1. Introduction
Mulberry plants, belonging to the genus Morus, are an intriguing group of deciduous wind-pollinated perennial trees and shrubs distinguished for their rapid growth, vibrant fruits and leaves for feeding silkworms in the sericulture industries around the globe [
1,
2,
3,
4]. Cultivation of mulberry ranges from native to warm temperate and subtropical regions, predominantly in Asia, some parts of Africa, and the Americas. Mulberry plants are known to thrive in a variety of environments [
5,
6,
7,
8]. Many cultivars and species have been identified, but the most cultivated species include the white mulberry (
Morus alba), black mulberry (
Morus nigra), and red mulberry (
Morus rubra) [
9]. Although mulberry is a perennial tree plant, it is propagated via both sexual and asexual modes of propagation. As a result of its heterozygous nature and long juvenile period, with seed propagation estimated to bear fruits in a decade, the asexual or vegetative means of propagation has been the most used method in its cultivation [
10]. It is not only complaisant to propagation via the seed sowing, the generation of seedlings, but also responsive to cutting, grafting, budding, and layering methods in a process called saplings [
11]. It has recently been found that generating mulberry saplings through stem cutting is fascinatingly the most principal and conspicuous mode utilized across all the mulberry-cultivating countries [
11]. This is due to its ability to profusely produce succulent leaves for feeding silkworms. Depending on the cultivar, a well-developed and healthy shoot with active buds from 6-to-8-month-old stem cutting is reportedly suitable for propagation [
11]. Early sprouting of these cuttings depends on the size, length and the number of the buds on the cuttings. For instance, cuttings with lengths ranging from an estimated 15 to 20 cm, with about 3–4 active buds, and 22–25 cm long, with 5–6 healthy buds, are recommended for generating and sprouting mulberry under conducive environmental conditions [
11]. Indeed, the rooting capabilities of mulberry via cuttings depends not only on the inherent factors such as genotype (regenerative or rejuvenation ability), but other determinants, including environmental factors (temperature, humidity etc.), physiological factors (development of root primordial, amount of nutrient stored), management and intercultural operations (fertilization, irrigation, weeding, etc.), age and quality of the stem cuttings, and exogenous hormone treatments [
11,
12]. Apart from the above factors, the rooting abilities of cuttings largely depend on whether it is a temperate, tropical or sub-tropical genotype. Recent evidence suggests that the tropical mulberry cultivar cuttings have higher rooting propensity relative to the temperate mulberry cultivars [
11,
13]. However, the cuttings of the temperate varieties of mulberry with low rooting abilities are not only enhanced with diverse rooting or growth-regulating hormones, including indole acetic acid, indole butyric acid, and naphthalene acetic acid, but can also be improved by grafting a poor rooter as scion on a good rooter variety as stock [
11,
13].
Vegetative propagation via stem cutting is regarded as a post-operation root regeneration and rejuvenation processes in plant growth and development [
14]. Cuttings made from parent plants immediately lose nutrients, substrates and water in the process [
12,
15], leading to inhibition of adventitious root formation that ensures rejuvenation and regeneration of new roots from buds. To counteract plasticity such as oxidative stress and redox imbalances in post-cuttings, plants induce endogenous hormones to trigger the formation of adventitious roots. Additionally, the treatment of cuttings with exogenous hormones, including abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellins (GAs), ethylene (ETH), auxin, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins (CKs), brassinosteroids (BRs), and melatonin (MLT), promotes root formation in the plant [
12,
16]. Adventitious root formation in cuttings is strictly modulated by a large set of exogenous and endogenous hormones, which coordinate many physiological and biochemical processes. Early studies have opined that exogenous hormone treatment accelerates cell division, improves biosynthesis of intrinsic hormones, salicylic acid, accumulation of carbohydrate, and consequently stimulates adventitious root formation [
12,
16,
17]. Similar reports have suggested that auxin is the master regulator coordinating and controlling adventitious root formation, and plays a decisive role in cell fate, and activates signaling networks in plants [
18]. For example, multiple experimental substantiations have reported that the treatments of auxin stimulated adventitious root formation by triggering auxin-promoted cell wall loosening and stretching in plants such as black walnut, black locust and
Populus tremula [
19,
20,
21,
22]. Stem cuttings of
M. hupehensis subjected to IAA, naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), or green growth regulator (GGR) not only showed apparent improvement in adventitious root at stages, including the root pre-emergence stage, the early stage of root formation, the massive root formation stage, and the later stage of root formation, but also caused a concomitant reduction in rooting time by 25–47.4% and promoted the rooting efficiencies of cuttings by 0.9–1.3 times, relative to the control [
12]. Additionally, exogenous IAA significantly promoted plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and number as well as the contents of endogenous IAA and GA3, but ABA content was significantly decreased in Syringa plants [
23]. Indeed, the possible synergistic and antagonistic interactions among different phytohormones cannot be over-ruled. Multiple research attestations have highlighted some of these interactions. For instance, ETH was found to have positively regulated adventitious root formation via adjusting auxin transport and distribution in tomato [
24]. Meanwhile, CKs interacted with ETH and auxin pathways to repress adventitious root development in poplar [
25]. Furthermore, high-throughput metabolomics analyses have identified diverse differentially accumulated phytohormone metabolites. For example, a study optimizing the cultivation technique to shorten the cultivation cycle of
Pueraria montana plants (var. Gange No. 5″) from two years to one year identified 42 differentially accumulated hormone metabolites, with hormones, including auxin, CKs, jasmonic acids (JAs), salicylic acid (SA), MLT, ETH, ABA, etc., accumulating maximum contents at the pre- and final-expansion periods [
26]. Such hormones were suggested to play a heightened role in stimulating the initiation of tuberous root expansion.
Based on these premises and antecedents, it is quite plausible to highlight that ensuring homeostasis by maintaining the endogenous hormone balance in rooting during vegetative propagation process is crucial. The possible question or hypothesis is, do the differences in lengths/heights of a stem cutting stimulate and induce biosynthesis of endogenous hormones, which consequently triggers the formation of adventitious roots and general growth of plants? Evidence has suggested and confirmed that the treatment of stem cuttings with phytohormones not only stimulates adventitious root formation, regeneration and rejuvenation of plants but also improves the general growth, as elucidated earlier [
23,
26]. However, the counter argument is that the differences in lengths of stem cuttings stimulate and modulate the accumulation of endogenous phytohormones in plants remain obscure. Hence, investigating how varying lengths of stubbles in plants induce endogenous phytohormones that promote and initiate adventitious root formation during vegetative propagation is of great significance and will likely reveal striking evidence in current research. To the best of our knowledge, this study happens to be the first study elucidating the mechanisms and how the ripple effects of differential lengths of stubbles stimulate and accumulate endogenous phytohormones in mulberry plants via morpho-physiological and targeted metabolomics analyses.
We aim to compare and elucidate the mechanisms and the repercussions of the differential length of stubbles on regrowth, physiological and hormone accumulation of mulberry parameters, as well as the signatures in phytohormone metabolites using targeted metabolomics. If successful, the mechanisms and alterations in the biosynthesis of plant hormones and plant hormone signal transduction pathways that manifest as a result of the differential stubble lengths of mulberry would be the prime focus of this study. Shedding light on the variations in stubbles of mulberry plants is of great importance to improve the cutting survival and shortening of rooting time for the rapid production of leaves for the sericulture industries.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials and Design
Mulberry (M. alba L.) was collected from the National Mulberry GenBank at Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China. Field experimental design was used and adopted a single-factor regression design. The experiment combined randomized arrangement and Latin square arrangement for the field setup. The stubble area underwent complete stumping, with four stubble lengths (0 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, and 20 cm) as treatments and unstumped plants as the control (CK). The plants used for the stubble were 2 years old on loamy soil field. The soil was supplemented with NPK (14:16:15) compound fertilizer at a rate of 122.5 g per meter square (applied at one time in May 2024). The experimental set-up consisted of 5 treatments, with each treatment containing 5 plots as replicates, totaling 25 plots. Each treatment contained 10 stubbles, resulting in a total of 200 stubbles and 50 normal plants making 250. The experiment was performed on 18 June 2024.
2.2. Field Investigation and Sampling
After the experimental setup, follow-up investigations were conducted to monitor the sprouting and re-growth conditions of the stumped plants (stubbles), as shown in
Figure 1. The investigation included the checking of the number of sprouts by counting and tagging, sprout growth by measuring the sprouts’ growth with ruler; new shoot growth of CK plants and the stubbles were also measured. The investigation period spanned from June 2024 to October 2024, with growth indicators measured every week. Leaf sampling was performed by selecting three standard plants from each stubble group. First, leaf samples were collected 15 days (used for metabolomics and biochemical analysis) after sprouting of the stubble. Again, leaf samples were collected at 90 days of stubble growth (used for other analysis including mineral analysis). For the stubble plants, young leaves from the sprouting shoots were collected. For normal plants, young leaves from the middle part of the canopy were collected. Each sample (approximately 0.5 g) was placed into a cryotube. Three tubes were collected for each replicate at each sampling time. To ensure the samples were dry and uncontaminated, latex gloves and masks were worn during sampling. After collection, the leaf samples were quickly transferred into cryotubes and placed in a liquid nitrogen tank. Upon returning to the laboratory, the samples were stored in an ultra-low temperature freezer at −80 °C for preservation.
2.3. Biomass Measurement
After 90 days of stubbles growth, the biomass of plants was measured. To measure the biomass, 10 stubble plants and 10 normal plants were randomly selected for biomass measurement. The types of biomass measured include aboveground biomass, fresh branch weight, fresh leaf weight and dry leaf weight. A precision electronic balance (BSA224S, Sartorius, Beijing, China) with accuracy 0.001 g was used for the measurement. Fresh branch weight was the weight of branches after leaf removal. Fresh leaf weight was calculated by subtracting the branch weight from the total fresh weight. Dry leaf weight was determined by placing leaves in separate beakers and were subjected to drying process using an electric blast drying oven (DHG-9140A, JingHong, Shanghai, China) set at 65 °C for 48 h until a constant weight was achieved [
5].
2.4. Photosynthetic Parameters and Chlorophyl Measurement
Photosynthetic parameters were measured using the PPSYSTEMS CIRAS-3 Portable Photosynthesis System (PP Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) analyzer from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Leaves from the 3rd to 5th leaf positions facing the sun, and with uniform growth, were selected for measurement. Parameters measured included net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO
2 concentration (Ci), and water use efficiency (WUE). Leaf temperature was at 31.1 ± 2 °C and light intensity was at 1000 μmol/m
−2 s
−1. The relative humidity was around 35%. Leaf chamber was 18 cm × 25 cm square window, using an open gas exchange system. Flow rate was set to 500 μmol·s
−1. A buffer bottle was used to stabilize the atmospheric CO
2 concentration (CO
2) between 380 and 420 μmol·mol
−1. Three plants with consistent growth were randomly selected from each stubble group and leaves from the same position were measured [
5], with three replicates per leaf and two technical replicates. Subsequently, analysis of variance and statistical significance (Tukey’s HSD,
p < 0.05) was determined using R software v4.2, and the graphs were visualized using Hiplot Pro (
https://hiplot.com.cn/ accessed on 21 February 2025), a comprehensive web service for biomedical data analysis and visualization. Total Chlorophyl (Chl) content was measured using SPAD-502 chlorophyl meter (Konika Minolta, Tokyo, Japan).
2.5. Minerals and Crude Protein Determination
Mineral content in
M. alba leaves was determined using an inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy/mass spectrometry (ICP-AES/OES/MS) apparatus (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). This analysis was performed according to the standards of the People’s Republic of China National Food Safety Standard for the analysis of multiple elements in food (GB 5009.268–2016) [
27]. Using mixed sampling method, the leaves of M. alba harvested 90 days after stubble sprout and the CK were used for both minerals and crude protein analysis. Sample preparation followed the study by Li et al. (2024) [
5]. Samples were washed with deionized water and then dried with absorbent paper and then oven-dried to constant weight at 65 °C. The dried leaves were then ground with mortar to a fine powder. The leaf powder (0.2 g) was weighed in the PTFE (polyteflon) digestion tube and soaked overnight with 5 mL nitric acid. The digestion tubes were tightened and placed into microwave at 80 °C for 2 h; the temperature increased from 120 °C to 160 °C over 2 h. The digested product was transferred into a 25 mL volumetric flask and diluted with H
2O (100 mL) and stored for content analysis [
5,
8]. A blank, without sample was prepared. The element contents were measured separately with ICP-AES/OES/MS. Each group comprised three biological replicates, with each replicate having three leaves. The element concentrations in the samples were calculated based on the calibration curves and the sample’s emission intensity.
The crude protein content was determined according to the Agricultural Industry Standard of the People’s Republic of China (NY/T 3-1982) [
28]. Briefly, dry leaf samples (three replicates each) from the stubble groups and the CK were used for the crude protein determination. The leaf samples (0.20 g) were digested with concentrated sulfuric acid in the presence of a catalyst (selenium or copper sulfate) to convert the nitrogen in the sample into ammonium sulfate. The digested sample was then distilled with sodium hydroxide to release ammonia gas, and the ammonia was captured in a boric acid solution. The ammonia-boric acid solution was titrated with a standard acid (hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid) to determine the nitrogen content. The nitrogen content was then converted to crude protein using a conversion factor (6.25 for most plant materials) and the crude protein was calculated as crude protein (%) = nitrogen content (%) × 6.25. Three biological replicates per leaf and two technical replicates were used.
2.6. Biochemical Measurements of Hormones and Correlation Analysis
To determine the contents of hormones biochemically, hormones such as salicylic acid (SA), abscisic acid (ABA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), jasmonic acid (JA), and gibberellin (GA) were evaluated in leaves of
M. alba stubbles (0 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm) from plants harvested after 15 days of stubble sprouting and the normal plant (CK). All the parameters were measured with detection Kit provided by Suzhou Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Three biological replicates were used in each indicator. Data were processed and, subsequently, analysis of variance and statistical significance (Tukey’s HSD,
p < 0.05) were determined using R software v4.2. Figures were plotted in Hiplot Pro (
https://hiplot.com.cn). Pearson correlation heatmap analysis involving the hormones, elements, growth and photosynthetic parameters was performed in Corrplot tools in Hiplot Pro (
https://hiplot.com.cn/). Correlation coefficient = 1 or −1 was considered positive or negative correlation, respectively, at
p < 0.05.
2.7. Sample Preparation for Metabolites Extraction
All chemicals including methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), acetonitrile (Sigma-Aldrich), formic acid (Aladdin, Waukesha, WI, USA), standard substances (YuanYe, Aladdin, Sigma-Aldrich) used in this study were of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or analytical grade. M. alba leaves obtained from the various stubbles and the normal plant were used for the metabolite’s extraction. In total, 12 samples comprising 4 groups and 3 replicates each were used for the extraction and analysis. Leaf samples were thawed at 4 °C in a refrigerator, and the same group of samples were mixed well. An appropriate amount of sample (0.1 g) was placed in a 10 mL centrifuge tube, and 5 mL of extraction solution (methanol: water: formic acid; 15:4:1 with 0.5% BHT) was added. The mixture was vortexed for 1 min, ultrasonicated for 30 min, and allowed to stand at −40 °C for 60 min, then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was then removed for solid-phase extraction. In the solid-phase extraction, an eluent (activation: 3 mL water, 3 mL methanol; adsorption: the supernatant into the SPE solid phase extraction column (flow rate ≤ 1 mL/min); rinsing: 3 mL water, 10% methanol water; elution: 1 mL methanol) was performed. The above eluent was concentrated to dryness in a concentrator, re-dissolved in 0.60 mL of 80% methanol water, vortexed and mixed for 1 min, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, and then the supernatant was taken into the machine for LC-MS/MS analysis.
2.8. LC-MS/MS Analysis
The liquid chromatography system was a Waters Acquity UPLC, coupled with a mass spectrometer from AB SCIEX 5500 QQQ-MS (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). The chromatographic columns employed were Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (1.7 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) and Acquity UPLC HSS T3 (1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm). The chromatographic separation conditions included a column temperature of 35 °C and a flow rate of 0.30 mL/min. The mobile phase composition consisted of component A, which was water containing 10 mM ammonium formate, and component B, which was methanol. The total runtime was 8 min, with an injection volume of 6 µL. The mass spectrometric conditions were as follows: ion source, ESI; curtain gas, 35 arb; collision gas, 7 arb; ion spray voltage, 4500 V; ion source temperature, 450 °C; ion source gases, 55 arb each for ion source gas1 and ion source gas2. The MRM acquisition parameters were established based on the aforementioned chromatographic and mass spectrometric conditions, and standard solution preparations were injected into the sample vials for analysis.
2.9. Data Processing and Quality Control Analysis of Metabolites
Integration was carried out using MultiQuant software (v3.0.3), and content calculation was performed according to the internal standard one-point method. The internal standard method was to add a certain weight of pure substance as an internal standard to a certain amount of the analyzed sample mixture and calculate the content of the measured component according to the mass ratio of the test sample and the internal standard, the ratio of its corresponding chromatographic peak area and the relative correction factor. The internal standard method was calculated as shown below:
From the formula,
As and
Ar are the peak areas or peak heights of the internal standard and the control, respectively, and
ms and
mr are the amounts of the internal standard and the control added, respectively. The solution of the component to be tested containing the internal standard was taken into the sample, and recorded the chromatogram, and then calculated the content (
mi) according to the peak response value of the solution of the component to be tested containing the internal standard:
where
Ai and
As are the peak areas or peak heights of the metabolite to be measured and internal standard, respectively, and
ms is the amount of internal standard added. The MultiQuant software (v3.0.3) was utilized for integration and the standard curve was utilized for content calculation. Data quality control (QC) was determined mainly by the RSD value (relative standard deviation) of each targeted metabolite in the QC samples. In general, the RSD value of <10% was deemed a good data quality.
2.10. Multivariate Statistical Analysis
For a preliminary visualization of differences between different groups of samples, the unsupervised dimensionality reduction method principal component analysis (PCA) was applied in all samples using R package models (v2.16. 2) (
http://www.r-project.org/) [
29]. Again, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) is a supervised dimensionality reduction method in which class memberships are coded in matrix form into Y to better distinguish the metabolomics profile of two groups by screening variables correlated to class memberships [
30]. PLS-DA was applied in comparison groups using R package ropls (
http://www.r-project.org/) [
31]. Further, orthogonal projection to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) [
32] is an extension of PLS-DA, which incorporates an Orthogonal Signal Correction (OSC) filter into a PLS model. OPLS-DA was applied in comparison groups using R package models (
http://www.r-project.org/). The OPLS-DA model was further validated by cross-validation and permutation test [
33]. For cross-validation, the data was partitioned into seven subsets, where each of the subsets was then used as a validation set. R2 indicated the total variation in the data matrix that was explained by the model. Predictive ability (Q2) values represented the most recognized diagnostic statistical parameter to validate the OPLS-DA model in metabolomics. An acceptable predictive model is considered for Q2 value greater than 0.4. and a good predictive model is considered for Q2 value greater than 0.9. Permutation tests randomly permute class labels 200 times and then produce a distribution of R2 values and Q2 values.
2.11. Differential Metabolites Analysis
For the targeted metabolomics analysis, we used Student’s
t-test to screen for significant differences in metabolites between the different comparison groups. When
p < 0.05, it was determined to be differential metabolites (DMs). To further understand the changes in the abundance of DMs, a volcano plot was constructed for the metabolites screened based on the VIP values and
p-values, incorporating the FC (fold change) values and
p-values of the metabolites in the comparison group. The abundance of DMs in the same group was normalized by z-score and then the VIP score of the OPLS-DA was used for visualization. The top 15 metabolites were then drawn and shown in the variable importance in projection (VIP) score plot in descending order [
34]. The abundances of DMs were normalized by z-score and hierarchical clustered by R package pheatmap (
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap accessed on 15 November 2024) to show the accumulation differences between two groups. To determine the mechanisms of the DMs, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes [
35] was utilized. The DMs were mapped to KEGG metabolic pathways for annotation and enrichment analysis. Pathway enrichment analysis identified significantly enriched metabolic pathways in differential metabolites compared with the whole background. The calculating formula was as follows:
Here, N is the number of all metabolites that were with KEGG annotation, n is the number of DMs in N, M is the number of all metabolites annotated to specific pathways, and m is number of DMs in M. The calculated p-value went through FDR correction, taking FDR ≤ 0.05 as a threshold. Pathways meeting this condition were defined as significantly enriched pathways in DMs.
4. Discussion
The sericulture industries around the globe rely exclusively on
Morus sp to primarily feed the domesticated mulberry silkworm (
Bombyx mori L.). This makes the leaves of mulberry the single most important part of the mulberry plants. Multiple efforts towards the intensification and mass production of mulberry leaves are increased exponentially to bridge the production gaps industries encounter in the feeding of the silkworm during the larvae stage. These intensification and mass production strategies depend largely on the propagation or cultivation method, or the system employed. Mulberry is reproduced via both sexual and vegetative means. However, the vegetative or asexual means of propagation are preferably the most adopted due to multiple complications, including availability of fruit, drudgery in fruit collection, poor germination percentage, less storage period, time-consuming mulberry sapling production, late maturity (takes about a decade to bear fruits from seeds), high heterozygosity, and poor viability associated with the sexual propagation method [
36,
37]. This has made the vegetative propagation method the most pivotal and commonly used means by the commercial producers of cocoons from silkworms. The planting of mulberry via sapling methods such as grafting, budding, and layering due to their ability to exponentially multiply lateral buds on stem cuttings that enhance rapid shoot formation by increasing the rate of cell division and promoting the vigor of the sprouted cuttings is crucial [
36].
Now, the sprouting of mulberry using stubbles is a hotspot method in the rapid and mass production of mulberry leaves. We speculated that differential stubble lengths not only promote rapid growth and improve physiological traits but also alter the synthesis and accumulation of endogenous plant hormones, which have been reported to modulate the formation of adventitious roots and growth of mulberry [
16,
38].
We carried out a series of analyses to check whether the differential stubble lengths from mulberry plants promote early growth in comparison to fully established mulberry plants (control). Our hypothesis and curiosity resulted in revealing some striking results heightening the premise that the differential stubble lengths enhance rapid growth of mulberry plants compared to the control. The use of differential stubble lengths of mulberry promoted growth, bud formation, and biomass (
Figure 2A–C), highlighting the rapid shoot formation by increasing the rate of cell division and promoting the vigor of the sprouted cuttings obtained from stubbles. The highest growth and the associated parameters were recorded in 10 cm stubble length (
Figure 2A–C), indicating the influence of differential stubble lengths on the growth of mulberry. This result was supported by the physiological and photosynthetic-related traits, where the results consistently heightened the fact that the differential stubble lengths promoted higher growth and production in mulberry relative to the control. For instance, net photosynthesis, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and intercellular CO
2 levels were generally observed to be relatively higher in 0 cm and 5 cm stubble lengths in comparison to the control (
Figure 3B–D), suggesting that the increased growth recorded in the stubble is in accordance with the other growth determinants. It is quite plausible to conclude that the growth, developments, and rapid production of leaves depend not only on the type of cuttings, environmental condition, age, genotype, etc., but also rely on the differential stubble lengths, as highlighted and established in this study.
Referring to our current results and other prior studies, employing stubbles as cutting techniques has manifested some promising signatures in ameliorating mulberry survival rates by improving the sprouting of new shoots from buds. However, the exogenous application of growth regulators has auspicious signs of expediting and improving critical processes such as cell division, rhizome elongation, and shoot sprouting from buds [
39,
40]. For example, a study conducted by Zhang et al. (2017) [
38] revealed that the exogenous application of IAA, naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), or green growth regulator (GGR) to
M.
hupehensis improved adventitious root at different stages, concomitantly shortened rooting time by 25–47.4%, and promoted the rooting efficiencies of cuttings by 0.9–1.3 times, as compared to the control, indicating that fortification of soil with growth hormones expedites growth and rapid production of shoots. Even though we supplied no exogenous plant growth-enhancing hormones to the stubbles after cutting, we speculated that the termination of plant growth by cutting the shoots to obtain stubbles would cause external shocks that could trigger the de novo synthesis of plant-growth-enhancing hormones or instantaneous synthesis and modulation of plant growth regulators that ensure early sprouting of new juvenile and succulent shoots in mulberry. This hypothesis was narrowed down to focus on a more specific question: at what stubble length does sprouting of new shoots from buds and growth concomitantly elevate the induction and accumulation of plant-growth-enhancing hormones in mulberry? Intriguingly, our findings revealed striking observations that the morphological, physiological, biochemical, and targeted metabolomics signature metamorphosis associated with early sprouting and growth complemented the modulation of endogenous plant growth hormones and regulators. These attestations are manifested in the numerous significant and positive correlations exhibited among the morphological (plant height, aboveground weights, number of buds, branch and leaf weights), physiological (photosynthetic parameters, elemental analysis), biochemical (chlorophyll content, crude protein, phytohormones), and targeted metabolomics (differentially accumulated phytohormones) determinants in our study. For example, striking evidence from our study revealed that endogenous SA determined via biochemical analysis exhibited highly significant and positive associations with branch weight (r = 0.89), aboveground weight (r = 0.5), leaf weight (r = 0.87), plant height (r = 1) and net photosynthetic rate (r = 0.34) (
Figure 5F), highlighting the role of SA in the sprouting and rejuvenation of stubbles used as a vegetative propagation technique for the rapid production of mulberry leaves for sericulture industries. In other developments, the biochemical analysis of endogenous GA content in leaves of mulberry presented yet another highly significant and positive correlation with determinants, including Fe, Ca (r = 0.35), P (r = 0.5), leaf weight (r = 0.85), bud yield (r = 0.62) and aboveground weight (r = 1) (
Figure 5F), confirming that GA was crucially involved in the sprouting and early growth of mulberry stubbles by enhancing cell division and elongation [
41]. Further multiple findings from our results saw crude protein, bud yield, leaf weight, aboveground weight, and Fe significantly and positively correlating with biochemically determined JA and IAA (
Figure 5F), highlighting that endogenous JA and IAA play a pivotal role by improving the cell regeneration abilities of mulberry stubbles. Meanwhile, ABA, tagged as an inhibitory plant hormone, observed interesting synergistic interactions by correlating positively with crude protein (r = 0.45), stomatal conductance (r = 1), transpiration rate (r = 1), net photosynthetic rate (r = 0.45) and intercellular CO
2 concentration (r = 1) (
Figure 5F). This phenomenon could suggest that endogenous ABA plays a crucial role in stubble regeneration and sprouting. Similarly, it has previously been reported that the ABA content of vegetable and mulberry cuttings was found to increase assistance in regulating the adaptability of cuttings to stress by hardening them for the formation of root primordia [
42]. To further confirm our findings from the biochemical analysis ascertaining that phytohormones play a relevant role in stubble rejuvenation in mulberry plants, we correlated the differentially accumulated metabolites identified from our targeted metabolomics analysis of phytohormones with growth-related and other physiological parameters. Remarkable correlations, including 3-indolepropionic acid, gibberellin A1, gibberellin A1, Indole-3-acetic acid, trans-zeatin-riboside, and melatonin identified from the metabolomics analysis, strongly correlated positively with Fe content, bud yield, crude protein, leaf weight, and aboveground weight (
Figure 5G). The above multiple findings and pieces of evidence suggest that the stimulation and modulation of endogenous hormones in mulberry improved the regeneration and growth of stubbles, supporting the hypothesis that stubble growth is greatly enhanced by endogenous hormones.
The differential stubble lengths not only promoted growth and regeneration of mulberry cuttings, but also regulated the various hormones implicated in the biosynthesis of the plant hormones (ko01070) pathway. In this study, the remarkable enrichment and upregulation of the biosynthesis of the plant hormones pathway, generally in all stubbles, except the 10 cm stubble, indicate an alteration to the pathway triggered by the differential stubble lengths in mulberry plants (
Figure 12A;
Table 1). The stubble rhizogenesis modulated endogenous phytohormones and significantly altered the biosynthesis of plant hormones by modulating the upregulation of IAA and gibberellin A1 in mulberry leaves (
Figure 11A). The upregulation of IAA was further supported by the increased IAA content recorded in the 10 cm stubble (
Figure 5C), which tandemly correlated positively with crude protein, bud yield, leaf weight, aboveground weight, and Fe (
Figure 5F), signaling that IAA was directly involved in the sprouting of stubbles. IAA is associated with adventitious root induction, tuber expansion by triggering the formation of a tuber layer and doubling xylem cell proliferation [
26]. IAA biosynthesis commences with its precursor, tryptophan, that undergoes a multiple chemical metamorphosis via decarboxylation to form tryptamine, which is subsequently changed through direct oxidative deamination to IAA. Interestingly, tryptophan metabolism was found to be significantly enriched in our study (
Figure 11), further augmenting the upregulation of IAA and confirming the influence of differential stubble length on mulberry growth and induction of endogenous hormones.
GA biosynthesis is crucial in the hormone biosynthesis pathway. This process occurs through three catalytic stages, where geranylgeranyl diphosphate is catalyzed by ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase to form ent-kaurene. The ent-kaurene is oxidized to GA12-aldehyde by ent-kaurene oxidase, which is composed of GA precursor. The GA12-aldehyde is further activated by cytochrome P-450 mono-oxygenases to enter the cytosol of the cell, where it is catalyzed by 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases [
43]. The biosynthesis of GA propels plants to stimulate shoot growth, the extension of the internode, flowering, stem growth, seed germination, fruit setting, and the inhibition of the formation of free radicals, which induce lipid peroxidation [
44]. Our study identified significant upregulation of two GA isoforms, including Gibberellin A1 and Gibberellin A4 in DXZ-FC-CK-vs-DXZ-FC-0, DXZ-FC-CK-vs-DXZ-FC-5 and DXZ-FC-CK-vs-DXZ-FC-10 (
Table 1), and significantly altered the hormone biosynthesis pathway in mulberry leaves (
Figure 12A). This is a strong testimony to its crucial role in the sprouting of stubble by stimulating higher shoot growth and stem growth [
45] in this study. To further buttress our findings, the high accumulation of GA not only had a direct effect on mulberry growth by increasing GA content in, for example, 10 cm and 5 cm stubbles relative to the control (
Figure 5E), but also had a direct and positive correlation with all growth and photosynthetic parameters (
Figure 5F). This indicates that the higher GA biosynthesis promoted shoot growth by enhancing rapid sprouting and early growth of mulberry stubbles. Although we supplied no exogenous GA, exogenous GA
3 was found to have regulated the biosynthesis of phytohormones and plant hormone signal transduction pathways of endogenous phytohormones, which modulates the plant growth in sweet cherry and
Pseudostellaria heterophylla [
46,
47]. Of course, contradictory responses and antagonistic interactions among phytohormones were highly expected and could not be ruled out entirely. We found that the regulation of the plant hormone biosynthesis pathway by the different stubble lengths concurrently triggered downregulation of phytohormones such as SA, JA, ABA, and trans-zeatin (
Figure 12A), which are known to be involved in signaling. The up- and down-regulations observed, respectively, in gibberellin A1, gibberellin A4, and ABA in this pathway show an antagonistic relationship existing between gibberellin A1, and ABA.
Although both JA and SA play pivotal roles in many physiological processes in plant growth and development, they are known to be keenly involved in signaling through the mediation of plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [
48,
49], making them indispensable constituents in the plant hormone signal transduction pathways. In our study, a significantly altered and modulated expression occurred in the plant hormonal signal transduction pathway, and this was complemented by the downregulation of phytohormones, including ABA, SA, JA, and trans-zeatin (
Figure 12B). However, the same pathway saw the upregulation of phytohormones such as IAA, gibberellin A1, and gibberellin A4 in the 5 cm stubble, which we hypothesized to be associated with unique regulation of the biosynthesis of both the plant hormonal biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways in mulberry plants. Meanwhile, the absolute downregulation of ABA, SA, and JA in stubble comparisons such as DXZ-FC-CK-vs-DXZ-FC-0, DXZ-FC-CK-vs-DXZ-FC-5, and DXZ-FC-CK-vs-DXZ-FC-10 (
Table 1) further supports our speculation and could suggest that mulberry plants repress expression and accumulation of ABA, SA, and JA and instantaneously increase the contents of GA (gibberellin A1, gibberellin A4), IAA and melatonin to balance its metabolic adjustment; it could also be a sign that an alternative signal transduction route has been employed by the mulberry. A similar finding was reported in
Camellia sinensis exposed to MT and GA [
50]. It is quite plausible to conclude that the use of different stubble lengths promotes growth and regulates plant hormonal biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways in mulberry and is highly recommended for use by farmers and the sericulture industries.