Skip to Content
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

28 May 2024

Enhancing Structural Stability in Cable Bracing Systems: The Benefits of an Additional Horizontal Member †

and
Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes—Green and Sustainable Process Engineering and Process Systems Engineering (ECP 2024), 29–31 May 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ECP2024.
This study looks at how cables behave in structures using SAP2000 (Version 25). The research focuses on how cables can act in unexpected ways, introducing a new cable support design that makes buildings more stable and prevents cables from becoming slack. Detailed tests with different tensions and cable sizes were carried out to find the best way to use cables. This investigation focused on determining the optimal height of a horizontal cable member within a single-story frame. The proposed model introduces a novel bracing configuration, incorporating a chevron cable brace with a horizontal member that connects members of the diagonal bracings. Braces affected by the lateral force do not slack and remain permanently in tension. The effect of different pre-stresses, different cable diameters, and different supporting conditions on the axial forces of the cables was investigated. With the modified method, it was noted that all cables are working and economically feasible. It was also observed that under the dynamic loading of cable bracing systems, increasing the diameter of the cable and increasing the pre-stress force did not have much effect on the axial forces, but with the changing of the supporting conditions, from the fixed support to the joint support, the axial forces of the cable increased. The position of the horizontal member was examined in the frame. The optimum height and length of the horizontal member were determined by the analyses to be at 16% of frame height and length.

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.N. and M.B.; methodology, N.N.; software, N.N.; validation, N.N.; formal analysis, N.N.; investigation, N.N.; resources, N.N. and M.B.; data curation, N.N.; writing—original draft preparation, N.N.; writing—review and editing, N.N.; visualization, N.N.; supervision, M.B.; project administration, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.