Next Article in Journal
A Pricing Model Study of Shared Parking Area Charge Based on Game Theory
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Risk Assessment Approach for Open-Cast Coal Mines Using Hybrid MCDM Models with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: A Case Study in Türkiye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Feature Distributions of Technologies

1
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2
School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Center of Engineering Management, Polytechnic Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, China
4
National Institute of Innovation Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2024, 12(8), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12080268
Submission received: 18 June 2024 / Revised: 23 July 2024 / Accepted: 25 July 2024 / Published: 26 July 2024

Abstract

In this study, we propose a big data-based method for characterizing the feature distributions of multiple technologies within a specific domain. Traditional approaches, such as Gartner’s hype cycle or S-curve model, portray the developmental trajectory of individual technologies. However, these approaches are insufficient to encapsulate the aggregate characteristic distribution of multiple technologies within a specific domain. Thus, this study proposes an innovative method in terms of four proposed features, namely versatility, significance, commerciality, and disruptiveness, to characterize the technologies within a given domain. The research methodology involves that the features of technologies are quantitively portrayed using the representative keywords and volumes of returned search results from Google and Google Scholar in two-dimensional analytical spaces of technique and application. We demonstrate the applicability of this method using 452 technologies in the domain of intelligent robotics. The results of our assessment indicate that the versatility values are normally distributed, while the values of significance, commerciality, and disruptiveness follow power-law distributions, in which few technologies possess higher feature values. We also show that significant technologies are more likely to be commercialized or cause potential disruption, as such technologies have higher scores in these features. Further, we validly prove the robustness of our approach by comparing historical trends with the literature and characterizing technologies in reduced analytical spaces. Our method can be widely applied in analyzing feature distributions of technologies in different domains, and it can potentially be exploited in decisions like investment, trade, and science policy.
Keywords: 2D analytical space; commerciality; disruptiveness; representative keyword; search engine; significance; technological assessment; versatility 2D analytical space; commerciality; disruptiveness; representative keyword; search engine; significance; technological assessment; versatility

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, J.; Deng, C.; Pan, J.; Gu, F.; Guo, J. Feature Distributions of Technologies. Systems 2024, 12, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12080268

AMA Style

Zhu J, Deng C, Pan J, Gu F, Guo J. Feature Distributions of Technologies. Systems. 2024; 12(8):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12080268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Jiannan, Chao Deng, Jiaofeng Pan, Fu Gu, and Jianfeng Guo. 2024. "Feature Distributions of Technologies" Systems 12, no. 8: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12080268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop