Reliability of Different Nanofluids and Different Micro-Channel Configurations on the Heat Transfer Augmentation
, Abdulaziz Alhajri, Mohammad Doust, Yousef Almulla, Mohamed Fayed, Ali Dinc, Mohamed Abouelela, Ibrahim Mahariq and Wael Al-Kouz *Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Reliability of Different Nanofluids and Different Microchannel Configurations on the Heat Transfer Augmentation:
· At the end of the abstract, it is mentioned that the pressure drop increases with higher hydraulic diameter; also, in discussing Fig 13. This is wrong.
· Check the figure 6 caption.
· Could you have validation for a nanofluid?
· All heat transfer coefficient values are exaggerated for a laminar flow. Either post-process calculation is wrong, or data is obtained from CFD.
· Massive discussion for results is required.
Author Response
Please check the reponse on the uploaded file
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
accept
Author Response
Please check the response on the uploaded file
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The paper is interesting but some revision must be done:
1-Please add a section about numerical model
2-Please add the grid study
3-Please add residual errors
4-Which parameter is equal in different MCHS? Hydraulic diameter must be equal NOT another parameters. Please check and represent your data with equal hydraulic diameter.
5-The nanofluids thermal properties formula are very old. Please check one of results with new formula such as: A different look at the effect of temperature on the nanofluids thermal conductivity: focus on the experimental-based models
and Statistical study and a complete overview of nanofluid viscosity correlations: a new look
6- Please correct the typos errors
Author Response
Please check the response on the uploaded file
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors addressed the comments.
Reviewer 3 Report
Accepted
