Next Article in Journal
Infrared Thermal Imaging and Morpho-Physiological Indices Used for Wheat Genotypes Screening under Drought and Heat Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Waste from Artichoke Processing Industry: Reuse in Bread-Making and Evaluation of the Physico-Chemical Characteristics of the Final Product
Previous Article in Journal
Volatile Oil Chemical Composition of Wild, Edible Centaurea scabiosa L. and Its Cytotoxic Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protein Maps for Durum Wheat Precision Harvest and Pasta Production
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 23
10.3390/plants11233268
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors (ATIs) in a Selection of Ancient and Modern Wheat: Effect of Genotype and Growing Environment on Inhibitory Activities

by
Emanuela Simonetti
,
Sara Bosi
*,
Lorenzo Negri
and
Giovanni Dinelli
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(23), 3268; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233268
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 17 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Evaluation and Functional Food Development of Cereals, Pseudocereals and Pulse Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Wheat amylase-trypsin inhibitors (ATIs) are a family of plant defense proteins with an important role in human health for their involvement in allergies, celiac disease and non-celiac wheat sensitivity. Information about the differences in ATI activities among wheat genotypes and the influence of the growing environment is scarce. Therefore, ten selected wheat accessions with different ploidy level and year of release, previously characterized for their ATI gene sequences, were grown during three consecutive crop years at two growing areas and used for in vitro ATI activities. The contributions of the genotype and the crop year were significant for both activities. The hexaploid wheat genotypes showed the highest inhibitory activities. Einkorn had a peculiar behavior showing the lowest alpha-amylase inhibitory activity, but the highest trypsin inhibitory activity. It was not possible to observe any trend in ATI activities as a function of the release year of the wheat samples. The two inhibitory activities were differently affected by the growing conditions and were negatively correlated with the protein content. This information can be important in understanding the extent of variation of ATI inhibitory properties in relation to the wheat genotype and the growing environment and the impact of ATIs, if any, on human health and nutrition.

1. Introduction

Wheat amylase-trypsin inhibitors (ATIs) are a family of water-soluble proteins with low molecular weight and account for about 2–4% of total wheat protein [1]. Four groups of ATIs have been identified: three groups of alpha-amylase inhibitors are classified according to their degree of aggregation—monomeric (WMAI), homodimeric (WDAI) and heterotetrameric forms (WTAI)—and one group of trypsin inhibitors which are monomeric [2]. In modern hexaploid wheat, five sub-units of tetrameric inhibitors have been identified: CM1, CM2, CM3, CM16 and CM17. Tetrameric inhibitors are generally composed by one copy of either CM1 or CM2 sub-unit, plus one copy of either CM16 or CM17 sub-unit, plus two copies of CM3 sub-unit.
ATIs are accumulated at high levels in the endosperm of the grain kernel where they give an important contribution to plant defense against pests and pathogens [2]. They can inhibit amylases and/or trypsin or other proteases in many common parasites such as mealworms and mealy bugs from digesting starch and protein in wheat [3]. ATIs also function as storage proteins. With a more balanced amino acid composition compared to gluten proteins which are rich in glutamine and proline, ATIs make an important contribution to both seedling growth and human nutrition [4].
Regarding the impact on human health, ATIs are involved in bakers’ eczema, asthma and food allergy, [5] and, recently, they have gained an increasing interest for having a role in the etiology of celiac disease and non-celiac wheat sensitivity [6]. Studies carried out in vitro and in vivo in animals evidenced that ATIs can activate the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) complex playing a role in wheat as a main nutritional trigger of human and murine innate immunity [6,7,8]. ATIs can also act indirectly by suppressing the activity of digestive enzymes, namely trypsin and alpha-amylases, leading to a wide spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms [9].
In recent years, there has been an increasing interest from consumers and farmers in landraces and old wheat varieties which are wheat species that remained unchanged over the last hundred years, in contrast to modern species released after 1950, i.e., after the phase commonly referred to as the “Green Revolution” [10]. Several studies highlighted their healthier nutritional profile and their higher antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties compared to the modern wheat varieties. Although the mechanisms responsible for these beneficial effects are not completely understood, a different protein composition, a higher mineral content and a better phytochemical profile of ancient wheat genotypes seem to be the main determinants [11].
There are few and, in some cases, contrasting data in the literature about the differences in ATIs existing between different wheat genotypes and, in particular, between ancient and modern wheat varieties. Data concerning the inflammatory potential of ATIs (determined as pro-inflammatory cytokine release in TLR4-responsive mouse and human cell lines) from different wheat varieties showed that modern hexaploid wheat contained higher ATI inflammatory activity than some ancient variants like diploid (einkorn) and tetraploid wheat (emmer, khorasan wheat) or older hexaploid variants like spelt [8]. Regarding the evaluation of in vitro ATI inhibitory activities, recent studies did not find differences between ancient and modern wheat cultivars [9,12]. However, some of these studies were missing information about the growing conditions of the tested wheat varieties; moreover, the ATI gene sequence diversity among the wheat varieties tested was not known.
In the present study, ten selected wheat accessions with different ploidy level and year of release, previously characterized for their ATI gene sequences [13], were grown during three consecutive crop years at two growing areas (Italy and USA) and used for in vitro alpha-amylase and trypsin inhibitory activities with the aim to find possible differences among the wheat genotypes. Correlations between inhibitory activities, growing environment and genetic background of the wheat genotypes have been investigated and discussed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating ATI activities of ancient and modern wheat genotypes with different ploidy levels, previously characterized for their ATI gene sequences and grown in different environments and in different crop years.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Grain Samples

Ten selected samples belonging to different Triticum species were grown under organic farming management for three consecutive crop years at two locations in the USA and in Italy. At the American location, it was not possible to harvest Peliss wheat in 2016 and 2017 and emmer harvested in 2016 was not included in the analyses because it was destroyed while in storage.
The meteorological data (temperature and rain) recorded at both sites are shown in Figure 1.
All the wheat genotypes were tested for their protein contents and levels of mycotoxins (DON), and results are shown in Table 1.
In general, samples grown in the USA showed higher protein contents than those cultivated in Italy. This agrees with the fact that, compared to Italy, in Montana (USA) the average wheat yields are typically lower and the protein contents are higher [14]. All the levels of mycotoxins (DON) measured in this study were below the maximum limit allowed both for raw material durum wheat and oat (1750 ppb) and for the other raw material cereals (1250 ppb) (EU legislation n. 1881/2006). However, in the USA during the first crop year (2015–2016), there were values of DON content higher than the detection limit of analysis (200 ppb) in some samples, likely as consequence of more rainfall in the spring and summer registered in 2016 compared to the same period in 2017 and 2018. Similarly, in Italy the precipitation in spring was most abundant in 2019, and this resulted in positive DON levels in 8 out of 10 wheat genotypes harvested in 2019, all of which were below the EU legislation limit.

2.2. Alpha-Amylase Inhibitory Activity Assay

The results of the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity showed that there was high variability among the ten wheat genotypes analyzed (Table 2).
The general linear model (GLM) highlighted that the contribution of the fixed (genotype) and the random (year) factors, as well as their interactions, to the variability of the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity was significant in both growing areas. Similarly, another study showed that inhibitory activities against human saliva alpha-amylase in two cultivars of T. aestivum, triticale and rye were significantly affected by the variety, genus and year of harvest as sources of changes [15]. However, they could not highlight an effect of the year of harvest in relation to the wheat variety to the variability of the inhibitory activities.
In this study, the mean values for the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity ranged between 1.12% and 66.63%, with the lowest activity observed in einkorn samples in both growing areas. In general, except for emmer, the hexaploid wheat genotypes showed higher inhibitory activities than tetraploid and diploid wheat genotypes. Interestingly, these results are supported by the ATI gene sequences obtained previously from the same samples used in this study [13]. In fact, considering the WDAI (wheat homodimeric amylase inhibitors) gene sequences, the haplotypes showing a perfect homology with the three inhibitor spots important for the human alpha-amylase inhibitory activity [16] were present only in hexaploid wheat genotypes which also showed the highest alpha-amylase inhibitory activity in this study. The important contribution of WDAI to the total inhibitory activity is known in the literature. A previous study showed, in fact, that WDAI 0.19, even if consisted of 24.9% of total wheat albumin, contributed approximately 80% to the inhibiting activities against human alpha-amylase [17].
Considering the results of the alpha-amylase inhibitory activities, it was not possible to highlight differences between ancient and modern wheat genotypes. The same conclusions were reported by Gelinas et al. [9] who also highlighted that most of the hexaploid wheat cultivars had higher alpha-amylase inhibitory activity than tetraploids. Interestingly, within the common wheat genotypes, most of the hard red spring wheat tested by Gelinas et al. had higher alpha-amylase inhibitory activity than the hard red winter wheat. However, they did not have any information about the growing conditions and the agronomic performance of the tested wheat genotypes. In this study, the hard red winter common wheat genotypes (Turkey Red and Judee) showed higher activities than the hard red spring common wheat genotypes (Marquis and Vida) in the USA where a winter and a spring cycle, respectively, were used. Differently, in Italy where a winter cycle was used for all the wheat genotypes, Marquis showed a similar inhibitory activity than Turkey Red and Judee, but Vida seemed not to be influenced by the different growing cycle adopted in Italy and showed similar inhibitory activities as in the USA.
As mentioned above, the lowest activity was observed in einkorn samples in both growing areas with values much lower than the other wheat samples or even close to zero. These results agree with previous studies based on immunological, mass spectrometry and colorimetric tests [18,19,20,21]. It was previously suggested that the apparent absence of alpha-amylase inhibitory activity of einkorn could be explained by the fact that the corresponding coding genes might be expressed at very low level or even silenced, perhaps as a result of gene mutations that prevent the translation into the mature protein [22]. This hypothesis is confirmed by the gene sequencing results obtained previously from the same einkorn sample used in this study [13]. In fact, Simonetti and colleagues could not find any WTAI-CM3 gene sequence in einkorn, and, consequently, it should not be able to produce tetrameric alpha-amylase inhibitor proteins. Moreover, all the WDAI gene sequences of einkorn showed an insertion of C at position 160 which resulted in a premature stop codon which caused the impossibility to synthesize the correct WDAI mature protein. Lastly, einkorn showed functional WMAI gene sequences, but it is known that WMAI proteins weakly inhibit the human alpha-amylases [23]. On the other hand, WMAI proteins are highly active against alpha-amylase of Tenebrio molitor, and this could be related to the well-known high resistance of einkorn to pest and disease [21]. So, the results obtained in this study regarding the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity of einkorn are supported by the corresponding ATI gene sequences.
The mean values for each genotype in the three crop years are shown in Figure 2a (USA) and Figure 2b (Italy).
In the USA, 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 crop years showed higher alpha-amylase inhibitory activities than 2015–2016. All the wheat genotypes showed a similar trend among the three crop years with the exceptions of einkorn and turanicum samples which significantly increased and decreased, respectively, their activities in 2017–2018. As it is shown in Figure 1, in the USA there was more rainfall in spring and summer in 2016 compared to the same period in 2017 and 2018. More specifically, in May and July 2016 there was a double amount of precipitation compared to the averages reported in that area [24]. Considering that the last months before harvest are crucial for the kernels’ filling, it is interesting to note that the higher rainfall during the period May–August in 2016, compared to the same period in 2017 and 2018, corresponded to the lowest level of alpha-amylase inhibitory activity.
In Italy, the highest alpha inhibitory activities were in 2016–2017 and the lowest in 2018–2019. Overall, there were not samples showing a different trend compared to the average. The precipitation was most abundant in the last months before the harvest in 2019 (period April–July). In particular, the amount of precipitation in May was double compared to the averages for that area [25], and as seen in the USA, in this year the wheat samples showed the lowest levels of alpha-amylase inhibitory activity.
In both growing areas, higher precipitation resulted in higher DON content in wheat genotypes, but corresponded to lower alpha-amylase inhibitory activities, differently from what could be expected for a class of protein involved in plant defense. However, it should be taken into consideration that it is known in the literature that each type of ATIs shows different specificities against different enzymes [26], and in this study the inhibitory properties have been studied against mammalian enzymes.
Regarding the mean high temperatures for the same period analyzed for precipitation, the lowest values were registered in 2016 in the USA and in 2019 in Italy (Figure 1) which corresponded to the lowest levels of alpha-amylase inhibitory activity, highlighting a positive trend with these activities in both growing areas.
The two cultivation areas affected the wheat genotypes differently. Einkorn, Peliss, Alzada and Turkey Red all showed significantly higher alpha-amylase inhibitory activities in USA (Figure 3).
There were negative correlations between the protein content and the alpha-amylase inhibitory activities both in the USA (r = −0.626; p < 0.01) and in Italy (r = −0.526; p < 0.01). This agrees with Prandi et al. [27] who previously observed that locations that yielded more protein content consistently produced lower amounts of CM3 ATI.

2.3. Trypsin Inhibitory Activity Assay

As for the alpha-amylase inhibitory activities, the trypsin inhibitory activities showed a high variability among the ten wheat genotypes analyzed (Table 3).
The general linear model (GLM) showed that the contribution of the fixed (genotype) and the random (year) factors to the variability of the trypsin inhibitory activity were significant, but not their interactions. Previously Piasecka et al. [15] showed that inhibitory activities against bovine trypsin in two cultivars of T. aestivum, triticale and rye were statistically significant in all sources of changes (variety, genus, year of harvest as well as interaction between them).
The mean values of the trypsin inhibitory activity ranged between 18.61% and 100%, with the lowest activity observed in the Peliss sample and the highest activity observed in the einkorn sample in both growing areas and in all three crop years.
After einkorn, the hexaploid wheat genotypes Turkey Red, Judee and Marquis showed the highest inhibitory activities in both growing areas. Moreover, as for the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity, it was not possible to observe any trend as a function of the release year of wheat samples. These results are in line with the ATI gene sequence analysis results on the same wheat samples [13] and with previous studies which evaluated the ATI concentration in ancient and modern wheat. D’Amico et al. [28] used a new RP-HPLC method to determine the quantitative levels of ATIs in Austrian wheat varieties from the 19th century up to the present day and found a high variation among the samples. However, they could not highlight any correlation between ATI content and the year of release of the samples. Another study [29] determined the content of eight ATI proteins and the total ATI of 149 European old and modern bread-wheat cultivars grown at three different field locations, and also in this case it was not possible to find any trends regarding ATI content in wheat cultivars and their breeding history. All these cited studies suggest that the beneficial effects of ancient wheat on human health evidenced in recent studies are likely linked to other characteristics of these grains other than their ATI activity.
The hard red winter common wheat genotypes (Turkey Red and Judee) showed higher activities than the hard red spring common wheat genotypes (Marquis and Vida) in the USA where they were cultivated on a winter and on a spring cycle, respectively. However, in Italy where all the genotypes were cultivated on a winter cycle, Marquis showed a similar inhibitory activity as Turkey Red and Judee, but Vida seemed not to be influenced by the different growing cycle adopted in Italy and showed similar inhibitory activities as in the USA. Interestingly, the same behavior of Marquis and Vida samples were observed in this study for the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity. So, besides the genotype, it seems that also the crop cycle can influence the expression of these inhibitors. However, further studies on more samples are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Data regarding trypsin inhibitory activity of wheat are very scarce in the literature. A few studies compared trypsin inhibitory activity in wheat with other cereals and legumes and showed that it is much lower in wheat than in rye, triticale and soybean [15,30]. Regarding more specifically the genus Triticum, Priya et al. [26] found large variation in trypsin inhibitory activity against insect and bovine trypsin in 54 genotypes of T. aestivum.
The absence of correlation between the release year of wheat samples and the trypsin inhibitor activity and the high activities observed in einkorn samples are in line with what is observed in a recent paper where the authors analyzed the ATI concentrations and trypsin inhibitor activities in a set of different Triticum species [12]. They also obtained the lowest activity with emmer samples unlike this study where emmer sample showed a low activity only when grown in the USA with a spring cycle. They could not find any correlation between the ATI concentrations and the trypsin inhibitor activities in einkorn and they hypothesized the presence of other proteins showing high affinity to trypsin. In fact, previously, Taddei et al. [31] and then Sielaff et al. [32] found specific einkorn trypsin inhibitors (ETIs), not detected in durum and soft wheat, that can explain the high trypsin inhibitory activity in einkorn despite the low levels of detected ATIs. The ATI gene sequences determined by Simonetti et al. [13] highlighted a separate genetic profile of einkorn from the other nine wheat samples, and this can support the distinct inhibitory activities of einkorn (lowest alpha-amylase and highest trypsin inhibitory activities) obtained in this study using the same wheat sample.
Regarding the interaction of the trypsin inhibitory activity with the crop year, as shown in Table 3, in the USA the 2015–2016 crop year showed the highest and 2016–2017 the lowest trypsin inhibitory activities. In Italy, the highest trypsin inhibitory activities were in 2016–2017 and the lowest in 2018–2019. All the genotypes showed a similar trend among the three crop years both in the USA and in Italy (Figure 4a,b).
Considering the same period analyzed for alpha-amylase inhibitory activities, the highest precipitation corresponded to the lowest trypsin inhibitory activity in Italy (2018–2019), but to the highest trypsin inhibitory activity in the USA (2015–2016). Similarly, the lowest values for the mean high temperatures corresponded to the lowest trypsin inhibitory activity in Italy (2018–2019), but to the highest trypsin inhibitory activity in the USA (2015–2016) (Figure 1 and Table 3). So, the trypsin inhibitory activities in Italy showed the same trends with respect to rainfall and high mean temperature as seen for the alpha-amylase inhibitory activities in both areas, but in the USA these trends were opposite.
Genotypes responded differently to the growing areas; in particular emmer, Judee, Turkey Red and Alzada showed significantly higher trypsin activities in the USA, even three times more considering emmer (Figure 5).
As for the alpha-amylase inhibitory activities, there were negative correlations between the protein content and the trypsin inhibitory activities both in the USA (r = −0.273; p < 0.01) and in Italy (r = −0.489; p < 0.01).

2.4. ATI Inhibitory Activity, Genotype and Growing Environment

To highlight the contribution of genotype and crop year and their interaction to the variability of alpha-amylase and trypsin inhibitory activity, the mean square values of each factor (obtained from general linear model elaborations) have been reported in Table 4 and expressed as the percentage values of the total mean square (excluding mean square of error factor).
The wheat genotype had the most effect on the inhibitory activities of both locations, representing 55–65% of the variability, which was higher for trypsin inhibitory activity especially in Italy where it exerted a predominant effect (91.5%). Genotype × Year interaction was small but significant for alpha-amylase inhibitor activity and non-significant for trypsin inhibitory activity. This indicates a higher stability of trypsin inhibitors which seem to be less influenced by the climatic conditions compared to alpha-amylase inhibitors, especially in Italy. A possible explanation could be provided by the type of soil in the two test areas. In fact, the soil in Italy was clay–loam which is known to be able to retain moisture and so to keep more constant the moisture level in the soil unlike the soil in the USA which was sandy–loam and so prone to moisture loss. A more constant level of moisture in Italy could have stimulated less enzyme activity, especially of trypsin inhibitors which were less affected by the environment than alpha-amylase inhibitors in both Italy and the USA. As a result, the genotype had a significantly higher contribution on the variability of trypsin inhibitory activity in Italy.
Besides genetic factors, the results shown in Table 4 suggest that also the crop year gave an important contribution to the variability of ATI activity in the wheat grains. In this study, different climatic conditions corresponded to different inhibitory activities of wheat genotypes. In both cultivation areas, higher precipitation and lower mean-high temperatures were observed during the spring and summer of the year characterized by the lowest alpha-amylase inhibitory activities, while there were opposite trends for the two growing areas regarding trypsin inhibitory activity.
Figure 3 and Figure 5 showed that the mean values of both alpha-amylase and trypsin inhibitory activity were lower in Italy compared to the USA for most wheat genotypes. As explained above, the soil in Italy was clay–loam which is known to be able to retain moisture unlike the soil in the USA which was sandy–loam. Moreover, Figure 1 shows in the months just before harvest the curve related to mean high temperatures is always over the curve of precipitation in the USA unlike in Italy. So, considering both the soil types and the meteorological data, it is likely that in Italy there was higher availability of water compared to the USA for the three years of the study, and that corresponded to lower ATI activities in Italy, confirming again the negative trend between ATI activity and precipitation in Italy.
A previous study also highlighted a negative correlation between the monthly precipitation (particularly in January and in March) and the alpha-inhibitory activities in two cultivars of T. aestivum against the hog pancreas alpha-amylase, but not against human alpha-amylase and insects α-amylase [15]. Other studies showed that high-temperature and water-deficit stress conditions can influence the ATI levels in seed, indicating a possible stress-related function of ATIs from seed germination through seed development [33,34,35]. Moreover, another study showed that wheat endosperm expressed alpha-amylase inhibitors in response to the reduced starch as a result of drought stress [36]. The growing location had a significant impact on the amounts of CM3 WTAI [27,32]. All these studies confirmed what was observed in the present study that, besides genetic factors, also the growing environment and the climatic conditions influence the ATI activity in the wheat grains.
The inhibitory activities were measured in this study against mammalian enzymes. It is known from the literature that each type of ATI has a different specificity and that it can be differentially activated by different types of stress. Further studies are needed to understand possible mechanisms able to modulate the enzymatic activity in response to different types of biotic stress.

2.5. ATI-Inhibitory Activity and Human Nutrition

ATIs have also a relevant place in human nutrition. Besides their role in allergies and in the etiology of celiac disease and non-celiac wheat sensitivity [6], ATIs can act indirectly by suppressing the activity of digestive enzymes, namely trypsin and alpha-amylase, with two independent binding sites [4,37] and with consequent impact on human health.
Inhibition of alpha-amylase activity leads to accumulation of undigested and unabsorbed starchy constituents which are fermented in the distal gut by the microbial flora and can cause mild to moderate symptoms, including flatulence and bloating, in sensitive individuals to carbohydrate malabsorption [38]. These symptoms are also reported by non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients after consuming wheat products [39]. However, the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity of wheat-based food has significant relevance for its dietary and therapeutic support to potentially maintain postprandial glucose homeostasis, which is essential for prevention and overall management of early-stages type 2 diabetes [40].
High trypsin inhibitory activities can be negative from a nutritional point of view because these can limit the absorption of protein during food assumption which decreases its nutritional usefulness [41]. It was previously described that an excessive amount of trypsin inhibitors in food can progressively lead to pancreas hyperplasia or hypertrophy and is correlated to a higher risk of pancreatic cancer. Imbalanced and uncontrolled proteolysis can also lead to tissue damage such as inflammation, hypertension, gastric ulcer, tumor growth and metastasis [42]. For these reasons, protease inhibitors are considered “antinutritional compounds”, due to their inhibitory activity on digestive enzymes in humans and animals.
According to the results of this study, the genotypes which showed in general the lowest inhibitory activities against both alpha-amylase and trypsin and could be better tolerated by people suffering from wheat sensitivities were turanicum and Alzada, while the highest activities were shown by the hexaploid Judee, Turkey Red and Marquis. In line with these results, consumption of T. turgidum ssp. turanicum wheat-based products has been previously shown to improve symptoms in people suffering from irritable bowel syndrome [43]. Moreover, considering the potential effect on glycemic control, emmer cultivated in Italy showed the best combination for diabetic people with high alpha-amylase inhibitory activity, but low trypsin inhibitory activity. The evidenced differences, even if they require confirmation in further studies also in vivo, can be useful information for the selection of the better genotypes for specific food needs.
The effect of ATIs on the human organism highly depends on how these proteins are processed by the digestive enzymes. ATIs are members of the prolamin superfamily, and these proteins are characterized by having high resistance to digestion and denaturation [7]. However, a recent study showed that the ATIs found in two varieties of einkorn were completely digested by gastrointestinal enzymes with the result that these einkorn samples failed to induce innate immune response in vivo, unlike the modern common wheat varieties included in the same study [44]. So, the effect of ATIs in the human body highly depends on the specific variety of wheat selected as a source of these proteins. These findings suggest that the gut digestion could neutralize the high trypsin inhibitory activity of einkorn shown in this study and, consequently, its potential negative effect on the human body. It could be hypothesized that the result of an in vivo effect of digestive enzymes could evidence differences among wheat genotypes not highlighted in vitro in the present study. Therefore, additional in vivo studies are needed to deepen knowledge on the differential effect of gastrointestinal enzymes on ATIs from different wheat genotypes and the resulting impact on human health.
Recent studies showed that activity and pro-inflammatory properties of ATIs can be lost also as a consequence of food processing, such as bread making, sourdough fermentation and baking [45,46] as well as pasta cooking [47]. Moreover, little residual inhibitory activity towards alpha-amylase from human saliva was detected in commercial and laboratory-made cereal foods [48]. So, both the alpha-amylase and trypsin inhibitory activities should be tested for the resistance to the digestive enzymes and to food processing to assess their residual activity before drawing final conclusions about the impact of a specific wheat genotype on human health.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Grain Samples

The present study included ten selected accessions belonging to different Triticum species, i.e., T. monococcum L. subsp. monococcum (2n = 2x = 14 chromosomes, AA genome), T. turgidum L. subsp. dicoccum, T. turgidum L. subsp. turanicum, T. turgidum L. subsp. durum (all 2n = 4x = 28 chromosomes, AABB genomes), T. aestivum L. subsp. aestivum, T. aestivum L. subsp. spelta (all 2n = 6x = 42 chromosomes, AABBDD genomes). The selection of these genotypes was made to include different wheat species with a different genome composition (diploid, tetraploid, hexaploid) and with a different year of release, when available. A full description of these wheat accessions was reported in Simonetti et al. (2022) and in Table 5.
The ten selected wheat samples were grown under organic farming management during three consecutive crop years at two locations: at the Quinn Farm & Ranch located near Big Sandy, Montana, USA (48°02′19″ N, 110°00′55″ W, 921 m a.s.l.) and at the experimental farm Podere Santa Croce located at Argelato, Bologna, Italy (44°39′57″ N, 11°19′43″ E, 16 m a.s.l.). The field trial soil in the USA was sandy–loam while in Italy was clay–loam. The soil parameters prior to sowing are shown in Table 6.
The three crop years were 2015–2016; 2016–2017; 2017–2018 in the USA and 2016–2017; 2017–2018; 2018–2019 in Italy. In the USA, the wheat samples einkorn, emmer, turanicum, Peliss, Alzada, Marquis and Vida were cultivated on a spring cycle (planted in May and harvested in August), while spelt, Turkey Red and Judee were cultivated on a winter cycle (planted in September and harvested in early August). In Italy, all ten wheat samples were planted in November and harvested in July. The meteorological data (temperature and rain) were recorded at both sites from the National Center of Environmental Information [49] for the American location and from Arpae Emilia Romagna [50] for the Italian location.
Grain samples from different genotypes were tested for their protein contents by employing the Foss Infratec 1229 NIT spectrophotometer (Global calibration No. WH000003).
The grain samples were milled with the domestic stone mill (100% flour extraction) (Billy 200, Hawos Kornmülen gmbh, Germany), and the flour obtained was used for the assessment of the mycotoxins content and for the enzymatic tests.

3.2. Assessment of Mycotoxin Levels

The content of deoxynivalenol (DON) was determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the AgraQuant® Deoxynivalenol ELISA test kit (Romer Labs GmbH, Tulln, Austria) and following the manufacturer’s instructions. The color produced was read at 450 nm with the Labsystems Multiskan MS Microplate Reader (Labsystems, Ottawa, ON, Canada).

3.3. Enzymatic Assays

The whole wheat flour samples previously obtained from the ten wheat genotypes cultivated for three consecutive years in two growing areas were extracted in duplicate and, two replicates from each sample extract were tested independently in the following enzymatic assays.

3.3.1. Alpha-Amylase Inhibitory Activity Assay

In duplicate, the flour samples were extracted using cold water. Briefly, 100 mg of each of the flour samples was homogenized with 500 μL of distilled water using an automatic shaker at 160 rpm for 30 min. The samples were then centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 5 min, and 400 μL of supernatant was collected. The remaining pellet was again homogenized with 400 μL of distilled water at 160 rpm for 5 min, and after a centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 5 min, 350 μL of supernatant was collected and added to the first supernatant. Then, the supernatant was heated at 70 °C for 20 min to inactivate endogenous enzymes, diluted 1:100 in distilled water and used the same day for alpha-amylase inhibitory activity assessment.
In duplicate, 1.7 μL of each sample extract was transferred to a 96 well flat-bottom clear plate and incubated for 10 min at 25 °C with 48.3 μL of amylase assay buffer (Sigma–Aldrich Co., Oakville, ON, Canada) containing 20 mU of alpha-amylase from human saliva (Sigma–Aldrich Canada Co.). The control was the amylase assay buffer containing 20 mU of alpha-amylase from human saliva without the addition of the sample extract. The amylase activity was tested with the Amylase Activity Assay Kit (Sigma–Aldrich Canada Co.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. This test is based on the production of a colorimetric product at 405 nm (p-nitrophenol) which is proportional to the amount of the substrate (ethilidene-pNP-G7) hydrolyzed by the amylase. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm with the Labsystems Multiskan MS Microplate Reader. The inhibitory activity of the extracts was calculated as a percentage with respect to the control according to the following formula:
inhibition % = [(Bcontrol − Bsample)/Bcontrol × 100]
where B is the amount (nmol) of colorimetric product generated between Tinitial and Tfinal and calculated using the standards provided by the kit; Tinitial is the first absorbance measure taken 3 min after the addition of the substrate; Tfinal is the absorbance measured when the most active sample was close to but not exceeding the end of the linear range of the standard curve.

3.3.2. Trypsin Inhibitory Activity Assay

In duplicate, the flour samples were extracted using a sodium acetate buffer solution with a pH of 3.8 and ionic strength of 0.02 N as reported by Chang and Tsen [28]. Morever, 1 g of each flour sample was homogenized with 15 mL of solvent using an automatic shaker at 160 rpm for 1 h. The samples were then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, and 800 μL of supernatant was collected and used the same day for trypsin inhibitory activity determination.
In duplicate, 2 μL of each extract was transferred to a 96 well flat-bottom clear plate and incubated for 20 min at 25 °C with 48 μL of trypsin assay buffer (Sigma–Aldrich Canada Co.) containing 8 U of trypsin from bovine pancreas (Sigma–Aldrich Canada Co.). The control was the trypsin assay buffer containing 8 U of trypsin from bovine pancreas without the addition of the sample extract. The trypsin activity was tested with the Trypsin Activity Colorimetric Assay Kit (Sigma–Aldrich Canada Co.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. This test is based on the production of a colorimetric product at 405 nm (p-nitroaniline) which is proportional to the amount of the substrate hydrolyzed by the trypsin. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm as described for the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity assay (see Section 3.3.1).

3.3.3. Statistical Analysis

The general linear model (GLM) was used to assess the variance significance for the fixed (genotype) and the random (year) factors, as well as their interactions, for all measured variables. Tukey’s (HSD) test was used to determine differences between means at p < 0.05. Analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 software. The analysis of correlation was performed using STATISTICA Software v. 7.1, (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).

4. Conclusions

The tested in vitro inhibitory activities showed high variability among the ten wheat genotypes analyzed, and the contributions of the genotype and the crop year were significant for both the alpha-amylase and the trypsin inhibitory activities in the two growing areas. In general, the hexaploid wheat genotypes showed the highest ATI inhibitory activities, and it was not possible to highlight any trend in ATI activities as function of release year of wheat samples. Einkorn had a peculiar behavior showing the lowest alpha-amylase inhibitory activity, but the highest trypsin inhibitory activity. The tetraploid turanicum and Alzada wheat samples showed an interesting profile, with the lowest inhibitory activities against both alpha-amylase and trypsin The two inhibitory activities were differently affected by the growing conditions and were negatively correlated with the protein content.
Although the number of samples tested was limited, the information collected may be important to understand the extent of the variation of ATI inhibitory properties in relation to the wheat genotype and the growing environment and its impact, if any, on human health and nutrition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S. and G.D.; data curation and investigation, E.S. and S.B.; methodology, E.S., S.B., L.N.; supervision, S.B. and G.D.; validation, S.B. and G.D.; writing—original draft, E.S.; writing—review and editing S.B., L.N. and G.D; funding acquisition G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Kamut Enterprises of Europe, bv (KEE), Oudenaarde, Belgium. KEE had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, preparation of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Robert M. Quinn, owner of Quinn Farm & Ranch (Big Sandy, MT, USA), for his support in managing the trial in Montana and for his scientific English language editorial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dupont, F.M.; Vensel, W.H.; Tanaka, C.K.; Hurkman, W.J.; Altenbach, S.B. Deciphering the Complexities of the Wheat Flour Proteome Using Quantitative Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis, Three Proteases and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Proteome Sci. 2011, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Carbonero, P.; García-Olmedo, F. A Multigene Family of Trypsin/α-Amylase Inhibitors from Cereals. In Seed Proteins; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 617–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Salcedo, G.; Snchez-Monge, R.; Garca-Casado, G.; Armentia, A.; Gomez, L.; Barber, D. The Cereal α-Amylase/Trypsin Inhibitor Family Associated with Bakers’ Asthma and Food Allergy. In Plant Food Allergens; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; pp. 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Altenbach, S.; Vensel, W.H.; Dupont, F.M. The Spectrum of Low Molecular Weight Alpha-Amylase/Protease Inhibitor Genes Expressed in the US Bread Wheat Cultivar Butte 86. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Tatham, A.S.; Shewry, P.R. Allergens to Wheat and Related Cereals. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2008, 38, 1712–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Junker, Y.; Zeissig, S.; Kim, S.J.; Barisani, D.; Wieser, H.; Leffler, D.A.; Zevallos, V.; Libermann, T.A.; Dillon, S.; Freitag, T.L.; et al. Wheat Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors Drive Intestinal Inflammation via Activation of Toll-like Receptor 4. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 2395–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Geisslitz, S.; Shewry, P.; Brouns, F.; America, A.H.P.; Caio, G.P.I.; Daly, M.; D’Amico, S.; De Giorgio, R.; Gilissen, L.; Grausgruber, H.; et al. Wheat ATIs: Characteristics and Role in Human Disease. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 667370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zevallos, V.F.; Raker, V.; Tenzer, S.; Jimenez-Calvente, C.; Ashfaq-Khan, M.; Rüssel, N.; Pickert, G.; Schild, H.; Steinbrink, K.; Schuppan, D. Nutritional Wheat Amylase-Trypsin Inhibitors Promote Intestinal Inflammation via Activation of Myeloid Cells. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 1100–1113.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gélinas, P.; Gagnon, F. Inhibitory Activity towards Human α-Amylase in Wheat Flour and Gluten. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bosi, S.; Negri, L.; Fakaros, A.; Oliveti, G.; Whittaker, A.; Dinelli, G. GGE Biplot Analysis to Explore the Adaption Potential of Italian Common Wheat Genotypes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dinu, M.; Whittaker, A.; Pagliai, G.; Benedettelli, S.; Sofi, F. Ancient Wheat Species and Human Health: Biochemical and Clinical Implications. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 52, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Call, L.; Kapeller, M.; Grausgruber, H.; Reiter, E.; Schoenlechner, R.; D’Amico, S. Effects of Species and Breeding on Wheat Protein Composition. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 93, 102974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Simonetti, E.; Bosi, S.; Negri, L.; Baffoni, L.; Masoni, A.; Marotti, I.; Benedettelli, S.; Dinelli, G. Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors (ATIs) from a Selection of Ancient and Modern Wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 105, 103441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Belderok, B.; Mesdag, J.; Mesdag, H.; Donner, D.A. Bread-Making Quality of Wheat: A Century of Breeding in Europe; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; 416p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Piasecka-Kwiatkowska, D.; Madaj, D.; Warchalewski, J.R. The Biological Activity of Wheat, Rye and Triticale Varieties Harvested in Four Consecutive Years. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2007, 6, 55–65. [Google Scholar]
  16. Franco, O.L.; Rigden, D.J.; Melo, F.R.; Bloch, C.; Silva, C.P.; Grossi De Sá, M.F. Activity of Wheat α-Amylase Inhibitors towards Bruchid α-Amylases and Structural Explanation of Observed Specificities. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 2166–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Choudhury, A.; Maeda, K.; Murayama, R.; DiMagno, E.P. Character of a Wheat Amylase Inhibitor Preparation and Effects on Fasting Human Pancreaticobiliary Secretions and Hormones. Gastroenterology 1996, 111, 1313–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bedetti, C. Amylase Protein Inhibitors and the Role of Aegilops Species in Polyploid Wheat Speciation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1974, 362, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Geisslitz, S.; Ludwig, C.; Scherf, K.A.; Koehler, P. Targeted LC-MS/MS Reveals Similar Contents of α-Amylase/Trypsin-Inhibitors as Putative Triggers of Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity in All Wheat Species except Einkorn. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 12395–12403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Geisslitz, S.; Longin, C.F.H.; Koehler, P.; Scherf, K.A. Comparative Quantitative LC–MS/MS Analysis of 13 Amylase/Trypsin Inhibitors in Ancient and Modern Triticum Species. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zoccatelli, G.; Sega, M.; Bolla, M.; Cecconi, D.; Vaccino, P.; Rizzi, C.; Chignola, R.; Brandolini, A. Expression of α-Amylase Inhibitors in Diploid Triticum Species. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2643–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. García-Maroto, F.; Maraña, C.; Mena, M.; García-Olmedo, F.; Carbonero, P. Cloning of CDNA and Chromosomal Location of Genes Encoding the Three Types of Subunits of the Wheat Tetrameric Inhibitor of Insect α-Amylase. Plant Mol. Biol. 1990, 14, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Payan, F. Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Mammalian and Insect α-Amylases by Plant Protein Inhibitors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Proteins Proteom. 2004, 1696, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Climate-Data.org. Big Sandy Climate (United States of America). Available online: https://en.climate-data.org/north-america/united-states-of-america/montana/big-sandy-124832/ (accessed on 2 September 2022).
  25. Climate-Data.org. Grafico Temperatura Argelato. Available online: https://it.climate-data.org/europa/italia/emilia-romagna/argelato-14258/#temperature-graph (accessed on 2 September 2022).
  26. Priya, S.; Kumar, S.; Kaur, N.; Gupta, A.K. Specificity of α-Amylase and Trypsin Inhibitor Proteins in Wheat against Insect Pests. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2013, 41, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Prandi, B.; Faccini, A.; Tedeschi, T.; Galaverna, G.; Sforza, S. LC/MS Analysis of Proteolytic Peptides in Wheat Extracts for Determining the Content of the Allergen Amylase/Trypsin Inhibitor CM3: Influence of Growing Area and Variety. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. D’Amico, S.; Call, L.; Edlmayr, M.; Marzak, S.; Jäger, H.; Domig, K.; Reiter, E.; Grausgruber, H. Characterization of Non-Gluten Proteins in Austrian Wheat Varieties from 19th Century until Today. Cereal Technol. 2018, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. EL Hassouni, K.; Sielaff, M.; Curella, V.; Neerukonda, M.; Leiser, W.; Würschum, T.; Schuppan, D.; Tenzer, S.; Longin, C.F.H. Genetic Architecture Underlying the Expression of Eight α-Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021, 134, 3427–3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chang, C.-R.; Tsen, C.C. Note on Trypsin Inhibitor Activity in the Acetate Extract of Cereal Samples. Cereal Chem. 1979, 56, 493–494. [Google Scholar]
  31. Taddei, F.; Gazza, L.; Conti, S.; Muccilli, V.; Foti, S.; Pogna, N.E. Starch-bound 2S proteins and kernel texture in einkorn, Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 1205–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sielaff, M.; Curella, V.; Neerukonda, M.; Afzal, M.; El Hassouni, K.; Distler, U.; Schuppan, D.; Longin, C.F.H.; Tenzer, S. Hybrid QconCAT-Based Targeted Absolute and Data-Independent Acquisition-Based Label-Free Quantification Enables In-Depth Proteomic Characterization of Wheat Amylase/Trypsin Inhibitor Extracts. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 1544–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Altenbach, S.B.; Kothari, K.M. Transcript Profiles of Genes Expressed in Endosperm Tissue Are Altered by High Temperature during Wheat Grain Development. J. Cereal Sci. 2004, 40, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Juhász, A.; Belova, T.; Florides, C.G.; Maulis, C.; Fischer, I.; Gell, G.; Birinyi, Z.; Ong, J.; Keeble-Gagnère, G.; Maharajan, A.; et al. Genome Mapping of Seed-Borne Allergens and Immunoresponsive Proteins in Wheat. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar8602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, F.; Jørgensen, A.D.; Li, H.; Søndergaard, I.; Finnie, C.; Svensson, B.; Jiang, D.; Wollenweber, B.; Jacobsen, S. Implications of High-Temperature Events and Water Deficits on Protein Profiles in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Cv. Vinjett) Grain. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1684–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gu, A.; Hao, P.; Lv, D.; Zhen, S.; Bian, Y.; Ma, C.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yan, Y. Integrated Proteome Analysis of the Wheat Embryo and Endosperm Reveals Central Metabolic Changes Involved in the Water Deficit Response during Grain Development. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8478–8487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cuccioloni, M.; Mozzicafreddo, M.; Ali, I.; Bonfili, L.; Cecarini, V.; Eleuteri, A.M.; Angeletti, M. Interaction between Wheat Alpha-Amylase/Trypsin Bi-Functional Inhibitor and Mammalian Digestive Enzymes: Kinetic, Equilibrium and Structural Characterization of Binding. Food Chem. 2016, 213, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kawamori, R.; Tajima, N.; Iwamoto, Y.; Kashiwagi, A.; Shi-mamoto, K.; Kaku, K. Voglibose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomised, double-blind trial in Japanese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Lancet 2009, 373, 1607–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bardella, M.T.; Elli, L.; Ferretti, F. Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2016, 18, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kodama, T.; Miyazaki, T.; Kitamura, I.; Suzuki, Y.; Namba, Y.; Sakurai, J.; Torikai, Y.; Inoue, S. Effects of Single and Long-Term Administration of Wheat Albumin on Blood Glucose Control: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 59, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Birk, Y. Plant Protease Inhibitors: Significance in Nutrition. Plant Protection, Cancer Prevention and Genetic Engineering, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 52–96. [Google Scholar]
  42. Call, L.; Reiter, E.V.; Wenger-Oehn, G.; Strnad, I.; Grausgruber, H.; Schoenlechner, R.; D’Amico, S. Development of an Enzymatic Assay for the Quantitative Determination of Trypsin Inhibitory Activity in Wheat. Food Chem. 2019, 299, 125038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sofi, F.; Whittaker, A.; Gori, A.M.; Cesari, F.; Surrenti, E.; Abbate, R.; Gensini, G.F.; Benedettelli, S.; Casini, A. Effect of Triticum turgidum Subsp. Turanicum Wheat on Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Double-Blinded Randomised Dietary Intervention Trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 111, 1992–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Iacomino, G.; Rotondi Aufiero, V.; Di Stasio, L.; Picascia, S.; Iannaccone, N.; Giardullo, N.; Troncone, R.; Gianfrani, C.; Mamone, G.; Mazzarella, G. Triticum monococcum Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors Possess a Reduced Potential to Elicit Innate Immune Response in Celiac Patients Compared to Triticum aestivum. Food Res. Int. 2021, 145, 110386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huang, X.; Schuppan, D.; Tovar, L.E.R.; Zevallos, V.F.; Loponen, J.; Gänzle, M. Sourdough Fermentation Degrades Wheat Alpha-Amylase/Trypsin Inhibitor (ATI) and Reduces Pro-Inflammatory Activity. Foods 2020, 9, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kostekli, M.; Karakaya, S. Protease Inhibitors in Various Flours and Breads: Effect of Fermentation, Baking and in Vitro Digestion on Trypsin and Chymotrypsin Inhibitory Activities. Food Chem. 2017, 224, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mamone, G.; Nitride, C.; Picariello, G.; Addeo, F.; Ferranti, P.; Mackie, A. Tracking the Fate of Pasta (T. durum Semolina) Immunogenic Proteins by in Vitro Simulated Digestion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 2660–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gélinas, P.; McKinnon, C.; Gagnon, F. Inhibitory Activity towards Human α-Amylase in Cereal Foods. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 93, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. National Center of Environmental Information. Climate Data Online Data Tools. Available online: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/ (accessed on 9 October 2022).
  50. Arpae Emila Romagna. Available online: https://www.arpae.it/it (accessed on 9 October 2022).
Plants 11 03268 g001 550
Figure 1. Total precipitation and mean temperatures over the cultivation years for 2015–2016 (a), 2016–2017 (b) and 2017–2018 (c) in the USA and for 2016–2017 (d), 2017–2018 (e) and 2018–2019 (f) in Italy.
Figure 1. Total precipitation and mean temperatures over the cultivation years for 2015–2016 (a), 2016–2017 (b) and 2017–2018 (c) in the USA and for 2016–2017 (d), 2017–2018 (e) and 2018–2019 (f) in Italy.
Plants 11 03268 g001
Plants 11 03268 g002 550
Figure 2. Mean values of the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity for each genotype in the three crop years. Samples grown in the USA (a); samples grown in Italy (b). The bars in the graph indicate the standard error (SE).
Figure 2. Mean values of the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity for each genotype in the three crop years. Samples grown in the USA (a); samples grown in Italy (b). The bars in the graph indicate the standard error (SE).
Plants 11 03268 g002
Plants 11 03268 g003 550
Figure 3. Differences between the mean values of alpha-amylase inhibitory activity in the USA and in Italy for each wheat genotype. Significance level: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ns, not significant.
Figure 3. Differences between the mean values of alpha-amylase inhibitory activity in the USA and in Italy for each wheat genotype. Significance level: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ns, not significant.
Plants 11 03268 g003
Plants 11 03268 g004 550
Figure 4. Mean values of the trypsin inhibitory activity for each genotype in the three crop years. Samples grown in the USA (a); samples grown in Italy (b). The bars in the graph indicate the standard error (SE).
Figure 4. Mean values of the trypsin inhibitory activity for each genotype in the three crop years. Samples grown in the USA (a); samples grown in Italy (b). The bars in the graph indicate the standard error (SE).
Plants 11 03268 g004
Plants 11 03268 g005 550
Figure 5. Differences between the mean values of trypsin inhibitory activity in the USA and in Italy for each wheat genotype. Significance level: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ns, not significant.
Figure 5. Differences between the mean values of trypsin inhibitory activity in the USA and in Italy for each wheat genotype. Significance level: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ns, not significant.
Plants 11 03268 g005
Table
Table 1. Protein and DON mean content of the wheat samples grown in the USA and in Italy. Standard deviation (SD) is reported in brackets in the table.
Table 1. Protein and DON mean content of the wheat samples grown in the USA and in Italy. Standard deviation (SD) is reported in brackets in the table.
USA2015–20162016–20172017–2018
Wheat GenotypeProtein
(g/100g dm)		DON
(ppb)		Protein
(g/100g dm)		DON
(ppb)		Protein
(g/100g dm)		DON
(ppb)
Einkorn26.7 (1.0)<20020.8 (1.1)<20020.8 (1.1)<200
EmmerSample not available19.7 (0.6)<20019.1 (0.8)<200
Turanicum19.4 (0.6)253 (18.4)15.8 (0.6)<20017.1 (0.4)<200
PelissSample not availableSample not available18.5 (0.7)<200
Alzada24.7 (1.0)376 (22.6)17.3 (1.1)<20019.7 (0.7)<200
Spelt14.8 (0.4)204 (5.7)18.6 (0.1)<20019.5 (0.7)<200
Turkey Red14.6 (0.4)<20017.0 (0.7)<20016.8 (0.1)<200
Judee13.7 (0.1)<20017.0 (0.3)<20016.4 (0.6)<200
Marquis22.3 (1.4)<20018.5 (0.6)<20019.2 (0.3)<200
Vida18.6 (0.8)296 (8.5)17.8 (0.3)<20017.9 (0.3)<200
Italy2016–20172017–20182018–2019
Wheat GenotypeProtein
(g/100g dm)		DON
(ppb)		Protein
(g/100g dm)		DON
(ppb)		Protein
(g/100g dm)		DON
(ppb)
Einkorn15.2 (0.3)<20014.0 (0.7)<20017.3 (0.4)<200
Emmer12.3 (0.4)<20012.5 (0.7)<20011.1 (0.1)219 (12.7)
Turanicum12.7 (0.3)<20012.8 (0.3)593 (18.4)10.3 (0.4)969 (12.7)
Peliss12.3 (0.4)<20013.2 (0.6)383 (18.4)10.1 (0.1)342 (17.0)
Alzada12.6 (0.1)299 (19.1)14.2 (0.4)547 (23.3)11.5 (0.7)1122 (45.3)
Spelt12.0 (0.1)<20013.8 (0.3)<20014.0 (0.7)260 (14.1)
Turkey Red11.3 (0.7)<20011.4 (0.1)<20010.1 (0.1)271 (15.6)
Judee11.4 (0.4)<20011.3 (0.1)<20010.1 (0.1)920 (14.1)
Marquis12.5 (0.1)<20012.9 (0.6)<20012.5 (0.6)<200
Vida12.7 (0.3)<20013.3 (0.4)<20013.1 (0.1)373 (11.3)
Table
Table 2. Mean values (%) of the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity for wheat genotypes, years and growing areas. Different letters indicate statistically significant different means for p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01.
Table 2. Mean values (%) of the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity for wheat genotypes, years and growing areas. Different letters indicate statistically significant different means for p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01.
USAItaly
Year (Y)**Year (Y)**
2015–201640.83 (b)2016–201753.43 (a)
2016–201756.26 (a)2017–201847.06 (b)
2017–201849.75 (a)2018–201938.52 (c)
Genotype (G)**Genotype (G)**
Einkorn13.76 (d)Einkorn1.12 (f)
Emmer56.62 (ab)Emmer65.42 (a)
Turanicum39.6 (c)Turanicum44.14 (cd)
Peliss59.73 (ab)Peliss48.80 (c)
Alzada47.61 (bc)Alzada33.28 (e)
Spelt63.15 (a)Spelt59.95 (b)
Turkey Red66.63 (a)Turkey Red56.42 (b)
Judee60.50 (a)Judee57.47 (b)
Marquis49.24 (bc)Marquis55.00 (b)
Vida45.35 (bc)Vida41.77 (d)
G × Y**G × Y**
Table
Table 3. Mean values (%) of the trypsin inhibitory activity for wheat genotypes, years and growing areas. Different letters indicate statistically significant different means for p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. ns, not significant.
Table 3. Mean values (%) of the trypsin inhibitory activity for wheat genotypes, years and growing areas. Different letters indicate statistically significant different means for p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. ns, not significant.
USAItaly
Year (Y)**Year (Y)**
2015–201663.31 (a)2016–201742.53 (a)
2016–201743.72 (c)2017–201839.57 (b)
2017–201849.04 (b)2018–201935.47 (c)
Genotype (G)**Genotype (G)**
Einkorn100.00 (a)Einkorn100.00 (a)
Emmer60.55 (d)Emmer19.34 (e)
Turanicum23.08 (h)Turanicum20.93 (d)
Peliss18.61 (i)Peliss18.77 (e)
Alzada30.45 (f)Alzada23.30 (d)
Spelt39.46 (e)Spelt36.18 (c)
Turkey Red66.54 (c)Turkey Red49.27 (b)
Judee71.06 (b)Judee51.70 (b)
Marquis59.00 (d)Marquis49.76 (b)
Vida27.26 (g)Vida22.64 (d)
G × YnsG × Yns
Table
Table 4. Analysis of variance: percentage of mean square obtained from the ANOVA highlighting the contribution of genotype and crop year and their interaction to the variability of alpha-amylase (a) and trypsin (b) inhibitory activity. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. ns, not significant.
Table 4. Analysis of variance: percentage of mean square obtained from the ANOVA highlighting the contribution of genotype and crop year and their interaction to the variability of alpha-amylase (a) and trypsin (b) inhibitory activity. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. ns, not significant.
(a)
Year (Y)Genotype (G)G × Y
USA37.5 **55.3 **7.2 **
Italy34.1 **62.9 **2.3 **
(b)
Year (Y)Genotype (G)G × Y
USA32.8 **64.7 **1.8 ns
Italy6.0 *91.5 **1.4 ns
Table
Table 5. List of wheat genotypes used in this study.
Table 5. List of wheat genotypes used in this study.
Ploidy LevelTriticum SpeciesGenotypeYear of ReleaseClassificationName Used in This Study
DiploidT. monococcum L. subsp. monococcumLocal landrace a/Hulled, ancient wheatEinkorn
TetraploidT. turgidum L. subsp. dicoccumLocal landrace a/Hulled, ancient wheatEmmer
T. turgidum L. subsp. turanicum *QK-77 b/Naked, ancient wheatTuranicum
T. turgidum L. subsp. durumPeliss c1900Naked, heritage durum wheatPeliss
T. turgidum L. subsp. durumAlzada a2004Naked, modern durum wheatAlzada
HexaploidT. aestivum L. subsp. speltaLocal landrace a/Hulled, ancient wheatSpelt
T. aestivum L. subsp. aestivumTurkey Red d1873Naked, heritage hard red common wheatTurkey Red
T. aestivum L. subsp. aestivumJudee a2011Naked, modern hard red common wheatJudee
T. aestivum L. subsp. aestivumMarquis a1913Naked, heritage hard red common wheatMarquis
T. aestivum L. subsp. aestivumVida a2006Naked, modern hard red common wheatVida
* sold under the KAMUT® brand. KAMUT® is a registered trademark of Kamut International, Ltd., and Kamut Enterprises of Europe, bv. Provenance: Montana State University, Montana, USA (a); Kamut International, Montana, USA (b); University of Saskatchewan, Canada (c); Hartland Mills, Kansas, USA (d).
Table
Table 6. Soil parameters prior to sowing for years and growing areas (a), Italy; (b) USA. The soil parameters were supplied by Agriparadigma Laboratories (Ravenna, Italy).
Table 6. Soil parameters prior to sowing for years and growing areas (a), Italy; (b) USA. The soil parameters were supplied by Agriparadigma Laboratories (Ravenna, Italy).
(a)
Soil Characteristics before Sowing2016–20172017–20182018–2019
pH7.66.67.6
Organic matter (% dm)1.23.33.7
Total N (‰ dm)0.71.41.5
C/N ratio9.713.614.7
Assimilable p (mg/kg dm)16.98.313.8
Assimilable K (mg/kg dm)190.1178.5182.3
(b)
Soil Characteristics before Sowing2016–20172017–20182018–2019
pH7.37.07.4
Organic matter (% dm)1.51.82.4
Total N (‰ dm)0.90.80.5
C/N ratio9.613.127.9
Assimilable p (mg/kg dm)14.212.111.6
Assimilable K (mg/kg dm)261.1239.4211.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simonetti, E.; Bosi, S.; Negri, L.; Dinelli, G. Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors (ATIs) in a Selection of Ancient and Modern Wheat: Effect of Genotype and Growing Environment on Inhibitory Activities. Plants 2022, 11, 3268. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233268

AMA Style

Simonetti E, Bosi S, Negri L, Dinelli G. Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors (ATIs) in a Selection of Ancient and Modern Wheat: Effect of Genotype and Growing Environment on Inhibitory Activities. Plants. 2022; 11(23):3268. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simonetti, Emanuela, Sara Bosi, Lorenzo Negri, and Giovanni Dinelli. 2022. "Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors (ATIs) in a Selection of Ancient and Modern Wheat: Effect of Genotype and Growing Environment on Inhibitory Activities" Plants 11, no. 23: 3268. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233268

APA Style

Simonetti, E., Bosi, S., Negri, L., & Dinelli, G. (2022). Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors (ATIs) in a Selection of Ancient and Modern Wheat: Effect of Genotype and Growing Environment on Inhibitory Activities. Plants, 11(23), 3268. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop