Next Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Water Leaks in Water Distribution Networks from Ground-Penetrating Radar Images by Exploring New Influencing Factors with Multi-Agent and Intelligent Data Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Application of a Neural Network Model to Short-Term Water Demand Forecasting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Advanced Lime Mortars for Historical Architectural Structures †

by
Theodoros A. Pringopoulos
1,
Athanasia K. Thomoglou
2,
Jacob G. Fantidis
3,*,
Anna A. Thysiadou
1 and
Zoi S. Metaxa
1
1
Hephaestus Laboratory, School of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace, 65404 Kavala, Greece
2
Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece
3
Hephaestus Laboratory, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace, 65404 Kavala, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Conference on Electronics, Engineering Physics and Earth Science (EEPES’24), Kavala, Greece, 19–21 June 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 70(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024070058
Published: 12 September 2024

Abstract

:
The utilization of lime mortar to connect the masonry wall elements of historical architectural structures, to overlap and protect these structures, is an ancient technique that has prevailed until today as a compatible solution based on the principles of restoration. In recent years, scientists have studied the modification of lime mortars with new, sustainable and environmentally friendly materials that respect the value of monuments and are aligned with the principles of restoration. In the present study, the existing international literature on advanced lime mortars with improved mechanical and physicochemical properties is presented, and the knowledge gap is identified. Finally, new materials for improving lime mortars are proposed as a basis for successful restoration and further protection of architectural heritage.

1. Introduction

From ancient to modern times structures are build using natural materials such as lime mortars [1,2,3]. The importance of lime is demonstrated by the existence of stable lime mining sites in Europe, driven by additional knowledge of limestone quality (CaCO3) and repeated effective empirical use [4]. Lime mortar was used as a binding material and as a coating material for facades. Even today, this material is used in the restoration of existing ancient and modern monuments following the principles of restoration. One of the most important restoration principles is compatibility, as materials should have specific characteristics. In the case of integration, new materials promote mechanical characteristics and physical properties such as compression and flexural strength improvement, freeze–thaw resistance, compatibility, thermal insulation, self-healing, self-cleaning, durability and elasticity [5,6,7,8]. State-of-the-art advanced lime mortars for historical architectural structures represent a convergence of traditional craftsmanship with modern materials science and engineering principles. These advanced lime mortars aim to address the unique challenges associated with the conservation, restoration, and sustainable enhancement of historical buildings while preserving their architectural authenticity and cultural significance.
Non-destructive methods for evaluating the physicomechanical, electrochemical and mineralogical characterization of lime mortars have already been employed, such as X-ray diffraction, Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, or thermogravimetric analysis [9,10] (Figure 1).
Researchers have explored the incorporation of nanoparticles such as silica nanoparticles, calcium carbonate nanoparticles, and nanosized fibers to enhance the mechanical properties and durability, bond strength, and resistance of mortars to environmental degradation. On the other hand, the aim was to reduce porosity and thus enhance the sustainability of historical architectural heritage. Moreover, the integration of natural and pozzolanic materials, such as metakaolin, rice husk ash, and volcanic ash, has gained attention for its ability to improve the workability, strength, and durability of lime mortars. These materials react with lime to form additional binding phases, enhancing the mortar’s performance while maintaining compatibility with historic substrates [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The various proportions of hydraulic lime mortars offer a beneficial enhanced setting and hardening properties concerning traditional non-hydraulic lime mortars. Through careful selection and possible combination of two types of hydraulic limes, the lime mortar developed has properties that could meet the specific requirements of historical architectural heritage restoration. The embodiment of natural fibers, bio-fibers, or synthetic fibers and textiles from cellulose, jute, hemp, or polypropylene can enhance the tensile strength, crack resistance, and ductility of restoration mortars [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. This strengthening method contributes to the wall stabilization of vulnerable masonry, converting it into an earthquake-resistant structure.
With advanced digital simulation tools, including finite element analysis (FEA) or computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the performance of lime mortar can be optimized under various loading and environmental conditions. This fact leads to accurate mechanical and physico-chemical performance predictions, aligned with the conservation strategies for historical structures. Finally, interdisciplinary research on sustainable and environmentally friendly products with innovative properties and a low environmental footprint is provided, in combination with the promotion of cultural heritage conservation [11,13,26].
In the subsequent sections, fundamental knowledge concerning the existing international literature is presented to establish the research on advanced lime mortars with improved mechanical and physicochemical properties, and the knowledge gap is identified. Additionally, the key properties essential for assessing the admixture performance are outlined, with following the principles of successful restoration and the further protection of architectural heritage.

2. Classification of Additives in Lime Mortar

The classification of the additives used in lime mortar for historical architectural heritage, is divided into several categories based on their specific functions and properties. Some usual types of additives including pozzolans, nanoparticles, fibers, plasticizers, air-entraining agents, accelerators or retarders, waterproofing agents, antifungal and antimicrobial agents, and coloring agents are illustrated in Figure 2.
Pozzolanic constituents such as silica fume, metakaolin, fly ash, and volcanic ash act with lime to arrange supplementary binding composites, refining the mortar’s strength, durability, and environmental resistance. Natural fibers (jute, straw, or hemp) or synthetic fibers (polypropylene, nylon) can be integrated into the lime mortar to improve its flexural strength, cohesion and ductility, serving to provide crack prevention. Plasticizers can improve the workability or consistency of lime mortar without significantly altering its chemical properties, reducing the water content and improving the mortar’s flow, making it easier to apply and ensuring better adhesion to substrates. Air-entraining agents are additives that introduce microscopic air bubbles into the mortar mixture, enhancing the mortar’s freeze-thaw resistance by providing space for water to expand and contract without causing damage.
Accelerators are additives that speed up the curing and setting time of lime mortar, allowing for faster construction or repair work. Retarders, on the other hand, slow down the setting time, providing more time for application and adjustment. Waterproofing additives such as silicone-based compounds or admixtures containing water repellents can be added to lime mortar to improve its resistance to water penetration and moisture-related deterioration. Additives with antifungal and antimicrobial properties can be incorporated into lime mortar to inhibit the growth of mold, mildew, algae, and other microorganisms that can cause staining and deterioration over time. Coloring additives such as pigments or mineral oxides are used as coloring additives to tint lime mortar to match existing historic mortars or achieve specific aesthetic effects. These additives can help preserve the visual integrity of historical structures during restoration or repair work.
By carefully selecting and incorporating these additives into lime mortar formulations, preservationists and conservators can ensure the longevity, structural integrity, and visual authenticity of historical architectural heritage.

3. Mechanical, Physical and Chemical Properties of Advanced Lime Mortar

The physical and mechanical properties (Figure 3) of lime mortar play a crucial role in its performance and suitability for use in historical architectural structures. A crucial indicator of the capacity of a mortar to be used in anti-seismic structures is its compressive, flexural and tensile strength. These significant properties are necessary for earthquake-resistant mortar applications to withstand lateral or bending forces. Another property is the ability of lime mortar to adhere strongly to brick, tile, and stone masonry substrates, ensuring detachment and delamination prevention.
Durability measures the resistance of lime mortar to deterioration and weathering over time. It encompasses various factors, including resistance to freeze-thaw cycles, moisture ingress, chemical exposure, and biological growth. Durable lime mortar formulations ensure the long-term performance and protection of historical structures. Moreover, successful workability allows easy application, establishing the correct consolidation of the lime mortar within masonry wall joints. Permeability and porosity are important properties of lime mortar that influence its ability to absorb and release moisture. Controlled porosity allows lime mortar to breathe and accommodate moisture movement, reducing the risk of trapped moisture and the associated deterioration, such as efflorescence or spalling. Thus, the risk of entrapped moisture and efflorescence or spalling occurring is decreased. Volume and shape stability reduce the risk of shrinkage and expansion, which can lead to cracking, distortion and displacement, ensuring the integrity and functionality of masonry walls. Finally, nano-enhancement [5,7,9,10,12,14,16,17,25], fiber tailoring [9,14,18,19,20,24] or using conductive materials [5,7,10,17,19,20] as additives can improve the electrical resistance or piezo resistivity of lime mortars. Through the systematic assessment and optimization of electromechanical and physicochemical properties, preservation professionals can decide on the appropriate lime mortar formulations according to the specific requirements of historical architectural anti-seismic structures.
In Table 1, indicative examples from recent bibliographic research, showcasing various types of advanced lime mortars with additives at the nano- and micro-scale, as well as hybrids, are presented. Also, the different properties being investigated and the experimental results are listed for each author.

4. Discussion and Recommendations for the Future Research

This review presents the body of existing research on enhancing lime mortar performance through the use of various additives. It is evidence that several areas remain unexplored. For instance, while it has been demonstrated that various nanoparticles improve the compressive and flexural strength of lime mortars, the results are still uncertain, given. In particular, for the mechanical properties, a slight drop in flexural and compressive strength was evidence. Considering their physical and chemical efficiency, it is suggested that future studies investigate the efficacy of different types and concentrations of nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of lime mortars. Additionally, a comprehensive assessment of the durability and weathering resistance of advanced lime mortars with nanoparticles is essential to gain valuable insights into practical applications in historical architectural structures.
Standing at a pivotal point of tradition and innovation, it is imperative to recognize the deep impact that advanced lime mortars can exert on the future trajectory of architectural preservation. It would be beneficial for future research to explore novel, cost-effective and environmentally friendly methods for fortifying historical heritage and enhancing the resilience of masonry constructions.
By understanding the implications of heterogeneity and variability in traditional materials is crucial, to investigate how these variations may impact the effectiveness of different strengthening techniques and identify strategies to mitigate their impact. Different organic additives and other materials could be identified for effective lime mortar strengthening, exploring an area of interest in future studies.
Future studies could explore the environmental impact of using enriched mortar with natural additives. The low environmental footprint of mortars essential globally, should incorporate eco-friendly materials and methods for building restoration.

5. Conclusions

This review focuses on basic and preliminary knowledge about lime mortar enhancement using various additives to protect the historical architectural heritage. Specifically, there are three categories of geometry scales, the nano-, the micro- and the hybrid combination of the two scales, used to study the lime mortars’ mechanical or physicochemical properties. Classifying additives in lime mortar is vital for understanding their miscellaneous roles and effects on performance. By systematically classifying additives and detailing their properties and functions, the purpose of choosing individual additives for lime mortar strengthening becomes more obvious. Additionally, additive optimization enables the efficient application of advanced materials in several architectural preservation and restoration projects, according to historical heritage preservation principles.
Lastly, fostering robust interdisciplinary collaboration and embracing innovative approaches are essential to fully grasp the potential of advanced lime mortars and ensure their resonance in the present and -for future generations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.A.P., A.K.T. and Z.S.M.; data curation, T.A.P.; formal analysis, T.A.P., A.K.T., J.G.F., A.A.T. and Z.S.M.; investigation, T.A.P.; methodology, T.A.P., A.K.T., J.G.F., A.A.T. and Z.S.M.; project administration, Z.S.M. and A.K.T.; software, T.A.P.; supervision, A.K.T., J.G.F., A.A.T. and Z.S.M.; validation, A.K.T., J.G.F., A.A.T. and Z.S.M.; visualization, A.K.T., A.A.T. and Z.S.M.; writing—original draft, T.A.P. and A.K.T.; writing—review and editing, A.K.T., J.G.F., A.A.T. and Z.S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed through this study are included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sağın, E.U.; Duran, H.E.; Böke, H. Lime mortar technology in ancient eastern Roman provinces. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2021, 39, 103132. [Google Scholar]
  2. Moropoulou, A.; Bakolas, A.; Bisbikou, K. Investigation of the technology of historic mortars. J. Cult. Hertiage 2000, 1, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Papayianni, I.; Pachta, V. Experimental study on the performance of lime-based grouts used in consolidating Historic Masonries. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 111–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Forster, A.M.; Válek, J.; Hughes, J.J.; Pilcher, N. Lime binders for the repair of historic buildings: Considerations for CO2 abatement. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dimou, A.-E.; Metaxa, Z.S.; Kourkoulis, S.K.; Alexopoulos, N.D. Piezoresistive Properties of Natural Hydraulic Lime Binary Pastes with Incorporated Carbon-Based Nanomaterials under Cyclic Compressive Loadings. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dimou, A.E.; Asimakopoulos, G.; Karatasios, I.; Gournis, D.; Metaxa, Z.S.; Kourkoulis, S.K.; Alexopoulos, N.D. Self-diagnostic lime-pozzolan-cement restoration nanocomposites: Effect of graphene modification and cyclic loading level under compression. Dev. Built Environ. 2022, 10, 100068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dimou, A.E.; Charalampidou, C.M.; Metaxa, Z.S.; Kourkoulis, S.K.; Karatasios, I.; Asimakopoulos, G.; Alexopoulos, N.D. Mechanical and electrical properties of hydraulic lime pastes reinforced with carbon nanomaterials. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2020, 28, 1694–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fantidis, J.G.; Nicolaou, G.E.; Tsakalos, G.; Thysiadou, A. The comparison of five proton linac beams in order to set up a thermal neutron radiography installation. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1032, 012046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thomoglou, A.K.; Falara, M.G.; Voutetaki, M.E.; Fantidis, J.G.; Tayeh, B.A.; Chalioris, C.E. Electromechanical properties of multi-reinforced self-sensing cement-based mortar with MWCNTs, CFs, and PPs. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 400, 132566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thomoglou, A.K.; Fantidis, J.G.; Voutetaki, M.E.; Metaxa, Z.S.; Chalioris, C.E. Mechanical Characterization of Nano-Reinforced Mortar: X-ray Micro-CT for 3D Imaging of Microstructure. Eng. Proc. 2023, 41, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Manoharan, A.; Umarani, C. Properties of air lime mortar with bio-additives. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Drougkas, A.; Sarhosis, V.; Basheer, M.; D’Alessandro, A.; Ubertini, F. Design of a smart lime mortar with conductive micro and nano fillers for structural health monitoring. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 367, 130024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fang, S.Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, B.J.; Zheng, Y. The identification of organic additives in traditional lime mortar. J. Cult. Herit. 2014, 15, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rosato, L.; Stefanidou, M.; Milazzo, G.; Fernandez, F.; Livreri, P.; Muratore, N.; Terranova, L.M. Study and evaluation of nano-structured cellulose fibers as additive for restoration of historical mortars and plasters. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 6954–6965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thomoglou, A.K.; Voutetaki, M.E.; Fantidis, J.G.; Chalioris, C.E. Novel Natural Bee Brick with a Low Energy Footprint for “Green” Masonry Walls: Mechanical Properties. Eng. Proc. 2024, 60, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nalon, G.H.; Ribeiro, J.C.L.; Pedroti, L.G.; da Silva, R.M.; de Araújo, E.N.D.; de Lima, G.E.S. Smart laying mortars for masonry structures: Effects of lime/cement ratio and carbon nanomaterials content on self-sensing behavior. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2024, 145, 105351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Diaz, J.; Ševcík, R.; Mácová, P.; Menéndez, B.; Frankeová, D.; Slížková, Z. Impact of nanosilica on lime restoration mortars properties. J. Cult. Herit. 2022, 55, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Slížková, Z.; Drdácký, M. Effects of Various Chemical Agents on Mechanical Characteristics of Weak Lime Mortar. In Historic Mortars; Hughes, J., Válek, J., Groot, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Santarelli, M.L.; Sbardella, F.; Zuena, M.; Tirillò, J.; Sarasini, F. Basalt fiber reinforced natural hydraulic lime mortars: A potential bio-based material for restoration. Mat.Des. 2014, 63, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Di Bella, G.; Fiore, V.; Galtieri, G.; Borsellino, C.; Valenza, A. Effects of natural fibers reinforcement in lime plasters (kenaf and sisal vs polypropylene). Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 58, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Apostolopoulou, M.; Asteris, P.G.; Armaghani, D.J.; Douvika, M.G.; Lourenço, P.B.; Cavaleri, L.; Bakolas, A.; Moropoulou, A. Mapping and Holistic Design of Natural Hydraulic Lime Mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 136, 106167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kesikidou, F.; Stefanidou, M. Natural fiber-reinforced mortars. JBE 2019, 25, 100786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stefanidou, M.; Kamperidou, V.; Konstantinidis, A.; Koltsou, P.; Papadopoulos, S. Use of Posidonia oceanica fibres in lime mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 298, 123881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tsampali, E.; Vitta, I.; Stefanidou, M. Effect of hemp fibers and crystalline admixtures on the properties and self-healing efficiency of lime and clay-based mortars. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 86, 108963. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hassanisaadi, M.; Barani, M.; Rahdar, A.; Heidary, M.; Thysiadou, A.; Kyzas, G.Z. Role of agrochemical-based nanomaterials in plants: Biotic and abiotic stress with germination improvement of seeds. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 375–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fernandez, F.; Germinario, S.; Basile, R.; Montagno, R.; Kapetanaki, K.; Gobakis, K.; Maravelaki, P.N. Development of eco-friendly and self-cleaning lime-pozzolan plasters for bio-construction and cultural heritage. Buildings 2020, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of unmodified (a) lime mortar [11], (b) the modified with nano [12], (c) nano-metakaoline [13], (d) bio-additives [11], (e) pozzolane [1], and (f) nano-fibril additives [14].
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of unmodified (a) lime mortar [11], (b) the modified with nano [12], (c) nano-metakaoline [13], (d) bio-additives [11], (e) pozzolane [1], and (f) nano-fibril additives [14].
Engproc 70 00058 g001
Figure 2. Classification of additives used in lime mortar for historical architectural heritage.
Figure 2. Classification of additives used in lime mortar for historical architectural heritage.
Engproc 70 00058 g002
Figure 3. Mechanical, physical and chemical properties of advanced lime mortar.
Figure 3. Mechanical, physical and chemical properties of advanced lime mortar.
Engproc 70 00058 g003
Table 1. Indicative experimental research, showcasing various types of advanced lime mortars with additives.
Table 1. Indicative experimental research, showcasing various types of advanced lime mortars with additives.
Authors + YearType of MortarType of AdditionPropertiesResults
Tsampali et al., 2024 [24]Lime, clay-basedUntreated and hydrothermally treated hemp fibers and crystaline admixturesPhysicochemical strength, self-healingEnhanced the mechanical strength and reduced the mortars’ shrinkage. For clay mortars, an increase of 24% for untreated fibers, while for the hydrothermal process, fibers exhibited an increase (43%)
Drougkas et al., 2023 [12]Conductive micro and nanofillers Graphite (G), carbon nanotubes (CNT) and carbon microfibres (CMF)Electro-mechanical properties (piezoresistivity)Significant strength recovery and self-healing potential in lime-pozzolan mortars with hemp fibers
Nalon et al., 2023 [16]Lime/cementCarbon black nanoparticles (CBN) contents (0%, 3%, 6%, 9% by weight of binders)Electro-mechanical properties (self- sensing, electrical conductivity)Reduction of electrical resistivity of dry masonry mortars by more than 4 orders of magnitude with the addition of CBN contents > 6%. Self-sensing response in masonry mortars containing 6% or 9% of CBN
Diaz et al., 2022 [17]LimeSilica (SiO2) nanoparticlesPhysical-mechanical and mineralogical properties, mineralogical compositionsImprovement of mechanical properties up to 4 wt.%
Dimou et al., 2022 [6]Lime/cementGraphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and carboxylated graphene (GCOOH)Electro-mechanical properties (self-sensing, electrical conductivity)The highest (+33%) increase of the compressive strength is noted for the rGO-reinforced paste
Stefanidou et al., 2022 [23]LimeSubstitution of natural pozzolan by perlite by-productsPhysico-mechanical propertiesReduction of the W/B ratio around (15–30%). Reduction of porosity, absorption and capillary absorption (up to 75%). Enhanced 90d mechanical characteristics and Dynamic Modulus of elasticity
Dimou et al., 2020 [7]Natural hydraulic limeSilica (SiO2) nanoparticlesElectro-mechanical properties (self-sensing, electrical conductivity)The addition of MWCNTsCOOH at 0.15 wt.% led to a 56% increase in flexural strength. Improvement of compressive strength (20%) while the flexural strength remained almost constant with rGO. The electrical resistance drops in both cases (~15%)
Fernandez et al., 2020 [26]Lime-Pozzolan PlastersLime–metakaolin and hydraulic lime–metakaolin with the addition of nano-TiO2 and perliteMechanical performance and durabilityDecreased mechaniclal properties but enhanced the durability and energy
Kesikidou and Stefanidou, 2019 [22]Lime/cementNatural fibers jute, coconut and kelp were used as additives in 1.5% by mortar volumeMechanical, physical and microstructure propertiesJute and kelp, reduce the compressive strength of cement mortars (15%), but increase it in lime mortars (250%). Coconut fibers, work better with cement but they do not favor lime
Slížková et al., 2019 [18]Lime Calcium hydroxide (lime water) or barium hydroxide (barium water) Mechanical properties (compression and surface cohesion)Barium water treatment significantly increased mainly the tensile strength of the tested lime mortar. Improved surface cohesion
Rosato et al., 2017 [14]LimeBio-fibrils are nano-structured cellulose fibers (nano-fibrils)Physico-mechanical propertiesMechanical tests showed a decrease in flexural and compressive strength as the percentage of nano-fibrils increased
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pringopoulos, T.A.; Thomoglou, A.K.; Fantidis, J.G.; Thysiadou, A.A.; Metaxa, Z.S. Advanced Lime Mortars for Historical Architectural Structures. Eng. Proc. 2024, 70, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024070058

AMA Style

Pringopoulos TA, Thomoglou AK, Fantidis JG, Thysiadou AA, Metaxa ZS. Advanced Lime Mortars for Historical Architectural Structures. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 70(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024070058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pringopoulos, Theodoros A., Athanasia K. Thomoglou, Jacob G. Fantidis, Anna A. Thysiadou, and Zoi S. Metaxa. 2024. "Advanced Lime Mortars for Historical Architectural Structures" Engineering Proceedings 70, no. 1: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024070058

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop