Next Article in Journal
Integrative Analysis Provides Insights into Genes Encoding LEA_5 Domain-Containing Proteins in Tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L.)
Previous Article in Journal
An Efficient Model for Leafy Vegetable Disease Detection and Segmentation Based on Few-Shot Learning Framework and Prototype Attention Mechanism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of External Sources of Indole Acetic Acid and 2,3,5-Triiodobenzoic Acid on Alkaloid Production and Their Relationships with Primary Metabolism and Antioxidant Activity in Annona emarginata (Schltdl.) H. Rainer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Allelic Expression Dynamics of Regulatory Factors During Embryogenic Callus Induction in ABB Banana (Musa spp. cv. Bengal, ABB Group)

1
Institute of Horticultural Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Key Laboratory of Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Ministry of Education, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(5), 761; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050761
Submission received: 15 December 2024 / Revised: 19 February 2025 / Accepted: 25 February 2025 / Published: 1 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plant Auxin Biology)

Abstract

:
The regulatory mechanisms underlying embryogenic callus (EC) formation in polyploid bananas remain unexplored, posing challenges for genetic transformation and biotechnological applications. Here, we conducted transcriptome sequencing on cultured explants, non-embryogenic callus, EC, and browning callus in the ABB cultivar ‘MJ’ (Musa spp. cv. Bengal). Our analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) revealed significant enrichment in plant hormones, MAPK, and zeatin biosynthesis pathways. Notably, most genes in the MJ variety exhibited balanced expression of the A and B alleles, but A-specific allele expression was dominant in the key signaling pathways, whereas B-specific allele expression was very rare during EC induction. In the auxin signaling pathway, six A-specific MJARF genes were markedly downregulated, underscoring their critical roles in the negative regulation of callus formation. Additionally, six A-specific MJEIN3 alleles were found to play negative regulatory roles in ethylene signaling during EC development. We also identified phenylpropanoids responsible for enzymatic browning. Furthermore, the expression patterns of transcription factors in bananas exhibited specific expression modes, highlighting the unique mechanisms of callus formation. This study enhanced our understanding of the regulatory roles of these alleles in EC induction and offers new insights into the utilization of alleles to improve the efficiency of somatic embryogenesis in bananas.

1. Introduction

Bananas (Musa spp.) are perennial, herbaceous, monocotyledonous plants belonging to the Musaceae family within the order Zingiberales. As one of the most produced fruits globally, bananas are a staple food for millions of people. The ABB group, which consists of starchy cooking bananas, plays a crucial role in food security, particularly in Southeast Asia [1]. Almost all cultivated banana varieties originated from the intra- and interspecific hybridization of two wild species in the Eumusa section, namely Musa acuminata (AA) and Musa balbisiana (BB), as well as long-term evolutionary variations, resulting in different genomic types such as diploids (AA, AB, and BB), triploids (AAA, AAB, ABB), and tetraploids (AAAA, AAAB, AABB, ABBB) [2]. Most commercial bananas are triploids, making it challenging to improve them using traditional breeding methods. To enhance the diversity, disease resistance, and cold tolerance of banana varieties, breeding bananas using biotechnological approaches is inevitable. The establishment of a robust genetic transformation receptor system is the foundation of plant genetic engineering [3]. A deeper understanding of the regulatory mechanisms governing banana embryogenic callus (EC) will significantly enhance genetic transformation efficiency.
The receptor system for exogenous genes in bananas is much more complex than the general tissue culture and reproduction systems used for banana production. Embryogenic cell suspension (ECS) lines have been successfully established in various banana varieties (lines) with multiple genotypes (AA, AB, AAB, ABB, AAA, and AAAA) [4,5]. The embryogenic system has been successfully used for Banana Agrobacterium transformation [6]; however, the transformation efficiency remains relatively low. Genotypes are the most crucial factor affecting efficiency. In this sense, somatic embryogenesis (SE) has been successfully achieved in several banana genotypes, including AA, BB, AB, AAA, ABB, and AAB) [3]. Currently, three varieties of Musa AAB, namely ‘French Plantain’, ‘Mysore’, and ‘Silk’, have been reported with SE induction efficiencies of 2%, 3%, and 7%, respectively. However, the Musa AAA ‘Grande Naine’ variety exhibited the highest induction rate among all the tested varieties, reaching 37% [7]. The reason for the highest induction rate in AAA varieties, and whether this was due to gene duplication in the A genome, has not yet been reported. Despite the existing research on SE induction in bananas, the process still faces challenges of low and unstable induction rates. The low induction efficiency of EC is still the key to hindering the genetic transformation of bananas [3]. Therefore, unveiling the key genes and molecular mechanisms underlying somatic embryogenic callus induction has become a focal point of research on the banana embryogenic regeneration system.
The use of plant genetic transformation systems to investigate gene functions has become a widely adopted research approach. Recent reports have suggested that the overexpression of certain key genes can significantly enhance the ability of plants to induce callus differentiation and regeneration, thereby improving the efficiency of genetic transformation. Overexpression of the maize GOLDEN2 gene in rice and maize callus tissues promotes callus differentiation, consequently enhancing genetic transformation efficiency [8]. Similarly, the TaWOX5 gene could significantly enhance wheat embryogenic calli and plant regeneration. Utilization of the TaWOX5 gene markedly improves genetic transformation efficiency and reduces genotype dependence in most wheat varieties [9]. Furthermore, the TaLAX1 gene enhances wheat malt regeneration by activating cytokinin synthesis and auxin transport-related gene expression, thereby enhancing wheat genetic transformation and gene-editing efficiency [10]. In Arabidopsis, ectopic expression of LEC2 promotes SE, whereas, in cassava, MeLEC2 overexpression induces embryogenesis, making it a valuable tool for transformation recovery [11,12]. Furthermore, HB52 and CRF3 overexpression in Arabidopsis aids callus formation without requiring exogenous auxins, whereas DoLEA43 overexpression enhances callus induction, such as WIND1 expression [13,14]. All these genes, which can significantly enhance callus differentiation and regeneration capabilities, have been successfully applied in genetic transformation following in-depth studies on the mechanisms of embryogenic calli and callus differentiation. This suggests that if we can identify the key genes involved in the induction of embryogenic calli in bananas and thoroughly elucidate their regulatory mechanisms, it may be possible to apply this knowledge to enhance the efficiency of banana genetic transformation.
There has been limited research on the regulatory mechanisms of EC induction and SE in bananas, and the main regulatory genes have not yet been identified. Understanding somatic cell development at the molecular level can be facilitated by transcriptome and proteome analyses [15]. Various differentially expressed proteins and genes involved in banana SE have been identified using multi-omics approaches, particularly transcriptomics and proteomics [16,17,18]. Studies suggest that embryogenic cells (ECs) are associated with an elevated accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging proteins, heat shock proteins (HSPs), and proteins involved in growth regulation [16,17]. Calcium signaling pathways and plant growth regulators, including indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), benzylaminopurine (BAP), and kinetin, play critical roles in the development and germination of banana somatic embryos [3].
The hormone signaling pathway, an important carrier of regulatory substances in organisms, plays an important role in callus formation [19]. Some studies have found that exogenous auxin can activate the expression of LECs and then activate the expression of auxin synthesis-related genes YUC2 and YUC4 and promote the development of Arabidopsis somatic embryo [20]. The LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN (LBD)/asymmetric leaf 2-like transcription factor is involved in the regulation of callus formation in Arabidopsis. Auxin response factor ARF can activate the expression of the downstream LBD family of transcription factors LBD16, LBD17, LBD18, and LBD29 [21]. The molecular mechanism by which cytokinins promote callus formation remains to be further studied; however, B-ARRs, key transcription factors of the cytokinin signaling pathway, are closely related to callus formation [22]. Studies on Arabidopsis thaliana showed that overexpression of ARR4 significantly promoted bud formation in the presence of cytokinin, while overexpression of ARR8 inhibited bud formation and callus greening [23]. Overexpression of ARR1 in a medium containing cytokinins promotes the formation of Arabidopsis calli [24]. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is an important signal transmitter from the cell surface to the nucleus and plays a crucial regulatory role in plant growth and development [25,26]. Transcriptome sequencing of different calli from two Eucalyptus species revealed that most of the genes were involved in signaling pathways such as plant hormones and MAPK [27]. In Hevea brasiliensis, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were mainly enriched in MAPK and plant hormone signaling, biosynthesis, and metabolic pathways of secondary metabolites [28]. Numerous genes associated with SE have been identified through transcriptome analyses and callus induction, including ABA-induced genes [29], AGL 15 [30], calmodulin [31], DcAGP [32], LEC [33], and SERK [34]. Further studies suggest that the transcription factors BBM, WUS, VIVIVIPAROUS1, and LEC may play important roles in banana SE, particularly BBM2 and WUS2, in both embryogenic and non-embryogenic cell suspensions [18]. To date, the regulatory network for EC induction in triploid bananas of the ABB genome group has not been established, and the contributions of different alleles during the induction process remain unclear. The “Bengal Banana” (Musa spp. cv. Bengal, ABB Group, referred to as MJ banana) is part of the cooking banana series and was introduced from Bangladesh to China. Its primary phenotypic traits include a robust plant structure, large fruit size, and strong resistance to both diseases and drought [35]. Investigating the EC regulation mechanism of the MJ cultivar and establishing its callus induction system is crucial for developing transgenic banana varieties that are cold-tolerance, disease-resistant, and of high quality.
In this study, we developed an EC induction system for the MJ cultivar and uncovered a framework for the molecular events of callus formation in the ABB banana MJ. Furthermore, we elucidated the functional roles of the A and B alleles, providing a critical foundation for a deeper understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying EC formation in triploid bananas.

2. Results

2.1. Morphologies of Calli and the Crucial Role of the Growth Regulator 2,4-D in Promoting EC Induction

When cultured on previously reported callus induction media with varying hormone ratios [36,37], the MJ cultivar (ABB genotype) exhibited the earliest initiation of callus growth. Therefore, we selected this cultivar as the primary experimental material. We developed several distinct culture media to induce callus formation and observed that immature flowers of the MJ cultivar could be induced to form callus on any of the four media tested (Supplementary Table S1). After a 5-month induction period, explants from immature male flowers showed the highest callus induction rate on B1 medium with 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D, resulting in the emergence of crystalline small granular callus on the explant surfaces (Figure 1a–d, Supplementary Table S1). The callus induction rate on the B2 medium with 1 mg/L 2,4-D was similar, with most explants producing larger yellowish granular calli (Figure 1e) and small crystalline granular calli. However, some explants on B2 medium produced velvety white calli. The induction rate on B3 medium with 2 mg/L 2,4-D was significantly decreased compared to that on B1 and B2, showing a mix of crystalline small granular calli and yellowish larger granular calli (Supplementary Table S1). For the B4 medium with 4 mg/L 2,4-D, the induction rate of the explants was 28.1% (Supplementary Table S1). The callus state was suboptimal, with a low number of induced calli, exhibiting velvety white calli and very few crystalline small granular calli with a more pronounced brown coloration. From these results, we concluded that the concentration of 2,4-D is crucial for callus induction rate and quality. Embryogenic calli of Banana MJ were successfully induced from the B2 medium after 9 months of induction, displaying a soft, yellow, moist, and loose morphology (Figure 1f). Therefore, the B2 medium (basal medium supplemented with 1 mg/L 2,4-D, 1 mg/L NAA, and 1 mg/L IAA) was determined to be the optimal medium for subsequent experiments.
To further analyze the morphology of callus cells at different developmental stages, we examined the status of various callus cell forms in paraffin sections. The non-embryogenic calli appeared white, loose and lacked embryo-like structures on the surface (Figure 1g). The cells of the non-embryogenic calli were highly vacuolated, contained fewer starch granules, and exhibited abnormal shapes and sizes (Figure 1g–h). Larger yellowish granular calli were another special non-embryogenic callus (Figure 1e), suggesting that they may be intermediates in the process of EC formation or SE. In contrast, the embryogenic calli of MJ were pale yellow and delicate. These cells were small, spherical, and had centrally located nuclei. Both the nucleus and the cytoplasm were deeply stained and displayed characteristics typical of ECs. Darkly stained cell aggregates confirmed the presence of dense cytoplasm with abundant starch granules in the EC (Figure 1i). Embryogenic cells were spherical and multiplied at a high rate.

2.2. Comparison of Transcriptional Profiling During Formation of EC in ABB Banana

To identify the key DEGs and essential pathways involved during banana EC induction, we selected samples from the five stages for global transcriptome analysis. These stages included immature male flowers of bananas cultivated on B2 medium for one week (0M), flowers cultivated on B2 medium for 5 months (5M) and 12-month callus (12M), embryogenic calli (EC), and browning embryogenic calli (BC) (Figure 2a–e). The published genome of M. acuminata (AA genome) of DH-Pahang and Musa balbisiana (BB genome) of DH-PKW were used as reference genomes for transcriptome data analysis [38,39]. The correlation between the biological replicates for each stage was calculated based on the FPKM results. Pearson’s correlation analysis indicated a high linear correlation among different samples (Supplementary Figure S1a). Furthermore, the PCA of the 15 samples (with three biological replicates for each sample) showed clear distinctions at different stages and a compact distribution of biological replicates (Supplementary Figure S1b), indicating that the data quality was highly reproducible, allowing for further analysis.
We identified 6440, 5053, 4335, and 1787 upregulated DEGs and 6634, 6005, 4143, and 1018 downregulated DEGs across four comparisons: 5M versus 0M, 12M versus 5M, EC versus 12 M, and BC versus EC, respectively, using the AA genome as a reference (Figure 2f–g). Similar patterns of upregulated and downregulated DEGs were observed when the BB genome was used as a reference (Figure 2f). Additionally, using the AA genome as a reference, we identified 4756, 2159, 1937, and 299 specific DEGs across the four groups, respectively (Figure 2g). Similarly, using the BB genome as a reference, we detected 4286, 2026, 1696, and 256 DEGs in the respective groups (Supplementary Figure S2). The number of specifically expressed genes progressively decreased across the four stages, suggesting that gene expression was significantly influenced during the early phases of explant differentiation. To investigate the specific expression of the A and B alleles in MJ bananas further, we identified homologous and specific genes using scripts based on mapping of the AA and BB genomes. We identified 28,969 homologous genes, 7936 A-specific genes, and 2772 B-specific genes in the MJ bananas. The number of A-specific genes was 2.8 times greater than that of B-specific genes, indicating the significant predominance of A-specific genes in the MJ ABB genome.

2.3. Global Analysis of DEGs Expressed in Calli During the EC Induction of ABB Banana

Subsequently, GO classification and KEGG pathway analyses were conducted for the DEGs across the four comparisons. In the comparison between the 0M and 5M callus, DEGs were significantly enriched in biological processes such as response to stimulus, response to stress, embryogenic root development, and protein phosphorylation (Supplementary Figure S3a).
Additionally, in the comparison between the 12M and 5M callus, DEGs were enriched in biological processes, including response to stimulus, response to stress, oxidation–reduction, and DNA metabolic processes (Supplementary Figure S3b). As the 12M callus developed into an EC, the DEGs were primarily enriched in plant organ development, response to hormones, response to organic substances, and response to acidic chemicals (Supplementary Figure S3c). When comparing browning calli and embryogenic calli, enrichment was observed for phenylpropanoid metabolic processes, phenylpropanoid biosynthetic processes, secondary metabolic processes, lignin metabolic processes, and flavonoid metabolic processes (Supplementary Figure S3d).
Furthermore, significant differences were identified in the KEGG pathways of DEGs during the formation of embryogenic calli in MJ at various stages. In the comparison between 12M and 5M callus, DEGs were enriched in pathways such as plant hormone signal transduction, tyrosine metabolism, fatty acid degradation, ABC transporters, and starch and sucrose metabolism (Supplementary Figure S4a). Following the development of the 5-month callus, the enriched pathways included plant hormone signal transduction, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, glutathione metabolism, starch, and sucrose metabolism, and the MAPK signaling pathway (Supplementary Figure S4b). Notably, aside from metabolism and secondary metabolism, the hormone signaling pathway emerged as the most significantly enriched pathway, underscoring the pivotal role of hormones at this stage. Additionally, KEGG enrichment analysis revealed a distinct MAPK signaling pathway in plants. Previous evidence suggests that MAPK plays a crucial role in physiological processes such as the regulation of plant growth, development, and stress resistance [40].
In the comparison between 12M callus and embryogenic calli, plant hormone signal transduction and MAPK signaling pathways were the two most enriched pathways. Concurrently, significant enrichment was observed in metabolites such as glutathione metabolism, tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis; phenylpropanoid biosynthesis; and starch and sucrose metabolism (Supplementary Figure S4c). When comparing browning calli to normal calli, pathways including phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis, glutathione metabolism, and flavonoid biosynthesis were predominantly enriched (Supplementary Figure S4d), suggesting that the accumulation of metabolites primarily begins at the EC stage. Subsequently, we focused on the changes in the expression levels of genes significantly enriched in these pathways to elucidate the cellular changes occurring in plant cells.
Next, we concentrated on the plant hormone signaling pathways, MAPK signaling pathways, and zeatin biosynthesis signaling pathways to uncover the critical roles of A-specific and B-specific alleles in the banana MJ EC induction process. Consequently, we identified 48, 32, and 5 genes within the A-specific alleles in three signaling pathways. Interestingly, we identified only two specific B alleles expressed in the hormone signaling pathway, whereas no specific B allele was identified in the MAPK or zeatin biosynthesis signaling pathways (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). We selected seven specific genes for identify chromosomal position and specificity determination, encompassing six A-specific genes: Macma4_04_g11940 (MJ_GID2), Macma4_06_g14450 (MJ_ARF), Macma4_07_g28170 (MJ_IAA), Macma4_02_g00180 (MJ_CALM) involved in the MAPK signaling pathway, Macma4_08_g22960 (MJ_EIN3), and Macma4_04_g24700 (MJ_CISZOG) associated with the zeatin biosynthesis pathway, in addition to one B-specific gene, Mba10_g12780 (MJ_PYL). Through a comprehensive synteny analysis of the genes flanking these seven specific loci, we observed that the interval lengths of these A-specific genes and their adjacent syntenic genes were significantly greater than those of the syntenic genes in the BB genome (Figure 3). The results showed that the emergence of these specific genes was attributable to gene loss in the BB genome or insertional structural variations. This finding not only corroborates the precision of identifying specific genes but also reveals potential mechanisms underlying the formation of these specific genes.

2.4. The Dominant Expression Changes of Genes Involved in Auxin Signaling During EC Formation

To elucidate the regulatory network involved in EC dedifferentiation, we analyzed the DEGs enriched in hormonal signaling pathways across the four stages of callus development. Specifically, 234, 210, 183, and 58 genes were enriched in the comparisons of 5M vs. 0M, 12M vs. 5M, EC vs. 12M, and BC vs. EC, respectively. A Venn diagram was constructed to identify the stage-specific genes (Figure 2g, Supplementary Figure S2), highlighting the significant involvement of hormone-related genes in the differentiation potential of embryogenic calli. Our initial focus was on the auxin and cytokinin signaling pathways during callus induction.
The primary inactivation route for the natural auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) involves the GH3-ILR1-DAO pathway. Initially, GH3 IAA amidosynthetases transform IAA into IAA-amino acid conjugates. These conjugates, specifically IAA-aspartate (IAA-Asp) and IAA-glutamate (IAA-Glu) act as storage forms of IAA. They can be reconverted to IAA through the action of ILR1/ILL amidohydrolases [41]. We identified 17 A allele GH3 genes and 19 B allele GH3 genes. Among the A alleles, MJGH3.8_1, MJGH3.8_2, MJGH3.1_3, and MJGH3.8_5 were significantly upregulated during the 5M stage of MJ, whereas MJGH3.1_1, MJGH3.1_5, and MJGH3.8_7 showed notable induction at the 12M stage, with a marked increase in expression in the EC (Figure 4a). These findings suggest that following callus induction, MJGH3 expression is induced by auxin in the culture medium, leading to the production of more IAA-amino acid conjugates within the cells. This indicated that GH3 plays a crucial role in maintaining auxin concentrations and ensuring cell division, thereby promoting callus induction.
In the auxin signaling pathway, Aux/IAA plays an inhibitory role in the regulation of auxin-responsive gene expression. Aux/IAA proteins form dimers with the Auxin Response Factors (ARFs), thereby inhibiting their transcriptional regulatory functions of ARFs. ARF transcription factors can bind to the cis-regulatory elements of auxin-inducible genes and regulate their transcriptional expression [42]. We identified 27 differentially expressed members of the IAA family in both A and B alleles during MJ callus induction. Notably, MJIAA21_2, MJIAA30_3, MJIAA16, and MJIAA21_4 were notably induced at the 5M stage of callus initiation, with B alleles showing a consistent expression pattern (Figure 4b). This suggests that IAA transcriptional repressors were significantly upregulated after callus induction, initiating transcriptional repression. Additionally, 12 differentially expressed ARF genes were identified. Interestingly, these alleles exhibited low expression levels during the MJ callus induction stage, except for one gene, MJARF24_1, which was highly expressed in MJ explants but showed a significant decrease in expression at the 5M stage (Figure 4c,f). Notably, we identified 11 specific A alleles of MJARF genes, all of which displayed a significant downward trend during callus induction (Figure 4d,f). These findings indicate that, during banana callus induction, the accumulation of IAA family members leads to an increase in bound ARFs, resulting in decreased ARF expression, thereby regulating callus proliferation and differentiation.
Small auxin-up RNA (SAUR) is a rapidly responsive gene to auxin [43]. A total of five MJSAUR genes that exhibited differential expression during the callus induction process with MJ treatment were identified. Notably, almost all these genes showed a significant increase in expression at the 5M stage (Figure 4e,f). This suggests that MJSAUR plays a crucial role in the early response to callus induction.
Cytokinin signaling relies primarily on downstream auxin response regulators (ARRs) to convey signals. Interestingly, we observed minimal differential expressions of cytokinin-related genes during callus induction in bananas. Only three ARR-B genes were identified as A-specific alleles. However, they exhibited very low expression levels in both MJ explants and callus induction stages (Supplementary Table S2). Additionally, cytokinin dehydrogenase (CKX) inactivates cytokinins by oxidatively removing their active side chains, rendering them biologically inactive. We identified one specific A allele of MJCKX with no differential expression; the B allele was not expressed during callus formation (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

2.5. BSK and BZR1 Are Involved in the Regulation of EC Induction

Brassinosteroids (BRs) constitute a class of plant steroid hormones playing pivotal roles in plant growth and development [44,45]. Studies have demonstrated that supplementation with BRs at suitable concentrations enhances SE formation in various plant species, including plumules [46], Coffea arabica [47], and cotton [48]. In our study, we identified five DEGs enriched in brassinosteroid (BR) synthesis and signal transduction pathways, comprising two BR-signaling kinase genes (BSK) and three brassinosteroid-resistant 1/2 genes (BZR1_2). The expression abundance of the MJBSK1 gene peaked during the 0M period, followed by initial downregulation and subsequent gradual upregulation after the 12M period. Conversely, the expression of the MJBSK2 gene was upregulated during the 5M period, reaching its peak at the 12M period and then gradually decreasing during EC development, with an interesting upregulation observed in the browning EC (Figure 5a). For the MJBZR1_1 genes, expression abundance peaked in the EC, whereas MJBZR1_2 expression peaked at the 12M stage (Figure 5a). The expression patterns of the B allele of MJBSK1 and MJBZR1 were highly similar to those of the A allele, suggesting the conservation of BSK and BZR1 in the functions of both A and B alleles (Figure 5a). These results indicated that MJBZR1_1 and MJBZR1_2 play positive roles in inducing EC formation.

2.6. Abscisic Acid Pathway Gene PYL Is Very Important to Respond EC Induction

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a classical plant growth inhibitor that regulates various physiological processes, including embryo maturation, seed dormancy, germination, cell division, and elongation [49]. ABA also inhibits the germination of mature embryos and their conversion into plantlets [50]. ABA is perceived by the intracellular PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors, which are encoded by PYL genes [51,52]. When ABA binds to PYL receptors, it triggers a signaling cascade that activates downstream responses [53]. In our study, we identified eight DEGs enriched in the abscisic acid receptor PYR/PYL family. Four MJPYL genes (MJPYL2_1, MJPYL12_1, MJPYL12_2, and MJPYL2_2) were highly expressed during EC induction. However, the B alleles of MJPYL8_1 and MJPYL8_2 were significantly upregulated in Stage 2 (five months after callus induction in explants), whereas the expression of the A alleles showed no significant changes (Figure 5b). This indicated that the B alleles of these two alleles were specifically expressed. Interestingly, we also identified one B allele of MJPYL that was specifically expressed and exhibited the highest expression levels in the embryogenic calli (Supplementary Table S3). This suggests that the B-specific allele of MJPYL is crucial for EC formation in MJ bananas.

2.7. Genes Involved in Ethylene Signaling Negatively Regulate the Formation of EC

Ethylene regulates organogenesis and SE, and its role has been extensively studied [54]. EBF1 (EIN3-Binding F-box 1) and EIN3 (Ethylene Insensitive 3) are key components of the ethylene signaling pathway, where EBF1 negatively regulates EIN3 by promoting its degradation. In our study, three out of four MJEBF1 genes showed high expression in the explants, but all were downregulated after callus induction, with similar trends observed for both the A and B alleles (Figure 5c). Furthermore, six MJEIN3 genes exhibited similar expression patterns in both the A and B alleles. Among them, MJEIN3_L1_1 and MJEIN3_L1_3 showed the highest expression in the explants, with their expression levels gradually decreasing after callus induction. However, MJEIN3_L1_2 and MJEIN3_L1_4 displayed different patterns, with their expression levels significantly upregulated at Stage 2 (five months after callus induction), followed by a decrease (Figure 5c). Interestingly, we identified six MJEIN3 genes that were specifically expressed in the A allele. Among these, MJEIN3_L1_5, MJEIN3_L3_4, and MJEIN3_L3_4.2 exhibited very low expression levels, whereas MJEIN3_L1_6, MJEIN3_L1_7, and MJEIN3_L1_8 exhibited allele-specific expression (Figure 5d). Specifically, MJEIN3_L1_6 and MJEIN3_L1_7 alleles negatively regulated callus formation, whereas MJEIN3_L1_8 was significantly highly expressed only at stage 2, and its expression decreased at other stages (Figure 5d). These findings indicate that MJEBF1 and MJEIN3 serve as negative regulators of callus induction. Notably, the expression of specific MJEIN3 A alleles appears to play a crucial role in negative regulation during embryogenic development. This suggests a complex regulatory mechanism by which these alleles modulate key developmental processes, potentially influencing the efficiency and outcomes of callus formation.

2.8. Specific A Alleles Involved in the MAPK Signaling Pathway Positively Regulates the Development of EC

In plants, MAPK signaling pathways play crucial regulatory roles in various biological processes, including responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as hormone and developmental signaling pathways [55]. BraMAPK3 demonstrates a rapid response to treatments involving salt, heat, waterlogging, wounding, 6-BA, and NAA, suggesting that BraMAPK3 may be a key regulator of abiotic stress responses [56]. Additionally, miRNAs target genes within the MAPK signaling pathway to regulate the accumulation of functional metabolites in longans [57].
We investigated the MAPK signaling pathway and identified 128 and 103 DEGs in comparisons between 12M vs. 5M and between EC vs. 12M, respectively. Among these, 68 DEGs were common to both comparisons, whereas 60 of 128 and 35 of 103 DEGs were unique to each comparison. CHIB basic endochitinase B (CHIB) and pathogenesis-related protein 1(PR1) are both involved in plant defense mechanisms and can be linked to the MAPK signaling pathway, which is crucial for transmitting stress and defense signals in plants [58]. Specifically, we identified three CHIB, six PR1 for the A allele, and three CHIB and seven PR1 genes for the B allele that were differentially expressed during callus formation in Banana MJ (Figure 5e).
Notably, the three CHIB genes for the A and B alleles were significantly upregulated at the 5-month callus stage but were downregulated at other stages, particularly MJCHIB2 and MJCHIB3, indicating their dominance in banana callus formation. Plant pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins are crucial components of plant defense mechanisms and are primarily associated with responses to biotic and abiotic stress [59,60]. For the A allele of PR1, all MJPR were highly expressed in the 5-month callus and browning calli, except for the B alleles of MJPR_1 and MJPR_6 (Figure 5e). This indicates that the MJPR1 gene exhibits a similar effect in both the A and B alleles.
Interestingly, our analysis revealed 32 genes associated with the MAPK signaling pathway within specific A alleles, including notable genes such as calmodulin (CALM), MKK4_5, MKK9, MPK1, and transcription factor MYC2 (Supplementary Table S2). Among these nine members of the MJCALM gene family, MJCALM_1, MJCALM_1.2, and MJCALM3 (Figure 5f) showed remarkably high expression levels during callus formation. Of special interest, MJCALM3 was significantly induced at the 5M stage, underscoring its pivotal role in callus induction. These observations imply that the 32 genes involved in the MAPK signaling pathway may have a substantial impact on callus induction.

2.9. Pheylalanine and Flavonoids Are the Main Phenolic Compounds Responsible for Enzymatic Browning

Tissue culture is an effective method for rapidly breeding seedlings and enhancing production efficiency. However, explant browning poses a key limitation to successful tissue culture. Enzymatic browning is the primary cause of explant browning in plant tissue culture. In banana tissue culture, browning of embryogenic calli is a significant hurdle in banana callus transformation. Through a comparative analysis between embryogenic calli and browning calli, we identified 49 DEGs significantly enriched in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, 18 DEGs in the Tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis pathways, 17 DEGs in ubiquinone and other terpenoid–quinone biosynthesis pathway and 21DEGs in the Flavonoid Biosynthesis pathway. Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H; CYP73A) is a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase located in the endoplasmic reticulum of plants. This enzyme utilizes NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase as an electron donor and hydroxylates cinnamic acid to produce 4-coumaric acid during phenylpropanoid metabolism. Notably, all six MaCYP73A genes and their alleles exhibited markedly upregulated expression levels in the browning calli, with particular emphasis on MJCYP73A_5 (Figure 5g). In the phenylalanine metabolism pathway, genes encoding phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), peroxidase, and cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) displayed lower expression during the formation stage of the EC but significantly higher expression in browning calli. Notably, the inhibition of PAL activity has been linked to a reduction in phenolic compound biosynthesis, and our analysis identified six MaPAL genes and alleles that showed elevated expression in the browning callus compared to the EC (Figure 5g). CHS (chalcone synthase) is a key enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of flavonoids. We identified nine MaCHS DEGs, four of which were specific genes lacking the B allele. All of these CHS genes exhibited elevated expression levels in the browning callus, with particular emphasis on the specific gene MJCHS_5 (Figure 5g). When explants are cut, the cells are damaged, leading to the release of phenols that undergo enzymatic oxidation to form quinones, resulting in enzymatic browning [61].

2.10. Specific Expression of Transcription Factors During the EC Formation Process

Transcription factors (TFs) are master regulators that play crucial roles in various biological processes by modulating a wide array of downstream targets. Our RNA-seq data revealed that the bHLH, MYB, ERF, NAC, and WRKY families were the top five TF families identified in the DEG involved in the four comparisons (Figure 6a,b). Notably, one-third of the transcription factors were significantly downregulated upon initiation of EC induction, indicating their negative regulatory role in this process. In contrast, the remaining two-thirds of the transcription factors exhibited varying degrees of upregulation during both the 5-month and 12-month stages of EC development, suggesting at positive regulatory function for the induction of embryogenic calli (Figure 6c).
Over the past decade, studies of mutants with abnormal callus induction and development have revealed that callus induction is governed by intricate regulatory mechanisms [62]. Several key molecules involved in callus development regulation have been identified in Arabidopsis, many of which are crucial transcription factors. We investigated homologous genes in bananas and examined the expression of their A and B alleles. Interestingly, we found that nearly 80% of these homologous genes exhibited very low or no significant expression during EC induction in bananas. However, some previously reported transcription factors, such as MJLBD and MJWIND1, were significantly induced. Specifically, MJLBD17 and MJLBD18 were markedly induced in the BB genome, whereas both A and B alleles of the MJLBD16 gene are induced during banana development. Additionally, MJWIND1, MJWIND2, MJWIND3, and MJWIND4, and the auxin transport carrier genes MJPIN and MJLAX2 showed significant induction only in the B allele during EC induction. CYCD3, previously reported as a cell cycle-related gene, also showed significantly high expression of both the A and B alleles during the callus induction stage in bananas (Figure 6d). To validate the accuracy of the transcriptome data, we selected six genes (MJGH3_1, MJIAA30_1, MHLAX2, MJCYCD3, MJWIND2, MJAGL15) for quantitative analyses. The observed expression patterns were consistent with those of the RNA-Seq, confirming the reliability of the data (Figure 7, Supplementary Table S4). These findings suggest that the expression of these genes, which are known to play critical roles in callus induction in Arabidopsis, plays an allele-specific role in bananas.

3. Discussion

The induction of embryogenic calli in bananas is challenging. In this study, we successfully induced embryogenic calli in the ABB genotype of the banana MJ variety under various test conditions, and histological analysis confirmed the excellent state of the EC. Through transcriptome analysis during the formation of embryogenic calli, we discovered that auxin signaling pathway genes played a dominant role in the induction of MJ embryogenic calli, followed by the involvement of the MAPK signaling pathway, ABA, and ethylene. This indicates that the induction of banana callus is a process of coordinated hormonal signaling regulation, with callus induction and explant defense responses being synergistically controlled. Surprisingly, we demonstrated the minimal involvement of cytokinin signaling molecules in the establishment of embryogenic calli.
In our study of the banana ABB genotype cultivar MJ, we focused on the dominant and specific expression of the A and B alleles. Interestingly, we found that the homologous genes of the A and B alleles in MJ exhibited very similar expression patterns in the auxin, ABA, ethylene, and MAPK signaling pathways, with no homologous genes showing dominant expression levels (Figure 8). However, we identified some A-specific genes expressed in these signaling pathways, including the specific expression of the ARF gene family in the AA genome, which negatively regulates EC induction (Figure 8). MJEIN3 in the ethylene signaling pathway also acts as a negative regulator, whereas MJCALM in the MAPK signaling pathway acts as a positive regulator (Figure 8). This suggests that these specific A genes have unique effects on embryogenic calli in bananas. In the B allele, we identified only two PYL genes in the ABA signaling pathway, and only one was specifically expressed in embryogenic calli, indicating that ABA signaling molecules in B-specific genes promote EC expression to some extent (Figure 8). In addition, our analysis of embryogenic calli and browned embryogenic calli revealed that browning was primarily caused by the accumulation of phenylpropanoids and flavonoids (Figure 8). Browning can be effectively suppressed by inhibiting the synthesis of these phenolic compounds, thereby enhancing the activity of banana embryogenic calli and improving their genetic transformation.

3.1. Auxin Master Regulator in the Induction of EC in ABB Banana

Auxins and cytokinins are primary hormones that induce callus formation. Recent studies have highlighted auxin as a well-known inducer of lateral root formation in Arabidopsis. In the auxin signaling pathway, enzymes encoded by GH3 genes primarily function to conjugate auxins with amino acids, thereby regulating auxin activity and levels. This regulatory mechanism helps maintain the auxin balance during various developmental stages and environmental conditions [41]. Studies have shown that within a few hours of SE induction, IAA concentration decreases while CcGH3 levels increase, resulting in reduced auxin levels [63]. These findings suggest that endogenous auxin accumulation is crucial for altering cell fate and establishing embryogenesis. Furthermore, in our studies, during the induction of embryogenic calli in bananas, we observed significant changes in MJGH3 gene expression. Genes such as MJGH3.8_1, MJGH3.1_3, and MJGH3.8_5 were highly expressed at the 5M stage and during both the 12M and EC stages, whereas genes such as MJGH3.1_5 were significantly expressed during the 12M and EC stages (Figure 4a). This indicates that auxin levels in MJ banana callus induction are regulated by multiple GH3 genes, with endogenous auxin decreasing after 5M induction, promoting EC formation through precise regulation by multiple GH3 genes, differing from previous studies.
Previous studies have indicated that nearly 86 transcription factors related to auxin synthesis and signaling are differentially expressed from the dedifferentiation process to the SE development stage. In embryogenic calli, GH3.17, PIN3, AUX.IAA, YUC, AUX/LIKE1, and SAUR show highly expressed; however, their expression decreases during embryo proliferation. However, their expression levels decline as embryo proliferation progresses [64]. We found that MJIAAs were also significantly upregulated after callus induction (Figure 4b), suggesting that the expression changes in IAA genes during callus induction are relatively conserved. In our study, MJSAURs were significantly induced at the 5M stage (Figure 4e), indicating their involvement in EC formation in bananas. Our study also found significant upregulation of MJPIN1 at the onset of the 5M stage (Figure 6d), indicating a significant correlation between PIN1 and banana EC formation, which is consistent with previous studies.
Various members of the LBD family also referred to as the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2-LIKE transcription factors, such as LBD16, LBD17, LBD18, and LBD29, play a role in callus formation on explants cultured on callus induction medium (CIM) by interacting with ARF7 and ARF19 [65,66]. Our results indicate that MJLBD16 was significantly induced at the 12-month stage of callus induction (Figure 6d), suggesting that its role is also conserved in monocotyledonous bananas, potentially acting as a key transcription factor that activates the expression of downstream genes related to callus induction.
ARRs play a pivotal role in the induction of callus through cytokinin signaling. These transcription factors are activated via a multistep phosphorelay process, leading to the activation of various target genes [22]. One notable target of type-B ARRs is CYCD3, which is crucial for reinitiating the cell cycle. The expression of CYCD3 is significantly increased within an hour of cytokinin exposure, and its overexpression can promote callus formation even without external cytokinin application [67]. Although our callus-induction medium did not include exogenous cytokinins, we observed a significant increase in MJCYCD3 expression at the 12M stage of callus induction (Figure 6d). We did not detect significantly high expression of type-B ARRs during the callus induction stage, suggesting that MJ callus formation may be promoted by the activation of MJCYCD3 expression through endogenous cytokinins. The AP2/ERF transcription factors, including ESR (also referred to as DORNRÖSCHEN [DRN]), ESR1, and ESR2, are potential candidates involved in cytokinin-driven callus formation. Notably, the overexpression of either ESR1 or ESR2 can trigger callus formation even without the addition of external plant hormones [68,69]. However, in bananas, we found that MJESR1 was not expressed during the callus formation, indicating that the underlying mechanism in bananas is significantly different from that in papaya.

3.2. The PYL Genes Play a Specific Promotive Role in the B Genome During Banana Callus Formation

In Ormosia henryi, the levels of IAA, cytokinins, gibberellins, and ABA significantly increase during the development of embryogenic calli (EC). The expression patterns of DEGs involved in ABA biosynthesis and signal transduction, such as ZEP, ABA2, AAO3, CYP97A3, PYL, and ABF, are consistent with endogenous hormone levels observed during SE [70]. As receptors of ABA, PYL proteins play crucial roles in ABA-mediated seed germination, with ABI5 modulating seed germination through the feedback regulation of PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA receptor gene expression [71]. In banana tissues, the expression levels of most PYL genes peaked during the 5M and 12M stages and gradually decreased during the EC and BC stages (Figure 5b). However, previous studies indicated that ABA represses callus formation, highlighting its negative effects on cell proliferation. In our study, we did not observe the upregulation of PYL during SE in banana tissues. Notably, within the hormone signaling pathways, we identified only two B-specific genes, the MJPYL genes, whose expression began to increase gradually from the 5M stage, reaching the highest levels in embryogenic calli (Supplementary Table S3). ABA concentration in plants increases upon exposure to salt stress. ABA binds to its receptor proteins (PYR/PYL/RCAR), thereby transmitting the ABA signal to downstream transcription factors that regulate the expression of stress-responsive genes. These findings suggest that the PYL gene, a downstream receptor of ABA, is significantly upregulated during banana callus formation, indicating a potential promotive role in callus development rather than merely responding to stress signals. The specific inducible expression of the two B alleles of MJPYL suggests that they may play a crucial role in promoting callus formation via the ABA signaling pathway. This represents a polyploid-specific expression pattern that is significantly different from that of ordinary diploids.

3.3. Elucidating the Primary Browning Compounds Contributes to Mitigating Browning During the Process of EC Induction

Most studies on callus responses to browning have concentrated on physiological indicators, with limited research on the transcriptomic responses of banana calli to browning [72]. In the present study, we analyzed the genetic differences between embryogenic and browning calli in bananas. We identified DEGs that were enriched in pathways such as flavonoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, the biosynthesis of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. These findings suggest that phenolic compounds, which are ubiquitous secondary metabolites in plants, serve as primary substrates for enzymatic browning. These substances can be categorized as flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tannins.
Browning results from a physiological enzymatic process where phenolic production, influenced by sugars, is essential. Preventing browning can be achieved by inhibiting flavonoid production. CHS is responsible for catalyzing the first critical step in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway [73,74]. The expression of the CHS genes was upregulated during the browning of banana explants, which accelerated the browning process (Figure 5g). Phenolic secondary metabolites significantly influence the quality of plant-derived foods by affecting their appearance, flavor, and health-promoting properties. Various factors affect the contents of these metabolites, influencing their stability, biosynthesis, and degradation. Notably, PAL is a key enzyme in their biosynthesis, inducible by diverse stress and environmental conditions [75]. PAL and peroxidase (POD) act as catalysts for polyphenol biosynthesis, leading to wound-induced browning [76]. The PAL gene family is crucial for plant growth, development, and abiotic stress response and has been identified in various plants [77]. Browning of banana fruit during ripening results from the release of pre-existing PPO enzyme, which is synthesised very early in fruit development [78]. Genome-wide analysis of the polyphenol oxidase gene family in bananas reveals that MaPPO1 and MaPPO6 are major contributors to fruit browning during fruit ripening [79]. Phenylpropanoid compounds serve multiple functions in plant defense mechanisms, acting as both preformed and inducible barriers-physical and chemical-against infections. They also function as signaling molecules that trigger defense gene activation both locally and systemically [80]. Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) is a crucial gene within the phenylpropanoid pathway, playing a role in the regulation of flavonoid and lignin biosynthesis in plants. Additionally, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) facilitates the final step in monolignol biosynthesis by converting cinnamyl aldehydes into alcohols, utilizing NADPH as a cofactor [81]. 4-Coumarate: coenzyme A ligase (4CL) is a critical enzyme in the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway [82]. The upregulation of these genes in MJ ultimately leads to flavonoid biosynthesis and the accumulation of phenylpropanoids, with the phenolic substances responsible for enzymatic browning originating primarily from the phenylpropanoid pathway (Figure 5g). These phenolic compounds cause browning in MJ embryogenic calli. By identifying the main metabolites responsible for browning in bananas, we can effectively inhibit the production of these compounds during banana tissue culture using substances that suppress their synthesis, thereby enhancing callus induction rates and transformation efficiency. Previous studies on plant tissue cultures of Taxus chinensis and Glycyrrhiza inflata identified flavonoid compounds from the phenylpropanoid pathway as the primary contributors to browning, with myricetin and quercetin being the main substrates of the browning reaction. The inhibition of flavonoid biosynthesis can prevent browning, and the use of gibberellic acid (GA3) as an inhibitor of flavonoid biosynthesis has been shown to effectively control browning [73], further confirming the role of flavonoids in inducing browning. Research has shown that incorporating ascorbic acid into basal media can significantly reduce phenolic secretion, enhancing culture quality and boosting the survival rates of okra cotyledonary node explants (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) [83]. Additional research has demonstrated that activated charcoal in the culture medium can mitigate the negative effects of leached phenolics on the regeneration of Celastrus paniculatus and C. orchioides [84]. Based on these insights, we suggest that testing various combinations of GA3, ascorbic acid, activated charcoal, and other additives during callus induction in the ABB genotype MJ cultivar could inhibit embryogenic calli browning, thereby enhancing the efficiency of banana genetic transformation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Callus Induction

The MJ variety of bananas (Musa spp. cv. Bengal, ABB Group), with a genotype of ABB, was introduced from Bangladesh and cultivated on the campus of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. Young male inflorescences were sourced from MJ banana plants exhibiting normal flowering patterns. They were used as explant material and initially rinsed under clean running water. The outer bracts and flowers were removed, leaving an inner inflorescence approximately 4 cm in size. These were then transferred to a laminar flow hood, where the inflorescences were rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. Following this, the inflorescences were immersed in 75% ethanol for 5 min with occasional stirring. The ethanol was discarded, and the inflorescences were rinsed 3–5 times with sterile distilled water. The inflorescence is then trimmed to approximately 1.5 cm, and immature male flowers are selected for inoculation. Eight banana cultivars were collected to establish an embryogenic callus induction system. The culture medium was prepared using MS basal medium and single distilled water, incorporating chemicals such as MS basal medium salts, 2,4-D, NAA, and IAA, as outlined in Supplementary Table S1. The concentrations of NAA and IAA were 1 mg/L in the culture medium, and the concentrations of 2,4-D in media B1 to B4 were 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/L, respectively. The callus induction rate statistics were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.26.0.

4.2. Histological Observation of Callus

Embryogenic and non-embryogenic calli were fixed and preserved using FAA fixative, composed of 50 mL of 95% ethanol, 5 mL of glacial acetic acid, 10 mL of 37% formaldehyde, and 35 mL of double-distilled water. A vacuum was applied until bubbles appeared on the surface, maintained for 10 min, and then gradually released, allowing the tissue to settle at the bottom of the tube. Post-vacuum, the FAA fixative was replenished as necessary, and samples were stored at 4 °C overnight. Dehydration was subsequently performed by transitioning to absolute ethanol, starting with 50% ethanol, each concentration applied for 60 min, followed by an overnight treatment in absolute ethanol. Sequential treatments with 75% ethanol and 25% xylene, 50% ethanol and 50% xylene, 25% ethanol and 75% xylene, and finally 100% xylene were conducted, each for 60 min, with an overnight treatment in 100% xylene. Samples were then treated at 60 °C with 25%, 50%, and 75% paraffin–xylene solutions, each for 3–5 h, and finally with 100% paraffin for one week, changing the paraffin twice daily. For embedding, the embedding box was placed on an ice–water mixture, and melted paraffin was quickly poured into it. Once the paraffin slightly solidified at the bottom, the material was positioned in the paraffin using preheated tweezers and allowed to cool. The embedded tissue was sectioned into 8 μm slices using a microtome (LEICA, RM2145, Wetzlar, Germany), and the sections were floated on water on glass slides and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The samples were deparaffinized with 100% xylene and treated twice for 20 min each. Rehydration was performed sequentially with a 50% ethanol/xylene mixture, followed by 100%, 95%, 80%, and 70% ethanol, each for 2–5 min. The samples were stained with 1% periodic acid solution for 15–20 min, followed by Schiff reagent for 10–15 min, rinsed with running water for 5–10 min, stained with 0.5% hematoxylin for 2 min, and rinsed again with running water for 5 min. A few drops of mounting resin were applied to the slide, which was then covered with a coverslip. The morphology, internal structure, and cell division of the callus tissues at various stages were observed using a Nikon Ni-U research-grade upright microscope.

4.3. RNA Extraction and Library Conduction

Total RNA extraction utilized the TaKaRa MiniBEST Plant RNA Extraction kit (Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing), Beijing, China). The integrity and quality of the RNA were assessed through 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA-Seq libraries were constructed using the NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England Biolabs (NEB), Ipswich, MA, USA). Prior to sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq platform at Novogene (Beijing, China), the concentrations of the prepared libraries were quantified using the Qubit® 2.0 fluorimeter (Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.4. Differential Gene Expression Analysis and Function Enrichment Analysis

Banana explants were subjected to flower culture, resulting in the generation of callus at various developmental stages, including EC and browning EC. Explants cultured on B2 for seven days were as the beginning control (MJ_0M), and after 5 months (MJ_5M) were selected for further culture, and those collected after 12 months (MJ_12M) were also cultured. The EC (MJ_EC) and browning EC (MJ_BC) obtained were then subjected to transcriptome sequencing with three replicates for each sample. Illumina sequencing was employed to generate the sequencing data, followed by quality control filtering using Fastp software (v.0.23.2, https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp (accessed on 8 July 2023). Assembly and annotation of the M. acuminata (AA genome) of DH-Pahang and Musa balbisiana (BB genome) of DH-PKW were downloaded from NCBI as reference genomes for the analysis of transcriptome data. Comparative analysis was performed using Hisat2 software [85] (v.2.1.0, https://daehwankimlab.github.io/hisat2/download/ (accessed on 15 July 2023), and feature counts were quantified using featureCounts [86] (v.2.0.2, https://github.com/ShiLab-Bioinformatics/subread (accessed on 20 July 2023) to calculate TMM (Trimmed Mean of M-values normalized data) value. Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Trinity software (v.2.11.0, https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/wiki/Installing-Trinity, accessed on 20 July 2023), and the DESeq2 (v.1.42.0) package in R (v.4.3.1). DEGs were identified based on log2FoldChange (|log2FoldChange| > 1) and padj (<0.05). Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis for the DEGs were conducted using the EggNOG Database (http://eggnog5.embl.de/#/app/home (accessed on 10 November 2023) and OmicShare (https://www.omicshare.com/tools/ (accessed on 15 November 2023). The visualization of the gene expression heatmap was also performed using the OmicShare platform(https://www.omicshare.com/tools/ (accessed on 15 November 2023). The prediction of the functional roles of the DEGs utilized the nr database; details regarding its setup can be found at https://www.matrixscience.com/help/seq_db_setup_nr.html (accessed on 10 December 2023).

4.5. Identification of Genomic Alleles in AA and BB

The collinear genes between AA and BB genome were identified using Mcscan (https://github.com/tanghaibao/jcvi/wiki/MCscan-(Python-version) (accessed on 2 August 2024), complemented by the reciprocalBLAST_plus.pl script with identity set to 0.6 and coverage set to 0.2. The remaining genes were added to the list of contributing genes through homologous alignment, resulting in a comprehensive collinearity table for AA and BB. Genes specific to AA and BB, with no matches, were further confirmed as specific genes by aligning them to the AA and BB genomes, respectively, using the GMAP software (http://research-pub.gene.com/gmap/, accessed on 20 October 2024) [87]. Additionally, seven specific genes were selected, and their adjacent genes were detected using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 20 October 2024). The positions of these specific genes were visualized using R (v.4.3.1), illustrating whether the variations were due to segment insertions or deletions. Structural variation analysis was conducted to confirm the variant genes.

4.6. Quantitative Analysis

The relative expression changes of six candidate genes (MJ_A_GH3_1, MJ_A_IAA30_1, MJ_B_LAX2, MJ_A_CYCD3, MJ_B_WIND2, and MJ_A_AGL15) in banana callus at five different stages were analyzed using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) technology. The Banana RPS2 gene was used as the reference gene [88]. Sangon Biotech synthesised specific primers for each transcript. Extracting RNA from the material at different periods using Tiangen’s RNAprep Pure Plant Plus Kit (Polysaccharides and Polyphenolics-rich). The extracted RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA using the EvoM-MLV reverse transcription premix kit (Accurate Biotechnology, Changsha, Hunan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Materials from five different developmental stages (0M, 5M, 12M, EG, BC) were cultured on fresh media for 10 days before sampling. The five samples were collected around 7 p.m. and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. All samples were stored at −80 °C. Once all the materials were collected, we proceeded with qPCR analysis. The RT-qPCR was performed using the TB Green Premix Ex Taq II kit (Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing), China). The amplification program was as follows: 95 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 30 s, cycle 40, followed by a melting curve analysis from 65–95 °C. Relative transcript levels were calculated with the ΔΔCt method. The primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S4.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we performed a dynamic expression analysis of the EC induction process in the banana cultivar MJ. Our findings reveal that this process is mainly regulated by the plant hormone, MAPK, and zeatin biosynthesis pathways. Notably, while homologous genes did not exhibit dominant expression between the A and B alleles, there was a marked predominance of A-specific allele expression within these pathways, with B-specific allele expression being notably scarce during EC induction. This suggests that A-specific alleles may play a pivotal role in the induction of banana EC. Furthermore, we discovered that the browning of banana callus could be attributed to the substantial upregulation of key genes in the phenylpropanoid and flavonoid metabolic pathways, resulting in the accumulation of these metabolites. Additionally, we identified several key transcription factors known to be highly expressed during the induction of banana EC. Our results provide valuable insights into the allele-specific expression effects in banana EC induction and serve as important references for enhancing the banana embryogenic callus induction system.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14050761/s1. Supplementary Table S1: Effects of 2,4-D on embryonic callus induction of Banana ABB cultivar MJ. Supplementary Table S2: Annotation of specific A Alleles enriched in plant hormone signal transduction, MAPK signaling pathways and zeatin biosynthesis. Supplementary Table S3: Annotation of specific A Alleles enriched in plant hormone signal transduction, MAPK signaling pathways and zeatin biosynthesis. Supplementary Table S4: Primers for RT-PCR are used to verify gene expression levels. Supplementary Figure S1: The Pearson’s correlation analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were conducted on 15 samples. Each with three biological replicates, using the AA genome as a reference. Supplementary Figure S2: Venn diagram showing overlap and specific DEGs between four samples at different stages using BB genome as reference. 0M: immature male flower cultivated on B2 medium for one week as cultured explant; 5M: flower cultivated on B2 medium for 5 months; 10M: 10-month callus; EC:embryogenic callus. BC: Browning embryogenic callus. Supplementary Figure S3: Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of differentially expressed genes across four groups. (a) The 20 most significantly enriched GO biological process categories among DEGs in the comparison of 5M versus 0M. (b) The top 20 enriched GO pathways identified in the 12M versus 5M comparison, sorted by the number of DEGs with a p value ≤ 0.05. (c) The 20 most enriched GO categories among DEGs in the EC versus 12M comparison. (d) The top 20 GO pathway categories in the BC versus EC DEGs. Supplementary Figure S4: KEGG analysis of differentially expressed genes across four groups. (a) The 20 most significantly enriched GO biological process categories among DEGs in the comparison of 5M versus 0M. (b) The top 20 enriched GO pathways identified in the 12M versus 5M comparison, sorted by the number of DEGs with a p value ≤ 0.05. (c) The 20 most enriched GO categories among DEGs in the EC versus 12M comparison. (d) The top 20 GO pathway categories in the BC versus EC DEGs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation, X.Z.; validation, Y.Z., W.X. and Y.Y.; formal analysis, Z.F.; investigation, X.Z., Y.Z. and J.P.; data curation, writing—review and editing, Z.L., Y.L. and Y.C.; supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System (Banana) Special Fund (GARS-31-15) from Zhongxiong Lai, the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFD1000900) from Zhongxiong Lai, and the Special Fund for Scientific and Technological Innovation of Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University (KFb22021XA) from Zhongxiong Lai.

Data Availability Statement

The transcriptome data of banana callus at various developmental stages have been uploaded to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number PRJNA1212789.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cenci, A.; Sardos, J.; Hueber, Y.; Martin, G.; Breton, C.; Roux, N.; Swennen, R.; Carpentier, S.C.; Rouard, M. Unravelling the complex story of intergenomic recombination in ABB allotriploid bananas. Ann. Bot. 2021, 127, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Simmonds, N. The Evolution of the Bananas; Longmans: London, UK, 1962; pp. 101–131. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, J.; Gan, S.; Zheng, Y.; Jin, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, J. Banana somatic embryogenesis and biotechnological application. Trop. Plants 2022, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Novak, F.J.; Afza, R.; Van Duren, M.; Perea-Dallos, M.; Conger, B.V.; Tang, X. Somatic embryogensis and plant regeneration in suspension cultures of dessert (AA and AAA) and cooking (ABB) bananas (Musa spp.). Biotechnology 1989, 7, 154–159. [Google Scholar]
  5. Remakanthan, A.M.T.; Soniya, E.V. Somatic embryogenesis in banana (Musa acuminata AAA cv. Grand Naine): Effect of explant and culture conditions. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2014, 50, 127–136. [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, X.; Huang, X.L.; Xiao, W.; Zhao, J.T.; Dai, X.M.; Chen, Y.F.; Li, X.J. Highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic cell suspensions of Musa acuminata cv. Mas (AA) via a liquid co-cultivation system. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 1755–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Escalant, J.V.; Teisson, C.; Cote, F. Amplified somatic embryogenesis from male flowers of triploid banana and plantain cultivars (Musa spp.). In Vitro-Plant 1994, 30, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.; Yu, S.; Cheng, Z.; Chang, X.; Yun, Y.; Jiang, M.; Chen, X.; Wen, X.; Li, H.; Zhu, W.; et al. Origin and evolution of the triploid cultivated banana genome. Nat. Genet. 2024, 56, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, K.; Shi, L.; Liang, X.; Zhao, P.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Chang, Y.; Hiei, Y.; Yanagihara, C.; Du, L.; et al. The gene TaWOX5 overcomes genotype dependency in wheat genetic transformation. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, Y.; Yu, H.; Peng, J.; Yao, W.J.; Wang, Y.P.; Zhang, F.L.; Wang, S.R.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.Y.; Zhang, X.S.; et al. Enhancing wheat regeneration and genetic transformation through overexpression of TaLAX1. Plant Commun. 2023, 28, 100738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brand, A.; Quimbaya, M.; Tohme, J.; Chavarriaga-Aguirre, P. Arabidopsis LEC1 and LEC2 Orthologous Genes Are Key Regulators of Somatic Embryogenesis in Cassava. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, F.; Liu, C.; Xia, H.; Bi, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, S.; Hou, L.; Li, F.; Wang, X. Induced expression of AtLEC1 and AtLEC2 differentially promotes somatic embryogenesis in transgenic tobacco plants. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. He, C.; Liu, X.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Wang, H.; Peng, T.; Zhang, M.; Si, C.; Yu, Z.; Tan, J.; Zhang, J.; et al. Characterization of LEA genes in Dendrobium officinale and one Gene in induction of callus. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 259, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, K.; Liu, J.; Fan, M.; Xin, W.; Hu, Y.; Xu, C. A genome-wide transcriptome profiling reveals the early molecular events during callus initiation in Arabidopsis multiple organs. Genomics 2012, 100, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marsoni, M.; Bracale, M.; Espen, L.; Prinsi, B.; Negri, A.S.; Vannini, C. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Vitis vinifera. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumaravel, M.; Uma, S.; Backiyarani, S.; Saraswathi, M.S.; Vaganan, M.M.; Muthusamy, M.; Sajith, K.P. Differential proteome analysis during early somatic embryogenesis in Musa spp. AAA cv. Grand Naine. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumaravel, M.; Uma, S.; Backiyarani, S.; Saraswathi, M.S. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryo development in Musa spp. cv. Grand Naine (AAA). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 020–61005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shivani; Awasthi, P.; Sharma, V.; Kaur, N.; Pandey, P.; Tiwari, S. Genome-wide analysis of transcription factors during somatic embryogenesis in banana (Musa spp.) cv. Grand Naine. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Su, Y.H.; Zhang, X.S. The hormonal control of regeneration in plants. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2014, 108, 35–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Braybrook, S.A.; Harada, J.J. LECs go crazy in embryo development. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fan, M.; Xu, C.; Xu, K.; Hu, Y. LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN transcription factors direct callus formation in Arabidopsis regeneration. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hwang, I.; Sheen, J.; Müller, B. Cytokinin signaling networks. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 353–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Osakabe, Y.; Miyata, S.; Urao, T.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Overexpression of Arabidopsis response regulators, ARR4/ATRR1/IBC7 and ARR8/ATRR3, alters cytokinin responses differentially in the shoot and in callus formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 293, 806–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sakai, H.; Honma, T.; Aoyama, T.; Sato, S.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; Oka, A. ARR1, a transcription factor for genes immediately responsive to cytokinins. Science 2001, 294, 1519–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Guan, R.; Li, S.; Xu, X.; Zhang, S.; Xu, J. Co-regulation of indole glucosinolates and camalexin biosynthesis by CPK5/CPK6 and MPK3/MPK6 signaling pathways. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 1780–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, K.; Sui, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W. Colonization of Trichoderma viride Tv-1511 in peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.) roots promotes essential oil production by triggering ROS-mediated MAPK activation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Chen, S.; Tang, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Zhong, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, B. Gene expression programs during callus development in tissue culture of two Eucalyptus species. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, L.; Sun, X.; Yu, W.; Gui, M.; Qiu, Y.; Tang, M.; Tian, H.; Liang, G. Comparative transcriptome analysis of high- and low-embryogenic Hevea brasiliensis genotypes reveals involvement of phytohormones in somatic embryogenesis. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, X.; Zhang, X. Regulation of Somatic Embryogenesis in Higher Plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2010, 29, 36–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zheng, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Ji, H.; Burnie, W.; Perry, S.E. Gene Regulation by the AGL15 Transcription Factor Reveals Hormone Interactions in Somatic Embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 2374–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mahalakshmi, A.; Singla, B.; Khurana, J.P.; Khurana, P. Role of calcium–calmodulin in auxin-induced somatic embryogenesis in leaf base cultures of wheat (Triticum aestivum var. HD 2329). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007, 88, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baldwin, T.C.; Domingo, C.; Schindler, T.; Seetharaman, G.; Stacey, N.; Roberts, K. DcAGP1, a secreted arabinogalactan protein, is related to a family of basic proline-rich proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 45, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Niu, D.; He, Y. LEAFY COTYLEDONs: Old genes with new roles beyond seed development. F1000Research 2019, 27, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kumar, V.; Van Staden, J. Multi-tasking of SERK-like kinases in plant embryogenesis, growth, and development: Current advances and biotechnological applications. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2019, 41, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, J.Y. Preliminary Research on the Cold and Disease Resistance of Bengal Plantain. J. Zhongkai Agrotech. Coll. 1994, 7, 85–87. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jekayinoluwa, T.; Tripathi, J.N.; Obiero, G.; Muge, E.; Tripathi, L. Phytochemical Analysis and Establishment of Embryogenic Cell Suspension and Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation for Farmer Preferred Cultivars of West African Plantain (Musa spp.). Plants 2020, 9, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kulkarni, V.M.; Bapat, V.A. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from cell suspension cultures of Rajeli (AAB), an endangered banana cultivar. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 22, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Z.; Miao, H.; Liu, J.; Xu, B.; Yao, X.; Xu, C.; Zhao, S.; Fang, X.; Jia, C.; Wang, J.; et al. Musa balbisiana genome reveals subgenome evolution and functional divergence. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 810–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. D’Hont, A.; Denoeud, F.; Aury, J.-M.; Baurens, F.-C.; Carreel, F.; Garsmeur, O.; Noel, B.; Bocs, S.; Droc, G.; Rouard, M.; et al. The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature 2012, 488, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, M.; Zhang, S. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant signaling. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 301–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hayashi, K.-i.; Arai, K.; Aoi, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Hira, H.; Guo, R.; Hu, Y.; Ge, C.; Zhao, Y.; Kasahara, H.; et al. The main oxidative inactivation pathway of the plant hormone auxin. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, S.B.; Xie, Z.Z.; Hu, C.G.; Zhang, J.Z. A Review of Auxin Response Factors (ARFs) in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Spartz, A.K.; Lee, S.H.; Wenger, J.P.; Gonzalez, N.; Itoh, H.; Inzé, D.; Peer, W.A.; Murphy, A.S.; Overvoorde, P.J.; Gray, W.M. The SAUR19 subfamily of SMALL AUXIN UP RNA genes promote cell expansion. Plant J. 2012, 70, 978–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xie, Z.; Nolan, T.; Jiang, H.; Tang, B.; Zhang, M.; Li, Z.; Yin, Y. The AP2/ERF Transcription Factor TINY Modulates Brassinosteroid-Regulated Plant Growth and Drought Responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1788–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, C.; He, B.; Liu, X.; Ma, X.; Liu, Y.; Yao, H.Y.; Zhang, P.; Yin, J.; Wei, X.; Koh, H.J.; et al. Pyrophosphate-fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFP1) regulates starch biosynthesis and seed development via heterotetramer formation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Azpeitia, A.; Chan, J.L.; Sáenz, L.; Oropeza, C. Effect of 22(S),23(S)-homobrassinolide on somatic embryogenesis in plumule explants of Cocos nucifera (L.) culturedin vitro. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 78, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chone, R.M.S.; Rocha, D.I.; Monte-Bello, C.C.; Pinheiro, H.P.; Dornelas, M.C.; Haddad, C.R.B.; Almeida, J.A.S. Brassinosteroid increases the cytokinin efficiency to induce direct somatic embryogenesis in leaf explants of Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2018, 135, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Aydin, Y.; Talas-Ogras, T.; Ipekçi-Altas, Z.; Gözükirmizi, N. Effects of brassinosteroid on cotton regeneration via somatic embryogenesis. Biologia 2006, 61, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Finkelstein, R.R.; Rock, C.D. Abscisic Acid Biosynthesis and Response. Arab. Book 2002, 1, e0058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ruduś, I.; Kępczyńska, E.; Kępczyński, J. Comparative efficiency of abscisic acid and metyl jasmonate for indirect somatic embryogenesis in Medicago sativa L. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 48, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, Y.; Szostkiewicz, I.; Korte, A.; Moes, D.; Yang, Y.; Christmann, A.; Grill, E. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 2009, 324, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Park, S.Y.; Fung, P.; Nishimura, N.; Jensen, D.R.; Fujii, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lumba, S.; Santiago, J.; Rodrigues, A.; Chow, T.F.; et al. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 2009, 324, 1068–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fidler, J.; Graska, J.; Gietler, M.; Nykiel, M.; Prabucka, B.; Rybarczyk-Płońska, A.; Muszyńska, E.; Morkunas, I.; Labudda, M. PYR/PYL/RCAR Receptors Play a Vital Role in the Abscisic-Acid-Dependent Responses of Plants to External or Internal Stimuli. Cells 2022, 11, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Neves, M.; Correia, S.; Cavaleiro, C.; Canhoto, J. Modulation of Organogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis by Ethylene: An Overview. Plants 2021, 10, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Colcombet, J.; Hirt, H. Arabidopsis MAPKs: A complex signalling network involved in multiple biological processes. Biochem. J. 2008, 413, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lu, K.; Guo, W.; Lu, J.; Yu, H.; Qu, C.; Tang, Z.; Li, J.; Chai, Y.; Liang, Y. Genome-Wide Survey and Expression Profile Analysis of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Gene Family in Brassica rapa. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Yao, D.; Lin, Y.; Lai, Z. Exploration of the effect of blue light on microRNAs involved in the accumulation of functional metabolites of longan embryonic calli through RNA-sequencing. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 1533–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Farooq, M.A.; Zeeshan Ul Haq, M.; Zhang, L.; Wu, S.; Mushtaq, N.; Tahir, H.; Wang, Z. Transcriptomic Insights into Salt Stress Response in Two Pepper Species: The Role of MAPK and Plant Hormone Signaling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kothari, K.S.; Dansana, P.K.; Giri, J.; Tyagi, A.K. Rice Stress Associated Protein 1 (OsSAP1) Interacts with Aminotransferase (OsAMTR1) and Pathogenesis-Related 1a Protein (OsSCP) and Regulates Abiotic Stress Responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Seo, P.J.; Lee, A.K.; Xiang, F.; Park, C.M. Molecular and functional profiling of Arabidopsis pathogenesis-related genes: Insights into their roles in salt response of seed germination. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhou, H.; Zhou, R.; Zeng, S.; Wang, B.; Zhu, P. Advance of studies on browning and antibrowning techniques in the tissue culture of horticultural plants. Acta Hortic Sin 2000, 27, 481–486. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ikeuchi, M.; Sugimoto, K.; Iwase, A. Plant callus: Mechanisms of induction and repression. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3159–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Grieneisen, V.A.; Xu, J.; Marée, A.F.; Hogeweg, P.; Scheres, B. Auxin transport is sufficient to generate a maximum and gradient guiding root growth. Nature 2007, 449, 1008–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, D.; Jin, F.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J. Transcript profiling reveals complex auxin signalling pathway and transcription regulation involved in dedifferentiation and redifferentiation during somatic embryogenesis in cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 1471–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Okushima, Y.; Fukaki, H.; Onoda, M.; Theologis, A.; Tasaka, M. ARF7 and ARF19 regulate lateral root formation via direct activation of LBD/ASL genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, D.K.; Geisler, M.; Springer, P.S. LATERAL ORGAN FUSION1 and LATERAL ORGAN FUSION2 function in lateral organ separation and axillary meristem formation in Arabidopsis. Development 2009, 136, 2423–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Riou-Khamlichi, C.; Huntley, R.; Jacqmard, A.; Murray, J.A. Cytokinin activation of Arabidopsis cell division through a D-type cyclin. Science 1999, 283, 1541–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Banno, H.; Ikeda, Y.; Niu, Q.W.; Chua, N.H. Overexpression of Arabidopsis ESR1 induces initiation of shoot regeneration. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2609–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ikeda, Y.; Banno, H.; Niu, Q.W.; Howell, S.H.; Chua, N.H. The ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION 2 gene in Arabidopsis regulates CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON 1 at the transcriptional level and controls cotyledon development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 1443–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, G.; Wei, X.; Wang, X.; Wei, Y. Changes and transcriptome regulation of endogenous hormones during somatic embryogenesis in Ormosia henryi Prain. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1121259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhao, H.; Nie, K.; Zhou, H.; Yan, X.; Zhan, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Song, C.P. ABI5 modulates seed germination via feedback regulation of the expression of the PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA receptor genes. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, N.N.; Yang, Y.C.; Sun, D.W.; Pu, H.; Zhu, Z. Shelf-Life Prediction of ‘Gros Michel’ Bananas with Different Browning Levels Using Hyperspectral Reflectance Imaging. Food Anal. Methods 2015, 8, 1173–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dong, Y.S.; Fu, C.H.; Su, P.; Xu, X.P.; Yuan, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, C.F.; Yu, L.J. Mechanisms and effective control of physiological browning phenomena in plant cell cultures. Physiol. Plant 2016, 156, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yang, T.; Zhang, T.; Li, Y.; Kang, Y.; Wang, P.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Tian, L.; Dai, J.; Zhou, Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the Chalcone Synthase (CHS) Gene Family in Dendrobium catenatum. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Francisco A Tomás-Barberán, J.C.E. Phenolic compounds and related enzymes as determinants of quality in fruits and vegetables. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2001, 81, 853–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Krishna, H.; Sairam, R.K.; Singh, S.K.; Patel, V.; Sharma, R.R.; Grover, M.; Nain, L.; Sachdev, A. Mango explant browning: Effect of ontogenic age, mycorrhization and pre-treatments. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 118, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gao, X.; Hu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Peng, D.; Guo, Q. Expression profiling of the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) gene family in Ginkgo biloba L. Plant Signal Behav. 2023, 18, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gooding, P.S.; Bird, C.; Robinson, S.P. Molecular cloning and characterisation of banana fruit polyphenol oxidase. Planta 2001, 213, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Qin, F.; Hu, C.; Dou, T.; Sheng, O.; Yang, Q.; Deng, G.; He, W.; Gao, H.; Li, C.; Dong, T.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of the polyphenol oxidase gene family reveals that MaPPO1 and MaPPO6 are the main contributors to fruit browning in Musa acuminate. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1125375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dixon, R.A.; Achnine, L.; Kota, P.; Liu, C.J.; Reddy, M.S.; Wang, L. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence-a genomics perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bukh, C.; Nord-Larsen, P.H.; Rasmussen, S.K. Phylogeny and structure of the cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene family in Brachypodium distachyon. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 6223–6236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ata, N.; Yusuf, N.A.; Tan, B.C.; Husaini, A.; Mohd Yusuf, Y.; Majid, N.A.; Khalid, N. Expression profiles of flavonoid-related gene, 4 coumarate: Coenzyme A ligase, and optimization of culturing conditions for the selected flavonoid production in Boesenbergia rotunda. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2015, 123, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Irshad, M.; Rizwan, H.M.; Debnath, B.; Anwar, M.; Li, M.; Liu, S.; He, B.; Qiu, D. Ascorbic Acid Controls Lethal Browning and Pluronic F-68 Promotes High-frequency Multiple Shoot Regeneration from Cotyldonary Node Explant of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). HortScience 2018, 53, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sharada, M.; Ahuja, A.; Kaul, M.K. Regeneration of plantlets via callus cultures in Celastrus paniculatus Willd—A rare endangered, medicinal plant. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2003, 12, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kim, D.; Paggi, J.M.; Park, C.; Bennett, C.; Salzberg, S.L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wu, T.D.; Watanabe, C.K. GMAP: A genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 1859–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Chen, L.; Zhong, H.Y.; Kuang, J.F.; Li, J.G.; Lu, W.J.; Chen, J.Y. Validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR studies of gene expression in banana fruit under different experimental conditions. Planta 2011, 234, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The process of embryogenic callus (EC) induction and morphological observation in banana MJ. (a) MJ male inflorescence. (b) The internal flower combs of MJ banana. (c,d) Crystalline small granular callus on B2 medium for 12 months. (e) Yellowish large granular callus cultivated on B2 medium for 8 months; (f) EC cultivated on B2 medium for 14 months. (g,h) Paraffin section of banana non-embryogenic callus as c and e, respectively. (i) Paraffin section of banana EC as (f). Scale bar = 2 cm (a), scale bar = 1 mm (bf), scale bar = 20 μm (gi).
Figure 1. The process of embryogenic callus (EC) induction and morphological observation in banana MJ. (a) MJ male inflorescence. (b) The internal flower combs of MJ banana. (c,d) Crystalline small granular callus on B2 medium for 12 months. (e) Yellowish large granular callus cultivated on B2 medium for 8 months; (f) EC cultivated on B2 medium for 14 months. (g,h) Paraffin section of banana non-embryogenic callus as c and e, respectively. (i) Paraffin section of banana EC as (f). Scale bar = 2 cm (a), scale bar = 1 mm (bf), scale bar = 20 μm (gi).
Plants 14 00761 g001
Figure 2. Overview of differentially expressed genes among five samples during the stages of EC induction in banana MJ. (a) MJ flower buds. (b) Explants induced on B2 medium for 5 months (5M). (c) Explants induced on B2 medium for 12 months (12 M). (d) EC obtained after 14 months of induction on the B2 medium. (e) Browned EC (BC). (f) The number of DEGs up- or downregulated during embryogenic callus formation. (g) Venn diagram showing overlap and specific DEGs in five samples. Scale bar = 2 mm (ae).
Figure 2. Overview of differentially expressed genes among five samples during the stages of EC induction in banana MJ. (a) MJ flower buds. (b) Explants induced on B2 medium for 5 months (5M). (c) Explants induced on B2 medium for 12 months (12 M). (d) EC obtained after 14 months of induction on the B2 medium. (e) Browned EC (BC). (f) The number of DEGs up- or downregulated during embryogenic callus formation. (g) Venn diagram showing overlap and specific DEGs in five samples. Scale bar = 2 mm (ae).
Plants 14 00761 g002
Figure 3. Visualization of the Specific Gene Locations Identified in the AA and BB Genomes. Specific genes within the AA and BB genomes were identified using BLASTn, and the positions of homologous genes flanking these specific genes in both genomes are displayed. This figure demonstrates the accuracy of specific gene identification and indicates that these specific genes arise due to insertion and deletion mutations. (ad) Panels illustrate specific genes in the hormone signaling pathways, including Macma4_04_g11940 (MJ_GID2), Macma4_06_g14450 (MJ_ ARF), Macma4_07_g28170 (MJ_IAA) in the A genome compared to the B genome, Macma4_02_g00180 (MJ_CALM) in the MAPK signaling pathway, Macma4_08_g22960 (MJ_EIN3), and Macma4_04_g24700 (MJ_CISZOG) in the zeatin biosynthesis pathway (e), as well as the specific gene Mba10_g12780 (MJ_PYL) in the BB genome (f).
Figure 3. Visualization of the Specific Gene Locations Identified in the AA and BB Genomes. Specific genes within the AA and BB genomes were identified using BLASTn, and the positions of homologous genes flanking these specific genes in both genomes are displayed. This figure demonstrates the accuracy of specific gene identification and indicates that these specific genes arise due to insertion and deletion mutations. (ad) Panels illustrate specific genes in the hormone signaling pathways, including Macma4_04_g11940 (MJ_GID2), Macma4_06_g14450 (MJ_ ARF), Macma4_07_g28170 (MJ_IAA) in the A genome compared to the B genome, Macma4_02_g00180 (MJ_CALM) in the MAPK signaling pathway, Macma4_08_g22960 (MJ_EIN3), and Macma4_04_g24700 (MJ_CISZOG) in the zeatin biosynthesis pathway (e), as well as the specific gene Mba10_g12780 (MJ_PYL) in the BB genome (f).
Plants 14 00761 g003
Figure 4. Expression of genes involved in the auxin pathway during embryogenic callus formation. The expression levels were visualized by using OmicStudio tools at https://www.omicstudio.cn/tool (accessed on 5 December 2023). Numbers beneath the heat map indicate the relative expression intensities and the higher expression intensities are indicated by more reddish colors. Identification of A and B alleles in the ABB genome was conducted using allele tables, where A-5M denotes the gene expression levels of the A allele at the 5M stage, and B-5M denotes those of the B allele at the same stage. (ac,e) The expression levels of MJGH3s, MJIAAs, MJARFs, and MJSAUR, which are associated with the auxin pathway. (d) A heat map showing A-specific allele expression levels of MJARF. (f) The diagram illustrates the upregulation and downregulation of components in the auxin signaling pathway.
Figure 4. Expression of genes involved in the auxin pathway during embryogenic callus formation. The expression levels were visualized by using OmicStudio tools at https://www.omicstudio.cn/tool (accessed on 5 December 2023). Numbers beneath the heat map indicate the relative expression intensities and the higher expression intensities are indicated by more reddish colors. Identification of A and B alleles in the ABB genome was conducted using allele tables, where A-5M denotes the gene expression levels of the A allele at the 5M stage, and B-5M denotes those of the B allele at the same stage. (ac,e) The expression levels of MJGH3s, MJIAAs, MJARFs, and MJSAUR, which are associated with the auxin pathway. (d) A heat map showing A-specific allele expression levels of MJARF. (f) The diagram illustrates the upregulation and downregulation of components in the auxin signaling pathway.
Plants 14 00761 g004
Figure 5. Expression of genes involved in the hormone pathway pathway during embryogenic callus formation. Numbers beneath the heat map indicate the relative expression intensities and the higher expression intensities are indicated by more reddish colors. Identification of A and B alleles in the ABB genome was conducted using allele tables, where A-5M denotes the gene expression levels of the A allele at the 5M stage, and B-5M denotes those of the B allele at the same stage. (a) A heat map illustrating gene expression levels in the BR signaling pathway. (b) A heat map for gene expression levels in the ABA signaling pathway. (c) A heat map depicting gene expression levels in the ethylene signaling pathway. (d) A heat map showing A-specific allele expression levels within the ethylene signaling pathway. (e) A heat map of gene expression levels in the MAPK signaling pathway. (f) A heat map of A-specific allele gene expression levels in the MAPK signaling pathway. (g) The expression levels of MJCYP73As, MJPALs, and MJCHSs, which are associated with embryogenic callus browning.
Figure 5. Expression of genes involved in the hormone pathway pathway during embryogenic callus formation. Numbers beneath the heat map indicate the relative expression intensities and the higher expression intensities are indicated by more reddish colors. Identification of A and B alleles in the ABB genome was conducted using allele tables, where A-5M denotes the gene expression levels of the A allele at the 5M stage, and B-5M denotes those of the B allele at the same stage. (a) A heat map illustrating gene expression levels in the BR signaling pathway. (b) A heat map for gene expression levels in the ABA signaling pathway. (c) A heat map depicting gene expression levels in the ethylene signaling pathway. (d) A heat map showing A-specific allele expression levels within the ethylene signaling pathway. (e) A heat map of gene expression levels in the MAPK signaling pathway. (f) A heat map of A-specific allele gene expression levels in the MAPK signaling pathway. (g) The expression levels of MJCYP73As, MJPALs, and MJCHSs, which are associated with embryogenic callus browning.
Plants 14 00761 g005
Figure 6. Expression levels of differentially expressed transcription factors and homologous genes previously reported to be involved in callus induction. (a,b) Statistics on the number of transcription factors encoded by differentially expressed genes identified during the banana embryogenic callus induction process, using AA and BB as reference genomes, respectively. (c) Expression levels of transcription factors encoded by differentially expressed genes during the embryogenic callus induction process using AA as reference. (d) Expression levels of homologous genes in banana MJ corresponding to genes reported in Arabidopsis, which are essential in the callus induction process. Genes highlighted in blue indicate lower expression levels of transcription factors (TFs), while those highlighted in red represent TFs with higher expression levels.
Figure 6. Expression levels of differentially expressed transcription factors and homologous genes previously reported to be involved in callus induction. (a,b) Statistics on the number of transcription factors encoded by differentially expressed genes identified during the banana embryogenic callus induction process, using AA and BB as reference genomes, respectively. (c) Expression levels of transcription factors encoded by differentially expressed genes during the embryogenic callus induction process using AA as reference. (d) Expression levels of homologous genes in banana MJ corresponding to genes reported in Arabidopsis, which are essential in the callus induction process. Genes highlighted in blue indicate lower expression levels of transcription factors (TFs), while those highlighted in red represent TFs with higher expression levels.
Plants 14 00761 g006
Figure 7. Transcript levels of four genes as determined by qRT-PCR. (af) Illustrate the expression of the A allele of MJGH3 (MJ_A_GH3.1), MJ_A_IAA30_1, MJ_A_CYCD3, the B allele of MJLAX2 (MJ_B_LAX2) and MJ_B_WIND2, respectively. The data presented are the means ± standard deviation (S.D.) from three biological replicates.
Figure 7. Transcript levels of four genes as determined by qRT-PCR. (af) Illustrate the expression of the A allele of MJGH3 (MJ_A_GH3.1), MJ_A_IAA30_1, MJ_A_CYCD3, the B allele of MJLAX2 (MJ_B_LAX2) and MJ_B_WIND2, respectively. The data presented are the means ± standard deviation (S.D.) from three biological replicates.
Plants 14 00761 g007
Figure 8. A schematic representation of gene expression regulation during the induction of embryogenic callus from explants in the banana cultivar MJ. The depth of the orange color in the oval signifies the importance of the involved signaling pathways, with darker hues indicating a higher likelihood of involvement. Genes highlighted in gray denote the presence of both A and B alleles, while those in blue indicate alleles specific to A or B. The auxin signaling pathway genes are primarily responsible for the induction of embryonic callus in bananas, with significant contributions from the MAPK signaling pathway, as well as the ABA, Ethylene, and BR pathways. Importantly, transcription factors such as LBD, WIND, and CYCD3, previously identified as key players in callus induction, are also integral to the formation of embryogenic callus in bananas, establishing a comprehensive regulatory network. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the predominant cause of browning in banana embryogenic callus is the marked upregulation of genes involved in the phenylalanine and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways, resulting in the accumulation of these compounds and potentially leading to browning.
Figure 8. A schematic representation of gene expression regulation during the induction of embryogenic callus from explants in the banana cultivar MJ. The depth of the orange color in the oval signifies the importance of the involved signaling pathways, with darker hues indicating a higher likelihood of involvement. Genes highlighted in gray denote the presence of both A and B alleles, while those in blue indicate alleles specific to A or B. The auxin signaling pathway genes are primarily responsible for the induction of embryonic callus in bananas, with significant contributions from the MAPK signaling pathway, as well as the ABA, Ethylene, and BR pathways. Importantly, transcription factors such as LBD, WIND, and CYCD3, previously identified as key players in callus induction, are also integral to the formation of embryogenic callus in bananas, establishing a comprehensive regulatory network. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the predominant cause of browning in banana embryogenic callus is the marked upregulation of genes involved in the phenylalanine and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways, resulting in the accumulation of these compounds and potentially leading to browning.
Plants 14 00761 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Zhuang, Y.; Xie, W.; Yang, Y.; Pu, J.; Fan, Z.; Chen, Y.; Lin, Y.; Lai, Z. Allelic Expression Dynamics of Regulatory Factors During Embryogenic Callus Induction in ABB Banana (Musa spp. cv. Bengal, ABB Group). Plants 2025, 14, 761. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050761

AMA Style

Zhao X, Zhuang Y, Xie W, Yang Y, Pu J, Fan Z, Chen Y, Lin Y, Lai Z. Allelic Expression Dynamics of Regulatory Factors During Embryogenic Callus Induction in ABB Banana (Musa spp. cv. Bengal, ABB Group). Plants. 2025; 14(5):761. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xiaobing, Yiting Zhuang, Wangyang Xie, Yixin Yang, Jingyu Pu, Zhengyang Fan, Yukun Chen, Yuling Lin, and Zhongxiong Lai. 2025. "Allelic Expression Dynamics of Regulatory Factors During Embryogenic Callus Induction in ABB Banana (Musa spp. cv. Bengal, ABB Group)" Plants 14, no. 5: 761. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050761

APA Style

Zhao, X., Zhuang, Y., Xie, W., Yang, Y., Pu, J., Fan, Z., Chen, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, Z. (2025). Allelic Expression Dynamics of Regulatory Factors During Embryogenic Callus Induction in ABB Banana (Musa spp. cv. Bengal, ABB Group). Plants, 14(5), 761. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop