Next Article in Journal
The Role of Systemic Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Previous Article in Journal
LPS Administration Impacts Glial Immune Programs by Alternative Splicing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Myocardial and Arrhythmic Spectrum of Neuromuscular Disorders in Children
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/biom12020272
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Glycemic Control and the Heart: The Tale of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Continues

by
Miriam Longo
1,2,†,
Lorenzo Scappaticcio
1,†,
Paolo Cirillo
1,
Antonietta Maio
1,
Raffaela Carotenuto
1,2,
Maria Ida Maiorino
1,2,
Giuseppe Bellastella
1,2 and
Katherine Esposito
1,2,*,‡
1
Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
2
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
Current address: Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Avanzate (DAMSS), University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Piazza Luigi Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(2), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12020272
Submission received: 3 September 2021 / Revised: 25 January 2022 / Accepted: 1 February 2022 / Published: 8 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Biomolecules—Recent Advances in Cardiomyopathy)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in people with diabetes. Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DC) is an important complication of diabetes and represents a distinct subtype of heart failure that occurs in absence of cardiovascular diseases. Chronic hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia along with insulin resistance and inflammatory milieu are the main mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of DC. Changes in lifestyle favoring healthy dietary patterns and physical activity, combined with more innovative anti-diabetes therapies, are the current treatment strategies to safeguard the cardiovascular system. This review aims at providing an updated comprehensive overview of clinical, pathogenetic, and molecular aspects of DC, with a focus on the effects of anti-hyperglycemic drugs on the prevention of pump dysfunction and consequently on cardiovascular health in type 2 diabetes.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a challenging issue in the management of diabetes mellitus (DM) and the main cause of death in diabetic patients. Heart failure (HF) is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease [1]. Recent studies have found that rates of incident HF hospitalization were twofold higher in patients with diabetes compared with those without [1,2]. Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DC) is a subtype of HF defined as the diabetes-associated structural and functional myocardial dysfunction that occurs in absence of conventional cardiovascular diseases (i.e., coronary artery disease, uncontrolled hypertension, valvular heart diseases or congenital heart diseases) [3,4]. DC often appears in the context of CVD; however, it may present as the unique manifestation of cardiac disease [4].
The three major risk factors for DC are high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), long disease duration, and older age [4,5]. It has been estimated that 22% of patients diagnosed with idiopathic cardiomyopathy have underlying DM [6]. Moreover, in studies published after 2000, in which more advanced echocardiographic imaging techniques were used, the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the population affected by type 2 DM (DMT2) without the conventional CVD varied between 28% and 75%. Data reporting the prevalence rate of DC in type 1 diabetes are limited; however, there is evidence from a few observational studies that type 1 diabetes even affects heart function with different mechanisms as compared with those described in DMT2 [6,7].
This review aims at providing an updated comprehensive overview of clinical, pathogenetic, and molecular aspects of DC, with a focus on the effects of anti-hyperglycemic drugs on the prevention of pump dysfunction and consequently on cardiovascular health in DMT2.

2. Clinical Aspects of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

Independently of traditional risk factors, diabetes-related heart anatomical and functional alterations, including fibrosis, left ventricle (LV) remodeling, and impaired contractility, led to the four stages or subgroups of DC (Table 1) [8,9,10]. DC is regarded as a restrictive phenotype with LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction during the first stages, and a dilatative phenotype with reduced ejection fraction at late stages [10]. Specifically, patients with stage 1 are usually asymptomatic and have only diastolic dysfunction. On the other hand, in stages 2 and 3 there are both diastolic and systolic dysfunctions. In patients at early stage, although myocardial dysfunction is subclinical, stress situations (i.e., exercise) can induce an impairment of systolic performance with altered contractile reserve [8,9]. This subclinical systolic dysfunction could be associated with diastolic dysfunction, which precedes the development of both systolic dysfunction with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Otherwise, patients in stage 4 have symptomatic HF and coronary heart disease [8,9]. Although the distinction of these four forms has important therapeutic and prognostic consequences, its translation in clinical practice is difficult since it is challenging to distinguish when heart abnormalities are due to DC or to coronary artery disease or other diseases unrelated to diabetes [4].

Imaging and Laboratory

Echocardiography, also known as cardiac ultrasound (cUS), is the most sensitive test to diagnose DC [7]. It allows the evaluation of anatomical and functional alterations in the LV, including the diastolic dysfunction, LV filling pressure, and myocardial perfusion reserve [4,7]. Moreover, cUS can also exclude other causes of cardiac damage. The addition of tissue doppler imaging (TDI) currently improves its diagnostic accuracy in measuring myocardial velocities, leading to higher performance in detecting diastolic dysfunction in patients with normal systolic function [7,11]. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is the gold standard for the identification of interstitial fibrosis and extracellular matrix expansion, which are important pathological features of patients with DC [7]. The assessment of myocardial fibrosis by cMRI could have a prognostic value in patients with DC without any evidence of underlying CVD, identifying patients at high risk of future cardiovascular events [12]. Interestingly, cardiac abnormalities assessed by cMRI have been associated with the up-regulation of specific microRNAs targeting the extracellular matrix [13].
Among the cardiovascular biomarkers, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) could be the most useful one to evaluate LV dysfunction, as well as in asymptomatic patients in the subclinical phase [14].
Interestingly, persistent microalbuminuria can be used as a marker of diffuse fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction, based on its association with cardiac extracellular volume [15].

3. Pathophysiology of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

A wide variety of molecular mechanisms underlie the development and progression of DC, which are partially different from those promoted by hypertension or ischemia (Figure 1). Hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia along with insulin resistance are the main pathogenetic drivers of the metabolic alterations that lead to the DC [4,7]. In the setting of hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and hypertriglyceridemia, there is a reduction in the myocardium’s ability to use glucose as an energy source, and it subsequently switches to free fatty acids (FFAs). Specifically, the key mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of DC are oxidative stress, hyperglycemia and glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity, advanced glycated end-products (AGEs) deposition, inflammation, cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), and microvascular dysfunction [16].

3.1. Hyperglycemia and Glucotoxicity

Hyperglycemia is a major etiological factor in the development of DC. It enhances the production of FFA and different growth factors, causing abnormalities in substrate supply and utilization, calcium homeostasis, and lipid metabolism [17]. Furthermore, it contributes to the excessive release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are responsible for oxidative stress, impairment of gene expression, abnormal signal transduction, and cardiomyocytes apoptosis. The effects of growth factors on connective tissue, together with fibrosis and the formation of AGEs, increase the stiffness of diabetic hearts [18]. A healthy heart can metabolize a range of substrates, including FFA, glucose, amino acids, ketones, and lactate, in order to produce ATP [19,20]. Particularly, the oxidation of FFA, glucose, and pyruvate represent the main contributors for ATP formation and energy storage. The activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), which is a key enzyme regulating the balance between carbohydrate and fat metabolism in the heart, appears to be decreased in diabetes and associated with the impairment of the pyruvate oxidation [21,22]. The dissociation of glycolysis and pyruvate oxidation in the diabetic heart results in the accumulation of glycolytic intermediates, which are responsible for the activation of specific glucose-sensing transcription factors [23,24]. Glycolytic intermediates decrease the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2a (SERCA2a) expression [25], which is essential in calcium homeostasis, resulting in diastolic dysfunction [26]. Indeed, SERCA2a expression in the heart appeared to be decreased in diabetes [26,27]. Finally, hyperglycemia induces the production of AGEs and decreases the production of nitric oxide (NO) in coronary endothelial cells, leading to upregulation of endothelial vascular growth factor (VEGF) pathway. This metabolic abnormality causes fibrosis of capillaries with consequent impairment of myocardial functional reserve [7]. Therefore, uncontrolled hyperglycemia and subsequent metabolic changes triggered by these factors are responsible for a status of cardiac glucotoxicity and myocardial dysfunction [28].

3.2. Lipid in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

The relationship between dyslipidemia, inflammation, and cardiovascular (CV) health in type 2 diabetes mellitus is complex. The status of insulin resistance and chronic low-grade inflammation increases plasma triglycerides (TG) levels [29]. Inflammatory mediators also enhance the production of matrix-metalloproteinases (MMPs) that, together with TG, reduce high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels. All these factors promote structural and functional impairment of the CV system [30]. Increased circulating TG levels are associated with intracardiac accumulation of fatty acids and, thus, enhanced fatty acid β-oxidation and impaired insulin metabolic signaling in diabetic hearts [31]. Additionally, in diabetes, cardiomyocytes often display increased expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α), associated with increased FFA uptake, triacylglycerol accumulation, and reduced glucose utilization [32]. Abnormal lipid metabolism often accelerates the development of DC. Indeed, there is an increased release of FFA from adipose tissue, which in turn leads to the FFA transport in myocyte sarcolemma [33]. The cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36), which is located predominantly on the cell surface, promoting the FFA uptake in both sarcolemma and endosomal membranes, is overexpressed in diabetic hearts [34]. Conversely, GLUT4, which is an important glucose membrane transporter, is internalized in the cardiomyocytes, assuming an intracellular location [34]. The reduced glucose uptake promotes a metabolic shift toward FFA oxidation, resulting in decreased cardiac performances [35,36]. Indeed, CD36 knockout mice showed a 70% reduction in FFA uptake in cardiomyocytes [37], and CD36 deficiency prevents lipotoxic cardiomyopathy [38,39]. Some lipid metabolites, including diacylglycerols and ceramides, impair insulin metabolic signaling, further promoting cardiac damage. Increased levels of diacylglycerols in cardiomyocytes compromise glucose metabolism through activation of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms, thereby reducing insulin metabolic signaling and NO production [31]. Therefore, excessive accumulation of lipids and toxic intermediates contributes to cardiac insulin resistance, reduced NO bioavailability, inflammation, fibrosis, and diastolic dysfunction in DC [32].

3.3. Oxidative Stress

In the setting of diabetes, both increased production of ROS and impairment of endogenous antioxidant mechanisms play an essential role in both mitochondrial damage and cardiac fibrosis [40]. In DC, the antioxidant factors, like superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), are reduced in cardiomyocytes, and ROS generation is dramatically increased, leading to high oxidative stress [41]. Moreover, the continuous production of ROS induces the activation of the TGFβ1/Smad3 signaling pathway, which promotes the expression of several fibrotic factors, as α-SMA, collagen I, and collagen III in diabetic heart [42]. Therefore, therapeutic molecules and agents that counteract ROS generation and the related cardiac fibrosis may represent a potential therapeutic strategy for DC.

3.4. Endothelial Dysfunction

The integrity of vascular endothelial cells constitutes the essential key basis of CV health. A healthy endothelium generates various vasodilating factors, such as NO, prostacyclin, bradykinin, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor; moreover, it also produces vasoconstrictor agents including endothelin and angiotensin II. Hyperglycemia can impair the physiological homeostasis of the endothelium. This may result in increased leukocyte adhesion and permeability, and reduced fibrinolysis, activating the diacylglycerol (DAG)-PKC signaling pathway [43,44]. PKC is a family of serine-threonine kinases that has been previously reported to be associated with vascular permeability in diabetes [45,46]. Activation of this pathway may contribute to diabetic endothelial dysfunction in several tissues, including the heart, retina, and kidney [47]. However, the precise pathway that leads to increased endothelial cell permeability and leukocyte adhesion by PKC activation remains still unclear.

3.5. Inflammation

Inflammation has been recognized as a key common pathogenic process of lipid and glucose excess. Since DM is recognized as an inflammatory disease, the induction of pro-inflammatory genes and proteins has been reported as one of the main risk factors for myocardial injury [16]. In addition, an inflammatory myocardial injury may be amplified by increased ROS levels. The nuclear factor-KB (NF-kB) is mainly implicated in inflammatory responses. NF-KB induces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, pro IL1-β, and pro-IL-18 in the heart. NF-kB can also induce the expression of NLRP3 inflammasome [48]. The latter seems to be a novel molecular marker of DC. The activation of NLRP3 inflammasome leads to recruitment of procaspase-1. Activated caspase-1 processes many inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 precursors. An NF-κB–positive feedback further increases NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and procaspase-1 activation and pro-interleukin-1β processing and maturation, generating an inflammatory vicious cycle [49]. Meanwhile, increased monocyte/macrophage migration through the coronary endothelium increases resident cardiac macrophages, which acquire a pro-inflammatory profile (M1) under conditions of enhanced oxidative stress induced by increased ROS and reduced NO bioavailability [50]. All these pathways contribute to cardiomyocytes dysfunction and the development of DC.

3.6. AGEs

There is evidence that AGEs contribute to the development and progression of diabetic heart dysfunction. Chronic hyperglycemia results in intra- and extracellular AGEs production, by non-enzymatic reactions between reducing sugars with amino groups of nucleic acids, lipids, peptides, and proteins. Once formed, AGEs interact with receptors for advanced glycation end products (RAGEs), triggering a series of vascular and myocardial damage, resulting in diastolic and systolic dysfunction [51]. AGEs may bind RAGE, leading to maladaptive inflammatory gene expression, thus activating mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Janus kinase (JAK) pathways in vascular and cardiac tissues. Meanwhile, AGEs are involved in increasing the production of ROS, which further promotes inflammation and fibrosis [33]. AGEs-induced modification of extracellular matrix and other structural proteins may provide a reduction of myocardial compliance and myocardial fibrosis [16]. Interestingly, in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes, administration of a RAGE antagonist prevented AGEs/RAGE signaling-mediated increase in myocardial collagen, fibrosis, stiffness, and diastolic dysfunction [52].

3.7. CAN

Hyperglycemia can activate multiple pathways involved in the pathogenesis of CAN. The majority of these pathways are related to the metabolic and/or oxidative state of neuronal cells. Oxidative stress can induce DNA damage, leading to activation of PARP and inhibition of GAPDH [53]. This in turn can activate multiple molecular mechanisms, including the polyol pathway, the hexosamine pathway, as well as activation of PKC and increased production of AGEs, which correlate with the severity of autonomic nerve abnormalities in patients with DM [53,54]. Particularly, the hyperadrenergic state characterizing the CAN promotes the development of interstitial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction, also through the increased activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) [55].

4. Role of Glucose Control in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

There is evidence that poor glycemic control correlates with an increased risk of heart failure among individuals with diabetes [56]. About a 1% increase in HbA1c is associated with an 8% increased risk of heart failure [56,57]. In a recent Chinese study on 64 adult subjects with type DMT2 and 30 healthy controls, LV myocardial function, evaluated by cMRI, was impaired in patients with uncontrolled DMT2 (HbA1c ≥ 7%) and diabetes duration < 10 years as compared with healthy control [58]. Moreover, poor glucose control was an independent predictor of LV myocardial dysfunction in this population. Furthermore, high HbA1c variability is associated with increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as diabetic complications [59]. These findings suggest that achieving adequate glycemic control may be useful to reduce the burden of diabetes-related CVD and thus preserve CV health in people with diabetes. In a recent meta-analysis with meta-regression of 15 cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) including 138,250 patients with T2DM, there was a robust relationship between the reduction in achieved HbA1c at the end of the trial and the HR reduction for major cardiovascular events, mainly driven by the reduction of non-fatal stroke, with no effect on HF [2].
A multifactorial approach that includes lifestyle modification and appropriate medical treatment of DMT2, hypertension, and dyslipidemia is essential to preserve pump function in people with diabetes. Several different new classes of glucose-lowering agents have been recently introduced in the market. Some of them have shown many cardioprotective effects beyond their ability to control hyperglycemia, with beneficial effects in preventing cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to HF (Table 2). However, with the exception of some experimental preclinical researches and very limited clinical studies, there is little evidence on the effects of glucose-lowering treatment in the specific setting of DC.

5. Lifestyle Changes

A healthy dietary pattern together with regular physical activity, which represent the first line therapeutic strategies for T2DM, may be useful to prevent and treat DC in individuals with diabetes [33]. Aerobic exercise and caloric restriction of fat and refined carbohydrate intake seem to improve insulin resistance, reduce myocardial triglyceride content, and improve diastolic LV dysfunction [33]. Indeed, in a study of 11 overweight-to-obese male patients with T2DM, 12-weeks of progressive endurance/strength training was effective in improving insulin sensitivity, LVEF, cardiac index, and cardiac output, with no variation in cardiac lipid content [60]. A Mediterranean dietary pattern characterized by a high proportion of mono and polyunsaturated fat, a small portion of red meat, and high quantities of olive oil has demonstrated many cardiovascular benefits, by decreasing inflammatory status, and improving lipid profile, endothelial dysfunction, and insulin sensitivity [61,62]. In particular, in a recent observational study on 9316 men and 27,645 women, including also people with diabetes, a higher adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet evaluated by modified Mediterranean Diet Scores (mMDS) was associated with a 12% reduced risk of HF in men but not in women [63]. Consequently, a healthy lifestyle, including the assumption of the Mediterranean diet, can be useful to preserve heart pump function in T2DM.

6. Diabetes Therapy and DC

Nowadays, there are several treatment options targeting differing mechanisms of actions for improving glycemia, in people with DM and CVD. In the following paragraph, we will discuss the effects of anti-hyperglycemic agents and lipid-lowering therapy on CV health in DM.

6.1. Metformin

Metformin is the first-line oral anti-hyperglycemic treatment in the management of DMT2. It belongs to the class of biguanide drugs. Initially, its use was contraindicated in patients with diabetes and HF, due to the potential increased risk of lactic acidosis. In 2006, the FDA removed this contraindication from metformin’s product label, and a further systematic review showed that metformin was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, without increased risk of hospital admission in patients with HF and diabetes [64].
However, metformin should be stopped in case of acutely decompensated HF, sepsis, or hypoperfusion conditions in order to prevent lactic acidosis. Metformin seems to exert several favorable effects on the pathophysiology of DC, by decreasing insulin resistance and TNF-α production, reducing cardiomyocytes and fibroblast LV remodeling, increasing the production of NO, and improving systolic and diastolic function [7,65].
Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that metformin can improve cardiac function and alleviate apoptosis by activating the prokineticin 2 pathway [7]. Moreover, in murine models, metformin provided substantial protection against DC, reducing the production of ROS, expression of p53, and production of collagen [66].
In a clinical setting, in a retrospective cohort study on 242 adults with DMT2 undergoing coronary angiography, the use of metformin was associated with improved LV diastolic function (lower IVRT and higher e’ wave), as compared with sulfonylurea or insulin therapy [67]. Moreover, a 2-years prospective, randomized, open-label trial on 49 non-diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome and diastolic dysfunction showed that treatment with metformin (1000 mg bid) on top of lifestyle counseling was associated with significant improvement of diastolic function (improved e’ velocity and reduced insulin resistance) as compared with lifestyle counseling alone [68]. A meta-analysis of 13 trials conducted between 1995 and 2011 with a total of 2.079 individuals with DMT2 demonstrated that the use of metformin slightly improved the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and peripheral disease as compared with control strategies (no intervention, placebo, or lifestyle changes), but none of these outcomes achieved statistical significance [69].

6.2. Sulfonylureas

Sulfonylureas are a class of oral anti-diabetes agents that stimulate the release of insulin from pancreatic β cells. In experimental murine models, triple anti-diabetes oral therapy with glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone showed a synergistic effect in improving insulin resistance and retarding development of DC [70]. However, there is evidence that associates the use of sulfonylureas with a higher risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain [71], which in turn increases the risk of HF. Moreover, in a cohort study on new users of metformin or sulfonylurea in the veteran’s population, the initiation of sulfonylurea was associated with a 32% increased risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death compared with metformin initiation [72]. In a pooled analysis of clinical trials, the use of sulfonylureas did not significantly increase the risk of MACE, cardiovascular death, or HF hospitalization [73]. At the moment, sulfonylureas are not indicated as first-line treatment for patients with DMT2 and cardiovascular disease by international guidelines for the management of DMT2 [71]; therefore, their use should be considered in people free of CVD in case of intolerance to metformin or when an upgrade of glucose-lowering therapy is needed.

6.3. Thiazolidinediones

Thiazolidinediones are oral anti-hyperglycemic agents that act on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPR-γ) to increase insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues. Both clinical and experimental studies suggest beneficial effects of these molecules on inflammation, lipid and protein metabolism, and vascular endothelial function [74,75].
In preclinical studies on diabetic mice, the use of pioglitazone remarkably increased ventricular function, reduced fibrosis and TGF-β protein expression in myocardial tissues, and attenuated myocardial hypertrophy [75]. Moreover, pioglitazone combined with curcumin reduced oxidative stress and fibrosis in diabetic rats, decreasing lipid peroxidation and TGF-β1 level [76]. However, the use of these drugs in clinical practice is limited due to their potential to cause weight gain, edema, fractures, and HF. Indeed, the addition of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in clinical trials demonstrated a significant increase in the risk for heart failure hospitalizations [77,78]. Therefore, these agents should be avoided in patients with HF and used with caution in patients who have any signs or symptoms of HF.

6.4. SGLT-2 Inhibitors

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are the latest class of oral glucose-lowering agents approved by FDA for management of DMT2. These drugs inhibit the renal sodium/glucose cotransporter in the kidney proximal convoluted tubule, increasing glycosuria and favoring osmotic diuresis [79].
Over the last few years, there has been a growing body of evidence from randomized controlled trials of their cardiovascular and renal benefits in people with DMT2 at high cardiovascular risk [80]. Although it is noticeable that SGLT-2i exert beneficial cardiovascular effects, the specific mechanisms of action of SGLT-2i on cardiac metabolism have not yet been carefully understood. The potential mechanisms involved in the cardiovascular protection are the glucose-lowering effect, weight loss, blood pressure reduction, hemodynamic effects, osmotic diuresis, and natriuresis. Conversely, SGLT-2 seems to not be expressed in cardiac myocytes [81]. However, SGLT-2i may have a direct action on the myocardium by the inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger (NHE), which may be involved in myocardial injury, fibrosis, and LV dysfunction [82].
In preclinical studies, dapagliflozin was demonstrated to reduce ROS production, decrease fibrosis, reduce inflammation, and improve systolic function in an experimental model of DC [83]. When added to ticagrelor, dapagliflozin ameliorated the progression of DC, attenuating the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, and reducing TNFα and IL-6 levels and fibrosis [84]. The use of empagliflozin in diabetic mice for 8 weeks was associated with decreased myocardial oxidative stress, reduced myocardial fibrosis, and better myocardial structure and function [85]. Moreover, empagliflozin improved diastolic function and reduced mortality in a murine model of severe diabetes [86].
In a prospective observational study of 35 symptomatic non-ischemic HF patients with DMT2 and LVEF > 40% treated with empagliflozin (EMPA group) and 20 control subjects, patients in the empagliflozin group showed a significant improvement of LV dysfunction [LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e′)], particularly in early cardiomyopathy stages [87]. Data from a meta-analysis of the CVOTs involving the use of SGLT2-i versus placebo show a significant 33% reduced risk of hospitalization for HF in people using this class of drugs [73,88]. Since this effect is associated with each studied molecule (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, canagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin), the reduced risk for HF related to SGLT-2i should be considered a class effect [79]. Indeed, according to the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2021 of the American Diabetes Association, a SGLT-2i with proven cardiovascular benefit is recommended as part of the glucose-lowering regimen, independent of HbA1c, for patients with type 2 diabetes who have an established history of HF, and particularly with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF < 45%) [71]. Thus, the use of SGLT2i should be recommended as soon as possible in patients with type 2 diabetes and HF at early stages.

6.5. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are a class of injective anti-diabetes agents that lower blood glucose levels, enhancing insulin secretion in response to nutrient ingestion, without risk of hypoglycemia. Moreover, they inhibit inappropriate glucagon secretion, suppress appetite, and slow gastric emptying, which represent all pleiotropic favorable effects in the management of DMT2 [89].
Over the years, GLP-1RAs have demonstrated many beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system. These agents may exert their benefits both indirectly by decreasing different established cardiovascular risk factors (hyperglycemia, obesity, high blood pressure, and lipid profile) and directly on cardiomyocytes and coronary vasculature [90]. The expression of GLP-1 receptor has been reported in human atrial tissue, vascular smooth muscles, and endothelial cells [91]. GLP-1RA seem to reduce inflammatory myocardial remodeling and decrease inflammatory pathways in cardiomyocytes, promoting glucose uptake and increasing coronary blood flow [90].
Exenatide, a short-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, has proven to attenuate ROS production, increasing the antioxidant enzymes manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) and catalase activity and preventing cell apoptosis [92]. Treatment of lean mice with liraglutide showed to increase myocardial glucose oxidation, enhancing pyruvate dehydrogenase activity and alleviating diastolic dysfunction in mice with DMT2 [93]. In a preclinical study on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats treated with liraglutide and/or empagliflozin, both agents were effective in ameliorating myocardial fibrosis and apoptosis. Particularly, empagliflozin modulated fatty acid and glucose metabolism, while liraglutide regulated inflammation and apoptosis in DC [94].
Whether GLP-1RAs are effective in improving ventricular function in human subjects is still controversial. A 5-week continuous subcutaneous infusion of GLP-1 (2.5 pmol/kg/min) in 12 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III–IV HF significantly improved LV function, walking time, and quality of life scores in patients with severe HF [95]. However, the exciting results of the earlier pilot study were not completely confirmed in larger studies of GLP-1RA in patients with HF. Among 154 recently hospitalized patients with HFrEF, the use of liraglutide did not lead to greater post-hospitalization clinical stability for HF as compared with placebo in a 6-months randomized controlled clinical trial [96]. On the other hand, in another randomized controlled trial of 49 subjects with DMT2 without cardiovascular disease assigned to liraglutide (1.8 mg once daily) or placebo, treatment with liraglutide for 6 months reduced early LV diastolic filling and LV filling pressure, thereby improving diastolic function [97].
In the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter LIVE trial, 241 subjects with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≤45%) with and without diabetes were randomized to liraglutide or placebo [98]. As a result, liraglutide did not improve LV systolic function as compared with placebo in stable chronic heart failure patients and was rather associated with an increase in heart rate and more serious cardiac adverse events. However, a recent meta-analysis of the eight CVOTs with GLP-1RAs so far conducted, including 60,080 participants, demonstrated that GLP-1RAs reduced the risk of MACE by 14%, the risk of cardiovascular death by 13%, and the risk of hospitalization for HF by 10% [99].
Although this class of agents has been associated with potential benefits on the risk of HF, further studies are needed to specifically assess the efficacy of GLP-1RAs in the setting of DC.

6.6. DPP-4 Inhibitors

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) represents another new class of oral glucose-lowering agents that block the enzyme DPP-4, thereby extending the lifetime of incretin hormones [GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)] and enhancing insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. Pre-clinical studies reported a correlation between DPP-4 activity and cardiac dysfunction [100], as well as the improvement of pump function with the use of DPP-4i [101].
In experimental murine models, sitagliptin showed to down-regulate the JAK/STAT signaling pathway—ameliorating histological cardiac structure, oxidative stress, and inflammation—and rejuvenated the antioxidant defenses in diabetic hearts [102]. Sitagliptin could also improve the contraction and relaxation functions of cardiomyocytes in diabetic rats [103].
In a small 24-weeks randomized trial, the use of sitagliptin in subjects with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin and glyburide was associated with improvement in diastolic function as compared with NPH insulin [104]. Furthermore, an improvement of diastolic function reflected by attenuation of the increase in E/e′ ratio was also observed with sitagliptin compared with placebo in a 24- months, randomized trial of 115 Japanese subjects with DMT2 whose blood glucose was inadequately controlled with lifestyle interventions and/or pharmacotherapy [105]. On the contrary, the use of sitagliptin at the dosage of 50 mg once daily did not produce a significant effect on diastolic function in 80 subjects with DMT2 compared with voglibose (0.6 mg once daily) in a 24-weeks randomized trial [106]. Despite these potential beneficial effects, data from the larger CVOTs with DPP-4i have resulted in a substantial non-inferiority versus placebo with respect to the risk of MACE. Moreover, some concerns have been raised on the possibility of a higher risk of HF hospitalization combined with the use of some molecules in specific trials. Indeed, in the SAVOR-TIMI trial, treatment with saxagliptin was associated with a 7% increased risk of HF hospitalization as compared with placebo [107]. A similar, although not statistically significant trend has been detected also in the EXAMINE trial with the use of alogliptin [108] and CAROLINA trial with linagliptin [109], whereas no difference was observed in the TECOS trial with sitagliptin [110].
However, in a recent umbrella meta-analysis, the use of DPP-4i was not associated with a significant increase in HF risk [73]. Thus, this effect seems to be drug-specific and imputable to the sole use of saxagliptin.

6.7. Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Drugs that lower plasma lipids seem to improve cardiac performance in diabetic rats. Statins are effective, pleiotropic lipid-lowering agents representing the first-line therapy for patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia and a cornerstone of prevention of CVD [111]. In previous animal experiments, statins were hypothesized to prevent DC by multiple pleiotropic properties, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [111]. Rosuvastatin reduced NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β activation by suppressing MAPK pathways in diabetic rats [112]. Simvastatin also exhibited protective effects by significantly reducing cardiac enzymes, inflammatory mediators, and deposition of collagen in the diabetic murine heart [113]. On the other hand, an 8-weeks study on 87 murine models with type 1 diabetes rather suggested that glycemic control was more important than pravastatin to attenuate the progression of DC, expressed as the cardiac expression of collagen I/III, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) [114]. Atorvastatin was able to preserve the myocardial structure, inhibiting fibrosis through anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammation pathways [115]. Atorvastatin could also reduce β-adrenergic dysfunction in rats with diabetic cardiomyopathy via increasing NO availability [116]. Recently, the combined administration of metformin and atorvastatin in experimental models significantly inhibited oxidative stress and the levels of inflammation-related proteins, [NLRP3, caspase-1, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)], decreased pro-apoptotic-related proteins (cleaved caspase-3 and BAX), and increased anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2) [117]. Also fenofibrate, which is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) agonist, prevented heart damage in the wild-type 1 diabetic mice by reducing inflammation and fibrosis in cardiomyocytes [118].
The effects of lipid-lowering therapy in the clinical setting are still unknown. However, the use of statins is associated with an important decrease of cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients also in primary prevention [119]. Indeed, international guidelines suggest statins together with other lipid-lowering agents (PPARα agonists) for both primary and secondary CV prevention [120].

7. Conclusions

Although DC is rarely clinically evident, particularly in its early phase, it is a common condition, which increases the risk of the development of HF in people with diabetes. Its pathogenesis is still not completely clarified, although hyperglycemia, cardiac insulin resistance, and inflammatory pathways are key factors for myocardial fibrosis, stiffness, and hypertrophy. Achieving optimal glycemic control is important to prevent and delay diabetes complications and preserve heart health. Changes in lifestyle favoring healthy dietary patterns and physical activity, combined with more innovative anti-diabetes therapies are the current treatment strategies to safeguard the cardiovascular system. Data from randomized controlled trials show that both SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA offer protection against major cardiovascular events, including CV mortality and hospitalization for HF, in people with DMT2 at high CV risk. Future and larger studies are needed to better clarify the pathogenic mechanisms of pump dysfunction in diabetes and the effects of innovative therapies on DC and systolic and diastolic dysfunction.

Author Contributions

M.L. and L.S. conceived the review and wrote the manuscript. P.C., A.M. and R.C. collected the data for the work. M.I.M., G.B. and K.E. reviewed and critiqued the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, S125–S150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Giugliano, D.; Bellastella, G.; Longo, M.; Scappaticcio, L.; Maiorino, M.I.; Chiodini, P.; Esposito, K. Relationship between improvement of glycaemic control and reduction of major cardiovascular events in 15 cardiovascular outcome trials: A meta-analysis with meta-regression. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2020, 22, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Seferović, P.M.; Petrie, M.C.; Filippatos, G.S.; Anker, S.D.; Rosano, G.; Bauersachs, J.; Paulus, W.J.; Komajda, M.; Cosentino, F.; de Boer, R.A.; et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2018, 20, 853–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, M.; McMurray, J.; Lorenzo-Almorós, A.; Kristensen, S.L.; Sattar, N.; Jhund, P.S.; Petrie, M.C. Diabetic cardiomyo-pathy. Heart 2019, 105, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hölscher, M.E.; Bode, C.; Bugger, H. Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Does the Type of Diabetes Matter? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Konduracka, E.; Cieslik, G.; Galicka-Latala, D.; Rostoff, P.; Pietrucha, A.; Latacz, P.; Gajos, G.; Malecki, M.T.; Nessler, J. Myocardial dysfunction and chronic heart failure in patients with long-lasting type 1 diabetes: A 7-year prospective cohort study. Acta Diabetol. 2013, 50, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Murtaza, G.; Virk, H.; Khalid, M.; Lavie, C.J.; Ventura, H.; Mukherjee, D.; Ramu, V.; Bhogal, S.; Kumar, G.; Shanmu-gasundaram, M.; et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy—A comprehensive updated review. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019, 62, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fang, Z.Y.; Prins, J.B.; Marwick, T.H. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: Evidence, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications. Endocr. Rev. 2004, 25, 543–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maisch, B.; Alter, P.; Pankuweit, S. Diabetic cardiomyopathy–Fact or fiction? Herz 2011, 36, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seferović, P.M.; Paulus, W.J. Clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy: A two-faced disease with restrictive and dilated pheno-types. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 1718–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Di Bonito, P.; Moio, N.; Cavuto, L.; Covino, G.; Murena, E.; Scilla, C.; Turco, S.; Capaldo, B.; Sibilio, G. Early detection of diabetic cardiomyopathy: Usefulness of tissue Doppler imaging. Diabet. Med. 2005, 22, 1720–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kwong, R.Y.; Sattar, H.; Wu, H.; Vorobiof, G.; Gandla, V.; Steel, K.; Siu, S.; Brown, K.A. Incidence and prognostic im-plication of unrecognized myocardial scar characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance in diabetic patients without clinical evidence of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2008, 118, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pofi, R.; Giannetta, E.; Galea, N.; Francone, M.; Campolo, F.; Barbagallo, F.; Gianfrilli, D.; Venneri, M.A.; Filardi, T.; Cristini, C.; et al. Diabetic Cardiomiopathy Progression is Triggered by miR122-5p and Involves Extracellular Matrix: A 5-Year Prospective Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, 1130–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Maisel, A.S.; Koon, J.; Krishnaswamy, P.; Kazenegra, R.; Clopton, P.; Gardetto, N.; Morrisey, R.; Garcia, A.; Chiu, A.; De Maria, A. Utility of B-natriuretic peptide as a rapid, point-of-care test for screening patients undergoing echocardiography to determine left ventricular dysfunction. Am. Heart J. 2001, 141, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Swoboda, P.P.; McDiarmid, A.K.; Erhayiem, B.; Ripley, D.P.; Dobson, L.E.; Garg, P.; Musa, T.A.; Witte, K.K.; Kearney, M.T.; Barth, J.H.; et al. Diabetes Mellitus, Microalbuminuria, and Subclinical Cardiac Disease: Identification and Monitoring of Individ-uals at Risk of Heart Failure. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e005539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ritchie, R.H.; Abel, E.D. Basic Mechanisms of Diabetic Heart Disease. Circ. Res. 2020, 126, 1501–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jia, J.; Hill, M.A.; Sowers, J.R. Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: An Update of Mechanisms Contributing to This Clinical Entity. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 624–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Falcão-Pires, I.; Leite-Moreira, A.F. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: Understanding the molecular and cellular basis to progress in diagnosis and treatment. Heart Fail. Rev. 2012, 17, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Heather, L.C.; Clarke, K. Metabolism, hypoxia and the diabetic heart. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2011, 50, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Taegtmeyer, H. Cardiac metabolism as a target for the treatment of heart failure. Circulation 2004, 110, 894–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Park, S.; Jeon, J.H.; Min, B.K.; Ha, C.M.; Thoudam, T.; Park, B.Y.; Lee, I.K. Role of the Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex in Metabolic Remodeling: Differential Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Functions in Metabolism. Diabetes Metab. J. 2018, 42, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Karwi, Q.G.; Wagg, C.S.; Altamimi, T.R.; Uddin, G.M.; Ho, K.L.; Darwesh, A.M.; Seubert, J.M.; Lopaschuk, G.D. Insulin directly stimulates mitochondrial glucose oxidation in the heart. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Badolia, R.; Ramadurai, D.; Abel, E.D.; Ferrin, P.; Taleb, I.; Shankar, T.S.; Krokidi, A.T.; Navankasattusas, S.; McKellar, S.H.; Yin, M.; et al. The Role of Nonglycolytic Glucose Metabolism in Myocardial Recovery Upon Mechanical Unloading and Circulatory Support in Chronic Heart Failure. Circulation 2020, 142, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Diakos, N.A.; Navankasattusas, S.; Abel, E.D.; Rutter, J.; McCreath, L.; Ferrin, P.; McKellar, S.H.; Miller, D.V.; Park, S.Y.; Richardson, R.S.; et al. Evidence of Glycolysis Up-Regulation and Pyruvate Mitochondrial Oxidation Mismatch During Mechanical Unloading of the Failing Human Heart: Implications for Cardiac eloading and Conditioning. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2016, 1, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Young, M.E.; McNulty, P.; Taegtmeyer, H. Adaptation and maladaptation of the heart in diabetes: Part II: Potential mechanisms. Circulation 2002, 105, 1861–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhong, Y.; Ahmed, S.; Grupp, I.L.; Matlib, M.A. Altered SR protein expression associated with contractile dysfunction in diabetic rat hearts. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2001, 281, H1137–H1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lacombe, V.A.; Viatchenko-Karpinski, S.; Terentyev, D.; Sridhar, A.; Emani, S.; Bonagura, J.D.; Feldman, D.S.; Györke, S.; Carnes, C.A. Mechanisms of impaired calcium handling underlying subclinical diastolic dysfunction in diabetes. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2007, 293, R1787–R1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaiser, N.; Leibowitz, G.; Nesher, R. Glucotoxicity and beta-cell failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 16, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parhofer, K.G. Interaction between Glucose and Lipid Metabolism: More than Diabetic Dyslipidemia. Diabetes Metab. J. 2015, 39, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kozakova, M.; Morizzo, C.; Goncalves, I.; Natali, A.; Nilsson, J.; Palombo, C. Cardiovascular organ damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus: The role of lipids and inflammation. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019, 18, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Costantino, S.; Akhmedov, A.; Melina, G.; Mohammed, S.A.; Othman, A.; Ambrosini, S.; Wijnen, W.J.; Sada, L.; Ciavarella, G.M.; Liberale, L.; et al. Obesity-induced activation of JunD promotes myocardial lipid accumulation and metabolic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, L.; Cai, Y.; Jian, L.; Cheung, C.W.; Zhang, L.; Xia, Z. Impact of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α on diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2021, 20, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jia, G.; DeMarco, V.G.; Sowers, J.R. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016, 12, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, T.W.; Bai, K.J.; Lee, T.I.; Chao, T.F.; Kao, Y.H.; Chen, Y.J. PPARs modulate cardiac metabolism and mitochondrial function in diabetes. J. Biomed. Sci. 2017, 24, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Harmancey, R.; Lam, T.N.; Lubrano, G.M.; Guthrie, P.H.; Vela, D.; Taegtmeyer, H. Insulin resistance improves metabolic and contractile efficiency in stressed rat heart. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2012, 26, 3118–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mandavia, C.H.; Pulakat, L.; DeMarco, V.; Sowers, J.R. Over-nutrition and metabolic cardiomyopathy. Metabolism 2012, 61, 1205–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Habets, D.D.; Coumans, W.A.; Voshol, P.J.; den Boer, M.A.; Febbraio, M.; Bonen, A.; Glatz, J.F.; Luiken, J.J. AMPK-mediated increase in myocardial long-chain fatty acid uptake critically depends on sarcolemmal CD36. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 355, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, J.; Sambandam, N.; Han, X.; Gross, R.W.; Courtois, M.; Kovacs, A.; Febbraio, M.; Finck, B.N.; Kelly, D.P. CD36 deficiency rescues lipotoxic cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 1208–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tanaka, T.; Nakata, T.; Oka, T.; Ogawa, T.; Okamoto, F.; Kusaka, Y.; Sohmiya, K.; Shimamoto, K.; Itakura, K. Defect in human myocardial long-chain fatty acid uptake is caused by FAT/CD36 mutations. J. Lipid Res. 2001, 42, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Faria, A.; Persaud, S.J. Cardiac oxidative stress in diabetes: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 172, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wilson, A.J.; Gill, E.K.; Abudalo, R.A.; Edgar, K.S.; Watson, C.J.; Grieve, D.J. Reactive oxygen species signalling in the diabetic heart: Emerging prospect for therapeutic targeting. Heart 2018, 104, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Biernacka, A.; Cavalera, M.; Wang, J.; Russo, I.; Shinde, A.; Kong, P.; Gonzalez-Quesada, C.; Rai, V.; Dobaczewski, M.; Lee, D.W.; et al. Smad3 Signaling Promotes Fibrosis While Preserving Cardiac and Aortic Geometry in Obese Diabetic Mice. Circulation 2015, 8, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Maruhashi, T.; Higashi, Y. Pathophysiological Association between Diabetes Mellitus and Endothelial Dysfunction. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Geraldes, P.; King, G.L. Activation of protein kinase C isoforms and its impact on diabetic complications. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 1319–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Rask-Madsen, C.; King, G.L. Vascular complications of diabetes: Mechanisms of injury and protective factors. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yuan, T.; Yang, T.; Chen, H.; Fu, D.; Hu, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuan, Q.; Yu, H.; Xu, W.; Xie, X. New Insights into Oxidative Stress and Inflammation during Diabetes Mellitus-Accelerated Atherosclerosis. Redox Biol. 2019, 20, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lien, C.F.; Chen, S.J.; Tsai, M.C.; Lin, C.S. Potential Role of Protein Kinase C in the Pathophysiology of Diabetes-Associated Atherosclerosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 716332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fuentes-Antras, J.; Ioan, A.M.; Tunon, J.; Egido, J.; Lorenzo, O. Activation of Toll-like repceptors and inflammasome complexes in the diabetic cardiomyopathy-associated inflammation. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 2014, 847827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pal, P.B.; Sonowal, H.; Shukla, K.; Srivastava, S.K.; Ramana, K.V. Aldose reductase mediates NLRP3 inflammasome-initiated innate immune response in hyperglycemia-induced Thp1 monocytes and male mice. Endocrinology 2017, 158, 3661–3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Giacco, F.; Brownlee, M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bodiga, V.L.; Eda, S.R.; Bodiga, S. Advanced glycation end products: Role in pathology of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Heart Fail. Rev. 2014, 19, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ma, H.; Li, S.Y.; Xu, P.; Babcock, S.A.; Dolence, E.K.; Brownlee, M.; Li, J.; Ren, J. Advanced glycation endproduct (AGE) accumulation and AGE receptor (RAGE) up-regulation contribute to the onset of diabetic cardiomyopathy. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2009, 13, 1751–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Papachristoforou, E.; Lambadiari, V.; Maratou, E.; Makrilakis, K. Association of Glycemic Indices (Hyperglycemia, Glucose Variability, and Hypoglycemia) with Oxidative Stress and Diabetic Complications. J. Diabetes Res. 2020, 2020, 7489795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Verrotti, A.; Prezioso, G.; Scattoni, R.; Chiarelli, F. Autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Bernardi, S.; Michelli, A.; Zuolo, G.; Candido, R.; Fabris, B. Update on RAAS Modulation for the Treatment of Diabetic Cardiovascular Disease. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 2016, 8917578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Mozaffarian, D.; Benjamin, E.J.; Go, A.S.; Arnett, D.K.; Blaha, M.J.; Cushman, M.; de Ferranti, S.; Despres, J.P.; Fullerton, H.J.; Howard, V.J.; et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2015 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 131, e29–e322. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Iribarren, C.; Karter, A.J.; Go, A.S.; Ferrara, A.; Liu, J.Y.; Sidney, S.; Selby, J.V. Glycemic control and heart failure among adult patients with diabetes. Circulation 2001, 103, 2668–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zhou, F.L.; Deng, M.Y.; Deng, L.L.; Li, Y.M.; Mo, D.; Xie, L.J.; Gao, Y.; Tian, H.M.; Guo, Y.K.; Ren, Y. Evaluation of the effects of glycated hemoglobin on cardiac function in patients with short-duration type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2021, 178, 108952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, S.; Liu, T.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wong, W.T.; Tse, G. Predictions of diabetes complications and mortality using hba1c variability: A 10-year observational cohort study. Acta Diabetol. 2021, 58, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schrauwen-Hinderling, V.B.; Meex, R.C.; Hesselink, M.K.; van de Weijer, T.; Leiner, T.; Schär, M.; Lamb, H.J.; Wildberger, J.E.; Glatz, J.F.; Schrauwen, P.; et al. Cardiac lipid content is unresponsive to a physical activity training intervention in type 2 diabetic patients, despite improved ejection fraction. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2011, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Longo, M.; Scappaticcio, L.; Caputo, M.; Maiorino, M.I.; Esposito, K. Mediterranean diet in type 2 diabetes: An updated overview of pharmacological activities of cardiometabolic and reproductive outcomes. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2021, 60, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Maiuolo, J.; Carresi, C.; Gliozzi, M.; Musolino, V.; Scarano, F.; Coppoletta, A.R.; Guarnieri, L.; Nucera, S.; Scicchitano, M.; Bosco, F.; et al. Effects of Bergamot Polyphenols on Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Strengers, J.G.; den Ruijter, H.M.; Boer, J.M.A.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Verschuren, W.M.M.; van der Schouw, Y.T.; Sluijs, I. The association of the Mediterranean diet with heart failure risk in a Dutch population. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Eurich, D.T.; McAlister, F.A.; Blackburn, D.F.; Majumdar, S.R.; Tsuyuki, R.T.; Varney, J.; Johnson, J.A. Benefits and harms of antidiabetic agents in patients with diabetes and heart failure: Systematic review. BMJ 2007, 335, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Wang, X.F.; Zhang, J.Y.; Li, L.; Zhao, X.Y.; Tao, H.L.; Zhang, L. Metformin improves cardiac function in rats via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Clin. Exp. Pharm. Physiol. 2011, 38, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yang, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, F.; Jiang, B.; Zha, W.; Yu, W. Metformin Ameliorates Diabetic Cardiomyopathy by Activating the PK2/PKR Pathway. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Andersson, C.; Søgaard, P.; Hoffmann, S.; Hansen, P.R.; Vaag, A.; Major-Pedersen, A.; Hansen, T.F.; Bech, J.; Køber, L.; Torp-Pedersen, C.; et al. Metformin is associated with improved left ventricular diastolic function measured by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with diabetes. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2010, 163, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ladeiras-Lopes, R.; Sampaio, F.; Leite, S.; Santos-Ferreira, D.; Vilela, E.; Leite-Moreira, A.; Bettencourt, N.; Gama, V.; Braga, P.; Fontes-Carvalho, R. Metformin in non-diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome and diastolic dysfunction: The MET-DIME randomized trial. Endocrine 2021, 72, 699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Griffin, S.J.; Leaver, J.K.; Irving, G.J. Impact of metformin on cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis of randomised trials among people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 1620–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Sharma, A.K.; Srinivasan, B.P. Triple verses glimepiride plus metformin therapy on cardiovascular risk biomarkers and diabetic cardiomyopathy in insulin resistance type 2 diabetes mellitus rats. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 38, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, S111–S124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Roumie, C.L.; Min, J.Y.; D’Agostino McGowan, L.; Presley, C.; Grijalva, C.G.; Hackstadt, A.J.; Hung, A.M.; Greevy, R.A.; Elasy, T.; Griffin, M.R. Comparative Safety of Sulfonylurea and Metformin Monotherapy on the Risk of Heart Failure: A Cohort Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e005379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Zhu, J.; Yu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Y.; He, Z.; Zhao, W.; Chen, C.; Qiu, K.; et al. Association of glucose-lowering medications with cardiovascular outcomes: An umbrella review and evidence map. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Campia, U.; Matuskey, L.A.; Panza, J.A. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation with pioglitazone improves endothelium-dependent dilation in nondiabetic patients with major cardiovascular risk factors. Circulation 2006, 113, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, X.D.; Sun, G.X.; Guo, J.J.; Hu, C.C.; Sun, R.C.; Yu, H.C. Effects of PPARγ agonist pioglitazone on cardiac fibrosis in diabetic mice by regulating PTEN/AKT/FAK pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 25, 812–819. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Gbr, A.A.; Abdel Baky, N.A.; Mohamed, E.A.; Zaky, H.S. Cardioprotective effect of pioglitazone and curcumin against diabetic cardiomyopathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus: Impact on CaMKII/NF-κB/TGF-β1 and PPAR-γ signaling pathway. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2021, 394, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dormandy, J.A.; Charbonnel, B.; Eckland, D.J.; Erdmann, E.; Massi-Benedetti, M.; Moules, I.K.; Skene, A.M.; Tan, M.H.; Lefèbvre, P.J.; Murray, G.D.; et al. PROactive Investigators. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 366, 1279–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Home, P.D.; Pocock, S.J.; Beck-Nielsen, H.; Curtis, P.S.; Gomis, R.; Hanefeld, M.; Jones, N.P.; Komajda, M.; McMurray, J.J.; RECORD Study Team. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): A multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 2009, 373, 2125–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Giugliano, D.; Longo, M.; Scappaticcio, L.; Caruso, P.; Esposito, K. Sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors for prevention and treatment of cardiorenal complications of type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2021, 20, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Giugliano, D.; Longo, M.; Caruso, P.; Maiorino, M.I.; Bellastella, G.; Esposito, K. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for the prevention of cardiorenal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: An updated meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2021, 23, 1672–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, J.; Williams, S.; Ho, S.; Loraine, H.; Hagan, D.; Whaley, J.M.; Feder, J.N. Quantitative PCR tissue expression profiling of the human SGLT2 gene and related family members. Diabetes Ther. 2010, 1, 57–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Packer, M.; Anker, S.D.; Butler, J.; Filippatos, G.; Zannad, F. Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure: Proposal of a Novel Mechanism of Action. JAMA Cardiol. 2017, 2, 1025–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Arow, M.; Waldman, M.; Yadin, D.; Nudelman, V.; Shainberg, A.; Abraham, N.G.; Freimark, D.; Kornowski, R.; Aravot, D.; Hochhauser, E.; et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor Dapagliflozin attenuates diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chen, H.; Tran, D.; Yang, H.C.; Nylander, S.; Birnbaum, Y.; Ye, Y. Dapagliflozin and Ticagrelor Have Additive Effects on the Attenuation of the Activation of the NLRP3 Inflammasome and the Progression of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: An AMPK-mTOR Interplay. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2020, 34, 443–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Xue, M.; Li, X.; Han, F.; Liu, X.; Xu, L.; Lu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Li, T.; et al. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin attenuates myocardial oxidative stress and fibrosis in diabetic mice heart. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019, 18, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Moellmann, J.; Klinkhammer, B.M.; Droste, P.; Kappel, B.; Haj-Yehia, E.; Maxeiner, S.; Artati, A.; Adamski, J.; Boor, P.; Schütt, K.; et al. Empagliflozin improves left ventricular diastolic function of db/db mice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Oka, S.; Kai, T.; Hoshino, K.; Watanabe, K.; Nakamura, J.; Abe, M.; Watanabe, A. Effects of empagliflozin in different phases of diabetes mellitus-related cardiomyopathy: A prospective observational study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2021, 21, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Giugliano, D.; Maiorino, M.I.; Bellastella, G.; Esposito, K. The residual cardiorenal risk in type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2021, 20, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Campbell, J.E.; Drucker, D.J. Pharmacology, physiology, and mechanisms of incretin hormone action. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 819–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Drucker, D.J. The Cardiovascular Biology of Glucagon-like Peptide-1. Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Baggio, L.L.; Yusta, B.; Mulvihill, E.E.; Cao, X.; Streutker, C.J.; Butany, J.; Cappola, T.P.; Margulies, K.B.; Drucker, D.J. GLP-1 Receptor Expression Within the Human Heart. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 1570–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Ding, W.; Chang, W.G.; Guo, X.C.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, D.D.; Ding, D.; Wang, J.X.; Zhang, X.J. Exenatide Protects Against Cardiac Dysfunction by Attenuating Oxidative Stress in the Diabetic Mouse Heart. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Almutairi, M.; Gopal, K.; Greenwell, A.A.; Young, A.; Gill, R.; Aburasayn, H.; Al Batran, R.; Chahade, J.J.; Manoj Gandhi, M.; Eaton, F.; et al. The GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Liraglutide Increases Myocardial Glucose Oxidation Rates via Indirect Mechanisms and Mitigates Experimental Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Can. J. Cardiol. 2021, 37, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Trang, N.N.; Chung, C.C.; Lee, T.W.; Cheng, W.L.; Kao, Y.H.; Huang, S.Y.; Lee, T.I.; Chen, Y.J. Empagliflozin and Liraglutide Differentially Modulate Cardiac Metabolism in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Sokos, G.G.; Nikolaidis, L.A.; Mankad, S.; Elahi, D.; Shannon, R.P. Glucagon-like peptide-1 infusion improves left ventricular ejection fraction and functional status in patients with chronic heart failure. J. Card. Fail 2006, 12, 694–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Margulies, K.B.; Hernandez, A.F.; Redfield, M.M.; Givertz, M.M.; Oliveira, G.H.; Cole, R.; Mann, D.L.; Whellan, D.J.; Kiernan, M.S.; Felker, G.M.; et al. NHLBI, Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Effects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016, 316, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bizino, M.B.; Jazet, I.M.; Westenberg, J.J.M.; van Eyk, H.J.; Paiman, E.H.M.; Smit, J.W.A.; Lamb, H.J. Effect of liraglutide on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Randomized placebo-controlled trial. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019, 18, 55, Erratum in Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019, 18, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Jorsal, A.; Kistorp, C.; Holmager, P.; Tougaard, R.S.; Nielsen, R.; Hänselmann, A.; Nilsson, B.; Møller, J.E.; Hjort, J.; Rasmussen, J.; et al. Effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, on left ventricular function in stable chronic heart failure patients with and without diabetes (LIVE)-a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2017, 19, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Maiorino, M.I.; Longo, M.; Scappaticcio, L.; Bellastella, G.; Chiodini, P.; Esposito, K.; Giugliano, D. Improvement of glycemic control and reduction of major cardiovascular events in 18 cardiovascular outcome trials: An updated meta-regression. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2021, 20, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dos Santos, L.; Salles, T.A.; Arruda-Junior, D.F.; Campos, L.C.; Pereira, A.C.; Barreto, A.L.; Antonio, E.L.; Mansur, A.J.; Tucci, P.J.; Krieger, J.E.; et al. Circulating dipeptidyl peptidase IV activity correlates with cardiac dysfunction in human and experimental heart failure. Circ. Heart Fail 2013, 6, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Suda, M.; Shimizu, I.; Yoshida, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; Ikegami, R.; Katsuumi, G.; Wakasugi, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Okuda, S.; Soga, T.; et al. Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 ameliorates cardiac ischemia and systolic dysfunction by up-regulating the FGF-2/EGR-1 pathway. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Al-Rasheed, N.M.; Al-Rasheed, N.M.; Hasan, I.H.; Al-Amin, M.A.; Al-Ajmi, H.N.; Mahmoud, A.M. Sitagliptin attenuates cardiomyopathy by modulating the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in experimental diabetic rats. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2016, 10, 2095–2107. [Google Scholar]
  103. Wu, Y.; Xu, M.; Bao, H.; Zhang, J.H. Sitagliptin inhibits EndMT in vitro and improves cardiac function of diabetic rats through the SDF-1α/PKA pathway. Eur Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Nogueira, K.C.; Furtado, M.; Fukui, R.T.; Correia, M.R.; Dos Santos, R.F.; Andrade, J.L.; Rossi da Silva, M.E. Left ventricular diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor-A pilot study. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2014, 6, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Yamada, H.; Tanaka, A.; Kusunose, K.; Amano, R.; Matsuhisa, M.; Daida, H.; Ito, M.; Tsutsui, H.; Nanasato, M.; Kamiya, H.; et al. PROLOGUE Study Investigators. Effect of sitagliptin on the echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the PROLOGUE study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2017, 16, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Oe, H.; Nakamura, K.; Kihara, H.; Shimada, K.; Fukuda, S.; Takagi, T.; Miyoshi, T.; Hirata, K.; Yoshikawa, J.; Ito, H.; et al. Comparison of effects of sitagliptin and voglibose on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of the 3D trial. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2015, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Scirica, B.M.; Bhatt, D.L.; Braunwald, E.; Steg, P.G.; Davidson, J.; Hirshberg, B.; Ohman, P.; Frederich, R.; Wiviott, S.D.; Hoffman, E.B.; et al. SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Zannad, F.; Cannon, C.P.; Cushman, W.C.; Bakris, G.L.; Menon, V.; Perez, A.T.; Fleck, P.R.; Mehta, C.R.; Kupfer, S.; Wilson, C.; et al. EXAMINE Investigators. Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2015, 385, 2067–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rosenstock, J.; Kahn, S.E.; Johansen, O.E.; Zinman, B.; Espeland, M.A.; Woerle, H.J.; Pfarr, E.; Keller, A.; Mattheus, M.; Baanstra, D.; et al. CAROLINA Investigators. Effect of Linagliptin vs Glimepiride on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The CAROLINA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019, 322, 1155–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Green, J.B.; Bethel, M.A.; Armstrong, P.W.; Buse, J.B.; Engel, S.S.; Garg, J.; Josse, R.; Kaufman, K.D.; Koglin, J.; Korn, S.; et al. TECOS Study Group. Effect of Sitagliptin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Liberale, L.; Carbone, F.; Camici, G.G.; Montecucco, F. IL-1β and Statin Treatment in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 23, 8–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Luo, B.; Li, B.; Wang, W.; Liu, X.; Liu, X.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; An, F. Rosuvastatin alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome and MAPK pathways in a type 2 diabetes rat model. Cardiovasc. Drugs. Ther. 2014, 28, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Al-Rasheed, N.M.; Al-Rasheed, N.M.; Hasan, I.H.; Al-Amin, M.A.; Al-Ajmi, H.N.; Mohamad, R.A.; Mahmoud, A.M. Simvastatin Ameliorates Diabetic Cardiomyopathy by Attenuating Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Rats. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 1092015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Min, J.J.; Shin, B.S.; Lee, J.H.; Jeon, Y.; Ryu, D.K.; Kim, S.; Shin, Y.H. Effects of Pravastatin on Type 1 Diabetic Rat Heart with or without Blood Glycemic Control. J. Diabetes Res. 2018, 2018, 1067853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Abdel-Hamid, A.A.; Firgany, A.E.-D.L. Atorvastatin alleviates experimental diabetic cardiomyopathy by suppressing apoptosis and oxidative stress. J. Mol. Histol. 2015, 46, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Carillion, A.; Feldman, S.; Na, N.; Biais, M.; Carpentier, W.; Birenbaum, A.; Cagnard, N.; Loyer, X.; Bonnefont-Rousselot, D.; Hatem, S.; et al. Atorvastatin reduces β-Adrenergic dysfunction in rats with diabetic cardiomyopathy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Jia, W.; Bai, T.; Zeng, J.; Niu, Z.; Fan, D.; Xu, X.; Luo, M.; Wang, P.; Zou, Q.; Dai, X. Combined Administration of Metformin and Atorvastatin Attenuates Diabetic Cardiomyopathy by Inhibiting Inflammation, Apoptosis, and Oxidative Stress in Type 2 Diabetic Mice. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 16, 634900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, J.; Cheng, Y.; Gu, J.; Wang, S.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Y.; Tan, Y.; Feng, W.; Fu, Y.; Mellen, N.; et al. Fenofibrate increases cardiac autophagy via FGF21/SIRT1 and prevents fibrosis and inflammation in the hearts of Type 1 diabetic mice. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Malmborg, M.; Schmiegelow, M.D.S.; Gerds, T.; Schou, M.; Kistorp, C.; Torp-Pedersen, C.; Gislason, G. Compliance in Primary Prevention With Statins and Associations With Cardiovascular Risk and Death in a Low-Risk Population With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 6, e020395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cosentino, F.; Grant, P.J.; Aboyans, V.; Bailey, C.J.; Ceriello, A.; Delgado, V.; Federici, M.; Filippatos, G.; Grobbee, D.E.; Hansen, T.B.; et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 255–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 12 00272 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular mechanisms underlying the development and progression of DC. AGEs, advanced glycated end-products; CAN, cardiac autonomic neuropathy.
Figure 1. Molecular mechanisms underlying the development and progression of DC. AGEs, advanced glycated end-products; CAN, cardiac autonomic neuropathy.
Biomolecules 12 00272 g001
Table
Table 1. Stages or subgroups of diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Table 1. Stages or subgroups of diabetic cardiomyopathy.
CharacteristicsStage 1Stage 2Stage 3Stage 4
ProgressionEarly phaseMiddle phaseMiddle/late phaseLate phase
FunctionDiastolic dysfunctionDiastolic and systolic dysfunctionDiastolic and systolic dysfunctionDiastolic and systolic dysfunction
AnatomyHypertrophy;
↑ LV mass		Hypertrophy;
↑ LV mass and wall thickness;
dilatation;
fibrosis		Dilatation;
fibrosis;
microangiopathy		Dilatation;
fibrosis;
micro- and macroangiopathy
Symptoms of HFNYHA INYHA IINYHA II-IIINYHA II-IV
Troponins--+ if inflammation or ischemia+ in infarction or severe
heart failure
↑ stands for increase; + stands for increased levels; HF, hearth failure; LV, left ventricle; NYHA, New York Heart Association.
Table
Table 2. Summary of the main effects of different glucose-lowering agents on diabetic cardiomyopathy and heart failure.
Table 2. Summary of the main effects of different glucose-lowering agents on diabetic cardiomyopathy and heart failure.
Glucose-Lowering AgentMechanisms of ActionEffects on Pump Function
Metformin↓ insulin resistance and TNF-α production
↓ cardiomyocytes and fibroblast LV remodeling
↑ production of NO
↑ systolic and diastolic function		No significant effects on HF hospitalization
SGLT-2i↓ weight and blood pressure
↑ osmotic diuresis and natriuresis
↓ sodium-hydrogen exchanger (NHE)
↓ myocardial injury
↑ LV function		33% reduced risk of HF hospitalization
GLP-1RAs↓ inflammatory myocardial remodeling
↓ inflammatory pathways in cardiomyocytes
↑ glucose uptake and coronary blood flow		10% reduced risk of HF hospitalization
DPP-4i=/↑ diastolic functionNo significant effect on HF hospitalization (↑ risk of HF hospitalization only with saxagliptin)
Sulfonylureas↑ hypoglycemia risk
↑ weight		No significant effect on HF hospitalization
Thiazolidinediones↑ weight
↑ edema
↓ inflammation, lipid and protein metabolism
↑ vascular endothelial function 		↑ risk of HF hospitalization
↑ stands for increase;↓ stands for reduction; = stands for no effect. DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP-1Ras, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HF, heart failure; SGLT-2i, Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Longo, M.; Scappaticcio, L.; Cirillo, P.; Maio, A.; Carotenuto, R.; Maiorino, M.I.; Bellastella, G.; Esposito, K. Glycemic Control and the Heart: The Tale of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Continues. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12020272

AMA Style

Longo M, Scappaticcio L, Cirillo P, Maio A, Carotenuto R, Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Esposito K. Glycemic Control and the Heart: The Tale of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Continues. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(2):272. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12020272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Longo, Miriam, Lorenzo Scappaticcio, Paolo Cirillo, Antonietta Maio, Raffaela Carotenuto, Maria Ida Maiorino, Giuseppe Bellastella, and Katherine Esposito. 2022. "Glycemic Control and the Heart: The Tale of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Continues" Biomolecules 12, no. 2: 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12020272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop