Previous Article in Journal
Software Defect Prediction Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques: An Empirical Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Fault Classification of 3D-Printing Operations Using Different Types of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques

Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International, Deemed University, Pune 412115, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
AI 2024, 5(4), 1759-1778; https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5040087
Submission received: 6 August 2024 / Revised: 22 September 2024 / Accepted: 24 September 2024 / Published: 27 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Systems for Industry 4.0)

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM), a method of additive manufacturing (AM), comprises the extrusion of materials via a nozzle and the subsequent combining of the layers to create 3D-printed objects. FDM is a widely used method for 3D-printing objects since it is affordable, effective, and easy to use. Some defects such as poor infill, elephant foot, layer shift, and poor surface finish arise in the FDM components at the printing stage due to variations in printing parameters such as printing speed, change in nozzle, or bed temperature. Proper fault classification is required to identify the cause of faulty products. In this work, the multi-sensory data are gathered using different sensors such as vibration, current, temperature, and sound sensors. The data acquisition is performed by using the National Instrumentation (NI) Data Acquisition System (DAQ) which provides the synchronous multi-sensory data for the model training. To induce the faults, the data are captured under different conditions such as variations in printing speed, temperate, and jerk during the printing. The collected data are used to train the machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) classification models to classify the variation in printing parameters. The ML models such as k-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree (DT), extra trees (ET), and random forest (RF) with convolutional neural network (CNN) as a DL model are used to classify the variable operation printing parameters. Out of the available models, in ML models, the RF classifier shows a classification accuracy of around 91% whereas, in the DL model, the CNN model shows good classification performance with accuracy ranging from 92 to 94% under variable operating conditions.
Keywords: data acquisition; deep leaning; fault classification; fused deposition modeling; machine learning data acquisition; deep leaning; fault classification; fused deposition modeling; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, S.; Sayyad, S.; Bongale, A. Fault Classification of 3D-Printing Operations Using Different Types of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques. AI 2024, 5, 1759-1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5040087

AMA Style

Kumar S, Sayyad S, Bongale A. Fault Classification of 3D-Printing Operations Using Different Types of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques. AI. 2024; 5(4):1759-1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5040087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Satish, Sameer Sayyad, and Arunkumar Bongale. 2024. "Fault Classification of 3D-Printing Operations Using Different Types of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques" AI 5, no. 4: 1759-1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5040087

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop