Next Article in Journal
Pathological and Epidemiological Characterization of First Outbreak of Daylily Rust in Europe and Evaluation of Puccinia hemerocallidis Resistance in Hemerocallis Cultivars
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrothermal Carbonization and Pellet Production from Egeria densa and Lemna minor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Citrus Polyamines: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Physiological Functions

1
Citrus Research and Education Center and Department of Plant Pathology, IFAS, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USA
2
Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(4), 426; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040426
Submission received: 2 March 2020 / Revised: 17 March 2020 / Accepted: 24 March 2020 / Published: 31 March 2020

Abstract

:
Polyamines (PAs) are ubiquitous biogenic amines found in all living organisms from bacteria to Archaea, and Eukaryotes including plants and animals. Since the first description of putrescine conjugate, feruloyl-putrescine (originally called subaphylline), from grapefruit leaves and juice, many research studies have highlighted the importance of PAs in growth, development, and other physiological processes in citrus plants. PAs appear to be involved in a wide range of physiological processes in citrus plants; however, their exact roles are not fully understood. Accordingly, in the present review, we discuss the biosynthesis of PAs in citrus plants, with an emphasis on the recent advances in identifying and characterizing PAs-biosynthetic genes and other upstream regulatory genes involved in transcriptional regulation of PAs metabolism. In addition, we will discuss the recent metabolic, genetic, and molecular evidence illustrating the roles of PAs metabolism in citrus physiology including somatic embryogenesis; root system formation, morphology, and architecture; plant growth and shoot system architecture; inflorescence, flowering, and flowering-associated events; fruit set, development, and quality; stomatal closure and gas-exchange; and chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis. We believe that the molecular and biochemical understanding of PAs metabolism and their physiological roles in citrus plants will help citrus breeding programs to enhance tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses and provide bases for further research into potential applications.

1. Introduction

Polyamines (PAs) are low molecular weight, small, linear/aliphatic and occasionally branched polycationic nitrogen compounds containing unsaturated hydrocarbon with two or more primary amino groups [1,2,3,4,5,6]. At physiological pH, the characteristic feature of PAs structure is that they are positively charged at a defined distance and have methylene groups harbored within them. These methylene groups are known to participate in hydrophobic interactions, thereby influencing PA activity as a whole [7]. In addition, due to the cationic nature of PAs, they can bind to negatively-charged macromolecules, such as nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), acidic phospholipids, and numerous types of proteins [3] to stabilize their structure, particularly under stress conditions.
The history of PAs is about a hundred and thirty years older than that of proteinogenic amino acids. Asparagine was the first isolated amino acid in 1806 [8], whereas, the first polyamine was discovered in 1678 and was subsequently named “spermine” [9]. In that year, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek described the presence of crystalline substances in human semen after standing for several days, but not observed in fresh samples [10]. Two centuries later, in 1878, these crystalline substances were identified as an organic base [11] and named as “spermine” in 1888 [12]. In 1898, the role of spermine in inhibiting bacterial growth and curing various diseases was reported [13]. The structure of polyamines was not known until 1924 when Rosenheim synthesized putrescine (C4H12N2), spermine (C10H26N4), and the related base spermidine (C7H19N3) for the first time [14]. In 1952, the occurrence of the di-amine putrescine was reported in potassium-deficient barley plants [15]. To our knowledge, the putrescine conjugate feruloyl-putrescine (N-(4-aminobutyl)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-cinnamamide; originally called subaphylline) was the first PAs compound isolated and identified from grapefruit (Citrus × paradisi) leaves and juice [16]. In the same year (1965), feruloyl-putrescine was also reported in some varieties of sweet orange (including Hamlin, Navel, Pineapple, and Valencia) and grapefruit (including Duncan, Marsh, and Ruby red), but not in Dancy tangerine, lemons, limes, and ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin [16].
PAs are ubiquitous biogenic amines that are found in all living organisms from bacteria to Archaea, and Eukaryotes including plants and animals [3,5,17,18]. For instance, PAs and their biosynthetic genes were reported in phytopathogenic fungi [19,20] such as the Ascomycota fungi Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Fusarium spp., Nectria hematococa, Mycosphaerella spp. and Magnaporthe grisea and the Basidiomycota fungi Puccinia graminis tritici, P. triticina, and Ustilago maydis [19,20]. In addition, PAs and their biosynthetic genes were reported in phytopathogenic fungi-related Chromista organisms (formally known as oomycetes or stramenopiles) such as Phytophthora infestans, P. ramorum, and P. sojae [19]. Moreover, PAs were reported in bacteria from families Aeromonadaceae, Halomonadaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, and Vibrionaceae, and other related genera of the gamma subclass of the Proteobacteria [21,22,23,24], although some bacterial genera do not synthesize them [25]. Additionally, PAs were found in bacterial viruses (bacteriophage) [26,27].
In higher plants, putrescine (di-amine), spermidine (tri-amine), and spermine (tetra-amine) (Figure 1) are the major ubiquitously found PAs [28,29,30]. However, other PAs such as the di-amines 1,3-diaminopropane (C3H10N2) and cadaverine (C5H14N2) (Figure 1A); the tri-amines sym-norspermidine (C6H17N3) and sym-homospermidine (C8H21N3) (Figure 1B); and the tetra-amines sym-norspermine (C9H24N4) and thermospermine (C10H26N4) (Figure 1C) and longer-chain or branched polyamines are less widely distributed [30].
The genus Citrus (family Rutaceae) is considered one of the most widely grown fruit crops worldwide [31]. Citrus spp. can grow within 35–40 ° north and south latitude [31,32]. Therefore, they consider being native to the tropical and subtropical areas [31,32]. Previously, several metabolic signaling pathways were reported to be involved in physiological functions in citrus plants, including amino acids, organic acids, fatty acids, phytohormones, polyamines, and other secondary metabolites.
In citrus, PAs play an important role(s) in plant growth, development, and other physiological processes. These physiological processes include embryogenesis [33,34]; root system formation, morphology, and architecture [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]; plant growth and shoot system architecture [35,37,43,44,45,46,47]; inflorescence, flowering and flowering-associated events [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]; fruit set, development, and quality [55,56]; stomatal closure and gas-exchange [39,47,57,58,59]; and photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence [37,40,45,47,60,61,62]. However, the molecular mechanisms behind these roles remain ambiguous. Accordingly, in the present review, we discuss the biosynthesis of PAs in citrus plants, with an emphasis on the recent advances in identifying and characterizing PAs-biosynthetic genes and other upstream regulatory genes involved in transcriptional regulation of PAs metabolism. In addition, we are going to discuss the recent metabolic, genetic, and molecular evidence illustrating the roles of PAs in citrus physiology including embryogenesis, root and shoot systems architecture, flowering, fruit set, gas-exchange, and photosynthesis.

2. Biosynthesis of Polyamines (PAs) in Citrus Plants

The biosynthetic pathway of PAs has been extensively studied in all the kingdoms of living organisms, from Bacteria to Archaea and Eukaryotes [29,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. However, our knowledge about this pathway and the genes involved in citrus is still limited. In general, PAs are synthesized in citrus plants from the proteinogenic amino acid l-Arginine through two different arginine-dependent routes. The first route is similar to that of animals and fungi, where l-arginine is converted by mitochondrial arginase (EC 3.5.3.1) to the non-proteinogenic amino acid ornithine, which is then decarboxylated by ornithine decarboxylase (ODC; EC 4.1.1.17) to form the diamine putrescine (Figure 2). Moreover, citrus plants could use an additional route involving arginine decarboxylation by arginine decarboxylase (ADC; EC 4.1.1.19) to produce agmatine, which catalyze to N-carbamoylputrescine (N-CP) then to putrescine by agmatine iminohydrolase (AIH, also known as agmatine deiminase; EC 3.5.3.12) and N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase (NPL1, also known as N-carbamoylputrescine amidase (CPA); EC 3.5.1.53), respectively. In addition, l-arginine and agmatine could contribute directly toward the production of putrescine via the catalytic actions of ADC and agmatine ureohydrolase (AUH, also known as agmatinase; EC 3.5.3.11), respectively (Figure 2).
Interestingly, the enzymatic activities and transcriptomic analyses of both ODC and ADC (the rate-limiting enzymes in PAs biosynthesis) were reported previously from several citrus varieties such as ‘Murcott’ mandarin (Citrus reticulata) [71], Valencia sweet orange (C. sinensis) [34], and C. clementina [56]. Additionally, phylogenetic comparison of citrus loci of PAs biosynthetic genes with those from Arabidopsis thaliana showed that ADC from citrus was presented as one locus in comparison with two loci from A. thaliana [72]. In contrast, ODC, which is not present in A. thaliana [73], was identified in Citrus and presented a similar number of loci (only one locus) as those described in Oryza sativa, and Glycine max [72].
The presence of the active forms of both ADC and ODC was previously reported in different citrus species under biotic and abiotic stressors [46,72,74,75]. Taken together, the presence of both enzymes indicates that citrus could have two alternative routes to generate putrescine from l-arginine. These two routes could be activated differently upon different stressors. However, further studies are required to identify and explain the physiological function(s) of each route.
Once putrescine is produced, it is then converted into the tri-amine spermidine by spermidine synthase (SPDS; EC 2.5.1.16), with the addition of an aminopropyl moiety donated by decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine (dcSAM). dcSAM is synthesized from the proteinogenic amino acid l-methionine via two sequential reactions that catalyze l-methionine to S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) by S-adenosyl-methionine synthase (SAMS, also known as methionine adenosyltransferase; EC 2.5.1.6), then converted to dcSAM by S-adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase (AMD1, also known as SAMDC; EC 4.1.1.50) (Figure 2). Moreover, putrescine could be converted to spermidine via carboxyspermidine, as an intermediate, by carboxynorspermidine dehydrogenase (CANSDH, also known as carboxynorspermidine/carboxyspermidine synthase; EC 1.5.1.43) and carboxynorspermidine decarboxylase (CANSDC; EC 4.1.1.96), respectively, with the addition of an amide group donated by L-aspartate-4-semialdehyde from glycine metabolism pathway (Figure 2). Both putrescine and spermidine support the production of the tri-amine homospermidine using homospermidine synthase (HSS; EC 2.5.1.44). Finally, spermidine is then converted into the tetra-amines spermine or thermospermine by the incorporation of another aminopropyl group (also from dcSAM) using spermine synthase (SPMS; EC 2.5.1.22) and thermospermine synthase (TSS, encoded by a gene named ACAULIS5 (ACL5); EC 2.5.1.79), respectively (Figure 2). Originally, it was thought that two genes (SPMS and ACL5) both encode for SPMS enzyme in A. thaliana [76,77]. However, ACL5, from Thalassiosira pseudonana and A. thaliana, was reported to catalyze the conversion of spermidine to thermospermine but not to spermine [78]. Intriguingly, ACL5 genes have been expressed during parthenocarpic fruit development in C. clementina [56].
Noteworthy, phylogenetic analysis showed that SPDS from citrus is presented as one locus only in comparison with two loci from A. thaliana [72]. On the other hand, AMD1, SPMS, TSS (also known as ACL5), NLP1, and AIH enzymes were identified in Citrus and presented a similar number of loci as those described in A. thaliana [72]. Sweet orange (C. sinensis) constitutively overexpressing SPDS1 from apple resulted in significantly higher endogenous polyamine content, particularly the free spermine [79]. In addition, the flux of radioactivity from l-[3,4-14C] methionine into [14C]spermidine was greatly induced when the enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS (EC 4.4.1.14), responsible for the conversion of SAM to ACC) was inhibited by aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) in aged peel discs of orange (C. sinensis) fruit [80]. While AVG reduced the flux of radioactivity to ACC, it increased the label in SAM [80]. The accumulated SAM could contribute directly to increase the dcSAM levels, which subsequently enhance the spermidine and spermine synthesis. Furthermore, AMD1 (also known as CsSAMDC) was previously cloned and biochemically identified from the navel orange (C. sinensis). Taken together, this provides strong evidence for the physiological link between dcSAM, produced by the catalytic actions of AMD1 (also known as CsSAMDC), and the biosynthesis of tri- and tetra-amines.
Furthermore, some other PAs could be derived from other proteinogenic amino acids rather than l-arginine. For instance, the diamine cadaverine is synthesized from l-lysine by the catalytic actions of lysine decarboxylase (LDC; EC 4.1.1.18) (Figure 2). High levels of cadaverine were recorded in immature seeds of citrus species [81,82,83,84]. For example, cadaverine covalently bound in the perchloric acid-insoluble fraction of flesh and peel of Brasiliano N.L. 92 (C. sinensis) unripe and ripe fruits [82]. Recently, the free, soluble-conjugated, and insoluble-bound forms of cadaverine were reported in Kinnow mandarin (C. nobilis × C. deliciosa) plants grafted on diploid (2x) and double-diploid (4x) rootstocks of P. trifoliata, C. reshni, and C. limonia [84]. Cadaverine and its biosynthetic gene (LDC) may be used as biochemical markers of potassium (K) deficiency [83], as well as playing a key role in chromium-tolerance in Kinnow mandarin [84]. However, to our knowledge, the LDC of citrus is not yet cloned.
Glycine and l-aspartate metabolism pathways could be involved in the biosynthesis of PAs, particularly the tri-amine norspermidine. Briefly, both glycine and l-aspartate metabolism pathways input to produce L-aspartate-4-semialdehyde which donates a carboxy-aminopropyl group to propane-1,3-diamine to form carboxynorspermidine by CANSDH, then Norspermidine and Norspermine by CANSDC and Norspermine synthase (NSS, also known as long-chain polyamine synthase; EC 2.5.1.126), respectively (Figure 2). Norspermidine could be produced from L-aspartate-4-semialdehyde via the production of L-2,4-diaminobutyrate by L-2,4-diaminobutyrate:2-oxoglutarate 4-aminotransferase (DABA-AT, also known as diaminobutyrate-2-oxoglutarate transaminase; EC 2.6.1.76), then the conversion to 1,3-diaminopropane by diaminobutyrate decarboxylase (DABA-DC, also known as L-2,4-diaminobutyrate decarboxylase; EC 4.1.1.86).

3. Physiological Roles of PAs in Citrus

During the last two decades, multitudinous studies have highlighted the regulatory roles of PAs in different physiological processes of plant growth and development (for details see reviews by [85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92]. Most, if not all, of these studies demonstrated that PAs have many similarities with the five classic groups of phytohormones [93,94]. Therefore, PAs have been proposed recently as a new class of plant growth regulators (PGRs) [94,95]. However, plant physiologists have not yet given PAs the status of phytohormones unequivocally, perhaps because PAs differ from phytohormones in two respects; (I) the concentration of PAs in plant tissue is much higher compared to phytohormones (mM vs μM); and (II) in contrast with most phytohormones, PAs are poorly translocated.
PAs play vital multi-regulatory roles in most, if not all, growth- and development-related processes in citrus plants. However, our knowledge about these roles is still limited, and in fact, many roles have not yet been discovered. These processes including somatic embryogenesis [33,34,96], seed germination [97], plant growth (including biomass production, plant height, fresh and dry weight, and number of leaves/plant) [35,36,44,45,47], root morphogenesis and architecture [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigments [35,37,45,60], and reproductive development during flowering [49,50,51,88] and fruit set [55,71,88,98]. In the next paragraphs, we will discuss the multi-regulatory roles of PAs in citrus plants.

4. Role of PAs in Somatic Embryogenesis of Citrus Plants

Somatic embryogenesis is a complex multi-stage process to regenerate new plants in vitro through the tissue culture technique. During the somatic embryogenesis, differentiated somatic cells are used to develop cellular structures similar to zygotic embryos, subsequently generating whole plant bodies. Somatic embryogenesis involves several morphological, physiological, transcriptional, and biochemical changes [99,100]. In vitro, somatic embryogenesis, and plant regeneration, in general, are controlled by exogenous supplementation of plant hormones [101]. Auxin and cytokinin are the main phytohormones involved in this process. The balance between auxin and cytokinin regulates the developmental fate of regenerating plant organs [101].
Although the role of auxin and/or cytokinin in somatic embryogenesis in citrus was intensively studied previously [102,103,104,105,106,107,108], their roles are still controversial. Some scientists suggest that auxins and their synthetic analogs (such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), α-naphthalene acetic acid (α-NAA), and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)) strongly inhibit the somatic embryogenesis [103,105] and somatic embryogenesis could be enhanced by lowering the auxin status and using the inhibitors of auxin synthesis [103,104]. On the contrary, others believe that increasing the level of auxins such as 2,4-D and NAA in tissue culture media was effective in callus induction in somatic embryogenesis [107,108].
In contrast with the controversial role of auxins, evidence suggests that PAs are positively associated with somatic embryogenesis in citrus [33,34,96], although the exact mechanisms through which they exert an effect have not yet been fully elucidated. Liu et al. (2005) analyzed the changes in polyamine levels during somatic embryogenesis using a long-term (8 years) sub-cultured calli of C. sinensis cv. Valencia. Their findings showed that endogenous PAs content of embryogenic calli was significantly higher than those in non-embryogenic calli, and the embryogenetic capability was positively correlated to the endogenous levels of PAs [33]. Furthermore, putrescine reached its highest level at an early stage of differentiation, while spermidine and spermine increased and reached their peak at the globular embryo stage and at a later stage of globular embryo development, respectively [33].
In addition, Wu et al. (2009) noticed that culturing the embryogenic callus of C. sinensis on the embryo-inducing medium (EIM) containing glycerol produced a large number of embryos, which were positively correlated with the endogenous levels of PAs (spermidine and spermine) during the first 20 days of culture, coincident with abundant somatic embryogenesis [34]. Moreover, the expression levels of the four key genes involved in PAs biosynthesis (CsADC, CsODC, CsSPDS, and CsSPMS) were higher in cultures on EIM, and that their transcriptional levels were increased with the developmental stages of the embryos [34]. Likewise, the induction in CsADC activity [33] and CsSPDS gene expression [96] were positively correlated to the endogenous levels of PAs during somatic embryogenesis in citrus plants. Similar results were found in other plant species such as Pinus radiata [109], Panax ginseng [110], and Picea rubens [111]. Additionally, overexpression of polyamine oxidase 4 of citrus (CsPAO4; a key gene in PAs catabolism that uses both spermidine and spermine as substrates for terminal catabolism) in transgenic lines of Nicotiana tabacum displayed higher PAO activity, lower spermidine, and spermine levels, and down-regulation of late embryogenesis abundant protein gene (NtLEA5) compared with wild-type tobacco plants [112].
Moreover, the addition of α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO; an inhibitor of PAs biosynthesis) to the EIM inhibited the somatic embryogenesis remarkably, concurrent with a significant reduction of endogenous PAs levels [34]. However, exogenous supplementation of putrescine with [34] or without DFMO [33] enhanced the embryogenesis frequency and increased the endogenous PAs levels [33,34]. All of these, collectively, demonstrate that PAs play a key role in the regulation of somatic embryogenesis in citrus plants. The regulatory role of PAs in somatic embryogenesis could be due to the interactions between PAs and nitric oxide (NO). Previous studies showed that exogenous supplementation of PAs to the culture media of several plant species such as Pinus taeda (Family: Pinaceae), Ocotea catharinensis (Family: Lauraceae), and Araucaria angustifolia (Family: Araucariaceae), altered the endogenous levels of NO in somatic embryos [113,114,115,116], which support our suggestion that interactions between PAs and NO might play a key role in somatic embryogenesis (for more details see the review of [117]. Another reason behind the regulatory role of PAs in somatic embryogenesis could be due to the suggestion that PAs act as growth regulators [94,95,118,119] that function as secondary messengers for phytohormones, particularly auxins, within the plant cells [120,121].

5. Role of PAs in the Root System Architecture of Citrus Plants

Plant roots play a vital role in the uptake of nutrients and water, anchoring and mechanical support of the plant, storage functions, and interaction with soil microbial flora and abiotic factors [122]. The root system architecture is a key determinant of nutrient- and water-use efficiency in plants. Root system architecture and development are controlled by phytohormonal, metabolic, and environmental cues that might act on genetically controlled developmental processes. From a metabolic point of view, root architecture and development involve not only the five classic phytohormone groups but also other PGRs, such as PAs [87].
In citrus, several studies have outlined the role of PAs in root formation, morphology, and architecture [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] (Figure 3). In general, modifications of the endogenous levels of PAs by chemical inhibitors [36,39], by mutation or gene manipulation [74,112], or by exogenous supplementation [35,36,37,40,41] can directly affect the root morphogenesis, development, and subsequent architecture. The exogenous supplementation of PAs increased root length, root projected surface area, root volume and root tip number in Canton lemon (C. limonia) [35,40], C. tangerine seedlings [41], and trifoliate orange (P. trifoliata) seedlings [37]. PAs did not improve the root length of all diameters, but only the diameters below 0.4 mm (more precisely, diameters 0.2-0.4 mm) [35]. Nevertheless, PAs treatment did not affect the root average diameter [37], but sometimes it was decreased in PAs-treated plants [35,40]. The reduction in the average root diameter might be due to the increase in fine roots (%) and the decrease in coarse roots [40].
Likewise, the addition of PAs to a medium containing Murashige and Skoog salts significantly improved the root formation and growth of two sweet orange cultivars (C. sinensis ‘Pineapple’ and ‘Pêra’) in a concentration-based manner [36]. Furthermore, PAs supplementation increased the numbers of first, second, and third-order lateral roots in PAs-treated plants [35,37] indicating that PAs regulate the root system architecture via controlling the formation and development of lateral root primordia. These effects may be associated with the well-known role of PAs in the regulation of cell division and differentiation in the root apex, and during lateral and adventitious root formation [87]. Likewise, PAs supplementation significantly decreased the available phosphorus content of rhizosphere, while it notably induced phosphorus level in the roots of treated plants [41], which concluded that exogenous PAs could stimulate root morphology, via controlling root phosphorus level, which could result in enhanced growth performance.
Moreover, the application of DFMO significantly inhibited root development (including total length, total projected area, total surface area, and total volume) of P. trifoliata seedlings [37] and also inhibited root formation and growth of C. sinensis [36]. DFMO inhibited the allocation of glucose but stimulated both the allocation of sucrose to roots and guaiacol peroxidase (G-POD; negatively related to root development) activity in roots [37]. Interestingly, the negative effects of DFMO on citrus roots were reversed completely, or at least partially, by the application of putrescine to the DFMO-treated plants [36,37]. Together, these findings indicated that carbohydrate allocation might be associated with endogenous PAs regulation of root development in citrus seedlings. Furthermore, AVG and AgNO3 inhibited in vitro rooting in sweet orange (C. sinensis), indicating that the ethylene biosynthesis pathway was also required for rhizogenesis in citrus [36]. The relationship between the ethylene biosynthesis pathway and PAs biosynthesis pathway was discussed in the previous section (see the above section entitled “Biosynthesis of PAs in citrus plants”).

6. Role of PAs in the Plant Growth and Shoot System Architecture of Citrus Plants

Plant architecture could be defined as the three-dimensional organization of the plant body. For the shoot system (aerial parts), this includes the branching pattern, as well as the size, shape, and position of leaves and flower organs. The shoot system architecture is controlled by several environmental factors and endogenous signals such as phytohormones [123,124,125,126] as well as growth regulators such as PAs [89,94,95,118,119,127,128,129]
In higher plants, the plant architecture and growth of axillary buds are initially controlled by auxins and cytokinins. Auxins were previously reported as a direct regulator of plant architecture. Auxins are synthesized in the apical meristems, are translocated basipetally (downward through the phloem), and suppress axillary bud outgrowth, causing a phenomenon known as apical dominance [123,124,130]. Whereas, cytokinins are synthesized in the root tip meristems, travel acropetally (upward through the xylem), and promote/stimulate axillary bud outgrowth [123,124]. Therefore, cytokinin functions as a second signaling molecule that mediates the role of auxin in the regulation of apical dominance [131]. Both auxins and cytokinins interact antagonistically, it has been reported that kind of organogenesis is controlled by relative concentrations of auxins and cytokinins [123,124,125,126].
In addition to auxins and cytokinins, there is accumulating evidence that PAs also play an important regulatory role in plant growth and shoot system architecture, as they do in other horticultural crops [132,133]. PAs and/or PA-conjugates have been analyzed with respect to plant growth and shoot system architecture in intact plants and in in vitro systems. Most previous studies on intact plants have reported a positive correlation between citrus growth and the appearance of a particular class of PAs compounds [35,37,43,44,45,46,47].
For example, the exogenous PAs supplementation beneficially affected the seedling growth of Canton lemon (C. limonia), represented by increased biomass, increased shoot and root fresh weight to different extents [35]. Likewise, in the presence of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus versiforme, the application of putrescine and spermine increased the total dry weight of trifoliate orange (P. trifoliata) seedlings [44]. Similarly, exogenously applied spermidine by addition to the saline Hoagland nutrient solution (HNS) or via weekly sprays enhanced the accumulation of total spermidine and spermine contents and improved the leaf number of Troyer citrange (P. trifoliata × C. sinensis) [45]. Furthermore, the expression of PAs biosynthetic (ADC, SAMDC, SPDS, and SPMS) and catabolic (DAO and PAO) genes was significantly up-regulated by PAs [46].
Correspondingly, exogenous application of putrescine significantly increased plant height, stem diameter, leaf number per plant, and shoot, and total dry weights of trifoliate orange (P. trifoliata) seedlings compared with the non-treated plants [37]. By contrast, the application of the PAs inhibitor, DFMO, significantly inhibited these metrics; however, the inhibitory effect was partly or completely reversed by exogenous putrescine application to the DFMO-treated plants [37]. Furthermore, the foliar application of 0.5 mM spermidine enhanced growth parameters of Iranian mandarin (C. reticulata × C. limetta cv. Bakraii), as represented by leaf number, shoot length, total plant dry weight, and total plant fresh weight [47].
It was suggested that the enhancement of citrus growth might be due to the fact that PAs acts as a hormonal second-messengers of cell proliferation and differentiation in many processes [37,134], or regulates the plant sensitivity to auxins/cytokinins ratio [131,135]. In A. thaliana, PA-deficient mutants were hyposensitive to auxin and hypersensitive to cytokinin [131]. PAs might play a key regulatory role in citrus morphology and shoot system architecture as well, through controlling the plant response(s) to the auxin/cytokinin ratio. Therefore, we suggest that the interaction between PAs and auxin/cytokinin ratio in citrus tissues determines the initiation of shoot buds (Figure 4). However, the mechanism(s) of how PAs change the sensitivity of citrus plants to auxins and cytokinins is poorly understood and more investigations should be pursued in this area.
In addition, the regulatory role of PAs in citrus growth and shoot system architecture could be modulated by other phytohormones such as abscisic acid (ABA) (Figure 4). Exogenously applied ABA increased the endogenous content of putrescine and spermine in Populus popularis (drought-tolerant genotype) compared with the drought-sensitive poplar genotype [136] and ABA-treated wheat (Triticum aestivum) [137]. However, the spermidine levels were decreased after ABA treatment [137], or at least were unaffected [136]. Moreover, the transcript levels of the major PAs biosynthetic genes (ADC2, SPDS1, and SPMS) were up-regulated in wild type plants of A. thaliana subjected to water stress; however, these genes were impaired in the ABA-deficient (aba2-3) and ABA-insensitive (abi1-1) mutants [138]. Likewise, the transcript level and activity of ADC2 were reduced in the knockout mutant of the NCED3 gene (nc3-2) in A. thaliana [139]. These findings indicated that ABA modulates PAs metabolism at the transcription level by up-regulating the PAs-biosynthetic genes [138,139].
Additionally, the positive effects of PAs in improving the growth of citrus plants could be due to the reduction in electrolyte leakage, increasing the relative water content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, photosynthetic pigment concentration [47], as well as reprograming the oxidative and nitrosative status and enhancing the activities of antioxidant enzymes [46,47].
Moreover, PAs might play a key role in the regulation of plant vasculature. For instance, relatively high contents of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine were detected in xylem exudates of citrus and some other species [140]. Furthermore, thermospermine was detected in Arabidopsis wild-type, but not acl5 mutants [141]. The absence of thermospermine in acl5 mutants caused stem growth imperfection, which partially rescued by exogenous supplementation of thermospermine [141]. Several genetic and molecular evidence suggest that thermospermine might play a fundamental role in preventing maturation and death of the xylem vessel elements [65]. Nevertheless, the role of PAs and their biosynthetic genes in citrus vasculature is poorly studied and more investigations should be pursued in this area.
Previously, the ectopic expression of the spermidine synthase gene from apple (MdSPDS1) into sweet orange (C. sinensis) via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic calluses resulted in enhanced growth, higher endogenous PAs levels, and reduced canker susceptibility on transgenic lines compared with wild-type plants [79]. Moreover, it has been shown recently that thermospermine is involved in growth and gene expression of PAs-associated enzymes in rice seedlings [142]. Likewise, it was reported that both thermospermine synthase (ACL5) and diamine oxidase (DAO) genes are required for zygotic embryogenesis and vascular development in scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) [143]. Collectively, these findings indicate that thermospermine is critical for proper vascular development and xylem cell specification. However, the molecular mechanism(s) behind this role remains ambiguous and it is poorly understood how thermospermine homeostasis controlled in the xylem. A negative auxin-dependent feedback loop mechanism was reported previously to control the thermospermine levels in stem xylem tissues when ACAULIS5 (also known as ACL5) was cloned from hybrid aspen (Populus tremula × P. tremuloides) and black cottonwood (P. trichocarpa) [144]. Briefly, the over-expression of the ACL5 in Populus resulted in the up-regulation of ACL5 expression and enhanced thermospermine accumulation, but negatively influenced the accumulation of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). On the other hand, exogenous auxin supplementation enhanced ACL5 expression. Taken together, these results support the suggestion that thermospermine plays a key role in vascular development particularly and shoot system architecture in general (Figure 4)

7. Role of PAs in the Flowering and Inflorescence of Citrus Plants

The juvenile phase (also known as the vegetative phase) of Citrus species is relatively long, taking 2-5 years to reach maturity period (also known as reproductive phase) and produce flowers [145,146]. In the maturity phase, the developed inflorescence may be either leafy or leafless and may carry multiple flowers or only one of them [145,146,147]. Citrus flowering is a complex phenological process and the floral load is affected by the genotype, cultivar, age, and environmental conditions [145,146]. Citrus species usually overproduce flowers during the blooming season, leading to a high abscission rate and low fruit set [145]. The coordinated transition from vegetative phase to flowering, or reproductive phase in general, is controlled by a complex genetic network, several external environmental cues (such as photoperiod and temperature, etc.) [145,146,147], as well as by endogenous factors such as phytohormones [148] and PAs [92,93,128].
Several previous studies outlined the close connection between nitrogen metabolism in general, PAs particularly, and the flowering-associated physiological events in citrus plants [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. For instance, PAs were reported to be involved in the compatible and self-incompatible pollination of citrus [54]. Briefly, the self-pollinated flowers (self-incompatible pollination model) had higher levels of putrescine, spermidine, and sometimes spermine compared with cross-pollinated pistils in the compatible pollination model [54]. In addition, flowering and inflorescence could be induced by alterations in the sink-source relationship of nitrogen metabolism such as PAs. Changes in the PAs levels and some other nitrogen metabolites during floral development in citrus plants with their corresponding phenological growth stages on BBCH-scale [149,150] are summarized in Figure 5. Briefly, NH3–NH4+ content was higher (more than 4-folds) in Stage I (growth stage 53 of BBCH-scale) of inflorescence emergence of ‘Washington’ navel orange (C. sinensis), then it consistently decreased through all subsequent stages of flower development until the petal fall at Stage V (growth stage 67 of BBCH-scale) [50,51] (Figure 5). These findings were consistent with the accumulation of NH3–NH4+ in the leaves of ‘Washington’ navel orange during the developing floral buds stage, which was associated with a higher number of flowers after low temperature-induced flowering [48]. Similar results of higher flowering intensity and NH3–NH4+ content were found in commercial groves of ‘Frost Lisbon’ lemon trees (C. limon) subjected to drought-induced flowering [48]. Interestingly, the maximum activity of the l-arginine de novo biosynthesis pathway was also observed in Stage I (growth stage 53 of BBCH-scale) flowers (Figure 5) and decreased throughout the flower development stages in the same manner as NH3–NH4+ content [50,51].
Likewise, putrescine and spermidine were higher in the apical flowers of inflorescences initiated in response to eight weeks of low-temperature stress (Stage I flowers) and decreased in parallel with NH3–NH4+ and l-arginine as flowers developed through Stage V (petal fall; growth stage 67 of BBCH-scale), except for spermidine which did not change significantly between Stage IV (growth stage 61 of BBCH-scale) and Stage V (growth stage 67 of BBCH-scale) flowers [49,50]. Studies on the annual cycle of endogenous PAs of two citrus varieties, 32-year-old ‘Washington’ navel orange (C. sinensis) grafted on Troyer (C. sinensis × P. trifoliata) and 8-year-old Miyagawa Satsuma (C. unshiu) grafted on trifoliate orange (P. trifoliata), showed partially similar results, where putrescine content changed most dramatically during flowering, peaked at full bloom, and decreased rapidly afterward [151]. In contrast, spermine had lower levels in the Stage I flowers, but increased dramatically, reaching its maximum concentration (approximately 7-folds) during Stage IV (flower opening; growth stage 61 of BBCH-scale) [49,50]. The changes in the levels of l-arginine, putrescine, spermidine, and spermine were not due to increased organ weight since the fresh weight followed a different pattern (Figure 5).
Interestingly, the exogenous foliar treatment with low-biuret urea, at the end of minimal stress treatment that does not usually result in significant flower production (i.e., 4 instead of 8 weeks of low-temperature treatment or deficit irrigation instead of withholding irrigation, treatment), increased the endogenous ammonia content, which was correlated with higher number of floral shoots and flowers per shoot [51,152]. Likewise, foliar application of putrescine (20 mM) and spermidine (10 mM) significantly increased the number of the total flowers per tree, the number, and proportion of leafless inflorescences per tree [153]. This induced flowering was positively correlated with the endogenous levels of spermidine in citrus leaves at the beginning of the induction treatment [52]. Furthermore, the developed apical flowers had higher levels of ammonia and putrescine and exhibited a higher activity of the de novo arginine biosynthetic pathway [51]. However, all these criteria declined in parallel as flowers developed through stage V flowers (petal fall).
Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the floral buds depend on parallel changes in nitrogen metabolism during low temperature-induced flowering and provide strong evidence for the correlation between NH3-NH4+ content, PAs and their precursor (l-arginine), and the flower development in C. sinensis [49,50]. Accordingly, two hypotheses were suggested for nitrogen metabolism-based flowering induction. The first hypothesis is that the higher ammonia level during stress resulted in the accumulation of arginine and PAs, which subsequently could induce the cell division required for bud induction. Alternately, the second hypothesis suggests that these physiological changes and the subsequent induction of cell division are pre-requisites to flower initiation in citrus [48].
In other plant models, the relationship between PAs and flower development has been intensively studied using chemical inhibitors of PA biosynthesis pathway. For example, cyclohexylamine (CHA; an inhibitor of spermidine biosynthesis) prevents spermidine accumulation, inhibits floral initiation, and inhibits flowering, without significant effects on vegetative growth, in N. tabacum [154] and Spirodela punctuata [155], while spermidine supplementation abolished these inhibitory effects and induced flowering [154,155]. Similarly, using methylglyoxal-bis(guanylhydrazone) (MGBG; a specific inhibitor of SAMDC enzyme) inhibits flowering without significant effects on the vegetative growth of S. punctuata, whereas exogenous spermidine application reversed these inhibitory effects and induced flowering [155]. Likewise, using dl-α-difluormethylarginine (DFMA; a specific inhibitor of ADC enzyme) prevented floral bud initiation in thin-layer explants of tobacco, while using DFMO (a specific inhibitor of ODC enzyme) did not affect the floral bud initiation [156]. On the other hand, using DFMO prevented the subsequent development of newly regenerated floral buds, but not using DFMA [156]. These findings suggested that floral bud initiation requires ADC-derived PAs, while ODC-derived PAs are required for subsequent growth and development of newly regenerated floral buds [156]. Although PA biosynthetic inhibitors proved to be powerful tools for studying the relationship between PAs and flower development, to our knowledge, no studies have been carried out in Citrus.

8. Role of PAs in the Fruit Set, Development, and Quality of Citrus Plants

In fruit crops, the yield is directly correlated to the fruit set after pollination. Nevertheless, heavy flowering does not necessarily guarantee a subsequent economic crop of fruit. Poor fruit set either by severe post-bloom drop and/or pre-harvest drop could cause significant losses in yield. Fruit set varies among different fruit crops. For instance, it could reach as high as 90% as in blueberries, or it could be as low as 1% as in sweet oranges [157]. Moreover, in addition to the low fruit set, citrus has a noticeable, if not extensive, post-bloom fruit drop (also known as June drop) compared to a small percentage of fruit drop for blueberries [157]. In citrus, fruit set may be affected by tree genetics (such as variety, rootstock, and cultivar), environmental conditions (before, during, and after bloom), and/or endogenous factor (such as carbohydrate competition, phytohormones homeostasis, and PAs content) [51,55,56,71,88]. Although many comprehensive physiological and biochemical descriptive studies have been carried out to explore the endogenous PAs levels and their roles in the citrus fruit set, the enormous unexplored potential exists in this area of study.
Furthermore, PAs and their biosynthesis genes might play a key role in parthenocarpic ability and ability to set leafy and leafless inflorescences. For instance, the ovaries of ‘Oronules’ mandarin (a self-incompatible cultivar) had a higher PAs content than ‘Okitsu’ mandarin (a male-sterile cultivar with a high degree of natural parthenocarpy) [55].
Changes in the PAs levels, their biosynthetic genes, and some other nitrogen-containing metabolites during the fruit set of citrus plants with their corresponding phenological growth stages of BBCH-scale [149,150] are summarized in Figure 6. In contrast with the role of NH3–NH4+ content in citrus flowering mentioned in the previous section, no distinct relationship between the NH3–NH4+ content and fruiting intensity was observed during induction of both July and February flushes under hot sub-humid tropical climate [158]. Although the major PAs compounds (putrescine, spermidine, and spermine) were detected throughout the fruit set, however, each compound displayed a different profile and relative variations in its content during the different fruit set stages (Figure 6). Briefly, putrescine content transiently dropped during the first 7 or 15 days after anthesis (growth stage 65-67 of BBCH-scale), then it re-established and increased after petal fall through the growth stage 71-72 of the BBCH-scale [55,56]. Likewise, the free and perchloric acid (PCA)-insoluble conjugated putrescine increased in the flesh and peel (flavedo plus albedo) of ‘Brasiliano’ navel orange (C. sinesis) during ripening, going from unripe to ripe fruits, and decreased in overripe fruits [82]. However, putrescine levels were varied in the growth stage 71 and 72 of the BBCH-scale depending on the cultivar and the year that experiment was carried out [55,56].
Moreover, the exogenous-applications of low-biuret urea, to the leaves of ‘Washington' navel orange during early bloom, increased the endogenous putrescine content and fruit set [51]. Likewise, exogenous application of 0.01 mM aqueous solution of PAs (putrescine, spermidine or spermine) significantly increased the initial fruit set of ‘Blood Red’ sweet orange (C. sinensis), with greater effects by spermidine, followed by spermine and putrescine, respectively [98]. Furthermore, putrescine application increased the fruit yield/tree, production of grade-I fruit (%), fruit weight (g), and fruit diameter (cm), whereas exogenous application of the mixture of all three PAs (0.001 mM each) decreased the fruit set and slightly increased the other parameters compared with control plants [98].
Interestingly, the expression levels of putrescine biosynthetic genes, CsADC and CsODC, showed a contrary behavior. The expression of CsADC was decreased throughout the fruit set stages, whereas one of the two CsODC paralogs (CsODC-II) was up-regulated throughout the fruit set stages [56]. In other words, the expression CsADC mirrored the reduction in putrescine levels during the first 7 or 15 days after anthesis, whereas, CsODC mirrored the increase in putrescine content in citrus ovaries after petal fall through the growth stage 71-72 of the BBCH-scale [56]. These findings suggest that fruit set initiation requires ADC-derived PAs, while ODC-derived PAs are required for subsequent growth and development of citrus fruits.
Spermidine content decreased across the flowering stages (Figure 6) and it continued to drop throughout all the fruit set stages, regardless the cultivar, year, and type of inflorescence [55,56], except at petal fall (growth stage 69 of BBCH-scale) when it slightly increased in the GA-induced fructification in the first-year experiment of [56]. The induction of spermidine content at the end of fruit set (growth stages 69 to 72 of BBCH-scale) could be due to the activity of SPDS enzyme, since the expression of CsSPDS displayed a transient decrease during the first week after anthesis, then recovered the initial level two weeks after anthesis and was significantly up-regulated three weeks after anthesis [56]. Likewise, tyramine demonstrated similar trends as spermidine throughout the fruit set period, where it suffered a transient drop until 21 days after anthesis (the growth stages 71-72 of BBCH-scale [56] (Figure 6). Interestingly, the reduction in spermidine and tyramine content might not be associated with the fruit set development, since both compounds were decreased in ovaries that had not accomplished fruit development at 21 days after anthesis [56]. Furthermore, spermidine content was higher in ‘Oronules’ Clementine (a cultivar with low fruit set) than in ‘Okitsu’ Satsuma mandarin (a cultivar with high fruit set) [55]. Likewise, spermidine content was significantly higher in low-flowering years than those for the high-flowering years [55]. Together, these findings suggest a negative correlation between fruit set and spermidine. Almost similar results were obtained from ‘Murcott’ mandarin, where putrescine biosynthetic enzymes (CsADC but not CsODC) and, to a lesser extent, putrescine and spermidine content roughly followed the patterns of fruit growth, with a higher content at the early stages, a minimum at mid-summer and intermediate values at full fruit development [71].
On the other hand, spermine content hardly changed and remained relatively constant during the first 14 days of fruit development after anthesis or until growth stage 69 of BBCH-scale, where it increased remarkedly and experienced a gradual increase [55,56]. However, the behavior of the spermine profile during the growth stage 71 and 72 of the BBCH-scale is controversial. For example, Trénor et al. (2010) showed that spermine content, from petal fall to the onset of physiological fruit drop, depending on the year that when the experiment was carried out since it decreased in the first-year experiment but slightly increased in the second-year experiment [56]. Likewise, Arias et al. (2005) reported that spermine content was decreased after the growth stage 69 of BBCH-scale regardless of the cultivar, year, or inflorescences type, except for ‘Oronules’ mandarin in the first-year experiment, where it slightly increased [55]. Studies on the annual cycle of endogenous PAs of two citrus varieties, ‘Washington’ navel orange (C. sinensis), and ‘Miyagawa’ Satsuma (C. unshiu), showed that change of the total PAs content in fruit paralleled the enlargement of fruit diameter and spermidine and spermine contents increased at later stages [151].
The induction of spermine levels could be due to the higher activity of SPMS. Interestingly, the transcript levels of CsSPMS was raised after the initiation of fruit set and maintained at this level until the growth stages 71-72 of BBCH-scale [55]. While the endogenous levels of spermine hardly changed during the first two weeks of fruit set, the content of synephrine and methyl-tyramine experienced a gradual increase [55]. However, the endogenous levels of synephrine and methyl-tyramine showed contrary results after petal fall through the growth stage 71-72 of the BBCH-scale.
Furthermore, PAs levels were increased during fruit maturation and ripening of ‘Murcott’ mandarin [71]. These high endogenous PAs levels may be associated with the high growth rate [159] or active cell division [85]. We suggest that in the initial stage of fruit development, active cell division occurs, which possibly needs sufficient putrescine and spermidine contents. While, at the later stage of fruit development, cell division gives way to cell enlargement, in which PAs synthesis is enhanced to fulfill the nitrogen needs required for cell enlargement. Together these findings suggest that PAs might be used as a nitrogen source rather than a growth regulator of fruit set in citrus [55] since the fruit number positively correlated with the increased nitrogen supplementation if other factors are not limiting [55].
In addition to the well-known role of PAs in fruit set of citrus plants, they also could be involved in the fruitlet and fruit abscission [55,71,98], fruit quality [98], fruit creasing [160], alternate bearing [161], and postharvest storage life [162]. Briefly, the exogenous PAs supplementation decreases cell separation processes (abscission) of citrus fruit and fruitlet based on the polyamine compound, concentration, and time of application [55,71,98]. The foliar application of PAs during the flowering period significantly reduced the fruitlet abscission in ‘Murcott’ mandarin [71] and sweet orange [98] and decreased the fruit abscission percentage in ‘Oronules’ Clementine (C. clementina) and ‘Okitsu’ Satsuma (C. unshiu) mandarins [55].
Exogenous application of aqueous PA solutions significantly improved the fruit quality, represented by peel color, peel smoothness, total soluble solids (TSS), total and non-reducing sugars of ‘Blood Red’ sweet orange (C. sinensis). For example, spermidine application increased the TSS, total sugars, peel color, and peel smoothness score, while it reduced the fruit acidity [98]. These findings proved the effectiveness of spermidine for improving fruit quality of citrus plants. In addition, PAs are involved in creasing (albedo breakdown) of citrus fruits [160]. Creasing is a physiological disorder in the rind of sweet orange (C. sinensis) fruit and causes serious economic losses worldwide. Hussain and Singh (2015) found that the single-spray application of putrescine, at fruit set or golf ball stage, reduced creasing index percentage, improved the rind thickness, and increased the levels of endogenous PAs in the flavedo and albedo tissues of ‘Washington’ navel and ‘Lane Late’ fruit in a concentration-based manner. On the other hand, single-spray treatment of MGBG (PAs inhibitor) at the golf ball stage significantly increased the creasing index percentage in both cultivars [160].
Recently, Mirsoleimani and Shahsavar (2018) showed that the seasonal changes in the free PAs contents in the leaves and stems of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin (C. reticulata) could be involved in the alternate bearing habit for these plants. For instance, total PAs content in leaves was higher in “off” trees than in “on” trees throughout the flower bud formation period. Similarly, the endogenous levels of spermidine and spermine in the stems were significantly higher in “off” trees than in “on” ones most of the season, while putrescine content in the stems was significantly higher in “on” trees than in “off” ones [161]. Although these results did not prove the relationship between PAs changes in stems and leaves of citrus plants with processes of flower bud formation, these findings showed that alternate bearing habit could be controlled by variations in PAs content during the season.

9. Role of PAs in the Stomatal Closure and Gas-Exchange of Citrus Plants

Photosynthetic organisms, particularly green plants, require oxygen (O2) in order to carry on cellular respiration, while carbon dioxide (CO2) is required for photosynthesis. Unlike animals, plants do not have specialized organs for gas exchange. Therefore, plants exchange gases through their leaves via stomata. Although several studies showed that abiotic stresses increase the PA levels in the guard cells of stomata of several plant species [47,58,59,163,164,165], little is known about the physiological function of elevated PA levels in gas exchange of citrus plants. Generally, all-natural PAs strongly inhibited the opening and induced the closure of stomata but using different mechanisms.
For example, in Vicia faba plants, PAs regulate the voltage-dependent inward K+ channel in the plasma membrane of guard cells and modulate stomatal aperture [163]. While in A. thaliana plants, PAs regulates the stomatal closure through manipulation of the levels of NO as well as reactive oxygen species (ROS) in guard cells [165]. Similar results were obtained from ‘Red Tangerine’ (C. reticulata) plants, where the in vitro exogenous application of spermine (1 mM) resulted in higher endogenous PAs content which was associated with less wilted phenotype, lower water loss, and lower electrolyte leakage than the control plants [58]. Interestingly, the leaves of spermine-pretreated plants had less ROS and higher activities of peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) than the control [58]. Taken together, these findings suggest that PAs control the stomatal response of citrus plants via modulation of antioxidative capacity [58]. Another example of the association between PAs and ROS scavenging is that the overexpression of the abscisic acid-responsive element (ABRE)-binding factor (ABF) of P. trifoliata (PtrABF) significantly enhanced dehydration tolerance [59]. The PtrABF transgenic lines displayed smaller stomatal apertures and reduced stomatal density/index. Simultaneously, the transgenic plants had higher PAs content, which was associated with higher antioxidant enzyme activities and less ROS [59]. Taken together, these findings suggest that PAs might control the gas exchange and stomatal density via maintaining ROS homeostasis.
Addition of d-arginine (as PAs-biosynthesis inhibitor) to the saline HNS reduced the gas exchange-related parameters, including stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intracellular CO2 concentration, and total putrescine content, but increased total spermine content of the attached leaves of ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin seedlings [57]. On the other hand, supplementation of the saline medium with spermidine (0.5 mM) alleviated the antagonistic effects of d-arginine and improved the total putrescine, spermidine, and spermine contents of the leaves [57]. Likewise, the application of putrescine inhibitor, DFMO, inhibited the stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rates (E) of C. tangerine seedlings [39]. However, the application of exogenous putrescine to DFMO-treated plants partly or completely reversed the negative effects of DFMO [39].
Recently it has been shown that exogenous application of PAs, particularly spermidine (0.5 mM), significantly increased the gas exchange parameters as presented by intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gs), and net photosynthetic rate (PN) of Bakraii (C. reticulata × C. limetta) seedlings when subjected to salinity stress [47]. Additionally, boron deficiency in C. sinensis seedlings caused a significant reduction in some of gas exchange characteristics, but induction in other parameters. For example, boron-deficient lines exhibited lower leaf CO2 assimilation, leaf gs, leaf transpiration, and root respiration, but higher leaf Ci and dark respiration [62]. Interestingly, boron deficiency was associated with the accumulation of caffeoyl-PAs conjugates such as caffeoylputrescine and putative dicaffeoylspermidine in tobacco plants [166]. These findings indicate that PAs accumulation might be related to the gas exchange characteristics directly or indirectly (Figure 7); however, more investigations are required to understand the physiological role of elevated PAs levels in the modulation of gas exchange in citrus plants.

10. Role of PAs in the Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Citrus Plants

Although photosynthesis in higher plants is mainly controlled by three major factors including light irradiance, CO2 concentration, and temperature, it could be limited by a range of environmental factors such as leaf area, shading by other plants, water availability, and many other factors. Moreover, PAs are involved in regulating the light-harvesting and photosynthetic functions [61,167,168]. In citrus, many previous studies demonstrated the role of PAs in the photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and their related parameters through the modifications of the endogenous levels of PAs [37,40,45,47,60,61,62].
For example, exogenously applied spermidine, by addition to the saline HNS or via weekly sprays, enhanced the accumulation of spermidine and spermine contents and improved chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, and chlorophyll fluorescence yield (Fv/Fm; also known as maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII) of NaCl-stressed Troyer citrange plants [45]. Likewise, exogenously applied putrescine significantly increased chlorophyll a, total carotenoid, and total chlorophyll contents in trifoliate orange seedlings [37]. Moreover, the application of DFMO (a putrescine inhibitor) significantly decreased the total chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rates (PN) of C. tangerine seedlings, whereas the application of exogenous putrescine to DFMO-treated seedlings partly reversed the negative effects of DFMO [39]. Consistent with these findings, the application of different exogenous PAs (putrescine, spermidine, or spermine) improved the relative chlorophyll content in leaves of Canton lemon (C. limonia), which was associated with significantly increased in plant biomass. [40]. Taken together, these findings suggest that PAs might be positively influencing the photosynthetic functions of citrus plants. In fact, chloroplasts themselves could augment the endogenous PAs content, which can benefit the formation of chlorophyll a but not chlorophyll b [61]. However, the high dose of PAs may destroy the structure of chloroplasts based on light conditions [37].
Recently, the PAs-treated Iranian mandarin (C. reticulata × C. limetta cv. Bakraii) seedlings showed an increased net photosynthetic rate in salt-stressed plants, which was found to be associated with increased photosynthetic pigments content, as well as fluorescence parameters including minimal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (F0), maximal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (Fm), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv), nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), and photochemical quenching (qP) [47].
Under both saline and non-saline conditions, putrescine and paclobutrazol (a plant growth retardant and triazole fungicide) significantly enhanced the photosynthetic rates of salt-sensitive citrus rootstock Karna khatta (C. karna) seedlings [60]. In the same study, chlorophyll a and b were decreased significantly in NaCl-stressed plants, however, the application of putrescine, paclobutrazol, or a combination of both improved the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll contents, and chlorophyll a/b ratio [60]. The positive effects of putrescine and paclobutrazol on chlorophyll could contribute directly toward the enhancement of photosynthesis in citrus. Paclobutrazol blocks some biosynthesis-limiting steps of the terpenoid/isoprenoid pathway which results in inhibiting the gibberellins biosynthesis but enhancing cytokinins and ABA accumulation [169,170]. The inhibition of gibberellin synthesis increases the availability of terpenoid pathway precursors, particularly geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP). Increased GGPP could contribute directly toward the enhancement of chlorophyll content via phytyl-pp using geranylgeranyl reductase (GGRS), chlorophyll synthase (CHL), and some other enzymes [170]. Furthermore, it might play an indirect role in the enhancement of photosynthesis via the induction of carotenoids content through phytoene using phytoene synthase (PSY) [170]. Carotenoids play a photoprotective role in the photosynthetic process [171,172]. In addition to their role as accessory light-harvesting pigments, carotenoids protect chlorophylls from photo-damage through the absorption of light energy to be utilized in photosynthesis [171,172].

11. Conclusions Remarks and Future Prospects

The considerable increase in research studies about the roles of polyamines in citrus growth and development suggests that they do something interesting and important. In this review, we presented an overview of the role PAs in a wide range of physiological processes of citrus plants; however, their exact roles are not completely understood. Nevertheless, the knowledge gained thus far about the physiological roles of PAs in citrus builds a strong case for further studies toward understanding the metabolic and molecular regulation of PAs in citrus, and their emergence as a promising approach to practical applications in citriculture. Furthermore, several synergistic and antagonistic interactions exist between PAs and various phytohormones, particularly ABA and ethylene, during the regulation of cellular processes of citrus plants. Although significant progress has been made in understanding the crosstalk between PAs and phytohormones, the molecular mechanisms underlying PAs-phytohormone interactions require more investigation to understand the signaling transductions that regulate PA functions in citrus.
In this review, we dissected the biosynthesis pathway of PAs in citrus plants, along with its associated biosynthetic genes. However, only two PAs biosynthetic genes have been cloned from citrus or its relatives, including CsSAMDC (GenBank Accession No. FJ496345) from ‘Newhall’ navel orange (C. sinensis) [173] and PtADC (GenBank accession No. HQ008237) from trifoliate orange (P. trifoliata) [74]. Further studies are required though for cloning, biochemical identification, and expression analysis of the genes involved in citrus PA biosynthesis. Traditional quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping/cloning, and genome-wide association mapping are two of the best approaches that could be used for gene identification and modulation of PAs content by genetic engineering. The genetic manipulation of PAs biosynthetic genes to produce transgenic citrus plants with modulated PAs content may enhance the tolerance of citrus plants against stressful conditions. Moreover, isolation and analysis of PAs biosynthetic genes will significantly improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind the role of PAs in stress tolerance. Transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches are very helpful tools to understand these molecular mechanisms. Additionally, the exogenous application of PAs can be an alternate option to enhance citrus tolerance, and other plant species in general, to both biotic and abiotic stresses.

Author Contributions

N.K., together with Y.N., conceptualized the idea. Y.N. and N.K. contributed to digging into literature and finalizing the figures. Both authors worked together in drafting the manuscript. Finally, N.K. and Y.N. revised and finalized of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was generously supported by grant No. 2016-70016-24844 for NK from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA-USDA).

Acknowledgments

We apologize for not being able to cite all related references because of space limitations. The authors would like to acknowledge the members of our laboratory for helpful discussions, detailed comments, and constructive suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tabor, C.W.; Tabor, H. Polyamines. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1984, 53, 749–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tabor, C.W.; Tabor, H. Polyamines in microorganisms. Microbiol. Rev. 1985, 49, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cohen, S.S. A Guide to the Polyamines; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. Groppa, M.D.; Benavides, M.P. Polyamines and abiotic stress: Recent advances. Amino Acids 2008, 34, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hussain, S.S.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, M.; Siddique, K.H.M. Polyamines: Natural and engineered abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Singh, P.; Basu, S.; Kumar, G. Polyamines Metabolism: A Way Ahead for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. In Biochemical, Physiological and Molecular Avenues for Combating Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants; Wani, S.H., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2018; pp. 39–55. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wallace, H.M.; Fraser, A.V.; Hughes, A. A perspective of polyamine metabolism. Biochem. J. 2003, 376, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vickery, H.B.; Schmidt, C.L.A. The History of the Discovery of the Amino Acids. Chem. Rev. 1931, 9, 169–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bachrach, U. The early history of polyamine research. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Leeuwenhoek, A.; Observationes, D. Anthonii Lewenhoeck, De Natis E Semine Genitali Animalculis. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1678, 12, 1040–1046. [Google Scholar]
  11. Schreiner, P. Ueber eine neue organische Basis in thierischen Organismen. Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1878, 194, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ladenburg, A.; Abel, J. Ueber das Aethylenimin (Spermin?). Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 1888, 21, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Poehl, A. Die Physiologisch-Chemischen Grundlagen der Spermintheorie Nebst Klinischem Material zur Therapeutischen Verwendung des Sperminum-Poehl; Wiencke: St. Petersburg, Russia, 1898. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenheim, O. The Isolation of Spermine Phosphate from Semen and Testis. Biochem. J. 1924, 18, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Richards, F.J.; Coleman, R.G. Occurrence of putrescine in potassium-deficient barley. Nature 1952, 170, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wheaton, T.A.; Stewart, I. Feruloylputrescine: Isolation and Identification from Citrus Leaves and Fruit. Nature 1965, 206, 620–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alcázar, R.; Marco, F.; Cuevas, J.C.; Patron, M.; Ferrando, A.; Carrasco, P.; Tiburcio, A.F.; Altabella, T. Involvement of polyamines in plant response to abiotic stress. Biotechnol. Lett. 2006, 28, 1867–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Michael, A.J. Polyamines in eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 14896–14903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Valdés-Santiago, L.; Cervantes-Chávez, J.A.; León-Ramírez, C.G.; Ruiz-Herrera, J. Polyamine metabolism in fungi with emphasis on phytopathogenic species. J. Amino Acids 2012, 2012, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Valdés-Santiago, L.; Ruiz-Herrera, J. Stress and polyamine metabolism in fungi. Front. Chem. 2014, 1, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Auling, G.; Busse, H.-J.; Pilz, F.; Webb, L.; Kneifel, H.; Claus, D. Rapid differentiation, by polyamine analysis, of Xanthomonas strains from phytopathogenic pseudomonads and other members of the class proteobacteria interacting with plants. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1991, 41, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Auling, G. Polyamines, biomarker for taxonomy and ecology of phytopathogenic and other bacteria belonging to the Proteobacteria. Belgian J. Bot. 1992, 125, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hamana, K. Polyamine distribution patterns within the families Aeromonadaceae, Vibrionaceae, Pasteurellaceae, and Halomonadaceae, and related genera of the gamma subclass of the Proteobacteria. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 43, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wortham, B.W.; Oliveira, M.A.; Patel, C.N. Polyamines in Bacteria: Pleiotropic Effects Yet Specific Mechanisms. In The Genus Yersinia: Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology Book Series; Perry, R.D., Fetherston, J.D., Eds.; AEMB: Ruston, LA, USA, 2007; Volume 603, pp. 106–115. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, B.; Kim, S.H.; Zhang, Y.; Hanfrey, C.C.; Elliott, K.A.; Ealick, S.E.; Michael, A.J. Different polyamine pathways from bacteria have replaced eukaryotic spermidine biosynthesis in ciliates Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetaurelia. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 97, 791–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hershey, A.D. Some minor components of bacteriophage T2 particles. Virology 1957, 4, 237–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ames, B.N.; Dubin, D.T.; Rosenthal, S.M. Presence of polyamines in certain bacterial viruses. Science 1958, 127, 814–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kaur-Sawhney, R.; Tiburcio, A.F.; Altabella, T.; Galston, A.W. Polyamines in plants: An overview. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2003, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, J.-H.; Wang, W.; Wu, H.; Gong, X.; Moriguchi, T. Polyamines function in stress tolerance: From synthesis to regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Michael, A.J. Biosynthesis of polyamines and polyamine-containing molecules. Biochem. J. 2016, 473, 2315–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Heying, E.; Tanumihardjo, S.A. History, global distribution, and nutritional importance of citrus fruits. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012, 11, 530–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gottwald, T.R. Current epidemiological understanding of citrus Huanglongbing. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 119–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Liu, H.-Y.; Xiao, L.-T.; Lu, X.-D.; Hu, J.-J.; Wu, S.; He, C.-Z.; Deng, X.-X. Changes in polyamine levels in Citrus sinensis Osb. cv. Valencia callus during somatic embryogenesis. J. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 2005, 31, 275–280. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu, X.-B.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.-H.; Deng, X.-X. Involvement of polyamine biosynthesis in somatic embryogenesis of Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) induced by glycerol. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yao, Q.; Wang, L.R.; Chen, J.Z.; Zhu, H.H. The effects of polyamines on root morphology and arbuscular mycorrhiza of citrus seedlings. Acta Hortic. 2008, 774, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mendes, A.F.S.; Cidade, L.C.; Otoni, W.C.; Soares-Filho, W.S.; Costa, M.G.C. Role of auxins, polyamines and ethylene in root formation and growth in sweet orange. Biol. Plant. 2011, 55, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, Q.-S.; Zou, Y.-N.; Liu, M.; Cheng, K. Effects of exogenous putrescine on mycorrhiza, root system architecture, and physiological traits of Glomus mosseae-colonized trifoliate orange seedlings. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2012, 40, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wu, Q.S.; Zou, Y.N.; Liu, C.Y.; Lu, T. Interacted effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and polyamines on root system architecture of citrus seedlings. J. Integr. Agric. 2012, 11, 1675–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, Q.S.; Zou, Y.N.; Zhan, T.T.; Liu, C.Y. Polyamines participate in mycorrhizal and root development of citrus (Citrus tangerine) seedlings. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2010, 38, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yao, Q.; Wang, L.-R.; Xing, Q.-X.; Chen, J.-Z.; Zhu, H.-H. Exogenous polyamines influence root morphogenesis and arbuscular mycorrhizal development of Citrus limonia seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 60, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, Q.S.; Zou, Y.N.; Peng, Y.H.; Liu, C.Y. Root morphological modification of mycorrhizal citrus (Citrus tangerine) seedlings after application with exogenous polyamines. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2011, 21, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ishii, T.; Aikawa, J.; Kirino, S.; Kitabayashi, H.; Matsumoto, I.; Kadoya, K. Effects of Alginate Oligosaccharide and Polyamines on Hyphal Growth of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Their Infectivity of Citrus Roots. In Proceedings of the 9th International Society of Citriculture Congress, Orlando, FL, USA, 3–7 December 2000; pp. 1030–1032. [Google Scholar]
  43. Anjum, M.A. Effect of NaCl concentrations in irrigation water on growth and polyamine metabolism in two citrus rootstocks with different levels of salinity tolerance. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2007, 30, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Q.-S.; Zou, Y.-N. The effect of dual application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and polyamines upon growth and nutrient uptake on trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) Seedlings. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2009, 37, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  45. Anjum, M.A. Effect of exogenously applied spermidine on growth and physiology of citrus rootstock Troyer citrange under saline conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2011, 35, 43–53. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tanou, G.; Ziogas, V.; Belghazi, M.; Christou, A.; Filippou, P.; Job, D.; Fotopoulos, V.; Molassiotis, A. Polyamines reprogram oxidative and nitrosative status and the proteome of citrus plants exposed to salinity stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 864–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Khoshbakht, D.; Asghari, M.R.; Haghighi, M. Influence of foliar application of polyamines on growth, gas-exchange characteristics, and chlorophyll fluorescence in Bakraii citrus under saline conditions. Photosynthetica 2018, 56, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lovatt, C.J.; Zheng, Y.; Hake, K.D. Demonstration of a change in nitrogen metabolism influencing flower initiation in Citrus. Isr. J. Bot. 1988, 37, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kushad, M.M.; Orvos, A.R.; Yelenosky, G. Relative changes in polyamines during citrus flower development. HortScience 1990, 25, 946–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sagee, O.; Lovatt, C.J. Putrescine content parallels ammonia and arginine metabolism in developing flowers of the ‘Washington’ Navel Orange. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1991, 116, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ali, A.G.; Zheng, Y.; Sagee, O.; Protacio, C.; Lovatt, C.J. Ammonia And/Or Its Metabolites Influence Flowering, Fruit Set, And Yield Of The ‘Washington’ Navel Orange. HortScience 1993, 28, 559. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ali, A.G.; Lovatt, C.J. Relationship of polyamines to low-temperature stress-induced flowering of the ‘Washington’ navel orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). J. Hortic. Sci. 1995, 70, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Krajewski, A.J.; Rabe, E. Citrus flowering: A critical evaluation. J. Hortic. Sci. 1995, 70, 357–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gentile, A.; Antognoni, F.; Iorio, R.A.; Distefano, G.; Las Casas, G.; La Malfa, S.; Serafini-Fracassini, D.; Del Duca, S. Polyamines and transglutaminase activity are involved in compatible and self-incompatible pollination of Citrus grandis. Amino Acids 2012, 42, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Arias, M.; Carbonell, J.; Agustí, M. Endogenous free polyamines and their role in fruit set of low and high parthenocarpic ability citrus cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Trénor, M.; Perez-Amador, M.A.; Carbonell, J.; Blázquez, M.A. Expression of polyamine biosynthesis genes during parthenocarpic fruit development in Citrus clementina. Planta 2010, 231, 1401–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Anjum, M.A. Response of Cleopatra mandarin seedlings to a polyamine-biosynthesis inhibitor under salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2010, 32, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shi, J.; Fu, X.-Z.; Peng, T.; Huang, X.-S.; Fan, Q.-J.; Liu, J.-H. Spermine pretreatment confers dehydration tolerance of citrus in vitro plants via modulation of antioxidative capacity and stomatal response. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhang, Q.; Wang, M.; Hu, J.; Wang, W.; Fu, X.; Liu, J.-H. PtrABF of Poncirus trifoliata functions in dehydration tolerance by reducing stomatal density and maintaining reactive oxygen species homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 5911–5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Sharma, D.K.; Dubey, A.K.; Srivastav, M.; Singh, A.K.; Sairam, R.K.; Pandey, R.N.; Dahuja, A.; Kaur, C. Effect of putrescine and paclobutrazol on growth, physiochemical parameters, and nutrient acquisition of salt-sensitive citrus rootstock Karna Khatta (Citrus karna Raf.) under NaCl Stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 30, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shu, S.; Guo, S.-R.; Yu, L.-Y. A Review: Polyamines and Photosynthesis. In Advances in Photosynthesis—Fundamental Aspects; Najafpour, M., Ed.; In Tech: Beijing, China, 2012; pp. 439–464. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lu, Y.-B.; Yang, L.-T.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Liao, T.-T.; Chen, Y.-B.; Chen, L.-S. Effects of boron deficiency on major metabolites, key enzymes and gas exchange in leaves and roots of Citrus sinensis seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2014, 34, 608–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kusano, T.; Berberich, T.; Tateda, C.; Takahashi, Y. Polyamines: Essential factors for growth and survival. Planta 2008, 228, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Carbonell, J.; Blázquez, M.A. Regulatory mechanisms of polyamine biosynthesis in plants. Genes Genomics 2009, 31, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vera-Sirera, F.; Minguet, E.G.; Singh, S.K.; Ljung, K.; Tuominen, H.; Blázquez, M.A.; Carbonell, J. Role of polyamines in plant vascular development. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pegg, A.E.; Casero, R.A. Current status of the polyamine research field. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 720, 3–35. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Marina, M.; Sirera, F.V.; Rambla, J.L.; Gonzalez, M.E.; Blázquez, M.A.; Carbonell, J.; Pieckenstain, F.L.; Ruiz, O.A. Thermospermine catabolism increases Arabidopsis thaliana resistance to Pseudomonas viridiflava. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1393–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gupta, K.; Dey, A.; Gupta, B. Plant polyamines in abiotic stress responses. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 2015–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mattoo, A.K.; Fatima, T.; Upadhyay, R.K.; Handa, A.K. Polyamines in Plants: Biosynthesis from Arginine, and Metabolic, Physiological and Stress-Response Roles. In Amino Acids in Higher Plants; D’Mello, J.P.F., Ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2015; pp. 177–194. [Google Scholar]
  70. Handa, A.K.; Fatima, T.; Mattoo, A.K. Polyamines: Bio-molecules with diverse functions in plant and human health and disease. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Nathan, R.; Altman, A.; Monselise, S.P. Changes in activity of polyamine biosynthetic enzymes and in polyamine contents in developing fruit tissues of ‘Murcott’ mandarin. Sci. Hortic. 1984, 22, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Petrocelli, S.; Pizarro, M.D.; Alet, A.; De Ollas, C.; Talón, M.; Tadeo, F.R.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Arbona, V.; Orellano, E.G.; Daurelio, L.D. Phytohormone participation during Citrus sinensis non-host response to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Gene 2018, 15, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hanfrey, C.; Sommer, S.; Mayer, M.J.; Burtin, D.; Michael, A.J. Arabidopsis polyamine biosynthesis: Absence of ornithine decarboxylase and the mechanism of arginine decarboxylase activity. Plant J. 2001, 27, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wang, J.; Sun, P.-P.; Chen, C.-L.; Wang, Y.; Fu, X.-Z.; Liu, J.-H. An arginine decarboxylase gene PtADC from Poncirus trifoliata confers abiotic stress tolerance and promotes primary root growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2899–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Daurelio, L.D.; Petrocelli, S.; Blanco, F.; Holuigue, L.; Ottado, J.; Orellano, E.G. Transcriptome analysis reveals novel genes involved in nonhost response to bacterial infection in tobacco. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hanzawa, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Michael, A.J.; Burtin, D.; Long, D.; Pineiro, M.; Coupland, G.; Komeda, Y. ACAULIS5, an Arabidopsis gene required for stem elongation, encodes a spermine synthase. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 4248–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Panicot, M.; Minguet, E.G.; Ferrando, A.; Alcázar, R.; Blázquez, M.A.; Carbonell, J.; Altabella, T.; Koncz, C.; Tiburcio, A.F. A polyamine metabolon involving aminopropyl transferase complexes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2539–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Knott, J.M.; Römer, P.; Sumper, M. Putative spermine synthases from Thalassiosira pseudonana and Arabidopsis thaliana synthesize thermospermine rather than spermine. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 3081–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Fu, X.-Z.; Chen, C.-W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.-H.; Moriguchi, T. Ectopic expression of MdSPDS1 in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) reduces canker susceptibility: Involvement of H2O2 production and transcriptional alteration. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Even-Chen, Z.; Mattoo, A.K.; Goren, R. Inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis by aminoethoxyvinylglycine and by polyamines shunts label from 3,4-[14C]methionine into spermidine in aged orange peel discs. Plant Physiol. 1982, 69, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Han, K.R.; Kim, M.W.; Kim, H.Y.; Riu, K.Z.; Stadelmann, Y.O.K. Endogeneous Levels of Polyamines in Citrus and Related Species: Their Role in In Vitro Organogenesis, Somatic Embrogenesis and Recalcitrance. In Abstract no 118 in Plant Biology Conference; American Society of Plant Biologists: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  82. Tassoni, A.; Germanà, M.A.; Bagni, N. Free and conjugated polyamine content in Citrus sinensis Osbeck, cultivar Brasiliano N.L. 92, a Navel orange, at different maturation stages. Food Chem. 2004, 87, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Srivastava, A.K.; Singh, S. Biochemical markers and nutrient constraints diagnosis in citrus: A perspective. J. Plant Nutr. 2006, 29, 827–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shahid, M.A.; Balal, R.M.; Khan, N.; Rossi, L.; Rathinasabapathi, B.; Liu, G.; Khan, J.; Cámara-Zapata, J.M.; Martínez-Nicolas, J.J.; Garcia-Sanchez, F. Polyamines provide new insights into the biochemical basis of Cr-tolerance in Kinnow mandarin grafted on diploid and double-diploid rootstocks. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 156, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Galston, A.W. Polyamines as modulators of plant development. Bioscience 1983, 33, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Martin-Tanguy, J. Metabolism and function of polyamines in plants: Recent development (new approaches). Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 34, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Couée, I.; Hummel, I.; Sulmon, C.; Gouesbet, G.; El Amrani, A. Involvement of polyamines in root development. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 2004, 76, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liu, J.-H.; Honda, C.; Moriguchi, T. Involvement of polyamine in floral and fruit development. JARQ 2006, 40, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Takahashi, T.; Kakehi, J.-I. Polyamines: Ubiquitous polycations with unique roles in growth and stress responses. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Tiburcio, A.F.; Altabella, T.; Bitrián, M.; Alcázar, R. The roles of polyamines during the lifespan of plants: From development to stress. Planta 2014, 240, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Masson, P.H.; Takahashi, T.; Angelini, R. Editorial: Molecular mechanisms underlying polyamine functions in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Tiburcio, A.F.; Alcázar, R. Potential Applications of Polyamines in Agriculture and Plant Biotechnology. In Polyamines: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology Volume1694; Alcázar, R., Tiburcio, A.F., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 489–508. [Google Scholar]
  93. Galston, A.W.; Sawhney, R.K. Polyamines in plant physiology. Plant Physiol. 1990, 94, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Bagni, N.; Torrigiani, P. Polyamines: A New Class of Growth Substances. In Progress in Plant Growth Regulation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 264–275. [Google Scholar]
  95. El-Otmani, M.; Lovatt, C.J.; Coggins, C.W.; Agustí, M. Plant growth regulators in citriculture: Factors regulating endogenous levels in citrus tissues. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1995, 14, 367–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pan, Z.; Guan, R.; Zhu, S.; Deng, X. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck). Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nieves, N.; Martinez, M.E.; Blanco, M.A.; Gonzalez, J.L.; Borroto, E.; Lorenzo, J.C.; Portilla, Y. Changes in soluble proteins and polyamines during citrus seed germination. Fruits 1998, 53, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  98. Saleem, B.A.; Malik, A.U.; Anwar, R.; Farooq, M. Exogenous application of polyamines improves fruit set, yield and quality of sweet oranges. Acta Hortic. 2008, 774, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kawahara, R.; Komamine, A. Gene expression during somatic embryogenesis. Protein Nucleic Acid Enzym. 1992, 37, 1249–1256. [Google Scholar]
  100. Chugh, A.; Khurana, P. Gene expression during somatic embryogenesis—Recent advances. Curr. Sci. 2002, 83, 715–730. [Google Scholar]
  101. Ikeuchi, M.; Ogawa, Y.; Iwase, A.; Sugimoto, K. Plant regeneration: Cellular origins and molecular mechanisms. Development 2016, 143, 1442–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Kochba, J.; Spiegel-Roy, P. Embryogenesis in gamma-irradiated habituated ovular callus of the “Shamouti” orange as affected by auxin and by tissue age. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1977, 17, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kochba, J.; Spiegel-Roy, P. The effects of auxins, cytokinins and inhibitors on embryogenesis in habituated ovular callus of the Shamouti orange (Citrus sinensis). Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 1977, 81, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Spiegel-Roy, P.; Kochba, J. Embryogenesis in Citrus Tissue Cultures. In Advances in Biochemical Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1980; pp. 27–48. [Google Scholar]
  105. Fiore, S.; De Pasquale, F.; Carimi, F.; Sajeva, M. Effect of 2,4-D and 4-CPPU on somatic embryogenesis from stigma and style transverse thin cell layers of Citrus. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 68, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tao, H.; Shaolin, P.; Gaofeng, D.; Lanying, Z.; Gengguang, L. Plant regeneration from leaf-derived callus in Citrus grandis (pummelo): Effects of auxins in callus induction medium. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 69, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hao, Y.J.; Wen, X.P.; Deng, X.X. Genetic and epigenetic evaluations of citrus calluses recovered from slow-growth culture. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ramdan, R.; Handaji, N.; Beyahia, H.; Ibriz, M. Influence of growth regulators on callus induction from embryos of five citrus rootstocks. J. Appl. Biosci. 2014, 73, 5959–5965. [Google Scholar]
  109. Minocha, R.; Smith, D.R.; Reeves, C.; Steele, K.D.; Minocha, S.C. Polyamine levels during the development of zygotic and somatic embryos of Pinus radiata. Physiol. Plant. 1999, 105, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Kevers, C.; Le Gal, N.; Monteiro, M.; Dommes, J.; Gaspar, T. Somatic embryogenesis of Panax ginseng in liquid cultures: A role for polyamines and their metabolic pathways. Plant Growth Regul. 2000, 31, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Minocha, R.; Minocha, S.C.; Long, S. Polyamines and their biosynthetic enzymes during somatic embryo development in red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2004, 40, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wang, W.; Liu, J.-H. CsPAO4 of Citrus sinensis functions in polyamine terminal catabolism and inhibits plant growth under salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Silveira, V.; Iochevet Segal Floh, E.; Handro, W.; Pedro Guerra, M. Effect of plant growth regulators on the cellular growth and levels of intracellular protein, starch and polyamines in embryogenic suspension cultures of Pinus taeda. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 2004, 76, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Silveira, V.; Santa-Catarina, C.; Tun, N.N.; Scherer, G.F.E.; Handro, W.; Guerra, M.P.; Floh, E.I.S. Polyamine effects on the endogenous polyamine contents, nitric oxide release, growth and differentiation of embryogenic suspension cultures of Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. Plant Sci. 2006, 171, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Santa-Catarina, C.; Silveira, V.; Scherer, G.F.E.; Floh, E.I.S. Polyamine and nitric oxide levels relate with morphogenetic evolution in somatic embryogenesis of Ocotea catharinensis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007, 90, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dutra, N.T.; Silveira, V.; de Azevedo, I.G.; Gomes-Neto, L.R.; Façanha, A.R.; Steiner, N.; Guerra, M.P.; Floh, E.I.S.; Santa-Catarina, C. Polyamines affect the cellular growth and structure of pro-embryogenic masses in Araucaria angustifolia embryogenic cultures through the modulation of proton pump activities and endogenous levels of polyamines. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 148, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wimalasekera, R.; Tebartz, F.; Scherer, G.F.E. Polyamines, polyamine oxidases and nitric oxide in development, abiotic and biotic stresses. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bagni, N.; Tassoni, A. Biosynthesis, oxidation and conjugation of aliphatic polyamines in higher plants. Amino Acids 2001, 20, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bais, H.P.; Ravishankar, G.A. Role of polyamines in the ontogeny of plants and their biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 69, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Anwar, R.; Mattoo, A.K.; Handa, A.K. Polyamine Interactions with Plant Hormones: Crosstalk at Several Levels. In Polyamines; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2015; pp. 267–302. [Google Scholar]
  121. Podlešáková, K.; Ugena, L.; Spíchal, L.; Doležal, K.; De Diego, N. Phytohormones and polyamines regulate plant stress responses by altering GABA pathway. New Biotechnol. 2019, 48, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Smith, S.; De Smet, I. Root system architecture: Insights from Arabidopsis and cereal crops. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 1441–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Ongaro, V.; Leyser, O. Hormonal control of shoot branching. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Shimizu-Sato, S.; Tanaka, M.; Mori, H. Auxin–cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Martín-Trillo, M.; Cubas, P. TCP genes: A family snapshot ten years later. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Müller, D.; Leyser, O. Auxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching. Ann. Bot. 2011, 107, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Evans, P.T.; Malmberg, R.L. Do polyamines have roles in plant development? Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989, 40, 235–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Walden, R.; Cordeiro, A.; Tiburcio, A.F. Polyamines: Small molecules triggering pathways in plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 1997, 113, 1009–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Galston, A.W.; Kaur-Sawhney, R. Polyamines as Endogenous Growth Regulators. In Plant Hormones; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 158–178. [Google Scholar]
  130. Reinhardt, D.; Kuhlemeier, C. Plant architecture. EMBO Rep. 2002, 3, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Cui, X.; Ge, C.; Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Chen, W.; Fu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. The BUD2 mutation affects plant architecture through altering cytokinin and auxin responses in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2010, 20, 576–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Scholten, H.J. Effect of polyamines on the growth and development of some horticultural crops in micropropagation. Sci. Hortic. 1998, 77, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Movahed, N.; Eshghi, S.; Tafazoli, E.; Jamali, B. Effects of polyamines on vegetative characteristics, growth, flowering and yield of strawberry (“Paros” and ’Selva’). Acta Hortic. 2012, 926, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Steiner, N.; Santa-Catarina, C.; Silveira, V.; Floh, E.I.S.; Guerra, M.P. Polyamine effects on growth and endogenous hormones levels in Araucaria angustifolia embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 2007, 89, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Geuns, J.M.; Smets, R.; Struyf, T.; Prinsen, E.; Valcke, R.; Van Onckelen, H. Apical dominance in Pssu-ipt-transformed tobacco. Phytochemistry 2001, 58, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Chen, S.; Wang, S.; Hüttermann, A.; Altman, A. Xylem abscisic acid accelerates leaf abscission by modulating polyamine and ethylene synthesis in water-stressed intact poplar. Trees 2002, 16, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kovács, Z.; Simon-Sarkadi, L.; Szűcs, A.; Kocsy, G. Differential effects of cold, osmotic stress and abscisic acid on polyamine accumulation in wheat. Amino Acids 2010, 38, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Alcázar, R.; Cuevas, J.C.; Patron, M.; Altabella, T.; Tiburcio, A.F. Abscisic acid modulates polyamine metabolism under water stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 128, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Urano, K.; Maruyama, K.; Ogata, Y.; Morishita, Y.; Takeda, M.; Sakurai, N.; Suzuki, H.; Saito, K.; Shibata, D.; Kobayashi, M.; et al. Characterization of the ABA-regulated global responses to dehydration in Arabidopsis by metabolomics. Plant J. 2009, 57, 1065–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Friedman, R.; Levin, N.; Altman, A. Presence and identification of polyamines in xylem and Phloem exudates of plants. Plant Physiol. 1986, 82, 1154–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Kakehi, J.-I.; Kuwashiro, Y.; Niitsu, M.; Takahashi, T. Thermospermine is Required for Stem Elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 1342–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Miyamoto, M.; Shimao, S.; Tong, W.; Motose, H.; Takahashi, T. Effect of thermospermine on the growth and expression of polyamine-related genes in rice seedlings. Plants 2019, 8, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Vuosku, J.; Muilu-Mäkelä, R.; Avia, K.; Suokas, M.; Kestilä, J.; Läärä, E.; Häggman, H.; Savolainen, O.; Sarjala, T. Thermospermine synthase (ACL5) and diamine oxidase (DAO) Expression is needed for zygotic embryogenesis and vascular development in Scots Pine. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Milhinhos, A.; Prestele, J.; Bollhöner, B.; Matos, A.; Vera-Sirera, F.; Rambla, J.L.; Ljung, K.; Carbonell, J.; Blázquez, M.A.; Tuominen, H.; et al. Thermospermine levels are controlled by an auxin-dependent feedback loop mechanism in Populus xylem. Plant J. 2013, 75, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Iglesias, D.J.; Cercós, M.; Colmenero-Flores, J.M.; Naranjo, M.A.; Ríos, G.; Carrera, E.; Ruiz-Rivero, O.; Lliso, I.; Morillon, R.; Tadeo, F.R.; et al. Physiology of citrus fruiting. Brazilian J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 19, 333–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Huchche, A.D.; Ladaniya, M.S. Citrus Flowering and Fruiting—Recent Research Advances. In Souvenir, National Seminar-cum-Workshop on Physiology of Flowering in Perennial Fruit Crops; Ravishankar, H., Singh, V.K., Misr, A.K., Eds.; Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture (ICAR): Lucknow, India, 2014; pp. 74–88. [Google Scholar]
  147. Goldschmidt, E.E.; Huberman, M. The coordination of organ growth in developing citrus flowers: A possibility for sink type regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 1974, 25, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Davis, S.J. Integrating hormones into the floral-transition pathway of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 1201–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Agustí, M.; Zaragoza, S.; Bleiholder, H.; Buhr, L.; Hack, H.; Klose, R.; Staub, Y.R. Escala BBCH para la descripción de los estadios fenológicos del desarrollo de los agrios (Gén. Citrus). Levante Agrícola 1995, 3, 189–199. [Google Scholar]
  150. Meier, U. Phenological Growth Stages and BBCH-Identification Keys of Citrus (Citrus spp. L.). In Growth Stages of Mono-and Dicotyledonous Plants (BBCH Monograph); Meier, U., Ed.; Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry: Berlin, Germany, 2001; pp. 66–68. [Google Scholar]
  151. Qiuming, Z.; Yusheng, Z.; Kunyu, L.; Shengxi, X.; Dazhi, L. Studies on the annual cycle of endogenous free polyamines in citrus. J. Fruit Sci. 2003, 3. [Google Scholar]
  152. Ali, A.G.; Lovatt, C.J. Winter application of low-biuret urea to the foliage of ‘Washington’ navel orange increased yield. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1994, 119, 1144–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ali, A.G.; Lovatt, C.J. Low-Temperature Stressed-Induced Flowering of the ‘Washington’ Navel Orange (Citrus sinensis l. osbeck) was Increased by Application of Putrescine or Spermidine to the Foliage. In HortScience; American Society for Horticultural Science: Alexandria, VA, USA, 1994; Volume 29. [Google Scholar]
  154. Kaur-Sawhney, R.; Tiburcio, A.F.; Galston, A.W. Spermidine and flower-bud differentiation in thin-layer explants of tobacco. Planta 1988, 173, 282–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. De Cantú, L.B.; Kandeler, R. Significance of polyamines for flowering in Spirodela punctata. Plant Cell Physiol. 1989, 30, 455–458. [Google Scholar]
  156. Tiburcio, A.F.; Kaur-Sawhney, R.; Galston, A.W. Polyamine biosynthesis during vegetative and floral bud differentiation in thin layer tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Cell Physiol. 1988, 29, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar]
  157. Davies, F.S. Fruit Drop Problems of Citrus; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  158. Huchche, A.; Dass, H.C.; Kohli, R.R.; Srivastava, A.K. Leaf NH3—NH4+ content and flowering response in Nagpur Mandarin. Indian J. Hortic. 1994, 53, 163–165. [Google Scholar]
  159. Fraga, M.F.; Berdasco, M.; Diego, L.B.; Rodríguez, R.; Cañal, M.J. Changes in polyamine concentration associated with aging in Pinus radiata and Prunus persica. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24, 1221–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Hussain, Z.; Singh, Z. Involvement of polyamines in creasing of sweet orange Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 190, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Mirsoleimani, A.; Shahsavar, A.-R. Changes of free polyamines in the leaves and stems of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin tree as affected by alternate bearing. J. Plant Process Funct. 2018, 6, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  162. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Q. Effects of polyamines and salicylic acid on postharvest storage of “Ponkan” mandarin. Acta Hortic. 2004, 632, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Liu, K.; Fu, H.; Bei, Q.; Luan, S. Inward potassium channel in guard cells as a target for polyamine regulation of stomatal movements. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1315–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Kusano, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Berberich, T.; Takahashi, Y. The polyamine spermine rescues Arabidopsis from salinity and drought stresses. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 251–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Agurla, S.; Gayatri, G.; Raghavendra, A.S. Polyamines increase nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in guard cells of Arabidopsis thaliana during stomatal closure. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; Lunar, L.; Lafont, F.; Baumert, A.; González-Fontes, A. Boron deficiency causes accumulation of chlorogenic acid and caffeoyl polyamine conjugates in tobacco leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 879–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kotzabasis, K.; Fotinou, C.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K.A.; Ghanotakis, D. Polyamines in the photosynthetic apparatus. Photosynth. Res. 1993, 38, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Ioannidis, N.E.; Kotzabasis, K. Effects of polyamines on the functionality of photosynthetic membrane in vivo and in vitro. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2007, 1767, 1372–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Mackay, C.E.; Christopher Hall, J.; Hofstra, G.; Fletcher, R.A. Uniconazole-induced changes in abscisic acid, total amino acids, and proline in Phaseolus vulgaris. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 1990, 37, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Soumya, P.R.; Kumar, P.; Pal, M. Paclobutrazol: A novel plant growth regulator and multi-stress ameliorant. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 22, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Armstrong, G.A.; Hearst, J.E. Carotenoids 2: Genetics and molecular biology of carotenoid pigment biosynthesis. FASEB J. 1996, 10, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Vershinin, A. Biological functions of carotenoids-diversity and evolution. Biofactors 1999, 10, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Wang, J.; Liu, J.-H.; Kurosawa, T.; Nada, K.; Ban, Y.; Moriguchi, T. Cloning, biochemical identification, and expression analysis of a gene encoding S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase in navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the polyamines (PAs) and other nitrogen-containing molecules discussed throughout this review. (A) Diamines, (B) Tri-amines, (C) Tetra-amines, (D) Non-proteinogenic amino acids, and (E) Polyamine-containing molecules. Molecular weight/molar mass (g.mol−1) is mentioned between parentheses beside the chemical formula of each compound.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the polyamines (PAs) and other nitrogen-containing molecules discussed throughout this review. (A) Diamines, (B) Tri-amines, (C) Tetra-amines, (D) Non-proteinogenic amino acids, and (E) Polyamine-containing molecules. Molecular weight/molar mass (g.mol−1) is mentioned between parentheses beside the chemical formula of each compound.
Plants 09 00426 g001
Figure 2. Key steps in the polyamines (PAs) biosynthesis pathway and its associated genes in citrus. Genes are mentioned in italic. Abbreviations: ACC: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, ACCO: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase, ACS: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase, AIH: Agmatine deiminase/iminohydrolase, AUH: Agmatine ureohydrolase (also known as agmatinase), ADC: Arginine decarboxylase, ASL: Argininosuccinate lyase (also known as argininosuccinase), ASS: Argininosuccinate synthase, CANSDC: Carboxynorspermidine/carboxyspermidine decarboxylase, CANSDH: Carboxynorspermidine/carboxyspermidine dehydrogenase (also known as Carboxynorspermidine/ carboxyspermidine synthase), dcSAM: decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, DAO: Diamine oxidase, DABA-DC: Diaminobutyrate decarboxylase (also known as L-2,4-diaminobutyrate decarboxylase), DABA-AT: Diaminobutyrate-2-oxoglutarate transaminase (also known as L-2,4-diaminobutyrate:2-Oxoglutarate 4-aminotransferase), HSS: Homospermidine synthase, LDC: Lysine decarboxylase, N-CP: N-carbamoylputrescine, NPL1: N-Carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase (also known as N-carbamoylputrescine amidase (CPA)), NSS: Norspermine synthase (also known as long-chain polyamine synthase), ODC: Ornithine decarboxylase, OTC: Ornithine transcarbamylase, PAO: Polyamine oxidase, SAM: S-Adenosyl methionine, AMD1: S-Adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase (also known as SAMDC), SAMS: S-Adenosyl-methionine synthase, SPDS: Spermidine synthase, SPMS: Spermine synthase, and TSS: Thermospermine synthase encoded by ACAULIS5 (ACL5).
Figure 2. Key steps in the polyamines (PAs) biosynthesis pathway and its associated genes in citrus. Genes are mentioned in italic. Abbreviations: ACC: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, ACCO: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase, ACS: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase, AIH: Agmatine deiminase/iminohydrolase, AUH: Agmatine ureohydrolase (also known as agmatinase), ADC: Arginine decarboxylase, ASL: Argininosuccinate lyase (also known as argininosuccinase), ASS: Argininosuccinate synthase, CANSDC: Carboxynorspermidine/carboxyspermidine decarboxylase, CANSDH: Carboxynorspermidine/carboxyspermidine dehydrogenase (also known as Carboxynorspermidine/ carboxyspermidine synthase), dcSAM: decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, DAO: Diamine oxidase, DABA-DC: Diaminobutyrate decarboxylase (also known as L-2,4-diaminobutyrate decarboxylase), DABA-AT: Diaminobutyrate-2-oxoglutarate transaminase (also known as L-2,4-diaminobutyrate:2-Oxoglutarate 4-aminotransferase), HSS: Homospermidine synthase, LDC: Lysine decarboxylase, N-CP: N-carbamoylputrescine, NPL1: N-Carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase (also known as N-carbamoylputrescine amidase (CPA)), NSS: Norspermine synthase (also known as long-chain polyamine synthase), ODC: Ornithine decarboxylase, OTC: Ornithine transcarbamylase, PAO: Polyamine oxidase, SAM: S-Adenosyl methionine, AMD1: S-Adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase (also known as SAMDC), SAMS: S-Adenosyl-methionine synthase, SPDS: Spermidine synthase, SPMS: Spermine synthase, and TSS: Thermospermine synthase encoded by ACAULIS5 (ACL5).
Plants 09 00426 g002
Figure 3. Hypothetical model of the effect of (A) exogenous polyamines (PAs) and (B) PAs biosynthesis inhibitors on root growth, development, morphology and root system architecture of citrus plants. Solid lines with arrows signify positive reaction, while round-dotted lines with bar-ends indicate negative interaction. For more details, see the main text.
Figure 3. Hypothetical model of the effect of (A) exogenous polyamines (PAs) and (B) PAs biosynthesis inhibitors on root growth, development, morphology and root system architecture of citrus plants. Solid lines with arrows signify positive reaction, while round-dotted lines with bar-ends indicate negative interaction. For more details, see the main text.
Plants 09 00426 g003
Figure 4. Hypothetical model of the integration of polyamines (PAs) with the major groups of phytohormones in the regulation of the shoot system architecture of citrus plants. Solid lines with arrows signify positive reaction, while round-dotted lines with bar-ends indicate negative interaction. Abbreviations: ABA: Abscisic acid, ACC: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, ADC: Arginine decarboxylase, CKs: Cytokinins, dcSAM: decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, IAA: indole-3-acetic acid, Put: Putrescine, ROS: Reactive oxygen species, SAM: S-Adenosyl methionine, Spd: Spermidine, SPDS: Spermidine synthase, Spm: Spermidine, SPMS: Spermine synthase, and T-Spm: thermospermine. For more details, see the main text.
Figure 4. Hypothetical model of the integration of polyamines (PAs) with the major groups of phytohormones in the regulation of the shoot system architecture of citrus plants. Solid lines with arrows signify positive reaction, while round-dotted lines with bar-ends indicate negative interaction. Abbreviations: ABA: Abscisic acid, ACC: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, ADC: Arginine decarboxylase, CKs: Cytokinins, dcSAM: decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, IAA: indole-3-acetic acid, Put: Putrescine, ROS: Reactive oxygen species, SAM: S-Adenosyl methionine, Spd: Spermidine, SPDS: Spermidine synthase, Spm: Spermidine, SPMS: Spermine synthase, and T-Spm: thermospermine. For more details, see the main text.
Plants 09 00426 g004
Figure 5. Schematic overview representation of the metabolic behavior of polyamines (PAs), some other nitrogen-containing metabolites, and the major PAs-biosynthetic gene, Arginine decarboxylase (ADC), during the floral development of citrus plants. Flower development stages (53, 55, 59, 61, and 67) are corresponding to the phenological growth stages on BBCH-scale [149,150]. Yellow bars/triangles represent the reduction in the metabolite levels or down-regulation in gene expression, while blue bars/triangles represent the increase in the metabolite levels or up-regulation in gene expression. For more details, see the main text.
Figure 5. Schematic overview representation of the metabolic behavior of polyamines (PAs), some other nitrogen-containing metabolites, and the major PAs-biosynthetic gene, Arginine decarboxylase (ADC), during the floral development of citrus plants. Flower development stages (53, 55, 59, 61, and 67) are corresponding to the phenological growth stages on BBCH-scale [149,150]. Yellow bars/triangles represent the reduction in the metabolite levels or down-regulation in gene expression, while blue bars/triangles represent the increase in the metabolite levels or up-regulation in gene expression. For more details, see the main text.
Plants 09 00426 g005
Figure 6. Schematic overview representation of the metabolic behaviors of polyamines (PAs), some other nitrogen-containing metabolites, and the major PAs-biosynthetic genes during the fruit set and development of citrus plants. Fruit set stages (61, 67, 69, 71, and 72) are corresponding to the phenological growth stages on BBCH-scale [149,150]. Yellow bars/triangles represent the reduction in the metabolite levels or down-regulation in gene expression, blue bars/triangles represent the increase in metabolite levels or up-regulation in gene expression, while gray bars/triangles represent the controversial behavior in metabolite levels. For more details, see the main text. Abbreviations: CsADC: Arginine decarboxylase, CsODC: Ornithine decarboxylase, CsSPDS: Spermidine synthase, CsSPMS: Spermine synthase, and CsACL5: Thermospermine synthase encoded by ACAULIS5.
Figure 6. Schematic overview representation of the metabolic behaviors of polyamines (PAs), some other nitrogen-containing metabolites, and the major PAs-biosynthetic genes during the fruit set and development of citrus plants. Fruit set stages (61, 67, 69, 71, and 72) are corresponding to the phenological growth stages on BBCH-scale [149,150]. Yellow bars/triangles represent the reduction in the metabolite levels or down-regulation in gene expression, blue bars/triangles represent the increase in metabolite levels or up-regulation in gene expression, while gray bars/triangles represent the controversial behavior in metabolite levels. For more details, see the main text. Abbreviations: CsADC: Arginine decarboxylase, CsODC: Ornithine decarboxylase, CsSPDS: Spermidine synthase, CsSPMS: Spermine synthase, and CsACL5: Thermospermine synthase encoded by ACAULIS5.
Plants 09 00426 g006
Figure 7. Hypothetical model of the effect of exogenous polyamines (PAs) and PAs biosynthesis inhibitors on gas exchange and its related parameters of citrus plants. Solid lines with arrows signify positive reaction, while round-dotted lines with bar-ends indicate negative interaction. Abbreviations: DFMO: α-difluoromethylornithine, POD: Peroxidase, PtrABF: Abscisic acid-responsive element (ABRE)-binding factor (ABF) of Poncirus trifoliata, ROS: Reactive oxygen species, and SOD: Superoxide dismutase. For more details, see the main text.
Figure 7. Hypothetical model of the effect of exogenous polyamines (PAs) and PAs biosynthesis inhibitors on gas exchange and its related parameters of citrus plants. Solid lines with arrows signify positive reaction, while round-dotted lines with bar-ends indicate negative interaction. Abbreviations: DFMO: α-difluoromethylornithine, POD: Peroxidase, PtrABF: Abscisic acid-responsive element (ABRE)-binding factor (ABF) of Poncirus trifoliata, ROS: Reactive oxygen species, and SOD: Superoxide dismutase. For more details, see the main text.
Plants 09 00426 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Killiny, N.; Nehela, Y. Citrus Polyamines: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Physiological Functions. Plants 2020, 9, 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040426

AMA Style

Killiny N, Nehela Y. Citrus Polyamines: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Physiological Functions. Plants. 2020; 9(4):426. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Killiny, Nabil, and Yasser Nehela. 2020. "Citrus Polyamines: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Physiological Functions" Plants 9, no. 4: 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop