Forests play a vital role in the global carbon cycle; however, the carbon sink capacity of African forests is increasingly threatened by wildfires, rising temperatures, and ecological degradation. This study analyzes the spatiotemporal dynamics of forest carbon fluxes across Africa from 2001 to
[...] Read more.
Forests play a vital role in the global carbon cycle; however, the carbon sink capacity of African forests is increasingly threatened by wildfires, rising temperatures, and ecological degradation. This study analyzes the spatiotemporal dynamics of forest carbon fluxes across Africa from 2001 to 2023, based on multi-source remote sensing and climate datasets. The results show that wildfires have significantly disrupted Africa’s carbon balance over the past two decades. From 2001 to 2023, fire activity was most intense in the woodland–savanna transition zones of Central and Southern Africa. In countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Angola, Mozambique, and Zambia, each recorded burned areas exceeding 500,000 km
2, along with high recurrence rates (e.g., up to 0.7584 fires per year in South Sudan). These fire-affected regions often exhibited high ecological sensitivity and carbon density, which led to pronounced disturbances in carbon fluxes. Nevertheless, the Democratic Republic of the Congo maintained an average annual net carbon sink of 74.2 MtC, indicating a high potential for ecological recovery. In contrast, Liberia and Eswatini exhibited net carbon emissions in fire-affected areas, suggesting weaker ecosystem resilience. These findings underscore the urgent need to incorporate wildfire disturbances into forest carbon management and climate mitigation strategies. In addition, climate variables such as temperature and soil moisture also influence carbon fluxes, although their effects display substantial spatial heterogeneity. On average, a 1 °C increase in temperature leads to an additional 0.347 (±1.243) Mt CO
2 in emissions, while a 1% increase in soil moisture enhances CO
2 removal by 1.417 (±8.789) Mt. However, compared to wildfires, the impacts of these climate drivers are slower and more spatially variable.
Full article