Next Article in Journal
Elicitation of Stilbenes and Benzofuran Derivatives in Hairy Root Cultures of White Mulberry (Morus alba)
Next Article in Special Issue
Conserving Citrus Diversity: From Vavilov’s Early Explorations to Genebanks around the World
Previous Article in Journal
Biomass, Essential Oil Yield, and Composition of Marjoram as Influenced by Interactions of Different Agronomic Practices under Controlled Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of N.I. Vavilov on the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources in Scandinavia: A Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparative Analysis of the Genetic Diversity of Chilean Cultivated Potato Based on a Molecular Study of Authentic Herbarium Specimens and Present-Day Gene Bank Accessions

by Tatjana Gavrilenko *, Irena Chukhina, Olga Antonova, Ekaterina Krylova, Liliya Shipilina, Natalia Oskina and Ludmila Kostina
Reviewer 1:
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 31 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We are grateful to Reviewer 1 or valuable critical comments. Please find our responce on your comments in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

See attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We are grateful to Reviewer 2 or valuable critical comments. Please find our responce on your comments in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised MS by Gavrilenko et al. reveals many excelent improvements, especially to the Abstract, Discussion and Conclusion. Nevertheless, several points raised in my previous review have not neen properly attended. They include the references, the protocol for DNA isolation and PCR analysis (lack of proper controls) and insufficiently founded conclusions based on the markers of R genes. There are vast possibilities for further editing the MS.   However, the quality of the article is the responsibility of the authors, not the reviewers. Therefore I am ready to finally conclude that the manuscript has been sufficiently improved to warrant publication in Plants.

 

Back to TopTop