Next Article in Journal
Screening of Early Flowering Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) Cultivars and Effects of Different Cultivars on Flowering Period
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Characteristics of Reaction Tissue in Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Association Mapping of Grain-Size Traits in Rice Landraces from the Honghe Hani Rice Terraces System in Yunnan Province
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Banana SNARE Genes and Their Expression Analysis under Temperature Stress and Mutualistic and Pathogenic Fungal Colonization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/plants12081681
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of the Typical Class III Chitinase Genes from Three Mangrove Species under Heavy Metal Stress

by
Yue-Yue Zhou
1,2,3,4,
You-Shao Wang
1,2,3,* and
Cui-Ci Sun
1,2,3,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
2
Daya Bay Marine Biology Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518121, China
3
Innovation Academy of South China Sea Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
4
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(8), 1681; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081681
Submission received: 5 March 2023 / Revised: 1 April 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Plant Resistance to Stress)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chitinases are considered to act as defense proteins when plants are exposed to heavy metal stresses. Typical class III chitinase genes were cloned from Kandelia obovate, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, and Rhizophora stylosa by using RT-PCR and RACE and named KoCHI III, BgCHI III, and RsCHI III. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the three genes encoding proteins were all typical class III chitinases with the characteristic catalytic structure belonging to the family GH18 and located outside the cell. In addition, there are heavy metal binding sites in the three-dimensional spatial structure of the type III chitinase gene. Phylogenetic tree analysis indicated that CHI had the closest relationship with chitinase in Rhizophora apiculata. In mangrove plants, the balance of the oxidative system in the body is disrupted under heavy metal stress, resulting in increased H2O2 content. Real-time PCR illustrated that the expression level under heavy metal stress was significantly higher than that in the control group. Expression levels of CHI III were higher in K. obovate than in B. gymnorrhiza and R. stylosa. With the increase in heavy metal stress time, the expression level increased continuously. These results suggest that chitinase plays an important role in improving the heavy metal tolerance of mangrove plants.

1. Introduction

Mangroves are a wetland woody plant community that grows in the intertidal zone of tropical and subtropical coasts and also play an important role in purifying seawater, preventing wind and waves, storing blue carbon, and maintaining biodiversity [1,2,3]. In recent years, with the rapid development of industry and agriculture and the expansion of coastal cities, large amounts of sewage and waste are discharged into estuaries and coastal areas every year, and the continuous development of the marine transportation industry causes water pollution in the bay area. Environmental pollution in the mangrove growing area has become an environmental problem that cannot be ignored, especially heavy metal pollution as a typical persistent pollutant; heavy metals can not only endanger the security of the mangrove ecosystem, but also pass through the food chain to other consumers and continuously accumulate in organisms, eventually posing a threat to the health of human beings and other organisms. This harm should not be ignored. Heavy metal pollution in estuaries and bays has become increasingly acute, which has attracted the attention of ecologists and environmental protection departments [4,5]. Excessive metal can inhibit seed germination and seedling growth, destroy antioxidant enzymes and membrane systems, cause chromosomal aberrations, and lead to plant death. Moreover, metal ions also seriously interfere with plant metabolism by causing secondary stresses such as nutritional imbalance, generating large amounts of free radicals (ROS) and oxidative stress [6,7]. At present, it is believed that the adaptation mechanism of plants to heavy metal roughly includes: (1) the root effect and efflux of heavy metals; (2) the chelation of compounds; (3) the regulation of the antioxidant system; (4) and the induction of related gene expression [8]. Although many available data show that some mangrove plants appear to possess a great tolerance for high levels of heavy metal pollution [9,10], very little information exists on the molecular mechanisms of their heavy metal tolerance.
The chitinase gene is a typical plant defense gene that plays an important role in plant growth and development, stress resistance, and defense response [11,12,13,14]. Chitinase is divided into five types I–V and four families (18, 19, 23, and 48 families) [15,16,17]. Chitinases are responsible for the hydrolysis of beta-1,4-linkages in chitin [18]. The GH18 family is widely distributed and found in viruses, bacteria, plants, fungi, and animals [19]. Chitinases in plants are encoded by single genes. Some types of chitinase are localized in extracellular spaces and some types of chitinase are localized in intracellular spaces. Most of them are small molecular proteins with a molecular weight between 25 and 35 kDa [20], and are usually very acidic or very alkaline. The type III chitinases in plants are similar to those of fungi and bacteria, and do not have the chitinase binding domain (CBD) [21,22,23]. When plants are induced by inducible factors (polysaccharides such as chitin, fungal cell walls as chitin) and some stresses such as ethylene and heavy metals, chitinase activity increases, which enhances plant defenses [24,25,26]. Plants have evolved multiple defense mechanisms to respond to metal toxicity, and chitinases are involved in the plant defense response to metal stress. The chitinase genes in Viciafaba, barley, maize, and soybean, induced by lead, arsenic, and cadmium, showed that this enzyme has a role in preventing heavy metal toxicity [24,27]. It has been shown that multiple isoforms of chitinase were detected in the roots of two soybean (Glycine max) varieties, Chernyatka (metal-ion-resistant) and Kyivska 98 (metal-ion-sensitive). The expression patterns of the two soybean root isozymes differed after different metal ion stresses; for example, isoform D expression was up-regulated in Chernyatka after Cd2+ stress, while isoform D expression was not significantly changed in Kyivska 98 [28]. In addition, metal ions such as Na+ and Fe3+ have been reported to increase chitinase activity, while Zn2+ and Co2+ showed inhibitory effects on chitinase activity [29]. At present, only two full-length cDNA sequences of chitinase genes (class I and III) have been reported from mangrove plants of Avicennia marina and Aegiceras corniculatum in our previous research [30,31].
In the paper, three mangrove species, Kandelia obovate, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, and Rhizophora stylosa, were selected for the experiments. PCR techniques, genomic DNA library construction, gene cloning techniques, and the RACE method were used to carry out full-length cloning of type III chitinase genes of mangrove plants, and bioinformatics was applied to analyze the primary structure, secondary structure, tertiary structure, and gene function analysis of the genes. In this study, mangrove plants were subjected to stress treatment with complex heavy metals (Cu, Cd, and Pb) commonly found in the environment to study in detail the expression response of a particular chitinase gene. Additionally, the expression characteristics of the genes under the stress of heavy metals were analyzed via real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction technology. This is the first time the full-length cDNA of class III chitinase genes (BgCHI III, KoCHI III, and RsCHI III) has been cloned from B. gymnorrhiza, K. obovate, and R. stylosa to explore the potential molecular mechanism of mangrove plant tolerance to heavy metal pollution. This study will provide more details on the molecular mechanisms of or a scientific basis for coastal wetland heavy metal environmental remediation using mangrove plants.

2. Results

2.1. The Full-Length cDNA of the CHI III Gene Cloning

In Figure 1A, the integrity of the extracted total RNA is good. The OD260/OD280 values of the total RNA samples were between 1.8 and 2.1, indicating that the extracted total RNA had a high purity. After obtaining the intermediate fragment, the nucleotide sequences were obtained via sequencing. The nucleotide sequences were carried out in the NCBI database via BLAST comparison, and the similarity with the existing chitinase sequence reached 99%, which indicated that it was a chitinase sequence. The 3 and 5′ end-specific fragments (Figure 1B) were obtained by using the RACE method. After sequencing, the full length was finally determined after splicing.
Through SMARTTM RACE cDNA amplification, the full-length cDNA sequence of chitinase was isolated from mangrove and named BgCHI III (Figure 2A), KoCHI III (Figure 2B), and RsCHI III (Figure 2C). The nucleotide sequence of BgCHI III was 1067 bp, containing a 711 bp open reading frame (ORF) encoding the deduced protein length of 236 amino acids. The ORF starts at the 109 ATG start codon and ends at the 819 TGA stop codon (Figure 2A). The calculated molecular weight of the protein was 25.3 kDa and the isoelectric point was 6.06. Amino acid composition analysis showed that BgCHI III contained higher levels of Ser (11.4%), Gly (11.0%), and Ala (8.9%). The stability coefficient was 43.50, and the hydrophilic coefficient was −0.252.
The nucleotide sequence of KoCHI III was 1071 bp, containing a 600 bp open reading frame (ORF) encoding the deduced protein length of 199 amino acids. The ORF starts at the 225 ATG start codon and ends at the 824 TGA stop codon (Figure 2B). The calculated molecular weight of the protein was 21.7 kDa and the isoelectric point was 5.69. Amino acid composition analysis showed that KoCHI III contained higher levels of Ser (11.6%), Gly (10.6%), and Ala (8.5%). The stability coefficient was 42.31, and the hydrophilic coefficient was −0.284.
The nucleotide sequence of RsCHI III was 1063 bp, containing a 600 bp open reading frame (ORF) encoding the deduced protein length of 199 amino acids. The ORF starts at the 216 ATG start codon and ends at the 815 TGA stop codon (Figure 2C). The calculated molecular weight of the protein was 21.6 kDa and the isoelectric point was 5.69. Amino acid composition analysis showed that RsCHI III contained higher levels of Ser (11.6%), Gly (10.6%), and Ala (8.5%). The stability coefficient was 41.98, and the hydrophilic coefficient was −0.285.
Analysis indicated that the protein was an unstable hydrophilic protein with no transmembrane helix signals. Subcellular localization predictions using the online software Plant-mPLoc [32] pairs showed that three genes encoding type III chitinase proteins may be non-secretory proteins localized extracellularly, which may be related to the defense mechanism of chitinase in mangrove plants. This is consistent with the previous conclusion that type I and V chitinases are located in the vacuole, and type III chitinase is located extracellularly. In addition, chitinase belongs to the 18th family of glycohydrolase (GH18) in terms of structure. Without a chitinase binding domain (CBD), it is a typical type III chitinase. Secondary structure analysis showed that the chitinase consisted of seven α-helices and seven β-turns (Figure 3). Based on SWISS-MODEL analysis [33], ribbon cartoon and space-filling models of CHI III are presented in Figure 4. Taking the three-dimensional spatial structure of pomegranate as a template, the three-dimensional spatial structure of the mangrove was established. GH 18 chitinase from pomegranate has the crystal structure of pomegranate chitinase III. In this study, there are heavy metal binding sites in the three-dimensional spatial structure of the type III chitinase gene. The type III chitinase gene may combine with heavy metal ions to reduce the entry of heavy metal into cells, reducing the toxicity of heavy metals to plant cells. This also provides insights on its metal storage capacity.
The phylogenetic tree was constructed via the NJ method using MEGA6 software. In this study, we chose Vitis vinifera (AB105374), Arabidopsis thaliana (NM-122314.3), Glycine max (NM-001249780.1), Rhizophora apiculate (KY795335.1), Hevea brasiliensis (DQ873889.2), Citrullus colocynthis (JQ756124.1), Citrullus lanatus (DQ180495.1), Nepenthes rafflesiana (GQ338259.1), Avicennia marina (JQ655770), Aegiceras corniculatum (JQ655771), Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Kandelia obovate, and Rhizophora stylosa. The amino acid sequences of chitinase type III in these plants were selected to construct the phylogenetic tree. The phylogenetic analysis results show that the chitinase type III genes of B. gymnorrhiza, K. obovate, and R. stylosa belonging to Rhizoporaceae were clustered together, while the chitinase type III genes of A. marina belonging to Myrsinaceae and A. corniculatum belonging to Verbenaceae evolved another branch that was quite different. Phylogenetic tree analysis indicated that CHI had the closest relationship with chitinase in Rhizophora apiculate (94.40% similarity) (Figure 5). Although B. gymnorrhiza, K. obovate, and R. stylosa belong to oriental mangrove species and R. apiculate belongs to western mangrove species, their chitinase genes are closely related.

2.2. The Effect on Mangrove under Heavy Metal Treatment

A plant’s growth is slowed by heavy metal treatment, resulting in yellowing of the leaves. The heavy metal exposure affects the morphology of the mangrove plants. In this study, we observed that the leaf morphology of K. obovate and R. stylosa changed after exposure to high concentrations of heavy metals (Figure 6). The content of H2O2 can reflect the accumulation of ROS in plants [34]. The changing trend in H2O2 content was obvious with the increase in the concentration of composite heavy metals. At the highest concentration of treatment, the H2O2 content of the five mangrove plants increased significantly compared with the control group. H2O2 content was 3.78 times higher than the control of B. gymnorrhiza at C3. H2O2 content was 6.17 times higher than the control of K. obovate at C4. H2O2 content was 7.57 times higher than the control of R.stylosa at C4. The order of H2O2 content was K. obovate > R. stylosa > B. gymnorrhiza (Figure 7).

2.3. CHI III mRNA Expression in Leaf in Response to Heavy Metals

The effects of heavy metals on the expression of CHI III mRNA in leaves are shown in Figure 8. Moreover, there were different patterns of CHI III mRNA expression response to heavy metal stress among the three mangrove plants. After 3 days of exposure, BgCHI III mRNA expression was 2.41 times higher than the control at C2. BgCHI III mRNA expression was 1.97 times higher than the control at C4. In addition, the maximum expression level was detected at C2 after 3 days in B. gymnorrhiza leaves (Figure 8A). After 28 days of exposure, KoCHI III mRNA expression was 14.79 times higher than the control, and the maximum expression level was detected at C2 (Figure 8B). Under the treatment of heavy metal C4 concentration, the expression levels of R. stylosa were relatively high, reaching a maximum value of 6.74 times that of the control group on the 28th day of treatment (Figure 8C). Under treatment at C2 and C4 concentrations and with the increase in heavy metal stress time, the expression change had an upward trend in K. obovate. Under C1, C3, and C4 heavy metal treatment, the expression change had an upward trend in R. stylosa with the increase in heavy metal stress time. The expression levels of the CHI gene with C2 stress treatment in K. obovate on the 28th day of treatment were higher than those in R. stylosa and B. gymnorrhiza.

3. Discussion

3.1. Cloning and Structural Characterization Analysis of CHI III

In this study, chitinase genes were cloned for the first time from B. gymnorrhiza, K. obovate, and R. stylosa. These were predicted and analyzed for their secondary structure, subcellular localization, transmembrane domain, and functional domain of the cloned amino acid sequences. The amino acid sequences of chitinases from other plants also underwent multiple comparisons and were phylogenetically analyzed to demonstrate the homology between the cloned genes and chitinase genes from other plants. In the process of molecular evolution, amino acids with strong functions in the protein components evolved slowly, so the base evolution of amino acids with strong functions maintained relatively high conservation. Generally, the homology of sequences is closely related to the similarity of their functions, so the homology sequence of chitinase cloned via NCBI can be used to predict the function of the target gene according to its homology sequence. Constructing a phylogenetic tree can help us analyze protein evolution more clearly. The chitinases of glycoside hydrolase family 18 and glycoside hydrolase family 19 differ greatly in structure and distribution due to their different origin and evolution [34]. GH18 family chitinases include class III and V chitinases in plants [35,36]; class III and V chitinases have both lysozyme activity and chitinase activity [24]. In terms of structure, the 18 family only contains one catalytic region. In terms of distribution range, the glycosidase 18 family is widely distributed in microorganisms, animals, and plants. In our study, the cloned chitinase genes of mangrove plants were searched using Blast in NCBI, and it was found that the gene was highly similar to the chitinase gene of other plants, indicating that the three genes cloned were chitinase genes. Bioinformatics analysis showed that the chitinase gene encodes a typical type III chitinase that belongs to the glycoside hydrolase family 18. A conserved catalytic region means that it has a glycohydrolase function. Without CBD structure, it does not have anti-bacterial function in vitro. The chitinase protein is located outside the cell. When it encounters pathogens, it can directly hydrolyze new hyphae and resist pathogenic fungi. The sequences of type III chitinase genes from 11 other plants were selected for comparison in this chapter, and the three cloned type III chitinase genes were found to be the most evolutionarily similar (94.40% similarity) to the type III chitinase gene of R. apiculata. All three mangrove species belong to the family Mangroveaceae; the developmental tree branches were clustered together, and the kinship determination was based on amino acids. The results of kinship determination based on sequence analysis were the same as those based on traditional evolutionary kinship determination. The first basis for the investigation of gene function is to know the full-length sequence of the gene and the structural features of the protein space.

3.2. Expression of CHI III in Leaves in Response to Heavy Metal

Plant chitinases are disease-course-associated proteins that can disrupt the cell walls of pathogenic bacteria and the exoskeletons of insects and are also regulated by other disease-resistance-related molecules such as salicylic acid (SA), which play an important role in plant defense processes and are thus widely used in the genetic engineering of plant disease resistance [37,38,39,40]. In addition, chitinases are involved in plant responses to abiotic stresses such as drought, metal ions, and high temperatures. When plants were subjected to environmental stress, type III chitinase showed strong induction and expression [28,40]. The cotton type III chitinase gene is GhaChi, which is induced by ABA [41]. The sugarcane type III chitinase gene plays a positive role in response to biotic and abiotic stresses [26]. When Arabidopsis plants were subjected to environmental stress, especially salt stress and mechanical damage, only class III chitinase genes were induced and expressed [37]. Zhou’s study shows that SlChi is a gene responsive to salt stress in Salix. When Salix was treated with 100 mmol/L NaCl stress, the expression level of endogenous SlChi increased with time, and the gene expression level after 48 h of continuous high salt treatment was 40 times that of non-treatment [42]. Furthermore, it has now been shown that overexpression of chitinase in transgenic plants does improve resistance to heavy metals [43]. Previous studies have focused on a single phenotype of the gene and studied the differences in its expression in different tissues, lacking the analysis of multiple phenotypes of the gene in multiple species. Among them, the mechanism of action of chitinase in mangrove plants under heavy metal stress is less studied, and one study cloned and compared the differences between different tissues of the type I chitinase of A. corniculatum [31]. In this study, when K. obovate was treated with C2 heavy metal stress, the expression level of endogenous KoCHI increased with treatment time, and the expression level of the gene after 28 days of heavy metal treatment was 14.49 times that of non-treatment. Additionally, the expression level of the gene after 28 days of heavy metal treatment was 6.47 times higher in R. stylosa treated with C4 heavy metal stress. The CHI III expression in leaves was up-regulated with heavy metals, which was in good agreement with previous results in other plants [20,44]. In nature, mangrove plants are stressed by various heavy metals. When the concentration of heavy metal is too high, it causes a series of injuries and cells produce a series of stress responses [45,46]. At present, it is generally believed that plants have an innate “immune system”, oxidative burst (OXB), meaning that plant cells rapidly produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) under stress conditions that initiate other signal cascades in the body [47,48]. In most cases, H2O2 is the main accumulation product of OXB [49,50]. In the present study, the H2O2 content accumulated more after heavy metal stress treatment, and according to previous studies, many heavy metals entering plant cells would cause the accumulation of ROS, and the antioxidant system in plants would act as a regulator to convert ROS into H2O2, which would be a signaling factor to trigger the expression of some genes when accumulated in excess [51,52]. Our experiments to understand the structural features of the chitinase gene properties and protein space revealed that type III chitinase acts mainly outside the cell and has metal binding sites that may bind directly to heavy metals. The possible intrinsic molecular mechanism is that heavy metal stress leads to high levels of H2O2 in vivo, and H2O2 becomes a signaling factor triggering the expression of chitinase, which may bind to heavy metals and attenuate heavy metal damage to plant leaves (Figure 9). There are different phenotypes of chitinases, and the functional roles they have can vary, as other reports say that chitinases are considered components of the second line of defense under metal stress [53]. They may alter the kinetics and permeability of the cell wall to metals, as well as affect the metal binding and fixation capacity of the cell wall [54]. They seem to be stable components of the plant metal stress defense [27]. Indeed, transgenic plants overexpressing chitinase have shown increased tolerance to metal [43].
Overall, expression of the chitinase gene may have improved the tolerance and accumulation of heavy metals in mangrove plants. In coastal wetlands, mangrove plants can be used as remediation plants for heavy metal pollution. Therefore, it is speculated that CHI may play a role in the resistance of mangrove plants to heavy metal stress.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

The hypocotyls of mature B. gymnorrhiza, K. obovate, and R. stylosa were collected from the Leizhou Peninsula, Guangdong Province, China, with salinity ranging from 22‰ to 30‰. Each pot was irrigated with 500 mL of 1/2 Hoagland’s nutrient solution (containing 10‰ NaCl) every 3 days.
When the plants grew to 3–5 true leaves, the mangrove seedlings were irrigated with 1/2 Hoagland’s nutrient solution containing mixed heavy metal sewage of different pollution levels (Table 1). C1: 5 mg/L CuCl2, 1 mg/L PbCl2, 0.2 mg/L CdCl2; C2: 25 mg/L CuCl2, 5 mg/L PbCl2, 1 mg/L CdCl2; C3: 50 mg/L CuCl2, 10 mg/L PbCl2, 2 mg/L CdCl2; C4: 75 mg/L CuCl2, 15 mg/L PbCl2, 3 mg/L CdCl2. Watered once every 3–5 days, each treatment was 600 mL, and then combined heavy metal treatment sampling was performed simultaneously at 0 days, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days. The leaves of control and treatment plants were quickly placed in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C on standby. After 28 days of treatment, plant photographs of morphological changes were recorded and H2O2 content was determined. The amount of hydrogen peroxide can be detected by measuring the reaction product of H2O2 and molybdic acid [55].

4.2. Extraction of the Total RNA

The total RNA of mangrove leaves was extracted using the TIANGEN polysaccharide polyphenol plant total RNA extraction kit centrifugal column method. The extracted RNA was analyzed for purity and integrity. The RNA was treated with DNase I, and Oligo(dt)15 was used as the universal primer. The treated RNA was reverse transcribed with reverse transcriptase to synthesize first-strand cDNA for RT-PCR amplification.

4.3. Primer Designs and Sequence Comparison Analysis

The amino acid sequences of chitinase genes from five closely related plants were downloaded from NCBI, and the conserved sequences were found using BioEdit sequence software. The primers F1 and R1 were designed with Primer Premier 5.0 using the closest sequence as a template.

4.4. Cloning the Full-Length cDNA of the Chitinase Gene

The intermediate fragment was cloned via PCR with the first-strand cDNA as the template and the primers F1, R1 (Table 2). The intermediate fragment sequence of the chitinase gene was obtained. Primers GSP-3′, GSP-5′, NGSP-3′, and NGSP-5′ were designed according to the obtained intermediate fragment sequence (Table 2). The specific primers were designed using the software Primer Premier 5.0. The full-length cloning was carried out via the RACE method according to the instructions of the “SMARTTM RACE cDNA Amplification Kit” from CLONTECH. During RACE, the reverse transcription product was used as a template. The outer primer was used for amplification, and the inner primer was used for nested PCR amplification. Additionally, single primer control was set. The PCR products were recovered using a GenStar kit and ligated with pMD18-T vector. The ligation product was transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells, and two-way sequencing was completed by the HuaDa Gene Sequencing Company. We obtained the full-length cDNA using Contig Express software. The sequencing results were searched and analyzed in GenBank.

4.5. Bioinformatic Analysis

The full-length sequence was subjected to bioinformatics analysis using the following software or online tools: validation of the full-length sequence and analysis of the functional domains (Table 3).

4.6. Analysis of Gene Expression using Real-Time Quantitative PCR

The preparation method of first-strand cDNA is shown above. The specific primers for the type III chitinase gene used in semi-quantitative RT-PCR were F and R (Table 2). The primers Bg18S (F), Bg18S (R), Ko18S (F), Ko18S (R), Rs18S (F), and Rs18S (R) (Table 2) were designed according to the RNA18S histone of mangrove as the cDNA content reference and for DNA contamination detection. Methods: NTC control was carried out on each plate of each gene, and qPCR96Well was taken to prepare the following reaction system (Table 4). Fold induction in CHI III mRNA expression relative to the control was determined by the standard 2 -DDCT method of Livak and Schmittgen [56].

4.7. Statistics Analysis

Using statistical analysis software, significant differences between controls and treatments were determined via one-way ANOVA and analyzed using SPSS V.22.0 software (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test). All experiment data are presented as mean ± standard values of three independent sets.

5. Conclusions

Three chitinase genes (CHI) were cloned for the first time from B. gymnorrhiza, K. obovate, and R. stylosa; these belong to the 18th glycosidase family and are class III chitinases. Our results indicate that leaf CHI III expression was regulated by Cu, Cd, and Pb. After exposure to heavy metal, CHI III mRNA was strongly activated. Moreover, CHI III consistently presented the highest transcript level after 28 days of exposure. There was a higher expression level in K. obovate compared with others. This study will open a window on the function of the chitinase gene and provide a solid basis for the mechanism of heavy metal resistance in mangroves.

Author Contributions

Y.-Y.Z.: methodology, software, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization, validation, writing—reviewing and editing. Y.-S.W.: conceptualization, supervision, writing—reviewing and editing. C.-C.S.: investigation and writing—reviewing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1901211 and No. 41876126), International Partnership Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 133244KYSB20180012), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA23050200 and No. XDA19060201) and the Special Fund for Marine Economic Development in Guangdong Province (No. YZRZH [2023]43).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the laboratory staff for their contributions, continued diligence, and dedication to their craft.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.S. Restoration and Evaluation Technology of Mangrove Ecosystem; The Science Publishing Company: Beijing, China, 2013; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, Y.S. Molecular Ecology of Mangroves; The Science Publishing Company: Beijing, China, 2019; pp. 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, Y.S.; Gu, J.D. Ecological responses, adaptation and mechanisms of mangrove wetland ecosystem to the global climate change and anthropogenic activities. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2021, 162, 105–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Valls, M.; Lorenzo, V.D. Exploiting the genetic and biochemical capacities of bacteria for the remediation of heavy metal pollution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kamala, K.S.; Batvari, B.; Lee, K.J.; Kannan, N.; Krishnamoorthy, R.; Shanthi, K.; Jayaprakash, M. Assessment of heavy metals (Cd, Cr, and Pb) in water, sediment, and seaweed (Ulva lactuca) in the Pulicat Lake, Southeast India. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Srivastava, A.K.; Bhargava, P.; Rai, L.C. Salinity and copper-induced oxidative damage and changes in the antioxidative defense system of Anabaena doliolum. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, L.L.; Xiao, M.L.; Ze, Y.P. Flavanol derivatives from Rhizophora stylosa and their DPPH radical scavenging activity. Molecules 2007, 12, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar]
  8. He, Y.J.; Sun, M.H.; Shen, Y.T. Progress in interaction mechanism and application between super enriched plants and heavy metals. Rock Min. Test 2020, 39, 639–657. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, F.Q.; Wang, Y.S.; Lou, Z.P.; Dong, J.D. Effect of heavy metal stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of two mangrove plant seedlings (Kandelia candel and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza). Chemosphere 2007, 67, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, F.Q.; Wang, C.C.; Luo, Z.P.; Dong, J.D. A novel metallothionein gene from a mangrove plant Kandelia candel. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 1633–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Z.G.; Zhu, X.F. Molecular biology characterization and application in transgenic plant for chitinase. Chin. Bull. Life Sci. 2002, 14, 117–121. [Google Scholar]
  12. Peumans, W.J.; Proost, P.; Swennen, R.L.; Damme, V. The abundant class III chitinase homolog in young developing banana fruits behaves as a transient vegetative storage protein and most probably serves as an important supply of amino acids for the synthesis of ripening-associated proteins. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kasprzewska, A. Plant chitinases-regulation and function. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 2003, 8, 809–824. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vellicce, G.R.; Ricci, J.C.D.; Hernández, L. Enhanced resistance to Botrytis cinerea, mediated by the transgenic expression of the chitinase gene ch5b in strawberry. Transgenic Res. 2006, 15, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Collinge, D.B.; Kragh, K.M.; Mikkelsen, J.D.; Nielsen, K.K.; Rasmussen, U.; Vad, K. Plant chitinases. Plant J. 1993, 3, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Melchers, L.S.; Apotheker-de Groot, M.; van der Knaap, J.A.; Ponstein, A.S.; Linthorst, H.J.M. A new class of tobacco chitinases homologous to bacterial exo-chitinases displays antifungal activity. Plant J. 1994, 5, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arimori, T.; Tamada, T. Structure and function of a novel chitinase belonging to GH family 23. X-rays 2014, 56, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cantarel, B.L.; Coutinho, P.M.; Rancurel, C.; Bernard, T.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B. The Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes database (CAZy): An expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D233–D238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, D.C. Review of fungal chitinases. Mycopathologia 2006, 161, 345–360. [Google Scholar]
  20. Arakane, Y.; Koga, D. Purification and characterization of a novel chitinase isozyme from yam tuber. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 1999, 63, 1895–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Graham, L.S.; Sticklen, M.B. Plant chitinases. Can. J. Bot. 1994, 72, 1057–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Berglund, L.; Brunstedt, J.; Nielsen, K.K.; Chen, Z.C.; Mikkelsen, J.D.; Marcker, K.A. A proline-rich chitinase from Beta vulgaris. Plant Mol. Biol. 1995, 27, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, C.M.; Chye, M.L.; Ramalingam, S.; Ouyang, S.W.; Zhao, K.J.; Ubhayasekera, W.; Mowbray, S.L. Functional analyses of the chitin-binding domains and the catalytic domain of Brassica juncea chitinase BjCHI1. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 56, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Loon, L.C.V.; Rep, M.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. van Keulen, H.; Wei, R.; Cutright, T.J. Arsenate-induced expression of a class III chitinase in the dwarf sunflower Helianthus annuus. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 63, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Su, Y.C.; Xu, L.P.; Fu, Z.W.; Yang, Y.T.; Guo, J.L.; Wang, S.S.; Que, Y.X. ScChi encoding an acidic class III chitinase of sugarcane, confers positive responses to biotic and abiotic stresses in sugarcane. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2738–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Békésiová, B.; Hraška, Š.; Libantová, J.; Moravcíková, J.; Matušíková, I. Heavy-metal stress induced accumulation of chitinase isoforms in plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2008, 35, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mészáros, P.; Rybanský, L.; Spieß, N.; Socha, P.; Kuna, R.; Libantová, J.; Moravčíková, J.; Piršelová, B.; Hauptvogel, P.; Matušíková, I. Plant chitinase responses to different metal-type stresses reveal specificity. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 1789–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zheng, Y.; Yang, Q.J.; Zhang, C.Z.; Luo, J.M.; Shen, Y.B.; Wang, M. Characterization of antifungal chitinase from Bacillus licheniformis TCCC10016. Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 2014, 249, 597–607. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, L.Y.; Wang, Y.S.; Zhang, J.P.; Gu, J.D. Molecular cloning of class III chitinase gene from Avicennia marina and its expression analysis in response to cadmium and lead stress. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 1697–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, L.Y.; Wang, Y.S.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, J.P.; Foong, S.Y. Cloning of the Aegiceras corniculatum class I chitinase gene (AcCHI I) and the response of AcCHI I mRNA expression to cadmium stress. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 1705–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chou, K.C.; Shen, H.B. Cell-PLoc: A package of web-servers for predicting subcellular localization of proteins in various organisms. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schwede, T.; Kopp, J.; Guex, N.; Peitsch, M.C. SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3381–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Meins, F.J.; Bernard, F.; Linthorst, H.U.M. Plant chitinase genes. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 1994, 12, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Henrissat, B.; Davies, G. Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997, 7, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Takenaka, Y.; Nakano, S.; Tamoi, M.; Sakuda, S.; Fukamizo, T. Chitinase gene expression in response to environmental stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana: Chitinase inhibitor allosamidin enhances stress tolerance. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 2009, 73, 1066–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chandra, S.; Dutta, A.K.; Chandrashekara, K.N.; Acharya, K. In silico characterization, homology modeling of Camellia sinensis chitinase and its evolutionary analyses with other plant chitinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 87, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nagpure, A.; Choudhary, B.; Gupta, R.K. Chitinases: In agriculture and human healthcare. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2013, 34, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tapia, G.; Morales-Quintana, L.; Inostroza, L. Molecular characterisation of Ltchi7, a gene encoding a class III endochitinase induced by drought stress in Lotus spp. Plant Biol. 2011, 13, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Y.W.; Zhang, B.L.; Ni, W.C.; Shen, X.L.; Zhang, X.G.; Xu, Y.J. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of two chitinase in upland cotton. Mianhua Xuebao 2008, 20, 88–93. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhou, J.; Huang, J. Cloning and Functional Identification of Chitinase Gene SlChi in Salix. Mol. Plant Breed. 2018, 16, 8013–8021. [Google Scholar]
  43. De las Mercedes, D.M.; Pintor-Toro, J.A.; Cubero, B. Transgenic tobacco plants over expressing chitinases of fungal origin show enhanced resistance to biotic and abiotic stress agents. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 722–730. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rivera-Becerril, F.; Metwally, A.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Van Tuinen, D.; Dietz, K.J.; Gianinazzi, S.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. Molecular responses to cadmium in roots of Pisum sativum L. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2005, 168, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rivera-Becerril, F.; van Tuinen, D.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Metwally, A.; Dietz, K.J.; Gianinazzi, S.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. Molecular changes in Pisum sativum L. roots during arbuscular mycorrhiza buffering of cadmium stress. Mycorrhiza 2005, 16, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Maksymiec, W. Effect of copper on cellular processes in higher plants. Photosynthetica 1997, 34, 321–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Siedlecka, A.; Tukendorf, A.; Skorzynska-Polit, E.; Maksymiec, W.; Wojcik, M.; Baszynski, T.; Krupa, Z. Angiosperms (Asteraceae, Convolvulaceae, Fabaceae and Poaceae; other than Brassicaceae). In Metals in the Environment; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 171–215. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fang, W.C.; Kao, C.H. Enhanced peroxidase activity in rice leaves in response to excess iron, copper and zinc. Plant Sci. 2000, 158, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tewari, R.K.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, P.N.; Bisht, S.S. Modulation of oxidative stress responsive enzymes by excess cobalt. Plant Sci. 2002, 162, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Allan, A.C.; Fluhr, R. Two distinct sources of elicited reactive oxygen species in tobacco epidermal cells. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1559–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lamb, C.; Dixon, R.A. The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 48, 251–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, R. Oxidative burst and H2O2 signal transduction in plant cells. Plant Physiol. Lett. 2000, 36, 376–383. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mészáros, P.; Rybanský, L.; Hauptvogel, P.; Kuna, R.; Libantová, J.; Moravčíková, J.; Piršelová, B.; Tirpaková, A.; Matušíková, I. Cultivar-specific kinetics of chitinase induction in soybean roots during exposure to arsenic. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 2127–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Corrales, I.; Poschenrieder, C.; Barcelo, J. Boron-induced amelioration of aluminium toxicity in a monocot and a dicot species. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, W.W.; Yang, Y.; Chen, P.C.; Li, C.; Wu, J.; Li, S. Ammonium Molybdate Spectrophotometric Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide Residues in Water and Hair Products. Mod. Prev. Med. 2008, 8, 1556–1558. [Google Scholar]
  56. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T) (-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 12 01681 g001 550
Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of total RNA (A), PCR products of 3′ or 5′ RACE (B).
Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of total RNA (A), PCR products of 3′ or 5′ RACE (B).
Plants 12 01681 g001
Plants 12 01681 g002 550
Figure 2. CHI gene cDNA sequence and its encoded amino acid sequence. The encoded protein starts from start codon ATG to stop codon TAG, and the predicted amino acid sequence is shown in one-letter code under the DNA sequence. Complete gene bands contain AATAA-box and poly (A) tail. (A) BgCHI, (B) KoCHI, (C) RsCHI. “*” represents the position of the end of protein translation in the figure.
Figure 2. CHI gene cDNA sequence and its encoded amino acid sequence. The encoded protein starts from start codon ATG to stop codon TAG, and the predicted amino acid sequence is shown in one-letter code under the DNA sequence. Complete gene bands contain AATAA-box and poly (A) tail. (A) BgCHI, (B) KoCHI, (C) RsCHI. “*” represents the position of the end of protein translation in the figure.
Plants 12 01681 g002
Plants 12 01681 g003 550
Figure 3. Prediction of secondary protein structure.
Figure 3. Prediction of secondary protein structure.
Plants 12 01681 g003
Plants 12 01681 g004 550
Figure 4. The molecular model of CHI III. (A) Pomegranate. (B) Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. (C) Kandelia obovate. (D) Rhizophora stylosa.
Figure 4. The molecular model of CHI III. (A) Pomegranate. (B) Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. (C) Kandelia obovate. (D) Rhizophora stylosa.
Plants 12 01681 g004
Plants 12 01681 g005 550
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of the CHI III. Multiple alignments of the sequences of CHI III and other selected plant chitinase were performed using MEGA 6. The three red point represents the chitinase of three mangrove plants in the figure.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of the CHI III. Multiple alignments of the sequences of CHI III and other selected plant chitinase were performed using MEGA 6. The three red point represents the chitinase of three mangrove plants in the figure.
Plants 12 01681 g005
Plants 12 01681 g006 550
Figure 6. Morphological changes under heavy metal treatment of mangrove plants. (A) Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. (B) Kandelia obovate. (C) Rhizophora stylosa.
Figure 6. Morphological changes under heavy metal treatment of mangrove plants. (A) Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. (B) Kandelia obovate. (C) Rhizophora stylosa.
Plants 12 01681 g006
Plants 12 01681 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of heavy metal treatments on H2O2 content of mangrove plants. Data are the means ± standard of three separate individuals. Each bar with different lowercase letters was significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Effect of heavy metal treatments on H2O2 content of mangrove plants. Data are the means ± standard of three separate individuals. Each bar with different lowercase letters was significantly different (p < 0.05).
Plants 12 01681 g007
Plants 12 01681 g008 550
Figure 8. Expression of CHI gene in leaves of three species in response to heavy metal stresses using real-time quantitative PCR analysis. (A) Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. (B) Kandelia obovate. (C) Rhizophora stylosa. Data are the means ± standard of three separate individuals. Each bar with different lowercase letters was significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Expression of CHI gene in leaves of three species in response to heavy metal stresses using real-time quantitative PCR analysis. (A) Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. (B) Kandelia obovate. (C) Rhizophora stylosa. Data are the means ± standard of three separate individuals. Each bar with different lowercase letters was significantly different (p < 0.05).
Plants 12 01681 g008
Plants 12 01681 g009 550
Figure 9. Concept map of chitinase action mechanism of mangrove plants under heavy metal stress.
Figure 9. Concept map of chitinase action mechanism of mangrove plants under heavy metal stress.
Plants 12 01681 g009
Table
Table 1. Heavy metal concentrations in artificial sewage prepared from 1/2 Hoagland’s nutrient solution.
Table 1. Heavy metal concentrations in artificial sewage prepared from 1/2 Hoagland’s nutrient solution.
Heavy Metal (mg/L)Control Group (CK)C1C2C3C4
Cu2+05255075
Pb2+0151015
Cd2+00.2123
Table
Table 2. List of primers for PCR, RACE, and real-time PCR experiments.
Table 2. List of primers for PCR, RACE, and real-time PCR experiments.
PrimersSequence (5′–3′)
F1TTGCCATCTACTGGGGTCA
R1CGTACTTTGGGGACTTCTTTAT
UPSCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC
GSP-3′GATTACGCCAAGCTTGGGTCAAAACGGCAACGA
GSP-5′GATTACGCCAAGCTTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTG
NGSP-3′GATTACGCCAAGCTTTACGGGTCTGTTTGACTATG
NGSP-5′GATTACGCCAAGCTTATCTGCGGAAGGATTTGA
FGGACATCAAAAGTTGCCAGAG
RGCATCACCTAAAGGACGAGAA
Bg18S(F)CGGGGGCATTCGTATTTC
Bg18S(R)CCTGGTCGGCATCGTTTAT
Ko18S(F)CCTGAGAAACGGCTACCACATC
Ko18S(R)ACCCATCCCAAGGTCCAACTAC
Rs18S(F)ACCATAAACGATGCCGACC
Rs18S(R)CCTTGCGACCATACTCCC
Table
Table 3. Methods and the website of bioinformatics analysis.
Table 3. Methods and the website of bioinformatics analysis.
FunctionTool
Spliced sequence alignmentApE software
Predict the open reading frameORFFinder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/ accessed on 15 October 2021)
Predict the molecular weight, theoretical pI and hydrophiliaExPASy-Compute pl/Mw (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/ accessed on 15 October 2021)
Physical and chemical properties of protein ExPASy-ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/ accessed on 15 October 2021))
HydrophiliaExPASy-ProtScale (http://web.expasy.org/protscale/ accessed on 15 October 2021)
Functional site prediction of amino acid sequenceSoftBerryPSITE (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=psite&group=programs&subgroup=proloc/ accessed on 15 October 2021)
Protein transmembrane domain analysisTMHMM Server v. 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM accessed on 15 October 2021)
Predict potential signal peptide cleavage siteSignalP4.0-Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP-4.0 accessed on 15 October 2021)
Analysis of protein structure and function domainSMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/ accessed on 15 October 2021)
Prediction of protein secondary structurePhyre2 (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index accessed on 15 October 2021)
Automated 3D structure buildingExPASy-SWISS-MODEL (https://www.swissmodel.expasy.org/ accessed on 15 October 2021)
Multiple sequence alignmentClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/ accessed on 15 October 2021)
Reconstruct phylogenetic treeMEGA6
Predict the subcellular localizationPlant-PLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc/ accessed on 15 October 2021)
Table
Table 4. Three tubes were prepared for each reverse transcription product.
Table 4. Three tubes were prepared for each reverse transcription product.
Amplification ProgramIngredientVolume
95 °C 10 min 2xqPCRmix 10 μL
95 °C 10 s40 cyclesF primer (10 pmol/uL)0.5 μL
60 °C 60 sR primer (10 pmol/uL)0.5 μL
95 °C 5 s DNA template2 μL
60 °C 5 sTest once every 0.5 °C temperature riseddH2O7 μL
95 °C 5 stotal20 μL
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, Y.-Y.; Wang, Y.-S.; Sun, C.-C. Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of the Typical Class III Chitinase Genes from Three Mangrove Species under Heavy Metal Stress. Plants 2023, 12, 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081681

AMA Style

Zhou Y-Y, Wang Y-S, Sun C-C. Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of the Typical Class III Chitinase Genes from Three Mangrove Species under Heavy Metal Stress. Plants. 2023; 12(8):1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081681

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Yue-Yue, You-Shao Wang, and Cui-Ci Sun. 2023. "Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of the Typical Class III Chitinase Genes from Three Mangrove Species under Heavy Metal Stress" Plants 12, no. 8: 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081681

APA Style

Zhou, Y. -Y., Wang, Y. -S., & Sun, C. -C. (2023). Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of the Typical Class III Chitinase Genes from Three Mangrove Species under Heavy Metal Stress. Plants, 12(8), 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081681

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop