Next Article in Journal
Influence of the Degumming Process Parameters on the Formation of Glyceryl Esters and 3-MCPDE in Refined Palm Oil: Optimization and Palm Oil Quality Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
Pasta-Making Process: A Narrative Review on the Relation between Process Variables and Pasta Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Application of High-Intensity Ultrasound to Improve Food Processing Efficiency: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Kernel Size and Its Potential Interaction with Genotype on Key Quality Traits of Durum Wheat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Development of Novel Pasta Products with Evidence Based Impacts on Health—A Review

Department of Primary Industries, Tamworth Agricultural Institute, 4 Marsden Park Road, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia
Foods 2022, 11(1), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010123
Submission received: 29 November 2021 / Revised: 28 December 2021 / Accepted: 30 December 2021 / Published: 4 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Durum Wheat Products - Recent Advances)

Abstract

:
Pasta made from durum wheat is a widely consumed worldwide and is a healthy and convenient food. In the last two decades, there has been much research effort into improving the nutritional value of pasta by inclusion of nonconventional ingredients due to the demand by health-conscious consumers for functional foods. These ingredients can affect the technological properties of the pasta, but their health impacts are not always measured rather inferred. This review provides an overview of pasta made from durum wheat where the semolina is substituted in part with a range of ingredients (barley fractions, dietary fibre sources, fish ingredients, herbs, inulin, resistant starches, legumes, vegetables and protein extracts). Impacts on pasta technological properties and in vitro measures of phytonutrient enhancement or changes to starch digestion are included. Emphasis is on the literature that provides clinical or animal trial data on the health benefits of the functional pasta.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Carbohydrates in foods are an important source of energy for humans, with cereals, tubers and pulses being the main dietary sources. Pasta is a popular food worldwide known for its ease of preparation, good storage stability (dried form), low cost, simple preparation with a low glycaemic index (GI). Pasta consists mostly of carbohydrates (70–76%), protein (~10–14%), lipids (~1.8%), dietary fibre (~2.9%) and small amounts of minerals and vitamins [1]. Pasta is made from either semolina (derived from durum wheat (Tritcum turgidum var. durum Desf.) or common wheat flour (aestivum) usually when supply of durum is limited or the price too high) mixed with water and mechanical energy input (mixing, extrusion, lamination) to produce a crumbly dough (~28–32% w/w water) either on an industrial or artisan scale producing a fresh pasta, which can then be dried. However, pasta has low amounts of dietary fibre, vitamins, essential amino acids and minerals [1] and during milling to make semolina there is some loss of these components. Pasta can be considered a good vehicle for including bioactive ingredients (proteins, phytochemicals, minerals, vitamins, etc.) as recognised by the World Health Organization and U.S. Food and Drug Administration because in some situations, up to 10–15% of non-traditional ingredients can be added without major loss of pasta quality depending on the ingredient and pasta processing technology employed [2,3]. However, the benefit of the added ingredient purported to provide, can be limited with such a low incorporation level. While designing foods with biologically active compounds, the resultant food often has technological deficiencies, undesirable appearance and sensorial properties making them less attractive to consumers or simply uneconomic to manufacture.
Increasingly many consumers in more wealthy economies are more interested in food that provides a benefit to prevent or reduce nutritional related diseases than was the case a decade or two ago. The main so called “lifestyle or civilisation” diseases have been associated with a combination of excessive caloric intake, poor nutrient balance and lack of sufficient exercise include obesity, overweight, elevated blood pressure, elevated blood cholesterol, cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancers, alimentary system disorders and type II diabetes mellitus (2-DM). These diseases afflict a large percentage of the population of westernized countries, with the trend continuing to worsen in developing nations and these diseases represent the main non-communicable cause of death [4]. The term functional food was developed first in Japan defined by the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences as “any modified food or food ingredient that may provide a health benefit beyond that of the nutrients it contains” [5]. More common now is the consumer demand for food that not only provides additional health benefits but tastes good and has the texture and flavour close to the traditional food. Adding a functional ingredient will increase the cost of the food which, if a health benefit can be demonstrated, many consumers are likely to pay in discerning markets.
Increasing demand by a growing number of health-conscious consumers for healthy foods has garnered interest from food manufacturers and a plethora of studies exist in the literature today [4,6]. Within the last decade or so, there has been a trend towards manufacturers trying to improve the nutritional value or create a presumed health benefit by supplementing semolina with various ingredients either as a partial replacement of the semolina or a complete replacement [3]. This approach is a powerful strategy for improving diet and wellbeing. Typical strategies employed to create a functional pasta are summarised in Table 1.
Creating genetically modified wheat through transgenic or non-transgenic (TILLING, CRISPR-Cas9) or conventional breeding to modify starch, protein and lipid composition is an ambitious strategy gaining interest by breeders but is very much in its infancy. For example, a high amylose durum wheat was developed using TILLING showing that the GI of durum pasta, already low–medium, can be further reduced with the right starch biosynthetic enzyme mutation [7]. Beta-carotene has already been expressed in a genetically engineered rice cultivar, named Golden Rice to benefit people with vitamin A deficiency in developing countries [8]. Breeding durum wheat for enhanced functional or medicinal value is a new concept that has yet to take-off in commercial plant breeding programs and traditionally plant breeding of crop species has mostly focussed on yield, quality, biotic and abiotic tolerance but not food nutrition or health benefits. Research arising from the HEALTHGRAIN project between 2005–2010 described the genetic variation of key grain nutrient components and tools were developed for breeders for selecting cultivars with high levels of healthy compounds [9] but commercial application has been limited until recently. Some programs have begun work in this area and the reader is referred to the review by Yu and Tian [8]. Pasta made from pseudocereals (amaranth, buckwheat, quinoa) or blends with wheat flour are rich in micronutrients, phytonutrients, gluten free, with a more balanced amino acid profile than rice, wheat and maize, could be another route to have “ready-made” functional cereal products [10]. Ancient grains that can be readily made into flours can also provide some benefits although the evidence for their functional value is unclear [11]. Gluten free pasta can address the needs of the celiac person who must avoid gluten to prevent symptoms of this disease while gluten intolerant individuals, which are on the increase in society, will choose these products over gluten containing pasta. Simply adding various nutrients by substituting some of the semolina or adding them in the water used to make the dough at various levels (1–20%) of ingredient(s) is the most common strategy used and a focus of this review (Table 1 and Table 2). To improve the total protein of pasta (beyond the typical 10–15% range) or improve the amount of essential amino acids lacking in pasta (lysine, threonine, methionine), common sources used for pasta include legumes, cereal germ, dairy powders (egg white, casein), bovine serum powders, fish proteins and microbial fermentation products [6]. During the milling of grains many vitamins are lost which can be overcome by adding vitamin-rich tissues such as spinach, tomatoes, mushrooms, calf liver, sunflower seeds, chicken or fish meat [6]. Cereal bran is a good source of fibre, and vegetable oils, seafood and fish oil are excellent sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids. See Table 2 for some studies relating to enhancing limiting nutrients in pasta.
Other avenues such as valorising cereal and non-cereal by-products is becoming more popular with a push to reduce food waste and create a circular food economy. Finally processing to modify the additive before its addition to the food, e.g., germination, fermentation, enzymic treatment, etc. is another approach to create a functional pasta. The aim of these strategies is to improve the nutritional and/or physiological functions from consuming such food on for example, gut health, immune system activity, mental status and/or to reduce the risk of specific pathologies for example cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and osteoporosis.
In designing a functional pasta consideration must be given to the form the food is consumed. Pasta is traditionally eaten cooked after boiling in water for several minutes. In processing the extrusion or lamination process introduces forces, the drying process uses high temperature and variable humidity, so all these can affect the functionality of the included active ingredient(s). Even during digestion in the human system, there can be a loss in efficacy of the active ingredient (bioavailability) [12]. An added challenge is to ensure that the added ingredient should have a minimal impact on the pasta quality, palatability and consumer appeal.
The present review aims to provide an overview of recently published scientific articles from the year 2000 to 2021 focussing on ingredients added to a durum wheat semolina –water formulation to make pasta with a functional benefit. However, where appropriate relevant pre-2000 references are included. Emphasis will be on more recent novel ingredients and evidence for demonstrated health benefits from animal or human trials rather than reports relying on the presumed benefit from only in vitro studies alone or assuming that the added ingredient’s known medicinal value transfers to the pasta consumed, which is not necessarily the case. While it might be a simple matter of adding an ingredient into the semolina–water mix at various percentages, the active ingredients functionality cannot be assured.
Review of methods Recent reviews on the impacts on the technological quality of the pasta with added functional ingredients have been published in the last decade and the reader is referred to these to supplement this review [2,3,4,6,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Many of the studies mentioned in these reviews and other publications have been summarised in Table 2. Most of these have not shown evidence of the impact of the added ingredient on human health. A focus of this review was to present studies where some clinical evidence for the health benefit of the functional pasta (made only from durum wheat) is presented either in human or animal studies. For the other studies, a summary is provided in the form of a table (Table 2) where the author has decided to present relevant studies from the perspective of the raw ingredient(s) added to the pasta formulae, the likely active ingredient providing the purported health benefit, impact on the pasta quality and functional value with some prediction over the possible in vivo benefit if clinical studies were performed. Areas not covered in this review include the effect of functional pasta ingredients from ancient grains and pseudocereals [10]; gluten free pasta [20,21]; cereal and non-cereal by-products [17] and pasta made with agro-industrial by-products [13] to keep the scope of this review manageable. Database searches were supplemented by manual searches of the reference lists of included reports and previous reviews. Language was restricted to English only. The search strategy used was last updated on 5 October 2021 (Table 3). Studies using common wheat to prepare pasta were not included.
Table 1. Strategies to create pasta with added nutritional functionality.
Table 1. Strategies to create pasta with added nutritional functionality.
ApproachIntentionReference
Genetically modify the composition of the grainEnhance a specific component of the grain[7,8]
  • conventional breeding
  • GMOs
  • Gene technologies—TILLING, CRISPR-Cas9
Substitute semolina with various levels (1–20+%) of ingredient(s)
with potential health value:
Functional foods: Increase protein content and quality; increase fibre, AO, phytochemicals, etc.[2,3,4,6,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]
  • Proteins, Fructo oligosaccharides, dietary fibre,
  • Prebiotics, ω-3 fatty acids, minerals, vitamins
  • Phytochemicals and probiotics
  • Legumes (chickpeas, red lentils, yellow peas, faba beans, soy)
  • Vegetables (pumpkin, zucchini, spinach, tomato)
  • Herbs (oregano leaves, parsley leaves)
  • Roots and tubers (cassava, sweet potato, beet, carrot)
  • Others (gums, resistant starch, modified starch, β-glucan, psyllium seed husk)
Composite floursReduce cost of pasta by replacing some/all durum semolina with common wheat flour and other flours[15]
  • Common wheat and durum wheat
  • Other cereal flours and durum wheat
Gluten free pastaGluten free diet, celiac diet[20,21]
Processing to modify the additive before its addition to the foodEnhance ingredient nutritional value, remove anti-nutritional factors
  • Germination
  • Fermentation
  • Enzymic treatment
  • Micronisation
[22]
[6,23,24]
[6]
[25,26]
Low value products/waste streamsValorisation of cereal and noncereal by-products
  • Bran fractions
  • Aleurone fractions
  • Grape marc, fruit pomace
  • Fish meal
  • Whey
  • Algae
[25,27,28]
[29]
[30]
[31,32]
[15,33]
[34]
Ancient grain/pseudocerealsValorisation of underutilised grains[10,15,35]
  • einkorn
  • emmer wheat
  • kamut
  • spelt
  • buckwheat
  • quinoa
  • amaranth
Table 2. Examples of pasta made with a combination of semolina and non-traditional ingredients.
Table 2. Examples of pasta made with a combination of semolina and non-traditional ingredients.
Ingredient AddedActive IngredientSubstitution RangeImpact on PastaPredicted Health Benefits from Data PresentedReference
Barley fractions or β-glucan
Barley Balance®β-glucan0, 7.5, 15, 20Provides AO, lowers IVSD, minimal impact on pasta making quality up to 7.5%Lower GI, cholesterol reduction, SCFA production[36]
Glucagel, Barley Balance® (BB)β-glucan0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10BB only reduced IVSD. Some impact on pasta making quality after 4%Lower GI, cholesterol reduction, SCFA production[37]
Barley β-glucan fibre fractionβ-glucan0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10lowers IVSD but reduced pasta making quality above 2.5%Lower GI, cholesterol reduction, SCFA production[38]
Barley fractionsβ-glucan0, 5, 20, 40Increased TDF, darker, acceptable sensory, lower total caloriesunknown[39]
Barley pearling fractionsβ-glucan50Higher TDF, pasta darker with good cooking qualitiesunknown[40]
β-glucan enriched barley flourβ-glucan40Increased β-glucan to 5% in pasta; pasta quality comparable to control; higher AO and TPA; reduced IVSDCould lower GI and enhance plasma oxidative defence[41]
Barley hull air classification fractionsβ-glucan50% coarse Fr; 45% coarse Fr + 5% gluten; 95% coarse Fr + 5% glutenIncreased TDF and β-glucan; Higher AO and flavan-3-ols, TPACould enhance plasma oxidative defence[42]
Soluble fibres: BB, psyllium, GR-inulin, HPX-inulin enriched pasta and doughsSoluble fibres15% individual fibre and dual combinations, 7.5% eachPasta containing BB individually and in combination with psyllium showed an overall sensory acceptability comparable to control and in vivo glycaemic index reduction of 33–37%Reduced pasta GI[43]
Oat (1,3)(1,4) β-d-glucansβ-glucan0, 5, 10, 15, 20Oat β-glucan increased pasta water absorption, fat, TDF, and increased cooking loss >5%, minimal impact on appearance but sensory acceptable up to 15%. 10–15% Oat β-glucan and 5% additive of vital wheat gluten and xanthan gum yielded functional pasta containing 3.3–5.5 g β-glucans/100 gOat claim for lowering GI, lowering cholesterol[44]
Other dietary fibres components
Guar gum, CMCSoluble fibresCMC: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5
GG: 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20
lowers IVSD with 20% GG but impacts pasta making quality; lowers IVSD with 1.5% CMC no impact on pasta making qualityLower GI unknown level needed[45]
Bran, pollardInsoluble fibresBran: 0, 10, 20, 30
Pollard: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60
Up to 10% pollard can be tolerated minimal impact pasta quality with elevated AO, TDF. Bran had negative impacts pasta at all doses but with enhanced TDF, AO with no effect on IVSDHigher TDF bowel health and transit[27]
Commercial sources of pea fibre, Inulin, GG, locust bean gum, Xanthan gum, Bamboo fibre, HISol (B-glucan)Non-starch polysaccharides, inulin0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10Increased cooking loss and reduced starch and protein and effects on texture varied with non-starch polysaccharides used and quantity with 5% the limit. Fresh pasta only usedHigher TDF bowel health and transit; lower GI likely, enhanced Ca absorption[14]
Debranning fractions (DF) and micronized debranned kernels (MK)AO, phenolicsDF 30%; MK 100%Higher content of phenolic compounds with minimal effects on pasta sensory propertiesHigher TDF bowel health and transit[46]
Phenolic extractPhenolicsPhenolic extract liquid replaces water used in pasta makingDough was weakened, pasta was more brown and sensory scores impaired (more bitter and salty)Poor strategy to enhance phenolics in pasta[25]
Long-chain inulin (HPX), short-chain inulin (GR), Glucagel, psyllium and oat material added individually and in combinationsInulin, β-glucan, dietary fibre15Addition of DF individually and in combination increased pasta optimum cooking time, cooking loss, water absorption and a deterioration in texture and colour values compared to non-DF enriched control. Oat bran flour with another DF gave the best pasta while psyllium fibre was the worstHigher TDF[47]
Wheat, rice, barley, oat bransInsoluble fibres0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25Decreasing sensory acceptability and colour and increase in cooking loss with increasing dose, least impact with oat branunknown[28]
Dephytinized rice, rye, wheat, oatInsoluble fibres20A 1.7–2.9% increase in pasta TDF. Increased TPA andF AO and Ca, P, K, Mg, Zn with significantly reduced phytic acid contentHigher TDF bowel health and transit[48]
Whole wheat durum pastaWholegrain componentsWhole wheat vs. regular pastaWhole wheat dough is weaker, pasta is reddish-brown with higher cooking loss, lower firmness in cooked product and reduced mechanical strength of dried compared to regular pastaPotentially multiple benefits, likely lower GI[49]
Micronized wheat bran with CMC, XG, locus bean gumInsoluble fibres and gums11.5Egg tagliatelle pasta with added XG > 0.8% improved textural properties and CMC >0.6% to enhance yellowness was found to produce a healthier pasta product with higher content of fibre, minerals and vitamins and suitable qualityHigher TDF and potential health benefits from this[26]
High fibre oat pastaSoluble and insoluble fibre10, 20Oat fibre increased pasta TDF ~8% but increased water absorption and cooking loss, decreased brightness and firmness and impacts reduced using fine (volume mean diameter, μm 50.5) vs. medium (141) and coarse (249) oat powderOat claim for lowering GI, lowering cholesterol[50]
Fish products and algae
Spirulina microalgae enriched pastawater-soluble pigments and phycocyanin and phenolic compounds3The technological properties of pasta were affected, but overall acceptability index (85.13%) not influenced by microspheres. Microencapsulated spirulina protects the microalgae’s antioxidant potentialBenefits from AO[34]
Pastas with added concentrates of flesh and skin from aquaculture seabassSource of polyunsaturated fatty acids and mineralsconcentrate fish flesh powder 10, concentrate fish skin powder, 20Increased Ω-3 fatty acids in pastas with fish concentrates, decrease in the Ω6/Ω3 ratio that greatly exceeds current nutritional guidelines. All pastas showed a low valuation in negative attributes such as oil, or rancidity flavours. Main differences detected were colour, fishy flavour, odour, and texture (chewiness)Possible improved cardiovascular health markers[51]
Salmon fish (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha) powder (SFP) supplemented pastaAntioxidants and other carotenoids5, 10, 15, 20SFP addition to pasta increased the release of phenolic compounds and AO activity from pasta during digestion to achieve higher levels than control pasta and also reduced the in vitro starch digestibilityLowers GI[31]
Pasta formulation was substituted with shrimp meatOmega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids10, 20, 30shrimp meat (P. monodon) can be added up to 20% without drastically affecting the sensory attributes of pasta with enhanced nutritional quality (protein, fat and ash content)unknown[32]
Herbs
Dried amaranth leaves and amaranth seed flour pastaPeptides derived from protein, source AO, phenolic acids, flavonoids, carotenoidsamaranth seed flour, 21.25–50.97% and dried amaranth leaves, 0–5.61%.Pasta with amaranth seed flour and dried amaranth leaves exhibited significantly higher content of protein, crude fibre, minerals with higher AO but panellists preferred pastas with low percentage levels of amaranth seed flourBenefits from AO anti-hypertensive, anti-oxidant, antithrombotic, anti-proliferative, and anti-inflammatory activities[35]
Wild edible plants, Pereskia aculeata Miller or American gooseberry dried leaf flour enriched pastaSource of protein and lysine, soluble fibre, minerals, vitamins0, 10, 20Improved pasta dietary fibre, calcium, iron compared to the control pasta. Enriched pasta presented a greenish fibrous appearance. Sensory evaluations indicated that pasta enriched with 10% did not affect consumer acceptanceconstipation, obesity (high satiety due the dietary fibre content)[52]
Inulin addition
Inulin enriched pastaInulin0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 20The higher molecular weight inulin had minimal impact on pasta quality and sensory properties until 20% while lower MW inulin had more negative impacts on pasta firmness, cooking loss, and sensory acceptability. IVSD was reduced in pasta with inulin higher MW inulin up to 5% but was increased with 20% inulin. Inulin enhanced the gluten structure in pasta with higher starch crystallinityLower GI[53]
Fresh pasta with inulin (FRUTAFIT HD)Inulin0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10Inulin was shown to influence the swelling index and firmness, but not the adhesiveness and elasticity of pasta products and lowered IVSDLower GI[54]
Legume addition
Chickpea flourphytic acid, sterols, tannins, carotenoids, as isoflavones5–20Increased protein content; sensory properties (colour, flavour and overall acceptability) improved up to 10%; >30% led to lasagne processing handling and cooking characteristics deterioration and soft mushy pastaHigher quality protein with good balance of amino acids[55]
Desi chickpea ‘besan’ flourphytic acid, sterols, tannins, carotenoids, as isoflavones0, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30Up to 15% chickpea can be tolerated in spaghetti with acceptable pasta making qualityHigher lysine and protein content[56]
Legume pasta (mung, soya, red spit lentil, chickpea)Soluble and insoluble fibres10No negative impact on technological quality or IVSDHigher TDF and potential health benefits from this[57]
Black chickpea flour and fermented black chickpea dough pastaphytic acid, sterols, tannins, carotenoids, as isoflavones5.6 (Black chickpea flour), 15 (black chickpea dough)Fermentation enabled release of 20% of bound phenolic compounds in the dough, higher resistant starch and total free amino acids while antinutritional factors significantly decreased. Fortified pasta had higher in vitro protein digestibility (up to 38%) and higher AO levels. Fermentation reduced antinutritional elements in the black chickpea flour. Sensory acceptance while different to control described a peculiar but appreciated profile of the fortified samples, especially for the pasta including fermented black chickpea dough. unknown[58]
Lentil flour and CMCproteins, dietary fibres, oligosaccharides, starch, polyphenols, fatty acids, and antioxidants and prebiotics40 (lentil)
2 (CMC)
Lentil fortified spaghetti increased essential amino acids but caused a decrease in pasta quality (e.g., higher cooking loss, lower breaking energy) that was improved by adding CMCunknown[59]
Mexican common bean flourproteins, vitamins, complex carbohydrates and minerals0, 15, 30The cooking time and water absorption decreased and cooking loss increased to unacceptable levels, firmness decreased and pasta was darker as a function of the bean flour percentage. Protein increased. Increases of furosine and marginal increases in phenolic contents in pastaBenefits from TPA[23]
Faba bean pastaEssential amino acids0, 30, 70, 100Faba enriched pasta weakened the protein network that could be responsible for the increase in the in vitro protein digestion but led to high cooking loss and reduced resilience in cooked product. Very high temperature drying strengthened the protein structure of pasta, resulting in increased integrity and better resilience of pasta without altering their in vitro protein digestibility. Appreciation of legume pasta containing 80% or 100% was similar to that of commercial whole wheat pastaunknown[60]
Pasta with added chickpea flourFibre, proteins20, 40Protein, ash, lipid, and dietary fibre and RS content increased by adding chickpea flour to the pasta. The starch hydrolysis index decreased as chickpea flour in the pasta increased, with a lower predicted glycaemic index than durum wheat-control pasta. Lower GI[61]
Yellow pea pastaalkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, isoflavones, phenols, phytosterols, phytic acid, protease inhibitors, saponins, tannins0, 10, 20, 3020% yellow pea flour had favourable sensory attributes, protein content, good texture, yellowness values, reduction in the glucose release and increased protein digestibility. Dough was weaker while product appearance similar to controlLower GI[62]
Pasta with split pea and faba beanFibre, protein, vitamins and minerals35Increased cooking loss, lower pasta breaking energy, altered sensory properties (higher hardness and fracturability). High drying temperature improved slightly but pasta redness increased to undesirable levels with very high T dryingHigher TDF and potential health benefits from this[63]
Pasta with added germinated pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)low fat, fibre, proteins and starch, balanced of minerals0, 5, 8, 10Germination of pigeon pea reduced antinutritional components and increased vitamin B2, E and C. Good acceptability, higher protein, total available sugars, dietary fibre, micronutrients, and vitamins than pasta made from 100% semolina but impacts on pasta making quality (shorter cooking time, higher water absorption and cooking loss)Vitamins, fibre, better protein balance[22]
Corn gluten meal enriched pastaHigh protein source0, 5, 10Corn gluten meal increased pasta protein content, had a similar cooked weight and cooking loss but was less firm with inferior colour compared with the control. The overall flavour quality score of the spaghetti decreasedUnknown[64]
Lupin addition
Lupin flour to replace semolinaHigh protein and fibre source0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50Minimal impacts on pasta cooking loss and dry pasta colour and no difference in sensory acceptability up to 20% but α-galactosides and antinutritional factors like phytic acid, saponins, lectins and protease inhibitors reduce protein digestibilityunknown[65]
Lupin protein isolateProteins, AO, TDF0, 5, 17, 30Lupin protein isolate increased protein up to 129%, reduced pasta cooking time, water absorption and cooked firmness while stickiness
and cooking loss were increased. Lupin protein isolate made the dried pasta more red and yellow and decreased brightness. The percentage of starch digested under in vitro conditions was reduced using 17% lupin protein isolate
Reduced GI[66]
α-galactosides free lupin flourHigh protein and fibre source0, 50, 80, 100α-galactosides free lupin flour can improve pasta nutritional value without flatulent causing oligosaccharidesunknown[22]
Protein addition
Lupin protein isolateHigh protein and fibre source0, 5, 17, 30Lupin protein isolate increased protein, reduced cooking time, water absorption and firmness but stickiness and cooking loss increased making dried pasta dullerunknown[66]
Durum bran protein concentrateHigh in phytosterols, protein and EAA0, 1 5, 10, 20Pasta quality acceptable up to 10% and enriched in EAABenefits from better protein quality[67,68,69]
Whey enriched pastaHigh in protein and EAA0, 20Whey addition increased protein content, and pasta water uptake with minimal impact on sensory qualityunknown[33]
Beef lung powder enriched pastaHigh in protein and EAA, Fe0, 10, 15, 20Pasta had higher cooking loss, cooked pasta was firmer and much darker than control with reduced IVSD, higher Fe and protein contentLowers GI[70]
Mustard protein isolate enriched pastaHigh in protein and EAA0, 2.5, 5, 10Increased pasta protein while cooking loss, cooked weight and stickiness decreased and firmness increased while pasta is duller and more redUnknown[71]
Phaseolus vulgaris protein hydrolysateangiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity (ACE) and AO0, 5, 10Pasta with bean had higher protein content with good sensory acceptability up to 10% with ACE and AO activityBP regulation[72]
Resistant starch
Hi Maize™ RSII and Novelose 330™ (RSIII) enriched pastaResistant starchRSII: 0, 10, 20, 50
RSIII: 0, 10, 20
Minimal impact on pasta quality using these ingredients up to 20% while increasing RS content of pasta, stable after cooking. Both RS reduced IVSDLower GI gut health benefits from RS[73]
Hi Maize260™, Hi Maize1043™, RSII and Fibersym70™ (RSIV) enriched pastaResistant starch0, 10, 20RS addition had minimal impact on pasta quality and acceptability while reducing the IVSDLower GI gut health benefits from RS[73,74]
Unripe banana fibreStarch from unripe banana flour0, 5, 10, 15, 20Increased pasta RS, decreased gluten, was darker, higher cooking loss and firmness lower while sensory analysis found banana starch improved acceptability up to 15% but this analysis was limitedUnknown[75]
Pastas with elderberry juice Concentrate (EJC) and Hi-maize starch or apple pectinphenolic acids, anthocyanins, flavanols, carotenoids, vitamins and minerals, soluble DF10 g Hi-maize starch, pectin or combination, and diluted elderberry juice concentrate (50 mL per 50 g flour)Adding EJC to fettuccine pastas reduced the firmness, wettability and volume expansion of the fresh pastas, but Increased protein, total DF content, total antioxidant activity and total extracted TPA contentAO and TDF mostly from insoluble fibre[76]
Vegetables
Stems of Opuntia ficus-indica (cladodes), dried and ground and extracted (Opuntia cladode extract )Rich in soluble fibre (arabinose, galactose, rhamnose, xylose and galacturonic acid)0, 10, 20, 30 mL substituting the added water used to prepare pastaComparable quality and sensory acceptability using up to 10–20% Opuntia cladode extract. IVSD decreased with increasing level of Opuntia cladode extract and cholesterol bioaccessibility decreased which could reduce blood cholesterolBlood cholesterol- and glucose-lowering capabilities[77]
Carrot leaf meal and Oregano leaf mealalpha-linolenic acid, omega-3 fatty acids0, 5, 10 of each and combinationsIncreased AO, and omega-3 fatty acid content from as little as 5% but pasta with higher cooking loss, shorter optimum cooking time, reduced weight increase but all formulations were acceptable by sensory the best being 10% oregano and carrot leaf mealUnknown[78]
Soy okra soybean by-productprotein, lipid, dietary fibre isoflavones, phytosterols, coumestans, lignans, phytates, and saponins0, 10, 20, 30, 40Increasing soy okra flour reduced pasta optimum cooking time, increased cooking loss and altered taste, texture and colour tolerating only 10%. However, AO and total phenolic contents increased and predicted GI (IVSD) decreasedLower GI, TPA presumed benefits[79]
Mushroom powder (white button, shiitake and porcini)proteins, acidic polysaccharides, dietary fibre and antioxidants0, 5, 10, 15mushroom powder increased pasta cooking loss and cooked firmness The addition of shiitake mushroom powder resulted in pasta with the highest firmness and tensile strengthunknown[80]
Tomato peelAntioxidants, carotenoids, DF0, 10, 15Detrimental effect on pasta such as colour, break resistance, high firmness, reduced cooking loss, inferior sensory taste and overall quality at 10% and higher. However, by adding CMC or gums could negate some of these effects on sensory. Nutritionally tomato peel enhanced b-carotene, lycopene and TDFto scavenge reactive oxygen species and protect against degenerative diseases like cancer and cardiovascular diseases[20]
Onion powderFlavonoids, Quercetin, Proteins, saponins and phenolic components0, 5, 10, 15Onion powder up to 10% does not affects sensory characteristics and provides 2.2 mg/100 g of quercetinUnknown[81]
Table 3. Database search history showing database, search term and number of hits.
Table 3. Database search history showing database, search term and number of hits.
Web of Science (2000–2021)
Pasta and human healthGlycaemic index and pastaCardiovascular disease and durum pastaDiabetes and durum pastaObesity and durum pastaInsulin and durum pastaDietary fibre and durum pastaCholesterol and durum pasta
27198858534
PubMed (2000–2021)
Pasta and healthCVD and durum wheat pastadiabetes and durum wheat pastaobesity and durum wheat pastaweight gain and durum wheat pastacancer and durum wheat pastainsulin and durum wheat pastacholesterol and durum wheat pastadietary fibre and durum wheat pastadietary fibre and durum wheat pasta and health
707655331586220
Cochrane Registry
durum pasta and obesitydurum pasta and CVDdurum pasta and weight gaindurum pasta and cancerdurum pasta and insulindurum pasta and dietary fibre and healthdurum pasta and cholesterol
0121601

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Health Based Evidence for Functional Pasta

Different approaches can be used to enhance the nutritional and potentially health promoting properties of pasta. Consuming pasta simply as a wholegrain or wholemeal product which has been available commercially for many years is probably the simplest way. Wholemeal pasta is when bran has been added back to the semolina, while wholegrain pasta refers to “the intact, cracked, ground or flaked caryopsis, whose anatomical parts, endosperm, bran and germ are found in the same quantity as present in the intact original grain” [82]. Since the bran and germ contain many biologically active compounds such as vitamins, minerals, essential fatty acids, amino acids and many phytochemicals, they have been linked to reducing the risk of many lifestyle diseases [83]. However, consumer preference is for pasta made from refined semolina or flour due to better taste, appearance and texture despite fewer health benefits compared to wholemeal/wholegrain counterparts. Other approaches to enhance the nutritional properties of pasta include the addition of specific ingredients or combination of ingredients to provide specific functionalities based on knowledge about their function in isolation or from research studies in other foods. To enhance the consumption of pasta with added health benefits researchers, industry and relevant agencies need to overcome some of the barriers to their uptake such as improving the sensory quality, processing issues (cooking time), availability and media mixed messages.
Studies where health promoting ingredients have been added to pasta and evidence of a health affect using animal, human clinical studies or in vivo measurements are discussed. These are divided into the major disease risk categories.

2.1.1. Hypoglycaemic Effects

Lowering the absorption of carbohydrate into the blood stream from the intestine has been shown to reduce the risk of developing metabolic disease and type II diabetes mellitus (2-DM) while lowering insulin demand caused by eating slowly absorbed carbohydrates less likely to induce insulin resistance in healthy people [84]. It has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo that durum wheat pasta made from a high amylose durum wheat (with elevated resistant starch), at least above ~50%, reduces the postprandial glycaemic response (PPGR) compared to regular durum wheat pasta with amylose 25–30% [7]. Food structure plays an important role in determining a foods glycaemic response. Both the compact structure of pasta and the presence of the gluten network which surrounds the starch granules together interferes with α-amylase breakdown of the starch is thought to be the mechanism for this effect [85,86,87]. Similarly in noodles [88] fed 12 healthy subjects noodles with amylose contents ranging from 15–45% obtained by blending high amylose wheat flour and showed a reduction in the PPGR in the 45% amylose noodles compared to the low amylose, 15% noodles but no difference to the 19.6% amylose noodles. This is supported by earlier studies substituting semolina for high amylose (>75%) maize flour in pasta with significantly lower PPGR and postprandial insulin levels [89].
Other ingredients added to pasta have also shown a reduction in the glycaemic response and some studies are discussed. Lupin (Lupinus albus) flour contains a protein called ϒ-conglutin, shown to decrease glycaemia in humans and an extract enriched in this protein was added to pasta (125 mg of pure protein in 100 g of pasta) which was fed to hyperglycaemic rats as uncooked food for three weeks. The protein enriched pasta with ϒ-conglutin led to a decrease in food intake, and a reduction in glycaemia [90]. Authors noted that their results could have been affected by the lower carbohydrate content in the lupin meal with respect to the control and that the pasta was not cooked before feeding as the stability of the ϒ-conglutin protein could have been affected. Goñi and Valentín-Gamazo (2003) [91] fed 12 healthy subjects test meals of durum spaghetti and spaghetti containing 25% chickpea flour and the latter had significantly lower GI than the regular spaghetti as well as increasing the mineral, fat and indigestible content of the pasta. Authors suggested this was due to the presence in the chickpea flour of non-starch polysaccharides resistant to enzymic digestion.
Soluble dietary fibres such as β-glucan, guar gum, psyllium and alginate can reduce elevations in postprandial glucose [92,93] because of their viscosity properties which adjusts the rate of gastric emptying. The insulin response of 11 healthy males fed a high fibre pasta made from 40% barley flour high in β-glucan was compared to regular wheat flour pasta. Carbohydrate was more slowly absorbed from the high fibre pasta with a reduced insulin response [94]. Some of these components are already present in certain foods (β-glucan rich sources are oats and barley; Plantago ovata plant for psyllium) and efforts to isolate these fibre components for use as supplemental dietary fibre in functional food design is attractive. To be certain of the effectiveness of the active ingredient, food processing and the form of food consumption (cooked, steamed, etc.) may modify the food structure, ingredient stability and fibre viscosity and potentially impact any proposed health claims. Thus, food manufacturing process may or may not preserve the beneficial properties of the added ingredient and should be considered.
Pasta made from debranned durum wheat flour, enriched in polyphenols and with added barley β-glucan and Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 (probiotic) had good cooking quality with high content of bound ferulic acid compared to control pasta. The probiotic strain remained viable during the pasta-making and cooking processes. However, the PPGR measured in healthy volunteers was no different to control pasta [95]. Frost et al. (2003) [96] included soluble fibre psyllium into pasta to see the impact of a viscous fibre fed to 10 subjects. While there was no effect on gastric emptying or the incremental area under the curve for glucagon-like peptide 1 compared with the control pasta, the added polyunsaturated fat (30 g) and sodium propionate (3 g) in the pasta recipe did alter these parameters which could reduce the risk of diabetes and improve coronary risk factor profiles. Authors suggested the combined high-fat meal with psyllium-enriched pasta may affect the intestinal milieu, affecting carbohydrate digestion and glucose uptake from the small intestine with slower rates of gastric emptying [96]. The addition of fat to a food can reduce glucose response to carbohydrate.
Evidence for efficacy of soluble fibres on PPGR in other foods is extensive [97] but there are issues with their application particularly with regards to sensory acceptance, due to the requirement for relatively large quantities necessary to confer the intended health benefit. To maximize the bioavailability and physiological effects of soluble DF in relation to PPGR, functional food design and assessing processing effects is needed. For example, during extrusion there are forces and heat developed that can reduce the soluble fibre molecular weight, reducing viscosity and effectiveness on PPGR [98]. The most effective soluble fibre from clinical studies in attenuating the PPGR when consumed with a high carbohydrate food like pasta seems to be β-glucan provided it undergoes minimal processing [99]. This efficacy can be diminished with food processing for example Bourdon et al. (1999) [94] found no effect on PPGR when β-glucan was added to pasta because the food structure was not altered by the food processing. More research is needed to develop food manufacturing procedures that minimise disruptions to pasta structure and the resulting viscosity. While a positive effect on PPGR in clinical studies is desirable, longer clinical trials are needed to establish a link between attenuation of blood glycaemia and a reduction in incidence of lifestyle diseases related to PPGR.
Taha and Wasif (1996) [100] fed diabetic rats a diet consisting of semolina only pasta, or wholemeal pasta or wholemeal pasta supplemented with 12% soy flour and 3% methionine for 28 days. They showed that the latter pasta diet lowered total glycerides and cholesterol, and within 10 d, it lowered the PPGR compared to rats fed only semolina or wholemeal pasta, which was maintained at a lower level over the study period. Using wholegrain pasta as a control, pasta containing barley β-glucans and Bacillus coagulans BC30, 6086 were fed to healthy overweight or obese volunteers (n = 41) for a 12-week intervention study. The study found that a daily serving of symbiotic whole-grain pasta reduced glycaemia (plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) and plasma LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio [101].
Recently, a review of the GI of 74 pasta products consisting of refined and wholewheat pasta made from durum semolina or white wheat flour, together with pasta made with added egg or legumes or vegetable or algae or other ingredients were described. This database of pasta GI studies (minimum 10 subjects) show a large variability with GI ranging from 18 to 93. Most pasta products had low to medium GI with the median value of 52.5, which is low GI < 55 by definition [102]. The variability within each group reflects the different processing methods for manufacturing, and different subject groups and laboratories conducting the GI test, but, overall, the review concludes that pasta is generally a low GI food. Details on the influence of pasta processing on starch digestion is discussed elsewhere [103].

2.1.2. Hypocholesterolemic Properties and Beneficial Effects on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)

Attempts to reduce the risk of CVD with diet are varied and aim to prevent the move towards use of drugs which impart their own risks. Recent guidelines recommend consumption of functional foods with evidence from epidemiological studies indicating adequate consumption of whole-wheat or wholegrain foods is associated with reduced CVD risk [104,105]. Favari et al. (2020) [106] fed 41 subjects daily for 12 weeks a whole-wheat pasta (control) and a new innovative whole-wheat pasta enriched in barley β-glucans (2.3 g/100 g) and supplemented with spores of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 (108–109 CFU/100 g). They showed improvement in serum cholesterol efflux capacity in overweight/obese participants, indicating the potential of a functional food to improve athero-protective high-density lipoprotein cholesterol function. Patients with hypercholesterolemia fed a soy-germ-enriched pasta containing isoflavone aglycons displayed improved serum lipid markers of cardiovascular risk [107]. A similar study in patients with T2D [108] showed the same soy-germ-enriched pasta significantly reduced blood pressure, and oxidative stress thought to be due to the high antioxidant capacity of the isoflavones in soy protein [109].
Use of non-live bacterial cells (paraprobiotics defined as inactivated microbial cells or cell fractions) as alternative to probiotics decreases risks in certain individuals and avoids need to use dairy foods as a delivery vehicle. Since pasta is processed and consumed after heat treatments, use of paraprobiotics has an advantage over probiotics. Almada et al. (2021) [110] investigated the effects of consumption of wheat-durum pasta with added Bifidobacterium animalis inactivated by gamma-irradiation on the health and gut microbiota of rats. Durum wheat pasta with added B. animalis was prepared, cooked and dried and the ground material fed to rats for 15 days. This pasta was found to reduce the serum glucose and total cholesterol levels in healthy rats compared to a standard control (non-pasta) and changed the gut microbiota. Pasta can be an effective vehicle to deliver this paraprobiotic.
A common pre-biotic, inulin (a fructan carbohydrate) has been shown to reduce serum triglycerides that might help reduce the development of the metabolic syndrome. Inulin (Raftline HP = Gel) was incorporated into pasta (11%) and together with regular 100% semolina control pasta fed to 22 healthy males in two 5 week feeding periods in a crossover design. Inulin enriched pasta improved lipid (reduced triglycerides and increased HDL-cholesterol) and glucose metabolism (lower fasting glucose and haemoglobin A1c) and delayed gastric emptying. Delayed gastric emptying could be caused by colonic fermentation of the inulin leading to short chain fatty acid production inhibiting gastric emptying [24]. Slowing the gastric emptying can also decrease glucose absorption of foods, reducing PPGR. Indeed, improved metabolic control in the group treated with inulin-enriched pasta was observed. This level of inulin addition (11%) from other studies has been shown to have a minimal impact on traditional pasta quality measures depending on the degree of polymerisation of the inulin used [53]. No side effects on the gastrointestinal tract were found in the study [24].
Opuntia ficus-indica (prickly pear) is an important source of vitamins C, B1, B2, A, and E and minerals such as potassium, calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus. Durum wheat pasta was supplemented with 3% Opuntia and fed to 49 people with metabolic syndrome for 4 weeks. Improved atherogenic benefits were obtained such as reduced waist circumference, plasma glucose and triglycerides indicating beneficial effects of this extract [111].
In a randomised controlled trial consisting of meals of regular pasta (control) or pasta with 40% sprouted chickpea flour fed to 22 participants, a higher AO content and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was achieved eating the functional pasta indicating potential benefits to cardiovascular health [112].

2.1.3. Antihypertensive Effects

In a recent study Valdez-Meza et al. (2019) [113] prepared pasta at different protein contents with amaranth protein concentrate and an amaranth hydrolysate to evaluate antihypertensive properties in rats compared to regular pasta. The antihypertensive amaranth activity of the hydrolysate was maintained after incorporation in the pasta and after pasta ingestion, reducing blood pressure in the rats, confirming bioavailability. These additives reduced the sensory desirability of the pasta as assessed by 30 untrained panellists compared to regular pasta. Hydrolysis of amaranth proteins with microbial alcalase can release ACE-1 inhibitory peptides that can reduce the activity of angiotensin-1-converting enzyme which is involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension. The presence of these proteins in pasta was evaluated as a vehicle for consumption of these proteins in a food matrix. Pasta was supplemented with an alcalase-treated amaranth protein concentrate and compared to regular pasta. This ingredient negatively impacted the overall acceptability but antihypertensive measures in rats indicated reduced blood pressure [113].

2.1.4. Oxidative Stress and Aging Effects

Oxidative stress is a condition where there is an imbalance between the generation of free radicals, such as reactive oxygen/nitrogen species, and the antioxidant defences (endogenous antioxidants glutathione, catalase and superoxide dismutase). Lack of dietary intake of foods rich in antioxidants, such as polyphenols, can play a role in the development and progression of many chronic diseases, such as CVD [114,115,116] and diabetes. While some information exists on the level of AO in pasta enriched in various ingredients [4,117] impacts on the AO status in vivo is lacking for most functional pasta studies. Epidemiological studies have shown an inverse association between the consumption of polyphenolic-rich foods and the risk of chronic diseases associated with oxidative stress [118]. Khan et al., 2014 [119] fed cooked pasta containing red wholegrain sorghum flour (30% w/w) to 20 healthy subjects and found elevated levels of polyphenols, antioxidant capacity and superoxide dismutase activity in their blood compared to 100% semolina pasta control thus improving the antioxidant status. This level of incorporation was found to be acceptable to consumers [119].
Laus et al., 2016 [120] fed 7 healthy subjects pasta bran enriched in lipophilic antioxidants or bran enriched in phenolics compared to non-supplemented pasta control. These pastas were similar in sensory score to control pasta. Lipophilic pasta improved the antioxidant status of the serum similar to a wheat AO rich commercial dietary supplement called Lisosan G while the phenolic antioxidants enriched pasta effected serum AO status. There were no differences in the AO status of the pasta extracts by in vitro assay.
Pasta enriched with tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) sprouts (30%) was characterised by a high quercetin content and antioxidant activity. When fed to rats for six weeks, the rats exhibited a significant decrease in DNA damage (38%) and more efficient DNA repair (84%) compared to rats fed with commercial pasta [121,122]. Pasta enriched with 6% β-glucan can lower oxidative stress in people based on a longitudinal study that lasted 30 days [123].
Healthy diets have been linked to delaying the onset of aging disabilities and pathologies. Cactus pear extract was added to pasta (3% w/w) and fed to healthy human subjects for 30 days which led to decreased glycaemic and anti-inflammatory responses with putative effect on the aging process and related metabolic disorders [124].

2.1.5. Other Effects

Weight gain and obesity are critical societal issues facing many communities world-wide and the push for foods that are less energy dense and promote satiety is strong. Pulse flours are higher in protein than cereals and contain slowly digestible and resistant starch. They also provide a better amino acid balance with higher levels of cereal deficient lysine and threonine. Up to 35% faba bean flour has been incorporated into pasta but can reduce pasta quality thought to be related to structural impacts [63]. These and possibly the presence of α-amylase inhibitors may explain the slowing of starch digestion and a lower postprandial glycaemic response. Faba bean flour and protein concentrate were added to pasta (25% dwb) and fed to 15 human subjects and compared to a durum semolina pasta. Pasta with faba bean added had reduced postprandial blood glucose response and improved satiety with acceptable sensory liking for the faba bean flour pasta [125]. Greffeuille et al. (2015) [126] over a two and a half month period fed 15 healthy subjects cooked durum wheat pasta dried at a low temperature (control), and pasta enriched with 35% faba bean dried at either a low or very high temperature and the GI was determined and visual analogue scale (degree of fullness). Inclusion of 35% faba bean flour in pasta increased resistant starch content but had no effect on starch digestion extent in vitro or the in vivo GI, despite disruption to the pasta structure. Using a high-temperature drying cycle during pasta manufacture but with no impact on pasta GI did improve its global digestive comfort and led to a decrease in appetite after eating.
A recent review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of pasta consumption in adults showed a significant reduction in body weight gain and body mass index compared with higher GI dietary patterns, dispelling the myth that a carbohydrate staple food such as pasta is a cause of the obesity epidemic [127].
In a study by Costabile et al. (2018) [128] a randomized, controlled, crossover trial (14 subjects) consumed whole grain (with 13% higher TDF) instead of refined wheat pasta and this improved appetite control but did not influence acute energy balance. After the wholemeal pasta, the desire to eat and the sensation of hunger were lower (−16%, p = 0.04 and −23%, p = 0.004, respectively) and satiety was higher (+13%; p = 0.08) compared with the control pasta. After consumption of wholemeal pasta, the blood glucose and triglyceride levels increased compared to control pasta. Insulin response at 30 min (p < 0.05) and ghrelin at 60 min (p = 0.03) were lower and PYY (anorexigenic gastrointestinal hormone Peptide YY) levels higher (AUC = +44%, p = 0.001) in subjects that ate the wholemeal compared to the refined wheat pasta.
Fibres can be used to reduce digestion and absorption in the human small intestine and thus reduce the daily caloric intake [16]. Typical DF used in pasta are legume fibre, wheat bran insoluble fibre, inulin, psyllium fibre, olive powder, psyllium seed husk, oat β-glucans, Lentinus edodes β-glucans, resistant starch, common bean flour, and some non-starch polysaccharides such as locust bean gum, xanthan gum, guar gum, and pectin (Table 2).

2.2. Pasta with Added Functional Ingredients with No Direct Evidence of Health Benefits

There is a plethora of reports on adding ingredients into a pasta formula without any evidence of health effects from animal or human studies [2,3,4,6,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Rather than repeat the approach taken in these reviews, a summary of studies where durum only semolina has been substituted in part with an ingredient are listed in a table grouped into arbitrary categories: barley components, dietary fibre, fish products, herbs, inulin, legumes, oat, proteins, resistant starch, soy and vegetable (Table 2). For each of the listed studies (n = 60), information on the ingredient added to the pasta, the amounts, the likely active ingredient(s), the reported impact on the pasta quality and the authors predicted health benefits from the data are presented (Table 2).
The majority of the studies reviewed in the previous section focus mostly on evidence for reducing the PPGR in humans, a few on CVD risk reduction and blood pressure brought about by a range of pasta supplemented ingredients (β-glucan, soluble fibres, high amylose flours, inulin) and other flours from other crop species (chickpeas, sorghum, pseudocereals, faba bean, lupin). No other health conditions seemed to have been looked at with functional pasta to date that meet the search criteria and inclusion restrictions. For studies where barley fractions or commercial β-glucan has been included in the pasta recipe, the in vitro studies show a reduction in starch digestion extent [36,37,38,41] that compares with the in vivo data from clinical studies [43,92,93,94]. Amounts less than 20% are generally effective in reducing in vitro starch digestion however there are impacts on the pasta quality especially above 10% if using β-glucan extract or commercial sources (e.g., Barley Balance®) but this depends on the β-glucan and if used in combination with other ingredients like vital wheat gluten or gums that can overcome some limitations of β-glucan [44]. Although Peressini et al. (2020) [43] confirmed differences in sensory attributes between Barley Balance® enriched (15%) pasta samples and control pasta, these differences were not judged detrimental for the overall quality.
Inulin (a prebiotic) addition to pasta has been shown in laboratory studies to lower starch digestion up to ~5% inclusion [53] and at higher levels > 7.5% [54] backed up by clinical studies showing 11% inulin pasta slows the gastric emptying causing a decrease in PPGR [24]. Clinical studies adding flours from chickpea [91,129], faba bean [125,126], lupin [92] and red lentil flour [130] to pasta show reductions in GI. Laboratory studies with these flour additions to pasta support reduction in GI [61] while similar in vitro studies in faba bean are lacking and only one study looked at pasta fortified with lupin protein isolate (17%) showing a reduction in in vitro starch digestion [66]. Soy has also been shown in clinical studies when consumed with pasta to show benefits such as reduced GI [100] and reduced blood pressure [107] while only Kamble et al. (2019) [79] study using soy-okra provided evidence of a reduction in in vitro GI. Wholemeal pasta has been shown to have a low GI from a survey by Di Pede et al. (2021) [102] ranging from 35–65, while studies examining the in vitro starch digestion of wholemeal pasta are rare. One study found no effect on the in vitro starch digestion in pasta prepared with fine bran 10–30% [27]. Vegetables have been added to pasta for many years with two studies showing low pasta GI with added vegetable pulps [131] supported by the in vitro studies [77,79]. The other ingredients added to pasta listed in Table 2 seem not to have been evaluated in human clinical trials (gums, debranning fractions, wheat embryo, herbs, protein extracts) so more evaluation is needed. As always, cost of human trials can be prohibitive as well as obtaining ethics approval. Also, there is a need to look at other health indicators besides those discussed in this review such as ingredients added to pasta that can demonstrate benefits to mental health, slowing aging, improving the microbiome health.
Overall, it seems many of the in vitro claims are met by the in vivo results although the level of affect in vivo could be higher than the in vitro studies suggest. For example, raising the amylose content of pasta to mid-40s% while significantly increasing the in vitro starch digestion extent had no significant impact on the GI in a 10 subject glucose tolerance test [7]. The in vitro studies provide a guide to the likely impact in the human but claims for health benefits require proof from the human feeding trials and longer-term data to provide good evidence for using a functional pasta for health benefits. Much more research is needed in this area. Interactions between active compounds and protein matrix while understood for some ingredients like bran, inulin, soluble fibre and resistant starch [6] are not understood for many novel approaches proposed in Table 1. Only a few studies have considered synergism or interactions between individual compounds affecting pasta product quality. While a health benefit is sought after in the many studies discussed, a very important consideration is consumer acceptance of the functional pasta. Many of the studies listed in Table 2 evaluate the technological quality of the resultant pasta with a range of instrumental, cooking procedures and colour as well as the important sensory analysis, most often using a trained panel mostly limited to 10 people. More expensive and time-consuming consumer panels involving many people are needed to give an indication of the market acceptance of the product since taste, appearance, smell and texture are important to consumers. However, gender, race, country of origin can affect peoples perceived acceptance of functional foods [132]. Generally, these studies are not done for specific functional foods but more generally for food categories like wholegrain foods [132]. Another important consideration in the manufacture and consumption of functional pasta is the storage stability. Dried pasta made from 100% semolina typically has a water activity in the range 0.3–0.5 [133] and if stored in sealed containers typically lasts at least 2 or more years, often well passed the shelf-life given by the manufacturer, which is often conservative. However, the composition of the pasta with added ingredients needs to be considered. For example, any egg products used in the manufacture of the dried pasta may not be as stable for such a length because of their high content of lipids, the pasta can turn rancid. Discolouration or off-odours are good indicators of spoilage. Fresh pasta has a much shorter shelf life of 2–3 days with refrigeration because of the high water activity (0.92–0.99) [133] and will deteriorate rapidly if not stored properly. Various chemicals and natural antimicrobials can be used to extend shelf-life [6]. There are limited studies on the storage stability of pasta and impacts on pasta nutritional value. One example is the use of modified packaging using high-density polyethylene and biaxially oriented polypropylene films were compared with the former providing a longer shelf life for multigrain pasta [134]. Another investigated lipid oxidation in spaghetti enriched in long chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids with functional spaghetti having a shelf life comparable to control pasta [135]. Thus, it is important to include storage stability studies in functional food design to ensure no deterioration in the functional value occurs with storage.

3. Conclusions

Pasta is a popular food and has already been shown to be a good method to incorporate increased nutritional or functional compounds. Care is needed to ensure good technological quality in pasta with a substituted ingredient and consumer acceptability at an affordable price. Therefore, the manufacturer of such products must be profitable, and a ready supply of the desired ingredient be assured before a manufacturer prepares such products as well as a likely market. Interactions between active compounds and protein matrix while understood for some ingredients like bran, inulin, soluble fibre and resistant starch, are not understood for many novel approaches proposed in Table 1. Only a few studies have considered synergism or interactions between individual compounds affecting pasta product quality. However, legislation in many countries require proof before a health claim can be made on a food, such as low GI, cholesterol lowering, heart safe etc. For this reason, more research is needed to evaluate the most promising functional pasta with human clinical trials to validate the actual health benefit. Health claims together with good taste, texture and appearance at an acceptable price will help drive consumer demand for such foods.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to institutional privacy requirements.

Acknowledgments

NSW Department of Primary Industries, Australia.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

GIglycaemic index
IVSDin vitro starch digestion
TPAtotal phenolic acids
AOantioxidant
TDFtotal dietary fibre
DFdietary fibre
CMCcarboxymethylcellulose
XGxanthan gum
EAAessential amino acids
ACEangiotensin 1-converting enzyme
RSresistant starch
CMCcarboxymethylcellulose
GGguar gum

References

  1. Sissons, M. Pasta. In Encyclopedia of Food Grains, 2nd ed.; Wrigley, C., Corke, H., Seetharaman, K., Faubion, J., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 79–89. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bustos, M.C.; Perez, G.T.; Leon, A.E. Structure and quality of pasta enriched with functional ingredients. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 30780–30792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mercier, S.; Moresoli, C.; Mondor, M.; Villeneuve, S.; Marcos, B. A Meta-analysis of enriched pasta: What are the effects of enrichment and process specifications on the quality attributes of pasta? Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 685–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wahanik, A.L.; Chang, Y.K.; Clerici, P.S.; Teresa, M. How to make pastas healthier? Food Rev. Int. 2018, 34, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Available online: https://www.nationalacademies.org/fnb/food-and-nutrition-board (accessed on 2 December 2021).
  6. Li, M.; Zhu, K.-X.; Guo, X.-N.; Brijs, K.; Zhou, H.-M. Natural additives in wheat-based pasta and noodle products: Opportunities for enhanced nutritional and functional properties. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sissons, M.; Sestili, F.; Botticella, E.; Masci, S.; Lafiandra, D. Can manipulation of durum wheat amylose content reduce the glycaemic index of spaghetti? Foods 2020, 9, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, S.; Tian, L. Breeding major cereal grains through the lens of nutrition sensitivity. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gebruers, K.; Dornez, E.; Boros, D.; Fraś, A.; Dynkowska, W.; Bedő, Z.; Rakszegi, M.; Delcour, J.A.; Courtin, C.M. Variation in the content of dietary fiber and components thereof in wheats in the HEALTHGRAIN diversity screen. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 9740–9749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pirzadah, T.B.; Malik, B. Pseudocereals as super foods of 21st century: Recent technological interventions. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020, 2, 100052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mefleh, M.; Conte, P.; Fadda, C.; Giunta, F.; Piga, A.; Hassounc, G.; Motzoa, R. From ancient to old and modern durum wheat varieties: Interaction among cultivar traits, management, and technological quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 99, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Onwulata, C.I. Encapsulation of new active ingredients. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 3, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bianchi, F.; Tolve, R.; Rainero, G.; Bordiga, M.; Brennan, C.S.; Simonato, B. Technological, nutritional and sensory properties of pasta fortified with agro-industrial by-products: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 4356–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brennan, C.S.; Tudorica, C.M. Evaluation of potential mechanisms by which dietary fibre additions reduce the predicted glycaemic index of fresh pastas. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 2151–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fuad, T.; Prabhasankar, P. Role of ingredients in pasta product quality: A review on recent developments. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 50, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Krishnan, M.; Prabhasankar, P. Health based pasta: Redefining the concept of the next generation convenience food. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marconi, E.; Messia, M.C. Pasta made from non-traditional raw materials: Technological and nutritional aspects. In Durum Wheat Chemistry and Technology 2012, 2nd ed.; Sissons, M., Abecassis, J., Marchylo, B., Carcea, M., Eds.; AACC International Press: St Paul, MN, USA, 2012; pp. 85–124. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nilusha, R.A.T.; Jayasinghe, J.M.J.K.; Perera, O.D.A.N.; Perera, P.I.P. Development of Pasta Products with Nonconventional Ingredients and Their Effect on Selected Quality Characteristics: A Brief Overview. Int. J. Food Sci. 2019, 2019, 6750726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sissons, M.; Fellows, C.M. Sensory, technological and health aspects of adding fibre to wheat-based pasta. In Wheat and Rice in Disease Prevention and Health; Watson, R.R., Preedy, V.R., Zibaldi, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 211–226. [Google Scholar]
  20. Padalino, L.; Conte, A.; Lecce, L.; Likyova, D.; Sicari, V.; Pellicano, T.M.; Poiana, M.; Del Nobile, M.A. Functional pasta with tomato by-product as a source of antioxidant compounds and dietary fibre. Czech J. Food Sci. 2017, 35, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Marti, A.; Pagani, M.A. What can play the role of gluten in gluten free pasta? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Torres, A.; Frias, J.; Granito, M.; Guerra, M.; Vidal-Valverde, C. Chemical, biological and sensory evaluation of pasta products supplemented with alpha-galactoside-free lupin flours. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gallegos-Infante, J.A.; Rocha-Guzman, N.E.; Gonzalez-Laredo, R.F.; Ochoa-Martínez, L.A.; Corzo, N.; Bello-Perez, L.A.; Medina-Torres, L.; Peralta-Alvarez, L.E. Quality of spaghetti pasta containing Mexican common bean flour (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1544–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Russo, F.; Riezzo, G.; Chiloiro, M.; De Michele, G.; Chimienti, G.; Marconi, E.; D’Attoma, B.; Linsalata, M.; Clemente, C. Metabolic effects of a diet with inulin-enriched pasta in healthy young volunteers. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Delvecchio, L.N.; Pasqualone, A. Production trials of fresh pasta enriched with phenolic compounds extracted from wheat by KOH-induced hydrolysis. Prog. Nutr. 2012, 14, 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin-Esparza, M.E.; Raga, A.; Gonzalez-Martinez, C.; Albors, A. Micronised bran-enriched fresh egg tagliatelle: Significance of gums addition on pasta technological features. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2018, 24, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aravind, N.; Sissons, M.J.; Egan, N.E.; Fellows, C.M. Effect of insoluble dietary fibre addition on technological, sensory, and structural properties of durum wheat spaghetti. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaur, G.; Sharma, S.; Nagi, H.P.S.; Dar, B.N. Functional properties of pasta enriched with variable cereal brans. J. Food Sci. Technol.-Mysore 2012, 49, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bagdi, A.; Szabo, F.; Gere, A.; Kókai, Z.; Sipos, L.; Tőmőskőzi, S. Effect of aleurone-rich flour on composition, cooking, textural and sensory properties of pasta. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marinelli, V.; Padalino, L.; Conte, A.; Del Nobile, M.A.; Briviba, K. Red grape marc flour as food ingredient in durum wheat spaghetti: Nutritional evaluation and bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2018, 24, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Desai, A.S.; Brennan, M.A.; Guo, X.; Zeng, X.-A.; Brennan, C.S. Fish protein and lipid interactions on the digestibility and bioavailability of starch and protein from durum wheat pasta. Molecules 2019, 24, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kadam, S.U.; Prabhasankar, P. Evaluation of cooking, microstructure, texture and sensory quality characteristics of shrimp meat-based pasta. J. Texture Stud. 2012, 43, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Boudalia, S.; Gueroui, Y.; Boumaza, B.; Bousbia, A.; Benada, M.; Leksir, C.; Mezroua, E.Y.; Zemmouchi, K.R.; Saoud, A.; Chemmam, M. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties and sensory qualities of pasta enriched with freeze-dried sweet whey. Sci. Agric. Bohem. 2020, 51, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zen, C.K.; Tiepo, C.B.V.; da Silva, R.V.; Reinehr, C.O.; Gutkoski, L.C.; Oro, T.; Colla, L.M. Development of functional pasta with microencapsulated Spirulina: Technological and sensorial effects. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 100, 2018–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cárdenas-Hernández, A.; Beta, T.; Loarca-Piña, G.; CastanoTostado, E.; Nieto-Barrera, J.O.; Mendoza, S. Improved functional properties of pasta: Enrichment with amaranth seed flour and dried amaranth leaves. J. Cereal. Sci. 2016, 72, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aravind, N.; Sissons, M.J.; Egan, N.; Fellows, C.M.; Blazek, J.; Gilbert, E.P. Effect of β-glucan on technological, sensory, and structural properties of durum wheat pasta. Cereal. Chem. 2012, 89, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chillo, S.; Ranawana, D.V.; Henry, C.J.K. Effect of two barley beta-glucan concentrates on in vitro glycaemic impact and cooking quality of spaghetti. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 940–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cleary, L.; Brennan, C. The influence of a (1 -> 3)(1 -> 4)-beta-D-glucan rich fraction from barley on the physico-chemical properties and in vitro reducing sugars release of durum wheat pasta. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 41, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Knuckles, B.E.; Hudson, C.A.; Chiu, M.M.; Sayre, R.N. Effect of beta-glucan barley fractions in high-fibre bread and pasta. Cereal. Foods World 1997, 42, 94–97. [Google Scholar]
  40. Marconi, E.; Graziano, M.; Cubadda, R. Composition and utilization of barley pearling by-products for making functional pastas rich in dietary fiber and beta-glucans. Cereal. Chem. 2000, 77, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Montalbano, A.; Tesoriere, L.; Diana, P.; Barraja, P.; Carbone, A.; Spano, V.; Parrino, B.; Attanzio, A.; Livrea, M.A.; Cascioferro, S.; et al. Quality characteristics and in vitro digestibility study of barley flour enriched ditalini pasta. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 72, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Verardo, V.; Gomez-Caravaca, A.M.; Messia, M.C.; Marconi, E.; Caboni, M.F. Development of functional spaghetti enriched in bioactive compounds using barley coarse fraction obtained by air classification. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9127–9134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Peressini, D.; Cavarape, A.; Brennan, M.A.; Gao, J.; Brennan, C.S. Viscoelastic properties of durum wheat doughs enriched with soluble dietary fibres in relation to pasta-making performance and glycaemic response of spaghetti. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 102, 105613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Krawęcka, A.; Sobota, A.; Sykut-Domańska, E. Physicochemical, sensory, and cooking qualities of pasta enriched with oat beta-glucans, xanthan gum, and vital gluten. Foods 2020, 9, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aravind, N.; Sissons, M.J.; Fellows, C.M. Effect of soluble fibre (guar gum and carboxymethylcellulose) addition on technological, sensory and structural properties of durum wheat spaghetti. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ciccoritti, R.; Taddei, F.; Nicoletti, I.; Gazza, L.; Corradini, D.; D’Egidio, M.G.; Martini, D. Use of bran fractions and debranned kernels for the development of pasta with high nutritional and healthy potential. Food Chem. 2017, 225, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Foschia, M.; Peressini, D.; Sensidoni, A.; Brennan, M.A.; Brennan, C.S. Synergistic effect of different dietary fibres in pasta on in vitro starch digestion? Food Chem. 2015, 172, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Levent, H.; Koyuncu, M.; Bilgicli, N.; Adiguzel, E.; Dedeoglu, M. Improvement of chemical properties of noodle and pasta using dephytinized cereal brans. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 128, 109470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Manthey, F.A.; Schorno, A.L. Physical and cooking quality of spaghetti made from whole wheat durum. Cereal. Chem. 2002, 79, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Piwińska, M.; Wyrwisz, J.; Wierzbicka, A. Effect of micronization of high-fiber oat powder and vacuum-drying on pasta quality. J. Food 2016, 14, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Calanche, J.; Beltran, H.; Marquina, P.; Roncales, P.; Beltran, J.A. Eating fish in another way: Development of functional pasta with added concentrates of farmed sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Cereal. Chem. 2019, 96, 856–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sato, R.; de Lima Cilli, L.P.; de Oliveira, B.E.; Vieira Maciel, V.B.; Venturini, A.C.; Pedroso Yoshida, C.M. Nutritional improvement of pasta with Pereskia aculeata Miller: A non-conventional edible vegetable. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Aravind, N.; Sissons, M.J.; Fellows, C.M.; Blazek, J.; Gilbert, E.P. Effect of inulin soluble dietary fibre addition on technological, sensory, and structural properties of durum wheat spaghetti. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 993–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Brennan, C.S.; Kuri, V.; Tudorica, C.M. Inulin-enriched pasta: Effects on textural properties and starch degradation. Food Chem. 2004, 86, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sabanis, D.; Makri, E.; Doxastakis, G. Effect of durum flour enrichment with chickpea flour on the characteristics of dough and lasagne. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 1939–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wood, J.A. Texture, processing and organoleptic properties of chickpea-fortified spaghetti with insights to the underlying mechanisms of traditional durum pasta quality. J. Cereal. Sci. 2009, 49, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chillo, S.; Monro, J.A.; Mishra, S.; Henry, C.J. Effect of incorporating legume flour into semolina spaghetti on its cooking quality and glycaemic impact measured in vitro. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 61, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. De Pasquale, I.; Verni, M.; Verardo, V.; Gomez-Caravaca, A.M.; Rizzello, C.G. Nutritional and functional advantages of the use of fermented black chickpea flour for semolina-pasta fortification. Foods 2021, 10, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Di Stefano, V.; Pagliaro, A.; Del Nobile, M.A.; Conte, A.; Melilli, M.G. Lentil fortified spaghetti: Technological properties and nutritional characterization. Foods 2021, 10, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Laleg, K.; Barron, C.; Cordelle, S.; Schlich, P.; Walrand, S.; Micard, V. How the structure, nutritional and sensory attributes of pasta made from legume flour is affected by the proportion of legume protein. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 79, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Osorio-Diaz, P.; Agama-Acevedo, E.; Mendoza-Vinalay, M.; Tovar, J.; Bello-Perez, L.A. Pasta added with chickpea flour: Chemical composition, in vitro starch digestibility and predicted glycemic index. Cienc. Y Tecnol. Aliment. 2008, 6, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shreenithee, C.R.; Prabhasankar, P. Effect of different shapes on the quality, microstructure, sensory and nutritional characteristics of yellow pea flour incorporated pasta. Food Meas. 2013, 7, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Petitot, M.; Boyer, L.; Minier, C.; Micard, V. Fortification of pasta with split pea and faba bean flours: Pasta processing and quality evaluation. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wu, Y.V.; Hareland, G.A.; Warner, K. Protein enriched spaghetti fortified with corn gluten meal. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3906–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jayasena, V.; Nasar-Abbas, S.M. Development and quality evaluation of high-protein and high-dietary-fiber pasta using lupin flour. J. Texture Stud. 2012, 43, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cutillo, S.; Farahnaky, A.; Marcotuli, I.; Gadaleta, A.; Sissons, M. In vitro starch digestion and technological properties of spaghetti fortified with lupin protein isolate. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 3567–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Alzuwaid, N.T.; Sissons, M.; Laddomada, B.; Fellows, C.M. Nutritional and functional properties of durum wheat bran protein concentrate. Cereal. Chem. 2020, 97, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alzuwaid, N.T.; Pleming, D.; Fellows, C.M.; Sissons, M. Fortification of durum wheat spaghetti and common wheat bread with wheat bran protein concentrate-impacts on nutrition and technological properties. Food Chem. 2021, 334, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Alzuwaid, N.T.; Laddomada, B.; Fellows, C.M.; Egan, N.; Sissons, M. Supplementation of durum wheat spaghetti with wheat bran protein concentrate: Impacts on phytochemical profile and starch digestion. Cereal. Chem. 2021, 98, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jayawardena, S.R.; Morton, J.D.; Brennan, C.S.; Bekhit, A.E.-D.A. Utilisation of beef lung protein powder as a functional ingredient to enhance protein and iron content of fresh pasta. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sadeghi, M.; Bhagya, S. Quality characterization of pasta enriched with mustard protein isolate. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, S229–S237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Segura-Campos, M.R.; Garcia-Rodriguez, K.; Carlos Ruiz-Ruiz, J.; Chel-Guerrero, L.; Betancur-Ancona, D. Effect of incorporation of hard-to-cook bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) protein hydrolysate on physical properties and starch and dietary fiber components of semolina pasta. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gelencser, T.; Gal, V.; Salgo, A. Effects of applied process on the in vitro digestibility and resistant starch content of pasta products. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 3, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Aravind, N.; Sissons, M.J.; Fellows, C.M.; Blazek, J.; Gilbert, E.P. Optimisation of resistant starch II and III levels in durum wheat pasta to reduce in vitro digestibility while maintaining processing and sensory characteristics. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1100–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hernandez-Nava, R.G.; Berrios, J.D.J.; Pan, J.; Osorio-Diaz, P.; Bello-Perez, L.A. Development and characterization of spaghetti with high resistant starch content supplemented with banana starch. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2009, 15, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Jin, D.; Waterhouse, G.I.N. Effect of adding elderberry juice concentrate on the quality attributes, polyphenol contents and antioxidant activity of three fibre-enriched pastas. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Attanzio, A.; Diana, P.; Barraja, P.; Carbone, A.; Spano, V.; Parrino, B.; Cascioferro, S.M.; Allegra, M.; Cirrincione, G.; Tesoriere, L.; et al. Quality, functional and sensory evaluation of pasta fortified with extracts from Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4242–4247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Boroski, M.; de Aguiar, A.C.; Boeing, J.S.; Rotta, E.M.; Wibby, C.L.; Bonafé, E.G.; de Souza, N.E.; Visentainer, J.V. En-hancement of pasta antioxidant activity with oregano and carrot leaf. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 696–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kamble, D.B.; Singh, R.; Rani, S.; Pratap, D. Physicochemical properties, in vitro digestibility and structural attributes of okara-enriched functional pasta. J. Food Process Preserv. 2019, 43, e14232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lu, X.K.; Brennan, M.A.; Serventi, L.; Mason, S.; Brennan, C.S. How the inclusion of mushroom powder can affect the physicochemical characteristics of pasta. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 2433–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rajeswari, G.; Susanna, S.; Prabhasankarn, P.; Venkateswara Rao, G. Influence of onion powder and its hydrocolloid blends on pasta dough, pasting, microstructure, cooking and sensory characteristics. Food Biosci. 2013, 4, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. AACC International. Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th ed.; AACC International: St Paul, MN, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  83. Allai, F.M.; Azad, Z.R.A.A.; Gul, K.; Dar, B.N. Wholegrains: A review on the amino acid profile, mineral content, physicochemical, bioactive composition and health benefits. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Krawęcka, A.; Sobota, A.; Sykut-Domańska, E. Functional cereal products in the diet for type 2 diabetes patients. Int. J. Food Sci. 2019, 2019, 4012450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jenkins, D.J.A.; Wolever, T.M.S.; Jenkins, A.L.; Lee, R.; Wong, G.S.; Josse, R. Glycemic response to wheat products: Reduced response to pasta but no effect of fiber. Diabetes Care 1983, 6, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Colonna, P.; Barry, J.-L.; Cloarec, D.; Bornet, F.; Gouilloud, S.; Galmiche, J.-P. Enzymic susceptibility of starch from pasta. J. Cereal Sci. 1990, 11, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Zou, W.; Sissons, M.; Gidley, M.J.; Gilbert, R.G.; Warren, F.J. Combined techniques for characterising pasta structure reveals how the gluten network slows enzymic digestion rate. Food Chem. 2015, 188, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ang, K.; Bourgy, C.; Fenton, H.; Regina, A.; Newberry, M.; Diepeveen, D.; Lafiandra, D.; Grafenauer, S.; Hunt, W.; Solah, V. Noodles made from high amylose wheat flour attenuate postprandial glycaemia in healthy adults. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hospers, J.J.; van Amelsvoort, J.M.M.; Westrate, J.A. Amylose-amylopectin ratio in pasta affects PPBG and insulin responses and satiety in males. J. Food Sci. 1994, 59, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Capraro, J.; Magni, C.; Scarafoni, A.; Caramanico, R.; Rossi, F.; Morlacchini, M.; Duranti, M. Pasta supplemented with isolated lupin protein fractions reduces body weight gain and food intake of rats and decreases plasma glucose concentration upon glucose overload trial. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Goñi, L.; Valentín-Gamazo, C. Chickpea flour ingredient slows glycemic response to pasta in healthy volunteers. Food Chem. 2003, 81, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Brownlee, I.A. The physiological roles of dietary fibre. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yokoyama, W.M.; Hudson, C.A.; Knuckles, B.E. Effect of barley ß-glucan in durum wheat pasta on human glycemic response. Cereal. Chem. 1997, 74, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bourdon, I.; Yokoyama, W.; Davis, P.; Hudson, C.; Backus, R.; Richter, D.; Schneeman, B.O. Postprandial lipid, glucose, insulin, and cholecystokinin responses in men fed barley pasta enriched with beta-glucan. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 69, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fares, C.; Menga, V.; Martina, A.; Pellegrini, N.; Scazzina, F.; Torriani, S. Nutritional profile and cooking quality of a new functional pasta naturally enriched in phenolic acids, added with b-glucan and Bacillus coagulans GBI-30,6086. J. Cereal. Sci. 2015, 65, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Frost, G.; Brynes, A.; Dhillo, W.; Bloom, S.; McBurney, M. The effects of fiber enrichment of pasta and fat content on gastric emptying, GLP-1, glucose, and insulin responses to a meal. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 57, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Cassidy, Y.M.; McSorley, E.M.; Allsopp, P.J. Effect of soluble dietary fibre on postprandial blood glucose response and its potential as a functional food ingredient. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 46, 423–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Regand, A.; Tosh, S.M.; Wolever, T.M.; Wood, P.J. Physicochemical properties of β-glucan in differently processed oat foods influence glycemic response. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 8831–8838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wood, P.J.; Braaten, J.T.; Fraser, W.S.; Riedel, D.; Postel, M. Comparisons of viscous properties of oat and guar gum and effects of these and oat bran on glycemic index. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Taha, S.; Wasif, M. Hypoglycemic effect and protein nutritive quality of soy and methionine-supplemented whole durum pasta products. Food/Nahrung 1996, 40, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Angelino, D.; Martina, A.; Rosi, A.; Veronesi, L.; Antonini, M.; Mennella, I.; Vitaglione, P.; Grioni, S.; Brighenti, F.; Zavaroni, I.; et al. Glucose- and lipid-related biomarkers are affected in healthy obese or hyperglycemic adults consuming a whole-grain pasta enriched in prebiotics and probiotics: A 12-week randomized controlled trial. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 1714–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Di Pede, G.; Dodi, R.; Scarpa, C.; Brighenti, F.; Dall’Asta, M.; Scazzina, F. Glycemic index values of pasta products: An Overview. Foods 2021, 10, 2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Petitot, M.; Abecassis, J.; Micard, V. Structuring of pasta components during processing: Impact on starch and protein digestibility and allergenicity. Trends. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Catapano, A.L.; Graham, I.; De Backer, G.; Wiklund, O.; Chapman, M.J.; Drexel, H.; Hoes, A.W.; Jennings, C.S.; Landmesser, U.; Pedersen, T.R.; et al. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 2999–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Brunner, E.J.; Thorogood, M.; Rees, K.; Hewitt, G. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005, 19, CD002128. [Google Scholar]
  106. Favari, E.; Angelino, D.; Cipollari, E.; Adorni, M.P.; Zimetti, F.; Bernini, F.; Ronda, N.; Pellegrini, N. Functional pasta consumption in healthy volunteers modulates ABCG1-mediated cholesterol efflux capacity of HDL. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 1768–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Clerici, C.; Setchell, K.D.R.; Battezzati, P.M.; Pirro, M.; Giuliano, V.; Asciutti, S.; Castellani, D.; Nardi, E.; Sabatino, G.; Orlandi, S.; et al. Pasta naturally enriched with isoflavone aglycons from soy germ reduces serum lipids and improves markers of cardiovascular risk. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2270–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Clerici, C.; Nardi, E.; Battezzati, P.M.; Asciutti, S.; Castellani, D.; Corazzi, N.; Giuliano, V.; Gizzi, S.; Perriello, G.; Di Matteo, G.; et al. Novel soy germ pasta improves endothelial function, blood pressure, and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, 1946–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Ruiz-Larrea, M.B.; Mohan, A.R.; Paganga, G.; Miller, N.J.; Bolwell, G.P.; Rice-Evans, C.A. Antioxidant activity of phytoestrogenic isoflavones. Free Radic. Res. 1997, 26, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Almada, C.N.; Almada-Erix, C.N.; Costa, W.K.A.; Silva, J.; Cabral, L.; Noronha, M.F.; Goncalves, A.E.S.S.; dos Santos, A.; Lollo, P.C.; Magnani, M.; et al. Wheat-durum pasta added of inactivated Bifidobacterium animalis decreases glucose and total cholesterol levels and modulates gut microbiota in healthy rats. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 72, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Giglio, R.V.; Carruba, G.; Cicero, A.F.G.; Banach, M.; Patti, A.M.; Nikolic, D.; Cocciadiferro, L.; Zarcone, M.; Montalto, G.; Stoian, A.P.; et al. Pasta supplemented with opuntia ficus-indica extract improves metabolic parameters and reduces atherogenic small dense low-density lipoproteins in patients with risk factors for the metabolic syndrome: A four-week intervention study. Metabolites 2020, 26, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bruno, J.A.; Feldman, C.H.; Konas, D.W.; Kerrihard, A.L.; Matthews, E.L. Incorporating sprouted chickpea flour in pasta increases brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. Physiol. Int. 2019, 16, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Vernaza, M.G.; Biasutti, E.; Schmiele, M.; Jaekel, L.Z.; Bannwart, A.; Chang, Y.K. Effect of supplementation of wheat flour with resistant starch and monoglycerides in pasta dried at high temperatures. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 1302–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Strobel, N.A.; Fassett, R.G.; Marsh, S.A.; Coombes, J.S. Oxidative stress biomarkers as predictors of cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2011, 147, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Giacco, F.; Brownlee, M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Scalbert, A.; Williamson, G. Dietary intake and bioavailability of polyphenols. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 2073Se85S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Camelo-Mendez, G.A.; Ferruzzi, M.G.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A.; Bello-Perez, L.A. Carbohydrate and phytochemical digestibility in pasta. Food Eng. Rev. 2016, 8, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Arts, I.C.W.; Hollman, P.C. Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81 (Suppl. S1), 317S–325S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Khan, I.; Yousif, A.M.; Johnson, S.K.; Gamlath, S. Effect of sorghum flour addition on in vitro starch digestibility, cooking quality and consumer acceptability of durum wheat pasta. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, S1560–S1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Laus, M.N.; Soccio, M.; Alfarano, M.; Pasqualone, A.; Lenucci, M.S.; Miceli, G.D.; Pastore, D. Different effectiveness of two pastas supplemented with either lipophilic or hydrophilic/phenolic antioxidants in affecting serum as evaluated by the novel Antioxidant/Oxidant Balance approach. Food Chem. 2016, 221, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Meschini, R.; Filippi, S.; Molinari, R.; Costantini, L.; Bonafaccia, G.; Merendino, N. Pasta containing tartary buckwheat sprouts prevents DNA damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 66, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Merendino, N.; Molinari, R.; Costantini, L.; Mazzuccato, A.; Pucci, A.; Bonafaccia, F.; Esti, M.; Brunella Ceccantoni, B.; Papeschi, C.; Bonafaccia, G. A new ‘‘functional’’ pasta containing tartary buckwheat sprouts as an ingredient improves the oxidative status and normalizes some blood pressure parameters in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Barera, A.; Buscemi, S.; Monastero, R.; Caruso, C.; Caldarella, R.; Ciaccio, M.; Vasto, S. β-glucans: Ex vivo inflammatory and oxidative stress results after pasta intake. Immun. Ageing 2016, 13, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Aiello, A.; Di Bona, D.; Candore, G.; Carru, C.; Zinellu, A.; Di Miceli, G.; Nicosia, A.; Gambino, C.M.; Ruisi, P.; Caruso, C.; et al. Targeting Aging with Functional Food: Pasta with Opuntia Single-Arm Pilot Study. Rejuvenation Res. 2018, 21, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chan, C.K.Y.; Fabek, H.; Mollard, R.C.; Jones, P.J.H.; Tulbek, M.C.; Chibbar, R.N.; Gangola, M.P.; Ramadoss, B.R.; Sanchez-Hernandez, D.; Anderson, G.H. Faba bean protein flours added to pasta reduce post-ingestion glycaemia, and increase satiety, protein content and quality. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 7476–7488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Greffeuille, V.; Marsset-Baglieri, A.; Molinari, N.; Cassan, D.; Sutra, T.; Avignon, A.; Micard, V. Enrichment of pasta with faba bean does not impact glycemic or insulin response but can enhance satiety feeling and digestive comfort when dried at very high temperature. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 2996–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chiavaroli, L.; Kendall, C.W.C.; Braunstein, C.R.; Blanco Mejia, S.; Leiter, L.A.; Jenkins, D.J.A.; Sievenpiper, J.L. Effect of pasta in the context of low-glycaemic index dietary patterns on body weight and markers of adiposity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in adults. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e019438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Costabile, G.; Griffo, E.; Cipriano, P.; Vetrani, C.; Vitale, M.; Mamone, G.; Rivellese, A.A.; Riccardi, G.; Giacco, R. Subjective satiety and plasma PYY concentration after wholemeal pasta. Appetite 2018, 125, 172–181 . [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Turco, I.; Bacchetti, T.; Morresi, C.; Padalino, L.; Ferretti, G. Polyphenols and the glycaemic index of legume pasta. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 5931–5938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Fujiwara, N.; Hall, C.; Jenkins, A.L. Development of low glycemic index (GI) foods by incorporating pulse ingredients into cereal-based products: Use of in vitro screening and in vivo methodologies. Cereal. Chem. 2017, 94, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Scazzina, F.; Dall’Asta, M.; Casiraghi, M.C.; Sieri, S.; Del Rio, D.; Pellegrini, N.; Brighenti, F. Glycemic index and glycemic load of commercial Italian foods. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2016, 26, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Deana, M.; Shepherda, R.; Arvolab, A.; Vassalloc, M.; Winkelmannd, M.; Claupeind, E.; Lähteenmäki, L.; Raatsa, M.M.; Saba, A. Consumer perceptions of healthy cereal products and production methods. J. Cereal. Sci. 2007, 46, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Schmidt, S.J.; Fontana, A.J. Water Activity Values of Select Food Ingredients and Products. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470376454.app5 (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  134. Kamble, D.B.; Singh, R.; Pal Kaur, B.; Rani, S. Storage stability and shelf life prediction of multigrain pasta under dif-ferent packaging material and storage conditions. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Verardo, V.; Ferioli, F.; Riciputi, Y.; Iafelice, G.; Marconi, E.; Caboni, M.F. Evaluation of lipid oxidation in spaghetti pasta enriched with long chain n−3 polyunsaturated fatty acids under different storage conditions. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sissons, M. Development of Novel Pasta Products with Evidence Based Impacts on Health—A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010123

AMA Style

Sissons M. Development of Novel Pasta Products with Evidence Based Impacts on Health—A Review. Foods. 2022; 11(1):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sissons, Mike. 2022. "Development of Novel Pasta Products with Evidence Based Impacts on Health—A Review" Foods 11, no. 1: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010123

APA Style

Sissons, M. (2022). Development of Novel Pasta Products with Evidence Based Impacts on Health—A Review. Foods, 11(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop