1. Introduction
Sweet potato (
Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is the fifth most important food crop in the world [
1]. As well as being an important food and feed crop, it is a useful industrial raw material and new energy crop in China. As such, it plays an important role in food and energy security. Therefore, there is an increasing amount of research on sweet potato worldwide.
Stem nematode (
Ditylenchus destructor Thorne, SN) is a serious disease that limits the production of many crops such as sweet potato, potato, peanut, and onion. This disease usually reduces sweet potato yield by 20% to 50%, but serious infections can destroy the entire crop [
2]. The breeding of SN-resistant cultivars has become one of the most important objectives in sweet potato breeding programs, and many studies have focused on functionally characterizing genes related to SN resistance.
The sweet potato gene
IbMIPS, which encodes myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase, is homologous to a SN-resistance gene in sugar beet. Transgenic sweet potato plants overexpressing
IbMIPS1 showed increased SN resistance as well as tolerance to abiotic stress [
3,
4,
5]. Qu et al. [
6]. acquired several nucleotide-binding–leucine-rich repeat (NBS–LRR) homologous sequences showing close relationships with SN resistance from the sweet potato SN-resistant cultivar AB94078-1, the susceptible cultivar Xushu 18, and their eight progenies. Genes encoding nucleotide-binding site (NBS) proteins are a major type of resistance (R) gene that play important roles in biotic stress responses in plants. Si et al. [
7,
8]. recently analyzed the genome and transcriptome data of
Ipomoea species and isolated several NBS genes responding to SN infection. These genes have potential value for improving the SN resistance of sweet potato. A suppression subtractive hybridization analysis revealed that four genes related to SN resistance and one gene encoding a serine/threonine kinase protein showed different expression patterns in the SN-resistant cultivar Lushu 3 [
9]. Overexpression of
IbMVD, encoding mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase, increased the SN resistance of transgenic sweet potato [
10]. Similarly, overexpression of
OCI encoding the protease inhibitor cystatin-I from rice significantly increased the SN resistance of transgenic plants [
11]. Another study aimed to develop molecular markers related to SN resistance and obtained the SN resistance-related marker 0PD689 using PCR amplification of the F
1 population of the resistant parent Xu 781 and the highly susceptible parent Xushu 18 [
12]. Zhao et al. [
13] developed four sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers closely related to SN-resistance genes of sweet potato, and they have proved to be a useful reference for gene mapping.
To date, most studies on SN resistance in sweet potato have focused on the functional characterization of single genes. However, it would be useful to gain an overview of SN-responsive pathways in sweet potato. In this study, therefore, we compared the transcriptomes and metabolomes between the SN-resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22 and the susceptible cultivar Longshu 9 after SN infection. The resulting profile of SN-defensive pathways provides a valuable reference for understanding the SN-resistance mechanism of sweet potato.
2. Results
2.1. Phenotypes of Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars after Infection with Stem Nematode
In the early stage of infection (0–10 d), there was no significant difference in the phenotype of storage roots between Zhenghong 22 and Longshu 9, but at 10 dpi, the stem nematodes had spread into the flesh in the susceptible cultivar Longshu 9. Almost the entire storage root of Longshu 9 was infected at 30 dpi, and its degree of infection was significantly higher than that in storage roots of Zhenghong 22 (
Figure 1).
2.2. Transcriptomic Differences between Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars
The transcriptomes of resistant and susceptible cultivars were compared to identify genes related to SN resistance and the corresponding pathways at different stages after infection. In total, 49,283 genes were detected from the transcriptome sequences. At 0.5 dpi, 2667 genes were upregulated and 2681 genes were downregulated in the resistant cultivar compared with the susceptible cultivar. At 1 dpi, 2319 genes were upregulated and 2936 genes were downregulated in the resistant cultivar compared with the susceptible cultivar. At 3 dpi, 2199 genes were upregulated and 2274 genes were downregulated in the resistant cultivar compared with the susceptible cultivar. At 10 dpi, 2978 genes were upregulated and 4648 genes were downregulated in the resistant cultivar compared with the susceptible cultivar. At 30 dpi, 3047 genes were upregulated and 3900 genes were downregulated in the resistant cultivar compared with the susceptible cultivar. As illustrated in
Figure 2A and
Supplementary Figure S1, the comparative transcriptome analysis revealed differences between the two cultivars after infection, especially at 0.5 dpi, 10 dpi, and 30 dpi. The Venn diagram in
Figure 2B shows that the differences in transcriptomes between the resistant and susceptible cultivars were smallest at 1 dpi and 3 dpi, and largest at 10 dpi, followed by 30 dpi, and then 0.5 dpi (
Figure 2B). The same results are shown in the principal component analysis (PCA) plot (
Figure 2C).
After removing the genes that were co-expressed in the control (see Venn diagram), the remaining genes expressed in Zhenghong 22 during SN infection were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. In the biological process category, the GO terms enriched with DEGs were involved in protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation pathways, consistent with the increased activity of signal transduction pathways to mediate disease resistance (
Figure 3A). The third pathway was the defense response, indicating that Zhenghong 22 initiated a stronger defense response than Longshu 9. The salicylic acid (SA) pathway and the ethylene pathway were also activated in Zhenghong 22.
After screening 5709 DEGs, there were 1277 genes with pathway annotations in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (
Figure 3B). The pathways significantly enriched with DEGs were in the metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing, cellular processes, and organismal systems categories. Among them, the metabolism and environmental information processing pathways were strongly related to SN resistance. Some DEGs related to the synthesis and metabolism of amino acids were upregulated in the resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22, consistent with the metabolomics data. Other upregulated pathways in Zhenghong 22 included the N-glycan synthesis pathway; the tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis pathway; carotenoid biosynthesis, terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, other secondary metabolic pathways, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway; the ethylene and abscisic acid (ABA) pathway; the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) signaling pathway; the brassinosteroid-insensitive associated kinase receptor (BAK) signaling pathway; and the plant-pathogen interaction pathway. In addition,
WRKY superfamily genes were upregulated in Zhenghong 22. The transcript levels of most genes in the ethylene pathway were higher in Zhenghong 22 than in Longshu 9. The calcium ion transport pathway mediating peroxide accumulation was enriched with DEGs in Zhenghong 22. These results were consistent with those obtained in the trend analysis and the analysis of DEGs and differentially accumulated metabolites (DMs) showing at least 10 times difference in abundance between pairs of samples (
Supplementary Figures S2 and S3).
2.3. Comparative Metabolomic Analysis between Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars
On the basis of phenotypic changes after infection, samples at 0 dpi, 10 dpi, and 30 dpi were collected for metabolomic analysis. The sample cluster analysis distinguished all samples of the resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22 from those of the susceptible cultivar Longshu 9 (
Figure 4A). The data quality and trends detected in the positive and negative ion modes were basically the same (
Supplementary Figure S4), and the data quality was good. There were greater differences in metabolites between the control and 30 dpi samples than between the control and 10 dpi samples (
Figure 4B).
Analyses of the metabolomics data revealed 16,916 metabolites, of which 7849 were detected in the positive ion mode (POS). Of them, 1094 metabolites were annotated, and 6755 metabolites were unknown. In total, 9067 metabolites were detected in the negative ion mode (NEG). Of them, 610 metabolites were annotated, and 8457 metabolites were unknown. Overall, 423 DMs were detected between the resistant and susceptible cultivars at 10 dpi and 30 dpi (
Figure 5A). The KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the DMs were mainly in metabolic pathways (
Figure 5B). Amino acid metabolism and the contents of various amino acids were increased in Zhenghong 22, as was the biosynthesis of plant secondary metabolites and the contents of metabolites involved in the citrate cycle.
In Zhenghong 22, the DMs included many in the ABA synthesis pathway, ethylene synthesis pathway, and SA synthesis pathway. The increased content of the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) suggested that this pathway was stimulated to produce more ethylene to participate in SN resistance. The SA content increased sharply after infection in both cultivars, indicating that they both initiated the SA pathway in response to SN infection, but the content of the SA precursor trans-cinnamic acid was higher in Zhenghong 22 than in Longshu 9. The results of the trend analysis and the adjusted differential factor analysis were consistent with these findings (
Supplementary Figures S5 and S6).
2.4. Screening of Candidate Genes and Metabolites
To process the large amount of transcriptome data, we conducted a WGCNA to obtain information about clusters of co-expressed genes. The Midnight Blue and Green modules were related to Zhenghong 22 at all times after infection. The Darkseagreen4, Orangered3, Skyblue3, and Coral2 modules were related to Zhenghong 22 at 0.5 dpi. Coral2 was related to both 0.5 dpi and 30 dpi, while Skyblue3 was only related to 30 dpi (
Supplementary Figure S7). The 37 genes (
Table 1) with the highest connectivity with the modules were screened, and the GO enrichment analyses included a total of 28 key genes that were enriched in 35 GO terms. The genes
itf15g12000.t1 and
itf15g12000.t2 were enriched in the GO terms “responses to insects” and “stimulus response function”. The genes
itf03g17570.t1 (
XI-K),
itf04g13120.t1,
itf05g19720.t1,
itf07g02790.t1,
itf10g23050.t1,
itf13g03200.t1 were also enriched in the “stimulus response function” GO term. Only nine key genes had pathway annotations;
itf06g12490.t1 belonged to the LRR receptor protein kinase family and was enriched in the MAPK signaling pathway, which is also considered as a plant–pathogen interaction pathway.
Itf12g04740.t1 was enriched in the plant hormone signal transduction pathway.
itf10g2060.t1 encoding peroxidase was enriched in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway.
itf15g12000.t1 and
itf15g12000.t2 were enriched in the fatty acid metabolism pathway, and other key genes were enriched in the carbon metabolism, purine metabolism, and nucleotide repair pathways.
To identify candidate metabolites related to infection, we focused on metabolites that accumulated after infection, as they show strong positive relationships with the disease resistance response. After removing basic metabolites such as amino acids, the remaining 19 were identified as candidate metabolites. The WGCNA analysis revealed Zhenghong 22-related modules and metabolites with higher connectivity in these modules. For most of the metabolites with higher connectivity, their chemical formulae and related pathways were unknown. Of the 13 metabolites with molecular formulae, 11 showed more than 10 times difference in abundance between the resistant and susceptible cultivars and were selected for further analysis (
Table 2).
2.5. Combined Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis
The transcriptome analysis revealed details of gene expression during the defense response after infection, and but only a few metabolites had molecular formula and pathway annotation information available. The top 250 DEGs and DMs with correlation coefficients were analyzed, and the top 100 were selected for heatmap analysis. As shown in the heatmap, there were strong correlations between the DEGs and DMs (
Supplementary Figure S8).
We determined which pathways were enriched with DMs and DEGs at 0, 10, and 30 dpi. The top five pathways showing differences between the two cultivars before infection were starch metabolism, sucrose metabolism, metabolic pathway, tyrosine metabolism, and carotenoid biosynthesis. At 10 dpi, the top five pathways showing differences between the two cultivars were metabolic pathway, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, biosynthesis of monoterpenes, metabolism of nicotine and nicotinamide, and biosynthesis of benzoquinone; these findings were consistent with the results of the transcriptome and metabolome analyses. The phenotypes of the two cultivars were not very different at 10 dpi, but the defense response had clearly been initiated in Zhenghong 22. There were significant differences in the phenotype between the two cultivars at 30 dpi, and larger differences in pathways enriched with DEGs and DMs. The pathways enriched with DEGs and DMs at 30 dpi included those detected at 10 dpi as well as glutathione metabolism, carotenoid biosynthesis, glycolysis, fatty acid degradation, linoleic acid metabolism, and the pentose phosphate pathway.
The criterion for DEGs and DMs was increased to at least 10 times difference between the two cultivars, and the upregulated genes and metabolites in Zhenghong 22 were subjected to KEGG analysis. The following nine pathways were enriched with strongly up-regulated DEGs in Zhenghong 22 after infection: Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites; phenylpropanoid biosynthesis; tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis; fatty acid degradation; monoterpenoid biosynthesis; nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism; MAPK signaling pathway-plant; and terpenoid backbone biosynthesis. Four pathways were enriched with strongly upregulated DMs in Zhenghong 22 after infection: biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from the shikimate pathway; the citrate cycle (TCA cycle); biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids; and biosynthesis of plant hormones.
A correlation network diagram was constructed to discover relationships between candidate metabolites and candidate genes. We selected 35 genes with high connectivity out of 45 candidate genes and 27 out of 32 metabolites. The candidate genes and metabolites showed high connectivity. The correlation network diagram divided them into two groups (
Figure 6 and
Supplementary Table S2). The first group (on the left in
Figure 6) consisted of two genes in the stimulus response pathway, an unknown gene, a gene encoding a DNA-directed DNA polymerase, and a gene encoding a Ser/Thr protein kinase (
Itf14g18430.t1). The
Itf14g18430.t1 gene triggered the initiation of the insect resistance defense, and it connected the two modules. The metabolites in this module included amino acids, peptides, linoleic acid, and metabolites of the TCA cycle. These metabolites are related to the accumulation of raw materials and energy in the early stage of infection. The other module (
Figure 6, on the right) contained genes encoding disease resistance proteins, genes involved in the stimulation response, and genes encoding subtilisins, chitinases, and receptor kinases. The metabolites in this module included those related to the secondary metabolite synthesis pathway, hormone synthesis pathway, benzoin synthesis pathway, terpenoid backbone formation pathway, and alkaloid synthesis pathway. On the basis of these findings, six genes related to disease resistance were selected for qRT-PCR verification (
Figure 7A–F).
2.6. Analysis of Regulatory Pathway Involved in the Response to Stem Nematode in Sweet Potato
The genes and metabolites that were upregulated in the resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22 after infection were classified and displayed according to their related pathways (
Supplementary Figure S9). Those results indicated that, after activation of the MAPK signaling pathway (
Figure 8), antitoxins were produced and genes related to ethylene synthesis were upregulated, thereby enhancing the defense response in Zhenghong 22. The results of qRT-PCR analyses confirmed the upregulation of
ACS6, a key gene for ethylene synthesis, consistent with the transcriptome results (
Figure 7G). At the same time, activation of defense response pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) induced expression of the gene encoding the respiratory burst oxidase, as well as genes related to the production of raw materials and energy–supply pathways. The plant–pathogen interaction signaling pathway, as well as pathways regulated by salicylic acid, ethylene, ABA, and indole were activated in Zhenghong 22. These pathways do not function independently, but instead interact to promote or inhibit each other. The shikimic acid pathway produces the main precursors for amino acids and secondary metabolites and showed a 10 times upward trend in Zhenghong 22. Amino acid and secondary metabolite synthesis pathways were activated in Zhenghong 22. This cultivar also accumulated phenylalanine, which is mainly involved in the benzoin synthesis pathway that generates flavonoids and lignin. Coniferyl alcohol is an intermediate in this pathway, and it accumulated in Zhenghong 22. Genes involved in the antibiotic synthesis pathway that generates podophyllotoxin showed significantly increased transcript levels in Zhenghong 22. We will further analyze this pathway and its metabolites in future research.
The metabolite tyramine also accumulated during the response to SN infection in Zhenghong 22. The terpenoid backbone formation pathway regulates the biosynthesis of carotenoids and promotes the synthesis of ABA, which is involved in stress adaptation. The zeatin biosynthesis pathway promotes cell division, which may be related to disease resistance, and the terpenoid and steroid biosynthesis pathway generates indole, which may initiate the defense response. Zhenghong 22 showed increased contents of monoterpenes and diterpenes after SN infection, and an increase in brassinosteroid, which promotes camalexin biosynthesis.
3. Discussion
After infection, the contents of various hormones increased and remained at a high level in the resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22. A sharp increase in the content of the ethylene precursor ACC was accompanied by increased transcript levels of ethylene synthesis genes and enhanced activity of ethylene synthesis pathways. Although SA plays an important role in the resistance response, there was little difference in SA content between the two cultivars. However, the content of the SA precursor trans-cinnamic acid was higher in Zhenghong 22 than in Longshu 9, and the transcript levels of defense-related genes initiated by SA were higher in Zhenghong 22. The ABA content was higher in Zhenghong 22 than in Longshu 9 both before and after SN infection. Therefore, we speculate that the ethylene/SA pathway is very important in SN resistance. The MAPK cascade signaling pathway is the most important pathway in the resistance response to SN. On the basis of our results, we speculate that secondary metabolites such as antitoxins, alkaloids, ketones, and terpenes may be toxic to SN, or participate in tropism and growth inhibition to inhibit the infection and spread of SN.
3.1. MAPK Cascade Signaling Pathway
The MAPK cascade signaling pathway is widely involved in the immune response of plants. It is a highly conserved signal module located downstream of eukaryotic receptors that respond to external stress [
14,
15,
16]. Arabidopsis receptor for activated C kinase 1 (encoded by
RACK1) functions as a MAPK scaffold protein in the absence of pathogen infection [
17]. In cotton, GhMORG1 functions as a scaffold protein and interacts with
GhMKK6 and
GhMPK4 to mediate resistance to Fusarium wilt [
18].
MAPKs are Ser/Thr protein kinases that participate in responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, growth and development, and signal transduction [
19]. The candidate genes identified in this study included
itf14g18430.t1, encoding a Ser/Thr protein kinase, and
itf12g18840.t1, encoding a gene related to ethylene synthesis. Future research will focus on how the ethylene signaling pathway is regulated during SN resistance.
3.2. Effects of Ethylene on Plant Disease Resistance
Ethylene synthesis is regulated by the activity of ACC synthases (ACS). The conversion of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to ACC by ACS is considered to be the rate-limiting step in ethylene biosynthesis [
20,
21]. Our results show that
ACS6 was upregulated in Zhenghong 22, as was ACC. These findings suggest that ethylene production increased to regulate resistance to SN.
Jasmonic acid (JA), SA, and ethylene are key components of responses to biotic stresses and play important roles in plant disease resistance [
22]. Many studies have shown that ethylene positively regulates resistance to some pathogens in plants. For example, ethylene biosynthesis was found to increase in rice plants infected with the blast fungus
Magnaporthe oryzae, and the ethylene signal transduction element encoded using
OsEIN3 may play an important role in the production of reactive oxygen species, JA, and phytoalexins [
23]. Overexpression of
TuACO3 promoted the biosynthesis of ethylene in plants and enhanced their resistance to
Blumeria graminisf. sp. Tritici [
24].
3.3. Synergistic Effects of Ethylene and Other Hormones on Plant Disease Resistance
Ethylene, SA, and JA are key regulators of the plant immune response. The synergy or antagonism among hormones and the intersection of related signaling pathways are current research hotspots. We found that the SA content increased rapidly in both cultivars after infection, and the ethylene biosynthetic pathway was initiated in the resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22.
It is known that SA can inhibit the conversion of ACC to ethylene [
25]. A study on tomato showed that coordination between ethylene and SA caused susceptibility to pathogens [
26]. Studies have shown that PTI and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) induced by pathogen infection can induce ethylene biosynthesis, and this can be enhanced using SA treatment. Both ethylene and SA were found to be involved in the immune response triggered by
Pseudomonas syringae in
Arabidopsis thaliana [
27]. We speculate that stem nematode infection may trigger PTI-mediated ethylene synthesis and SA synthesis in sweet potato.
Ethylene and JA function synergistically to regulate plant immune responses. Apetala 2/ethylene response factor (AP2/ERF) ORA59, an important component of the ethylene signaling pathway, plays an important role in this process. Hydroxycinnamic acid amides are a class of antibacterial metabolites that are involved in the defense response of plants against necrotic pathogens including
Botrytis cinerea and
Alternaria brassicicola [
28]. Another study showed that overexpression of
ORA59 in
Arabidopsis increased its resistance to
B. cinerea. ORA59 regulates the expression of JA/ethylene-related genes by directly binding to elements in the promoter of target genes to regulate plant defense against necrotic pathogens in a synergistic manner [
29]. In our study, the abundance of SA precursor substances and transcript levels of SA biosynthetic genes were higher in Zhenghong 22 than in Longshu 9. Interestingly, the SA content was higher in Zhenghong 22 than in Longshu at 30 dpi, but not at 10 dpi. We speculated that the combined regulation of the two hormones led to greater consumption of SA in the resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22 during its resistance response at the early stage. In further research, we will explore the joint regulatory pathway of ethylene and SA. Previous studies have shown that ABA, brassinosteroid, and other hormones regulate plant immunity by interacting with transcription factors [
30].
3.4. Role of Resistance-Related Metabolites
The first level of the immune response is PTI. During this process, pattern recognition receptors recognize conserved molecular patterns, such as lipopolysaccharides, peptidoglycans, chitins, flagellins, and ergosterol, collectively known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns [
31,
32]. They can initiate and continuously activate the innate immune response [
33]. The candidate gene
itf10g03250.t1 putatively encodes a subilase family protein. Its expression pattern suggests that it is an innate immune protein.
Plants produce resistance (R) proteins, many of which are intracellular NB-LRR proteins [
34]. Both pattern recognition receptors and NLR initiate downstream signaling networks, leading to the expression of defense-related genes, the production of reactive oxygen species, and callose deposition [
35,
36,
37]. The candidate genes
itf14g17940.t1 and
itf06g12490.t1 encode LRR receptors, and
itf04g08530.t1 encodes an R protein.
In our study, Zhenghong 22 accumulated shikimic acid, which is produced by the shikimic acid pathway from phosphoenolpyruvate and erythrose-4-phosphate. Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan are produced in the shikimic acid pathway, and are the cornerstones of protein synthesis. They are also common precursors of plant secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds and nitrogen-containing compounds. Phenylalanine is a common precursor of flavonoids, lignans, lignin, condensed tannins, and phenylpropionic acid benzene volatiles. Tyrosine is also used in the synthesis of isoquinoline alkaloids, pigment betaines, and quinones. Tryptophan is a precursor of alkaloids, plant antitoxins, indole glucosinolates, and auxin [
38].
Secondary metabolites are mainly involved in plant defense and environmental communication. In transgenic rice plants, the accumulation of phenylpropanoid and flavonoids increased or decreased to varying degrees after rice blast infection [
39]. In our study, Zhenghong 22 accumulated coniferyl alcohol, an intermediate in the phenylpropanoid pathway, to high levels. Coniferyl alcohol is a precursor for podophyllotoxin biosynthesis. Although the transcript levels of two podophyllotoxin biosynthesis genes were significantly increased in Zhenghong 22, the corresponding metabolite was not detected. However, our results confirm that these substances exist and play a role. The final products of the phenylalanine metabolic branch such as flavonoids, hydroxycinnamic acid lipids, hydroxycinnamic acid amides, and precursors of lignin, lignans, and tannins play important roles in the SN resistance of sweet potato [
40].
After infection, many defensive secondary metabolites are secreted by plants [
37]. In this study, we detected increased contents of nicotine, monoterpenes, and diterpenes in the SN-resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22, suggesting that these compounds play an important role in SN resistance. The specific metabolites and how they affect the disease resistance of sweet potato will be explored in further studies.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials
Two sweet potato cultivars were selected for this study: the resistance to both intrusive and expansive of stem nematode cultivar Zhenghong 22 and the susceptible cultivar Longshu 9. Thirty mid-sized (200–300 g) storage roots that were complete and healthy were selected for the infection experiment.
4.2. Stem Nematodes Infection
Diseased sweet potato storage roots were collected, and nematodes were isolated using the Bayman funnel method. The cultured nematodes were filtered using a 400-mesh sieve, washed three times with sterile water, and placed in a preprepared solution of 1% w/v penicillin and 1% w/v streptomycin. The nematodes were stored in this solution at 4 °C for 12 h, washed three times with sterile water, and then used to prepare a suspension of 200 nematodes per mL for use.
A cylinder-shaped piece (5 mm diameter) was removed from the middle of each storage root, and 200 nematodes were placed inside the hole with a sterilized pipette. After removing 1.5 cm from the bottom of the cylinder, it was replaced in the hole. The cut part was sealed with paraffin, and then the storage roots were placed in a sterilized plastic box and kept at 26–28 °C and 80–90% humidity [
41].
4.3. Sampling and Phenotypic Observations
Samples were collected at 0 h, 0.5 d, 1 d, 3 d, 10 d, and 30 d post-infection (dpi) with stem nematodes for transcriptome analysis. The phenotype of infected storage roots was recorded at 10 dpi and 30 dpi. Samples were collected at 0 dpi, 10 dpi, and 30 dpi for metabolomic analysis.
4.4. Transcriptome Sequencing and Raw Data Quality Control
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality of the extracted RNA was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and RNase-free agarose gel electrophoresis. After total RNA was extracted, eukaryotic mRNA was enriched using oligo (dT) beads. The enriched mRNA was cut into short fragments using fragmentation buffer and reverse-transcribed into cDNA with random primers. Second-strand cDNA was synthesized in a mixture of DNA polymerase I, RNase H, dNTP, and buffer. The cDNA fragments were purified using a QiaQuick PCR extraction kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) and end-repaired before addition of poly (A) and ligation to Illumina sequencing adapters. The ligation products were size-selected using agarose gel electrophoresis, PCR-amplified, and then sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co. (Guangzhou, China). The clean reads were compared with the reference genome (
http://sweetpotato.uga.edu/index.shtml, accessed on 31 May 2022) of sweet potato’s wild relative
Ipomoea trifida. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between samples were detected using DESeq2 software, with the following criteria: false discovery rate of <0.05 and absolute fold change of ≥2.
4.5. Metabolite Extraction, Data Processing, and Metabolite Identification
Each storage root sample (100 mg) was ground in liquid nitrogen and the homogenate was resuspended in 500 μL prechilled 80% methanol using vigorous vortexing. After processing, the supernatant was analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) [
42,
43].
The LC–MS/MS analyses were performed using a Vanquish ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatograph (UHPLC) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with an Orbitrap Q Exactive TM HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by Gene Denovo Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) [
44]. The raw data files generated using UHPLC–MS/MS were processed using Compound Discoverer 3.1 (CD3.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to perform peak alignment, peak-picking, and quantification for each metabolite. The normalized data were used to predict the molecular formula based on additive ions, molecular ion peaks, and fragment ions. Peaks were matched with data in online spectral libraries (mz Cloud (
https://www.mzcloud.org/, accessed on 31 May 2022); mz Vault) and the Mass List database to obtain accurate qualitative and relative quantitative results. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software R (R version R-3.4.3), Python (Python 2.7.6 version), and CentOS (CentOS release 6.6). When data were not normally distributed, the area normalization method was applied.
4.6. Real-Time Quantitative PCR
Candidate genes were selected for real-time quantitative PCR analyses, which were conducted on a CFX Connect instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with HiScript II reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). The specific primers for glycosyltransferase genes were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 (
Supplementary Table S1). A constitutively expressed gene (
Actin) was used as the internal control. The relative transcript levels of genes were calculated using the 2
−ΔΔCt method. Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were analyzed.
4.7. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis
The co-expression network was constructed using the WGCNA (v1.47) package in R. After filtering genes, we calculated the correlation coefficients between module eigengene values and samples or sample traits to identify biologically significant modules. The intramodular connection strength, module membership (MM) value, and gene significance values were calculated for each gene. Genes with high connectivity tended to be hub genes that may have important functions. Correlation analysis was performed using module eigengene values and data for specific traits or phenotypes. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between each gene and trait data were calculated for the most relevant module (positive and negative correlations) corresponding to each phenotype. The network was visualized using Cytoscape_3.3.0.
5. Conclusions
In this study, Zhenghong 22, a sweet potato cultivar highly resistant to SN, and Longshu 9, a highly susceptible cultivar, were analyzed to reveal the regulatory pathways involved in SN resistance using transcriptome and metabolome correlation analysis. In total, 45 key candidate genes and 32 key candidate metabolites were obtained. In the early stage (0–1 dpi), activation of the MAPK signaling pathway led to the upregulation of genes involved in ethylene synthesis and disease resistance in Zhenghong 22. The SA regulatory pathway was activated, possibly as a result of two interacting hormones. Respiratory burst oxidase activated the hypersensitive response in the resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22, and the glycolytic pathway was upregulated to provide amino acids and energy. In the middle (3–10 dpi) stage, brassinosteroid mediated camalexin production, and zeatin also played an important role. Pti1 may have enhanced the accumulation of reactive oxygen species. At the late stage (30 dpi), the respiratory burst oxidase gene and Pti1 were again activated. The secondary metabolite biosynthesis pathways remained active and generated various hormones and phenylpropanoids that were incorporated into lignin to participate in disease resistance, as well as other secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, monobactam, and ketones. Alkaloids, monoterpenoids, flavonoids, and other terpenoids were implicated in resistance to SN. Our results indicate that itf12g18840, which encodes a gene related to ACC synthesis, and itf06g12490, which encodes an LRR-like protein, play important roles in resistance to SN in sweet potato. Gene function identification will be the next research direction for our group.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12102052/s1. Figure S1. Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between uninfected (control, CK) and infected sweet potato. (A) Number of DEGs at various time points in the resistant variety Zhenghong 22. (B) Number of DEGs at various time points in the susceptible variety Longshu 9. Figure S2. Trend analysis of transcriptome data and KEGG analysis of selected modules. (A) Different modules were obtained using trend analysis of DEGs in the two varieties. (B) KEGG analysis of genes in 10 selected modules. Figure S3. Transcriptome analysis with criterion adjusted to 10 times difference in transcript levels between pairs of samples, and KEGG analysis of DEGs. (A) Number of DEGs showing 10 times differences in transcript levels in the two sweet potato varieties at various time points. (B) KEGG analysis of DEGs. Figure S4. PCA based on transcriptome data. (A) PCA diagram based on metabolites detected in negative ion mode. (B) PCA diagram based on metabolites detected in positive ion mode. Figure S5. Trend analysis of metabolome data and KEGG analysis of selected modules. (A) Different modules obtained by trend analysis of DMs between the two varieties. (B) KEGG analysis of metabolites in four selected modules. Figure S6. Analysis of DMs showing at least 10 times difference in abundance between pairs of samples. (A) Number of metabolites showing at least 10 times difference between pairs of samples. (B) KEGG analysis of DMs. Figure S7. Selection of modules related to resistance to stem nematode from WGCNA. Figure S8. Correlation heatmap of the top 100 DEGs and top 100 DMs. Figure S9. Genes and metabolites responding to stem nematode infection in the resistant cultivar Zhenghong 22. (A) Genes in secondary metabolite synthesis pathway. (B) Genes in MAPK signaling pathway-plant. (C) Genes in plant hormone signaling transduction pathway. (D) Genes in plant–pathogen interaction pathway. (E) Metabolites accumulated after stem nematode infection. Table S1. Quantitative Real-time PCR primer design. Table S2. Annotation of metabolites in correlation network diagram (
Figure 6).
Author Contributions
S.Q. and J.M. conducted most of the experimental work and wrote the manuscript together. Y.W., J.C. (Jingwei Chen), and Z.K. performed part bioinformatics analysis. Q.B., J.C. (Jinjin Chen), and Y.Y. (Yumeng Yin) performed the data collation. G.C. and G.Z. prepared the materials. G.Y. supervised this research. Y.Y. (Yufeng Yang) and H.S. designed and guided this research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Independent Innovation Program of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2022ZC10, 2023ZC012), the Earmarked Fund for CARS-10-Sweet Potato (CARS-10), the Special Fund for Henan Agriculture Research System (HARS-22-04-G1), and the Henan Joint Research Program for Improved Agricultural Varieties (2022010401-2).
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
We thank Zhai Hong from China Agricultural University for her valuable suggestions regarding manuscript structure.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- FAO. 2021. Available online: www.fao.org/giews/english/fo/index.htm (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- Xie, Y.Z.; Yin, Q.H.; Dai, Q.W.; Qiu, R.L. Inheritance and breeding for resistance to sweet potato nematodes. Plant Genet. Resour. 2004, 5, 393–396. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhai, H. Cloning of RGA Related to Stem Nematode Resistance of Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) with Modified SSAP. Mol. Plant Breed. 2005, 3, 369–374. [Google Scholar]
- Zhai, H.; Shang, L.; Liu, Q. Construction of SSH cDNA Library Induced by Ditylenchus destructor in Sweetpotato and Analysis of its Expressed Sequence Tags. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2010, 18, 141–148. [Google Scholar]
- Zhai, H.; Liu, Q. Expression Analysis of Sweetpotato Myo Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase Gene. Mol. Plant Breed. 2009, 7, 537–544. [Google Scholar]
- Qu, M.; Zha, X.; Wang, Y. Cloning and Copy Number Estimation of NBS-LRR Based Disease Resistance Gene Analogs from Ipomoea batatas. China J. Tropical Crop. 2008, 29, 610–617. [Google Scholar]
- Si, Z.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, K.; Ji, Z.; Han, J. Characterization of Nucleotide Binding-Site-Encoding Genes in Sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., and Their Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2021, 161, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Si, Z.; Wang, L.; Qiao, Y.; Roychowdhury, R.; Ji, Z.; Zhang, K.; Han, J. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the nucleotide-binding site-encoding genes in four Ipomoea species. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 960723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Ma, D.; Li, Q. Initial Application of SCAR Markers Linked to a Gene for Stem Nematode Disease Resistance in Assisted Selection in Sweetpotato Breeding. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 25, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
- Zhai, H.; Wang, F.; Si, Z.; Huo, J.; Xing, L.; An, Y.; He, S.; Liu, Q. A myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase gene, IbMIPS1, enhances salt and drought tolerance and stem nematode resistance in transgenic sweet potato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 592–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, G.; Bo, Y.; Li, Y. Production of transgenic sweet potato plants resistant to stem nematodes using Oryza cystatin-I gene. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 128, 408–414. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, G.; Peng, D.; Sun, J.; Huang, W.; Peng, H.; Long, H. Cloning and sequence analysis of a new cathepsin L-like cysteine proteinase gene from Ditylenchus destructor. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 60–68. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, N.; Zhai, H.; Yu, X. Development of SRAP Markers Linked to a Gene for Stem Nematode Resistance in Sweet potato 2011, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. J. Integr. Agric. 2013, 12, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widmann, C.; Gibson, S.; Jarpe, M.B.; Johnson, G.L. Mitogen-activated protein kinase: Conservation of a three-kinase module from yeast to human. Physiol. Rev. 1999, 79, 143–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pitzschke, A.; Schikora, A.; Hirt, H. MAPK cascade signalling networks in plant defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Popescu, S.C.; Popescu, G.V.; Bachan, S.; Zhang, Z.; Gerstein, M.; Snyder, M.; Dinesh-Kumar, S.P. MAPK target networks in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed using functional protein microarrays. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Xu, J.; Zhang, S. RACK1, scaffolding a heterotrimeric G protein and a MAPK cascade. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Guo, H.; He, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Guo, D.; Guo, X. Scaffold protein GhMORG1 enhances the resistance of cotton to Fusarium oxysporum by facilitating the MKK6-MPK4 cascade. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1421–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dóczi, R.; Bögre, L. The Quest for MAP Kinase Substrates: Gaining Momentum. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 918–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binder, B.M. Ethylene signaling in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 7710–7725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leslie, C.A.; Romani, R.J. Salicylic acid: A new inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis. Plant Cell Rep. 1986, 5, 144–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alazem, M.; Lin, N.S. Roles of plant hormones in the regulation of host-virus interactions. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, C.; Li, W.; Cao, J.; Meng, F.; Yu, Y.; Huang, J.; Jiang, L.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X.; et al. Activation of ethylene signaling pathways enhances disease resistance by regulating ROS and phytoalexin production in rice. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017, 89, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, H.; Dong, L.; Han, X.; Jin, H.; Yin, C.; Han, Y.; Li, B.; Qin, H.; Zhang, J.; Shen, Q.; et al. The TuMYB46L-TuACO3 module regulates ethylene biosynthesis in einkorn wheat defense to powdery mildew. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 2526–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leslie, C.A.; Romani, R.J. Inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis by salicylic Acid. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 833–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Donnell, P.J.; Jones, J.B.; Antoine, F.R.; Ciardi, J.; Klee, H.J. Ethylene-dependent salicylic acid regulates an expanded cell death response to a plant pathogen. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001, 25, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, R.; Su, J.; Meng, X.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, S. Multilayered Regulation of Ethylene Induction Plays a Positive Role in Arabidopsis Resistance against Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhang, K.; Meng, Y.; Hu, J.; Ding, M.; Bian, J.; Yan, M.; Han, J.; Zhou, M. Jasmonic acid/ethylene signaling coordinates hydroxycinnamic acid amides biosynthesis through ORA59 transcription factor. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2018, 95, 444–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.N.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.J.; Cho, K.M.; Kim, Y.; Lee, D.S.; Lee, M.-H.; Kim, S.Y.; Hong, J.C.; et al. The transcription factor ORA59 exhibits dual DNA binding specificity that differentially regulates ethylene- and jasmonic acid-induced genes in plant immunity. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 2763–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Feng, B.; Zhou, J.M.; Tang, D. Plant immune signaling: Advancing on two frontiers. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, M.; Ngou, B.P.M.; Ding, P.; Xin, X.F. PTI-ETI crosstalk: An integrative view of plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 62, 102030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yakura, H. Cognitive and Memory Functions in Plant Immunity. Vaccines 2020, 8, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pélissier, R.; Violle, C.; Morel, J.B. Plant immunity: Good fences make good neighbors. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 62, 102045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, L.; Chen, H.; Curtis, C.; Fu, Z.Q. Go in for the kill: How plants deploy effector-triggered immunity to combat pathogens. Virulence 2014, 5, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, M.; Jiang, Z.; Bi, G.; Nomura, K.; Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Cai, B.; Zhou, J.-M.; He, S.Y.; Xin, X.-F. Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity. Nature 2021, 592, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, K.; Xia, J.; Wang, Y. Genetic Improvement of Rice Blast Resistance in Restorer Line M630 and Metabolomic Anaysis. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2021, 22, 427–437. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, E.; da Graça, J.P.; Porto, C.; Prado, R.M.D.; Hoffmann-Campo, C.B.; Meyer, M.C.; Nunes, E.D.O.; Pilau, E.J. Unraveling Asian Soybean Rust metabolomics using mass spectrometry and Molecular Networking approach. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shetty, R.; Fretté, X.; Jensen, B.; Shetty, N.P.; Jensen, J.D.; Jørgensen, H.J.; Newman, M.A.; Christensen, L.P. Silicon-induced changes in antifungal phenolic acids, flavonoids, and key phenylpropanoid pathway genes during the interaction between miniature roses and the biotrophic pathogen Podosphaera pannosa. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 2194–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biała, W.; Jasiński, M. The Phenylpropanoid Case—It Is Transport That Matters. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, J.; Caparrós-Ruiz, D.; Grotewold, E. Grass phenylpropanoids: Regulate before using. Plant Sci. An Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2012, 184, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, C. Technical Code of Practice for Identification of Resistance to Sweetpotato Diseases-Part 2: Sweetpotato Stem Nematode; NY/T 3939.2-2021; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, N.; Yu, X.; Jie, Q. A genetic linkage map based on AFLP and SSR markers and mapping of QTL for dry-matter content in sweet potato. Mol. Breed. 2013, 32, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.B. Production and Characteristic Identification of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Plant Overexpressing IbMIPS1 and IbMVD Genes. Ph.D. Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Want, E.J.; Masson, P.; Michopoulos, F.; Wilson, I.D.; Theodoridis, G.; Plumb, R.S.; Shockcor, J.; Loftus, N.; Holmes, E.; Nicholson, J. Global metabolic profiling of animal and human tissues via UPLC-MS. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).