Next Article in Journal
Ocimum basilicum-Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Induces Innate Immune Responses against Cucumber Mosaic Virus in Squash
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Dissection of Drought Tolerance of Elite Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes Using Genome Wide Association Study in Morocco
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of an Arctic Tertiary Relict Tree Endemic to China (Sassafras tzumu) Revealed by Novel Nuclear Microsatellite (nSSR) Markers

1
College of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
2
Systematic & Evolutionary Botany and Biodiversity Group, MOE Laboratory of Biosystem Homeostasis and Protection, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3
College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
4
Mount Longwang Nature Reserve, Huzhou 313300, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(20), 2706; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202706
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 9 October 2022 / Accepted: 10 October 2022 / Published: 13 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics, Genomics and Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Sassafras tzumu (Hemsl.) Hemsl., as an Arctic Tertiary relict woody species, is an ecologically and economically important deciduous tree endemic to southern China. Nonetheless, the genetic resources and backgrounds of S. tzumu are still lacking and remain largely unclear. Here, we predicted 16,215 candidate polymorphic nuclear microsatellite (nSSR) loci from the assembled nucleus databases of six geographic-distant individuals of S. tzumu via CandiSSR. Among these nSSRs, the di- (75.53%) and tri-nucleotide (19.75%) repeats were the most abundant, and 27 new polymorphic SSRs were developed and characterized in 136 individuals from six natural populations of S. tzumu. The majority of the above 27 SSRs (24 loci, 88.89%) presented moderate polymorphism (mean PIC = 0.356), and the transferability of these markers in other Sassafras species was high (85.19%). A moderately low level of genetic diversity and a high variation (FST = 0.286) of six wild populations of S. tzumu were illuminated by 16 selected polymorphic nSSRs, with the average expected heterozygosity (HE) of 0.430 at the species level and HE ranging from 0.195 to 0.387 at the population level. Meanwhile, a bottleneck effect was shown in two populations. Consistent with the results of the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and phylogenetic trees, structure analysis optimally divided these six S. tzumu populations into two clusters, and the further strong population subdivision appeared from K = 2 to K = 5, which corresponded to two evolutionarily significant units (ESUs). Moreover, the significant correlation between genetic and geographic distance was tested by the Mantel test (r = 0.742, p = 0.006), clarifying the effect about isolation by distance (IBD), which could be possibly explained by the low gene flow (Nm = 0.625), a relatively high degree of inbreeding (FIS = 0.166), a relatively large distribution, and mountainous barriers. Above all, our research not only enlarged the useful genetic resources for future studies of population genetics, molecular breeding, and germplasm management of S. tzumu and its siblings but also contributed to proposing scientific conservation strategies and schemes for the better preservation of S. tzumu and other Sassafras (Lauraceae) species.

1. Introduction

Sassafras J. Presl (Lauraceae) contains three extant species with a disjunct distribution between East Asia and North America: S. tzumu (Hemsl.) Hemsl. is located in the Yangtze River basin and its southern areas in continental China; S. randaiense (Hayata) Rehder is merely distributed in Central Taiwan; whereas S. albidum (Nutt.) Nees is found in the east of North America [1,2]. Previous studies pointed out that Sassafras is monophyletic, and the species of North America (S. albidum) is sister to the clade of its two East Asian counterparts [3,4,5]. Morphologically, the above three sibling species mainly differ in their floral structure: S. randaiense distinguishes from S. tzumu in the number of anther chambers (two-locular versus four-locular), whereas we can tell S. albidum apart from its two Asian congeners in its six staminodes in the female flower and lacking the fourth staminal whorl [3,6].
S. tzumu, the focal species of our present study, is an Arctic Tertiary relict plant endemic to China, growing in both broad-leaved evergreen and mixed deciduous forests of subtropical China at an altitude range of 100–1900 m [7,8,9]. S. tzumu has strong tolerance for various types of soil, such as acid or sandy loam soil [7,8,10]. Additionally, S. tzumu has many important values in economy and ecology: its meticulous and durable timber is widely used for ship-building and manufacturing of fine furniture; its root and bark are used as medicine, with functions of activating blood circulation and dispersing blood stasis and treating muscle strain; its fruit, leaves, and root contain aromatic oil and safrole oleoresin; and it is also an ornamental landscape garden tree because of its peculiar shape and colorful leaves and the beautiful tree form [7,8,10,11]. In 2017, S. tzumu was listed in the Reference List of Major Cultivated Precious Tree Species in China by State Forestry Administration [12]. Meanwhile, some previous studies reported that S. tzumu is at risk due to their declining population size that resulted from overexploitation and other threats [7,8]. Therefore, it is crucial to conserve this precious species via enlarging its genetic resources and unraveling its genetic backgrounds of genetic diversity and population structure.
In recent years, with the rapid advancement of sequencing technology, developing molecular markers for the genetic survey of our interested species has become much easier and more effective [13]. Simple sequence repeat (SSR), also known as microsatellite, is a short repetitive DNA sequence consisting of a core motif (typically 2–6 bp) and a flanking sequence together [14]. SSR can be commonly spotted in both coding and noncoding regions of eukaryotic genomes [14], and it is widely used in the studies of population genetics, breeding programs, and phylogeography on account of its codominance, the abundance of genotypic polymorphism, high versatility, and variation detection rate [15,16,17,18,19]. Previous studies of S. tzumu primarily focused on germplasm investigation, taxonomy, cultivation, and population ecology [8,9,20,21,22,23,24,25], whereas a few studies have assessed the genetic diversity and population structure of this species [7,26,27,28]. For details, Ding et al. [26] firstly clarified the low-level genetic diversity (HE = 0.280) of three natural populations of S. tzumu in Hubei Province [29] using an isozyme marker; Jiang et al. [27] found a high-level genetic diversity (HE = 0.84) and a moderate genetic differentiation among five wild populations in Tianmu Mountain with five different altitudes via employing 13 polymorphic SSRs developed from S. randaiense [7] and Cinnamomum camphora [30]; Liu et al. [28] recently identified 11,862 SNP loci in 13 relatively agminated populations of S. tzumu and observed a relatively low-level genetic diversity (HE = 0.3004) and a relatively high degree of population differentiation (FST = 0.118). The level of genetic diversity, status of population differentiation, and population structure on a relatively large scale were still controversial in S. tzumu in these investigations. Obviously, there is still a lack of some alternative molecular markers such as the nSSR marker directly mined from the genomic sequencing data of S. tzumu to augment its genetic resources and ascertain its genetic backgrounds.
The procedures of SSR development for a target species in a traditional way mainly consist of three steps: SSR discovery, primer design, and polymorphic survey in representative population or individuals. It is costly and extremely labor-intensive, time-consuming in the traditional experimental screening of the SSR polymorphic status and its subsequent applicability to genetic studies. Compared with the conventional methods or tools, CandiSSR is an easy-to-use, economic, and labor- and time-saving pipeline, which can friendly enable users to find putative polymorphic SSRs not only from the transcriptome datasets but also from multiple assembled genome sequences of a target species or genus along with several comprehensive assessments to help researchers focus more on subsequent genetic studies [19]. Hence, following Zhang et al.’s effective method of developing novel SSR markers for the interested species [31], we firstly selected six individuals from six geographically distant populations of S. tzumu for low-coverage whole-genome short-gun sequencing in our present study to directly develop polymorphic SSR markers. We further investigated the genetic diversity and population structure of these six wild populations of S. tzumu via the polymorphic nSSR loci screened and developed from the nuclear genome data of S. tzumu. The results here will provide useful genetic resources for further studies of population genetics, molecular breeding, and germplasm management of S. tzumu and its congeners, as well as lay a solid basis for proposing scientific conservation strategies and schemes for their better preservation.

2. Results

2.1. Prediction, Verification, and Transferability of Newly Developed nSSR Loci of S. tzumu

A total of 16,215 potential polymorphic nSSR loci with 424 repeated types were identified by the effective pipeline CandiSSR. The most abundant motif was dinucleotide repeat (12,248; 75.53%) followed by trinucleotide repeat (3203; 19.75%), and the tetranucleotide, pentanucleotide, and hexanucleotide repeats accounted for 2.61%, 0.91%, and 1.19%, respectively (Figure 1). According to Zhang et al.’s principles of primer screening [31], we selected 48 candidate polymorphic nSSRs to test their amplification success and effectiveness using six individuals of S. tzumu and then detected their polymorphisms via 12 individuals from six representative geographically distant populations (two individuals were randomly chosen from each population). As a result, 35 nSSR loci (73.92%) were successful in amplification, among which 27 pairs of primers (56.25%) were polymorphic. The sequences of these above 27 polymorphic nSSRs were submitted to GenBank and annotated against the GenBank nonredundant database using BLASTX [32]. The detailed characteristics of these nSSRs are shown in Table 1 and Table S1.
For the assessment of cross-species transferability of these 27 newly developed nSSR loci in other two Sassafras species (S. albidum and S. randaiense), we found that 23 nSSR loci (85.19%) were successfully amplified in S. albidum and S. randaiense. Two nSSRs (N362 and N2716) failed to yield positive amplicon, and the other two nSSRs (N2689 and N7047) did not show clear readable allelic bands in these two species. Furthermore, 17 nSSRs (62.96%) presented the polymorphisms in 22 individuals of S. albidum, and 14 nSSRs (51.85%) successfully presented the polymorphisms (various genotypes in different individuals) in 10 individuals of S. randaiense (Tables S1 and S2).

2.2. Genetic Diversity of nSSRs of S. tzumu

As a result, a total of 125 reproducible alleles were screened in 27 nSSR primers set by 136 individuals of S. tzumu from six populations (Table S3). For each locus, the average of the number of alleles (NA), effective number of alleles (NE), observed heterozygosity (HO), and expected heterozygosity (HE) was 4.630, 1.750, 0.333, and 0.408, respectively. The polymorphism information content (PIC) of these loci varied from 0.071 (N1037) to 0.567 (N15402), and the average of PIC, HS, HT, and I was 0.356, 0.325, 0.413, and 0.742, respectively (Table 2). The proportion of nSSRs with moderate (0.25 < PIC < 0.5) or high polymorphism (PIC > 0.5) was 88.89%. These findings indicated that the majority of our developed nSSRs showed relatively high polymorphism in S. tzumu. The average inbreeding coefficient (FIS) was 0.209, and the FIS in 21 loci were all greater than zero (Table 2).
For analyzing the genetic diversity of six S. tzumu populations, 11 loci (N43, N168, N711, N1037, N2689, N2799, N6336, N6882, N8706, N13148, and N16055) were excluded from subsequent calculation because of the excessive null allele frequency (greater than 0.08) [33] or significant linkage disequilibrium (less than 0.05) [34] according to the estimated results we obtained (Tables S4–S7). The averages of HO, HE, HS, HT, PIC, I, and FIS were changed to 0.359, 0.430, 0.324, 0.436, 0.370, 0.764, and 0.166 from 0.333, 0.408, 0.325, 0.413, 0.356, 0.742, and 0.209, respectively (Table 2). Overall, no significant changes were shown.
At the population level, the expected heterozygosity (HE) ranged from 0.195 (LL) to 0.387 (BYS), and the observed heterozygosity (HO) ranged from 0.244 (LL) to 0.464 (JGS). The highest values of allele richness (AR), number of effective allele (AE), average number of allele (A), number of private allele (AP), Shannon’s information index (I), and expected heterozygosity (HE) were all detected in the BYS population (2.891, 1.800, 3.125, 7, 0.674, and 0.387), and the lowest were in the LL population (2.016, 1.382, 2.125, 1, 0.341, and 0.195) (Table 3). Moreover, a genetic bottleneck effect was observed in population YX and JGS (Table S8).

2.3. Population Structure and Differentiation in S. tzumu

High genetic differentiation (FST = 0.286) existed among six populations in S. tzumu [35]. The results of the AMOVA revealed that the main variation of S. tzumu was within the populations (71.60%), and 28.40% of the total variation was attributed to differences among the six populations (Table 4). The pairwise population genetic differentiation index (FST) and gene flow (Nm) among populations were also estimated in Table 5, from which we can find that all the FST values were significantly greater than 0.25 between population LL and the other five populations with the range of 0.356 (BYS) to 0.536 (JGS); and the values of Nm were all less than 1 among LL and the other five populations. The results of the Mantel test of the IBD effect revealed a significant correlation (r = 0.742, p = 0.006) between the geographical and genetic distance among the six populations (Figure S1, Table S9).
STRUCTURE yielded the highest likelihood when individuals were grouped into two clusters (K = 2) with the maximum ΔK (Figure 2). However, the maximum of lnp (D) was exhibited with K = 5 (Figure 2), and the further strong population subdivision appeared from K = 2 to K = 5 (Figure 2). LL, the westernmost population, was assigned to one cluster (the red color in Figure 2), and the other five populations were assigned to another cluster (the green color in Figure 2) when running STRUCTURE with K = 2, although the population BYS appeared mixed into two clusters. When K = 3, populations BYS and HNS (the southernmost population) were formed as a separate cluster (the blue color in Figure 2). With K = 4, populations JZF and JGS (the northernmost population) were assigned to a separate cluster (the yellow color in Figure 2), whereas population YX (the easternmost population) was separated and showed some degree of mixed ancestry (the green color in Figure 2). When K = 5, the population BYS separated into another cluster (the purple color in Figure 2).
Consistent with the result of STRUCTURE when K = 2, the topology of UPGMA and NJ trees all indicated that the six populations of S. tzumu could be grouped into two clades: population LL and the other remaining five populations (BYS, HNS, YX, JZF, and JGS) (Figure 3). Moreover, the first two components of the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) were generated based on the mean genotypic genetic distance among the six populations of S. tzumu, accounting for 73.31% (Axis 1) and 11.58% (Axis 2) of the total variance. It presented that the JZF and JGS populations had the most similar value, and the other four populations formed their own positions (Figure 4). The above results also accorded with the results of phylogenic and genetic cluster analysis.

3. Discussion

3.1. Characterization, Polymorphism, and Transferability of Newly Developed nSSRs of S. tzumu

In this study, following Zhang et al.’s effective method and under the help of the pipeline of CandiSSR [31], we successfully predicted plenty of putative polymorphic nSSR loci from the sequenced nuclear genome’s contigs and scaffolds of six geographically distant individuals of S. tzumu. Compared with the traditional way of developing SSR markers, the above procedures are believed to be much more time- and energy-saving.
For the details of our candidate polymorphic nSSR loci for S. tzumu, we found that dinucleotide repeats were the most abundant type (75.53%) followed by the trinucleotide repeats (19.75%) (Figure 1). This distribution was commonly found in other tree species, such as Dalbergia hupeana (dinucleotide repeats account for 69.67%, whereas trinucleotide repeats account for 27.03%); and Parrotia subaequalis (80.54%, 16.77%) [36,37]. Worth mentioning is the fact that the trinucleotide repeat is deemed to be one of the most abundant repetition motif types for tree or fruit species because they hold less chance to the frameshifts in the coding sequences of species [36,38]. Meanwhile, a relatively low SSR density was observed in the coding sequences of species because the high mutation rate of SSR may affect the gene function, regulation of gene transcription, translation, and metabolic activities [38]. Indeed, the obtained 27 polymorphic nSSRs were annotated against the GenBank nonredundant database, among which, seven nSSR loci were correspondingly linked to transcription and other vital activities (Table 1). In addition, for the assessment of the polymorphism of these 27 novel nSSRs, the majority of the developed nSSRs (88.89%) showed high or moderate polymorphism (PIC > 0.25), which indicated that these nSSRs have great power to illuminate the population genetic diversity and variation of S. tzumu.
Furthermore, many previous studies indicated that SSR markers have high cross-species transferability among closely related species in plants [7,36,37,39]. For the genus Sassafras here, 20 nSSRs from S. randaiense has been successfully transferrable to S. tzumu using one individual [7]; in our study, the tests of interspecies transferability of the 27 nSSRs from S. tzumu to the other two Sassafras species yielded a transfer success rate of 85.19% (23 loci), and the proportion of polymorphic primers for S. albidum and S. randaiense was relatively high (62.96% and 51.85%, respectively) (Tables S1 and S2). It revealed a relatively high cross-species transferability of these nSSR markers, which will have great assistance in the studies of population genetics, phylogeography, phylogenetics, molecular breeding, and resource management of S. tzumu and the other Sassafras (Lauraceae) species.

3.2. Population Genetic Diversity of S. tzumu

Extensive literature pointed out that plant genetic diversity could be affected by various internal and external factors; for internal factors, they include the breeding system, genetic drift (bottleneck effect as an exceptional case), natural selection, gene mutation, and gene flow; whereas the environmental change and human interference are supposed to be the external factors [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. The expected heterozygosity (HE) and Shannon’s information index (I) are commonly used to assess population genetic diversity [36]. In this study, HE and I were estimated to be 0.317 and 0.527, respectively, at the population level (Table 3), which were higher than the three populations in Hubei Province in China of S. tzumu (HE = 0.280) uncovered by isozyme analysis [26], but significantly lower than the five populations in Tianmu Mountain along with different altitudes (HE = 0.802) revealed by SSR markers [27]. We assumed that these differences might be due to different methods and sample distributions [51]. At the species level, our results revealed an intermediate level of genetic diversity (HE = 0.430, I = 0.764) (Table 2), which was consistent with the study of Liu (HE = 0.3004) [28]. Meanwhile, this genetic diversity calculated by our study with more extensive sampling covering the distribution range of S. tzumu was lower than the average HE of long-lived perennial plants (HE = 0.68), but slightly higher than the average of endemic plants (HE = 0.42) [41]. Additionally, compared with the other species of Lauraceae these share the similar distribution range of S. tzumu, the genetic diversity of S. tzumu in this study was generally lower than Machilus pauhoi (HE = 0.751) [52], Lindera glauca (HE = 0.59, I = 1.17) [53], Cinnamomum camphora (HE = 0.785) [54], and Persea americana (HE = 0.6927) [55] but a little higher than those of some endangered species, such as Litsea szemaois (I = 0.3826 ± 0.2333) [56], Cinnamomun chago (HE = 0.340) [57], and Phoebe bournei (HE = 0.43, I = 0.72).
Considering that S. tzumu is a species with entomophily, and the main factor affecting genetic diversity is the breeding system [27,35,40,44,58,59], therefore, S. tzumu has a lower gene flow than plants with anemophily [40]. Furthermore, the characteristics of pollen abortion, short time to maintain pollen viability, a low proportion of normal-growing embryo sacs, and low seed setting percentage of S. tzumu [9] also lead to a lower level of gene flow [40] (Nm = 0.625) (Table 5). Moreover, the relatively high level of inbreeding (FIS = 0.166) and heterozygote deficit were detected in S. tzumu, which also resulted in its low genetic diversity. Furthermore, two populations (YX and JGS) were examined experiencing a recent genetic bottleneck effect [60]; we assumed that human interference and habitat fragmentation were the significant affect factors for this result according to the field investigation. As indicated by a previous study, the total distribution areas of S. tzumu have migrated southward and decreased by 15.06% from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to present [61]. LL, as the westernmost population at the edge of the distribution areas, was located in the distribution area with contraction from the LGM to present, which corresponded to the result of the lowest genetic diversity of LL among the six populations (Table 3). Some species in partially overlapping distribution areas with S. tzumu also had low genetic diversity due to the above factors, such as Salix taishanensis (I = 0.3505) [62], Magnolia sinostellata (HE = 0.27312) [63], Michelia chapensis (HE = 0.3255) [64], and Sinomanglietia glauca (HE = 0.423) [65].

3.3. Population Structure and Differentiation of S. tzumu

The population genetic structure has an inseparable relationship with the biological evolution process, which included natural selection in heterogeneous environments, genetic drift, and gene flow [66,67]. Structure analysis in this study optimally divided six selected S. tzumu populations into two clusters: LL, the westernmost population in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, formed a separate cluster, whereas the other five populations (BYS, HNS, YX, JZF, and JGS) were assigned to another cluster (Figure 2). Moreover, there are many mountains in subtropical China [68] based on the study about the distribution of the mountain ranges and peaks in China [69], and the significant effect of isolation by distance (IBD) was detected by the Mantel test (r = 0.742, p = 0.006) in this study (Figure S1), which corresponded to the relatively large geographic distance and barriers of multiple mountain ranges of the six populations of S. tzumu, and these two factors also played facilitating roles in promoting genetic differentiation and hindering the gene flow. A previous study also revealed the effect of IBD and the barrier of the Meiling Mountain and Lu Mountain in S. tzumu [28]. In the present study, we identified that the Wuling Mountain, Dalou Mountain, and Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau played major barrier roles among LL and the other five populations. Similar mechanism of population structures has been reported in other species, such as Cerasus dielsiana (Wuling Mountain) [70]; Tetracentron sinense (Qinling Mountain, Hengduan Mountain, and Dalou Mountain) [35]; Sinomanglietia glauca (Wuling Mountain) [65]; and Phoebe zhennan (Wu Mountain and Wuling Mountain) [71].
When it comes to the level of population differentiation, our study unveiled a relatively high genetic differentiation (FST = 0.286) that existed among the six populations of S. tzumu. Compared with other forest trees of Lauraceae, it was much higher than Cinnamomun camphora (FST = 0.109) [54], Cinnamomun chago (FST = 0.2198) [57], and Cryptocarya chinensis (FST = 0.141) [72] but lower than Lindera glauca (FST = 0.362) [73] and Machilus pauhoi (FST = 0.3366) [74], and had a similar value with Phoebe bournei (FST = 0.287) [75]. In addition, the AMOVA indicated that 28.40% (Table 4) of the total variation was distributed among the populations, and most of the genetic variation was distributed within the populations. This finding agreed that long-lived, outcrossing, and/or late successional taxa retain most of their genetic variability within populations with the analyses based on microsatellite DNA loci [41]. Apart from the geographic distance, Liu pointed out that the environmental distance had a more significant effect on the genetic distance than the geographic distance (IBE = 1.54 IBD), especially with the influence of the mean annual temperature [28], and the amount of precipitation was also considered to be the main effect factor on the suitability degree of the distribution areas of S. tzumu [61]. These findings supported our views and were consistent with the biological character of habitat preference with warmth and wetness of S. tzumu [28]. Therefore, both the geographic distance and climate difference played important roles for the intraspecific divergence of S. tzumu.

3.4. Conservation Implications for S. tzumu

Above all, a moderately low level of genetic diversity is believed to relatively lack the ability to adapt to various habitats and changing climate [28,66], and increase the risk of being endangered for a species [7,8]. Here, in our study, S. tzumu presented an intermediate level of genetic diversity in its distribution range. Hence, it is urgent and crucial to protect this Arctic Tertiary relict endemic species in China. As revealed by our study herein, population LL (the westernmost population) and the other five populations (BYS, HNS, YX, JZF, and JGS) of S. tzumu formed two detached clusters, which could be considered as two ESUs for its long-term preservation of genetic resources. What is more, all populations should be protected in situ based on the low genetic diversity among populations as resources (money, manpower, etc.) permit.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and DNA Extraction

The fresh young leaves of six individuals were collected from six geographic representative populations in southern China (Figure 2, Table 6) to represent the various distributions of S. tzumu. To evaluate and validate the polymorphism of the nSSRs developed from our sequencing data, the leaf material of two individuals in S. tzumu was collected from each of the six populations from across the distribution range of the species in southern China. For each population, more than 14 individuals were sampled at least 10 m apart to minimize the likelihood of sampling clones, resulting in a total of 136 individuals (Table 6). The polymorphic nSSRs were further tested for transferability to two related species in Sassafras genus, S. albidum and S. randaiense (Table S10). The leaf materials of 22 individuals of S. albidum were collected in 22 different regions in the USA and 10 individuals of S. randaiense in Taiwan, China (Table S10). The collected leaf materials were dried and stored in silica gel at 4 °C for further DNA extraction. The representative voucher specimens of the Sassafras species were deposited in the Herbarium of Nanjing University Table 6 and Table S10). Total genomic DNA was extracted from leaf tissue using Plant DNAzol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies), following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA quality was examined on a 0.8% agarose gel stained with 1× GelRed (Biotium Inc., Fremont, CA, USA), and the concentration was checked using a Nano-Drop Lite spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.2. NSSR Development, Polymorphism, and Transferability Assessment

One individual was selected from each of the 6 populations to construct six next-generation sequencing genomic paired-end DNA libraries using the low-coverage shotgun sequencing in the HiSeq XTen platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at BGI (China). For each individual, about 7 Gb of raw data was obtained with paired-end 150 bp read length. Following Zhang et al.’s effective method [31], we filtered the chloroplast- and mitochondria-containing contigs and used CandiSSR [19] to identify potentially polymorphic nSSR primer pairs from the remaining scaffolds of the assembled nuclear genome database with a individual (from the BYS population) as the reference. Then, the specific potential polymorphic nSSRs were selected based on the above method [31]. The total selected candidate nSSRs were used for preliminary screening, and the corresponding primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).
Six randomly selected individuals from six populations were used to initially screen the amplification success and effectiveness of the primer pairs and verify the optimal primer temperature by PCR amplifications and 1% agarose gel stained with 1× GelRed (Biotium Inc., Fremont, CA, USA). The polymorphism of each locus was then performed by selecting 12 individuals from 6 representative geographically distant populations (two individuals were chosen from each population at random) (Table 6). Cross-species amplification was then conducted in two more Sassafras species (Table S10) to test the transferability of the polymorphic nSSRs above. PCR amplifications were performed on a GeneAmp9700 DNA Thermal Cycler (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) following the standard protocol of the AmpliTaq Gold 360 Master PCR kit (Thermofisher Biotech Company, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in a final volume of 15 µL, which contained 1 µL of template DNA, 7.5 µL of AmpliTaq Gold 360 Master Mix (Thermofisher Biotech Company, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 5.5 µL of deionized water, 0.5 µL of reverse primers (10µM), and 0.5 µL of forward primers (10µM), with the 5′ end labeled with a fluorescent dye (FAM, HEX, TAMRA, or ROX) (Table S1). Moreover, the PCR procedure was as follows: 5 min initial denaturation at 95 °C, 35 cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 30 s annealing at an optimal primer temperature (Table S1) and 30 s synthesis at 72 °C, followed by a final 10 min extension step at 72 °C and a 4 °C maintained temperature. The PCR products were detected by an ABI 3730XL capillary electrophoresis analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with GeneScan-500LIZ as an internal reference (Applied Biosystems). Fragments were genotyped for their presence or absence at each locus, and the allele sizes were scored by using GeneMarker v2.2.0 (SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA) and manually checked twice to reduce genotyping errors.

4.3. Assessment of Genetic Diversity of S. tzumu

For each nSSR locus, the polymorphism information content (PIC), number of alleles (NA), expected heterozygosity (HE), and observed heterozygosity (HO) were calculated by CERVUS v3.0.7 [76]; the total genetic diversity (HT) and average genetic diversity within populations (HS) were estimated by FSTAT v2.9.4 [77]; the inbreeding coefficient (FIS) was calculated by INEst v2.2 [78]; and the Shannon’s information index (I) and effective number of alleles (NE) were counted by Popgene v1.31 [79]. Additionally, deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) [80] for each locus was tested using a Markov chain (dememorization: 10,000; batches: 20, iterations per batch: 5000) in GENEPOP v4.7.5 [81]. The null allele frequency of each locus in each population was estimated based on the expectation maximization algorithm in FREENA [82].
For each population of S. tzumu, the allelic richness (AR) was estimated by FSTAT v2.9.4 [76], and the following genetic diversity parameters were calculated by GenALEx v6.502 (Canberra, Australia) [83]: the average number of alleles (A), effective number of alleles (AE), number of private alleles (AP), observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE), unbiased expected heterozygosity (μHE), and Shannon’s information index (I). Furthermore, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Z-test were used to estimate the excess of heterozygosity under the infinite model (IAM), strict stepwise mutation model (SMM), and two-phase model (TPM) by INEst v2.2 [77] to perform a bottleneck test [84] for each population.

4.4. Population Structure and Differentiation of S. tzumu

The total genetic differentiation coefficient (FST) and pairwise population genetic differentiation index (FST) were calculated by Genetix v4.05 program [85], and an estimate of Nm (the number of migrants per generation/gene flow) among the populations was computed using the formula Nm = 0.25(1 − FST)/FST [86]. In addition, the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed to partition the total genetic variance among populations using ARLEQUIN v3.5.2.2 [87]. Moreover, GenALEx v6.502 (Canberra, Australia) [83] was used to compute the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and perform the Mantel test to estimate the correlation between Nei’s unbiased genetic distance and geographic distance (9999 permutations) to reveal the influence of the isolation-by-distance (IBD) model. Moreover, the study of the phylogenetic relationship among the populations of S. tzumu was performed by POPTREE [88] based on shared allele distances among the populations (DA genetic distance) to build the UPGMA and NJ tree [89] using unweighted pair-group method (UPGMA) [90] and neighbor-joining method (NJ) [91].
Bayesian methods were utilized to reveal the optimal number of genetic clusters (K) for the studied populations, and these Bayesian analyses were implemented using STRUCTURE v2.3.4 [92], with ten independent runs for each K value that ranges from 1 to 10 that were performed to determine the maximum value of the posterior probability of the data [lnp(D)] with 100,000 MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo) repetitions and 100,000 burn-in periods. We assumed that the studied populations conformed to the admixture model and independent allele frequencies. The obtained results from STRUCTURE were further interpreted by STRUCTURE HARVESTER [80], which implemented Evanno’s ΔK method [93] to estimate the parameter (ΔK) that corresponded to the change of lnp(D) between consecutive K values for the calculation of the optimal K. The most likely number of cluster (K) was identified as the one that maximized lnp(D) and/or ΔK.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we first identified 16,215 potential polymorphism nSSR loci based on the assembled nuclear genome database of six individuals of S. tzumu. The di- (75.53%) and trinucleotide (19.75%) repeats were the most abundant. A total of 27 novel nSSRs with polymorphism were utilized to illuminate the genetic diversity of 136 individuals in six populations of S. tzumu, resulting most markers (88.89%) showing high or moderate polymorphism (PIC = 0.356). The majority of nSSRs (85.19%) could be successfully transferred to the other two Sassafras species, and some of them showed polymorphism. The population genetic results revealed a moderately low genetic diversity of S. tzumu with HE ranging from 0.195 (LL) to 0.387 (BYS) at the population level, and the average HE was 0.430 at the species level. The bottleneck effect appeared in some populations (YX and JGS). The population differentiation was high (FST = 0.286), and the majority of variations (71.60%) were within the populations. Consistent with the results of the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and phylogenetic trees, structure analysis optimally divided these six S. tzumu populations into two clusters, and the further strong population subdivision appeared from K = 2 to K = 5, which corresponded to two evolutionarily significant units (ESUs). Moreover, the significant correlation between genetic and geographic distance was tested by the Mantel test (r = 0.742, p = 0.006), clarifying the effect about isolation by distance (IBD), which could be possibly explained by the low gene flow (Nm = 0.625), a relatively high degree of inbreeding (FIS = 0.166), a relatively large distribution, and mountainous barriers. Taken together, our research gives a deeper understanding of the population genetic diversity and structure of S. tzumu in subtropical China and will contribute to the conservation and utilization of S. tzumu and the other Sassafras (Lauraceae) species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11202706/s1, Table S1: Characteristics of nSSR makers designed for S. tzumu in this study; Table S2: Allele matrix of S. albidum and S. randaiense; Table S3: Allele matrix of S. tzumu; Table S4: p-Value of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test with probability test for each locus in 6 populations; Table S5: p-Value of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test for each locus; Table S6: p-Value of genotypic linkage disequilibrium test for each locus pair across all populations; Table S7: Result of estimating null allele frequency using EM algorithm; Table S8: p-Value of bottleneck test; Table S9: Nei’s unbiased genetic distance (above diagonal) and geographic distance (km, below diagonal) among 6 populations of S. tzumu; Table S10: Information of plant materials of S. albidum and S. randaiense collected in this study; Figure S1. Correlation between Nei’s unbiased genetic distance and geographical distance to reflect IBD detected by Mantel test of S. tzumu.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W., Y.Z., S.W., and Y.W.; methodology, Y.Z., Z.W., Y.P., and S.W.; validation, J.Z. and Y.W.; formal analysis, S.W. and Y.Z.; investigation, J.Z., Y.W., P.L., H.L., L.Y., Y.Z., and S.W.; data curation, J.Z. and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W., Y.W., and Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., Z.W., Y.W., J.Z., P.L., H.L., Y.P., and L.Y.; visualization, S.W. and Y.Z.; supervision, Z.W. and Y.Z.; project administration, Z.W. and Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) (access on 28 July 2022); The GenBank accession number is shown in Table 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, S.H.; Li, X.W.; Li, J.; Huang, P.H.; Wei, F.N.; Cui, H.B.; van der Werff, H. Lauraceae. In Flora of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1984; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Little, E.L. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees; Chanticleer: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nie, Z.L.; Wen, J.; Sun, H. Phylogeny and biogeography of Sassafras (Lauraceae) disjunct between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Plant Syst. Evol. 2007, 267, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Chanderbali, A.S.; van der Werff, H.; Renner, S.S. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of Lauraceae: Evidence from the chloroplast and nuclear genomes. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2001, 88, 104–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Rohde, R.; Rudolph, B.; Ruthe, K.; Lorea-Hernandez, F.G.; de Moraes, P.L.R.; Li, J.; Rohwer, J.G. Neither Phoebe nor Cinnamomum—The tetrasporangiate species of Aiouea (Lauraceae). Taxon 2017, 66, 1085–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rehder, A. The American and Asiatic species of Sassafras. J. Arnold Arbor. 1920, 1, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chung, K.F.; Lin, T.T.; Tsai, Y.S.; Lin, S.T.; Peng, C.I. Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Loci in Sassafras Randaiense (Lauraceae). Am. J. Bot. 2011, 98, E326–E329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, K.L.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, D.W.; Tao, J. Species Distribution Modeling of Sassafras Tzumu and Implications for Forest Management. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, N.N.; Liu, J.; Zhang, M.Y.; Wang, L.; Yang, S.L.; Liao, W.B. Characteristics of Pinus taiwanensis + Sassafras tzumu community in Taoyuandong National Nature Reserve of Hu’nan Province. J. Plant Resour. Environ. 2017, 26, 84–92. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, X.; Yang, S.G.; Yu, F.; Ji, C.F.; Long, C.L.; Jiang, C.M. Research progress of Sassafras tzumu. S. China For. Sci. 2015, 43, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, X.P. Comparative analysis of the effect of wood mixed with wood-load afforestation. For. By-Prod. Spec. China 2022, 4, 22–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, H.Z.; Liu, J.; Jiang, J.M.; Sun, Y.; Dong, X.; Fu, A.P. A study on flowering and fruit development of Sassafras tzumu. For. Res. 2020, 33, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; He, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, Y. Genetic diversity and population structure of 93 rice cultivars (lines) (Oryza sativa Xian group) in Qinba in China by 3 types of genetic markers. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, C.; Li, J.P.; Chai, B.F. Development of microsatellites DNA marker and Its application. J. Zhengzhou Inst. Aeronaut. Ind. Manag. Soc. Sci. Ed. 2004, 23, 199–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Powell, W.; Machray, G.C.; Provan, J. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tautz, D. Hypervariability of Simple Sequences as a General Source for Polymorphic DNA Markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 6463–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Varshney, R.K.; Graner, A.; Sorrells, M.E. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: Features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wen, J.H. Study on genetic diversity and construction of core collections about Vitis amurensis Rupr. germplasm resources by SSR markers. Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. Xia, E.H.; Yao, Q.Y.; Zhang, H.B.; Jiang, J.J.; Zhang, L.P.; Gao, L.Z. CandiSSR: An Efficient Pipeline used for Identifying Candidate Polymorphic SSRs Based on Multiple Assembled Sequences. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 6, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, X.; Yu, F.; Ji, C.F.; Long, C.L.; Yang, G.Y. Anatomical study on pollen development of Sassafras tzumu (Hemsl.) Hemsl. J. Gansu Agric. Univ. 2014, 49, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, Z.; Tan, C.; Wei, Y.-M.; Rohwer, J.G.; Liu, B.; Yang, Y. Floral morphology and phenology of Sassafras tzumu (Lauraceae). BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, J.J.; Jiang, B.; Zhu, J.R.; Wu, D.T.; Ye, N.N.; Qiu, H.J.; Yuan, W.G.; Wu, C.P.; Huang, Y.J.; Jiao, J.J.; et al. Prediction of potential suitable habitat and dominate environmental factors of Sassafras tzumu in Zhejiang with MaxEnt Model. J. Northeast. For. Univ. 2020, 48, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, J.J.; Jiang, B.; Wu, C.P.; Yuan, W.G.; Zhu, J.R.; Huang, Y.J.; Jiao, J.J.; Shen, A.H. Study on the habitat and niche of Sassafras tzumu (Hemsl.) Hemsl. in Zhejiang Province. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 884–894. [Google Scholar]
  24. Long, X.F. Effects of Different Mixing Methods on the Growth of Pinus massoniana and Sassafras tsumu. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2019, 47, 140–141. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bi, G.Y.; Jiang, X.H.; Jiang, S.F. Growth and silvicultural technology of Sassafras tzumu. Pract. For. Technol. 2003, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ding, X.F.; Chen, H.L.; Cao, J.; Koono, K.; Ubukata, M.; Okamura, M. Preliminary study on genetic st ructure of three natural populations in Sassafrass Tzumu. Hubei For. Sci. Technol. 2006, 005, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang, A.P.; Jiang, J.M.; Liu, J. Genetic diversity and genetic structure in Sassafras tsumu populations along altitudinal gradients in Tianmushan Mountain, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 27, 1829–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, X. Landscape genetics of Sassafras tzumu based on the Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS). Master’s Thesis, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sylva, E.B.O.C. China Sylva: The First Volume Lauraceae; China Forestry Press: Beijing, China, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kameyama, Y. Development of Microsatellite Markers for Cinnamomum Camphora (Lauraceae). Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, E1–E3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhang, Y.Y. The conservation genetics research of Parrotia subaequalis (Hamamelidaceae), an endangered palaeoendemic plant in China. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wen, Y.F.; Uchiyama, K.; Han, W.J.; Ueno, S.; Xie, W.D.; Xu, G.B.; Tsumura, Y. Null alleles in microsatellite markers. Biodivers. Sci. 2013, 21, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Z.F. Molecular Ecology and Fundamentals of Data Analysis; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tian, Z.Q. The development of SSR markers and genetic structure analysis of an endangered plant Tetracentron sinense Oliv. Master’s Thesis, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, C.H.; Zheng, Y.Q.; Liu, Y.; Lin, F.R.; Huang, P. Development of Genomic SSR for the Subtropical Hardwood Tree Dalbergia hupeana and Assessment of Their Transferability to Other Related Species. Forests 2021, 12, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.Y.; Shi, E.; Yang, Z.P.; Geng, Q.F.; Qiu, Y.X.; Wang, Z.S. Development and Application of Genomic Resources in an Endangered Palaeoendemic Tree, Parrotia subaequalis (Hamamelidaceae) From Eastern China. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Song, X.; Li, N.; Guo, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wu, T.; Yu, T.; Feng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z. Comprehensive identification and characterization of simple sequence repeats based on the whole-genome sequences of 14 forest and fruit trees. For. Res. 2021, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, M.Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Wang, G.H.; Zhou, J.B.; Tian, Y.J.; Geng, Q.F.; Wang, Z.S. Development and characterization of 20 novel EST-SSR markers for Pteroceltis tatarinowii, a relict tree in China. Appl. Plant Sci. 2020, 8, e11320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Wen, Y.F.; Han, W.J.; Wu, S. Plant genetic diversity and its influencing factors. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2010, 30, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nybom, H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 1143–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Slatkin, M. Gene Flow and the Geographic Structure of Natural-Populations. Science 1987, 236, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lande, R. Genetics and Demography in Biological Conservation. Science 1988, 241, 1455–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, H.X.; Hu, Z.A. Plant breeding system genetic structure and conservation of genetic diversity. Chin. Biodivers. 1996, 4, 92–96. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nevo, E. Evolution of genome-phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 6233–6240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Frankham, R.; Ballou, J.D.; Briscoe, D.A. Introduction to Conservation Genetics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  47. Morjan, C.L.; Rieseberg, L.H. How species evolve collectively: Implications of gene flow and selection for the spread of advantageous alleles. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 1341–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Petit, R.J.; Duminil, J.; Fineschi, S.; Hampe, A.; Salvini, D.; Vendramin, G.G. Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 689–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Freeland, J.R. Molecular Ecology; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, G.B. Plant Population Genetics; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vasilyeva, Y.; Chertov, N.; Nechaeva, Y.; Sboeva, Y.; Pystogova, N.; Boronnikova, S.; Kalendar, R. Genetic Structure, Differentiation and Originality of Pinus sylvestris L. Populations in the East of the East European Plain. Forests 2021, 12, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhu, Q.; Li, P.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, J.J.; Que, Q.M.; Hui, W.K.; Chen, X.Y. Optimization of SSR-PCR reaction system and study on genetic diversity of natural populations of Machilus pauhoi. For. Res. 2019, 32, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xiong, B.; Zhang, L.M.; Ha, D.L.; Ju, Y.X.; Zhang, Z.X. Construction of core germplasm of wild Lindera glauca based on SSR molecular marker. Mol. Plant Breed. 2018, 16, 6380–6389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, S. Population genetic structure of Cinnamomum camphora in China. Master’s Thesis, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  55. Dong, M.C.; Yue, J.Q.; Li, J.X.; Yang, F.; Zhou, D.G.; Wang, S.H.; Long, C.R.; Guo, L.N.; Gao, J.Y.; Yang, E.C. Genetic diversity analysis of germplasm resources of Persea americana Mill. based on SSR fluorescent marker. Mol. Plant Breed. 2020, 18, 5403–5410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, J.Q.; Ci, X.Q.; Li, Q.M.; Li, J. Genetic diversity of Litsea szemaois, an endangered species endemic to China, detected by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR). Biodivers. Sci. 2006, 14, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zhang, X. Species germplasm conservation of the wild plants with extremely small populations—Cinnamomum chago. Ph.D. Thesis, Yunnan University, Kunming, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang, X. Reproductive Biology and Conservation Genetics of Rhododendron sinofalconeri. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pu, T.L.; Han, X.Q.; Luo, H.Y.; Deng, H.S.; Zou, M.L.; Jin, J.; Xia, Z.Q.; Wang, W.Q. Analysis of genetic of Moringa oleifera population based on SNP markers. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2022, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  60. Cornuet, J.M.; Luikart, G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 1996, 144, 2001–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, X.; Gong, X.; Chen, S.S.; Guan, B.C. Simulation of the distribution pattern of Sassafras tzumu and changes in habitat based on ArcGIS and MaxEnt. Plant Sci. J. 2018, 36, 320–326. [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu, H.Y. Genetic Diversity and Population Ecology of Salix taishanensis. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  63. Yao, Z.X. The conservation genetics research of Magnolia sinostellata. Master’s Thesis, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  64. Jiang, J.M.; Teng, H.J.; Yuan, J.L.; Luan, Q.F.; Tan, Z.F. Genetic diversity of Michelia chapensis dandy populations. For. Res. 2005, 18, 109–113. [Google Scholar]
  65. Xiong, M.; Tian, S.; Zhang, Z.R.; Fan, D.M.; Zhang, Z.Y. Population genetic structure and conservation units of Sinomanglietia glauca (Magnoliaceae). Biodivers. Sci. 2014, 22, 476–484. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhou, P.Y.; Hui, L.X.; Huang, S.J.; Ni, Z.X.; Yu, F.X.; Xu, L.A. Study on the Genetic Structure Based on Geographic Populations of the Endangered Tree Species: Liriodendron chinense. Forests 2021, 12, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, X.Y.; Lu, H.P.; Shen, L.; Li, Y.Y. Identifying populations for priority conservation of important species. Biodivers. Sci. 2002, 10, 332–338. [Google Scholar]
  68. Peng, B.Z.; Chen, F. Progress in the study of mountain vertical zonation in China. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 1999, 19, 303–308. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang, X.P.; Wang, Z.H.; Fang, J.Y. Mountain ranges and peaks in China. Biodivers. Sci. 2004, 12, 206–212. [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhu, H. Phylogenetic position and population biogeography of Cerasus dielsiana (Rosaceae). Ph.D. Thesis, Nanjing Forest University, Nanjing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  71. Gao, J.H.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.Y.; Long, H.L.; He, W.; Li, X.Q. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis of the population structure and genetic diversity of Phoebe zhennan (Lauraceae), a native species to China. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2016, 64, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gao, S.H.; Wang, Z.F.; Zhang, J.L.; Tian, S.N. Genetic diversity of Cryptocarya chinensis life stages in heishiding Guangdong Province. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2005, 6, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xiong, B.; Zhang, L.M.; Dong, S.B.; Zhang, Z.X. Population genetic structure and variability in Lindera glauca (Lauraceae) indicates low levels of genetic diversity and skewed sex ratios in natural populations in mainland China. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Zhou, P.; Lin, W.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, X.B.; Wu, L.Y.; Chen, X.Y. Genetic diversity of Machilus pauhoi assessed by SRAP markers. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2016, 38, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Huang, Y.Q. Genetic diversity analysis and core germplasm construction of Phoebe bournei based on SSR molecular markers. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  76. Kalinowski, S.T.; Taper, M.L.; Marshall, T.C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 1099–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Goudet, J. FSTAT (Version 2.9.3): A Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices. Available online: https://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm (accessed on 21 July 2022).
  78. Chybicki, I.J. INEST 2.2. The User Manual. Available online: https://www.ukw.edu.pl/pracownicy/strona/igo_chybicki/software_ukw (accessed on 1 August 2022).
  79. Yeh, F.; Yang, R.; Boyle, T.; Ye, Z.; Mao, J.; Francis, C.Y.; Timothy, B.B.; Judy, X.M. POPGENE, Version 1.31. The User-Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Available online: http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/index.htm (accessed on 3 September 2022).
  80. Earl, D.A.; Vonholdt, B.M.; Earl, D.A.; VonHoldt, B.M. Structure Harvester: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2012, 4, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rousset, F. Genepop’007: A complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008, 8, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chapuis, M.P.; Estoup, A. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Garza, J.C.; Williamson, E.G. Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Belkhir, K.; Borsa, P.; Chikhi, L.; Raufaste, N.; Bonhomme, F. GENETIX4. 05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétiquedes populations. Lab. Génome Popul. Interact. CNRS UMR 2004, 5000, 1996–2004. [Google Scholar]
  86. Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1984; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  87. Excoffier, L.; Lischer, H.E.L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Takezaki, N.; Nei, M.; Tamura, K. POPTREE2: Software for Constructing Population Trees from Allele Frequency Data and Computing Other Population Statistics with Windows Interface. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Nei, M.; Chesser, R.K. Estimation of Fixation Indexes and Gene Diversities. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1983, 47, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sneath, P.H.A.; Sokal, R.R. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification; Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  91. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The Neighbor-Joining Method—A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Statistics of types of candidate polymorphic nSSRs of S. tzumu.
Figure 1. Statistics of types of candidate polymorphic nSSRs of S. tzumu.
Plants 11 02706 g001
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of six populations of S. tzumu in China and population genetic structure among six populations of S. tzumu estimated using STRUCTURE based on nSSR with values of K from 2 to 5.
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of six populations of S. tzumu in China and population genetic structure among six populations of S. tzumu estimated using STRUCTURE based on nSSR with values of K from 2 to 5.
Plants 11 02706 g002
Figure 3. Phylogeny relationships among six populations of S. tzumu by unweighted pair-group method (UPGMA) (a) and neighbor-joining (NJ) method (b) based on DA distance.
Figure 3. Phylogeny relationships among six populations of S. tzumu by unweighted pair-group method (UPGMA) (a) and neighbor-joining (NJ) method (b) based on DA distance.
Plants 11 02706 g003
Figure 4. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) among six populations based on mean genotypic genetic distance.
Figure 4. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) among six populations based on mean genotypic genetic distance.
Plants 11 02706 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of 27 newly developed nSSR loci of S. tzumu in this study.
Table 1. Characteristics of 27 newly developed nSSR loci of S. tzumu in this study.
LocusRepeat MotifOptimal Primer Temperature (°C)Size Range (bp)GenBank Accession NumberBLASTX Top Hit Description
N43(AAAG)859157–169OP094707zinc finger protein [Cinnamomum micranthum f. kanehirae]
N168(AAC)756134–146OP094689-
N362(AAG)755185–206OP094695-
N711(AATAAA)559187–223OP094710putative nuclease HARBI1 [Cinnamomum micranthum f. kanehirae]
N1037(ACAA)555139–155OP094684hypothetical protein SLEP1_g25016 [Shorea leprosula]
N1047(ACAT)556162–166OP094703-
N2689(AGA)852188–197OP094687Alcohol dehydrogenase superfamily, zinc-type [Cinnamomum micranthum f. kanehirae]
N2716(AGAT)559159–175OP094697-
N2799(AGGTGA)552159–183OP094690-
N6336(ATC)659178–187OP094701-
N6339(ATC)656169–172OP094694-
N6493(ATGT)659128–148OP094692-
N6882(CAC)855167–188OP094708-
N6889(CACCTC)556159–189OP094705-
N7047(CCCTCA)559182–206OP094702-
N8706(CTC)655114–129OP094688-
N8723(CTC)951156–177OP094685zinc finger protein 1-like protein [Cinnamomum micranthum f. kanehirae]
N8865(CTT)855191–203OP094699methyltransferase-like protein 13 isoform X1 [Cinnamomum micranthum f. kanehirae]
N10640(GAT)653181–187OP094691N-carbamoylputrescine amidase [Glycine max]
N13148(TATAC)556162–177OP094704-
N13155(TATG)558179–191OP094686-
N13174(TATTTT)656178–196OP094706-
N14929(TCT)757187–202OP094698-
N15402(TGA)657178–199OP094709-
N15940(TTC)55582–100OP094700-
N16055(TTCT)555161–169OP094693-
N16204(TTTTC)556133–148OP094696-
Table 2. Genetic characteristics of 27 polymorphic nSSRs in S. tzumu.
Table 2. Genetic characteristics of 27 polymorphic nSSRs in S. tzumu.
LocusNA 1NE 2HO 3HE 4HS 5HT 6PIC7I8FIS 9
N4341.8580.5370.4640.4460.4640.3840.759−0.159
N16841.9500.4120.4890.4060.4870.4020.7920.158
N36271.7580.2280.4330.2220.4530.4000.8780.474
N71171.4470.2500.3100.2880.3180.2910.6760.194
N103751.0770.0510.0720.0640.0670.0710.2010.285
N104721.8260.6760.4540.4200.4520.3500.645−0.493
N268941.7550.3970.4320.3750.4400.3930.7950.081
N271651.5930.0880.3740.1420.4030.3280.6890.765
N279951.9960.4260.5010.3080.5030.4180.8530.149
N633641.3220.0660.2440.2280.2520.2280.5000.730
N633921.5340.2570.3490.2870.3580.2870.5320.264
N649362.1990.7280.5470.5260.5500.4480.929−0.332
N688261.7970.2650.4450.3810.4400.4260.9850.406
N688952.1890.5510.5450.4380.5380.4400.891−0.012
N704741.4940.2870.3320.2970.3290.3030.6350.136
N870652.2730.5070.5620.5190.5610.5111.0670.098
N872371.6550.2790.3970.2750.4170.3790.8930.297
N886541.6760.4190.4050.3270.3930.3590.731−0.035
N1064032.3010.1990.5670.2230.5680.4690.9050.651
N1314851.5470.3310.3550.3400.3720.3270.6920.068
N1315531.9560.4490.4910.3490.4930.3730.7000.086
N1317441.5330.2650.3490.3160.3670.3200.6820.242
N1492941.8590.4340.4640.3580.4360.3650.7030.065
N1540272.5320.3530.6070.4700.6130.5671.2460.420
N1594061.3910.2940.2820.2550.3100.2660.611−0.043
N1605531.3550.0070.2630.2410.2830.2370.4870.972
N1620441.3910.2350.2820.2740.2960.2580.5540.166
T-Mean 104.6301.7500.3330.4080.3250.4130.3560.7420.209
E-Mean 114.5631.8050.3590.4300.3240.4360.3700.7640.166
1 Number of alleles; 2 Effective number of alleles; 3 Observed heterozygosity; 4 Expected heterozygosity; 5 Average genetic diversity within populations; 6 Total genetic diversity; 7 Polymorphism information content; 8 Shannon’s information index; 9 inbreeding coefficients; 10 Mean of total loci; 11 Mean of loci after excluding the loci with excessive null allele frequencies or significant linkage disequilibrium.
Table 3. Genetic parameters of six populations in S. tzumu.
Table 3. Genetic parameters of six populations in S. tzumu.
Population CodeN 1A2AE 3AR 4AP 5HO 6HE 7μHE 8I 9
BYS213.1251.8002.89170.3660.3870.3960.674
LL202.1251.3822.01610.2440.1950.2000.341
HNS222.7501.6432.57550.3180.3550.3630.599
YX262.4381.6482.25810.3920.3220.3290.526
JZF332.5631.5552.21330.3810.3090.3130.502
JGS142.1251.5952.12520.4640.3340.3460.518
Mean/Total1362.5211.6042.346190.3610.3170.3250.527
1 Number of individuals; 2 Average number of alleles; 3 Effective number of alleles; 4 Allelic richness (average of per locus in each population) based on minimum sample size of population with 14 diploid individuals; 5 Number of private alleles; 6 Observed heterozygosity; 7 Expected heterozygosity; 8 Unbiased expected heterozygosity; 9 Shannon’s information index.
Table 4. Result of AMOVA for S. tzumu.
Table 4. Result of AMOVA for S. tzumu.
Source of Variationd.f.Sum of SquaresVariance ComponentsPercentage of Variation
Among populations5242.7741.027 Va28.40
Within populations266689.1782.591 Vb71.60
Total271931.9523.618
Table 5. Pairwise population genetic differentiation index (FST) (above diagonal) with all significant population differentiation where p < 0.01 and number of migrants per generation (Nm) (below diagonal) among populations of S. tzumu.
Table 5. Pairwise population genetic differentiation index (FST) (above diagonal) with all significant population differentiation where p < 0.01 and number of migrants per generation (Nm) (below diagonal) among populations of S. tzumu.
BYSLLHNSYXJZFJGS
BYS-0.3560.1470.2340.1840.205
LL0.452-0.4430.5300.5140.536
HNS1.4480.314-0.2240.1850.182
YX0.8200.2210.868-0.1270.162
JZF1.1090.2361.1021.712-0.063
JGS0.9700.2161.1201.2923.740-
Total FST0.286
Total Nm0.625
Table 6. Information of plant materials of S. tzumu collected in this study.
Table 6. Information of plant materials of S. tzumu collected in this study.
Population CodeCollection LocalityGeographic CoordinatesNumber of IndividualsVoucher Specimens
BYSBaiyun Mountain Natural Reserve, Hunan Province, China28.7301° N, 109.3955° E21ZJB201903
LLLeli Village Forestry Farm, Yunnan Province, China27.4202° N, 104.8601° E20ZJB201904
HNSHuangniushi Natural Reserve, Guangdong Province, China 24.4294° N, 114.4556° E22ZJB201905
YXYixing National Forest Park, Jiangsu Province, China31.6986° N, 119.7449° E26ZJB201906
JZFJunzifeng Peak Natural Reserve, Fujian Province, China26.4863° N, 116.6559° E33ZJB201907
JGSJigong Mountain Natural Reserve, Henan Province, China31.8185° N, 114.0583° E14ZJB201908
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, P.; Lin, H.; Peng, Y.; Yu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of an Arctic Tertiary Relict Tree Endemic to China (Sassafras tzumu) Revealed by Novel Nuclear Microsatellite (nSSR) Markers. Plants 2022, 11, 2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202706

AMA Style

Wang S, Wang Y, Zhou J, Li P, Lin H, Peng Y, Yu L, Zhang Y, Wang Z. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of an Arctic Tertiary Relict Tree Endemic to China (Sassafras tzumu) Revealed by Novel Nuclear Microsatellite (nSSR) Markers. Plants. 2022; 11(20):2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Shuang, Ying Wang, Jingbo Zhou, Pan Li, Hungwei Lin, Ye Peng, Lipeng Yu, Yunyan Zhang, and Zhongsheng Wang. 2022. "Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of an Arctic Tertiary Relict Tree Endemic to China (Sassafras tzumu) Revealed by Novel Nuclear Microsatellite (nSSR) Markers" Plants 11, no. 20: 2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202706

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop