Abstract
For a given integer n, we provide some families of imaginary quadratic number fields of the form , whose ideal class group has a subgroup isomorphic to .
MSC:
11R29; 11R11
1. Introduction
The class number of a number field is by definition the order of the ideal class group of its ring of integers. Thus, a number field has class number one if and only if its ring of integers is a principal ideal domain. In this sense, the ideal class group measures how far R is from being a principal ideal domain, and hence from satisfying unique prime factorization. The divisibility properties of class numbers are very important to know the structure of ideal class groups of number fields. Numerous results about the divisibility of the class numbers of quadratic fields have been introduced by many authors ([,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]). By their works, it was shown that there exist infinitely many imaginary quadratic number fields whose ideal class numbers are multiples of n. They proved that there exist infinitely many imaginary quadratic number fields such that the ideal class group has a cyclic subgroup of order n. Most of such families are of the type or of the type , where x and t are positive integers with some restrictions. (For the case of , see [,,,,,,,,] and for the case of see [,,,,,]).
Recently, K. Chakraborty, A. Hoque, Y. Kishi and P.P. Pandey considered the family when p and q were distinct odd prime numbers and was an odd integer (see Theorem 1.2 of []). However, they just dealt with the case when n was an odd integer. We want to deal with the case when n is an even integer. In this article, we treat the family when p and q are distinct odd prime numbers.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we review some previous results which we will use.
2.1. Being a pth Power
Proposition 1.
(Proposition 2.2 in []). Let be an integer and ℓ be a prime. For odd integers a, b, we have
Definition 1.
If is a Galois extension and α is in L, then the trace of α is the sum of all the Galois conjugates of α, i.e.,
where denotes the Galois group of .
Lemma 1.
(Lemma 4 in []). Let K be a quadratic number field and be its ring of algebraic integers. If , then α is a square in if and only if there exists such that and such that is a square in . If K is imaginary, we may assume that .
2.2. Result of Y. Bugeaud and T. N. Shorey
In this section, we review a result of Y. Bugeaud and T.N. Shorey (see []). Let be the nth Fibonacci sequence and be the nth Lucas sequence. Let us define the sets and by
and
For , we define the set by
Theorem 1.
(Theorem 1 in []). Let , and p be mutually coprime positive integers with p a prime number. Let be such that if . We assume that is odd if . Then, the number of positive integer solutions of the equation
is at most one except for
or
We recall the result of J.H.E Cohn [] about the appearance of squares in the Lucas sequence.
Theorem 2.
Let be the nth Lucas sequence. Then, the only perfect square appearing in the Lucas sequences are and .
3. Main Result
In this section, we will describe the main result. Here is the crucial theorem.
Theorem 3.
Suppose that is an integer and q is an odd prime number such that and for all odd prime number dividing n. Let p be an odd prime number with and . Let d be the square-free part of , i.e., for some positive integer m. Assume that . Moreover, we assume when . Then, we have the following:
(i) Assume that n is an even integer or . Then, the class number of is divisible by n.
(ii) Assume that n is an odd integer and . Moreover, we assume when . Then, the class number of is divisible by n.
Remark 1.
By Dirichlet’s theorem on arithmetic progressions, we know that there exist infinitely many q such that for all odd prime number dividing n.
Theorem 4.
Let n, q be as in Theorem 3. For each q, the class number of is divisible by n for all but finitely many . Furthermore, for each q there are infinitely many fields .
4. Proof of Main Theorem
4.1. Crucial Proposition
Lemma 2.
Let and m be as in Theorem 3 (i) or (ii). Let ℓ be an odd prime such that
for some integer a and b. Then, if and only if .
Proof.
Suppose that
If we compare the real parts, we know that
This implies that . Since , we also know that . Similarly, implies that . □
Proposition 2.
Let and m be as in Theorem 3 (i) or (ii). Then, the element is not an ℓth power of an element in the ring of integers of for any odd prime divisor ℓ of n. In addition, α and are not a square in .
Proof.
(i) Assume that n is an even integer or 4). Moreover, we assume when . Since n is an even integer or 4), we know that 4). Let ℓ be an odd prime divisor of n. If is an ℓth power, then
for some integer a and b. If we compare the real parts, we know that
This implies that . By Lemma 2, we can assume that , , or .
Case (i-A1): ,
Comparing the real parts, we have
From these, we have , which violates our assumption.
Case (i-A2): ,
Suppose that
Comparing the real parts, we have
Since , we have . This is impossible.
Case (i-B1): ,
Comparing the real parts, we have
Thus, we get or , which contradicts the assumption “” and “”.
Case (i-B2): ,
Case (i-C):
We have . Taking the norm on both sides, we obtain
If we write , we have
We also obtain
Then, we easily know that and are distinct solutions of (1) for , , . The next thing we have to do is to show that and . Clearly, and . By Theorem 2, we know that . Finally suppose that . Then, there exist positive integers such that
and
By (4), we have , and hence we have . From this together with (5), we obtain
that is,
This implies that or . It contradicts the fact that q is an odd prime number. Hence, . By Theorem 1, the equation
has at most one integer solutions . Thus,
Case (i-D):
Comparing the real parts, we have
It contradicts our assumption “”.
(ii) Assume that n is an odd integer and 4). Then, we know that 4). Moreover, we assume when . Let ℓ be an odd prime divisor of n. If is an ℓth power, then
for some integer a and b. In case both a and b are even, then we can proceed as in the above and obtain a contradiction. Thus, we can assume that both a and b are odd. If we take the norm on both sides we obtain
Since a and b are odd integers and , we can get 8). By Proposition 1, we know that . Thus, we have
Comparing the real parts, we have
Since a is an odd integer, we have or .
Case (ii-A):
By (7) and , we have . This is not possible.
Case (ii-B):
By (6) and (7), we have
From these, we have . This implies that or . Since q is a prime, we have and . These violate our assumption .
□
4.2. Proof of Theorem 3
Next, we prove Theorem 3.
Proof of Theorem 3.
Let and m be as in Theorem 3 (i) or (ii). Set . We can easily check that and are coprime and . This implies that for some integral ideal of . It suffices to show that the order of in the ideal class group of is n. If this is not the case, we have for some integer in and some prime divisor ℓ of n. Since is an imaginary quadratic field, the only units of are . Thus, we have . If ℓ is an odd prime, we have where . This contradicts Proposition 2. Next, let us consider the case of . Then, we have . It means that or is a square in , which contradicts Proposition 2. Hence, the order of in the ideal class group of is n. □
4.3. Proof of Theorem 4
We are now in a position to prove the main theorem
Proof.
Let n and q be as in Theorem 3. For any positive integer D, the curve
is an irreducible algebraic curve of genus > 0 (see []). By Siegel’s theorem (see []), there are only finitely many integral points on the curve (8). Thus, for each , there are at most finitely many primes p such that
It means that there are infinitely many fields for the fixed prime q. In addition, we have for sufficiently large p, so . Further, if p is large enough, then and . Hence, the class number of is divisible by n for a sufficiently large p. □
5. Numerical Examples
In this section, we give several examples. All computations in this section are based on the Magma program. For example, Table 1 is the list of imaginary quadratic fields corresponding to and . In the below Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8, we use * in the column for class number to indicate the failure of condition “” or “”. Furthermore, the appearance of ** in the column for a class number indicates the failure of condition “ ”. Finally, the appearance of *** in the column for a class number indicates the failure of condition “ ℓ)” for an odd prime divisor of n.

Table 1.
Numerical examples for .

Table 2.
Numerical examples for .

Table 3.
Numerical examples for .

Table 4.
Numerical examples for .

Table 5.
Numerical examples for .

Table 6.
Numerical examples for .

Table 7.
Numerical examples for .

Table 8.
Numerical examples for .
Funding
This study was supported by research funds from Chosun University 2022.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Ankeny, N.; Chowla, S. On the divisibility of the class numbers of quad-ratic fields. Pac. J. Math. 1955, 5, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, K.; Hoque, A.; Kishi, Y.; Pandey, P.P. Divisibility of the class numbers of imaginary quadratic fields. J. Number Theory 2018, 185, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohn, J.H.E. On the class number of certain imaginary quadratic fields. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2002, 130, 1275–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gross, B.H.; Rohrlich, D.E. Some results on the Mordell–Weil group of the Jacobian of the Fermat curve. Invent. Math. 1978, 44, 201–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishii, K. On the divisibility of the class number of imaginary quadratic fields. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. A 2011, 87, 142–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, A. A note on the divisibility of class numbers of imaginary quadratic fields . Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. A 2011, 87, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, A. Remarks on the divisibility of the class numbers of imaginary quad-ratic fields . Glasg. Math. J. 2011, 53, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ito, A. Notes on the divisibility of the class numbers of imaginary quadratic fields . Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg. 2015, 85, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishi, Y. Note on the divisibility of the class number of certain imaginary quadratic fields. Glasg. Math. J. 2009, 51, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Louboutin, S.R. On the divisibility of the class number of imaginary quadratic number fields. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2009, 137, 4025–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Murty, M.R. The ABC conjecture and exponents of class groups of quadrat-ic fields. Contemp. Math. 1998, 210, 85–95. [Google Scholar]
- Murty, M.R. Exponents of class groups of quadratic fields. In Topics in Number Theory; Mathematics and Its Applications; Kluwer Academic Publishers: University Park, PA, USA; Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999; Volume 467, pp. 229–239. [Google Scholar]
- Soundararajan, K. Divisibility of class numbers of imaginary quad-ratic fields. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2000, 61, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamamoto, Y. On unramified Galois extensions of quadratic number fields. Osaka J. Math. 1970, 7, 57–76. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, M.; Wang, T. The divisibility of the class number of the imaginary quadratic field ). Glasg. Math. J. 2012, 54, 149–154. [Google Scholar]
- Bugeaud, Y.; Shorey, T.N. On the number of solutions of the generalized Ra-manujan–Nagell equation. J. Reine Angew. Math. 2001, 539, 55–74. [Google Scholar]
- Cohn, J.H.E. Square Fibonacci numbers, etc. Fibonacci Quart. 1964, 2, 109–113. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, W.M. Equations over Finite Fields, an Elementary Approach; Lecture Notes in Math.; Springer: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1976; Volume 536. [Google Scholar]
- Evertse, J.-H.; Silverman, J.H. Uniform bounds for the number of solutions to Yn = f(X). Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 1986, 100, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).