Next Article in Journal
Antioxidative, Metabolic and Vascular Medicinal Potentials of Natural Products in the Non-Edible Wastes of Fruits Belonging to the Citrus and Prunus Genera: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Na, K and Ca Salts on Growth, Physiological Performance, Ion Accumulation and Mineral Nutrition of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Shoot Priming Efficiency to Counteract Complex Metal Stress in Halotolerant Lobularia maritima
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Glycine-Rich RNA-Binding Protein AtGRP7 Functions in Nickel and Lead Tolerance in Arabidopsis

1
Interdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Convergence Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Rural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(2), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020187
Submission received: 30 November 2023 / Revised: 4 January 2024 / Accepted: 5 January 2024 / Published: 10 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Responses and Tolerance to Metal/Metalloid Toxicity III)

Abstract

:
Plant glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins (GRPs) play crucial roles in the response to environmental stresses. However, the functions of AtGRP7 in plants under heavy metal stress remain unclear. In the present study, in Arabidopsis, the transcript level of AtGRP7 was markedly increased by Ni but was decreased by Pb. AtGRP7-overexpressing plants improved Ni tolerance, whereas the knockout mutant (grp7) was more susceptible than the wild type to Ni. In addition, grp7 showed greatly enhanced Pb tolerance, whereas overexpression lines showed high Pb sensitivity. Ni accumulation was reduced in overexpression lines but increased in grp7, whereas Pb accumulation in grp7 was lower than that in overexpression lines. Ni induced glutathione synthase genes GS1 and GS2 in overexpression lines, whereas Pb increased metallothionein genes MT4a and MT4b and phytochelatin synthase genes PCS1 and PCS2 in grp7. Furthermore, Ni increased CuSOD1 and GR1 in grp7, whereas Pb significantly induced FeSOD1 and FeSOD2 in overexpression lines. The mRNA stability of GS2 and PCS1 was directly regulated by AtGRP7 under Ni and Pb, respectively. Collectively, these results indicate that AtGRP7 plays a crucial role in Ni and Pb tolerance by reducing Ni and Pb accumulation and the direct or indirect post-transcriptional regulation of genes related to heavy metal chelators and antioxidant enzymes.

1. Introduction

Heavy metal (HM) pollutants in the environment have increased tremendously because of industrial pollution, urban activities, and agricultural practices [1]. Soil HM contamination has become a worldwide environmental problem because HMs are not naturally degraded and accumulate continuously in the soil for a long time. Ni is an essential element for plant growth and development, is a cofactor of several enzymes, such as glyoxalase and urease, and is required in very low amounts in plants [2,3]. However, the excessive application of fertilizers and pesticides, as well as other anthropogenic activities such as battery manufacturing, has increased the release of Ni into the environment [4]. Similarly, Pb is a toxic nonessential element that is primarily released from mining, automobile exhausts, and industrial waste. Pb exerts highly toxic effects on the environment, even when introduced into plant cells in minute quantities [5]. Excess essential HMs (Ni, Mn, Zn, Fe, and Cu) and small amounts of hazardous nonessential HMs (Pb, Cd, As, and Hg) interfere with the physiological, biochemical, and metabolic processes of plants by disrupting the structural integrity of functional groups in important cellular molecules; this phenomenon inhibits important plant events, such as photosynthesis, respiration, and enzymatic activity, and negatively affects seed germination, plant growth, and production [6,7,8]. To prevent toxic reactions of HMs, plants employ complex resistance strategies, such as the chelation of cellular free HM ions via HM chelators, the sequestration of HM ions from the metabolically active cytoplasm into inactive compartments such as vacuoles and cell walls, and the homeostasis of HM-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) [8,9,10].
HM chelation is a powerful strategy for reducing free toxic HM ions in plant cells. Glutathione (GSH), phytochelatins (PCs), and metallothioneins (MTs) are HM-binding ligands that protect plant cells from the toxicity of free HM ions by complexing with and sequestering toxic metals [11,12]. The expression levels of genes associated with the syntheses of GSH (GSH synthetase, GS), PC (PC synthase, PCS), and MT in plants are usually dynamic in response to HM stress. These genes play pivotal roles in the detoxification and tolerance of HMs [11,12,13,14]. Moreover, high HM concentrations in plant cells induce oxidative stress by promoting ROS generation, which can damage cellular macromolecules, including lipids, proteins, and DNA, and cause the denaturation of cell structures and membranes, leading to cell death and plant growth inhibition [15]. Therefore, ROS removal is another strategy to alleviate HM toxicity. ROS scavenging is accompanied by an antioxidant system composed of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants that maintain the redox state of the cell. Antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), which dismutates O2 into H2O2, and peroxidase (POD), glutathione reductase (GR), and catalase (CAT), which convert H2O2 into H2O and O2, alleviate the adverse effects of oxidative stress and stabilize cell membranes in plants under HM stress [16,17,18]. Plant responses and adaptations to environmental stresses result from alterations in gene expression via transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation in plants [19,20,21,22]. Therefore, understanding the expression regulation of genes associated with HM chelators and antioxidant enzymes is important to understand the adaptation and tolerance mechanisms of plants under Ni and Pb stress.
Glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins (GRPs), which contain an RNA-binding domain at the N-terminus and a glycine-rich region at the C-terminus, play important roles in RNA metabolism at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels via either the direct or indirect binding of target RNAs under environmental stresses, such as cold temperatures, drought, wounding, UV radiation, and high salinity [23,24,25,26,27,28]. GRPs are involved in abiotic stress tolerance, but their functional roles in response to HMs are unclear. The expression levels of two maize GRPs are downregulated by Cr stress [29], whereas the expression of soybean GRP-like gene (GmGRPL) is upregulated by Al stress [30]. In addition, AtGRP3 knockdown and GmGRPL overexpression enhance Al tolerance in Arabidopsis [30,31]. The expression of AtGRP7, a well-characterized GRP in Arabidopsis, is altered by various stresses, such as cold, high salinity, or drought, and affects the stress tolerance in Arabidopsis [32] by RNA chaperone activity that regulates the export of mRNA. However, to date, the role of AtGRP7 in HM stress response remains to be elucidated.
Hence, the present study aimed to explore the functional roles of AtGRBP7 under Ni and Pb stress. We found that AtGRP7-overexpressing Arabidopsis showed enhanced Ni tolerance, whereas the grp7 knockout mutant was more susceptible than the wild type to Ni stress. The grp7 mutant showed higher tolerance to Pb than to Ni, whereas the overexpressing plants showed Pb sensitivity. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying AtGRP7-mediated Ni and Pb tolerance, the expression modulation of genes related to HM chelators and antioxidant enzymes was analyzed in the grp7 mutant and overexpressing lines during Ni and Pb exposure.

2. Results

2.1. Effects of Ni and Pb Stress on the Transcript Level of AtGRP7

To determine the effects of Ni and Pb treatments on the expression pattern of AtGRP7 in Arabidopsis, we treated 14-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings with 100 μM Ni and 500 μM Pb for different time periods (6, 12, and 24 h). qRT-PCR analysis showed that the transcript level of AtGRP7 was quickly upregulated by approximately 6-fold after 6 h of Ni treatment and further increased by approximately 9-fold at 12 h. After 24 h of Ni treatment, the expression of AtGRP7 gradually decreased by 6-fold (Figure 1A). By contrast, Pb treatment greatly reduced the transcript level of AtGRP7 within 6 h, and this decrease was maintained until 24 h (Figure 1B).

2.2. Effects of AtGRP7 on Germination and Seedling Growth under Ni and Pb Stress

To elucidate the functional role of AtGRP7 in response to Ni and Pb stress, we used three AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) and a grp7 knockout mutant as described in a previous study [32]. All genotypes showed similar germination rates and seedling growth under control conditions. Low concentrations of Ni (~20 μM) did not affect the germination rate or seedling growth in the wild type, grp7 mutant, or overexpression lines. Under 50 and 75 μM Ni, the germination rate of the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines was better, but the grp7 mutant showed slightly inhibited seed germination compared to the wild type (Figure 2A). In comparison with 50 and 75 μM Ni, 100 μM Ni remarkably retarded the germination of all genotypes and did not show significant differences in each genotype. Under 50, 75, or 100 μM Ni, the biomass including seedling growth and fresh weight of the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines was higher than that of the wild type. However, compared with that shown by the wild type, the grp7 mutant showed markedly retarded seedling growth and fresh weight (Figure 2B).
When the three genotypes were grown on solid medium supplemented with 500 or 700 μM Pb, the germination of the grp7 mutant was strongly promoted, but that of the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines was more delayed compared with that of the wild type (Figure 3A). In particular, Pb stress remarkably suppressed the post-germination seedling growth of the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines but considerably improved that of the grp7 mutant (Figure 3B). Notably, under 700 μM Pb, the cotyledons of the grp7 mutant grew well with cotyledon greening, whereas those of the overexpression lines did not show post-germination development.

2.3. Bioaccumulation of Ni and Pb

To determine the effect of AtGRP7 on Ni and Pb uptake, we treated the seedlings of the three genotypes with 100 μM Ni and 500 μM Pb for 24 h (Figure 4A,B). Ni accumulation increased in the grp7 mutant but decreased in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines compared with that in the wild type (Figure 4A). The AtGRP7-overexpressing lines accumulated more Pb than Ni, whereas the grp7 mutant accumulated less Pb than Ni when compared with those in the wild type (Figure 4B).
High concentrations of Ni and Pb in plant cells affect the cellular metabolism and cause cellular damage. To determine whether Ni and Pb can cause cell damage, we treated the seedlings of the three genotypes with 100 μM Ni and 500 μM Pb for 24 h and then stained them with Evans blue, a dye that stains dead cells blue (Figure 4C). The Ni-treated grp7 mutant showed a significantly stronger density of staining in the leaves than that of the Ni-treated wild type, whereas the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines exhibited a lower density of staining in the leaves. Under Pb treatment, the leaves of the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines showed strong staining density, but the grp7 mutant displayed a much lower staining density than that of the wild type (Figure 4C).

2.4. Effects of AtGRP7 on Transcript Levels of HM Chelators under Ni and Pb Stress

HM chelation reduces the intracellular toxicity of free Ni and Pb ions and increases the tolerance of plants to these HMs. To explore the function of AtGRP7 in Ni and Pb tolerance, we measured the transcript levels of genes related to major HM chelators, such as GSH, PCs, and MT, through qRT-PCR (Figure 5). Under control conditions, AtGRP7 downregulated MT1c and MT2a, whereas it upregulated MT2b in the grp7 mutant and MT4b in AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (Figure S1). Under Ni stress, none of the genotypes displayed significant alterations in MT1a, MT4a, or MT4b expression. However, all genotypes showed a reduction in MT1C expression (Figure 5A). Meanwhile, Ni stress significantly reduced the expression of MT2a in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines and the expression of MT3 in the mutant and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines. Although the MT2b expression of the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines did not change, the MT2b expression of the wild type increased by 2.7-fold, whereas that of the grp7 mutant decreased. Interestingly, the GS1 and GS2 expression in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines greatly increased by approximately 2-fold and 4–6-fold, respectively. The wild type also showed 1.6- and 3-fold upregulation in GS1 and GS2 expression, respectively. However, the transcripts in the grp7 mutant did not show any changes (Figure 5A). By contrast, the expression levels of the PC synthesis genes (PCS1 and PCS2) were slightly reduced or remained unchanged in all genotypes. Under Pb stress, the expression levels of MT1a, MT1c, MT2a, and MT2b were severely downregulated in all genotypes, whereas the expression of MT3 was only slightly reduced in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (Figure 5B). The expression levels of MT4a and MT4b were increased by 2-fold in the grp7 mutant, which were higher than those in the wild type and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines. The expression levels of GS1 and GS2 were significantly downregulated in all genotypes. Pb stress increased PCS1 expression by approximately 2-fold in the wild type and the mutant and PCS2 expression in the mutant. However, it reduced the expression levels of PCS1 and PCS2 in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines, which were lower in the mutant (Figure 5B).

2.5. Effects of AtGRP7 on Transcript Levels of Antioxidant Enzymes under Ni and Pb Stress

Excess Ni and Pb cause oxidative cellular damage through ROS generation; thus, understanding the transcriptional regulation of antioxidant enzyme genes involved in ROS scavenging is important. Under control conditions, AtGRP7 downregulated FeSOD1 and FeSOD2 in the grp7 mutant, whereas it upregulated CAT3 in AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (Figure S1). The transcript levels of SODs, CATs, and GRs in the Ni- and Pb-treated seedlings are shown in Figure 6. Ni stress increased CuSOD1 expression by approximately 2-fold in the wild type and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines and by 4-fold in the grp7 mutant (Figure 6A). However, it downregulated the expression of FeSOD2, FeSOD3, MnSOD1, and CAT3 and did not change the expression of CAT1 in all genotypes. Meanwhile, under the same treatment, the CuSOD2 and FeSOD1 expression levels were only slightly higher in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines than in the grp7 mutant. CAT2 expression did not change in the wild type but was reduced in the grp7 mutant and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines. Notably, GR1 expression increased in the wild type and grp7 mutant by approximately 5.3-fold and 7.5-fold, respectively, but only by 1.5–3.0-fold in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (Figure 6A). GR2 expression only slightly increased in the mutant. Under Pb stress, CuSOD1 and CuSOD2 expression did not show significant alterations in the wild type and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines but decreased in the mutant. FeSOD1 and FeSOD2 expression significantly decreased in the wild type and grp7 mutant but increased in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines by 2- and 3.5–5.6-fold, respectively. Moreover, Pb stress significantly reduced FeSOD3 and CAT2 expression in all genotypes. CAT1 and CAT3 expression decreased in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines and grp7 mutant but did not change in the wild type. Interestingly, MnSOD1 expression increased by approximately 5-fold in the grp7 mutant but decreased in the wild type and grp7 mutant. Furthermore, GR1 expression increased in the wild type (2.7-fold), grp7 mutant (1.9-fold), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (1.6–1.7-fold), whereas GR2 expression markedly decreased in all the three genotypes (Figure 6B).

2.6. Effects of AtGRP7 on mRNA Stability under Ni and Pb Stress

To understand the molecular mechanism of AtGRP7 on the post-transcriptional regulation, we examined whether AtGRP7 affects the stabilization of mRNAs such as GS2, GR1, MT4a, PCS1, FeSOD1, and FeSOD2 which shows large alteration under Ni or Pb stress (Figure 7). Transcription inhibitors (TI) including actinomycin D and cordycepin effectively suppressed the transcript levels of all genes in all genotypes. Similarly, the application of Ni or Pb with TI gradually decreased the transcript levels of all target genes in all genotypes (Figure 7). GS2 transcripts were more stable in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines but degraded more rapidly in the mutant compared to the wild type in the presence of TI and Ni (Figure 7A). These results suggest that the GS2 transcript is directly regulated by an AtGRP7-mediated mRNA stabilization. We found that the PCS1 transcript was more reduced in the wild type than the mutant and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines at 3 h. However, no noticeable differences were observed between the wild type, mutant, and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines in mRNA stability of GR1 under Ni stress as well as MT4a, FeSOD1, and FeSOD2 under Pb stress. Among the genes, stability of FeSOD1 decreased much more rapidly under Pb stress (Figure 7B).

3. Discussion

Although previous studies have revealed the important role of AtGRP7 in the response to abiotic stress [32], the functional role of AtGRP7 under HM stress has not been explored in plants. This study is the first to demonstrate a tolerance mechanism for Ni and Pb stress governed by AtGRP7 in Arabidopsis. In the present study, the transcript levels of AtGRP7 were markedly upregulated by Ni but downregulated by Pb (Figure 1). It is likely that several cis-regulatory elements, such as DPBF1&2, MYB4, RAV1-A, bHLH, GATA and W-box, in the promoter of AtGRP7 are associated with the differential regulation of AtGRP7 in response to Ni and Pb stress. It would be interesting to further explore which cis-regulatory elements are responsible for the altered expression patterns of AtGRP7 in response to Ni and Pb stress. The different regulation of AtGRP7 by Ni and Pb may lead to contrasting functions of AtGRP7 in Ni and Pb responses, as revealed by phenotype analysis. AtGRP7 overexpression enhanced germination and seedling growth under Ni stress but had detrimental effects on these processes under Pb stress. In contrast, the seedling growth of the grp7 mutant was severely inhibited by Ni stress but promoted by Pb stress (Figure 2 and Figure 3). These findings suggest that AtGRP7 functions as a positive and negative regulator of Ni and Pb tolerance, respectively. As AtGRP7 plays an important role under Ni and Pb stress, the response mechanisms of the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines and grp7 mutant need to be elucidated.
High concentrations of intracellular Ni and Pb affect various metabolic pathways, because of their strong affinity for the –SH functional groups of essential biomolecules, negatively affecting biological metabolism and plant growth [14,33]. Therefore, restricting the entry of Ni and Pb is important for Ni and Pb stress tolerance in plants. Our findings showed a correlation between maintenance of low Ni/Pb content and Ni/Pb tolerance. A low Ni accumulation in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines and high Ni contents in the grp7 mutant indicate that AtGRP7 acts as a negative regulator of Ni uptake. By contrast, a high Pb accumulation in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines and low Pb contents in the grp7 mutant indicates that AtGRP7 acts as a positive regulator of Pb uptake (Figure 4A,B). These opposite accumulation patterns of Ni and Pb result in contrasting cell damage in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines and grp7 mutant under Ni and Pb stress (Figure 4C). It is likely that AtGRP7 directly or indirectly regulates Ni and Pb uptake-related genes such as transporters. Further exploration of how AtGRP7 regulates the expression of heavy metal transporters would be an interesting future experiment.
In general, plants produce low-molecular-weight thiols, such as GSH, PCs, and MT, which have a high affinity for HMs to reduce the toxicity of free HM ions in plant cells, conferring HM tolerance to plants [11,14]. Ni-elevated GSH synthesis enhances Ni tolerance in some plants, such as mustard, Arabidopsis, and Thlaspi goesingense [34,35]. Our results showed that Ni significantly increased the expression levels of GSH synthesis genes, especially GS2, without affecting the upregulation of MT and PC synthesis genes in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (Figure 5A). These results suggest that GSH is important for Ni responseas reported in previous studies, and that GSH is preferentially used over MTs and PCs to reduce Ni toxicity and improve Ni tolerance. Interestingly, unlike Ni, Pb stimulated the MT and PC synthesis pathways more than the GSH synthesis pathway in the grp7 mutant (Pb tolerant). Although MT4a and MT4b were significantly induced by Pb in grp7 mutant, the expression level of MT4b in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines remained 2-fold higher than that of the grp7 mutant under control conditions (Figure 5B and Figure S1). It can be interpreted that MT4b induction via Pb in the grp7 mutant is much greater than the results shown in Figure 5B. Additionally, PC synthases (PCS1 and PCS2) in the grp7 mutant were significantly higher than those in the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines. These results suggest that MT and PC are more crucial than GSH in Pb chelation, possibly reducing the deleterious effects of Pb toxicity such as cell damage and improving the Pb tolerance of the grp7 mutant.
Ni and Pb induce ROS generation in plant cells and induce oxidative stress, which damages proteins, lipids, membranes, and nucleic acids, leading to cell death [15,33,36]. The dark color after Evans blue staining of the leaves from the Ni-treated grp7 mutant and Pb-treated AtGRP7-overexpressing lines suggested an abundance of oxidative stress and severe cell damage (Figure 4C), whereas a relatively light color of staining was observed in the leaves of the Ni-treated AtGRP7-overexpressing lines and Pb-treated grp7 mutant. This result suggests that Ni and Pb tolerance is correlated with reduced oxidative damage, which is consistent with the results of previous studies [37,38]. Given that antioxidant enzymes can scavenge ROS to mitigate cellular damage, whether Ni and Pb tolerance is related to the gene expression of ROS-scavenging enzymes is worth investigating. Ni and Pb stimulate the activities and gene expression of antioxidant enzymes [3,36]. Thus, the active enzymatic ROS scavenging system provides a protective response to Ni and Pb stress and confers Ni and Pb tolerance. In this study, Ni decreased the expression of most genes (CuSOD2, FeSOD2, FeSOD3, MnSOD1, and CAT3) in the wild type, while it significantly upregulated the expression of CuSOD1 and GR1 (Figure 6A). Inconsistent with the findings from the present study, a previous study reported that Ni upregulates CAT, POD, APX, and GR but downregulates SOD in rice leaves [39]. The present and previous results suggest that antioxidant enzyme genes are differentially regulated by Ni depending on the plant species and that GR is a crucial Ni-inducible gene in both rice and Arabidopsis. Interestingly, CuSOD1 and GR1 induced by Ni in the wild type were also significantly increased by Ni to a much higher level in the grp7 mutant compared to the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines. On the other hand, the AtGRP7-overexpressing lines showed considerably higher FeSOD1 and FeSOD2 expression than the grp7 mutant under Pb stress (Figure 6B). These results suggest that Ni- and Pb-sensitive plants may more likely suffer from the overproduction of ROS, such as O2 and H2O2, than Ni- and Pb-tolerant plants and that, presumably, the induced ROS-scavenging genes in Ni- and Pb-sensitive plants can be utilized to overcome excessive oxidative stress induced by Ni and Pb. By contrast, the significant induction of MnSOD1 may play a partial role in ROS scavenging in the grp7 mutant. AtGRP7-mediated antioxidant enzyme gene expression shows various patterns depending on the genotype; hence, the correlation between antioxidant enzyme gene regulation and Ni or Pb tolerance is difficult to explain.
Post-transcriptional RNA regulation, including pre-mRNA splicing, polyadenylation, mRNA transport, and stability, is a fundamental step in gene expression regulation. Since it is believed that GRPs are involved in post-transcriptional RNA regulation [27], we examined whether AtGRP7 contributes to the mRNA stability of target gene transcripts which shows strong modulation during Ni and Pb stress conditions. It is obvious that the GS2 transcript was decreased more rapidly in the grp7 mutant than AtGRP7-overexpressing lines under Ni stress (Figure 7), implying that AtGRP7 directly contributes to the mRNA stability of GS2, resulting in an increase in GS2 transcripts (Figure 5). More stable PCS1 in the mutant than in the wild type over 3 h under Pb stress is believed to contribute to maintaining the high expression level of PCS1 (Figure 5 and Figure 7). However, no significant differences in target mRNA decay among the wild type, mutant, and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines were found in most genes such as GR1 under Ni stress as well as MT4a, FeSOD1, and FeSOD2 under Pb stress, suggesting that AtGRP7 does not influence the stability of the target mRNAs but may affect other RNA regulation mechanisms such as splicing. Taken together, these results indicate that AtGRP7 differently regulates the stability of target mRNAs. To better understand the post-transcriptional RNA regulation of target genes by AtGRP7, questions of whether AtGRP7 can directly bind to these RNAs and how AtGRP7 affects the stability or splicing of its target transcripts under Ni and Pb stress warrant further studies. In addition, it would be interesting to further explore whether AtGRP7 can affect the protein level of heavy metal chelators and the activity of antioxidant enzymes involved in Ni and Pb response.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia-0 (Col-0) ecotype was used in this study. Arabidopsis AtGRP7 T-DNA-tagged knockout mutant (KO, PST18261) and AtGRP7-overexpressing transgenic plants (T6, T7, and T9) were used throughout this study, as described previously [32]. The seeds were sterilized using 70% ethanol and 1% NaClO and then washed with sterile water several times. The seeds were sown on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 3% sucrose and were stratified at 4 °C for 3 days in darkness. The seeds were grown in a growth room maintained at 22 °C under long day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod cycle).

4.2. Germination and Seedling Growth Assays under Ni and Pb Stress

Wild type, mutant, and transgenic seeds were harvested at the same time and were used for the analysis of germination and seedling growth. To determine the effect of Ni and Pb stress on germination and seedling growth, the sterilized seeds were sown on a half-strength MS agar medium supplemented with various concentrations of NiCl2 (50, 75, and 100 μM) and PbSO4 (500 and 700 μM). The seeds were stratified at 4 °C for 3 days and transferred to 23 °C under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod cycle). The germination rate was investigated for 6 days. For phenotypic analysis of post-germination growth, the germinated seeds were vertically grown, and then the root length and fresh weight of the seedlings were measured. At least three independent replicates were performed for all experiments.

4.3. Ni and Pb Treatment

To examine the heavy metal content and gene expression, wild type, mutant, and transgenic seeds were placed on the filter papers supplemented with MS agar medium and allowed to germinate and grow. Fourteen-day-old plants on the filter papers were transferred and treated with solutions containing 100 µM Ni or 500 µM Pb for 24 h. The harvested samples were used for RNA isolation and ICP analysis.

4.4. Determination of Ni and Pb Accumulation

Ni or Pb-treated plants were rinsed several times with deionized water and dried for 72 h in an oven at 65 °C. The dried samples were milled to powder, and Ni and Pb concentrations were detected via inductively coupled plasma-spectrometry (ICP, Perkin Elmer Optima 2200 DV, Waltham, MA, USA). The entire experiment was replicated three times.

4.5. Evans Blue Staining Analysis

The cell viabilities of the plant leaves were determined using the Evans blue staining method [40]. Seedlings with similar growth were treated with 100 μM Ni and 500 μM Pb for 24 h, and the seedlings were stained with 0.25% (w/v) Evans blue dye for 10 min. The surface of the stained samples was washed three times with water and then observed.

4.6. Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the harvested Arabidopsis seedlings using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR analysis was performed using the 2X Real-Time PCR smart mix (SolGent, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) and conducted using the Rotor-Gene Q PCR cycler (Qiagen). Actin was used as the internal control. The primers used for the qRT-PCR analysis are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Three independent replicates were performed for all experiments with different RNA samples.

4.7. mRNA Stability Analysis

Fourteen-day-old seedlings of wild type, mutant, and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines growing on half-strength MS medium were transferred to liquid half-strength MS medium for 1 h and harvested as time 0 h controls. Subsequently, transcription inhibitors (100 µM cordycepin and 10 µM actinomycin D) used to block the transcription of genes were added to the liquid medium containing 100 µM Ni or 500 µM Pb. The total RNAs extracted from the harvested samples at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 12 h were used for qRT-PCR assay to elucidate the stability of target gene transcripts.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted with at least three repetitions. All data are presented as the means ± standard deviations. Statistically significant differences among treatments were analyzed using ANOVA (SPSS for Windows version 19) followed by Student’s t-test analysis (SigmaPlot version 13 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and defined as p < 0.05 in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13020187/s1, Table S1: Primers for qRT-PCR used in this study; Figure S1: Expression levels of heavy metal chelators (A) and antioxidant enzymes (B) under normal conditions. Each value is the mean ± SD of three replicates.

Author Contributions

Y.-O.K. and H.K. conceived the project and designed the experiments. Y.-O.K., M.S. and J.K. performed the experiments and data analysis. J.K., H.K. and Y.-O.K. supervised the research and prepared the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07045677), and from the Regional Innovation Strategy through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education (2021RIS-002).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pilon-Smits, E. Phytoremediation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.; Zamble, D.B. Nickel homeostasis and nickel regulation: An overview. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4617–4643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shahzad, B.; Tanveer, M.; Rehman, A.; Cheema, S.A.; Fahad, S.; Rehman, S.; Sharma, A. Nickel; whether toxic or essential for plants and environment-A review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hassan, M.U.; Chattha, M.U.; Khan, I.; Chattha, M.B.; Aamer, M.; Nawaz, M.; Ali, A.; Khan, M.A.U.; Khan, T.A. Nickel toxicity in plants: Reasons, toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and remediation possibilities—A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 12673–12688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zeng, L.S.; Liao, M.; Chen, C.L.; Huang, C.Y. Effects of lead contamination on soil enzymatic activities, microbial biomass, and rice physiological indices in soil–lead–rice (Oryza sativa L.) system. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2007, 67, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tamás, M.J.; Sharma, S.K.; Ibstedt, S.; Jacobson, T.; Christen, P. Heavy metals and metalloids as a cause for protein misfolding and aggregation. Biomolecules 2014, 4, 252–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Emamverdian, A.; Ding, Y.; Mokhberdoran, F.; Xie, Y. Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 756120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jalmi, S.K.; Bhagat, P.K.; Verma, D.; Noryang, S.; Tayyeba, S.; Singh, K.; Sharma, D.; Sinha, A.K. Traversing the links between heavy metal stress and plant signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cobbett, C.; Goldsbrough, P. Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: Roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Riyazuddin, R.; Nisha, N.; Ejaz, B.; Khan, M.I.R.; Kumar, M.; Ramteke, P.W.; Gupta, R. A comprehensive review on the heavy metal toxicity and sequestration in plants. Biomolecules 2021, 12, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anjum, N.A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Thangavel, P.; Roychoudhury, A.; Gill, S.S.; Rodrigo, M.A.M.; Adam, V.; Fujita, M.; Kizek, R. Jacks of metal/metalloid chelation trade in plants—An overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hasan, M.K.; Cheng, Y.; Kanwar, M.K.; Chu, X.-Y.; Ahammed, G.J.; Qi, Z.-Y. Responses of plant proteins to heavy metal stress—A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thakur, M.; Praveen, S.; Divte, P.R.; Mitra, R.; Kumar, M.; Gupta, C.K.; Kalidindi, U.; Bansal, R.; Roy, S.; Anand, A. Metal tolerance in plants: Molecular and physicochemical interface determines the “not so heavy effect” of heavy metals. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 131957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Salbitani, G.; Maresca, V.; Cianciullo, P.; Bossa, R.; Carfagna, S.; Basile, A. Non-protein thiol compounds and antioxidant responses involved in bryophyte heavy-metal tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shahid, M.; Pourrut, B.; Dumat, C.; Nadeem, M.; Aslam, M.; Pinelli, E. Heavy-metal-induced reactive oxygen species: Phytotoxicity and physicochemical changes in plants. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 232, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berni, R.; Luyckx, M.; Xu, X.; Legay, S.; Sergeant, K.; Hausman, J.-F.; Lutts, S.; Cai, G.; Guerriero, G. Reactive oxygen species and heavy metal stress in plants: Impact on the cell wall and secondary metabolism. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Glisovic, T.; Bachorik, J.L.; Yong, J.; Dreyfuss, G. RNA-binding proteins and post-transcriptional gene regulation. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 1977–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bach-Pages, M.; Homma, F.; Kourelis, J.; Kaschani, F.; Mohammed, S.; Kaiser, M.; van der Hoorn, R.A.; Castello, A.; Preston, G.M. Discovering the RNA-binding proteome of plant leaves with an improved RNA interactome capture method. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, N.; Huang, Y.; Huang, S. Phase separation of Arabidopsis EMB1579 controls transcription, mRNA splicing, and development. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yan, Y.; Gan, J.; Tao, Y.; Okita, T.W.; Tian, L. RNA-binding proteins: The key modulator in stress granule formation and abiotic stress response. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 882596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sachetto-Martins, G.; Franco, L.O.; de Oliveira, D.E. Plant glycine-rich proteins: A family or just proteins with a common motif? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1492, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Floris, M.; Mahgoub, H.; Lanet, E.; Robaglia, C.; Menand, B. Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in plants during abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3168–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, D.H.; Kwak, K.J.; Kim, M.K.; Park, S.J.; Yang, K.-Y.; Kang, H. Expression of Arabidopsis glycine-rich RNA-binding protein AtGRP2 or AtGRP7 improves grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa) under drought stress conditions. Plant Sci. 2014, 214, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ciuzan, O.; Hancock, J.; Pamfil, D.; Wilson, I.; Ladomery, M. The evolutionarily conserved multifunctional glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins play key roles in development and stress adaptation. Physiol. Plant. 2015, 153, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Czolpinska, M.; Rurek, M. Plant glycine-rich proteins in stress response: An emerging, still prospective story. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marondedze, C. The increasing diversity and complexity of the RNA-binding protein repertoire in plants. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2020, 287, 20201397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, R.; Gao, F.; Guo, B.-Q.; Huang, J.-C.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.-J. Short-term chromium-stress-induced alterations in the maize leaf proteome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11125–11144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, L.; Cai, Y.; Liu, X.; Guo, C.; Yao, W.; Sun, S.; Wu, C.; Jiang, B.; Han, T.; Hou, W. GmGRP-like gene confers Al tolerance in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mangeon, A.; Pardal, R.; Menezes-Salgueiro, A.D.; Duarte, G.L.; de Seixas, R.; Cruz, F.P.; Cardeal, V.; Magioli, C.; Ricachenevsky, F.K.; Margis, R. AtGRP3 is implicated in root size and aluminum response pathways in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE. 2016, 11, e0150583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kim, J.S.; Jung, H.J.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, K.A.; Goh, C.H.; Woo, Y.; Oh, S.H.; Han, Y.S.; Kang, H. Glycine-rich RNA-binding protein7 affects abiotic stress responses by regulating stomata opening and closing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 55, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Amari, T.; Ghnaya, T.; Abdelly, C. Nickel, cadmium and lead phytotoxicity and potential of halophytic plants in heavy metal extraction. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 111, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Freeman, J.L.; Salt, D.E. The metal tolerance profile of Thlaspi goesingense is mimicked in Arabidopsis thaliana heterologously expressing serine acetyl-transferase. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khan, M.I.R.; Khan, N.A.; Masood, A.; Per, T.S.; Asgher, M. Hydrogen peroxide alleviates nickel-inhibited photosynthetic responses through increase in use-efficiency of nitrogen and sulfur, and glutathione production in mustard. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rasouli, F.; Hassanpouraghdam, M.B.; Pirsarandib, Y.; Aazami, M.A.; Asadi, M.; Ercisli, S.; Mehrabani, L.V.; Puglisi, I.; Baglieri, A. Improvements in the biochemical responses and Pb and Ni phytoremediation of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia L.) plants through Funneliformis mosseae inoculation. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, Y.-O.; Gwon, Y.; Kim, J. Exogenous cysteine improves mercury uptake and tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating the expression of heavy metal chelators and antioxidative enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 898247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Tan, P.; Chang, L.; Yue, Z.; Zeng, C.; Li, M.; Liu, Z.; Dong, X.; Yan, M. Exogenous proline mitigates toxic effects of cadmium via the decrease of cadmium accumulation and reestablishment of redox homeostasis in Brassica juncea. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rizwan, M.; Mostofa, M.G.; Ahmad, M.Z.; Imtiaz, M.; Mehmood, S.; Adeel, M.; Dai, Z.; Li, Z.; Aziz, O.; Zhang, Y. Nitric oxide induces rice tolerance to excessive nickel by regulating nickel uptake, reactive oxygen species detoxification and defense-related gene expression. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, L.; Pei, Y.; Wang, H.; Jin, Z.; Liu, Z.; Qiao, Z.; Fang, H.; Zhang, Y. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates cadmium-induced cell death through restraining ROS accumulation in roots of Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2015, 2015, 804603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression level of AtGRP7 under Ni and Pb stress. Fourteen-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were treated with 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) for 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, and transcript level of AtGRP7 was determined via qRT-PCR. Each value is mean ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with control (p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Expression level of AtGRP7 under Ni and Pb stress. Fourteen-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were treated with 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) for 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, and transcript level of AtGRP7 was determined via qRT-PCR. Each value is mean ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with control (p < 0.01).
Plants 13 00187 g001
Figure 2. Effects of Ni stress on seed germination and seedling growth of wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. (A) Wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were sown on 1/2 MS medium containing 50 or 75 μM NiCl2, and seed germination rate was scored. (B) The germinated seeds were grown vertically, and primary root length and fresh weight of the seedlings were measured on day 10 of transplantation. Each value is mean ± SD of three replications, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with wild type (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Effects of Ni stress on seed germination and seedling growth of wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. (A) Wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were sown on 1/2 MS medium containing 50 or 75 μM NiCl2, and seed germination rate was scored. (B) The germinated seeds were grown vertically, and primary root length and fresh weight of the seedlings were measured on day 10 of transplantation. Each value is mean ± SD of three replications, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with wild type (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Plants 13 00187 g002
Figure 3. Effects of Pb stress on seed germination and seedling growth of wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. (A) Wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were sown on 1/2 MS medium containing 500 or 700 μM PbSO4 and seed germination rate was scored. Each value is mean ± SD of three replications, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with wild type (p < 0.05). (B) The germinated seeds were grown vertically, and primary root lengths of the seedlings were measured on day 10 of transplantation.
Figure 3. Effects of Pb stress on seed germination and seedling growth of wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. (A) Wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were sown on 1/2 MS medium containing 500 or 700 μM PbSO4 and seed germination rate was scored. Each value is mean ± SD of three replications, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with wild type (p < 0.05). (B) The germinated seeds were grown vertically, and primary root lengths of the seedlings were measured on day 10 of transplantation.
Plants 13 00187 g003
Figure 4. Ni and Pb accumulation and cell damage in wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. Fourteen-day-old seedlings of wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were treated with 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) for 24 h. Each value is mean ± SD of three independent experiments, and different letters indicate significant differences between different genotypes (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test). (C) Visualization of cell death in leaves of Arabidopsis via Evans blue staining.
Figure 4. Ni and Pb accumulation and cell damage in wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. Fourteen-day-old seedlings of wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were treated with 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) for 24 h. Each value is mean ± SD of three independent experiments, and different letters indicate significant differences between different genotypes (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test). (C) Visualization of cell death in leaves of Arabidopsis via Evans blue staining.
Plants 13 00187 g004
Figure 5. Effects of Ni and Pb on the expression levels of heavy metal chelators in wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. Fourteen-day-old seedlings of wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were treated with 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) for 24 h. The transcript levels of MT, GSH, and PC synthesis genes were analyzed via qRT-PCR and were normalized to mRNA level of actin, used as internal control. Mock-treated wild type was set to 1 as a control for each gene (dotted line). Each value is the mean ± SD of three replicates and different letters indicate significant differences between different genotypes (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 5. Effects of Ni and Pb on the expression levels of heavy metal chelators in wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. Fourteen-day-old seedlings of wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were treated with 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) for 24 h. The transcript levels of MT, GSH, and PC synthesis genes were analyzed via qRT-PCR and were normalized to mRNA level of actin, used as internal control. Mock-treated wild type was set to 1 as a control for each gene (dotted line). Each value is the mean ± SD of three replicates and different letters indicate significant differences between different genotypes (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Plants 13 00187 g005
Figure 6. Effects of Ni and Pb on the expression levels of antioxidant enzymes in wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. Fourteen-day-old seedlings of wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were treated with 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) for 24 h. Expression levels of the enzymes were normalized to mRNA level of actin, used as internal control. Mock-treated wild type was set to 1 as a control for each gene (dotted line). Each value is the mean ± SD of three replicates, and different letters indicate significant differences between different genotypes (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 6. Effects of Ni and Pb on the expression levels of antioxidant enzymes in wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants. Fourteen-day-old seedlings of wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were treated with 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) for 24 h. Expression levels of the enzymes were normalized to mRNA level of actin, used as internal control. Mock-treated wild type was set to 1 as a control for each gene (dotted line). Each value is the mean ± SD of three replicates, and different letters indicate significant differences between different genotypes (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Plants 13 00187 g006
Figure 7. mRNA stability of target genes via AtGRP7. Two-week-old seedlings of wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were subjected to 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) with transcription inhibitors, and the target mRNA levels were examined at different time points. Each value is mean ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with control (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 7. mRNA stability of target genes via AtGRP7. Two-week-old seedlings of wild type (Col), grp7 mutant (KO), and AtGRP7-overexpressing lines (T6, T7, and T9) were subjected to 100 μM Ni (A) and 500 μM Pb (B) with transcription inhibitors, and the target mRNA levels were examined at different time points. Each value is mean ± SD of three replicates, and asterisks indicate significant differences compared with control (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Plants 13 00187 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.-O.; Safdar, M.; Kang, H.; Kim, J. Glycine-Rich RNA-Binding Protein AtGRP7 Functions in Nickel and Lead Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plants 2024, 13, 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020187

AMA Style

Kim Y-O, Safdar M, Kang H, Kim J. Glycine-Rich RNA-Binding Protein AtGRP7 Functions in Nickel and Lead Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plants. 2024; 13(2):187. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020187

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Yeon-Ok, Mahpara Safdar, Hunseung Kang, and Jangho Kim. 2024. "Glycine-Rich RNA-Binding Protein AtGRP7 Functions in Nickel and Lead Tolerance in Arabidopsis" Plants 13, no. 2: 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020187

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop