Next Article in Journal
Potential Use of Ascophyllum nodosum as a Biostimulant for Improving the Growth Performance of Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal
Next Article in Special Issue
Foliar Sprayed Green Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Mitigate Drought-Induced Oxidative Stress in Tomato
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Parent vs. Hybrid Canola under Varying Nitrogen Availabilities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biosynthesis and Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Ochradenus arabicus and Their Effect on Growth and Antioxidant Systems of Maerua oblongifolia
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Pomegranate and Orange Peel Extracts and Their Antifungal Activity against Alternaria solani, the Causal Agent of Early Blight Disease of Tomato

Plants 2021, 10(11), 2363; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112363
by Yasser S. Mostafa 1,†, Saad A. Alamri 1,†, Sulaiman A. Alrumman 1,†, Mohamed Hashem 1,2,† and Zakaria A. Baka 3,*,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Plants 2021, 10(11), 2363; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112363
Submission received: 30 September 2021 / Revised: 20 October 2021 / Accepted: 29 October 2021 / Published: 2 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Nano-Particles under Combined Stress on Plants)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Lines 366-371: I think an image suggestive for the affected plants should be included.

Lines 378-379: please specify how the correction of fungal burden was made.

Lines 421-422: include details about sequencing (equipment, conditions etc.)

Lines 126-137: Were the sequences of your Alternaria solani isolates deposited in GenBank database? If yes, please provide their accesion numbers.

Lines 477-487: Which solvent has been used for AgNPs and peel extracts? It seems that it was not included into the control plates. Also, the dilution of culture medium (1:1 with extracts and AgNPs suspensions) could affect the fungal growth comparing with control plates where only culture medium was used.

Line 492: The concentration of 10 mg/ml has been tested or not? (see line 479).

Author Response

Dear Reviewer;

thank you for you valuable comments

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In its assumptions, the study is justified and interesting. Similar research has not been done so far. However, I have a few technical notes:

line 148 - point 2.3 correct the font size and remove the period

line 152 - table 3 incorrect value 8.6.32

line 185 - figure 6 to improve the quality of photos

line 190 - figure 7 I suggest that you add more detailed photos

line 259 - remove bold

line 528, 540, 562, 566, 592, 603, 640, 702 - remove the underline 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you for valuable comments

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have extensively modified their manuscript and improved its quality. I consider that it is now publishable.

Back to TopTop