Next Article in Journal
Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics of Marine–Continental Transitional Black Shales: A Case Study of the Permian Shanxi Formation in the Eastern Margin of the Ordos Basin
Previous Article in Journal
Ruthenium Catalysts Supported on Hydrothermally Treated Carbon from Rice Husk: The Effect of Reduction Temperature on the Hydrogenation Reaction of Levulinic Acid to γ-Valerolactone
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Nitrogen Removal from Domestic Wastewater by Partial-Denitrification/Anammox in an Anoxic/Oxic Biofilm Reactor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue on “Anammox-Based Processes for Wastewater Treatment”

1
LEQUIA, Institute of the Environment, Universitat de Girona, Campus Montilivi, Carrer Maria Aurèlia Capmany 69, 17003 Girona, Spain
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence, Via di S. Marta, 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(5), 1422; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051422
Submission received: 19 April 2023 / Revised: 25 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 8 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anammox-Based Processes for Wastewater Treatment)
Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox, A) has become an appealing bioprocess for the water sector as a method to remove nitrogen (N) from wastewater using low-energy and organic carbon inputs. Its development has come a long way since its discovery at the beginning of the 1990s [1,2]. Anammox involves the simultaneous conversion of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrite (NO2) to nitrogen gas (N2) and nitrate (NO3) under anaerobic conditions. To produce nitrite, the anammox process is commonly coupled with partial nitritation (PN), which can be engineered in a single tank or in two different tanks. Overall, the PN/A process consumes 60% less oxygen, produces about 90% less sludge, and consumes 100% less organic carbon compared with conventional nitrification/denitrification (N/DN) [3].
Nowadays, the PN/A process offers mature alternatives for the treatment of dewatering liquors (sidestream) resulting from anaerobic digestion (i.e., mesophilic sludge digestion, codigestion, anaerobic digestion after a thermal hydrolysis process) in urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), as well as of some other high-strength industrial wastewaters. Treatment of the mainstream in WWTPs, as well as of other complex wastewaters, is moving forward, although it still requires further development to be implemented safely [3,4]. This Special Issue on “Anammox-Based Processes for Wastewater Treatment” collates nine articles that describe advances in the development and application of anammox in wastewater treatment. The Special Issue is available online at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/processes/special_issues/anammox_processes_wastewater_treatment (accessed on 18 April 2023).
  • Urban wastewaters
The PN/A process can improve the energy efficiency in WWTPs as well as diminish operational costs. Pedrouso et al. [5] performed a theoretical study and confirmed the interest in thermally pretreating the sludge in the sidestream to increase biogas production before a PN/A single-tank unit. Moreover, this paper also assessed the effect of promoting the growth of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in the sidestream to carry out their bioaugmentation in the mainstream in view of the PN/A process. The achievement of a suitable effluent quality was promoted by heterotrophic denitrification, adjusting excess nitrate—generated by anammox bacteria (AnAOB) and/or nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB)—to meet the discharge requirements.
Concerning particular technologies for the sidestream, Driessen and Hendrickx [6] reviewed full-scale experiences with the granular sludge-based ANAMMOX® process. Long-term operations of various case studies showed a stable process performance, reaching removal efficiencies of 90% at low and high loading rates of up to 2.5 kg NH4+–N/(m3·d). Similarly, Lemaire and Christensson [7] reviewed experiences with the ANITATM Mox process based on the moving bed biofilm reactor technology. AnAOB and AOB are retained in a biofilm on moving carriers with no risk of biomass wash-out. By taking into account the existing facilities for both of the technologies referred to above, the number of full-scale installations existing worldwide reaches about 100 units. Alternatively, Ochs et al. [8] evaluated the performance and stability of a full-scale suspended sludge continuously stirred tank reactor with a hydrocyclone for anammox biomass separation. The hydrocyclone was responsible for retaining about 60–80% of the AnAOB, and the washout of AOB and NOB was two times greater than that of AnAOB.
Finally, Huang et al. [9] coupled partial denitrification (PD) with anammox (PD/A) on a lab scale in a continuous-flow anoxic/oxic biofilm reactor to treat urban wastewater. Ammonium oxidation to nitrate occurred in the oxic zone, whereas nitrite accumulation occurred in the anoxic zone due to the insufficient availability of organic carbon to complete nitrate reduction to nitrogen gas. After the inoculation of anammox sludge to anoxic zones, AnAOB were effectively retained in the anoxic biofilm using the nitrite produced via PD and the ammonium present in the wastewater.
  • Urban landfill leachate
The biological treatment of landfill leachates using anammox is challenging because of the characteristics of this complex wastewater. Magrí et al. [10] described the scaling-up and long-term operation of a full-scale two-step PN/A unit, in which conductivity above a certain threshold could negatively affect the performance of the process. A pre-treatment step targeting adjusting alkalinity before biological treatment was essential to produce a good-quality nitritated effluent to feed the anammox process downstream. The heterotrophic activity in the PN reactor also favored softening the impact on the anammox process caused by the availability of biodegradable organic carbon in the leachate. On the other hand, Lanzeta et al. [11] modeled two full-scale one-step reactors operated to achieve two different N removal bioprocesses (i.e., PN/A and simultaneous partial nitrification/denitrification (SPND)). Despite the different strategies applied in terms of aeration and mixing patterns, the results aided in understanding that the PN/A process was the main contributor to N removal when the availability of organic carbon was low. By increasing the external carbon addition, a fast decrease in the anammox activity was observed, with SPND becoming the main N removal mechanism.
  • Livestock and aquaculture effluents
Waki et al. [12] reported the spontaneous enrichment of anammox biofilms in swine wastewater N/DN treatment facilities running under low dissolved oxygen levels. Such installations could easily be converted to anammox-based treatment units or used as seed sources for the inoculation of new anammox reactors. The aquaculture sector is growing fast as an essential source of food, and recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) are promising candidates for sustainable development. Roque et al. [13] investigated the potential of the anammox process to treat marine wastewater from cold-water RAS, obtaining promising results. The activity of AnAOB was negatively impacted after direct exposure to wastewater from the RAS, making necessary the establishment of an appropriate acclimatization procedure.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the contributors to this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acronyms

anammox (A)Anaerobic ammonium oxidation
AnAOBAnaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria
AOBAmmonia-oxidizing bacteria
NNitrogen
N/DNNitrification/denitrification
NOBNitrite-oxidizing bacteria
PDPartial denitrification
PD/APD/anammox
PNpartial nitritation
PN/APN/anammox
RASRecirculating aquaculture systems
SPNDSimultaneous partial nitrification/denitrification
WWTPWastewater treatment plant

References

  1. Mulder, A.; van de Graaf, A.A.; Robertson, L.A.; Kuenen, J.G. Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation Discovered in a Denitrifying Fluidized Bed Reactor. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1995, 16, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peeters, S.H.; van Niftrik, L. Trending Topics and Open Questions in Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019, 49, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cao, Y.S.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Daigger, G.T. Mainstream Partial Nitritation-Anammox in Municipal Wastewater Treatment: Status, Bottlenecks, and Further Studies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 1365–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, Z.; Zheng, M.; Duan, H.; Yuan, Z.; Hu, S. A 20-Year Journey of Partial Nitritation and Anammox (PN/A): From Sidestream Toward Mainstream. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 7522−7531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pedrouso, A.; Vázquez-Padín, J.; Crutchik, D.; Campos, J. Application of Anammox-Based Processes in Urban WWTPs: Are We on the Right Track? Processes 2021, 9, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Driessen, W.; Hendrickx, T. Two Decades of Experience with the Granular Sludge-Based ANAMMOX® Process Treating Municipal and Industrial Effluents. Processes 2021, 9, 1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lemaire, R.; Christensson, M. Lessons Learned from 10 Years of ANITA Mox for Sidestream Treatment. Processes 2021, 9, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ochs, P.; Martin, B.; Germain, E.; Wu, Z.; Lee, P.; Stephenson, T.; van Loosdrecht, M.; Soares, A. Evaluation of a Full-Scale Suspended Sludge Deammonification Technology Coupled with an Hydrocyclone to Treat Thermal Hydrolysis Dewatering Liquors. Processes 2021, 9, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Huang, D.; Fan, J.; Du, R. Enhanced Nitrogen Removal from Domestic Wastewater by Partial-Denitrification/Anammox in an Anoxic/Oxic Biofilm Reactor. Processes 2022, 10, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Magrí, A.; Ruscalleda, M.; Vilà, A.; Akaboci, T.; Balaguer, M.; Llenas, J.; Colprim, J. Scaling-Up and Long-Term Operation of a Full-Scale Two-Stage Partial Nitritation-Anammox System Treating Landfill Leachate. Processes 2021, 9, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lanzetta, A.; Mattioli, D.; Di Capua, F.; Sabia, G.; Petta, L.; Esposito, G.; Andreottola, G.; Gatti, G.; Merz, W.; Langone, M. Anammox-Based Processes for Mature Leachate Treatment in SBR: A Modelling Study. Processes 2021, 9, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Waki, M.; Ishimoto, C.; Suto, R.; Nagamine, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Uenishi, H.; Yasuda, T.; Fukumoto, Y. An Analysis of Operation Conditions and Microbial Characteristics in Swine Wastewater Treatment Plants with Spontaneously Enriched Anammox Bacteria. Processes 2021, 9, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Roques, J.; Micolucci, F.; Hosokawa, S.; Sundell, K.; Kindaichi, T. Effects of Recirculating Aquaculture System Wastewater on Anammox Performance and Community Structure. Processes 2021, 9, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magrí, A.; Lotti, T. Special Issue on “Anammox-Based Processes for Wastewater Treatment”. Processes 2023, 11, 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051422

AMA Style

Magrí A, Lotti T. Special Issue on “Anammox-Based Processes for Wastewater Treatment”. Processes. 2023; 11(5):1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magrí, Albert, and Tommaso Lotti. 2023. "Special Issue on “Anammox-Based Processes for Wastewater Treatment”" Processes 11, no. 5: 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop