Next Article in Journal
Modeling Drying Process Parameters for Petroleum Drilling Sludge with ANN and ANFIS
Previous Article in Journal
Phase Equilibria Study of the MgO–CaO–SiO2 Slag System with Ferronickel Alloy, Solid Carbon, and Al2O3 Additions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Processing of Ilmenite Concentrate with High Chromium Content
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Alloy Composition Dynamics: Thermodynamic Analysis of Fe-Al-Si-Cr System in Homogeneous Liquid State

1
Department of Metallurgy and Mining, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan
2
REC Ltd., Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
3
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan
4
Department of Oil and Gas Industry, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe 0430000, Kazakhstan
5
Department of Physical Chemistry, Catalysis and Petrochemistry, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050038, Kazakhstan
6
Department of Chemistry, Chemical Technology and Ecology, Kazakh University of Technology and Business, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(9), 1947; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091947
Submission received: 20 June 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 15 July 2024 / Published: 11 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Processing, Manufacturing and Properties of Metal and Alloys)

Abstract

:
This study employs thermodynamic-diagram analysis to investigate component ratios within the Fe-Al-Si-Cr system, focusing on the behavior of homogeneous liquid states. Through comprehensive modeling, a phase diagram is constructed, elucidating the interplay of iron, aluminum, silicon, and chromium components. This study identifies stable elementary tetrahedra within the system, providing insights into phase compositions and distribution. Key findings reveal the significance of tetrahedral geometry in understanding and optimizing alloy compositions, particularly in the context of complex chromium alloys. This research underscores the utility of thermodynamic analysis in advancing our understanding of alloy systems and facilitating the optimization of production processes.

1. Introduction

An analysis of the global raw material base for metallurgy indicates a decline in the availability of high-quality ores, coupled with increasing demands for superior metal quality [1]. This necessitates the development of materials with new, complex properties. To enhance metal quality and introduce advanced technologies, comprehensive physicochemical studies are essential. These studies underscore the growing importance of physical chemistry as a foundation for producing metals with specific, desired properties [2].
The motivation for studying the Fe-Al-Si-Cr system lies in its significant potential for developing advanced high-temperature materials with improved mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and oxidation resistance, which are crucial for various industrial applications such as aerospace, automotive, and energy sectors [3,4].
Conducting thermodynamic studies on multicomponent systems is inherently complex, often requiring extensive mathematical calculations [5,6]. These studies are directly related to defining the thermodynamic functions of numerous independent reactions. However, the thermodynamic-diagram analysis of complex systems, developed at the Zh. Abishev Chemical-Metallurgical Institute, offers a simpler and more accurate alternative compared to classical thermodynamic studies of metallurgical processes [7].
In line with our objectives, we have performed a thermodynamic assessment of the feasibility of melting a complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy with a given composition. We have plotted the phase diagram of the Fe-Al-Si-Cr metal system in the homogeneous liquid state and identified the elementary tetrahedra.
This phase diagram can predict the phase composition of aluminum–silicon–chromium alloys at varying element concentrations. It effectively identifies the optimal composition ranges for forming high-quality aluminum–silicon–chromium alloys. This predictive capability is a significant advantage of the thermodynamic-diagram analysis of multicomponent systems.
Plotting phase diagrams for the Fe-Cr-Si-Al metal system across the full temperature range of phase transitions requires accurate thermodynamic characteristics of the involved compounds [8,9,10]. These characteristics are crucial for the comprehensive understanding of the four-component system. In addition to the standard values of enthalpy and entropy of formation, it is essential to determine the temperature dependences of heat capacities, enthalpies, and entropies of these compounds to calculate their thermodynamic properties over a wide temperature range.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Thermodynamic-Diagram Analysis

A thermodynamic-diagram analysis was employed to study the phase compositions of the complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloys. The compositions of individual grades were recalculated into the four primary elements of the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system. The phase compositions of the alloys were determined by calculating the normative number of secondary phases within the corresponding tetrahedra.

2.2. Phase Diagram Plotting

The phase diagram of the Fe-Al-Si-Cr system in the homogeneous liquid state was plotted based on the recalculated compositions. The elementary tetrahedra and their volumes were identified to map the phase space.

2.3. Mathematical Modeling

The analytical expressions for the secondary phases in each tetrahedron were derived using the Heath’s transformation equation:
aiCr + biFe + ciAl + diSi
The coefficients were used to compute the amounts of the formed secondary phases.

3. Results and Discussion

The values of heat capacity − C p 0 ( T ) , the enthalpy of melting −∆H0mel. and the entropy of melting −∆S0mel. of compounds Cr2Al, Fe2Al5, FeSi, Cr3Si, Cr5Si3, CrSi2, formed in the Fe-Cr-Si-Al metal system, have been calculated. Their reference data have not been found.
The precise thermodynamic methods can be applied to define the melting heat. For instance, it can be calculated using the Clapeyron–Clausius equation [11]. Therefore, data on the dependence of melting point on pressure should be requested. However, the data are rarely available to a researcher.
The authors of [12,13,14] have recommend to calculate ΔHmel. of compounds from the phase diagrams of systems using the Schröder’s equation in the ideal solutions [15]. Unfortunately, ideal solutions and melts are rare. Thus, the Schröder’s equation should be applied with great caution for the practical calculations.
The known methods to estimate the melting heat are few in number, and they do not provide a reliable assessment. The paper of [16] has pointed out that there is no precise and universal correlation for the melting heat. The paper of [17] has described that ΔHmel. cannot be estimated with high accuracy.
Referring to Turkdogan and Pearson [18,19], a value of the melting entropy (ΔSmel.) correlates with Tmel. and number of atoms in the compound molecule (m). The recommended formula to estimate ΔHmel. is as follows:
(ΔHmel./Tmel.) × m = K
where, K is determined by a melting point of the compound, i.e., K has the same numerical value for compounds with the same melting point.
However, the data in [20] have described that this correlation does not provide the satisfactory accuracy of assessment of the melting heat, i.e., a value of (ΔHmel./Tmel.) × m changes within a wide range for different compounds with the same melting point.
It should be stated that the reference data on the melting heat of molecular compounds contains large gaps. Data on many compounds are contradictory. As a result, it makes difficult to find the universal correlations.
Morachevsky et al. [21] have analyzed the experimental data on the melting heat of the molecular compounds. Their vapor pressure at a triple point has not exceeded 104 Pa.
The non-polar and low polar molecular compounds (ψ < 0.05) have a universal ratio between the value of ΔSmel. and a melting point, presented as follows:
ΔSmel. = ΔHmel./Tmel.
Thus, it leads to the formula to calculate a melting heat [13,14]:
ΔHmel. = 6.147 × Tmel.1.333
Since the compounds of Cr2Al, Fe2Al5, FeSi, Cr3Si, Cr5Si3a and CrSi2 are low polar, thus, the Formula (3) is used to calculate values of ΔHmel.:
ΔHmel., Cr2Al = 6.147 × 15281.333 = 76.727 kJ/mol
ΔHmel., Fe2Al5 = 6.147 × 14271.333 = 100.084 kJ/mol
ΔHmel., FeSi = 6.147 × 14221.333 = 70.103 kJ/mol
ΔHmel., Cr3Si = 6.147 × 14851.333 = 131.284 kJ/mol
ΔHmel., Cr5Si3 = 6.147 × 12381.333 = 126.364 kJ/mol
ΔHmel., CrSi2 = 6.147 × 13031.333 = 102.959 kJ/mol
Then the Formula (2) is used to calculate ΔSmel.:
ΔSmel., Cr2Al = 76727/1183 = 64.86 J/(mol∙K)
ΔSmel., Fe2Al5 = 100084/1144 = 69.31 J/(mol∙K)
ΔSmel., FeSi = 70103/1678 = 41.8 J/(mol∙K)
ΔSmel., Cr3Si = 131284/1170 = 74.17 J/(mol∙K)
ΔSmel., Cr5Si3 = 126364/1720 = 73.47 J/(mol∙K)
ΔSmel., CrSi2 = 102959/1475 = 69.8 J/(mol∙K)
The literature has not yet described methods for the approximate calculation of the heat capacity of liquids for the inorganic compounds. Only the Neumann–Kopp approach has been found from the original literature [22,23]. This approach has been successfully justified for the intermetallic compounds. This approach has been based on the additive contribution of different atoms to the molecular heat capacity of a compound [24,25]:
C p ж = i C p ж ( i ) · n i ,
where C p ж ( i ) is an atomic component (increment) of the heat capacity of an element, J/(mol∙K); ni—number of atoms; i—an element in a molecule of the compound.
The thermodynamic constants of compounds of the Fe-Si-Al-Cr system calculated by Formula (4) are presented in Table 1.
Thus, based on the semi-empirical methods to calculate the thermodynamic characteristics of substances, the values of melting enthalpy and melting entropy of compounds of Cr2Al, Fe2Al5, FeSi, Cr3Si, Cr5Si3 and CrSi2 have been determined for the following tetrahedration of the Fe-Al-Si-Cr system at a melting temperature.
In order to plot the phase diagram of the Fe-Al-Si-Cr metal system at temperatures of phase transitions of the compounds, a complete calculation of the thermodynamic constants of reactions (in these systems) has been performed using the “Gibbs-MISiS” software package (National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, Moscow, Russia, 2011). The results have been described in [26].
The Gibbs software package developed by scientists developed at Zh.Abishev Chemical-Metallurgical Institute determines the change in enthalpy, entropy, heat capacity and Gibbs energy of any reaction in the heterogeneous and homogeneous liquid-phase states at different temperatures including all phase transitions (the allotropic transformations, melting, etc.) for all system components and calculates the equilibrium constant of the reaction. The algorithm for calculation of the reaction value G T 0 based on the Gibbs software package can be represented by formulas of (5)–(8):
(1)
The Gibbs energy values G f ,   298.15 0 of these compounds have been calculated by the following formula:
G f ,   298.15 0 = H f ,   298.15 0 T · S 298.15 0
(2)
Calculation of the reaction of the enthalpy change at a given temperature:
H T 0 = H 298.15 0 + 298.15 T п л C p dT + H mel 0
(3)
Determination of the reaction of the entropy change at a given temperature:
S T 0 = S 298.15 0 + 298.15 T п л C p dT T + S m e l . 0
(4)
Calculation of the reaction of the Gibbs energy change at a given temperature— G T 0 using the Gibbs–Helmholtz formula.
After substituting formulas of (6) and (7) into formula (5), an expression has been presented:
G T 0 = H 298.15 0 + 298.15 T п л C p dT + H m e l 0 T · S 298.15 0 + 298.15 T п л C p dT T + S mel . 0
where:
-
H 298.15 0 —a standard value of the reaction of enthalpy, J/mol;
-
S 298.15 0 —a standard value of the reaction of entropy, J/(mol∙K);
-
C p —value of the reaction of the heat capacity, J/(mol∙K);
-
Tmel.—a current temperature or temperature of the phase transition (melt, evaporation, etc.) of the component, respectively, K;
-
T—a temperature where the system is in the homogeneous liquid-phase state, K;
-
ΔH0mel.—enthalpy of phase transition or melt of a component, respectively, J/mol;
-
∆S0mel.—entropy of phase transition or melt of a component, respectively, J/(mol∙K).
In order to plot a phase diagram of tetrahedration of the Fe-Al-Si-Cr system in the homogeneous liquid state by the thermodynamic-diagram analysis, the Si-Al-Fe, Si-Cr-Fe, Fe-Al-Cr and Si-Al-Cr boundary subsystems have been decomposed into elementary independent triangles. The principle of Gibbs free energy minimization has been used [27]. If the Gibbs energy change was negative during the reaction between the phases, then the reaction products as the coexisting phases have been connected with a straight line in the diagram. The sequence of this operation leads to a phase equilibrium diagram [28]. First of all, the metal compounds with the varying complexity forming the studied system should be described.
The approved coordinates (based on mass fraction × 1000) of the congruent and incongruent compounds of the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system used in the further study of their crystallization regions are presented in Table 2. The data of this table focus attention on 21 simple and complex compounds.
Tetrahedration of the Si-Al-Fe subsystem. The Gibbs energy values (∆G02500) of the reactions calculated with the Gibbs software package for the Si-Al-Fe subsystem are demonstrated in Table 3.
The reaction of 3Al + FeSi2 = FeAl3 + 2Si has been observed in the Si-Al-Fe subsystem. the Gibbs energy was positive at a temperature of 2500 K. It was equal ΔG02500 = 112.61 kJ/mol, i.e., the reaction has shifted to formation of the initial compounds. The plotted phase diagram based on the data obtained in the Si-Al-Fe subsystem at a temperature of 2500 K is illustrated in Figure 1.
As a result of triangulation of the Si-Al-Fe system (Figure 1) including all complex compounds, five regions have been formed. The incongruent compounds have not been found in regions of Si-Al-FeSi2 (1), FeSi2-Al-FeSi (2), FeSi-Al-Fe5Si3 (3), Fe5Si3-Al-Fe2Si (4). The diagram region of Fe2Si-Al-Fe has one congruent (Fe2Al5) and two incongruent compounds (FeAl3, FeAl). These compounds divide this region into four sub-regions: Fe2Si-Al-FeAl3 (5I), Fe2Si-FeAl3-Fe2Al5 (5II), Fe2Si-Fe2Al5-FeAl (5III) and Fe2Si-FeAl-Fe (5IV).
Tetrahedration of the Si-Cr-Fe subsystem. Values of changes in the Gibbs energy of the reactions for the Si-Cr-Fe subsystem are presented in Table 4.
Based on the obtained thermodynamic data, the phase diagram of the Si-Cr-Fe subsystem has been plotted up to a temperature of 2500 K (Figure 2).
Eight regions have been formed during the triangulation of the ternary Si-Cr-Fe system (Figure 2). However, the Si-CrSi-FeSi2 region has one congruent compound—CrSi2 which resulted in formation of two sub-regions: Si-CrSi2-FeSi2 (1I) and CrSi-FeSi2-CrSi2 (1II). The incongruent compounds have not been observed in regions of CrSi-Cr5Si3-FeSi2 (2), Cr5Si3-Cr3Si-FeSi2 (3), Fe2Si-Cr3Si-FeSi (4), FeSi-Cr3Si-Fe5Si3 (5), Fe5Si3-Cr3Si-Fe2Si (6), Fe2Si-Cr3Si-Fe (7) and Cr3Si-Cr-Fe (8) [14].
Tetrahedration of the Fe-Al-Cr subsystem. The values of changes in the Gibbs energy of the reactions for the Fe-Al-Cr subsystem are demonstrated in Table 5.
Based on the obtained thermodynamic data, the phase diagram of the Fe-Al-Cr subsystem at a temperature of 2500 K has been constructed (Figure 3). The phase diagram of the Fe-Al-Cr subsystem is a set of binary compounds which have been found in its binary Cr-Fe, Fe-Al, Cr-Al systems.
The triangulation of the ternary Fe-Al-Cr system (Figure 3) has formed nine regions. The incongruent compounds have not been found in the regions of Fe-FeAl-Cr (1), Fe2Al5-Cr-FeAl (2), Fe2Al5-Cr2Al-Cr (3), Fe2Al5-Cr5Al8-Cr2Al (4), Fe2Al5-Cr4Al9-Cr5Al8 (5), Fe2Al5-CrAl4-Cr4Al9 (6), Fe2Al5-Cr2Al11-CrAl4 (7) and Fe2Al5-CrAl7-Cr2Al11 (8). The Fe2Al5-Al-CrAl7 region has one incongruent compound—FeAl3. This incongruent compound divides this region into two sub-regions, respectively: Fe2Al5-FeAl3-CrAl7 (9I) and FeAl3-Al-CrAl7 (9II).
Tetrahedration of the Si-Al-Cr subsystem. Values of changes in the Gibbs energy of reactions for the Si-Al-Cr subsystem are presented in Table 6. Based on the obtained thermodynamic data, the phase diagram of the Si-Al-Cr subsystem at a temperature of 2500 K has been plotted (Figure 4).
The triangulation of the ternary Si-Al-Cr system (Figure 4) has formed five regions.
The incongruent compounds have not been observed in regions of Si-Al-CrSi2 (1), CrSi2-Al-CrSi (2), CrSi-Al Cr5Si3 (3) and Cr5Si3-Al-Cr3Si (4). Two congruent (Cr2Al and CrAl7) and four incongruent compounds (Cr2Al11, CrAl4, Cr4Al9, Cr5Al8) have been found in the diagram region of Fe3Si-Al-Cr which resulted in formation of seven sub-regions: Cr3Si-Al-CrAl7 (5I), Cr3Si-CrAl7-Cr2Al11 (5II), Cr3Si-Cr2Al11-CrAl4 (5III), Cr3Si-CrAl4-Cr4Al9 (5IV), Cr3Si-Cr4Al9-Cr5Al8 (5V), Cr3Si-Cr5Al8-Cr2Al (5VI) and Cr3Si-Cr2Al-Cr (5VII).
Figure 5 illustrates a general view of the analyzed Cr-Fe-Al-Si system in the homogeneous liquid state including the congruent and incongruent compounds.
Thus, the above-mentioned data and results on calculations have confirmed the reliability of tetrahedration of the phase diagram of the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system in the liquid state. Thereafter, the phase compositions of the metal products can be predicted in the sub-solidus state during the melting of different grades of the complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy [29,30].
The quasi-systems of the general Fe-Cr-Si-Al system and their mathematical models.
The above-stated data on the boundary ternary systems derived from the sub-solidus structure of the four elements of three-component subsystems are sufficient to divide the concentration space of tetrahedron of the Fe-Cr-Si-Al system into elementary ones.
Distances between pairs of the coexisting compounds are picks of quasi-systems with oblique axes of A1 (x1; y1; z1; u1 …), A2 (x2; y2; z2; u2 …). They have been needed to plot the composition–property diagrams in the corresponding sections. They have been calculated by Formula (9) [15,16]:
l2 = (x2 − x1)2 + (y2 − y1)2 + (z2 − z1)2 + (u2 − u1)2 + … + (x2 − x1) × (y2 − y1) + (x2 − x1) × (z2 − z1) + (x2 − x1) × (u2 − u1) + … + (y2 − y1) × (z2 − z1) + (y2 − y1) × (u2 − u1) … + (z2 − z1) × (u2 − u1) + …
The four-component Fe-Cr-Si-Al metal system has been composed of four ternary metal systems of Si-Al-Fe, Si-Cr-Fe, Fe-Al-Cr and Si-Al-Cr.
Based on the results of tetrahedration of the above four ternary systems, the elementary tetrahedrons of the general Fe-Cr-Si-Al system are easier to determine by searching through the related (differ in one component) triangles of subsystems. Then, the resulting tetrahedron of the studied quadruple system is derived by summing up these triangles. Therefore, the exclusion of one of the components of this four-vertex can be reduced to a triangle of the subsystem of the general system to find the next adjacent four-vertex. It is performed schematically as described in Table 7.
As a result, the phase diagram of the general Cr-Fe-Al-Si system (Figure 5) has been derived by searching through all related triangles of the four ternary subsystems using a similar method.
Thus, based on the tetrahedration of the quadruple metal Fe-Cr-Si-Al system for the liquid-phase state (T = 2500 K) it has been established that the system consists of 21 elementary independent tetrahedral. They model the compositions of different grades of aluminum–silicon–chromium in recovery process of elements from ash of the high-ash coal. The resulting elementary quadruple systems and their volumes are summarized in Table 8 [26].
Earlier, the results of the thermodynamic-diagram analysis were confirmed by studying the phase compositions of the complex aluminum–silicon–chrome alloy. The aluminum–silicon–chrome alloy was smelted in a single-stage carbothermic process in an open-type ore-thermal furnace, and the alloy samples were then sent for phase composition determination. In the aforementioned study, the thermodynamic-diagram analysis for the Cr-Fe-Al-Si metallic system was conducted using only congruent compounds, and accordingly, the system consists of 11 tetrahedra [31].
The accuracy of division of the general system into the quasi-systems is controlled by the equality to unity of the amount of the relative volumes of quasi-systems to avoid losses of the transient polytopes. The above data of the table demonstrate that the amount of the relative volumes of the elementary tetrahedra is practically equal to unity (0.9994). Thus, it confirms the accuracy of the made tetrahedration.
The data of phase diagrams can be processed analytically without visualizing the system. Thus, the equations can be obtained to study its physical and chemical properties [32,33,34,35]. The simple and accessible method for manual calculation to derive the transformation equations expressing any secondary system using the primary components of the general system has been described in the well-known papers of [36,37]. The criterion for position of a given composition of the melts into one of the quasi-systems is positive values of the n- amount of the secondary components of a certain polytope calculated by the Heath’s equation [38].
Based on the above mentioned, the coefficients calculated for each secondary component of the 21 quasi-systems of the basic tetrahedron have been derived by the procedure described in [39], and they are presented in Table 9.
Hereafter, in order to apply results on the thermodynamic-diagram analysis to the compositions of different grades of aluminum–silicon–chromium, the elementary tetrahedra with their compositions have been found. Then, based on the normative distribution of the primary phases between the compounds (secondary phases) located at the peaks of a given tetrahedron, the metallurgical assessment of the melts has been made.
For this purpose, the chemical compositions of the individual grades of aluminum–silicon–chromium and the complex aluminum–chromium–silicon alloy have been recalculated to the four elements of the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system. Their compositions are presented in Table 10. Then based on Table 9, their positions in the factor space of this system have been determined by calculation of the normative number of the secondary phases in the corresponding tetrahedra (Table 11).
The phase composition in each of the tetrahedra presented in Table 8 can be described by substituting of the corresponding coefficients from Table 10 into the Equation (10) [39]:
Xi = aiCr + biFe + ciAl + diSi
It is the Heath’s transformation equation, where Xi—the amount of the formed secondary phase; ai, bi, ci and di—the transformation coefficients; Cr, Fe, Al and Si—the amounts of the primary metal components in the metal.
The results of the calculations have found that all grades of the complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy by a chemical composition were located in tetrahedron No.1 (Table 11) and contained 10.99–28.95% Si, 35.18–54.68% CrSi2, 10.38–13.6% Al and 23.08–31.08% FeSi2. The petrographic analysis has really found these phases in the composition of aluminum–silicon–chromium. The found tetrahedron was volumetric (Vi = 0.2405) phase triangle of the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system. Therefore, the large volume of the tetrahedron has provided good conditions for the melt of aluminum–silicon–chromium. As a result, it was possible to freely adjust the compositions of the charge to obtain the required grade composition of the alloy [40].
The analytical expressions of the secondary phases of tetrahedron No.1 of Si-FeSi2-Al-CrSi2 are presented below:
Si = a1Cr + b1Fe + c1Al + d1Si = −1.07900∙Cr − 1.0∙Fe + 1.0∙Si
CrSi2 = a2Cr + b2Fe + c2Al + d2Si = 2.07900∙Cr
Al = a3Cr + b3Fe + c3Al + d3Si = 1.0∙Al
FeSi2 = a4Cr + b4Fe + c4Al + d4Si = 2.0∙Fe
Compositions of the aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy have changed their positions to tetrahedral of No.2, No.3, No.11 (CrSi2-FeSi2-CrSi-Al, CrSi-Cr5Si3-Al-FeSi2, FeAl-Fe-Cr3Si-Fe2Si) when the chromium content increased, and aluminum content decreased. These tetrahedra have taken from 5 to 8% of the factor space of the general system.
The normative amounts of the secondary phases in tetrahedra of No.2, No.3 and No.11 are calculated by the Formulas (12)–(14):
CrSi = a1Cr + b1Fe + c1Al + d1Si = −2.84615∙Cr + 2.84615∙Fe + 3.07101∙Si
CrSi2 = a2Cr + b2Fe + c2Al + d2Si = 3.84615∙Cr − 3.84615∙Fe − 2.07101∙Si
Al = a3Cr + b3Fe + c3Al + d3Si = 1.0∙Al
FeSi2 = a4Cr + b4Fe + c4Al + d4Si = 2.0∙Fe
CrSi = a1Cr + b1Fe + c1Al + d1Si = 7.19048∙Cr − 7.19048∙Fe − 2.33333∙Si
Cr5Si3 = a2Cr + b2Fe + c2Al + d2Si = −6.19048∙Cr + 6.19048∙Fe + 3.33333∙Si
Al = a3Cr + b3Fe + c3Al + d3Si = 1.0∙Al
FeSi2 = a4Cr + b4Fe + c4Al + d4Si = 2.0∙Fe Fe
FeAl = a1Cr + b1Fe + c1Al + d1Si = 3.07692∙Al
Fe = a2Cr + b2Fe + c2Al + d2Si = 0.71698∙Cr + 1.0∙Fe − 2.07692∙Al − 4.0∙Si
Cr3Si = a3Cr + b3Fe + c3Al + d3Si = 1.17925∙Cr
Fe2Si = a4Cr + b4Fe + c4Al + d4Si = −0.89623∙Cr + 5.0∙Si Fe
Figure 6 schematically illustrates the phase diagrams of the complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy (a) and aluminum–chromium–silicon (ACS) alloy (b, c, d). They have the following average chemical composition after recalculation into four components (Table 12).
Thus, the region of compositions of the complex chromium alloys, in particular aluminum–silicon–chromium, is characterized by the set of the above mentioned tetrahedra.
By volume they take up 43.26% of the factor space of the general Cr-Fe-Al-Si system. The volumes of tetrahedra of No.2 and No.11 can be disregarded, i.e., only alloy compositions with the high chromium content and the low aluminum content are able to penetrate them. However, tetrahedral of No.1 and No.3 are of direct interest, i.e., the amount of their relative volumes equals 29.3% of the general system volume (Table 8).

4. Conclusions

Based on the theoretical studies conducted by the thermodynamic-diagram analysis, the following results have been obtained:
  • A phase diagram of the metal Fe-Al-Si-Cr system modeling the compositions of the multicomponent chromium alloys including the complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy has been plotted. It has been found that the system consisted of 21 stable elementary tetrahedra. The amount of the relative volumes of the elementary tetrahedra was practically equal to unity (0.999999), and thus, it has confirmed the accuracy of the made tetrahedration;
  • The analytical expressions for each tetrahedron have been derived. The created mathematical model can find the phase composition of the complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy in combination with other properties to optimize the technological process of its production. Based on the calculations, it has been stated that the phase compositions of aluminum–silicon–chromium are characterized by tetrahedron No.1 (Si-FeSi2-Al-CrSi2). The found tetrahedron is the most volumetric (Vi = 0.2405) phase triangle of the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system. Therefore, the large volume of the tetrahedron has provided good conditions for the melt of aluminum–silicon–chromium. As a result, it was possible to freely adjust the composition of the charge to obtain the required grade composition of the alloy.

Author Contributions

Data curation, Y.S., Y.Z., N.N. and M.D.; formal analysis, K.A., R.O. and T.K.; Investigation, N.N., M.D. and F.K.; project administration, Y.S.; software, B.B. and E.Z.; visualization, E.Z.; writing—original draft, Y.Z. and N.N.; writing—review and editing, Y.S., M.D., K.A., R.O., T.K., B.B., F.K. and E.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Nurzhan Nurgali, Murat Dossekenov were employed by REC Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The REC Ltd. had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Magdalena, R.; Valero, A.; Palacios, J.-L.; Valero, A. Mining energy consumption as a function of ore grade decline: The case of lead and zinc. J. Sustain. Min. 2021, 20, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yan, Z.-m.; Lv, X.-w.; Li, Z.-s. Physicochemical properties and structure of titania-containing metallurgical slags: A review. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2022, 29, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fan, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, C. High Temperature Oxidation and Wear Resistance of Y-modified Hot Dipping Aluminized Coating on SCH12 Steel. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2012, 41, 231–235. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gialanella, S.; Malandruccolo, A. Aerospace Alloys; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zepon, G.; Silva, B.H.; Zlotea, C.; Botta, W.J.; Champion, Y. Thermodynamic modelling of hydrogen-multicomponent alloy systems: Calculating pressure-composition-temperature diagrams. Acta Mater. 2021, 215, 117070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mikhailov, G.; Makrovets, L. Thermodynamic Analysis of the Processes in the High-Temperature Multicomponent Fe–Y–Si–O–C System. Russ. Metall. (Met.) 2023, 2023, 1159–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baisanov, S.; Tolokonnikova, V.; Yerekeyeva, G.; Narikbayeva, G.; Korsukova, I. Thermodynamic-diagram analysis of the Fe-Si-Al-Mn system with the construction of diagrams of phase relations. Metalurgija 2022, 61, 828–830. [Google Scholar]
  8. Young, D.A. Phase Diagrams of the Elements; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  9. Saka, H. Introduction to Phase Diagrams in Materials Science and Engineering; World Scientific: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhumagaliyev, Y.; Nurumgaliyev, Y.G.; Mongolkhan, A.O.; Davletova, A.; Sagynbekova, G. Thermodynamic-diagram analysis of the Fe-Si-Al-Cr system with the construction of diagrams of phase relations. Metalurgija 2022, 61, 825–827. [Google Scholar]
  11. Saslow, W.M. A history of thermodynamics: The missing manual. Entropy 2020, 22, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tolokonnikova, V.V.; Baisanov, S.; Yerekeyeva, G.S.; Narikbayeva, G.I.; Korsukova, I.Y. Evaluation of the Degree of Dissociation of A Congruent Compound Fe2Ti across the Bjerrum–Guggenheim Coefficient. Metals 2022, 12, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kasenov, B.K.; Aldabergenov, M.K.; Pashinkin, A.S. Thermodynamic Methods in Chemistry and Metallurgy; Rauan-Demeu: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 1994; p. 256. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kasenov, B.K.; Aldabergenov, M.K.; Pashinkin, A.S. Methods of Applied Thermodynamics in Chemistry and Metallurgy; Glasir: Karaganda, Kazakhstan, 2008; p. 332. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tolokonnikova, V.; Baisanov, S.; Narikbayeva, G.; Yerekeyeva, G. Regularities of phase equilibria based on the Bjerrum-Guggenheim concept for the Fe-Al binary system. CIS Iron Steel Rev. 2022, 24, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reid, R.C.; Sherwood, T.K. The Properties of Gases and Liquids; McGraw-Hill Book Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1958; 386p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Perry, J.H. Chemical Engineers’ Handbook; Mc Graw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 1950. [Google Scholar]
  18. Viktorov, M.M. Methods for Calculating of Physical and Chemical Values and Applied Calculations; Chemistry: Moscow, Russia, 1977; p. 360. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, H.; Yang, J.; Lu, X.; Liu, W.; Ye, G.; Zhang, R.; Yang, W. Dephosphorization in double slag converter steelmaking process at different temperatures by industrial experiments. Metals 2021, 11, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Salina, V.; Baisanov, S.O. Temperature dependence of the specific heat, enthalpy, and entropy of melting of BaSi2, Mn11Si19, and Fe2Si. Izv. Nats. Akad. Nauk Resp. Kazakhstan Ser. Khim 2010, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  21. Morachevsky, A.G.; Sladkova, I.B. Thermodynamic Calculations in Metallurgy: Reference Guide; Metallurgiya: Moscow, Russia, 1985; p. 137. [Google Scholar]
  22. Joubert, J.-M.; Kaplan, B.; Selleby, M. The specific heat of Al-based compounds, evaluation of the Neumann-Kopp rule and proposal for a modified Neumann-Kopp rule. Calphad 2023, 81, 102562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Samoshkin, D.; Abdullaev, R.; Stankus, S.; Agazhanov, A.S. Heat capacity of magnesium-calcium alloys in the solid state. Thermophys. Aeromechanics 2023, 30, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krestovnikov, A.N.; Vladimirov, L.P.; Gulyanitskiy, B.S.; Fisher, A.Y. Reference Guide on Calculations of Equilibria of Metallurgical Reactions; Metallurgizdat: Moscow, Russia, 1963; p. 416. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mel’Nikova, S.; Isaenko, L.; Pashkov, V.; Pevnev, I. Phase transition in a KPb2Br5 crystal. Phys. Solid State 2005, 47, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baisanov, S.; Shabanov, Y.; Baisanov, A.; Issagulov, A.; Laurent, C. Diagram of phase structure of metallic system in liquid state. In Proceedings of the the Fourteenth International Ferroalloys Congress INFACON XIV, Kiev, Ukraine, 31 May–4 June 2015; pp. 540–547. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yasin, G.; Ibraheem, S.; Ali, S.; Arif, M.; Ibrahim, S.; Iqbal, R.; Kumar, A.; Tabish, M.; Mushtaq, M.; Saad, A. Defects-engineered tailoring of tri-doped interlinked metal-free bifunctional catalyst with lower gibbs free energy of OER/HER intermediates for overall water splitting. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 23, 100634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, B.; Chen, L.-Q. Theory of strain phase equilibria and diagrams. Acta Mater. 2024, 274, 120025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Makhambetov, Y.; Timirbayeva, N.; Baisanov, S.; Baisanov, A.; Shabanov, E. Thermodynamic modeling of phase composition for Fe-Ca-Si-Al system. Metalurgija 2021, 60, 117–120. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhumagaliev Ye, B.S.; Chekimbaev, A.; Nurgali, N. Phase diagram of Ti-Fe-Al system. In Proceedings of the 12th International Ferroalloys Congress: Sustainable Future, Helsinki, Finland, 6–9 June 2010; pp. 653–656. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mekhtiev, A.; Shabanov, Y.; Issagulov, A.; Baissanov, S.; Baissanov, A.; Issagulova, D. Development of technology of complex aluminum-silicon-chrome alloy with utilization of off grade raw materials. Metalurgija 2015, 54, 157–160. [Google Scholar]
  32. Akberdin, A.; Kim, A.; Orlov, A.; Sultangaziev, R. Diagram of the phase composition of the Fe-Si-Al system and its isothermal sections. CIS Iron Steel Rev. 2022, 23, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nurgali, N.Z.; Kelamanov, B.S.; Tazhiyev, Y.B.; Sariyev, O.R.; Abdirashit, A.M.; Burumbayev, A.G.; Zayakin, O. Modeling of metal systems Fe-Ti, Ti-Si, Ti-Al. Vestnik KazNRTU 2021, 143, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kelamanov, B.S.; Zayakin, O.V.; Yessengaliev, D.A.; Kobegen, Y.; Adaybayeva, R.A.; Temirbekov, A.Z. Study of the Fe-Si-Al-Ba system using the thermodynamic-diagrammatic analyses method. Eng. J. Satbayev Univ. 2023, 145, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kelamanov, B.S.; Yessengaliyev, D.; Tazhiyev, Y.B.; Zayakin, O. Study of the Ti-Zr-Al-Si system by thermodynamic-diagram analysis and phase composition of ferrum-silicon-cyrconium alloy. Vestnik KazNRTU 2021, 143, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Makhambetov, Y.; Abdirashit, A.; Kuatbay, Y.; Yerzhanov, A.; Issengaliyeva, G.; Angsapov, A. Research of microstructure and phase composition of a new complex alloy–alumosilicomanganese (Al-Si-Mn). Metalurgija 2022, 61, 804–806. [Google Scholar]
  37. Makhambetov, Y.; Abdirashit, A.; Kuatbay, Y.; Yerzhanov, A.; Mukhambetkaliyev, A.; Abishkenov, M. Thermodynamic diagrammatic analysis (TDA) of the system Al-Si-Mn-Fe. Metalurgija 2022, 61, 807–809. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nurgali, N.; Sariev, O.; Mukhambetkaliyev, A.; Momenov, B.; Kuandykova, A.; Abdrashev, R. Phase composition of titanium-containing raw materials depending on its titanium oxide content. Metalurgija 2021, 60, 374–376. [Google Scholar]
  39. Akberdin, A.; Kim, A.; Sultangaziev, R.; Orlov, A. The method of mathematical description of the phase composition diagrams. CIS Iron Steel Rev. 2023, 25, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Issagulov, A.Z.; Baisanov, C.O.; Baisanov, A.C.; Azotte, A.; Shabanov, E.Z. Analytical expressions of the Fe-Al-Si-Cr system and the phase composition of the complex aluminum-silicon-chromium alloy. Proc. Univ. Karaganda 2016, 2, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Phase diagram in the Si-Al-Fe subsystem at T = 2500 K.
Figure 1. Phase diagram in the Si-Al-Fe subsystem at T = 2500 K.
Processes 12 01947 g001
Figure 2. The phase diagram in the Si-Cr-Fe subsystem at T = 2500 K.
Figure 2. The phase diagram in the Si-Cr-Fe subsystem at T = 2500 K.
Processes 12 01947 g002
Figure 3. The phase diagram in the Fe-Al-Cr subsystem at T = 2500 K.
Figure 3. The phase diagram in the Fe-Al-Cr subsystem at T = 2500 K.
Processes 12 01947 g003
Figure 4. The phase diagram in the Si-Al-Cr subsystem at T = 2500 K.
Figure 4. The phase diagram in the Si-Al-Cr subsystem at T = 2500 K.
Processes 12 01947 g004
Figure 5. Tetrahedration of metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Figure 5. Tetrahedration of metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Processes 12 01947 g005
Figure 6. The schematic view of phase diagrams of complex chromium alloys: aluminum–silicon–chromium (a) and aluminum–chromium–silicon (ACS) alloy (bd).
Figure 6. The schematic view of phase diagrams of complex chromium alloys: aluminum–silicon–chromium (a) and aluminum–chromium–silicon (ACS) alloy (bd).
Processes 12 01947 g006
Table 1. The calculated thermodynamic constants of compounds formed in the Fe-Si-Al-Cr system.
Table 1. The calculated thermodynamic constants of compounds formed in the Fe-Si-Al-Cr system.
Compounds∆Hmel.,
kJ/mol
∆Smel.,
J/(mol∙K)
C p 0 ( T ) ,
J/(mol∙K)
Tmel., K
Cr2Al−33.075.3177.58298
76.72764.8627.321183
Fe2Al5−200.83206.37197.76298
100.0869.31254.491444
FeSi−76.5746.02448.53298
70.10341.887.511678
Cr3Si−138.0786.6190.41298
131.28474.1728.151770
Cr5Si3−326.57182.5291.77298
126.36473.47269.351720
CrSi2−100.4255.6563.59298
102.95969.827.751475
Table 2. The congruent and incongruent metallic compounds in the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system and their coordinates on the quadruple concentration simplex (tetrahedron).
Table 2. The congruent and incongruent metallic compounds in the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system and their coordinates on the quadruple concentration simplex (tetrahedron).
CompoundsCoordinates Based on Mass Fraction × 1000
CrFeAlSi
Cr1000000
Fe0100000
Al0010000
Si0001000
FeAl06753250
Fe2Al504535470
FeAl304095910
Fe2Si08000200
Fe5Si307690231
FeSi06670333
FeSi205000500
CrAl721607840
Cr2Al1125907410
CrAl432506750
Cr4Al946105390
Cr5Al854604540
Cr2Al79002100
Cr3Si84800152
Cr5Si375500245
CrSi65000350
CrSi248100519
Table 3. Thermodynamics of reactions in the Si-Al-Fe subsystem (T = 2500 K).
Table 3. Thermodynamics of reactions in the Si-Al-Fe subsystem (T = 2500 K).
Equation of Reaction∆G02500, (kJ/mol)
3Al + FeSi2 = FeAl3 + 2Si112.61
FeAl3 + FeSi2 = 3Al + 2FeSi−40.52
2FeAl3 + 3FeSi = 6Al + Fe5Si3−93.33
FeAl3 + Fe5Si3 = 3Al + 3Fe2Si−39.12
Table 4. Thermodynamics of reactions in the Si-Cr-Fe subsystem (T = 2500 K).
Table 4. Thermodynamics of reactions in the Si-Cr-Fe subsystem (T = 2500 K).
Equation of Reaction∆G02500, (kJ/mol)
FeSi + CrSi2 = FeSi2 + CrSi−45.77
2FeSi + 5CrSi = 2FeSi2 + Cr5Si3−32.06
4FeSi + 3Cr5Si3 = 4FeSi2 + 5Cr3Si−70.95
FeSi + Cr3Si = FeSi2 + 3Cr14.61
Fe5Si3 + 2Cr3Si = 5FeSi + 6Cr39.79
5Fe2Si + Cr3Si = 2Fe5Si3 + 3Cr7.09
2Fe + Cr3Si = Fe2Si + 3Cr41.24
Table 5. Thermodynamics of reactions in the Fe-Al-Cr subsystem (T = 2500 K).
Table 5. Thermodynamics of reactions in the Fe-Al-Cr subsystem (T = 2500 K).
Equation of Reaction∆G02500, (kJ/mol)
Fe + Cr2Al = FeAl + 2Cr−71.62
Fe2Al5 + 6Cr = 2FeAl + 3Cr2Al338.09
2FeAl3 + 3Cr = Fe2Al5 + Cr2Al−282.52
11FeAl3 + 2.5Cr2Al = 5.5Fe2Al5 + Cr5Al8−1614.65
26FeAl3 + 4Cr5Al8 = 13Fe2Al5 + 5Cr4Al9−3489.90
14FeAl3 + Cr4Al9 = 7Fe2Al5 + 4CrAl4−2194.17
3FeAl3 + CrAl4 = 1.5Fe2Al5 + 0.5Cr2Al11−388.55
3FeAl3 + 0.5Cr2Al11 = 1.5Fe2Al5 + CrAl7−440.55
Table 6. Thermodynamics of reactions in the Si-Al-Cr subsystem (T = 2500 K).
Table 6. Thermodynamics of reactions in the Si-Al-Cr subsystem (T = 2500 K).
Equation of Reaction∆G02500, (kJ/mol)
2Si + CrAl7 = CrSi2 + 7Al−190.22
CrSi2 + CrAl7 = 2CrSi + 7Al−214.37
3CrSi + 2CrAl7 = Cr5Si3 + 14Al−339.78
0.5Cr5Si3 + 2CrAl7 = 1.5Cr3Si + 14Al−359.51
Table 7. Determination of the resulting tetrahedra of the Fe-Cr-Si-Al system by triangulation data of its boundary systems.
Table 7. Determination of the resulting tetrahedra of the Fe-Cr-Si-Al system by triangulation data of its boundary systems.
SystemInitial Triangles
Boundary1616
Si-AlFeFeSi2-Al-SiFe5Si3-Al-FeSi
Si-Cr-FeFeSi2-CrSi2-SiFe5Si3-Cr3Si-FeSi
Fe-Al-CrFe2Al5-Cr4Al9-Cr5Al8
Si-Al-CrSi-Al-CrSi2Cr3Si-Cr4Al9-Cr5Al8
GeneralThe resulting tetrahedra
Fe-Cr-Si-AlSi-FeSi2-Al-CrSi2Fe5Si3-FeSi-Al-Cr3SiFe2Al5-Cr4Al9-Cr5Al8-Cr3Si
Table 8. List of tetrahedra of the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Table 8. List of tetrahedra of the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Tetrahedra No.TetrahedraElementary Volumes
1Si-FeSi2-Al-CrSi20.2405
2CrSi2-FeSi2-CrSi-Al0.0845
3CrSi-Cr5Si3-Al-FeSi20.0525
4Cr5Si3-Cr3Si-Al-FeSi20.0465
5FeSi-FeSi2-Al-Cr3Si0.1416
6Fe5Si3-FeSi-Al-Cr3Si0.0865
7Fe2Si-Fe5Si3-Al-Cr3Si0.0263
8FeAl3-Al-Cr3Si-Fe2Si0.0693
9FeAl3-Fe2Al5-Cr3Si-Fe2Si0.0074
10Fe2Al5-FeAl-Cr3Si-Fe2Si0.0376
11FeAl-Fe-Cr3Si-Fe2Si0.0551
12Fe-Cr-Cr3Si-FeAl0.0494
13FeAl-Fe2Al5-Cr-Cr3Si0.0337
14Fe2Al5-Cr-Cr3Si-Cr2Al0.0144
15Fe2Al5-Cr2Al-Cr5Al8-Cr3Si0.0168
16Fe2Al5-Cr4Al9-Cr5Al8-Cr3Si0.0058
17Fe2Al5-CrAl4-Cr4Al9-Cr3Si0.0093
18Fe2Al5-Cr2Al11-CrAl4-Cr3Si0.0045
19Fe2Al5-CrAl7-Cr2Al11-Cr3Si0.0029
20FeAl3-Fe2Al5-CrAl7-Cr3Si0.0014
21Al-FeAl3-CrAl7-Cr3Si0.0134
Amount0.9994
Table 9. List of elementary tetrahedra, their volumes and coefficients of equations to calculate the equilibrium ratios of secondary components of the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Table 9. List of elementary tetrahedra, their volumes and coefficients of equations to calculate the equilibrium ratios of secondary components of the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Initial
Components
CoefficientsPolytopes, Their Volumes and Transformation Coefficients
1234567891011
Si
FeSi2
Al
CrSi2
CrSi
CrSi2
Al
FeSi2
CrSi
Cr5Si3
Al
FeSi2
Cr5Si3
Cr3Si
Al
FeSi2
FeSi
Cr3Si
Al
FeSi2
FeSi
Cr3Si
Al
Fe5Si3
Fe2Si
Cr3Si
Al
Fe5Si3
FeAl3
Al
Cr3Si
Fe2Si
FeAl3
Fe2Al5
Cr3Si
Fe2Si
FeAl
Fe2Al5
Cr3Si
Fe2Si
FeAl
Fe
Cr3Si
Fe2Si
Volumes0.24050.08450.05250.04650.1416160.0864960.0262880.0693660.0074620.0376510.05512
Cra1−1.079−2.846157.19048−1.6344−2.9947.53922−24.80651.75301−8.913371.766620
a203.84615−6.19052.63441000−1.036039.63036−1.049630.71698
a300000001.179251.179251.179251.17925
a42.0790003.99401−6.539225.8065−0.89623−0.89623−0.89623−0.8962
Feb1−12.84615−7.1905−9.11832.99401−2.26477.451612.44499−12.43182.463960
b22−3.846156.190488.11828000−1.4449913.4318−1.463961
b300000000000
b40222−1.9943.26471−6.451610000
Alc10000000010.2955−2.040543.07692
c200000001−9.295453.04054−2.0769
c311111110000
c400000000000
Sid113.07101−2.33339.118280.53666−1.35144.44644−9.7799549.7272−9.855860
d20−2.071013.33333−8.11831.179251.179251.179255.77995−53.72735.85586−4
d300000000000
d40000−0.71591.17212−4.625685555
Initial
Components
CoefficientsPolytopes, Their Volumes and Transformation Coefficients
12131415161718192021
Fe
Cr
Cr3Si
FeAl
FeAl
Fe2Al5
Cr
Cr3Si
Fe2Al5
Cr
Cr3Si
Cr2Al
Fe2Al5
Cr5Al8
Cr3Si
Cr2Al
Fe2Al5
Cr4Al9
Cr5Al8
Cr4Al9
Fe2Al5
CrAl4
Cr3Si
Cr4Al9
Fe2Al5
CrAl4
Cr3Si
Cr2Al11
Fe2Al5
CrAl7
Cr3Si
Cr2Al11
FeAl3
Fe2Al5
CrAl7
Cr3Si
FeAl3
Al
CrAl7
Cr3Si
Volumes0.04940.0337440.014460.0168010.0058530.0093640.0045440.0029610.0014450.013428
Cra10−2.0405000000−37.36870
a213.040541−0.860666.34118−3.9632311.2273−17.232633.7391−3.6296
a3000000004.629634.62963
a40001.86066−5.34124.96323−10.227318.232600
Feb1102.207512.207512.207512.207512.207512.20751−12.43182.44499
b2004.54252−3.909556.54894−4.093094.73854−7.2731113.4318−1.445
b30−5.57900000000
b406.57895−5.752.70204−7.75652.88558−5.946056.0656100
Alc1−2.0769000000010.29550
c200−3.76193.2377−5.42353.38971−3.924246.02325−9.295451
c30100000000
c43.0769204.7619−2.23776.42353−2.389714.92424−5.0232600
Sid102.46396000000208.4780
d2−5.579−1.464−5.5794.80155−35.37722.1107−62.636496.1395−188.22820.2495
d36.5789506.578956.578956.578956.578956.578956.57895−25.8285−25.828
d4000−10.380529.7982−27.689657.0574−101.7196.578956.57895
Table 10. The chemical composition of complex alloys based on the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Table 10. The chemical composition of complex alloys based on the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
MaterialThe Chemical Composition, %
CrSiAlFeCPSTiCa
Complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy
AS65Cr1515.7153.410.4713.250.540.0370.070.581.40
AS65Cr2020.3348.4813.2115.090.750.0280.0470.661.10
AS60Cr2525.549.4110.7911.250.400.0460.0330.310.86
AS60Cr3028.9547.1510.1211.250.560.050.040.420.94
Complex aluminum–chromium–silicon (ACS) alloy
ACS No.1 alloy33.423.5713.0724.290.690.100.006-0.06
ACS No.2 alloy41.8827.4210.7316.620.580.080.005-0.16
ACS No.3 alloy61.6114.400.1715.390.35-0.004-0.32
Table 11. The standard phase compositions of complex alloys based on the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Table 11. The standard phase compositions of complex alloys based on the Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
MaterialThe Standard Phase Composition, %TetrahedronVolume
SiFeSi2AlCrSi2CrSiCr5Si3FeAlFeCr3SiFe2Si
Complex aluminum–silicon–chromium alloy
AS65Cr1525.028.5411.2835.18------Si-FeSi2-Al-CrSi2 (No.1)0.2405
AS65Cr2011.7831.0813.643.53------Si-FeSi2-Al-CrSi2 (No.1)0.2405
AS60Cr2510.9923.211.1354.68------Si-FeSi2-Al-CrSi2 (No.1)0.2405
AS60Cr3017.6923.0810.3848.85------Si-FeSi2-Al-CrSi2 (No.1)0.2405
Complex aluminum–chromium–silicon (ACS) alloy
ACS No.1 alloy-51.513.85-11.1523.50----CrSi-Cr5Si3-Al-FeSi2 (No.3)0.0525
ACS No.2 alloy-34.411.141.7412.75-----CrSi2-FeSi2-CrSi-Al (No.2)0.0845
ACS No.3 alloy------0.551.7579.3418.35FeAl-Fe-Cr3Si-Fe2Si (No.11)0.05512
Table 12. Components of complex chromium alloys based on the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
Table 12. Components of complex chromium alloys based on the metal Cr-Fe-Al-Si system.
NameComponent, %
CrSiAlFe
Aluminum–silicon–chromium grade: AS65Cr1516.9257.5311.2814.27
Aluminum–silicon–chromium grade: AS65Cr2020.9449.9213.615.54
Aluminum–silicon–chromium grade: AS60Cr2526.350,9711.1311.6
Aluminum–silicon–chromium grade: AS60Cr3029.748.3810.3811.54
ACS No.1 alloy35.4124.9913.8525.75
ACS No.2 alloy43.3328.3711.1017.20
ACS No.3 alloy67.2815.730.1816.81
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shabanov, Y.; Zhumagaliyev, Y.; Nurgali, N.; Dossekenov, M.; Almuratova, K.; Orynbassar, R.; Kainenova, T.; Bakirova, B.; Kanapiyeva, F.; Zhunussova, E. Exploring Alloy Composition Dynamics: Thermodynamic Analysis of Fe-Al-Si-Cr System in Homogeneous Liquid State. Processes 2024, 12, 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091947

AMA Style

Shabanov Y, Zhumagaliyev Y, Nurgali N, Dossekenov M, Almuratova K, Orynbassar R, Kainenova T, Bakirova B, Kanapiyeva F, Zhunussova E. Exploring Alloy Composition Dynamics: Thermodynamic Analysis of Fe-Al-Si-Cr System in Homogeneous Liquid State. Processes. 2024; 12(9):1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091947

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shabanov, Yerbol, Yerlan Zhumagaliyev, Nurzhan Nurgali, Murat Dossekenov, Karlyga Almuratova, Raigul Orynbassar, Tursyngul Kainenova, Botagoz Bakirova, Fatima Kanapiyeva, and Elvira Zhunussova. 2024. "Exploring Alloy Composition Dynamics: Thermodynamic Analysis of Fe-Al-Si-Cr System in Homogeneous Liquid State" Processes 12, no. 9: 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091947

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop