Next Article in Journal
Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from the Fruits of Jambolan (Syzygium cumini (L.)) Using Alternative Solvents
Previous Article in Journal
Phytochemical Composition and Biological Activity of the Essential Oil from Ericameria nauseosa Collected in Southwestern Montana, United States
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of the CYP716 Gene Family in Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A. DC. and Its Role in the Regulation of Triterpenoid Saponin Biosynthesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 15
10.3390/plants13152064
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of bZIP Transcription Factors in Transcriptome of Chrysanthemum mongolicum and Roles of CmbZIP9 in Drought Stress Resistance

by
Xuan Wang
1,
Yuan Meng
1,
Shaowei Zhang
1,
Zihan Wang
1,
Kaimei Zhang
2,
Tingting Gao
1 and
Yueping Ma
1,*
1
College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China
2
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(15), 2064; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152064
Submission received: 3 July 2024 / Revised: 22 July 2024 / Accepted: 23 July 2024 / Published: 26 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Horticultural Plant Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
bZIP transcription factors play important roles in regulating plant development and stress responses. Although bZIPs have been identified in many plant species, there is little information on the bZIPs in Chrysanthemum. In this study, bZIP TFs were identified from the leaf transcriptome of C. mongolicum, a plant naturally tolerant to drought. A total of 28 full-length bZIP family members were identified from the leaf transcriptome of C. mongolicum and were divided into five subfamilies based on their phylogenetic relationships with the bZIPs from Arabidopsis. Ten conserved motifs were detected among the bZIP proteins of C. mongolicum. Subcellular localization assays revealed that most of the CmbZIPs were predicted to be localized in the nucleus. A novel bZIP gene, designated as CmbZIP9, was cloned based on a sequence of the data of the C. mongolicum transcriptome and was overexpressed in tobacco. The results indicated that the overexpression of CmbZIP9 reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content and increased the peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities as well as the expression levels of stress-related genes under drought stress, thus enhancing the drought tolerance of transgenic tobacco lines. These results provide a theoretical basis for further exploring the functions of the bZIP family genes and lay a foundation for stress resistance improvement in chrysanthemums in the future.

1. Introduction

The basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family is one of the largest families of transcription factors in plants and plays important roles in plant development and responses to various biotic and abiotic stresses. The bZIP protein is also a well-known abscisic acid (ABA)-induced DNA-binding protein family that is essential for the activation of downstream gene expression during abiotic stress [1,2,3,4,5]. This family contains a highly conserved basic domain and a relatively divergent leucine chain that bind to a core sequence (ACGT) in the promoter of the target genes, such as G-box, C-box, and A-box [4,6]. To date, many bZIP TFs have been identified in plants. For example, 869 bZIPs with nine subgroups were identified from12 species of Rosaceae [7]; 75 bZIPs with 13 subfamilies were detected in Arabidopsis thaliana [8]; and 62 bZIP members with 12 subgroups were found in Andrographis paniculatan [9]. Several bZIP members are involved in plant tolerance to salt stress, drought, etc. [10,11,12,13].
Chrysanthemums is a famous traditional flower in China with high ornamental, medical, and economic value. However, the production and commercialization of chrysanthemum have been hindered by water shortages [14,15]. Therefore, cultivating new chrysanthemum varieties with high drought resistance is a key goal for chrysanthemum breeders. Compared to conventional breeding approaches, genetic transformation techniques are more powerful and efficient. Although many bZIP TFs have been identified in different plants, few bZIPs have been characterized in Chrysanthemum. Chrysanthemum mongolicum belongs to Chrysanthemum (Asteraceae), mainly distributed in Nei Mongol, China, and is a remarkable drought-tolerant plant that grows on rocky mountain slopes at an altitude of 1500–2500 m [16,17,18]. Its outstanding drought-resistant gene resources are an excellent choice for molecular breeding for chrysanthemum stress resistance. In this study, bZIP family-member genes were identified from the leaf transcriptome of C. mongolicum. The protein properties, phylogenies, and motif composition were assessed. In addition, a candidate bZIP gene, CmbZIP9, was isolated from C. mongolicum using RT-PCR and genomic PCR. The roles of CmbZIP were determined through heterologous expression in Nicotiana tabacum L. under drought conditions. This study provides useful information on exploring the functions of the bZIP family genes in Chrysanthemum species and lays a foundation for stress resistance improvement in chrysanthemums in the future.

2. Results

2.1. Phylogenetic Analysis of bZIP Family Members in C. mongolicum

In total, 28 full-length bZIP members were identified from the transcriptome of C. mongolicum (Table S1). The proteins of the bZIP family members in C. mongolicum range from 140 aa to 1822 aa in length. Most CmbZIPs were predicted to be localized in the nucleus (Table S1). The bZIP family members in C. mongolicum were divided into five subgroups by referencing the 13 subclasses of AtbZIPs in the phylogenetic tree. The homologous proteins in families B, D, F, H, J, K, and E of A. thaliana were not found in the obtained transcriptome data from C. mongolicum (Figure 1). The largest subgroup, S, contained 10 CmbZIP members, followed by group A (8). Only one member was homologous to family G of the AtbZIPs. In addition, the homologs of the family members of groups D and E in Arabidopsis were found in other Chrysanthemum bZIPs, suggesting that some bZIPs are expressed in other organs and developmental stages. This result suggested that the members of bZIP proteins in different subgroups might be involved in various biological functions in C. mongolicum.

2.2. Conserved Motif Analysis of CmbZIPs

A total of 10 protein-conserved motifs with 15~50 amino acid residues were identified in the CmbZIPs with low E-values (<10−10) using the MEME tool (Table S2). At least one protein-conserved motif was found in all of the identified protein sequences (Figure 2). The number and type of conserved motifs in each of the five subclades were similar, but each subgroup had special characteristics. Motif 1, a conserved basic bZIP domain, was present in all of the members of the protein sequences, which confirmed the correctness of our identifications. Groups S and C had similar motif compositions, with most of the sequences containing motifs 1 and 2. We found that the protein sequences in group S had two different motif compositions: one consisted of motifs 1 and 9, and the other contained motifs 1, 2, and 8. In addition, groups A and I contained a significantly higher number of motifs than the other groups. Motif 7 predominantly existed in group I, while motifs 3 and 4 appeared only in group A. The specific motifs in each subgroup suggested their specific biological functions within the subgroup and the functional diversity of bZIP family genes.

2.3. Gene Isolation and Sequence Analysis

The phylogenetic analysis showed that the sequence of cluster-19700.13551 in the members of subgroup C was more closely related to that of AtbZIP9 (Figure 1), a protein that responds to drought stress. As such, we selected it to study its function in transgenic tobacco under drought stress. The full-length coding sequence of the bZIP9 homolog, CmbZIP9, was successfully isolated from the leaves of C. mongolicum using RT-PCR and genomic PCR with a pair of primers (Table S3). It was 768 bp in length, encoding 255 amino acids (Figure S1A). The putative peptide sequence of CmbZIP9 contains a typical basic region leucine zipper (BRLZ) domain, which is conserved in bZIP family proteins (GenBank accession number OR831111, named CmbZIP9). CmbZIP9 contains five exons and four introns (GenBank accession number OR842904, Figure S1B). The comparison of the putative amino acid sequences of CmbZIP9 with those of other bZIP homologs revealed that the sequence identity ranged from 57.8% to 94.12%, and the highest identity of 94.12% was shared with AabZIP from Artemisia annua (Figure S2A). The phylogenetic analysis showed that CmbZIP9 clusters with the bZIP9 homolog of A. annua and Tanacetum cinerariifolium into a clade with an 87% bootstrap support value, which is consistent with the biological evolutionary patterns (Figure S2B).

2.4. Heterologous Expression of CmbZIP9 in Tobacco

After rooting on MS medium containing kanamycin and rifampicin, more than 65 transgenic tobacco lines were obtained. Genomic PCR and qRT-PCR were performed to confirm the CmbZIP9 transgenic lines (Figure 3). Lines 2, 4, and 6, which had high expression levels of CmbZIP9, were selected for further functional studies.

2.5. CmbZIP9 Improved the Tolerance of Plants to Drought Stress

Four-week-old transgenic tobacco lines and wild-type seedlings were used to observe the phenotypes under drought stress. There were no obvious morphological differences between transgenic and wild-type plants under normal conditions. The WT tobacco wilted earlier than the transgenic tobacco, whereas the transgenic lines showed less wilting and grew well after 7 days of drought treatment (Figure 4A). Under drought stress, the relative water contents (RWCs) of the transgenic tobacco plants and wild-type plants were all reduced, but the transgenic tobacco plants had a significantly higher RWC than the wild-type plants (Figure 4B).
The malondialdehyde (MDA) content gradually increased in all plants with increasing duration of drought stress, but a significantly higher content was observed in the wild-type plants than in the transgenic plants. After 7 days of exposure to drought stress, the MDA content of the wild-type plants was 1.65, 1.38 and 1.35 times higher than that in transgenic plants 2, 4 and 6, respectively (Figure 4C). Therefore, the overexpression of CmbZIP9 reduced the degree of lipid peroxidation.
The peroxidase (POD) activity of the transgenic tobacco plants was slightly higher than that of the wild-type plants under normal conditions, after drought treatment for 4 days, and after drought treatment for 7 days. After 4 days of drought treatment, the POD contents of the transgenic tobacco plants 2, 4, and 6 was 1.18, 1.45, and 1.54 times higher than that in the wild-type plants, respectively. After 7 days of drought treatment, the POD content of transgenic plants 2, 4, and 6 was 2.33, 2.51 and 2.90 times higher than that of the wild-type plants, respectively (Figure 4D).
Under normal conditions, the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the leaves of the transgenic plants was slightly lower than that in the wild-type plants. After drought treatment, the SOD activity of the transgenic plants increased obviously. After 4 days of drought treatment, the SOD content of the transgenic plants 2, 4, and 6 was 1.44, 1.71 and 1.61 times higher than that of the wild-type plants, respectively. After 7 days of drought treatment, the SOD content of the transgenic plants was 1.35, 1.81, and 1.91 times higher than that of the wild-type plants, respectively (Figure 4E). These results indicated that the overexpression of CmbZIP9 in tobacco increased the tolerance of tobacco to drought stress.

2.6. CmbZIP9 Overexpression in Transgenic Tobacco Enhanced the Expression of Drought-Responsive Genes

To further explore the possible molecular mechanism by which CmbZIP9 improves drought tolerance, the transcript levels of four abiotic-stress-related genes, including ABA-responsive element binding factor (AREB), ethylene responsive factor (ERF), S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (SAMDC), and arginine decarboxylase (ADC) were investigated. The results showed that the expressions of the genes related to ROS detoxification (NtSOD) and stress (NtERF, NtAREB, NtADC, and NtSAMDC) in the transgenic lines were significantly higher than those in the WT plants after exposure to drought stress for 7 days (Figure 5). Therefore, CmbZIP9 might regulate the expression of stress-related genes, thus improving the tolerance of transgenic tobacco to drought stress.

3. Discussion

bZIP TFs have been shown to play important roles in plant development and the responses to various biotic and abiotic stress [15,19,20]. The bZIP domain is crucial to the functioning of the bZIP TF family members [21]. In this study, 28 CmbZIPs were identified in C. mongolicum, which were classified into five subgroups. The conserved motif of the basic region was present in all the members of the CmbZIPs, which indicated the evolutionary conservation of bZIP gene function in these plants. In addition, the CmbZIP proteins of the same subgroup shared the same conserved motif types and similar numbers of them, but the number of conserved motifs varied considerably between subclades, consistent with the bZIP findings in other plants [22,23]. The diversity of the conserved motifs outside of the bZIP domain in different bZIP members suggests that the bZIP genes might have diverse functions.
The bZIP structure varies among species, and even among different bZIP family members of the same species. For example, a maximum of 12 introns have been detected in Arabidopsis, cucumber, and rice; 11 bZIPs were found in mung bean and barley, and so on [24,25,26,27]. In our study, four introns were found within the ORF of CmbZIP9. The diverse structures of bZIPs suggest that different splicing states of exons and introns may have been of great significance in the evolution of bZIP genes in plants. The positions and phases of the introns in the basic and hinge regions of the bZIP domain are highly conserved, indicating multiple functions of this gene family in plant development and biotic/abiotic stress responses.
Usually, an appropriate balance between ROS production and scavenging is maintained in plants under normal conditions. However, large amounts of ROS are produced when plants are exposed to stress [28,29,30]. Excessive ROS results in plant metabolism disorders and oxidative damage, which inhibit normal plant growth and development and may even lead to plant death in severe cases [31,32,33]. In order to effectively reduce the accumulation of ROS, plants have evolved complex and precise antioxidant systems to neutralize ROS and prevent the oxidative damage of cells during stress conditions [34]. The MDA content is an important indicator of lipid peroxidation, which indirectly reflects the degree of plant membrane system damage and stress resistance [35,36]. The MDA content sharply increases in plants under abiotic stress [37]. In our study, the MDA content of CmbZIP9 transgenic tobacco was significantly lower than that of the wild-type tobacco under drought stress, indicating lower cell membrane system damage and lipid peroxidation levels in CmbZIP9 transgenic plants under drought stress than in wild-type plants.
SOD and POD are important components of the antioxidant enzyme defense system that can effectively remove excess ROS from plants [37,38,39]. SOD scavenges ROS by converting superoxide into H2O2 [40], whereas POD can consume ROS [41]. As a result, higher SOD and POD activities contribute to plant resistance to abiotic stresses [42,43]. The activities of SOD and POD have been found to be higher in many species after exposure to drought stress [44,45]. Overexpression of the grapevine transcription factor VvABF2 in Arabidopsis thaliana led to considerably higher SOD and POD activities in transgenic plants than in wild-type plants under drought treatment and enhanced the drought tolerance of Arabidopsis [46]. The bZIP transcription factor PtrABF, isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, also increased the SOD and POD activities of transgenic tobacco lines compared with those of wild type after drought treatment [47]. In our study, the POD and SOD activities in the leaves of CmbZIP9 transgenic tobacco were significantly increased under drought stress and these plants showed more stress resistance than wild-type tobacco (Figure 5). In addition, the transcripts of the SOD gene and some stress-related genes (AREB, SAMDC, ERF, and ADC) significantly increased in the transgenic lines under drought stress in this study. Previous studies have reported that these genes are involved in the response to abiotic stress and show higher expression levels under environmental stress [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Taking these results together, we found that the overexpression of CmbZIP9 led to increases in POD and SOD activities and in the expression levels of genes related to environment stress under drought stress, which might enhance the drought tolerance of plants. These results demonstrated that CmbZIP9 plays important roles in drought stress resistance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

The Chrysanthemum mongolicum plants used in this study were collected from Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China, and transplanted into the nursery garden of Northeastern University, China. A voucher specimen was collected and stored in the herbarium of Northeastern University, with voucher number ZL-20170817-02. Plant leaves were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C. Total RNA was extracted using a Plant RNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) and treated with DNase I (Omega Bio-Tek, USA) to remove DNA contamination. Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaves using a DNA kit (DNeasy Plant Mini Kit, (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA, USA) and treated with RNase to remove the RNA.

4.2. CmbZIP Genes Identification, Motif Composition Analyses

The bZIP family members were detected from the transcriptome of C. mongolicum [26] using a hidden Markov model (HMM) (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 23 October 2023). The open reading frames (ORFs) were confirmed using NCBI’s ORFfinder (ORFfinder Archives—NCBI Insights). The number of amino acids, isoelectric point (pI), and molecular weight (Mw) of the completely coded CmbZIP members were determined using the ExPASy website (https://www.expasy.org/, accessed on 2 November 2023) [55]. Thw WoLF PSORT website (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/, accessed on 10 November 2023) [56] was used to predict the localization of CmbZIPs. Online MEME (v 5.0) software was used to confirm the conserved motifs of the bZIPs (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 15 November 2023) with a motif threshold of 10 for each sequence.

4.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

Seventy-one bZIP proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana were obtained from TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp, accessed on 1 December 2023). Eleven chrysanthemum bZIP protein sequences were obtained from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 5 December 2023). The putative bZIP protein sequences of C. mongolicum and AtbZIPs were aligned using MEGA [57] and manually checked. IQ-TREE was employed to construct a maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates [58]. TBtools was used to visualize the phylogenetic tree and motif compositions [59].

4.4. Isolation of CmbZIP9 and Sequence Analysis

The quality of the total RNA was measured according to the method described by Zhang et al. [60]. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from a library of leaves using a Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The complete CmbZIP9 was amplified via RT-PCR and genomic PCR with primers M551ZIP F and M551ZIP R (Table S1) which were designed according to cluster-19700.13551 in the transcriptome data of C. mongolicum [18] with Pfu DNA polymerase (Takara Tokyo, Japan). Purified PCR products were linked to the Kan-EZ-TA-TOPO vector and transformed into Escherichia coli competent cells according to the method previously described by Hu et al. [61]. Transformed colonies were identified by PCR with gene-specific primers; restriction digestion and sequenced by Zhongmeitaihe Company (Beijing, China). DNAMAN software (version 6.0) was used to align multiple amino acid sequences, and a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 6 software with 1000 bootstrap replicates using Kimura two-parameter distances and the pairwise deletion of gaps. The intron–exon structures of CmbZIP9 were analyzed using TBtools [59] and checked manually.

4.5. Transformation of CmbZIP9 in Tobacco

The coding sequence of CmbZIP9 was inserted into the pBI121 vector to generate the 35S:: CmbZIP9 expression vector, which was transformed into Nicotiana tabacum using the leaf disk method, mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 following the method described by Hu et al. [61]. A series of Murashige and Skoog (MS) media with kanamycin and rifampicin were used to culture the leaf disks. Plant transformation was confirmed using genomic PCR, with specific primers used for initial CmbZIP9 amplification. The qPCR was performed on ABI QuantStudio 5 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using an SYBR Green PCR master mix kit (Thermol Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions to explore the transcript levels of the transgenic tobacco lines. NtACTIN gene was used as an endogenous control [62].

4.6. Drought Stress Treatment

Tobacco seedlings (4–5 weeks old) of the transgenic and wild-type plants were cultured as described by Li et al. [62]. Plants with 8–10 leaves were used for drought stress treatment. After complete watering, the plants were cultured at 25 °C day/18 °C night with 70% relative humidity and were not watered again. A minimum of three replicates were performed for each experiment. The leaves of treated and control plants were harvested after drought stress treatment for 0, 4, and 7 days, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use.

4.7. Measurement of Relative Water Content (RWC)

For relative water content (RWC) measurement, we followed the method described by Yaghoubian et al. [63]. with minor modifications to the method. Briefly, the fresh weight of each leaf was determined, then the leaf was immersed immediately in distilled water at 4 °C for 24 h to obtain the saturation weight (SW) and then placed in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h to measure the dry weight (DW).

4.8. Determination of MDA Content

MDA is a biomarker of lipid oxidation in plant membrane systems and indirectly reflects the level of damage to the plant membrane system and stress tolerance. The MDA content was measured using the method described by Li et al. [62] with minor modifications. Briefly, approximately 0.1 g of leaf tissue was homogenized with 5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (5%, w/v) and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. Next, 0.067% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid (2 mL) was added to 2 mL of the supernatant to be mixed, boiled for 30 min, and cooled on ice immediately. Then, the solution was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 450, 532, and 600 nm to calculate the MDA content.

4.9. Measurement of the SOD and POD Activities

POD and SOD are antioxidant enzymes that play crucial roles in plant responses to various abiotic stresses. SOD and POD activities were determined using an ELISA reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. About 0.3 g of leaves was homogenized with 5 mL of 0.1 mol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5) to extract the crude enzyme solution after centrifuging at 4000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was used to measure the SOD content at 550 nm, and POD activity was assessed following the method described by Pan et al. [64].

4.10. Quantification Analysis of Stress-Related Genes

The transcript levels of antioxidative gene NtSOD and stress-related genes, including NtERF, NtSAMD, AREB, and NtADC, were examined in the wild-type and transgenic plants under drought stress conditions. The NtActin gene was used as a reference. The qRT-PCR reaction was performed in 20 μL volumes containing 10 μL of SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), 1.0 µL of both forward and reverse primers to a final concentration of 200 µM, 2 μL of a template diluted 1: 5 of the cDNA, and 2.5 μL of PCR-grade ddH2O to a final volume of 20 μL. The qPCR was performed on an ABI QuantStudio 5 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the following procedure: 55 °C for 2 min, 94°C for 5 min, and 40 cycles consisting of denaturation 94 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min. Each experiment was independently repeated in triplicate. Relative transcript levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [65]. The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S3.

4.11. Statistical Analyses

Three independent samples were used for each analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (San Diego, CA, USA). Multiple range tests were used to detect significant differences between the mean values, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, p < 0.01, or p < 0.001.

5. Conclusions

In this study, 28 CmbZIP family genes were identified in the transcriptome of C. mongolicum, and 10 motifs were detected among these CmbZIP proteins. A candidate gene, CmbZIP9, was isolated. CmbZIP9 contains five exons and four introns. The overexpression of CmbZIP9 increased the drought tolerance of transgenic tobacco lines. The functions of the other CmbZIPs we identified in C. mongolicum and the additional functions of CmbZIP9 need to be further explored.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13152064/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.M. (Yueping Ma) collected the plants and designed the experiments; X.W., Y.M. (Yuan Meng), Z.W., S.Z. and T.G. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; X.W wrote the first draft; K.Z. and Y.M. (Yueping Ma) revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31872710).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available from NCBI GenBank at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. The accession numbers can be found in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The manuscript was approved by all authors for publication and no conflicts of interest exist regarding the submission of this manuscript. The authors declare that this research was performed without any commercial or financial relationships that could be interpreted as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Shao, H.; Tang, X. Recent advances in utilizing transcription factors to improve plant abiotic stress tolerance by transgenic technology. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, H.; Liu, C.; Li, Z.; Ran, Q.; Xie, G.; Wang, B.; Fang, S.; Chu, J.; Zhang, J. ZmbZIP4 contributes to stress resistance in maize by regulating ABA synthesis and root development. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 753–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yao, L.; Hao, X.; Cao, H.; Ding, C.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, X. ABA-dependent bZIP transcription factor, CsbZIP18, from Camellia sinensis negatively regulates freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 553–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Joo, H.; Baek, W.; Lim, C.W.; Lee, S.C. Post-translational modifications of bZIP transcription factors in abscisic acid signaling and drought responses. Curr. Genom. 2021, 22, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, Y.; Xia, J.; Jiang, Y.; Bao, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, D.; Zhang, D.; Yu, J.; Cang, J. Genome-wide identification and analysis of bZIP gene family and resistance of TaABI5 (TabZIP96) under freezing stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 2, 2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. An, J.; Yao, J.; Xu, R.; You, C.; Wang, X.; Hao, Y. Apple bZIP transcription factor MdbZIP44 regulates abscisic acid-promoted anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 2678–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhu, L.; Zhang, M.J.; Yang, X.Y.; Zi, Y.Q.; Yin, T.; Li, X.L.; Wen, K.; Zhao, K.; Wan, J.Q.; Zhang, H.Y.; et al. Genome-wide identification of bZIP transcription factors in 12 Rosaceae species and modeling of novel mechanisms of EjbZIPs response to salt stress. Plant Genome 2024, e20468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dröge-Laser, W.; Snoek, B.L.; Snel, B.; Weiste, C. The Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factor family-an update. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Guan, R.; Xu, S.; Lu, Z.; Su, L.; Zhang, L.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Liu, Z.; Duan, L.; et al. Genomic characterization of bZIP transcription factors related to andrographolide biosynthesis in Andrographis paniculata. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 223, 1619–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qu, D.; Wu, F.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, D.; Gu, L.; Yang, L.; Zhao, W.; Sun, Y.; Yang, J.; Tian, W.; et al. A bZIP transcription factor VabZIP12 from blueberry induced by dark septate endocyte improving the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2022, 315, 111135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cao, L.; Lu, X.; Zhang, P.; Wang, G.; Wei, L.; Wang, T. Systematic analysis of differentially expressed maize ZmbZIP genes between drought and rewatering transcriptome reveals bZIP family members involved in abiotic stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Joo, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Song, S.I. OsbZIP42 is a positive regulator of ABA signaling and confers drought tolerance to rice. Planta 2019, 249, 1521–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, W.; Qiu, X.; Yang, Y.; Kim, H.S.; Jia, X.; Yu, H.; Kwak, S.S. Sweetpotato bZIP transcription factor IbABF4 confers tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sahithi, B.M.; Razi, K.; Al Murad, M.; Vinothkumar, A.; Jagadeesan, S.; Benjamin, L.K.; Jeong, B.R.; Muneer, S. Comparative physiological and proteomic analysis deciphering tolerance and homeostatic signaling pathways in chrysanthemum under drought stress. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, T.; Wei, Q.; Wang, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhao, X.; Ma, C.; Gao, J.; Xu, Y.; Hong, B. CmNF-YB8 affects drought resistance in chrysanthemum by altering stomatal status and leaf cuticle thickness. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 741–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, H.; Liu, Z.; Hu, X.; Yin, J.; Li, W.; Rao, G.; Zhang, X.; Huang, C.; Anderson, N.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Chrysanthemum genetic resources and related genera of Chrysanthemum collected in China. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2009, 56, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, H.; Chen, F.; Chen, S.; Wu, G.; Guo, W. Molecular phylogeny of Chrysanthemum, Ajania and its allies (Anthemideae, Asteraceae) as inferred from nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast trnL-F IGS sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 2010, 284, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, Y.; Meng, Y.; Lin, J. Comparative Transcriptome analyses reveal different regulatory mechanisms in ecological adaptation between Chrysanthemum vestitum and Chrysanthemum mongolicum. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Y.; Kong, Q.; Tee, W.T.; Li, Y.; Low, P.M.; Patra, B.; Guo, L.; Yuan, L.; Ma, W. Transcription factor bZIP52 modulates Arabidopsis seed oil biosynthesis through interaction with WRINKLED1. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2628–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yue, L.; Pei, X.; Kong, F.; Zhao, L.; Lin, X. Divergence of functions and expression patterns of soybean bZIP transcription factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1150363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Souza, C.R.B.; Serrão, C.P.; Barros, N.L.F.; dos Reis, S.P.; Marques, D.N. Plant bZIP proteins: Potential use in agriculture—A Review. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2023, 25, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gu, C.H.; Hong, S.D.; Wang, J.; Shang, L.X.; Zhang, G.Z.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, Q.Q.; Ma, D.D. Identification and expression analysis of the bZIP and WRKY gene families during anthocyanins biosynthesis in Lagerstroemia indica L. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2024, 65, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ye, F.T.; Zhu, G.; Wu, S.F.; Du, Y.Y.; Pan, X.F.; Wu, Y.C.; Qian, Z.Y.; Li, Z.W.; Lin, W.X.; Fan, K. Conserved and divergent evolution of the bZIP transcription factor in five diploid Gossypium species. Planta 2023, 257, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Z.; Cheng, K.; Wan, L.; Yan, L.; Jiang, H.; Liu, S.; Lei, Y.; Liao, B. Genome-wide analysis of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor gene family in six legume genomes. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jakoby, M.; Weisshaar, B.; Dröge-Laser, W.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; Tiedemann, J.; Kroj, T.; Parcy, F.; bZIP Research Group. bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nijhawan, A.; Jain, M.; Tyagi, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. Genomic survey and gene expression analysis of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family in rice. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 333–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pourabed, E.; Ghane, G.F.; Soleymani, M.P.; Razavi, S.M.; Shobbar, Z.S. Basic leucine zipper family in barley: Genome-wide characterization of members and expression analysis. Molecular Biotech. 2015, 57, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miller, G.; Suzuki, N.; Ciftciyilmaz, S.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, W.D.; Gao, J.; Dou, T.X.; Shao, X.H.; Bi, F.C.; Sheng, O.; Deng, G.M.; Li, C.Y.; Hu, C.H.; Liu, J.H.; et al. Early cold-induced peroxidases and aquaporins are associated with high cold tolerance in Dajiao (Musa spp. ‘Dajiao’). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 282. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, L.; Yi, H. Differential expression of Arabidopsis defense-related genes in response to sulfur dioxide. Chemosphere 2012, 87, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, L.; Yi, H.; Liu, X.; Qi, H. Sulfur dioxide enhance drought tolerance of wheat seedlings through H2S signaling. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 207, 111248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Yan, C.; Ma, C.; Liu, J.; Dong, S. Effects of different drought degrees on physiological characteristics and endogenous hormones of soybean. Plants 2022, 11, 2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mittler, R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Breusegem, F.V. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Luan, Y.; Cui, J.; Li, J.; Jiang, N.; Liu, P.; Meng, J. Effective enhancement of resistance to Phytophthora infestans by overexpression of miR172a and b in Solanum lycopersicum. Planta 2018, 247, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cheng, S.; Tang, D.; Miller, W.B.; Shi, Y. Evaluation of salinity tolerance in honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) using growth ion accumulation, lipid peroxidation, and non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants system criteria. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. ElSayed, A.I.; El-Hamahmy, M.A.M.; Rafudeen, M.S.; Mohamed, A.H.; Omar, A.A. The impact of drought stress on antioxidant responses and accumulation of flavonolignans in Milk thistle (Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn). Plants 2019, 8, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khan, R.; Ma, X.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Iqbal, A.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, S. Circular drought-hardening confers drought tolerance via modulation of the antioxidant defense system, osmoregulation, and gene expression in tobacco. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 1073–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Norris, A.; Jiang, C.Z. S1-bZIP transcription factors play important roles in the regulation of fruit quality and stress response. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 802802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Willekens, H.; Chamnongpol, S.; Davey, M.; Schraudner, M.; Langebartels, C.; Van Montagu, M.; Inze, D.; Van Camp, W. Catalase is a sink for H2O2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C3 plants. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 4806–4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaushik, D.; Aryadeep, R. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front. Environ. Sci. 2014, 2, 53. [Google Scholar]
  42. Santos, A.D.A.; Silveira, J.A.G.D.; Bonifacio, A.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Figueiredo, M.D.V.B. Antioxidant response of cowpea co-inoculated with plant growth-promoting bacteria under salt stress. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhou, Y.; Hu, L.; Ye, S.; Jiang, L.; Liu, S. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene (CsCSD1) from Cucumis sativus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2018, 135, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Y.; He, Z.; Xie, Y.; Su, L.; Zhang, R.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Long, S. Drought resistance mechanisms of Phedimus aizoon L. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, S.; Qu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Dong, S. Effects of weak and strong drought conditions on physiological stability of flowering soybean. Plants 2022, 11, 2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, J.; Chu, J.; Ma, C.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Xiong, J.; Cheng, Z.M. Overexpression of an ABA-dependent grapevine bZIP transcription factor, VvABF2, enhances osmotic stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Huang, X.S.; Liu, J.H.; Chen, X.J. Overexpression of PtrABF gene, a bZIP transcription factor isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, enhances dehydration and drought tolerance in tobacco via scavenging ROS and modulating expression of stress-responsive genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, N.; Qin, J.; Tong, S.; Wang, W.; Jiang, Y. One AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Positively Regulates Pi Uptake and Drought Tolerance in Poplar. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jia, T.; Hou, J.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, B.; Feng, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhou, J.; Feng, G.; et al. Overexpression of the white clover TrSAMDC1 gene enhanced salt and drought resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 165, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ran, J.; Shang, C.; Mei, L.; Li, S.; Tian, T.; Qiao, G. Overexpression of CpADC from Chinese cherry (Cerasus pseudocerasus Lindl. ‘Manaohong’) promotes the ability of response to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Singh, D.; Laxmi, A. Transcriptional regulation of drought response: A tortuous network of transcriptional factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Charfeddine, S.; Saıdi, M.N.; Charfeddine, M.; Gargouri-Bouzid, R. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of the late embryogenesis abundant genes in potato with emphasis on dehydrins. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 42, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, J.H.; Nada, K.; Honda, C.; Kitashiba, H.; Wen, X.P.; Pang, X.M.; Moriguchi, T. Polyamine biosynthesis of apple callus under salt stress: Importance of the arginine decarboxylase pathway in stress response. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 2589–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mo, H.J.; Sun, Y.X.; Zhu, X.L.; Wang, X.F.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Yan, G.J.; Ma, Z.Y. Cotton S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase-mediated spermine biosynthesis is required for salicylic aci -and leucine-correlated signaling in the defense response to Verticillium dahliae. Planta 2016, 243, 1023–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Duvaud, S.; Gabella, C.; Lisacek, F.; Stockinger, H.; Ioannidis, V.; Durinx, C. Expasy, the Swiss Bioinformatics Resource Portal, as designed by its users. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W216–W227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Horton, P.; Park, K.J.; Obayashi, T.; Fujita, N.; Harada, H.; Adams-Collier, C.J.; Nakai, K. WoLF PSORT: Protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W585–W587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chen, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; Chen, H.; He, Y.; et al. TBtools-II: A “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Mol. Plant. 2023, 16, 1733–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhang, W.; Xu, H.; Duan, X.; Hu, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, L.; Ma, Y. Characterizing the leaf transcriptome of Chrysanthemum rhombifolium (Ling et C. Shih), a drought resistant, endemic plant from China. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 625985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hu, J.; Jin, Q.; Ma, Y. AfLFY, a LEAFY homolog in Argyranthemum frutescens, controls flowering time and leaf development. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, J.; Xu, H.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Y. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a Chrysanthemum vestitum GME homolog that enhances drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yaghoubian, I.; Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M.; Smith, D.L. Plant growth promoting microorganisms (PGPM) as an eco-friendly option to mitigate water deficit in soybean (Glycine max L.): Growth, physio-biochemical properties and oil content. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 191, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pan, Y.; Wu, L.; Yu, Z. Effect of salt and drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD isoenzymes of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch). Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 49, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kenneth, J.; Livak, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar]
Plants 13 02064 g001
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of bZIP proteins in C. mongolicum. The CmbZIPs are shown as clusters in the leaf transcriptome of C. mongolicum. Branch support was assessed with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The support values are provided at each node. The letters with different colors outside the circle indicate the various subgroups. AtbZIPs represent the bZIPs from A. thaliana. The 11 Chrysanthemum bZIPs are displayed with their sequence IDs and names.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of bZIP proteins in C. mongolicum. The CmbZIPs are shown as clusters in the leaf transcriptome of C. mongolicum. Branch support was assessed with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The support values are provided at each node. The letters with different colors outside the circle indicate the various subgroups. AtbZIPs represent the bZIPs from A. thaliana. The 11 Chrysanthemum bZIPs are displayed with their sequence IDs and names.
Plants 13 02064 g001
Plants 13 02064 g002
Figure 2. Conserved motif analysis of bZIP family in C. mongolicum. Conservative motifs are indicated with different colored boxes. The black line represents nonconserved sequences.
Figure 2. Conserved motif analysis of bZIP family in C. mongolicum. Conservative motifs are indicated with different colored boxes. The black line represents nonconserved sequences.
Plants 13 02064 g002
Plants 13 02064 g003
Figure 3. Identification of transgenic tobacco plants. (A) Genomic PCR for the identification of the transgenic plants. M: DL2000 marker, W: wild-type tobacco, lines 1–7: transgenic tobacco lines; uncropped gels are shown in Supplementary Figure S3. (B) Transcript levels of CmbZIP9 in wild-type and transgenic tobacco plants. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3. Identification of transgenic tobacco plants. (A) Genomic PCR for the identification of the transgenic plants. M: DL2000 marker, W: wild-type tobacco, lines 1–7: transgenic tobacco lines; uncropped gels are shown in Supplementary Figure S3. (B) Transcript levels of CmbZIP9 in wild-type and transgenic tobacco plants. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Plants 13 02064 g003
Plants 13 02064 g004
Figure 4. The constitutive expression of CmbZIP9 in tobacco enhanced drought tolerance. (A) Morphology of wild-type and CmbZIP9 transgenic plants before and after 7 days of drought stress treatment. (B) Relative water content (RWC) before and after drought treatment for 4 and 7 d. (C) MDA content before and after drought treatment for 4 and 7 d. (D) Peroxidase (POD) activity before and after drought treatment for 4 and 7 d. (E) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity before and after drought treatment for 4 and 7 d. The numbers 2, 4, and 6 indicate T1 generations of three different transgenic lines. Asterisks represent values that are significantly different from those of the wild type (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4. The constitutive expression of CmbZIP9 in tobacco enhanced drought tolerance. (A) Morphology of wild-type and CmbZIP9 transgenic plants before and after 7 days of drought stress treatment. (B) Relative water content (RWC) before and after drought treatment for 4 and 7 d. (C) MDA content before and after drought treatment for 4 and 7 d. (D) Peroxidase (POD) activity before and after drought treatment for 4 and 7 d. (E) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity before and after drought treatment for 4 and 7 d. The numbers 2, 4, and 6 indicate T1 generations of three different transgenic lines. Asterisks represent values that are significantly different from those of the wild type (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Plants 13 02064 g004
Plants 13 02064 g005
Figure 5. Expression levels of stress-related genes in wild-type and transgenic tobacco lines before and after 7 days of drought treatment. W: wild-type tobacco; 2, 4, and 6: T1 generations in three different transgenic lines. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks represent values that are significantly different from those of the wild type (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Expression levels of stress-related genes in wild-type and transgenic tobacco lines before and after 7 days of drought treatment. W: wild-type tobacco; 2, 4, and 6: T1 generations in three different transgenic lines. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks represent values that are significantly different from those of the wild type (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Plants 13 02064 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Meng, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, K.; Gao, T.; Ma, Y. Characterization of bZIP Transcription Factors in Transcriptome of Chrysanthemum mongolicum and Roles of CmbZIP9 in Drought Stress Resistance. Plants 2024, 13, 2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152064

AMA Style

Wang X, Meng Y, Zhang S, Wang Z, Zhang K, Gao T, Ma Y. Characterization of bZIP Transcription Factors in Transcriptome of Chrysanthemum mongolicum and Roles of CmbZIP9 in Drought Stress Resistance. Plants. 2024; 13(15):2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xuan, Yuan Meng, Shaowei Zhang, Zihan Wang, Kaimei Zhang, Tingting Gao, and Yueping Ma. 2024. "Characterization of bZIP Transcription Factors in Transcriptome of Chrysanthemum mongolicum and Roles of CmbZIP9 in Drought Stress Resistance" Plants 13, no. 15: 2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152064

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop