Pinus Species as Prospective Reserves of Bioactive Compounds with Potential Use in Functional Food—Current State of Knowledge
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Nutritional Value and Mineral Content
3. Polyphenol Content
4. Essential Oils
5. Antioxidant Activity
6. Pharmacological Properties
Activity | Material | Experimental Model | Result | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
Antihypertensive | P. densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. extract | A group of Wistar-Kyoto rats—a normotensive group—was orally administered tap water. Four groups of spontaneously hypertensive rats were orally administered tap water, captopril (a positive control), 50 mg/kg/day of KRPBE P. densiflora bark extract (Korean red pine bark extract; KRPBE) and 150 mg/kg/day of KRPBE, respectively. The blood pressure of rats was measured once a week during the seven weeks of oral administration of drugs. After seven weeks, the researchers collected the rats’ lungs, kidneys and serum, and subsequently determined the activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), as well as the content of angiotensin II and malondialdehyde (MDA). | Blood pressure of rats served with captopril and KRPBE was significantly lower than that of the SHR control group. The activity of ACE, as well as the content of angiotensin II and MDA, was significantly lower in groups administered with captopril and KRPBE than those in the SHR control group. | [114] |
Anti-adipogenic | P. densiflora aqueous bark extract | Four-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were fed with regular feed (18% kcal from fat) or HFD (60% kcal from fat). Animals fed with HFD were additionally subjected to PineXol treatment at 10 or 50 mg/kg body weight (PX10 or PX50, respectively). | Compared to the HFD group, the PX50 group was characterised by statistically lower body weight and body fat mass (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). In the PX50 group, concentrations of hepatic triglycerides, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were lower than those in the HFD group (p < 0.01). The levels of acetyl CoA carboxylase (p < 0.01), elongase of a very long chain of fatty acids 6 (p < 0.01), stearoyl CoA desaturase 1 (p < 0.05), microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (p < 0.01) and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (p < 0.05) in the PX50 group were significantly lower compared to their respective levels in the HFD group. In the white adipose tissue, the levels of CCAAT enhancer-binding protein alpha (p < 0.05), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (p < 0.001) and perilipin (p < 0.01) in the PX50 group were lower than those in the HFD group. | [115] |
Antidiabetic | P. roxburghii ethanolic bark extract | Rats were induced with diabetes through alloxan injection (120 mg/kg body weight). Control rats were either healthy and untreated, or induced with diabetes, untreated and provided only with distilled water. The acute effect of ethanolic extract was evaluated by administering 100, 300 and 500 mg/kg body weight p.o. of the extract to normoglycemic rats. In the chronic model, the ethanolic extract was administered to normal and alloxan-induced, diabetic rats at 100, 300 and 500 mg/kg body weight p.o. per day for 21 days. Levels of blood glucose and the values of body weight were monitored at specific intervals using different biochemical parameters. | Statistical data indicated a significant (p < 0.01) increase in the body weight, as well as a decrease in the level of blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin, total cholesterol and serum triglycerides. The level of HDL cholesterol was significantly (p < 0.01) increased in rats administered with the extract. | [116] |
Hepatoprotective | P. roxburghii wood oil | The administration of P. roxburghii wood oil at 200, 300 and 400 mg/kg body weight was examined in terms of its hepatoprotective activity on rat liver damage induced by carbon tetrachloride and ethanol. | Noticeably high levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, malondialdehyde (MDA) and low levels of reduced glutathione (GSH) and total protein induced by hepatotoxins, significantly inclined towards adopting normal levels due to the wood oil administered at 200 and 300 mg/kg. | [117] |
Antidyslipidemic | P. roxburghii needles, hexane (B), chloroform (C), n-butanol soluble (D) and n-butanol insoluble (E) fractions. | Dyslipidemic hamsters were divided into six groups and fed with five solvent fractions (A, B, C, D and E) of P. roxburghii needles. | Extract from P. roxburghii needles exhibited the significant potential to decrease the level of the plasma lipid profile, as well as having a beneficial effect on the HDL-C and its ratio with total cholesterol in a dyslipidemic hamster model. | [118] |
Analgesic | P. roxburghii Sarg. stem bark ethanolic extract | Analgesic activity was evaluated using acetic acid-induced writhing and tail immersion tests in Swiss albino mice. | Alcoholic extract from Pinus roxburghii Sarg. (at 100, 300 and 500 mg/kg) significantly and dependently reduced the number of abdominal constrictions induced in mice by administering a 1% solution of acetic acid. This dose-dependent protective effect reached a maximum pain inhibition of 80.95% at 500 mg/kg. | [119] |
Anticonvulsant | P. roxburghii alcoholic extract | Anticonvulsant activity was evaluated by means of maximal electroshock (MES) and pentylenetetrazole-induced (PTZ) seizures in Wistar albino rats at various doses (i.e., 100, 300 and 500 mg/kg). | In the MES-induced seizure model, AEPR at 300 and 500 mg/kg body weight significantly reduced all phases of convulsion (p < 0.01). In the PTZ-induced seizure model, administration of the extract at 300 and 500 mg/kg half an hour before the injection of PTZ significantly delayed the onset of clonic seizures (p < 0.01). | [120] |
Anti-viral (HIV-1) | P. pinaster ssp. atlantica extract (Pycnogenol) | The inhibitory effect of the extract on virus binding to MT-4 cells was examined by infecting the MT-4 cells with IIIB-env-Hiv-1 in the presence or absence of extract. | Addition of the compound at the time of injection resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of the cytopathic effect, as well as a dose-dependent reduction in p24. | [121] |
Anti-viral (Epstein-Barr virus) | P. massoniana aqueous bark extract | Inhibition of the immediate-early viral gene transpiration by the extract was assessed by transient transfection assay. | P. massoniana bark extract (PMBE) at 60 microg/mL or a higher dose, inhibits the expression of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic proteins, such as Rta, Zta and EA-D. The EBV lytic cycle was blocked by the inhibition of the immediate-early gene transcription. | [122] |
Wound healing | Methanol and P. longifolia roxburghii aqueous leave extracts | Extracts were examined in terms of wound healing properties on excision and incision wound models in Wistar albino rats. | Both extracts exhibited significant wound healing activity. However, the rate of wound contraction and epithelialisation was faster in groups administered with methanol extract. | [123] |
Anti-cancer | P. roxburghii essential oil | The essential oil was tested against human cancer cell lines, i.e., cultured HCT-116 (colon cancer), KBM-5 (myelogenous leukaemia), U-266 (multiple myeloma cells), MiaPaCa-2 (pancreatic cancer cells), A-549 (lung carcinoma cells) and SCC-4 (squamous cell carcinoma) cell lines by means of the MTT assay. | The percentage inhibition of PREO activity was found to be concentration-dependent. U-266 exhibited maximum inhibition of 83%, while HCT-116, SCC4, MiaPaCa-2, A-549 and KBM-5 manifested 71, 69, 73, 73 and 76% of inhibition, respectively. | [124] |
Petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, chloroform and P. roxburghii Sarg. ethanolic extract | Effect of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. extracts on the growth of human IMR32 neuroblastoma cancer cell line was studied using the SRB assay. | Petroleum ether and chloroform extracts were the only extracts that exhibited anticancer activity. | [125] | |
Cardio-protective | P. pinaster ssp. atlantica extract (Pycnogenol) | Twenty-three patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) completed this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Apart from the standard cardiovascular therapy, patients received Pycnogenol (200 mg/day) for 8 weeks followed by the placebo, or vice versa. At a baseline and after each treatment period, the endothelial function, assessed in a non-invasive manner via flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery using high-resolution ultrasound, biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation, platelet adhesion and 24 h blood pressure monitoring were evaluated. | In CAD patients, treatment with Pycnogenol was associated with an improvement of FMD from 5.3 ± 2.6 to 7.0 ± 3.1 (p < 0.0001), while no change was observed in case of placebo (5.4 ± 2.4 to 4.7 ± 2.0; p = 0.051). Isoprostane—which influences the oxidative stress index—significantly decreased from 0.71 ± 0.09 to 0.66 ± 0.13 after treatment with Pycnogenol, while no change was observed in the group treated with placebo (mean difference 0.06 pg/mL with an associated 95% CI (0.01, 0.11), p = 0.012). Inflammation markers, platelet adhesion and blood pressure levels did not change following the treatment with Pycnogenol or placebo. | [126] |
Neuroprotective | P. densiflora aqueous bark extract | Neuroprotective effect (anticholinesterase activity) was determined using the AChE and BChE assays while intracellular oxidative stress was evaluated using the fluorescent assay using DCFH-DA on neuronal PC-12 cells. | Pretreatment of PC-12 cells with Kextract decreased the oxidative stress in a dose-dependent manner compared to cells exposed solely to oxidative stress. Inhibition of AChE and BChE occurred at 10 µg/mL and 100 µg/mL in TE values—approx. 68.3 nM and 15.1 nM for the inhibition of AChE and BChE, respectively. | [127] |
P. roxburghii Sarg. methanolic extract | The in vitro cell viability activity of P. roxburghii was assessed using the PC-12 cell lines. The in vivo neuroprotective activity of P. roxburghii was tested on Wistar albino rats (both sexes). ICV-STZ (3 mg/kg, bilateral) was administered to induce a memory deficit. | P. roxburghii exhibited significant cell viability at 10, 50 and 100 µg/mL in an in vitro assay on PC-12 cell lines. In the in vivo activity, ICV-STZ significantly deteriorated memory, cognition, tissue oxidative stress and the AchE activity. P. roxburghii (at 100, 200 and 300 mg/kg p.o.) and donepezil (at 3 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly (p < 0.05) reversed the behavioural changes in rats when tested in a morris water maze and elevated plus maze. Increased levels of lipid peroxidation, AchE activity and decreased the level of glutathione were significantly (p < 0.05) antagonised by P. roxburghii, similarly to the case of donepezil in rat brain. | [128] | |
P. radiata bark | Sixty adults who sustained a mild TBI 3–12 months before recruitment and were experiencing persistent cognitive difficulties (CFQ score > 38), were randomised in order to receive enzogenol (1000 mg/day) or a corresponding dose of placebo for 6 weeks. Subsequently, all participants received enzogenol for a further 6 weeks, followed by placebo for 4 weeks. Compliance, side-effects, cognitive failures, working and episodic memory, post-concussive symptoms and mood were evaluated at baseline, as well as in the 6th, 12th and 16th week. | Enzogenol was found to be safe and well-tolerated. Trend and breakpoint analyses revealed a significant reduction in cognitive failures after 6 weeks (mean CFQ score, 95% CI, Enzogenol versus placebo 6.9 (10.8 to 4.1)). Improvements in the frequency of self-reported cognitive failures were estimated to continue until the 11th week before stabilising. | [111] | |
P. radiata | During the period of 5 weeks, the participants (42 males aged 50–65) were supplemented either with Enzogenol combined with vitamin C, or vitamin C only. A battery of computerised cognitive tests was administered while cardiovascular and haematological parameters were assessed before and after supplementation. | The speed of the response to the spatial working memory and immediate recognition tasks improved after supplementation with Enzogenol combined with vitamin C, whereas supplementation with vitamin C alone did not induce any improvement. A trend in the reduction of systolic blood pressure was observed in patients supplemented with Enzogenol combined with vitamin C, but not with vitamin C alone. The blood safety parameters remained unchanged. | [112] | |
Photoprotective | P. pinaster | A total of 21 volunteers were administered oral supplementation of Pycnogenol: 1.10 mg/kg body weight (b. wt.)/day (d) for the first 4 weeks and 1.66 mg/kg b. wt./d for the following 4 weeks. The minimal erythema dose (MED) was measured twice before the supplementation (baseline MED), once after the first 4 weeks of supplementation and the last time at the end of the study. | An increase in MED was observed after supplementation with 1.10 mg/kg b. wt./d of PBE for 4 weeks (mean MED 5 34.62 mJ/cm2, 95% CI 5 from 31.87 to 37.37). A supplementation with 1.66 mg/kg b. wt./d of PBE for the last 4 weeks of the study caused an even further increase in MED (mean MED 5 39.62 mJ/cm2, 95% CI 5, from 37.51 to 41.73). | [109] |
Anti-photoaging | P. pinaster | A total of 112 women with mild to moderate skin photoaging symptoms were randomised to either take part in a 12-week open trial regimen of 100 mg PBE supplementation once a day or to be in a parallel-group—a trial regimen of 40 mg PBE supplementation once a day. | A significant decrease in clinical grading of skin photoaging scores was observed during both 100 mg and 40 mg of PBE daily supplementation regimens. Furthermore, a significant reduction in the pigmentation of age spots was demonstrated using skin colour measurements. | [110] |
7. Antimicrobial Activity
8. Food Application of Pinus
9. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gernandt, D.S.; López, G.G.; García, S.O.; Liston, A. Phylogeny and Classification of Pinus. Taxon 2005, 54, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gifford, E.M.; Foster, A.S. Morphology and Evolution of Vascular Plants, 3rd ed.; W. H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1989; ISBN 978-0-7167-1946-5. [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, D.M. Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; ISBN 978-0-521-78910-3. [Google Scholar]
- Farjon, A. Pines: Drawings and Descriptions of the Genus Pinus, 2nd ed.; Brill: Buckinghamshire, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-90-474-1516-9. [Google Scholar]
- Boag, D.A.; Kiceniu, J.W. Protein and Caloric Content of Lodge Pole Pine Needles. For. Chron. 1968, 44, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nergiz, C.; Dönmez, İ. Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Pinus pinea L. Seeds. Food Chem. 2004, 86, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziedzinski, M.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Szymanowska, D.; Stuper-Szablewska, K.; Baranowska, M. Identification of Polyphenols from Coniferous Shoots as Natural Antioxidants and Antimicrobial Compounds. Molecules 2020, 25, 3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Angel, H.Z.; Priest, J.S.; Stovall, J.P.; Oswald, B.P.; Weng, Y.; Williams, H.M. Individual Tree and Stand-Level Carbon and Nutrient Contents across One Rotation of Loblolly Pine Plantations on a Reclaimed Surface Mine. New For. 2019, 50, 733–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anäs, E.; Ekman, R.; Holmbom, B. Composition of Nonpolar Extractives in Bark of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 1983, 3, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, C.; Höll, W. Food Reserves of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Trees 1991, 5, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda, I.; Gominho, J.; Mirra, I.; Pereira, H. Chemical Characterization of Barks from Picea Abies and Pinus sylvestris after Fractioning into Different Particle Sizes. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2012, 36, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajorek-Zydroń, K.; Krzaklewski, W.; Pietrzykowski, M. Ocena zaopatrzenia sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus sylvestris L.) w składniki pokarmowe w warunkach zwałowiska zewnętrznego KWB “Bełchatów.”. Górnictwo i Geoinżynieria 2007, 31, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
- Bamigboye, A.; Okafor, A.; Adepoju, O. Proximate and Mineral Composition of Whole and Dehulled Nigerian Sesame Seed. Afr. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 1, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
- Kulczyński, B.; Gramza-Michałowska, A. The Profile of Secondary Metabolites and Other Bioactive Compounds in Cucurbita pepo L. and Cucurbita moschata Pumpkin Cultivars. Molecules 2019, 24, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Edelman, M.; Colt, M. Nutrient Value of Leaf vs. Seed. Front. Chem. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sayeed, M.A.; Ali, M.A.; Sohel, F.I.; Khan, G.R.M.A.M.; Yeasmin, M.S. Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Mesua Ferrea Seed Oil and Nutritional Composition of Its Seed and Leaves. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2004, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szulc, P.; Barłóg, P.; Ambroży-Deręgowska, K.; Mejza, I.; Kobus-Cisowska, J. In-Soil Application of NP Mineral Fertilizer as a Method of Improving Nitrogen Yielding Efficiency. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szulc, P.; Ambroży-Deręgowska, K.; Mejza, I.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Ligaj, M. The Role of Agrotechnical Factors in Shaping the Protein Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.). Sustainability 2020, 12, 6833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usowicz, B.; Lipiec, J. Spatial Variability of Soil Properties and Cereal Yield in a Cultivated Field on Sandy Soil. Soil Tillage Res. 2017, 174, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelonek, T.; Gzyl, J.; Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M.; Tomczak, A.; Remlein, A. The influence of the selected ratios of trees stability on the wall thickness of tracheids in the scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Ind. Lignaria 2016, 15, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Köhler, I.H.; Huber, S.C.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Baxter, I.R. Increased Temperatures May Safeguard the Nutritional Quality of Crops under Future Elevated CO2 Concentrations. Plant J. 2019, 97, 872–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Borreani, G.; Tabacco, E.; Schmidt, R.J.; Holmes, B.J.; Muck, R.E. Silage Review: Factors Affecting Dry Matter and Quality Losses in Silages. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3952–3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kyriacou, M.C.; Leskovar, D.I.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y. Watermelon and Melon Fruit Quality: The Genotypic and Agro-Environmental Factors Implicated. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 234, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubus, M.; Graczyk, M. Microelement Variability in Plants as an Effect of Sewage Sludge Compost Application Assessed by Different Statistical Methods. Agronomy 2020, 10, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellini, M.; Stellacci, A.M.; Tomaiuolo, M.; Barca, E. Spatial Variability of Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties in a Durum Wheat Field: An Assessment by the BEST-Procedure. Water 2019, 11, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wen, J.; Ji, H.; Sun, N.; Tao, H.; Du, B.; Hui, D.; Liu, C. Imbalanced Plant Stoichiometry at Contrasting Geologic-Derived Phosphorus Sites in Subtropics: The Role of Microelements and Plant Functional Group. Plant Soil 2018, 430, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, D.K.; Singh, V.P.; Chauhan, D.K.; Prasad, S.M.; Dubey, N.K. Role of Macronutrients in Plant Growth and Acclimation: Recent Advances and Future Prospective. In Improvement of Crops in the Era of Climatic Changes: Volume 2; Ahmad, P., Wani, M.R., Azooz, M.M., Phan Tran, L.-S., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 197–216. ISBN 978-1-4614-8824-8. [Google Scholar]
- Klimek, K.; Jelonek, T.; Tomczak, A. The effect of tree ageing processes on selected physical properties of xylem in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Ind. Lignaria 2018, 17, 353–360. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, W.; Nazim, H.; Liang, Z.; Yang, D. Magnesium Deficiency in Plants: An Urgent Problem. Crop J. 2016, 4, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Broadley, M.; Brown, P.; Cakmak, I.; Rengel, Z.; Zhao, F. Chapter 7—Function of Nutrients: Micronutrients. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Marschner, P., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 191–248. ISBN 978-0-12-384905-2. [Google Scholar]
- Cabot, C.; Martos, S.; Llugany, M.; Gallego, B.; Tolrà, R.; Poschenrieder, C. A Role for Zinc in Plant Defense Against Pathogens and Herbivores. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.R.; Khan, M.M. Plants Response to Diseases in Sulphur Dioxide Stressed Environment. Plant Pathol. J. 2011, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.-Y.; Chung, H.-J. Flavor Compounds of Pine Sprout Tea and Pine Needle Tea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1269–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, J.-R.; Kim, J.-Y.; Lee, K.-M.; Cho, D.-H. Anti-Obese Effects of Mixture Contained Pine needle, Black Tea and Green Tea Extracts. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2005, 48, 375–381. [Google Scholar]
- Glasdam, S.-M.; Glasdam, S.; Peters, G.H. The Importance of Magnesium in the Human Body. In Advances in Clinical Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 73, pp. 169–193. ISBN 978-0-12-804690-6. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, M.H. Dietary Supplements and Sports Performance: Minerals. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2005, 2, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roh, S.-S.; Park, M.-K.; Kim, Y. Abietic Acid from Resina Pini of Pinus Species as a Testosterone 5α-Reductase Inhibitor. J. Health Sci. 2010, 56, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aggarwal, S.; Thareja, S.; Verma, A.; Bhardwaj, T.R.; Kumar, M. An Overview on 5α-Reductase Inhibitors. Steroids 2010, 75, 109–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsao, R. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Dietary Polyphenols. Nutrients 2010, 2, 1231–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, T.; Zheng, P.; Zhang, K.; Liao, J.; Xiong, F.; Shen, Q.; Ma, Y.; Fang, W.; Zhu, X. Effects of GABA on the Polyphenol Accumulation and Antioxidant Activities in Tea Plants (Camellia sinensis L.) under Heat-Stress Conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghahremani, A.; Ghasemi Pirbalouti, A.; Mozafari, H.; Habibi, D.; Sani, B. Phytochemical and Morpho-Physiological Traits of Mullein as a New Medicinal Crop under Different Planting Pattern and Soil Moisture Conditions. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 145, 111976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares, S.; Brandão, E.; Guerreiro, C.; Soares, S.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V. Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste. Molecules 2020, 25, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Debnath-Canning, M.; Unruh, S.; Vyas, P.; Daneshtalab, N.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Weber, J.T. Fruits and Leaves from Wild Blueberry Plants Contain Diverse Polyphenols and Decrease Neuroinflammatory Responses in Microglia. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 68, 103906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manach, C.; Scalbert, A.; Morand, C.; Rémésy, C.; Jiménez, L. Polyphenols: Food Sources and Bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 727–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Manasa, V.; Padmanabhan, A.; Anu Appaiah, K.A. Utilization of Coffee Pulp Waste for Rapid Recovery of Pectin and Polyphenols for Sustainable Material Recycle. Waste Manag. 2021, 120, 762–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cutrim, C.S.; Cortez, M.A.S. A Review on Polyphenols: Classification, Beneficial Effects and Their Application in Dairy Products. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2018, 71, 564–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Wang, C.; Zou, Y.; Hu, J.; Li, Y.; Cheng, Y. Natural Polyphenols in Drug Delivery Systems: Current Status and Future Challenges. Giant 2020, 3, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debelo, H.; Li, M.; Ferruzzi, M.G. Processing Influences on Food Polyphenol Profiles and Biological Activity. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira-Santos, P.; Zanuso, E.; Genisheva, Z.; Rocha, C.M.R.; Teixeira, J.A. Green and Sustainable Valorization of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Pinus By-Products. Molecules 2020, 25, 2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bindes, M.M.M.; Cardoso, V.L.; Reis, M.H.M.; Boffito, D.C. Maximisation of the Polyphenols Extraction Yield from Green Tea Leaves and Sequential Clarification. J. Food Eng. 2019, 241, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorzynik-Debicka, M.; Przychodzen, P.; Cappello, F.; Kuban-Jankowska, A.; Marino Gammazza, A.; Knap, N.; Wozniak, M.; Gorska-Ponikowska, M. Potential Health Benefits of Olive Oil and Plant Polyphenols. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dzah, C.S.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Authur, D.A.; Ma, H. Ultrasound-, Subcritical Water- and Ultrasound Assisted Subcritical Water-Derived Tartary Buckwheat Polyphenols Show Superior Antioxidant Activity and Cytotoxicity in Human Liver Carcinoma Cells. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabaston, J.; Richard, T.; Cluzet, S.; Palos Pinto, A.; Dufour, M.-C.; Corio-Costet, M.-F.; Mérillon, J.-M. Pinus pinaster Knot: A Source of Polyphenols against Plasmopara Viticola. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 8884–8891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D’Andrea, G. Pycnogenol: A Blend of Procyanidins with Multifaceted Therapeutic Applications? Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 724–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, X.; Shen, T.; Lou, H. Dietary Polyphenols and Their Biological Significance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 8, 950–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Szymanowska, D.; Szczepaniak, O.M.; Gramza-Michałowska, A.; Kmiecik, D.; Kulczyński, B.; Szulc, P.; Górnaś, P. Composition of Polyphenols of Asparagus Spears (Asparagus Officinalis) and Their Antioxidant Potential. Ciência Rural 2019, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ku, S.; Mun, S.P. Antioxidant Properties of Monomeric, Oligomeric, and Polymeric Fractions in Hot Water Extract from Pinus radiata Bark. Wood Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lantto, T.A.; Dorman, H.J.D.; Shikov, A.N.; Pozharitskaya, O.N.; Makarov, V.G.; Tikhonov, V.P.; Hiltunen, R.; Raasmaja, A. Chemical Composition, Antioxidative Activity and Cell Viability Effects of a Siberian Pine (Pinus Sibirica Du Tour) Extract. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira-Santos, P.; Genisheva, Z.; Pereira, R.N.; Teixeira, J.A.; Rocha, C.M.R. Moderate Electric Fields as a Potential Tool for Sustainable Recovery of Phenolic Compounds from Pinus pinaster Bark. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 8816–8826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coppen, J.J.W.; Robinson, J.M.; Kaushal, A.N. Composition of Xylem Resin from Pinus Wallichiana and P. Roxburghii. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 2873–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willför, S.; Ali, M.; Karonen, M.; Reunanen, M.; Arfan, M.; Harlamow, R. Extractives in Bark of Different Conifer Species Growing in Pakistan. Holzforschung 2009, 63, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beri, R.M. Chemical Constituents of the Bark of Pinus roxburghii Sargent. Indian J. Chem. 1970, 469–470. [Google Scholar]
- Rawat, U.; Srivastava, B.; Semwal, S.; Sati, O.P. Xanthones from Pinus roxburghii. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2006, 83, 391–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, Z.; Fatima, A.; Khan, S.; Rehman, Z.; Mehmud, S. GC-MS Studies of Needles Essential Oil of Pinus roxburghaii and Their Antimicrobial Activity From. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological Effects of Essential Oils—A Review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaccardelli, M.; Roscigno, G.; Pane, C.; Celano, G.; Di Matteo, M.; Mainente, M.; Vuotto, A.; Mencherini, T.; Esposito, T.; Vitti, A.; et al. Essential Oils and Quality Composts Sourced by Recycling Vegetable Residues from the Aromatic Plant Supply Chain. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 162, 113255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Ye, M.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, H.; Chi, L.; Pan, C.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, X.; Xiang, H.; Li, C. Phytochemical Components and Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Three Selected Medicinal Plants. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 160, 113127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turek, C.; Stintzing, F.C. Stability of Essential Oils: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sounouvou, H.T.; Toukourou, H.; Catteau, L.; Toukourou, F.; Evrard, B.; Van Bambeke, F.; Gbaguidi, F.; Quetin-Leclercq, J. Antimicrobial Potentials of Essential Oils Extracted from West African Aromatic Plants on Common Skin Infections. Sci. Afr. 2021, e00706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.H.; Park, Y.E.; Yeo, H.J.; Chun, S.W.; Baskar, T.B.; Lim, S.S.; Park, S.U. Chemical Compositions of the Volatile Oils and Antibacterial Screening of Solvent Extract from Downy Lavender. Foods 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tisserand, R.; Young, R. Essential Oil Safety—E-Book: A Guide for Health Care Professionals; Elsevier Health Sciences: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-0-7020-5434-1. [Google Scholar]
- Marques, A.P.S.; Bonfim, F.P.G.; Santos, D.G.P.O.; da Paz Lima, M.; Semir, J.; Martins, E.R.; Zucchi, M.I.; Hantao, L.W.; Sawaya, A.C.H.F.; Marques, M.O.M. Chemical Diversity of Essential Oils from the Brazilian Medicinal Plant Lychnophora Pinaster Mart from Different Environments. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 156, 112856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, Y.J.; de BritoMachado, D.; de Queiroz, G.A.; Guimarães, E.F.; e Defaveri, A.C.; de Lima Moreira, D. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oils of Circadian Rhythm and of Different Vegetative Parts from Piper Mollicomum Kunth—A Medicinal Plant from Brazil. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2020, 92, 104116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifi-Rad, J.; Sureda, A.; Tenore, G.C.; Daglia, M.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Valussi, M.; Tundis, R.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Loizzo, M.R.; Ademiluyi, A.O.; et al. Biological Activities of Essential Oils: From Plant Chemoecology to Traditional Healing Systems. Molecules 2017, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armijos, C.; Matailo, A.; Bec, N.; Salinas, M.; Aguilar, G.; Solano, N.; Calva, J.; Ludeña, C.; Larroque, C.; Vidari, G. Chemical Composition and Selective BuChE Inhibitory Activity of the Essential Oils from Aromatic Plants Used to Prepare the Traditional Ecuadorian Beverage Horchata Lojana. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 263, 113162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaire, S.; Lewis, C.D.; Booth, W.; Scharf, M.E.; Zheng, W.; Ginzel, M.D.; Gondhalekar, A.D. Bed Bugs, Cimex Lectularius L., Exhibiting Metabolic and Target Site Deltamethrin Resistance Are Susceptible to Plant Essential Oils. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 169, 104667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandi, S.; Godishala, V.; Rao, P.; Ramana, K.V. Biomedical Significance of Terpenes: An Insight. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 8–10. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, B.; Al-Wabel, N.A.; Shams, S.; Ahamad, A.; Khan, S.A.; Anwar, F. Essential Oils Used in Aromatherapy: A Systemic Review. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 5, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tadtong, S.; Kamkaen, N.; Watthanachaiyingcharoen, R.; Ruangrungsi, N. Chemical Components of Four Essential Oils in Aromatherapy Recipe. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 1934578X1501000673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karlberg, A.-T. Colophony. In Handbook of Occupational Dermatology; Kanerva, L., Wahlberg, J.E., Elsner, P., Maibach, H.I., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2000; pp. 509–516. ISBN 978-3-662-07677-4. [Google Scholar]
- Silori, G.; Kushwaha, N.; Kumar, V. Essential Oils from Pines: Chemistry and Applications. In Essential Oil Research, Trends in Biosynthesis, Analytics, Industrial Applications and Biotechnological Production; Springer: Cham, Swizerland, 2019; pp. 275–297. [Google Scholar]
- Hajdari, A.; Mustafa, B.; Nebija, D.; Selimi, H.; Veselaj, Z.; Breznica, P.; Quave, C.L.; Novak, J. Essential Oil Composition of Pinus peuce Griseb. Needles and Twigs from Two National Parks of Kosovo. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2016/5393079/ (accessed on 26 January 2021).
- Koukos, P.K.; Papadopoulou, K.I.; Patiaka, D.T.; Papagiannopoulos, A.D. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Needles and Twigs of Balkan Pine (Pinus peuce Grisebach) Grown in Northern Greece. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1266–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ustun, O.; Sezik, E.; Kurkcuoglu, M.; Baser, K.H.C. Study of the Essential Oil Composition of Pinus sylvestris from Turkey. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2006, 42, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borges, R.S.; Ortiz, B.L.S.; Pereira, A.C.M.; Keita, H.; Carvalho, J.C.T. Rosmarinus Officinalis Essential Oil: A Review of Its Phytochemistry, Anti-Inflammatory Activity, and Mechanisms of Action Involved. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 229, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehi, B.; Upadhyay, S.; Erdogan Orhan, I.; Kumar Jugran, A.; Jayaweera, S.L.D.; Dias, D.A.; Sharopov, F.; Taheri, Y.; Martins, N.; Baghalpour, N.; et al. Therapeutic Potential of α- and β-Pinene: A Miracle Gift of Nature. Biomolecules 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thomsett, M.R.; Moore, J.C.; Buchard, A.; Stockman, R.A.; Howdle, S.M. New Renewably-Sourced Polyesters from Limonene-Derived Monomers. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almirall, M.; Montaña, J.; Escribano, E.; Obach, R.; Berrozpe, J.D. Effect of D-Limonene, Alpha-Pinene and Cineole on in Vitro Transdermal Human Skin Penetration of Chlorpromazine and Haloperidol. Arzneimittelforschung 1996, 46, 676–680. [Google Scholar]
- Park, Y.S.; Jeon, M.H.; Hwang, H.J.; Park, M.R.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, M. Antioxidant Activity and Analysis of Proanthocyanidins from Pine (Pinus densiflora) Needles. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2011, 5, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wei, Q.-Y.; Zhou, B.; Cai, Y.-J.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z.-L. Synergistic Effect of Green Tea Polyphenols with Trolox on Free Radical-Induced Oxidative DNA Damage. Food Chem. 2006, 96, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinyua Muthuri, L.; Nagy, L.; Nagy, G. Chronopotentiometric Method for Assessing Antioxidant Activity: A Reagentless Measuring Technique. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 122, 106907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Qiu, Y.; Gong, D.; Wang, J.; Sun, G. A Novel Method for Quality Consistency Evaluation of Yankening Tablet by Multi-Wavelength Fusion Profiling Combined with Overall Components Dissolution Method and Antioxidant Activity Analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 196, 113910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusznierewicz, B.; Staroszczyk, H.; Malinowska-Pańczyk, E.; Parchem, K.; Bartoszek, A. Novel ABTS-Dot-Blot Method for the Assessment of Antioxidant Properties of Food Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juárez-Gómez, J.; Ramírez-Silva, M.T.; Guzmán-Hernández, D.S.; Romero-Romo, M.; Palomar-Pardavé, M. Novel Electrochemical Method to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Infusions and Beverages, Based on in Situ Formation of Free Superoxide Radicals. Food Chem. 2020, 332, 127409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moon, J.-K.; Shibamoto, T. Antioxidant Assays for Plant and Food Components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1655–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naji, K.; Thamer, F.; Dauqan, M.; Alshaibi, Y.; Dsouza, M. Ferric-Bipyridine Assay: A Novel Spectrophotometric Method for Measurement of Antioxidant Capacity. Heliyon 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pastor, F.T.; Šegan, D.M.; Gorjanović, S.Ž.; Kalušević, A.M.; Sužnjević, D.Ž. Development of Voltammetric Methods for Antioxidant Activity Determination Based on Fe(III) Reduction. Microchem. J. 2020, 155, 104721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- dos Reis Teixeira, A.; Teixeira, R.R.; Ribeiro, I.M.L.; Pereira, W.L.; Manhabosco, T.M.; de Brito, A.C.F.; Oliveira, L.A.M.; Coelho Nogueira, K. de O.P. Association of Electroanalytical and Spectrophotometric Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Activity of Isobenzofuranone in Primary Cultures of Hippocampal Neurons. Toxicol. In Vitro 2020, 68, 104970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jerez, M.; Selga, A.; Sineiro, J.; Torres, J.L.; Núñez, M.J. A Comparison between Bark Extracts from Pinus pinaster and Pinus radiata: Antioxidant Activity and Procyanidin Composition. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cretu, E.; Karonen, M.; Salminen, J.-P.; Mircea, C.; Trifan, A.; Charalambous, C.; Constantinou, A.I.; Miron, A. In Vitro Study on the Antioxidant Activity of a Polyphenol-Rich Extract from Pinus brutia Bark and Its Fractions. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Su, X.-Y.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Liu, J.-R. In Vitro and in Vivo Antioxidant Activity of Pinus koraiensis Seed Extract Containing Phenolic Compounds. Food Chem. 2009, 117, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesan, T.; Choi, Y.-W.; Kim, Y.-K. Impact of Different Extraction Solvents on Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Potential of Pinus densiflora Bark Extract. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2019/3520675/ (accessed on 27 January 2021).
- Venkatesan, T.; Choi, Y.-W.; Kim, Y.-K. Effect of an Extraction Solvent on the Antioxidant Quality of Pinus densiflora Needle Extract. J. Pharm. Anal. 2019, 9, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apetrei, C.L.; Tuchilus, C.; Aprotosoaie, A.C.; Oprea, A.; Malterud, K.E.; Miron, A. Chemical, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Investigations of Pinus cembra L. Bark and Needles. Molecules 2011, 16, 7773–7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dziedziński, M.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Szymanowska-Powałowska, D.; Stuper-Szablewska, K.; Baranowska, M. Polyphenols Composition, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Pinus sylvestris L. Shoots Extracts Depending on Different Drying Methods. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2020, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iravani, S.; Zolfaghari, B. Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Effects of Pinus pinaster Bark Extract. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.-Y.; Feng, J.; Zhang, X.-L.; Cui, Y.-Y. Pine Bark Extracts: Nutraceutical, Pharmacological, and Toxicological Evaluation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2015, 353, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Robertson, N.U.; Schoonees, A.; Brand, A.; Visser, J. Pine Bark (Pinus Spp.) Extract for Treating Chronic Disorders. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saliou, C.; Rimbach, G.; Moini, H.; McLaughlin, L.; Hosseini, S.; Lee, J.; Watson, R.R.; Packer, L. Solar Ultraviolet-Induced Erythema in Human Skin and Nuclear Factor-Kappa-B–Dependent Gene Expression in Keratinocytes Are Modulated by a French Maritime Pine Bark Extract. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 30, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furumura, M.; Sato, N.; Kusaba, N.; Takagaki, K.; Nakayama, J. Oral Administration of French Maritime Pine Bark Extract (Flavangenol®) Improves Clinical Symptoms in Photoaged Facial Skin. Clin. Interv. Aging 2012, 7, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Theadom, A.; Mahon, S.; Barker-Collo, S.; McPherson, K.; Rush, E.; Vandal, A.C.; Feigin, V.L. Enzogenol for Cognitive Functioning in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Placebo-Controlled RCT. Eur. J. Neurol. 2013, 20, 1135–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pipingas, A.; Silberstein, R.B.; Vitetta, L.; Rooy, C.V.; Harris, E.V.; Young, J.M.; Frampton, C.M.; Sali, A.; Nastasi, J. Improved Cognitive Performance after Dietary Supplementation with a Pinus radiata Bark Extract Formulation. Phytother. Res. 2008, 22, 1168–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spagnuolo, C.; Napolitano, M.; Tedesco, I.; Moccia, S.; Milito, A.; Russo, G.L. Neuroprotective Role of Natural Polyphenols. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2016, 16, 1943–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.J.; Hwang, E.-S.; Kim, M.-J.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, D.-O. Antihypertensive Effects of Polyphenolic Extract from Korean Red Pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc.) Bark in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Antioxidants 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahn, H.; Go, G.-W. Pinus densiflora Bark Extract (PineXol) Decreases Adiposity in Mice by Down-Regulation of Hepatic De Novo Lipogenesis and Adipogenesis in White Adipose Tissue. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kaushik, P.; Khokra, S.L.; Kaushik, D. Evaluation of Antidiabetic Potential of Pinus roxburghii Bark Extract in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Rats. J. Pharmacogn. Nat. Prod. 2015, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, I.; Singh, V.; Chaudhary, A.K. Hepatoprotective Activity of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. Wood Oil against Carbon Tetrachloride and Ethanol Induced Hepatotoxicity. Bangladesh J. Pharmacol. 2012, 7, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Puri, A.; Srivastava, A.K.; Singhal, B.; Mishra, S.K.; Srivastava, S.; Lakshmi, V. Antidyslipidemic and Antioxidant Activity of Pinus roxburghii Needles. Med. Chem. Res. 2011, 20, 1589–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaushik, D.; Kumar, A.; Kaushik, P.; Rana, A.C. Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/aps/2012/245431/ (accessed on 19 December 2020).
- Kaushik, D.; Kumar, A.; Kaushik, P.; Rana, A.C. Anticonvulsant Activity of Alcoholic Extract of Bark of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. J. Chin. Integr. Med. 2012, 10, 1056–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, W.Y.; Tanaka, R.; Inagaki, Y.; Saitoh, Y.; Chang, M.O.; Amet, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Yamaoka, S.; Yoshinaka, Y. Pycnogenol, a Procyanidin-Rich Extract from French Maritime Pine, Inhibits Intracellular Replication of HIV-1 as Well as Its Binding to Host Cells. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 61, 279–285. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Gao, Y.; Qin, X.; Wu, K. Effect of Pinus massoniana Lamb. Bark Extract on Lytic Cycle of Epstein-Barr Virus. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2012, 50, 708–713. [Google Scholar]
- Kinger, H.K.; Dutt, K.R.; Saini, V.; Sheeja, E.; Gupta, V.B.; Deb, L. Wound Healing Activity of Pinus longifolia Roxb. Plant Arch. 2006, 6, 651–652. [Google Scholar]
- Sajid, A.; Manzoor, Q.; Iqbal, M.; Tyagi, A.K.; Sarfraz, R.A.; Sajid, A. Pinus roxburghii Essential Oil Anticancer Activity and Chemical Composition Evaluation. EXCLI J. 2018, 17, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaushik, P.; Khokra, S.; Rana, A.C.; Kaushik, D. Evaluation of Anticancer Activity of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. Against IMR-32 Human Neuroblastoma Cancer Cell Line. Int. J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2015, 7, 105–108. [Google Scholar]
- Enseleit, F.; Sudano, I.; Périat, D.; Winnik, S.; Wolfrum, M.; Flammer, A.J.; Fröhlich, G.M.; Kaiser, P.; Hirt, A.; Haile, S.R.; et al. Effects of Pycnogenol on Endothelial Function in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-over Study. Eur. Heart J. 2012, 33, 1589–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kim, J.-W.; Im, S.; Jeong, H.-R.; Jung, Y.-S.; Lee, I.; Kim, K.J.; Park, S.K.; Kim, D.-O. Neuroprotective Effects of Korean Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) Bark Extract and Its Phenolics. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, A.; Goyal, R. In-Vitro Neuronal Cell Proliferation and in-Vivo Neuroprotective Activity of Pinus roxburghii for Memory and Cognition. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020, 16, e038337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azmat, A.; Ahmed, K.; Ahmed, M.; Tariq, B. Antinocciceptive Effects of Poly Herbal Oil Extract. Pak. J. Phamacol. 2006, 23, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Panahande, S.B.; Maghbooli, Z.; Hossein-nezhad, A.; Qorbani, M.; Moeini-Nodeh, S.; Haghi-Aminjan, H.; Hosseini, S. Effects of French Maritime Pine Bark Extract (Oligopin®) Supplementation on Bone Remodeling Markers in Postmenopausal Osteopenic Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fair, R.J.; Tor, Y. Antibiotics and Bacterial Resistance in the 21st Century. Perspect. Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 25–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brecha, F.S.; Ozanne, E.M.; Esplin, J.; Stoddard, G.J.; Nirula, R.; Huang, L.C.; Cohan, J.N. Patient Willingness to Accept Antibiotic Side Effects to Reduce SSI After Colorectal Surgery. J. Surg. Res. 2020. [CrossRef]
- Lai, C.-S.; Ponnusamy, Y.; Lim, G.-L.; Ramanathan, S. Antibacterial, Antibiofilm and Antibiotic-Potentiating Effects of a Polyphenol-Rich Fraction of Dicranopteris Linearis (Burm.f.). Underw. J. Herb. Med. 2021, 25, 100419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virjamo, V.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Quality and Quantity of Piperidine Alkaloids in Needles and Bark of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris) Seedlings. Phytochem. Lett. 2018, 26, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, S.Y.C.; Davis, J.S.; Eichenberger, E.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler, V.G. Staphylococcus Aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 603–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mun, S.-H.; Joung, D.-K.; Kim, Y.-S.; Kang, O.-H.; Kim, S.-B.; Seo, Y.-S.; Kim, Y.-C.; Lee, D.-S.; Shin, D.-W.; Kweon, K.-T.; et al. Synergistic Antibacterial Effect of Curcumin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus. Phytomedicine 2013, 20, 714–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craft, K.M.; Nguyen, J.M.; Berg, L.J.; Townsend, S.D. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA): Antibiotic-Resistance and the Biofilm Phenotype. Med. Chem. Commun. 2019, 10, 1231–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haaber, J.; Penadés, J.R.; Ingmer, H. Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 893–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Safarpoor Dehkordi, F.; Gandomi, H.; Basti, A.A.; Misaghi, A.; Rahimi, E. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Isolated from Hospital Food. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2017, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-H.; Yang, H.-Y.; Lee, H.-S.; Hong, S.-K. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oil from Cones of Pinus koraiensis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 18, 497–502. [Google Scholar]
- Ulukanli, Z.; Karabörklü, S.; Bozok, F.; Ates, B.; Erdogan, S.; Cenet, M.; Karaaslan, M.G. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial, Insecticidal, Phytotoxic and Antioxidant Activities of Mediterranean Pinus brutia and Pinus pinea Resin Essential Oils. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2014, 12, 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.-S.; Lee, G.-H. Volatile Compounds and Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oils of the Needles of Pinus densiflora and Pinus thunbergii: Bioactivity of Pine Needle Essential Oil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jennison, A.V.; Verma, N.K. Shigella Flexneri Infection: Pathogenesis and Vaccine Development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ashkenazi, S.; Cohen, D. An Update on Vaccines against Shigella. Ther. Adv. Vaccines 2013, 1, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- González-Lamothe, R.; Mitchell, G.; Gattuso, M.; Diarra, M.S.; Malouin, F.; Bouarab, K. Plant Antimicrobial Agents and Their Effects on Plant and Human Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.; Han, O.; Choi, H.-S.; Lee, B.-Y.; Chung, H.-J.; Lee, O.-I. Antioxidant and Anti-Adipogenic Effects of PineXol ®. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 45, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Chowdhury, V.S.; Han, G.; Zhang, R.; Furuse, M. Flavangenol Regulates Gene Expression of HSPs, Anti-Apoptotic and Anti-Oxidative Factors to Protect Primary Chick Brain Cells Exposed to High Temperature. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 81, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shand, B.; Strey, C.; Scott, R.; Morrison, Z.; Gieseg, S. Pilot Study on the Clinical Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Enzogenol, a Flavonoid Extract of Pine Bark and Vitamin C. Phytother. Res. 2003, 17, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varelas, V.; Langton, M. Forest Biomass Waste as a Potential Innovative Source for Rearing Edible Insects for Food and Feed—A Review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 41, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šojić, B.; Tomović, V.; Jokanović, M.; Ikonić, P.; Džinić, N.; Kocić-Tanackov, S.; Popović, L.; Tasić, T.; Savanović, J.; Šojić, N.Ž. Antioxidant Activity of Juniperus communis L. Essential Oil in Cooked Pork Sausages. Czech J. Food Sci. 2017, 35, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Semeniuc, C.A.; Rotar, A.; Stan, L.; Pop, C.R.; Socaci, S.; Mireşan, V.; Muste, S. Characterization of Pine Bud Syrup and Its Effect on Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Kefir. CyTA J. Food 2016, 14, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- López-Nicolás, R.; González-Bermúdez, C.A.; Ros-Berruezo, G.; Frontela-Saseta, C. Influence of in Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion of Fruit Juices Enriched with Pine Bark Extract on Intestinal Microflora. Food Chem. 2014, 157, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frontela-Saseta, C.; López-Nicolás, R.; González-Bermúdez, C.A.; Peso-Echarri, P.; Ros-Berruezo, G.; Martínez-Graciá, C.; Canali, R.; Virgili, F. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity and Antiproliferative Effect of Fruit Juices Enriched with Pycnogenol® in Colon Carcinoma Cells. The Effect of In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion. Phytother. Res. 2011, 25, 1870–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yesil Celiktas, O.; Isleten, M.; Vardar-Sukan, F.; Oyku Cetin, E. In Vitro Release Kinetics of Pine Bark Extract Enriched Orange Juice and the Shelf Stability. Br. Food J. 2010, 112, 1063–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.; Grün, I.U.; Fernando, L.N. Antioxidant Properties of Natural Plant Extracts Containing Polyphenolic Compounds in Cooked Ground Beef. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1364–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, D.-M.; Chung, S.-K.; Lee, D.-S. Shelf Life Extension of Steamed Bread by the Addition of Fermented Pine Needle Extract Syrup as an Ingredient. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007, 36, 616–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.; Grün, I.U.; Mustapha, A. Effects of Plant Extracts on Microbial Growth, Color Change, and Lipid Oxidation in Cooked Beef. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frontela-Saseta, C.; López-Nicolás, R.; González-Bermúdez, C.A.; Martínez-Graciá, C.; Ros-Berruezo, G. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Fruit Juices Enriched with Pine Bark Extract in an in Vitro Model of Inflamed Human Intestinal Epithelium: The Effect of Gastrointestinal Digestion. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruggeri, S.; Straniero, R.; Pacifico, S.; Aguzzi, A.; Virgili, F. French Marine Bark Extract Pycnogenol as a Possible Enrichment Ingredient for Yogurt. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 4484–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sert, D.; Mercan, E.; Dertli, E. Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Yogurt-like Product Fermented with Pine Cone and Determination of Their Role on Physicochemical, Textural and Microbiological Properties of Product. LWT 2017, 78, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penkina, N.; Tatar, L.; Kolesnyk, V.; Karbivnycha, T.; Letuta, T. the Study of Beer Quality with the Reduced Toxic Effect. EUREKA Life Sci. 2017, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Kingdom | Plantae |
---|---|
Subkingdom | Viridiplantae |
Infrakingdom | Streptophyta |
Superdivision | Embryophyta |
Division | Tracheophyta |
Subdivision | Spermatophytina |
Class | Pinopsida |
Subclass | Pinidae |
Order | Pinales |
Family | Pinaceae |
Genus | Pinus L. |
Section Pinus | Section Trifoliae | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Subsection Pinus | Subsection Pinaster | Subsection Contortae | Subsection Australes | Subsection Ponderosae |
P. densata, densiflora, hwangshanensis, kesiya, luchuensis, massoniana, merkusii, mugo, nigra, resinosa, sylvestris, tabuliformis, taiwanensis, thunbergii, tropicalis, uncinata, yunnanensis | P. brutia, canariensis, halepensis, heldreichii, pinaster, pinea, roxburghii. | P. banksiana, clausa, contorta, virginiana; | P. attenuata, caribaea, cubensis, echinata, elliottii, glabra, greggii, herrerae, jaliscana, lawsonii, leiophylla, lumholtzii, muricata, occidentalis, oocarpa, palustris, patula, praetermissa, pringlei, pungens, radiata, rigida, serotina, taeda, tecunumanii, teocote | P. cooperi, coulteri, donnell-smithii, devoniana, douglasiana, durangensis, engelmannii, hartwegii, jeffreyi, maximinoi, montezumae, nubicola, ponderosa, pseudostrobus, sabineana, torreyana, washoensis. |
Index | Species | Part of the Tree | Content | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Energy value | P. contorta L. | needles | 500 kcal/100 g | [5] |
Energy value | P. pinea L. | seeds | 583 kcal/100 g | [6] |
Dry mass | P. sylvestris L. | shoots | 13.98% | [7] |
P. taeda L. | stem | 30.74% | [8] | |
needles | 1.55% | [8] | ||
crude protein | P. contorta L. | needles | 3.63% | [5] |
crude protein | P. pinea L. | seeds | 31.6 g/100 g | [6] |
fat | P. pinea L. | seeds | 44.9 g/100 g | [6] |
triglycerides | P. sylvestris L. | inner bark | 33.40 mg/g | [9] |
outer bark | 1.71 mg/g | [9] | ||
conifer needles | 10.3 µmol/g dry weight | [10] | ||
Mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids | inner bark | 2.26 mg/g | [9] | |
outer bark | 5.46 mg/g | [9] | ||
conifer needles | 2.3 µmol/g dry weight | [10] | ||
steryl esters | inner bark | 1.54 mg/g | [9] | |
outer bark | 0.19 mg/g | [9] | ||
free fatty acids | inner bark | 0.63 mg/g | [9] | |
outer bark | 1.68 mg/g | [9] | ||
conifer needles | 10.3 µmol/g | [10] | ||
resin acids | inner bark | 7.16 mg/g | [9] | |
outer bark | 2.39 mg/g | [9] | ||
sterols and triterpenic alcohols | inner bark | 4.50 mg/g | [9] | |
outer bark | 2.98 mg/g | [9] | ||
fatty alcohols | inner bark | 1.33 mg/g | [9] | |
outer bark | 1.25 mg/g | [9] | ||
carbohydrates | P. pinea L. | seeds | 13.3 g/100 g | [6] |
total soluble sugar | P. pinea L. | seeds | 5.15 g/100 g | [6] |
reducing sugar | P. pinea L. | seeds | 0.7 g/100 g | [6] |
glucose | P. sylvestris L. | needles | 121.8 µmol/g | [10] |
fructose | P. sylvestris L. | needles | 151.3 µmol/g | [10] |
galactose/arabinose | P. sylvestris L. | needles | 5.2 µmol/g | [10] |
sucrose | P. sylvestris L. | needles | 59.6 µmol/g | [10] |
sucrose | P. pinea L. | seeds | 4.3 g/100 g | [6] |
raffinose/melibiose | P. sylvestris L. | needles | 4.1 µmol/g | [10] |
starch | P. sylvestris L. | needles | 124.8 µmol/g | [10] |
Na | P. pinea L. | seeds | 11.7 g/100 g | [6] |
Ca | P. pinea L. | seeds | 13.8 mg/100 g | [6] |
Ca | P. sylvestris L. | bark | 0.38% | [11] |
Ca | P. sylvestris L. | needles | 0.53% | [12] |
Ca | P. taeda L. | stem | 0.09% | [8] |
Ca | P. taeda L. | needles | 0.31% | [8] |
K | P. pinea L. | seeds | 713 mg/100 g | [6] |
K | P. sylvestris L. | Needles | 0.54% | [12] |
K | P. sylvestris L. | bark | 0.172% | [11] |
K | P. taeda L. | stem | 0.08% | [8] |
K | P. taeda L. | needles | 0.54% | [8] |
Mg | P. pinea L. | seeds | 325 mg/100 g | [6] |
Mg | P. sylvestris L. | Needles | 0.09% | [12] |
Mg | P. sylvestris L. | bark | 0.059 | [11] |
Mg | P. taeda L. | stem | 0.14% | [8] |
Mg | P. taeda L. | needles | 0.18% | [8] |
P | P. pinea L. | seeds | 512 mg/100 g | [6] |
S | P. sylvestris L. | Needles | 0.095% | [12] |
Fe | P. pinea L. | seeds | 10.2 mg/100 g | [6] |
Fe | P. sylvestris L. | Needles | 61.7 µg/g | [12] |
Mn | P. pinea L. | seeds | 6.9 mg/100 g | [6] |
Mn | P. sylvestris L. | Needles | 275.6 µg/g. | [12] |
Zn | P. pinea L. | seeds | 6.4 mg/100 g | [6] |
Zn | P. sylvestris L. | Needles | 53.63 µg/g | [12] |
Cu | P. pinea L. | seeds | 1.5 mg/100 g | [6] |
Cu | P. sylvestris L. | Needles | 5.3 µg/g | [12] |
Cu | P. sylvestris L. | bark | 2.98 mg/kg | [11] |
N | P. sylvestris L. | bark | 0.49% | [11] |
N | P. taeda L. | stem | 0.35% | [8] |
N | P. taeda L. | needles | 1.39% | [8] |
ascorbic acid | P. pinea L. | seeds | 2.5 mg/100 g | [6] |
ascorbic acid | P. sylvestris L. | shoots | 29.3 mg/g | [7] |
Thiamine | P. pinea L. | seeds | 1.5% | [6] |
Riboflavin | P. pinea L. | seeds | 0.28% | [6] |
Compound | Species | Part of the Tree | Content | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
gallic acid | P. sylvestris L. | shoots | 208.38 ± 069 µg/g dw | [7] |
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid | 16.63 ± 0.54 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
4-hydroxybenzoic acid | 1084.92 ± 39.04 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
caffeic acid | 1502.03 ± 52.53 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
syringic acid | 145.44 ± 3.28 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
p-coumaric acid | 387.89 ± 15.83 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
ferulic acid | 2088.89 ± 56.89 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
chlorogenic acid | 518.25 ± 4.90 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
sinapic acid | 54.09 ± 2.06 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
t-cinnamic acid | 111.44 ± 3.4 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
vanillic acid | 0.46 ± 0.01 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
salicylic acid | 0.36 ± 0.00 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
naringenin | 1.59 ± 0.02 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
vitexin | 0.61 ± 0.01 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
rutin | 0.63 ± 0.02 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
quercetin | 0.98 ± 0.03 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
apigenin | 0.30 ± 0.01 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
kaempferol | 0.38 ± 0.01 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
luteolin | 0.30 ± 0.01 µg/g dw | [7] | ||
protocatechuic acid | P. radiata | bark | 46.2 ± 1.1 µg/mg | [57] |
P. sibirica | seeds | 49.2 ± 0.5 mg/100 g dw | [58] | |
(+)-Catechin | 52.5 ± 0.6 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
vanillic acid | 85.5 ± 1.0 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
epigallocatechin gallate | 47.0 ± 1.4 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
syringic acid | 101 ± 0.3 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
()-epicatechin; | 125 ± 3.1 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
taxifolin | 172 ± 3.1 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
eriodictyol | 383 ± 1.0 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
(E)-cinnamic acid | 12.2 ± 1.2 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
naringenin | 37.0 ± 2.1 mg/100 g dw | [58] | ||
catechin | P. sinaster | bark | 117.0 ± 8.0 mg/L | [59] |
gallocatechin | 16.8 ± 4.9 mg/L | [59] | ||
taxifolin | 447.7 ± 32.5 mg/L | [59] | ||
quercetin | 105.5 ± 2.7 mg/L | [59] | ||
3,4 hydroxybenzoic acid | 17.3 ± 2.4 mg/L | [59] | ||
gallic acid | 3.6 ± 0.7 mg/L | [59] | ||
caffeic acid | 20.6 ± 1.1 mg/L | [59] | ||
o-coumaric acid | 47.5 ± 25.3 mg/L | [59] | ||
ferulic acid | 47.2 ± 0.8 mg/L | [59] | ||
rosmarinic acid | 72.5 ± 4.0 mg/L | [59] | ||
ellagic acid | 402.2 ± 51.4 mg/L | [59] | ||
naringin | 173.4 ± 55.5 mg/L | [59] | ||
apigenin | 53.9 ± 0.1 mg/L | [59] | ||
resveratrol | 40.0 ± 0.4 mg/L | [59] | ||
trans-ferulic acid | P. radiata | bark | 5.9 ± 0.1 µg/mg | [57] |
trans-caffeic acid | 2.6 ± 0.1 µg/mg | [57] | ||
()-epicatechin; | 21.6 ± 1.7 µg/mg | [57] | ||
(+)-Catechin | 198.5 ± 6.4 µg/mg | [57] | ||
cis-taxifolin | 73.6 ± 2.7 µg/mg | [57] | ||
trans-taxifolin | 382.5 ± 12.1 µg/mg | [57] | ||
quercetin | 15.2 ± 1.0 µg/mg | [57] | ||
quercetin, resin acid (abietic acid, neoabietic acid), taxifolin, catechin, quercetin derivative, taxifolin derivative, catechin and gallocatechin, kaempferol, rhamnetin isorhamnetin, myricetin, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid, pinosylvin 3-methyl ether, dihydromonomethyl pinosylvin, resveratrol, glycoside, pinoresinol, secoisolariciresinol | P. wallichiana and P. roxburghii, P. gerardiana | stem and needle extract | presence found | [60,61] |
1,5-diliydroxy-3,6,7-triniethoxy-8-allyloxyxanthone, 1-hydroxy-3,6-diinethoxy-2-β glucopyranoxanthone, friedelin, ceryl alcohol, b-sitosterol, taxifolin, quercetin, catechin, kaempferol, rhamnetin, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid, pinosylvin, pinoresinol, resin acid, sterols, gallocatechin and tannins was found. hexacosyl ferulate | P. roxburghii | bark | presence found | [62,63] |
12-hydroxydodecanoic acid, 14-hydroxytetradecanoic acid and 16-hydroxy-hexadecanoic acid | needle wax | presence found | [64] |
Part of the Plant | Bioactive Components | Average Concentration (%) |
---|---|---|
Needles | α-pinene | 31.6 |
β-pinene | 13.8 | |
β-phellandrene | 9.8 | |
germacrene D | 9.2 | |
α-Terpineol | 6.2 | |
camphene | 7.7 | |
bornyl acetate | 4.4 | |
twigs | β-phellandrene | 34.4 |
α-pinene | 17.7 | |
β-pinene | 17.4 | |
germacrene D | 6.5 | |
bornyl acetate | 4.3 | |
camphene | 3.2 | |
α-Terpineol | 2.1 | |
Needles and twigs | Tricyclene, Sabinene, Myrcene, 3-Carene, β-Z-Ocimene, γ-Terpinene, Terpinolene, E-Pinene hydrate, α-Campholenal, iso-3-Thujanol, Z-Verbenol, Borneol, Terpinene-4-ol, Myrtenal, E-Piperitol, Linalool acetate, α-Terpineol acetate, α-Copaene, β-Bourbonene, β-Elemene, β-Caryophyllene, β-Copaene, α-E-Bergamotene, α-Humulene, Z-Muurola-4(14),5-diene, γ-Cadinene, δ-Cadinene, α-Cadinene, E-Nerolidol, Germacrene-4-ol, Spathulenol, Caryophyllene oxide, Humulene epoxide II, Z-Cadin-4-en-7ol, Cubenol, α-Muurolol, α-Cadinol, Eudesma-4(15),7-diene-1-β-ol, Oplopanone, Cembrene | <1 |
Method | Species | Material | Result | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total phenolic content | P. koraiensis | Seed 40% ethanolic extract | 264 ± 10.52 mg of gallic acid equivalents/g | [101] |
P. pinaster | Bark ethanolic extract | 890 mg of gallic acid equivalents/200 mL | [99] | |
P. radiata | Bark ethanolic extract | 1610 mg of gallic acid equivalents/200 mL | [99] | |
P. cembra L. | Bark 80% aqueous methanol extract | 299.3 ± 1.4 mg of gallic acid/g extract | [104] | |
P. cembra L. | Needle 80% aqueous methanol extract | 78.22 ± 0.44 mg of gallic acid/g extract | [104] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Shoot aqueous extract | 0.86 ± 0.09 mg of gallic acid/g dw | [7] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Air-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 13.4 ± 4.07 mg of gallic acid/g dw | [105] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Vacuum-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 8.34 ± 2.01 mg of gallic acid/g dw | [105] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Freeze-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 5.73 ± 2.55 mg of gallic acid/g dw | [105] | |
P. brutia | Bark 80%aqueous methanol extract | 412.42 ± 7.56 mg of gallic acid/g extract | [100] | |
OH scavenging activity EC50 | P. koraiensis | Seed 40% ethanolic extract | 0.391 ± 0.055 mg/mL | [101] |
P. brutia | Bark 80%aqueous methanol extract | 0.5 ± 0.0 mg/mL | [100] | |
DPPH radical scavenging activity | P. koraiensis | Seed 40% aqueous ethanol extract | EC50 value 0.023 ± 0.004 mg/mL | [101] |
P. cembra L. | Bark 80% aqueous methanol extract | EC50 value 71.1 ± 0.5 μg/mL | [104] | |
P. cembra L. | Needle 80% aqueous methanol extract | EC50 value 186.1 ± 1.7 μg/mL | [104] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Shoot aqueous extract | 200.94 ± 23.47 mg of gallic acid/g dw | [7] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Air-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 332.25 ± 10.49 dw μM Trolox/g dw | [105] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Vacuum-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 299.72 ± 15.97 dw μM Trolox/g dw | [105] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Freeze-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 339.00 ±19.61 dw μM Trolox/g dw | [105] | |
P. radiata | Aqueous bark extract | 36.3 ± 5.0% at 2.0 μg/mL | [57] | |
P. brutia | Bark 80%aqueous methanol extract | 1.47 ± 0.02 Trolox equivalent mg/mL | [100] | |
O2 inhibition activity | P. sylvestris L. | Vacuum-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 8.34 ± 2.01 mg of gallic acid/g dw | [105] |
ABTS radical cation scavenging assay | P. sylvestris L. | Freeze-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 5.73 ± 2.55 mg of gallic acid/g dw | [105] |
P. cembra L. | Needle 80% aqueous methanol extract | 0.3 ± 0.0 μM Trolox equivalent to 1 μg/mL extract | [104] | |
P. radiata | Aqueous bark extract | 55.1 ± 5.8% at 1.0 ug/mL | [57] | |
Reducing power assay EC50 | P. cembra L. | Bark 80% aqueous methanol extract | 26.0 ± 0.3 mg/mL | [104] |
P. cembra L. | Needle 80% aqueous methanol extract | 104 ± 2 mg/mL | [104] | |
P. brutia | Bark 80%aqueous methanol extract | 9.17 ± 0.13 μg/mL | [100] | |
Ferrous ion chelating ability assay | P. cembra L. | Needle 80% aqueous methanol extract | EC50 = 1.755 ± 22 μg/mL | [104] |
P. sylvestris L. | Shoot aqueous extract | 42.76 ± 5.7 μM FeSO4/g dw | [7] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Air-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 37.79 ±3.64 μM FeSO4/g dw | [105] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Vacuum-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 47.25 ±14.06 μM FeSO4/g dw | [105] | |
P. sylvestris L. | Freeze-dried shoot 40% aqueous ethanol extract | 21.79 ± 4.36 μM FeSO4/g dw | [105] | |
Superoxide anion | P. radiata | Aqueous bark extract | 47.6 ± 5.8% at 23.0 ug/mL | [57] |
P. brutia | Bark 80%aqueous methanol extract | 39.37 ± 0.85 μg/mL | [100] | |
Hydrogen peroxide | P. radiata | Aqueous bark extract | 47.8 ± 12.3% at 8.0 ug/mL a | [57] |
15-LO inhibition assay | P. brutia | Bark 80%aqueous methanol extract | EC50 = 22.47 ± 0.75 μg/mL | [100] |
Name of Formulation | Plant Part Used | Pharmacological Activity Declared by the Manufacturer | References |
---|---|---|---|
Polyherbal oil extract | Oleoresin of P. roxburghii | Analgesic and anti-inflammatory | [129] |
Rumalaya gel | Resin from P. roxburghii | Lowers the joint and bone pain associated with various orthopedic ailments | [119] |
Pycnogenol® | P. pinaster bark | Antimicrobial activity and treatment of asthma, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, chronic venous insufficiency, diabetes, erectile disorders and osteoarthritis | [108] |
Oligopin® | P. pinaster bark | Cardiovascular and vein health, antioxidant, treatment of male sexual disorders and ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) | [130] |
PineXol® | P. densiflora bark | Anti-inflammatory agent, enhances blood circulation and improves skin conditions | [146] |
Flavangenol® | P. maritima bark | Lowers blood pressure and improves glycemic control, plasma lipoprotein profile, body weight, antioxidative capacity, level of anti-inflammatory markers and liver function tests | [147] |
Enzogenol® | P. radiata bark | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and anti-diabetic properties. | [148] |
Food Application | Material Used | Application Result | References |
---|---|---|---|
Fruit juices supplementation | P. pinaster Ait bark extract | Fresh fruit juices enriched with PBE exhibited the highest inhibitory effect on the growth of pathogenic intestinal bacteria, primarily E. coli and Enterococcus faecalis. The in vitro digestion process reduced the antibacterial effect of juices on the majority of pathogenic bacteria by approx. 10%. | [152] |
ROS production increased in the inflamed cells exposed to digested commercial red fruit juice (86.8 ± 1.3%) in comparison with the fresh juice (77.4 ± 0.8%) and increased in the inflamed cells exposed to digested enriched red fruit juice (82.6 ± 1.6%) in comparison with the fresh enriched juice (55.8 ± 6%) | [158] | ||
Following the in vitro digestion, the level of detectable phenolic compounds (expressed as gallic acid equivalent) was higher in both pineapple and red fruit juices enriched with Pycnogenol than non-enriched commercial juices (155.6 mg/100 mL vs 94.6 mg/100 mL and 478.5 mg/100 mL vs 406.9 mg/100 mL respectively). Increased antioxidant activity (measured by 2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) methods) was observed in digested enriched juices, contrary to the same samples before digestion. Undigested, enriched with Pycnogenol pineapple juice displayed a higher antiproliferative effect between the 24th and 72nd hour of incubation in comparison with the non-enriched juice. | [153] | ||
P. brutia, P. pinea bark extracts, Pycnogenol®. | The paper shows that juices enriched with pine bark extracts exhibit higher antioxidant capacities and ascorbic acid contents compared to the control group, thereby providing improved functionality. | [154] | |
Yoghurt supplementation | French marine bark extract | Addition of Pycnogenol neither significantly affected the growth of microorganisms nor caused any modifications in nutritional parameters during the storage of yoghurt. Data indicate that neither the content of total polyphenol nor selected phenolic substances (catechin, epicatechins, chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid) was affected during the shelf life. In conclusion, these results indicate Pycnogenol as a valuable ingredient for the enrichment of yoghurt preparations. | [159] |
P. nigra cones | This study used yoghurt samples to identify the LAB strains generated by the pine cone addition and determined the physicochemical properties of these samples. The genotypic identification revealed that in yoghurt samples, Streptococcus thermophilus strains were the main force conducting the fermentation process, while Lactobacillus plantarum strains appeared in three yoghurt samples as an adjunct culture. The time of pine cones collection significantly affected the physicochemical properties of yoghurt. | [160] | |
Kefir | Pine bud syrup | The pine bud syrup used to enrich kefir contains a lot of polyphenols and terpenes, as well as exhibiting a high antioxidant activity. The addition of pine bud syrup resulted in an increase in total solids, as well as a decrease in the content of fat, proteins and pH levels. The kefir sample containing 10% pine bud syrup was the most appreciated by the sensory panel. Its overall acceptability score was higher (6.71 points) than that of the regular kefir (5.57 points). The addition of 10% pine bud syrup improved the texture and consistency of regular kefir. | [151] |
Meat | Pine bark extract (Pycnogenol) | The pine bark extract (Pycnogenol®) significantly improved the oxidative stability of cooked beef and reduced the hexanal content by 73% after 3 days of refrigerated storage. | [155] |
Tea | Pine needles | Supplementation of pine needle extract at 1, 2, 4 and 8% in the control diet and mixed groups significantly decreased the weight gain and visceral fat mass in comparison with the corresponding values of the control group. | [34] |
Beer | P. sylvestris needles | The addition of needles increases the beer gustatory properties and decreases the methanol content. The content of ascorbic acid in ready-made drinks amounts to 3.52 mg/100 g. The antioxidant activity of elaborated beer is 178.1 C/100 g and determines its high biological value. In the study, the influence of beer enriched with needle extract was evaluated concerning the antioxidant system of organisms of biological objects. Under acute pathological conditions, a beer with needle extract decreases its oxidative influence on brains of the biological objects. | [161] |
Bread | Fermented pine needle extract syrup | Bread with a higher content of pine needle extract syrup demonstrated a slower increase of bread hardening during the storage period, suggesting a slowdown of bread retrogradation. The addition of pine needle extract syrup in bread dough also inhibited the growth of aerobic bacteria and moulds on the bread surface (by 0.8~24 in log (CFU/g) during the 4-day storage). The use of concentration higher than 11% initially gave the bread a strong, fine needle flavour, which disappeared after 2 days. Generally, the addition of pine needle extract syrup had no negative effect on the quality (including sensory) of bread. Therefore, the addition of needle extract syrup could improve storage stability and extend the shelf life of bread. | [156] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dziedziński, M.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Stachowiak, B. Pinus Species as Prospective Reserves of Bioactive Compounds with Potential Use in Functional Food—Current State of Knowledge. Plants 2021, 10, 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071306
Dziedziński M, Kobus-Cisowska J, Stachowiak B. Pinus Species as Prospective Reserves of Bioactive Compounds with Potential Use in Functional Food—Current State of Knowledge. Plants. 2021; 10(7):1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071306
Chicago/Turabian StyleDziedziński, Marcin, Joanna Kobus-Cisowska, and Barbara Stachowiak. 2021. "Pinus Species as Prospective Reserves of Bioactive Compounds with Potential Use in Functional Food—Current State of Knowledge" Plants 10, no. 7: 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071306
APA StyleDziedziński, M., Kobus-Cisowska, J., & Stachowiak, B. (2021). Pinus Species as Prospective Reserves of Bioactive Compounds with Potential Use in Functional Food—Current State of Knowledge. Plants, 10(7), 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071306