Next Article in Journal
A New Protocol to Mitigate Damage to Germination Caused by Black Layers in Maize (Zea mays L.) Seeds
Next Article in Special Issue
Variability in Stomatal Adaptation to Drought among Grapevine Cultivars: Genotype-Dependent Responses
Previous Article in Journal
Usefulness of Living Mulch in Rows in a Dwarf Pear, Pyrus communis L., Orchard
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating Agro-Morpho-Physiological Traits and SSR Markers for Detecting the Salt Tolerance of Advanced Spring Wheat Lines under Field Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Silicon Alone and Combined with Organic Matter and Trichoderma harzianum on Sorghum Yield, Ions Accumulation and Soil Properties under Saline Irrigation

by
José Orlando Nunes da Silva
1,*,
Luiz Guilherme Medeiros Pessoa
1,*,
Emanuelle Maria da Silva
1,
Leonardo Raimundo da Silva
2,
Maria Betânia Galvão dos Santos Freire
3,
Eduardo Soares de Souza
1,
Sérgio Luiz Ferreira-Silva
1,
José Geraldo Eugênio de França
1,
Thieres George Freire da Silva
1 and
Eurico Lustosa do Nascimento Alencar
4
1
Graduate Program in Crop Production, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada 56909-535, PE, Brazil
2
Academic Unit of Serra Talhada, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada 56909-535, PE, Brazil
3
Graduate Program in Soil Science, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, PE, Brazil
4
Irrigated Agriculture Station of Parnamirim, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Parnamirim 56163-000, PE, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(11), 2146; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112146
Submission received: 16 October 2023 / Revised: 31 October 2023 / Accepted: 2 November 2023 / Published: 14 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Crops Subjected to Drought and Salinity Stress)

Abstract

:
The action of silicon as a salt stress mitigator has been investigated in isolation, and its combined efficacy with other salt stress mitigators needs to be addressed. This work verified whether silicon, in combination with organic matter and Trichoderma harzianum, enhances the production of forage sorghum under saline irrigation and its effects on soil properties. The field experiment was conducted in Parnamirim (PE), a semiarid region of Brazil. Forage sorghum (Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf) was irrigated with saline water (3.12 dS m−1) and subjected to the application of non-silicon, silicon alone, and silicon combined with Trichoderma and organic matter over three consecutive cuts (every three months after germination). Silicon applied in combination significantly increased the content of nutrient ions K+, P, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in sorghum leaves, stems, and panicles and increased P content in the soil by 170, 288, and 92% for the first, second, and third cuts, respectively. When silicon was applied in combination, sorghum’s dry and fresh matter (total yield for the three cuts) increased to 62.53 and 182.43 t ha−1, respectively. In summary, applying silicon (Si) combined with Trichoderma and organic matter promotes higher nutrient ion contents in soil and sorghum plants and a higher forage sorghum yield.

1. Introduction

Food production is directly linked to climate, and this means that crop yields, water use, and soil quality are affected by climate change [1]. Increased concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases are likely indicators that climate change significantly impacts soil salinization [2], by increasing air temperature and thereby increasing soil water and groundwater evaporation. Consequently, the capillary movement of groundwater and soil water will rise in dry seasons, accelerating the soil salinization process in arid regions of the world [3]. Thus, salt-affected areas have increased, mainly due to increased evapotranspiration, lower precipitation, increased use of poor-quality water, poor irrigation management, and inappropriate soil management practices [4]. Given this scenario, one of the main challenges of current world agriculture is ensuring food security under extreme abiotic stress, such as saline stress.
In much of the Brazilian semiarid region, producers already suffer from problems related to the availability of good quality water for use in irrigated agriculture [5]. This has caused an increase in groundwater use for irrigation purposes, which generally have high saline contents, with high concentrations of sodium and chlorine in their composition [6,7]. The excessive use and mismanagement of these waters, combined with poor soil management and lack of drainage [8], has limited food and fodder production and contributed enormously to soil degradation and desertification of the region [9].
Salinity affects plant production and plant metabolism at all stages of growth [10] through nutritional imbalances [11], reduction in osmotic potential [12], and ionic and oxidative toxicity [13], causing morphological [14], physiological, and biochemical damage [15]. Despite the Brazilian semiarid region’s current scenario concerning the increasing use of saline water for crop irrigation, cultivation strategies that favor mitigating saline stress on plants still need to be explored. In this context, it is essential and urgent to carry out studies investigating ways to minimize salt stress and promote crop production that meet the region’s demand.
To address this issue, using crops with agricultural potential and a tolerance to high salinity is a promising alternative to ensure plant production in the Brazilian semiarid region and around the globe [16]. In this sense, forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is an essential source of animal feed that has increased its importance in many semiarid regions of the globe due to its high yield and ability to use water effectively, even under water and salt stress conditions [10,17].
Although sorghum is recommended for cultivation in saline environments [18], its salt tolerance can be improved by using salt stress attenuators. Thus, it is crucial to investigate the effectiveness of salt stress attenuators in mitigating the effects of salt on different crops and increasing the range of possibilities for success in the yield of salt-tolerant plants.
Silicon (Si) has been widely studied as a saline stress attenuator [19,20,21]. The effectiveness of Si in attenuating salt stress in plants can occur through several mechanisms. Zhu and Gong [22] report that Si has a relieving effect on salt stress in plants by reducing the ionic toxicity of Na+ and Cl; decreasing oxidative damage by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes; regulating the biosynthesis of compatible solutes; affecting lignin biosynthesis; and by regulating levels of plant hormones and polyamines. Although several studies report the beneficial effects of Si on crops growing in saline environments, few studies evaluate the effectiveness of Si combined with other salinity attenuators.
Organic treatments correspond to a wide variety of products made by organic compounds that can be added to the soil to increase soil fertility and favor plant growth, improving agricultural sustainability, habitats, biogeochemical cycles, and soil biological activity [23]. These correspond to organic fertilizers, applied to the soil as beneficial microorganisms (Rhizobium, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Trichoderma, Azospirillum, etc.) and organic soil conditioners (manure, biochar, etc.), which tend to improve the physical properties of the soil, accelerate the leaching of salts and Na+, increase the percentage of aggregate stability, and reduce the percentage of exchangeable sodium (ESP) and electrical conductivity (EC) [24].
Trichoderma is an important fungus commonly found in soils, which can spread rapidly, colonizing and surviving in the rhizosphere for extended periods [25]. Trichoderma promotes root growth and has a high capacity to mobilize and absorb nutrients from the soil, increasing the efficiency of nutrient utilization by plants and promoting crop growth and production [26], thus providing greater tolerance to various environmental stresses [27]. Additionally, Trichoderma alleviates the effects of salinity on plants by increasing the activity of antioxidative defense systems [28]. On the other hand, using manure as a source of organic matter in soils is a common practice in the Brazilian semiarid region. In this sense, using Trichoderma can potentiate the mineralization of the organic matter applied as manure and increase the solubilization of nutrients for the plants, since salinity reduces the absorption of nutrients and their efficiency in crops [29].
Although the benefits of Si as an attenuator of salt stress in plants are well documented in the literature [18,20,30,31], in the Brazilian semiarid region, its use for this purpose is still incipient, and investigations are needed to assess its effectiveness in mitigating salt stress. Furthermore, its association with organic treatments still needs to be reported in the literature. Thus, we hypothesize that the combined application of Si with organic treatments can increase the performance of sorghum under saline stress. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of Si alone and combined with organic matter and Trichoderma harzianum on the yield of forage sorghum under saline irrigation, as well as to verify changes in the soil chemical properties in response to the application of saline attenuators.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was carried out at the Parnamirim Irrigated Agriculture Station—Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE), in Parnamirim (PE), located in a semiarid region of Brazil (latitude 8°5′08″ S, longitude 39°34′27″ W and an altitude of 390 m) (Figure 1). According to the Köppen classification, the climate in the region is semiarid, of the BSwh type. The average annual rainfall in the study area is 431.8 mm [32]. However, the rainy season in the region is short and occurs from December to March.
The region’s principal economic activity is the production of goats and sheep. It requires a forage supply in large quantities. As the rainy season in the region is short, many producers resort to groundwater use in the driest months to guarantee forage production. However, these waters do not have a good quality for irrigation use due to the high saline content, which compromises forage production.
The experiment was conducted in the field, in saline Fluvisol soil [33]. The chemical and physical properties of the soil used in the experiment at depths of 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Experimental Design

The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with five treatments and four replications. The saline stress attenuators used were silicon (Si) applied alone and silicon in combination with organic matter (goat manure) (OM) and Trichoderma harzianum (T), tested using the forage sorghum crop (Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf), cultivar IPA Sudan 4202. The treatments were: sorghum without application of salinity attenuator (control); sorghum + Si; sorghum + Si + OM; sorghum + Si + T; and sorghum + Si + T + OM. The dimensions of the experimental units were 20.0 m × 16.5 m for the total area, 4 m × 4 m for the plots, and 2 m × 2 m for the useful plots (where plants and soil samples were collected). The adopted spacing was 0.50 m between rows and ten plants per linear meter.
For the study, three sorghum cuts (the first cut plus two regrowths) were carried out between June 2021 and April 2022, totaling ten months, among which it was possible to evaluate the sorghum growth responses to the application of salinity attenuators during the region’s dry and rainy seasons (Figure 2). There was no rain between the sowing and the first cut (1st cycle), while in the 2nd and 3rd cuts, the accumulated precipitation values were equal to 176.5 and 252 mm, respectively.
Irrigation was carried out using a drip irrigation system with an efficiency of 96%, the flow of each dripper set at 1.06 L h−1, emitters spaced at 40 cm, and an application interval of 48 h, based on the total replacement of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) [34]. The reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was determined by the model proposed by Penman–Monteith and adapted by FAO-56 [34]. Meteorological data were collected at an automatic INMET station (National Institute of Meteorology) [Salgueiro, Pernambuco, Brazil], located 50 km from the experimental area. Rainfall data were collected in the experiment area using a manual rain gauge.
The water for irrigation came from an artesian well (Table 2), classified as C4S1, with a very high risk of promoting soil salinization and a low risk of soil sodification, according to [35].
Potassium silicate, the silicon source used in this work, is a fertilizer containing at least 10% K+ in K2O and 10% silicon. It was applied twice via the soil (the first application was performed one week after sowing and the second after an interval of 15 days) and two foliar applications (the first within 15 days after the applications via soil and the second 15 days after the first foliar application), in all cycles. The spray concentrations were 5 mL L−1 and 10 mL L−1 for soil and foliar applications, respectively, as recommended by the manufacturer. In both conditions, 39.06 mL m−1 linear was applied.
T. harzianum was obtained from the commercial product Trichodermil SC I306. In the first cut, two applications were carried out via soil, the first at sowing and the second with an interval of 30 days after the first application. In the 2nd and 3rd cuts, an application was made at the beginning of each regrowth. In all applications, the syrup concentration was 12.5 mL L−1, as recommended by the manufacturer. The applications were carried out using a costal manual pump in the planting line, with a volume of 39.06 mL of mixture per linear meter.
At the time of sowing, the soil was fertilized with goat manure (source of organic matter) (Table 3) in the proportion of 50 Mg ha−1, in the treatments that included the application of organic matter. According to [36], this dose provides the best performance for the sorghum crop. The manure was previously tanned and incorporated into the surface layer of the soil.

2.3. Soil Sampling

Soil samples were collected at the end of each sorghum cut, in the “useful plots”, at depths of 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm. All samples were air-dried and sieved through a 2 mm mesh. Then, the samples were submitted for the analysis of elements in the exchange complex and the soil saturation extract (soil soluble complex).

2.4. Soil Analysis

2.4.1. Soluble Complex

The saturated paste was prepared according to the methodology described by [37]. For this, distilled water was added to 500 g of soil until complete saturation was reached [37]. After 12 h of rest, the soil solution was extracted by suction. In the soil solution, the electrical conductivity (EC) was measured at 25 °C, using a conductivity meter, as well as the concentrations of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and K+ (cations) and Cl (anions). Ca2+ and Mg2+ were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry, and Na+ and K+ were determined by flame emission photometry [37]. Cl was determined by titration with AgNO3 solution, using K2CrO4 as an indicator [37].

2.4.2. Exchangeable Complex

Soil pH was measured directly in the 1:2.5 soil/water mixture suspension using a potentiometer. The exchangeable cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and K+) were determined after washing soil samples with 96° alcohol. Exchangeable cations were extracted with 1 mol L−1 ammonium acetate solution. After that, Ca2+ and Mg2+ were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry, and Na+ and K+ were determined by flame emission photometry [37]. The exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) was calculated by the ratio of exchangeable Na+ to the cation exchange capacity (CEC), according to [37] (Equation (1)).
ESP (%) = (Na+/CEC) × 100
Soil-available phosphorus was extracted with 0.5 mol L−1 NaHCO3 solution at pH 8.5, and determined by colorimetry with ammonium molybdate, using a spectrophotometer at 882 nm [38].

2.5. Content of Sodium, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, Chloride, and Phosphorus in the Plant

The sorghum plants were fractionated into leaves, stems, and panicles, and the dry mass of the sorghum plant fractions was ground in a Wiley-type mill to determine the elements Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, and P.
To determine Na+, K+, and Cl concentrations, we added 25 mL of ultra-pure water to 100 mg of dry matter in a closed container and boiled for 1 h at 100 °C [39]. The obtained extract was filtered, and the Na+ and K+ contents were determined by flame emission photometry. To determine Cl, 10 mL of the extract was collected and titrated with silver nitrate (28 mM AgNO3), using potassium chromate (5% K2CrO4) as an indicator.
To determine P, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations, we added 25 mL of 1 mol L−1 HCl solution to 500 mg of dry plant mass and heated it at 80 °C for 15 min [40]. After that, Ca2+ and Mg2+ were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry, and P was determined by molybdenum blue spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 660 nm [40].
With the values of these elements’ concentrations per fraction of the plants and the dry mass production of each fraction, the contents of the elements in each fraction of the aerial part were calculated. For that, we multiplied the ion concentration by the dry mass of each plant compartment [41].

2.6. Sorghum Productivity and Water Use Efficiency (WUE)

The fresh and dry yields of forage sorghum were obtained at the end of the three sorghum cuts, with representative plants of the “useful plot”. The plants were harvested and weighed at the end of each sorghum cut to obtain average fresh mass values. Then, the plants were placed in a forced circulation oven at 65 °C for 72 h until they reached constant weight, to determine the dry mass of forage sorghum. The productivity values of fresh and dry mass were multiplied by the plant stand (number of plants ha−1) to obtain the productivity of shoots (dry and fresh mass in Mg of plants ha−1). In this study, we had a homogeneous stand of 200,000 plants ha−1 for all treatments. The total productivity of fresh and dry mass was obtained by adding the values found for the productivity of the three sorghum cuts.
From the ratio between the DMY and the sum of the ETC for the cycle, the water use efficiency (WUE) was calculated in g L−1.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were subjected to an analysis of variance and normality testing, as well as a comparison of the means using the Scott–Knott test at a 5% probability level, with the statistical program Rstudio (version 4.2.2) (R Core Team, 2022). Graphs were created using SigmaPlot (version 14.0) (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Soil Chemical Properties

3.1.1. Salinity Parameters

Applying Si, Trichoderma, and organic matter mitigated the increase in soil salinity due to the use of saline irrigation over time, which could be observed in the second and third cuts. In the first cut, there was a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in EC values only in the 10–20 cm layer, where the treatment with the application of Si + T obtained the lowest value. In the second cut, the application of isolated or combined Si in all soil layers efficiently attenuated the increase in EC, with isolated Si promoting the lowest values. In the third cut, the treatments promoted differentiation in EC values in the 10–20 cm and 40–60 cm layers, where the application of Si alone and Si + T had the best attenuation in the increase in EC, respectively (Figure 3A).
There was a change in pH in the soil layers 20–40 and 40–60 cm (cut 1), 0–10 and 40–60 cm (cut 2), and 10–20 and 20–40 cm (cut 3). Applying Si alone or combined promoted increases in soil pH values (Figure 3B). Regarding ESP, the effect of Si alone or combined did not enable significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) concerning the control treatment in the first sorghum cut in all layers (Figure 3C). In the second and third cuts, there was a tendency for Si alone or combined to attenuate the increase in ESP concerning the control treatment. The control treatment was the least efficient in attenuating the rise in ESP, with values varying from 43% (10–20 cm) to 28% (40–60 cm) in the second cut and from 46% (10–20 cm) to 25% (40–60 cm) in the third cut.

3.1.2. Soluble Complex

The application of combined Si promoted increases in the levels of nutrient ions (K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) in the soil solution while reducing the levels of toxic ions (Na+ and Cl) (Table 4). For K+, in the first cut, the highest concentrations were observed with the application of Si + T + OM, ranging from 1.53 (0–10 cm) to 0.36 mmolc L−1 (40–60 cm). In the second cut, the highest concentration of K+ was observed with the application of Si + T. In the third cut, applying Si + T promoted a higher concentration of K+ on the surface (0–10 cm). There was no difference in the concentration of K+ in the subsoil layers (10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm) concerning the control treatment (Table 4).
There was a higher concentration of Ca2+ in the soil solution on the surface (0–10 and 10–20 cm) with the application of Si + OM and Si + T + OM in the first cut (Table 4). In the second cut, the application of Si + OM and Si + T promoted a significant increase (p ≤ 0.05) in Ca2+ levels in the 10–20 cm layer, while in the third cut, the application of Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM promoted increases in Ca2+ content in the 0–10 cm layer.
Applications of Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM also promoted increased Mg2+ in the soil solution on the surface (0–10 cm) in the first cut (Table 4). In the second cut, there was an increase in Mg2+ content in the 10–20 cm layer with the application of Si + T, while in the third cut, there was an increase in the surface (0-10 cm) with the application of Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM. There was no difference in the other layers compared to the control treatment (p ≤ 0.05).
Concerning Na+ concentrations, the application of Si + T most attenuated its concentration during the first cut compared to the other treatments (Table 4). In the second cut, isolated Si and its combinations effectively attenuated the increase in Na+ concentration in the soil solution in all layers evaluated. In the third cut, Si + OM and Si + T attenuated the rise in Na+ in the soil solution (Table 4).
The concentration of Cl in the soil solution was lower in the first cut for the Si and Si + T treatments in the 0–10 cm layer, while in the 10–20 cm layer, all forms of Si application proved effective for reducing Cl levels. In the second cut, isolated and combined Si presented the lowest concentrations of Cl- in soil solution in the layers of 0–10, 20–40, and 40–60 cm. In the third cut, there was an attenuation of Cl levels in the subsurface, with the application of Si, Si + T, and Si + T + OM in the 20–40 cm layer and the 40–60 cm layer, the application of Si + T was the combination that obtained the lowest concentration of Cl (Table 4).

3.1.3. Sorptive Complex

Regarding the soil assortative complex, the application of Si, alone and combined, also promoted a greater concentration of nutrient ions (K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and P) and reductions in the concentration of exchangeable Na+ (Table 5). Applying Si + OM and Si + T + OM provided a higher concentration of K+ in the 10–20 cm layer during the first cut. In the second cut, all forms of Si application showed a higher concentration of K+ on the surface (0–10 cm). In the third cut, only the application of Si was superior in surface area (0–10 cm) (Table 5).
The Ca2+ concentration was higher with the application of Si + OM in the 0–10 cm layer and with Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM in the 20–40 cm layer during the first cut of sorghum. In the second cut, only the application of Si + T + OM in the 0–10 cm layer showed a higher concentration of Ca2+. In the third cut, the highest concentrations of Ca2+ were also observed on the surface (0–10 cm) with the application of Si + OM and Si + T + OM (Table 5).
Concerning Mg2+ in the first and second cuts, its highest concentration was observed on the surface (0–10 cm) with Si + OM and Si + T + OM. In the third cut, this increase was observed in the subsurface (20–40 cm) with the application of Si + OM and Si + T + OM (Table 5). A lower concentration of Na+ was observed from the second cut of sorghum on the surface (0–10 cm) with any form of application of Si, isolated or combined. In the subsurface (40–60 cm), only the application of Si + T attenuated the Na+ concentration. The Na+ concentration was attenuated in the 10–20 and 20–40 cm layers during the third cut by applying Si, Si + OM, and Si + T (Table 5).
Available P presented the highest concentration on the surface in treatments with the application of organic matter (Si + OM and Si + T + OM) during the first cut. In the second cut, similarly to the first, the treatments where organic matter was applied showed the highest concentrations of P on the surface (0–10 cm), and it was also possible to observe differences in the 40–60 cm layer with the application of Si, Si + T and Si + T + OM, which presented higher concentrations compared to the control treatment. In the third cut, treatments applying organic matter also stand out concerning the others (Table 5).

3.2. Ions Content at Plant Tissue

The total Na+ content in the aerial part of the plant differed only in the second cut, where the application of Si + T presented a higher content (Table 6). We observed that the Na+ content in the leaf was lower in all treatments with the application of isolated or combined Si, compared to the control treatment, and that sorghum tends to concentrate more Na+ in the stalk, having the Si + T treatment present the highest content (Table 6).
About K+, the application of Si alone or combined promoted a more significant accumulation of this element in the aerial part of sorghum in the first and third cuts than the control treatment. In the leaves, the application of S + T + OM favored a more significant accumulation of K+. In the stalks, in the third cut, the control treatment showed a lower accumulation of K+ than the others. There was also a difference in the content of this ion in the panicle, with treatments with the application of organic matter (Si + OM and Si + T + OM) showing the highest values.
In the third sorghum cut, the application of Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM favored a more significant accumulation of Cl in the aerial part of the plant, so that most of the Cl was more significantly present in the plant stalks. In the leaves, the concentration of Cl was significantly higher in the control treatment and with the application of Si + T + OM. In contrast, in the stalks, the control treatment and Si alone showed lower contents of this element (Table 6).
Applying Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM also favored a more significant accumulation of P in the aerial part of sorghum in the three cuts. Si + T + OM promoted the highest P contents, with 92.27, 118.93, and 113.55 mg of P in the first, second, and third cuts, respectively. The accumulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the sorghum leaf, stalk, and panicle was enhanced with the application of Si alone and combined with T and OM; however, combined Si (Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM) promoted more significant accumulation of these elements in different parts of the plant as well the aerial part of sorghum, in the three cuts (Table 6).

3.3. Sorghum Yield and Water Use Efficiency

In all sorghum cuts, applying Si combined with T and/or OM, significantly increased the fresh and dry mass of the shoot in the three sorghum cuts (Table 7). The highest accumulated yields (total of the three cuts) were also achieved with the application of combined Si, where Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM obtained, respectively, yields of 62.03, 62.53, and 59.05 t ha−1 of dry matter, and 182.43, 179.45, and 169.62 t ha−1 of fresh mass (Table 7). It corresponds to gains in dry mass for the Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM treatments, of 38, 39, and 31% compared to the control treatment (without application of Si) and 26, 27, and 20% compared to the treatment where Si was applied alone. Regarding fresh mass, also for the Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM treatments, the accumulated gains concerning the control treatment (without application of Si) and Si alone were similar—25, 23, and 11%.
Applying Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM increased the water use efficiency (WUE) of sorghum plants, compared to the control and Si alone, in the three sorghum cuts. Regarding the accumulated values, Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM obtained a water use efficiency of 15.3, 15.05, and 14.65 g of dry mass per liter of water, respectively, compared to 10.98 and 12.02 g L−1 of dry mass from the control treatments and with application of Si alone, respectively (Table 8). It meant an increased water use efficiency for Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM of 40, 37, and 33%, compared to the control treatment and 27, 25, and 22% compared to Si alone.

4. Discussion

Increasing soil salinity through irrigation with saline water is a common challenge in semiarid regions around the globe. Biosaline agriculture, in conjunction with saline stress attenuators, proved to be efficient in improving the productivity of crops and enabling agricultural production under salty stress conditions. In our study, silicon combined with Trichoderma harzianum and organic matter was more effective in mitigating the effects of saline irrigation on forage sorghum and mainly favoring its growth and yield.

4.1. Salinity Parameters

The decrease in EC over time can be explained by the precipitation observed during the experiment period, which was 176.5 and 252 mm during the second and third sorghum cuts, respectively, totaling 428.5 mm. Soil salinity is seasonal and follows climate change, so salinity is higher in dry periods and tends to decrease in rainy periods, as water promotes the dilution of the salts present, which are leached out of the soil profile, thus promoting its washing.
In addition to this natural decrease caused by rain, it was observed that treatments with Si and other salt stress attenuators also reduced EC compared to the control treatment, emphasizing the application of isolated Si and Si + T. Ref. [42] stated that silicon interacts with soil moisture and can regulate EC. As all salt stress attenuators were applied with silicon, alone or combined, our results are in agreement with previous studies such as [43,44], which had also observed that the application of silicon reduced the EC of the soil and favored plant growth. A similar result was found by [45], who, studying different sources of Si in a saline soil cultivated with corn, also found a decrease in EC with the application of potassium silicate.
In saline and sodic soils, silicon interacts with Na+ present in the soil and forms sodium silicate (Na2SiO3), which increases the mobility and absorption of Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+ and reduces the transport of Na+ and Cl to the roots of plants, favoring their leaching [30]. Furthermore, Ref. [42] stated that Si’s ability to bind to other minerals and its adsorption on clay particles makes it difficult for more Na or Cl ions to bind to essential mineral nutrients or to the surface of soil particles, which can reduce the availability of these salts and their absorption by plant roots in the soil, and consequently promote their leaching.
The predominance of Cl and Na+ in the soil solution mainly influenced the increase in EC in the control treatment, reflecting the low quality of the water used in this experiment, which contains a high concentration of these ions in its composition (Table 2). According to [6,9], the predominance of Na+ and Cl in the soil solution in irrigated areas is expected due to the low groundwater quality in the region. The predominance of ions in the soil solution was in the following order: Na+ > Cl > Ca2+ >Mg2+ > K+. The high concentration of these elements in the soil solution contributes to increasing the ionic strength of the soil solution and, consequently, its electrical conductivity [46].
Soil pH showed high variability between treatments in all soil layers. It ranged from 6.68 to 7.75, values above the ideal range for sorghum cultivation, which is 5.5 to 6.5 [47], but which are in line with expectations for salt-affected soils in semiarid regions [48]. This increase may be due to the imbalance in ionic composition resulting from excess Na+ and the presence of bicarbonates (5.70 mmolc L−1), which are also present in the water used for irrigation (Table 2) [49,50].
In general, applying Si alone or in combination promoted an increase in pH in some soil layers. Previous studies have demonstrated positive correlations between silicon and soil pH [51,52], as well as increases in soil pH in response to the application of silicon sources in the soil [31,53]. It occurs because OH ions are released during the dissolution of silicate fertilizers [54], contributing to an increase in soil pH. Ref. [55] further stated that the mineral Si has an alkaline nature, and its surface can easily transport exchangeable cations in large quantities and exchangeable H+ in small quantities, resulting in solid hydrolysis of exchangeable cations in the soil, which produces a high proportion of NaOH in the soil solution and increases soil pH.
Compared to the initial soil sample (Table 1), ESP increased between 200 and 400% in the soil layers across the three sorghum cuts. The soil was classified as saline-sodic [37], with an EC > 4 dS m−1 and a PST > 15%. Increased sodicity promotes physical deterioration of the soil, mainly affecting water infiltration into the soil and root penetration [56,57]. The soil used in this study is especially susceptible to salinization and sodification due to its finer texture (Table 1) [58,59]. However, despite the increase, the application of Si alone or combined allowed this increase in ESP to be smaller than the control treatment, mainly related to the decrease in Na+ in the soil sorptive complex and the increase in K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+.

4.2. Soluble and Sorptive Complex

Compared to the initial soil characterization (Table 1), there was a reduction in soluble K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+, while soluble Na+ increased by approximately 10 times in the soil layers along the sorghum cuts. This increase in Na+ levels is explained by its high concentration in the irrigation water used in this work. Thus, the components of the soluble fraction of the soil are quickly altered in areas using irrigation with saline water [60]. Furthermore, it is normal for nutrient ions to decrease over time due to the absorption of these nutrients by plants, especially K+, which sorghum absorbed in more significant quantities in this experiment.
Si applied alone was ineffective in increasing nutrient concentrations in the soil, since, in its composition, the only nutrient provided in addition to Si is K+. Still, it reduced the concentrations of Na+ and Cl in the soil, with the treatment which proved to be more effective in mitigating soil salinity when applied in combination with Trichoderma. Although there was a reduction in the levels of Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+ compared to the initial characterization of the soil, in general, the applied silicon combined with organic matter and Trichoderma (Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM) presented higher concentration values of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in the solution as well the soil sorption complex, compared to the control.
Adding organic matter can mitigate the effect of salts and improve plant growth, as it is a source of nutrients, increasing their availability, while also increasing water retention, improving soil structure, and increasing the bioactivity of microorganisms [61,62]. The action of Trichoderma may be associated with the fungus’ ability to increase the availability of nutrients in the soil through the secretion of organic acids into the root environment, as well as acting as a decomposer and mineralizer of OM, releasing the nutrients present in it more quickly [63,64,65,66].
In the soil exchange complex, the abundance of cations was in the following order: Ca2+ > Mg2+ > Na+ > K+. Ref. [9] observed the same sequence of cation abundance in cultivated soils in semiarid Brazil. Some cations are adsorbed more strongly to soil colloids, with this binding force being more significant the greater the charge on the ion and the smaller its hydrated radius [67]. Ca2+ and Mg2+ (present in high levels in irrigation water), because they have a greater charge (+2) and a smaller hydrated radius than Na and K (+1), are more easily retained in the soil exchange complex. Regarding Na+ and K+, although K+ has a smaller ionic radius, the high concentration of soluble Na+ in the soil solution causes it to become more adsorbed [68].
Concerning available P, treatments applying organic matter (S + OM and Si + T + OM) contributed most to its increase. Ref. [69] stated that the organic P present in OM can contribute to the long-term supply of P to crops through mineralization processes, so that organic P constitutes, on average, 25% of the total P in agricultural soils. It has also been demonstrated that the long-term application of organic fertilizer can improve soil P availability, reducing P sorption by competition or altered pH, accelerating the dissolution of soil metal oxides by organic acids, and promoting microbial P mineralization [70,71,72]. Additionally, Ref. [73] found that organic amendments can improve crop yield and phosphate fertilizer use efficiency by altering soil P fractions and increasing phosphatase activity. Similarly, Ref. [74] showed that combining organic and chemical fertilizers increased vegetable production and decreased total P leaching losses by >20%. In addition to increasing P availability and soil organic carbon (C), applying organic matter improves soil aggregation and environmental conditions for the soil microbial community, consequently improving SOM mineralization and nutrient cycling [75,76].

4.3. Ions Content at Plant Tissue Level

In sorghum plants, a higher content of K+ without Na+ was observed with the application of Si alone or in combination. In other crops, the isolated efficiency of Si, OM, and T in improving the absorption of K+ at the expense of Na+ has been proven, such as in spinach [77], fava beans [78], wheat [79], and in sorghum itself [18,80,81]. It may have occurred due to Si’s ability to increase the absorption of K+ at the expense of Na+, thus balancing the Na+/K+ ratio [19,20,82]. Furthermore, Si forms a silica barrier in the roots that reduces the passage of Na+ to the shoot [20,83]. This is supported by the results of this study, since Na+ was the cation absorbed the least by sorghum, despite its higher concentration in the soil solution. The accumulation of ions in the sorghum shoot followed the following order: K+ > Cl > Ca2+ > Mg2+ > Na+ > P.
Despite the low absorption of Na+ by plants, this behavior was not observed for the Cl content, which was high, second only to K+. Other authors observed the opposite effect, such that the application of Si reduced the absorption of Cl in different cultures. Si decreased Cl absorption in rice, while Cl concentration in roots was not changed [84]. Similar results were found in okra [85] and grapevine [86].
The greater absorption of Cl with the application of attenuators (Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM) did not negatively affect sorghum production, since these were the same treatments that obtained the highest fresh and dry mass production. The high K+ content in the plant may justify not affecting production, as potassium is an activator of many cytoplasmic enzymes necessary for photosynthesis and respiration [87]. Therefore, a deficiency in K+ suppresses photosynthesis and even reduces plant growth, while an increase in its absorption can alleviate the harmful effects of salinity [88]. Furthermore, K+ plays a vital role in maintaining and creating turgor pressure and adjusting plant water balance [87].
Applying Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM increased the K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and P content in the aerial part of sorghum plants. It can be explained by the ability of OM to improve soil fertility. As already reported, applying organic matter enhances soil aggregation, improving environmental conditions for the soil microbial community and consequently improving SOM mineralization and nutrient cycling [75,76]. Trichoderma, in addition to exuding organic acids, can solubilize nutrients, especially phosphates, assists in the mineralization of organic matter, improves soil fertility, and improves the efficiency of nutrient use by plants, consequently contributing to their growth [25,63,89]. Trichoderma spp. is also related to the production of phytohormones, such as auxins, that help plant growth [90]. Such substances favor cell elongation in higher plants and increase the surface of the root system, enabling greater access to soil nutrients [91,92].

4.4. Sorghum Yield and Water Use Efficiency

Isolated Si increased sorghum dry matter productivity by around 10%, and this gain may be mainly associated with the reduction in the EC of the saturation extract in this treatment. However, the EC of all treatments did not exceed the threshold salinity for forage sorghum (10 dS m−1) [93]. However, Si’s ability to reduce Na+ and Cl concentrations in the soil changes the ionic composition of the EC and reduces the toxicity caused by these ions [30,42]. The gain in productivity with combined Si (Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM) is associated with improvements in chemical attributes, soil fertility, and plant nutrition promoted by saline stress attenuators [19,94,95,96]. This study evidenced this by a reduction in toxic ions (Na+ and Cl) in the soil and an increase in nutrient ions (K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and P) in the soil and plant tissue using combined Si.
Trichoderma are recognized as synthesizers of phytohormones, such as auxin, and hormone-like compounds called harzianolide, substances that, together with auxin, act to expand the cell wall and increase biomass production by plants [97,98]. OM acts as a source of nutrients, soil conditioner, and food for the soil microbiota, and these characteristics improve fertility, soil aggregation, and nutrient cycling, thus promoting better nutrition and more significant biomass accumulation by sorghum [99,100]. The productivity obtained in this study is compatible with that found even when forage sorghum is irrigated with good-quality water [101,102,103].
Regarding WUE, in the bibliography, we found positive results on the efficiency of Si [104,105], OM [106,107], and T [108,109] in improving WUE. It is known that T increases root growth [110,111], and as a result, a greater area of soil is explored by the roots, resulting in better absorption and efficiency in the use of water by sorghum. Ref. [112] reported that Trichoderma increased sorghum root biomass by 50% under salinity. T also acts on stomatal regulation, thus reducing water loss and improving WUE [108]. Meanwhile, OM promotes greater water retention in the soil (irrigation + rain), increasing available water and its absorption by sorghum [113]. Si mainly contributes by adjusting nutritional imbalances, the photosynthetic system, and antioxidant mechanisms, factors associated with WUE [104].

5. Conclusions

Due to the soil in this study being, in particular, more susceptible to salinization and sodification due to its finer texture, the chemical quality of the soil deteriorated over time (>EC, ESP, Na+ and Cl), making this type of soil unsuitable for irrigation with saline water. However, the applications of salt stress attenuators used in this study caused this increase in salinity parameters to be reduced in comparison with the control treatment. This way, the risk of degradation and loss of the soil’s productive capacity using mitigating agents is lower. The association of silicon with organic matter and Trichoderma harzianum increases the concentration of soluble K+ in the soil and the content of this element in plants. In this sense, plants’ tolerance to salinity is increased, since K+ participates in several critical metabolic processes in plants, alleviating the harmful effects of salinity. In general, the tested combinations improve plant nutrition by increasing the absorption of K+, P, Ca2+, and Mg2+ and, consequently, increasing the tolerance of forage sorghum to saline stress. In general, plants subjected to combined Si were better nourished and exposed to greater soil water retention and lower concentrations of toxic ions (Na+ and Cl). Thus, productive capacity and WUE were improved. Therefore, agricultural practices with combined Si management (Si + T, Si + OM, and Si + T + OM) are essential for semiarid regions, as they favor the development of forage sorghum and allow the use of saline waters common to these regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.O.N.d.S., L.G.M.P. and E.M.d.S.; methodology, J.O.N.d.S., L.G.M.P. and M.B.G.d.S.F.; field work and laboratory analyses, J.O.N.d.S. and L.R.d.S.; data curation, E.S.d.S. and S.L.F.-S.; writing—original draft, J.O.N.d.S., L.G.M.P. and E.M.d.S.; writing—review and editing, T.G.F.d.S. and J.G.E.d.F.; supervision, E.L.d.N.A.; funding acquisition, L.G.M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPQ) obtained through the Call CNPq/MCTI/FNDCT n° 18/2021 (UNIVERSAL), Track A—Emerging Groups (Project Number: 409937/2021-5).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Corwin, D.L. Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2021, 72, 842–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haj-Amor, Z.; Bouri, S. Use of HYDRUS-1D–GIS tool for evaluating effects of climate changes on soil salinization and irrigation management. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2020, 66, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mukhopadhyay, R.; Sarkar, B.; Jat, H.S.; Sharma, P.C.; Bolan, N.S. Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shao, H.; Chu, L.; Lu, H.; Qi, W.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Kuang, S.; Tang, B.; Wong, V. Towards sustainable agriculture for the salt-affected soil. L. Degrad. Dev. 2019, 30, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lima, A.O.; Lima-Filho, F.P.; Dias, N.S.; Chipana-Rivera, R.; Ferreira Neto, M.; Souza, A.M.; Rego, P.R.A.; Fernandes, C.S. Variation of the water table and salinity in alluvial aquifers of underground dams in the semi-arid region of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Biosci. J. 2019, 35, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fernandes, J.G.; Freire, M.B.G.S.; Cunha, J.C.; Galvíncio, J.D.; Correia, M.M.; Santos, P.R. Qualidade físico-química das águas utilizadas no Perímetro Irrigado Cachoeira II, Serra Talhada, Pernambuco. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Agrár.–Braz. J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 4, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lessa, C.I.N.; Lacerda, C.F.; Cajazeiras, C.C.D.A.; Neves, A.L.R.; Lopes, F.B.; Silva, A.O.; Souza, H.C.; Gheyi, H.R.; Nogueira, R.S.; Lima, S.C.R.V.; et al. Potential of Brackish Groundwater for Different Biosaline Agriculture Systems in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region. Agriculture 2023, 13, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pessoa, L.G.M.; Freire, M.B.G.D.S.; Wilcox, B.P.; Green, C.H.M.; Araújo, R.J.T.; Filho, J.C.D.A. Spectral reflectance characteristics of soils in northeastern Brazil as influenced by salinity levels. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pessoa, L.G.M.; Freire, M.B.G.S.; Green, C.H.M.; Miranda, M.F.A.; Filho, J.C.A.; Pessoa, W.R.L.S. Assessment of soil salinity status under different land-use conditions in the semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 141, 109139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, A.Y.A.; Ibrahim, M.E.H.; Zhou, G.; Zhu, G.; Elsiddig, A.M.I.; Suliman, M.S.E.; Elradi, S.B.M.; Salah, E.G.I. Interactive impacts of soil salinity and jasmonic acid and humic acid on growth parameters, forage yield and photosynthesis parameters of sorghum plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 146, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saadat, S.; Homaee, M. Modeling sorghum response to irrigation water salinity at early growth stage. Agric. Water Manag. 2015, 152, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Parihar, P.; Singh, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4056–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xie, Z.; Song, R.; Shao, H.; Song, F.; Xu, H.; Lu, Y. Silicon improves maize photosynthesis in saline-alkaline soils. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 245072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ji, X.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J. Effects of Salt Stress on the Morphology, Growth and Physiological Parameters of Juglansmicrocarpa L. Seedlings. Plants 2022, 11, 2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dehnavi, A.R.; Zahedi, M.; Ludwiczak, A.; Perez, S.C.; Piernik, A. Effect of Salinity on Seed Germination and Seedling Development of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Genotypes. Agronomy 2020, 10, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pessoa, L.G.M.; Silva, L.F.D.S.; Freire, M.B.G.D.S.; Ferreira-Silva, S.L.; Green, C.H.M.; Melo, H.F.; Fernandes, J.G.; Freire, F.J. Effectiveness of soil conditioners to enhance salt extraction ability of Salicornia ramosissima in saline-sodic soil for different soil moisture contents. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2022, 24, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Silva, M.M.A.; Pessoa, L.G.M.; Simplício, J.B.; Souza, W.L.D.S.; Freire, M.B.G.D.S.; Souza, E.S.; Santos, E.S.; Miranda, M.F.A.; Junior, C.C.P. Soil conditioners as candidates to mitigate salt/water stress effects on sorghum growth and soil properties. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2021, 15, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hurtado, A.C.; Chiconato, D.A.; Prado, R.M.; Junior, G.D.S.S.; Gratao, P.L.; Felisberto, G.; Viciedo, D.O.; Santos, D.M.M. Different methods of silicon application attenuate salt stress in sorghum and sunflower by modifying the antioxidative defense mechanism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 110964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yin, L.; Wang, S.; Tanaka, K.; Fujihara, S.; Itai, A.; Den, X.; Zhang, S. Silicon-mediated changes in polyamines participate in silicon-induced salt tolerance in Sorghum bicolor L. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dhiman, P.; Rajora, N.; Bhardwaj, S.; Sudhakaran, S.S.; Kumar, A.; Raturi, G.; Chakraborty, K.; Guspta, O.P.; Devana, B.N.; Tripathi, D.K.; et al. Fascinating role of silicon to combat salinity stress in plants: An updated overview. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdolzadeh, A.; Zarooshan, M.; Sadeghipour, H.R.; Mehrabanjoubani, P. Effect of silicon and nano silicon application on wheat (C3) and sorghum (C4) under salinity stress. J. Plant Prod. Res. 2022, 29, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, Y.; Gong, H. Beneficial effects of silicon on salt and drought tolerance in plants. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 34, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumari, R.; Bhatnagar, S.; Mehla, N.; Vashistha, A. Potential of organic amendments (AM fungi, PGPR, vermicompost and seaweeds) in combating salt stress: A Review. Plant Stress 2022, 6, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miranda, M.F.A.; Freire, M.B.G.S.; Almeida, B.G.; Freire, F.J.; Pessoa, L.G.M.; Freire, A.G. Phytodesalination and chemical and organic conditioners to recover the chemical properties of saline-sodic soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2021, 85, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, K. Saline–alkaline stress in growing maize seedlings is alleviated by Trichoderma asperellum through regulation of the soil environment. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Saravanakumar, K.; Arasu, V.S.; Kathiresan, K. Effect of Trichoderma on soil phosphate solubilization and growth improvement of Avicennia marina. Aquat. Bot. 2013, 104, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Huqail, A.A.A.; Egamberdieva, D. Alleviation of abiotic salt stress in Ochradenus baccatus (Del.) by Trichoderma hamatum (Bonord.) Bainier. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, F.; Ge, H.; Tian, F.; Yang, T.; Zhang, Y. Trichoderma harzianum mitigates salt stress in cucumber via multiple responses. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cruz, J.L.; Coelho, E.F.; Coelho Filho, M.A.; Santos, A.A. Salinity reduces nutrients absorption and efficiency of their utilization in cassava plants. Ciência Rural 2018, 48, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hoffmann, J.; Berni, R.; Hausman, J.F.; Guerriero, G. A review on the beneficial role of silicon against salinity in non-accumulator crops: Tomato as a model. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Greger, M.; Landberg, T.; Vaculík, M. Silicon influences soil availability and accumulation of mineral nutrients in various plant species. Plants 2018, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rodrigues, A.C.F.; Rodrigues, E.S.C.; Silva, W.G.; Galvão, S.R.S. Classificação da precipitação pluviométrica anual para o município de Parnamirim—PE utilizando Índice de Anomalia de Chuva (IAC). Rev. Semiárido Visu 2019, 7, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Embrapa. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos; Centro Nac.: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  34. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrig. Drain. Pap. 1998, 56, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Richards, L.A. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1954, 18, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Freitas, G.A.; Sousa, C.R.; Capone, A.; Afférri, F.S.; Silva, R.R. Adubação orgânica no sulco de plantio e sua influência no desenvolvimento do sorgo. J. Biotechnol. Biodivers. 2012, 3, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. USSL. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Olsen, S.R.; Cole, C.; Watanabe, F.; Dean, L. Estimation of Available Phosphorous in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate; US Department: Washington, DC, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
  39. Silva, M.M.A.; Santos, H.R.B.; Silva, E.N.; Neto, J.B.; Hermínio, P.J.; Ramalho, T.L.; Nunes, V.G.; Simões, A.N.; Souza, E.S.; Ferreira-Silva, S.L. Higher control of Na+ and Cl− transport to the shoot along with K+/Na+ selectivity is determinant for differential salt resistance in grapevine rootstocks. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 5713–5726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Embrapa. Manual de Análises Químicas de Solos. Plantas e Fertilizantes; Embrapa Informação Tecnológica: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  41. Queiroz, G.C.M.; Medeiros, J.F.; Silva, R.R.; Morais, F.M.S.; Sousa, L.V.; Souza, M.V.P.; Santos, E.N.; Ferreira, F.N.; Silva, J.M.C.; Clemente, M.I.B.; et al. Growth, solute accumulation, and ion distribution in sweet sorghum under salt and drought stresses in a Brazilian Potiguar semiarid área. Agriculture 2023, 13, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khan, I.; Awan, S.A.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Hassan, M.J.; Brestic, M.; Zhang, X.; Huang, L. Effects of silicon on heavy metal uptake at the soil-plant interphase: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 222, 112510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, B.; Chu, C.; Wei, H.; Zhang, L.; Ahmad, Z.; Wu, S.; Xie, B. Ameliorative effects of silicon fertilizer on soil bacterial community and pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) grown on soil contaminated with multiple heavy metals. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 267, 115411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Véras, M.L.M.; Alves, L.S.; Silva, T.I.; Silva, I.N.; Costa, A.S.D.N.; Melo, E.N.; Cordovil, H.P.L.; Dantas, A.P.J.; Souza, N.A.; Dias, T.J. Silicon as mitigator of salt stress in mango tree seedlings. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2021, 15, 1146–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rizwan, A.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Rizwan, M.; Usman, M.; Anayatullah, S.; Alharby, H.F.; Bamagoos, A.A.; Alharbi, B.M.; Ali, S. Effects of silicon nanoparticles and conventional Si amendments on growth and nutrient accumulation by maize (Zea mays L.) grown in saline-sodic soil. Environ. Res. 2023, 227, 115740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Black, A.S.; Campbell, A.S. Ionic strength of soil solution and its effect on charge properties of some New Zealand soils. J. Soil Sci. 1982, 33, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ramírez-Jaramillo, G.; Lozano-Contreras, M.G.; Ramírez-Silva, J.H. Agroclimatic conditions for growing Sorghum bicolor L. Moench, under irrigation conditions in Mexico. OALib 2020, 7, 100813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Negacz, K.; Malek, Ž.; Vos, A.; Vellinga, P. Saline soils worldwide: Identifying the most promising areas for saline agriculture. J. Arid Environ. 2022, 203, 104775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Whalen, J.K.; Chang, C.; Clayton, G.W.; Carefoot, J.P. Cattle manure amendments can increase the pH of acid soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64, 962–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Yao, R.; Wang, X.; Xie, W. Short-term effects of biochar and gypsum on soil hydraulic properties and sodicity in a saline-alkali soil. Pedosphere 2020, 30, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miles, N.; Manson, A.D.; Rhodes, R.; van Antwerpen, R.; Weigel, A. Extractable Silicon in Soils of the South African Sugar Industry and Relationships with Crop Uptake. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2014, 45, 2949–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yanai, J.; Taniguchi, H.; Nakao, A. Evaluation of available silicon content and its determining factors of agricultural soils in Japan. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 62, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Camargo, M.S.; Pereira, H.S.; Korndörfer, G.H.; Queiroz, A.A.; Reis, C.B. Soil reaction and absorption of silicon by rice. Sci. Agric. 2007, 64, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Haynes, R.J. What effect does liming have on silicon availability in agricultural soils? Geoderma 2019, 337, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, C.; Ci, K.; Zhu, J.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, C.; Wang, P.; Liu, Z. Impacts of exogenous mineral silicon on cadmium migration and transformation in the soil-rice system and on soil health. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 143501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Freire, M.B.G.S.; Ruiz, H.A.; Ribeiro, M.R.; Ferreira, P.A.; Alvarez, V.H.; Freire, F.J. Estimativa do risco de sodificação de solos de Pernambuco pelo uso de águas salinas. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2003, 7, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Minhas, P.S.; Qadir, M.; Yadav, R.K. Groundwater irrigation induced soil sodification and response options. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 215, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pessoa, L.G.M.; Freire, M.B.G.S.; Filho, J.C.A.; Santos, P.R.; Miranda, M.F.A.; Freire, F.J. Characterization and classification of halomorphic soils in the semiarid region of northeastern Brazil. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 11, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Silva, M.O.; Freire, M.B.G.S.; Mendes, A.M.S.; Freire, F.J.; Duda, G.P.; Sousa, C.E.S. Risco de salinização em quatro solos do Rio Grande do Norte sob irrigação com águas salinas. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Agrár.–Braz. J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 2, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, P.; Liu, S.; Yang, H.; Fan, G.; Zhou, D. Short-term land use conversions influence the profile distribution of soil salinity and sodicity in northeastern China. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 88, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Feng, X.; Zhang, L. Vermiculite and humic acid improve the quality of green waste compost as a growth medium for Centaurea cyanus L. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 101945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, X.; Zhang, L. The effectiveness of composted green waste amended with vermiculite and humic acid powders as an alternative cultivation substrate for cornflower cultivation. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2021, 52, 2945–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ikram, M.; Ali, N.; Jan, G.; Iqbal, A.; Hamayun, M.; Jan, F.G.; Hussain, A.; Lee, I.J. Trichoderma reesei improved the nutrition status of wheat crop under salt stress. J. Plant Interact. 2019, 14, 590–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kusumawati, R.; Pangestu, H.E.; Basmal, J. Effect of Trichoderma addition on sargassum organic fertilizer. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 715, 012059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pratiwi, V.; Oktarina, H.; Sriwati, R. The potential of Trichoderma spp. and Pseudomonas auregenosa as patchouli waste decomposer. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 667, 012019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pelagio-Flores, R.; Esparza-Reynoso, S.; Garnica-Vergara, A.; López-Bucio, J.; Herrera-Estrella, A. Trichoderma-induced acidification is an early trigger for changes in arabidopsis root growth and determines fungal phytostimulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Batista, M.A.; Inoue, T.T.; Esper Neto, M.; Muniz, A.S. Princípios de fertilidade do solo, adubação e nutrição mineral. In Hortaliças-Fruto; EDUEM: Maringá, Brazil, 2018; pp. 113–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Carneiro, C.E.A.; Fioretto, R.A.; Fonseca, I.C.B.; Carneiro, G.E.S. Calcário, potássio, fosfato e silício na produtividade do solo. Acta Sci. Agron. 2006, 28, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Stutter, M.I.; Shand, C.A.; George, T.S.; Blackwell, M.S.; Dixon, L.; Bol, R.; MacKay, R.L.; Richardson, A.E.; Condron, L.M.; Haygarth, P.M. Land use and soil factors affecting accumulation of phosphorus species in temperate soils. Geoderma 2015, 258, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hunt, J.F.; Ohno, T.; He, Z.; Honeycutt, C.W.; Dail, D.B. Inhibition of phosphorus sorption to goethite, gibbsite, and kaolin by fresh and decomposed organic matter. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2007, 44, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yan, X.; Wang, D.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, G.; Wei, Z. Organic amendments affect phosphorus sorption characteristics in a paddy soil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 175, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bi, Q.-F.; Li, K.J.; Zheng, B.X.; Liu, X.P.; Li, H.Z.; Jin, B.J.; Ding, K.; Yang, X.; Lin, X.Y.; Zhu, Y.G. Partial replacement of inorganic phosphorus (P) by organic manure reshapes phosphate mobilizing bacterial community and promotes P bioavailability in a paddy soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 134977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Qaswar, M.; Chai, R.; Ahmed, W.; Jing, H.; Han, T.; Liu, K.; Zhang, H. Partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic amendments increased rice yield by changing phosphorus fractions and improving phosphatase activities in fluvo-aquic soil. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 1285–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, Y.; Gao, W.; Luan, H.; Tang, J.; Li, R.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Huang, S. Long-term organic substitution management affects soil phosphorus speciation and reduces leaching in greenhouse vegetable production. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 327, 129464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lin, Y.; Ye, G.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Liu, D.; Fan, J.; Ding, W. Long-term manure application increases soil organic matter and aggregation, and alters microbial community structure and keystone taxa. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 134, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ding, L.-J.; Su, J.-Q.; Sun, G.-X.; Wu, J.-S.; Wei, W.-X. Increased microbial functional diversity under long-term organic and integrated fertilization in a paddy soil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 1969–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kong, F.; Ling, X.; Iqbal, B.; Zhou, Z.; Meng, Y. Integrated usage of Trichoderma harzianum and biochar to ameliorate salt stress on spinach plants. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2021, 69, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. El-Baki, G.A.; Mostafa, D. The potentiality of Trichoderma harzianum in alleviation the adverse effects of salinity in faba bean plants. Acta Biol. Hung. 2014, 65, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Tuna, A.L.; Kaya, C.; Higgs, D.; Murillo-Amador, B.; Aydemir, S.; Girgin, A.R. Silicon improves salinity tolerance in wheat plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 62, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, D.; Cao, B.; Wang, S.; Liu, P.; Deng, X.; Yin, L.; Zhang, S. Silicon moderated the K deficiency by improving the plant-water status in sorghum. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hurtado, A.C.; Chiconato, D.A.; Prado, R.M.; Sousa Junior, G.S.; Felisberto, G. Silicon attenuates sodium toxicity by improving nutritional efficiency in sorghum and sunflower plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 142, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hurtado, A.C.; Chiconato, D.A.; Prado, R.M.; Sousa Junior, G.S.; Viciedo, D.O.; Díaz, Y.P.; Calzada, K.P.; Gratão, P.L. Silicon alleviates sodium toxicity in sorghum and sunflower plants by enhancing ionic homeostasis in roots and shoots and increasing dry matter accumulation. Silicon 2021, 13, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yin, L.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Tanaka, K.; Oka, M. Application of silicon improves salt tolerance through ameliorating osmotic and ionic stresses in the seedling of Sorghum bicolor. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 3099–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Flowers, T.J.; Gong, H. Silicon decreases chloride transport in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Abbas, T.; Balal, R.M.; Shahid, M.A.; Pervez, M.A.; Ayyub, C.M.; Aqueel, M.A.; Javaid, M.M. Silicon-induced alleviation of NaCl toxicity in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) is associated with enhanced photosynthesis, osmoprotectants and antioxidant metabolism. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Soylemezoglu, G.; Demir, K.; Inal, A.; Gunes, A. Effect of silicon on antioxidant and stomatal response of two grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) rootstocks grown in boron toxic, saline and boron toxic-saline soil. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 123, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Karimi, G.; Pourakbar, L.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Danesh, Y.R.; Djordjevi’c, J.P. Effectiveness of fungal bacterial biofertilizers on agrobiochemical attributes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) under salinity stress. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 11989–12002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shabala, S.; Cuin, T.A. Potassium transport and plant salt tolerance. Physiol. Plant 2008, 133, 651–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Wang, L.; Sun, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, W.; Zhai, P. Application of organic amendments to a coastal saline soil in north China: Effects on soil physical and chemical properties and tree growth. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Carvalho, D.D.C.; Mello, S.C.M.; Lobo Júnior, M.; Silva, M.C. Controle de Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. phaseoli in vitro e em sementes, e promoção do crescimento inicial do feijoeiro comum por Trichoderma harzianum. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2011, 36, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bortolin, G.S.; Wiethan, M.M.S.; Vey, R.T.; Oliveira, J.C.P.; Köpp, M.M.; Silva, A.C.F. Trichoderma na promoção do desenvolvimento de plantas de Paspalum regnellii Mez. Rev. Ciênc. Agrár. 2019, 42, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kakabouki, I.; Tataridas, A.; Mavroeidis, A.; Kousta, A.; Karydogianni, S.; Zisi, C.; Kouneli, V.; Konstantinou, A.; Folina, A.; Konstantas, A.; et al. Effect of colonization of Trichoderma harzianum on growth development and CBD content of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Microorganisms 2021, 9, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco (IPA). Sorgo Sudão: Sudão 4202—Cultivar Tolerante a Salinidade e Com Aptidão Para Feno. 2007. Available online: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/487334 (accessed on 15 October 2023).
  94. Aishwarya, S.; Viswanath, H.S.; Singh, A.; Singh, R. Biosolubilization of different nutrients by Trichoderma spp. and their mechanisms involved: A review. Int. J. Adv. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2020, 7, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  95. Naveed, M.; Sajid, H.; Mustafa, A.; Niamat, B.; Ahmad, Z.; Yaseen, M.; Kamram, M.; Rafique, M.; Ahmar, S.; Chen, J.T. Alleviation of salinity-induced oxidative stress, improvement in growth, physiology and mineral nutrition of canola (Brassica napus L.) through calcium-fortified composted animal manure. Sustainability 2020, 12, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sousa, R.A.; Lacerda, C.F.; Neves, A.L.R.; Costa, R.N.T.; Hernandez, F.F.F.; Sousa, C.H.C. Crescimento do sorgo em função da irrigação com água salobra e aplicação de compostos orgânicos. Rev. Bras. Agric. Irrig. 2018, 12, 2315–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cai, F.; Yu, G.; Wang, P.; Wei, Z.; Fu, L.; Shen, Q.; Chen, W. Harzianolide, a novel plant growth regulator and systemic resistance elicitor from Trichoderma harzianum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 73, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Rajesh, R.W.; Rahul, M.S.; Ambalal, N.S. Trichoderma: A significant fungus for agriculture and environment. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 11, 1952–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Klepper, K.; Ahmad, R.; Blair, G. Impact of feedlot manure and nitrogen additions on forage yields, nutrient balance and soil nitrate, phosphate and salinity. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2020, 51, 2658–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yang, R.; Sun, Z.; Liu, X.; Long, X.; Gao, L.; Shen, Y. Biomass composite with exogenous organic acid addition supports the growth of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor ‘Dochna’) by reducing salinity and increasing nutrient levels in coastal saline–alkaline soil. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1163195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cunha, E.E.; Lima, J.M.P. Caracterização de genótipos e estimativa de parâmetros genéticos de características produtivas de sorgo forrageiro. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Oliveira, L.B.; Pires, A.J.V.; Viana, A.E.S.; Matsumoto, S.N.; Carvalho, G.G.P.; Ribeiro, L.S.O. Produtividade, composição química e características agronômicas de diferentes forrageiras. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39, 2604–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rodrigues, C.R.; Comassetto, D.S.; Dornelles, R.R.; Rosa, F.Q.; Oaigen, R.P.; Castagnara, D.D.; Valle, T.A.; Azevedo, E.B. Produção, composição bromatológica e fenológica de forrageiras estivais na Região Sul do Brasil. Agrarian 2020, 13, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Alayafi, A.H.; Al-Solaimani, S.G.M.; El-Wahed, M.H.A.; Alghabari, F.M.; El Sabagh, A. Silicon supplementation enhances productivity, water use efficiency and salinity tolerance in maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 953451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Khan, W.; Aziz, T.; Hussain, I.; Ramzani, P.M.A.; Reichenauer, T.G. Silicon: A beneficial nutrient for maize crop to enhance photochemical efficiency of photosystem II under salt stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 63, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, X.; Nie, J.; Wang, P.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zang, H. Does the replacement of chemical fertilizer nitrogen by manure benefit water use efficiency of winter wheat—Summer maize systems? Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 243, 106428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, X.; Yan, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y. Organic manure input improves soil water and nutrients use for sustainable maize (Zea mays. L) productivity on the Loess Plateau. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Oljira, A.M.; Hussain, T.; Waghmode, T.R.; Zhao, H.; Sun, H.; Liu, X.; Liu, B. Trichoderma enhances net photosynthesis, water use efficiency, and growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Pereira, T.S.; Paula, A.M.; Ferrari, L.H.; Silva, J.; Pinheiro, J.B.; Cajamarca, S.M.N.; Busato, J.G. Trichoderma-inriched vermicompost extracts reduces nematode biotic stress in tomato and bell pepper crops. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Scudeletti, D.; Crusciol, C.A.C.; Bossolani, J.W.; Moretti, L.G.; Momesso, L.; Tubana, B.S.; Hungria, M. Trichoderma asperellum inoculation as a tool for attenuating drought stress in sugarcane. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 645542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sousa, T.P.; Chaibub, A.A.; Silva, G.B.; Filippi, M.C.C. Trichoderma asperellum modulates defense genes and potentiates gas exchanges in upland rice plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 112, 101561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cabral-Miramontes, J.P.; Olmedo-Monfil, V.; Lara-Banda, M.; Zúñiga-Romo, E.R.; Aréchiga-Carvajal, E.T. Promotion of plant growth in arid zones by selected Trichoderma spp. strains with adaptation plasticity to alkaline pH. Biology 2022, 11, 1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ahmed, B.A.O.; Inoue, M.; Moritani, S. Effect of saline water irrigation and manure application on the available water content, soil salinity, and growth of wheat. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the experimental field in Parnamirim (PE), a semiarid region of Brazil.
Figure 1. Location of the experimental field in Parnamirim (PE), a semiarid region of Brazil.
Agriculture 13 02146 g001
Figure 2. Meteorological conditions in the municipality of Parnamirim (PE) during the experimental period. ID—irrigation depth (mm day−1); ETo—reference evapotranspiration (mm day−1).
Figure 2. Meteorological conditions in the municipality of Parnamirim (PE) during the experimental period. ID—irrigation depth (mm day−1); ETo—reference evapotranspiration (mm day−1).
Agriculture 13 02146 g002
Figure 3. Mean values of the saline variables: electrical conductivity—EC (A), soil pH (B), and exchangeable sodium percent—ESP (C) at depths of 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm for each cut, depending on the tested saline attenuator. Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05. Si = silicon; Si + OM = silicon + organic matter; Si + T = silicon + Trichoderma harzianum; Si + OM + T = silicon + organic matter + Trichoderma harzianum.
Figure 3. Mean values of the saline variables: electrical conductivity—EC (A), soil pH (B), and exchangeable sodium percent—ESP (C) at depths of 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm for each cut, depending on the tested saline attenuator. Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05. Si = silicon; Si + OM = silicon + organic matter; Si + T = silicon + Trichoderma harzianum; Si + OM + T = silicon + organic matter + Trichoderma harzianum.
Agriculture 13 02146 g003
Table 1. Chemical and textural characterization of soil in the experimental area.
Table 1. Chemical and textural characterization of soil in the experimental area.
Soil PropertySoil Layer (cm)
0–1010–2020–4040–60
Chemical property
pH6.056.096.166.32
OM (g kg−1)25.0819.3518.0011.75
P (mg dm−3)28.4019.7314.839.75
K+ (cmolc dm−3)0.510.340.240.14
Na+ (cmolc dm−3)0.300.370.520.82
Ca2+ (cmolc dm−3)9.068.548.799.98
Mg2+ (cmolc dm−3)5.295.405.215.53
H + Al (cmolc dm−3)0.960.890.760.60
SB (cmolc dm−3)15.1414.6514.9316.48
CEC (cmolc dm−3)16.1015.5415.6917.08
ESP (%)1.862.383.314.80
Saturation extract
EC (dS m−1)3.566.217.225.77
Ca2+ (mmolc L−1)31.8858.8860.4543.85
Mg2+ (mmolc L−1)12.0322.7825.1518.00
K+ (mmolc L−1)9.635.785.082.13
Na+ (mmolc L−1)5.589.4012.1813.15
SAR (mmolc L−1)1.201.501.832.23
Soil texture
Sand (%)14.2010.3011.3010.92
Silt (%)72.1275.6271.6275.48
Clay (%)13.6814.0817.0813.60
EC—electrical conductivity of saturation extract; pH—hydrogen potential; OM—organic matter; SB—sum of base; CEC—cation exchange capacity; ESP—exchangeable sodium percentage; SAR—sodium adsorption ratio.
Table 2. Chemical properties of irrigation water during the experimental period.
Table 2. Chemical properties of irrigation water during the experimental period.
pHECCa2+Mg2+K+Na+ClHCO3SO42−BCuFeMnZnSAR
dS m−1----------------- mmolc L−1 -------------------------- mg L−1 ---------mmolc L−0.5
7.233.129.299.230.1211.7326.385.700.760.110.020.020.030.203.85
pH—hydrogen potential; EC—electrical conductivity; SAR—sodium adsorption ratio.
Table 3. Characterization of goat manure used as an organic matter source in the experiment.
Table 3. Characterization of goat manure used as an organic matter source in the experiment.
DCNPK+Na+Ca2+Mg2+pHEC
g cm−3-------------------------------- g kg−1 --------------------------------- dS m−1
0.8158119.7017.908.704.501.1027.7010.207.871.87
D—density of manure; C—total organic carbon; N—total nitrogen; pH—hydrogen potential; EC—electrical conductivity.
Table 4. Soluble ions concentrations for each studied soil layer in response to the tested saline attenuator along the three sorghum cuts. Different letters in the line indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. Soluble ions concentrations for each studied soil layer in response to the tested saline attenuator along the three sorghum cuts. Different letters in the line indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Soil
Layer (cm)
Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3
CSiSi + OMSi + TSi + T
+ OM
CSiSi + OMSi + TSi + T
+ OM
CSiSi + OMSi + TSi + T
+ OM
K+ (mmolc L−1)
0–100.79 c0.51 d1.50 a0.97 b1.53 a0.67 b0.67 b0.76 b0.92 a0.94 a0.36 c0.44 c0.40 c0.56 a0.49 b
10–200.71 b0.64 b0.80 b0.65 b1.13 a0.31 b0.22 b0.34 b0.47 a0.31 b0.38 a0.24 b0.31 a0.32 a0.31 a
20–400.42 b0.45 b0.39 b0.49 b0.60 a0.35 a0.24 b0.29 b0.36 a0.25 b0.340.290.360.300.23
40–600.390.470.520.360.360.30 b0.28 b0.34 b0.64 a0.33 b0.40 a0.43 a0.33 b0.30 b0.29 b
Na+ (mmolc L−1)
0–10124.37 a84.69 b144.26 a90.22 b119.69 a133.57 a72.07 c107.30 b90.58 c83.41 c60.27 c48.98 d74.95 b86.12 a76.61 b
10–2077.42 b111.44 a95.03 b87.48 b90.82 b122.82 a98.4 b116.85 a94.76 b114.46 a103.56 a68.97 b80.24 b71.91 b113.73 a
20–4043.6250.4156.4142.2167.6281.03 a80.43 a62.52 b70.28 a55.95 b93.08 a74.95 b102.57 a63.46 b88.76 a
40–6046.34 c75.67 b57.83 c52.01 c99.85 a121.33 a63.12 b72.07 b61.32 b63.71 b51.22 b82.59 a52.51 b43.57 b57.58 b
Cl (mmolc L−1)
0–1064.58 a29.58 b88.75 a44.58 b73.75 a72.08 a20.00 b41.25 b44.58 b31.67 b13.33 c13.75 c27.92 a22.08 b32.08 a
10–2068.75 a56.25 b59.58 b44.58 c45.42 c53.75 a26.25 b45.42 a52.08 a52.92 a34.5820.6325.6339.5827.50
20–4041.2542.5030.4236.2542.0879.38 a37.92 c57.92 b59.58 b58.75 b50.42 a27.08 b56.25 a40.42 b29.17 b
40–6042.0842.9237.9231.2543.7598.33 a47.08 b52.08 b58.75 b46.25 b84.17 a44.17 b50.42 b27.08 c44.58 b
Ca2+ (mmolc L−1)
0–1023.36 b18.61 b39.50 a26.31 b43.30 a29.20 a13.19 b33.12 a25.09 a25.44 a10.54 b10.43 b16.93 a14.94 a18.77 a
10–2035.19 b29.75 b46.04 a23.14 b30.81 b24.50 b14.06 c32.72 a29.80 a23.98 b17.38 a11.11 b20.63 a19.18 a20.21 a
20–4031.4230.7533.6930.4335.7138.26 a23.79 b38.18 a42.91 a40.45 a26.81 a16.56 c31.28 a32.68 a22.85 b
40–6034.2838.2642.3032.2639.2860.73 a30.96 b37.45 b63.01 a42.03 b38.00 a28.54 a43.56 a19.64 b32.24 a
Mg2+ (mmolc L−1)
0–1012.07 b9.46 b31.87 a22.99 a24.11 a15.587.0812.5614.1510.485.10 c4.11 c9.05 a7.46 b9.55 a
10–2019.3416.9520.2716.4817.0613.77 b6.91 b11.08 b21.23 a13.60 b9.764.285.655.925.65
20–4017.6120.4116.9015.2218.6828.80 a14.32 b22.55 a16.95 b16.84 b13.28 a8.28 b16.95 a7.41 b12.29 a
40–6033.60 a28.36 a10.94 b15.99 b20.38 b23.2618.8215.6316.6220.5231.43 a14.43 b24.91 a9.66 b16.79 b
Si = silicon; Si + OM = silicon + organic matter; Si + T = silicon + Trichoderma harzianum; Si + OM + T = silicon + organic matter + Trichoderma harzianum.
Table 5. Ions concentrations in the exchange complex for each studied soil layer, in response to the tested saline attenuator along the three sorghum cuts. Different letters in the line indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 5. Ions concentrations in the exchange complex for each studied soil layer, in response to the tested saline attenuator along the three sorghum cuts. Different letters in the line indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Soil
Layer (cm)
Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3
CSiSi + OMSi + TSi + T
+ OM
CSiSi + OMSi + TSi + T
+ OM
CSiSi + OMSi + TSi + T
+ OM
K+ (cmolc kg−1)
0–101.141.541.351.111.380.79 c1.23 a1.01 b1.25 a1.03 b0.58 b0.96 a0.65 b0.74 b0.63 b
10–200.59 c0.60 c0.85 b0.69 c1.07 a0.45 b0.35 b0.54 b0.77 a0.69 a0.420.290.410.430.45
20–400.35 a0.26 b0.28 b0.24 b0.33 a0.310.260.260.370.350.220.240.210.210.21
40–600.210.220.190.210.260.33 a0.23 b0.26 b0.37 a0.23 b0.210.220.140.210.24
Na+ (cmolc kg−1)
0–106.236.026.345.526.966.51 a5.93 b6.02 b5.90 b6.07 b5.635.195.255.395.39
10–205.026.024.765.415.296.867.006.706.667.227.16 a5.16 b6.83 a5.77 b6.93 a
20–403.443.533.623.293.944.945.125.033.875.266.15 a5.51 b5.48 b5.63 b6.21 a
40–603.654.353.623.504.124.80 a4.88 a4.33 a3.38 b4.62 a4.254.103.643.754.19
Ca2+ (cmolc kg−1)
0–1014.79 b15.31 b18.67 a14.19 b16.12 b18.12 b16.52 b18.23 b19.45 b22.79 a18.21 b17.88 b18.72 a16.78 c19.30 a
10–2015.2815.4115.8415.1316.0517.4116.7416.1816.7517.0916.3816.0416.5916.5616.08
20–4016.75 b16.47 b18.67 a18.00 a19.20 a18.0718.6118.2918.3119.4716.3816.8116.4916.4917.16
40–6020.52 a19.70 a17.08 b17.96 b19.68 a19.3218.3420.1220.0419.4518.0217.2517.2117.5217.44
Mg2+ (cmolc kg−1)
0–109.85 b9.02 c11.04 a9.90 b10.93 a9.06 b8.29 c8.73 b8.73 b10.49 a13.34 a12.49 b12.92 b12.57 b13.32 a
10–2010.2010.3410.9510.3110.868.73 a8.84 a8.91 a8.27 b9.17 a12.90 a13.21 a12.95 a11.70 b13.19 a
20–4012.00 a9.87 b11.96 a9.17 b9.39 b9.159.309.619.469.9011.85 b12.16 b13.30 a11.78 b12.81 a
40–6013.25 a13.03 a11.56 b12.42 a11.28 b11.8111.0210.539.8111.0413.9814.6412.7512.5513.69
P (mg kg−1)
0–1045.72 b56.19 b123.17 a43.10 b113.66 a38.14 c44.79 c97.20 b40.63 c148.32 a42.16 b32.29 b81.07 a38.60 b70.40 a
10–2035.52 c42.11 c52.67 b38.41 c69.87 a23.8734.4237.2139.0647.8626.94 c35.57 b41.96 a28.16 c44.73 a
20–4024.4325.8126.7727.7424.8424.6323.0325.2128.0831.6230.97 a23.09 b34.92 a23.87 b20.92 b
40–6023.3430.1324.8721.5828.8517.10 c26.42 b21.18 c32.56 a26.42 b30.1821.0621.6227.5326.77
Si = silicon; Si + OM = silicon + organic matter; Si + T = silicon + Trichoderma harzianum; Si + OM + T = silicon + organic matter + Trichoderma harzianum.
Table 6. Ions content in each part of the plant and all plant shoots, in response to the tested saline attenuator for the three sorghum cuts. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 6. Ions content in each part of the plant and all plant shoots, in response to the tested saline attenuator for the three sorghum cuts. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
TreatmentNa+ (g)K+ (g)Cl (g)P (mg)Ca2+ (g)Mg2+ (g)
Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3
Leaves
Control0.050.15 a0.060.78 b0.670.360.410.320.31 a33.8443.73 a27.09 c0.20 b0.220.16 b0.13 b0.10 c0.09
Si0.070.06 b0.040.90 b0.480.300.440.240.24 b44.4732.49 b30.44 b0.26 a0.240.21 a0.18 a0.12 c0.10
Si + OM0.060.08 b0.050.85 b0.570.410.380.300.22 b41.2748.72 a23.93 c0.21 b0.240.22 a0.17 a0.11 c0.10
Si + T0.060.10 b0.070.84 b0.640.380.360.370.23 b46.7943.16 a25.05 c0.27 a0.260.23 a0.18 a0.13 b0.11
Si + OM + T0.060.10 b0.051.06 a0.630.390.520.340.30 a47.9245.66 a34.01 a0.28 a0.290.25 a0.20 a0.15 a0.13
Stems
Control0.16 b0.22 b0.072.65 b2.110.86 b2.07 a1.140.82 b23.7541.4224.33 b0.21 a0.22 b0.21 b0.22 a0.23 a0.21
Si0.11 b0.19 b0.142.72 b2.191.68 a1.47 b1.321.06 b16.9435.9953.85 a0.15 b0.18 b0.20 b0.15 b0.17 b0.23
Si + OM0.21 b0.30 b0.173.75 a2.931.82 a2.07 a1.191.32 a31.0356.9241.75 b0.22 a0.20 b0.28 a0.25 a0.20 b0.26
Si + T0.32 a0.80 a0.154.16 a2.351.92 a2.21 a1.731.27 a19.9956.9964.87 a0.21 a0.30 a0.26 a0.20 a0.25 a0.27
Si + OM + T0.17 b0.39 b0.123.22 b2.821.79 a2.14 a1.461.30 a24.3360.5467.31 a0.23 a0.29 a0.27 a0.23 a0.29 a0.28
Panicles
Control0.020.020.01 0.15 b0.140.05 c0.050.020.036.52 c14.365.310.01 c0.02 c0.03 c0.03 c0.02 b0.02 c
Si0.030.030.01 0.19 b0.130.04 c0.100.040.0312.01 b11.263.160.02 b0.04 b0.06 b0.05 b0.04 b0.04 b
Si + OM0.050.020.02 0.42 a0.140.10 a0.110.040.0618.60 a13.059.850.04 a0.06 a0.09 a0.09 a0.06 a0.07 a
Si + T0.050.030.01 0.27 b0.130.04 c0.110.020.0420.38 a15.215320.03 b0.06 a0.06 b0.06 a0.06 a0.06 a
Si + OM + T0.060.020.010.35 a0.140.07 b0.100.030.0720.02 a12.7212.240.03 a0.06 a0.07 b0.07 a0.06 a0.07 a
Plant shoot
Control0.230.38 b0.143.58 b2.931.28 b2.541.491.16 b64.11 b99.50 b56.73 c0.42 c0.46 b0.40 b0.37 c0.35 b0.31 b
Si0.210.28 b0.183.82 b2.792.03 a2.021.601.33 b73.41 b79.74 b87.45 b0.44 c0.47 b0.46 b0.38 c0.33 b0.38 b
Si + OM0.320.40 b0.245.02 a3.642.33 a2.571.531.61 a90.91 a118.69 a75.53 c0.48 b0.49 b0.59 a0.51 a0.38 b0.43 a
Si + T0.430.93 a0.235.26 a3.122.35 a2.672.121.54 a87.16 a115.36 a95.25 b0.51 a0.62 a0.56 a0.44 b0.44 a0.43 a
Si + OM + T0.300.51 b0.194.63 a3.602.25 a2.761.831.66 a92.27 a118.93 a113.55 a0.55 a0.64 a0.59 a0.50 a0.49 a0.47 a
Si = silicon; Si + OM = silicon + organic matter; Si + T = silicon + Trichoderma harzianum; Si + OM + T = silicon + organic matter + Trichoderma harzianum.
Table 7. Mean values of sorghum dry matter yield (DMY) and sorghum fresh matter yield (FMY) for each cut and the total of the three cuts, depending on the tested saline attenuator. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 7. Mean values of sorghum dry matter yield (DMY) and sorghum fresh matter yield (FMY) for each cut and the total of the three cuts, depending on the tested saline attenuator. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Saline AttenuatorDMY (t ha−1)FMY (t ha−1)
Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3Total YieldCut 1Cut 2Cut 3Total Yield
Control16.99 b17.59 b10.21 c44.80 b52.33 b52.28 c41.76 b146.37 b
Si18.09 b19.34 b11.71 c49.14 b55.42 b49.25 c41.58 b146.24 b
Si + OM22.09 a21.06 b18.88 a62.03 a62.58 a58.78 b61.07 a182.43 a
Si + T19.96 b27.36 a15.21 b62.53 a58.61 b67.14 a53.70 a179.45 a
Si + OM + T23.69 a20.56 b14.80 b59.05 a66.20 a51.22 c52.20 a169.62 a
Si = silicon; Si + OM = silicon + organic matter; Si + T = silicon + Trichoderma harzianum; Si + OM + T = silicon + organic matter + Trichoderma harzianum.
Table 8. Mean values of water use efficiency (WUE) by sorghum for each cut and the total of the three cuts, depending on the tested saline attenuator. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 8. Mean values of water use efficiency (WUE) by sorghum for each cut and the total of the three cuts, depending on the tested saline attenuator. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Saline AttenuatorWUE (g DM L−1 H2O)
Cut 1Cut 2Cut 3Total WUE
Control4.89 b3.55 b2.55 c 10.98 b
Si5.20 b3.90 b2.92 c12.02 b
Si + OM6.35 a4.25 b4.71 a15.30 a
Si + T5.74 b5.52 a3.79 b15.05 a
Si + OM + T6.81 a4.14 b3.69 b14.65 a
Si = silicon; Si + OM = silicon + organic matter; Si + T = silicon + Trichoderma harzianum; Si + OM + T = silicon + organic matter + Trichoderma harzianum.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, J.O.N.d.; Pessoa, L.G.M.; Silva, E.M.d.; Silva, L.R.d.; Freire, M.B.G.d.S.; Souza, E.S.d.; Ferreira-Silva, S.L.; França, J.G.E.d.; Silva, T.G.F.d.; Alencar, E.L.d.N. Effects of Silicon Alone and Combined with Organic Matter and Trichoderma harzianum on Sorghum Yield, Ions Accumulation and Soil Properties under Saline Irrigation. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112146

AMA Style

Silva JONd, Pessoa LGM, Silva EMd, Silva LRd, Freire MBGdS, Souza ESd, Ferreira-Silva SL, França JGEd, Silva TGFd, Alencar ELdN. Effects of Silicon Alone and Combined with Organic Matter and Trichoderma harzianum on Sorghum Yield, Ions Accumulation and Soil Properties under Saline Irrigation. Agriculture. 2023; 13(11):2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, José Orlando Nunes da, Luiz Guilherme Medeiros Pessoa, Emanuelle Maria da Silva, Leonardo Raimundo da Silva, Maria Betânia Galvão dos Santos Freire, Eduardo Soares de Souza, Sérgio Luiz Ferreira-Silva, José Geraldo Eugênio de França, Thieres George Freire da Silva, and Eurico Lustosa do Nascimento Alencar. 2023. "Effects of Silicon Alone and Combined with Organic Matter and Trichoderma harzianum on Sorghum Yield, Ions Accumulation and Soil Properties under Saline Irrigation" Agriculture 13, no. 11: 2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112146

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop