Screening of Early Flowering Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) Cultivars and Effects of Different Cultivars on Flowering Period
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Screening Results of Early Flowering Lotus Cultivars in 2019–2020
2.2. Weather Differences in 2019–2020 Caused Different Flowering Periods
2.3. Variation of Accumulated Temperature Required by 19 Cultivars during Two-Year Growth Period
2.4. The Changes of Accumulated Temperature Required for the Growth Period of Three Cultivars in Two Years
2.5. Cause Analysis of Early and Late Flowering of Three Typical Cultivars
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
4.2. Measurement of Rhizomes
4.3. Observation of Phenological Period
4.4. Measurement of Leaf Traits and Pedicel Height
4.5. Meteorological Data Monitoring
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, S.; Fang, L.; Xi, H.; Guan, L.; Fang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wu, B.; Li, S. Simultaneous qualitative assessment and quantitative analysis of flavonoids in various tissues of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quad mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 724, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Limwachiranon, J.; Huang, H.; Shi, Z.; Li, L.; Luo, Z. Lotus Flavonoids and Phenolic Acids: Health Promotion and Safe Consumption Dosages. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Zhu, L.P.; Pan, C.; Xu, L.M.; Liu, Y.L.; Ke, W.D.; Yang, P.F. Transcriptomic analysis of the regulation of rhizome formation in temperate and tropical Lotus(Nelumbo nucifera). Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Zhang, C.; Cao, D.; Damaris, R.N.; Yang, P. The Latest Studies on Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera)-an Emerging Horticultural Model Plant. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samach, A.; Wigge, P.A. Ambient temperature perception in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagadish, S.K.; Bahuguna, R.N.; Djanaguiraman, M.; Gamuyao, R.; Prasad, P.V.; Craufurd, P.Q. Implications of high temperature and elevated CO2 on flowering time in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balasubramanian, S.; Sureshkumar, S.; Lempe, J.; Weigel, D. Potent induction of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering by elevated growth temperature. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2, e106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Bermejo, E.; Zhu, W.; Tasset, C.; Eimer, H.; Sureshkumar, S.; Singh, R.; Sundaramoorthi, V.; Colling, L.; Balasubramanian, S. Genetic architecture of natural variation in thermal responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 647–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Li, X.; Jiang, J.; Li, J.; Luo, H.; Hu, Y. Study on anniversary bloom of ornamental lotus in greenhouse of southern Jiangsu. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2013, 41, 191–193. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhuang, W.; Cai, B.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, Z. Determination of chilling and heat requirements of 69 Japanese apricot cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 74, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Templ, B.; Templ, M.; Filzmoser, P.; Lehoczky, A.; Bakšienè, E.; Fleck, S.; Gregow, H.; Hodzic, S.; Kalvane, G.; Kubin, E.; et al. Phenological patterns of flowering across biogeographical regions of Europe. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2017, 61, 1347–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, B.; Yang, N.; Li, L. Pavement induced soil warming accelerates leaf budburst of ash trees. Urban For. Urban Green. 2016, 16, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.; Li, W.; Fan, C.; Liu, M.; Liu, J.; Liang, W.; Wang, L.; Di, S.; Fang, C.; Li, H.; et al. Genome-wide association study uncovers major genetic loci associated with flowering time in response to active accumulated temperature in wild soybean population. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, S.L.; Yang, B.L.; Deng, M. Effect of effective accumulated temperature on spurring effect of Lotus. For. Sci. Technol. Dev. 2014, 28, 105–107. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Bernier, G.; Havelange, A.; Houssa, C.; Petitjean, A.; Lejeune, P. Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doust, J.L.; Doust, L.L. Modules of Production and Reproduction in a Dioecious Clonal Shrub. Ecology 1988, 69, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obeso, J.R. The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol. 2002, 155, 321–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ning, Y.W.; Ma, H.B.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.D.; Xu, X.J.; Zhang, Y.C. Response of sweetpotato in source-sink relationship establishment, expanding, and balance to nitrogen application rates. Acta Agron. Sin. 2015, 41, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mason, T.G.; Maskell, E.J. Studies on the transport of carbohydrates in the cotton plant: II. The factors determining the rate and the direction of movement of sugars. Ann. Bot. 1928, 42, 571–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Tan, B.H.G.; Qin, L. Source-to-sink relationship between green leaves and green pseudobulbs of C3 orchid in regulation of photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 2011, 49, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; Jin, Q.J.; Kuang, J.Y.; Wang, Y.J.; Xu, Y.C. Regulation of flowering timing by ABA-NnSnRK1 signaling pathway in Lotus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.C.; Zhang, X.Y. Development of character recording items for New Lotus Varieties. Chin. J. Landsc. Archit. 2012, 28, 74–77. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, P.; Jin, Q.; Qian, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, H.; Yao, D.; Liu, X.; Liu, F.; Li, J. Genetic resources of lotus (Nelumbo) and their improvement. Ornam. Plant Res. 2022, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srikanth, S. Regulation of flowering time: All roads lead to Rome. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 2013–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, H.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.H.; Kuang, J.; Wang, Y.; Jin, Q. Integrated Transcriptome and Targeted Metabolite Analysis Reveal miRNA-mRNA Networks in Low-Light-Induced Lotus Flower Bud Abortion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, D.; Damaris, R.N.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Li, M.; Yang, P. Proteomic analysis showing the signaling pathways involved in the rhizome enlargement process in Nelumbo nucifera. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.Q. A preliminary study on the nutrient morphology and bud structure of lotus. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 1956, 425–438. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.Q.; Yu, B.S. The Structure of the Germ and the nature of the bud scale of Lotus. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 1966, 126–138. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.P.; Zhang, S.M.; Yan, S.Z. Preliminary study on flower anatomy and development of Lotus. J. Nanjing Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 1982, 68, 75–80. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, M.; Hameed, I.; Cao, D.; He, D.; Yang, P. Integrated omics analyses identify key pathways involved in petiole rigidity formation in Sacred Lotus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, Y.L.; Patrick, J.W. The celluar pathway of postphloem sugar transport in developing tomato fruit. Planta 1995, 196, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cultivar | Average Number of Days from Planting to Blooming Stage (Day) | Cluster Analysis Results of First Flowering Time (Divided into 3 Categories) | Variation Coefficient of First Flowering Time % |
---|---|---|---|
‘Bai Ju Hua’ | 42.00 ± 10.39 AB | Early flowering | 25 |
‘Fen Yan Zi’ | 47.50 ± 6.03 AB | Early flowering | 13 |
‘Cheng Shan Qiu Yue’ | 49.50 ± 3.89 ABC | Early flowering | 8 |
‘Xiang Hu Lian Yi’ | 49.67 ± 7.74 ABC | Early flowering | 16 |
‘Xiang Hu Ming Yue’ | 50.17 ± 0.75 A | Early flowering | 1 |
‘Kua Hu Qiao’ | 50.67 ± 1.75 ABC | Early flowering | 3 |
‘Qian Tang Chun Xiao’ | 51.25 ± 7.41 ABC | Early flowering | 14 |
‘Wu Zhi Lian’ | 51.60 ± 2.30 ABC | Early flowering | 4 |
‘Xing Yue Dian Cui’ | 51.75 ± 6.24 ABC | Early flowering | 12 |
‘Xiang Hu Xian Zi’ | 52.25 ± 5.56 ABC | Early flowering | 11 |
‘Xiang Hu Fen’ | 54.83 ± 9.06 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 17 |
‘Xiang Hu Ming Cui’ | 55.33 ± 3.50 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 6 |
‘Hong Zhuang Pi Yu’ | 55.33 ± 2.31 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 4 |
‘Karizma’ | 56.00 ± 9.85 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 18 |
‘Yue Cheng Fu Qu’ | 56.17 ± 0.75 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 1 |
‘Cheng Shan Fen Dai’ | 56.20 ± 9.09 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 16 |
‘Guang Hui’ | 56.33 ± 5.13 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 9 |
‘Qian Tang Jiao Yang’ | 57.17 ± 5.53 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 10 |
‘Xiang Hu Yan Yu’ | 57.60 ± 5.03 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 9 |
‘Dan Yang Dian Jiang’ | 58.33 ± 6.03 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 10 |
‘Xiang Hu Ta Xun’ | 60.00 ± 3.46 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 6 |
‘Cheng Shan Yu Huan’ | 61.00 ± 4.40 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 7 |
‘Jun Yu Lian’ | 62.33 ± 12.74 ABC | Intermediate flowering | 20 |
‘Xiang Hu Liu Xia’ | 66.67 ± 3.06 B | Intermediate flowering | 5 |
‘Qian Tang Chao Yong’ | 68.20 ± 4.02 B | Intermediate flowering | 6 |
‘Qian Tang Qiu Yun’ | 70.67 ± 1.53 B | Late flowering | 2 |
‘Qiu Ri Hong Hua’ | 74.33 ± 9.81 ABC | Late flowering | 13 |
‘Qiu Xing’ | 77.33 ± 15.37 ABC | Late flowering | 20 |
‘Pi Zhen Fen’ | 79.00 ± 5.57 C | Late flowering | 7 |
‘He Tang Xiao Yue’ | 88.33 ± 19.40 ABC | Late flowering | 22 |
Cultivar | Average Number of Days from Planting to Blooming Stage (Day) | Cluster Analysis Results of First Flowering Time (Divided into 3 Categories) | Variation Coefficient of First Flowering Time % |
---|---|---|---|
‘Qian Tang Chun Xiao’ | 51.67 ± 6.43 AB | Early flowering | 12 |
‘Cheng Shan Qiu Yue’ | 52.33 ± 6.66 AB | Early flowering | 13 |
‘Qian Tang Jiao Yang’ | 52.60 ± 4.98 A | Early flowering | 9 |
‘Xiang Hu Ming Yue’ | 53.00 ± 7.30 AB | Early flowering | 14 |
‘Fen Yan Zi’ | 53.20 ± 5.26 AB | Early flowering | 10 |
‘Wu Zhi Lian’ | 53.20 ± 3.56 A | Early flowering | 7 |
‘Cheng Shan Fen Dai’ | 53.67 ± 7.51 AB | Early flowering | 14 |
‘Yue Cheng Fu Qu’ | 58.33 ± 2.31 AB | Intermediate flowering ring | 4 |
‘Bai Ju Hua’ | 59.33 ± 8.33 AB | Intermediate flowering | 14 |
‘Jun Yu Lian’ | 62.00 ± 4.00 AB | Intermediate flowering | 6 |
‘Kua Hu Qiao’ | 67.40 ± 7.77 AB | Intermediate flowering | 12 |
‘Xing Yue Dian Cui’ | 67.50 ± 8.70 AB | Intermediate flowering | 13 |
‘Guang Hui’ | 71.67 ± 2.08 AB | Late flowering | 3 |
‘Xiang Hu Xian Zi’ | 71.67 ± 8.62 AB | Late flowering | 12 |
‘Xiang Hu Yan Yu’ | 71.67 ± 9.61 AB | Late flowering | 13 |
‘Qian Tang Chao Yong’ | 71.75 ± 10.21 AB | Late flowering | 14 |
‘Dan Yang Dian Jiang’ | 74.00 ± 9.49 AB | Late flowering | 13 |
‘Xiang Hu Ming Cui’ | 79.00 ± 9.64 AB | Late flowering | 12 |
‘Xiang Hu Lian Yi’ | 101.00 ± 3.46 B | Late flowering | 3 |
Cultivar | First Flowering Time in 2019 | Cluster Analysis Results of First Flowering Time in 2019 | First Flowering Time in 2020 | Cluster Analysis Results of First Flowering Time in 2020 | First Flowering Time in 2020 after Increase the Sample Size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘Fen Yan Zi’ | 47.50 ± 6.03 a | Early flowering | 53.20 ± 5.26 a | Early flowering | 56.5 ± 7.27 a |
‘Xiang Hu Xian Zi’ | 52.25 ± 5.56 a | Early flowering | 71.67 ± 9.61 b | Late flowering | 72.4 ± 8.13 b |
‘Xiang Hu Yan Yu’ | 57.60 ± 5.03 a | Intermediate flowering | 71.67 ± 8.62 b | Late flowering | 81.67 ± 6.08 c |
Cultivar | Lateral Bud Number | Fresh Weight of Rhizomes | Expansion Coefficient of the First Nod | Expansion Coefficient of the Second Nod | Length of Apical Bud | Width of Apical Bud |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘Fen Yan Zi’ | 1.00 ± 0.93 b | 34.38 ± 17.11 a | 0.74 ± 0.19 a | 0.63 ± 0.18 a | 2.50 ± 0.77 a | 0.45 ± 0.09 b |
‘Xiang Hu Xian Zi’ | 2.00 ± 0.71 a | 13.92 ± 8.29 b | 0.46 ± 0.10 b | 0.39 ± 0.16 b | 2.72 ±0.78 a | 0.45 ± 0.08 b |
‘Xiang Hu Yan Yu’ | 1.92 ± 0.79 a | 19.5 ± 8.69 ab | 0.47 ± 0.22 b | 0.54 ± 0.16 ab | 3.12 ± 0.70 a | 0.69 ± 0.10 a |
Cultivar | Germination Time | Time of Floating Leaves Unfolding | Time of Vertical Leaves Unfolding | Time of Budding |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘Fen Yan Zi’ | 12.25 ± 6.67 a | 25.38 ± 6.76 a | 69.38 ± 23.49 a | 37.88 ± 7.2 b |
‘Xiang Hu Xian Zi’ | 12.15 ± 3.34 a | 24.08 ± 2.43 a | 64.38 ± 10.89 a | 55.77 ± 11.09 b |
‘Xiang Hu Yan Yu’ | 15.08 ± 8.61 a | 27.67 ± 5.97 a | 58.08 ± 22.35 a | 61.83 ± 12.3 a |
Cultivar | Average Height of Vertical Leaves | Average Area of Vertical Leaves | Average Height of Flower Stalk |
---|---|---|---|
‘Fen Yan Zi’ | 10.92 ± 4.72 b | 110.29 ± 22.71 ab | 21.34 ± 2.88 b |
‘Xiang Hu Xian Zi’ | 25.54 ± 8.09 a | 92.26 ± 23.56 b | 35.36 ± 5.59 b |
‘Xiang Hu Yan Yu’ | 24.36 ± 4.41 a | 139.47 ± 45.70 a | 42.93 ± 9.35 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jiang, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, G.; Zhou, P.; Jin, Q.; Wang, Y.; Guo, H.; Qian, P.; Xu, Y. Screening of Early Flowering Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) Cultivars and Effects of Different Cultivars on Flowering Period. Plants 2023, 12, 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081683
Jiang H, Chen J, Liu G, Zhou P, Jin Q, Wang Y, Guo H, Qian P, Xu Y. Screening of Early Flowering Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) Cultivars and Effects of Different Cultivars on Flowering Period. Plants. 2023; 12(8):1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081683
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiang, Huiyan, Junjie Chen, Guangyang Liu, Ping Zhou, Qijiang Jin, Yanjie Wang, Huan Guo, Ping Qian, and Yingchun Xu. 2023. "Screening of Early Flowering Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) Cultivars and Effects of Different Cultivars on Flowering Period" Plants 12, no. 8: 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081683
APA StyleJiang, H., Chen, J., Liu, G., Zhou, P., Jin, Q., Wang, Y., Guo, H., Qian, P., & Xu, Y. (2023). Screening of Early Flowering Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) Cultivars and Effects of Different Cultivars on Flowering Period. Plants, 12(8), 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081683