Next Article in Journal
One-Step Microwave Synthesis of New Hybrid Phosphor (CSSC) for White Light-Emitting Diodes
Previous Article in Journal
Size-Independent Flexure Test Technique for the Mechanical Properties of Geocomposites Reinforced by Unidirectional Fibers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effect of the Addition of Aluminum Nitride to the Composition of NiAl2O4 Ceramics on Hydrogenation Processes and the Increase in Resistance to Swelling and Degradation

Ceramics 2023, 6(4), 2070-2085; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics6040127
by Artem L. Kozlovskiy
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Ceramics 2023, 6(4), 2070-2085; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics6040127
Submission received: 19 September 2023 / Revised: 13 October 2023 / Accepted: 18 October 2023 / Published: 19 October 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is generally well-written, and the topic is interesting, but it could not be accepted for publication in the existing form. The author needs to make minor modifications (corrections to minor methodological errors and text editing).

1)    The abstract should be more concise. The author should change it.

2)    Line 132: The irradiation temperature was 1000 K- Here, the author used Kelvin for temperature. Please, change it. Units for temperature should be uniform.

 

3)    Line 479: “…we can conclude..  We? The author should change this sentence to be more appropriate for one scientific paper. 

Author Response

Review Report Form 1

 

1)    The abstract should be more concise. The author should change it.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment, correction is made to the text of the article, the abstract is reduced.

2)    Line 132: The irradiation temperature was 1000 K- Here, the author used Kelvin for temperature. Please, change it. Units for temperature should be uniform.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment, correction is made to the text of the article, units of measurement are given in the same format.

3)    Line 479: “…we can conclude”..  We? The author should change this sentence to be more appropriate for one scientific paper. 

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment, correction is made to this text, the sentence is paraphrased.

Analysis of the data obtained revealed that the formation of two-phase ceramics with the main phase of NiAl2O4 and impurity inclusions in the form of Al7O3N8 grains located along the grain boundaries has increased resistance to hydrogenation while maintaining stability of strength and thermophysical characteristics at high irradiation doses (20 – 50 dpa), simulating hydrogenation processes.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript requires revision.

Please explain why you used the NiO and Al2O3 ratio of 1:3 M. In the NiAl2O4 the ratio of NiO and Al2O3 is 1:1. Please explain the role of the excess alumina in the structure of the spinel.

Line 192. “…the altered shape of diffraction reflections suggests the existence of factors within the structure that introduce distortions. These distortions manifest as reduced structural order and deviations in crystal lattice parameters from their reference values.” Please provide the reference values that you mentioned.

Please explain in detail how you calculate the structural ordering factor.

Please explain the reason why the spinel lattice parameter decreases with increasing the concentration of AlN.

Please explain why reduction of the crystal lattice parameters and volume “signifies an enhancement in the structural order of the ceramics and a decrease in deformation-related irregularities within the structure”.

Line 244. I did not notice “diamond-shaped grains” in Fig. 3. Please make correction. Please add the crystal size distribution data to your micrographs.

Please explain in detail how you calculated values presented in Fig. 4.

Please try to write  easier and clearer for readers.

The article is written very heavily. This makes it difficult to understand.

Author Response

Review Report Form 2

 

Please explain why you used the NiO and Al2O3 ratio of 1:3 M. In the NiAl2O4 the ratio of NiO and Al2O3 is 1:1. Please explain the role of the excess alumina in the structure of the spinel.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information is provided. 

During mechanochemical synthesis and subsequent thermal sintering, according to previous studies, it was established [32] that the use of a molar ratio of components NiO:Al2O3 →1:1 results in the formation of a low content of impurity inclusions in the form of nickel oxide, which makes it impossible to obtain a highly ordered spinel structure.

Line 192. “…the altered shape of diffraction reflections suggests the existence of factors within the structure that introduce distortions. These distortions manifest as reduced structural order and deviations in crystal lattice parameters from their reference values.” Please provide the reference values that you mentioned.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information is provided. 

Data from card values PDF# 00-010-0339, a = 8.048 Å, were taken as reference parameters from the PDF-2 NiAl2O4 database.

Please explain in detail how you calculate the structural ordering factor.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information is provided. 

To calculate the structure factor of ordering, the data on changes in the crystal lattice parameters of the samples obtained by varying the ratio of the components, as well as data on the reference values of the crystal lattice parameters taken from the PDF-00-010-0339 database were used. In the case of a spinel crystal lattice type, the parameters are refined using parameter a (for a cubic crystal lattice type).

Please explain the reason why the spinel lattice parameter decreases with increasing the concentration of AlN.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information is provided. 

The reduction in the crystal lattice parameters of the NiAl2O4 phase with growing concentration of the AlN dopant is due to the effects of structural ordering associated with the ordering of the crystal lattice and its compaction.

Please explain why reduction of the crystal lattice parameters and volume “signifies an enhancement in the structural order of the ceramics and a decrease in deformation-related irregularities within the structure”.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information is provided. 

A decline in the crystal lattice parameters results in a decrease in its volume, which in turn directly affects the number of porous inclusions (density changes). At the same time, a rise in the structural ordering degree (a decrease in the parameters of the crystal lattice, as well as its volume) is due to a decrease in deformation distortions caused by the processes of mechanochemical grinding of samples.

Line 244. I did not notice “diamond-shaped grains” in Fig. 3. Please make correction. Please add the crystal size distribution data to your micrographs.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information is provided. 

In this range, an increase in AlN content leads to the development of a densely packed structure consisting of grains of irregular cubic or pentagonal shape.

Also in Figure 3, grain size distribution diagrams have been added.

Please explain in detail how you calculated values presented in Fig. 4.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information is provided. 

The swelling value was determined using the following calculation method. The swelling value was determined by calculating changes in the crystal lattice volumes of the studied samples in the initial state (depending on the concentration of the AlN dopant) and their changes as a result of hydrogenation processes under high-dose irradiation.

The structural disorder value was calculated based on changes in the structural order values (calculated for the initial values of the crystal lattice parameters) as a result of external influences (in this case, hydrogenation processes under high-dose irradiation).

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The author studied the effect of adding AlN inclusions in a spinel ceramic on the degradation of mechanical properties after irradiation. The study was well conducted and the results are clearly presented. However, some points have to be clarified before acceptance of this article.  

1) In the introduction, the author deals with the ceramic fuel cells and their degradation due to hydrogenation. But, he does not detail which ceramics are commonly used as a ceramic fuel cell. Can the author add few details about this point ? Why do the author study NiAl2O4 in this study ? 

2) Section 2.1 : No information are given about the raw powders used in the study (reference of the suppliers, purity).

3) Section 2.1 : The author claims that a sintering was carried out on the powders. The type of thermal treatment carried out is not clear. Is there a thermal treatment on the powders to obtain the spinel phase and a sintering treatment to densify the tablets ? Can the author clarify this point ?

4) Page 7 : The author claims that densification was improved by the addition of AlN. But, no values of final densities for the different samples are given.

Page 1 : Please correct : 'there remain…'

Author Response

Review Report Form 3

 

In the introduction, the author deals with the ceramic fuel cells and their degradation due to hydrogenation. But, he does not detail which ceramics are commonly used as a ceramic fuel cell. Can the author add few details about this point ? Why do the author study NiAl2O4 in this study ? 

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information was provided. 

The choice of NiAl2O4 ceramics as objects of research is due to their great potential for use as materials for ceramic fuel cells capable of operating in aggressive environments, as well as high temperatures, as reported in several scientific papers [26-28]. Simultaneously, a range of studies [29-31] has emphasized the necessity of modifying these ceramics to enhance their resistance against external factors related to operational processes, such as hydrogenation or mechanical stresses at elevated temperatures.

Section 2.1 : No information are given about the raw powders used in the study (reference of the suppliers, purity).

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information was provided. 

NiO, Al2O3, AlN powders purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) were used as initial components for the production of ceramics. The sizes of the powders in the initial state were about 10 microns, the chemical purity was 99.95 %.

Section 2.1 : The author claims that a sintering was carried out on the powders. The type of thermal treatment carried out is not clear. Is there a thermal treatment on the powders to obtain the spinel phase and a sintering treatment to densify the tablets ? Can the author clarify this point ?

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information was provided. 

Annealing of the samples was carried out on samples pressed into tablets with a thickness of about 15 microns and a diameter of 10 mm. The samples were pressed into a special mold under a pressure of 300 MPa. The samples were placed in corundum crucibles, which were placed in the muffle furnace chamber, after which the samples were heated to a temperature of 1500°C at a heating rate of 20°C/min until the set annealing temperature was reached, after which the temperature in the chamber was stabilized and maintained at for 10 hours. After 10 hours, the samples were cooled together with the chamber for 24 hours until they reached room temperature.

Page 7 : The author claims that densification was improved by the addition of AlN. But, no values of final densities for the different samples are given.

The author thanks the reviewer for this comment. In response, the following information was provided. 

Sample density data is presented in Table 1.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for addressing my comments. The paper can be published.

I prefer a more simple and clear style of presentation.

Reviewer 3 Report

The author answered to the questions. I recommend the publication of the revised version.

Back to TopTop