Next Article in Journal
Prevention of Adhesions after Bone Fracture Using a Carboxymethylcellulose and Polyethylene Oxide Composite Gel in Dogs
Previous Article in Journal
Awake 160-Slice Computed Tomography for Upper Airway Evaluation in 17 Dogs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Health-Related Outcomes and Molecular Methods for the Characterization of A1 and A2 Cow’s Milk: Review and Update
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/vetsci11080344
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A One Health Perspective on Camel Meat Hygiene and Zoonoses: Insights from a Decade of Research in the Middle East

by
Mohamed-Yousif Ibrahim Mohamed
1,2,
Glindya Bhagya Lakshmi
1,2,
Hamidreza Sodagari
3 and
Ihab Habib
1,2,*
1
Veterinary Public Health Research Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 1555, United Arab Emirates
2
ASPIRE Research Institute for Food Security in the Drylands (ARIFSID), United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 1555, United Arab Emirates
3
Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2024, 11(8), 344; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11080344 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 June 2024 / Revised: 13 July 2024 / Accepted: 24 July 2024 / Published: 29 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue One Health Challenges and Opportunities—Animals, Humans and Their Interconnected Ecosystems)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This review explores the safety of camel meat and the diseases that camels can transmit to humans in the Middle East conducted over the past ten years, emphasizing the need for a One Health approach. An examination of recent studies indicated significant issues with pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant bacteria and contamination with heavy metals and pesticides. The review also highlighted the ongoing risk of diseases like Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and other zoonoses. Findings from this review call for more robust food safety measures and increased cooperation among veterinary and public health authorities to ensure the safety of camel meat and protect public health.

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to investigatethe microbial and chemical safety of camel meat and the zoonotic diseases associated with camels in the Middle East over the past decade, emphasizing the crucial role of a One Health approach. By systematically analyzing recent studies (in the past decade, from 2014), we assessed pathogen prevalence, contamination with heavy metals and pesticide residues, and the impact of zoonotic diseases like Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). The findings revealed significant variability in pathogen prevalence, with the frequent detection of traditional foodborne pathogens (e.g., Salmonella and E. coli O157), as well as antibiotic-resistant strains like methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli, underscoring the need for stringent antibiotic use policies and robust food safety measures. Additionally, the review highlighted substantial contamination of camel meat with heavy metals and pesticide residues, posing significant public health concerns that necessitate stringent regulatory measures and regular monitoring. The persistent occurrence of zoonotic diseases, particularly MERS-CoV, along with other threats like trypanosomiasis, brucellosis, and Clostridium perfringens, emphasizes the importance of strengthening ongoing surveillance. Enhancing investment in diagnostic infrastructures, training programs, and planning capabilities is crucial to address these issues at the camel–human interface in the Middle East. Adopting a One Health perspective is vital to ensuring the safety and quality of camel meat and managing zoonotic risks effectively to ultimately safeguard public health and promote sustainable livestock practices.

1. Introduction

Camels are known as the champions of deserts and highlands, thriving in regions with challenging climates. Camelidae includes two subfamilies: Camelinae (Old World camelids) and Lamini (New World camelids). The two main species of Old World camels are, as follows: (i) the Dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius), found in the hot, arid areas of the Middle East and Africa; and (ii) the Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus), the largest camel species with two humps on its back, living in northwestern China and southwestern Mongolia. New World camelids are found in South America. The four species of New World camelids are, as follows: (iii) the llama (Lama glama); (iv) the alpaca (Lama pacos); (v) the guanaco (Lama guanaco); and (vi) the vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) [1,2].
Camels have been integral to the history and culture of the Middle East, where they have been closely connected with human societies for centuries [3]. Camels are considered multipurpose animals, offering meat, milk, wool, hair, and dung. Female camels are mainly utilized for their milk, while male camels are employed for transportation and draft work [4]. In some Arabian countries, camel meat is the preferred choice for many traditional dishes and is often favored over other types of red meats. Most of the meat comes from male and female camels that are seven years old or older and are primarily raised for milk, racing, and transportation rather than for meat production alone [5,6,7]. Typically, a dromedary camel carcass can produce between 125 kg and 400 kg or more of meat, with the amount varying depending on the breed, sex, and age at slaughter [8]. In addition to its important contribution to transportation, draft work, and food security in the Middle East, the camel plays a vital role as a sport animal in the region [9]. Camel racing, deeply rooted in Bedouin ancestral culture, is a prominent traditional sport in many Arab countries and is known for its profitability and efficient organization. It is of significant importance as a traditional activity and is an essential aspect of the animal agribusiness within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, especially in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, and Qatar [8,9].
The United Nations has designated 2024 as the International Year of Camelids (IYC 2024) to emphasize camelids’ crucial role in combating hunger by contributing to food security, nutrition, and economic development in areas where other livestock cannot thrive [10]. Therefore, this review focuses on exploring, as follows: (a) the microbial and chemical safety of camel meat, and (b) camel-associated zoonotic diseases across Middle Eastern countries, where the camel plays a significant role in food and animal agriculture. This review will focus on the advances in regional research generated over the past decade (from 2014 onward).

2. Camel Meat Production and Supply Chain in the Middle East

Globally, camel husbandry has garnered increasing social and economic interest over the past three decades due to the international importance of camels as a sustainable livestock species [11]. Due to rising food demand, urbanization, and concerns about deforestation from open grazing, camel rearing has transitioned towards intensive or semi-intensive farming methods [12]. Dromedary camels are considered one of the most suitable breeds for meat production in arid land due to their ability to endure adverse climatic conditions, which sets them apart from other breeds [13]. The camel meat industry operates on a regional scale, leading to the export of live camels rather than carcasses. The nutritional quality of camel meat varies with age, breed, and muscle type [13,14]. Camel meat is considered a healthy option because it contains less fat and cholesterol and is rich in essential fatty acids such as omega-3 fatty acids [14,15,16,17,18]. It is also a good source of minerals, vitamins, and bioactive compounds compared to meat from other animals [7,18,19,20]. The consumption of camel meat has been linked to a likely reduction in hypertension and hypersensitivity (allergic reactions or intolerances) [6,20,21].
Camel productivity and profitability have historically been hindered by factors such as limited sales opportunities, restricted slaughter practices, low yields, and a high mortality rate [22,23,24]. In the Middle East, farmers typically pay minimal attention to production costs. The primary reason for this is that a significant portion of the expenses associated with establishing and maintaining camel farms is covered/subsidized by government support [11]. Consequently, many farm owners do not view camel farming as their primary occupation [11].
Producers, processors, and retailers of camel meat must stay informed about, and comply with, relevant hygiene standards and regulations to ensure the safety and quality of the product [25,26,27,28]. In the following sections of this review, we will examine recent studies exploring biological hazards linked to camel meat consumption. We will also draw insights from emerging findings on the chemical contaminants found in camel meat, elaborating on data from published studies in the Middle East from 2014 onward.

3. Methodological Framework and Data Acquisition

An extensive literature search was performed using multiple databases. The primary databases utilized included PubMed and Google Scholar, which were chosen for their broad coverage of biomedical and scientific literature. We excluded non-peer-reviewed sources, such as Letters to the Editor, opinion pieces, and anecdotal reports, to ensure the reliability and scientific rigor of the information presented. Some of the data on zoonotic outbreaks were sourced from international organizations (e.g., the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) World Animal Health Information System (WAHIS), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Health Observatory (GHO) and Disease Outbreak News (DON) reporting systems. The search focused on articles published in English over the past decade (from 2014) to ensure the inclusion of the most recent and relevant research. The search strategy involved using Boolean operators to combine keywords, enhancing the retrieval of pertinent articles [29]. The search terms were: ((“camel meat” OR “camelmeat” OR “camel” AND “meat”) AND (hygiene OR sanitation OR “microbial quality” OR “microbial hazard” OR “chemical quality” OR “chemical hazard” OR “food safety”)) AND (zoonoses OR “zoonotic diseases” OR “infectious diseases” OR “camel diseases”) AND (“One Health” OR “interdisciplinary approach” OR “human-animal-environment interaction”) AND (“Middle East” OR “Arabian Peninsula” OR “Near East” OR “North Africa”).
Additionally, variations and synonyms of these terms were included to ensure that no relevant studies were overlooked. Inclusion criteria were established to filter the articles for relevance. Only studies that provided insights into microbial and chemical safety and zoonotic diseases in camel meat were considered. Exclusion criteria were also defined, eliminating studies not directly related to camel meat hygiene or those published in languages other than English. The initial search yielded a large number of articles (Figure 1), which were then subjected to a rigorous screening process by two of the co-authors. Titles and abstracts were reviewed to assess their relevance, followed by a full-text review of the selected articles. Data extraction was performed systematically, focusing on study design, methodology, findings, and hazards related to camel meat hygiene [30]. Figure 1 represents the systematic approach to the inclusion and exclusion of articles.

4. Microbial Hazards of Camel Meat in the Middle Eastern Countries over the Past Decade

Food safety is an international issue, and according to the WHO, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) ranks third in the highest estimated burden of foodborne diseases per population [31]. The microbial safety of camel meat is crucial for public health, as the consumption of contaminated meat can contribute to the overall burden of foodborne disease in the region.
The findings in Table 1, from articles found in the database search, provide insights into the potential hazards associated with camel meat consumption in the Middle East over the past decade. The available data reveal significant variability in pathogen prevalence across different countries (Table 1), indicating differing standards in meat handling, hygiene practices, and detection capabilities. The studies utilized a range of detection methods, including conventional cultural techniques, as well as various molecular techniques. Studies conducted in Egypt, Iran, Libya, and Saudi Arabia between 2014 and 2024 highlight the presence of various pathogens in camel meat and related products (Table 1). In Egypt, research conducted in 2019 identified Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. fluorescens in 10% of meat samples, while Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) was found in 14.5% of samples [32,33]. Further studies in 2023 detected Escherichia coli O157 in 9.1% of meat samples and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli in 8% of the samples [34,35]. By 2024, Salmonella spp. had a prevalence of 8% in camel meat samples, with multiple serotypes showing a 20% presence in meat, liver, and kidney samples [36]. In Iran, Acinetobacter baumanii was identified in 2.26% of meat samples in 2019, and Staphylococcus aureus had a 4% prevalence in samples in 2020 [37,38]. A study in Libya reported an intriguing prevalence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in camel meat samples, at 33.33% in 2016 [39].
Saudi Arabia’s studies indicated the prevalence of varyious pathogens over the years (Table 1). In 2015, E. coli O157 was found in 2.4% of fecal samples and 2.9% of hides, with Salmonella showing a prevalence of 23.2% in the feces and 67.6% in the hides of camels [42]. In 2016, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was detected in 20% of meat samples [43]. A report in the year 2020 pointed to the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in 16% of camel meat samples, and other Listeria species were also detected [44]. ESBL-producing E. coli had an 11.3% prevalence in minced camel meat [45]. In 2021, Clostridium perfringens was present in 14% of minced camel meat, and Metallo-β-lactamase (MβL)-producing Pseudomonas spp. showed a high prevalence of 55% in the screened meat from camels [46,47].
The recurring detection of traditional foodborne pathogens (e.g., Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and E. coli O157), as well as antibiotic-resistant strains, like MRAS, VRSA, and ESBL-producing E. coli, underscores the urgent need for stringent antibiotic use policies and foodborne pathogen management strategies. Overall, the summary of results in Table 1 indicates substantial challenges in ensuring the microbial safety of camel meat, with potential public health implications. These findings highlight the need for enhanced food safety measures, improved hygienic practices, and robust surveillance systems targeting camel meat consumed in the Middle East.

5. Chemical Hazards of Camel Meat in the Middle Eastern Countries over the Past Decade

While camels serve as a complementary source of red meat in certain Middle Eastern nations, research focusing on heavy metals contamination across the region has predominantly centered on the meat and products of cattle, sheep, and goats, with few investigations conducted on camel meat (Table 2). The consumption of meat contaminated with chemical residues and contaminants could affect human health and poses significant public health challenges [49]. The bioaccumulation and biomagnification of heavy metals in camels occur when they are exposed to environmental pollution when, for example, they freely graze in contaminated areas or consume polluted water [50].
Table 2 elaborates on the status of chemical residues and contaminants in camel meat and meat products in the Middle Eastern region over the past decade, based on evidence from articles found in the database search. The results reveal significant contamination (above certain levels stipulated by national standards) with heavy metals, pesticide residues, and drug residues, highlighting critical concerns for food safety. Notably, high contamination levels were reported in several countries (Table 2). In Egypt, a 2015 study identified the presence of heavy metals, such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn), in muscle, serum, lungs, liver, and kidney samples using atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) [51]. In the same year, another study detected oxytetracycline and heavy metals in muscles, kidneys, and liver [52]. El Gareeb et al. [53] reported the presence of various antibiotic residues, including enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline derivatives, in muscle, kidney, and liver samples, detected using LC-MS/MS (Table 2).
In Iraq, studies conducted in 2020 and 2021 identified heavy metals, including arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), and cobalt (Co), in muscle, kidney, and liver samples from camels using inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES) [54,55]. Similarly, high levels of heavy metals were reported in Saudi Arabia, with studies from 2015 to 2024 consistently detecting Pb, Cd, Hg, As, and Cr in various camel tissues, including in the muscles and liver [53,59,60,62,63,64]. In 2015, a study in Saudi Arabia also reported the detection of pesticide residues, such as DDT and its metabolites, in the muscles and liver of camels, using Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) [59].
Detecting heavy metals, especially lead and cadmium, alongside persistent organic pollutants, like DDT and its metabolites, in edible camel tissues underscores a significant public health concern due to the potential for toxic accumulation in humans through the food chain. These contaminants can lead to severe health issues, including neurological, reproductive, and developmental problems [49,50]. Antibiotic residues in camel meat further complicate the issue, raising questions about the misuse of veterinary drugs and the potential for antibiotic resistance. These findings highlight the need for stringent regulatory measures and regular monitoring efforts to ensure the safety of camel meat with regard to chemical residues and contaminants. In Middle Eastern countries, where camel meat is more commonly consumed, future studies must focus on the long-term health implications, the sources of contamination, and effective mitigation strategies. Enhanced analytical methods and comprehensive risk assessments of chemical residues and contaminants in camel meat are essential to address these food safety challenges.

6. Zoonoses in Camel Populations in the Middle Eastern Countries

One of the most widely known zoonotic diseases connected with camels over the past decade is the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [65]. Recognizing the range of camel-related zoonotic diseases is essential for carrying out reliable control actions and reducing health threats. Zoonotic infections can spread from camels to humans via direct contact with infected animals, contaminated food products, or exposure to contaminated environments [65,66]. For instance, traditional camel management practices, slaughtering approaches, processing aspects, and hygienic procedures are among the key factors influencing the course of these zoonotic diseases [67]. Implementing appropriate control and prevention processes for zoonotic diseases related to camels is contingent upon the One Health concept, which embraces system thinking and addresses diseases at the animal–human–environment interfaces [68,69]. Techniques that include camel vaccination, the introduction of biosecurity systems in farms and retail markets, the recommendation of hygienic food handling practices, and public health education can be employed to minimize the risk of camel-associated zoonotic transmission [70].
In the Middle East, there has been a tangible improvement in the surveillance and monitoring of significant zoonotic risks in camels, notably MERS-CoV and brucellosis; however, there are still significant gaps [65]. A critical gap is the lack of an operational One Health surveillance system that could integrate data from both human and animal health sectors [23]. Some countries, especially in the GCC region, have established surveillance programs for specific zoonotic diseases like MERS-CoV or brucellosis. However, these initiatives are isolated, and efficient system thinking and transparent data-sharing must be further considered [71]. One of the gaps is also in the diagnostic methods used to identify zoonotic pathogens in the camel population. More sensitive and specific methods are required, especially for rapidly detecting multiple emerging zoonotic diseases [65]. Moreover, applying new technologies for pathogen identification in some Middle Eastern countries, such as next-generation sequencing, is not equally accessible due to economic challenges; hence, accurate monitoring is hindered. There is a need, across the region, to invest more in diagnostic infrastructures, planning capabilities, and training programs to improve capacities and strengthen surveillance systems [72]. Baseline studies on camel zoonoses are lacking in many Middle Eastern countries; as such, there is a gap in knowledge on transmission routes and contributing environmental factors. This knowledge is in high demand to guide evidence-based policies and practices in preventing and controlling zoonotic diseases.
Table 3 provides a detailed review of human cases of camel-origin zoonotic diseases in the GCC and north African countries over the past decade (2014 and onward). MERS-CoV remains a persistent zoonotic challenge issue in several countries across the regions (Table 3). For instance, multiple outbreaks in humans were reported in Saudi Arabia over the past decade (Table 3). The most significant outbreak in 2014–2015 involved 566 human cases, all of which required hospitalization and resulted in 69 deaths [72]. The prevalence of direct contact with camels as the primary transmission route underscores the critical need for stringent control measures in camel handling and interactions (Table 3).
Similarly, the UAE reported significant outbreaks in humans between 2017 and 2022, with 14 cases requiring hospitalization [71]. Oman and Qatar also experienced substantial MERS-CoV activity, with Oman recording 18 human cases from 2017 to 2022, all requiring hospitalization [71], and Qatar reported 16 human cases from 2014 to 2016, all requiring hospitalization [72]. On the other hand, Algeria and Bahrain experienced fewer, but a still significant amount of, MERS-CoV human cases, with Algeria documenting an outbreak in 2014 that resulted in two deaths [72], while Bahrain had an outbreak in 2016 with 1 death [71]. On the other hand, Egypt reported Trypanosomiasis and Clostridium perfringens outbreaks linked to camel meat consumption, highlighting the potential for non-traditional zoonotic threats beyond MERS-CoV (Table 3).
The recurrence of MERS-CoV outbreaks across the Middle East over the past decade emphasizes the zoonotic risks associated with camel–human interactions across the region. This consistent pattern necessitates ongoing surveillance, improved One Health strategies, and better veterinary preparedness to mitigate these risks.

7. Conclusions

Over the past decade, significant research endeavors have been made to understand camel meat’s microbial and chemical safety and the zoonotic risk in the Middle East; however, there is considerable variability in pathogen surveillance efforts across different countries. The persistent detection of antibiotic-resistant strains underscores the urgency for stringent antibiotic use policies and robust food safety measures. Enhanced hygienic practices and surveillance systems are crucial to mitigate these microbial risks and protect public health. The findings from this review also highlight a significant contamination of camel meat with heavy metals, pesticide residues, and antibiotic residues, posing a substantial public health concern. MERS-CoV continues to be a persistent public health issue in the region, with numerous outbreaks reported.
We acknowledge that English might not be the predominant publishing language in some Middle Eastern countries, where Arabic, French, and Farsi are used for local scientific publications. Consequently, limiting our search to English-language publications may have restricted our review findings. However, we chose to focus on English to ensure accessibility and consistency in the review process and to utilize widely accessible databases. Future research could expand to include additional languages for a more comprehensive overview of the topic.
Baseline studies on camel zoonoses are needed to fill knowledge gaps on transmission routes and contributing environmental factors. Collaborative efforts among governments, researchers, and veterinary and public health authorities are crucial to the development of evidence-based policies and practices to control food safety hazards and prevent the zoonotic diseases associated with camels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.H.; methodology, M.-Y.I.M., G.B.L., H.S. and I.H.; investigation, M.-Y.I.M., G.B.L., H.S. and I.H.; writing-original draft preparation, M.-Y.I.M. and G.B.L.; writing-review and editing, H.S. and I.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.-Y.I.M. and G.B.L. are supported by ASPIRE, the technology program management pillar of Abu Dhabi’s Advanced Technology Research Council (ATRC), via the ASPIRE Research Institute for Food Security in the Drylands (ARIFSID) project (Subtheme 4.1—One Health and Antimicrobial Resistance).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

References

  1. Dorman, A.E. Aspects of the Husbandry and Management of the Genus Camelus. Br. Vet. J. 1984, 140, 616–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Skidmore, J.A. Reproduction in Dromedary Camels: An Update. Anim. Reprod. 2005, 2, 161–171. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ouajd, S.; Kamel, B. Physiological Particularities of Dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) and Experimental Implications. Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2009, 36, 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  4. Faraz, A.; Tauqir, N.A.; Ishaq, H.M.; Hussain, S.M.; Akbar, M.A.; Mirza, R.H.; Sufyan, A.; Rashid, S. Camel Production Profile and Role in Food Security. Int. J. Agric. Biosci. 2023, 2, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kurtu, M.Y. An Assessment of the Productivity for Meat and the Carcase Yield of Camels (Camelus dromedarius) and of the Consumption of Camel Meat in the Eastern Region of Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2004, 36, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kadim, I.T.; Mahgoub, O.; Al-Marzooqi, W.; Al-Zadjali, S.; Annamalai, K.; Mansour, M.H. Effects of Age on Composition and Quality of Muscle Longissimus Thoracis of the Omani Arabian Camel (Camelus dromedarius). Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kadim, I.T.; Al-Amri, I.S.; Al Kindi, A.Y.; Mbaga, M. Camel Meat Production and Quality: A Review. J. Camel Pract. Res. 2018, 25, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nelson, K.S.; Bwala, D.A.; Nuhu, E.J. The Dromedary Camel; a Review on the Aspects of History, Physical Description, Adaptations, Behavior/Lifecycle, Diet, Reproduction, Uses, Genetics and Diseases. Niger. Vet. J. 2015, 36, 1299–1317. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cuadrado, P.S.; Young, H.; Vance, A. Camel Racing: The Multi-Million Dollar Industry Mixing Modernity and Tradition. Available online: https://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/14/sport/camel-racing-robots-uae-thoroughbred-hussain-al-marzooqi/index.html (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  10. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). International Year of Camelids (IYC) 2024|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Fao.Org). Available online: https://www.fao.org/camelids-2024/en (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  11. Kutty, C.I.; Yousuf, A.M. Management Practices and Production Performance of Camels under Organized Farming in Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 87, 1269–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Faye, B. The Production Potential and the Importance of Camel and Camelids in the World. In Proceedings of the WBC/ICAR 2008 Satellite Meeting on Camelid Reproduction, Budapest, Hungary, 12–13 July 2008; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kadim, I.T.; Mahgoub, O.; Purchas, R.W. A Review of the Growth, and of the Carcass and Meat Quality Characteristics of the One-Humped Camel (Camelus dromedaries). Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 555–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baba, W.N.; Rasool, N.; Selvamuthukumara, M.; Maqsood, S. A Review on Nutritional Composition, Health Benefits, and Technological Interventions for Improving Consumer Acceptability of Camel Meat: An Ethnic Food of Middle East. J. Ethn. Foods 2021, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kadim, I.T.; Al-Ani, M.R.; Al-Maqbaly, R.S.; Mansour, M.H.; Mahgoub, O.; Johnson, E.H. Proximate, Amino Acid, Fatty Acid and Mineral Composition of Raw and Cooked Camel (Camelus dromedarius) Meat. Br. Food J. 2011, 113, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Raiymbek, G.; Kadim, I.; Konuspayeva, G.; Mahgoub, O.; Serikbayeva, A.; Faye, B. Discriminant Amino-Acid Components of Bactrian (Camelus bactrianus) and Dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) Meat. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 41, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mohammed, H.H.H.; Jin, G.; Ma, M.; Khalifa, I.; Shukat, R.; Elkhedir, A.E.; Zeng, Q.; Noman, A.E. Comparative Characterization of Proximate Nutritional Compositions, Microbial Quality and Safety of Camel Meat in Relation to Mutton, Beef, and Chicken. LWT 2020, 118, 108714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghazali, M.H.; Bakhsh, M.; Zainab, U.; Faraz, A.; Munir, M.U.; Channo, A.; Ahmad, M.; Rashid, S. Camel Meat Production, Consumption and Nutritive Value: Present Status and Future Prospects. Int. J. Camel Sci. 2023, 5, 123–136. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kadim, I.T.; Mahgoub, O.; Mbaga, M. Potential of Camel Meat as a Non-Traditional High Quality Source of Protein for Human Consumption. Anim. Front. 2014, 4, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sabahat, S.; Nadeem, A.; Maryam, J. Genetic and Genomic Prospects for Camel Meat Production. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2020, 31, 635–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yam, B.A.Z.; Khomeiri, M.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Heidari, Z.; Bashghareh, H.; Haghighi, N. Effect of Levels of Camel Meat on Physiochemichal and Sensory Properties of Hamburger. Basic Res. J. Microbiol. 2015, 2, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  22. Salah, H.; Abdu, K.; Elasraag, Y. The Potential Contribution of Camel Meat Production to Achieve Food Security from Animal Protein in Egypt. Menoufia J. Agric. Econ. Soc. Sci. 2023, 8, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Suliman, G.M. Camel Meat as a Future Promising Protein Source. Anim. Front. 2023, 13, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Djenane, D.; Aider, M. The One-Humped Camel: The Animal of Future, Potential Alternative Red Meat, Technological Suitability and Future Perspectives. F1000Res 2024, 11, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Corrò, M.; Saleh-Mohamed-Lamin, S.; Jatri-Hamdi, S.; Slut-Ahmed, B.; Mohamed-Lejlifa, S.; Di Lello, S.; Rossi, D.; Broglia, A.; Vivas-Alegre, L. A Preliminary Microbiological Assessment of Process Hygiene of Traditional Outdoor Camel Slaughter in Sahrawi Refugee Camps. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 1859–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hassen, K.A.; Omer, S.A.; Hassen, N.A. Assessment of Hygienic Practice on Camel Meat Handlers, and Identification of Bacterial Contamination in Abattoir and Butcheries of Nagelle Town, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Int. Res. J. Sci. Technol. 2021, 2, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Benyagoub, E.; Lali, M.A.; Lamari, N. Quality of Fresh Camel Meat (Camelus dromedarius) Sold at Retail Houses in Bechar City (Southwest of Algeria): Physicochemical and Hygienic Approaches. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2022, 41, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morshdy, A.E.M.A.; Mehrez, S.M.I.; Tharwat, A.E.; Abdallah, K.M.E.; Darwish, W.S.; Nabawy, E.E.; Ali, E.-S.M. Hygienic Status of the Carcass Surfaces of Cattle, Buffalo, Sheep, and Camel Carcasses and Their Contact Surfaces. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2023, 13, 1294–1298. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chigbu, U.E.; Atiku, S.O.; Du Plessis, C.C. The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising. Publications 2023, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases: Foodborne Disease Bur-Epidemiology Reference Group 2007–2015; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; ISBN 9789241565165. [Google Scholar]
  32. Osman, K.; Orabi, A.; Elbehiry, A.; Hanafy, M.H.; Ali, A.M. Pseudomonas Species Isolated from Camel Meat: Quorum Sensing-Dependent Virulence, Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance. Future Microbiol. 2019, 14, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Amery, K.; Elhariri, M.; Elsayed, A.; El-Moghazy, G.; Elhelw, R.; El-Mahallawy, H.; El Hariri, M.; Hamza, D. Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Camel Meat and Slaughterhouse Workers in Egypt. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sallam, K.I.; Abd-Elrazik, Y.; Raslan, M.T.; Imre, K.; Morar, A.; Herman, V.; Zaher, H.A. Cefotaxime-, Ciprofloxacin-, and Extensively Drug-Resistant Escherichia coli O157:H7 and O55:H7 in Camel Meat. Foods 2023, 12, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahmed, H.A.; Elsohaby, I.; Elamin, A.M.; El-Ghafar, A.E.A.; Elsaid, G.A.; Elbarbary, M.; Mohsen, R.A.; El Feky, T.M.; El Bayomi, R.M. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing E. coli from Retail Meat and Workers: Genetic Diversity, Virulotyping, Pathotyping and the Antimicrobial Effect of Silver Nanoparticles. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alkhalaf, A.A.; El-Ghareeb, W.R.; Abdel Raheem, S.M.; Seliem, M.M.; Shosha, A.M.; Elzawahry, R.R. A Study on the Prevalence of Multidrug Resistant Food Poisoning Salmonella spp. in Camel Meat and Offal with a Reduction Trial Using Organic Acids. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2024, 14, 526–530. [Google Scholar]
  37. Askari, N.; Momtaz, H.; Tajbakhsh, E. Acinetobacter Baumannii in Sheep, Goat, and Camel Raw Meat: Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern. AIMS Microbiol. 2019, 5, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baghbaderani, Z.T.; Shakerian, A.; Rahimi, E. Phenotypic and Genotypic Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteria Isolated from Retail Meat. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 1339–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Azwai, S.; Alfallani, E.; Abolghait, S.; Garbaj, A.; Naas, H.; Moawad, A.; Gammoudi, F.; Rayes, H.; Barbieri, I.; Eldaghayes, I. Isolation and Molecular Identification of Vibrio spp. by Sequencing of 16S RDNA from Seafood, Meat and Meat Products in Libya. Open Vet. J. 2016, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salman, M.B.; Zin Eldin, A.I.A.; Ata, N.S.; Abd Elfatah, E.B.; Eissa, N. Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Risk Factors of Zoonotic Foodborne Pathogens Isolated from Camel Meat. J. Curr. Vet. Res. 2024, 6, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Elkady, S.; Darwish, W.; Tharwat, A.; Said, M.; ElAtriby, D.; Seliem, M.; Alfifi, A.; Ghareeb, W.; Gad, T. Prevalence and Antibiogram of Shigatoxin-Producing E. coli in Camel Meat and Offal. Open Vet. J. 2024, 14, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bosilevac, J.M.; Gassem, M.A.; Al Sheddy, I.A.; Almaiman, S.A.; Al-Mohizea, I.S.; Alowaimer, A.; Koohmaraie, M. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in Camels, Cattle, Goats, and Sheep Harvested for Meat in Riyadh. J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Raji, M.A.; Garaween, G.; Ehricht, R.; Monecke, S.; Shibl, A.M.; Senok, A. Genetic Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Retail Meat in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yehia, H.M.; Elkhadragy, M.F.; Aljahani, A.H.; Alarjani, K.M. Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes in Camel Meat. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20201062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El-Ghareeb, W.R.; Abdel-Raheem, S.M.; Al-Marri, T.M.; Alaql, F.A.; Fayez, M.M. Isolation and Identification of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamases (ESBLs) Escherichia coli from Minced Camel Meat in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Thai J. Vet. Med. 2020, 50, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fayez, M.; El-Ghareeb, W.R.; Elmoslemany, A.; Alsunaini, S.J.; Alkafafy, M.; Alzahrani, O.M.; Mahmoud, S.F.; Elsohaby, I. Genotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridioides difficile in Camel Minced Meat. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Husain, F.M.; Perveen, K.; Qais, F.A.; Ahmad, I.; Alfarhan, A.H.; El-Sheikh, M.A. Naringin Inhibits the Biofilms of Metallo-β-Lactamases (MβLs) Producing Pseudomonas Species Isolated from Camel Meat. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Al-Asmari, F.; Hamad, S.H.; Al Hashedi, S.A. Prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae in Camel, Cattle, and Sheep Carcasses at Slaughterhouses and Butcher Shops. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hembrom, S.; Singh, B.; Gupta, S.K.; Nema, A.K. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Heavy Metal Contamination in Foodstuff and Associated Human Health Risk: A Global Perspective. In Contemporary Environmental Issues and Challenges in Era of Climate Change; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 33–63. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bala, A.; Junaidu, A.U.; Salihu, M.D.; Agaie, B.M.; Saulawa, M.A.; Musawa, A.I.; Ahmad, K.H. Determination of Heavy Metal Residues in Slaughtered Camels at Sokoto and Gusau Modern Abattoirs, Nigeria. J. Health Pollut. 2018, 8, 181204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Abdou, A.; Mohamed, F. Estimation of Some Heavy Metals Residues in Blood Serum and Tissues of Camels. Assiut Vet. Med. J. 2015, 61, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Morshdy, A.E.M.; Darwish, W.S.; El-Ghareeb, W.R.; Gouda, R. Antibiotic and Heavy Metal Residues in Camel Meat. In Proceedings of the 7th International Toxicology Symposium in Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa, 31 August 2015; pp. 38–39. [Google Scholar]
  53. El-Ghareeb, W.R.; Mulla, Z.S.; Meligy, A.M.A.; Darwish, W.S.; Edris, A.M. Antibiotic Residue Levels in Camel, Cattle and Sheep Tissues Using LC-MS/MS Method. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2019, 29, 943–952. [Google Scholar]
  54. Asli, M.; Azizzadeh, M.; Moghaddamjafari, A.; Mohsenzadeh, M. Copper, Iron, Manganese, Zinc, Cobalt, Arsenic, Cadmium, Chrome, and Lead Concentrations in Liver and Muscle in Iranian Camel (Camelus dromedarius). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 194, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Al-perkhdri, A.S.A. Study of the Some Heavy Metals Residues in the Camel Meat in Different Regions of Kirkuk Governorate during the Spring and Summer Seasons. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 735, 012080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jehad, A.-H.; Moawiya, H.; Mazen, A.; Sati, A.-D.; Khaled, A.-H. Banned Organochlorine Pesticides Residues in Camel Milk, Meat, and Liver: A Case Study from Jordan. Jordan. J. Eng. Chem. Ind. 2021, 4, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  57. Elasough, J.; Elgerwi, A.; Eldaghayes, I.; El-Mahmoudy, A. Residual Evaluation of Oxytetracycline in Camel Edible Tissues in Tripoli Region, Libya. Curr. Res. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 718–724. [Google Scholar]
  58. Abdelbasset, C.; Rabia, E.; Abdallah, B.; Boubker, N.; AbdelKhalid, E. Distribution of Trace Elements and Heavy Metals in Liver, Lung, Meat, Heart and Kidney of Cattle, Sheep, Camel and Equine Slaughtered in Casablanca City-Morocco. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2014, 5, 294–303. [Google Scholar]
  59. Osman, K.A. Human Health Risk of Dietary Intake of Some Organochlorine Pesticide Residues in Camels Slaughtered in the Districts of Al-Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia. J. AOAC Int. 2015, 98, 1199–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mohamed, H.; Haris, P.; Brima, E. Estimated Dietary Intakes of Toxic Elements from Four Staple Foods in Najran City, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. El-Ghareeb, W.R.; Darwish, W.S.; Meligy, A.M.A. Metal Contents in the Edible Tissues of Camel and Sheep: Human Dietary Intake and Risk Assessment in Saudi Arabia. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2019, 67, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hussein, Y.A.; Meligy, A.M.A.; El-Ghareeb, W.R.; Al-Shokair, S.S.; Abdel-Raheem, S.M. Selected Heavy Metals and Their Risk Assessment in Camels (Camelus dromedarius). J. Camel Pract. Res. 2022, 29, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Abdelrahman, M.M.; Alhidary, I.A.; Matar, A.M.; Alobre, M.M.; Ayadi, M.; Aljumaah, R.S. Heavy Metals Levels in Soil, Water and Feed and Relation to Slaughtered Camels’ Tissues (Camelus dromedarius) from Five Districts in Saudi Arabia during Spring. Life 2023, 13, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Meligy, A.; Ghareeb, W.; Raheem, S.; Ismail, H.; Darwish, W.; Kandeel, M.; Alfifi, A.; Shokair, S.; Hussein, M. Assessment of Some Toxic Elements (Co, Cr, Mn, Se, and As) in Muscle, Offal, Hair and Blood of Camels (Camelus dromedaries) and Their Risk Assessment. Open Vet. J. 2024, 14, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Khalafalla, A.I. Zoonotic Diseases Transmitted from the Camels. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1244833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kumar, V. Emerging Human Coronavirus Infections (SARS, MERS, and COVID-19): Where They Are Leading Us. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 40, 5–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aklilu, M.A.; WeldeMariam, D.T.; Shanta, S.A.; Islam, M.S.; Akter, A. Review on the Epidemiology and Public Health Importance of Camel Tuberculosis. Int. J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 2022, 5, 116–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Habib, I.; Mohamed, M.Y.I. Foodborne Infections in the Middle East. In Food Safety in the Middle East; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 71–107. ISBN 9780128224175. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mohamed, M.-Y.I.; Habib, I.; Khalifa, H.O. Salmonella in the Food Chain within the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. AIMS Microbiol. 2024, 10, 468–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Adel, M. Brucella Transmission from Domestic and Wild Animals to Dromedary Camel: Diagnostic Methods and Zoonotic Threats—A Review. Open Vet. Sci. 2022, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOUN MERS-CoV Situation Update. Available online: https://www.fao.org/animal-health/situation-updates/mers-coronavirus (accessed on 18 May 2024).
  72. Aly, M.; Elrobh, M.; Alzayer, M.; Aljuhani, S.; Balkhy, H. Occurrence of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) across the Gulf Corporation Council Countries: Four Years Update. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sobhy, H.M.; Barghash, S.M.; Behour, T.S.; Razin, E.A. Seasonal Fluctuation of Trypanosomiasis in Camels in North-West Egypt and Effect of Age, Sex, Location, Health Status and Vector Abundance on the Prevalence. Beni Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Garcell, H.G.; Garcia, E.G.; Pueyo, P.V.; Martín, I.R.; Arias, A.V.; Alfonso Serrano, R.N. Outbreaks of Brucellosis Related to the Consumption of Unpasteurized Camel Milk. J. Infect. Public Health 2016, 9, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. ECDPC. Geographical Distribution of Cases of MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia; ECDPC: Solna, Sweden, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  76. Newey, S. Mers Outbreak in Saudi Arabia Puts Health Experts on High Alert. Available online: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/mers-outbreak-saudi-arabia-middle-east-respiratory-syndrome/ (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  77. WHO. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus—Saudi Arabia. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-(mers-cov) (accessed on 13 June 2024).
  78. Aleanizy, F.S.; Mohmed, N.; Alqahtani, F.Y.; El Hadi Mohamed, R.A. Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, G.-H.; Tan, B.-H.; Chi-Yuan Teo, E.; Lim, S.-G.; Dan, Y.-Y.; Wee, A.; Kim Aw, P.P.; Zhu, Y.; Hibberd, M.L.; Tan, C.-K.; et al. Chronic Infection with Camelid Hepatitis e Virus in a Liver Transplant Recipient Who Regularly Consumes Camel Meat and Milk. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 355–357.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vetsci 11 00344 g001
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for updated reviews in the database search.
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for updated reviews in the database search.
Vetsci 11 00344 g001
Table 1. Overview of research on microbial hazards of camel meat in some Middle Eastern countries published between 2014–2024.
Table 1. Overview of research on microbial hazards of camel meat in some Middle Eastern countries published between 2014–2024.
CountryYearPathogen(s)Source(s)Sample SizePrevalence (%)Detection MethodReference
Egypt2019Pseudomonas aeruginosaMeat1008.0Biochemical identification by VITEK 2 and PCR confirmation[32]
Pseudomonas fluorescens2.0
Egypt2019Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA)Meat20014.5Culture-based detection, biochemical identification, and PCR confirmation[33]
Egypt2023Escherichia coli O157:H7Meat1109.1Culture-based detection, biochemical and serological identification, and PCR confirmation[34]
Escherichia coli O55:H732.0
Egypt2023Extended Spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coliMeat508.0Culture-based detection, biochemical identification, and PCR confirmation.
Double-Disc Synergy Test (DDST) for ESBL characterization		[35]
Egypt2024Salmonella Enteritidis
Salmonella Typhimurium
Salmonella Virchow
Salmonella Apeyeme		Meat, liver, kidney6020.0Culture-based detection, biochemical and serological identification, and PCR confirmation[36]
Iran2019Acinetobacter baumaniiMeat 952.3Culture-based detection and PCR confirmation[37]
Iran2020Staphylococcus aureusMeat1004.0Culture-based detection, biochemical identification, and PCR confirmation[38]
Libya2016Vibrio parahaemolyticusMeat933.3Culture-based detection, PCR confirmation[39]
Egypt2024Salmonella spp. Meat1008.0Culture-based detection, biochemical identification, and PCR confirmation[40]
Staphylococcus aureus24.0
Escherichia coli14.0
Egypt2024Escherichia coli strains O17:H18; O128:H2, O119: H6, O103:H4, O145, O121:H7Meat 6010.0Culture-based detection, serological identification, and PCR confirmation[41]
Liver30.0
Kidney5.0
Saudi Arabia2015Escherichia coli O157Feces2062.4Culture-based detection, biochemical identification, and PCR confirmation[42]
Hides2.9
Salmonella spp.Feces23.2
Hides 67.6
Saudi Arabia2016Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)Meat2420.0Culture-based detection, biochemical identification, molecular characterization by StaphyType DNA microarray technology[43]
Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)28.0
Saudi Arabia2020Listeria monocytogenesMeat5016.0Culture-based detection,
biochemical identification and PCR confirmation		[44]
Listeria seeligeri6.0
Listeria innocua2.0
Listeria welshimeri2.0
Listeria grayi1.0
Saudi Arabia2020Extended Spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) producing Escherichia coliMinced meat15011.3Culture-based detection, biochemical identification by VITEK 2,
and PCR confirmation		[45]
Saudi Arabia2021Clostridium perfringensMinced meat10014.0Culture-based detection, biochemical identification by VITEK 2[46]
Clostridium difficile4.0
Saudi Arabia2021Metallo-β-lactamases (MβLs) producing Pseudomonas spp.Meat4555.0Culture-based detection, biochemical identification[47]
Saudi Arabia2023Escherichia coliCarcass 40100.0Culture-based detection, biochemical identification, and PCR confirmation[48]
Meat cuts70.0
Salmonella spp.Carcass 40.0
Meat cuts40.0
Table 2. Overview of research on the chemical hazards of camel meat in some Middle Eastern countries published between 2014–2024.
Table 2. Overview of research on the chemical hazards of camel meat in some Middle Eastern countries published between 2014–2024.
CountryYearHeavy Metal(s) aPesticide /Drug Residue bSource(s)Detection Method cReference
Egypt2015Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn-Muscles, serum, lungs, liver, kidneyAAS[51]
Egypt2015Pb, Cd, Cu, AlOxytetracyclineMuscles, kidney, and liverAntibiotic residue detected by four-plate method using nutrient agar seeded with Bacillus subtilis and HPLC; Heavy metal detected by AAS[52]
Egypt2018Pb, Cd, Hg-Muscles, kidney, and liverAAS[52]
Egypt2019-Enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, tylosin, erythromycin, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, sulfamethazine and sulfaquinoxalineMuscles, kidney, and liverLC MS/MS[53]
Iraq2020As, Cd, Pb, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Co -Muscles, kidney, and liverICP–OES[54]
Iraq2021Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Co-Muscles, kidney, and liver-[55]
Jordan2021-DDT and its metabolites, HCH and its isomers, Heptachlor and Heptachlor epoxide, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin, and HCBMeat, liver, milkGC (HP 5890) equipped with Ni electron capture detector[56]
Libya2015-OxytetracyclineMuscles, kidney, liver, and fatLC MS[57]
Morocco2014Cd, Pb-Liver, lung, meat, heart, and kidneyICP–AES[58]
Saudi Arabia2015-DDT, DDE, DDD, DDA, Lindane, DicofolMuscles and liver of camelsGC/MS[59]
Saudi Arabia2017As, Cd, Cr, Pb-MeatCoupled plasma mass spectrometry[60]
Saudi Arabia2019Cd, Pb, As-Muscles, kidney, and liverICP–OES[61]
Saudi Arabia2022Zn, Fe, Cu, Pb, Cd-Tissues, muscles, kidney, and liver; serum and hairAAS[62]
Saudi Arabia2023Pb, Cd, Co-Meat, liver,
young camels’ carcass tissues		ICP–OES equipped with a Meinhard Nebulizer type A2[63]
Saudi Arabia2024As, Cr-Muscles, kidney, and liverAAS used in conjunction with a (GFAAS)[64]
a Pb—Lead; Cd—Cadmium; Cu—Copper; Zn—Zinc; Al—Aluminum; Hg—Mercury; As—Arsenic; Cr—Chromium; Fe—Iron; Mn—Manganese; Zn—Zinc; Co—Cobalt; b DDT—Dichlordiphenyltrichloroethane; DDE—Dichlordiphenyldichloroethene; DDD—Dichlordiphenyldichloroethane; DDA—Bis 4 chlorophenyl acetic acid; HCH—Hexachlorocyclohexane; HCB—Hexachlorobenzene. c AAS—Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer; LC MS/MS—Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry; ICP–OES—Inductively Coupled Plasma–Optical Emission Spectrometry; GC—Gas chromatography; LC/MS—liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; ICP–AES—Inductively Coupled Plasma–Atomic Emission Spectroscopy; GC/MS—Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry; GFAAS—Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.
Table 3. Overview of human cases of camel-origin zoonoses in some Middle Eastern countries published between 2014–2024.
Table 3. Overview of human cases of camel-origin zoonoses in some Middle Eastern countries published between 2014–2024.
CountryYearEpidemiological StudyCamel-Origin Zoonotic DiseaseNo. of
Human Cases		No. of
Hospitalizations		No. of
Deaths		Suspected Transmission Source(s) Reference
Bahrain2016Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV11NDDirect contact[71]
Oman2017–2022Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV1818NDDirect contact[71]
Qatar2017–2022Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV1212NDDirect contact[71]
United Arab Emirates2017–2022Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV14140Direct contact[71]
Algeria2014Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV22ND *Direct contact[72]
Egypt2014Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV11NDDirect contact[72]
Kuwait2014–2015Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV44NDDirect contact[72]
Oman2014–2016Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV88NDDirect contact[72]
Qatar2014–2016Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV1616NDDirect contact[72]
Saudi Aribia2016Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV318318NDDirect contact[72]
2015Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV448448NDDirect contact
2014Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV566566NDDirect contact[72]
Egypt2014–2015Cross-sectional studyTrypanosomiasisNDNDNDMeat[73]
Qatar2015Outbreak investigationsBrucellosis1414NDUnpasteurized camel milk[74]
United Arab Emirates2023–2024Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV11NDDirect contact[75]
Saudi Aribia2023–2024Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV55NDDirect contact[75]
2024Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV331Unknown[76]
2022–2023Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoV332Direct contact[77]
2014–2015Outbreak investigationsMERS-CoVND19069Direct contact[78]
United Arab Emirates2016Case studyHepatitis E infectionNDNDNDMeat[79]
* ND, not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohamed, M.-Y.I.; Lakshmi, G.B.; Sodagari, H.; Habib, I. A One Health Perspective on Camel Meat Hygiene and Zoonoses: Insights from a Decade of Research in the Middle East. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11080344

AMA Style

Mohamed M-YI, Lakshmi GB, Sodagari H, Habib I. A One Health Perspective on Camel Meat Hygiene and Zoonoses: Insights from a Decade of Research in the Middle East. Veterinary Sciences. 2024; 11(8):344. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11080344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohamed, Mohamed-Yousif Ibrahim, Glindya Bhagya Lakshmi, Hamidreza Sodagari, and Ihab Habib. 2024. "A One Health Perspective on Camel Meat Hygiene and Zoonoses: Insights from a Decade of Research in the Middle East" Veterinary Sciences 11, no. 8: 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11080344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop