Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Characterization, Identification and Expression Profile of MYB Transcription Factor Gene Family during Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in Mango (Mangifera indica)
Next Article in Special Issue
Introgression of Heterotic Genomic Segments from Brassica carinata into Brassica juncea for Enhancing Productivity
Previous Article in Journal
Species-Specific Plant-Derived Nanoparticle Characteristics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mapping of Two Major QTLs Controlling Flowering Time in Brassica napus Using a High-Density Genetic Map
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 22
10.3390/plants11223140
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptome and Regional Association Analyses Reveal the Effects of Oleosin Genes on the Accumulation of Oil Content in Brassica napus

by
Yuan Jia
,
Min Yao
,
Xin He
,
Xinghua Xiong
,
Mei Guan
,
Zhongsong Liu
,
Chunyun Guan
and
Lunwen Qian
*
Collaborative Innovation Center of Grain and Oil Crops in South China, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(22), 3140; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223140
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 13 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Genetics and Breeding of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rapeseed stores lipids in the form of oil bodies. Oil bodies in the seeds of higher plants are surrounded by oleosins. Adjusting oleosin protein levels can prevent the fusion of oil bodies and maintain oil body size during seed development. However, oil contents are affected by many factors, and studies on the complex molecular regulatory mechanisms underlying the variations in seed oil contents of B. napus are limited. In this study, a total of 53 BnOLEO (B. napus oleosin) genes were identified in the genome of B. napus through a genome-wide analysis. The promoter sequences of oleosin genes consisted of various light-, hormone-, and stress-related cis-acting elements, along with transcription factor (TF) binding sites, for 25 TF families in 53 BnOLEO genes. The differentially expressed oleosin genes between two high- and two low-oil-content accessions were explored. BnOLEO3-C09, BnOLEO4-A02, BnOLEO4-A09, BnOLEO2-C04, BnOLEO1-C01, and BnOLEO7-A03 showed higher expressions in the high-oil-content accessions than in low-oil-content accessions, at 25, 35, and 45 days after pollination (DAP) in two different environments. A regional association analysis of 50 re-sequenced rapeseed accessions was used to further analyze these six BnOLEO genes, and it revealed that the nucleotide variations in the BnOLEO1-C01 and BnOLEO7-A03 gene regions were related to the phenotypic variations in seed oil content. Moreover, a co-expression network analysis revealed that the BnOLEO genes were directly linked to lipid/fatty acid metabolism, TF, lipid transport, and carbohydrate genes, thus forming a molecular network involved in seed oil accumulation. These favorable haplotypes can be utilized in molecular marker-assisted selection in order to further improve seed oil contents in rapeseed.

1. Introduction

Rapeseed (Brassica napus L., AACC, 2n = 38) is one of the most important oil crops, providing approximately 15% of vegetable oil worldwide [1]. It originated approximately 7500 years ago from a spontaneous hybridization between B. rapa (AA, 2n = 20) and B. oleracea (CC, 2n = 18) [2]. The large amounts of unsaturated fatty acids (FAs) present in rapeseed oil have made it widely accepted as vegetable oil for human consumption and as biofuel for industry [3]. Enhancing seed oil content (SOC) and oil production per unit area of land is of paramount importance to meet the growing demand for oilseed breeding programs [4]. SOC is a highly complex trait due to multiple genes that regulate various seed-storage-oil metabolisms [5]. The biological and metabolic pathways for triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis have been well recorded in various studies [6,7].
In the past few decades, oil content-associated quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been identified in nearly all 19 linkage groups, and vary from 3 to 27 QTLs in each chromosome by biparental linkage mapping [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Recently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been widely used to dissect the regulatory loci and genetic architecture of SOC at the whole-genome level. For example, a genome-wide association study conducted by Liu et al. [16] identified 50 loci that were significantly associated with seed oil contents in 521 rapeseed accessions. GWAS was used to detect the associations of 112 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with seed quality traits in 405 B. napus inbred lines [17]. Tang et al. [18] used GWAS to detect the significant associations of 27 QTLs with SOC in different environments for 500 B. napus inbred lines. Xiao et al. [19] identified 17 loci that were significantly associated with seed oil content by GWAS, with 385,692 SNPs. GWAS was used to reveal nine haplotype regions that were significantly associated with the oil content in 203 Chinese semi-winter rapeseed accessions [20]. Although a large number of QTLs that affect oil content accumulations have been identified, their molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood.
With the development of sequencing and statistics, these approaches have been extensively applied to profile genome-wide gene expressions in crops. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) based on transcriptome data has become one of the most efficient methods to display the correlations between genes in a pairwise manner to construct network graphs [21]. Clustering genes show similar expression patterns across many samples, as they could be members of the same pathway or biological process. These co-expression network properties can be further correlated with target traits to find the functional genes [22]. For example, Cui et al. [23] established an acyl-lipid metabolism co-expression network and detected 12 hub genes related to oil content accumulations. WGCNA was used to identify five modules that were highly associated with high-quality fiber, as well as five transcription factor (TF) genes playing an important role in fiber development [24]. A co-expression network was used to detect seven hub genes that were involved in soybean oil and seed storage protein accumulations [25].
Oleosins are hydrophobic plant proteins related to small (0.6–2 μm diameter) storage oil droplets, termed oil bodies [26]. At present, six oleosin lineages have been reported, including P, U, SL, SH, T, and M. The P (primitive) lineage is mainly distributed in green algae and may be the source of U (universal) oleosins, which further gives rise to the SL (seed low molecular weight) and SH (seed high molecular weight) lineages. In addition, the T (tapetum) lineage was detected only in the tapeta of Brassicaceae, and the M (mesocarp) lineage was detected in Lauraceae [27,28,29]. Oleosins are found in the oil bodies of seeds, tapetum cells, and pollen, but not in fruits [30]. Many studies have shown that adjusting oleosin protein levels can prevent the fusion of oil bodies and maintain oil body size during seed development [6,31,32]. Siloto et al. [33] suggested that a lack of oleosins caused fusion of oil bodies, leading to a decrease in oil content during the middle stage of seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Overexpression of GmOLEO1 was found to increase the numbers of oil bodies and oil accumulations in soybeans [34].
In this study, the expression patterns of the oleosin genes in high- and low-oil-content rapeseed inbred lines were analyzed during different developmental stages of the seed. The novel loci of the oleosin genes that affect the accumulation of seed oil content were further identified by resequencing 50 rapeseed accessions with 532,005 SNPs. A co-expression network was also employed to reveal the regulatory network of oleosin genes in the accumulation of oil content. Together, our findings lay a foundation for an enhanced understanding of the role of oleosin genes in the accumulation of oil content in B. napus.

2. Results

2.1. Genome-Wide Identification of Oleosin Family Genes in the Genome of B. napus

Based on the hidden Markov model (HMM) and BLAST analysis, 16 and 53 oleosin genes were identified in Arabidopsis and B. napus, respectively. Information on gene names, IDs, chromosomal locations, and amino acid numbers is listed in Table S1. In the present study, in order to analyze the evolutionary relationships of oleosin genes, a neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed based on 69 oleosin protein sequences that were divided into four lineages, namely, T, SL, SH, and U. The conserved motifs and exon and intron structures of the oleosin genes were then obtained (Figures S1 and S2). The T, SL, SH, and U lineages had 25, 8, 10, and 10 oleosin genes in B. napus, respectively. These results were consistent with the findings of Chen et al. [29].

2.2. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements in Oleosin Genes of B. napus

The cis-elements in 53 BnOLEO (B. napus oleosin) genes were analyzed using the PlantCARE database. Cis-acting elements were found in the promoter region of the BnOLEO gene family, including elements primarily related to light, phytohormone, and abiotic stress responses (Figure 1, Table S2). The cis-regulatory elements included light-responsive elements, such as G-box, Box 4, and GT1-motif; phytohormone-responsive elements, such as ABRE (involved in the abscisic acid response); CGTCA- and TGACG-motifs (involved in methyl jasmonate response); TCA-elements (involved in salicylic acid response); motifs related to abiotic and biotic stresses, such as ARE elements (essential for anaerobic induction); TC-rich repeats (involved in defense and stress responses), LTR (involved in low-temperature responsiveness); and MBS (MYB binding site involved in drought-inducibility); (Figure 1, Table S2). There were many light-responsive elements in the promoters of BnOLEO genes, including the G-box identified in the promoters of 53 BnOLEO genes (with 3.50 on average for each promoter), Box 4 elements present in 39 of the 53 BnOLEO gene promoters (with 2.67 on average for each promoter), and GT1-motif elements present in 31 BnOLEO gene promoters (with 2.10 on average for each promoter). In addition, 212 ABREs associated with hormone response were unevenly scattered in the promoters of 52 BnOLEO genes, which were most enriched in the SH lineage (54/10) but rare in the T lineage (80/25). A total of 198 methyl jasmonate (MeJA) response elements showed relatively unbiased distributions in both the SH and T lineages. Additionally, 156 ARE elements were found to be common in the promoters of 49 BnOLEO genes (with 3.18 on average for each promoter; Figure 1, Table S2). These results indicated that oleosin played a role in regulating light, hormone, and abiotic stress responses.

2.3. Prediction of TF Binding Sites in BnOLEO Genes

In order to investigate the regulation of TFs on the expressions of BnOLEO genes, the potential regulatory network of BnOLEO genes was inferred using PlantTFDB v5.0 (http://plantregmap.gao-lab.org/ (accessed on 10 May 2022)). The results showed that approximately 207 TFs from 25 TF gene families had potential target binding sites in the promoter region of BnOLEO genes (Figure 2, Table S3). The most enriched TFs belonged to the AP2/ERF superfamily containing the AP2/ERF domain (62 genes), WRKY DNA-binding protein (29 genes), basic leucine zipper (bZIP, 19 genes), DNA binding with one finger (Dof, 15 genes), and MYB (12 genes) families (Figure 2, Tables S3 and S4).

2.4. Expression Analysis of Oleosin Genes in B. napus with High and Low Oil Content

We investigated the expression of all oleosin genes in different tissues of Arabidopsis based on the Arabidopsis eFP Browser data (http://bar.utoronto.ca/efp/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi (accessed on 30 May 2022)) (Table S5). In Arabidopsis, the expression levels of oleosin genes in different lineages varied differently among different tissues. T lineage showed high expression levels in the flowering stage, but relatively low expression levels in other tissues. The expression levels of U, SL, and SH lineages gradually increased from seed stage 3 to 10 (exception for AtOLEO3), indicating that these lineages might be involved in seed development and oil content accumulation (Figure S3). Therefore, to investigate the expression patterns of oleosin genes in rapeseed, based on the gene expression database of two high-oil-content (HOC) and two low-oil-content (LOC) accessions, the expression profiles of BnOLEO genes at 25, 35, and 45 days after pollination (DAP) in two different environments were normalized to log10FPKM, and a heatmap was generated. The results showed that 16 oleosins belonging to the SH and SL lineages were expressed (Figure S4, Table S6). Among the 16 BnOLEO genes, BnOLEO3-C09, BnOLEO4-A02, BnOLEO4-A09, BnOLEO2-C04, BnOLEO1-C01, and BnOLEO7-A03 showed higher expression in the HOC accessions than in the LOC accessions at 25, 35, and 45 DAP in two different environments (Figure 3a). In order to validate the transcriptional profiling results, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to detect the transcript levels of 6 BnOLEO genes at 25, 35, and 45 DAP. The expression pattern of the genes obtained by qRT-PCR were consistent with the RNA-seq results, thereby confirming the accuracy of the RNA-seq data (Figure 3b).

2.5. Regional Association Analysis of Oleosin Genes

Regional association analysis detected 182.4 Kb (13,459,752–13,642,146 bp, r2 = 0.71) and 411.3 Kb (11,575,987–11,987,271 bp, r2 = 0.67) haplotype regions that were significantly associated with oil content on the A03 and C01 chromosomes in the 50 re-sequenced rapeseed inbred lines, respectively (Figure 4a and Figure S5a). In the two haplotype regions, three SNPs were located in the BnOLEO1-C01 and BnOLEO7-A03 gene regions, which showed associations with SOC (Figure 4a and Figure S5a). Two and three haplotype alleles were identified in the BnOLEO1-C01 and BnOLEO7-A03 gene regions, respectively (Figure 4b and Figure S5b). Comparative analysis of the two and three haplotype alleles related to SOC revealed that BnOLEO1-C01-Hap1 and BnOLEO7-A03-Hap1 corresponded to accessions that showed higher SOCs compared to other haplotype alleles (Figure 4 and Figure S5, and Table S7).

2.6. Co-Expression Analysis of Oleosin Genes

In order to further analyze the function of oleosin genes, the transcriptome data of seeds at different developmental stages were used to construct co-expression networks. The analysis yielded 14 gene modules, each represented by a different color in the output (Figure S6a). BnOLEO genes were distributed in the blue and yellow modules (Figure S6c). The blue and yellow modules represent significant positive and negative correlations with high and low oil contents, respectively (Figure S6b). In order to provide a biological explanation of the gene network in the blue and yellow modules related to the BnOLEO genes, gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses were conducted. In the blue module, in terms of the biological process ontology, the genes were mainly enriched for the ATP metabolic process (GO:0046034), ATP biosynthetic process (GO:0006754), and response to lipid (GO:0033993). For the molecular function ontology, the genes were mainly enriched for ATP binding (GO:0005524), carbohydrate derivative binding (GO:0097367), and lipase activator activity (GO:0060229; Figure S7 and Table S8), respectively. In the yellow module, the genes were mostly enriched for responses to high light intensity (GO:0009644), lipid storage (GO:0019915), and seed maturation (GO:0010431). For the cellular component ontology, the genes were mainly enriched for cytoplasm (GO:0005737) and lipid droplet (GO:0005811; Figure S7 and Table S8), respectively.
Based on functional annotation, the genes that were co-expressed with oleosin genes were further classified. 16 BnOLEO genes were directly linked to 165 genes, including 54, 50, 14, 21, and 13 genes related to TFs, lipid/fatty acid metabolism, lipid transport, photosynthesis, and carbohydrate metabolism, respectively (Figure 5; Table S9).

3. Discussion

In previous studies, when the main oleosin gene in Arabidopsis seeds was inhibited, the oil bodies became larger, with decreases in TAG accumulation levels [33,35]. Despite studies on genome-wide identification and functional analysis of oleosin genes in B. napus [29], the underlying molecular regulatory networks of the oleosin genes remain unclear. In this study, the promoters of 53 BnOLEO genes were studied for the presence of light-, hormone-, and stress-related cis-elements. Several types of light-responsive elements (for example, G-box, Box 4, and GT1-motif) and plant growth hormones, including abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and MeJA responsive elements, were identified in the candidate genes. Li et al. [36] suggested strong positive correlations between oil contents and different light intensities in Brassica species. Phytohormones play an important role in improving oil yield and quality by regulating several enzymatic activities and signaling responses [37]. Deletion of the G-box element was found to reduce the promoter activity for light and hormone responses [38]. Wu et al. [39] suggested that abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and MeJA at physiological concentrations played crucial roles in lipid accumulation. The occurrence of these cis-regulatory elements provided evidence of the role of BnOLEO genes in the accumulation of oil content in B. napus.
RNA-seq technology was used to investigate the expression patterns of oleosin genes at different stages of seed development among two HOC and two LOC inbred lines. In total, 16 oleosin genes in the SL and SH lineages were highly expressed during seed development, including BnOLEO3-C09, BnOLEO4-A02, BnOLEO4-A09, BnOLEO2-C04, BnOLEO1-C01, and BnOLEO7-A03 in the HOC accessions, compared to the LOC accessions at 25, 35, and 45 DAP, in two different environments (Figure 3a). These results indicated that oleosin genes played an important role in the seed oil biosynthesis in B. napus. Meanwhile, a regional association analysis revealed that BnOLEO1-C01-Hap1 and BnOLEO7-A03-Hap1 corresponded to accessions with higher seed oil contents compared to other haplotype alleles (Figure 4, Figure S5, and Table S7). The haplotype region on the A03 chromosome, where BnOLEO7-A03 is located, overlaps with a previously reported QTL [40]. Thus, these favorable haplotype alleles can be used to further improve SOCs in rapeseed.
In addition, co-expression network studies showed that 16 BnOLEO genes were directly linked to each other, as well as to TFs, including LEC1, WRI1, WRKY1, bZIP12, bZIP25, bZIP28, bZIP60, MYB44, MYB73, and MYB118. (Figure 5; Table S9). Prediction of the TF binding sites showed AP2/ERF, WRKY, bZIP, and MYB as the main gene families regulating oleosin genes (Figure 2, Table S3). TFs were found to be involved in positive or negative regulation of the expressions of genes responsible for oil content accumulation [41]. Over-expression of LEC1 was reported to cause upregulated expressions of FA synthetic genes, and promoted oil content accumulation in B. napus [42]. WRI1 was studied as a member of a plant-specific family of TFs (AP2/EREBP) involved in fatty acid production at the onset of the seed maturation phase in Arabidopsis [43]. ABI4 was found to encode an AP2/ERF TF involved in lipid mobilization in Arabidopsis embryos [44]. A bZIP family TF, bZIP53, was shown to form a ternary complex with bZIP10 or bZIP25 and ABI3, and promoted the expressions of seed maturation genes and lipid accumulations [45]. Overexpression of GmMYB73 was shown to enhance the lipid contents of transgenic Arabidopsis seeds and enhanced oil production in legume crop plants [46]. Barthole et al. [47] suggested that MYB118 repressing LEC2 expressions influenced FA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Oleosin genes were found to be directly linked to FA synthesis (e.g., CAC1, CAC2, CAC3, FAD3, KASI, MOD1, mtACP1, and mtACP2) and lipid transfer (ACBP1, ACBP2, ACBP6, LTP1, LTP2, LTP3, LTP5, and LTP6) genes in the co-expression network. Bhatla et al. [48] suggested that the co-expression of oleosins and genes involved in TAG biosynthesis increased oil contents. These results suggested that oleosin genes, TFs, and lipid transport-related genes form a complex network that helps to co-regulate seed oil accumulation in B. napus.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of Oleosin Genes in Arabidopsis and B. napus

Arabidopsis oleosin genes were searched for in The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/ (accessed on 18 December 2021)) [49], using oleosin as the keyword query. HMMER3.2 software was used to search against the B. napus protein sequences using the HMM file of oleosin (PF01277) that was downloaded from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/ (accessed on 1 January 2022)) [50]. The candidate BnOLEO proteins were obtained using E-values ≤ 1 × 10−5. The obtained Arabidopsis and B. napus oleosin sequences were confirmed using the NCBI Conserved Domain Search database [51]. When searching for sequence information, the numbers of amino acids, intron and exon numbers, coding sequence (CDS) lengths, and chromosomal locations of the oleosin genes were obtained from the CNS-Genoscope database [52].

4.2. Phylogenetic Analysis and Regulatory GENE Prediction of oleosin Genes

Multiple sequence alignments of all identified oleosin proteins in Arabidopsis and B. napus were conducted using ClustalW. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the NJ phylogenetic method in MEGA7 [53] with 1000 bootstrap replicates. TBtools was used to obtain 2000 bp of the genomic DNA sequence located upstream of the start codon. The PlantCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ (accessed on 9 May 2022)) was used to predict the cis-acting elements in the promoter sequences (−2000 bp) [54]. PlantTFDB database (http://plantregmap.gao-lab.org/ (accessed on 10 May 2022)) was used to predict the TF binding sites in the promoter sequences, and the parameter was set to a p value ≤ 1 × 10−6 [55].

4.3. Gene Structure and Conserved Motif Analysis

The conserved motifs of oleosin were analyzed with MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme (accessed on 11 March 2022)) [56], and the parameters were as follows: zoop (zero or one occurrence per sequence) was selected in site distribution, the width of motifs was 8 to 29, and the maximum number of motifs was set to 11. The exon–intron structures of the oleosin genes were analyzed by the Gene Structure Display Server 2.0 (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/ (accessed on 27 March 2022)) [57]. TBtools [58] was used to construct and merge the visualizations of all characteristic results.

4.4. Transcriptome Sequencing

Two HOC (ZY036 and ZY511) and two LOC (XY774-3 and XY15) Chinese semi-winter rapeseed inbred lines, obtained from Hunan Agricultural University in Changsha, China, were used for transcriptome profiling in our study. These four accessions were planted in Changsha (CS, 28.2282° N, 112.9388° E) and Kunming (KM, 25.0406° N, 102.7122° E). The total RNA of these four inbred lines was extracted from seeds using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 25, 35, and 45 DAP, and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. The total RNA from each accession was used to construct paired-end sequencing libraries according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Paired-end reads (125 bp) were evaluated using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Next, the raw data were preprocessed using the Illumina paired-end RNA-seq approach to remove adapter sequences, low-quality sequences (average quality scores less than 20), short sequences (lengths less than 100), and poly-A tails before assembly. Finally, high-quality sequencing data for each accession were generated.

4.5. Expression Analysis of Oleosin Genes

The high-quality reads were subsequently aligned to the Darmor-bzh reference genome v.4.1 [52] using HISAT2. HTSeq v.0.6.1 [59] was used to estimate the gene expression levels in the four accessions. The fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) of each gene were then calculated based on gene length and read counts [60]. A heatmap drawn by Heatmap Illustrator 1.0 (Hemi 1.0) was used to visualize the similarities and differences of the oleosin genes [61]. qRT-PCR was carried out to confirm the RNA-seq results. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TaKaRa Biotech, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Analysis of the results was performed using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master Mix and a LightCycler 480II real-time PCR system (Roche, Switzerland). BnEF was selected as the reference gene [62,63]. Three biological replicates and three measurements for each replicate were performed under identical conditions. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to estimate the relative expression levels [64]. The gene-specific primer sequences are listed in Table S10.

4.6. Regional Association Analysis

The re-sequencing of 50 rapeseed accessions was described in detail by Dong et al. [65], including removal of SNP loci with heterozygous rates > 0.25 and MAFs < 0.05. A total of 532,005 high-quality SNP markers were used to determine the correlations among oleosin genes and oil contents in 50 re-sequenced rapeseed inbred lines. Yao et al. [20] provided a detailed description of the population structure and a principal component analysis (PCA) of 50 Chinese semi-winter rapeseed accessions. Marker–trait associations were identified by TASSEL v.5.0 software [66] with a mixed linear model (MLM) [67]. Manhattan plots were constructed using the R package “qqman” [68]. In order to calculate the FDR threshold with the R package fdrtool [69], we estimated the significant associations between SNPs and seed oil content phenotypes using a threshold value of −log10(P) = 4.0.

4.7. Co-Expression Network

WGCNA is an effective way to identify clusters of highly correlated genes. The “WGCNA” R package [70] was used to construct co-expression networks with a cutoff value of 0.15 for the weight parameter. Visualization of the co-expression network was performed using Cytoscape v.3.6 [71]. GO enrichment analysis was completed by TBtools [58] and visualized using the R package, “ggplot2” [72].

5. Conclusions

The differentially expressed oleosin genes among two HOC and two LOC accessions were explored in B. napus. BnOLEO3-C09, BnOLEO4-A02, BnOLEO4-A09, BnOLEO2-C04, BnOLEO1-C01, and BnOLEO7-A03 showed higher expressions in the HOC accessions compared to the LOC accessions, at 25, 35, and 45 DAP, in two different environments. A regional association analysis revealed that the natural variations in the BnOLEO1-C01 and BnOLEO7-A03 gene regions were related to phenotypic variations in the oil content of 50 re-sequenced rapeseed accessions. A co-expression network analysis showed that the oleosin genes were directly related to lipid/fatty acid metabolism, TFs, and lipid transport- and carbohydrate-related genes, thus forming a molecular network involved in the potential regulation of seed oil accumulation. This study holds great significance for the development of oleosin gene-specific markers and molecular marker-assisted selection breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11223140/s1, Figure S1: Phylogenetic tree, gene structure, and gene motifs of oleosin of A. thaliana and B. napus; Figure S2: The average expression levels of Arabidopsis oleosin genes in developmental map; Figure S3: The average expression levels of Arabidopsis oleosin genes in developmental map; Figure S4: Expression patterns of oleosin genes in different stages of seed development after pollination in B. napus; Figure S5: Regional association analysis of seed oil contents of chromosome A03 with whole-genome resequencing of 50 accessions; Figure S6: Gene co-expression network construction; Figure S7: GO enrichment analyses of target module genes; Table S1: List of oleosin genes identified in Arabidopsis and B. napus; Table S2: The cis-elements on the promoter regions of oleosin genes in B. napus. Table S3: Transcription factor binding sites in the promoter region of oleosin genes in B. napus. Table S4: Number of transcription factors with potential binding sites in promoter regions of oleosin genes; Table S5: The average expression levels of Arabidopsis oleosin genes in developmental map; Table S6: The FPKM value of oleosin genes at different stages of seed development; Table S7: Detailed analysis of haplotype alleles of oleosin genes related to oil content in the haplotype regions of chromosome C01 and A03; Table S8: GO enrichment analyses of target module genes; Table S9: List of genes and their corresponding FPKM values in the co-expression subnetwork; Table S10: Primers used for qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Q.; methodology, Y.J. and M.Y.; software, Y.J. and M.Y.; formal analysis, Y.J., X.H., X.X. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J.; critically reviewed and corrected the manuscript, L.Q., M.G., Z.L. and C.G.; funding acquisition, L.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Science Foundation for Distinguished Youth Scholars of Hunan Province, China (grant number: 2022JJ10027) and Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (grant number: 21A0135).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Usda, E.R.S. Oil Crops Yearbook. 2014. Available online: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/oil-crops-yearbook.aspx (accessed on 27 December 2021).
  2. Nagaharu, U. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn. J. Bot 1935, 7, 389–452. [Google Scholar]
  3. Meyer, M. Rapeseed oil fuel-the crisis-proof home-made eco-fuel. Agrarforschung 2009, 16, 262–267. [Google Scholar]
  4. Weselake, R.J.; Taylor, D.C.; Rahman, M.H.; Shah, S.; Laroche, A.; McVetty, P.B.E.; Harwood, J.L. Increasing the flow of carbon into seed oil. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 866–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mekhedov, S.; de Ilárduya, O.M.; Ohlrogge, J. Toward a functional catalog of the plant genome. A survey of genes for lipid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Baud, S.; Lepiniec, L. Physiological and developmental regulation of seed oil production. Prog. Lipid Res. 2010, 49, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li-Beisson, Y.; Shorrosh, B.; Beisson, F.; Andersson, M.X.; Arondel, V.; Bates, P.D.; Baud, S.; Bird, D.; Debono, A.; Durrett, T.P. Acyl-lipid metabolism. Arab. Book 2013, 11, e0161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Burns, M.J.; Barnes, S.R.; Bowman, J.G.; Clarke, M.H.E.; Werner, C.P.; Kearsey, M.J. QTL analysis of an intervarietal set of substitution lines in Brassica napus: (i) Seed oil content and fatty acid composition. Heredity 2003, 90, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Delourme, R.; Falentin, C.; Huteau, V.; Clouet, V.; Horvais, R.; Gandon, B.; Specel, S.; Hanneton, L.; Dheu, J.E.; Deschamps, M. Genetic control of oil content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 113, 1331–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qiu, D.; Morgan, C.; Shi, J.; Long, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, R.; Zhuang, X.; Wang, Y.; Tan, X.; Dietrich, E. A comparative linkage map of oilseed rape and its use for QTL analysis of seed oil and erucic acid content. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 114, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, G.; Geng, J.; Rahman, M.; Liu, X.; Tu, J.; Fu, T.; Li, G.; McVetty, P.B.E.; Tahir, M. Identification of QTL for oil content, seed yield, and flowering time in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Euphytica 2010, 175, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, M.; Hua, W.; Liu, J.; Huang, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Wang, H. Design of new genome-and gene-sourced primers and identification of QTL for seed oil content in a specially high-oil Brassica napus cultivar. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, J.; Huang, J.; Chen, F.; Xu, F.; Ni, X.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Wang, H.; Xu, A. Molecular mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana lipid-related orthologous genes in Brassica napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jiang, C.; Shi, J.; Li, R.; Long, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, D.; Zhao, J.; Meng, J. Quantitative trait loci that control the oil content variation of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 957–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chao, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Guo, L.; Gu, J.; Zhao, W.; Li, B.; Chen, D.; Raboanatahiry, N.; Li, M. Genetic dissection of seed oil and protein content and identification of networks associated with oil content in Brassica napus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Liu, S.; Fan, C.; Li, J.; Cai, G.; Yang, Q.; Wu, J.; Yi, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, Y. A genome-wide association study reveals novel elite allelic variations in seed oil content of Brassica napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 1203–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Körber, N.; Bus, A.; Li, J.; Parkin, I.A.P.; Wittkop, B.; Snowdon, R.J.; Stich, B. Agronomic and seed quality traits dissected by genome-wide association mapping in Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tang, S.; Zhao, H.; Lu, S.; Yu, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Q.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.; Ma, W. Genome-and transcriptome-wide association studies provide insights into the genetic basis of natural variation of seed oil content in Brassica napus. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 470–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xiao, Z.; Zhang, C.; Tang, F.; Yang, B.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J.; Huo, Q.; Wang, S.; Li, S.; Wei, L. Identification of candidate genes controlling oil content by combination of genome-wide association and transcriptome analysis in the oilseed crop Brassica napus. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yao, M.; Guan, M.; Yang, Q.; Huang, L.; Xiong, X.; Jan, H.U.; Voss-Fels, K.P.; Werner, C.R.; He, X.; Qian, W. Regional association analysis coupled with transcriptome analyses reveal candidate genes affecting seed oil accumulation in Brassica napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021, 134, 1545–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yip, A.M.; Horvath, S. Gene network interconnectedness and the generalized topological overlap measure. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, W.; Lin, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, S.; Gao, K.; Lv, Y.; Tao, H.; He, H. Gene co-expression network analysis identifies trait-related modules in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2019, 249, 1487–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cui, Y.; Zeng, X.; Xiong, Q.; Wei, D.; Liao, J.; Xu, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhou, Y.; Dong, H.; Wan, H. Combining quantitative trait locus and co-expression analysis allowed identification of new candidates for oil accumulation in rapeseed. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 1649–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zou, X.; Liu, A.; Zhang, Z.; Ge, Q.; Fan, S.; Gong, W.; Li, J.; Gong, J.; Shi, Y.; Tian, B. Co-expression network analysis and hub gene selection for high-quality fiber in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) using RNA sequencing analysis. Genes 2019, 10, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Qi, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Yu, J.; Qin, H.; Mao, X.; Jiang, H.; Xin, D.; Yin, Z.; Zhu, R. Meta-analysis and transcriptome profiling reveal hub genes for soybean seed storage composition during seed development. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 2109–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Capuano, F.; Beaudoin, F.; Napier, J.A.; Shewry, P.R. Properties and exploitation of oleosins. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, M.D.; Huang, A.H.C. Bioinformatics reveal five lineages of oleosins and the mechanism of lineage evolution related to structure/function from green algae to seed plants. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 453–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, A.H.C. Plant lipid droplets and their associated proteins: Potential for rapid advances. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1894–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, K.; Yin, Y.; Liu, S.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, K.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, W.; Chao, H.; Li, M. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of oleosin genes in Brassica napus L. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Huang, A.H.C. Oleosins and Oil Bodies in Seeds and Other Organs. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 1055–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Krahmer, N.; Guo, Y.; Wilfling, F.; Hilger, M.; Lingrell, S.; Heger, K.; Newman, H.W.; Schmidt-Supprian, M.; Vance, D.E.; Mann, M. Phosphatidylcholine synthesis for lipid droplet expansion is mediated by localized activation of CTP: Phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase. Cell Metab. 2011, 14, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wu, Y.Y.; Chou, Y.R.; Wang, C.-S.; Tseng, T.H.; Chen, L.J.; Tzen, J.T.C. Different effects on triacylglycerol packaging to oil bodies in transgenic rice seeds by specifically eliminating one of their two oleosin isoforms. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Siloto, R.M.P.; Findlay, K.; Lopez-Villalobos, A.; Yeung, E.C.; Nykiforuk, C.L.; Moloney, M.M. The accumulation of oleosins determines the size of seed oilbodies in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1961–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, D.; Zhang, H.; Hu, Z.; Chu, S.; Yu, K.; Lv, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Kan, G. Artificial selection on GmOLEO1 contributes to the increase in seed oil during soybean domestication. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Shimada, T.L.; Shimada, T.; Takahashi, H.; Fukao, Y.; Hara-Nishimura, I. A novel role for oleosins in freezing tolerance of oilseeds in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 55, 798–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Y.; Beisson, F.; Pollard, M.; Ohlrogge, J. Oil content of Arabidopsis seeds: The influence of seed anatomy, light and plant-to-plant variation. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 904–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ashfaq, M.; Khan, S. Role of phytohormones in improving the yield of oilseed crops. In Oils Seed Crops: Yield and Adaptation under Environmental Stress, 1st ed.; Ahmad, P., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 165–183. [Google Scholar]
  38. Menkens, A.E.; Schindler, U.; Cashmore, A.R. The G-box: A ubiquitous regulatory DNA element in plants bound by the GBF family of bZIP proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1995, 20, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, G.; Gao, Z.; Du, H.; Lin, B.; Yan, Y.; Li, G.; Guo, Y.; Fu, S.; Wei, G.; Wang, M. The effects of abscisic acid, salicylic acid and jasmonic acid on lipid accumulation in two freshwater Chlorella strains. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 64, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Raboanatahiry, N.; Chao, H.; Guo, L.; Gan, J.; Xiang, J.; Yan, M.; Zhang, L.; Yu, L.; Li, M. Synteny analysis of genes and distribution of loci controlling oil content and fatty acid profile based on QTL alignment map in Brassica napus. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kumar, N.; Chaudhary, A.; Singh, D.; Teotia, S. Transcriptional regulation of seed oil accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana: Role of transcription factors and chromatin remodelers. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 754–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Elahi, N.; Duncan, R.W.; Stasolla, C. Modification of oil and glucosinolate content in canola seeds with altered expression of Brassica napus LEAFY COTYLEDON1. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 100, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cernac, A.; Benning, C. WRINKLED1 encodes an AP2/EREB domain protein involved in the control of storage compound biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2004, 40, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Penfield, S.; Li, Y.; Gilday, A.D.; Graham, S.; Graham, I.A. Arabidopsis ABA INSENSITIVE4 regulates lipid mobilization in the embryo and reveals repression of seed germination by the endosperm. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1887–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Alonso, R.; Oñate-Sánchez, L.; Weltmeier, F.; Ehlert, A.; Diaz, I.; Dietrich, K.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; Droge-Laser, W. A pivotal role of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor bZIP53 in the regulation of Arabidopsis seed maturation gene expression based on heterodimerization and protein complex formation. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1747–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Liu, Y.F.; Li, Q.T.; Lu, X.; Song, Q.X.; Lam, S.M.; Zhang, W.K.; Ma, B.; Lin, Q.; Man, W.Q.; Du, W.G. Soybean GmMYB73 promotes lipid accumulation in transgenic plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Barthole, G.; To, A.; Marchive, C.; Brunaud, V.; Soubigou-Taconnat, L.; Berger, N.; Dubreucq, B.; Lepiniec, L.; Baud, S. MYB118 represses endosperm maturation in seeds of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3519–3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bhatla, S.C.; Kaushik, V.; Yadav, M.K. Use of oil bodies and oleosins in recombinant protein production and other biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Goodstein, D.M.; Shu, S.; Howson, R.; Neupane, R.; Hayes, R.D.; Fazo, J.; Mitros, T.; Dirks, W.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N. Phytozome: A comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D1178–D1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Finn, R.D.; Mistry, J.; Tate, J.; Coggill, P.; Heger, A.; Pollington, J.E.; Gavin, O.L.; Gunasekaran, P.; Ceric, G.; Forslund, K. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D211–D222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Gonzales, N.R.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; He, J.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D222–D226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Chalhoub, B.; Denoeud, F.; Liu, S.; Parkin, I.A.P.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Chiquet, J.; Belcram, H.; Tong, C.; Samans, B. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 2014, 345, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jin, J.; Tian, F.; Yang, D.C.; Meng, Y.Q.; Kong, L.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. PlantTFDB 4.0: Toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 45, D1040–D1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Anders, S.; Pyl, P.T.; Huber, W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Trapnell, C.; Roberts, A.; Goff, L.; Pertea, G.; Kim, D.; Kelley, D.R.; Pimentel, H.; Salzberg, S.L.; Rinn, J.L.; Pachter, L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Deng, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, H.; Xue, Y. HemI: A toolkit for illustrating heatmaps. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nesi, N.; Lucas, M.O.; Auger, B.; Baron, C.; Lécureuil, A.; Guerche, P.; Kronenberger, J.; Lepiniec, L.; Debeaujon, I.; Renard, M. The promoter of the Arabidopsis thaliana BAN gene is active in proanthocyanidin-accumulating cells of the Brassica napus seed coat. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Fang, H.; Shi, H.; Chen, K.; Zhang, Z.; Tan, X. Selection of reference genes for quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction normalization in Brassica napus under various stress conditions. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2014, 289, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dong, H.; Tan, C.; Li, Y.; He, Y.; Wei, S.; Cui, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wei, D.; Fu, Y.; He, Y. Genome-wide association study reveals both overlapping and independent genetic loci to control seed weight and silique length in Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Bradbury, P.J.; Zhang, Z.; Kroon, D.E.; Casstevens, T.M.; Ramdoss, Y.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2633–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Yu, J.; Pressoir, G.; Briggs, W.H.; Bi, I.V.; Yamasaki, M.; Doebley, J.F.; McMullen, M.D.; Gaut, B.S.; Nielsen, D.M.; Holland, J.B. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Turner, S.D. qqman: An R package for visualizing GWAS results using QQ and manhattan plots. J. Open Source Softw. 2018, 3, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Strimmer, K. fdrtool: A versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1461–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Langfelder, P.; Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Smoot, M.E.; Ono, K.; Ruscheinski, J.; Wang, P.L.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape 2.8: New features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 431–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Villanueva, R.A.M.; Chen, Z.J. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Meas. Interdiscip. Res. Perspect. 2019, 17, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 03140 g001 550
Figure 1. Analysis of cis-elements in the promoter regions of oleosin genes. The presence of different cis-acting elements was determined by the PlantCARE database.
Figure 1. Analysis of cis-elements in the promoter regions of oleosin genes. The presence of different cis-acting elements was determined by the PlantCARE database.
Plants 11 03140 g001
Plants 11 03140 g002 550
Figure 2. Transcription factor (TF) binding site analysis in the oleosin gene promoter. Boxes with different colors represent different transcription factor families. “+” and “−” represent positive and negative strands, respectively.
Figure 2. Transcription factor (TF) binding site analysis in the oleosin gene promoter. Boxes with different colors represent different transcription factor families. “+” and “−” represent positive and negative strands, respectively.
Plants 11 03140 g002
Plants 11 03140 g003 550
Figure 3. Expression patterns of oleosin genes at different stages of seed development after pollination in B. napus. (a) The heatmap is generated by comparing the relative results of different genes in different periods. Red, blue, and white indicate high, low, and medium expression levels, respectively. (b) qRT-PCR analysis of relative expression levels. The relative qRT-PCR expression levels (blue bar) are shown on the left y-axis. The RNA-Seq values (orange line) are shown on the right y-axis. BnEF was used as the reference gene. The relative transcript levels were averaged over the three technical replicates. LOC, low-oil content; HOC, high-oil content; CS, Changsha; KM, Kunming.
Figure 3. Expression patterns of oleosin genes at different stages of seed development after pollination in B. napus. (a) The heatmap is generated by comparing the relative results of different genes in different periods. Red, blue, and white indicate high, low, and medium expression levels, respectively. (b) qRT-PCR analysis of relative expression levels. The relative qRT-PCR expression levels (blue bar) are shown on the left y-axis. The RNA-Seq values (orange line) are shown on the right y-axis. BnEF was used as the reference gene. The relative transcript levels were averaged over the three technical replicates. LOC, low-oil content; HOC, high-oil content; CS, Changsha; KM, Kunming.
Plants 11 03140 g003
Plants 11 03140 g004 550
Figure 4. Regional association analysis of seed oil content on chromosome C01 by whole-genome resequencing of 50 accessions. (a) Haplotype region (11,575,987–11,987,271 bp, r2 = 0.67) was significantly associated with seed oil content. The chrC01:11,674,520, chrC01:11,674,742, and chrC01:11,677,187 SNPs are located in the promoter and UTR of BnOLEO1-C01 (BnaC01g17050D) in the haplotype region, respectively. The heatmap shows that these SNPs have a strong LD. (b) Two haplotype alleles with frequencies greater than 0.01 were identified in BnOLEO1-C01. (c) Comparative analysis of two haplotype alleles related to the oil contents of inbred lines. The boxplots show that BnOLEO1-C01-Hap1 has a higher oil content than BnOLEO1-C01-Hap2. *: p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. Regional association analysis of seed oil content on chromosome C01 by whole-genome resequencing of 50 accessions. (a) Haplotype region (11,575,987–11,987,271 bp, r2 = 0.67) was significantly associated with seed oil content. The chrC01:11,674,520, chrC01:11,674,742, and chrC01:11,677,187 SNPs are located in the promoter and UTR of BnOLEO1-C01 (BnaC01g17050D) in the haplotype region, respectively. The heatmap shows that these SNPs have a strong LD. (b) Two haplotype alleles with frequencies greater than 0.01 were identified in BnOLEO1-C01. (c) Comparative analysis of two haplotype alleles related to the oil contents of inbred lines. The boxplots show that BnOLEO1-C01-Hap1 has a higher oil content than BnOLEO1-C01-Hap2. *: p ≤ 0.05.
Plants 11 03140 g004
Plants 11 03140 g005 550
Figure 5. Co-expression network analysis of BnOLEO genes.
Figure 5. Co-expression network analysis of BnOLEO genes.
Plants 11 03140 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, Y.; Yao, M.; He, X.; Xiong, X.; Guan, M.; Liu, Z.; Guan, C.; Qian, L. Transcriptome and Regional Association Analyses Reveal the Effects of Oleosin Genes on the Accumulation of Oil Content in Brassica napus. Plants 2022, 11, 3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223140

AMA Style

Jia Y, Yao M, He X, Xiong X, Guan M, Liu Z, Guan C, Qian L. Transcriptome and Regional Association Analyses Reveal the Effects of Oleosin Genes on the Accumulation of Oil Content in Brassica napus. Plants. 2022; 11(22):3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Yuan, Min Yao, Xin He, Xinghua Xiong, Mei Guan, Zhongsong Liu, Chunyun Guan, and Lunwen Qian. 2022. "Transcriptome and Regional Association Analyses Reveal the Effects of Oleosin Genes on the Accumulation of Oil Content in Brassica napus" Plants 11, no. 22: 3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop