1. Introduction
Chloroplasts can develop directly from the undeveloped proplastids or from etioplasts; their intermediate structures form in the absence of light [
1]. During this process, thylakoids are formed and stacked into defined grana. Thylakoids are crucial structures in chloroplasts, which serve as the primary sites for the light-dependent reactions of photosynthesis. Another hallmark of chloroplast generation is chlorophyll biosynthesis. Chlorophyll is synthesized from glutamate, which is converted to 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) by the sequential reactions of Glu-tRNA synthetase (GluRS), glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR), and glutamate 1-semialdehyde aminotransferase (GSAT) [
2,
3]. Among these enzymes, GluTR represents the first rate-limiting step in ALA synthesis. In Arabidopsis, GluTR enzymes are encoded by three nuclear genes,
HEMA1,
HEMA2, and
HEMA3. Notably,
HEMA1 is the predominant gene, and its downregulation leads to chlorophyll deficiency, which negatively affects plant growth and development [
4].
Light is a crucial environmental factor that regulates chloroplast development and chlorophyll biosynthesis in plants [
5]. Light-dependent pathways involve photoreceptors, such as phytochromes and cryptochromes, which perceive different wavelengths of light and transmit signals that modulate gene expression [
6]. Among the downstream regulators, the bZIP transcription factor ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5) acts as a central regulator of chloroplast development by integrating signals from these photoreceptors [
7]. This integration is vital for the coordinated expression of genes essential for chloroplast biogenesis and function. A recent study demonstrated that HY5 directly activates the expression of two
GOLDEN2-LIKE (
GLK) family transcription factors,
GLK1 and
GLK2, which are key regulators of chloroplast biogenesis [
8,
9]. These GLKs function synergistically with MYB-related transcription factors to enhance the expression of several nucleus-encoded genes critical for photosynthesis, particularly those involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and light-harvesting capabilities [
10,
11]. The double mutant
glk1 glk2 exhibits a distinct pale-green phenotype and a significant reduction in thylakoid formation, underscoring the critical roles of
GLK1 and
GLK2 in chlorophyll biosynthesis and chloroplast development [
12]. Conversely, an overexpression of either
GLK1 or
GLK2 induces chloroplast development in non-green tissues, suggesting their potential use in biotechnological applications aimed at enhancing photosynthetic efficiency in crop plants [
13,
14].
Phytohormones, particularly cytokinins, play an essential role in chloroplast biogenesis and function [
15]. The involvement of cytokinins in delaying chlorophyll degradation was recognized soon after their identification as plant growth regulators [
16]. Over the past two decades, significant insights into the molecular pathways governing cytokinin-mediated chloroplast development have emerged. In Arabidopsis, cytokinin is perceived by three histidine kinases: ARABIDOPSIS HIS KINASE2 (AHK2), AHK3, and CRE1/AHK4, which function as cytokinin receptors. Upon cytokinin binding, these receptors transduce signals to type-B Arabidopsis response regulators (type-B ARRs) through histidine phosphotransfer proteins (AHPs) [
17]. Type-B ARRs subsequently activate the transcription of downstream target genes that regulate chloroplast development [
18]. Among these receptors, AHK3 plays a pivotal role in mediating the effects of cytokinins on chloroplast development and chlorophyll accumulation. Mutations in
AHK3 result in an approximately 25% reduction in chlorophyll content compared to wild-type plants, while mutations in
AHK2 have a negligible impact and
AHK4 mutations exhibit no effect on chlorophyll levels [
19]. Furthermore, a significant reduction in chlorophyll content has been observed in the triple type-B ARR mutant
arr1 arr10 arr12 [
18], indicating that the target genes of these type-B ARRs are essential for chloroplast development. Notably, ARR10 and ARR12 specifically bind to the promoters of
HEMA1 and
LIGHT HARVESTING COMPLEX PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT6 (
LHCB6) [
2].
HEMA1 and
LHCB6 encode glutamyl-tRNA reductase and Glu-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase, respectively, which catalyze the initial rate-limiting steps of chlorophyll synthesis.
Chloroplast differentiation in roots is mechanistically different from that in aerial tissues; however, the regulatory network governing root chloroplast development can be equally complex, comprising multiple transcription factors. Kobayashi et al. [
20] have reported that the B-GATA transcription factor
GNC-LIKE/CYTOKININ-RESPONSIVE GATA1 (
GNL) is significantly upregulated in detached roots mediated by ARR1 and ARR12. Although
GNL does not directly participate in chlorophyll synthesis, its overexpression promotes ectopic chloroplast development, while a loss of
GNL function results in reduced chlorophyll accumulation. Collectively, these findings suggest that
ARR1,
ARR10, and
ARR12 functionally overlap and act as key regulators of cytokinin signaling during chloroplast development and chlorophyll accumulation. In Arabidopsis, there are 11 type-B ARRs that can be categorized into three subfamilies based on phylogenetic analysis. However, other than
ARR1,
ARR10, and
ARR12, the roles of the remaining type-B ARRs in chloroplast development remain largely unexplored.
During embryogenesis, the formation of chloroplasts from proplastids is as critical as their development in vegetative organs. However, the regulatory mechanisms of chloroplast development and chlorophyll biosynthesis in reproductive organs remain poorly understood. In a previous study, we reported that overexpression of the seed-specific R2R3-MYB transcription factor PGA37 induces the formation of somatic embryos in Arabidopsis [
21]. In this study, we further investigated the role of PGA37 in chloroplast development, emphasizing its essential function in regulating chlorophyll accumulation in seeds and chloroplast biogenesis in roots through the direct regulation of
GLK2,
ARR13, and
ARR21.
3. Discussion
Chloroplasts are essential for plant growth and development, as they enable photosynthesis and significantly impact energy production and biomass accumulation, which ultimately influence crop yield and productivity. Therefore, the targeted engineering of this process could significantly contribute to crop improvement and help to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demands [
25]. In this study, we elucidated that an overexpression of
PGA37, a seed-specific gene, leads to the ectopic induction of chloroplasts in roots by integrating cross-family transcription factors, including those from families of MYB (PGA37/MYB118), GLK (GLK2), bZIP (HY5), and type-B ARR (ARR13 and ARR21) (
Figure 7). Since chloroplasts are typically absent in roots, our findings offer potential for enhancing photosynthesis in conditions where roots are exposed to light, such as in hydroponic or soilless cultivation systems. Furthermore, the homologs of
PGA37 may play a more crucial role in epiphytic plants, such as many species within the
Orchidaceae family, whose root systems are capable of photosynthesis [
26]. This approach could lead to increased yield and productivity under these specific agricultural practices.
In higher plants, the development of chloroplasts in roots is generally suppressed, even when exposed to light [
13], making the light-independent chloroplast biogenesis in
pga37 roots particularly remarkable. Previous studies, such as those by Kobayashi et al. [
22], have shown that light signaling is crucial for chloroplast development in detached roots. However, our results clearly show that
PGA37 could induce chloroplast formation in
pga37 roots under both light and dark conditions, with a significant increase in chlorophyll content under light conditions (
Figure 2A,B). This observation suggests a synergistic interaction between
PGA37 and light that enhances chloroplast development, although light is not strictly necessary for the process. The elevated accumulation of chlorophyll observed in the roots of
PGA37-overexpressing plants under dark conditions may be due to the activation of
GLK2. However, other pathways activated by
PGA37, such as the cytokinin signaling pathway, could also contribute to chloroplast induction under dark conditions. Interestingly, we found that the expression of
HY5 was significantly repressed by
PGA37 under light conditions (
Figure 2C). It has been reported that cytokinin can increase HY5 protein accumulation by reducing its CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS 1 (COP1)-dependent degradation [
27]. We hypothesize that the activation of the cytokinin signaling pathway by
ARR13 and
ARR21 might lead to an increase in the HY5 protein levels, resulting in a negative feedback regulation of
HY5 gene expression. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that PGA37 may interact with HY5, a light-induced protein, which could also, through negative feedback, regulate the expression of
HY5. In contrast to
PGA37′s role in promoting chloroplast development in roots, we observed that the
35S::
PGA37GR and pER10-
PGA37 transgenic seedlings displayed yellowish leaves when cultivated on a medium with a relative high concentration of inducer (
Figure 3B, see also reference [
21] (Wang et al., 2009). We hypothesize that this reduction in leaf chlorophyll is related to the expression levels of
PGA37. At lower expression levels,
PGA37 promotes chloroplast development. However, at excessively high expression levels, it may activate the synthesis of other products through its target genes, which, at elevated levels, could become toxic and result in chlorophyll degradation in leaves. Furthermore, the basal levels of these potentially toxic products are inherently lower in roots compared to leaves, causing a reduced-chlorophyll phenotype to appear in leaves first, where these products are naturally more abundant. In addition, the excessive production of certain intermediates or chlorophyll itself may trigger the feedback inhibition of the chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway, leading to the pale-yellow phenotype. Further experimental evidence will be required to validate this hypothesis.
The genome-wide identification of potential PGA37 target genes using a glucocorticoid-inducible system has provided valuable insights into the downstream regulatory network controlled by PGA37. RNA-Seq analysis identified 97 differentially expressed genes, with most being upregulated, indicating that PGA37 predominantly acts as a transcriptional activator (
Table S1). Among these differentially expressed genes,
GLK2 was identified as a direct target, showing rapid upregulation upon the induction of PGA37 expression (
Figure 4). The role of
GLK2 in chloroplast development is further supported by the phenotypic analysis of
GLK2 overexpression lines, which exhibited a root-greening phenotype similar to that of
pga37 mutants (
Figure 4E,F). The suppression of this phenotype by
GLK2 mutation in PGA37 overexpression lines underscores
GLK2′s important role in this pathway (
Figure 4G,H). The lack of
GLK1 induction and the inability of PGA37 binding to the
GLK1 promoter highlight the specific and non-redundant function of
GLK2 in
PGA37-mediated chloroplast development, suggesting that
GLK1 is dispensable in this context (
Figure S5). Moreover,
GLK1 is scarcely expressed in Arabidopsis roots, while
GLK2, but not
GLK1, was upregulated in roots treated with cytokinin [
22]. These findings consistently support the crucial role of
GLK2 in chloroplast development mediated by PGA37. In contrast, recent findings by Frangedakis et al. [
11] revealed that two RR-MYBs, AtMYBS1 and AtMYBS2, can bind to the promoter of
GLK1 but not
GLK2. This suggests a distinct regulatory mechanism involving RR-MYBs and GLK1 that may complement or diverge from the pathways mediated by PGA37 and GLK2. These insights broaden our understanding of the complex regulatory networks governing chloroplast development.
In Arabidopsis, there are 11 type-B ARRs categorized into three distinct subfamilies [
28]. Previous research by Cortleven et al. [
2] has identified three type-B ARRs from subfamily I—
ARR1,
ARR10, and
ARR12—as critical players in chloroplast development. Notably,
ARR1 and
ARR12 have been shown to be essential for chloroplast development specifically in detached roots [
20]. In our study, we discovered that ARR13 and ARR21, both from subfamily II, are direct targets of PGA37 (
Figure 5). Furthermore, the significant reduction in chlorophyll content in the roots of
35S::
PGA37-
GR arr13 arr21 triple mutants provides compelling evidence that cytokinin signaling, mediated by
ARR13 and
ARR21, plays a role in the ectopic development of chloroplasts in roots (
Figure 6). This finding underscores the complex regulatory mechanisms orchestrated by cytokinin signaling in chloroplast development.
It is noteworthy that
ARR13 and
ARR21, like
PGA37, are primarily expressed in reproductive organs [
21,
29,
30,
31]. Further investigation is needed to determine whether
ARR13 and
ARR21 contribute to chloroplast development in detached roots independently of PGA37. In addition to the root-greening phenotype,
PGA37 overexpression significantly hinders seedling growth and promotes somatic embryogenesis independently of cytokinin [
21]. These phenotypes may also result from the activation of the cytokinin signaling pathway by PGA37 through the upregulation of
ARR13 and
ARR21, as the double mutation of
ARR13 and
ARR21 can nearly completely suppress the growth retardation phenotype caused by
PGA37 overexpression (
Figure 6A).
The interplay of the transcriptional regulators characterized in this study reinforces the importance of cross-family transcription factor regulatory networks in gene regulation. The PGA37-regulated module includes transcription factors from different families, enabling the coordination of complex gene expression programs. Such cross-family modules allow for the integration of multiple signaling pathways, enabling cells to respond to a wide range of internal and external stimuli (e.g., hormones and light). The interaction between transcription factors from different families provides combinatorial control over gene expression. These networks often exhibit redundancy, where different transcription factors can compensate for each other’s function. While some transcription factors have broad regulatory roles, others are more specialized. During development, cross-family networks are essential for cellular differentiation and tissue-specific gene expression. Cross-family transcription factor regulatory networks are essential for the dynamic, precise, and context-dependent regulation of gene expression, enabling organisms to adapt to their environment, develop properly, and maintain homeostasis. The PGA37-mediated regulatory module integrates the phytochrome and cytokinin signals to fine-tune the expression of genes involved in chloroplast development and chlorophyll biosynthesis in various tissues (
Figure 7).
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
The origins of
pga37,
myb118 (Salk_118812),
myb115 (Salk_044168), and
myb115 myb118 mutants, as well as the pER10-
PGA37 transgenic line, have been previously described [
21]. The
arr13 (SALK_042719c) and
arr21 (SALK_005772c) mutants, both in the Col-0 background, were generously provided by Professor Chen Shouyi from the Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology. The
glk2 (Salk_17006C) mutant and the
GLK2 overexpression line (
GLK2ox, CS9906) were acquired from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH). The
35S::
PGA37-GR glk2 was generated by crossing the
35S::
PGA37-GR overexpression line and the
glk2 mutants. To create the
arr13 arr21 double mutant,
arr13 and
arr21 were crossed, and this double mutant was subsequently crossed with
35S::
PGA37-
GR to produce
35S::
PGA37-GR arr13,
35S::
PGA37-GR arr21, and
35S::
PGA37-GR arr13 arr21 mutants. PCR-based genotyping was employed to identify homozygous lines, with the primer sequences listed in
Table S2.
For the light-independent analysis of chloroplast induction, seven-day-old seedlings grown on solid MS medium were transferred to liquid MS medium and cultured for an additional two days. The roots were then excised and cultured for seven days on MS medium, either supplemented with 10 μM 17 β-estradiol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,MO, USA, Cat# E8875) or without it, under both normal light and dark conditions.
Unless otherwise specified, Arabidopsis plants were grown at 22 °C under a 16 h photoperiod in soil or on agar plates containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog basal medium with vitamins (PhytoTechnology LaboratoriesTM, St Lenexa, KS, USA, Cat# M519), supplemented with 2% sucrose and 0.8% agar.
4.2. Plasmid Constructs and in Planta Transformation of Arabidopsis
To make the
35S:
PGA37-GR fusion construct, a PCR fragment encoding the glucocorticoid receptor domain (amino acids 519 to 795) [
23,
32] was firstly amplified using primers GRF and GRB and introduced into the
Sma I-
Spe I sites of the HA-pBA plasmid. The resulting construct was designated HA-GR-pBA. Then, the
PGA37 coding sequence without stop codon was inserted into the HA-GR-pBA vector using the
Asc I and
Spe I sites to generate the
35S:
PGA37-GR construct. The primers used for plasmid construction are listed in
Table S2. All constructs were thoroughly verified through extensive restriction digests and DNA sequencing analysis.
Arabidopsis transformation was performed using the floral-dip method [
33] with the Agrobacterium GV3101 strain. T1 transgenic plants were selected on half-strength MS solid medium with kanamycin or Basta. Homozygous transgenic plants were obtained through self-crossing and subsequently used for analysis.
4.3. Chlorophyll Autofluorescence Detection and Ultrastructure Analysis of Root Plastids
To detect chlorophyll autofluorescence, the primary roots of two-week-old seedlings were examined approximately 1.5 cm from the root–hypocotyl junction using a laser confocal microscope (Leica, TCS SP8, Wetzlar, Germany). Chlorophyll autofluorescence was detected between 660 and 700 nm under 488 nm laser excitation and was merged with differential interference contrast images. For transmission electron microscopy analysis, the primary roots of two-week-old seedlings were cut approximately 1.5 cm from the root–hypocotyl junction and quickly prefixed overnight in 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C. The samples were then washed and postfixed in 1% OsO4 for about 4 h. After dehydration through a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%, three times each, v/v), the samples were embedded in Epon812 resin. Ultra-thin sections, sliced to a thickness of 70 nm, were subsequently stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Finally, the sections were photographed using a JEM-1400 electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
4.4. Chlorophyll Determination
To determine root chlorophyll content, 50 mg root samples were ground in 500 μL of 80% (
v/
v) acetone using a tissue lyser (Scientz-48, Scientz, Ningbo, China). The mixture was then centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 g. The resulting supernatant was transferred to a new microtube, and the remaining precipitate was re-extracted with an additional 500 μL of 80% (
v/
v) acetone. The absorbance of the combined supernatants was measured at 646 and 663 nm using a BioSpectrometer
® kinetic spectrophotometer (Eppendorf). The chlorophyll (a and b) concentrations were calculated as described by Wellburn [
34].
For the determination of seed chlorophyll content, fifty seeds at the torpedo stage were homogenized in 100 μL of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). The resulting extracts were then centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000× g. The supernatant was subsequently used to assess chlorophyll content. To identify the developmental stage, seeds from the middle of the silique were examined using a BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), while the other seeds within the siliques were utilized for chlorophyll measurement.
Chlorophyll assessments were conducted in three independent experiments for embryos and four independent experiments for roots.
4.5. RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total RNA was extracted using the RNAprep pure Plant Kit with DNase I (Tiangen Biotech (Beijing), China, Cat# DP432). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using the PrimeScript™ II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). The resulting cDNA was diluted 10- to 100-fold, and quantitative transcript analysis was conducted on a Bio-Rad CFX96 system using SYBR® Fast qPCR Mix (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China, Cat# RR430). All procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
4.6. Dexamethasone Treatment, Library Construction, RNA-Seq and Differential Expressed Gene Analysis
Two-week-old
35S:
PGA37-GR seedlings, geminated and grown on solid MS medium, were transferred to liquid MS medium containing 10 μM DEX (Sigma, Cat# D4902) and 100 μM CHX (MedChemExpress, Cat# HY-12320). Seedlings treated with 100 μM CHX were used as the control. After 4 h of treatment, the seedlings were collected and then total RNA was extracted, as described above. Library construction, RNA-Seq, and differentially expressed gene analysis were performed as described previously [
35].
4.7. Protein Expression of PGA37 and Biolayer Interferometry Assay
To express the PGA37 protein, the coding sequence (CDS) of PGA37 was cloned into the NdeI and EcoRI restriction sites of the pET-28a (+) vector, allowing for the expression of PGA37 with an N-terminal histidine tag for affinity purification and immunoblotting. The constructed pET28-PGA37 plasmid was then transformed into BL21 (DE3) competent cells. The transformed cells were cultured induced with 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 37 °C. After incubation, the cells were harvested, and the expressed protein was purified using standard purification techniques.
The purified PGA37 protein was then subjected to a biolayer interferometry (BLI) assay to evaluate its binding interactions with various oligonucleotides using a biolayer interferometry system (BLItz, FortèBIO Inc., Fremont, CA, USA). 5′-Biotinylated DNA oligonucleotides were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), with the sequences detailed in
Table S2. The biotinylated oligonucleotides were immobilized onto streptavidin biosensor tips that had been pre-wetted for 10 min in kinetic buffer containing PBS, 0.1% BSA, 0.02% Tween-20, and 0.05% sodium azide. The assay steps were initial baseline (60 s), loading (300 s), baseline stabilization (240 s), ligand–analyte association (300 s), and ligand–analyte dissociation (300 s).