Next Article in Journal
Reproductive Output and Insect Behavior in Hybrids and Apomicts from Limonium ovalifolium and L. binervosum Complexes (Plumbaginaceae) in an Open Cross-Pollination Experiment
Next Article in Special Issue
Taxonomy, Morphological and Molecular Identification of the Potato Cyst Nematodes, Globodera pallida and G. rostochiensis
Previous Article in Journal
Physiological and Molecular Traits Associated with Nitrogen Uptake under Limited Nitrogen in Soft Red Winter Wheat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Global Distribution of the Reniform Nematode Genus Rotylenchulus with the Synonymy of Rotylenchulus macrosoma with Rotylenchulus borealis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae), a New Root-Lesion Nematode Species on Soybean in North Dakota, USA †

1
Mycology and Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Northeast Area, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
2
Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
3
Electron & Confocal Microscopy Unit, USDA, ARS, Northeast Area, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F89CA839-1A5B-4A27-BA53-8F8D6633E89C.
Plants 2021, 10(1), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010168
Submission received: 7 January 2021 / Accepted: 14 January 2021 / Published: 17 January 2021

Abstract

:
Root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) of the genus Pratylenchus Filipjev, 1936, are among the most important nematode pests on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), along with soybean cyst and root-knot nematodes. In May 2015 and 2016, a total of six soil samples were collected from a soybean field in Walcott, Richland County, ND and submitted to the Mycology and Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory (MNGDBL), USDA, ARS, MD for analysis. Later, in 2019, additional nematodes recovered from a greenhouse culture on soybean originally from the same field were submitted for further analysis. Males, females, and juveniles of Pratylenchus sp. were recovered from soil and root samples and were examined morphologically and molecularly. DNA from single nematodes were extracted, and the nucleotides feature of three genomic regions targeting on the D2–D3 region of 28S rDNA and ITS rDNA and mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COX1) gene were characterized. Phylogeny trees were constructed to ascertain the relationships with other Pratylenchus spp., and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was performed to provide a rapid and reliable differentiation from other common Pratylenchus spp. Molecular features indicated that it is a new, unnamed Pratylenchus sp. that is different from morphologically closely related Pratylenchus spp., including P. convallariae, P. pratensis, P. fallax, and P. flakkensis. In conclusion, both morphological and molecular observations indicate that the North Dakota isolate on soybean represents a new root-lesion nematode species which is named and described herein as Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp.

1. Introduction

The genus Pratylenchus Filipjev, 1936, is one of the most important nematode genera in terms of the economic impact they have on crops [1,2]. Currently, the genus contains approximately 100 species [3,4,5], with new species being described very frequently. The root-lesion nematodes are ranked as the third most important group of plant-parasitic nematodes after root-knot and cyst nematodes [2] in terms of economic loss in agriculture and horticulture. Frederick and Tarjan [6] published a compendium of the Pratylenchus genus in 1989 in which they reported 89 species. In 1989, Handoo and Golden [7] also published a key and compendium to 63 valid species, including an update of the work done by different workers on the genus. The plants reported as hosts for the genus are very large. For example, one species, Pratylenchus penetrans, has been reported to have more than 400 plants as hosts [8].
On soybean, root-lesion nematodes are one of the most damaging nematodes that feed on the soybean roots [9]. Two species, Pratylenchus brachyurus and P. penetrans, have been reported to cause damage to the roots of soybean plants [10]. For example, soybean plant growth was suppressed by Pratylenchus brachyurus nematodes, with a negative correlation being reported between the number of nodes on the main stem and the number of nematodes at planting [11]. Despite the fact that nearly 100 different species of Pratylenchus have been described to date, only 5 have been reported in North Dakota, namely the P. agilis [12], P. neglectus, P. scribneri [13,14], and 2 new species of Pratylenchus [15,16].
The objective of this study was to describe one of these two new species using light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations and assess the diagnostic values of their morphological and molecular characters. The morphometric details of females and males were recorded and compared to closely related species. Also, the molecular details using ITS, 28S, and COX1 sequences were obtained and compared to the existing information in GenBank. PCR-RFLP was performed to rapidly and reliably differentiate it from other important Pratylenchus spp. species.

2. Materials and Methods

Nematode suspensions extracted from soil samples were sent to the MNGDBL, Beltsville, MD in May of 2015 and 2016. The origin of the soil samples was a field cultivated with soybean in Walcott, Richland County, ND. Nematodes were extracted from soil using the sugar centrifugal flotation method [17]. Each sample contained between 125 and 2000 root-lesion nematodes per kg soil [15]. In 2019, infested soil samples from the same field were planted to soybean cultivar Barnes in a greenhouse room at 22 °C. After 15 weeks of growth, the plants were harvested, and root-lesion nematodes were extracted from both the roots and soil using the Whitehead tray method [18]. Additional nematodes recovered from the greenhouse culture on soybean were submitted to the MNGDBL, Beltsville, MD for further analysis.

2.1. Morphological Examination

Females and males were recovered from the root and soil samples using the Whitehead tray method extraction method [18]. Nematodes were fixed in 3% formaldehyde and processed with glycerin by the formalin glycerin method [19,20]. Photomicrographs of females and males were made with an automatic 35 mm camera attached to a compound microscope with an interference contrast system, and light microscopic images of fixed nematodes were taken on a Nikon Eclipse Ni compound microscope using a Nikon DS-Ri2 camera. Measurements were made with an ocular micrometer on a Leica WILD MPS48 Leitz DMRB compound microscope. All measurements are in micrometers unless otherwise stated.
For the Low-Temperature Scanning Electron Microscopy (LT-SEM), nematodes were observed using the techniques described by Carta et al. [21], Kantor et al. [22], and Handoo et al. [23].

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR, and Sequencing

DNA was extracted from a single individual nematode using the Proteinase K method [24]. Briefly, the chopped nematode pieces were transferred into a 0.5 mL sterile Eppendorf tube containing 2 µL of 10 × PCR buffer with MgCl2, 2 µL of 600 µg/mL Proteinase K (Roche, Indianapolis, Indiana), and 6 µL of distilled ddH2O. Tubes were incubated at −20 °C for at least 30 min followed by 65 °C for 1 h and 95 °C for 10 min. DNA samples from 3 nematode individuals were prepared, which represented 3 biological replicates.
Nucleotide sequences of D2D3 fragment of 28S rDNA and ITS rDNA regions from ribosomal DNA and COX1 (cytochrome oxidase subunit I) gene from mitochondrial DNA were obtained by either direct sequencing using purified PCR products or T-A cloning. For D2–D3 region of 28S rDNA, the primer set of D2A (5′-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG-3′) and D3B (5′-TCGGAAGGA ACCAGCTAC TA-3′) was used [25]. For ITS rDNA, the primer set of 18S (5′-TTGATTACGTCCCTGCCCTTT-3′) and 26S (5′-TTTCACTCG CCGTTACTAAGG-3′) was used [26]. For COX1 gene, the primer set of JB3 (5′-TTTTTTGGGCATCCTGAGGTTTAT-3′) and JB4.5 (5′-TAAAGAAAGAACATAATGAAAATG-3′) was used [27]. The PCR were set up on Bio-Rad T100 Thermal Cycler (Hercules, CA, USA) as recommended [25,26,27]. For direct sequencing (D2–D3 region of 28S rDNA and COX1 gene), PCR products were purified using Bio-tek E.Z.N.A. Cycle-Pure Kit (Omega, Norcross, GA, USA) and then sent to Genscript for sequencing (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ, USA). For cloning and sequencing, target PCR products were segregated on a 1.0% agarose gel, purified using Gel Extraction Kit (Omega), and cloned into pGEM-T Vector using pGEM-T Vector System II Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid DNA was then extracted from the white colonies grown on indicator plates containing X-gal and IPTG, using a PerfectPrep™ Spin Mini Kit (5 PRIME Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and sent to Genscript for sequencing. Three sequences were generated for each of the three target areasand the corresponding consensus sequences of D2–D3 region of 28S rDNA, ITS rDNA, and COX1 gene were deposited into GenBank to obtain their accession numbers (MW290216.1 for D2–D3, MW290217.1 for ITS, and MW309316.1 for COX1).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic relationships among Pratylenchus spp. were analyzed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) method of MEGA7 software [28]. Available DNA sequences of the 28S rDNA, ITS rDNA, and COX1 gene of other Pratylenchus spp. species were retrieved from the NCBI Nucleotide Database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide) and aligned with corresponding sequences obtained in this study by MUSCLE software (v3.8.31) with default settings for the highest accuracy. The gaps and missing data were completely removed. Accordingly, the General Time Reversible model was selected using gamma distribution, with invariant sites and 5 gamma-distributed rate categories to account for rates and patterns. Finally, the phylogeny trees were constructed using maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replications.

2.4. PCR-RFLP Analysis

To differentiate different Pratylenchus spp., polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis was performed using ITS rDNA amplified by the primers 18S/26S [26,29] with restriction endonucleases Hind III and Hha I. The PCR was carried out in a 20 µl reaction comprising of 1.5 µL DNA template, 0.4 µM forward and reverse primers, 0.2 mM dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 × Green GoTaq® Flexi buffer, and 1 U GoTaq® Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with conditions of pre-denaturing at 94 °C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The digestion was performed in 20 µL reaction mixtures containing 5U restriction enzyme, 1× RE buffer, 2 µg acetylated BSA, and 10 µl PCR products at 37 °C for 2 h. The digested fragments were separated in 2 % agarose gel at 100 volts (V) for 20 min. The gel was visualized under UV light and images were captured using an AlphaImager® Gel Documentation System (Proteinsimple Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Systematics

Pratylenchus dakotaensis n.sp.

3.1.1. Measurements

3.1.2. Description

Female: Slender and vermiform body, assuming straight or arcuate form when killed by gentle heat and tapering at both ends. Lateral field with four lines, with the outer two lines being areolated more so at tail region. Occasionally, additional oblique lines are noted in between the two inner lines. The lip region is flat to rounded or dome-shaped, slightly offset with the body contour and bearing three fine annuli. The en face view shows a divided face with rectangular subdorsal and subventral lips fused with oral disc in a dumbbell- to dome-shaped pattern that is separated from lateral lip sectors by three almost straight, often obscure incisures forming an obtuse angle. The stylet is short and robust with rounded knobs. The distance of the dorsal pharyngeal gland orifice to the stylet base is 2–3 µm. The procorpus is generally cylindrical but narrows near the middle and at junction with median bulb. The median bulb is muscular and rounded to slightly oval-shaped with cuticularized valve plates. The nerve ring encircles median part of isthmus. The excretory pore is located posterior to the nerve ring. The hemizonid is located at the two annuli anterior to excretory pore. The pharyngeal glands’ nuclei are in tandem, elongate, and overlapping with the intestine ventrally. The reproductive system is monodelphic, prodelphic, with the ovary outstretched with single row of oocytes. The post-uterine sac is 18–20 µm long, and the vulva is located 78–83% of total body length from anterior end. The vulval lips are slightly protruding with no lateral flaps and epiptygma. The tail broad is conical, with 16–26 narrow irregularly annuli with terminal annuli usually wider than other tail annuli. The tail terminus is distinctly crenate/annulated with rounded to truncate- or clavate-shaped. The phasmids are prominently located at approximately the middle of the tail.
Male: Males are common and are similar to females, including the lip region, except for the sexual dimorphism. The stylet slightly is shorter than females, measuring 15.5 µm to 16.5 µm long. The lateral fields have four incisures, with the outer two lines mostly areolated. The reproductive system is composed of a single testis, which is anteriorly outstretched. The spicules and gubernaculum are ventrally curved, measuring 16–18.5 µm and 4–5 µm, respectively. The tail is short, bluntly rounded to pointed. The bursa encircle the entire tail. The ventral surface of the bursa is coarsely annulated. The phasmids are prominent.

3.2. Type Host and Locality

Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp is associated with roots and around soil from a soybean field in Richland County, ND. The global positioning coordinates for Richland County are 43.188221° N and 124.390174° W.

3.3. Type Material

Holotype (female): Slide T-740t, deposited in the United States Department of Agriculture Nematode Collection, Beltsville, MD, USA. Paratypes (Females, and Males): Same data and repository as holotype, Slides T-7153p to T-7158p. Additional females on slide numbers T-7159p at University of California, Riverside, CA, USA, and T-7160p at Fera, Plant Pest Disease Cultures and Collections, York, United Kingdom.

3.4. Diagnosis and Relationships

Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. is characterized by a combination of the following morphological features in females: Slender, vermiform body, assuming straight or arcuate form, lateral field with four lines, with the outer two lines being areolated; the lip region is flat to rounded or dome-shaped, slightly offset with the body contour and bearing three fine annuli; the en face view shows a divided face with a rectangular subdorsal and subventral lips fused with the oral disc in a dumbbell- to dome-shaped pattern; the stylet is short and robust, with rounded knobs; the vulva is located at 78–83% of total body length from anterior end; the vulval lips are slightly protruding with no lateral flaps and epiptygma; the tail is broad and conical, with 16–26 narrow irregularly annuli, and the terminal annuli usually wider than the other tail annuli; the tail terminus is distinctly crenate/annulated with rounded to truncate- or clavate-shaped. Males are common; their stylet is slightly shorter than females; the spicules and gubernaculum are ventrally curved, measuring 16–18.5 µm and 4–5 µm, respectively; the tail is short, bluntly rounded to pointed; and the bursa encircle the entire tail.
Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. is morphologically closely related to Pratylenchus convallariae, P. pratensis, and P. fallax. Sequence (GenBank accession No. MW290216, 702 bp) from the 28S D2–D3 had less than 94.2% similarity with these three species. In addition, it had 100% identity with Pratylenchus sp. (MN251269) from Lafayette County, Wisconsin and 98.6% identity with P. scribneri (MG925218) from Ohio, USA. The ITS sequence (GenBank accession No. MW290217, 1226 bp) of P. dakotaensis had less than 93.1% similarity with other Pratylenchus spp. including P. convallariae, P. pratensis, P. fallax, P. scribneri, and many isolates of an unknown Pratylenchus sp. Sequence (GenBank accession No. MW309316, 419 bp) from COX1 gene had 97.5% identity with five isolates of a Pratylenchus sp. from Atchison County, Kansas, USA and less than 84.6% identity with other Pratylenchus spp. Thus, the sequence data did not support P. convallariae, P. pratensis, or P. fallax. Another morphologically closely related species is P. flakkensis, but P. dakotaensis differs from P. flakkensis in several morphological characters, with a high head, three head annuli, slight longer stylet in females, higher vulva percentage, and longer spicule in males. Accordingly, both morphological and molecular observations with the known and abovementioned closely related species indicate that the North Dakota isolate on soybean represents a new root-lesion nematode species, which is described herein as Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp.

3.5. Etymology

The species name was derived from North Dakota, the geographic origin.

3.6. Molecular Analysis

Phylogenetic relationships based on the D2–D3 region of 28S rDNA, ITS rDNA, and COX1 gene were generated using the Maximum Likelihood method using corresponding nucleotides from Pratylenchus species (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). In the tree constructed using the D2–D3 region of 28S rDNA, which is considered as the most evolutionally conserved region, P. dakotaensis was more likely closely related with P. scribneri, P. hexincisus, P. pseudocoffeae P. loosi, P. speijeri, P. coffeae, and P. hippeastri (ML = 90), compared with those morphological closely related species, including P. convallariae, P. pratensis, P. fallax, and P. flakkensis. Similarly, in the trees constructed using ITS rDNA and COX1 gene, P. dakotaensis was also clustered with those closely related species in the tree of 28S rDNA.
The RFLP analysis using the ITS rDNA region was performed to distinguish P. dakotaensis n. sp. from other common, important root-lesion nematode species (Figure 7). The results revealed that PCR products from the ITS region with two digestion enzymes (Hind III and Hha I) generated the same banding pattern for nine samples from the field infested with P. dakotaensis n. sp. but different banding patterns from P. scribneri, P. neglectus, and P. penetrans, which are the major Pratylenchus species in the region.

4. Discussion

Based on the molecular results obtained using the 28S D2–D3 primers, the North Dakota population had less than 94.2% similarity with morphologically closely related Pratylenchus spp., including P. convallariae, P. pratensis, P. fallax, and P. flakkensis. After analyzing the molecular data obtained by sequencing the ITS region, less than 93.1% similarity with P. convallariae, P. pratensis, and P. fallax was observed. The sequence from the COX1 gene had less than 84.6% identity with other Pratylenchus spp., except 97.5% identity with five isolates of an undefined Pratylenchus sp. Looking at the morphometric data, the population of P. dakotaensis is similar to P. flakkensis. Despite the similarities between the two, several differences have been observed, such a high head in the North Dakota population, three head annuli instead of two, slightly longer stylet in females, higher vulva percentage, and longer spicule in males. In conclusion, combining all morphological and molecular data and observations with the known and abovementioned closely related species indicates that the North Dakota isolate on soybean represents a new root-lesion nematode species, described here as Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. Interestingly, the 28S D2–D3 sequence of an unknown Pratylenchus sp. from Wisconsin, USA (GenBank accession No. MN251269) showed 100% identity with this new species. The specimens from Wisconsin and North Dakota need to be compared thoroughly to determine whether the Wisconsin population belongs to Pratylenchus dakotaensis n.sp.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.A., M.K., G.Y., D.H.; methodology Z.H., G.Y., and M.K.; software, M.K., J.M., G.B.I.C, G.Y., D.H.; validation, Z.A., G.Y.; formal analysis, Z.H.; investigation, G.Y., Z.H., D.H.; resources, G.Y., M.K., Z.H; data curation, Z.H., M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.H., G.Y., M.K., D.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.H., G.Y., M.K., D.H., J.M., I.A.C., A.P.; visualization, Z.H., G.Y.; supervision, Z.H., G.Y.; project administration, Z.H., G.Y.; funding acquisition, G.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the North Dakota Soybean Research Council (NDSRC) for funding this research. This research was also supported by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Hatch Multistate project number ND02233.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Plants at https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010168.

Acknowledgments

Mihail Kantor was supported in part by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the Mycology and Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Northeast Area, Beltsville, MD, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and USDA-ARS. To Stephen Rogers of USDA-ARS, MNGDBL we are grateful for technical assistance. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sasser, J.N.; Freckman, D.W. A world perspective on nematology; the role of the society. In Vistas on Nematology; SON: Hyatsville, MD, USA, 1987; pp. 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  2. Castillo, P.; Vovlas, N. Pratylenchus (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae): Diagnosis, Biology, Pathogenicity and Management; Nematology Monographs and Perspectives; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2007; Volume 6, pp. 1–530. [Google Scholar]
  3. Geraert, E. The Pratylenchidae of the World: Identification of the Family Pratylenchidae (Nematoda: Tylenchida); Academia Press: Ghent, Belgium, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Handoo, Z.A.; Skantar, A.M.; Kantor, M.R.; Hafez, S.L.; Hult, M.N. Molecular and morphological characterization of the amaryllis lesion nematode, Pratylenchus hippeastri (Inserra et al., 2007), from California. J. Nematol. 2020, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Qing, X.; Bert, W.; Gamliel, A.; Bucki, P.; Duvrinin, S.; Alon, T.; Braun Miyara, S. Phylogeography and molecular species delimitation of Pratylenchus capsici n. sp., a new root lesion nematode in Israel on pepper (Capsicum annuum). Phytopathology 2019, 109, 847–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Frederick, J.J.; Tarjan, A.C. A compendium of the genus Pratylenchus Filipjev, 1936 (Nemata: Pratylenchidae). Rev. Nématologie 1989, 12, 243–256. [Google Scholar]
  7. Handoo, Z.A.; Golden, A.M. A key and compendium to the species of Pratylenchus (lesion nematodes). J. Nematol. 1989, 21, 202–218. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Vieira, P.; Maier, T.R.; Eves-van den Akker, S.; Howe, D.K.; Zasada, I.; Baum, T.J.; Eisenback, J.D.; Kamo, K. Identification of candidate effector genes of Pratylenchus penetrans. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 1887–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Lewis, S.A.; Drye, C.E.; Saunders, J.A.; Shipe, E.R.; Halbrendt, J.M. Plant-parasitic nematodes on soybean in South Carolina. J. Nematol. 1993, 25, 890. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schmitt, D.P.; Barker, K.R. Damage and reproductive potentials of Pratylenchus brachyurus and P. penetrans on soybean. J. Nematol. 1981, 13, 327. [Google Scholar]
  11. Koenning, S.R.; Schmitt, D.P.; Barker, K.R. Influence of selected cultural practices on winter survival of Pratylenchus brachyurus and subsequent effects on soybean yield. J. Nematol. 1985, 17, 464. [Google Scholar]
  12. Thorne, G.; Malek, R.B. Nematodes of the Northern Great Plains. Part I. Tylenchida (Nemata: Secernentea); Technical Bulletin 31. Paper 1; South Dakota State University: Brookings, SD, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yan, G.P.; Plaisance, A.; Huang, D.; Liu, Z.; Chapara, V.; Handoo, Z.A. First report of the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus neglectus on wheat (Triticum aestivum) in North Dakota. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, D.; Yan, G. Specific detection of the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus scribneri using conventional and real-time PCR. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yan, G.; Plaisance, A.; Huang, D.; Chowdhry, I.A.; Handoo, Z.A. First report of the new root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus sp. on Soybean in North Dakota. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yan, G.P.; Plaisance, A.; Huang, D.; Handoo, Z.A.; Chitwood, D.J. First Report of a New, Unnamed Lesion Nematode Pratylenchus sp. Infecting Soybean in North Dakota. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jenkins, W.R. A rapid centrifugal flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Dis. Rep. 1968, 48, 692. [Google Scholar]
  18. Whitehead, A.G.; Hemming, J.R. A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1965, 55, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Golden, A.M. Preparation and Mounting Nematodes for Microscopic Observations. In Plant Nematology Laboratory Manual; Zuckerman, M., Mai, W.F., Krusberg, L.R., Eds.; University of Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station: Amherst, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 197–205. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hooper, D.J. Handling, Fixing, Staining, and Mounting nematodes. In Laboratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes, 5th ed.; Southey, J.F., Ed.; Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UK, 1970; pp. 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  21. Carta, L.K.; Handoo, Z.A.; Li, S.; Kantor, M.; Bauchan, G.; McCann, D.; Gabriel, C.K.; Yu, Q.; Reed, S.E.; Koch, J.; et al. Beech Leaf Disease Symptoms Caused by Newly Recognized Nematode Subspecies Litylenchus crenatae mccannii (Anguinata) Described from Fagus grandifolia in North America. For Pathol. 2020, 50, e12580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kantor, M.; Handoo, Z.A.; Skantar, A.M.; Hult, M.N.; Ingham, R.E.; Wade, N.M.; Ye, W.; Bauchan, G.R.; Mowery, J.D. Morphological and molecular characterisation of Punctodera mulveyi n. sp. (Nematoda: Punctoderidae) from a golf course green in Oregon, USA, with a key to species of Punctodera. Nematology 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Handoo, Z.; Kantor, M.; Carta, L. Taxonomy and Identification of Principal Foliar Nematode Species (Aphelenchoides and Litylenchus). Plants 2020, 9, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumari, S.; Subbotin, S.A. Molecular characterization and diagnostic of stubby root and virus vector nematodes of the family Truchodoridae (Nametode: Triplonchida) using ribosomal RAN genes. Plant Pathol. 2012, 61, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Subbotin, S.A.; Sturhan, D.; Chizhov, V.N.; Vovlas, N.; Baldwin, J.G. Phylogenetic analysis of Tylenchida Thorne, 1949 as inferred from D2 and D3 expansion fragments of the 28S rRNA gene sequences. Nematology 2006, 8, 455–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Vrain, T.C.; Wakarchuk, D.A.; Levesque, A.C.; Hamilton, R.I. Intraspecific rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism in the Xiphinema americanum group. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 1992, 15, 563–573. [Google Scholar]
  27. Derycke, S.; Vanaverbeke, J.; Rigaux, A.; Backeljau, T.; Moens, T. Exploring the use of Cytochrome Oxidase c Subunit 1 (COI) for DNA barcoding of free-living marine nematodes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Waeyenberge, L.; Ryss, A.; Moens, M.; Pinochet, J.; Vrain, T.C. Molecular characterization of 18 Pratylenchus species using rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism. Nematology 2000, 2, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Line drawings of Pratylenchus dakoaiensis n. sp.: (A) Female pharyngeal region; (B) vulval region showing vulva, uterus, and spermatheca, (C) female lip region showing stylet; (D) details of the lip region showing the oral disc (en face view); (E,G) female tails with E showing lateral field with four lines; (F,H) male tails showing spicules and gubernaculum.
Figure 1. Line drawings of Pratylenchus dakoaiensis n. sp.: (A) Female pharyngeal region; (B) vulval region showing vulva, uterus, and spermatheca, (C) female lip region showing stylet; (D) details of the lip region showing the oral disc (en face view); (E,G) female tails with E showing lateral field with four lines; (F,H) male tails showing spicules and gubernaculum.
Plants 10 00168 g001
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp.: (A) Female anterior end showing pharyngeal region; (B) female anterior end showing stylet; (C) female vulval area with arrow pointing the spermatheca; (D) female posterior end with arrows in black and white pointing to vulval and anal openings, respectively; (E) entire female with arrows in black and white pointing to vulval and anal openings; (F) female mid body showing lateral field with four lines; (G,H,L) female posterior ends showing tail variations and arrows pointing to anal areas; (I,J) male posterior ends showing spicule and bursa; (K) male posterior end with arrow pointing the phasmid.
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp.: (A) Female anterior end showing pharyngeal region; (B) female anterior end showing stylet; (C) female vulval area with arrow pointing the spermatheca; (D) female posterior end with arrows in black and white pointing to vulval and anal openings, respectively; (E) entire female with arrows in black and white pointing to vulval and anal openings; (F) female mid body showing lateral field with four lines; (G,H,L) female posterior ends showing tail variations and arrows pointing to anal areas; (I,J) male posterior ends showing spicule and bursa; (K) male posterior end with arrow pointing the phasmid.
Plants 10 00168 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp.: (A) Male specimen, head; (B,C) female posterior and anterior ends, (B) female posterior end, arrow showing anal opening, and (C) arrows showing oral opening; (D) female mid-body region showing lateral field; (E) male posterior end arrows in white and black showing cloaca opening and spicule, respectively; (F) whole specimen lateral field.
Figure 3. SEM images of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp.: (A) Male specimen, head; (B,C) female posterior and anterior ends, (B) female posterior end, arrow showing anal opening, and (C) arrows showing oral opening; (D) female mid-body region showing lateral field; (E) male posterior end arrows in white and black showing cloaca opening and spicule, respectively; (F) whole specimen lateral field.
Plants 10 00168 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (red arrow) from D2–D3 28S with related Pratylenchus spp. sequences from GenBank based on Maximum Likelihood analysis. Support values are given above branches. Coslenchus costatus, Boleodorus sp., and Basiria gracilis were served as outgroups.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (red arrow) from D2–D3 28S with related Pratylenchus spp. sequences from GenBank based on Maximum Likelihood analysis. Support values are given above branches. Coslenchus costatus, Boleodorus sp., and Basiria gracilis were served as outgroups.
Plants 10 00168 g004
Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationships of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (red arrow) from ITS rDNA with related Pratylenchus spp. sequences from GenBank based on Maximum Likelihood analysis. Support values are given above branches. Caenorhabditiss elegans was served as an outgroup.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationships of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (red arrow) from ITS rDNA with related Pratylenchus spp. sequences from GenBank based on Maximum Likelihood analysis. Support values are given above branches. Caenorhabditiss elegans was served as an outgroup.
Plants 10 00168 g005
Figure 6. Phylogenetic relationships of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (red arrow) from partial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COX1) gene with related Pratylenchus spp. sequences from GenBank based on Maximum Likelihood analysis. Support values are given above branches. Caenorhabditiss elegans was served as an outgroup.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic relationships of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (red arrow) from partial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COX1) gene with related Pratylenchus spp. sequences from GenBank based on Maximum Likelihood analysis. Support values are given above branches. Caenorhabditiss elegans was served as an outgroup.
Plants 10 00168 g006
Figure 7. PCR-RFLP of Pratylenchus spp. using Hind III and Hha I enzymes. PCR products were amplified with primers rDNA2-V/PnSeqR targeted on ITS rDNA. The letter M refers to 100 bp DNA ladder from Promega, lanes 1–9 were nematode DNA extracted from single individuals isolated from the field having infestation of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp., Ps refers to DNA from P. scribneri (ND), Pn refers to DNA from P. neglectus (ND), Pt refers to DNA from P. thornei (OR), Pp refers to DNA from P. penetrans (MN), and NTC refers to no-template control using ddH2O instead of nematode DNA in the PCR reaction.
Figure 7. PCR-RFLP of Pratylenchus spp. using Hind III and Hha I enzymes. PCR products were amplified with primers rDNA2-V/PnSeqR targeted on ITS rDNA. The letter M refers to 100 bp DNA ladder from Promega, lanes 1–9 were nematode DNA extracted from single individuals isolated from the field having infestation of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp., Ps refers to DNA from P. scribneri (ND), Pn refers to DNA from P. neglectus (ND), Pt refers to DNA from P. thornei (OR), Pp refers to DNA from P. penetrans (MN), and NTC refers to no-template control using ddH2O instead of nematode DNA in the PCR reaction.
Plants 10 00168 g007
Table 1. Morphometrics of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. All measurements are in µm and in the form: mean ± standard deviation (s.d.) (range).
Table 1. Morphometrics of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. All measurements are in µm and in the form: mean ± standard deviation (s.d.) (range).
CharacterHolotypeFemalesMales
n 227
L552.0484.5 ± 39.9
(390.0–555.0)
445.7 ± 56.0
(355.0–502.0)
a27.623.4 ± 2.8
(20.8–29.8)
23.7 ± 2.01
(20.8–25.2)
b4.24.0 ± 0.4
(3.2–4.8)
4.06 ± 0.5
(3.2–4.8)
c22.020.2 ± 1.7
(16.8–24.1)
20.0 ± 1.7
(16.7–21.3)
C’2.01.9 ± 0.3
(1.4–2.4)
2.1 ± 0.17
(1.9–2.4)
Anal body width12.013.0 ± 2.0
(10.0–16.0)
10.9 ± 0.7
(10.0–12.0)
V%80.080.2 ± 1.5
(78.0–83.0)
-
Maximum body width21.021.9 ± 2.5
(20.8–29.8)
18.9 ± 1.5
(17.0–21.0)
Stylet length16.017.5 ± 0.3
(16.0–18.0)
16.0 ± 0.3
(15.5–16.5)
Distance from head end to posterior end of esophageal glands130.0118.8 ± 9.7
(110.0–140.0)
109.3 ± 5.7
(101.0–115.0)
Tail length25.024.4 ± 2.4
(20.0–30.0)
23.1 ± 1.8
(20.0–25.0)
Spicule length--17.5 ± 0.82
(16.0–18.5)
Gubernaculum--4.5 ± 0.5
(4.0–5.0)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Handoo, Z.A.; Yan, G.; Kantor, M.R.; Huang, D.; Chowdhury, I.A.; Plaisance, A.; Bauchan, G.R.; Mowery, J.D. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae), a New Root-Lesion Nematode Species on Soybean in North Dakota, USA. Plants 2021, 10, 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010168

AMA Style

Handoo ZA, Yan G, Kantor MR, Huang D, Chowdhury IA, Plaisance A, Bauchan GR, Mowery JD. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae), a New Root-Lesion Nematode Species on Soybean in North Dakota, USA. Plants. 2021; 10(1):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Handoo, Zafar A., Guiping Yan, Mihail R. Kantor, Danqiong Huang, Intiaz A. Chowdhury, Addison Plaisance, Gary R. Bauchan, and Joseph D. Mowery. 2021. "Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae), a New Root-Lesion Nematode Species on Soybean in North Dakota, USA" Plants 10, no. 1: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010168

APA Style

Handoo, Z. A., Yan, G., Kantor, M. R., Huang, D., Chowdhury, I. A., Plaisance, A., Bauchan, G. R., & Mowery, J. D. (2021). Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Pratylenchus dakotaensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae), a New Root-Lesion Nematode Species on Soybean in North Dakota, USA. Plants, 10(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop