Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Growth Performance, Nutritional Composition, and Muscle Transcriptome between Two Cultured Varieties of the Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis)
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanism of Ligilactobacillus salivarius GX118 in Regulating the Growth of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Resistance to Aeromonas salmonicida Infection
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between Mean Length at Maturity and Maximum Length in Coral Reef Fish
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characterization and Antibacterial Potential of Goose-Type Lysozyme from Japanese Pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Immune Protection of a Bivalent Inactivated Vaccine against Aeromonas salmonicida and Vibrio vulnificus in Turbot

1
School of Marine Science and Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2
Yantai Marine Economic Research Institute, Yantai 264000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fishes 2024, 9(4), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040131
Submission received: 21 March 2024 / Revised: 5 April 2024 / Accepted: 6 April 2024 / Published: 9 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Diseases Diagnostics and Prevention in Aquaculture)

Abstract

:
The Aeromonas salmonicida is responsible for causing furunculosis in various fish species. Furunculosis is a ubiquitous disease that affects the aquaculture industry and causes the mass mortality of turbot. Vibrio vulnificus is a pathogen that causes skin ulcers and hemorrhagic septicemia in fish, resulting in significant mortality in aquaculture. In this study, we have established a bivalent inactivated vaccine against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus with Montanide™ ISA 763 AVG as an adjuvant. This bivalent inactivated vaccine was used to immunize turbot by intraperitoneal injection, and the relevant immune indexes were detected. The results demonstrate that the bivalent inactivated vaccine exhibited a relative percent survival (RPS) of 77% following A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus intraperitoneal challenge. The vaccinated group exhibited higher levels of acid phosphatase activity and lysozyme activity compared to the control group. ELISA results showed a significant increase in serum antibody levels in immunized turbot, which was positively correlated with immunity. In the kidney tissue, related immune genes (TLR5, CD4, MHCI and MHCII) were up-regulated significantly, showing that the vaccine can induce cellular and humoral immune responses in turbot. In conclusion, the bivalent inactivated vaccine against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus was immunogenic, efficiently preventing turbot from infection, which has the potential to be applied in aquaculture.
Key Contribution: The formalin-inactivated bivalent vaccine can increase the serum antibody titer, ACP activity, and LZM activity of turbot; induce the expression of relevant immune genes; and effectively prevent the infection of A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus in turbot.

1. Introduction

Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) is a cold-water fish popular within the aquaculture industry around the world because of its refined flavor and white flesh. It not only provides abundant protein, vitamin B3, and B12 but also serves as a source of minerals such as selenium, magnesium, and phosphorus. After being imported from Europe, it is cultured in quantity in China. One major threat to turbot farming is the outbreak of infectious diseases, particularly those caused by various bacteria. These diseases dramatically influence turbot farming in Europe and China. Vibrio vulnificus [1], Edwardsiella tarda [2], and Aeromonas salmonicida [3] are the most common bacterial pathogen in turbot, causing significant economic losses. Currently, effective methods to control these diseases are needed urgently.
A. salmonicida has caused significant economic losses in the global aquaculture industry as a primary bacterial pathogen, particularly in salmonid culture systems, ever since its first documentation in the 19th century [4]. Previously, A. salmonicida was only considered a major pathogen in fish; however, recent reports have indicated its potential to cause zoonotic diseases [5,6,7]. This bacterium can be found almost worldwide in both marine and freshwater environments. A. salmonicida is the pathogen of furunculosis, which can lead to muscle necrosis, hemorrhagic septicemia, and death in turbot [8]. Clinical symptoms include redness of the skin, inflammation, and ulcers [9].
In bacterial diseases of aquaculture animals, V. vulnificus is one of the most common pathogens that inhabit marine environments [10]. Furthermore, Vibrio infections can lead to severe mortality in fish, shellfish, crustaceans, and other farmed populations [11], and are also pathogenic to humans [12,13]. What is more, infections with V. vulnificus can easily result in massive mortality of economically important animals. Especially in turbot, V. vulnificus can cause skin and fin hemorrhage as well as ulcerative necrosis, even leading to extensive mortality in turbot cultures [14].
In conclusion, A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus are two Gram-negative bacteria that can cause diseases in turbot, leading to high morbidity and mortality [4]. However, there are no studies of bivalent inactivated vaccines against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus infections. In this research, a bivalent inactivated vaccine supplemented with Montanide™ ISA 763 AVG adjuvant was developed to protect turbot against infections caused by A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus. We recorded the survival rate in the vaccinated group and control group to evaluate the RPS of the bivalent inactivated vaccine. Additionally, in the vaccinated group and control group, we assessed the acid phosphatase activity, lysozyme activity, serum antibody titer, and expression levels of immunity genes (TLR5, CD4, MHCI, and MHCII).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fish Rearing

The healthy turbot, with an average weight of 30 ± 5 g and an average length of 8 ± 2 cm, were procured from a commercial aquaculture farm located in Haiyang City, Shandong Province, China. These fish were reared in tanks filled with 18 °C aerated seawater, which was changed twice a day. The oxygen content in seawater was greater than 7 mg/L, and the salinity was 28 ppt. Throughout the duration of the experiment, turbots were fed with commercial feed (the main components of the feeds were fish meal, soybean meal, fish oil, etc.) twice daily. Before experimentation, samples were taken from the liver, kidney, and spleen for examination to verify that turbots were free from A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus.

2.2. Preparation of Inactivated Vaccine

Highly pathogenic A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus isolated from diseased turbot were used for vaccine production. The bacteria were cultured with Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB, Hopebio, Qingdao, China) and incubated in an incubator shaker at 200 rpm at 28 °C for 24 h. Bacteria were centrifuged at 4 °C at 6000 rpm for 15 min, after which the supernatant medium was abandoned. Bacteria were washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Welgene, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea) and then diluted to a concentration of 2 × 108 CFU/mL in sterile PBS. The concentration of bacteria was determined by optical density measurement. The resuspended bacteria were subjected to inactivation by adding 0.5% formaldehyde and then incubated at 4 °C for 24 h. A combined vaccine was prepared by combining equivalent quantities of inactivated A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus. The inactivation of bacteria was checked by plating on TSB agar plates after incubating for five days. The bivalent inactivated vaccine was ultimately a mixture of inactivated vaccine and Montanide™ ISA 763 AVG adjuvant (Seppic, Shanghai, China) in a ratio of 3:7.

2.3. Fish Immunization and Challenge

After acclimating for 7 d, 300 randomly selected turbot specimens were divided into 2 groups, including a vaccinated group and a control group, with 150 specimens in each group. The vaccinated group was administered with an intraperitoneal injection of 0.1 mL bivalent inactivated vaccine (2 × 108 CFU/mL) using a disposable sterile syringe, while the control group was injected with 0.1 mL PBS using the same method. The blood from nine vaccinated and control fish was isolated, respectively, at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks post-vaccination (wpv), with three biological replicates per time point and three fish per biological replicate. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min, the serum was collected and stored at −80 °C until further use. Meanwhile, head kidneys from nine vaccinated and control fish were isolated at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 wpv. The kidneys were collected under aseptic conditions and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Subsequently, they were preserved at −80 °C for the purpose of future RNA extraction. Before any operation, fish were anesthetized with Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (Aladdin, Shanghai, China, 60 mg/L).
According to the previous experimental results, A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus were cultured [3,15]. After centrifugation, the bacterial suspensions were separately resuspended in sterile PBS to achieve concentrations of 2.6 × 106 CFU/mL and 1.8 × 108 CFU/mL, respectively. They were then mixed in a 1:1 ratio to form a mixture of the two bacteria. On day 29 after vaccine immunization, 22 turbots were used for bacterial infection, and each fish was injected intraperitoneally with 200 μL of mixed bacterial suspension and monitored daily. Each fish in the control group was injected with 200 μL of PBS in the same manner. The cumulative mortality rates were recorded over a span of 15 d, and the following formula was used to calculate the relative percent survival (RPS): RPS = {1 − (% mortality in vaccinated fish/% mortality in control fish)} × 100%.

2.4. Analysis of Serum Enzyme Activity

2.4.1. ACP Activity

Acid phosphatase (ACP) can be hydrolyzed to hydrolase under acidic conditions, and hydrolase can destroy the cell walls of bacteria and make them inactive. The activity of ACP is related to the immune response of fish and can be measured to respond to the strength of the immune response of fish. The ACP activity of turbot serum was assessed using a commercially available assay kit (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). Acid phosphatase can decompose disodium phenylphosphate to produce free phenols. Phenols react with specific reagents in alkaline solutions to form red compounds, which are used to determine the activity of the enzyme. Following the specified protocol, 50 μL of the test serum, double distilled water, and standard solution were added to seven centrifugal tubes. Then, 500 μL of the matrix solution and buffer solution was added into each centrifugal tube, thoroughly mixed, and left at 37 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, 1500 μL of color development solution and 1000 μL of alkaline solution were added and left out for 10 min. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorbance at a wavelength of 520 nm. The previous serum sample was diluted twice and assessed three parallels. OD values were presented as the means ± SE (N = 3).

2.4.2. LZM Activity

Lysozyme (LZM) lyses bacteria in the body. When bacteria invade the fish, it is activated and lyses the cell wall of the bacteria, resulting in bacterial death. Therefore, the activity of LZM can reflect the activation of the immune system. The LZM activity of turbot serum was assessed using a commercially available assay kit (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) [16]. LZM can dissolve bacteria and release their contents, so the activity of LZM can be evaluated by measuring the OD value. According to the protocol, 200 μL of the test serum, double distilled water, and standard solution were placed in different tubes on ice, after which 2 mL of Micrococcus luteus was added, and the mixture was kept at 37 °C for 15 min under incubation. A blank control was conducted using double distilled water. The absorbance was measured at 530 nm using a spectrophotometer. The previous serum sample was diluted twice and assessed three parallels. OD values were presented as the means ± SE (N = 3).

2.5. Specific Antibody Levels in Serum

The procedure for the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was as follows. In brief, microtiter plates (Nunc, MaxiSorp, San Diego, CA, USA) were coated overnight at 4 °C with 100 μL of formalin-killed 1.0 × 108 CFU/mL A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus in carbonate–bicarbonate coating buffer (pH 9.6), respectively. Subsequently, the microtiter plate was washed three times with PBST (PBS containing 0.3% Tween-20) and then blocked with PBST containing 1% BSA for a duration of 3 h at 37 °C. After being washed three times, the turbot serum was diluted in PBST at a 1:100 ratio, with 100 μL per well in triplicate, and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, the microplates were washed as described previously and added to 100 μL/well mouse anti-turbot IgM mAb (1:100 Diluted by PBSTB), incubating for 1.5 h at 37 °C. Then, following the previous washing steps, the microplates were subjected to incubation with 100 µL/well goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to HRP (TransGen, Beijing, China, 1:2000 Diluted by PBSTB) for 1.5 h. Lastly, the microplates were washed five times according to the previous steps, and 100 μL/well TMB solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China) was added. Following a 5 min incubation period at room temperature, each well received 100 μL H2SO4 (1 M) to stop the reaction, and the OD450 was measured using a microplate reader.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis of Immune-Related Genes

TLR5 recognizes bacterial flagellin and increases phagocytic activity. MHCI and MHCII are related genes involved in antigen presentation to T cells. CD4 is a T-cell surface molecule that can be involved in T-cell proliferation and differentiation and is also a receptor for MHCII molecules. All these genes are closely related to the immune response after bacterial invasion, so they can reflect the level of immune response of the fish. We designed qRT-PCR primers with specific sequences for amplification of TLR5, CD4, MHCI, and MHCII using NCBI Primer (Table 1). In the extraction of RNA, frozen kidney tissue from the vaccinated group and control group were homogenized in liquid nitrogen in a mortar, and total RNA was extracted from the tissue using a SteadyPure Universal RNA Extraction Kit (Accurate Biology, Changsha, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Agarose gel electrophoresis was utilized to assess the quality of the total RNA that was extracted. The genomic DNA in the extracted RNA was removed by using one-step gDNA removal, and the total RNA was immediately synthesized into cDNA using the cDNA Synthesis SuperMix kit (TransGen, Beijing, China), in accordance with the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. Finally, we stored the synthesized cDNA at −20 °C for future use. The expression levels of immune genes were confirmed by qRT-PCR. Briefly, qRT-PCR was conducted utilizing the SYBR® Green qPCR superMix kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). The reaction was performed in a total volume of 10 µL, which includes 5 µL of 2× SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix, 0.4 µL each for forward and reverse primers (10 µM), 0.8 µL of cDNA, and 3.4 µL of ddH2O. The amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s, and extension at 60 °C for 34 s. The expression level was determined using the comparative threshold cycle method (2−∆∆Ct) with β-actin as the housekeeping gene. The samples were performed in triplicate and the values were presented as the means ± SE. The experimental data were correlated and processed using the one-way ANOVA method. Statistical significance was determined by considering the p < 0.05 to indicate significant differences.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 19.0 package for one-way analysis of variance, and p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Immune Protective Ability of Vaccine

To examine the protective effect of the bivalent inactivated vaccine against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus immunization on turbot, the cumulative mortality was recorded for 15 d, after which the RPS rates were calculated. As shown in Figure 1, the cumulative mortalities of the vaccinated group and control group were 13.6% and 59.1%. There was a notable decrease in mortality among vaccinated fish compared to the control group. The bivalent inactivated vaccine was calculated to have an RPS rate of 77% against the combined challenge of A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus. These data indicate that the bivalent inactivated vaccine against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus can effectively protect turbot from A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus infections and can be used as an effective vaccine for turbot.

3.2. Analysis of ACP Activity

As shown in Figure 2, the ACP activity in the vaccinated group was significantly higher than that in the control group. At 1 wpv, the results revealed that the ACP activity of the vaccinated group significantly exceeded the control group. At 2 wpv, the ACP activity of the vaccinated group reached the highest activity, which was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the peak ACP activity reached 32.7 U/mL. Until 4 wpv, the ACP activity remained elevated compared to the control group.

3.3. Analysis of LZM Activity

As shown in Figure 3, the LZM activity in the vaccinated group was significantly higher than in the control group. At 2 wpv, the LZM activity of the vaccinated group reached the highest activity, which was significantly higher than the control group, and the maximum activity of LZM was 241.7 μg/mL. These results indicate that the bivalent inactivated vaccine induced higher LZM activity compared with the control group.

3.4. The Analysis of Antibody Titers

The titer of specific antibodies in serum after immunization was measured with ELISA. As shown in Figure 4, the antibody titers against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus showed slight fluctuations from 0 to 2 wpv, after which a significant increasing trend was observed from 3 to 4 wpv. The vaccinated group showed a higher antibody response than the control group from 0 to 4 wpv (Figure 4A). At 3 wpv, the titer of the antibody against A. salmonicida reached a peak, which was significantly higher than the control group (p < 0.05). As shown in Figure 4B, the levels of antibodies against V. vulnificus demonstrated a significant increase trend at 3 wpv, with a peak at this time point. Compared to the control group, this level of antibodies was significantly higher (p < 0.05).

3.5. Expression Pattern of Immune-Related Genes during Immunization

The expression of some immune-related genes (TLR5, CD4, MHCI and MHCII) in the kidney tissue was determined by qRT-PCR during the post-vaccination period. To reflect the changes in gene expression before and after immunization, the immune genes of vaccinated groups 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 wpv were detected. As shown in Figure 5, the expression of TLR5, CD4, MHCI and MHCII was significantly increased in the kidney. The TLR5 transcript in the kidney was significantly increased to the maximum expression levels at 1 w; after, it decreased gradually but was still higher than 0 w until 3 w. The CD4 in the kidney was significantly increased to the highest expression levels at 3 wpv; then, it decreased at 4 wpv but was still higher than at 0 wpv. The MHCI transcript in the kidney showed a significant increase at 2 wpv, reaching its highest expression level. Subsequently, it gradually decreased but remained higher than at 0 wpv. The MHCII transcript was significantly up-regulated in a time-dependent manner and to the highest expression levels at 4 wpv.

4. Discussion

In recent years, the cultivation scale of turbot has been continuously expanded after its introduction into China. However, due to intensive cultivation, turbot frequently becomes infected with various pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites [17]. Vaccination has become an effective and popular measure in aquaculture, as we place increasing emphasis on food safety and environmental protection.
Vaccination is commonly utilized in finfish aquaculture, particularly for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). However, the vaccination capabilities for many other fish species are limited or nonexistent due to factors such as limited availability, poor performance, or high costs [18]. It is known that various adjuvants are frequently used in fish vaccines to enhance the protective effect of vaccines [19]. Oil-adjuvant vaccines show better efficacy in terms of protective effects compared to aqueous vaccines, and the Montanide™ ISA 763 AVG was used as an adjuvant in our bivalent inactivated vaccine against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus. The RPS has always been considered a primary indicator to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccines. In previous reports, the RPS values of A. salmonicida formalin-killed with the same adjuvant and V. vulnificus formalin-killed vaccine without an adjuvant were 83% and 60% [20,21]. The addition of the Montanide™ ISA 763 AVG adjuvant improved protection against Vibrio vulnificus infection compared to our vaccine. The inactivated A. salmonicida vaccine with the same adjuvant provided better protection against A. salmonicida infection, whereas our bivalent inactivated vaccine provided protection against both bacteria. In addition, the RPS of the bivalent inactivated vaccine against A. salmonicida and E. tarda with the Montanide™ ISA 763 AVG adjuvant was 77.1% [22]. In this study, our bivalent inactivated vaccine also had a high protective effect, with an RPS of 77%, indicating the vaccine is promising for practical use.
The first line of defense against pathogens in fish is constructed by the non-specific immune system, in which ACP and LZM play crucial roles in the humoral immunity response [23,24,25]. LZM is a crucial protein in the defense against bacteria as it can lyse bacteria in vivo and activate the complement system and phagocytic cells to provide protection [26]. Therefore, LZM activity is a quantitative measure of innate immune response in aquatic animals. ACP is a hydrolase that hydrolyzes various orthophosphate monoesters under acidic conditions and is a marker enzyme for macrophage lysosomes. ACP is one of the quantitative indicators of the non-specific immune system in aquatic animals. The current results indicate that ACP and LZM activities in the vaccinated group significantly exceed that of the control group, which implies that the bivalent inactivated vaccine can effectively increase ACP and LZM activity and improve the non-specific immunity of the immunized fish.
Immunoglobulins are the most important mediators of specific immune responses in fish humoral immunity, which are mainly present in the internal environment in the form of soluble antibodies and participate in humoral immune responses. Therefore, specific antibody titers are an important factor in determining the effectiveness of vaccines. The positive correlation between antibody titers and protection levels in immunized fish also suggests that antibody titers can reflect vaccine efficacy [27]. In our research, antibody levels were significantly increased in the vaccinated group at 3 w and 4 w after immunization. Therefore, we conclude that the combined vaccine of A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus can effectively activate specific immunity in immunized turbot.
A qRT-PCR analysis was used to examine the effect of the bivalent inactivated vaccine against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus on the expression of immune genes. The results showed that the majority of the evaluated genes exhibited increased expression. In particular, the significantly elevated expression levels of TLR5, MHCI, and MHCII imply the initiation of the innate immune response. The MHC gene cluster can encode the histocompatibility system that participates in immune responses, which is involved in antigen presentation. The main role of the MHCI is to deliver newly synthesized antigens in antigen-presenting cells to CD8+ T cells [28]. Similar to the role of MHCI, MHCII plays a role in the immune response by presenting exogenous proteins to T cell receptors, mainly in cellular immunity. CD4+ T cell function as a helper T cell, which can assist in cellular immunity. CD4 factor is a marker of helper T lymphocytes; CD4+ T cell function assists in cellular immunity and is also a receptor for MHCII molecules. According to the results of this experiment, CD4 and MHCII have an inseparable role in exerting immune responses, and the combined vaccine of A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus contributes to stimulating the activation of CD4+ T cells and improving the autoimmunity of fish. It can be hypothesized that the MHCI and MHCII molecules would bind with the antigen and thus present to CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells, which means the combined vaccine of A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus helps to stimulate the antigen presentation pathway. In addition, toll-like receptors (TLRs) have a crucial function in identifying microbial components [29,30]. In this experiment, TLR5 was up-regulated in kidney tissue after vaccination, reaching a peak after 1 wpv. Subsequently, TLR5 showed a downward trend, but the relative expression was still higher than at the 0 wpv level. TLR5 can improve the phagocytic activity of phagocytes, enhance the defense ability against bacteria, fungi, etc., and play an important role in the resistance to infection in immunized individuals. It can be hypothesized that the bivalent inactivated vaccine can promote the expression of TLR5 and induce immune effects in fish against pathogenic bacteria.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we prepared a formalin-inactivated combined vaccine for A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus and demonstrated that it exhibits good immune protection effects in turbot. The bivalent inactivated vaccine was used to immunize turbot by intraperitoneal injection, and the relevant immune indexes were detected. It was found that the serum antibody titer, LZM activity, and acid ACP were greatly increased after immunization, which was significantly different from the control group. In the kidney tissue, relevant immune genes (TLR5, CD4, MHCI, MHCII) were also up-regulated, which further confirmed the immunization effect of the bivalent inactivated vaccine against A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus. The findings from related experiments indicate that the bivalent inactivated vaccine for A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus can be used as an effective treatment to facilitate turbot aquaculture development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.X. and J.Y.; methodology, Y.X.; software, R.F.; validation, J.Y., J.S. and Y.P.; formal analysis, J.Y.; investigation, R.F.; resources, J.S.; data curation, Y.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.X.; visualization, P.L.; supervision, P.L.; project administration, S.Z.; funding acquisition, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by [Qingdao Agricultural University Doctoral Start-Up Fund] grant number [6631122030], [National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [32002421], [Fish Innovation Team of Shandong Agriculture Research System] grant number [SDAIT-12-06] And The APC was funded by [SDAIT-12-06].

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental animal protocols were carried out in accordance with the IACUC Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments at Qingdao Agricultural University (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee). Approval Code: 2022-076. Approval Date: May 2022.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Horne, M.T.; Richards, R.H.; Roberts, R.J.; Smith, P.C. Peracute vibriosis in juvenile turbot Scophthalmus maximus. J. Fish Biol. 2010, 11, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qin, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.G. Edwardsiellosis in farmed turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), associated with an unusual variant of Edwardsiella tarda: A clinical, aetiological and histopathological study. J. Fish Dis. 2014, 37, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lago, E.P.; Nieto, T.P.; Farto, R. Virulence factors of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida strains associated with infections in turbot Psetta maxima. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2012, 99, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Menanteau-Ledouble, S.; Kumar, G.; Saleh, M.; El-Matbouli, M. Aeromonas salmonicida: Updates on an old acquaintance. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2016, 120, 49–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Salehi, M.R.; Shadvar, S.; Sadeghian, M.; Doomanlou, M.; Abdollahi, A.; Manshadi, S.A.D.; Sardari, A.; Rahdar, H.A.; Feizabadi, M.M. Endocarditis with Aeromonas salmonicida. IDCases 2019, 18, e00625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vincent, A.T.; Fernández-Bravo, A.; Sanchis, M.; Mayayo, E.; Figueras, M.J.; Charette, S.J. Investigation of the virulence and genomics of Aeromonas salmonicida strains isolated from human patients. Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tewari, R.; Dudeja, M.; Nandy, S.; Das, A.K. Isolation of Aeromonas salmonicida from Human Blood Sample: A Case Report. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. JCDR 2014, 8, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Björnsdóttir, B.; Gudmundsdóttir, S.; Bambir, S.H.; Gudmundsdóttir, B.K. Experimental infection of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. achromogenes and evaluation of cross protection induced by a furunculosis vaccine. J. Fish Dis. 2005, 28, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Frans, I.; Michiels, C.W.; Bossier, P.; Willems, K.A.; Lievens, B.; Rediers, H. Vibrio anguillarum as a fish pathogen: Virulence factors, diagnosis and prevention. J. Fish Dis. 2011, 34, 643–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Givens, C.E.; Bowers, J.C.; DePaola, A.; Hollibaugh, J.T.; Jones, J.L. Occurrence and distribution of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus--potential roles for fish, oyster, sediment and water. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 58, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, R.; Qiu, L.; Yu, Z.; Zi, J.; Yue, F.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Teng, W.; Liu, X.; Song, L. Identification and characterisation of pathogenic Vibrio splendidus from Yesso scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) cultured in a low temperature environment. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2013, 114, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Janda, J.M.; Newton, A.E.; Bopp, C.A. Vibriosis. Clin. Lab. Med. 2015, 35, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sadat, A.; El-Sherbiny, H.; Zakaria, A.; Ramadan, H. Prevalence, antibiogram and virulence characterization of Vibrio isolates from fish and shellfish in Egypt: A possible zoonotic hazard to humans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hoihuan, A.; Soonson, P.; Bunlipatanon, P.; Thawonsuwan, J.; Tanasomwang, V.; Areechon, N.; Unajak, S. Molecular genotyping and phenotyping of Vibrio vulnificus isolated from diseased, brown-marbled grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus) in Thailand with preliminary vaccine efficacy analysis. Aquaculture 2021, 545, 737188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sanjuán, E.; Amaro, C. Protocol for Specific Isolation of Virulent Strains of Vibrio vulnificus Serovar E (Biotype 2) from Environmental Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 7024–7032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, L.; Yang, Q.; Huang, L.; Wang, K.; Wang, X.; Chen, D.; Geng, Y.; Huang, X.; Ouyang, P.; Lai, W. Effectivity of oral recombinant DNA vaccine against Streptococcus agalactiae in Nile tilapia. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2017, 77, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Q.; Ji, W.; Xu, Z. Current use and development of fish vaccines in China. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 96, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adams, A. Progress, challenges and opportunities in fish vaccine development. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 90, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Irshath, A.A.; Rajan, A.P. Bacterial Pathogenesis in Various Fish Diseases: Recent Advances and Specific Challenges in Vaccine Development. Vaccines 2023, 11, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Torres-Corral, Y.; Girons, A.; González-Barreiro, O.; Seoane, R. Effect of Bivalent Vaccines against Vibrio anguillarum and Aeromonas salmonicida Subspecie achromogenes on Health and Survival of Turbot. Vaccines 2021, 9, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, S.; Li, Y.; Yi, J.; Zheng, X.; Huang, Q.; Su, L.; Guo, B.; Yang, Z.; Xiu, Y. Immune responses to Vibrio vulnificus formalin-killed vaccine and ghost vaccine in Scophthalmus maximus. J. Fish Dis. 2022, 45, 1511–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Su, L.; Guo, H.; Guo, B.; Yi, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Xiu, Y. Efficacy of bivalent vaccine against Aeromonas salmonicida and Edwardsiella tarda infections in turbot. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2023, 139, 108837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Whyte, S.K. The innate immune response of finfish—A review of current knowledge. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2007, 23, 1127–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yin, F.; Gong, H.; Ke, Q.; Li, A. Stress, antioxidant defence and mucosal immune responses of the large yellow croaker Pseudosciaena crocea challenged with Cryptocaryon irritans. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 47, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saurabh, S.; Sahoo, P.K. Lysozyme: An important defence molecule of fish innate immune system. Aquac. Res. 2008, 39, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Magnadottir, B. Innate immunity of fish (overview). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2006, 20, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Romstad, A.B.; Reitan, L.J.; Midtlyng, P.; Gravningen, K.; Emilsen, V.; Evensen, O. Comparision of a serological potency assay for furunculosis vaccines (Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida) to intraperitoneal challenge in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Biol. J. Int. Assoc. Biol. Stand. 2014, 42, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yamaguchi, T.; Dijkstra, J.M. Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Genes and Disease Resistance in Fish. Cells 2019, 8, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Akira, S.; Uematsu, S.; Takeuchi, O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006, 124, 783–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: Update on Toll-like receptors. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cumulative mortality of vaccinated and control group after challenge with A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus. The x-axis represents the days post-vaccination and the y-axis represents the cumulative mortality rate.
Figure 1. Cumulative mortality of vaccinated and control group after challenge with A. salmonicida and V. vulnificus. The x-axis represents the days post-vaccination and the y-axis represents the cumulative mortality rate.
Fishes 09 00131 g001
Figure 2. ACP activity in serum of turbot after vaccination. The x-axis represents the weeks post-vaccination and the y-axis represents the ACP activity. Data are presented as the means ± SE (N = 3). The asterisk (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the vaccinated and control groups.
Figure 2. ACP activity in serum of turbot after vaccination. The x-axis represents the weeks post-vaccination and the y-axis represents the ACP activity. Data are presented as the means ± SE (N = 3). The asterisk (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the vaccinated and control groups.
Fishes 09 00131 g002
Figure 3. Lysozyme activity in serum of turbot after vaccination. The x-axis represents the weeks post-vaccination and the y-axis represents the LZM activity. Data are presented as the means ± SE (N = 3). The asterisk (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the vaccinated and control groups.
Figure 3. Lysozyme activity in serum of turbot after vaccination. The x-axis represents the weeks post-vaccination and the y-axis represents the LZM activity. Data are presented as the means ± SE (N = 3). The asterisk (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the vaccinated and control groups.
Fishes 09 00131 g003
Figure 4. Variation trend of serum antibody titer against A. salmonicida (A) and V. vulnificus (B). The x-axis represents the weeks post-vaccination and the y-axis represents the serum antibody titers. The asterisk (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the vaccinated and control groups.
Figure 4. Variation trend of serum antibody titer against A. salmonicida (A) and V. vulnificus (B). The x-axis represents the weeks post-vaccination and the y-axis represents the serum antibody titers. The asterisk (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the vaccinated and control groups.
Fishes 09 00131 g004
Figure 5. The expression levels of immune-related genes were analyzed by qRT-PCR. (A): TLR5 relative expression. (B): CD4 relative expression. (C): MHCI relative expression. (D): MHCII relative expression. The kidney was sampled at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-vaccination. Each bar represents the mean of three biological replicates. The asterisk (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. The expression levels of immune-related genes were analyzed by qRT-PCR. (A): TLR5 relative expression. (B): CD4 relative expression. (C): MHCI relative expression. (D): MHCII relative expression. The kidney was sampled at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks post-vaccination. Each bar represents the mean of three biological replicates. The asterisk (*) indicates the statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Fishes 09 00131 g005
Table 1. List of primers used for qRT-PCR.
Table 1. List of primers used for qRT-PCR.
GenePrimer NameNucleotide Sequence of Primer (5′–3′)
β-actinβ-actin-FAATGAGCTGAGAGTTGCCCC
β-actin-RAGCTTGGATGGCAACGTACA
TLR 5TLR 5-FGATCCCGGGCTTTAACACCA
TLR 5-RGGGGAGGCTAGGAAGTTGTT
CD 4CD 4-FACATACCAATCCGTGGCGAG
CD 4-RGAAATCGCGTCGGACGATCA
MHC IMHC I-FTGCTGAGAAAGCTCGACTCAC
MHC I-RCTCGCCCCAAAGTTCACGTA
MHC IIMHC II-FACTGGACTTCACCCCACAGT
MHC II-RCATCAACCAATCAGCTGCACTC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiu, Y.; Yi, J.; Feng, R.; Song, J.; Pang, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhou, S. Evaluation of Immune Protection of a Bivalent Inactivated Vaccine against Aeromonas salmonicida and Vibrio vulnificus in Turbot. Fishes 2024, 9, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040131

AMA Style

Xiu Y, Yi J, Feng R, Song J, Pang Y, Liu P, Zhou S. Evaluation of Immune Protection of a Bivalent Inactivated Vaccine against Aeromonas salmonicida and Vibrio vulnificus in Turbot. Fishes. 2024; 9(4):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiu, Yunji, Jingyuan Yi, Ruixin Feng, Jiaxue Song, Yunfei Pang, Peng Liu, and Shun Zhou. 2024. "Evaluation of Immune Protection of a Bivalent Inactivated Vaccine against Aeromonas salmonicida and Vibrio vulnificus in Turbot" Fishes 9, no. 4: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040131

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop