for each level of the fusion.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were collected and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 365 (Microsoft Office Professional Plus, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Continuous variables were established for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Student’s T test was employed to evaluate continuous variables with normal distribution and Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test was used as the non-parametric. An a priori alpha was set at 0.05 for significance. Chi-square analysis and Fisher’s exact test were applied to assess the relationships between categorical variables. Post hoc analysis was acheived by multiplied 2 × 2. Fisher’s exact tests for variables with >2 categories that had a statistically significant p-value.
Intra-rater reliability was analyzed for each of the four raters using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Inter-rater reliability was calculated for cervical lordosis and subsidence measurements using ICC. The mean of the measurements determined by the four raters was used for subsequent analysis. The association between a positive disc culture and cervical lordosis at 3 months and 6 months was evaluated using a mixed effects model, which controlled for the baseline cervical lordosis measure as a fixed effect and incorporated the subjects and raters as a random effect in the model. Likewise, the association between a positive disc culture and discs subsidence at 3 months and 6 months was evaluated using a mixed-effects model, which controlled for baseline measurements and patient characteristics. All analyses were completed using SAS v9.4 statistical software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

A total of 110 patients consented to partake in the study. Of these patients, 14 of them were excluded from the study due to inadequate intraoperative disc sample conditions as characterized by the pathologist (quality of specimen, contamination, etc.). An additional 17 patients were excluded for mixed constructs (ACDF with posterior fusion or standalone and traditional construct). Finally, 13 patients were lost due to a lack of follow-up and did not have imaging. In total, 66 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. A total of 119 intervertebral disc tissue samples were attained for culture. The cohort had an average age of 53.6 ± 10.1, a BMI of 28.8 ± 5.4 kg/m2, and a majority of female patients (n = 36, 54.5%) (Table 1). Neck pain (92.4%) and shoulder pain (89.4%) were the most frequently reported symptoms. The majority of the patients were non-smokers (60.6%) and received two-level fusion (62.1%). Additionally, 40 patients (60.1%) had at minimum one positive disc culture with a total of 79 (66.4%) culture-positive discs (Table 2). Culture-positive patients were younger than culture-negative patients (51.8 vs. 56.4, p = 0.042) and less likely to be female (40.0% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, culture-positive patients were more likely to have received multi-level fusion (82.5% vs. 53.9%, p = 0.024). The two cohorts had comparable levels of smoking status, diagnosis, and symptoms (Table 2).

3.2. Rater Reliability

Inter-rater reliability was high for cervical lordosis and subsidence measurements between the four raters (ICC = 0.83 and 0.82, respectively) (Table 3). Four raters obtained all measurements on all patients. Additionally, intra-rater reliability was high between the four raters with ICCs greater than 0.84 and an average intra-rater reliability of 0.92.

3.3. Cervical Lordosis

Postoperatively, the culture-positive and -negative cohorts had 13.2° and 11.2° of cervical lordosis, respectively. There was no significant difference in the change in cervical lordosis between the two groups at 3 months (2.5°, 95% CI: −1.0°–6.0°, p = 0.16) and 6 months (3.0°, 95% CI: −2.4°–8.4°, p = 0.27) following surgery.

3.4. Subsidence

The culture-positive and -negative cohorts had a mean postoperative fused segment length of 37.0 mm and 36.5 mm, respectively. For the culture-positive cohort, the mean fused segment length decreased to 34.3 mm at 3 months and 35.4 mm at 6 months. In the culture-negative cohort, the mean fused segment length decreased to 33.1 mm at 3 months and 33.6 at 6 months. There was no significant difference in subsidence between culture-positive and -negative cohorts observed at 3 months (1.2 mm, 95% CI: −0.1–2.6 mm, p = 0.07) or at 6 months (1.7 mm, 95% CI: −0.4–3.9 mm, p = 0.11).
For the most superiorly fused segments, there was no significant difference in subsidence between culture-positive and -negative cohorts observed at 3 months (0.4 mm, 95% CI: −1.6–2.4 mm, p = 0.67) and at 6 months (1.1 mm, 95% CI: −1.3–3.5 mm, p = 0.36). For the most inferiorly fused segments, there was a significant difference in subsidence observed at 3 months (1.5 mm, 95% CI: 0.2–2.7 mm, p = 0.02) but not at 6 months (1.5 mm, 95% CI: −0.2–3.7 mm, p = 0.17) between culture-positive and -negative cohorts.

3.5. Comparison of Evaluation Metrics

The impact of disc culture on cervical lordosis and subsidence was analyzed using two different metrics: absolute difference and percent difference. Both metrics were further analyzed using a mixed-effects model. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 4. As denoted earlier, all values were normalized to the initial postoperative measurements. The mean difference highlights the difference between culture-positive and culture-negative measurements with culture-negative values predetermined as a reference value of 0. The culture-positive group consisted of cervical lordosis angles that were 2.5 and 3 degrees higher relative to the culture-negative group at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Similarly, the culture-positive group had subsidence measurements that were 1–2 mm higher relative to those of culture-negative groups. The results from the analysis based on percent difference parallel the results from absolute difference.

4. Discussion

The pathogenesis of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) continues to be inadequately understood. Proposed etiologies include age-related intervertebral disc water loss, reduced endplate permeability, and biomechanical factors [30]. One proposed possible mechanism for DDD is C. acnes infection, as C. acnes has been demonstrated to be positive in 59% of infectious cases of DDD [18,31]. In the current study, 60% of patients who underwent ACDF had cultures positive for C. acnes. Graft subsidence is a usual occurrence in ACDF, which may decrease fusion rates and increase the risk of nearby segment disease [19,20,21]. Bivona et al. reported that 17.7% of patients who received an ACDF had positive intraoperative C. acnes cultures [32]. The purpose of this study is to investigate if C. acnes colonization in intervertebral discs raises the risk of subsidence following ACDF.
Although C. acnes has been linked to postoperative infections, aseptic loosening, and possibly DDD, this study did not establish whether or not C. acnes contributes to increased rates of subsidence following ACDF. There was not a significant difference in subsidence at 3 or 6 months postoperatively between the culture-positive and culture-negative cohorts. Both cohorts started to show subsidence at an approximate measurement of 3 mm loss in height by 6 months. Even though the culture-negative cohort had unexpectedly shorter fused segment lengths, the differences in the extent of subsidence were not statistically significant. It is important to distinguish that the two cohorts had different distributions of age, gender, and the number of fused levels. We saw that with a decreased age patients were more likely to have a positive disc culture which is probably due to younger patients having more exposure to C. acnes as they have more sebum production [33]. We saw that men were more likely to have positive cultures which is consistent with the current literature [34] as men typically have more sebaceous glands and, resultingly, a higher exposure to C. acnes. Additionally, we see that with more levels fused comes an increased risk of a positive culture, which could be due to an exposure issue as multilevel fusions have longer operative times, and the patient’s discs are exposed to the skin’s flora for a longer period of time. However, when these elements were controlled for in the mixed-effects model, the C. acnes-positive cohort had an increased, but not statistically significant, degree of subsidence.
Past studies have also mentioned that subsidence may play a crucial role in preserving sagittal balance, particularly in maintaining the natural cervical curvature following ACDF [35,36]. In this study, there was no significant difference in the loss of lordosis between culture-positive and culture-negative groups up to 6 months postoperatively. Conversely, larger studies with longer follow-up periods may be required to ascertain the significant effect of subsidence on cervical lordosis.
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first prospective study of its kind to investigate subsidence rates following ACDF via the collection of disc samples cultured for C. acnes. Future studies are necessary to validate these findings and compare the differences in subsidence with clinical outcomes, such as reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes. If future studies discover an association between C. acnes and subsidence after ACDF, clinical management may be altered to include prophylactic preoperative or postoperative antibiotics. As C. acnes research further develops, an organism that was once thought to be a contaminant in cultures may become a key to fully comprehending DDD and postoperative subsidence.
There are numerous limitations to this study. Though measurements of subsidence emphasized high intra- and inter-rater reliability, these small measurements demonstrated no statistical significance. Although our sample size was not sufficient for binary variables, we were sufficiently powered for continuous variables after post hoc power analysis. Future studies can focus on enrolling a larger sample size, allowing for the necessary power to focus on subsidence as a binary variable instead of a continuous variable. Future studies can also focus on longer follow-up data since this paper focuses on short-term follow-up outcomes. Lastly, the association between radiographic measurements of subsidence and clinical significance continues to be a topic of debate. Nevertheless, this prospective study provides vital early evidence and an initial framework for future studies of the effect of C. acnes on subsidence following ACDF.

5. Conclusions

Intervertebral discs with a positive C. acnes culture were not associated with greater levels of subsidence at 3 and 6 months after ACDF for DDD. Future research is warranted to corroborate these results and to further explore the clinical significance of C. acnes infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C.L., D.L.C., L.J.B., E.Y.K., J.C. (Jael Camacho) and J.J.J.; methodology, S.C.L., D.L.C., L.J.B., E.Y.K., J.C. (Jael Camacho), A.E.T. and J.J.J.; software, N.O.; validation, N.O.; formal analysis, N.O.; investigation, I.B.Y., A.E.T., J.B., R.G. and S.M.; resources, I.B.Y., A.E.T., J.B., R.G. and S.M.; data curation, N.O.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C. (Jael Camacho), J.C. (Jake Carbone) and R.I.S.; writing—review and editing, J.C. (Jake Carbone), R.I.S. and S.K.; visualization, J.C. (Jake Carbone)., R.I.S. and S.K; supervision, S.C.L., D.L.C., L.J.B., E.Y.K., J.C. (Jael Camacho) and J.J.J.; funding, S.C.L., D.L.C., L.J.B., E.Y.K., J.C. (Jael Camacho) and J.J.J.; project administration, N.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Maryland Baltimore (HP-00071677, July 2018) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Leheste, J.R.; Ruvolo, K.E.; Chrostowski, J.E.; Rivera, K.; Husko, C.; Miceli, A.; Selig, M.K.; Brüggemann, H.; Torres, G.P. Acnes-Driven Disease Pathology: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schmid, B.; Hausmann, O.; Hitzl, W.; Achermann, Y.; Wuertz-Kozak, K. The Role of Cutibacterium acnes in Intervertebral Disc Inflammation. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McLorinan, G.C.; Glenn, J.V.; McMullan, M.G.; Patrick, S. Propionibacterium acnes wound contamination at the time of spinal surgery. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, 437, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Horneff, J.G.; Hsu, J.E.; Huffman, G.R. Propionibacterium acnes Infections in Shoulder Surgery. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 45, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Singh, J.A.; Sperling, J.W.; Schleck, C.; Harmsen, W.S.; Cofield, R.H. Periprosthetic Infections after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A 33-Year Perspective. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2012, 21, 1534–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Levy, P.Y.; Fenollar, F.; Stein, A.; Borrione, F.; Cohen, E.; Lebail, B.; Raoult, D. Propionibacterium acnes Postoperative Shoulder Arthritis: An Emerging Clinical Entity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 1884–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jacobs, A.M.E.; Van Hooff, M.L.; Meis, J.F.; Vos, F.; Goosen, J.H.M. Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infections Due to Propionibacterium. Similar Results in 60 Patients Treated with and without Rifampicin. Acta Orthop. 2016, 87, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haidar, R.; Najjar, M.; Der Boghossian, A.; Tabbarah, Z. Propionibacterium acnes Causing Delayed Postoperative Spine Infection: Review. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 42, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khalil, J.G.; Gandhi, S.D.; Park, D.K.; Fischgrund, J.S. Cutibacterium acnes in Spine Pathology: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2019, 27, e633–e640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carragee, E.J. Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1997, 79, 874–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kowalski, T.J.; Berbari, E.F.; Huddleston, P.M.; Steckelberg, J.M.; Osmon, D.R. Propionibacterium acnes Vertebral Osteomyelitis: Seek and Ye Shall Find? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007, 461, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. LaGreca, J.; Hotchkiss, M.; Carry, P.; Messacar, K.; Nyquist, A.-C.; Erickson, M.; Garg, S. Bacteriology and Risk Factors for Development of Late (Greater Than One Year) Deep Infection Following Spinal Fusion With Instrumentation. Spine Deform. 2014, 2, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Senker, W.; Aspalter, S.; Radl, C.; Pichler, J.; Doppler, S.; Weis, S.; Webersinke, C.; Wagner, H.; Hermann, P.; Aichholzer, M.; et al. Frequency and characteristics of bacterial and viral low-grade infections of the intervertebral discs: A prospective, observational study. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2022, 23, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Coscia, M.F.; Denys, G.A.; Wack, M.F. Propionibacterium acnes, Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus, and the “Biofilm-like” Intervertebral Disc. Spine 2016, 41, 1860–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Albert, H.B.; Lambert, P.; Rollason, J.; Sorensen, J.S.; Worthington, T.; Pedersen, M.B.; Nørgaard, H.S.; Vernallis, A.; Busch, F.; Manniche, C.; et al. Does Nuclear Tissue Infected with Bacteria Following Disc Herniations Lead to Modic Changes in the Adjacent Vertebrae? Eur. Spine J. 2013, 22, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aghazadeh, J.; Salehpour, F.; Ziaeii, E.; Javanshir, N.; Samadi, A.; Sadeghi, J.; Mirzaei, F.; Naseri Alavi, S.A. Modic Changes in the Adjacent Vertebrae Due to Disc Material Infection with Propionibacterium acnes in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation. Eur. Spine J. 2017, 26, 3129–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fritzell, P.; Bergström, T.; Welinder-Olsson, C. Detection of Bacterial DNA in Painful Degenerated Spinal Discs in Patients without Signs of Clinical Infection. Eur. Spine J. 2004, 13, 702–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ganko, R.; Rao, P.J.; Phan, K.; Mobbs, R.J. Can Bacterial Infection by Low Virulent Organisms Be a Plausible Cause for Symptomatic Disc Degeneration? A Systematic Review. Spine 2015, 40, E587–E592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hilibrand, A.S.; Robbins, M. Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Adjacent Segment Disease: The Consequences of Spinal Fusion? Spine J. 2004, 4, 190S–194S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kast, E.; Derakhshani, S.; Bothmann, M.; Oberle, J. Subsidence after Anterior Cervical Inter-Body Fusion. A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial. Neurosurg. Rev. 2009, 32, 207–214; discussion 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jacobs, W.; Willems, P.C.; Kruyt, M.; van Limbeek, J.; Anderson, P.G.; Pavlov, P.; Bartels, R.; Oner, C. Systematic Review of Anterior Interbody Fusion Techniques for Single- and Double-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine 2011, 36, E950–E960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zajonz, D.; Franke, A.-C.; von der Höh, N.; Voelker, A.; Moche, M.; Gulow, J.; Heyde, C.-E. Is the Radiographic Subsidence of Stand-Alone Cages Associated with Adverse Clinical Outcomes after Cervical Spine Fusion? An Observational Cohort Study with 2-Year Follow-up Outcome Scoring. Patient Saf. Surg. 2014, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, S.Y.; Yoon, S.H.; Kim, D.; Oh, C.H.; Oh, S. A Prospective Study with Cage-Only or Cage-with-Plate Fixation in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion of One and Two Levels. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2017, 60, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, Y.-S.; Park, J.-Y.; Moon, B.J.; Kim, S.-D.; Lee, J.-K. Is Stand Alone PEEK Cage the Gold Standard in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)? Results of a Minimum 1-Year Follow Up. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2018, 47, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lim, T.H.; Kwon, H.; Jeon, C.H.; Kim, J.G.; Sokolowski, M.; Natarajan, R.; An, H.S.; Andersson, G.B. Effect of Endplate Conditions and Bone Mineral Density on the Compressive Strength of the Graft-Endplate Interface in Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion. Spine 2001, 26, 951–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Oxland, T.R.; Grant, J.P.; Dvorak, M.F.; Fisher, C.G. Effects of Endplate Removal on the Structural Properties of the Lower Lumbar Vertebral Bodies. Spine 2003, 28, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. STROBE Initiative Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. BMJ 2007, 335, 806–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Smith, G.W.; Robinson, R.A. The Treatment of Certain Cervical-Spine Disorders by Anterior Removal of the Intervertebral Disc and Interbody Fusion. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1958, 40, 607–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singhal, N.; Kumar, M.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: An Emerging Technology for Microbial Identification and Diagnosis. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Adams, M.A.; Roughley, P.J. What Is Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, and What Causes It? Spine 2006, 31, 2151–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dudli, S.; Liebenberg, E.; Magnitsky, S.; Miller, S.; Demir-Deviren, S.; Lotz, J.C. Propionibacterium acnes Infected Intervertebral Discs Cause Vertebral Bone Marrow Lesions Consistent with Modic Changes. J. Orthop. Res. 2016, 34, 1447–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bivona, L.J.; Camacho, J.E.; Usmani, F.; Nash, A.; Bruckner, J.J.; Hughes, M.; Bhandutia, A.K.; Koh, E.Y.; Banagan, K.E.; Gelb, D.E.; et al. The Prevalence of Bacterial Infection in Patients Undergoing Elective ACDF for Degenerative Cervical Spine Conditions: A Prospective Cohort Study With Contaminant Control. Glob. Spine J. 2021, 11, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Heng, A.H.S.; Chew, F.T. Systematic review of the epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Elston, M.J.; Dupaix, J.P.; Opanova, M.I.; Atkinson, R.E. Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Proprionibacterium acnes) and Shoulder Surgery. Hawaii J. Health Soc. Welf. 2019, 78 (Suppl. S2), 3–5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Tomé-Bermejo, F.; Morales-Valencia, J.A.; Moreno-Pérez, J.; Marfil-Pérez, J.; Díaz-Dominguez, E.; Piñera, A.R.; Alvarez, L. Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease: Long-Term Changes in Sagittal Alignment and Their Clinical Implications After Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage Subsidence: A Prospective Study With Standalone Lordotic Tantalum Cages. Clin. Spine Surg. 2017, 30, E648–E655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jang, J.-W.; Lee, J.-K.; Lee, J.-H.; Hur, H.; Kim, T.-W.; Kim, S.-H. Effect of Posterior Subsidence on Cervical Alignment after Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Reconstruction Using Titanium Mesh Cages in Degenerative Cervical Disease. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2014, 21, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients Included in the Study.
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients Included in the Study.
Demographics
     Number of Patients66
     Number of Discs119
     Age, (Mean ± SD)53.6 ± 10.1
     BMI, (Mean ± SD)28.8 ± 5.4
     Sex (Male), N (%)30 (45.5)
     Previous C-Spine Surgery, N (%)7 (10.6)
Diagnosis, N (%)
     Cervical Myelopathy12 (18.2)
     Cervical Radiculopathy26 (39.4)
     Cervical Stenosis10 (15.2)
     Disc Herniation 11 (16.7)
     Cervical Spondylosis 7 (10.6)
Symptoms, N (%)
     Neck Pain 61 (92.4)
     Arm/Shoulder Pain59 (89.4)
Smoking Status, N (%)
     Non-Smoker40 (60.6)
     Current Smoker14 (21.2)
     Former Smoker12 (18.2)
Segments, N (%) †
     C3/C49 (7.5)
     C4/C528 (23.5)
     C5/C651 (42.8)
     C6/C731 (26.0)
     C7/T11 (0.8)
Levels Fused, N (%)
     One19 (28.8)
     Two41 (62.1)
     Three6 (9.1)
† Total number of discs (119) used for percent calculation. SD—standard deviation.
Table 2. Patient Characteristics with Positive and Negative Disc Cultures.
Table 2. Patient Characteristics with Positive and Negative Disc Cultures.
CharacteristicsNegative
Disc Culture
Positive
Disc Culture
p-Value
     Number of Patients2640
     Number of Discs4079
     Age56.4 ± 6.251.8 ± 11.60.04
     BMI 28.4 ± 5.529.0 ± 5.30.66
     Sex (Male)6 (23.8)24 (60.0)<0.01
     Previous C-Spine Surgery3 (11.5)4 (10.0)1.00
Diagnosis, N (%) 0.93
     Cervical Myelopathy5 (19.2)7 (17.5)
     Cervical Radiculopathy11 (42.3)15 (37.5)
     Cervical Stenosis3 (11.5)7 (17.5)
     Disc Herniation 5 (19.2)6 (15.0)
     Cervical Spondylosis 2 (7.7)5 (12.5)
Symptoms, N (%)
     Neck Pain 25 (96.2)36 (90.0)0.34
     Arm/Shoulder Pain22 (84.6)37 (92.5)0.28
Smoking Status, N (%) 0.61
     Non-Smoker14 (53.8)26 (65.0)
     Current Smoker7 (26.9)7 (17.5)
     Former Smoker5 (19.2)7 (17.5)
Levels Fused, N (%) 0.01
     One12 (46.5)7 (17.5)0.02
     Two14 (53.9)27 (67.5)0.31
     Three0 (0)6 (15.0)0.07
Follow Up-Weeks (Mean ± SD)
     Immediate Post op0.2 ± 0.70.2 ± 0.50.71
     T1 (weeks)17.1 ± 6.416.9 ± 5.50.91
     T2 (weeks)42.4 ± 15.743.3 ± 13.20.86
Table 3. Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability for Cervical Lordosis and Fused Segment Length.
Table 3. Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability for Cervical Lordosis and Fused Segment Length.
MeasurementsICC95% CI
Intra-Rater Reliability †
     1  0.93  0.84–0.97
     2  0.91  0.79–0.96
     3  0.99  0.96–0.99
     4  0.84  0.64–0.93
Inter-Rater Reliability
     Cervical Lordosis  0.83  0.76–0.88
     Fused Segments  0.82  0.77–0.86
† Intra-rater reliability was calculated by repeat measurement of 20 samples by each rater. ICC—Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; CI—confidence interval.
Table 4. Impact of Disc Culture on Change in Cervical Lordosis and Subsidence.
Table 4. Impact of Disc Culture on Change in Cervical Lordosis and Subsidence.
Follow UpMean Diff95% CIp-Value
Absolute Difference †
Cervical Lordosis3 Months2.5−1.0–6.00.16
6 Months3−2.4–8.40.27
Subsidence: Combined3 Months1.2−0.1–2.60.07
6 Months1.7−0.4–3.90.11
Subsidence: Superior Level3 Months0.4−1.6–2.40.67
6 Months1.1−1.3–3.50.36
Subsidence: Inferior Level3 Months1.50.2–2.70.02
6 Months1.5−0.7–3.70.17
Percent Difference *
Cervical Lordosis3 Months0.9%0.3–2.20.15
6 Months0%−1.2–1.20.99
Subsidence: Combined3 Months2.6%−0.9–6.00.14
6 Months1.9%−2.1–5.90.33
Subsidence: Superior Level3 Months1.1%−6.8–4.60.70
6 Months2.0%−4.3–8.40.52
Subsidence: Inferior Level3 Months0.4%0.2–7.00.04
6 Months1.4%−3.4–6.20.55
† Mean difference in positive and negative disc cultures at 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Negative disc cultures were used as a reference point for the mixed model. * Percent difference calculated as follow up/pre-operative measurements. CI—confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Camacho, J.; Carbone, J.; Suresh, R.I.; Khanna, S.; Ye, I.B.; Thomson, A.E.; Bruckner, J.; Gopinath, R.; McGowan, S.; O’Hara, N.; et al. Positive Cutibacterium acnes Intervertebral Discs Are Not Associated with Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 3 or 6 Months. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5619. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185619

AMA Style

Camacho J, Carbone J, Suresh RI, Khanna S, Ye IB, Thomson AE, Bruckner J, Gopinath R, McGowan S, O’Hara N, et al. Positive Cutibacterium acnes Intervertebral Discs Are Not Associated with Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 3 or 6 Months. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(18):5619. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Camacho, Jael, Jake Carbone, Rohan I. Suresh, Shivam Khanna, Ivan B. Ye, Alexandra E. Thomson, Jacob Bruckner, Rohan Gopinath, Shane McGowan, Nathan O’Hara, and et al. 2024. "Positive Cutibacterium acnes Intervertebral Discs Are Not Associated with Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 3 or 6 Months" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 18: 5619. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop