Next Article in Journal
Characterization and Transcriptome Analysis of Maize Small-Kernel Mutant smk7a in Different Development Stages
Next Article in Special Issue
Priorities for Bark Anatomical Research: Study Venues and Open Questions
Previous Article in Journal
Spermine-Salicylic Acid Interplay Restrains Salt Toxicity in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Double Puzzle: Morphogenesis of the Bi-Layered Leaf Adaxial Epidermis of Magnolia grandiflora
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/plants12020353
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphoanatomical Changes in Eucalyptus grandis Leaves Associated with Resistance to Austropuccinia psidii in Plants of Two Ages

by
Edson Luiz Furtado
1,*,
André Costa da Silva
2,*,
Érica Araújo Rodrigues Silva
3,
Roberto Antônio Rodella
4,
Marcus Alvarenga Soares
5,
José Eduardo Serrão
6,
Cristiane de Pieri
1 and
José Cola Zanuncio
7,*
1
Departamento de Proteção Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu 18610-034, São Paulo, Brazil
2
Departamento de Fitossanidade, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
3
Instituto de Pesquisas e Estudos Florestais (IPEF), Piracicaba 18618-000, São Paulo, Brazil
4
Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu 18618-000, São Paulo, Brazil
5
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina 39100-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil
6
Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
7
Departamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(2), 353; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020353
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Plant Anatomy – Structure, Function and Environment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The fungus Austropuccinia psidii infects young tissues of Eucalyptus plants until they are two years old in the nursery and field, causing Myrtaceae rust. The characteristics making older eucalypt leaves resistant to A. psidii and the reason for the low levels of this pathogen in older plants need evaluations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphological differences between Eucalyptus grandis leaves of different growth stages and two plant ages to propose a visual phenological scale to classify E. grandis leaves according to their maturation stages and to evaluate the time of leaf maturation for young and adult plants. A scale, based on a morphological differentiation for E. grandis leaves, was made. The color, shape and size distinguished the leaves of the first five leaf pairs. Anatomical analysis showed a higher percentage of reinforced tissue, such as sclerenchyma-like tissue and collenchyma, greater leaf blade thickness, absence of lower palisade parenchyma in the mature leaves and a higher number of cavities with essential oils than in younger ones. Changes in anatomical characteristics that could reduce the susceptibility of older E. grandis leaves to A. psidii coincide with the time of developing leaf resistance. Reduced infection of this pathogen in older plants appears to be associated with a more rapid maturation of their leaf tissues.

1. Introduction

Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil are among the most productive in the world, with approximately 40 m3 ha−1 year−1 [1,2]. Adequate environmental conditions [3] and physiological adaptations [4] favor this productivity. Additionally, rapid growth and high yield of Eucalyptus clones can improve pulpwood production [5]. Eucalyptus grandis (W. Hill) Maiden is one of the most commonly used for this purpose [6]. This species has an excellent genetic basis [4,7,8], but most of its genotypes are susceptible to Austropuccinia psidii (G. Winter) Beenken [4,5,9]. This fungus, with a wide geographical distribution, is present in four of the five continents threatening Myrtaceae biodiversity, mainly in the Eucalyptus forestry industry [10,11].
Austropuccinia psidii, the etiologic agent of Myrtaceae rust, occurs mainly in Eucalyptus nurseries and on young plants in the field. This fungus is found on plant parts younger than two years [10], such as leaf primordia, young leaves and petiole. It causes necrosis and deformation of tissues with yellowish pustules in highly susceptible hosts [12,13,14]. Austropuccinia psidii generally penetrates directly through the cuticle and epidermis by appressorium [1,15,16]. However, the entrance, establishment and reproduction of this fungus gradually decrease with the Eucalyptus leaf age [15,17]. Austropuccinia psidii does not infect the leaves of susceptible eucalypt plants from the fifth leaf stage onward [15,16].
The effect of plant-growth stages on pathogen resistance is age-related resistance, developmental resistance or ontogenic resistance and has been reported in Myrtaceae [18] and other plants [19]. Host tissue susceptibility may increase or decrease over time according to the disease [20]. Resistance at different host development stages varies with plant age or tissue maturity and may be specific or broad-spectrum, driven by diverse mechanisms, depending on plant–pathogen interactions [19]. The influence of the phenological stage of Eucalyptus leaves on A. psidii resistance and the factors making older leaves resistant need to be better understood. This represents a key step to developing a viable method to manage eucalypt rust efficiently [1]. The effects of Eucalyptus leaf age on the production of antimicrobial compounds and on A. psidii pre-infection success have been studied [15,21,22,23], but the relation between leaf anatomy and resistance to rust has not. This information may improve our understanding of the phenological leaf age and resistance to eucalyptus rust.
The morphological characteristics of E. grandis leaves at different growth stages were studied. A visual scale to classify the eucalypt leaves relative to their stage of maturation and the time for leaf maturation of young and adult plants in the field using a scale was proposed. The hypothesis was that the age-related resistance of E. grandis to A. psidii includes morphological defense mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Characteristics

A visual phenological scale for E. grandis leaves of young and adult plants at six and 20 months old, respectively, is proposed. The evaluation was conducted in Santa Branca (23°24’ S and 45°51’ W), São Paulo, Brazil, with quartizarenic soil in the area. Cultural treatment and plant fertilization were applied as recommended by the forest company (calcium nitrate 1.0 g L−1; MAP 0.25 g L−1; potassium nitrate 0.75 g L−1; magnesium sulfate 0.7 g L−1; sulfate ammonium 0.33 g L−1 and micronutrient solution 0.15 mL L−1 every six months until the plants were two years old). Thirty branches of young and adult plants were collected at the top, median and lower plant heights from three E. grandis clones in the field (TC31, VR3748 and C041A) at “Votorantim Celulose e Papel (VCP)” commercial plantations, with 6 to 10 leaf pairs per branch, at different development stages per clone and age (Figure S1). These leaves were detached from the branches with their petiole, separated into pairs according to their position from the tip to the base of the branches and visually rated. The apical bud and the leaf pair nearby (closed) were numbered as growth leaf stage “zero” and not considered in this study. The subsequent opened leaf pairs were numbered growth stages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, grouped by similarity per class. The first pair considered was the very red one; the second pair with leaves larger than the previous and also red; average ones with color tending from slightly red to green; green and older leaves had more rigid appearance and wider than previous stages; and those with larger size than the others, with an intense green color, respectively. The subsequent leaves had no significant change in color or size compared to the fifth pair and, thus, they were not considered. The leaf length, width, area and shape; the shape of the leaf apex; the petiole diameter; and the leaf color were evaluated. The length, width and leaf area were measured using a scanner; the petiole diameter with a digital caliper rule (Digimess Resolution of 0.01 mm); the shape of the leaf apex was determined [24]; and the leaf color evaluation was based on the Exotic Encyclopedia Color Chart [25].

2.2. Anatomical Characteristics

The leaf growth stages were defined and used in scale proposed with three leaves per developmental class, from 6- and 20-month-old plants classified according to their anatomical characteristics. The leaves per stage were cut in the third middle region of the midrib and the adjacent internervural area. The leaf cuts were fixed in a solution of formaldehyde, acetic acid and 70% ethanol (5:5:90 v/v) for 48 h (Johansen, 1940) and stored in 70% ethanol. The samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in glycol methacrylate resin [26] and transverse sections of approximately 8 µm were sectioned with rotary microtome (RM 2145, Leica). Fifteen fragments were obtained per sample. Sections were stained with 0.05% toluidine blue in sodium phosphate buffer [27] and mounted in synthetic resin (Permount-Fisher, Suwanee, GA 30024, USA). The leaf structures were analyzed in triplicates, drawn with the aid of a projection microscope Axioskop 40 coupled to an optical microscope Zeiss (Axio Vision Camera and projection Axio Viewer), and the measurements of the structural characters carried out using a table scanner coupled to area meter. The following anatomical characteristics of the interveinal region of the leaf blade were quantified: leaf thickness, cuticle, epidermis and palisade parenchyma of adaxial and abaxial faces. The percentage of palisade parenchyma and spongy parenchyma in relation to leaf thickness, area and number of oil cavities per mm2 of leaf surface was calculated. The anatomical sections were embedded in historesin and stained with Sudan IV before measuring the thickness of the adaxial and abaxial cuticle.

2.3. Leaf Differentiation over Time

The periods for changes between growth stages of E. grandis C041H leaves were assessed using the scale proposed. The evaluation was conducted in the same soil type, cultural treatment and fertilization, where branches were collected during the proposed scale preparation. Ten 6-month-old plants and ten adult 20-month-old plants were evaluated. Ten lateral branches were marked in the middle third of each tree. The leaves of each stage were marked with a different color. The plants were evaluated daily according to the proposed scale (Figure 1) and the time taken for the leaves to reach the next stage was evaluated over 60 days. The average temperature and rainfall during the experiment were 23.5 °C and 21.2 mm, respectively.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The variance in the results of quantitative characteristics of the leaf anatomical analysis was calculated and the means compared by Tukey test at 5% probability and submitted to multivariate statistical tests of cluster and principal component analysis (PCA) [28]. Principal component analysis allowed to reduce the number of variables with the least possible information losses. The Y1 and Y2 axes represented the directions with maximum variability (which allow for a simpler interpretation of the structure of covariance matrix) with methodology proposed by Sneath and Sokal [28]. The correlation values between the 13 anatomical characters and the two main components (Y1 and Y2) were studied. Cluster analysis of quantitative anatomical leaf characteristics was performed with the Euclidean distance average between the five leaf growth stages and graphically demonstrated by dendograms. Data for leaf differentiation over time were analyzed with two factors (age and two rankings per leaf development: 1–3 and 3–5) and the variable was the number of days. The variance and treatment means were compared by Tukey test at 5% probability. The normality and homogeneity were examined using the residues without deviations based on the presuppositions of the analysis. The statistical analyses were performed using R (R Development Core Team) software.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characteristics

The qualitative and quantitative characteristics differentiated the five main phenological E. grandis leaf stages (Table 1, Figure S1, Table S1 and Supplementary Data) and the photographic visual scale accurately identified them (Figure 1). The qualitative (color and shape) and quantitative characteristics of the leaf blade (diameter of the petiole, leaf area, length and width) per development stage were similar between 6- and 20-month-old plants. The apex shape (sharp) and the leaf blade color (chocolate) differentiated the first leaf stage from the others (Table 1 and Figure 1). Staining Ivy Green (number 70 of the color letters) discriminated the fifth leaf development stage. The three intermediate stages (2, 3 and 4) were similar with an ovoid shape, sharped apex and olive-green color (84), making it necessary to individually measuring them (Table 1 and Figure 1). The leaf area, length and width distinguished leaf stages 2, 3 and 4 with values of 2.3–3.8, 7.2–8.9 and 19.2–27.5 cm2 of leaf area, 3.5–4.3, 5.0–6.2 and 8.3–9.5 cm long, 1.2–1.5, 2.2–2.5 and 3.7–4.7 cm wide, respectively.

3.2. Anatomical Characteristics

The increase or decrease in the percentage of tissues over the five leaf-growth stages were similar in the leaf midribs of the 6- and 20-month-old plants, but it varied with the leaf development stage (Table 2 and Figure 2). The percentages of vascular bundles and collenchyma increased from stages 1 to 4 and with lower values at stage 5. Leaves of 6-month-old plants had no collenchyma during stage 1, which was found from the beginning of leaf development in 20-month-old plants and with an expressive increase in leaf stages 3 and 4. The parenchyma decreased in leaf stages 1 to 4 and increased in stage-5 leaves. The sclerenchyma-like tissue was found only in stage-5 leaves with significant thickening near the epidermis. The total area of the midrib increased during all leaf development stages. The total epidermal tissue in the internervural leaf region of young plants decreased in the upper and lower surfaces according to leaf development. In contrast, those from adult plants showed no apparent tendency for variation in the percentage of these tissues over time (Table 3 and Figure 2). The upper-leaf palisade parenchyma increased from stages 1 to 3 in young and adult plants and decreased in the following ones. The lower palisade parenchyma of younger plants increased up to stage 2, was stable during stage 3 and decreased until it disappeared at stage 5. The percentage of this tissue decreased throughout leaf development and disappeared in stages 4 and 5 in adult plants. The spongy parenchyma decreased until stage 3, but with a significant increase from then on for the leaves of younger plants. The spongy parenchyma of adult plants decreased until stage 2, doubled in percentage from stages 3 to 4 and maintained a high percentage during stage 5. The spongy parenchyma increased and, consequently, the upper palisade decreased, especially at stage 3. Leaf thickness and the total area of oil cavities of young and adult leaf plants increased from stages 1 to 5, especially during stages 4 and 5 (Table 3 and Figure 2). The first leaf stage had no oils in the cavities, but their numbers increased with leaf development (Figure 2). A single cavity with oil was found in the leaves of stages 2 and 3 and all cavities in stages 3 and 4 had essential oils. The total area of the leaf internervural regions increased with plant development.
The five leaf development stages of young and adult E. grandis plants differed, based on the dendrogram (Figure 3) and graphic dispersion (Figure 4), resulting from 13 quantitative anatomical descriptors of the midrib and internervural region (Table 4). Cluster analysis presented four groups, at 0.15 to 0.2 on the Euclidean distance scale (Figure 3). Young eucalypt plants had the first, second, third and fourth groups formed by the first; second and third; fourth; and fifth development leaf stages, respectively (Figure 3A). The second and third leaf stages are anatomically closer to stage-1 leaves than to those of 4 and 5. The first, second, third and fourth groups for mature eucalypt plants were constituted by the first and the second leaves; third; fourth; and fifth leaf stages, respectively (Figure 3B). The first and second leaf stages were more anatomically similar than the others were. The third group, formed by leaf stage 3, was anatomically similar to stages 1 and 2. The convergence of other groups occurred at a very advanced scale level, demonstrating differences in leaf anatomy between them. Leaf stages 1, 2 and 3 are the most susceptible to rust and are anatomically similar, whereas those of leaf stages 4 and 5 are more resistant to the pathogen and anatomically similar. The correlation values between the 13 anatomical characters and the two main components (Y1 and Y2) of the young and adult plants, respectively, grouped the leaf stages in an identical manner to the cluster analysis (Figure 4). The correlation values were close to 1 with high discriminatory power for the leaf stages (Table 4). The major contribution of anatomical characters related to Y1 values accounted for 86.4 and 80.5 of the accumulated information for young and adult plants, respectively. Reinforcement tissues, such as sclerenchyma-like tissue, collenchyma and vascular bundles, in addition to leaf thickness and cavities containing essential oils, were the major influences on the Y1 axis, consistent with the hypothesis that the concentration of reinforcement tissues and cavities with essential oils are important for leaf resistance to rust.

3.3. Period of Leaf Differentiation

The period of leaf stage changes from 1 to 3 and 1 to 5 on young plants was longer than on adult ones (Table 5). The changes in the leaf stages from 1 to 3 and 1 to 5 were 34, 53, 24 and 43 days for young and adult plants, respectively. The initial stages during maturation were longer in leaves of young plants (1, 2 and 3).

4. Discussion

The proposed visual scale (Figure 1) will allow for the classification of the eucalypts leaf of interest according to its development stage using a simple comparison or by its length or width using graphic interpolation (Supplementary Data: Table S1 and Figure S2).
The differentiation of the first five growth E. grandis leaf stages is important to quantify eucalypt rust disease, the resistance of different eucalypt genotypes and to select leaves for deposition of inoculums in resistance tests [15,16]. This made it possible to evaluate eucalypt rust severity, since the leaves are similar from this stage onward and no infection by A. psidii was found after stage 5. The classification into five growth stages based on leaf ontogeny and an image scale for leaf differentiation is widely used for rubber tree leaves [29] to evaluate a Pseudocercospora ulei–rubber tree pathosystem [30,31]. The quantification of rust on eucalypt leaves and their resistance to this disease must be carried out using the first to third leaf pairs, since the disease decreases after the third leaf stage onward [15,22]. The apex shape (acute) and leaf blade color (chocolate) easily distinguish the first leaf pair; however, the second, third and fourth leaf pairs are similar, making the measurement of their length, width or even leaf area necessary to distinguish them.
The reinforced tissues, such as sclerenchyma, collenchyma, vascular bundles and leaf thickness, with the increasing age of the E. grandis leaf stages, based on anatomical analysis, show the importance of these tissues in the resistance to pathogens [32,33,34,35]. The anatomical analysis of the plant can evidence the pathogenesis and structural differences that make them generally or partially resistant to pathogens [36]. Austropuccinia psidii generally directly penetrates eucalypt leaves, through the cuticle and epidermis, by forming appressorium [15,16]. The damage by this fungus, mainly in the first to third leaf pairs, and the decreasing number and size of lesions from the fourth pair tending to zero on subsequent leaf stages make older leaves resistant, even in susceptible clones [22]. The entrance, colonization and reproduction of A. psidii decrease dramatically from the third leaf stage, dropping to zero from the fifth eucalypt leaf stage [15,22] (Figure S3), which may be due to the increasing leaf tissue reinforcement as eucalypts with mature leaves. The reinforced leaf tissues act as a physical barrier preventing pathogen penetration and growth [32,33,35]. The anatomical similarities between leaf stages 1, 2 and 3 (more susceptible to rust) than leaf stages 4 and 5 (more resistant to rust) have been reported [22]. The cluster and main component analyses reveal the relationship between the quantities of leaf reinforcement tissues and increasing leaf age. The decrease until the total absence of the lower palisade parenchyma in stages 3 to 4 and 4 to 5, respectively, in 6-month-old plants and the decrease in stages 1 to 2 and 2 to 3 until complete absence in stages 4 and 5 in the leaves of 20-month-old plants are important. Isobilateral mesophyll at the early stage of leaf growth is expected in Myrtaceae species, such as Calistemon and Eucalyptus; however, they become dorsal–ventral in mature stages [37]. This phenomenon should affect the colonization by the pathogen due to the lack of this tissue.
The deposition of lignin with the transformation of collenchyma to sclerenchyma during leaf stage 5 may be important to prevent the penetration of A. psidii in the eucalypt leaves due to the multiple layers surrounding the leaf interior. This forms a thicker zone with lignified and stronger tissues [33,38], protecting the parenchyma and vascular bundles from fungal invasion [33,34]. The thicker sclerenchyma cells observed in this study near the epidermis formed a stronger barrier against A. psidii penetration, as reported for Magnaporthe oryzae penetration in rice plants [33,39]. The sclerenchyma cells are important for the immune response to pathogen invasion [33] and greater thickness and higher number of cavities with essential oils are also linked to the resistance to A. psidii. This increase, in addition to the quantity of wax on older leaves and the chemical composition of cuticle waxes, may interfere with A. psidii infection on the older eucalypt leaves [15,16,40]. The antimicrobial compounds, including chitinase and peroxidase enzymes, polyphenols and tannins, monoterpenes, steroids, monounsaturated hydrocarbons, limonene and essential oils in older eucalypt leaves [21,22,23], reduced the germination, penetration and colonization processes in this fungus [15,16]. The increase in the number of cavities with essential oils, mainly at the 4th and 5th leaf stages, is important because these oils have a complex of volatile organic compounds [41] toxic to plant pathogens [42,43,44]. The limonene in the essential oil is toxic to A. psidii and its quantity increases with eucalypt leaf age [22]. The formation of reinforced tissues and the increase in the number of oil cavities should be related to the resistance of the older eucalypt leaves to A. psidii infection. This information improves our understanding of the phenological leaf age and resistance to A. psidii infection.
The leaf scale proposed made it possible to evaluate the periods of leaf-stage change in 6-month-old and 20-month-old E. grandis plants. Younger plants may be more vulnerable to rust because they remain longer during the initial stages (1, 2 and 3) and with a longer maturation period. The transition from stages 1 to 3 and 1 to 5 was 10 days faster in older than in younger plants, which may explain no occurrence of this disease in the former in the field due to leaf escape during periods of high susceptibility. This phenomenon may reduce the occurrence of the disease due to a shorter exposure period for leaves more susceptible to rust and this could reduce the epidemic period [1].
The higher resistance of adult plants (20-month-old E. grandis) and older leaves (above the fourth leaf stage) of Eucalyptus spp. to rust is similar to that found in rubber- Pseudocercospora ulei pathosystems (leaves up to or older than 21 days are susceptible and resistant, respectively) and the higher occurrence of this fungus on young rubber trees is due to the new shoots sprouting every month [30]. The lower intensity of A. psidii in older plants may be due to a shortened period of high susceptibility associated with more rapid leaf maturation, similar to that reported for the Micosphaerella sp. and Teratosphaeria sp. on Eucalyptus plants [45]. The transition from young to adult leaves of the hybrid genotypes of E. globulus × E. urophylla, and E. urophylla × E. grandis is faster reducing the susceptibility to the Mycosphaerella spot [45]. Rare pathogens infect the host organs at all ages and stages and growth stages susceptible to infection are present in most of them [42]. The development of genetic materials with a faster leaf maturation rate may decrease the occurrence of A. psidii, both in the nursery and in the field, and is an important tool for breeders. This work provides additional information about the mechanisms of resistance of eucalypt plants to A. psidii.

5. Conclusions

This is the first report demonstrating the natural physical resistance mechanisms of older eucalypt leaves to Myrtaceae rust, based on morphological and anatomical characteristics, which may explain the lower occurrence of this disease in older eucalypt plants.
The occurrence of reinforced tissues, including sclerenchyma-like tissue and collenchyma, greater leaf blade thickness, vascular bundles and the high number of cavities containing essential oils, may contribute to older E. grandis leaves being more resistant to rust.
The absence of lower palisade parenchyma from the fourth leaf stage of young plants and those of third leaf stage in adult plants could be important to reduce tissue invasion by A. psidii.
The lower occurrence of the fungus A. psidii in older plants is probably due to the escape of its leaves due to the rapid maturation period (10 days) compared to younger plants under two years old.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12020353/s1, Figure S1: Eucalypt branch with leaves of different development stages collected on 6 and 20 months old plants; Figure S2: Length (blue) and width (red) of eucalyptus leaves at five development stages; Figure S3: Abaxial surface of a Eucalyptus grandis clone 120 leaf in the fifth development stage h after the inoculation of Austropuccinia psidii. Resistant clone with shriveled spores (arrow) without appressorium or pathogen penetration (arrow) (A). Susceptible clone with extensive germ tube formation without appressorium or pathogen penetration (arrow) (B); Table S1: Length (cm) and width (cm) of eucalytp leaves at five development stages.

Author Contributions

E.L.F. conceived, designed, reviewed drafts of the paper and contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. A.C.d.S. analyzed the data, discussed results and wrote the paper. É.A.R.S. conceived, designed, performed the sampling, processed, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. R.A.R. conceived, designed and reviewed drafts of the paper. M.A.S. reviewed drafts and wrote the paper. J.E.S. reviewed drafts and wrote the paper. C.d.P. reviewed drafts and wrote the paper. J.C.Z. reviewed drafts and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)”, and “Programa Cooperativo sobre Proteção Florestal (PROTEF) do Instituto de Pesquisas e Estudos Florestais (IPEF)”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available because many of them are qualitative and most of the quantitative analyses were conducted by computerized images of plant tissue anatomy.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the researcher Donizete D. Costa of Votorantim Celulose e Papel for his collaboration. Global Edico Services corrected the English of this manuscript. Phillip John Villani (University of Melbourne, Australia) revised and corrected the English language used in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alfenas, A.C.; Zauza, E.A.V.; Mafia, R.G.; Assis, T.F. Clonagem e Doenças do Eucalipto, 2nd ed; Editora UFV: Viçosa, Brazil, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. De Moraes Goncalves, J.L.; Alvares, C.A.; Higa, A.R.; Silva, L.D.; Alfenas, A.C.; Stahl, J.; Ferraz, S.F.d.B.; Lima, W.d.P.; Brancalion, P.H.S.; Hubner, A.; et al. Integrating genetic and silvicultural strategies to minimize abiotic and biotic constraints in Brazilian eucalypt plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 301, 6–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stape, J.L.; Binkley, D.; Ryan, M.G. Production and carbon allocation in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation with water and nutrient manipulations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 920–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silva, P.H.M.; Miranda, A.C.; Moraes, M.L.T.; Furtado, E.L.; Stape, J.L.; Alvares, C.A.; Sentelhas, P.C.; Mori, E.S.; Sebbenn, A.M. Selecting for rust (Puccinia psidii) resistance in Eucalyptus grandis in São Paulo State, Brazil. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 303, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Junghans, D.T.; Alfenas, A.C.; Brommonschenkel, S.H.; Oda, S.; Mello, E.J.; Grattapaglia, D. Resistance to rust (Puccinia psidii Winter) in Eucalyptus: Mode of inheritance and mapping of a major gene with RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 108, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pegg, G.S.; Brawner, J.T.; Lee, D.J. Screening Corymbia populations for resistance to Puccinia psidii. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Harwood, C. New introductions—Doing it right. In Developing a Eucalypt Resource; Walker, J., Ed.; Learning from Australia and elsewhere Wood Technology Research Centre; University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011; pp. 125–136. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zanuncio, A.J.V.; Carvalho, A.G.; Carneiro, A.D.C.O.; Filho, M.T.; Valenzuela, P.; Gacitúa, W.; Colodette, J.L. Anatomical, ultrastructural, physical and mechanical wood properties of two-year-old Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla clones. Rev. Árvore 2018, 42, e420201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Furtado, Q.G.; Castro, H.A.; Pozza, E.A. Variabilidade fisiológica de Puccinia psidii Winter em Eucalyptus grandis e no híbrido urograndis. Summa Phytopathol. 2005, 31, 227–231. [Google Scholar]
  10. Coutinho, T.A.; Wingfield, M.J.; Alfenas, A.C.; Crous, P.W. Eucalyptus Rust: A disease with the potential for serious international implications. Plant Dis. 1998, 82, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Pérez, C.A.; Wingfield, M.J.; Altier, N.A.; Simeto, S.; Blanchette, R.A. Puccinia psidii infecting cultivated Eucalyptus and native Myrtaceae in Uruguay. Mycol. Prog. 2011, 10, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Miranda, A.C.; de Moraes, M.L.T.; Tambarussi, E.V.; Furtado, E.L.; Mori, E.S.; Da Silva, P.H.M.; Sebbenn, A.M. Heritability for resistance to Puccinia psidii Winter rust in Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden in Southwestern Brazil. Tree Genet. Genomes 2012, 9, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alves, A.A.; Guimarães, L.M.S.; Chaves, A.R.M.; DaMatta, F.M.; Alfenas, A.C. Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence of Eucalyptus urophylla in response to Puccinia psidii infection. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 1831–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ferreira, F.A. Ferrugem do Eucalipto. Rev. Arvore 1983, 7, 91–109. [Google Scholar]
  15. Silva-Souza, R.R.; Silva, A.C.; Rodella, R.A.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Furtado, E.L. Pre-infection stages of Austropuccinia psidii in the epidermis of Eucalyptus hybrid leaves with different resistance levels. Forests 2017, 8, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Xavier, A.A.; Da Silva, A.C.; Guimarães, L.M.D.S.; Matsuoka, K.; Hodges, C.S.; Alfenas, A.C. Infection process of Puccinia psidii in Eucalyptus grandis leaves of different ages. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2015, 40, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xavier, A.A.; Alfenas, A.C.; Matsuoka, K.; Hodges, C.S. Infection of resistant and susceptible Eucalyptus grandis genotypes by urediniospores of Puccinia psidii. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2001, 30, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beresford, R.M.; Shuey, L.S.; Pegg, G.S. Symptom development and latent period of Austropuccinia psidii (myrtle rust) in relation to host species, temperature, and ontogenic resistance. Plant Pathol. 2020, 69, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Develey-Rivière, M.; Galiana, E. Resistance to pathogens and host developmental stage: A multifaceted relationship within the plant kingdom. New Phytol. 2007, 175, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Furtado, G.Q.; Alves, S.A.M.; Carneiro, L.C.; Godoy, C.V.; Massola, N.S., Jr. Influência do estádio fenológico e da idade dos trifólios de soja na infecção de Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2009, 34, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Boava, L.P.; Kuhn, O.J.; Pascholati, S.F.; Di Piero, R.M.; Furtado, E.L. Atividade de quitinases e peroxidases em folhas de eucalipto em diferentes estágios de desenvolvimento após tratamento com acibenzolar-S-metil (ASM) e inoculação com Puccinia psidii. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2010, 35, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Silva, R.R.; Silva, A.C.; Rodella, R.A.; Marques, M.O.M.; Zanuncio, A.J.V.; Soares, M.A.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Furtado, E.L. Limonene, a chemical compound related to the resistance of Eucalyptus to Austropuccinia psidii. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bonora, F.S.; Nahrung, H.F.; Hayes, R.A.; Scharaschkin, T.; Pegg, G.; Lee, D.J. Changes in leaf chemistry and anatomy of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata (Myrtaceae) in response to native and exotic pathogens. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2020, 49, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hickey, L.J. Classification of architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Am. J. Bot. 1973, 60, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Graf, A.B. Exotical horticultural color guide. In Exotica 3: Pictorial Cyclopedia of Exotic Plants; Graf, A.B., Ed.; Roehrs: Rutherford, NJ, USA, 1970; pp. 37–38. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerrits, P.O. The Application of Glycolmetacrylate in Histotechnology; Some Fundamental Principles; LeicaGmbH: Wetzlar, Germany, 1991; 80p. [Google Scholar]
  27. O’Brien, T.P.; Feder, N.E.; Mccully, M.E. Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by Toluidine Blue O. Protoplasma 1964, 59, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sneath, P.H.A.E.; Sokal, R.R. Numerical Taxonomy; W.H. Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1973; 573p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hallé, F.; Oldeman, R.A.; Tomlinson, P.B. Tropical Trees and Forest; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1978; 441p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sambugaro, R.; Furtado, E.L.; Rodella, R.A.; Mattos, C.R.R. Anatomia foliar de seringueira (Hevea spp.) e desenvolvimento da infecção por Microcyclus ulei. Summa Phytopathol. 2004, 30, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gasparotto, L.; Pereira, J.C.R. Doenças da Seringueira No Brasil; Embrapa: Brasilia, Brazil, 2012; 255p. [Google Scholar]
  32. Banniza, S.; Hashemi, P.; Warkentin, T.D.; Vandenberg, A.; Davis, A.R. The relationships among lodging, stem anatomy, degree of lignification, and resistance to mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum). Can. J. Bot. 2005, 83, 954–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, W.; Wang, K.; Chern, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhu, X.; Yin, J.; Ran, L.; Xiong, J.; et al. Sclerenchyma cell thickening through enhanced lignification induced by OsMYB30 prevents fungal penetration of rice leaves. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1850–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Crang, R.; Lyons-Sobaski, S.; Wise, R. Parenchyma, collenchyma, and sclerenchyma. In Plant Anatomy (A Concept-Based Approach to the Structure of Seed Plants); Crang, R., Lyons-Sobaski, S., Eds.; Springer-Verlag Press: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 181–212. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nyadanu, D.; Akromah, R.; Adomako, B.; Kwoseh, C.; Lowor, S.T.; Dzahini-Obiatey, H.; Akrofi, A.Y.; Owusu Ansah, F.; Assuah, M.K. Histological mechanisms of resistance to black pod disease in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). J. Plant Sci. 2012, 7, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Jerba, V.F.; Rodella, R.A.; Furtado, E.L. Características anatômicas quantitativas e histopatológica foliar de feijoeiro infectado por Glomella cingulata f. sp. phaseoli. Summa Phytopathol. 2005, 31, 334–342. [Google Scholar]
  37. Metcalfe, C.R.; Chalk, L. Anatomy of Dicotyledons; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1979; pp. 620–631. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sarwar, A.; Ali, M. Studies on the leaf epidermis of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J. Agric. Res. 2002, 1, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gui, J.; Shen, J.; Li, L. Functional characterization of evolutionarily divergent 4-coumarate: Coenzyme a ligases in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 574–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Santos, I.B.; Lopes, M.D.S.; Bini, A.P.; Tschoeke, B.A.P.; Verssani, B.A.W.; Figueredo, E.F.; Cataldi, T.R.; Marques, J.P.R.; Silva, L.D.; Labate, C.A.; et al. The Eucalyptus cuticular waxes contribute in preformed defense against Austropuccinia psidii. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Batish, D.R.; Singh, H.P.; Kohli, R.K.; Kaur, S. Eucalyptus essential oil as a natural pesticide. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 2166–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Amorim, E.P.D.R.; De Andrade, F.W.R.; Moraes, E.M.D.S.; Da Silva, J.C.; Lima, R.D.S.; De Lemos, E.E.P. Antibacterial activity of essential oils and extracts on the development of Ralstonia solanacearum in banana seedlings. Rev. Bras. De Frutic. 2011, 33, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Pereira, R.B.; Lucas, G.C.; Perina, F.J.; De Resende, M.L.V.; Alves, E. Potential of essential oils for the control of brown eye spot in coffee plants. Ciência E Agrotecnologia 2011, 35, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Vilela, G.R.; Almeida, G.S.; D’Arce, M.A.B.R.; Moraes, M.H.D.; Brito, J.O.; Silva, M.F.G.F.; Silva, S.C.; Piedade, S.M.S.; Calori-Domingues, M.A.; Gloria, E.M. Activity of essential oil and its major compound, 1,8-cineole, from Eucalyptus globulus Labill., against the storage fungi Aspergillus flavus Link and Aspergillus parasiticus Speare. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2009, 45, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Passador, M.M.; Marubayashi, J.M.; Uzzo, R.P.; Marques, M.O.M.; Conceição, D.M.; da Silva Marques, A.P.; Furtado, E.L. Influence of Mycosphaerella and Teratosphaeria leaf diseases on chemical composition of essential oils of Eucalyptus globulus and effect of these essential oils on ascospores germination. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 3415–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 12 00353 g001 550
Figure 1. Visual scale of Eucalyptus grandis leaves at the five representative development stages from 6- and 20-month-old plants based on the shape and color of the leaf blade. A scale (cm) is below and the leaves were placed in order according to their position on the branch.
Figure 1. Visual scale of Eucalyptus grandis leaves at the five representative development stages from 6- and 20-month-old plants based on the shape and color of the leaf blade. A scale (cm) is below and the leaves were placed in order according to their position on the branch.
Plants 12 00353 g001
Plants 12 00353 g002 550
Figure 2. Light micrographs of the first (A–C), second (D–F), third (G–I), fourth (J–L) and fifth (M–O) leaf-growth stages of Eucalyptus grandis. Transverse sections of the midrib (B,E,H,K,N) and the internervural region (C,F,I,L,O). UE = upper epidermis tissue, LE = lower epidermis, PPU = palisade parenchyma upper, PPL = palisade parenchyma lower, SP = spongy parenchyma, Co = collenchyma, Scl = sclerenchyma-like tissue, OC = area of oil cavities, and BV = vascular bundles. Scale bars: 92 (B,E,H,K,N) and 46 µm (C,F,I,L,O).
Figure 2. Light micrographs of the first (A–C), second (D–F), third (G–I), fourth (J–L) and fifth (M–O) leaf-growth stages of Eucalyptus grandis. Transverse sections of the midrib (B,E,H,K,N) and the internervural region (C,F,I,L,O). UE = upper epidermis tissue, LE = lower epidermis, PPU = palisade parenchyma upper, PPL = palisade parenchyma lower, SP = spongy parenchyma, Co = collenchyma, Scl = sclerenchyma-like tissue, OC = area of oil cavities, and BV = vascular bundles. Scale bars: 92 (B,E,H,K,N) and 46 µm (C,F,I,L,O).
Plants 12 00353 g002
Plants 12 00353 g003 550
Figure 3. Cluster analysis of the quantitative anatomical variables for the five leaf development stages of Eucalyptus grandis. (A) Young (6 months old) and (B) mature (20 months old) plants.
Figure 3. Cluster analysis of the quantitative anatomical variables for the five leaf development stages of Eucalyptus grandis. (A) Young (6 months old) and (B) mature (20 months old) plants.
Plants 12 00353 g003
Plants 12 00353 g004 550
Figure 4. Dispersion graph for the five development stages of Eucalyptus grandis leaves using the two principal components (Y1 and Y2) for all the 13 quantitative anatomical descriptors of the midrib and internervural region. Dispersion graph of 6-month-old (A) and 20-month-old (B) plants.
Figure 4. Dispersion graph for the five development stages of Eucalyptus grandis leaves using the two principal components (Y1 and Y2) for all the 13 quantitative anatomical descriptors of the midrib and internervural region. Dispersion graph of 6-month-old (A) and 20-month-old (B) plants.
Plants 12 00353 g004
Table
Table 1. Differentiation of leaf stages based on quantitative (length and width), area, diameter of the petiole and qualitative (shape and color) factors for the five phenological development stages of Eucalyptus grandis leaf development.
Table 1. Differentiation of leaf stages based on quantitative (length and width), area, diameter of the petiole and qualitative (shape and color) factors for the five phenological development stages of Eucalyptus grandis leaf development.
Leaf Growth Stage
Characteristic1°2°3°4°5°
Leaf blade length (cm)2.0(1.7–2.4) * a ***3.8(3.5–4.3) b5.7(5.0–6.2) c9.0(8.3–9.5) d10.2(10.1–0.3) e
Leaf blade width (cm)0.6(0.5–0.7) * a ***1.3(1.2–1.5) b2.3(2.2–2.5) c4.2(3.7–4.7) d5.1(4.8–5.7) e
Leaf area (cm2)0.5(0.3–0.6) * a ***2.9(2.3–3.8) b8.0(7.2–8.9) c23.5(19.2–27.5) d31.8(30.4–33.2) e
Diameter of petiole (cm)0.6(0.5–0.7) * a ***0.9(0.8–1.0) b0.96(0.9–1.0) c1.31(1.2–1.38) c1.5(1.4–1.6) d
Leaf shape 1Acute 73% **Obtuse 73%Obtuse 73%Obtuse 60%Obtuse 73%
Leaf color 2Ch (7) 71% **OG (84) 53%OG (84) 51%OG (84) 84%IG (70) 98%
* Minimum and maximum values of the quantitative characters; ** Frequency of descriptive characters. *** Means followed by the same letter per line do not differ by Tukey test at 5% probability. Leaf blade (SDM = 0.62; GM = 6.16 and Deviation = 0.33); Leaf blade width (SDM = 0.37; GM = 2.72 and Deviation = 0.19); Leaf area (SDM = 8.83; GM = 14.02 and Deviation = 4.67) Petiole diameter (SDM = 0.14; GM = 1.02 and Deviation = 0.08) 1 Leaf classification according to Hickey (1973). 2 Color Chart Encyclopedia Exotic, “Horticultural Color Guide” (GRAF, 1970). Ch—Chocolate, OG—Olive Green, and IG—Ivy Green.
Table
Table 2. Percentage of tissues in the upper and lower epidermis, vascular bundles, collenchyma, sclerenchyma-like tissue, parenchyma and total area of the midrib for the five growth stages of Eucalyptus grandis leaf development stages of 6- and 20-month-old plants.
Table 2. Percentage of tissues in the upper and lower epidermis, vascular bundles, collenchyma, sclerenchyma-like tissue, parenchyma and total area of the midrib for the five growth stages of Eucalyptus grandis leaf development stages of 6- and 20-month-old plants.
Midrib-PercentageSix MonthsTwenty Months
Of Tissues (%)1°2°3°4°5°1°2°3°4°5°
Upper epidermis5.55.04.03.02.24.93.83.02.61.9
Lower epidermis4.13.83.02.42.14.13.22.62.41.6
Vascular bundles28.233.835.639.936.231.240.643.749.947.5
Collenchyma0.09.19.216.212.86.47.07.412.07.9
Sclerenchyma-like tissue0.00.00.00.02.30.00.00.00.02.3
Parenchyma62.148.348.238.540.552.846.143.434.338.1
Total area (×103 µm2)207.7274.3413.1479.9756.0220.8287.2382.5505.3881.9
Table
Table 3. Percentage of tissues in the upper epidermis, upper palisade parenchyma, spongy parenchyma, lower palisade parenchyma, lower epidermis, leaf thickness, area of oil cavities and total area in internerval region for the five growth stages of Eucalyptus grandis leaf development stages of 6- and 20-month-old plants.
Table 3. Percentage of tissues in the upper epidermis, upper palisade parenchyma, spongy parenchyma, lower palisade parenchyma, lower epidermis, leaf thickness, area of oil cavities and total area in internerval region for the five growth stages of Eucalyptus grandis leaf development stages of 6- and 20-month-old plants.
Internerval RegionSix MonthsTwenty Months
Leaf Stage
Percentage of Tissues (%)1°2°3°4°5°1°2°3°4°5°
Upper epidermis11.611.010.37.35.08.69.86.55.86.8
Upper palisade parenchyma28.229.534.427.220.524.728.834.324.422.6
Spongy parenchyma26.823.420.351.669.728.026.830.365.065.2
Lower palisade parenchyma25.928.728.57.40.030.428.619.00.00.0
Lower epidermis7.47.36.36.64.88.56.19.94.45.5
Leaf thickness (µm)179.5187.1227.1232.4297.1170.0207.0215.0243.0248.0
Area of oil cavities (×103 µm2)1.72.12.94.58.02.12.22.411.012.9
Total area (×103 µm2)95.097.0115.6122.1153.083.9101.4118.7122.4131.6
Table
Table 4. Correlation coefficients between 13 anatomical characteristics of the midrib (Mi) and internerval region (IR) for the five development stages of Eucalyptus grandis of 6- and 20-month-old plants and their two main components (Y1 and Y2).
Table 4. Correlation coefficients between 13 anatomical characteristics of the midrib (Mi) and internerval region (IR) for the five development stages of Eucalyptus grandis of 6- and 20-month-old plants and their two main components (Y1 and Y2).
Anatomical CharacteristicsSix MonthsTwenty Months
Y1Or. zY2Or.Y1Or.Y2Or.
Upper epidermis (Mi)−0.949650.23387−0.92104−0.15119
Lower epidermis (Mi)−0.914860.30716−0.70529−0.50453
Vascular bundles (Mi)0.624013−0.768610.838670.34746
Collenchyma (Mi)0.704511−0.685930.6611120.68052
Sclerenchyma-like tissue (Mi)0.849490.477440.693911−0.70901
Parenchyma (Mi)−0.6537120.73022−0.89416−0.37565
Upper epidermis (IR)−0.996210.071212−0.70538−0.41574
Palisade parenchyma upper (IR)−0.815310−0.40405−0.5466130.30137
Spongy parenchyma (IR)0.972230.0792110.981220.083512
Palisade parenchyma lower (IR)−0.964940.019613−0.98231−0.149010
Lower epidermis (IR)−0.89787−0.135110−0.704410−0.103111
Leaf thickness (IR)0.884880.184080.914750.15378
Area of oil cavities (IR)0.989220.135490.976030.076113
Retained information (%)86.44 13.56 80.50 19.50
Accumulated information86.44 100.00 80.50 100.00
Z Or.—Ordination of anatomical characteristics as the discriminatory power.
Table
Table 5. Average period (days) of leaf differentiation of growth stages 1 to 3 and 1 to 5 of Eucalyptus grandis plants of 6 and 20 months old.
Table 5. Average period (days) of leaf differentiation of growth stages 1 to 3 and 1 to 5 of Eucalyptus grandis plants of 6 and 20 months old.
Plant Age (Months)Leaf Stage of Change (Days) *
1–31–5
634 aB53 aA
2024 bB43 bA
Means followed by the same lowercase letter per column or capital letter per line do not differ by the Tuckey test at 5%. * Evaluation of development stages changes according to scale proposed (SMD = 0.3004; GM = 6.0889; deviation = 0.5112; data transformed in (x + 0.5)1/2).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Furtado, E.L.; Silva, A.C.d.; Silva, É.A.R.; Rodella, R.A.; Soares, M.A.; Serrão, J.E.; de Pieri, C.; Zanuncio, J.C. Morphoanatomical Changes in Eucalyptus grandis Leaves Associated with Resistance to Austropuccinia psidii in Plants of Two Ages. Plants 2023, 12, 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020353

AMA Style

Furtado EL, Silva ACd, Silva ÉAR, Rodella RA, Soares MA, Serrão JE, de Pieri C, Zanuncio JC. Morphoanatomical Changes in Eucalyptus grandis Leaves Associated with Resistance to Austropuccinia psidii in Plants of Two Ages. Plants. 2023; 12(2):353. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Furtado, Edson Luiz, André Costa da Silva, Érica Araújo Rodrigues Silva, Roberto Antônio Rodella, Marcus Alvarenga Soares, José Eduardo Serrão, Cristiane de Pieri, and José Cola Zanuncio. 2023. "Morphoanatomical Changes in Eucalyptus grandis Leaves Associated with Resistance to Austropuccinia psidii in Plants of Two Ages" Plants 12, no. 2: 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop