Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Omics Analysis Reveals Cold-Induced Metabolic Reprogramming and Alternative Splicing in Dendrobium officinale
Previous Article in Journal
Seasonal Variation in Nutritional and Chemical Profiles of Wild Opuntia ficus-indica Fruits
Previous Article in Special Issue
Drought Tolerance in Plants: Physiological and Molecular Responses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

MicroRNAs in Plant Genetic Regulation of Drought Tolerance and Their Function in Enhancing Stress Adaptation

by
Yryszhan Zhakypbek
1,*,
Ayaz M. Belkozhayev
2,3,*,
Aygul Kerimkulova
2,*,
Bekzhan D. Kossalbayev
2,4,5,
Toktar Murat
1,6,7,
Serik Tursbekov
1,
Gaukhar Turysbekova
8,
Alnura Tursunova
9,
Kuanysh T. Tastambek
4,5 and
Suleyman I. Allakhverdiev
10,11,12
1
Department of Surveying and Geodesy, Mining and Metallurgical Institute Named After O.A. Baikonurov, Satbayev University, Almaty 050043, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Geology and Oil-Gas Business Institute Named After K. Turyssov, Satbayev University, Almaty 050043, Kazakhstan
3
Department of Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
4
Ecology Research Institute, Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh Turkish University, Turkistan 161200, Kazakhstan
5
Sustainability of Ecology and Bioresources, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi 71, Almaty 050038, Kazakhstan
6
Department of Agronomy and Forestry, Faculty of Agrotechnology, Kozybayev University, Petropavlovsk 150000, Kazakhstan
7
Department of Soil Ecology, Kazakh Research Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Named After U.U. Uspanov, Al-Farabi Ave. 75, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
8
Department of Metallurgy and Mineral Processing, Satbayev University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan
9
Kazakh Research Institute of Plant Protection and Quarantine Named After Zhazken Zhiembayev, Almaty 050070, Kazakhstan
10
Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1-12, 119991 Moscow, Russia
11
Controlled Photobiosynthesis Laboratory, K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology RAS, Botanicheskaya Street 35, 127276 Moscow, Russia
12
Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul 34353, Turkey
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(3), 410; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030410
Submission received: 20 December 2024 / Revised: 18 January 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 30 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drought Responses and Adaptation Mechanisms in Plants)

Abstract

:
Adverse environmental conditions, including drought stress, pose a significant threat to plant survival and agricultural productivity, necessitating innovative and efficient approaches to enhance their resilience. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are recognized as key elements in regulating plant adaptation to drought stress, with a notable ability to modulate various physiological and molecular mechanisms. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the role of miRNAs in drought response mechanisms, including abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, reactive oxygen species (ROS) detoxification, and the optimization of root system architecture. Additionally, it examines the effectiveness of bioinformatics tools, such as those employed in in silico analyses, for studying miRNA-mRNA interactions, as well as the potential for their integration with experimental methods. Advanced methods such as microarray analysis, high-throughput sequencing (HTS), and RACE-PCR are discussed for their contributions to miRNA target identification and validation. Moreover, new data and perspectives are presented on the role of miRNAs in plant responses to abiotic stresses, particularly drought adaptation. This review aims to deepen the understanding of genetic regulatory mechanisms in plants and to establish a robust scientific foundation for the development of drought-tolerant crop varieties.

1. Introduction

Due to global climate change and increasing anthropogenic impacts, drought has become a pressing issue worldwide [1,2]. Terrestrial plants are among the first to suffer from drought’s effects. Over the course of evolution, plant species in arid climatic zones have developed various morphological, physiological, biochemical, and genetic adaptations to counteract stress factors like drought [3,4,5]. Despite extensive research on the molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying plant stress adaptation, our understanding of plants’ responses to drought stress remains incomplete [6,7]. Recent studies, however, have identified that one mechanism through which plants respond to drought involves the regulation of gene expression by small non-coding RNAs, specifically microRNAs (miRNAs) [8,9].
MicroRNAs are small, non-coding RNA molecules of 21–25 nucleotides that serve as key regulators of gene expression in plants [10,11,12]. They enable molecular adaptation during developmental processes and in response to environmental stimulus by controlling gene expression at spatial and temporal levels [13,14]. MicroRNAs play an essential role in regulating numerous physiological processes during plant development. For example, miR166 contributes to vascular tissue formation, whereas miR156 is key in managing shifts between developmental phases [15,16]. Furthermore, miRNAs display distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns, with miR167 predominantly active in roots and miR172 more prevalent in leaves, thereby supporting specific organ functions and influencing flowering time [17,18]. These insights emphasize the intricate regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs across various stages of growth and within different plant tissues. Additionally, miRNAs regulate crucial biological processes such as cellular differentiation, proliferation, and cell viability [11,19]. Recent studies show that drought conditions alter miRNA expression levels across various plant species [20,21], leading to changes in the expression of their target genes in response to drought stress. For example, increased expression of drought-responsive miRNAs has improved drought tolerance in transgenic plants [22,23,24].
An in-depth investigation of the molecular–genetic mechanisms underlying plant responses to drought stress is essential for enhancing agricultural productivity and developing climate-resilient crop varieties [25,26]. This review summarizes recent molecular–genetic studies on miRNAs involved in the regulation of drought-responsive genes, with a focus on the regulatory networks associated with drought-responsive miRNAs.

2. Mechanism of miRNA in the Genetic Regulation of Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants

2.1. MicroRNA Biogenesis and Processing Pathway in Plants

In plants, the biogenesis of miRNAs involves several key stages that are essential for their regulatory functions [27]. MicroRNAs are produced through the transcription of miRNA genes, which can reside within the introns of protein-coding genes or be transcribed as independent units [24]. The process begins with the transcription of primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) genes by RNA polymerase II, resulting in long, single-stranded RNA molecules that possess one or more hairpin-like structures [28,29]. Within the nucleus, pri-miRNAs are recognized and processed by a protein complex known as the microprocessor, primarily composed of Dicer-like 1 (DCL1) enzyme and cofactors, such as Serrate (SE) and Hyponastic leaves 1 (HYL1) [30,31]. The DCL1 enzyme processes pri-miRNA, cutting it into a hairpin-structured precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is then stabilized by methylation from the enzyme HEN1 and transported to the cytoplasm with the help of the HASTY (HST1) protein. In the cytoplasm, the pre-miRNA undergoes further processing by the DCL, resulting in the formation of a duplex that matures into single-stranded miRNA [32]. The mature miRNA is then integrated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), where it interacts with its complementary target mRNA. This interaction activates the catalytic component of the RISC, the AGO1 protein, leading to the repression or cleavage of the target mRNA’s translation (Figure 1) [33,34]. This biogenesis process in plants underscores the crucial role of miRNAs in regulating gene expression in response to environmental factors, including abiotic stresses such as drought [35].
The biogenesis of miRNAs in plants is a multi-step, highly coordinated process that plays a crucial role in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression [36]. From the transcription of pri-miRNAs to their final integration into the RISC, each stage ensures precise and efficient control of gene expression [37,38]. This process is essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and enabling plants to adapt effectively to various environmental stress factors, including drought. A deeper understanding of the intricacies of miRNA biogenesis not only enhances our knowledge of plant molecular biology but also opens new avenues for improving crop resilience through genetic and biotechnological approaches [39,40]. This is particularly important for increasing the adaptability of plants to changing environmental conditions, especially in the face of drought and other abiotic stresses [41].

2.2. Signaling Pathways Associated with Stress Tolerance Regulated by miRNAs

MicroRNAs play a critical role in plant adaptation to stress conditions by regulating several key signaling pathways [42,43]. Among these, hormonal signaling pathways, antioxidant-based pathways, calcium-dependent pathways, and mechanisms involving natural antisense transcripts are of particular importance (Table 1) [44]. As shown in Figure 2, miRNAs effectively regulate plant stress responses by modulating processes such as stomatal closure, reactive oxygen species (ROS) detoxification, hormonal balance, and the restructuring of root and leaf architecture. These mechanisms optimize plant adaptation to drought conditions and enhance tolerance by stabilizing cellular homeostasis, improving water use efficiency, and reducing oxidative damage (Figure 2).

2.2.1. MicroRNAs in Hormonal Signaling Pathways

In hormonal signaling pathways, abscisic acid (ABA) functions as a pivotal phytohormone in response to drought and salinity stress [45]. It plays a crucial role in mediating stress signals, regulating stomatal closure, and modulating gene expression. Additionally, ABA is synthesized in dehydrating roots during drought conditions, where it inhibits lateral root growth, contributing to the plant’s adaptive mechanisms under stress [46,47]. MicroRNAs play a critical role in regulating hormonal signaling pathways, which are essential for plant adaptation to stress conditions. For instance, miR159 plays a vital role in enhancing drought tolerance, particularly by targeting MYB transcription factors involved in stress and ABA signaling. In Populus and Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana), overexpression of miR159 improves water use efficiency, promotes stomatal closure, enhances ROS scavenging, and reduces cellular damage, thereby increasing drought resilience. Conversely, in rice, the downregulation of miR159 may activate MYB factors, suggesting a species-specific mechanism for stress adaptation. These findings highlight miR159’s potential in developing drought-tolerant crops [48,49,50,51]. Furthermore, Yan et al. [52] demonstrated that the miR165/166 regulatory module plays a critical role in maintaining ABA homeostasis and response in A. thaliana. Their study revealed that miR165/166 modulates the expression of key components in ABA signaling and metabolism, specifically ABA INSENSITIVE 4 (ABI4) and β-GLUCOSIDASE1 (BG1). Disruption of miR165/166 function led to altered ABA sensitivity and stress responses, highlighting its essential role in maintaining ABA balance under stress conditions.
Li et al. [53] investigated the role of miR162 in modulating stomatal conductance in response to low-night-temperature stress via the ABA signaling pathway in tomato. Their findings demonstrated that miR162 regulates the expression of DCL1, thereby influencing the biogenesis of other ABA-responsive miRNAs, which in turn modulate stomatal dynamics and enhance stress adaptation. This study highlights the critical function of post-transcriptional modulators as systemic responders within the ABA signaling cascade and provides new insights into post-transcriptional regulation as a mechanism for improving abiotic stress resilience in plants. Recent studies have investigated the function of miR2105 in rice plants under drought conditions. The findings indicate that the downregulation of miR2105 leads to increased expression of the transcription factor OsbZIP86, which activates the NCED3 gene involved in ABA biosynthesis. This activation results in elevated ABA levels, enhancing drought tolerance without compromising yield. Conversely, overexpression of miR2105 renders plants more susceptible to drought, highlighting its critical regulatory role in ABA-mediated drought responses [54,55]. In a 2024 study, researchers conducted an integrated transcriptome and miRNA analysis to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying bud dormancy in apricot trees. The analysis identified miR5776-x as a key regulator, targeting the PaNCED2 gene involved in ABA biosynthesis. The interaction between miR5776-x and PaNCED2 suggests a critical role in maintaining dormancy through ABA signaling pathways, providing valuable insights into the molecular regulation of dormancy [56]. Zhang et al. [57] explored the roles of various miRNAs in abiotic stress responses, including salinity. They identified that miR393 regulates salinity stress through RACK1A-mediated ABA signaling pathways in Arabidopsis seedlings under high-salt conditions. Similarly, miR393 plays a significant role in drought stress by targeting key components of the auxin signaling pathway, TIR1/AFB2, thereby influencing root growth and architecture under water-deficient conditions. Acting as a negative regulator of ABA, RACK1A mediates the interaction between miR393 and ABA signaling in response to both salinity and drought stress, highlighting the complexity of miRNA-regulated hormonal crosstalk in plant adaptation to abiotic stress [58,59].
Auxin plays a critical role as a key hormone and signaling molecule in regulating various aspects of plant growth and development, including root and leaf architecture, organ patterning, and root development [60], while several miRNA families manage auxin signaling under drought conditions to ensure plant adaptation [61]. A study by Marzi et al. [62] examined the role of transcriptional regulation in auxin-mediated responses to abiotic stresses. The review highlighted that miR160 targets and inhibits Auxin Response Factor 10 (ARF10), a positive regulator of shoot apical meristem (SAM) formation. This interaction underscores the critical role of miR160 in modulating auxin signaling pathways, particularly under stress conditions. The miR160 family plays a critical role in plant growth, development, and stress responses by regulating auxin and cytokinin signaling pathways. The miR160 targets ARFs, including ARF10, ARF16, and ARF17, which are key regulators of auxin signaling. This regulation is essential for balancing the interaction between auxin and cytokinin, influencing processes such as root architecture optimization, nodule development, and tissue regeneration [63,64]. A recent study investigated the effects of miR156ab on plant growth and drought tolerance. The study revealed that overexpression of miR156ab in apple and Arabidopsis plants promoted significant growth, with transgenic lines developing longer roots, taller shoots, and larger leaves under normal conditions. Gene expression analysis showed an upregulation of genes involved in auxin biosynthesis (MdYUCCAs), transport (MdPINs), and signaling (MdLBD18), leading to increased auxin levels and enhanced plant growth [65]. Moreover, in Medicago truncatula (M. truncatula), miR156 enhances drought resilience by increasing root biomass and promoting nodule formation. Additionally, in Triticum dicoccoides and Oryza sativa, miR156 optimizes leaf and root structures, reducing water loss and improving water uptake, thereby strengthening drought adaptation. The role of miR156 in stress adaptation positions it as a promising tool for developing stress-tolerant agricultural crops [66,67,68,69].

2.2.2. MicroRNAs in Antioxidant-Based Pathways

Drought stress increases the accumulation of ROS in cellular compartments such as chloroplasts, peroxisomes, and mitochondria, posing a threat to plant cells [70]. Plants have developed defense systems to regulate ROS levels, including antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase [71,72,73]. Additionally, miRNAs play a crucial role in maintaining ROS homeostasis by regulating antioxidant enzymes and interacting with hormonal signaling pathways, enhancing plant resilience to stress and enabling adaptation to challenging environmental conditions [74,75]. Recent studies have highlighted the critical role of miRNAs in regulating antioxidant pathways, thereby enhancing plant drought tolerance. These small non-coding RNAs modulate gene expression, reducing oxidative stress and enabling plants to adapt to water-deficient conditions [76]. For instance, under drought conditions, the critical role of miR1119 in regulating oxidative stress has been highlighted. miR1119 induces the expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and catalase, which are essential for scavenging ROS. This induction enhances the plant’s antioxidant defense system, thereby significantly contributing to improved drought tolerance [77]. A study on tea plants (Camellia sinensis) identified members of the miR156 family as key players in drought response. Specifically, csn-miR156f-2-5p was found to target the SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein-like 14 (CsSPL14), a gene involved in stress responses. The upregulation of csn-miR156f-2-5p under drought stress led to increased ROS accumulation and reduced chlorophyll content, highlighting its role in regulating antioxidant defenses and maintaining photosynthetic efficiency during water deficit conditions [78]. miR398 plays a critical role in regulating antioxidant pathways during drought stress by targeting Cu/Zn superoxide dismutases (CSD1, CSD2) and cytochrome c oxidase (COX5b). Its downregulation enhances CSD activity, improving ROS detoxification and boosting drought tolerance [79].

2.2.3. MicroRNAs in Calcium Signaling and Natural Antisense Transcript-Based Pathways

Calcium (Ca2+) serves as a crucial secondary messenger that modulates the complex network of signaling pathways enabling plants to respond to abiotic stresses, particularly drought, and plays a key role in regulating various physiological processes [80]. MicroRNAs act as essential regulators of these signaling pathways, playing a significant role in plant adaptation to water deficiency [81]. Studies have identified miR319 as a key regulator in drought stress adaptation. miR319 targets genes encoding TCP transcription factors, which are involved in various developmental processes and stress responses. Under drought conditions, miR319 modulates TCP transcription factors, influencing calcium-dependent signaling pathways, thereby regulating stomatal behavior and enhancing drought tolerance in plants [82,83]. miR164 regulates NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2 (NAC) transcription factors, which play a crucial role in plant development and stress responses. Under drought conditions, miR164-mediated modulation of NACs influences calcium signaling pathways, optimizing root architecture and improving water uptake efficiency [84]. miR396 targets growth-regulating factors (GRFs) involved in cell proliferation and development. Under drought stress, miR396 regulates GRF expression, influencing calcium signaling, modulating leaf growth, and enhancing plant adaptation to stress conditions [77]. These miRNAs highlight the complex regulatory mechanisms plants employ to adapt to drought stress through calcium-dependent pathways. Precise modulation of calcium signaling ensures optimal plant growth and survival under adverse conditions, while understanding their roles provides valuable insights into the molecular basis of drought tolerance and potential targets for developing stress-resilient crops.
Natural antisense transcripts (NATs) are RNA molecules transcribed from the opposite strand of protein-coding or non-coding genes, regulating gene expression through mechanisms such as transcriptional interference, RNA duplex formation, chromatin modification, and miRNA binding [85]. MicroRNAs interact with NATs to precisely coordinate key physiological processes, including stress responses, plant development, and adaptation to drought conditions [86]. For instance, in A. thaliana, miRNA398 and its cis-NATs (such as NAT398b and NAT398c) form a regulatory loop. These NATs suppress pri-miRNA processing, reducing mature miR398 levels and modulating stress responses. Under stress conditions like drought, this regulatory interaction can significantly impact the plant’s ability to manage ROS and maintain cellular homeostasis. This highlights the critical role of NATs in fine-tuning miRNA-mediated responses to abiotic stress [87].
Table 1. Key miRNA-regulated signaling pathways in plant stress tolerance.
Table 1. Key miRNA-regulated signaling pathways in plant stress tolerance.
PathwayKey miRNAsTarget GenesStress RoleRefs.
Hormonal Pathways (ABA)miR159, miR165/166, miR162, miR2105, miR5776-x,
miR393
ABI4, BG1, OsbZIP86, NCED3, PaNCED2,
RACK1A
Regulates ABA signaling, stomatal closure, root architecture, and dormancy[48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]
Hormonal Pathways (Auxin)miR160, miR156ab, miR393ARF10, ARF16, ARF17, TIR1/AFB2, MdYUCCAs, MdPINs, MdLBD18, RACK1AControls auxin signaling, root/shoot growth, and stress tolerance[63,64,65,66,67,68,69]
Antioxidant PathwaysmiR1119, csn-miR156f-2-5p, miR398SOD, CAT, CsSPL14, CSD1, CSD2, COX5bMaintains ROS homeostasis, photosynthetic efficiency, and antioxidant activity[77,78,79]
Calcium Signaling PathwaysmiR319, miR164, miR396TCP factors, NAC factors, GRFsRegulates calcium responses, water uptake, and stomatal behavior[77,82,83,84]
NAT-Based PathwaysmiR398 (NAT398b, NAT398c)ROS regulatory genesOptimizes miRNA responses, ROS regulation, and cellular balance[87]

3. In Silico Tools for miRNA Target Prediction in Drought Tolerance Mechanisms

3.1. Overview of miRNA Target Prediction

MicroRNAs regulate gene expression by targeting specific mRNAs, which is a crucial step in understanding the mechanisms of drought tolerance in plants [88]. Investigating miRNA-mRNA interactions is essential for elucidating plant strategies in response to stress conditions and enhancing drought resistance [89]. To identify specific miRNA targets at the gene level, advanced molecular techniques such as Western blotting, microarrays, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and quantitative PCR are widely utilized [90,91]. However, these methods do not always enable precise determination of miRNA binding sites within the mRNA sequence. In this context, in silico tools, leveraging sequence complementarity and thermodynamic stability, provide a broad-scale prediction of potential miRNA-mRNA interactions, offering a cost-effective alternative to experimental approaches [92,93]. Such predictive methods facilitate the identification of stress-responsive genes involved in key processes, including ABA signaling, ROS detoxification, and root growth regulation [94,95,96]. Despite their effectiveness, in silico tools are constrained by false-positive results and incomplete genome annotations, particularly in non-model plants [97,98,99]. To address these limitations, combining in silico predictions with experimental validation methods enhances the reliability and accuracy of findings [100,101]. Moreover, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning models are unlocking new possibilities for exploring miRNA-regulated drought tolerance mechanisms. These technologies facilitate more precise predictions and contribute to a deeper understanding of plant stress response systems [102,103].

3.2. Applications of In Silico Tools for miRNA Research in Drought Tolerance

Predicting miRNA targets in plants is relatively easier compared to animals due to the extensive complementarity typically observed between plant miRNAs and their target RNAs, which simplifies computational analyses [104,105]. To achieve accurate target prediction in plants, advanced bioinformatics tools and web-based platforms such as psRNATarget, TargetFinder, miRTarBase, RNAhybrid, Tapir, and MirTarget have been developed (Table 2).
psRNATarget is a modern bioinformatics tool designed to predict the interaction of small RNAs (sRNAs), including miRNAs, with their target mRNAs in plants. This server identifies miRNA-mRNA interactions through complementary sequence analysis and assessment of target site accessibility [106]. Its updated version allows users to customize parameters, enabling the efficient identification of both canonical and non-canonical targets. psRNATarget, widely used as an in silico tool, has been employed to predict potential miRNA targets during drought conditions [107,108]. Its ability to process large datasets and work with transcript libraries makes it a key resource for studying miRNA mechanisms associated with drought tolerance in plants. Additionally, psRNATarget is extensively used in investigating major stress response pathways, such as ABA signaling and ROS detoxification [109,110].
One of the highly efficient and precise bioinformatics tools for predicting miRNA target genes in plants is TargetFinder. This tool employs a position-weighted scoring algorithm to evaluate the complementarity between miRNAs and their mRNA target regions [111]. The algorithm accounts for mismatches, gaps, and bulges, ensuring accurate and reliable predictions of miRNA-mRNA interactions [112].
miRTarBase is one of the largest and most reliable databases for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions (MTIs), with over 3.8 million MTIs from around 13,690 studies [113]. It integrates diverse datasets, such as miRNA expression profiles, tissue-specific information, SNPs, and disease-associated variations, helping researchers understand miRNA regulation in different biological and environmental conditions, including drought stress [114,115]. In drought tolerance research, miRTarBase provides validated MTIs, enabling the identification of key regulatory pathways for stress responses, which is essential for studying plant adaptation [113,116]. By integrating expression data with validated targets, miRTarBase also aids in developing gene models and drought-tolerant plants [117].
RNAhybrid is a widely used in silico tool designed to predict interactions between miRNAs and mRNAs and identify the most energetically favorable binding regions. Its ability to accurately predict miRNA-mRNA duplexes makes RNAhybrid a crucial resource for studying the molecular mechanisms of plant adaptation to drought [118]. This tool facilitates the identification of key regulatory miRNAs, their functional validation, and their application in crop improvement programs [119]. The RNAhybrid tool is widely used for predicting interactions between miRNAs and plant mRNAs.
The next applications of in silico tools for miRNA target prediction include TAPIR, a web server designed to identify plant miRNA-mRNA interactions with both speed and precision. TAPIR can detect imperfectly matched duplexes that traditional tools often overlook. It employs two distinct algorithms: one based on the FASTA local alignment program for rapid genome-wide searches and another, more precise algorithm using RNAhybrid for detailed miRNA-mRNA interaction analysis [120]. The RNAhybrid-based algorithm is particularly advantageous for identifying complex regulatory phenomena such as “target mimicry,” where miRNA activity is sequestered. This feature makes TAPIR an invaluable resource for exploring regulatory networks under abiotic stresses, including drought. By accounting for parameters such as free energy and mismatches, TAPIR facilitates the discovery of miRNA-mediated pathways crucial for stress adaptation [121]. In the context of drought tolerance research, TAPIR enables researchers to investigate miRNA-mRNA interactions that regulate key stress responses, offering insights into both model and non-model plant species. This dual capability of speed and precision highlights TAPIR as a critical tool for advancing our understanding of miRNA roles in plant stress resilience [120,122].
MirTarget is a widely used bioinformatics tool for studying miRNAs in humans, animals, and plants. It identifies miRNA binding sites in mRNA sequences by evaluating free energy (ΔG) and other binding parameters. The program predicts miRNA binding sites in the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR), coding sequence (CDS), and 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of mRNAs. MirTarget performs a detailed analysis of miRNA-mRNA interactions, including the starting points of binding sites, their locations within mRNA regions, pairing schemes, and the free energy (ΔG) of the interactions [123,124]. Additionally, the tool accounts for non-canonical pairings such as G–U and A–C, improving the precision of its predictions. These capabilities make MirTarget a comprehensive and versatile tool for investigating miRNA–target interactions across various organisms [125,126].
In the study of drought tolerance mechanisms, in silico tools are widely used to predict miRNA-mRNA interactions. These tools enable the identification of key stress response pathways, including ABA signaling, ROS detoxification, and root growth regulation. Additionally, the integration of RT-qPCR and degradome sequencing as experimental validation methods significantly enhances the reliability of the results (Figure 3). These approaches not only save time and are cost-effective but also help to define precise research directions [127]. In addition to widely used tools such as psRNATarget, TargetFinder, miRTarBase, RNAhybrid, Tapir, and MirTarget, modern tools like Cleaveland (for degradome analysis) [128] and DeepMirTar (for deep learning-based predictions) [129] further deepen the exploration of miRNA targets. These technologies, leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, contribute to a deeper understanding of the molecular regulatory mechanisms in plants under stress conditions and facilitate the development of drought-tolerant crop varieties.
The quantitative characteristics of miRNA-mRNA interactions (binding free energy and the ΔG/ΔGm ratio) cannot be directly determined through “wet” experiments but play a crucial role in understanding the competition between miRNAs for binding to mRNAs. For example, multiple miRNAs may compete to bind within the same mRNA cluster. In such cases, miRNAs with higher binding free energy will preferentially bind to the mRNA, enhancing their regulatory efficiency over the target gene [13,130]. These competitive mechanisms highlight the complex and dynamic role of miRNAs in regulating gene expression. Differences in binding free energy among various miRNAs determine the strength of their regulatory effects and their influence on specific target genes. Furthermore, understanding these interaction patterns offers significant insights into plant adaptive mechanisms under abiotic stresses, such as drought or salinity. Future research could focus on developing advanced bioinformatics tools to complement these quantitative characteristics with experimental methods. This would provide a deeper understanding of miRNA dynamics and inform strategies for improving plant resilience to stress conditions.

4. Experimental Approaches for miRNA Isolation and Analysis in Drought Stress Research

Isolating and analyzing miRNAs from plants is crucial for understanding their role in stress tolerance [131]. These methods help identify miRNAs, their target genes, and signaling pathways, as well as uncover mechanisms involved in the response to water scarcity, while refining and complementing bioinformatics predictions [132,133]. The development of RNA extraction kits, microarray analysis, high-throughput sequencing (HTS), and RACE-PCR methods has advanced this field significantly. These techniques provide precise, reliable, and scalable tools for discovering and validating miRNAs, while their bioinformatics integration opens the way for developing drought-resistant crops [134,135].

4.1. Isolation of Total RNA/miRNA

High-quality RNA extraction is fundamental to miRNA research, as it ensures the accuracy of miRNA expression profiling, HTS, and RACE-PCR analyses. MiRNAs, being smaller and less concentrated than total RNA, require specialized methods for efficient isolation [136,137]. Techniques such as guanidine thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform extraction, Trizol, or other commercially available kits are used. Modern extraction kits, such as Qiagen’s miRNeasy and Invitrogen’s PureLink, efficiently isolate total RNA while preserving small RNA fractions. RNA should always be isolated from fresh tissues or tissues stored frozen, as RNA has a short half-life [138,139]. Extracting RNA from plant tissues can be challenging due to the presence of polysaccharides and phenolic compounds. After RNA extraction, its quality and integrity must be checked using methods such as spectrophotometric analysis, gel electrophoresis, or tools like Bioanalyzer or TapeStation (Figure 4) [140,141].

4.2. Microarray Analysis for miRNA Profiling

Microarray analysis is a high-throughput method that allows for the simultaneous measurement of miRNA expression levels under stress conditions, such as drought [142]. This technique provides crucial information for understanding the role of miRNAs in plant stress responses. Microarray analysis is used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs under various stress conditions, such as drought, salinity, and temperature [143]. For example, in an A. thaliana study, several miRNAs, including miR164, miR169, miR393, and miR396, were found to be involved in drought tolerance and pathogen resistance responses [144,145]. In a M. truncatula study, miR169 and miR396 were highly expressed during drought, while miR398 played a key role in oxidative stress tolerance. Microarray analysis not only identifies stress-responsive miRNAs but also helps in identifying the regulatory networks involving their target genes [146,147]. This method helps to understand the mechanisms of miRNA responses to stress and, by integrating with other methods such as HTS, enables the discovery of novel miRNAs, providing comprehensive information about miRNA expression and function.

4.3. High-Throughput Sequencing for miRNA Discovery

High-throughput sequencing (HTS) has introduced a significant breakthrough in the field of miRNA discovery and characterization, as this method allows for comprehensive and detailed profiling of miRNA expression [148]. Unlike microarray analysis, HTS is not limited to known sequences, enabling the identification of novel miRNA species. This method is an essential tool for studying the full spectrum of miRNA sequences, particularly in plants subjected to environmental stresses such as drought, salinity, and temperature [149,150]. HTS methods, including RNA-seq, sRNA-seq, and RNA-PET-seq platforms, have significantly advanced miRNA research in plants. These technologies provide a more comprehensive and efficient identification of miRNAs compared to traditional methods, as they offer high coverage and depth for genomic and transcriptomic studies. HTS platforms allow for the identification of novel miRNA species and their interactions with target genes through millions of short sequencing reads. For example, the sRNA-seq method enables the study of the spatial and temporal accumulation of miRNAs in plant tissues, which is particularly important for analyzing mature miRNAs that are more stable than precursor miRNA fragments [151,152,153]. Additionally, HTS methods like RNA-PET-seq enable the precise mapping of the transcriptional regions of miRNA genes, helping to identify new miRNA species and their target genes. Combining HTS data with other methods, such as degradome-seq and dsRNA-seq, enhances the accuracy of miRNA annotations and allows for the study of miRNA biogenesis and processing. Thus, HTS is an essential tool for miRNA discovery and functional analysis, especially in plants subjected to environmental stresses like drought [154,155]. Recent studies, using HTS, have identified miRNAs in plants that respond to drought. For example, in Camellia oleifera, it was shown that miR398, miR408-3p, miR166, and several novel miRNAs regulate drought tolerance. These studies provide insights into how regulatory networks mediated by miRNAs contribute to enhancing drought resistance [156]. Similarly, in tomato plants, HTS has identified several key miRNAs involved in drought tolerance under drought stress. Specifically, conserved miRNAs such as sly-miR156a, sly-miR164a-5p, sly-miR171c, and sly-miR396a-3p were found to be differentially expressed under drought conditions, with some showing higher expression in the drought-tolerant IL9–1 line and lower expression in the drought-sensitive M82 line. Additionally, novel miRNAs such as sly_miN_702, sly_miN_709, and sly_miN_710 were also identified as differentially expressed in response to drought stress, indicating their potential role in drought tolerance. These miRNAs regulate a variety of stress-responsive genes, including transcription factors and protein kinases [157]. Such findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the HTS method in uncovering the complex regulatory networks mediated by miRNAs that contribute to enhancing drought tolerance in plants.

4.4. RACE-PCR for miRNA Target Validation

Rapid amplification of cDNA ends–PCR (RACE-PCR) is widely used for validating miRNA target genes, enabling confirmation of the regulatory relationship between miRNAs and their specific target genes. This method precisely identifies the 3′ or 5′ UTR regions of the target mRNA [158,159]. In a study of A. thaliana, new miRNAs responsive to ABA were identified, including ath-miRn-1, ath-miRn-2, and others, with their potential target genes predicted using the psRNATarget bioinformatics tool. Validation using the 5′ RLM-RACE-PCR method revealed that the target genes of these miRNAs, such as AT1G73390.3 and AT5G40550.1, were identified as specific sites of mRNA degradation. These genes are involved in cellular processes, including endosomal targeting and anthocyanin pigment production, indicating the regulatory role of these miRNAs in ABA signaling. The 5′ RLM-RACE results provide strong evidence that these miRNAs regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally in Arabidopsis, confirming their role in plant stress responses [160]. Moreover, the RACE-PCR method was used to validate miRNA target genes under drought stress conditions. For example, in a study of O. sativa, several drought-responsive miRNAs, including miR156b-3p, miR159a.2, miR164c, miR169d, miR172d-5p, miR396g, miR395a, miR528-3p, and miR812q, along with their target genes, were identified. Through the use of RACE-PCR, this research contributed to understanding the molecular mechanisms of drought tolerance in rice and confirmed the interactions of these miRNAs with stress-responsive genes [161]. Additionally, a study by Fu et al. [162] investigated the role of miR159a in response to drought stress in Populus euphratica. Using the RACE-PCR method, the researchers validated the target genes of miR159a and confirmed its positive regulatory role in drought response. In another study, Gossypium hirsutum was investigated for miRNAs involved in the plant’s response to salt and drought stresses. For example, the study identified miRNVL5, which regulates the GhCHR gene, encoding a zinc-finger protein. RACE-PCR was used to validate the interaction between miRNVL5 and GhCHR, contributing to the understanding of stress tolerance mechanisms in cotton [163]. These discoveries also pave the way for future biotechnological applications, such as the development of genetically modified crops with enhanced resistance to drought and other abiotic stresses.

5. Conclusions and Prospects

In conclusion, miRNAs are key regulators of gene expression and play a crucial role in plant adaptation to drought stress. By regulating various signaling pathways, such as ABA signaling, ROS detoxification, and root system optimization, miRNAs significantly enhance plant tolerance to water scarcity. This review highlights the latest advancements in understanding the mechanisms of drought-responsive miRNAs, their target genes, and associated regulatory networks. In the future, integrating bioinformatics tools such as psRNATarget, TargetFinder, and MirTarget with experimental methods will provide effective strategies for identifying and validating miRNA-mRNA interactions. These integrative approaches will deepen our understanding of miRNA-mediated stress responses and open new opportunities for developing drought-resistant crops. Furthermore, experimental techniques such as miRNA isolation, microarray analysis, HTS, and RACE-PCR contribute significantly to understanding the mechanisms of drought tolerance mediated by miRNAs. These methods complement bioinformatics predictions and provide tools for the precise identification of miRNAs in response to ecological stress factors. Additionally, genomic editing technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 offer unique opportunities to precisely regulate miRNA expression and their target pathways, improving plant adaptation to abiotic stresses. Future research should focus on expanding miRNA studies in agriculturally significant, less-studied plants. The use of advanced technologies, such as single-cell sequencing and artificial intelligence, to predict miRNA targets accurately will further enhance our understanding. These efforts will make significant contributions to the development of drought-resistant crop varieties and strengthen global food security in the face of environmental challenges.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and A.M.B.; methodology, A.K.; software, B.D.K.; validation, Y.Z. and A.K.; formal analysis, S.T.; investigation, T.M. and S.I.A.; resources, G.T.; data curation, A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.M.B. and S.I.A.; visualization, K.T.T.; supervision, A.K.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan under the framework of the program BR24993218. Figure 3 (in part 3) was obtained within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme No. 122050400128-1).

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all collaborators and institutions involved in this study for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lieber, M.; Chin-Hong, P.; Kelly, K.; Dandu, M.; Weiser, S.D. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the impact of droughts, flooding, and climate variability on malnutrition. Glob. Public Health 2022, 17, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.; Ali, N.; Akmal, M.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Dindaroglu, T.; Abdul-Wajid, H.H.; Battaglia, M.L. Drought Stress Impacts on Plants and Different Approaches to Alleviate Its Adverse Effects. Plants 2021, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Anstett, D.N.; Branch, H.A.; Angert, A.L. Regional differences in rapid evolution during severe drought. Evol. Lett. 2021, 5, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wahab, A.; Abdi, G.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, B.; Ullah, S.; Shah, W.; Mumtaz, S.; Yasin, G.; Muresan, C.C.; Marc, R.A. Plants’ Physio-Biochemical and Phyto-Hormonal Responses to Alleviate the Adverse Effects of Drought Stress: A Comprehensive Review. Plants 2022, 11, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Monroe, J.G.; Powell, T.; Price, N.; Mullen, J.L.; Howard, A.; Evans, K.; Lovell, J.T.; McKay, J.K. Drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana by extensive genetic loss-of-function. Elife 2018, 7, e41038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marques, I.; Hu, H. Molecular Insight of Plants Response to Drought Stress: Perspectives and New Insights towards Food Security. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, V.; Gupta, K.; Singh, S.; Jain, M.; Garg, R. Unravelling the molecular mechanism underlying drought stress response in chickpea via integrated multi-omics analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1156606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y. miRNAs: Primary modulators of plant drought tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 2024, 301, 154313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luo, G.; Li, L.; Yang, X.; Yu, Y.; Gao, L.; Mo, B.; Chen, X.; Liu, L. MicroRNA1432 regulates rice drought stress tolerance by targeting the CALMODULIN-LIKE2 gene. Plant Physiol. 2024, 195, 1954–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Belkozhayev, A.; Niyazova, R.; Kamal, M.A.; Ivashchenko, A.; Sharipov, K.; Wilson, C.M. Differential microRNA expression in the SH-SY5Y human cell model as potential biomarkers for Huntington’s disease. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1399742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Belkozhayev, A.M.; Al-Yozbaki, M.; George, A.; Ye Niyazova, R.; Sharipov, K.O.; Byrne, L.J.; Wilson, C.M. Extracellular Vesicles, Stem Cells and the Role of miRNAs in Neurodegeneration. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2022, 20, 1450–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aalto, A.P.; Pasquinelli, A.E. Small non-coding RNAs mount a silent revolution in gene expression. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Belkozhayev, A.; Niyazova, R.; Wilson, C.; Jainakbayev, N.; Pyrkova, A.; Ashirbekov, Y.; Akimniyazova, A.; Sharipov, K.; Ivashchenko, A. Bioinformatics Analysis of the Interaction of miRNAs and piRNAs with Human mRNA Genes Having di- and Trinucleotide Repeats. Genes 2022, 13, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rakhmetullina, A.; Pyrkova, A.; Aisina, D.; Ivashchenko, A. In silico prediction of human genes as potential targets for rice miRNAs. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2020, 87, 107305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Válóczi, A.; Várallyay, É.; Kauppinen, S.; Burgyán, J.; Havelda, Z. Spatio-Temporal Accumulation of microRNAs Is Highly Coordinated in Developing Plant Tissues. Plant J. 2006, 47, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Parizotto, E.A.; Dunoyer, P.; Rahm, N.; Himber, C.; Voinnet, O. In Vivo Investigation of the Transcription, Processing, Endonucleolytic Activity, and Functional Relevance of the Spatial Distribution of a Plant miRNA. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Villani, V.; Di Marco, G.; Iacovelli, F.; Bernardi, G.; Gismondi, A.; Canini, A. Profile and Potential Bioactivity of the miRNome and Metabolome Expressed in Malva sylvestris L. Leaf and Flower. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gismondi, A.; Di Marco, G.; Camoni, L.; Pezzotti, M.; Ruffini Castiglione, M.; Canini, A. MicroRNA Expression Profiles in Moringa oleifera Lam. Seedlings at Different Growth Conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 2115–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, W.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, D.; Cheng, Y.; Shen, F. Plant MicroRNAs in Cross-Kingdom Regulation of Gene Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gómez-Martín, C.; Zhou, H.; Medina, J.M.; Aparicio-Puerta, E.; Shi, B.; Hackenberg, M. Genome-Wide Analysis of microRNA Expression Profile in Roots and Leaves of Three Wheat Cultivars under Water and Drought Conditions. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, X.; Chen, H.; Shen, T.; Luo, Q.; Xu, M.; Yang, Z. The miRNA-mRNA Regulatory Modules of Pinus massoniana Lamb. in Response to Drought Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, L.; Xu, Y.; Tao, X.; Fahim, A.M.; Zhang, X.; Han, C.; Yang, G.; Wang, W.; Pu, Y.; Liu, L.; et al. Integrated miRNA and mRNA Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Regulatory Mechanisms in the Response of Winter Brassica rapa to Drought Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, R.; Song, Y.; Xue, X.; Xue, R.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Qi, X.; Wang, Y. Differential Transcription Profiling Reveals the MicroRNAs Involved in Alleviating Damage to Photosynthesis under Drought Stress during the Grain Filling Stage in Wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lopos, L.C.; Panthi, U.; Kovalchuk, I.; Bilichak, A. Modulation of Plant MicroRNA Expression: Its Potential Usability in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Improvement. Curr. Genom. 2023, 24, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Geng, A.; Lian, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, G. Molecular Mechanisms and Regulatory Pathways Underlying Drought Stress Response in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sarsekeyeva, F.K.; Sadvakasova, A.K.; Sandybayeva, S.K.; Kossalbayev, B.D.; Huang, Z.; Zayadan, B.K.; Akmukhanova, N.R.; Leong, Y.K.; Chang, J.-S.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. Microalgae- and Cyanobacteria-Derived Phytostimulants for Mitigation of Salt Stress and Improved Agriculture. Algal Res. 2024, 82, 103686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jeena, G.S.; Singh, N.; Shikha; Shukla, R.K. An insight into microRNA biogenesis and its regulatory role in plant secondary metabolism. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 1651–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. O’Brien, J.; Hayder, H.; Zayed, Y.; Peng, C. Overview of MicroRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, Y.; Kim, M.; Han, J.; Yeom, K.H.; Lee, S.; Baek, S.H.; Kim, V.N. MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 4051–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, L.; Xiang, Y.; Chen, S.; Shi, M.; Jiang, X.; He, Z.; Gao, S. Mechanisms of MicroRNA Biogenesis and Stability Control in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 844149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, C.; Axtell, M.J.; Fedoroff, N.V. The helicase and RNaseIIIa domains of Arabidopsis Dicer-Like1 modulate catalytic parameters during microRNA biogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, X.; Li, L. Analyzing the microRNA Transcriptome in Plants Using Deep Sequencing Data. Biology 2012, 1, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xie, M.; Zhang, S.; Yu, B. microRNA biogenesis, degradation and activity in plants. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bajczyk, M.; Jarmolowski, A.; Jozwiak, M.; Pacak, A.; Pietrykowska, H.; Sierocka, I.; Swida-Barteczka, A.; Szewc, L.; Szweykowska-Kulinska, Z. Recent Insights into Plant miRNA Biogenesis: Multiple Layers of miRNA Level Regulation. Plants 2023, 12, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guleria, P.; Mahajan, M.; Bhardwaj, J.; Yadav, S.K. Plant small RNAs: Biogenesis, mode of action and their roles in abiotic stresses. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2011, 9, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. de Mello, A.S.; Ferguson, B.S.; Shebs-Maurine, E.L.; Giotto, F.M. MicroRNA Biogenesis, Gene Regulation Mechanisms, and Availability in Foods. Noncoding RNA 2024, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Samad, A.F.A.; Sajad, M.; Nazaruddin, N.; Fauzi, I.A.; Murad, A.M.A.; Zainal, Z.; Ismail, I. MicroRNA and Transcription Factor: Key Players in Plant Regulatory Network. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, M.; Yu, B. Recent advances in the regulation of plant miRNA biogenesis. RNA Biol. 2021, 18, 2087–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ghifari, A.S.; Saha, S.; Murcha, M.W. The biogenesis and regulation of the plant oxidative phosphorylation system. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 728–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ni, C.; Buszczak, M. The homeostatic regulation of ribosome biogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 136, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pegler, J.L.; Oultram, J.M.J.; Grof, C.P.L.; Eamens, A.L. Profiling the Abiotic Stress Responsive microRNA Landscape of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants 2019, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Shriram, V.; Kumar, V.; Devarumath, R.M.; Khare, T.S.; Wani, S.H. MicroRNAs as potential targets for abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Islam, W.; Waheed, A.; Naveed, H.; Zeng, F. MicroRNAs mediated plant responses to salt stress. Cells 2022, 11, 2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, Z.; Yang, J.; Zou, J.J.; Cai, X.; Zeng, X.; Xing, W. A systematic review on the role of miRNAs in plant response to stresses under the changing climatic conditions. Plant Stress 2024, 14, 100674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tuteja, N. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2007, 2, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Muhammad Aslam, M.; Waseem, M.; Jakada, B.H.; Okal, E.J.; Lei, Z.; Saqib, H.S.A.; Yuan, W.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Q. Mechanisms of Abscisic Acid-Mediated Drought Stress Responses in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abhilasha, A.; Roy Choudhury, S. Molecular and Physiological Perspectives of Abscisic Acid Mediated Drought Adjustment Strategies. Plants 2021, 10, 2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fu, T.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y. Function identification of miR159a, a positive regulator during poplar resistance to drought stress. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tiwari, M. Blessing in disguise: A loss of miR159 makes plant drought tolerant and ABA sensitive. Physiol. Plant. 2022, 174, e13763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Contreras-Cubas, C.; Rabanal, F.A.; Arenas-Huertero, C.; Ortiz, M.A.; Covarrubias, A.A.; Reyes, J.L. The Phaseolus vulgaris miR159a precursor encodes a second differentially expressed microRNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 80, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Eldem, V.; Çelikkol Akçay, U.; Ozhuner, E.; Bakır, Y.; Uranbey, S.; Unver, T. Genome-wide identification of miRNAs responsive to drought in peach (Prunus persica) by high-throughput deep sequencing. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yan, J.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhu, X.; Tang, G.; Bressan, R.A.; Zhu, J.K. The miR165/166 Mediated Regulatory Module Plays Critical Roles in ABA Homeostasis and Response in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Wang, F.; Xu, T.; Qi, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, T. MicroRNA162 regulates stomatal conductance in response to low night temperature stress via abscisic acid signaling pathway in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1045112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gao, W.; Li, M.; Yang, S.; Gao, C.; Su, Y.; Zeng, X.; Jiao, Z.; Xu, W.; Zhang, M.; Xia, K. miR2105 and OsSAPK10 co-regulate OsbZIP86 to mediate drought-induced ABA biosynthesis via OsNCED3 in rice. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 889–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Premachandran, Y. Triggered in distress: A miRNA-controlled switch for drought-induced ABA biosynthesis in rice. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 447–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, W.; Chen, C.; Bao, W.; Chen, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhao, H.; Zhu, G.; Wuyun, T.N.; Wang, L. Integrated transcriptome and miRNA analysis provides insight into the floral buds dormancy in Prunus armeniaca. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 104, 869–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, F.; Yang, J.; Zhang, N.; Wu, J.; Si, H. Roles of microRNAs in abiotic stress response and characteristics regulation of plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 919243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jiang, J.; Zhu, H.; Li, N.; Batley, J.; Wang, Y. The miR393-Target Module Regulates Plant Development and Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Si-Ammour, A.; Windels, D.; Arn-Bouldoires, E.; Kutter, C.; Ailhas, J.; Meins, F.; Vazquez, F. miR393 and Secondary siRNAs Regulate Expression of the TIR1/AFB2 Auxin Receptor Clade and Auxin-Related Development of Arabidopsis Leaves. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, Q.; Gong, M.; Xu, X.; Li, H.; Deng, W. Roles of Auxin in the Growth, Development, and Stress Tolerance of Horticultural Plants. Cells 2022, 11, 2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, H.; Li, Z.; Xiong, L. A plant microRNA regulates the adaptation of roots to drought stress. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 1742–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Marzi, D.; Brunetti, P.; Saini, S.S.; Yadav, G.; Puglia, G.D.; Dello Ioio, R. Role of transcriptional regulation in auxin-mediated response to abiotic stresses. Front. Genet. 2024, 15, 1394091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hao, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Chen, R.; Zhang, L. miR160: An Indispensable Regulator in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 833322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pessino, S.; Cucinotta, M.; Colono, C.; Costantini, E.; Perrone, D.; Di Marzo, M.; Callizaya Terceros, G.; Petrella, R.; Mizzotti, C.; Azzaro, C.; et al. Auxin response factor 10 insensitive to miR160 regulation induces apospory-like phenotypes in Arabidopsis. iScience 2024, 27, 111115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Safi, A. A microRNA with a mega impact on plant growth: miR156ab spray keeps drought away. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 1666–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Guo, C.; Xu, Y.; Shi, M.; Lai, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Z.; Poethig, R.S.; Wu, G. Repression of miR156 by miR159 Regulates the Timing of the Juvenile-to-Adult Transition in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1293–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wu, G.; Park, M.Y.; Conway, S.R.; Wang, J.W.; Weigel, D.; Poethig, R.S. The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell 2009, 138, 750–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jerome Jeyakumar, J.M.; Ali, A.; Wang, W.-M.; Thiruvengadam, M. Characterizing the Role of the miR156-SPL Network in Plant Development and Stress Response. Plants 2020, 9, 1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, H.H.; Tian, X.; Li, Y.J.; Wu, C.A.; Zheng, C.C. Microarray-based analysis of stress-regulated microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. RNA 2008, 14, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cruz de Carvalho, M.H. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: Production, scavenging and signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2008, 3, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Defense in Plants under Abiotic Stress: Revisiting the Crucial Role of a Universal Defense Regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rajput, V.D.; Harish; Singh, R.K.; Verma, K.K.; Sharma, L.; Quiroz-Figueroa, F.R.; Meena, M.; Gour, V.S.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; et al. Recent Developments in Enzymatic Antioxidant Defence Mechanism in Plants with Special Reference to Abiotic Stress. Biology 2021, 10, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zandi, P.; Schnug, E. Reactive Oxygen Species, Antioxidant Responses and Implications from a Microbial Modulation Perspective. Biology 2022, 11, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Carbonell, T.; Gomes, A.V. MicroRNAs in the regulation of cellular redox status and its implications in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Redox Biol. 2020, 36, 101607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Banerjee, J.; Khanna, S.; Bhattacharya, A. MicroRNA Regulation of Oxidative Stress. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 2872156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kaya, C.; Uğurlar, F.; Adamakis, I.S. Epigenetic Modifications of Hormonal Signaling Pathways in Plant Drought Response and Tolerance for Sustainable Food Security. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bakhshi, B.; Fard, E.M. The Arrangement of MicroRNAs in the Regulation of Drought Stress Response in Plants: A Systematic Review. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 41, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wen, S.; Zhou, C.; Tian, C.; Yang, N.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, A.; Chen, Y.; Lai, Z.; Guo, Y. Identification and Validation of the miR156 Family Involved in Drought Responses and Tolerance in Tea Plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze. Plants 2024, 13, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ding, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zhu, C. Emerging roles of microRNAs in the mediation of drought stress response in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3077–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, L.; Yu, D.; Zhao, F.; Pang, C.; Song, M.; Wei, H.; Fan, S.; Yu, S. Genome-wide analysis of the calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in Gossypium raimondii. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mahmood, T.; Khalid, S.; Abdullah, M.; Ahmed, Z.; Shah, M.K.N.; Ghafoor, A.; Du, X. Insights into Drought Stress Signaling in Plants and the Molecular Genetic Basis of Cotton Drought Tolerance. Cells 2019, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ma, Z.; Hu, L. MicroRNA: A Dynamic Player from Signalling to Abiotic Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Aliniaeifard, S.; Shomali, A.; Seifikalhor, M.; Lastochkina, O. Calcium Signaling in Plants Under Drought. In Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants: Signaling and Communication in Plants; Hasanuzzaman, M., Tanveer, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Peng, X.; Feng, C.; Wang, Y.T.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.Y.; Sun, Y.T.; Xiao, Y.Q.; Zhai, Z.F.; Zhou, X.; Du, B.Y.; et al. miR164g-MsNAC022 acts as a novel module mediating drought response by transcriptional regulation of reactive oxygen species scavenging systems in apple. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Santos, F.; Capela, A.M.; Mateus, F.; Nóbrega-Pereira, S.; Bernardes de Jesus, B. Non-coding antisense transcripts: Fine regulation of gene expression in cancer. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 5652–5660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wight, M.; Werner, A. The functions of natural antisense transcripts. Essays Biochem. 2013, 54, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; He, Y. Natural antisense transcripts of MIR398 genes suppress microR398 processing and attenuate plant thermotolerance. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jiao, P.; Ma, R.; Wang, C.; Chen, N.; Liu, S.; Qu, J.; Guan, S.; Ma, Y. Integration of mRNA and microRNA analysis reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying drought stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 932667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Luo, C.; Bashir, N.H.; Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Shi, Y.; Chu, H. Plant microRNAs regulate the defense response against pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1434798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Diener, C.; Keller, A.; Meese, E. The miRNA-target interactions: An underestimated intricacy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, 1544–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Siddika, T.; Heinemann, I.U. Bringing MicroRNAs to Light: Methods for MicroRNA Quantification and Visualization in Live Cells. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 8, 619583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Afonso-Grunz, F.; Müller, S. Principles of miRNA-mRNA interactions: Beyond sequence complementarity. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 3127–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Xiao, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, K.; Wen, Z.; Li, M.; Zhang, L.; Guang, X. In silico method for systematic analysis of feature importance in microRNA-mRNA interactions. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Iyer, N.J.; Jia, X.; Sunkar, R.; Tang, G.; Mahalingam, R. microRNAs responsive to ozone-induced oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal Behav. 2012, 7, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, W.; Fu, Z.; Zhao, S.; E, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, B.; Sun, M.; Han, P.; et al. Integration of mRNA and miRNA analysis reveals the molecular mechanisms of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) response to salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 22074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Das, R.; Mondal, S.K. Plant miRNAs: Biogenesis and its functional validation to combat drought stress with special focus on maize. Plant Gene 2021, 27, 100294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Klapproth, C.; Zötzsche, S.; Kühnl, F.; Fallmann, J.; Stadler, P.F.; Findeiß, S. Tailored machine learning models for functional RNA detection in genome-wide screens. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2023, 5, lqad072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mahood, E.H.; Kruse, L.H.; Moghe, G.D. Machine learning: A powerful tool for gene function prediction in plants. Appl. Plant Sci. 2020, 8, e11376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bolger, M.E.; Arsova, B.; Usadel, B. Plant genome and transcriptome annotations: From misconceptions to simple solutions. Brief Bioinform. 2018, 19, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Son, A.; Park, J.; Kim, W.; Lee, W.; Yoon, Y.; Ji, J.; Kim, H. Integrating Computational Design and Experimental Approaches for Next-Generation Biologics. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Arif, K.M.T.; Okolicsanyi, R.K.; Haupt, L.M.; Griffiths, L.R. A combinatorial in silico approach for microRNA-target identification: Order out of chaos. Biochimie 2021, 187, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Murmu, S.; Sinha, D.; Chaurasia, H.; Sharma, S.; Das, R.; Jha, G.K.; Archak, S. A review of artificial intelligence-assisted omics techniques in plant defense: Current trends and future directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1292054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhu, C.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, S.; Niu, X.; Li, L.; Gao, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, R.; et al. Utilizing machine learning and bioinformatics analysis to identify drought-responsive genes affecting yield in foxtail millet. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kong, Y.; Han, J.H. MicroRNA: Biological and computational perspective. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2005, 3, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Dweep, H.; Sticht, C.; Gretz, N. In-Silico Algorithms for the Screening of Possible microRNA Binding Sites and Their Interactions. Curr. Genom. 2013, 14, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Dai, X.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhao, P.X. psRNATarget: A plant small RNA target analysis server (2017 release). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W49–W54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chaudhary, S.; Grover, A.; Sharma, P.C. MicroRNAs: Potential Targets for Developing Stress-Tolerant Crops. Life 2021, 11, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tang, Q.; Lv, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Xu, J.; Wu, F.; Wang, Q.; Feng, X.; Lu, Y. Characteristics of microRNAs and Target Genes in Maize Root under Drought Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Dai, H.; Yang, J.; Teng, L.; Wang, Z.; Liang, T.; Khan, W.A.; Yang, R.; Qiao, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, C. Mechanistic basis for mitigating drought tolerance by selenium application in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.): A multi-omics approach. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1255682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gupta, S.; Dong, Y.; Dijkwel, P.P.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Gechev, T.S. Genome-Wide Analysis of ROS Antioxidant Genes in Resurrection Species Suggest an Involvement of Distinct ROS Detoxification Systems during Desiccation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gallardo, C.; Videm, P.; Serrano-Solano, B. Whole transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Galaxy Training Materials. Available online: https://training.galaxyproject.org (accessed on 25 November 2024).
  112. Sablok, G.; Yang, K.; Wen, X. Protocols for miRNA Target Prediction in Plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1970, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cui, S.; Yu, S.; Huang, H.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Xiao, J.; Zuo, H.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; et al. miRTarBase 2025: Updates to the collection of experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 53, D147–D156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Huang, H.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Cui, S.; Huang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Xu, J.; Bao, J.; Li, Y.; Wen, J.; Zuo, H.; et al. miRTarBase update 2022: An informative resource for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D222–D230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tripathi, A.; Goswami, K.; Sanan-Mishra, N. Role of bioinformatics in establishing microRNAs as modulators of abiotic stress responses: The new revolution. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Pagliarani, C.; Gambino, G. Small RNA mobility: Spread of RNA silencing effectors and its effect on developmental processes and stress adaptation in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Chou, C.H.; Chang, N.W.; Shrestha, S.; Hsu, S.D.; Lin, Y.L.; Lee, W.H.; Yang, C.D.; Hong, H.C.; Wei, T.Y.; Tu, S.J.; et al. miRTarBase 2016: Updates to the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D239–D247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Krüger, J.; Rehmsmeier, M. RNAhybrid: microRNA target prediction easy, fast and flexible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W451–W454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Rehmsmeier, M.; Steffen, P.; Hochsmann, M.; Giegerich, R. Fast and effective prediction of microRNA/target duplexes. RNA 2004, 10, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Wang, J.; Gu, P.; Chen, M. MTide: An integrated tool for the identification of miRNA–target interaction in plants. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 290–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Srivastava, P.K.; Moturu, T.R.; Pandey, P.; Baldwin, I.T.; Pandey, S.P. A comparison of performance of plant miRNA target prediction tools and the characterization of features for genome-wide target prediction. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bonnet, E.; He, Y.; Billiau, K.; Van de Peer, Y. TAPIR: A web server for the prediction of plant microRNA targets, including target mimics. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1566–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rakhmetullina, A.; Ivashchenko, A.; Pyrkova, A.; Uteulin, K.; Zielenkiewicz, P. In silico analysis of maize and wheat miRNAs as potential regulators of human gene expression. ExRNA 2023, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rakhmetullina, A.; Zielenkiewicz, P.; Pyrkova, A.; Uteulin, K.; Ivashchenko, A. Prediction of characteristics of interactions of miRNA with mRNA of GRAS, ERF, C2H2 genes of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and Z. mays. Curr. Plant Biol. 2021, 28, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rakhmetullina, A.K.; Régnier, M.; Ivashchenko, A.T. The characteristics of MiRNA binding sites with mRNA of MYB plant transcription factors. Int. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 12, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Leontis, N.B.; Stombaugh, J.; Westhof, E. The non-Watson-Crick base pairs and their associated isostericity matrices. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3497–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chen, B.; Ding, Z.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, F.; Sun, J.; Chen, J.; Han, W. Integrated full-length transcriptome and microRNA sequencing approaches provide insights into salt tolerance in mangrove (Sonneratia apetala Buch.-Ham.). Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 932832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  128. Addo-Quaye, C.; Miller, W.; Axtell, M.J. CleaveLand: A pipeline for using degradome data to find cleaved small RNA targets. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wen, M.; Cong, P.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, H.; Li, T. DeepMirTar: A deep-learning approach for predicting human miRNA targets. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 3781–3787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Allakhverdiev, E.S.; Kossalbayev, B.D.; Sadvakasova, A.K.; Bauenova, M.O.; Belkozhayev, A.M.; Rodnenkov, O.V.; Martynyuk, T.V.; Maksimov, G.V.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. Spectral insights: Navigating the frontiers of biomedical and microbiological exploration with Raman spectroscopy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2024, 252, 112870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Vera-Hernández, P.F.; de Folter, S.; Rosas-Cárdenas, F.F. Isolation and Detection Methods of Plant miRNAs. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1932, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Bellato, M.; De Marchi, D.; Gualtieri, C.; Sauta, E.; Magni, P.; Macovei, A.; Pasotti, L. A Bioinformatics Approach to Explore MiRNAs as Tools to Bridge Pathways Between Plants and Animals. Is DNA Damage Response (DDR) a Potential Target Process? Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kalaigar, S.S.; Rajashekar, R.B.; Nataraj, S.M.; Vishwanath, P.; Prashant, A. Bioinformatic Tools for the Identification of MiRNAs Regulating the Transcription Factors in Patients with β-Thalassemia. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2022, 16, 11779322221115536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zhuang, F.; Fuchs, R.T.; Robb, G.B. Small RNA Expression Profiling by High-Throughput Sequencing: Implications of Enzymatic Manipulation. J. Nucleic Acids 2012, 2012, 360358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Wang, H.; Wang, M.; Cheng, Q. Capturing the Alternative Cleavage and Polyadenylation Sites of 14 NAC Genes in Populus Using a Combination of 3′-RACE and High-Throughput Sequencing. Molecules 2018, 23, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Yang, X.; You, C.; Wang, X.; Gao, L.; Mo, B.; Liu, L.; Chen, X. Widespread Occurrence of miRNA-Mediated Target Cleavage on Membrane-Bound Polysomes. Genome Biol. 2021, 22, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ji, Y.; Chen, P.; Chen, J.; Pennerman, K.K.; Liang, X.; Yan, H.; Zhou, S.; Feng, G.; Wang, C.; Yin, G.; et al. Combinations of Small RNA, RNA, and Degradome Sequencing Uncovers the Expression Pattern of miRNA-mRNA Pairs Adapting to Drought Stress in Leaf and Root of Dactylis glomerata L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Carpinetti, P.A.; Fioresi, V.S.; Ignez da Cruz, T.; de Almeida, F.A.N.; Canal, D.; Ferreira, A.; Ferreira, M.F.D.S. Efficient Method for Isolation of High-Quality RNA from Psidium guajava L. tissues. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sasi, S.; Krishnan, S.; Kodackattumannil, P.; Shamisi, A.A.; Aldarmaki, M.; Lekshmi, G.; Kottackal, M.; Amiri, K.M.A. DNA-free High-Quality RNA Extraction from 39 Difficult-to-Extract Plant Species (Representing Seasonal Tissues and Tissue Types) of 32 Families, and Its Validation for Downstream Molecular Applications. Plant Methods 2023, 19, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Fleige, S.; Pfaffl, M.W. RNA Integrity and the Effect on the Real-Time qRT-PCR Performance. Mol. Asp. Med. 2006, 27, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Brown, J.L.; Gierke, T.; Butkovich, L.V.; Swift, C.L.; Singan, V.; Daum, C.; Barry, K.; Grigoriev, I.V.; O’Malley, M.A. High-Quality RNA Extraction and the Regulation of Genes Encoding Cellulosomes Are Correlated with Growth Stage in Anaerobic Fungi. Front. Fungal Biol. 2023, 4, 1171100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Xu, W.B.; Cao, F.; Liu, P.; Yan, K.; Guo, Q.H. The multifaceted role of RNA-based regulation in plant stress memory. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1387575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Lv, D.K.; Bai, X.; Li, Y.; Ding, X.D.; Ge, Y.; Cai, H.; Ji, W.; Wu, N.; Zhu, Y.M. Profiling of Cold-Stress-Responsive miRNAs in Rice by Microarrays. Gene 2010, 459, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Pervaiz, T.; Amjid, M.W.; El-Kereamy, A.; Niu, S.-H.; Wu, H.X. MiRNA and cDNA-Microarray as Potential Targets Against Abiotic Stress Response in Plants: Advances and Prospects. Agronomy 2022, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Sunkar, R.; Zhu, J.-K. Novel and Stress-Regulated miRNAs and Other Small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2001–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhao, B.; Liang, R.; Ge, L.; Li, W.; Xiao, H.; Lin, H.; Ruan, K.; Jin, Y. Identification of Drought-Induced miRNAs in Rice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 354, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sunkar, R.; Chinnusamy, V.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, J.-K. Small RNAs as Big Players in Plant Abiotic Stress Responses and Nutrient Deprivation. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ma, X.; Tang, Z.; Qin, J.; Meng, Y. The Use of High-Throughput Sequencing Methods for Plant MicroRNA Research. RNA Biol. 2015, 12, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Katiyar, A.; Smita, S.; Muthusamy, S.K.; Chinnusamy, V.; Pandey, D.M.; Bansal, K.C. Identification of Novel Drought-Responsive MicroRNAs and Trans-Acting siRNAs from Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench by High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ahmed, W.; Li, R.; Xia, Y.; Bai, G.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, X.; Guo, P. Comparative Analysis of miRNA Expression Profiles Between Heat-Tolerant and Heat-Sensitive Genotypes of Flowering Chinese Cabbage Under Heat Stress Using High-Throughput Sequencing. Genes 2020, 11, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kutnjak, D.; Tamisier, L.; Adams, I.; Boonham, N.; Candresse, T.; Chiumenti, M.; De Jonghe, K.; Kreuze, J.F.; Lefebvre, M.; Silva, G.; et al. A Primer on the Analysis of High-Throughput Sequencing Data for Detection of Plant Viruses. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Diallo, I.; Provost, P. RNA-Sequencing Analyses of Small Bacterial RNAs and Their Emergence as Virulence Factors in Host-Pathogen Interactions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bousios, A.; Gaut, B.S.; Darzentas, N. Considerations and Complications of Mapping Small RNA High-Throughput Data to Transposable Elements. Mob. DNA 2017, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Stokowy, T.; Eszlinger, M.; Świerniak, M.; Fujarewicz, K.; Jarząb, B.; Paschke, R.; Krohn, K. Analysis Options for High-Throughput Sequencing in miRNA Expression Profiling. BMC Res. 2014, 7, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Maree, H.J.; Fox, A.; Al Rwahnih, M.; Boonham, N.; Candresse, T. Application of HTS for Routine Plant Virus Diagnostics: State of the Art and Challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. He, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, R.; Chen, Y. Integration of mRNA and miRNA Analysis Reveals the Differentially Regulatory Network in Two Different Camellia oleifera Cultivars under Drought Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1001357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Liu, M.; Yu, H.; Zhao, G.; Huang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Ouyang, B. Profiling of Drought-Responsive MicroRNA and mRNA in Tomato Using High-Throughput Sequencing. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Thomson, D.W.; Bracken, C.P.; Goodall, G.J. Experimental Strategies for MicroRNA Target Identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 6845–6853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Adkar-Purushothama, C.R.; Bru, P.; Perreault, J.P. 3′ RNA Ligase-Mediated Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends for Validating Viroid Induced Cleavage at the 3′ Extremity of the Host mRNA. J. Virol. Methods 2017, 250, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Mehdi, S.M.M.; Krishnamoorthy, S.; Szczesniak, M.W.; Ludwików, A. Identification of Novel miRNAs and Their Target Genes in the Response to Abscisic Acid in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Chen, J.; Li, L. Multiple Regression Analysis Reveals MicroRNA Regulatory Networks in Oryza sativa under Drought Stress. Int. J. Genom. 2018, 2018, 9395261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jiang, Y.; Wu, X.; Shi, M.; Yu, J.; Guo, C. The miR159-MYB33-ABI5 module regulates seed germination in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 2022, 174, e13659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gao, S.; Yang, L.; Zeng, H.Q.; Zhou, Z.S.; Yang, Z.M.; Li, H.; Sun, D.; Xie, F.; Zhang, B. A Cotton miRNA Is Involved in Regulation of Plant Response to Salt Stress. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Biogenesis and processing pathway of miRNAs in plants. The miRNA gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase II into a pri-miRNA with a stem-loop structure. The pri-miRNA is processed by the DCL1 enzyme, along with auxiliary proteins such as SE and HYL1, resulting in the formation of a pre-miRNA molecule, which subsequently develops into a miRNA duplex. Then, this duplex is stabilized by methylation from the HEN1 enzyme, after which it is exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm via the HASTY (HST1) protein for further integration into the RISC. In the cytoplasm, the mature miRNA strand is loaded into the RISC, where it guides the AGO1 protein to bind complementary target mRNA, leading to mRNA cleavage or translational repression.
Figure 1. Biogenesis and processing pathway of miRNAs in plants. The miRNA gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase II into a pri-miRNA with a stem-loop structure. The pri-miRNA is processed by the DCL1 enzyme, along with auxiliary proteins such as SE and HYL1, resulting in the formation of a pre-miRNA molecule, which subsequently develops into a miRNA duplex. Then, this duplex is stabilized by methylation from the HEN1 enzyme, after which it is exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm via the HASTY (HST1) protein for further integration into the RISC. In the cytoplasm, the mature miRNA strand is loaded into the RISC, where it guides the AGO1 protein to bind complementary target mRNA, leading to mRNA cleavage or translational repression.
Plants 14 00410 g001
Figure 2. Role of miRNAs in drought stress adaptation and tolerance. Drought stress in plants leads to stomatal closure, reducing water loss, while the accumulation of ROS at the cellular level induces oxidative damage, causing membrane disruption, hormonal imbalance, growth reduction, premature senescence, and reproductive failure. MicroRNAs regulate the interplay of phytohormones such as ABA, auxin, and cytokinin, optimizing plant adaptation to drought conditions and enhancing drought stress adaptation and tolerance.
Figure 2. Role of miRNAs in drought stress adaptation and tolerance. Drought stress in plants leads to stomatal closure, reducing water loss, while the accumulation of ROS at the cellular level induces oxidative damage, causing membrane disruption, hormonal imbalance, growth reduction, premature senescence, and reproductive failure. MicroRNAs regulate the interplay of phytohormones such as ABA, auxin, and cytokinin, optimizing plant adaptation to drought conditions and enhancing drought stress adaptation and tolerance.
Plants 14 00410 g002
Figure 3. Integrated workflow for studying miRNA-mediated drought tolerance in plants. (1) Drought stress significantly impacts plants, causing physiological changes such as leaf yellowing, reduced photosynthesis, and excessive accumulation of ROS due to water deficiency. During this stress, drought-responsive miRNAs are activated. (2) Bioinformatics tools such as psRNATarget, TargetFinder, miRTarBase, RNAhybrid, and MirTarget are used to predict miRNA-mRNA interactions. These tools analyze miRNA binding sites on the mRNA sequence, providing insights into their regulatory mechanisms. (3) Total RNA is extracted from plant tissues (e.g., leaves and roots), serving as the foundation for studying miRNAs and their target mRNAs. (4) Methods like qPCR and Northern blot are employed to validate the in silico predictions of miRNAs and their target mRNAs. These techniques are used to determine inverse correlations in expression levels between miRNAs and their targets. (5) Functional analysis is performed to investigate whether miRNAs repress or activate mRNA expression. These studies reveal the specific genetic pathways regulated by miRNAs. (6) Transgenic plants are developed to overexpress or suppress specific miRNAs or their target genes. These models are then studied to evaluate their ability to adapt to drought stress. (7) Drought adaptation traits in transgenic plants, such as water retention capacity, root system architecture, and ROS levels, are assessed comprehensively. These analyses help determine the plants’ drought tolerance levels. (8) As a result of these steps, strategies to improve plant drought tolerance are identified. These strategies pave the way for developing drought-resistant crop varieties.
Figure 3. Integrated workflow for studying miRNA-mediated drought tolerance in plants. (1) Drought stress significantly impacts plants, causing physiological changes such as leaf yellowing, reduced photosynthesis, and excessive accumulation of ROS due to water deficiency. During this stress, drought-responsive miRNAs are activated. (2) Bioinformatics tools such as psRNATarget, TargetFinder, miRTarBase, RNAhybrid, and MirTarget are used to predict miRNA-mRNA interactions. These tools analyze miRNA binding sites on the mRNA sequence, providing insights into their regulatory mechanisms. (3) Total RNA is extracted from plant tissues (e.g., leaves and roots), serving as the foundation for studying miRNAs and their target mRNAs. (4) Methods like qPCR and Northern blot are employed to validate the in silico predictions of miRNAs and their target mRNAs. These techniques are used to determine inverse correlations in expression levels between miRNAs and their targets. (5) Functional analysis is performed to investigate whether miRNAs repress or activate mRNA expression. These studies reveal the specific genetic pathways regulated by miRNAs. (6) Transgenic plants are developed to overexpress or suppress specific miRNAs or their target genes. These models are then studied to evaluate their ability to adapt to drought stress. (7) Drought adaptation traits in transgenic plants, such as water retention capacity, root system architecture, and ROS levels, are assessed comprehensively. These analyses help determine the plants’ drought tolerance levels. (8) As a result of these steps, strategies to improve plant drought tolerance are identified. These strategies pave the way for developing drought-resistant crop varieties.
Plants 14 00410 g003
Figure 4. RNA extraction process for miRNA profiling and analysis. (1) Collection of plant samples subjected to drought stress (leaf, root, etc.). (2) RNA extraction using guanidine thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform extraction or commercial kits. (3) Ensuring efficient extraction while preserving small RNA fractions, including miRNA. (4) RNA/miRNA quality and integrity check using spectrophotometry, gel electrophoresis, or Bioanalyzer. (5) RNA/miRNA ready for analysis (miRNA profiling, HTS, or RACE-PCR).
Figure 4. RNA extraction process for miRNA profiling and analysis. (1) Collection of plant samples subjected to drought stress (leaf, root, etc.). (2) RNA extraction using guanidine thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform extraction or commercial kits. (3) Ensuring efficient extraction while preserving small RNA fractions, including miRNA. (4) RNA/miRNA quality and integrity check using spectrophotometry, gel electrophoresis, or Bioanalyzer. (5) RNA/miRNA ready for analysis (miRNA profiling, HTS, or RACE-PCR).
Plants 14 00410 g004
Table 2. In silico tools for miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction in drought tolerance studies.
Table 2. In silico tools for miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction in drought tolerance studies.
ToolDescription miRNAs Studied for Drought ToleranceRefs.
psRNATargetPredicts miRNA-mRNA interactions via sequence complementarity and target accessibility. Used for studying drought pathways like ABA signaling and ROS detoxificationmiR159a, miR1119, miR156d-3p, miR160a-5p, miR162a-3p, miR172b-3p, miR398a-5p, Novel_8,
Novel_9,
Novel_105
[106,107,108,109,110]
TargetFinderUses a position-weighted scoring algorithm to evaluate miRNA-mRNA complementaritymiR171, miR319, miR398, miR1432, miR156, miR396[111,112]
miRTarBaseA database of experimentally validated miRNA–target interactionsmiRNAs involved in ABA signaling and stress response pathways[113,114,115,116,117]
RNAhybridPredicts energetically favorable miRNA-mRNA duplexesmiR160, miR164, miR166, miR393, miR529, miR169, miR2275[118,119]
TapirPredicts imperfectly matched miRNA-mRNA interactions using FASTA- and RNAhybrid-based algorithmsmiR172, miR164, miR160[120,121,122]
MirTargetAnalyzes miRNA binding sites in coding and untranslated regions of mRNAstae-miR1127b-3p, tae-miR159a,b-3p, tae-miR164-5p, tae-miR171a-3p[123,124,125,126]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhakypbek, Y.; Belkozhayev, A.M.; Kerimkulova, A.; Kossalbayev, B.D.; Murat, T.; Tursbekov, S.; Turysbekova, G.; Tursunova, A.; Tastambek, K.T.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. MicroRNAs in Plant Genetic Regulation of Drought Tolerance and Their Function in Enhancing Stress Adaptation. Plants 2025, 14, 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030410

AMA Style

Zhakypbek Y, Belkozhayev AM, Kerimkulova A, Kossalbayev BD, Murat T, Tursbekov S, Turysbekova G, Tursunova A, Tastambek KT, Allakhverdiev SI. MicroRNAs in Plant Genetic Regulation of Drought Tolerance and Their Function in Enhancing Stress Adaptation. Plants. 2025; 14(3):410. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030410

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhakypbek, Yryszhan, Ayaz M. Belkozhayev, Aygul Kerimkulova, Bekzhan D. Kossalbayev, Toktar Murat, Serik Tursbekov, Gaukhar Turysbekova, Alnura Tursunova, Kuanysh T. Tastambek, and Suleyman I. Allakhverdiev. 2025. "MicroRNAs in Plant Genetic Regulation of Drought Tolerance and Their Function in Enhancing Stress Adaptation" Plants 14, no. 3: 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030410

APA Style

Zhakypbek, Y., Belkozhayev, A. M., Kerimkulova, A., Kossalbayev, B. D., Murat, T., Tursbekov, S., Turysbekova, G., Tursunova, A., Tastambek, K. T., & Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2025). MicroRNAs in Plant Genetic Regulation of Drought Tolerance and Their Function in Enhancing Stress Adaptation. Plants, 14(3), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030410

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop