Next Article in Journal
Regulatory Mechanism of Proanthocyanidins in Grape Peels Using vvi-miR828a and Its Target Gene VvMYBPA1
Previous Article in Journal
Recruitment and Aggregation Capacity of Tea Trees to Rhizosphere Soil Characteristic Bacteria Affects the Quality of Tea Leaves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Aerobiology of the Family Lamiaceae: Novel Perspectives with Special Reference to Volatiles Emission

Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Calea Mănăștur Street No. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(12), 1687; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121687
Submission received: 30 March 2024 / Revised: 26 May 2024 / Accepted: 12 June 2024 / Published: 18 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Plants Volatile Compounds)

Abstract

:
Lamiaceae is a botanical family rich in aromatic species that are in high demand such as basil, lavender, mint, oregano, sage, and thyme. It has great economical, ecological, ethnobotanical, and floristic importance. The aim of this work is to provide an updated view on the aerobiology of species from the family Lamiaceae, with an emphasis on novelties and emerging applications. From the aerobiology point of view, the greatest interest in this botanical family is related to the volatile organic compounds emitted by the plants and, to a much lesser extent, their pollen. Research has shown that the major volatile organic compounds emitted by the plants from this botanical family are monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. The most important monoterpenes reported across studies include α-pinene, β-pinene, 1,8-cineole, menthol, limonene, and γ-terpinene. Most reports tend to cover species from the subfamily Nepetoideae. Volatile oils are produced by glandular trichomes found on aerial organs. Based on general morphology, two main types are found in the family Lamiaceae, namely peltate and capitate trichomes. As a result of pollinator-mediated transfer of pollen, Lamiaceae species present a reduced number of stamens and quantity of pollen. This might explain the low probability of pollen presence in the air from these species. A preliminary synopsis of the experimental evidence presented in this work suggests that the interplay of the organic particles and molecules released by these plants and their environment could be leveraged for beneficial outcomes in agriculture and landscaping. Emerging reports propose their use for intercropping to ensure the success of fructification, increased yield of entomophilous crops, as well as in sensory gardens due to the therapeutic effect of volatiles.

1. Introduction

Aerobiology is a field of science that studies particles of biological origin that are small enough to travel with air masses and air currents [1]. Both the outdoor atmospheric domain [2] as well as the indoor environment [3] are studied within this science. This includes several topics that intersect with many other sciences. The research area of agricultural and biological sciences has consistently dominated the aerobiology field in the last decades, demonstrating the increasing practical interest in the subject, followed by the areas of medicine, immunology, and microbiology, among other minor domains [4]. Such organic particles are omnipresent in the air and can have their origin in different sources, such as the plant canopy, soil, water surface, and anthropic environments [5]. The air-borne biological particles studied by aerobiology, known as bioaerosols, can be either whole organisms or fragments from plants, fungi, protists, prokaryotes, and viruses, as well as minute animals such as small insects [6]. The products emitted by these, such as toxins [7] or biogenic volatiles, are also subjects of this field [8,9]. Although their presence in air masses can be more or less dispersed, these particles can travel large distances and influence atmospheric processes, interfere with other living systems, and cause observable biological or ecological effects [5].
The biological contribution of plants to ambient air has complex outcomes. It has been shown that vegetation enriches the atmosphere with organic aerosols, playing an important macro-scale role in atmosphere–biosphere feedback. The biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) emitted by such vegetation can constitute condensation nuclei that are able to form clouds; furthermore, they could contribute to the formation of bright clouds that better scatter sunlight, resulting in a cooling effect [10]. In natural and human-managed ecosystems, plants release volatile organic compounds which facilitate outcomes derived either directly or indirectly from their attractant or repellent effect on other organisms. These compounds have roles as signaling molecules in plant defense, pollination, and inter-plant communication [11]. In indoor spaces, plants are known for improving air quality by decreasing the suspended potentially pathogenic microorganism load [12] and releasing negatively charged ions beneficial for human health [13]. The particulate contribution of plants to air has been well studied, especially with regard to the allergenic potential of pollen [14]. For example, a previous study created a useful aerobiological risk map for the family Cupressaceae in the Iberian Peninsula for the safe planning of outdoor activities and to prevent pollen allergy cases [15]. Some studies have been concerned with the aerobiology of a single plant species in order to elucidate certain pollination mechanisms, such as in Symplocarpus foetidus [16]. The interplay of the organic particles and molecules released by the plants and their environment suggests that at least some could be deliberately leveraged for beneficial results. The cultivated or widespread plants known to be rich in volatiles could be of particular practical relevance.
Currently, the works dedicated to the aerobiology of a given botanic family are scarce; hence, this work intends to identify the relevant aerobiological aspects for one of the botanical families most rich in volatiles—Lamiaceae. This work further aims to highlight the importance of gathering information on a botanic family in a holistic way, with the purpose of discovering unexplored applications and identifying gaps in knowledge. This work assembles the relevant information to create a new perspective on this family. In this paper, we invite readers to gain an overview of the family Lamiaceae from the perspective of aerobiology and thus have a novel understanding of the species from this botanical family, from botany to practical implications.
Lamiaceae is a large family of flowering plants, which is rich in aromatic species. It holds great importance economically, ecologically, ethnobotanically, and floristically [17,18]. It is widespread in natural habitats, while the growth of crops is expanding as a result of high demand [19,20]. Hence, aromatic Lamiaceae species could become an important presence, as well as a potential organic aerosol contributor via their produced volatiles. The volatiles’ multiple interactions with other groups of organisms, from microorganisms (including potentially pathogenic ones) to other plants, animals (especially insects, herbivores, and pets), as well as humans, deserve a better understanding.
Given the huge economic importance of this botanical family, it is understandable why the specialist literature is exceptionally consistent on various research topics for species from Lamiaceae. Yet, to our knowledge, there is no overview that gathers the relevant findings on the aerobiology of this family, despite its widespread presence, cultivation, and use.
The aim of this work is to provide a general view on the aerobiology of the family Lamiaceae. This work considers the main aspects of aerobiology, such as volatiles and pollen, with the purpose of clarifying their relevance and placing an emphasis on emerging aspects with potential practical implications. This work seeks to gather examples on the commonly cultivated species of Lamiaceae due to their relevance. The goal is to provide an initial synopsis of the current knowledge by bringing attention to an approach that can be useful to better identify the unexplored potential of these species.

2. Botany Aspects of the Family Lamiaceae

2.1. Plant Morphology

The family Lamiaceae comprises about 3500–4000 species of plants largely spread throughout the warm and temperate Holarctic region. The vast majority of these plants are annual or perennial herbs, but there are also shrubs. The stems are quadrangular, with the leaves arranged opposite and decussate. The leaves are more often simple and margin entire to divided. Flowers are zygomorphic, with a characteristic bilabiate morphology, and are arranged in axillary cymes or in terminal spikes. The calyx is symsepalous and the corolla sympetalous. The stamens are frequently four and didynamous (only two stamens in the genus Salvia), often with a specialization for entomophilous pollination. The two carpels have a superior ovary and gynobasic style. The nectaries are present at the base of the ovary. The schizocarp fruit consists of four nutlets [21]. The flower morphology of the Lamiaceae species favors cross-pollination [22].
There are several high-diversity regions in the world. The family Lamiaceae remains particularly well represented in the Mediterranean region and Southwest Asia [23]. Greece reports the presence of 414 taxa of Lamiaceae in the country, including 111 species endemic to Greece [24]. Turkey reports 48 genera and 603 species, out of which 271 are endemic [25]. The flora of China reports 96 genera and 807 species [26]. In Mexico, 32 genera have been reported, comprising 591 species, notably with a high endemism rate of 65.82% [27]. In South Africa, there are 42 genera with 297 species, of which 105 are endemic [28]. In the Neotropics, the family is represented by about 65 genera and 1,690 species [29]. Olmstead check listed over 20 genera distributed in Australia, with several of them native [30].
Most people are familiar with certain species of this botanic family due to their frequent use as culinary herbs (Mentha × piperita, Salvia rosmarinus, Ocimum basilicum, Origanum majorana, Origanum vulgare) [31], valuable medicinal plants (Salvia officinalis, Melissa officinalis, Thymus serpyllum) [32], or highly melliferous species (Dracocephalum moldavica, Lavandula angustifolia, Leonurus cardiaca, Salvia verticillata) [33]. Some species are appreciated as ornamentals due to their flowers (Salvia splendens) [34] or their fruits (Callicarpa sp.) [35], while others confer emblematic notes in the fragrance industry (Pogostemon cablin) [36]. Many species are sources of aromatic oils that possess bioactivities (Agastache rugosa, Lavandula angustifolia, Dracocephalum officinalis, Satureja hortensis, Betonica officinalis, Thymus vulgaris) [37], while others are known for their strongly psychoactive effects (Salvia divinorum) [38]. The species that are important due to their uses are also cultivated over larger areas. Also, many of their applications are documented in relation to the essential oils extracted from these species [39]. The volatiles that are naturally emitted by these plants in the environment also deserve attention with regard to their potential role.

2.2. Pollen Grains

In the Lamiaceae family, the evolution of bilabiate flowers caused a reduction in stamen number, which is further associated with decreasing pollen production and increasing the precision of pollen transfer mechanisms [40]. Both the entomophilous and ornithophilous pollination types have been reported in this botanic family, with pollinators acting as carriers of pollen from one flower to another. Pollinators observed for some common Lamiaceae species belong to Hymenoptera, Diptera, and day-flying Lepidoptera [22]. Birds and beetles have been reported as well, such as in the Prostanthera genus in Australia [41]. Other interesting pollination mechanisms have been reported, such as explosive release of pollen in the ornithophilous species Hyptis pauliana from Brazil [42].
The pollen in Lamiaceae is of the colpate type [43]. The morphological characterization of pollen is based on variation in size and shape, on exine ornamentation pattern, colpi, number of perforations, occurrence of large central secondary lumina per primary lumen, as well as the number of secondary lumina per primary lumen. All these hold taxonomic significance and still provide taxonomic insights, as demonstrated in recent studies conducted on Salvia [44], Clerodendrum [45], and Nepeta [46]. The nutritional value of Lamiaceae pollen recommends their use, particularly for improving the food resources of hive bees [47].
Aeropalynology is a major chapter in the domain of aerobiology. However, our literature screening did not return many results, indicating that species of this family are not important contributors of pollen to the air, a fact that might explain the low number of reports and studies. A study conducted in the urban area of Canakkale, Turkey, reported a low degree of pollen allergenicity for Lamiaceae and a low average for total pollen counts of Lamiaceae taxa [48]. A study conducted in Poland on the variation in airborne herbaceous pollen from urban and rural areas showed the seasonal pollen index (SPI) of Lamiaceae was higher in rural than in urban areas. The SPI values ranged from 3 to 22 for Lamiaceae, which were overall lower than those reported for other entomophilous families such as Asteraceae, yet within close range of the values registered by Ranunculaceae [49]. Another study conducted in the Nam Co Basin in central Tibet showed that, while annually the herbaceous pollen represented 87.03% of the total sum of pollen in that type of habitat, the Lamiaceae pollen represented merely 0.14% [50]. An aero-palynological study from southwestern Nigeria confirmed Lamiaceae pollen presence from Hyptis suaveolens during three months of the year, as well as pollen from Ocimum gratissimum during eight months of the year [51], indicating that while pollen contribution to ambient air was low, it was possible to detect a species seasonality.
The modest number of reports could be explained by the low number of stamens in these species. Pollinators act as carriers of pollen on their backs or beaks; hence, this specialization might explain a low probability of pollen presence in the air. This is in comparison to anemophilous plant species of other botanic families that release large amounts of pollen in the air to be carried by the wind. The aerobiology studies do not abound in reports of Lamiaceae pollen, and, as a consequence, their relevance for this field of science remains low. This is in contrast with the volatile organic compounds emitted by these plants, which are of much greater interest for aerobiology, as will be presented in the following chapters.

2.3. Trichomes—The Structures Emitting Volatiles

Plants have dedicated organs and tissues specialized to produce and store metabolites, which are located internally or on the surface. The second category is broadly represented by glandular trichomes [52]. The glandular trichomes are found on the aerial organs of about 20–30% of vascular plant species [53]. These play a modulating and defensive role for the plant in relation to biotic and abiotic environmental factors, while the secretion products are gaining practical importance. Moreover, precision breeding by genome editing with the purpose of creating genotypes that display customized glandular trichome parameters is one possibility to harness their benefits [54].
The epidermal structures (indumentum) of the family Lamiaceae comprise both glandular and non-glandular trichomes [55], distributed on vegetative and reproductive organs. The morphology of glandular trichomes reported in this family varies [56,57]. Based on general morphology, two main types have been described in the Lamiaceae: peltate trichomes with a disk-shaped head and very short stalk and capitate trichomes with a longer stalk and a head comprising one to several cells. The glandular trichome has a base cell that connects it to the plant surface. The stalk cells present large vacuoles, and the neck cell has cutinized walls to prevent the backflow of secreted substances. The secretory head cells have a dense cytoplasm with leucoplasts. Through the separation of the outer cell wall and cuticle of the head, a space is formed where the secreted metabolites are accumulated. When the cuticle is broken, the secretory products from the subcuticular space are released. In valuable aromatic Lamiaceae species, these secretion products are represented by precious volatiles rich in monoterpenes [53]. Raffinose-based sugars are predominant in the phloem of the family Lamiaceae and represent the source of carbon for glandular trichomes [52]. In the biosynthesis pathway of monoterpenes in glandular trichomes of species from the Lamiaceae, several enzyme classes are involved, such as monoterpene synthase, CYPs, or reductases [58]. The European Pharmacopoeia (EP) refers to the peltate glandular trichomes found in the species from the Lamiaceae family as “secretory trichomes of lamiaceous type”. The morphology of glandular trichomes is detailed in the EP for several medicinal species of Lamiaceae [59]. There is a relationship between the peltate trichomes and the quantity of volatile oil produced in the aromatic members of the Nepetoideae. Hence, these can be considered the most valuable structures to study in relation to volatile emission. They appear under a microscope, regularly distributed over the surface, located in small depressions, and varying in color from yellow, white, to transparent [60]. Some morphological aspects are presented in Figure 1.
A study on the leaf and stem of several oil-bearing species from the Lamiaceae, which are of interest for several types of industries, reported large peltate trichomes in Mentha × piperita (70.61 μm in diameter) and the smallest in Mellissa officinalis (44.26 μm in diameter) [61]. A comparative study of lavender cultivars has provided evidence that peltate trichomes are the largest on the calyx, with a diameter exceeding 100 μm. Due to this, the flowers were shown to be the main sites where VOCs are accumulated in this widespread cultivated species [62]. Because the nectar itself does not attract pollinators, it is supposed that glandular trichomes present on various parts of the flower play a double role through the volatiles they emit. At first, they provide protection for the buds by exerting a repellent effect, but after the flowers open, they have a role in attracting pollinators. In this regard, in Origanum syriacum and Origanum vulgare, capitate glandular trichomes on the corolla lobes were observed [63].

3. Volatile Emission of the Family Lamiaceae

The phytochemistry of the family is complex and diverse. Yet, two main groups can be distinguished within this family. The first group includes all species producing volatile terpenoids (notably monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes) which therefore are essential oil-producing plants from the subfamily Nepetoideae. The second group comprises species that produce mostly non-volatile secondary metabolites in the polar fraction and are less valuable for essential oil production, including members of the subfamilies as follows: Ajugoideae, Callicarpoideae, Lamioideae, Peronematoideae, Premnoideae, Prostantheroideae, Scutellarioideae, and Viticoideae. However, the polar fraction metabolites can serve as chemotaxonomic markers at any level from species to subfamily and encompass seven classes of compounds, namely non-volatile terpenoids, lignans, flavonoids, iridoids, phenyl-ethanoid glycosides, caffeoyl-quinic acids, and phenolic acids. The rest of the subfamilies (Cymaroideae, Symphorematoideae, and Tectonoideae) cannot be currently assigned to either of the two groups, as more work on their phytochemistry is needed [55].
Plants can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from various parts of their organs, such as leaves, flowers, roots [64], and fruits [65]. They represent around 1% of the total secondary metabolites of plants [66] and play a crucial role in a wide range of physiological and ecological interactions. VOCs are one of the most important attractant signals for pollinators and are often surprisingly specific [67]. In general, for pollinators such as honey bees (Apis mellifera L., family Apidae, order Hymenoptera, class Insecta), the scent of plant volatiles carried by returning bees on their bodies becomes a source of chemical information for hive mates and is related to information about available floral resources [68]. The VOC emission regulates key ecological functions, being involved in plants’ protection against abiotic stressors such as temperature and light, by acting as antioxidants and cell membrane stabilizers [69]. Also, VOCs play an important role in natural seed dispersal [70,71,72], and they act directly or indirectly as protection mechanisms against herbivores [73,74] and pathogens [75]. VOCs also mediate intraspecific inter-plant communication [76].
Plant VOCs are small molecules with low molecular mass (100–500 Da) and high vapor pressure (0.01 kPa or higher at 20 °C) that quickly evaporate into the atmosphere [77]. These compounds are largely lipophilic products that belong to the chemical categories of terpenes and non-terpene aliphatics (including nitrogen- and sulfur-containing compounds), C5-branched compounds, phenylpropanoids, and benzenoids [11]. Many of these categories of compounds have been found in most orders of flowering plants, but 12 compounds are frequent, with the monoterpene category being by far the most present. Compounds (monoterpenes) occurring in more than half of the families of seed plants are limonene (71%), (E)-ocimene (71%), myrcene (70%), linalool (70%), α-pinene (67%), and β-pinene (59%) [78].
Headspace solid-phase microextraction sampling techniques showed that many flowering plants produce their most varied mixture, with the highest abundance of VOCs usually from their flowers [78]. However, in aromatic and medicinal plants (including the Lamiaceae family), the leaves also contribute significantly to VOC emissions. The essential oil and volatile profile (volatile emission) of Lamiaceae species is notably rich in volatile monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes. The most important monoterpenes are α-pinene, β-pinene, 1,8-cineole, menthol, limonene, and γ-terpinene [79]. These monoterpenes occur in more than half of the families of seed plants [78]; therefore, the distribution of emitted volatiles in Lamiaceae family plants is not within phylogenetic limitations. Many of the main compounds found in the volatile profile obtained from Lamiaceae species (with some exceptions) are not reliable chemotaxonomic markers because they have been reported in other botanic families as well, and their accumulation can vary depending on environmental factors. Hence, in the family Lamiaceae, chemotaxonomic importance remains mostly attached to the polar fraction metabolites, not the volatiles [55].
Terpenes are largely found as constituents of volatiles, being mostly hydrocarbons. Terpene hydrocarbons have a molecular formula of (C5H8)n, where the n dictates the number of units involved as follows: monoterpenes—2 isoprene units, 10 carbon atoms; sesquiterpenes—3 isoprene units, 15 carbon atoms; diterpenes—4 isoprene units, 20 carbon atoms; triterpenes—6 isoprene units, 30 carbon atoms; tetraterpenes—8 isoprene units, 40 carbon atoms [80]. Terpenes are typically volatile, while terpenoids may be non-volatile or semi-volatile as they normally contain other polar moieties. In addition to terpenes, the volatile profile of plants in the Lamiaceae contains a few other chemical compounds. In Table 1, the most important volatiles identified among Lamiaceae family representatives are presented.
The above table (Table 1) summarizes findings from studies in which headspace solid-phase microextraction was used to collect the volatiles emitted by a fresh plant. The reason for choosing this method is to target only the volatile components that are actually released into the atmosphere. Studies that used extractive methods (e.g., distillation) were not considered here since it might be possible that the compounds detected in plants by other methods are not always released from flowers or leaves in natural settings. Headspace solid-phase microextraction is an equilibrium methodology that requires the prior modification of experimental parameters in order to maximize the extraction efficiency of volatile metabolites and thus acquire the most precise volatile profile [129].
The dominant categories of VOC emission in the family Lamiaceae were the monoterpenes (MHs and OMs) and sesquiterpenes (SHs predominantly and less frequently OSs). Diterpenes and triterpenes are less volatile [130], as well as less abundant than mono- and sesquiterpenes; therefore, they are rarely seen as significant components in volatile emission from fresh plants.
Also, 2,5-dimethyl-3-methoxypyrazine was identified as a major compound in the volatile emission of fresh leaves of Mentha spicata [66], representing one of seven metoxypyrazines also identified in grapes or wine [131]. Several non-terpene derivates are major compounds in Lamiaceae representatives: 1-octen-3-ol specific to Melittis melissophyllum subsp. melissophyllum [98], as well as fatty acids and fatty acid esters specific to Salvia sp. [109], Mentha sp. [100], and Scutellaria sp. [119].
As for the scent of individual compounds, it has been reviewed by Chizzola in terms of sensory characteristics perceived by humans. Among these, camphor is described as fresh-ethereal, limonene as fresh citrus-like, myrcene as mild-sweet and balsamic, linalool as floral, α-pinene as sharp-woody, β-pinene as spicy, β-caryophyllene as woody-spicy, and germacrene D as fruity [132]. However, pollinators detect these volatiles with their antennae, and for them, these compounds represent important information signals that guide their decisions and flight patterns. Perception and function of olfactory pathways in insects can be measured through electro-antennography, which determines the neuronal electric signal of the antenna for a given molecule. Around 30% of current crops depend on successful pollination for a fruit and seed set; volatile emission is particularly relevant from this perspective. Among pollinators, Apis sp. remains one of the most important for agriculture due to its manageable, large colonies that can be easily deployed in the vicinity of crops to ensure successful yields. Hence, honey bee behavior in relation to volatile emissions from plants has enjoyed higher interest compared to that of other pollinators. Bees associate some of these volatile compounds with food rewards. But it has also been shown that bees learn to distinguish their signals, with variable memory depending on age and season [68].

4. Practical Implications of the Volatiles Emission

The rich, volatile profile of some Lamiaceae has some novel aerobiology-related practical implications. Monoterpenes (MHs and OMs), identified as the dominant category in volatiles emission of Lamiaceae representatives (Table 1), consist of a veritable weapon against pathogens. Monoterpenes can act against field crop insect pests in many ways, having important practical implications for intercropping. They can also be botanical pesticides and serve as lead candidates for the development and synthesis of novel monoterpenoid pesticides for agricultural use. Monoterpene modes of action are as follows: contact toxicity, fumigant toxicity, deterrent and antifeedant effects, growth inhibitory effects, and residual toxicity [133]. Linalool, myrcene, limonene, thymol, 1,8-cineol, and α-pinene, to name only a few monoterpenes, can act on the nervous system or on the cell membranes of crop pests (putative mode of action) [134]. The compound 3-hexenyl acetate, a volatile reported in Lamium species (Lamium amplexicaule, Lamium purpureum) (Table 1), belongs to “green leaf volatiles” (GLVs), molecules that intervene in plant defense to abiotic attack [135]. These compounds were shown to be involved in recruiting parasitoids or carnivorous predators into repelling or disposing of herbivorous arthropods [136]. Green leaf volatiles are almost ubiquitously produced by green plants. The compound 1-octen-3-ol, specific to Melittis melissophyllum subsp. melissophyllum, is responsible for the distinct fungal scent and flavor of edible mushrooms and has an ecological role in attracting flies and mosquitoes, which are helpful in the reproduction process or as a defense mechanism [98].
There is a revived interest in the practice of intercropping, which opens interesting opportunities for the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Mixed cultivation provides crop diversification with potential benefits derived from lower inputs required and enhanced yields [137]. Further down is compiled an overview of some of the most relevant examples for species from the Lamiaceae family, with regard to the effects of interest that were attributed to the volatiles emitted by the fresh plants. These recent examples place emphasis on agricultural settings.
The experimental evidence suggests that aromatic plants can be successfully used to control pests in some crops due to the repellent effect of their volatiles. The species Satureja hortensis and Ocimum basilicum demonstrated a repellent effect against black bean aphids (Aphis fabae Scopoli, family Aphididae, order Hemiptera, class Insecta). The mechanisms at play rely on the volatiles released by the aromatic plants, which are non-hosts for the aphids. Due to this effect, aromatic plants have the ability to decrease aphid infestation when planted near target crops [138]. The polyphagous onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman, family Thripidae, order Thysanoptera, class Insecta) are reportedly repelled by Lavandula angustifolia, Ocimum gratissimum, Origanum majorana, Mentha arvensis, and Salvia rosmarinus. This presents the possibility of using these plants for integrated pest management. It was proposed that aromatic plants might be effective in controlling a wider range of Thysanoptera species that affect crops [139]. A study demonstrated statistically significant repellent effect of volatiles from Ocimum basilicum against the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae Sulzer, family Aphididae, order Hemiptera, class Insecta). This further underlines the potential use of some aromatic companion plants as an eco-friendly strategy to optimize pest management in orchards, but not only [140]. Alternating rows or alternating plants of Amaranthus cruentus with Ocimum gratissimum showed a beneficial effect on amaranth yield and repelled the pests specific to this crop [141]. Capsicum frutescens showed increased productivity parameters and decreased pest attacks when associated with Ocimum basilicum [142]. VOCs emitted by Mentha × piperita were shown to reduce infestations with the fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii Matsumura, family Drosophilidae, order Diptera, class Insecta), a devastating pest of berry fruit crops. Hence, it was proposed that intercropping and mowing the peppermint during fruit ripening stages might decrease infestation as large amounts of VOCs are released in the air [143]. Because these pests are also disease vectors, it might be possible that by reducing pest infestation with the help of volatiles produced by aromatic plants, disease incidence will also decrease. In this regard, further research could provide valuable insights. Based on these promising results, it is worthwhile to further investigate the potential of aromatic plants from the Lamiaceae family because they could provide natural plant protection. This is of current importance considering the justified interest in reducing pesticide applications due to health concerns.
Flower strips are used in agriculture to improve pollination. This is particularly important for seed production in pollinator-dependent crops. Melliferous aromatic crops could act as an attractive spot for pollinators. In this regard, an experiment showed that bee visitation to sunflower heads increased due to flower strips containing 12 melliferous species, including Salvia pratensis [144]. In intensive agricultural areas, ensuring flower strips and semi-natural habitats (which include Lamiaceae species) in the vicinity of crops with the purpose of creating a refuge and attraction point for bees can result in more visits to the flowers of the nearby crops, therefore increasing seed yield—as demonstrated for sunflower crops [144,145]. A meta-analysis provided increasing evidence that flower strips improve pest control and seed yield in the adjacent fields [146], indicating that this is a justified path of research. Given the highly simplified landscapes of intensive agricultural areas, it is advised to use flower strips or intercrop aromatic species with various crop plants to attract pollinators and benefit from a natural pest control mediated by VOCs from the air that are emitted by the aromatic plants.
Novel and less explored are the allelopathic effects of volatiles released in the air by plants. Allelopathic properties have been identified so far in some species from Lamiaceae, with several classes of compounds produced by these plants being potentially responsible for the inhibitory effect on other plants or, on the contrary, exercising a stimulating effect on other plants. The volatile monoterpenoids camphor and 1,8-cineole are considered to be responsible for the well-known “Salvia phenomenon” in natural settings, explained by their inhibitory effects on surrounding species. Further evidence for allelopathic effects exists for genera such as Clinopodium [Calamintha], Coleus, Conradina, Dracocephalum [Hyssopus], Hyptis, Lavandula, Leonurus, Leucas, Mentha, Nepeta, Ocimum, Origanum, Orthosiphon, Salvia, Satureja, Tectona, and Thymus. But most studies investigated the allelopathic effect of certain isolated extracts or compounds [147], hence leaving a gap in the literature on the effect of volatiles that are only emitted in the air by plants. Out of the wide range of potential agricultural interests in these mechanisms, the phytotoxicity of volatiles released by aromatic plants against noxious weeds is of greatest importance—for weed control as natural bioherbicides [148]. Although the VOC-mediated allelopathy mechanisms at large still remain poorly documented and insufficiently understood [149], perhaps a good starting point for future research is to identify the taxonomic groups that might present the best potential. In this sense, arguments from this work sustain the idea that Lamiaceae is a good candidate for further study.
Regarding the effects of plants from the family Lamiaceae in intercropping schemes, these are not always so easily defined. A study that intercropped Salvia officinalis with Vitis vinifera “Trebbiano Romagnolo” did not find changes in the vineyard productivity parameters. But, more interestingly, the volatiles emitted by sage interacted with the grapevines and influenced the accumulation of volatile compounds. Particularly, eugenol in its bound form increased in grape berries. It was proposed that this could be due to the effect of VOCs produced by sage plants on biosynthesis pathways in grape berries [150].
In addition to applications in agriculture, aromatic species from this botanic family can find other applications right in the cities. Plant species such as Lavandula angustifolia, Mentha longifolia, Salvia officinalis, Salvia rosmarinus, and Thymus vulgaris have been suggested as suitable for sensory-therapeutic gardens. Notably, these provide olfactive and therapeutic value to specific landscaping settings [151].
The aromatic species of the family Lamiaceae were shown to emit volatile compounds (most often monoterpenes), and due to this fact, these can find in situ usefulness before they are harvested and processed. Thus, here we presented preliminary evidence of their beneficial use in agriculture (intercropping) and landscaping. Therefore, both in rural as well as urban spaces, species from the family Lamiaceae can play roles that spring up from the aerobiology relevance of their volatiles, and we propose further study of these applications.

5. Concluding Overview

Lamiaceae is a large family of flowering plants, comprising many of the aromatic species that are economically important for many industries. Despite its widespread presence, expanding cultivation, and use, there is no current overview of the aerobiology of this family. Hence, the aim of this work is to provide a general view and novelties on the aerobiology of the family Lamiaceae. It was identified that bioaerosols of interest in this family are, firstly, the abundant volatile organic compounds released in the air by the plants and to a lesser extent the pollen.
Although pollen is a large chapter of aerobiology, the flower morphology in Lamiaceae is specialized for pollinator-mediated transfer of pollen, a fact also evident due to the reduced number of stamens and quantity of pollen produced. The low probability of pollen presence in the air from these species might be due to this. This further suggests that the probability of pollen allergy might remain low even upon the mass flowering of these species.
Volatile organic compounds are the biogenic aerosols of greatest importance for the aerobiology of this species. The sites of biosynthesis of volatiles emitted by aromatic species are the glandular trichomes at the surface of the plants. Based on general morphology, two main types have been described in the Lamiaceae: peltate trichomes with a disk-shaped head and very short stalk and capitate with a longer stalk and head comprising one to several cells. Literature research indicated that volatile emissions of Lamiaceae species are abundant in monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes. The most important monoterpenes reported across studies were α-pinene, β-pinene, 1,8-cineole, menthol, limonene, and γ-terpinene, and the most frequent sesquiterpenes were γ-muurolene, β-caryophyllen, and germacrene D. Because diterpenes and triterpenes are less volatile and less abundant, these are less significant components in volatile emission from fresh plants.
The interaction of organic particles and molecules released by the plants and their environment suggests at least some aromatic species could be used for beneficial results. This represents the novel dimension of the aerobiology applications for these species. Based on emerging evidence, it is recommended to include aromatic species of Lamiaceae in intercropping schemes to enhance yields and the health of the crops. Also, farmers could consider these species in the planning of the crop structure in a field, to take advantage of natural pest control and enhanced yields.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A.H. and R.V.; methodology, R.A.H. and R.V.; formal analysis, R.A.H. and I.C.; investigation, R.A.H. and I.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.H. and I.C.; writing—review and editing, R.V. and D.V.; supervision, R.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hyde, H.A. Aerobiology. Nature 1957, 179, 890–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haddrell, A.E.; Thomas, R.J. Aerobiology: Experimental Considerations, Observations, and Future Tools. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00809-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Burge, H.A. Aerobiology of the Indoor Environment. Occup. Med. 1995, 10, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Lancia, A.; Capone, P.; Vonesch, N.; Pelliccioni, A.; Grandi, C.; Magri, D.; D’Ovidio, M.C. Research Progress on Aerobiology in the Last 30 Years: A Focus on Methodology and Occupational Health. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Choufany, M.; Martinetti, D.; Soubeyrand, S.; Morris, C.E. Inferring Long-Distance Connectivity Shaped by Air-Mass Movement for Improved Experimental Design in Aerobiology. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jacobs, W.C. Aerobiology. In Compendium of Meteorology: Prepared under the Direction of the Committee on the Compendium of Meteorology; Byers, H.R., Landsberg, H.E., Wexler, H., Haurwitz, B., Spilhaus, A.F., Willett, H.C., Houghton, H.G., Malone, T.F., Eds.; American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA, USA, 1951; pp. 1103–1111. ISBN 978-1-940033-70-9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Salem, H.; Katz, S. Aerobiology: The Toxicology of Airborne Pathogens and Toxins; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-1-84973-791-3. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pantoja, L.D.M.; do Nascimento, R.F.; de Araújo Nunes, A.B. Investigation of Fungal Volatile Organic Compounds in Hospital Air. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2016, 7, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oderbolz, D.C.; Aksoyoglu, S.; Keller, J.; Barmpadimos, I.; Steinbrecher, R.; Skjøth, C.A.; Plaß-Dülmer, C.; Prévôt, A.S.H. A Comprehensive Emission Inventory of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds in Europe: Improved Seasonality and Land-Cover. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 1689–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yli-Juuti, T.; Mielonen, T.; Heikkinen, L.; Arola, A.; Ehn, M.; Isokääntä, S.; Keskinen, H.-M.; Kulmala, M.; Laakso, A.; Lipponen, A.; et al. Significance of the Organic Aerosol Driven Climate Feedback in the Boreal Area. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.K.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, Function and Metabolic Engineering of Plant Volatile Organic Compounds. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Díaz Rojas, M.; Gutiérrez Espinosa, J.; Gutiérrez Espinosa, A.; González Chávez, M.D.C.; Vidal Gaona, G.; Zaragoza Palencia, R.M.; Calderón Ezquerro, C. Aerobiological Characterization of Indoor Enviroments in the Presence of Plant Coverings. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 2010, 26, 279–289. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jiang, S.-Y.; Ma, A.; Ramachandran, S. Negative Air Ions and Their Effects on Human Health and Air Quality Improvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Myszkowska, D. Aerobiological Studies—Current State and Future Challenges. Alergoprofil 2020, 16, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pecero-Casimiro, R.; Fernández-Rodríguez, S.; Tormo-Molina, R.; Silva-Palacios, I.; Gonzalo-Garijo, Á.; Monroy-Colín, A.; Coloma, J.F.; Maya-Manzano, J.M. Producing Urban Aerobiological Risk Map for Cupressaceae Family in the SW Iberian Peninsula from LiDAR Technology. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Camazine, S.; Niklas, K.J. Aerobiology of Symplocarpus Foetidus: Interactions Between the Spathe and Spadix. Am. J. Bot. 1984, 71, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Adler, A. The Lamiaceae Family: An Overview; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2020; ISBN 978-1-5361-7078-8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stankovic, M.S. (Ed.) Lamiaceae Species; MDPI—Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: Basel, Switzerland, 2020; ISBN 978-3-03928-418-4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ekren, S.; Gökçöl, A.; Yıldırım Keskinoğlu, A.; Paylan, İ.C. Optimizing Germination Performance of Lamiaceae Family Seeds: Insights from Research. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2024, 131, 999–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Trivellini, A.; Lucchesini, M.; Maggini, R.; Mosadegh, H.; Villamarin, T.S.S.; Vernieri, P.; Mensuali-Sodi, A.; Pardossi, A. Lamiaceae Phenols as Multifaceted Compounds: Bioactivity, Industrial Prospects and Role of “Positive-Stress”. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 83, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cristea, V. Plante Vasculare: Diversitate, Sistematică, Ecologie Și Importanță; Presa Universitara Clujeana: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2014; ISBN 978-973-595-648-6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mačukanović-Jocić, M.; Stevanović, Z.D.; Mladenović, M.; Jocić, G. Flower Morphophysiology of Selected Lamiaceae Species in Relation to Pollinator Attraction. J. Apic. Res. 2011, 50, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, Z.; Chang, L. Lamiaceae. In Identification and Control of Common Weeds: Volume 3; Xu, Z., Chang, L., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 181–265. ISBN 978-981-10-5403-7. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cheminal, A.; Kokkoris, I.P.; Strid, A.; Dimopoulos, P. Medicinal and Aromatic Lamiaceae Plants in Greece: Linking Diversity and Distribution Patterns with Ecosystem Services. Forests 2020, 11, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Celep, F.; Dirmenci, T. Systematic and Biogeographic Overview of Lamiaceae in Turkey. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2017, 4, 14–27. [Google Scholar]
  26. Xiwen, L.; Hedge, I.C. Flora of China: Lamiaceae. Flora China 1994, 17, 50–299. [Google Scholar]
  27. Martínez-Gordillo, M.; Fragoso-Martínez, I.; García-Peña, M.D.R.; Montiel, O. Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, Diversidad y Endemismo. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2013, 84, 30–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rattray, R.D.; Van Wyk, B.-E. The Botanical, Chemical and Ethnobotanical Diversity of Southern African Lamiaceae. Molecules 2021, 26, 3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Acevedo-Rodríguez, P. Guide to the Genera of Lianas and Climbing Plants in the Neotropics. 2020. Available online: https://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/file/lamiaceae.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2024).
  30. Olmstead, R. A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales; Version 2.8.0; University of Washington: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. Stefanaki, A.; van Andel, T. Chapter 3—Mediterranean Aromatic Herbs and Their Culinary Use. In Aromatic Herbs in Food; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 93–121. ISBN 978-0-12-822716-9. [Google Scholar]
  32. Milevskaya, V.V.; Prasad, S.; Temerdashev, Z.A. Extraction and Chromatographic Determination of Phenolic Compounds from Medicinal Herbs in the Lamiaceae and Hypericaceae Families: A Review. Microchem. J. 2019, 145, 1036–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Haas, R.A.; Crișan, I.; Vârban, D.; Stoie, A.; Vârban, R. Melliferous Aromatic Plants. Hop Med. Plants 2023, 31, 67–81. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dong, A.-X.; Xin, H.-B.; Li, Z.-J.; Liu, H.; Sun, Y.-Q.; Nie, S.; Zhao, Z.-N.; Cui, R.-F.; Zhang, R.-G.; Yun, Q.-Z.; et al. High-Quality Assembly of the Reference Genome for Scarlet Sage, Salvia Splendens, an Economically Important Ornamental Plant. GigaScience 2018, 7, giy068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Danila, J.S.; Grecebio, J.D.A. A Global Checklist of the Genus Callicarpa L. (Lamiaceae) in the 21st Century. Acta Manil. 2023, 71, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jain, P.L.B.; Patel, S.R.; Desai, M.A. Patchouli Oil: An Overview on Extraction Method, Composition and Biological Activities. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2022, 34, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karpiński, T.M. Essential Oils of Lamiaceae Family Plants as Antifungals. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Casselman, I.; Nock, C.J.; Wohlmuth, H.; Weatherby, R.P.; Heinrich, M. From Local to Global—Fifty Years of Research on Salvia Divinorum. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 151, 768–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ramos da Silva, L.R.; Ferreira, O.O.; Cruz, J.N.; de Jesus Pereira Franco, C.; Oliveira dos Anjos, T.; Cascaes, M.M.; Almeida da Costa, W.; de Aguiar Andrade, E.H.; Santana de Oliveira, M. Lamiaceae Essential Oils, Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant, and Biological Activities. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2021, 2021, 6748052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Naghiloo, S.; Nikzat-Siahkolaee, S.; Esmaillou, Z.; Claßen-Bockhoff, R. Pollination Efficiency and Pollen Limitation in Bistaminate vs Tetrastaminate Lamiaceae. Plant Species Biol. 2022, 37, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wilson, T.C.; Conn, B.J.; Henwood, M.J. Great Expectations: Correlations between Pollinator Assemblages and Floral Characters in Lamiaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 178, 170–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brantjes, N.B.M.; De Vos, O.C. The Explosive Release of Pollen in Flowers of Hyptis (Lamiaceae). New Phytol. 1981, 87, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, F.; Chen, Y.-P.; Salmaki, Y.; Drew, B.T.; Wilson, T.C.; Scheen, A.-C.; Celep, F.; Bräuchler, C.; Bendiksby, M.; Wang, Q.; et al. An Updated Tribal Classification of Lamiaceae Based on Plastome Phylogenomics. BMC Biol. 2021, 19, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Özler, H.; Kahraman, A.; PehliVan, S.; Doğan, M.; Başer, B.; FiŞne, A.Y.; Bagherpour, S. Contribution to the Knowledge of the Pollen Morphology of the Genus Salvia (Lamiaceae). Phytotaxa 2020, 428, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huang, X.; Wu, R.; Xiong, Z.; Ma, Z. Pollen Morphology of Clerodendrum L. (Lamiaceae) from China and Its Systematic Implications. PhytoKeys 2023, 235, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jabeen, S.; Zafar, M.; Ahmad, M.; Ali, M.A.; Elshikh, M.S.; Makhkamov, T.; Mamarakhimov, O.; Yuldashev, A.; Khaydarov, K.; Gafforov, Y.; et al. Micrometer Insights into Nepeta Genus: Pollen Micromorphology Unveiled. Micron 2024, 177, 103574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jachuła, J.; Wrzesień, M.; Strzałkowska-Abramek, M.; Denisow, B. The Impact of Spatio-Temporal Changes in Flora Attributes and Pollen Availability on Insect Visitors in Lamiaceae Species. Acta Bot. Croat. 2018, 77, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guvensen, A.; Uysal, I.; Celik, A.; Ozturk, M. Analysis of Ariborne Pollen Fall in Canakkale, Turkey. Pak. J. Bot. 2005, 37, 507–518. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kasprzyk, I. Comparative Study of Seasonal and Intradiurnal Variation of Airborne Herbaceous Pollen in Urban and Rural Areas. Aerobiologia 2006, 22, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lu, X.; Herrmann, M.; Mosbrugger, V.; Yao, T.; Zhu, L. Airborne Pollen in the Nam Co Basin and Its Implication for Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2010, 163, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Adeonipekun, P.; Agbalaya, A.; Adeniyi, T. Aeropalynology of Ayetoro–Itele, Ota Southwestern Nigeria: A Preliminary Study. In Human Palaeoecology in Africa: Essays in Honour of M. Adebisi Sowunmi; Palynological Association of Nigeria (PAN) and University of Ibadan Press: Ibadan, Nigeria, 2016; pp. 130–153. ISBN 987-978-081-937-2. [Google Scholar]
  52. Tissier, A. Plant Secretory Structures: More than Just Reaction Bags. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Muravnik, L.E. The Structural Peculiarities of the Leaf Glandular Trichomes: A Review. In Plant Cell and Tissue Differentiation and Secondary Metabolites: Fundamentals and Applications; Ramawat, K.G., Ekiert, H.M., Goyal, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–35. ISBN 978-3-030-11253-0. [Google Scholar]
  54. Schuurink, R.; Tissier, A. Glandular Trichomes: Micro-Organs with Model Status? New Phytol. 2020, 225, 2251–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Frezza, C.; Venditti, A.; Serafini, M.; Bianco, A. Chapter 4—Phytochemistry, Chemotaxonomy, Ethnopharmacology, and Nutraceutics of Lamiaceae. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 62, pp. 125–178. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gul, S.; Ahmad, M.; Zafar, M.; Bahadur, S.; Sultana, S.; Ashfaq, S.; Ullah, F.; Kilic, O.; Hassan, F.U.; Siddiq, Z. Foliar Epidermal Anatomy of Lamiaceae with Special Emphasis on Their Trichomes Diversity Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2019, 82, 206–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zaman, W.; Ullah, F.; Parmar, G.; Saqib, S.; Ayaz, A.; Park, S. Foliar Micromorphology of Selected Medicinal Lamiaceae Taxa and Their Taxonomic Implication Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2022, 85, 3217–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lange, B.M.; Srividya, N. Enzymology of Monoterpene Functionalization in Glandular Trichomes. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1095–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare of the Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia, 10th ed.; European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare of the Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2009; Volume 1, ISBN 978-92-871-8912-7. [Google Scholar]
  60. Svidenko, L.; Grygorieva, O.; Vergun, O.; Hudz, N.; Sedláčková, V.H.; Šimková, J.; Brindza, J. Characteristic of Leaf Peltate Glandular Trichomes and Their Variability of Some Lamiaceae Martinov Family Species. Agrobiodiver. Improv. Nutr. Health Life Qual. 2018, 2, 124–132. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kowalski, R.; Kowalska, G.; Jankowska, M.; Nawrocka, A.; Kałwa, K.; Pankiewicz, U.; Włodarczyk-Stasiak, M. Secretory Structures and Essential Oil Composition of Selected Industrial Species of Lamiaceae. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2019, 18, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, H.; Bai, H.; Sun, M.; Shi, L. Formation Mechanism of Glandular Trichomes Involved in the Synthesis and Storage of Terpenoids in Lavender. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Werker, E. Function of Essential Oil-Secreting Glandular Hairs in Aromatic Plans of Lamiacea—A Review. Flavour Fragr. J. 1993, 8, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kigathi, R.N.; Weisser, W.W.; Reichelt, M.; Gershenzon, J.; Unsicker, S.B. Plant Volatile Emission Depends on the Species Composition of the Neighboring Plant Community. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nevo, O.; Valenta, K.; Helman, A.; Ganzhorn, J.U.; Ayasse, M. Fruit Scent as an Honest Signal for Fruit Quality. BMC Ecol. Evol. 2022, 22, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Silva, C.L.; Câmara, J.S. Profiling of Volatiles in the Leaves of Lamiaceae Species Based on Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and Mass Spectrometry. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bouwmeester, H.; Schuurink, R.C.; Bleeker, P.M.; Schiestl, F. The Role of Volatiles in Plant Communication. Plant J. 2019, 100, 892–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mas, F.; Horner, R.; Brierley, S.; Harper, A.; Suckling, D.M. The Scent of Individual Foraging Bees. J. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 46, 524–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Loreto, F.; Pollastri, S.; Fineschi, S.; Velikova, V. Volatile Isoprenoids and Their Importance for Protection against Environmental Constraints in the Mediterranean Area. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 103, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nevo, O.; Razafimandimby, D.; Jeffrey, J.A.J.; Schulz, S.; Ayasse, M. Fruit Scent as an Evolved Signal to Primate Seed Dispersal. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Nevo, O.; Ayasse, M. Fruit Scent: Biochemistry, Ecological Function, and Evolution. In Co-Evolution of Secondary Metabolites; Mérillon, J.-M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 403–425. ISBN 978-3-319-96397-6. [Google Scholar]
  72. Yamada, M.; Hojo, M.K.; Imamura, A. Odor of Achlorophyllous Plants’ Seeds Drives Seed-Dispersing Ants. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 9308–9317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Erb, M. Volatiles as Inducers and Suppressors of Plant Defense and Immunity-Origins, Specificity, Perception and Signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 44, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Riahi, C.; González-Rodríguez, J.; Alonso-Valiente, M.; Urbaneja, A.; Pérez-Hedo, M. Eliciting Plant Defenses through Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles’ Exposure in Sweet Peppers. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 9, 776827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hammerbacher, A.; Coutinho, T.A.; Gershenzon, J. Roles of Plant Volatiles in Defence against Microbial Pathogens and Microbial Exploitation of Volatiles. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 2827–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Landi, M. Airborne Signals and Abiotic Factors: The Neglected Side of the Plant Communication. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2020, 13, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lazazzara, V.; Avesani, S.; Robatscher, P.; Oberhuber, M.; Pertot, I.; Schuhmacher, R.; Perazzolli, M. Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds in the Grapevine Response to Pathogens, Beneficial Microorganisms, Resistance Inducers, and Abiotic Factors. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 529–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Knudsen, J.T.; Eriksson, R.; Gershenzon, J.; Ståhl, B. Diversity and Distribution of Floral Scent. Bot. Rev. 2006, 72, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Stojičić, D.; Tošić, S.; Stojanović, G.; Zlatković, B.; Jovanović, S.; Budimir, S.; Uzelac, B. Volatile Organic Compound Composition and Glandular Trichome Characteristics of In Vitro Propagated Clinopodium Pulegium (Rochel) Bräuchler: Effect of Carbon Source. Plants 2022, 11, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ninkuu, V.; Zhang, L.; Yan, J.; Fu, Z.; Yang, T.; Zeng, H. Biochemistry of Terpenes and Recent Advances in Plant Protection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Khatteli, A.; Benabderrahim, M.A.; Triki, T.; Guasmi, F. Aroma Volatiles, Phenolic Profile and Hypoglycaemic Activity of Ajuga Iva L. Food Biosci. 2020, 36, 100578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Najar, B.; Marchioni, I.; Ruffoni, B.; Copetta, A.; Pistelli, L.; Pistelli, L. Volatilomic Analysis of Four Edible Flowers from Agastache Genus. Molecules 2019, 24, 4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Renda, G.; Yazıcı Bektaş, N.; Korkmaz, B.; Çelik, G.; Sevgi, S.; Yaylı, N. Volatile Constituents of Three Stachys L. Species from Turkey. Marmara Pharm. J. 2017, 21, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pinheiro, G.P.; Graciano, D.D.S.; Mayer, J.L.S.; Hantao, L.W.; Sawaya, A.C.H.F. Glandular Trichomes of Coleus amboinicus Lour. and the Effect of Developmental Stage on Leaf Headspace Volatile Composition. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 152, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Passinho-Soares, H.C.; David, J.P.; Santana, J.R.F.D.; David, J.M.; Rodrigues, F.d.M.; Mesquita, P.R.R.; de Oliveira, F.S.; Bellintani, M.C. Influence of Growth Regulators on Distribution of Trichomes and the Production of Volatiles in Micropropagated Plants of Plectranthus ornatus. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2017, 27, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hamdi, B.; Peron, G.; Miara, M.D.; Bouriah, N.; Flamini, G.; Maggi, F.; Sut, S.; Dall’Acqua, S. Phytochemical Analysis of Clinopodium Candidissimum (Munby) Kuntze Growing in Algeria by an Integrated HS-SPME-GC-MS, NMR and HPLC-DAD-MSn Approach: Valorisation of an Endemic Natural Source of Bioactive Compounds. Nat. Prod. Res. 2024, 38, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pistelli, L.; Noccioli, C.; D’Angiolillo, F.; Pistelli, L. Composition of Volatile in Micropropagated and Field Grown Aromatic Plants from Tuscany Islands. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2013, 60, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tomas, J.; Gil, L.; Llorens-Molina, J.A.; Cardona, C.; García, M.T.; Llorens, L. Biogenic Volatiles of Rupicolous Plants Act as Direct Defenses against Molluscs: The Case of the Endangered Clinopodium rouyanum. Flora 2019, 258, 151428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Saeidnia, S.; Sepehrizadeh, Z.; Gohari, A.; Amin, G.; Manayi, A.; Hadjiakhoondi, A. Monoterpene Synthase from Dracocephalum Kotschyi and SPME-GC-MS Analysis of Its Aroma Profile. Res. J. Pharmacogn. RJP 2014, 1, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  90. Saeidnia, S.; Gohari, A.R.; Haddadi, A.; Amin, G.; Nikan, M.; Hadjiakhoondi, A. Presence of Monoterpene Synthase in Four Labiatae Species and Solid-Phase Microextraction- Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Analysis of Their Aroma Profiles. Pharmacogn. Res. 2014, 6, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Choi, H.S.; Min, K.C. Aroma-Active Compounds of Elsholtzia Splendens Using AEDA and HS–SPME–GC–O Dilution Analysis. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Flamini, G.; Cioni, P.L.; Morelli, I. Composition of the Essential Oils and in Vivo Emission of Volatiles of Four Lamium Species from Italy: L. purpureum, L. hybridum, L. bifidum and L. amplexicaule. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gonçalves, S.; Serra, H.; Nogueira, J.M.F.; Almeida, R.; Custódio, L.; Romano, A. Headspace-SPME of in Vitro Shoot-Cultures and Micropropagated Plants of Lavandula Viridis. Biol. Plant. 2008, 52, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mohammadhosseini, M.; Nekoei, M. Profiling Volatile Natural Compounds from Flowers, Leaves and Stems of Marrubium Anisodon Using Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction in Combination with Gas Chromatographic Mass Spectrometric Determination. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2016, 19, 1839–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mohammadhosseini, M. First Report on Screening of the Profiles of the Essential Oils and Volatiles from the Aerial Parts of Marrubium Persicum Using Classical and Advanced Methods Prior to Gas Chromatographic Mass Spectrometric Determination. J. Med. Plants-Prod. 2016, 5, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bouriah, N.; Bendif, H.; Peron, G.; Miara, M.D.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Flamini, G.; Maggi, F. Composition and Profiling of Essential Oil, Volatile and Crude Extract Constituents of Micromeria Inodora Growing in Western Algeria. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 195, 113856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rehman, S.-; Latief, R.; Bhat, K.A.; Khuroo, M.A.; Shawl, A.S.; Chandra, S. Comparative Analysis of the Aroma Chemicals of Melissa Officinalis Using Hydrodistillation and HS-SPME Techniques. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S2485–S2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Maggi, F.; Papa, F.; Cristalli, G.; Sagratini, G.; Vittori, S. Characterisation of the Mushroom-like Flavour of Melittis melissophyllum L. Subsp. Melissophyllum by Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME) Coupled with Gas Chromatography (GC–FID) and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS). Food Chem. 2010, 123, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kowalczyk, A.; Piątkowska, E.; Kuś, P.; Marijanović, Z.; Jerković, I.; Tuberoso, C.I.G.; Fecka, I. Volatile Compounds and Antibacterial Effect of Commercial Mint Cultivars—Chemotypes and Safety. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 166, 113430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mohammadhosseini, M.; Venditti, A.; Mahdavi, B. Characterization of Essential Oils and Volatiles from the Aerial Parts of Mentha pulegium L. (Lamiaceae) Using Microwave-Assisted Hydrodistillation (MAHD) and Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME) in Combination with GC-MS. Nat. Prod. Res. 2023, 37, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Marchioni, I.; Najar, B.; Ruffoni, B.; Copetta, A.; Pistelli, L.; Pistelli, L. Bioactive Compounds and Aroma Profile of Some Lamiaceae Edible Flowers. Plants 2020, 9, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Klimánková, E.; Holadová, K.; Hajšlová, J.; Čajka, T.; Poustka, J.; Koudela, M. Aroma Profiles of Five Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Cultivars Grown under Conventional and Organic Conditions. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Özdemir, F.A.; Kiliç, Ö. Essential Oil Composition of Two Origanum L. Taxa from Bingol (Turkey). Prog. Nutr. 2017, 19, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sarikaya, A.; Fakir, H. Determination to Volatile Oil Components of Phlomis Grandiflora according to Various Vegetation Periods in the Lake District of Turkey. Int. J. Ecol. Sci. Environ. Eng. 2015, 2, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  105. Sarikaya, A.; Fakir, H. Effects of Reaping Time on Volatile Components of Natural Phlomis Rigida Labill. and Phlomis Monocephala P.H.Davis in Turkey. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 1923–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Giuliani, C.; Bottoni, M.; Ascrizzi, R.; Milani, F.; Falsini, S.; Papini, A.; Flamini, G.; Fico, G. Micromorphological and Phytochemical Survey of Ballota acetabulosa (L.) Benth. Plant Biol. Stuttg. Ger. 2021, 23, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. D’Auria, M.; Racioppi, R. The Effect of Drying of the Composition of Volatile Organic Compounds in Rosmarinus Officinalis, Laurus Nobilis, Salvia Officinalis and Thymus Serpyllum. A HS-SPME-GC-MS Study. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2015, 18, 1209–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Farré-Armengol, G.; Filella, I.; Llusia, J.; Peñuelas, J. Relationships among Floral VOC Emissions, Floral Rewards and Visits of Pollinators in Five Plant Species of a Mediterranean Shrubland. Plant Ecol. Evol. 2015, 148, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ascrizzi, R.; Cioni, P.L.; Amadei, L.; Maccioni, S.; Flamini, G. Geographical Patterns of in Vivo Spontaneously Emitted Volatile Organic Compounds in Salvia Species. Microchem. J. 2017, 133, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Giuliani, C.; Giovanetti, M.; Lupi, D.; Mesiano, M.P.; Barilli, R.; Ascrizzi, R.; Flamini, G.; Fico, G. Tools to Tie: Flower Characteristics, VOC Emission Profile, and Glandular Trichomes of Two Mexican Salvia Species to Attract Bees. Plants 2020, 9, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Najar, B.; Mecacci, G.; Nardi, V.; Cervelli, C.; Nardoni, S.; Mancianti, F.; Ebani, V.V.; Giannecchini, S.; Pistelli, L. Volatiles and Antifungal-Antibacterial-Antiviral Activity of South African Salvia Spp. Essential Oils Cultivated in Uniform Conditions. Molecules 2021, 26, 2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Pachura, N.; Zimmer, A.; Grzywna, K.; Figiel, A.; Szumny, A.; Łyczko, J. Chemical Investigation on Salvia Officinalis L. Affected by Multiple Drying Techniques—The Comprehensive Analytical Approach (HS-SPME, GC-MS, LC-MS/MS, GC-O and NMR). Food Chem. 2022, 397, 133802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Fu, M.; Cao, X.; Sun, B.-Y.; Wang, A.-X. Determination of Aromatic Ingredients of Salvia Sclarea by Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. J. Food Saf. Qual. 2021, 12, 1508–1512. [Google Scholar]
  114. Giuliani, C.; Ascrizzi, R.; Lupi, D.; Tassera, G.; Santagostini, L.; Giovanetti, M.; Flamini, G.; Fico, G. Salvia verticillata: Linking Glandular Trichomes, Volatiles and Pollinators. Phytochemistry 2018, 155, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mohammadhosseini, M.; Rezaei, P.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Beiranvand, M. Quantitative Monitoring of the Volatiles from the Aerial Parts of Satureja hortensis by the Use of HS-SPME-GC-MS Approach. Orient. J. Chem. 2016, 32, 2559–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Giuliani, C.; Bottoni, M.; Ascrizzi, R.; Santagostini, L.; Papini, A.; Flamini, G.; Fico, G. A Novel Study Approach on Scutellaria altissima L. Cultivated at the Ghirardi Botanic Garden (Lombardy, Italy). Plant Biol. Stuttg. Ger. 2020, 22, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Takeoka, G.R.; Rodriguez, D.M.; Dao, L.; Patterson, R. Headspace Volatiles of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi Flowers. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2009, 12, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Giuliani, C.; Bottoni, M.; Ascrizzi, R.; Milani, F.; Flamini, G.; Fico, G. Scutellaria Caucasica A. Ham.: Morphological Features and Headspace Characterization. Flora 2020, 269, 151638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Takeoka, G.R.; Dao, L.; Rodriguez, D.M.; Patterson, R. Headspace Volatiles of Scutellaria Californica A. Gray Flowers. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2008, 20, 169–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Türkmenoğlu, G.; Fakir, H. Determination of Volatile Components in Mountain Tea (Sideritis Condensata Boiss. Et. Heldr. Apud Bentham) Grown in Its Natural and Agricultural Field Environment. J. Bartin Fac. For. 2023, 25, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Marić, T.; Friščić, M.; Marijanović, Z.; Maleš, Ž.; Jerković, I. Comparison of Volatile Organic Compounds of Sideritis romana L. and Sideritis montana L. from Croatia. Molecules 2021, 26, 5968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Mohammadhosseini, M.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Hashemi-Moghaddam, H. Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Volatiles Obtained by HS-SPME-GC-MS Technique from Stachys Lavandulifolia and Evaluation for Biological Activity: A Review. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2016, 19, 1300–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Giuliani, C.; Bottoni, M.; Ascrizzi, R.; Milani, F.; Spada, A.; Flamini, G.; Fico, G. Morphology and Phytochemistry of Teucrium Chamaedrys L. (Lamiaceae) Cultivated at the Ghirardi Botanic Garden (Lombardy, Northern Italy). Flora 2021, 282, 151898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Djabou, N.; Andreani, S.; Varesi, L.; Tomi, F.; Costa, J.; Muselli, A. Analysis of the Volatile Fraction of Teucrium Marum L. Flavour Fragr. J. 2013, 28, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zouaoui, N.; Chenchouni, H.; Bouguerra, A.; Massouras, T.; Barkat, M. Characterization of Volatile Organic Compounds from Six Aromatic and Medicinal Plant Species Growing Wild in North African Drylands. NFS J. 2020, 18, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Soleimani, M.; Daryasari, A.P.; Ghorbani, A.; Hejri, O.M.; Mazaheri, R. Analysis of the Volatile Compounds in Thymus vulgaris L. Using Improved HS-SPME-GC-MS and Comparison with Conventional Methods. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2014, 17, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mohammadhosseini, M.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Hashemi-Moghaddam, H.; Shahnama, M.; Fahimi, B.; Azami, S. Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Volatiles Obtained by HS-SPME-GC-MS Technique from Aerial Parts of Ziziphora capitata L., and Evaluation for Biological Activity. Orient. J. Chem. 2016, 32, 1439–1451. [Google Scholar]
  128. POWO. Plants of the World Online, Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (accessed on 26 May 2024).
  129. Cagliero, C.; Mastellone, G.; Marengo, A.; Bicchi, C.; Sgorbini, B.; Rubiolo, P. Analytical Strategies for in-Vivo Evaluation of Plant Volatile Emissions—A Review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1147, 240–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Yáñez-Serrano, A.M.; Fasbender, L.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Dubbert, D.; Haberstroh, S.; Lobo-do-Vale, R.; Caldeira, M.C.; Werner, C. Volatile Diterpene Emission by Two Mediterranean Cistaceae Shrubs. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Lei, Y.; Xie, S.; Guan, X.; Song, C.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, J. Methoxypyrazines Biosynthesis and Metabolism in Grape: A Review. Food Chem. 2018, 245, 1141–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Chizzola, R. Regular Monoterpenes and Sesquiterpenes (Essential Oils). In Natural Products: Phytochemistry, Botany and Metabolism of Alkaloids, Phenolics and Terpenes; Ramawat, K.G., Mérillon, J.-M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 2973–3008. ISBN 978-3-642-22144-6. [Google Scholar]
  133. Abdelgaleil, S.A.M.; Gad, H.A.; Ramadan, G.R.M.; El-Bakry, A.M.; El-Sabrout, A.M. Monoterpenes for Management of Field Crop Insect Pests. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2023, 25, 769–784. [Google Scholar]
  134. Liu, Z.; Li, Q.X.; Song, B. Pesticidal Activity and Mode of Action of Monoterpenes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 4556–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Matsui, K.; Engelberth, J. Green Leaf Volatiles-The Forefront of Plant Responses Against Biotic Attack. Plant Cell Physiol. 2022, 63, 1378–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Scala, A.; Allmann, S.; Mirabella, R.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C. Green Leaf Volatiles: A Plant’s Multifunctional Weapon against Herbivores and Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17781–17811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Li, C.; Stomph, T.-J.; Makowski, D.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, F.; van der Werf, W. The Productive Performance of Intercropping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2201886120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ben-Issa, R.; Gomez, L.; Gautier, H. Companion Plants for Aphid Pest Management. Insects 2017, 8, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Wondimagegn, A.W. Role of Aromatic Plants in the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) of Thrips Tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2022, 18, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Dardouri, T.; Gautier, H.; Ben Issa, R.; Costagliola, G.; Gomez, L. Repellence of Myzus Persicae (Sulzer): Evidence of Two Modes of Action of Volatiles from Selected Living Aromatic Plants. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 1571–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Azandémè-Hounmalon, G.Y.; Logbo, J.; Gbèblonoudo Dassou, A.; Lokossi, L.; Akpla, E.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Tamò, M. Investigation of Amaranth Production Constraints and Pest Infestation Reduction by Basil Intercropping. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 12, 100627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Brito, E.A.S.; Togni, P.H.B.; Venzon, M. Aromatic Plants and Chili Pepper Intercropping as a Pest Management Strategy. Rev. Verde Agroecol. Desenvolv. Sustent. 2021, 16, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Gowton, C.M.; Cabra-Arias, C.; Carrillo, J. Intercropping with Peppermint Increases Ground Dwelling Insect and Pollinator Abundance and Decreases Drosophila Suzukii in Fruit. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 700842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ortega-Marcos, J.; Hevia, V.; García-Nieto, A.P.; González, J.A. Installing Flower Strips to Promote Pollinators in Simplified Agricultural Landscapes: Comprehensive Viability Assessment in Sunflower Fields. Land 2022, 11, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Hevia, V.; Carmona, C.P.; Azcárate, F.M.; Heredia, R.; González, J.A. Role of Floral Strips and Semi-Natural Habitats as Enhancers of Wild Bee Functional Diversity in Intensive Agricultural Landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 319, 107544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Albrecht, M.; Kleijn, D.; Williams, N.M.; Tschumi, M.; Blaauw, B.R.; Bommarco, R.; Campbell, A.J.; Dainese, M.; Drummond, F.A.; Entling, M.H.; et al. The Effectiveness of Flower Strips and Hedgerows on Pest Control, Pollination Services and Crop Yield: A Quantitative Synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 2020, 23, 1488–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Islam, A.K.M.M.; Suttiyut, T.; Anwar, M.P.; Juraimi, A.S.; Kato-Noguchi, H. Allelopathic Properties of Lamiaceae Species: Prospects and Challenges to Use in Agriculture. Plants 2022, 11, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. De Mastro, G.; El Mahdi, J.; Ruta, C. Bioherbicidal Potential of the Essential Oils from Mediterranean Lamiaceae for Weed Control in Organic Farming. Plants 2021, 10, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Effah, E.; Holopainen, J.K.; McCormick, A.C. Potential Roles of Volatile Organic Compounds in Plant Competition. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2019, 38, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rodríguez-Declet, A.; Castro-Marín, A.; Lombini, A.; Sevindik, O.; Selli, S.; Chinnici, F.; Rombolà, A.D. Characterization of Berry Aromatic Profile of Cv. Trebbiano Romagnolo Grapes and Effects of Intercropping with Salvia officinalis L. Agronomy 2022, 12, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Dinu Roman Szabo, M.; Dumitras, A.; Mircea, D.-M.; Doroftei, D.; Sestras, P.; Boscaiu, M.; Brzuszek, R.F.; Sestras, A.F. Touch, Feel, Heal. The Use of Hospital Green Spaces and Landscape as Sensory-Therapeutic Gardens: A Case Study in a University Clinic. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1201030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphological details of some Lamiaceae species: inflorescence of Agastache foeniculum (a), Dracocephalum ruyschiana flowers (b), Phlomoides tuberosa flowers (c), Salvia rosmarinus flowers (d), Lavandula × intermedia flowers (e), Dracocephalum officinalis leaves (f), Melissa officinalis leaves (g), Agastache rugosa leaves (h), Salvia officinalis leaves (i), Lavandula angustifolia leaves (j), large peltate trichomes on calyx of Lavandula angustifolia (k), short-stalked capitate trichomes with four-celled heads on Ocimum basilicum leaf (l), long-stalked glandular trichomes on Salvia sclarea leaf (m,n), pollen grains of Ocimum basilicum (o) (original photos by I.C.).
Figure 1. Morphological details of some Lamiaceae species: inflorescence of Agastache foeniculum (a), Dracocephalum ruyschiana flowers (b), Phlomoides tuberosa flowers (c), Salvia rosmarinus flowers (d), Lavandula × intermedia flowers (e), Dracocephalum officinalis leaves (f), Melissa officinalis leaves (g), Agastache rugosa leaves (h), Salvia officinalis leaves (i), Lavandula angustifolia leaves (j), large peltate trichomes on calyx of Lavandula angustifolia (k), short-stalked capitate trichomes with four-celled heads on Ocimum basilicum leaf (l), long-stalked glandular trichomes on Salvia sclarea leaf (m,n), pollen grains of Ocimum basilicum (o) (original photos by I.C.).
Plants 13 01687 g001
Table 1. Synopsis of major volatile compounds emissions reported in some Lamiaceae species.
Table 1. Synopsis of major volatile compounds emissions reported in some Lamiaceae species.
SpeciesClass *CompoundSource
Ajuga iva (L.) Schreb.MHsα-pinene, β-pinene, limonene[81]
OMslinalool[81]
Agastache mexicana (Kunth) Lint & EplingMHsmyrcene[82]
OMsα-citral, β-citral, citronellol, geraniol, geranyl acetate[82]
Agastache aurantiaca (A.Gray) Lint & EplingOMsmenthone, pulegone[82]
SHsβ-caryophyllene[82]
Betonica macrantha K.KochMHsα-pinene, p-cymene[83]
OMscarvacrol, thymoquinone, methyl ether[83]
SHs(E)-caryophyllene[83]
Coleus amboinicus Lour.MHso-cymene, γ-terpinene[84]
OMscarvacrol[84]
SHs(E)-caryophyllene, α-trans-bergamotene[84]
Coleus comosus Hochst. ex GürkeMHsα-thujene, α-pinene[85]
SHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene-D, trans-β-guaiene[85]
NTs1-octen-3-ol[85]
Clinopodium candidissimum (Munby) KuntzeOMsisopulegone, pulegone, neo-menthol, piperitenone[86]
SHsbicyclogermacrene, germacrene D[86]
Clinopodium nepeta (L.) KuntzeMHsα-pinene, β-pinene, limonene[87]
OMspiperitone oxide[87]
SHscaryophyllene, germacrene D[87]
Clinopodium pulegium (Rochel) BräuchlerMHsα-pinene, β-pinene[79]
OMsmenthone, pulegone, isomenthone[79]
Clinopodium rouyanum (Briq.) GovaertsMHslimonene[88]
OMsmenthone, pulegone[88]
SHsgermacrene-D[88]
Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss.MHslimonene[89]
OMsgeranial, limonene-10-al[89]
NTs1,1-dimethoxy decane[89]
Dracocephalum officinalis (L.) Y.P.Chen & B.T.DrewMHssabinene, β-pinene[90]
OMscis-pinocamphone, terpinen-4-ol, carvacrol[90]
Elsholtzia splendens Nakai ex F.Maek.OMsnaginata ketone, geranyl acetate, dehydro carveol[91]
Lamium amplexicaule L.MHsα-pinene
OMstrans-chrysanthenyl acetate[92]
SHsgermacrene D, β-caryophyllene[92]
NTs(E)-3-hexenyl acetate
Lamium bifidum CirilloMHsmyrcene, sabinene, α-pinene, (Z)-ocimene[92]
SHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene D, α-humulene, β-elemene[92]
Lamium hybridum Vill.MHsα-pinene, β-pinene, (Z)-ocimene[92]
SHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene D, (E) β-farnesene, bicyclogermacrene[92]
Lamium purpureum L.MHsα-pinene, β-pinene[92]
SHsgermacrene D, β-elemene, valencene, (E) β-farnesene[92]
NTs(E)-3-hexenyl acetate, n-pentadecane, decanal, (E)-2-decenal[92]
Lavandula angustifolia Mill.MHsα-pinene, δ-3-carene, (Z) β-ocimene,[87]
MHsmyrcene[90]
OMscamphor, 1,8-cineol[87]
OMslinalool, α-terpineol, linalyl acetate, lavandulyl acetate, caryophyllene[90]
SHscaryophyllene, trans-γ-cadinene, germacrene D, trans-α-bergamotene [87]
Lavandula viridis L’Hér.OMscamphor, 1,8-cineol[93]
Marrubium anisodon K.KochMHsmyrcene, α-phellandrene, p-cymene, limonene, trans-β-ocimene[94]
OMslinalool[94]
SHsβ-caryophyllene[94]
Marrubium persicum C.A.Mey.MHsα-thujene, trans-β-ocimene, α-terpinolene[95]
OMscamphor[95]
SHscaryophyllene, δ-elemene, β-elemene[95]
OSscaryophyllene oxide[95]
PPseugenol, methyl eugenol[95]
Micromeria inodora (Desf.) Benth.OMs1,8-cineole, camphor, α-terpinyl acetate[96]
SHsβ-caryophyllene, allo-aromadendrene[96]
Melissa officinalis L.MHs(Z)-b-ocimene[97]
OMscitronellal, citronellol, (E)-citral, (Z)-citral, geraniol[97]
SHsβ-caryophyllene[97]
Melittis melissophyllum L. subsp.
melissophyllum
MHsα-pinene[98]
OMscis-chrysanthenyl acetate[98]
NTs1-octen-3-ol, coumarin [98]
Mentha arvensis L. ‘Thai’MHslimonene[99]
OMscarvone[99]
Mentha haplocalyx var. piperascens (Malinv. ex Holmes) C.Y.Wu & H.W.LiMHslimonene[99]
OMsp-menthone, menthol, menthofuran, neomenthyl acetate[99]
Mentha × piperita L.MHsD limonene[66]
OMsD-carvone, eucalyptol[66]
OMs1,8-cineole, p-menthone, menthol, menthofuran, neomenthol, neomenthyl acetate [99]
SHs(+)-epi-bicyclo sesquiphellandren[66]
Mentha pulegium L.MHslimonene, sabinene[100]
OMs1,8-cineole, carvone[100]
ODsmethyl neoabietate[100]
NTsoleic acid, n-hexadecanoic acid, hexacosane, heptacosane, α-monoolein[100]
Mentha spicata L.OMseucalyptol[66]
SHscaryophyllene, D-germacrene, manoyl oxide, γ-muurolene[66]
MPRs2,5-dimethyl-3 methoxypyrazine[66]
Mentha suaveolens Ehrh.OMstrans-piperitenone oxide[99]
SHsgermacrene D[99]
Nepeta cataria L.OMsβ-citronellol, nerol, geraniol, α-citral[90]
Nepeta × faassenii Bergmans ex Stearn ‘Six Hills Giant’OMscis-trans-nepetalactone[64]
SHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene D[101]
Ocimum basilicum L.MHsD-limonene, β-myrcene[102]
OMs1,8-cineole, linalool, bornyl acetate, estragole (methyl chavicol)[102]
SHsbergamotene, β-muurolene[102]
PPseugenol[102]
Ocimum basilicum L.
‘Blue Spice’
MHs(E)-β-ocimeme[101]
SHstrans-α-bergamotene, germacrene D, β-bisabolene,
trans-α-bisabolene, β-caryophyllene
[101]
PPseugenol[101]
Ocimum basilicum L.
‘Cinnamon’
OMslinalool[101]
SHsβ-elemene, α-guaiene, germacrene D, β-bulnesene[101]
PPseugenol[101]
Origanum acutidens (Hand.-Mazz.) Ietsw.MHsp-cymene, γ-terpinene[103]
OMscarvacrol, thymol[103]
Origanum vulgare subsp. gracile (K.Koch) Ietsw.MHsγ-terpinene[103]
OMscarvacrol, thymol[103]
Phlomis grandiflora H.S.Thomps. var. grandifloraMHsα-pinene, limonene[104]
SHsα-cedrene, β-caryophyllene, germacrene D,
α-curcumene
[104]
Phlomis monocephala P.H.DavisMHsα-pinene[105]
SHs(E)-β-farnesene, germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene, δ-cadinene, α-cubebene[105]
NTs3-Octen-2-one[105]
Phlomis rigida Labill.SHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene D[105]
NTs(E)-2-hexenal[105]
Pseudodictamnus acetabulosus (L.) Salmaki & SiadatiSHsβ-caryophyllene, γ-muurolene, (E)-β-ionone,
aromadendrene, γ-elemene
[106]
OSs(E)-nerolidol[106]
NTs1-decanal, 1-nonanal[106]
ACs(E)-geranyl acetone[106]
Salvia rosmarinus Spenn.MHsα-pinene, camphene, β-pinene [87,107,108]
MHslimonene, P-cymene[107]
MHsmyrcene[87]
OMsborneol, bornyl acetate, 1,8-cineol[87]
OMscamphor[107,108]
SHsα-copaene, trans-caryophyllene, α-amorphene[107]
SHscaryophyllene, α-humulene[87]
Salvia aethiopis L.MHsα-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, sabinene,
(E)-β-ocimeme
[109]
SHsalloaromadendrene, β-caryophyllene[109]
ACs(E)-geranyl acetone[109]
Salvia amplexicaulis Lam.MHsβ-pinene, limonene[109]
SHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene D, α-gurjunene, alloaromadendrene, valencene[109]
Salvia austriaca Jacq.MHsα-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, (Z)-β-ocimeme[109]
OMsα-thujone[109]
NTsn-octanol, n-pentadecane[109]
Salvia blepharophylla Brandegee ex EplingOMs1,8-cineole, methyl carvacrol, isobornyl formate, linalool[110]
SHsβ-bourbonene, β-caryophyllene[110]
OSs(Z)-sesquilavandulol[110]
Salvia dentata AitonMHsα-pinene, camphene, β-pinene, δ-3-Carene,[111]
OMs1,8-cineole, camphor, bornyl acetate[111]
Salvia discolor KunthSHsβ-caryophyllene, α-humulene, β-elemene, β-bisabolene[101]
OSselemol acetate[101]
ODsmethyl neoabietate[101]
Salvia elegans VahlSHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene D, valencene, α-gurjunene, α-humulene[109]
Salvia greggii A.GrayMHsβ-pinene, limonene[110]
OMs1,8-cineole[110]
SHsγ-muurolene, β-caryophyllene, β-gurjunene,
germacrene D
[110]
Salvia microphylla Kunth ‘Hot Lips’MHsp-cymene, limonene, γ-terpinene, eucalyptol[101]
OMsisobornyl acetate, camphor[101]
SHsα-copaene[101]
OSsguaiol, cubebol[101]
Salvia officinalis L.MHsα-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, β-myrcene[107]
MHsα-pinene, camphene, β-pinene[109]
OMs1,8-cineole, α-thujone, β-thujone, camphor[107,109,112]
SHstrans-caryophyllene[107]
Salvia officinalis L. ‘Purpurascens’OMsβ-thujone[109]
SHsα-humulene[109]
OSsglobulol[109]
NTsisoamyl dodecanoate, n-hexadecane[109]
Salvia scabra Thunb.OMs1,8-cineole, camphor[111]
SHsα-copaene, β-caryophyllene, β-copaene, germacrene D, 9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene, γ-elemene[111]
OSsnuciferol acetate[111]
DHscembrene, isopimara-9(11),15-diene[111]
Salvia sclarea L.MHsα-pinene[90]
OMslinalool acetate, linalool[113]
OMsα-terpineol, linalyl acetate, linalool[90]
Salvia splendens Sellow ex NeesNTsisopropyl tetradecanoate[109]
Salvia transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) SchurSHsβ-caryophyllene[109]
OSs(E)-nerolidol, acorenone, (E,E)-farnesyl acetate[109]
ACs(E)-geranyl acetone[109]
NTsisopropyl tetradecanoate, n-decanal,
isoamyl dodecanoate, n-heptadecane,
n-octadecane
[109]
Salvia verticillata L.OMs1,8-cineole[114]
SHsδ-elemene; β-caryophyllene, germacrene D,
γ-muurolene, bicyclogermacrene, β-bourbonene, β-copaene, α-humulene, (E)-β-farnesene
[114]
Satureja hortensis L.MHsα-thujene, α-pinene, myrcene, β-pinene,
α-terpinene, p-cymene, γ-terpinene
[87,115]
OMsmethyl thymol, methyl carvacrol, thymol[87]
SHscaryophyllene, β-bisabolene[87]
Scutellaria altissima L.MHs(E)-β-ocimene, (Z)-β-ocimene[116]
SHsγ-muurolene[116]
ACs(E)-geranyl acetone[116]
NTs(Z)-3-hexenol acetate, (E)-3-hexen-1-ol, decanal[116]
Scutellaria baicalensis GeorgiSHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene D, δ-cadinene,
γ-muurolene, γ-cadinene, α-humulene,
α-copaene, α-muurolene, bicyclogermacrene
[117]
Scutellaria caucasica A.Ham.OMs1,8-cineole[118]
SHsγ-muurolene, β-caryophyllen, germacrene D,
α-humulene
[118]
Scutellaria californica A.GraySHsβ-caryophyllene, germacrene D, β-bourbonene[119]
NTsmethyl 2-methylbutyrate, methyl butyrate[119]
Sideritis condensata Boiss. & Heldr.MHsα-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, β-ocimene[120]
SHsgermacrene-D, trans-caryophyllene,
(E)-β-farnesene, α-copaene, bicyclogermacrene
[120]
NTscuminaldehyde[120]
Sideritis montana L.MHslimonene[121]
SHstrans-caryophyllene, trans-β-farnesene,
germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene, γ-cadinene, δ-cadinene, α-amorphene
[121]
Sideritis romana L.MHsβ-pinene, limonene[121]
SHsallo aromadendrene, trans-β-farnesene, isocaryophyllene, bicyclogermacrene[121]
Stachys annua L. subsp. annua var. annuaMHsα-pinene, β-pinene, (Z)-β-ocimene[83]
SHsβ-bourbonene[83]
Stachys lavandulifolia VahlMHsmyrcene, α-pinene, β-phellandrene, β-pinene,
α-phellandrene, sabinene
[122]
Stachys sylvatica L.MHslimonene, α-pinene, sabinene[83]
SHsγ-muurolene, α-cedrene, α-humulene, α-zingiberene[83]
NTs(2E)-hexenal[83]
Teucrium chamaedrys L.OMs1,8-cineole[123]
SHsβ-cubebene, α-cubebene, β-caryophyllene, α-humulene,γ-muurolene, β-bourbonene, (E)-β-farnesene[123]
Teucrium marum L.OMsdolichodial, dolicholactone, estragole[124]
SHs(E)-α-bergamotene, (E)-β-caryophyllene,
β-bisabolene, β-sesquiphellandrene
[124]
Teucrium polium L.SHsβ-farnesene, trans-caryophyllene, γ-elemene,
allo-aromadendrene, α-guaiene, α-gurjunene,
δ-guaiene
[125]
OSsfarnesol[125]
ACsgeranyl acetone[125]
NTs6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one[125]
Thymus algeriensis Boiss. and Reut.MHsα-pinene, camphene, β-myrcene[125]
OMscamphor, linalyl acetate, bornyl acetate,
1,8-cineole, α-terpineol, borneol
[125]
SHsβ-farnesene[125]
Thymus serpyllum L.MHsp-cymene, γ-terpinene[107]
OMscarvacrol methyl ether, thymol methyl ether[107]
SHsβ-bisabolene, trans-caryophyllene[107]
Thymus vulgaris L.MHsp-cymene, γ-terpinene[126]
OMsthymol, carvacrol[126]
SHsβ-caryophyllene[126]
Ziziphora capitata L.MHsα–pinene, β–Pinene, limonene,
p–mentha–3,8–diene, (Z)–b–ocimene
[127]
OMsp–menth–3–en–8–ol, pulegone[127]
* Note: Terpenoids: monoterpene hydrocarbons (MHs); oxygenated monoterpenes (OMs); sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (SHs); oxygenated sesquiterpenes (OSs); diterpene hydrocarbons (DHs); oxygenated diterpenes (ODs); triterpenes hydrocarbons (THs); other: methoxypyrazines (MPRs), phenylpropanoids (PPs), non-terpene derivatives (NTs), apocarotenoids (ACs). Volatile compounds identified by headspace solid-phase microextraction technique from aerial parts of plants, which account for more than 3% from total constituents. Species list according to Plants of the World Online [128].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haas, R.A.; Crișan, I.; Vârban, D.; Vârban, R. Aerobiology of the Family Lamiaceae: Novel Perspectives with Special Reference to Volatiles Emission. Plants 2024, 13, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121687

AMA Style

Haas RA, Crișan I, Vârban D, Vârban R. Aerobiology of the Family Lamiaceae: Novel Perspectives with Special Reference to Volatiles Emission. Plants. 2024; 13(12):1687. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121687

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haas, Robert Adrian, Ioana Crișan, Dan Vârban, and Rodica Vârban. 2024. "Aerobiology of the Family Lamiaceae: Novel Perspectives with Special Reference to Volatiles Emission" Plants 13, no. 12: 1687. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121687

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop