Next Article in Journal
Utilizing the LoxP-Stop-LoxP System to Control Transgenic ABC-Transporter Expression In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Soy Prevents Alcohol-Mediated Neurocognitive Dysfunction and Associated Impairments in Brain Insulin Pathway Signaling in an Adolescent Rat Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Brassinosteroids in Plants: Crosstalk with Small-Molecule Compounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Functional Interplay between Ethylene, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Sulfur in Plant Heat Stress Tolerance

1
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
2
Department of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India
3
Department of Biology, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(5), 678; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12050678
Submission received: 28 March 2022 / Revised: 2 May 2022 / Accepted: 5 May 2022 / Published: 8 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Hormones and Stresses)

Abstract

:
Plants encounter several abiotic stresses, among which heat stress is gaining paramount attention because of the changing climatic conditions. Severe heat stress conspicuously reduces crop productivity through changes in metabolic processes and in growth and development. Ethylene and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are signaling molecules involved in defense against heat stress through modulation of biomolecule synthesis, the antioxidant system, and post-translational modifications. Other compounds containing the essential mineral nutrient sulfur (S) also play pivotal roles in these defense mechanisms. As biosynthesis of ethylene and H2S is connected to the S-assimilation pathway, it is logical to consider the existence of a functional interplay between ethylene, H2S, and S in relation to heat stress tolerance. The present review focuses on the crosstalk between ethylene, H2S, and S to highlight their joint involvement in heat stress tolerance.

1. Introduction

1.1. Heat Stress: Impact and Consequences

In a field, plants are confronted with a variety of abiotic stresses; factors such as heat, drought, chilling, and salinity are all key constraints that impact crop yields in modern agriculture [1,2]. Of especial interest is the extreme seasonal heat induced by global warming, which exerts severe influence on crop growth and production around the world, aggravating food insecurity and malnutrition. In tropical and subtropical regions, an increase of 1 °C in seasonal temperature is expected to directly cause yield losses of 2.5% to 16% in staple crops [3]. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the greatest warming is regarded to occur in the period from the 19th to the 21st century. In the 21st century specifically, the average temperature of the Earth is anticipated to rise from 2 to 4.5 °C [4]. As the temperature has increased, the production of major crops has clearly been reduced around the world [5]; further temperature rise is expected to decrease yield more still. For example, forecasts based on the most conservative climate change projections suggest a minimum reduction of 4% to 10% in cereal production across South Asia [6]. Meanwhile, it is predicted that by 2050, rice production might drop by 8% and wheat production by 32% [7]. If temperatures rise by 3 to 4 °C, crop yields in Africa and Asia may be reduced by 15% to 35%, while those in the Middle East are likely to be reduced by 25% to 35% [8].
In conjunction with global warming, plant heat stress has become of considerable interest around the world, and the mechanisms of high-temperature injury and heat tolerance have attracted much attention [9,10,11,12]. Heat stress or shock is defined as a temporary increase in temperature of 10–15 °C over ambient conditions [13,14]. Whether temporary or persistent, high temperatures generate a variety of morpho-anatomical, physiological, and biochemical changes in plants, affecting their growth and development and consequently drastically lowering associated economic yield. Heat stress can affect a plant either directly or indirectly; protein aggregation, protein denaturation, and enhanced membrane fluidity are all examples of direct injury, whereas indirect injury can include inactivation of enzymes in chloroplasts and mitochondria, inhibition of protein synthesis, increased protein breakdown, and loss of membrane integrity. All of these changes cause cell injury or death within minutes, resulting in the catastrophic collapse of cellular organization [15,16,17]. At the process level, heat stress causes alterations in photosynthesis and respiration, resulting in a shorter life cycle and lower plant productivity [18]. For photosynthetic machinery in the chloroplast, the major sites of heat-induced damage have been identified as carbon metabolism in the stroma and chemical signaling in the thylakoid lamellae [19]. Both photosynthesis and the Calvin–Benson cycle enzymes, such as ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) and rubisco activase, are extremely sensitive to increased temperature and become severely inhibited even at low levels of heat stress [20,21]. Meanwhile, the activity of carbon metabolism enzymes and the accumulation of starch and sucrose are adversely affected by elevated temperature through altered regulation of carbohydrate metabolism genes [22]. Heat-induced disruption to the photosynthetic apparatus and chlorophyll has also been connected to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [23]. As an environmental factor, heat in its own right is further known to stimulate the generation of ROS, including superoxide anion radical (O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); the resulting imbalance between ROS production and the available antioxidant defense leads to oxidative stress [24,25]. Heat stress thus causes irreversible damage to plants by influencing a wide range of cellular components and metabolic functions [26].

1.2. Physiological and Molecular Responses to Heat Stress

Heat stress adversely impacts physiological and biochemical responses and photosynthetic efficiency and reduces productivity [27] through disruption of thylakoid membranes and reduction in pigment system (PS)II activity [28]. Chloroplasts are sensitive to heat stress, and heat-stress-induced damage to chloroplasts leads to downregulation of important chloroplast components, inhibition of rubisco activity and decrease in photosynthetic efficiency with redox imbalance and possible cell death [29,30,31]. In addition, disruption of thylakoid membranes is a consequence of heat stress that reduces the rate of photosynthesis through a reduction in PSII activity. Plants exposed to heat stress show alteration in carbohydrate metabolism and disruption of membrane functions, with increased membrane permeability leading to loss of cellular electrolytes and decreased thermotolerance [32]. Water potential and relative water content are substantially decreased upon exposure to heat, reducing photosynthetic productivity [33]. The levels of soluble sugars and proteins are also altered during heat stress to regulate osmotic pressure within the cell [34]. Plants exposed to heat stress show excess ROS production that causes lipid peroxidation and membrane damage [35]. ROS may cause programmed cell death, but plants have developed a mechanism to detoxify ROS and endure tolerance through activation of the antioxidant system.
Heat stress is transcriptionally regulated by heat shock factors (HSFs) and heat shock proteins (HSPs) that interact to bring thermotolerance. In addition, heat-responsive genes are also regulated by transcription factors such as multiprotein bridging factor 1 C (MBF1 C), N acetylcysteine (NAC), WRKY, basic leucine zipper (bZIP), and MYB to induce tolerance [36]. Exposure to heat upregulates the NAC transcription factor which further regulates the expression of dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 2A (DREB2A) for heat tolerance [37].
Noncoding RNAs also play a significant role in response to heat stress. miR156 isoforms are induced by heat stress [36]. Similarly, miR398 is induced under heat stress, leading to the accumulation of ROS through downregulation of SODs and thus inducing HSFs and HSPs [36]. Various miRNAs, mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs are associated with the plant hormonal signal transduction pathway under heat stress in Cucumis sativus [37]. Ahmed et al. [38] reported that numerous ncRNAs were involved in the regulation of gene expression in response to stress in Brassica. A study by Yu et al. [39] found the involvement of long noncoding RNA in activating ethylene synthesis in apple [39] and tomato [40]. H2S pretreatment was found to regulate alkaline stress tolerance by regulating the expression of microRNAs through downregulation of mhp-miR408a expression and upregulation of mhp-miR477a and mhp-miR827 [31]. The crosslink of H2S with transcription factors, signal transduction, miRNAs, and epigenetic modifications has been studied to better understand the regulation of genes by H2S in plants [41].
Thus, we can predict that the noncoding RNAs that are important regulators in heat stress tolerance can be modified by H2S for stress tolerance and can probably modify ethylene synthesis. Therefore, a possibility exists that ethylene and H2S might interact for heat tolerance.

1.3. Regulation of Heat Stress by Phytohormones

In addition to the above effects, heat stress alters gene expression and transcript accumulation at the molecular level, causing stress-related proteins to be synthesized as a coping mechanism [42]. Phytohormones including ethylene, salicylic acid (SA), abscisic acid (ABA), brassinosteroids (BR), and jasmonate are responsible for integrating environmental and endogenous signals to control plant defense responses to several abiotic stresses, including heat stress [43]. In particular, ABA and SA help plants cope with the harmful consequences of heat stress by minimizing oxidative damage and maintaining photosynthesis. For example, in heat-exposed Arabidopsis thaliana, exogenous treatment with a low dose of methyl jasmonate has been found to maintain cell viability via controlling electrolyte leakage [44]. Meanwhile, BR has been shown to improve plant thermotolerance, namely by increasing the photosynthetic rate and elevating the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs), which are implicated in the complex signal transduction network that allows plants to withstand heat stress. The BR signaling pathway also stimulates the expression of phytochrome-interacting factors and coordinates plant architectural modifications. In maize subjected to heat stress, application of ABA (100 µM) stimulates the expression of sHSP17.2, sHSP17.4, and sHSP26, as well as the activity of antioxidant enzymes, resulting in decreased cellular ROS levels [45]. Overall, most hormones ultimately improve plant heat tolerance through modulating ROS homeostasis, namely increasing antioxidant synthesis and thus the scavenging of ROS [43].
Heat stress also activates pathways for phytohormone biosynthesis, thereby resulting in greater hormone accumulation. In particular, Poór et al. [46] found that heat stress activates a number of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling genes; ethylene-mediated signaling in turn regulates the expression of HSPs. In addition to its direct role in heat stress tolerance, ethylene regulates the metabolism of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) via modulating osmoprotectants and the antioxidant defense system. In addition, ethylene has been shown to play a significant role in tomato pollen thermotolerance [47]. Finally, a study by Huang et al. [48] determined the ethylene response factor EIN3-ERF95/ERF97-HSFA2 transcriptional cascade to be key in heat stress response and established a connection between ethylene and its downstream regulatory factors in basal thermotolerance of plants. Ultimately, exogenous application of ethylene prior to or concurrent with heat stress has been found to considerably reduce heat-induced damage and improve plant thermotolerance, indicating a central role for ethylene in heat stress response. As such, there is considerable promise in targeting ethylene biosynthesis and signaling pathways with the aim of improving plant heat tolerance.

1.4. Sulfur-Containing Compounds in Heat Stress Tolerance

As a nutrient, sulfur (S) is a fundamental necessity for optimal plant growth and development and is required throughout the life cycle, from vegetative development through harvesting. It is a key component of plant proteins and contributes to fundamental processes such as electron transport, structure, and regulation [49,50]. In addition, while phytohormones regulate S metabolism, some require S or its derivatives for their biosynthesis [49]. Sulfur assimilates have also been reported to function as signaling agents for intracellular communication; in particular, thiol-containing sulfur metabolites including cysteine (Cys), methionine (Met), and glutathione (GSH) are well-known modulators of environmental responses, and sulfur compounds are required for the formation of effective defense mechanisms in response to a variety of stresses [51,52,53]. Accordingly, S status has a significant impact on the ability of plants to combat stressful conditions, and sulfur management is an important issue in crop plant nutrition. Studies aiming to mitigate heat stress in plants have primarily focused on introducing technologies to enhance crop performance; S in particular has attracted attention in this area due to its critical role in stress acclimation. For example, foliar treatment with sulfur has been shown to help tomato plants cope with heat stress and improve their physiological responses and growth. Sulfur addition has been found to alleviate oxidative damage induced by heat through an increase in ascorbate and glutathione content that lowers H2O2, MDA, and electrolyte leakage [54].
Sulfur is an important constituent of vitamins thiamine/vitamin B1 and biotin. The role of thiamine in heat stress has been suggested by Wolak et al. [55]. Proteome profiling of Populus euphratica upon heat stress by Ferreira et al. [56] showed the role of pyruvate dehydrogenase, of which sulfur is a cofactor, in heat stress.
Methionine, the sulfur-containing amino acid, plays an important role in heat stress response [57]. Chloroplast heat-shock proteins containing methionine are involved in protecting PSII electron transport during heat stress [58]. Methionine and polyamine derivatives are reported to play important role in stress tolerance. Polyamines provide heat tolerance by increasing the expression of stress response genes [59]. Proline, another amino acid, also regulates high-temperature-induced dehydration and tolerance and is induced under heat stress [57]. GSH is a sulfur-containing metabolite that combats stress either by working as a nonenzymatic antioxidant or through interaction with various signaling molecules that are activated under stress [60]. These signaling molecules are known to regulate HSP70 for heat tolerance [61], and in response to salinity, they increased ethylene production by regulating 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate [62]. Their interaction with ABA and ethylene regulates stress-related genes in response to abiotic stress [63,64].
Thioredoxin is a sulfur-containing heat-resistant protein, and in A. thaliana, thioredoxin reductase type C helped the plant tolerate stress [65]. Glucosinolate, another sulfur-containing secondary metabolite, increases under heat stress and has a protective role under heat stress [66].

1.5. Sulfur and Hydrogen Sulfide in Heat Stress Tolerance and Their Interrelationship with Ethylene

S assimilation leads to the synthesis of methionine, which acts as a precursor for ethylene through S-adenosyl methionine (SAM), and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is also produced by plant cells as an intermediate of assimilatory sulfate reduction. In plastids, plants reduce activated sulfate to sulfite, which is further reduced by sulfite reductase to H2S. The incorporation of H2S into O-acetylserine (OAS) to form cysteine catalyzed by O-acetylserine thiol lyase (OASTL) is a reversible reaction where cysteine could be decomposed to H2S and OAS [67]. Cysteine is a precursor for methionine which eventually leads to ethylene through SAM. Thus, the tolerance mechanisms induced by sulfur, H2S, and ethylene under heat stress could probably be interlinked with each other.
Interestingly, the emerging gasotransmitter H2S has also been revealed to possess important roles in abiotic stress tolerance; moreover, it seems to generally act via modulating the action of ethylene [68,69] H2S has been demonstrated to weaken the effect of ethylene on banana ripening [70], and ethylene in conjunction with H2S has recently been found to potentially alleviate hexavalent chromium toxicity in two pulse crops [71]. Hydrogen sulfide has also been shown by Kaya et al. [72] to mitigate mineral deficiency, specifically iron deficiency, in strawberry plants. Interestingly, treatment with the phytohormone ABA improves tobacco heat tolerance by increasing endogenous H2S, achieved through boosting the activity of L-cysteine desulfhydrase. Thus, H2S also factors into ABA-mediated heat tolerance [73]. Hancock [74] highlighted that in its central role in the S cycle, plant-produced H2S may also have intracellular effects through the modification of thiols and antioxidants. However, the potential mechanisms by which the S-assimilation pathway might regulate ethylene and H2S biosynthesis under heat stress are as of yet unknown.
More broadly, abiotic stress tolerance is aided by the coordination of phytohormones and nutritional signals. That is, plant nutrients interact with phytohormones, signaling molecules, polyamines, and even other nutrients, and these interactions can produce derivatives that counteract abiotic-stress-induced adversity and enhance stress tolerance [75,76]. The phytohormones ethylene and SA are representative of such interactions, as they both regulate S metabolism and influence abiotic stress tolerance [77]. For example, ethylene enhances ATP-sulfurylase (ATP-S) activity and Cys and GSH content in salt-stressed plants, and the same was reported with the application of nitrogen (N) and S [78]. These observations demonstrate the common regulatory impacts of ethylene, N, and S upon components of the salinity stress response. In relation to plant heat tolerance, studies have mainly investigated phytohormones and plant nutrients separately. While their interaction has been explored in relation to other abiotic stresses, little research has been done on the interaction of phytohormones and nutrients in the context of heat stress. Importantly, as the synthesis of ethylene and H2S needs S as a backbone, it is postulated that there is connectivity between ethylene, H2S, and S in heat stress tolerance. The present review focuses on the functional interplay between ethylene, H2S, and S in heat stress tolerance. The present review first focuses on the linkage of ethylene and H2S with S. Then, the individual role of each of these in heat stress tolerance is discussed to work out their mechanism of action and to find a common interface among them. Lastly, crosstalk between ethylene and H2S for heat stress tolerance through the involvement of sulfur is discussed.

2. Ethylene and H2S Synthesis: Involvement of the Sulfur Assimilation Pathway

Sulfur is a crucial element required for all living organisms as an active component of amino acids (i.e., Cys and Met), vitamins, GSH, several group transfer coenzymes, and the thioredoxin system that fulfills vital functions in plant growth and development [79,80]. Of particular relevance to the present topic is that assimilation of S is directly or indirectly involved in the biosynthesis of H2S and ethylene (Figure 1). In plants, there are two routes for absorption of S: either sulfate (SO42−) is taken up from the soil by roots, or sulfur oxides are absorbed from the atmosphere by leaves through the stomata [81,82]. However, the second mode mainly occurs when the soil is S-deficient; soil absorption is preferred. Once inside the roots, SO42− is first reduced and then incorporated into organic compounds [83]. Meanwhile, in leaf tissues, both assimilation and reduction occur as the enzymes involved in these processes are restricted to chloroplasts [84]. After entry of SO42− into chloroplasts, the assimilatory pathway is activated to produce adenosine 5-phosphosulfate (APS) through catalysis by ATP-sulfurylase (EC 2.7.7.4); APS is then in turn reduced to sulfite (SO32−) via APS reductase (APR, EC 1.8.99.2) with GSH as the electron donor. Afterward, SO32− is reduced to sulfide (S2−) under catalysis by sulfite reductase (SiR, EC 1.8.7.1) [78,85]. The sulfide is then used to produce H2S, for which SiR is considered a major generating enzyme in the chloroplast [86,87]. Subsequently, H2S and O-acetylserine are catalyzed by O-acetylserine (thiol)-lyase (EC 2.5.1.47) to produce Cys, which is the first stable compound of S assimilation and the synthetic precursor for both GSH and Met [88]. It can also be degraded to generate H2S. Recent studies have revealed that in addition to SiR, a variety of enzymes in the mitochondria and cytosol contribute to the biosynthesis of H2S, such as cysteine synthase (CS), β-cyanoalanine synthase (CAS, EC 4.4.1.9), L-cysteine desulfhydrase (LCD, EC 4.4.1.28), and D-cysteine desulfhydrase (DCD, EC 4.4.1.15) [48,87]. In mitochondria, H2S can be produced by CAS in the course of cyanide detoxification during ethylene synthesis, which requires the release of S2− through catabolism of Cys [89]. Importantly, accumulation of S2− is lethal for plants, and so detoxification mechanisms regulate its formation during the assimilation of S and/or metabolism of cyanide. An imperative detoxification mechanism involves fixation of S2− into Cys under severely elevated levels of S2− [90]. In addition, H2S generation from Cys in the cytosol mainly occurs through the activity of LCD and DCD, which is accompanied by the formation of pyruvate and ammonia [91,92] (Figure 1).
The rate-limiting enzyme in S assimilation is APR, which controls the flow of inorganic S into Cys and thus likely controls endogenous H2S production [93], which occurs via catalysis by enzymes downstream of APR [94,95]. Notably, H2S has the capability to interrelate with thiol (-SH) groups that are present in peptides such as GSH, and also with proteins that modify them, namely those that convert Cys thiols (-SH) into persulfide thiols (-SSH), a reaction known as persulfidation [96,97]. Such oxidative post-translational modification of Cys residues represents a signaling mechanism and is involved in biosynthetic pathways that require the transfer of S, for example in producing S-containing bases in RNA, Fe-S clusters, thiamine, biotin, molybdopterin, and lipoic acid [86]. In addition, these modifications of Cys residues can act as a defensive mechanism in an oxidative stress environment.
Apart from its free state, H2S reacts with different biochemical molecules and establishes different bioavailable pools including stable, acid-labile, and bound sulfide forms [98]. Free sulfide exists as S2−, HS, or H2S. Acid-labile sulfide is fundamental for iron–sulfur (Fe-S) complexes and persulfides, which assume a basic part in redox responses in cytoplasm and mitochondria. The critical pH below which H2S is released out of acid-labile sulfur-like Fe-S is 5.4 [99]. On the other hand, bound sulfane sulfur exists as a compound containing sulfur-bonded sulfur [100]. This incorporates compounds such as polysulfides, thiosulfate, polythionates, thiosulfonates bisorganyl-polysulfanes or monoarylthiosulfonates, and elemental sulfur. It may be said that H2S interconverts between gaseous and other complex storage compounds involving pH. Further, it has been reported that oxygen concentration and pH affect the stability of sulfide and derivatization within biological samples [101].
The other S-containing amino acid, Met, is synthesized in three steps from Cys and then is either incorporated into proteins or converted to S-adenosyl methionine (S-AdoMet (SAM)) by SAM synthetase (SAMS, EC 2.5.1.6) [80]. S-adenosyl methionine is the precursor of ethylene, biotin, polyamines, nicotinamide, and many other secondary metabolites [83]. Ethylene synthesis depends on SAM and likewise occurs in three steps; first, S-adenosyl methionine is formed from Met by the action of SAM synthetase, after which 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) is synthesized by ACC synthase (ACS, EC 4.4.1.14). Subsequently, ethylene is produced from the degradation of ACC by ACC oxidase (ACO, EC 1.14.17.4) [80,102]. The latter two enzymes, ACS and ACO, are encoded by multigene families [102]. Notably, derivation of ethylene from Met is not the only link between S assimilation and ethylene biosynthesis; the transcription factor ethylene insensitive-like 3 (EIL3) regulates many S-deficiency-responsive genes [103,104], primarily through the key regulator sulfate limitation 1 (SLIM1). Thus, there is a significant link between S status and ethylene signaling.

3. The Crucial Roles of Ethylene, H2S, and S in Heat Stress Tolerance

3.1. Potential Role of Ethylene in Heat Stress Tolerance

Heat stress affects plants, bringing about changes at the molecular, biochemical, morphological, and physiological levels, including increased ethylene biosynthesis. For example, soybean plants exposed to high temperature (38 °C for 14 days) showed enhanced ethylene production in leaves and pods [105]. Similarly, the heat-susceptible wheat cultivar ‘Karl 92′ had higher ethylene production in flag leaves, embryos, and kernels than did the heat-tolerant cultivar ‘Halberd’ [106]. In rice, application of the ethylene precursor ACC enhanced seedling tolerance to heat stress and reduced levels of cell membrane oxidation and ion leakage [107]. In conjunction with these effects, transcript expression was upregulated for the ethylene biosynthesis genes ACC oxidase 1 (ACO1) and ACC oxidase 3 (ACO3), which encode enzymes that catalyze ACC into ethylene; also elevated were the associated signal transduction genes ethylene-insensitive (EIN) 2, EIN-like1, and EIN-like2 (OsEIN2, OsEIL1, and OsEIL2). Work by Larkindale and Knight [108] further suggests that ethylene contributes to protecting Arabidopsis from heat-induced oxidative damage. Similarly, ethylene has been shown to play a favorable role in the activation of antioxidant enzyme activities and the reduction in ROS levels in plants under severe temperature stress. For instance, 10 µM ACC in Oryza sativa seedlings exposed to 45 °C for four days activated the antioxidant enzymes catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and total peroxidase, which were positively linked with increased tolerance [107]. Likewise, exogenous application of ethephon (an ethylene-releasing compound) to tomato plants prior to heat stress (50 °C for 2 h) upregulated protective mechanisms against oxidative stress, specifically those involved in cellular redox balance (including increased abundance of protein disulfide isomerase, glutathione-disulfide reductase, and glutaredoxin) [109]. Pretreating creeping bent-grass plants with 100 µmol/L ACC similarly imparted thermotolerance by maintaining higher ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, and peroxidase activity [110]. Thus, ethylene aids in ROS detoxification by inducing the antioxidant defense system during heat stress, allowing for heat stress adaptation.
Participation of ethylene in heat stress response and thermotolerance is further supported by results showing that treatment with an ethylene inhibitor negatively affects these changes, whereas using ethylene precursors promotes them. As an example, tomato plants of the ethylene-insensitive mutant never ripe (Nr), which are defective in an ethylene response sensor (ERS)-like ethylene receptor, exhibited higher heat-stress sensitivity. Likewise, a heat-susceptible wheat cultivar has been found to feature reduced ethylene production with increased kernel abortion and reduced kernel weight [106]. Meanwhile, pretreating wild-type tomato plants with an ethylene releaser in advance of heat stress improves pollen quality and increases the number of germinating pollen grains; conversely, pretreatment with an ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor reduces the number of germinating grains [47]. Similarly, priming lettuce seeds with 10 µM ACC added into KH2PO4 solution improves seed germination and performance under high temperature [111], and the application of exogenous ethylene precursors in artichoke promotes seed thermodormancy and reduces early root inhibition under heat stress [112]. More generally, pretreatment of a cool-season grass with ACC prior to heat exposure was found to boost thermotolerance, as evidenced by grass quality and leaf photosynthetic rates [110]. In addition, proteomics analysis revealed that pretreatment of lettuce with ethephon prior to heat stress causes the heat-stress pollen proteome to more closely resemble that associated with nonstressful conditions, specifically exhibiting a greater abundance of proteins involved in protein synthesis, degradation, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and RNA regulation [109]. However, while a positive role of ethylene in heat tolerance is widely accepted, contradictory findings have been reported. For example, the heat-stress-induced elevation of ethylene production triggers premature leaf senescence in soybean, whereas an ethylene production inhibitor (1-methylcycloprpene (1-MCP)) reduces or postpones premature leaf senescence [105]. Ethylene has also been linked to a yield penalty in heat-stressed wheat crops, in which context the application of compounds that serve as ethylene biosynthesis antagonists results in a considerable increase in grain output [106,113,114].
Moreover, under heat stress, protection of photosynthesis was associated with the physiological and biochemical mechanisms of SA, such as increased synthesis of proline and N assimilation and suppression of stress ethylene production [24]. It has also been reported that ethylene production was increased under heat stress and caused a decrease in grain yield [115]. Indeed, metabolite profiling during heat stress showed an accumulation of organic acids, sugar alcohols, and sucrose after treatment with AVG, an ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor, while glucose and fructose levels were greatly reduced [116], suggesting that differential accumulation of metabolites involved in osmoregulation and antioxidant metabolism induces tolerance to heat stress in the absence of ethylene [116]. Some selected studies on the role of ethylene in heat stress tolerance are shown in Table 1.
A key element of the ethylene signaling and response pathway is ethylene response factors (ERFs), which belong to the well-known APETALA2/ethylene-responsive element-binding protein (AP2/EREBP) family [117]. Plants exposed to heat stress show enhanced expression of ERFs, and ERF1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants exhibit greater tolerance to heat shock treatment than do control plants [118]. Huang et al. [119] discovered that ERFs regulate several heat-responsive genes in a heat-inducible way. A plant’s ability to respond to heat stress is mediated by heat shock transcription factors (HSFs), which quickly become activated under heat stress and connect to the promoter elements of genes encoding HSPs to boost their transcription [120]. HSPs then act as molecular chaperones, preventing cellular proteins from aggregating and denaturing while also assisting in the refolding of heat-damaged proteins [121]. In an ERF1-overexpression Arabidopsis line, heat shock treatment increased transcript levels of HsfA3 and HSP70; mechanistically, ERF1 bound to the GCC box elements of HsfA3 and HSP70 promoters and upregulated their expression to improve thermotolerance [118]. A recent study conducted by Wu and Yang [107] further revealed that ethylene signaling is involved in the complex regulation of HSF genes during heat stress; in particular, combined heat and ethylene precursor treatment in rice seedlings resulted in higher expression of the HsfA1a and A2a, c, d, e, and f genes than did heat stress alone.

3.2. Role of H2S in Heat Stress Tolerance

Long thought to be a phytotoxin, hydrogen sulfide is now recognized as a cell-signaling molecule involved in higher plant growth, development, and stress tolerance. It is actively associated with the plant defense system under severe conditions. In vitro, Li et al. [122] found that pretreatment of suspension-cultured tobacco cells with the H2S donor sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) could improve heat tolerance and that such acquisition of tolerance requires entry of extracellular Ca2+ across the plasma membrane, as well as mediation by intracellular CaM. Likewise, pretreatment of wheat seedlings with NaHS has a positive dose-dependent effect on heat tolerance that is specifically related to H2S [123]. Contrarily, Zhang et al. [124] showed contradictory findings on the role of exogenous H2S in heat stress tolerance. A high concentration of H2S inhibited primary root growth via the ROS-MPK6-NO signaling pathway. Exogenous H2S repressed the distribution of auxin and reduced the meristematic cell division potential in root tips, and NO was involved in this process. It has been reported that the low concentrations of H2S improved the tolerance of plants to abiotic and biotic stress, but high concentrations induced toxicity in plants’ growth [125]. However, Li et al. [126] found that pretreatment of maize seedlings with NaHS increased seed germination and seedling survival under heat stress and reduced root electrolyte leakage, tissue vitality, and the build-up of malondialdehyde (MDA) in coleoptiles. Such pretreatment also increased the activity of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) and decreased that of proline dehydrogenase (ProDH), resulting in a build-up of endogenous proline. Christou et al. [127] likewise found that pretreating strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa ‘Camarosa’) roots with NaHS effectively alleviated heat-associated decreases in leaf chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal conductance, and relative leaf water content, as well as increases in ion leakage and MDA accumulation. Additionally, endogenous H2S improved mechanical stability and physiological functions by increasing the uptake of key nutrient elements, i.e., calcium and potassium, in strawberry plants [128].
Ultimately, the beneficial effect of H2S is attributed to its ability to activate the antioxidant system, thus reducing the oxidative damage associated with stress conditions. During high temperature stress, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in NaHS-pretreated seedlings are increased compared to those of stressed non-pretreated plants, maintaining ROS homeostasis [123]. Min et al. [129] likewise suggested that exogenous NaHS treatment in wheat seedlings alleviates oxidative damage and increases heat tolerance by modulating antioxidant enzyme activity and gene expression under heat stress. Furthermore, at eight hours after heat stress exposure, strawberry plants whose roots were pretreated with NaHS were able to conserve ascorbate–glutathione (AsA-GSH) equilibrium, demonstrated by lower AsA and GSH pool redox disturbances and increased transcription of AsA and GSH biosynthesis enzymes; pretreatment also enhanced gene expression of antioxidant enzymes (cAPX, CAT, MnSOD, GR), heat shock proteins (HSP70, HSP80, HSP90), and aquaporins (PIP) [130]. These findings imply that H2S pretreatment activates a coordinated network of pathways related to heat shock defense, including antioxidant defense, at the transcriptional level, protecting plants from heat-stress-induced damage on a systemic level [131]. Interestingly, SA-induced heat tolerance in maize was found to be promoted by NaHS and blocked by H2S biosynthetic inhibitors or scavengers [132]. Therefore, H2S functions downstream of SA. Taken together, these findings suggest that heat tolerance in plants can be improved by NaHS pretreatment and that acquisition of NaHS-mediated heat tolerance may necessitate synergistic effects of the antioxidant system, the calcium messenger system, and heat shock proteins. Table 2 shows some selected studies on the role of H2S in heat stress tolerance.

3.3. Potential Role of Sulfur/S Compounds in Heat Stress Tolerance

Photosynthesis is more heat-sensitive than dark respiration and ceases before respiration is impaired on account of the damage induced by high temperatures [136]. High temperatures also induce a lack of transport that causes water shortage in plant tissues, resulting in mineral deficiency [137]. Mineral nutrition is key to regulating plant growth, metabolic functioning, and stress mitigation, and so it is of particular interest when it comes to developing new technologies and approaches for increasing crop performance under heat stress. Among all mineral nutrients, S is considered particularly key in the context of heat exposure [49]. Plants use S as a signaling agent to facilitate communication within the cellular environment [52], and they require thiol-containing biomolecules to establish defense mechanisms against various abiotic stressors [138]. For example, amino acids and metabolites containing S act to increase thermotolerance through interaction with a variety of biological substances, including plant growth regulators, enzymes, polyamines, and nutrients, and furthermore produce compounds that are essential in mechanisms for mitigating heat stress [49]. Sulfur and its derivatives are also essential for the activation of ROS-scavenging enzymes, which improve antioxidant defense in the face of abiotic stress [139]. In addition, sulfur is linked to secondary metabolism, abiotic and biotic stress regeneration, and photosynthetic oxygen generation. Mobin et al. [140] confirmed the involvement of sulfur in heat stress mitigation through significantly increasing photosynthetic and growth parameters, increasing antioxidant enzyme activities, and reducing oxidative stress biomarkers such as MDA and electrolyte leakage. The sulfur-containing defense compounds crucial for plant survival during biotic and abiotic stress response include elemental S, H2S, GSH, phytochelatins, S-rich proteins, and secondary metabolites, and the availability, demand, uptake, and assimilation of S are all critical factors in the formation of those compounds [50]. All told, many previous studies have emphasized the importance of S in plant stress defense.
In addition to the above, Martins et al. [141] found that iron–sulfur glutaredoxin (GRXS17) is redox-modified and consequently activates holdase to protect plants from heat stress. It also alleviates the misfolding and aggregation of proteins induced by heat stress. Consequently, we believe that the Fe-S cluster enzyme GRXS17 is an important guardian that protects proteins from moderate heat stress, most likely via a redox-dependent chaperone function. Some selected studies on the role of S in heat stress tolerance are shown in Table 3.

4. Post-Translational Modification of Ethylene- and H2S-Associated Proteins under Heat Stress

Post-translational modification (PTM) is a crucial step in determining the final functional fates of proteins. In post-translational modification, amino acid residues undergo covalent modifications such as glycosylation, phosphorylation, methylation, ADP-ribosylation, oxidation, and glycation; it can also involve proteolytic cleavage of the peptide backbone, nonenzymatic modifications such as deamidation and racemization, and spontaneous changes in protein conformation [147]. These modifications ensure the proper assembly and folding of proteins, which are then secreted or targeted to various compartments of the secretory system [148]. Post-translational modifications have also been found to perform significant roles in stress-exposed plants, for example helping to reduce crop damage [149]. Abiotic stresses in general exert significant impacts on plant proteomes, causing alterations in relative protein quantity, localization within the cell, post-transcriptional and -translational modifications, stability, interactions, and functions [150].
Of the various post-translational modifications in plants, SUMOylation has been revealed as a key player in responses to environmental stresses [149]. Studies conducted by Kurepa et al. [151] and Saracco et al. [152] using anti-SUMO antibodies discovered the crucial role of SUMOylation in defending against abiotic stresses such as heat, alcohol, ROS, and pathogenic toxicity. A positive role of SUMOylation in abiotic stress is also supported by various studies conducted on rice [153,154], tomato [155], and tobacco [156]. Enhanced SUMOylation of proteins under stress conditions such as higher temperature, drought, salinity, and increased ROS level further suggests a direct connection of this modification with tolerance response [151]. Mechanistically, a study in Arabidopsis indicated that protein modification mediated by SUMO1 and SUMO2 in the context of heat stress is directed by SIZ1 [157]. The direct relationship between SIZ1 and HSPs was explored by Zhang et al. [158] in heat-exposed tomato and revealed overexpression of SIZ1 followed by increased SUMO conjugation in such plants. In addition, an investigation of chromatin remodeling determined that protein SUMOylation is increased at promoters and enhancer sites during heat stress [159].
Furthermore, noncoding RNA is involved in the post-translational modification of ethylene and H2S. Noncoding RNA is the class of RNA regulating gene expression; however, these RNAs do not code for any functional proteins. microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs) are important noncoding RNAs involved in translational and post-translational gene modification [160,161]. Recent reports show a strong regulatory mechanism of such RNAs in overcoming abiotic stress responses in plants. In Arabidopsis, miR398 was rapidly induced in response to heat stress, followed by the downregulation of its target genes (CSD1, CSD2, and CCS). These are highly conserved genes involved in ROS scavenging [162]. Presences of the miR398-CSD/CCS pathway were also reported in plants like Brassica rapa and Populus tomentosa [163,164]. The association of miRNAs with phytohormones was also studied in several plants under heat stress. miR390, miR393, miR160, and many other miRNAs are involved in the auxin signaling pathway under heat stress. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 (ARF17) and ARF13 genes are the target sites for miR160. In the case of wheat, miR160 was downregulated while its other target HSP70 was upregulated when exposed to heat [165]. On the other hand, miR159 negatively targets the GAMYB genes of GA [166]. Plant mutants overexpressing TamiR159 are heat-sensitive since overexpression of miR159 leads to GAMYB downregulation during heat stress [167].
Small interfering RNAs (21–24 nucleotides long) catalyze dsRNA processing. In the case of wheat, the levels of siRNAs were downregulated by heat stress and upregulated by cold stress [168]. In Arabidopsis, restriction of the ONSEN gene is regulated by siRNA under heat stress [169]. Negative regulation of HEAT-INDUCED TAS1 TARGET1 (HTT1) and HTT2 was seen when miR173-cleaved ta-siRNA (TAS1) was overexpressed, leading to poor thermotolerance [161,170]. lncRNAs are 200 nt in length; they are classified as antisense lncRNAs or intronic lncRNAs based on their location [171]. Fifteen heat-responsive lncRNAs and 34 lncRNAs were identified in Arabidopsis and B. rapa, respectively [172]. Moreover, SUCROSE SYNTHASE 4, which is a heat-responsive gene, is the target site for lnc-173 under heat stress. Noncoding RNAs are the potent regulators of heat stress responses. Although genome-scale approaches have been used to conduct extensive research, we need more insight into this regulatory mechanism controlling heat stress responses and tolerance.

4.1. Ethylene and Related Post-Translational Modifications

Ethylene stands out as a potent abiotic stress regulator, operating over a wide range of concentrations and inducing multiple changes in plants to mitigate the damage caused by stress [51]. Heat stress has been shown to affect ethylene production mainly in reproductive tissues, such as floral, pedicel, and fruit tissues, and to optimize the dynamics of resource allocation [173]. Exogenous application of ethylene triggers activation of various defense proteins, which are important for maintaining homeostasis in plant cells and promoting thermotolerance [174], and also stimulates various signaling pathways involved in defense against heat stress [107].
Heat stress proteins also fill essential roles in combating high temperature stress, acting to maintain proper cell functioning, growth, and development [9]. They are associated with other defense responses such as protein refolding [175], prevention of protein denaturation and aggregation, membrane stabilization, and induction of antioxidant enzymes, which serve to further preserve cell homeostasis [176]. Studies to date support a direct link between ethylene and rapid synthesis of HSPs at both transcriptional and protein levels [177]. Early evidence also suggests that ethylene induces the accumulation of HSP70 [178] and HSP90 [179], two chaperones that regulate folding and whose cochaperones are associated with signaling, protein targeting, and protein denaturation [180]. Moreover, ACC-like oxidase, which is an important ethylene biosynthesis gene, is the target site for miR5175. According to the studies, ACC-like oxidase mRNA is downregulated in 24 h heat-stressed plants [181,182]. An omics-based approach has shown post-transcriptional regulation of fruit ripening (via miR164-NAC). NAC transcription factors are crucial for fleshy fruit ripening [183]. miR164 acts as an upstream regulator of NAC transcription factors, and the high abundance of miR164 might abolish the effects of NAC transcription factors on fruit ripening. Gene expression analysis and luciferase reporter assays indicated that Ade-miR164 and one of its precursor miRNAs (Ade-MIR164b) were repressed by ethylene treatment and negatively correlated with AdNAC6/7 expression [184]. Thus, considerable evidence has demonstrated that ethylene mediates transcriptional-level regulation; however, research on its contribution to post-translational regulation under heat stress is lacking.

4.2. H2S and Related Post-Translational Modifications

H2S is a lipophilic gaseous molecule that has been revealed as a potent gasotransmitter involved in signal transduction [185]. At low concentration, it can enhance the heat tolerance response in wheat seedlings and positively regulate their growth and development; it was also found to increase total sugar content and CAT, SOD, and APX activity while reducing MDA and ROS [123]. Similarly, exogenous application of H2S to maize in the context of heat stress decreased oxidative damage, reduced electrolyte leakage, and improved thermotolerance by modulating the antioxidant system (APX, CAT, SOD, glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR), monodehydroxy ascorbate reductase (MDHAR), ascorbic acid, glutathione, and flavonoids); upregulating gene expression; and increasing soluble sugar, trehalose, and osmolyte (proline, glycine betaine) contents [186].
Post-translational modification of proteins by H2S involves the oxidation of cysteine residues to form persulfides [187]. For example, in Arabidopsis, persulfidation of Cys160 in the cytosolic GapC1 and GapC2 isoforms of five glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases can affect either enzyme activity or cytosolic/nuclear partitioning [188,189]. Studies of stress physiology support a strong conclusion that various PTMs such as S-nitrosylation (SNO), S-glutathionylation (SSG), and S-sulfenylation (SOH) may be applied to Cys thiols to improve plant defense responses. These oxidized forms can be reduced by intracellular reducing agents such as GSH, thioredoxin (Trx), and glutaredoxin (Grx) [190]. Under prolonged stress, irreversible modification of thiols occurs, such as with sulfinic (RSO2H) and sulfonic acids (RSO3H). Persulfidated proteins also have a protective function against the accumulation of ROS/RNS, reacting with the latter to form an adduct (RSSO3H) that may be restored by thioredoxin to free thiol [191,192]. Antioxidant enzymes are also subject to PTMs under stress conditions; for example, APX1 is inactivated by oxidation of Cys32, while glutathionylation protects it from irreversible oxidation [193]. The same Cys32 position can also be S-nitrosylated by NO and persulfidated by hydrogen sulfide; these modifications increase the enzyme’s activity [188,194]. PTMs can also have negative feedback effects; in tomato plants under osmotic stress, ethylene regulates stomatal closure and triggers H2S production in guard cells, which in turn persulfidates Cys60 of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO1), inhibiting its enzymatic activity and retarding ethylene biosynthesis [195].
However, the direct interaction between miRNAs and H2S is documented in recent therapeutic research. miRNAs and H2S influence the biosynthesis and expression of each other. As per the evidence, H2S released by NaHS and Na2S can upregulate miR-133a levels in cultured cardiomyocytes in vitro and exhibits cardioprotective effects in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [196,197]. Moreover, miR-21 targets SP1 to decrease CSE transcription and H2S production [198].

5. Crosstalk between Ethylene and H2S for Heat Stress Tolerance through the Involvement of Sulfur

Sulfate availability enhances phytohormone-mediated action [79] and is ultimately used to produce Cys, which not only acts as the storage and transport form of reduced S but is required for GSH synthesis and helps in reducing oxidative stress by detoxifying ROS, thereby maintaining the redox state and defense processes required for thermotolerance [199,200]. As the immediate substrate for Cys synthesis, sulfide can be used to synthesize proteins and other organic compounds [201,202,203] that promote heat tolerance [86]; conversely, sulfide can be produced through the degradation of cysteine by desulfhydrases (DESs) [204,205,206]. Sulfide is also an important source of reactive sulfur species (RSS), SAM, GSH, and phytochelatins, and it has been reported to interact with ethylene [69]. That the interaction between ethylene and S promotes abiotic stress tolerance has been established by multiple studies [13,207,208,209,210]. In addition, H2S and ethylene can both be regulated by S and in turn can regulate S assimilation to influence stress tolerance. When plants are exposed to excess sulfur in the form of SO2, sulfate, or Cys, H2S is emitted via foliage into the atmosphere [201,211]. Thus, a regulatory interaction exists between the biosynthetic pathways of ethylene and H2S that induces signaling for tolerance of stress conditions via multiple mechanisms (Figure 2).
As described above, cysteine formed during S assimilation is involved in the synthesis of Met and proteins, and it also acts as the S2− donor for H2S synthesis. In addition, the ethylene generation and S metabolism pathways are interlinked; treatment with an exogenous ethylene precursor has been shown to increase the activity of APS reductase, which is involved in S assimilation [212]. Similarly, ethylene was found to increase ATP-S activity and S uptake in Brassica [80] and to induce H2S generation through increased activity of L-/D-cysteine desulfhydrase in Arabidopsis leaves [68]. Thus, both ethylene and H2S could be linked with S in inducing heat stress tolerance. Mechanistically, it could be assumed that heat stress causes oxidative stress, which increases S assimilation and leads to enhanced H2S and ethylene synthesis, which regulate antioxidants to scavenge ROS and induce tolerance. A regulatory role has been reported for H2S in ethylene-mediated stress responses, highlighting the crosstalk between these three pathways; for example, treatment of peach roots with exogenous H2S has been shown to increase endogenous H2S content, inhibiting ethylene synthesis and reducing the damage from waterlogging stress [213]. More indirect crosstalk is evidenced in the S-mediated regulation of NO via H2S to enhance abiotic stress tolerance; it is also known that a regulatory interaction occurs between NO and ethylene in the context of abiotic stress tolerance [78], and H2S and NO crosstalk is associated with inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis [214,215]. Another example of NO and ethylene crosstalk was demonstrated in wild-type Arabidopsis calluses under salt stress, in which H₂O₂ enhanced ethylene production while ethylene in turn reduced H₂O₂ generation [216]. In the presence of S, H2O2 has been shown in drought-exposed wheat to potentiate the defense system and alleviate damage to chloroplasts and photosynthesis [217]. These findings together highlight the interconnection between the three pathways.
By inhibiting stress ethylene synthesis, H2S can also improve the activity and proline content of roots, reduce oxidative damage, and alleviate lipid peroxidation [218]. In tomato, H2S decreases transcript accumulation of ethylene receptor genes (SlETR5 and SlETR6) and associated transcription factors (SlCRF2 and SlERF2) [213], while in the context of Pb stress, it enhances GSH content and nonprotein thiols to scavenge ROS [219]. H2S, ethylene, and S also all contribute to the regulation of sugar content, sugars being important osmolytes in regard to heat stress tolerance. All told, the evidence supports the existence of extensive crosstalk between ethylene, H2S, and S pathways in relation to heat tolerance.

6. Conclusions

Heat stress is a major constraint on crop productivity, and its severity is likely to increase with the ongoing climate change. Plants leverage various mechanisms for adapting to heat stress, including enhancement of antioxidant potential, synthesis of reduced S-compounds, and activation of signaling hormone biosynthetic pathways. Ethylene and H2S are key signaling molecules that regulate the growth and development of plants and are involved in acclimation to abiotic stresses; in particular, they contribute substantially to heat stress tolerance by inducing metabolic changes and post-translational modifications. In addition, the processes for their biosynthesis depend on S-adenosyl methionine and sulfide, respectively, and so are directly or indirectly tied to S assimilation. Consequently, crosstalk between ethylene, H2S, and S is an important factor in regulating heat stress, and it can potentially be exploited for maximum alleviation of heat and other stresses in crop plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.S., H.G., N.I., A.F.A., B.J. and M.F.; writing—review and editing, M.F., M.A. and N.A.K.; supervision, N.A.K.; funding acquisition, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this review article are original.

Acknowledgments

The research work on the mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in the laboratory of N.A.K. is supported by the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, New Delhi (38(1473)/19/EMR-II).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tardieu, F.; Tuberosa, R. Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Saud, S.H.A.H.; Chen, Y.; Long, B.; Fahad, S.H.A.H.; Sadiq, A.R.O.O.J. The different impact on the growth of cool season turf grass under the various conditions on salinity and draught stress. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res. 2013, 3, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  3. Battisti, D.S.; Naylor, R.L. Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science 2009, 323, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. IPCC. The Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. In Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tito, R.; Vasconcelos, H.L.; Feeley, K.J. Global climate change increases risk of crop yield losses and food insecurity in the tropical Andes. Glob. Change Biol. 2014, 24, 592–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aryal, J.P.; Sapkota, T.B.; Khurana, R.; Khatri-Chhetri, A.; Rahut, D.B.; Jat, M.L. Climate change and agriculture in South Asia: Adaptation options in smallholder production systems. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 22, 5045–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Parry, M.L.; Rosenzweig, C.; Iglesias, A.; Livermore, M.; Fischer, G. Effect of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2004, 14, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ortiz, R.; Sayre, K.D.; Govaerts, B.; Gupta, R.; Subbarao, G.V.; Ban, T.; Reynolds, M. Climate change: Can wheat beat the heat? Agricul. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 126, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wahid, A.; Gelani, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Asthir, B. Protective mechanisms of heat tolerance in crop plants. J. Plant Inter. 2015, 10, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hemmati, H.; Gupta, D.; Basu, C. Molecular physiology of heat stress responses in plants. In Elucidation of Abiotic Stress Signaling in Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 109–142. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, L.; Wu, J.; Luo, M.; Sun, Y.; Wang, G. The effect of heat stress on gene expression, synthesis of steroids, and apoptosis in bovine granulosa cells. Cell Stress Chaperones 2016, 21, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Fatma, M.; Iqbal, N.; Sehar, Z.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Kaushik, P.; Khan, N.A.; Ahmad, P. Methyl jasmonate protects the ps ii system by maintaining the stability of chloroplast d1 protein and accelerating enzymatic antioxidants in heat-stressed wheat plants. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Iqbal, N.; Sehar, Z.; Fatma, M.; Umar, S.; Sofo, A.; Khan, N.A. Nitric Oxide and Abscisic Acid Mediate Heat Stress Tolerance through Regulation of Osmolytes and Antioxidants to Protect Photosynthesis and Growth in Wheat Plants. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Howarth, C.J. Genetic improvements of tolerance to high temperature. In Abiotic Stresses–Plant Resistance through Breeding and Molecular Approaches; Ashraf, M., Harris, P.J.C., Eds.; Haworth Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 277–300. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schöffl, F.; Prandl, R.; Reindl, A. Molecular responses to heat stress. In Molecular Responses to Cold, Drought, Heat and Salt Stress in Higher Plants; Shinozaki, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Eds.; R.G. Landes Co.: Austin, TX, USA, 1999; pp. 81–98. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bhattacharya, A. Effect of High Temperature on Crop Productivity and Metabolism of Macro Molecules, 1st ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 1–628. [Google Scholar]
  18. Barnabás, B.; Jäger, K.; Fehér, A. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 11–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wise, R.R.; Olson, A.J.; Schrader, S.M.; Sharkey, T.D. Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gautam, H.; Sehar, Z.; Rehman, M.T.; Hussain, A.; AlAjmi, M.F.; Khan, N.A. Nitric oxide enhances photosynthetic nitrogen and sulfur-use efficiency and activity of ascorbate-glutathione cycle to reduce high temperature stress-induced oxidative stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Morales, D.; Rodríguez, P.; Dell’Amico, J.; Nicolas, E.; Torrecillas, A.; Sánchez-Blanco, M.J. High-temperature preconditioning and thermal shock imposition affects water relations, gas exchange and root hydraulic conductivity in tomato. Biol. Plantar. 2019, 47, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ruan, Y.L.; Jin, Y.; Yang, Y.J.; Li, G.J.; Boyer, J.S. Sugar input, metabolism, and signaling mediated by invertase: Roles in development, yield potential, and response to drought and heat. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 942–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Camejo, D.; Jiménez, A.; Alarcón, J.J.; Torres, W.; Gómez, J.M.; Sevilla, F. Changes in photosynthetic parameters and antioxidant activities following heat-shock treatment in tomato plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 2006, 33, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khan, M.I.R.; Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A. Salicylic acid alleviates adverse effects of heat stress on photosynthesis through changes in proline production and ethylene formation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e26374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gautam, H.; Fatma, M.; Sehar, Z.; Iqbal, N.; Albaqami, M.; Khan, N.A. Exogenously-Sourced Ethylene Positively Modulates Photosynthesis, Carbohydrate Metabolism, and Antioxidant Defense to Enhance Heat Tolerance in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sung, D.Y.; Kaplan, F.; Lee, K.J.; Guy, C.L. Acquired tolerance to temperature extremes. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Renata Szyma´nska Lesak, I.; Orzechowska, A.; Kruk, J. Physiological and biochemical responses to high light and temperature stress in plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 139, 165–177. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Alam, M.M.; Roychowdhury, R.; Fujita, M. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9643–9684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Parankusam, S.; Adimulam, S.S.; Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Sharma, K.K. Nitric oxide (NO) in plant heat stress tolerance: Current knowledge and perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Kreslavski, V.D.; Klimov, V.V.; Los, D.A.; Carpentier, R.; Mohanty, P. Heat stress: An overview of molecular responses in photosynthesis. Photosynth. Res. 2008, 98, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.; Cai, C.; Wang, Z.; Fan, B.; Zhu, C.; Chen, Z. Plastid translation elongation factor Tu is prone to heat-induced aggregation despite its critical role in plant heat tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 3027–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Xalxo, R.; Yadu, B.; Chandra, J.; Chandrakar, V.; Keshavkant, S. Alteration in Carbohydrate Metabolism Modulates Thermotolerance of Plant under Heat Stress. In Heat Stress Tolerance in Plants: Physiological, Molecular and Genetic Perspectives, 1st ed.; Wani, S.H., Kumar, V., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 77–115. [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, J.; Zhang, R.; Xu, X.; Fowler, J.C.; Miller, T.E.X.; Dong, T. Effect of summer warming on growth, photosynthesis and water status in female and male Populus cathayana: Implications for sex-specific drought and heat tolerances. Tree Physiol. 2020, 40, 1178–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.; Ma, K.B.; Lu, Z.G.; Ren, S.X.; Jiang, H.R.; Cui, J.W.; Chen, G.; Teng, N.J.; Lam, H.M.; Jin, B. Differential physiological, transcriptomic and metabolomic responses of Arabidopsis leaves under prolonged warming and heat shock. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Slimen, I.B.; Najar, T.; Ghram, A.; Dabbebi, H.; Mrad, M.B.; Abdrabbah, M. Reactive oxygen species, heat stress and oxidative-induced mitochondrial damage. A review. Int. J. Hyperthermia. 2014, 30, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, J.; Lu, Z.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Plant Responses to Heat Stress: Physiology, Transcription, Noncoding RNAs, and Epigenetics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, X.; Guo, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Shu, S.; Sun, J. Systematic identification and analysis of heat-stress-responsive lncRNAs, circRNAs and miRNAs with associated co-expression and ceRNA networks in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Physiol. Plant. 2020, 168, 736–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ahmed, W.; Xia, Y.; Li, R.; Bai, G.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Guo, P. Non-coding RNAs: Functional roles in the regulation of stress response in Brassica crops. Genomics 2020, 112, 1419–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yu, J.; Qiu, K.; Sun, W.; Yang, T.; Wu, T.; Song, T.; Zhang, J.; Yao, Y.; Tian, J. A long non-coding RNA functions in high-light-induced anthocyanin accumulation in apple by activating ethylene synthesis. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 66–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, Y.; Gao, L.; Li, J.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, H.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zuo, J. Analysis of long-non-coding RNAs associated with ethylene in tomato. Gene 2018, 674, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Iranbakhsh, A.; Ardebili, Z.O.; Ardebili, N.O. Gene regulation by H2S in plants. In Hydrogen Sulfide in Plant Biology; Singh, S., Singh, V., Tripathi, D., Prasad, S., Chauhan, D., Dubey, N.K., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  42. Iba, K. Acclimative response to temperature stress in higher plants: Approaches of gene engineering for temperature tolerance. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Li, N.; Euring, D.; Cha, J.Y.; Lin, Z.; Lu, M.; Huang, L.J.; Kim, W.Y. Plant Hormone-Mediated Regulation of Heat Tolerance in Response to Global Climate Change. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Clarke, S.M.; Cristescu, S.M.; Miersch, O.; Harren, F.J.; Wasternack, C.; Mur, L.A. Jasmonates act with salicylic acid to confer basal thermotolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hu, X.; Liu, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Tai, F.; Xue, R.; Li, C. Heat shock protein 70 regulates the abscisic acid-induced antioxidant response of maize to combined drought and heat stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 60, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Poór, P.; Nawaz, K.; Gupta, R.; Ashfaque, F.; Khan, M.I.R. Ethylene involvement in the regulation of heat stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 41, 675–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Firon, N.; Pressman, E.; Meir, S.; Khoury, R.; Altahan, L. Ethylene is involved in maintaining tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) pollen quality under heat-stress conditions. AoB Plants 2012, 2012, pls024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, D.; Huo, J.; Liao, W. Hydrogen sulfide: Roles in plant abiotic stress response and crosstalk with other signals. Plant Sci. 2021, 302, 110733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Mahmud, J.A.; Nahar, K.; Mohsin, S.M.; Parvin, K.; Fujita, M. Interaction of sulfur with phytohormones and signaling molecules in conferring abiotic stress tolerance to plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2018, 13, e1477905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Capaldi, F.R.; Gratão, P.L.; Reis, A.R.; Lima, L.W.; Azevedo, R.A. Sulfur metabolism and stress defense responses in plants. Trop. Plant Biol. 2015, 8, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Khan, M.I.R.; Asgher, M.; Khan, N.A. Alleviation of salt-induced photosynthesis and growth inhibition by salicylic acid involves glycinebetaine and ethylene in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 80, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Biswal, B.; Raval, M.K.; Biswal, U.C.; Joshi, P. Response of photosynthetic organelles to abiotic stress: Modulation by sulfur metabolism. In Sulfur Assimilation and Abiotic Stress in Plants; Khan, N.A., Singh, S., Umar, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 167–191. [Google Scholar]
  53. Rather, B.A.; Mir, I.R.; Masood, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene-nitrogen synergism induces tolerance to copper stress by modulating antioxidant system and nitrogen metabolism and improves photosynthetic capacity in mustard. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2022, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mobin, M.; Khan, M.N.; Abbas, Z.K.; Ansari, H.R.; Al-Mutairi, K.A. Significance of sulfur in heat stressed cluster bean (Cymopsis tetragonoloba L. Taub) genotypes, responses of growth, sugar and antioxidative metabolism. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 63, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wolak, N.; Kowalska, E.; Kozik, A.; Rapala-Kozik, M. Thiamine increases the resistance of baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae against oxidative, osmotic and thermal stress, through mechanisms partly independent of thiamine diphosphate-bound enzymes. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014, 14, 1249–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ferreira, S.; Hjernø, K.; Larsen, M.; Wingsle, G.; Larsen, P.; Fey, S.; Roepstorff, P.; Pais, M.S. Proteome profiling of Populus euphratica upon heat stress. Ann. Bot. 2006, 98, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Du, H.; Wang, Z.; Yu, W.; Liu, Y.; Huang, B. Differential metabolic responses of perennial grass Cynodon transvaalensis × Cynodon dactylon (C4) and Poa pratensis (C3) to heat stress. Physiol. Plant. 2011, 141, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Heckathorn, S.A.; Downs, C.A.; Sharkey, T.D.; Coleman, J.S. The small, methionine-rich chloroplast heat-shock protein protects photosystem II electron transport during heat stress. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sagor, G.H.M.; Berberich, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Niitsu, M.; Kusano, T. The polyamine spermine protects Arabidopsis from heat stress-induced damage by increasing expression of heat shock-related genes. Transgenic Res. 2013, 22, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Noctor, G.; Mhamdi, A.; Chaouch, S.; Han, Y.; Neukermans, J.; Marquez-Garcia, B.; Queval, G.; Foyer, C.H. Glutathione in plants: An integrated overview. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 454–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kumar, D.; Chattopadhyay, S. Glutathione modulates the expression of heat shock proteins via the transcription factors BZIP10 and MYB21 in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3729–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Datta, R.; Kumar, D.; Sultana, A.; Hazra, S.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Chattopadhyay, S. Glutathione Regulates 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate Synthase Transcription via WRKY33 and 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate Oxidase by Modulating Messenger RNA Stability to Induce Ethylene Synthesis during Stress. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2963–2981. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Yoshida, S.; Tamaoki, M.; Ioki, M.; Ogawa, D.; Sato, Y.; Aono, M.; Kubo, A.; Saji, S.; Saji, H.; Satoh, S.; et al. Ethylene and salicylic acid control glutathione biosynthesis in ozone-exposed Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 2009, 136, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wei, L.; Wang, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Guo, T.; Kang, G. Abscisic acid enhances tolerance of wheat seedlings to drought and regulates transcript levels of genes encoding ascorbate-glutathione biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chae, H.B.; Moon, J.C.; Shin, M.R.; Chi, Y.H.; Jung, Y.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kang, C.H. Thioredoxin reductase type C (NTRC) orchestrates enhanced thermotolerance to Arabidopsis by its redox-dependent holdase chaperone function. Mol. Plant. 2013, 6, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Martínez-Ballesta, M.C.; Moreno, D.A.; Carvajal, M. The physiological importance of glucosinolates on plant response to abiotic stress in Brassica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11607–11625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Filipovic, M.R.; Jovanovic, V.M. More than just an intermediate: Hydrogen sulfide signalling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4733–4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hou, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Hou, L.; Liu, X. Hydrogen sulfide regulates ethylene-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Int. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, J.; Hou, L.; Liu, G.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. Hydrogen sulfide induced by nitric oxide mediates ethylene-induced stomatal closure of Arabidopsis thaliana. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2011, 56, 3547–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ge, Y.; Hu, K.D.; Wang, S.S.; Hu, L.Y.; Chen, X.Y.; Li, Y.H.; Zhang, H. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates postharvest ripening and senescence of banana by antagonizing the effect of ethylene. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Husain, T.; Suhel, M.; Prasad, S.M.; Singh, V.P. Ethylene and hydrogen sulphide are essential for mitigating hexavalent chromium stress in two pulse crops. Plant Biol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kaya, C.; Ashraf, M. The mechanism of hydrogen sulfide mitigation of iron deficiency-induced chlorosis in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) plants. Protoplasma 2019, 256, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, Z.G.; Jin, J.Z. Hydrogen sulfide partly mediates abscisic acid-induced heat tolerance in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) suspension cultured cells. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016, 125, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hancock, J.T. Hydrogen sulfide and environmental stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khan, M.I.R.; Ashfaque, F.; Chhillar, H.; Irfan, M.; Khan, N.A. The intricacy of silicon, plant growth regulators and other signaling molecules for abiotic stress tolerance: An entrancing crosstalk between stress alleviators. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pavlíková, D.; Neuberg, M.; Žižková, E.; Motyka, V.; Pavlík, M. Interactions between nitrogen nutrition and phytohormone levels in Festulolium plants. Plant Soil Environ. 2012, 58, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Asgher, M.; Khan, N.A.; Khan, M.I.R.; Fatma, M.; Masood, A. Ethylene production is associated with alleviation of cadmium-induced oxidative stress by sulfur in mustard types differing in ethylene sensitivity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 106, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jahan, B.; Rasheed, F.; Sehar, Z.; Fatma, M.; Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Coordinated role of nitric oxide, ethylene, nitrogen, and sulfur in plant salt stress tolerance. Stresses 2021, 1, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jahan, B.; Sehar, Z.; Masood, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, M.I.R.; Khan, N.A. Sulfur availability potentiates phytohormones-mediated action in plants. In Plant Signaling Molecules; Khan, M.I.R., Reddy, P.S., Ferrante, A., Khan, N.A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 287–301. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jahan, B.; Iqbal, N.; Fatma, M.; Sehar, Z.; Masood, A.; Sofo, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene supplementation combined with split application of nitrogen and sulfur protects salt-inhibited photosynthesis through optimization of proline metabolism and antioxidant system in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Plants 2021, 10, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, T.; Xue, S. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in plant development and stress responses. Abiotech 2021, 2, 32–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhang, N.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Sun, C.; Lin, X. Sulfur deficiency exacerbates phytotoxicity and residues of imidacloprid through suppression of thiol-dependent detoxification in lettuce seedlings. Environ. Poll. 2021, 291, 118221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Astolfi, S.; Celletti, S.; Vigani, G.; Mimmo, T.; Cesco, S. Interaction between sulfur and iron in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 670308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Feldman-Salit, A.; Veith, N.; Wirtz, M.; Hell, R.; Kummer, U. Distribution of control in the sulfur assimilation in Arabidopsis thaliana depends on environmental conditions. New Phytolol. 2019, 222, 1392–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Samanta, S.; Singh, A.; Roychoudhury, A. Involvement of sulfur in the regulation of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Protective chemical agents in the amelioration of plant abiotic stress. Biochem. Mol. Perspect. 2020, 11, 437–466. [Google Scholar]
  86. Filipovic, M.R.; Zivanovic, J.; Alvarez, B.; Banerjee, R. Chemical biology of H2S signaling through persulfidation. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 1253–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Arif, M.S.; Yasmeen, T.; Abbas, Z.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Aljarba, N.H.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Role of exogenous and endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) on functional traits of plants under heavy metal stresses: A recent perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jez, J.M. Structural biology of plant sulfur metabolism: From sulfate to glutathione. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4089–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. García-Mata, C.; Lamattina, L. Hydrogen sulphide, a novel gasotransmitter involved in guard cell signalling. New Phytol. 2010, 188, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gotor, C.; García, I.; Aroca, Á.; Laureano-Marín, A.M.; Arenas-Alfonseca, L.; Jurado-Flores, A.; Romero, L.C. Signaling by hydrogen sulfide and cyanide through post-translational modification. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4251–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Rather, B.A.; Mir, I.R.; Sehar, Z.; Anjum, N.A.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. The outcomes of the functional interplay of nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide in metal stress tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Khanna, K.; Sharma, N.; Kour, S.; Ali, M.; Ohri, P.; Bhardwaj, R. Hydrogen Sulfide: A Robust Combatant against Abiotic Stresses in Plants. Hydrogen 2021, 2, 319–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fu, Y.; Tang, J.; Yao, G.F.; Huang, Z.Q.; Li, Y.H.; Han, Z.; Zhang, H. Central role of adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase in the control of plant hydrogen sulfide metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wilson, L.G.; Bressan, R.A.; Filner, P. Light-dependent emission of hydrogen sulfide from plants. Plant Physiol. 1978, 61, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Wang, C.; Deng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liao, W. Hydrogen Sulfide in Plants: Crosstalk with Other Signal Molecules in Response to Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Corpas, F.J. Hydrogen sulfide: A new warrior against abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Thakur, M.; Anand, A. Hydrogen sulfide: An emerging signaling molecule regulating drought stress response in plants. Physiol. Plantar. 2021, 172, 1227–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kolluru, G.K.; Shen, X.; Bir, S.C.; Kevil, C.G. Hydrogen sulfide chemical biology: Pathophysiological roles and detection. Nitric oxide 2013, 35, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Ishigami, M.; Hiraki, K.; Umemura, K.; Ogasawara, Y.; Ishii, K.; Kimura, H. A source of hydrogen sulfide and a mechanism of its release in the brain. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Kamoun, P. Endogenous production of hydrogen sulfide in mammals. Amino Acids 2004, 26, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Shen, X.; Peter, E.A.; Bir, S.; Wang, R.; Kevil, C.G. Analytical measurement of discrete hydrogen sulfide pools in biological specimens. Free Radic Biol. Med. 2012, 52, 2276–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Singh, N.; Gaddam, S.R.; Singh, D.; Trivedi, P.K. Regulation of arsenic stress response by ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 185, 104408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Maruyama-Nakashita, A.; Nakamura, Y.; Tohge, T.; Saito, K.; Takahashi, H. Arabidopsis SLIM1 is a central transcriptional regulator of plant sulfur response and metabolism. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3235–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Wawrzyńska, A.; Sirko, A. To control and to be controlled: Understanding the Arabidopsis SLIM1 function in sulfur deficiency through comprehensive investigation of the EIL protein family. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 575. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Djanaguiraman, M.; Prasad, P.V. Ethylene production under high temperature stress causes premature leaf senescence in soybean. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37, 1071–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hays, D.; Mason, E.; Do, J.H.; Menz, M.; Reynolds, M. Expression quantitative trait loci mapping heat tolerance during reproductive development in wheat (Triticum aestivum). In Wheat Production in Stressed Environments. Developments in Plant Breeding; Buck, H.T., Nisi, J.E., Salomón, N., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 373–382. [Google Scholar]
  107. Wu, Y.S.; Yang, C.Y. Ethylene-mediated signaling confers thermo-tolerance and regulates transcript levels of heat shock factors in rice seedlings under heat stress. Bot. Stud. 2019, 60, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Larkindale, J.; Knight, M.R. Protection against heat stress-induced oxidative damage in Arabidopsis involves calcium, abscisic acid, ethylene, and salicylic acid. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 682–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Jegadeesan, S.; Chaturvedi, P.; Ghatak, A.; Pressman, E.; Meir, S.; Faigenboim, A.; Firon, N. Proteomics of heat-stress and ethylene-mediated thermotolerance mechanisms in tomato pollen grains. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Larkindale, J.; Huang, B. Thermotolerance and antioxidant systems in Agrostis stolonifera: Involvement of salicylic acid, abscisic acid, calcium, hydrogen peroxide, and ethylene. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Korkmaz, A. Ameliorative effects of ethylene precursor and polyamines on the high temperature inhibition of seed germination in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) before and after seed storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 2006, 34, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Shinohara, T.; Martin, E.A.; Leskovar, D.I. Ethylene regulators influence germination and root growth of globe artichoke seedlings exposed to heat stress conditions. Seed Sci. Technol. 2017, 45, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Huberman, M.; Riov, J.; Goldschmidt, E.E.; Apelbaum, A.; Goren, R. The novel ethylene antagonist, 3-cyclopropyl-1-enyl-propanoic acid sodium salt (CPAS), increases grain yield in wheat by delaying leaf senescence. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 73, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Jegadeesan, S.; Pressman, E.; Beery, A.; Singh, V.; Peres, L.E.P.; Shabtai, S.; Firon, N. An ethylene over-producing mutant of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), epinastic, exhibits tolerance to high temperature conditions. Amer. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kaur, H.; Ozga, J.A.; Reinecke, D.M. Balancing of hormonal biosynthesis and catabolism pathways, a strategy to ameliorate the negative effects of heat stress on reproductive growth. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1486–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jespersen, D.; Yu, J.; Huang, B. Metabolite responses to exogenous application of nitrogen, cytokinin, and ethylene inhibitors in relation to heat-induced senescence in creeping bentgrass. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Müller, M.; Munné-Bosch, S. Ethylene response factors: A key regulatory hub in hormone and stress signaling. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Cheng, M.C.; Liao, P.M.; Kuo, W.W.; Lin, T.P. The Arabidopsis Ethylene Response Factor1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1566–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Huang, Z.; Ma, A.; Yang, S.; Liu, X.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, J.; Xu, R. Transcriptome analysis and weighted gene co-expression network reveals potential genes responses to heat stress in turbot Scophthalmus maximus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D Genom. Proteom. 2020, 33, 100632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Busch, W.; Wunderlich, M.; Schöffl, F. Identification of novel heat shock factor-dependent genes and biochemical pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005, 41, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Shoseyov, O.; Altman, A. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Li, Z.G.; Gong, M.; Xie, H.; Yang, L.; Li, J. Hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide-induced heat tolerance in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) suspension cultured cells and involvement of Ca2+ and calmodulin. Plant Sci. 2012, 185, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yang, X.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, N.; Tian, S. Heat shock factors in tomatoes: Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis and expression profiling under development and heat stress. Peer J. 2016, 4, e1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Zhang, P.; Luo, Q.; Wang, R.; Xu, J. Hydrogen sulfide toxicity inhibits primary root growth through the ROS-NO pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Jia, H.; Hu, Y.; Fan, T.; Li, J. Hydrogen sulfide modulates actin-dependent auxin transport via regulating ABPs results in changing of root development in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Li, Z.G.; Ding, X.J.; Du, P.F. Hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide-improved heat tolerance in maize and involvement of proline. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Christou, A.; Manganaris, G.A.; Papadopoulos, I.; Fotopoulos, V. Hydrogen sulfide induces systemic tolerance to salinity and non-ionic osmotic stress in strawberry plants through modification of reactive species biosynthesis and transcriptional regulation of multiple defence pathways. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1953–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Khan, M.I.R.; Asgher, M.; Fatma, M.; Khan, N.A. Cross-talk between sulfur assimilation and ethylene signaling in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e22478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Min, Y.A.N.G.; Qin, B.P.; Ping, W.A.N.G.; Li, M.L.; Chen, L.L.; Chen, L.T.; Yin, Y.P. Foliar application of sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), a hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donor, can protect seedlings against heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2745–2758. [Google Scholar]
  130. Christou, A.; Manganaris, G.A.; Fotopoulos, V. Systemic mitigation of salt stress by hydrogen peroxide and sodium nitroprusside in strawberry plants via transcriptional regulation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 107, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Li, Z.G.; Yi, X.Y.; Li, Y.T. Effect of pretreatment with hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide on heat tolerance in relation to antioxidant system in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Biologia 2014, 69, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Li, Z.G.; Xie, L.R.; Li, X.J. Hydrogen sulfide acts as a downstream signal molecule in salicylic acid-induced heat tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 177, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Li, Z.G.; Luo, L.J.; Zhu, L.P. Involvement of trehalose in hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide-induced the acquisition of heat tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Bot. Stud. 2014, 55, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Banerjee, A.; Roychoudhury, A. Roles of hydrogen sulfide in regulating temperature stress response in plants. In Plant Growth Regulators; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  135. Li, Z.G.; Long, W.B.; Yang, S.Z.; Wang, Y.C.; Tang, J.H.; Chen, T. Involvement of sulfhydryl compounds and antioxidant enzymes in H2S-induced heat tolerance in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) suspension-cultured cells. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2015, 51, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ribeiro, R.V.; Machado, E.C.; Oliveira, R.F.D. Temperature response of photosynthesis and its interaction with light intensity in sweet orange leaf discs under non-photorespiratory condition. Ciência Agrotecnologia 2006, 30, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ahanger, M.A.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ahmad, P. Plant responses to environmental stresses—from gene to biotechnology. AoB Plants 2017, 9, plx025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Ihsan, M.Z.; Daur, I.; Alghabari, F.; Alzamanan, S.; Rizwan, S.; Ahmad, M.; Shafqat, W. Heat stress and plant development: Role of sulphur metabolites and management strategies. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2019, 69, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bashir, H.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Bagheri, R.; Ahmad, J.; Arif, I.A.; Baig, M.A.; Qureshi, M.I. Influence of sulfur and cadmium on antioxidants, phytochelatins and growth in Indian mustard. AoB Plants 2015, 7, plv001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. North, K.A.; Kopriva, S. Sulfur in resistance to environmental stresses. In Sulfur in Plants. An Ecological Perspective; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 143–168. [Google Scholar]
  141. Martins, L.; Knuesting, J.; Bariat, L.; Dard, A.; Freibert, S.A.; Marchand, C.H.; Riondet, C. Redox modification of the iron-sulfur glutaredoxin GRXS17 activates holdase activity and protects plants from heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2020, 184, 676–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Brunel-Muguet, S.; d’Hooghe, P.; Bataillé, M.P.; Larré, C.; Kim, T.H.; Trouverie, J.; Dürr, C. Heat stress during seed filling interferes with sulfur restriction on grain composition and seed germination in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Waraich, E.A.; Hussain, A.; Ahmad, Z.; Ahmad, M.; Barutçular, C. Foliar application of sulfur improved growth, yield and physiological attributes of canola (Brassica napus L.) under heat stress conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2022, 45, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Waraich, E.A.; Ahmad, M.; Soufan, W.; Manzoor, M.T.; Ahmad, Z.; Habib-Ur-Rahman, M.; Sabagh, A.E. Seed priming with sulfhydral thiourea enhances the performance of Camelina sativa L. under heat stress conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ali, M.M.; Waleed Shafique, M.; Gull, S.; Afzal Naveed, W.; Javed, T.; Yousef, A.F.; Mauro, R.P. Alleviation of heat stress in tomato by exogenous application of sulfur. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Altaf, A.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, M.; Quan, M.; Irshad, S.; Xu, D.; Zada, A. Effects of Environmental Stresses (Heat, Salt, Waterlogging) on Grain Yield and Associated Traits of Wheat under Application of Sulfur-Coated Urea. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Gomord, V.; Faye, L. Post-translational modification of therapeutic proteins in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Matsuoka, K.; Neuhaus, J.M. Cis-elements of protein transport to the plant vacuoles. J. Exp. Bot. 1999, 50, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Park, H.J.; Yun, D.J. New insights into the role of the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) in plants. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 300, 161–209. [Google Scholar]
  150. Kosová, K.; Vítámvás, P.; Urban, M.O.; Prášil, I.T.; Renaut, J. Plant abiotic stress proteomics: The major factors determining alterations in cellular proteome. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Kurepa, J.; Walker, J.M.; Smalle, J.; Gosink, M.M.; Davis, S.J.; Durham, T.L.; Vierstra, R.D. The small ubiqui tin-like modifier (SUMO) protein modification system in Arabidopsis: Accumulation of SUMO1 and-2 conjugates is increased by stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 6862–6872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Saracco, S.A.; Miller, M.J.; Kurepa, J.; Vierstra, R.D. Genetic analysis of SUMOylation in Arabidopsis: Conjugation of SUMO1 and SUMO2 to nuclear proteins is essential. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Mishra, N.; Sun, L.; Zhu, X.; Smith, J.; Prakash Srivastava, A.; Yang, X.; Zhang, H. Overexpression of the rice SUMO E3 ligase gene OsSIZ1 in cotton enhances drought and heat tolerance, and substantially improves fiber yields in the field under reduced irrigation and rainfed conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Srivastava, A.K.; Zhang, C.; Caine, R.S.; Gray, J.; Sadanandom, A. Rice SUMO protease Overly Tolerant to Salt 1 targets the transcription factor, Osb ZIP 23 to promote drought tolerance in rice. Plant J. 2017, 92, 1031–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Zhang, S.; Zhuang, K.; Wang, S.; Lv, J.; Ma, N.N.; Meng, Q. A novel tomato SUMO E3 ligase, SlSIZ1, confers drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Wang, H.; Wang, M.; Xia, Z. Overexpression of a maize SUMO conjugating enzyme gene (ZmSCE1e) increases Sumoylation levels and enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Sci. 2019, 281, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Rytz, T.C.; Miller, M.J.; McLoughlin, F.; Augustine, R.C.; Marshall, R.S.; Juan, Y.T.; Vierstra, R.D. SUMOylome profiling reveals a diverse array of nuclear targets modified by the SUMO ligase SIZ1 during heat stress. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 1077–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhang, S.; Wang, S.; Lv, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ma, N.; Meng, Q. SUMO E3 ligase SlSIZ1 facilitates heat tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Niskanen, E.A.; Palvimo, J.J. Chromatin sumoylation in heat stress: To protect, pause and organise? Sumo stress response on chromatin. BioEssays 2017, 39, 1600263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Lima, J.C.D.; Loss-Morais, G.; Margis, R. MicroRNAs play critical roles during plant development and in response to abiotic stresses. Gene. Mol. Biol. 2012, 35, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Khraiwesh, B.; Zhu, J.K.; Zhu, J. Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gene Regul. Mech. 2012, 1819, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Sunkar, R.; Kapoor, A.; Zhu, J.K. Posttranscriptional induction of two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase genes in Arabidopsis is mediated by downregulation of miR398 and important for oxidative stress tolerance. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2051–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Kotak, S.; Larkindale, J.; Lee, U.; von Koskull-Döring, P.; Vierling, E.; Scharf, K.D. Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Yu, X.; Wang, H.; Lu, Y.; de Ruiter, M.; Cariaso, M.; Prins, M.; van Tunen, A.; He, Y. Identification of conserved and novel microRNAs that are responsive to heat stress in Brassica rapa. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1025–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Kumar, R.R.; Pathak, H.; Sharma, S.K.; Kala, Y.K.; Nirjal, M.K.; Singh, G.P.; Goswami, S.; Rai, R.D. Novel and conserved heat-responsive microRNAs in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Funct. Integr. Geno. 2015, 15, 323–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Reyes, J.L.; Chua, N.H. ABA induction of miR159 controls transcript levels of two MYB factors during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J. 2007, 49, 592–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Wang, Y.; Sun, F.; Cao, H.; Peng, H.; Ni, Z.; Sun, Q.; Yao, Y. TamiR159 directed wheat TaGAMYB cleavage and its involvement in anther development and heat response. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Yao, Y.; Ni, Z.; Peng, H.; Sun, F.; Xin, M.; Sunkar, R.; Zhu, J.K.; Sun, Q. Non-coding small RNAs responsive to abiotic stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Funct. Integr. Geno. 2010, 10, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Ito, H.; Gaubert, H.; Bucher, E.; Mirouze, M.; Vaillant, I.; Paszkowski, J. An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress. Nature 2011, 472, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Li, S.; Liu, J.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Wu, F.; He, Y. Heat-induced tas1 target1 mediates thermotolerance via heat stress transcription factor A1a–directed pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1764–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Wierzbicki, A.T. The role of long non-coding RNA in transcriptional gene silencing. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Song, X.; Liu, G.; Huang, Z.; Duan, W.; Tan, H.; Li, Y.; Hou, X. Temperature expression patterns of genes and their coexpression with LncRNAs revealed by RNA-Seq in non-heading Chinese cabbage. BMC Geno. 2016, 17, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Savada, R.P.; Ozga, J.A.; Jayasinghege, C.; Waduthanthri, K.D.; Reinecke, D.M. Heat stress differentially modifies ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in pea floral and fruit tissues. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 95, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Valluru, R.; Reynolds, M.P.; Davies, W.J.; Sukumaran, S. Phenotypic and genome-wide association analysis of spike ethylene in diverse wheat genotypes under heat stress. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Park, C.J.; Seo, Y.S. Heat shock proteins: A review of the molecular chaperones for plant immunity. Plant Pathol. J. 2015, 31, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. Mathur, S.; Agrawal, D.; Jajoo, A. Photosynthesis: Response to high temperature stress. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014, 137, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Pan, C.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Q.; Fan, F.; Fu, R.; Ahammed, G.J.; Shi, K. Role of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in elevated CO2-induced heat stress response in tomato. Planta 2019, 250, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Rickey, T.M.; Belknap, W.R. Comparison of the expression of several stress-responsive genes in potato tubers. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 16, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Salman, A.; Filgueiras, H.; Cristescu, S.; Lopez-Lauri, F.; Harren, F.; Sallanon, H. Inhibition of wound-induced ethylene does not prevent red discoloration in fresh-cut endive (Cichorium intybus L.). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2009, 228, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Jacob, P.; Hirt, H.; Bendahmane, A. The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Raz, V.; Ecker, J.R. Regulation of differential growth in the apical hook of Arabidopsis. Development 1999, 126, 3661–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kruszka, K.; Pacak, A.; Swida-Barteczka, A.; Nuc, P.; Alaba, S.; Wroblewska, Z.; Karlowski, W.; Jarmolowski, A.; Szweykowska-Kulinska, Z. Transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally regulated microRNAs in heat stress response in barley. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6123–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Lü, P.; Yu, S.; Zhu, N.; Chen, Y.R.; Zhou, B.; Pan, Y.; Tzeng, D.; Fabi, J.P.; Argyris, J.; Garcia-Mas, J.; et al. Genome encode analyses reveal the basis of convergent evolution of fleshy fruit ripening. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 784–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Wang, W.Q.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.Y.; Li, D.W.; Allan, A.C.; Yin, X.R. Genome-wide analysis of coding and non-coding RNA reveals a conserved miR164-NAC regulatory pathway for fruit ripening. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1618–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Guo, H.; Xiao, T.; Zhou, H.; Xie, Y.; Shen, W. Hydrogen sulfide: A versatile regulator of environmental stress in plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Ye, X.Y.; Qiu, X.M.; Sun, Y.Y.; Li, Z.G. Interplay between hydrogen sulfide and methylglyoxal initiates thermotolerance in maize seedlings by modulating reactive oxidative species and osmolyte metabolism. Protoplasma 2020, 257, 1415–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Mustafa, A.K.; Gadalla, M.M.; Sen, N.; Kim, S.; Mu, W.; Gazi, S.K.; Snyder, S.H. H2S signals through protein S-sulfhydration. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Aroca, Á.; Serna, A.; Gotor, C.; Romero, L.C. S-sulfhydration: A cysteine posttranslational modification in plant systems. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Aroca, A.; Schneider, M.; Scheibe, R.; Gotor, C.; Romero, L.C. Hydrogen sulfide regulates the cytosolic/nuclear partitioning of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase by enhancing its nuclear localization. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Sevilla, F.; Camejo, D.; Ortiz-Espín, A.; Calderón, A.; Lázaro, J.J.; Jiménez, A. The thioredoxin/peroxiredoxin/sulfiredoxin system: Current overview on its redox function in plants and regulation by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2945–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Wedmann, R.; Onderka, C.; Wei, S.; Szijártó, I.A.; Miljkovic, J.L.; Mitrovic, A.; Filipovic, M.R. Improved tag-switch method reveals that thioredoxin acts as depersulfidase and controls the intracellular levels of protein persulfidation. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3414–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Zhang, J.; Zhou, M.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, D.; Gotor, C.; Romero, L.C.; .Xie, Y. Hydrogen sulfide, a signaling molecule in plant stress responses. J. Integ. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Kitajima, S.; Kurioka, M.; Yoshimoto, T.; Shindo, M.; Kanaori, K.; Tajima, K.; Oda, K. A cysteine residue near the propionate side chain of heme is the radical site in ascorbate peroxidase. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Begara-Morales, J.C.; Sánchez-Calvo, B.; Chaki, M.; Valderrama, R.; Mata-Pérez, C.; López-Jaramillo, J.; Barroso, J.B. Dual regulation of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (APX) by tyrosine nitration and S-nitrosylation. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Kesherwani, V.; Nandi, S.S.; Sharawat, S.K.; Shahshahan, H.R.; Mishra, P.K. Hydrogen sulfide mitigates homocysteine-mediated pathological remodeling by inducing miR-133a in cardiomyocytes. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2015, 404, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  196. Jia, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, D.; Liesche, J.; Shi, C.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Ethylene-induced hydrogen sulfide negatively regulates ethylene biosynthesis by persulfidation of ACO in tomato under osmotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  197. Liu, J.; Hao, D.D.; Zhang, J.S.; Zhu, Y.C. Hydrogen sulphide inhibits cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by up-regulating miR-133a. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 413, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Yang, G.; Pei, Y.; Cao, Q.; Wang, R. MicroRNA-21 represses human cystathionine gamma-lyase expression by targeting at specificity protein-1 in smooth muscle cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 3192–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1866–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Szalai, G.; Kellős, T.; Galiba, G.; Kocsy, G. Glutathione as an antioxidant and regulatory molecule in plants under abiotic stress conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 66–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. De Kok, L.J. Sulfur metabolism in plants exposed to atmospheric sulphur. In Sulfur Nutrition and Sulfur Assimilation in Higher Plants: Fundamental, Environmental and Agricultural Aspects; Renneberg, H., Brunold, C., De Kok, L.J., Stulen, I., Eds.; Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 111–130. [Google Scholar]
  202. De Kok, L.J.; Yang, L.; Stuiver, C.E.E.; Stulen, I. Negative vs. positive functional plant responses to air pollution: A study establishing cause–effect relationships of SO2 and H2S. Dev. Environ. Sci. 2009, 9, 121–135. [Google Scholar]
  203. Koralewska, A.; Stuiver, C.E.E.; Posthumus, F.S.; Kopriva, S.; Hawkesford, M.J.; De Kok, L.J. Regulation of sulfate uptake, expression of the sulfate transporters Sultr1; 1 and Sultr1; 2, and APS reductase in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis) as affected by atmospheric H2S nutrition and sulfate deprivation. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Schuetz, T.J.; Gallo, G.J.; Sheldon, L.; Tempst, P.; Kingston, R.E. Isolation of a cDNA for HSF2: Evidence for two heat shock factor genes in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 6911–6915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Álvarez, C.; Ángeles Bermúdez, M.; Romero, L.C.; Gotor, C.; García, I. Cysteine homeostasis plays an essential role in plant immunity. New Phytol. 2012, 193, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Gotor, C.; Álvarez, C.; Bermúdez, M.Á.; Moreno, I.; García, I.; Romero, L.C. Low abundance does not mean less importance in cysteine metabolism. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 1028–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  207. Wawrzynska, A.; Moniuszko, G.; Sirko, A. Links between ethylene and sulfur nutrition—a regulatory interplay or just metabolite association? Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Masood, A.; Khan, M.I.R.; Fatma, M.; Asgher, M.; Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A. Involvement of ethylene in gibberellic acid-induced sulfur assimilation, photosynthetic responses, and alleviation of cadmium stress in mustard. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 104, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Nazar, R.; Khan, M.I.R.; Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Involvement of ethylene in reversal of salt-inhibited photosynthesis by sulfur in mustard. Physiol. Plantar. 2014, 152, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Khan, M.I.R.; Nazir, F.; Asgher, M.; Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A. Selenium and sulfur influence ethylene formation and alleviate cadmium-induced oxidative stress by improving proline and glutathione production in wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 173, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Bloem, E.; Haneklaus, S.; Schnug, E. Comparative effects of sulfur and nitrogen fertilization and post-harvest processing parameters on the glucotropaeolin content of Tropaeolum majus L. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 1576–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Koprivova, A.; North, K.A.; Kopriva, S. Complex signaling network in regulation of adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase by salt stress in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 1408–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Hu, X.; Chi, Q.; Liu, Q.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S. Atmospheric H2S triggers immune damage by activating the TLR-7/MyD88/NF-κB pathway and NLRP3 inflammasome in broiler thymus. Chemosphere 2019, 237, 124427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Iqbal, N.; Umar, S.; Khan, N.A.; Corpas, F.J. Nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide coordinately reduce glucose sensitivity and decrease oxidative stress via ascorbate-glutathione cycle in heat-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Mukherjee, S. Recent advancements in the mechanism of nitric oxide signaling associated with hydrogen sulfide and melatonin crosstalk during ethylene-induced fruit ripening in plants. Nitric Oxide 2019, 82, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Wang, H.; Liang, X.; Huang, J.; Zhang, D.; Lu, H.; Liu, Z.; Bi, Y. Involvement of ethylene and hydrogen peroxide in induction of alternative respiratory pathway in salt-treated Arabidopsis calluses. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1754–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. Sehar, Z.; Jahan, B.; Masood, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, N.A. Hydrogen peroxide potentiates defense system in presence of sulfur to protect chloroplast damage and photosynthesis of wheat under drought stress. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 922–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Xiao, Y.; Wu, X.; Sun, M.; Peng, F. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates waterlogging-induced damage in peach seedlings via enhancing antioxidative system and inhibiting ethylene synthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Chen, Z.; Yang, B.; Hao, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, T. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide ameliorates seed germination and seedling growth of cauliflower under lead stress and its antioxidant role. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the synthesis of H2S and ethylene and its association with the S-assimilation pathway. In plants, absorption of S occurs through uptake of SO42 from the soil by roots. The assimilatory pathway is activated to produce APS from SO42 under catalysis by ATP-S, which is in turn reduced to SO32− via APR. Afterward, SO32− is reduced to S2−, which is used to produce H2S via catalysis by chloroplast-localized sulfite reductase. The subsequent catalyzation of S2− by OASTL yields Cys, which is the first stable compound in the S-assimilation pathway and the precursor for GSH and Met. Met is converted to SAM by SAM synthetase, from which ACC is synthesized by ACS, degradation of which by the ACO enzyme yields ethylene. Ethylene-induced H2S in turn regulates ethylene biosynthesis via the persulfidation of ACO. H2S can also be generated through degradation of Cys or through biosynthesis in mitochondria and cytosol by the enzymes CS, CAS, LCD, and DCD. Activity of LCD and DCD in the cytosol is accompanied by formation of pyruvate and NH3. ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACO, ACC oxidase; ACS, ACC synthase; APR, APS reductase; APS, adenosine 5-phosphosulfate; ATP-S, ATP-sulfurylase; CAS, β-cyanoalanine synthase; Cys, cysteine; CS, cysteine synthase; DCD, D-cysteine desulfhydrase; GSH, glutathione reductase; LCD, L-cysteine desulfhydrase; NH3, ammonia; Met, methionine; S, sulfur; SAM, S-adenosyl methionine; SO42−, sulfate; SO32−, sulfite; S2−, sulfide; SiR, sulfide reductase; OASTL, O-acetylserine (thiol)-lyase. Blue arrows indicate upregulation and downregulation.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the synthesis of H2S and ethylene and its association with the S-assimilation pathway. In plants, absorption of S occurs through uptake of SO42 from the soil by roots. The assimilatory pathway is activated to produce APS from SO42 under catalysis by ATP-S, which is in turn reduced to SO32− via APR. Afterward, SO32− is reduced to S2−, which is used to produce H2S via catalysis by chloroplast-localized sulfite reductase. The subsequent catalyzation of S2− by OASTL yields Cys, which is the first stable compound in the S-assimilation pathway and the precursor for GSH and Met. Met is converted to SAM by SAM synthetase, from which ACC is synthesized by ACS, degradation of which by the ACO enzyme yields ethylene. Ethylene-induced H2S in turn regulates ethylene biosynthesis via the persulfidation of ACO. H2S can also be generated through degradation of Cys or through biosynthesis in mitochondria and cytosol by the enzymes CS, CAS, LCD, and DCD. Activity of LCD and DCD in the cytosol is accompanied by formation of pyruvate and NH3. ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACO, ACC oxidase; ACS, ACC synthase; APR, APS reductase; APS, adenosine 5-phosphosulfate; ATP-S, ATP-sulfurylase; CAS, β-cyanoalanine synthase; Cys, cysteine; CS, cysteine synthase; DCD, D-cysteine desulfhydrase; GSH, glutathione reductase; LCD, L-cysteine desulfhydrase; NH3, ammonia; Met, methionine; S, sulfur; SAM, S-adenosyl methionine; SO42−, sulfate; SO32−, sulfite; S2−, sulfide; SiR, sulfide reductase; OASTL, O-acetylserine (thiol)-lyase. Blue arrows indicate upregulation and downregulation.
Biomolecules 12 00678 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the regulatory interaction between ethylene and H2S biosynthesis for stress tolerance through the S-assimilation pathway. Different arrow types shown above indicate different possible mechanisms. ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACO, ACC oxidase; ACS, ACC synthase; APR, APS reductase; APS, adenosine 5-phosphosulfate; ATPS, ATP-sulfurylase; Cys, cysteine; DCD, D-cysteine desulfhydrase; LCD, L-cysteine desulfhydrase; ET, ethylene; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; NH3, ammonia; S, sulfur; SAM, S-adenosyl methionine; SO42, sulfate; SO32−, sulfite; S2−, sulfide; SiR, sulfide reductase; OASTL, O-acetylserine (thiol)-lyase.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the regulatory interaction between ethylene and H2S biosynthesis for stress tolerance through the S-assimilation pathway. Different arrow types shown above indicate different possible mechanisms. ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACO, ACC oxidase; ACS, ACC synthase; APR, APS reductase; APS, adenosine 5-phosphosulfate; ATPS, ATP-sulfurylase; Cys, cysteine; DCD, D-cysteine desulfhydrase; LCD, L-cysteine desulfhydrase; ET, ethylene; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; NH3, ammonia; S, sulfur; SAM, S-adenosyl methionine; SO42, sulfate; SO32−, sulfite; S2−, sulfide; SiR, sulfide reductase; OASTL, O-acetylserine (thiol)-lyase.
Biomolecules 12 00678 g002
Table 1. Selected studies on the crucial role of ethylene in heat stress tolerance. ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid; ETH, ethephon.
Table 1. Selected studies on the crucial role of ethylene in heat stress tolerance. ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid; ETH, ethephon.
S. No.PlantEthylene Source/ConcentrationTemperature RangeResponseReference
1.Agrostis stolonifera100 µmol L−1 ACC35 °CIncreased activity of ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase and regulated thermotolerance[110]
2.Cynara cardunculus30 µmol L−1 ETH30 °CImproved seed germination, root growth, and seed vigor[112]
3.Lactuca sativa10 μM ACC35 °CImproved seed germination performance[111]
4.Oryza sativa10 μM ACC45 °CDecreased oxidative stress, upregulated antioxidant defense system, and reduced ion leakage[107]
5.Solanum lycopersicum1 μL L−1 ETH50 °CPromoted expression of ethylene-induced responsive genes and improved pollen quality[47]
6.Solanum lycopersicum1 μL L−1 ETH50 °CAlleviated oxidative stress and maintained redox homeostasis[109]
7.Oryza sativa1.6 mM ETH40 °CStimulated antioxidant defense system, improved carbohydrate metabolism, and increased photosynthetic and growth attributes[20]
Table 2. Selected studies on the crucial role of H2S in heat stress tolerance. NAHS, sodium hydrogen sulfide.
Table 2. Selected studies on the crucial role of H2S in heat stress tolerance. NAHS, sodium hydrogen sulfide.
S. No.PlantH2S SourceTemperature RangeResponseReferences
1.Fragaria100 µM NAHS42 °CIncreased activity of antioxidant enzymes and increased expression of antioxidant enzymes[131]
2.Nicotiana tabacum50 µM NAHS42 °CIncreased vitality of cells and alleviated electrolyte leakage[122]
3.Nicotiana tabacum50 µM NAHS43 °CIncreased S-containing compounds such as cysteine and glutathione as well as antioxidant enzymes[132]
4.Zea mays1.2 mmol NAHS47 °CDecreased oxidative stress and upregulated antioxidant defense system[133]
5.Zea mays1.5 mmol NAHS38 °CIncreased proline biosynthesis[134]
6.Zea mays0.5 mmol NAHS47 °CIncreased betaine accumulation[135]
7.Zea mays500 µM NAHS48 °CIncreased endogenous H2S accumulation[132]
Table 3. Selected studies on the crucial role of sulfur in heat stress tolerance.
Table 3. Selected studies on the crucial role of sulfur in heat stress tolerance.
S. No.PlantSulfur ConcentrationTemperature RangeResponseReference
1.Brassica napus8.7 μM33 °CImproved grain quality and enhanced nutritional compounds[142]
2.Brassica napus500 ppm28 °CImproved growth, yield, and physiological characteristics[143]
3.Brassica napus500 ppm28 °CImproved physiological and yield characteristics[144]
4.Cymopsis tetragonoloba100 mg S kg−1 soil45 °CEnhanced carbohydrate metabolism and mitigated oxidative damage[140]
5.Solanum lycopersicum2–8 ppm45 °CImproved growth, photosynthesis, and biochemical attributes[145]
6.Triticum aestivum130 kg ha−1 S-coated urea 33 °CImproved growth rate, yield, physiological parameters, and N content[146]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sehar, Z.; Gautam, H.; Iqbal, N.; Alvi, A.F.; Jahan, B.; Fatma, M.; Albaqami, M.; Khan, N.A. The Functional Interplay between Ethylene, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Sulfur in Plant Heat Stress Tolerance. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12050678

AMA Style

Sehar Z, Gautam H, Iqbal N, Alvi AF, Jahan B, Fatma M, Albaqami M, Khan NA. The Functional Interplay between Ethylene, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Sulfur in Plant Heat Stress Tolerance. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(5):678. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12050678

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sehar, Zebus, Harsha Gautam, Noushina Iqbal, Ameena Fatima Alvi, Badar Jahan, Mehar Fatma, Mohammed Albaqami, and Nafees A. Khan. 2022. "The Functional Interplay between Ethylene, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Sulfur in Plant Heat Stress Tolerance" Biomolecules 12, no. 5: 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12050678

APA Style

Sehar, Z., Gautam, H., Iqbal, N., Alvi, A. F., Jahan, B., Fatma, M., Albaqami, M., & Khan, N. A. (2022). The Functional Interplay between Ethylene, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Sulfur in Plant Heat Stress Tolerance. Biomolecules, 12(5), 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12050678

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop