Next Article in Journal
Natural Products as Hepatoprotective Agents—A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Saponin and Phenolic Composition and Assessment of Biological Activities of Saponaria officinalis L. Root Extracts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 14
10.3390/plants13141983
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Xylem Sap Proteome Analysis Provides Insight into Root–Shoot Communication in Response to flg22

by
Romana Kopecká
and
Martin Černý
*
Department of Molecular Biology and Radiobiology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(14), 1983; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141983
Submission received: 28 June 2024 / Revised: 17 July 2024 / Accepted: 18 July 2024 / Published: 20 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Protection and Biotic Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Xylem sap proteomics provides crucial insights into plant defense and root-to-shoot communication. This study highlights the sensitivity and reproducibility of xylem sap proteome analyses, using a single plant per sample to track over 3000 proteins in two model crop plants, Solanum tuberosum and Hordeum vulgare. By analyzing the flg22 response, we identified immune response components not detectable through root or shoot analyses. Notably, we discovered previously unknown elements of the plant immune system, including calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinases and G-type lectin receptor kinases. Despite similarities in the metabolic pathways identified in the xylem sap of both plants, the flg22 response differed significantly: S. tuberosum exhibited 78 differentially abundant proteins, whereas H. vulgare had over 450. However, an evolutionarily conserved overlap in the flg22 response proteins was evident, particularly in the CAZymes and lipid metabolism pathways, where lipid transfer proteins and lipases showed a similar response to flg22. Additionally, many proteins without conserved signal sequences for extracellular targeting were found, such as members of the HSP70 family. Interestingly, the HSP70 response to flg22 was specific to the xylem sap proteome, suggesting a unique regulatory role in the extracellular space similar to that reported in mammalians.

1. Introduction

The plant vasculature serves as a vital lifeline, transporting energy-rich molecules, building blocks, and nutrients to various organs while providing structural support [1]. It also functions as an efficient long-distance communication network, relaying information about environment cues both above and below ground [2]. Molecular and physiological aspects, including electrical signals, hydraulic pressure changes, carbohydrate and hormonal signaling, calcium (Ca2+) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) waves, assimilate transport, signaling peptides, RNA, and proteins, have been detected in the vasculature, ensuring optimal plant functioning in constantly changing environments [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. This intricate system comprises two specialized transport channels: phloem and xylem. The phloem primarily translocates carbohydrates from sources to sinks but also plays a critical role in long-distance signaling and defense by transporting hormones, RNA, and proteins [10,11,12,13]. The xylem tissue of angiosperms is distinguished by its intricate arrangement of vertically oriented, multicellular vessel elements that are highly efficient and provide low-resistance water transport [14]. Primarily responsible for transporting water and minerals from roots to shoots, it also plays a significant role in root-to-shoot communication [15]. The long-distance coordination between shoots and roots is fundamental for optimal growth, development, and survival of vascular plants [16]. One of the best-characterized long-distance signal transduction pathways involves phytohormones. Xylem sap has been shown to transport various compounds, including trans-zeatin-like cytokinins, abscisic acid, strigolactones, the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, gibberellins, methyl jasmonate, and methyl salicylate. On the other hand, phloem sap transports isopentenyl-type cytokinins, abscisic acid, methyl jasmonate, and auxins [9,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
Proteins are a major component of both phloem and xylem saps. This has fueled the emergence of vascular sap proteomics, a field that has witnessed significant progress in the past two decades thanks to advancements in technology. Early studies revealed that long-distance protein movement in the phloem involves both nonselective bulk flow and a regulated process mediated by protein–protein interactions within sieve tubes [24], and it was proposed that proteins involved in plant signaling might be produced in the roots and travel long distances to the shoots [25]. The discovery of phloem proteins involved in the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) response spurred further interest in sap proteomics [26]. Recent advancements in molecular techniques have significantly enhanced our understanding of the plant vasculature’s role in plant–pathogen interactions. Various analyses of xylem sap during plant–pathogen interactions have been conducted on species such as Brassica oleracea, Glycine max, Brassica napus, Solanum lycopersicum, and Vitis vinifera, revealing the accumulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) and redox-related proteins, suggesting their protective roles in plant vasculature [27,28,29,30,31]. The increased sensitivity of new techniques has led to the detection of a wider range of proteins in xylem sap. Numerous proteins induced in response to abiotic and biotic stressors have been identified, including defense-related PR proteins, β-1,3-glucanases, chitinases, endochitinases, and proteases [9,27,32,33,34].
Pathogen infection can significantly alter the protein composition of xylem sap, and xylem can also be colonized by viruses, bacteria, and fungi [27,35]. Plants deploy a robust immune system that relies on their ability to recognize invading microbes. When bacteria enter plant tissues, the receptor FLS2 detects a short, conserved amino acid sequence (flg22) within the bacterial flagellin protein. This recognition triggers the activation of plant immunity and the FLS2 receptor is also needed for flg22 delivery to vascular tissue and its long-distance transport [36]. This mechanism is evolutionarily conserved, but it is not the sole means of bacterial flagellin perception [37]. Multiple studies have focused on flagellin because of its ability to induce the expression of defense-related genes and trigger resistance to pathogenic bacteria. However, despite numerous successes in uncovering molecular mechanisms behind its action [38,39], our knowledge is far from complete.
The research presented here investigates a faster and more sensitive method for analyzing xylem sap protein composition. We evaluated the reliability and reproducibility of shorter sampling intervals using a single plant per sample. Our findings confirm the feasibility of this approach and reveal novel insights into plant responses to biotic stimuli.

2. Results

While numerous experiments have successfully demonstrated the importance of apoplastic signaling in plants, established methods for analyzing the apoplastic proteome are often laborious and time-consuming, requiring large numbers of plants. These limitations can hinder both the reproducibility and reliability of the results. In this study, we employed proteomics, as described in the Section 4 and depicted in Figure 1, to analyze the xylem sap proteome of two model crops, Solanum tuberosum and Hordeum vulgare.

2.1. Majority of the Identified S. tuberosum Proteins in Xylem Sap Is Predicted to Be Extracellular

To estimate the contamination level and separate putative contaminants from the true components of xylem, we collected three consecutive fractions, reasoning that the proteins rapidly depleted most likely originated from damaged tissue and did not represent the real xylem proteome. Altogether, 918 proteins, representing 13.4% of the estimated total protein abundance in the first fraction, were significantly less abundant in the subsequent two fractions, and the differences between the fractions were also clearly visible in PCA (Figure 2a). The expected localization of the closest Arabidopsis orthologs showed that the majority of these proteins were not expected to be extracellular, with only 23 putative extracellular proteins, indicating a possible false negative rate of 2.5%. Next, we searched for all predicted localizations of identified proteins and their Arabidopsis orthologs. In total, 1170 and 487 proteins are predicted to be extracellular based on the cropPAL (any predictor) and SUBA (SUBAcon algorithm) databases, respectively. As illustrated in Figure 2b, these proteins constituted less than 50% of the first collected fraction and almost 70% of the third one, representing a 1.4-fold enrichment. Interestingly, the orthologs of Arabidopsis extracellular proteins that contributed less than 12% to the estimated protein abundance in the first fraction were enriched almost four-fold. This corroborated our findings, showing that the third fraction is the most suitable for analyzing extracellular proteins originating from the xylem sap. One could consider collecting additional fractions. However, the destructive nature of xylem sap collection can impact plant proteosynthesis and signaling. Therefore, the collection time must be limited to minimize experimental bias.

2.2. Functional Diversity of Putative Extracellular Xylem Sap Proteins in Solanum tuberosum

The analysis of proteins predicted to be extracellular revealed a diverse array of enzymes and components involved in cell wall dynamics and biotic interactions. These included expansins (facilitating cell wall loosening), endochitinases (defense against fungal pathogens), xyloglucan endotransglucosylases/hydrolases (cell wall construction), α-galactosidases and α-L-arabinofuranosidases (cell wall dissolution), β-glucosidases (potentially involved in cell wall breakdown), cellulases (degrading cellulose, a major plant cell wall component), lipid-transfer proteins (potentially influencing wax or cutin deposition in cell walls), defensins, peroxidases (involved in stress response and secondary metabolism), pathogenesis-related proteins, proteases, and protease inhibitors. Notably, the identified extracellular proteome comprised over 450 enzymes belonging to 54 distinct classes. Peroxidases (EC 1.11.1.7) constituted the most abundant fraction (exceeding 50% of estimated protein enzyme abundance), followed by serine endopeptidases (EC 3.4.21.-), tripeptidyl-peptidases II (EC 3.4.14.10), aspartic endopeptidases (EC 3.4.23.-), and mannan endo-1,4-β-mannosidases (EC 3.2.1.78) (Figure 3a). These enzymes also displayed significantly higher abundance in the second and third collected fractions (Figure 3c). Subsequent gene ontology (GO) analysis of the putative extracellular proteins revealed significant enrichment in categories related to carbohydrate metabolic processes and response to oxidative stress. Additionally, GO analysis identified categories of interest such as defense response and systemic acquired resistance (Figure 3e).

2.3. Solanum tuberosum Sap Proteome Response to flg22

The composition of the plant sap proteome offers valuable insights into its role in defense and immunity. To validate and expand our experiment, we compared the sap proteome of plants pretreated with a flagellin fragment (flg22), a bacterial elicitor, to controls pretreated with the mock treatment. The 24 h treatment did not induce any visually discernible changes in plant morphology, as treated and control plants appeared identical. Based on the initial findings described above, the third fraction was chosen for further analysis. To account for potential bias and contamination by intracellular proteins, estimated protein abundances were normalized to the total abundance of proteins predicted to have an extracellular localization.
Analysis of the S. tuberosum sap proteome identified 78 differentially abundant proteins (DAPs; fold change > 1.4, adjusted p-value < 0.05; Figure 4a). Functional analysis revealed that the majority of these DAPs belonged to peroxidases (PRXs), lipid transport and metabolism, cell organization and wall maintenance, carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), transport, protein metabolism, and energy metabolism (Figure 4b). Notably, most of these proteins displayed a decrease in abundance following flg22 treatment. Only ten proteins exhibited an increase in abundance upon elicitor treatment. These included two peroxidases (PGSC0003DMT400082008, PGSC0003DMT400068340), a bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein (PGSC0003DMT400044140), an ortholog of a 16 kDa phloem protein with a putative role in the defense response (PGSC0003DMT400007873), and an ortholog of a plasmodesmata callose-binding protein (PGSC0003DMT400024290) known to regulate cell-to-cell trafficking and signaling [43]. Proteins with a decrease in abundance in flg22 pretreated plants included four O-glycosyl hydrolases (PGSC0003DMT400033483, PGSC0003DMT400033482, PGSC0003DMT400000943, PGSC0003DMT400024535). These enzymes are known to play diverse roles in plant defense, potentially increasing or decreasing resistance depending on the specific pathogen [44]. Similarly, the decrease in an ortholog of zeamatin (PGSC0003DMT400009202), with putative antifungal activity [45], and a FASCICLIN-like arabinogalactan protein (PGSC0003DMT400091864), whose ortholog was recently implicated in resistance to Plasmodiophora brassicae [46], could suggest a shift in defense strategy in response to the perceived bacterial threat.

2.4. Root and Shoot Proteome Analyses Corroborate the Utility of Sap Proteome Profiling

The results of the sap proteome analyses were compared with total protein extracts obtained from the roots and shoots of collected plants. In total, 5034 and 3594 proteins were identified and quantified, respectively. The content of proteins with predicted extracellular localization represented less than 12% of the estimated total protein abundance, similar to that of the first fraction of collected xylem sap. The treatment with flg22 showed 50 DAPs in roots and 132 DAPs in shoots (Figure 4c). However, the overlap between identified DAPs in response to flg22 was negligible. Namely, a putative component of the transcriptional corepressor complex (PGSC0003DMT400060407) was significantly more abundant in shoots and significantly less abundant in roots. The comparison with DAPs identified in the sap proteome showed a similar response in the abundances of putative adenylosuccinate lyase (PGSC0003DMT400070618; root) and putative serine hydroxymethyltransferase (PGSC0003DMT400016362; shoot), and an opposite pattern for the response of glutathione peroxidase (PGSC0003DMT400012775; an increase in abundance in the roots of flg22-treated plants) and putative helicase (PGSC0003DMT400078069; an increase in abundance in the shoots of treated plants).
The functional analysis of DAPs revealed a striking tissue-specific enrichment in key metabolic pathways (Figure 4c). The shoots displayed an enrichment in proteins associated with secondary metabolism, photosynthesis, and ribosomal function. The roots exhibited a distinct enrichment of proteins involved in the pyruvate metabolism, vesicular transport, carbon fixation, and components of lipid metabolism. Interestingly, the pentose phosphate pathway and glycine/serine/threonine metabolism were jointly enriched in both the sap and shoot proteome. However, consistent with the lack of overlap in identified DAPs between different tissues, the metabolic pathways found enriched in the sap fraction were predominantly unique. These included pathways for energy metabolism, the sulfur relay system and metabolism, linolenic acid metabolism, and phagosome biogenesis (Figure 4c).

2.5. Xylem Sap Proteome Analysis of Hordeum Vulgare Revealed a Rich Protein Landscape and a Much Stronger Response to flg22

As detailed in the Section 4, we collected xylem sap proteomes from H. vulgare. The subsequent analysis yielded quantitative data for over 3300 proteins (see Supplementary Tables S2 and S5). The predicted localization of the best-matching Arabidopsis orthologs indicated a lower abundance of putative extracellular proteins, comprising at most 26% of the total protein content in the collected fractions. This likely contributes to a more diverse proteome composition (Figure 3b). Peroxidases were the dominant enzyme class in the dataset. However, their total abundance was only half of that observed in S. tuberosum (Figure 3b). Serine proteases and tripeptidyl-peptidases exhibited significantly lower abundance, whereas CAZymes showed an increase. These discrepancies might be attributed to differing developmental stages, as the H. vulgare plants were only three weeks old. Notably, the majority of enzyme classes displayed a significantly higher abundance in the second and third collected fractions, with the pattern generally mirroring that of S. tuberosum (Figure 3d). Additionally, gene ontology enrichment analysis of all putative extracellular proteins revealed substantial overlap in identified categories (Figure 3f). Next, the response to flg22 was compared in the third collected fraction using the estimated content of annotated extracellular proteins as a normalization factor. In contrast to S. tuberosum sap proteome, H. vulgare displayed a much stronger response to flg22 treatment. Over 14% of its xylem sap proteome was significantly affected, with 358 and 117 proteins showing increased and decreased abundances, respectively (fold change > 1.4, adj. p-value < 0.05). This suggests a more substantial reprogramming of cellular processes in barley upon exposure to flg22. To assess the broader relevance of our findings, we compared our results with a recently published dataset on the Arabidopsis seedling response to flg22 [48]. This analysis revealed an overlap of 95 proteins responsive to flg22 in both model organisms (Figure 5a), and most of these DAPs showed a similar response to flg22, including proteins involved in protein processing and endocytosis, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and CAZymes (see Supplementary Tables S5 and S6 for details). While this comparison is limited by the use of different targeted tissues, it provides an independent validation for a subset of the putative flg22-responsive proteins identified in our study.
We next investigated the functional roles of the identified xylem flg22 response proteins. To streamline the analysis and minimize potential bias, we focused exclusively on proteins predicted to localize to the extracellular space. The observed DAPs belong to the same metabolic pathways as those found in S. tubeorosum, dominated by CAZymes, lipid transfer proteins, peroxidases, and proteases (Figure 5b). The Flg22 response proteins identified in our study were involved in cell wall modification and defense, including various galactosidases, expansins, arabinofuranosidases, xylosidases, pectin acetylesterases, and pectin lyases. These proteins play a crucial role in modifying the plant cell wall, which serves as a primary barrier against pathogen invasion. Enzymes like α-galactosidase and β-galactosidase degrade complex carbohydrates, while expansins and pectin-modifying enzymes alter the structural properties of cell walls to bolster defense mechanisms [49]. Notably, pectin methylesterase (HORVU3Hr1G091360.3, HORVU5Hr1G010860.1, HORVU1Hr1G059010.1) was significantly less abundant in response to flg22. Interestingly, in Arabidopsis, pectin methylesterase is induced upon infection, and the corresponding mutant exhibits increased resistance to bacterial infection [50].

3. Discussion

Plant adaptation heavily relies on resource allocation and communication between shoots and roots, facilitated by plant vasculature through various signals, including electrical signals, hydraulic pressure changes, sugar and hormone signaling, calcium (Ca2+) and reactive oxygen species waves, assimilate transport, and the presence of peptides, RNA, esDNA, and proteins [19,32,51]. This dynamic communication ensures optimal plant functioning in an ever-changing environment. Several techniques have been established for extracting plant extracellular proteins, facilitating the analysis of processes occurring in the apoplast. Cell culture methods offer a comprehensive view of secreted proteins (e.g., [52]). However, these approaches lack the ability to investigate the role of the extracellular proteome in inter-tissue communication. For analyses at the tissue level, phloem sap collection can be achieved through EDTA-facilitated exudation, wound-induced exudation, or insect-assisted stylectomy (e.g., [53,54]). Apoplastic fluid can be isolated using vacuum infiltration–centrifugation techniques (reviewed in [15,26]). Xylem sap, on the other hand, is primarily collected via methods relying on root pressure or spontaneous exudation after stem cutting (reviewed in [55]). While these protocols provide valuable information, their laborious nature and requirement for large quantities of time or plant material can hinder widespread adoption.
Our analyses demonstrated that the xylem sap proteome can be effectively monitored, and sampling from a single plant for 60 min suffices to provide reproducible insights into the abundances of over 570 and 400 proteins with predicted extracellular localization in Solanum tuberosum and Hordeum vulgare, respectively. Likely, the portion of true extracellular proteins delivered through noncanonical secretory pathways [56] is much higher. We hypothesize that proteins whose abundances did not decrease in consecutive fractions are true extracellular proteins, though validating these findings will require further extensive research. The analysis of the xylem sap proteome has proven to be a valuable method for understanding plant defense mechanisms and pathogen interactions. However, the sampling protocol can be further optimized. The relatively high content of proteases suggests the inclusion of a protease inhibitor cocktail might be advantageous. We speculate that endogenous protease activity, despite the presence of inhibitor proteins and the anticipated specificity of secreted proteases, might have led to partial protein loss in our experiments. Alternatively, collecting sap into tubes containing denaturing agents, such as 10% trichloroacetic acid in acetone, could precipitate the isolated proteins and minimize residual enzymatic activity.

3.1. Novel flg22 Response Proteins Identified by Xylem Sap Proteome Analysis

Flagellin, a bacterial protein forming the flagellum, is also pivotal in plant immunity. Its N-terminus, represented by the peptide flg22, acts as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), triggering plant defense responses [57]. Studies on the effects of flagellin application on pathogen resistance have been conducted in various model plants, including Arabidopsis, Oryza sativa, Glycine max, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana tabacum [57,58,59,60,61]. Our xylem sap proteome analysis identified novel components of plant immunity in response to flg22 and assigned putative functions to previously unannotated proteins. These included components of signal transduction such as calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine/threonine-kinase (HORVU4Hr1G066750.1), an ortholog of G-type lectin S-receptor serine/threonine-protein kinase (HORVU3Hr1G110350.1), and signal peptidase complex subunit (HORVU5Hr1G088300.1). While these proteins have not been characterized, G-type lectin receptor kinases and calcium-dependent kinases are known to be involved in plant–microbe interactions [62] and plant immunity [63], respectively.
Proteins of interest that accumulated in response to flg22 included protease inhibitors (cysteine proteinase inhibitor HORVU3Hr1G038190.1; serpin-ZX, HORVU4Hr1G013550.2), an ortholog of protein EXORDIUM-like (HORVU6Hr1G077750.1), subtilisin protease (HORVU5Hr1G061990.1), and an endonuclease (HORVU2Hr1G112860.1). Protease inhibitors regulate proteolytic activities during pathogen attacks, inhibiting pathogen-secreted proteases and controlling endogenous proteases involved in programmed cell death to prevent excessive cell death and limit pathogen spread within plant tissues [64]. EXORDIUM regulates brassinosteroid-responsive genes and is proposed to be part of the flg22 response in Arabidopsis [65]. The endonuclease identified is an ortholog of Arabidopsis Endonuclease 2, known to play a role in biotic interactions. Finally, two subtilases were recently found as apoplastic proteases responsible for the C-terminal cleavage of flg22, and mutants lacking these subtilases displayed a decrease in ROS production in response to flg22 [66]. That suggests that HORVU5Hr1G061990.1 likely performs the same function in H. vulgare.

3.2. Response of Lipid Metabolism to flg22 Is Evolutionarily Conserved in H. vulgare and S. tuberosum

Lipid transfer proteins and lipases were among the DAPs in the xylem sap of both model plants, showing a similar response to flg22. In H. vulgare, four lipid transfer proteins were significantly less abundant (HORVU2Hr1G107480.2, HORVU2Hr1G107470.2, HORVU2Hr1G073730.1, HORVU1Hr1G046400.1), while S. tuberosum exhibited a decrease in glycolipid transfer protein (PGSC0003DMT400051703) and lipid-binding protein (PGSC0003DMT400057410). A similar pattern was observed for GDSL esterases/lipases and phospholipase patatin (HORVU2Hr1G107480.2, HORVU2Hr1G107470.2, HORVU2Hr1G073730.1, HORVU1Hr1G046400.1). These proteins modify membrane lipids, influencing membrane stability and integrity under biotic stress, which is crucial for pathogen resistance as they affect membrane permeability and signaling functions, enhancing plant defense capabilities. Notably, lipid transfer proteins can also directly target and disrupt bacterial cell membranes [67]. Beyond their role in membrane modification, lipid transfer proteins have been implicated in distal transport, potentially facilitating the movement of nutrients and signaling molecules like phytohormones [8].

3.3. HSP70 Family Proteins in Response to flg22 Suggests Their Extracellular Role

Despite targeting primarily proteins with a predicted extracellular localization, members of the HSP70 family were also among the DAPs in both model plants. HSP70 proteins are key components of cell maintenance and have a role in both abiotic and biotic signaling [68]. In H. vulgare, five HSP70 proteins were significantly more abundant in flg22-treated samples (HORVU1Hr1G030790.1, HORVU3Hr1G073230.1, HORVU4Hr1G012460.2, HORVU1Hr1G027420.2, HORVU2Hr1G112630.2), whereas S. tuberosum showed decreased abundance in an ortholog of cytosolic HSP70-14 (PGSC0003DMT400080581) and HSP70-interacting protein (PGSC0003DMT400038437). Interestingly, these proteins did not show significant changes in root or shoot tissues of S. tuberosum, implying a potential extracellular role for HSP70, as documented in mammalian systems [69].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Potato (Solanum tuberosum, variety Princ) and barley (Hordeum vulgare, variety Sebastian) plants were cultivated in a controlled environment. Plants were grown in Potgrond H soil (Klasmann-Deilmann GmbH, Geeste, Germany) under a 12 h photoperiod with a constant temperature of 21 °C and a photon flux density of 100 μmol m−2 s−1. Potato tubers were used as starting material, while barley plants were grown from surface-sterilized seeds. After six weeks of cultivation for potato and three weeks for barley, the sap proteome was collected by cutting the stems 10–20 mm above the soil surface using a razor blade. The xylem sap was sampled in three fractions over a two-hour period: F1 (15 min), F2 (75 min), and F3 (135 min). Fractions were collected every 5–10 min using a pipette, aspirating an average of 450 µL per hour for S. tuberosum and 50 µL per hour for H. vulgare. Upon collection, the sap was immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Each experiment included at least three independent biological replicates. The experimental design is summarized in Figure 1.

4.2. Elicitor Treatment

A subset of plants was pre-incubated with flg22, a conserved peptide sequence derived from bacterial flagellin (QRLSTGSRINSAKDDAAGLQIA, >95% purity; ProteoGenix, Schiltigheim, France). Flg22 solution (1 μM flg22, 0.025% v/v Silwet L-77) was applied by spraying the leaves and pouring the solution under the pot. Potato plants received 30 mL and 200 mL of the solution for spraying and watering, respectively. Due to their smaller size, barley plants were treated with half the solution volume. Mock-treated plants received a solution containing only 0.025% Silwet L-77. After 24 h, plants were cut, and the third fraction of the sap (75–135 min) was collected. Root and shoot tissues were collected in liquid nitrogen, the sap was collected as described above. Each experiment included at least three independent biological replicates.

4.3. Proteome Analysis

The collected sap was flash-frozen and lyophilized. Next, the samples were washed with 300 µL of a 3:1 (v/v) methyl tert-butyl ether/methanol mixture and with 200 µL of 80% (v/v) acetone in water. Finally, the samples were solubilized in urea and digested using the previously described protocol [70]. The resulting peptides were desalted using Strata C18-E and concentrated to 15 µL. Portions of samples corresponding to 5 μL were analyzed by nanoflow reverse-phase liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry using a 25 cm C18 Biozen 2.6 μm Peptide XB-C18 column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano-UPLC system, and the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid Mass Spectrometer equipped with a FAIMS Pro Interface (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). All samples were analyzed using FAIMS compensation voltages of −40, −50, and −75 V, as described previously [71]. The measured spectra were recalibrated and searched against the S. tuberosum (SolTub_3.0–GCA_000226075) and H. vulgare (MorexV3_pseudomolecules_assembly–GCA_904849725.1; Hordeum vulgare IBSC v2) databases, and common contaminants databases using Proteome Discoverer 2.5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) employing Sequest HT, MS Amanda 2.0 [72], or MSFragger [73] algorithms. The settings were as follows: enzyme–trypsin, max two missed cleavage sites; MS1 tolerance—5 ppm; MS2 tolerance—0.1 Da, SEQUEST/0.02 Da, MS Amanda; fixed modifications—carbamidomethyl (Cys); dynamic modifications including Met oxidation, Asn/Gln deamidation; and dynamic modifications at the end of the protein—acetylation (N-end); loss of methionine (N-terminus); loss of methionine/acetylation (N-terminus). The MSFragger was implemented using ProteomeDiscoverer and default settings for a closed search. The resulting peptide hits were filtered for a maximum 1% false discovery rate using the Percolator Node (Proteome Discoverer 2.5). Root and shoot proteomes were analyzed as described previously, e.g., [74]. The quantitative analysis centered on (i) proteins identified by two or more unique peptides and (ii) proteins with a single unique peptide but at least ten assigned peptides, aiming for broader proteome coverage. The mass spectrometric proteomic data acquired were deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository [75] with the dataset identifier PXD053406.

4.4. Data Analysis and Processing

The reported statistical tests were generated and implemented using the Real Statistics Resource Pack software for MS Excel (Release 6.8; Copyright 2013–2020; Charles Zaiontz; www.real-statistics.com), MetaboAnalyst 6.0 [76], SIMCA 14.1 (Sartorius), Proteome Discoverer 2.5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Proteomaps [77]. Significant differences refer to p < 0.05, adj. p-value represents Benjamini and Hochberg procedure at 5% FDR.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that with modern proteomics’ sensitivity, xylem sap can be collected from a single plant, providing sufficient and reproducible protein yields. This approach, as evidenced by our experiments with the flg22 treatment, can offer novel insights into plant–microbe interactions. Despite providing evidence on the reproducibility of proteomics data in the collected xylem sap and demonstrating the complementarity of the results found in the roots, shoots, and xylem saps, it is crucial to acknowledge that this simple and inexpensive technique for collecting xylem sap is prone to contamination from both phloem and cellular spillage, as evidenced by the first collected fractions. Bioinformatics tools indicate that the majority of proteins identified in the third collected fraction are extracellular. However, this does not confirm their origin in the xylem. Therefore, we recommend exercising caution when using our list of identified proteins as sole evidence for their presence in the xylem.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13141983/s1, Table S1: Proteins identified in S. tuberosum xylem sap; Table S2: Proteins identified in H. vulgare xylem sap; Table S3: Flg22 response proteins in S. tuberosum xylem sap proteome; Table S4: Flg22 response proteins in S. tuberosum root and shoot tissues; Table S5: Flg22 response proteins in H. vulgare xylem sap proteome; Table S6: Flg22 response proteins in Arabidopsis [49].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Č.; Methodology, R.K. and M.Č.; Formal Analysis, R.K. and M.Č.; Investigation, R.K. and M.Č.; Resources, M.Č.; Data Curation, M.Č.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.Č. and R.K.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.Č.; Visualization, R.K. and M.Č.; Supervision, M.Č.; Project Administration, M.Č.; Funding Acquisition, M.Č. and R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Internal Grant Agency of Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, grant AF-IGA2023-IP-051 and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, MSTC Danube project n. 8X23011.

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometric proteomic data acquired have been deposited in the Proteo-meXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository [75] with the dataset identifier PXD053406.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Koenig, A.M.; Hoffmann-Benning, S. The interplay of phloem-mobile signals in plant development and stress response. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20193329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lucas, W.J.; Groover, A.; Lichtenberger, R.; Furuta, K.; Yadav, S.; Helariutta, Y.; He, X.; Fukuda, H.; Kang, J.; Brady, S.M.; et al. The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and Functions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 294–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taleski, M.; Jin, M.; Chapman, K.; Taylor, K.; Winning, C.; Frank, M.; Imin, N.; Djordjevic, M.A. CEP hormones at the nexus of nutrient acquisition and allocation, root development, and plant–microbe interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 538–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ladeynova, M.; Kuznetsova, D.; Mudrilov, M.; Vodeneev, V. Integration of Electrical Signals and Phytohormones in the Control of Systemic Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Houmani, H.; Corpas, F.J. Can nutrients act as signals under abiotic stress? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 206, 108313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gao, Y.-Q.; Morin, H.; Marcourt, L.; Yang, T.-H.; Wolfender, J.-L.; Farmer, E.E. Chloride, glutathiones, and insect-derived elicitors introduced into the xylem trigger electrical signaling. Plant Physiol. 2024, 194, 1091–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rüscher, D.; Vasina, V.V.; Knoblauch, J.; Bellin, L.; Pommerrenig, B.; Alseekh, S.; Fernie, A.R.; Neuhaus, H.E.; Knoblauch, M.; Sonnewald, U.; et al. Symplasmic phloem loading and subcellular transport in storage roots are key factors for carbon allocation in cassava. Plant Physiol. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akhiyarova, G.; Finkina, E.I.; Zhang, K.; Veselov, D.; Vafina, G.; Ovchinnikova, T.V.; Kudoyarova, G. The Long-Distance Transport of Some Plant Hormones and Possible Involvement of Lipid-Binding and Transfer Proteins in Hormonal Transport. Cells 2024, 13, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shabala, S.; White, R.G.; Djordjevic, M.A.; Ruan, Y.-L.; Mathesius, U. Root-to-shoot signalling: Integration of diverse molecules, pathways and functions. Funct. Plant Biol. 2016, 43, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Schepper, V.; De Swaef, T.; Bauweraerts, I.; Steppe, K. Phloem transport: A review of mechanisms and controls. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4839–4850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garg, V.; Kühn, C. What determines the composition of the phloem sap? Is there any selectivity filter for macromolecules entering the phloem sieve elements? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tolstyko, E.A.; Lezzhov, A.A.; Morozov, S.Y.; Solovyev, A.G. Phloem transport of structured RNAs: A widening repertoire of trafficking signals and protein factors. Plant Sci. 2020, 299, 110602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, C.; Ham, B.; El-shabrawi, H.M.; Alexander, D.; Zhang, D.; Ryals, J.; Lucas, W.J. Proteomics and metabolomics analyses reveal the cucurbit sieve tube system as a complex metabolic space. Plant J. 2016, 87, 442–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brodersen, C.R.; Roddy, A.B.; Wason, J.W.; McElrone, A.J. Functional Status of Xylem Through Time. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 407–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rodríguez-Celma, J.; Ceballos-Laita, L.; Grusak, M.A.; Abadía, J.; López-Millán, A.-F. Plant fluid proteomics: Delving into the xylem sap, phloem sap and apoplastic fluid proteomes. BBA—Proteins Proteom. 2016, 1864, 991–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wheeldon, C.D.; Bennett, T. There and back again: An evolutionary perspective on long-distance coordination of plant growth and development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 109, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sakakibara, H. Cytokinin biosynthesis and transport for systemic nitrogen signaling. Plant J. 2021, 105, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mashiguchi, K.; Seto, Y.; Yamaguchi, S. Strigolactone biosynthesis, transport and perception. Plant J. 2021, 105, 335–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pérez-Pérez, J.G.; Puertolas, J.; Albacete, A.; Dodd, I.C. Alternation of wet and dry sides during partial rootzone drying irrigation enhances leaf ethylene evolution. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Regnault, T.; Davière, J.-M.; Wild, M.; Sakvarelidze-Achard, L.; Heintz, D.; Carrera Bergua, E.; Lopez Diaz, I.; Gong, F.; Hedden, P.; Achard, P. The gibberellin precursor GA12 acts as a long-distance growth signal in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 2015, 1, 15073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thorpe, M.R.; Ferrieri, A.P.; Herth, M.M.; Ferrieri, R.A. 11C-imaging: Methyl jasmonate moves in both phloem and xylem, promotes transport of jasmonate, and of photoassimilate even after proton transport is decoupled. Planta 2007, 226, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Park, S.-W.; Kaimoyo, E.; Kumar, D.; Mosher, S.; Klessig, D.F. Methyl Salicylate Is a Critical Mobile Signal for Plant Systemic Acquired Resistance. Science 2007, 318, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Broussard, L.; Abadie, C.; Lalande, J.; Limami, A.M.; Lothier, J.; Tcherkez, G. Phloem Sap Composition: What Have We Learnt from Metabolomics? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aoki, K.; Suzui, N.; Fujimaki, S.; Dohmae, N.; Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.; Fujiwara, T.; Hayashi, H.; Yamaya, T.; Sakakibara, H. Destination-Selective Long-Distance Movement of Phloem Proteins. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1801–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Djordjevic, M.A.; Oakes, M.; Li, D.X.; Hwang, C.H.; Hocart, C.H.; Gresshoff, P.M. The Glycine max Xylem Sap and Apoplast Proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 3771–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carella, P.; Merl-Pham, J.; Wilson, D.C.; Dey, S.; Hauck, S.M.; Vlot, C.; Cameron, R.K. Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Arabidopsis Phloem Exudates Collected During the Induction of Systemic Acquired Resistance. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1495–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rep, M.; Dekker, H.L.; Vossen, J.H.; de Boer, A.D.; Houterman, P.M.; Speijer, D.; Back, J.W.; de Koster, C.G.; Cornelissen, B.J.C. Mass Spectrometric Identification of Isoforms of PR Proteins in Xylem Sap of Fungus-Infected Tomato. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 904–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pu, Z.; Ino, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Tago, A.; Shimizu, M.; Natsume, S.; Sano, Y.; Fujimoto, R.; Kaneko, K.; Shea, D.J.; et al. Changes in the Proteome of Xylem Sap in Brassica oleracea in Response to Fusarium oxysporum Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Abeysekara, N.S.; Bhattacharyya, M.K. Analyses of the Xylem Sap Proteomes Identified Candidate Fusarium virguliforme Proteinacious Toxins. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Floerl, S.; Druebert, C.; Majcherczyk, A.; Karlovsky, P.; Kües, U.; Polle, A. Defence reactions in the apoplastic proteome of oilseed rape (Brassica napus var. napus) attenuate Verticillium longisporum growth but not disease symptoms. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zheng, T.; Haider, M.S.; Zhang, K.; Jia, H.; Fang, J. Biological and functional properties of xylem sap extracted from grapevine (cv. Rosario bianco). Sci. Hortic. 2020, 272, 109563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Notaguchi, M.; Okamoto, S. Dynamics of long-distance signaling via plant vascular tissues. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kehr, J.; Buhtz, A.; Giavalisco, P. Analysis of xylem sap proteins from Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2005, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Buhtz, A.; Kolasa, A.; Arlt, K.; Walz, C.; Kehr, J. Xylem sap protein composition is conserved among different plant species. Planta 2004, 219, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yadeta, K.A.J.; Thomma, B.P.H. The xylem as battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jelenska, J.; Davern, S.M.; Standaert, R.F.; Mirzadeh, S.; Greenberg, J.T. Flagellin peptide flg22 gains access to long-distance trafficking in Arabidopsis via its receptor, FLS2. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1769–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Moroz, N.; Tanaka, K. FlgII-28 Is a Major Flagellin-Derived Defense Elicitor in Potato. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2020, 33, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Colaianni, N.R.; Parys, K.; Lee, H.-S.; Conway, J.M.; Kim, N.H.; Edelbacher, N.; Mucyn, T.S.; Madalinski, M.; Law, T.F.; Jones, C.D.; et al. A complex immune response to flagellin epitope variation in commensal communities. Cell Host Microbe 2021, 29, 635–649.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Buscaill, P.; Chandrasekar, B.; Sanguankiattichai, N.; Kourelis, J.; Kaschani, F.; Thomas, E.L.; Morimoto, K.; Kaiser, M.; Preston, G.M.; Ichinose, Y.; et al. Glycosidase and glycan polymorphism control hydrolytic release of immunogenic flagellin peptides. Science 2019, 364, eaav0748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hooper, C.M.; Castleden, I.R.; Tanz, S.K.; Aryamanesh, N.; Millar, A.H. SUBA4: The interactive data analysis centre for Arabidopsis subcellular protein locations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D1064–D1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hooper, C.M.; Castleden, I.R.; Aryamanesh, N.; Jacoby, R.P.; Millar, A.H. Finding the Subcellular Location of Barley, Wheat, Rice and Maize Proteins: The Compendium of Crop Proteins with Annotated Locations (CropPAL). Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ge, S.X.; Jung, D.; Yao, R. ShinyGO: A graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 2628–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Simpson, C.; Thomas, C.; Findlay, K.; Bayer, E.; Maule, A.J. An Arabidopsis GPI-Anchor Plasmodesmal Neck Protein with Callose Binding Activity and Potential to Regulate Cell-to-Cell Trafficking. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kim, C.; Park, J.; Choi, G.; Kim, S.; Vo, K.T.X.; Jeon, J.; Kang, S.; Lee, Y. A rice gene encoding glycosyl hydrolase plays contrasting roles in immunity depending on the type of pathogens. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 400–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schimoler-O’Rourke, R.; Richardson, M.; Selitrennikoff, C.P. Zeamatin Inhibits Trypsin and α-Amylase Activities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2365–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jia, R.; Yu, L.; Chen, J.; Hu, L.; Cao, S.; Wang, Y. Characterization of the Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan gene family in Brassica napus and the negative regulatory role of BnFLA39 in response to clubroot disease stress. Ind. Crop Prod. 2023, 196, 116400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sun, L.; Dong, S.; Ge, Y.; Fonseca, J.P.; Robinson, Z.T.; Mysore, K.S.; Mehta, P. DiVenn: An Interactive and Integrated Web-Based Visualization Tool for Comparing Gene Lists. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pan, L.; Berka, M.; Černý, M.; Novák, J.; Luklová, M.; Brzobohatý, B.; Saiz-Fernández, I. Cytokinin Deficiency Alters Leaf Proteome and Metabolome during Effector-Triggered Immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Narváez-Barragán, D.A.; Tovar-Herrera, O.E.; Guevara-García, A.; Serrano, M.; Martinez-Anaya, C. Mechanisms of plant cell wall surveillance in response to pathogens, cell wall-derived ligands and the effect of expansins to infection resistance or susceptibility. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 969343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Raiola, A.; Lionetti, V.; Elmaghraby, I.; Immerzeel, P.; Mellerowicz, E.J.; Salvi, G.; Cervone, F.; Bellincampi, D. Pectin Methylesterase Is Induced in Arabidopsis upon Infection and Is Necessary for a Successful Colonization by Necrotrophic Pathogens. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, X.; Gao, H.; Zhang, X.; Khashi u Rahman, M.; Mazzoleni, S.; Du, M.; Wu, F. Plant extracellular self-DNA inhibits growth and induces immunity via the jasmonate signaling pathway. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2475–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Pernis, M.; Salaj, T.; Bellová, J.; Danchenko, M.; Baráth, P.; Klubicová, K. Secretome analysis revealed that cell wall remodeling and starch catabolism underlie the early stages of somatic embryogenesis in Pinus nigra. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1225424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Batailler, B.; Lemaître, T.; Vilaine, F.; Sanchez, C.; Renard, D.; Cayla, T.; Beneteau, J.; Dinant, S. Soluble and filamentous proteins in Arabidopsis sieve elements. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1258–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zimmermann, M.R.; Knauer, T.; Furch, A.C.U. Collection of Phloem Sap in Phytoplasma-Infected Plants. In Phytoplasmas. Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, Y.; Lin, T.; Valencia, M.V.; Zhang, C.; Lv, Z. Unraveling the Roles of Vascular Proteins Using Proteomics. Molecules 2021, 26, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Maricchiolo, E.; Panfili, E.; Pompa, A.; De Marchis, F.; Bellucci, M.; Pallotta, M.T. Unconventional Pathways of Protein Secretion: Mammals vs. Plants. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 895853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zipfel, C.; Robatzek, S.; Navarro, L.; Oakeley, E.J.; Jones, J.D.G.; Felix, G.; Boller, T. Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 2004, 428, 764–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Takai, R.; Isogai, A.; Takayama, S.; Che, F.-S. Analysis of Flagellin Perception Mediated by Flg22 Receptor OsFLS2 in Rice. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 1635–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wei, Y.; Balaceanu, A.; Rufian, J.S.; Segonzac, C.; Zhao, A.; Morcillo, R.J.L.; Macho, A.P. An immune receptor complex evolved in soybean to perceive a polymorphic bacterial flagellin. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hind, S.R.; Strickler, S.R.; Boyle, P.C.; Dunham, D.M.; Bao, Z.; O’Doherty, I.M.; Baccile, J.A.; Hoki, J.S.; Viox, E.G.; Clarke, C.R.; et al. Tomato receptor FLAGELLIN-SENSING 3 binds flgII-28 and activates the plant immune system. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Murakami, T.; Katsuragi, Y.; Hirai, H.; Wataya, K.; Kondo, M.; Che, F.-S. Distribution of flagellin CD2-1, flg22, and flgii-28 recognition systems in plant species and regulation of plant immune responses through these recognition systems. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2022, 86, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sun, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Muchero, W.; Chen, J.-G. Lectin Receptor-like Kinases: The Sensor and Mediator at the Plant Cell Surface. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 596301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yip Delormel, T.; Boudsocq, M. Properties and functions of calcium-dependent protein kinases and their relatives in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 585–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lampl, N.; Alkan, N.; Davydov, O.; Fluhr, R. Set-point control of RD21 protease activity by AtSerpin1 controls cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013, 74, 498–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tunc-Ozdemir, M.; Jones, A.M. BRL3 and AtRGS1 cooperate to fine tune growth inhibition and ROS activation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Matsui, S.; Noda, S.; Kuwata, K.; Nomoto, M.; Tada, Y.; Shinohara, H.; Matsubayashi, Y. Arabidopsis SBT5.2 and SBT1.7 subtilases mediate C-Terminal Cleavage of flg22 epitope from bacterial flagellin. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 3762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gao, H.; Ma, K.; Ji, G.; Pan, L.; Zhou, Q. Lipid transfer proteins involved in plant–pathogen interactions and their molecular mechanisms. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 1815–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Berka, M.; Kopecká, R.; Berková, V.; Brzobohatý, B.; Černý, M. Regulation of heat shock proteins 70 and their role in plant immunity. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 1894–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lopez, V.; Cauvi, D.M.; Arispe, N.; De Maio, A. Bacterial Hsp70 (DnaK) and mammalian Hsp70 interact differently with lipid membranes. Cell Stress. Chaperones 2016, 21, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dufková, H.; Berka, M.; Psota, V.; Brzobohatý, B.; Černý, M. Environmental impacts on barley grain composition and longevity. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 1609–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Berková, V.; Berka, M.; Kameniarová, M.; Kopecká, R.; Kuzmenko, M.; Shejbalová, Š.; Abramov, D.; Čičmanec, P.; Frejlichová, L.; Jan, N.; et al. Salicylic Acid Treatment and Its Effect on Seed Yield and Seed Molecular Composition of Pisum sativum under Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dorfer, V.; Pichler, P.; Stranzl, T.; Stadlmann, J.; Taus, T.; Winkler, S.; Mechtler, K. MS Amanda, a Universal Identification Algorithm Optimized for High Accuracy Tandem Mass Spectra. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 3679–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kong, A.T.; Leprevost, F.V.; Avtonomov, D.M.; Mellacheruvu, D.; Nesvizhskii, A.I. MSFragger: Ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dufková, H.; Berka, M.; Greplová, M.; Shejbalová, Š.; Hampejsová, R.; Luklová, M.; Domkářová, J.; Novák, J.; Kopačka, V.; Brzobohatý, B.; et al. The Omics Hunt for Novel Molecular Markers of Resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Plants 2022, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Perez-Riverol, Y.; Bai, J.; Bandla, C.; García-Seisdedos, D.; Hewapathirana, S.; Kamatchinathan, S.; Kundu, D.J.; Prakash, A.; Frericks-Zipper, A.; Eisenacher, M.; et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: A hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D543–D552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Pang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, G.; Hui, F.; Xu, L.; Viau, C.; Spigelman, A.F.; MacDonald, P.E.; Wishart, D.S.; Li, S.; et al. MetaboAnalyst 6.0: Towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W398–W406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liebermeister, W.; Noor, E.; Flamholz, A.; Davidi, D.; Bernhardt, J.; Milo, R. Visual account of protein investment in cellular functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 8488–8493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 13 01983 g001
Figure 1. Experimental design. (a) Stems of plants grown in soil were cut, and the xylem sap was collected in three consecutive fractions (15–135 min). Representative images of S. tuberosum (left) and H. vulgare (right) plants used in the experiment; (b) a subset of plants was pre-incubated with mock (water) or flg22 applied by spraying the leaves and pouring the solution under the pot as described in Materials and Methods. After 24 h, plants were cut, and the third fraction of the sap (75–135 min) was collected. Each experiment included at least three independent biological replicates.
Figure 1. Experimental design. (a) Stems of plants grown in soil were cut, and the xylem sap was collected in three consecutive fractions (15–135 min). Representative images of S. tuberosum (left) and H. vulgare (right) plants used in the experiment; (b) a subset of plants was pre-incubated with mock (water) or flg22 applied by spraying the leaves and pouring the solution under the pot as described in Materials and Methods. After 24 h, plants were cut, and the third fraction of the sap (75–135 min) was collected. Each experiment included at least three independent biological replicates.
Plants 13 01983 g001
Plants 13 01983 g002
Figure 2. Proteome analysis of S. tuberosum sap. (a) Principal component analysis (PCA) of quantified proteins in three consecutive fractions (F1–F3). Results are based on three biological replicates. (b) Proportion of the proteome extract formed by proteins predicted to have extracellular localization. Proteins were assigned based on homology to Arabidopsis orthologs in the SUBA database (green; SUBA database [40]) and predictions for S. tuberosum proteins from the cropPAL database (gray; cropPAL database [41]). The plots represent the means and standard deviations of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). See Supplementary Table S1 for details.
Figure 2. Proteome analysis of S. tuberosum sap. (a) Principal component analysis (PCA) of quantified proteins in three consecutive fractions (F1–F3). Results are based on three biological replicates. (b) Proportion of the proteome extract formed by proteins predicted to have extracellular localization. Proteins were assigned based on homology to Arabidopsis orthologs in the SUBA database (green; SUBA database [40]) and predictions for S. tuberosum proteins from the cropPAL database (gray; cropPAL database [41]). The plots represent the means and standard deviations of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). See Supplementary Table S1 for details.
Plants 13 01983 g002
Plants 13 01983 g003
Figure 3. Sap proteome composition of Solanum tuberosum (left) and Hordeum vulgare (right). (a,b) Estimated abundances of identified enzymes in the third collected fraction; (c,d) differences in categories representing ≥95% of the total identified enzyme abundances visualized on a heat map. The letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD), the numbers above the connecting lines represent Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) are marked with asterisks; (e,f) gene ontology enrichment analyses-based annotations of identified Arabidopsis orthologs. Nodes represent enriched GO pathways, with size indicating the number of proteins associated with the pathway and color intensity reflecting enrichment significance. Pathways connected by lines share ≥20% of their protein components. Analyses were performed using ShinyGO 0.8 [42].
Figure 3. Sap proteome composition of Solanum tuberosum (left) and Hordeum vulgare (right). (a,b) Estimated abundances of identified enzymes in the third collected fraction; (c,d) differences in categories representing ≥95% of the total identified enzyme abundances visualized on a heat map. The letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD), the numbers above the connecting lines represent Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) are marked with asterisks; (e,f) gene ontology enrichment analyses-based annotations of identified Arabidopsis orthologs. Nodes represent enriched GO pathways, with size indicating the number of proteins associated with the pathway and color intensity reflecting enrichment significance. Pathways connected by lines share ≥20% of their protein components. Analyses were performed using ShinyGO 0.8 [42].
Plants 13 01983 g003
Plants 13 01983 g004
Figure 4. S. tuberosum sap proteome response to flg22. (a) Volcano plot representation of response to flg22 (flg22 vs. mock). Highlighted differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) represent statistically significant differences at 5% FDR. (b) Visualization of functional categories in the ProteoMap. The size of each category corresponds to the estimated protein abundance. (c) The DiVenn visualization depicts DAPs (adjusted p-value < 0.05, absolute fold change > 1.4) and significantly enriched metabolic pathways identified by MetaboAnalyst in DAPs specific to shoot (green), root (gray), sap proteome (orange) and in the overlap of these treatments. Red and blue dots indicate a relative increase and decrease in protein abundances compared to mock-treated control plants, respectively, while yellow dots represent differential responses between the comparisons. S. tuberosum proteins were annotated using the closest Arabidopsis orthologs. Generated using DiVenn online tool [47]. For details on identified DAPs, see Supplementary Tables S1–S4.
Figure 4. S. tuberosum sap proteome response to flg22. (a) Volcano plot representation of response to flg22 (flg22 vs. mock). Highlighted differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) represent statistically significant differences at 5% FDR. (b) Visualization of functional categories in the ProteoMap. The size of each category corresponds to the estimated protein abundance. (c) The DiVenn visualization depicts DAPs (adjusted p-value < 0.05, absolute fold change > 1.4) and significantly enriched metabolic pathways identified by MetaboAnalyst in DAPs specific to shoot (green), root (gray), sap proteome (orange) and in the overlap of these treatments. Red and blue dots indicate a relative increase and decrease in protein abundances compared to mock-treated control plants, respectively, while yellow dots represent differential responses between the comparisons. S. tuberosum proteins were annotated using the closest Arabidopsis orthologs. Generated using DiVenn online tool [47]. For details on identified DAPs, see Supplementary Tables S1–S4.
Plants 13 01983 g004
Plants 13 01983 g005
Figure 5. H. vulgare xylem sap proteome response to flg22. (a) The DiVenn visualization depicts DAPs (adjusted p-value < 0.05) found in the third collected fraction of H. vulgare xylem sap proteome and flg22 response proteins identified in A. thaliana [48]. Red and blue dots indicate a relative increase and decrease in protein abundances compared to mock-treated control plants, respectively, while yellow dots represent differential responses between the comparisons; (b) visualization of functional categories in the ProteoMap. Based on estimated protein abundances of DAPs that are predicted to be extracellular proteins. The size of each category corresponds to the estimated protein abundance. H. vulgare proteins were annotated using the closest Arabidopsis orthologs. For details on identified DAPs, see Supplementary Tables S5 and S6.
Figure 5. H. vulgare xylem sap proteome response to flg22. (a) The DiVenn visualization depicts DAPs (adjusted p-value < 0.05) found in the third collected fraction of H. vulgare xylem sap proteome and flg22 response proteins identified in A. thaliana [48]. Red and blue dots indicate a relative increase and decrease in protein abundances compared to mock-treated control plants, respectively, while yellow dots represent differential responses between the comparisons; (b) visualization of functional categories in the ProteoMap. Based on estimated protein abundances of DAPs that are predicted to be extracellular proteins. The size of each category corresponds to the estimated protein abundance. H. vulgare proteins were annotated using the closest Arabidopsis orthologs. For details on identified DAPs, see Supplementary Tables S5 and S6.
Plants 13 01983 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kopecká, R.; Černý, M. Xylem Sap Proteome Analysis Provides Insight into Root–Shoot Communication in Response to flg22. Plants 2024, 13, 1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141983

AMA Style

Kopecká R, Černý M. Xylem Sap Proteome Analysis Provides Insight into Root–Shoot Communication in Response to flg22. Plants. 2024; 13(14):1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141983

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kopecká, Romana, and Martin Černý. 2024. "Xylem Sap Proteome Analysis Provides Insight into Root–Shoot Communication in Response to flg22" Plants 13, no. 14: 1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141983

APA Style

Kopecká, R., & Černý, M. (2024). Xylem Sap Proteome Analysis Provides Insight into Root–Shoot Communication in Response to flg22. Plants, 13(14), 1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141983

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop