Next Article in Journal
Simulation and Control Strategies for Longitudinal Propagation of Acid Fracture in a Low-Permeability Reservoir Containing Bottom Water
Previous Article in Journal
Erosion Resistance of Casing with Resin and Metallic Coatings in Liquid–Solid Two-Phase Flow
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Main Controlling Factors Affecting the Viscosity of Polymer Solution due to the Influence of Polymerized Cations in High-Salt Oilfield Wastewater

1
College of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
2
CNOOC China Limited Hainan Branch, Haikou 570100, China
3
Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Plateau Saline-Lacustrine Basinal Oil & Gas Geology, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Branch Exploration and Development Research Institute, Dunhuang 736202, China
4
PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Branch No.1 Oil Production Plant, Dunhuang 736202, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(4), 791; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040791
Submission received: 12 December 2023 / Revised: 10 April 2024 / Accepted: 10 April 2024 / Published: 14 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Systems)

Abstract

:
In view of the high salinity characteristics of reinjection oilfield wastewater in the Gasi Block of Qinghai Oilfield, with the polymer produced by Shandong Baomo as the research target, we systematically investigated the variations in the impact of six ions, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+, in the produced water from polymer flooding on the viscosity and stability of the polymer solution. Additionally, we provided the primary research methods for complexation in reinjected wastewater. Experimental results indicate that the main factors leading to a decrease in polymer viscosity are high-valence cations, with the descending order of their influence being Fe2+ > Fe3+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+ > Na+ > K+. High-valent cations also effect the viscosity stability of polymer solutions, and their order from greatest to least impact is: Fe2+ > Ca2+(Mg2+) > Fe3+ > Na+(K+). This article is focused on investigating the influencing factors and extent of the impact of oilfield wastewater on the viscosity of polymer solutions. It illustrates the response mechanism of cations to the viscosity of polymer solutions in reinjection wastewater polymerization. Through this research, the goal is to provide reference control indicators and limits for the water quality of injected polymers at oilfield sites. This ensures the stability and controllability of polymers in field applications and offers theoretical guidance for polymer flooding technology.

1. Introduction

With the large-scale application of polymer flooding technology, polymer flooding has entered the stage of industrial application in oilfield research. It mainly refers to the improvement of oil–water flow ratio and expansion of micro and macro sweep efficiency of oil layers. By increasing the viscosity of the polymer solution, the solution viscosity ratio is increased and the water phase permeability is reduced, so the viscosity of the polymer solution directly affects the polymer oil displacement effect [1,2,3]. Various cations, anions, and complex ions are present in oilfield wastewater and may interact with molecules in the polymer solution. These interactions may include adsorption, dissociation, or coordination reactions of ions, thereby affecting the conformation and interaction of polymer molecules, forming a complex and diverse environment. Different ions affect the solubility, dispersion, viscosity, and other properties of the polymer. It has varying degrees of impact. The importance of this issue is not only related to the sustainable utilization of resources. The viscosity-increasing ability of polymers directly affects engineering processes such as water quality treatment, oil field water injection and recovery, and also directly affects the oil field production process. The ions in wastewater exist in different forms such as free state and complex state, resulting in different forms of interactions, thus causing complex changes in the molecular structure and properties of the polymer. These ions may undergo ion exchange reactions with the polymer, affecting the stability and fluidity of its molecular chains, thereby affecting the viscosity and rheological properties of the solution. Although the technical level of polymer flooding ground technology has been increasingly improved, it faces more difficulties. Among them, the low viscosity property of polymer solution has always been a key issue restricting oil displacement efficiency [4,5,6,7]. Du et al. [8] studied the effects of adding different ions to polyacryloyl on the COO- group, including Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Cl. It was found that cations have an important impact on the viscosity of the polymer. Sun Lin et al. [9,10] conducted a study on the effect of metal ions on the viscosity of the polymer/alkali binary flooding system. The results showed that Ca2+ and Mg2+ have a greater impact on the viscosity of polymer solution than K+ and Na+. As the concentration of metal ions increases, the viscosity of the binary displacement system shows a decreasing trend. Since a large amount of water is needed to prepare a polymer aqueous solution on site, wastewater is usually used. However, a large number of metal ions exist in wastewater, and these ions will directly affect the viscosity of the polymer solution [11,12,13]. Fang Hongbo et al. [14] tested the viscosity changes of polymer solutions under different oxygen concentrations. The experimental results showed that after oxidative degradation of polyacrylamide solutions, the viscosity of the solution dropped significantly. Wen Feng et al. and others [15,16,17] believe that dissolved oxygen will affect the stability of polymers. Zhang Ke et al. [18] studied the effects and causes of viscosity of wastewater polymer solution under anaerobic and aerobic environmental conditions and determined the appropriate amount of oxygen exposure. According to Zhan’s research [19], polyacrylamide has three degradation methods: oxidative degradation, photodegradation, and photocatalytic degradation. Wu et al. [20] found that adding a certain proportion of S2− and Fe2+ to a low-concentration polyacrylamide solution will reduce the viscosity of the low-concentration polyacrylamide solution in a short period of time. Guan et al. [21] added NaCl, CaCl2, NaNO3, KNO3, and MgCl2 solutions with a concentration of 1.0 mol/L to a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) solution with a relative molecular mass of 1900 × 104 and a mass concentration of 1 g/L, respectively, to test the effects of different types of salts on the viscosity of HPAM. Divalent ions such as Ca2+ and Mg2+ have a greater impact than the monovalent ions Na+ and K+. When different types of salts are added to the solution, the positive ions neutralize the negative charges on the molecular chain, and the repulsive force between the ions in the water and the ions on the polymer molecular chain increases. Therefore, the repulsive force greatly reduces the ability of the molecular chain to unfold. This reduces the probability of molecular chain entanglement and greatly reduces the viscosity of the polymer. Therefore, when preparing the solution, the influence of salt ions on the viscosity of the solution should be eliminated as much as possible. Mingming et al. [22] added NaCl to the polymer solution and measured the viscosity of the 1500 mg/L polymer solution at different contents. The experimental results showed that as the Na+ content increased, the viscosity decreased. After the content was greater than 500 mg/L, the viscosity decreased. The trend slowed down. The same method was used to measure the viscosity of polymer solutions with different CaCl2 contents. The experimental results showed that CaCl2 has a greater impact on viscosity than NaCl. When the CaCl2 concentration is greater than 200 mg/L, the viscosity decrease trend slows down. The higher the Ca2+ content, the more serious the viscosity loss will be, and the HPAM solution may even flocculate or precipitate. At the same time, a FeCl3 solution with a concentration of 2 g/100 mL was added dropwise to 100 mL of HPAM aqueous solution with a concentration of 1500 mg/L to observe and measure the change in viscosity. The results show that when the concentration of FeCl3 exceeds 20 mg/L, the viscosity of the solution decreases significantly and even flocculates. This shows that trivalent salts have a great influence on the viscosity of the polymer solution. A trace amount of trivalent salts will cause the viscosity to decrease sharply or even flocculate. Therefore, the content of trivalent ions should be strictly controlled. Data show that foreign countries generally require it to be controlled below 20 mg/L, and Daqing Oilfield requires it to be below 0.99 mg/L. Levitt et al. [23] found under certain conditions, polyacrylamide can also be quite stable when dissolved oxygen is present and free of Fe2+ and free radical-generating impurities. This shows that under some special environmental conditions, polyacrylamide can maintain relative stability, but under other conditions, especially when influencing factors such as oxygen, iron ions, or free radicals are involved, different reactions and degradation may occur [24]. In recent years, research has mainly focused on the influence of ions on the apparent viscosity of polymers and the influence on the stability of polymer solutions. There is less research on the internal mechanism of cations reducing the viscosity of polymer solutions and their influence on the microstructure of polymers. This article studies the influence mechanism of different ions on the viscosity of polymer solutions, including K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+, and reveals the changing rules of the influence of different ions and their concentrations on polymer viscosity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instruments

Partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide was purchased from Baomo Co., Ltd. (Dongying, China), degree of hydrolysis 27%, relative molecular mass 2.3 × 107, effective mass fraction 95%; ferric chloride, sodium chloride, calcium chloride, potassium chloride, and magnesium chloride were purchased from Aladdin Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), analytically pure; reinjection wastewater is provided by Qinghai Oilfield, deionized water is prepared in the laboratory through distillation.
Brookfield DV-II viscometer was purchased from Brookfield Company (Waltham, MA, USA), The digital constant temperature water bath and JT-4 precision power-increasing electric mixer was purchased from Rayleigh Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

2.2. Experimental Methods

2.2.1. Polyacrylamide Mother Liquor Preparation

Accurately weigh the required polyacrylamide dry powder and gradually put it into a beaker pre-filled with a certain amount of deionized water. After each addition of polyacrylamide dry powder, use an electric mixer to stir evenly at a speed of 100 r/min to ensure sufficient stirring after each addition to prevent agglomeration. During the entire stirring process, observe whether the dry polymer powder is completely dissolved and ensure that the particles suspended in the water are fully dispersed. Continue stirring until all the polyacrylamide dry powder is added to the deionized water, then continue stirring and maintain the stirring speed at 100 r/min. Continue stirring for 3 h to ensure that the polymer mother liquor is fully homogeneous, which will help improve its performance. Then, allow the polymer mother liquor to stand for 3 h to mature. The aging process helps eliminate possible air bubbles and improves the stability of the solution. After maturation, take a sample to detect the concentration of the polyacrylamide mother liquor to ensure that it reaches the required mass concentration of 5000 mg/L. If necessary, the amount of polyacrylamide dry powder or deionized water in the polymer mother liquor can be adjusted and stirred again.

2.2.2. Effects of Different Ions on the Viscosity of Polymer Solutions

Preparation of cationic aqueous solution: Weigh quantitative cationic chemicals (K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Fe2+, Fe3+) and add them to the beaker, respectively. Pour 250 mL of deionized water into the beaker and stir with an electric stirrer at a speed of 100 r/min, stir for about 3 h and then let it sit.
Preparation of polymer solution: Take quantitative polymer mother liquor and mix it thoroughly with cationic aqueous solutions of different mass concentrations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe2+, Fe3+), stir with an electric stirrer for 3 h, the rotation speed is 100 r/min, and place it at room temperature 24 h, measure polymer viscosity using Brookfield DV-II viscometer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of K+ and Na+ on the Viscosity of Polymer Solution

A polymer solution with a mass concentration of 2500 mg/L was prepared by diluting the polyacrylamide mother liquor with mineralized water containing only K+ and Na+. The effect of K+ and Na+ ions on the viscosity of polymer solution is presented in Figure 1. It performs linear fitting, and the fitting results are shown in Figure 2.
As can be seen from Figure 1, it can be observed that when the concentrations of K+ and Na+ are in the range of 0 to 1200 mg/L, the viscosity of the polymer solution decreases with increasing ion concentration. However, when the concentrations of K+ and Na+ exceed 1200 mg/L, the polymer viscosity loss is relatively slow.
When the K+ and Na+ contents are 100~2000 mg/L, the linear fitting results of the solution viscosity and the cation content are shown in Figure 2. The difference in the distance between the straight lines indicates the difference in the influence of different ions on the viscosity of the polymer solution, and the influence of K+ on polymerization. The influence of the viscosity of the solution is about 0.93 times that of Na+.
K+ and Na+ ions neutralize the negative charges on polymer molecules in the solution, primarily concentrating on the -COO- groups. Due to its smaller ionic radius, Na+ more effectively approaches and neutralizes an equivalent number of negative charges compared to K+. Consequently, the neutralization effect of Na+ is more pronounced. This results in a reduction in intramolecular electrostatic repulsion, diminishing frictional forces between large molecules.
Na+ ions, due to their smaller ionic radius, can easily penetrate water molecules to approach polymer chains. Their interaction with -COO- groups is more intimate, inducing structural changes in polymer chains. This structural alteration may lead to the curling and unfolding of polymer chains, influencing the fluidity and viscosity of the solution [25,26]. As the concentrations of Na+ and K+ increase, the neutralization effect becomes more significant. In the lower concentration range, the neutralization effect may be relatively modest, while in the higher concentration range, it becomes more pronounced. This results in a reduction in negative charges, diminishing intermolecular electrostatic repulsion, and affecting the structure of polymer chains. The smaller ionic radius of Na+ enhances its ability to neutralize negative charges, making it more impactful on viscosity compared to K+ [27,28].

3.2. Effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on the Viscosity of Polymer Solutions

The polymer solution (concentration: 2500 mg/L) is prepared by diluting the polyacrylamide mother solution with mineralized water containing only Ca2+ and Mg2+. The results of the influence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ion concentrations on the viscosity of the polymer solution are shown in Figure 3.
It can be seen from Figure 3 that when Ca2+ and Mg2+ are present in the polymer solution, the viscosity of the polymer solution is greatly reduced. When the concentration of Ca2+ reaches a certain value, the viscosity of the solution drops to below 266 mPa·s; Mg2+ content in the range of 0–400 mg/L, with the increase in the concentration of Mg2+, the viscosity of the solution decreases rapidly, down to below 97.1 mPa·s. Therefore, it is believed that the effect of Mg2+ on the viscosity of the polymer solution is greater than the effect of Ca2+ on the viscosity of the polymer solution.
When there is only one kind of ion in the solution, namely Ca2+ or Mg2+, different mass concentrations will lead to different viscosity values; the corresponding Na+ mass concentration can be calculated based on the results of each viscosity value in Figure 1, which is called the viscosity corresponding to Ca2+, the equivalent Na+ mass concentration of Mg2+ mass concentration.
Based on the equivalent Na+ mass concentration at the same viscosity obtained in Table 1, establish the mathematical relationship between the mass concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ and them. The significance of the slope in the mathematical relationship lies in the difference in the ability of Ca2+, Mg2+ and Na+ to affect viscosity when the ion concentration increases. The smaller the slope, the greater the concentration, and the smaller the impact of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on viscosity; otherwise, vice versa.
It can be seen from Figure 4 that at the same viscosity, the effect of Ca2+ on the viscosity of the polymer solution is significantly greater than that of Na+, which is one to six times that of the latter. The effect of Na+ on the viscosity of the polymer solution is slightly lower than that of Ca2+; Mg2+ has a greater influence on the viscosity of the polymer solution. The effect of solution viscosity is 7 to 14 times that of Na+. The equivalent mass concentration of Na+ is much higher than that of Mg2+. This shows that the effect of Na+ on the viscosity of the polymer solution is much smaller than the effect of Mg2+ on the viscosity of the polymer solution, by comparing the slopes, we can see the order of the influence of the three ions on the viscosity of the polymer solution: Mg2+ > Ca2+ > Na+. Because the ionic radius of Mg2+ is smaller than that of Ca2+, Mg2+ is more likely to be close to the -COOH group in the polymer chain segment. The number of the other two ions in the first layer is significantly lower than the number of Mg2+ ions in the first cation layer, so the electrostatic shielding efficiency of Mg2+ ions is higher, they are more easily attracted to the polymer chain segments and are more tightly combined with the carboxylic acid groups. This tight combination makes it easier for Mg2+ ions to compress the polymer chain segments, thereby changing the configuration of the polymer chain and reducing the interaction force of the polymer chain [29].

3.3. Effect of Fe2+ and Fe3+ on the Viscosity of Polymer Solution

The polyacrylamide mother solution was diluted with mineralized water containing only Fe2+ and Fe3+ to prepare a polymer solution (mass concentration: 2500 mg/L). The results of the influence of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ion concentrations on the viscosity of the polymer solution are shown in Figure 5.
It can be seen from Figure 5 that a small amount of Fe2+ will cause a significant decrease in the viscosity of the polymer solution; as the Fe3+ content increases, the viscosity of the solution first decreases significantly and then decreases slowly. In aqueous solutions, Fe2⁺ ions catalyze the production of hydroxyl radicals through the Fenton reaction. These highly reactive oxidizing agents can disrupt the C-H bonds in polyacrylamide molecular chains [30]. This attack initiates a hydrogen abstraction reaction, leading to the formation of carbon-centered radicals, which in turn cause the molecular chains to break. As a result, the original long-chain polymers are transformed into smaller molecules, significantly reducing the viscosity of the polymer solution. Furthermore, the high charge density of Fe2⁺ ions enables them to effectively bind with the negatively charged functional groups on the surface of polymer molecules, leading to the compression of the diffusion double layer. This change reduces the repulsion between polymer molecules, causing them to move closer to each other, and subsequently undergo curling and aggregation. These structural changes reduce the hydration shell of the polymer, lowering the hydrodynamic radius of the solution, which further decreases its viscosity. In the compressed double layer environment, the free radical reactions catalyzed by Fe2⁺ ions more readily promote the breakage of polymer chains, as the charge shielding between molecules is weakened, making them more prone to contact and reaction [31,32,33]. Overall, the role of Fe2⁺ ions in polyacrylamide solutions is multifaceted. They not only trigger the oxidative degradation process but also alter the charge interactions between molecules, leading to changes in polymer structure and a significant decrease in solution viscosity [34]. When the Fe3+ content is 0~6 mg/L, the polymer solution decreases significantly. After reaching 6 mg/L, the polymer is observed to flocculate and settle, resulting in a decrease in solution viscosity. It can be seen that a trace amount of Fe2+ and Fe3+ can have a serious impact on the solution viscosity, and the impact of Fe2+ is greater than that of Fe3+. Therefore, the contents of Fe2+ and Fe3+ in the injected water need to be carefully controlled during on-site testing.
When only Fe2+ or Fe3+ exists in the solution, different mass concentrations correspond to a viscosity value; the corresponding Mg2+ mass concentration is obtained according to each viscosity value in Figure 3, which is called the equivalent Mg2+ mass concentration of the viscosity corresponding to the Fe2+ and Fe3+ mass concentrations.
Based on the equivalent Mg2+ mass concentration at the same viscosity obtained in Table 2, the mathematical relationship between Fe2+ mass concentration, Fe3+ mass concentration, and their relationships are established. The meaning of the slope in the mathematical relationship is the difference in the ability of Fe2+ and Fe3+ to affect viscosity relative to Mg2+ when the ion concentration increases.
It can be seen from Figure 6 that at the same viscosity, Fe2+ has a significantly greater impact on the viscosity of the polymer solution, and its impact is 19 times that of Mg2+. The impact of Mg2+ on the viscosity of the polymer solution is significantly lower than that of Fe2+, which is equivalent to the mass concentration of Mg2+ used. Much higher than the mass concentration used for Fe2+, the effect of Fe3+ on the viscosity of the polymer solution is 6 to 16.9 times that of Mg2+. By comparing the slopes, we can see the order of influence of the three ions on the viscosity of the polymer solution: Fe2+ > Fe3+ > Mg2+.

3.4. Effect of Cations on Viscosity Stability of Polymer Solutions

In this study, we diluted the polyacrylamide mother solution with mineralized water of a certain concentration of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+ to prepare a polymer solution (mass concentration: 2500 mg/L), and tested the polymer solution for 0–50 days.
It can be seen from Figure 7 that the viscosity retention rate of the polymer solution configured with Na+ and K+ is more than 83% within 50 days; the viscosity retention rate of the polymer solution configured with Ca2+ and Mg2+ within 50 days is 66.4% and 62.1%. The polymer solution configured with Fe2+ and Fe3+ has a viscosity retention rate of 24.9% and 69.92% within 50 days, which has a great impact on the stability of the viscosity of the polymer solution. By comparing the viscosity retention rates, the degree of influence of different cations on the viscosity stability of the polymer solution is Fe2+ > Ca2+(Mg2+) > Fe3+ > Na+(K+).
Define η as the viscosity loss strength, and calculate it according to Formula (1):
η = ξ ξ ξ ξ d i o × t × c
In the formula:
  • η —viscosity loss intensity, mPa·s/(mg·L−1·d−1);
  • ξ —polymer solution viscosity, mPa·s;
  • ξ —viscosity of polymer solution after standing, mPa·s;
  • ξ d i o _dio—viscosity of polymer solution prepared in deionized water, mPa·s;
  • t—viscosity stability test time, d;
  • c —Cation content in the polymer solution mg·L−1.
Calculate the solution viscosity loss intensity based on the experimental results in Figure 7 and Equation (1). According to the intensity of viscosity loss, the order of the influence of cations on the viscosity stability of the polymer solution can be obtained.
It can be seen from Table 3 that the order of influence of different cations on the viscosity stability of the polymer solution is Fe2+ > Ca2+ (Mg2+) > Fe3+ > Na+ (K+). Under experimental oilfield wastewater conditions, the viscosity of polymer solution is less affected by trivalent cations and monovalent cations, and the greatest impact is made by divalent cations.

4. Conclusions

(1) The effects of various cations (including Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+) on the viscosity changes of polymer solutions were studied. The study found that different cations have different effects on the viscosity of the polymer solution, and their presence leads to a decrease in the viscosity of the polymer solution. As the concentration of cations increases, the viscosity reduction effect shows a downward trend, which indicates that the concentration of cations has a certain impact on viscosity changes.
(2) Fe2+ have the most serious impact on the viscosity of polymer solutions because they trigger oxidative degradation by producing highly reactive oxidants, combine with the polymer surface to weaken molecular repulsion, and accelerate free radical reactions to break molecular chains.
(3) The order of their viscosity reducing effect is the following: Fe2+ > Ca2+(Mg2+) > Fe3+ > Na+(K+). Concerning the effect of viscosity stability in time the order of influence of different cations is the following: Fe2+ > Fe3+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+ > Na+ > K+.

Author Contributions

J.H. and M.F. designed this experiment; J.H. performed a series of experiments; M.L. performed evaluation test experiments; S.N. collated the experimental data; L.H. and Y.L. were responsible for supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the General Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China “Research on mechanisms of high temperature thixotropy of thermosensitive polymer nanofluid” (No. 52074038).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the insert article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Minxuan Li was employed by the company CNOOC China Limited Hainan Branch. Author Shuai Ni was employed by the company Qinghai Oilfield Branch Exploration and Development Research Institute. Author Lijuan Hou was employed by the company PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Branch No.1 Oil Production Plant. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Du, C.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z. The influence mechanism of cations on viscosity loss of polymer solution. J. China Univ. Pet. 2020, 44, 2, 164–168. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alias, N.H.; Jaafar, J.; Samitsu, S.; Ismail, A.; Othman, M.; Rahman, M.A.; Othman, N.H.; Yusof, N.; Aziz, F.; Mohd, T. Efficient removal of partially hydrolysed polyacrylamide in polymer-flooding produced water using photocatalytic graphitic carbon nitride nanofibres. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 4341–4349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ding, P.; Dang, W.; Wang, L. Current status and prospects of oilfield produced water reinjection treatment technology. Mod. Chem. 2019, 39, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, Z. Situation and countermeasure analysis of upgrading oily sewage quality in Xingbei oilfield. Oil Gas Field Ground Eng. 2020, 39, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, H.; Dai, L.; Lu, K. Influence factors of apparent viscosity and molecular chain failure mechanism of polyacrylamide solution used in drilling and production. J. China Univ. Pet. 2022, 46, 115–125. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, C. Exploration of measures to improve the water quality of oilfield wastewater. China Pet. Chem. Stand. Qual. 2022, 42, 39–41. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Y. Analysis of factors influencing the treatment effect of extracted water from ternary composite drive in a block and research on treatment measures. Energy Conserv. Pet. Petrochem. Ind. 2019, 9, 24–27+9–10. [Google Scholar]
  8. Du, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Ji, Y. Effect of salt-resistant mono-mers on viscosity of modified polymers based on the hy-drolyzed poly-acrylamide (HPAM): A molecular dynamics study. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 325, 115161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, L.; Pu, W.; Xin, J. Study on viscosity-affecting factors for alkali/polymer flooding system. Adv. Fine Petrochem. 2007, 25, 11–13+16. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ren, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, D. Analysis on influence factors of formulating polymer solution with sewage and thickening effect. Contemp. Chem. Ind. 2016, 45, 272–275. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumar, S.; Panigerhi, P.; Saw, R.K. Interfacial interaction of cationic surfactants and itseffect on wettability alteration of oil-wet carbonate rock. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 2846–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, L.; Qian, Z.; Li, L.; Fu, M.; Zhao, H.; Fu, L.; Li, G. Synergism of polyvinyl alcohol fiber to hydrogel for profile modification. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 578, 123609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, L.; Li, G.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, H.; Mao, Z.; Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Xu, S. Thixotropy research of laponite-hydrogel composites for water shutoff in horizontal wells. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021, 208, 109600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fang, H. Effect of retained polymer in oil produced wastewater on the viscosity of polymer solutions prepared by wastewater. Oilfield Chem. 2021, 38, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wen, F.; Cheng, R. Study and management of polymer solution viscosity instability. J. Shengli Oilfield Staff. Univ. 2006, 20, 47–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fu, M.; Zhou, K.; Zhao, L. Influence of dissolved oxygen in polymer repellent solution on polymer stability. J. Southwest Pet. Inst. 1999, 2, 71–73. [Google Scholar]
  17. He, J.; Yang, J.; Tang, S.; Yuan, L.; Meng, J. Effects of Fe2+ and S2- on performance of polymer solution. Oilfield Chem. 2015, 32, 370–375. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, K.; Jiang, W.; Lu, X. A laboratory study on impact of dissolved oxygen to viscosity of polymer solutions prepared in oilfield produced water. Oilfield Chem. 2006, 25, 239–242. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhan, Y.; Guo, S.; Yan, G. Study on degradation of partially hydrolysed polyacrylamide. Polym. Bull. 2004, 35, 70–73. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu, C.; Su, G.; Chen, S.; Yang, H.; Yu, X. Synthesis and properties evaluation of ultra-high molecular mass salt-resistant polymer. Fine Chem. 2021, 38, 1243–1249+1263. [Google Scholar]
  21. Guan, S.; Fan, H.; Zhu, J. Examination of viscosity stability of polyacrylamide. J. Northeast. Pet. Univ. 2007, 31, 113–114+121+131–132. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hu, G. Exploration of viscosity stabilisation technology for polymer deep fluids. Test Min. Technol. 2001, 22, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  23. Levitt, D.B.; Slaughter, W.; Pope, G.A.; Jouenne, S. The Effect of Redox Potential and Metal Solubility on Oxidative Polymer Degradation. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2011, 14, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Yu, L.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, M.; Zhao, Z.; Zuo, J. Experimental Investigation on the Nanosilica-Reinforcing Polyacrylamide/Polyethylenimine Hydrogel for Water Shutoff Treatment. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 6650–6656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tian, J.; Ao, W.; Wu, X. Experimental study on the effect of viscosity of effluent dilution polymer solutions formulated with sewage water. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2016, 16, 166–169. [Google Scholar]
  26. You, G.; Li, J. Chemical methods for treating produced water from polymer injection oil fields into polymer water. Ind. Water Treat. 2010, 30, 59–61. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ma, T.; Zhang, X.; Jing, L. Analysis of the main influencing factors of polymer solution viscosity. Chem. Eng. Abstr. 2004, 3, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu, G.; Xu, J.; Xia, Z. Discussion on viscosity increasing and stabilizing technology of polymer solution. Trial Min. Technol. 2004, 22, 21–22. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bala, T.; Prasad, B.L.V.; Sastry, M.; Kahaly, M.U.; Waghmare, U.V. Interaction of Different Metal Ions with Carboxylic Acid Group: A Quantitative Study. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 6183–6190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, D.; Zheng, T.; Yu, J.; He, H.; Shi, W.; Ma, J. Enhancement of the electro-Fenton degradation of organic contaminant by accelerating Fe3+/Fe2+ cycle using hydroxylamine. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 105, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Quadrado, R.F.; Fajardo, A.R. Fast decolorization of azo methyl orange via heterogeneous Fenton and Fenton-like reactions using alginate-Fe2+/Fe3+ films as catalysts. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 177, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, C.; Pang, S.; Ouyang, F.; Ma, J.; Jiang, J. A new insight into Fenton and Fenton-like processes for water treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhou, H.; Peng, J.; Duan, X.; Yin, H.; Huang, B.; Zhou, C.; Lai, B. Redox-active polymers as robust electron-shuttle co-catalysts for fast Fe3+/Fe2+ circulation and green fenton oxidation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 3334–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ling, X.; Cai, A.; Chen, M.; Sun, H.; Xu, S.; Huang, Z.; Deng, J. A comparison of oxidation and re-flocculation behaviors of Fe2+/PAA and Fe2+/H2O2 treatments for enhancing sludge dewatering: A mechanism study. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 847, 157690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of K+, Na+ content on the viscosity of polymer solutions.
Figure 1. Effect of K+, Na+ content on the viscosity of polymer solutions.
Processes 12 00791 g001
Figure 2. Linear fitting of the effect of Na+ and K+ content on the viscosity of polymer solutions.
Figure 2. Linear fitting of the effect of Na+ and K+ content on the viscosity of polymer solutions.
Processes 12 00791 g002
Figure 3. Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ content on the viscosity of polymer solutions.
Figure 3. Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ content on the viscosity of polymer solutions.
Processes 12 00791 g003
Figure 4. Linear fitting results of mass concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ corresponding to Na+ at the same viscosity.
Figure 4. Linear fitting results of mass concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ corresponding to Na+ at the same viscosity.
Processes 12 00791 g004
Figure 5. Effect of Fe2+ and Fe3+ content on the viscosity of polymer solutions.
Figure 5. Effect of Fe2+ and Fe3+ content on the viscosity of polymer solutions.
Processes 12 00791 g005
Figure 6. Linear fitting results of mass concentration of Fe2+ and Fe3+ corresponding to Mg2+ at the same viscosity.
Figure 6. Linear fitting results of mass concentration of Fe2+ and Fe3+ corresponding to Mg2+ at the same viscosity.
Processes 12 00791 g006
Figure 7. Relationship between polymer viscosity and cation.
Figure 7. Relationship between polymer viscosity and cation.
Processes 12 00791 g007
Table 1. Ca2+, Mg2+ mass concentration and equivalent Na+ mass concentration at the same viscosity.
Table 1. Ca2+, Mg2+ mass concentration and equivalent Na+ mass concentration at the same viscosity.
Viscosity (mPa·s)Equivalent Na+ Mass
Concentration (mg/L)
Ca2+ Content (mg/L)Mg2+ Content
(mg/L)
741000
600330.81761.65225.913
550432.62578.58943.746
500556.32689.48570.452
450641.23497.35680.689
330964.558259.55485.773
2501624.822615.325110.519
1302520.0611354.113190.258
Table 2. Fe2+and Fe3+mass concentration and equivalent Mg2+ mass concentration at the same viscosity.
Table 2. Fe2+and Fe3+mass concentration and equivalent Mg2+ mass concentration at the same viscosity.
Viscosity (mPa·s)Equivalent Mg2+ Mass
Concentration (mg/L)
Fe2+ Content
(mg/L)
Fe3+ Content
(mg/L)
741000
60025.9391.1222.139
55043.7321.6132.732
50070.4261.8823.926
45080.6642.4815.066
33085.7792.61519.620
250110.5104.13025.217
130190.2759.58036.470
Table 3. The result of viscosity loss intensity on cation.
Table 3. The result of viscosity loss intensity on cation.
Ion Type η /
(mPa·s/(mg·L−1·d−1))
Ion Type η /
(mPa·s/(mg·L−1·d−1))
Na+1.5~7.6Fe2+82.4~152.1
Ca2+19.2~100.8Fe3+42.5~60.4
Mg2+27.06~110.5K+0.029~8.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, J.; Fu, M.; Li, M.; Luo, Y.; Ni, S.; Hou, L. Main Controlling Factors Affecting the Viscosity of Polymer Solution due to the Influence of Polymerized Cations in High-Salt Oilfield Wastewater. Processes 2024, 12, 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040791

AMA Style

Hu J, Fu M, Li M, Luo Y, Ni S, Hou L. Main Controlling Factors Affecting the Viscosity of Polymer Solution due to the Influence of Polymerized Cations in High-Salt Oilfield Wastewater. Processes. 2024; 12(4):791. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040791

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Jiani, Meilong Fu, Minxuan Li, Yuting Luo, Shuai Ni, and Lijuan Hou. 2024. "Main Controlling Factors Affecting the Viscosity of Polymer Solution due to the Influence of Polymerized Cations in High-Salt Oilfield Wastewater" Processes 12, no. 4: 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040791

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop