Next Article in Journal
Biomass and Circular Economy: Now and the Future
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Factors Affecting Biogas Production Using the Taguchi Design of Experiment Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Unveiling the Potential of Spirulina Biomass—A Glimpse into the Future Circular Economy Using Green and Blue Ingredients

by
Monize Bürck
1,2,
Camilly Fratelli
1,
Marina Campos Assumpção de Amarante
3 and
Anna Rafaela Cavalcante Braga
1,4,5,*
1
Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Silva Jardim 136, Santos 11015-020, SP, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Program in Nutrition, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Botucatu 740, Santos 04023-062, SP, Brazil
3
School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
4
Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Campus Diadema, Diadema 09972-270, SP, Brazil
5
Nutrition and Food Service Research Center, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Silva Jardim 136, Santos 11015-020, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomass 2024, 4(3), 704-719; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4030039
Submission received: 23 February 2024 / Revised: 18 April 2024 / Accepted: 4 June 2024 / Published: 5 July 2024

Abstract

:
The present work aims to explore Spirulina biomass’ functional and technological marvels and its components, such as C-phycocyanin (C-PC), in modern food systems from a circular economy perspective, evaluating a decade of insights and innovations. This comprehensive review delves into the pivotal studies of the past decade, spotlighting the vital importance of maintaining stability in various food matrices to unleash the full biological impacts. Through the lens of food science intertwined with circular economy principles, this analysis meets health and environmental requisites and explores the harmonious synergy between food systems, economy, and industry. While Spirulina has typically served as a supplement, its untapped potential as a fundamental food ingredient has been unveiled, showcasing its abundant nutritional and functional attributes. Technological hurdles in preserving the vibrant color of C-PC have been triumphantly surmounted through simple temperature control methods or cutting-edge nanotechnology applications. Despite the gap in sensory acceptance studies, the emergence of blue foods introduces groundbreaking functional and innovative avenues for the food industry.

1. Introduction

In a global scenario encompassing the closely linked triad of climate change, undernutrition, and obesity, and the synergy of these epidemics, i.e., the Global Syndemic [1], the food industry must engage in strategic planning. Complex problems call for elaborate solutions. It takes technological, legal, economic, and strategic effort to reverse the Global Syndemic. To get ahead of such a joint effort, new products (mainly from vegetarian sources) and technologies for food processing are needed, where the production chains respect the environment and the food and nutrition security of the population.
Cyanobacteria of the genus Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) have great nutritional composition, mainly due to their high protein content. They are not dependent on land, as with conventional agriculture and livestock farming. Spirulina biomass can be cultivated in photobioreactors or opened systems with wastewater [2,3]. Thus, the recovery of promising sources of non-animal proteins and bioactive compounds such as C-PC and allophycocyanin can be carried out respecting the environment and circular economy concepts since soil biodiversity is protected, pollution is prevented from occurring at the outset, and value-added products are created, such as biofuel, green electricity [3], natural food dye [4,5] and food packaging [6], among others.
C-PC is the most abundant photosynthetic pigment among the Spirulina phycobiliproteins and the one with the most expressive antioxidant activity [7], acting on the cellular activation of antioxidant enzymes, inhibition of DNA damage, inhibition of lipid peroxidation, and neutralization of free radicals [7,8,9]. Anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, and immunomodulatory properties are also reported in the literature [10,11,12].
Spirulina extract was recognized by the US Food and Drug Administration as a safe ingredient, had its use regulated as a colorant exempt from certification, and was permanently listed for food use by the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 21, Chapter 1, Subchapter A, Part 73) for application in chewing gum, dessert toppings and coatings, frozen desserts, ice cream, yogurt, and cottage cheese, among other food uses [13]. As it is a water-soluble pigment with a strongly fluorescent blue color, C-PC has been remarkably used with a technological function in food science as a stable natural food dye with antioxidant properties in ice cream [4] and even as a texturizing agent in the form of an emulsifier [14,15]. These food applications can be considered substantial, considering that color is associated with the sensory appeal of food [16,17], and color stability is a great challenge for the industry.
C-PC, if regularly consumed as a food product ingredient, can be related to health benefits, and it is in line with healthy eating trends around the world, as 31% of the average global consumers are willing to pay for food without artificial colors [18,19]. On the other hand, blue food is perceived as less natural since the natural blue color is infrequent compared to green, yellow, and red, colors that the industry has already commercialized. Consequently, natural blue food dyes can be considered the future of the food industry that seeks innovations to call consumers’ attention in the face of a highly competitive market [20]. Innovative methods such as 3D food printing and electrospinning (Figure 1) can create several new food shapes, adjustable textures, and improve the thermal stability of the bioactive compounds [21,22], respectively. This process, in isolation or combination, will bring unusual colors and food appearances to the market.
Correspondingly, the present work aims to explore Spirulina biomass’ functional and technological marvels and its components, such as C-phycocyanin (C-PC), in modern food systems from a circular economy perspective, evaluating a decade of insights and innovations.

2. Materials and Methods

An investigation was carried out in the Elsevier Scopus database to understand the main aspects regarding the contributions of C-PC extracted from Spirulina biomass to publications reporting food product development. The search criteria strategy was as follows: ((“Spirulina” AND “platensis” OR “phycocyanin” OR “C-phycocyanin”) AND (“food product” OR “food application” OR “functional food” OR “food technology” OR “incorporation” OR “fortification” OR “enrichment” OR “packaging” OR “biotechnology”)). A total of 429 articles were found since 1971; after a limitation time considering the years from 2012 to 2024, 310 articles were evaluated; among these, 69 studies were within this review’s scope. The VosViewer 1.6.13 software created the bibliometric network visualization map (Figure 2).
Figure 2A shows five clusters, represented by different colors (blue, red, green, yellow, and purple), where the related terms are described. The terms “Spirulina”, “biotechnology”, and “phycocyanin” are the most relevant, characterized by more prominent labels (nodes) than the others. Small labels but also essential terms, in red, are related to metabolic characteristics of phycocyanin: “antioxidant activity”, “functional food”, and “diet supplementation”; in green, representing nutritional and technological food usage of Spirulina: “food products”, “proteins”, “fermentation”, “color”, “food storage”, “quality control”, “response surface methodology”, and “bakeries” (Figure 2B), which identify the most substantial ties (thick connectors) and weakest connections (thin connectors) that correspond to the most frequent and least frequent co-occurrences between the terms, respectively [23]. Therefore, this analysis was appropriate to incite and elucidate perspectives regarding the terms highlighted and how the scientific literature has addressed C-PC in food applications. Henceforth, the most meaningful studies for this review’s aims were covered.

3. Results

3.1. C-PC and Spirulina Biomass Applications in Food-Related Products

Spirulina, a type of microalgae and a common or commercial term encompassing a group of cyanobacteria species with Arthrospira platensis, serves as the most prevalent and extensively used strain and has been prevalent in commercial food production for an extensive period. These microalgae have established their reputation as a nutrient-dense food source, mainly due to their elevated protein content. Analysis has revealed that Spirulina comprises approximately 20% carbohydrates, 50–70% protein, 5% lipids, 7% minerals, and 3 to 6% moisture. Notably, Spirulina contains phycobiliproteins, vividly pigmented and water-soluble proteins. These proteins, specifically allophycocyanin and C-phycocyanin, offer promising value in production potential and multifaceted applications [23].
Spirulina has been notably endorsed by the United Nations for combating hunger and malnutrition in developing nations and is even utilized by the International Space Station to sustain astronauts with essential nutrients and oxygen. Beyond its nutritional value, Spirulina exhibits remarkable abilities in carbon fixation, nitrogen fixation, and metal ion adsorption, which have sparked interest in various sectors aiming to address environmental concerns, achieve carbon neutrality, and advance renewable energy sources [24].
C-phycocyanin, a key constituent of the phycobiliprotein family, stands out due to its significant production appeal and diverse usage. This compound finds application not only as a natural dye and food ingredient but also as a therapeutic agent with fluorescence properties. The biomedical community is keenly interested in phycocyanin, recognizing its potential antiviral, anti-tumoral, and anti-inflammatory properties. However, notwithstanding its valuable properties, extracting phycocyanin from S. platensis generates substantial by-products that warrant consideration [7].
Synthetic additives generally have better chemical properties and physical stability and are less expensive than natural additives, but the demand for natural foods has increased considerably in recent years. Additionally, the application of natural substances, such as C-PC, has been gaining visibility precisely due to its health benefits, as already mentioned [7,20]. Besides being used as a food additive, C-PC has been used as a fluorescent marker to monitor cells and macromolecules in biomedical research [25], to develop medication [26], to elaborate innovative packaging [6], and in nanotechnology [27,28]. Those are only some potential applications of this bioproduct that demand different purities. In this context, other target compounds are present (e.g., proteins and polyunsaturated fatty acids) in the same biomass that C-PC is obtained from, which makes Spirulina a significant matrix to be extensively exploited in the food industry while attenuating production costs and rising above the gap of the natural additives for protein fortification, coloring, and texturing, or even substituting conventional plastic food packaging. The biggest obstacles to applying Spirulina more widely in foodstuff are the consistency of the dry biomass, its solid green color, and its slight fishy odor [29].
On this matter, Spirulina fermentation resulted in overall smell improvement, thus being beneficial for off-flavor reduction [30]; hence, it is another strategy for food incorporation. Furthermore, adding C-PC or isolated/concentrated Spirulina proteins to foods can help increase palatability and consumer acceptance [31,32].
Most studies handle the incorporation of Spirulina biomass into food products, intending to improve the product’s nutritional profile. Bakery, pasta, and dairy products are the main studied matrices for new product development [29]. Table 1 summarizes the incorporation of Spirulina into food products in the last five years, using robust methodologies to analyze Spirulina’s role in the outcomes. Studies with isolated proteins or polysaccharides from Spirulina were excluded from Table 1. Antioxidant activity and sensory acceptability are only sometimes analyzed, representing a gap in food science research. However, the included studies in the present review provide an overview regarding Spirulina biomass applications in food, notably for increasing the protein content and/or as a texture improver for softening [33] or hardening [34], depending on the interactions between the polymers applied in the formulations. For instance, carboxymethyl cellulose and maltodextrin led to softening, due to their hydrophilic behavior, in a rice coating loaded with Spirulina.
Improved texture with better viscosity, reduced syneresis [53], and improved shelf life are attributes acquainted with Spirulina biomass incorporation into food products because of greater water-holding capacity, as observed in vegan products [32] and milk-based products, such as yogurt [49,53] and ayran [52]. These authors also obtained yogurt with stable acidity and color for both formulations; thus, the fermentation process is stimulated by Spirulina biomass. Corroborative results showed increased lactic acid bacteria and confirmed its potential in producing novel functional fermented dairy products. Fermented Spirulina was related to immunomodulatory advantages in vivo; thus, commonly consumed products such as yogurts are interesting application matrices.
Considering the extraction of C-PC, the study conducted by Pan-utai et al. [49] evaluated fresh and dried biomass. The authors observed that fresh biomass was less processed since it did not have a drying process among its obtainment steps, thus saving electricity and presenting a higher C-PC concentration in the final product [49].
Other aspects frequently associated with biomass incorporation as ingredients are the nutritional composition booster and color stability [54] of Spirulina-added products. Nutritional enrichment was identified, particularly in protein and mineral content, and a brown tonality was observed due to the baking process [44]. A green color is typically anticipated when Spirulina is incorporated into food products. Nevertheless, depending on the other ingredients used and heat application during processing, the resultant color can shift to a brown hue. This color alteration can impact the acceptability of the products among consumers.
On the other hand, the blue color associated with C-PC from Spirulina was preserved after the baking process in crostini [42,51]. The authors affirmed that the preservation was due to the protective action of tocopherol in extra virgin olive oil, which is one of the ingredients. Hence, relatively simple methods, such as adding olive oil or even sugar, can be an alternative to mitigate the loss of C-PC, a bioactive compound, during thermal processing.
Meeting the consumer’s demands through delivering novel products must be planned. It involves sensory acceptance evaluation, which was only sometimes carried out in the literature connected with Spirulina-biomass- or C-PC-added products. Sometimes, the number of non-trained panelists was modest (e.g., 20 individuals), and there needed to be more details about the methodology, such as in the study coordinated by El Baky et al. [55]. In this context, investigating the consumer’s willingness to buy novel products is the distinctive aspect of these investigations, and it was reported in only one study [51], considering the evaluated literature. The authors concluded that consumers would buy crostini at 2% of Spirulina concentration.
Amarante et al. [4] added C-PC obtained from Spirulina to ice cream. They observed antioxidant activities 2 to 13 times higher than the control ice cream after in vitro digestion, indicating that the compound remained active in the final product. Another dairy product that successfully received 2 and 4% C-PC was plain yogurt [56]. C-PC maintained color stability in this matrix, did not influence the starter culture, improved the texture, and decreased syneresis. Also, a sensory evaluation demonstrated that 4% C-PC-added yogurt had the best overall acceptability. Besides the coloring function, C-PC presented emulsifying and stabilizing activity in ice cream (concentration of 0.13 mg/mL), contributing to better nutritional food quality without influencing the overall acceptability [15].
Blue isotonic and tonic beverages commercialized without any coloring additive (control) were studied by Belén García et al. [57]. The control received lower amounts of C-PC (<1.12 mg/mL) to reach a color compatible with the blue commercialized products, which contain artificial colorants (i.e., brilliant blue E-133). They presented good color stability during analysis time (11 days), over a wide range of pH (3 to 9), and C-PC did not affect the viscosity of the elaborated products.
These results are significant due to the inclusion of C-PC in products already commercialized, showing the concrete way the food industry can reinvent itself. So far, refrigerated products are the most accessible options for incorporating C-PC as a natural blue dye due to the consequent color preservation under refrigerated temperatures. Referring to baked products, it was found that in 3% C-PC-added biscuits and 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9% Spirulina biomass biscuits, oxidation was reduced during 30 days of storage time and the final products presented antioxidant activity, especially at time zero [55]. The sensory acceptance showed no significant differences, but the number of panelists was limited. As the thermal degradation of C-PC was pointed out in the literature [28], its incorporation in baked products seems more difficult. The whole Spirulina biomass combined with tocopherol could protect the C-PC molecule more efficiently in this product, as Niccolai et al. found [42,51].
In terms of balance, the application of Spirulina biomass and C-PC in foods is very discrete, and due to their remarkable potential, it is challenging to understand why so few products have been developed in the last years. Academics and food industry decision-makers must incite the use of these bioproducts to formulate food products because of their nutritional characteristics and because they equalize ultra-processed product consumption.
The downstream processing of intracellular bioproducts, such as C-PC, involves a series of crucial steps, including cell separation, cell rupture, product extraction, at least one purification step, and the final refinement of the product. It is imperative to employ selective methods for cell rupture and extraction to enhance the purification process of intracellular products like C-PC. These methods effectively disrupt the cell walls, thereby increasing porosity and preventing the release of contaminants, ultimately leading to a high purity of the desired bioproduct without compromising the extraction yield. Furthermore, purifying certain products often necessitates using multiple purification techniques in succession, which can escalate production costs and result in substantial product losses. Therefore, exploring innovative approaches to streamline the purification process is essential. Precipitation and ultrafiltration, characterized by their cost-effectiveness and moderate resolution, can offer high recovery rates. However, depending on the value-added nature of the bioproduct, the utilization of more expensive high-resolution techniques may be justified if they ensure high product recovery. Among the high-resolution techniques, ion exchange chromatography (IEC) stands out as a commonly employed method for protein separation. Recent studies have demonstrated that employing IEC with pH gradient elution yields C-PC with exceptional purity, purification factor, and recovery rates, underscoring its effectiveness in bioproduct refinement [5]. All these steps make this bioproduct more sensitive to external agents, such as the action of light and changes in temperature and pH, making its addition to food a major technological challenge and increasing its production costs [58,59]. Additionally, maintaining the stability of this biomolecule when added to the food matrix is also a considerable challenge since it is sensitive to heat and changes in pH [60,61].
More recently, we have observed in the literature an important movement to improve the stability of phycocyanin through different methods, including the use of nanotechnology [62,63,64], stabilization through the formation of emulsions [64], the addition of sugars or hydrocolloids [64,65], the use of high pressures [66], and the combination, among others, of the cited techniques. This trend makes us believe that we will have at least partially overcome these difficulties in the coming years.

3.2. Health Effects

Scientific insights have demonstrated that Spirulina biomass’ health effects are mainly due to its nutritional value, including its macronutrients (primarily proteins and fatty acids), micronutrients (such as chromium, copper, and zinc), and bioactive compounds, such as carotenoids, chlorophylls, and phycocyanin [67]. Accordingly, Ashaolu et al. [27] have classified C-PC as a “super functional” ingredient due to its content of precious substances.
C-phycocyanin (C-PC) is recognized as a food colorant by ANVISA (National Health Surveillance Agency, Brazilian legislation) and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration in Code of Federal United States Regulations). In both regulations, C-PC, as a food ingredient, must be obtained exclusively by the filtered aqueous extraction of dried Arthrospira platensis biomass [68,69]. Furthermore, some differences in specifications are observed in legislation. ANVISA allows the use of C-PC as a food additive (the maximum limit of use) in (1) candies and confectionery (0.38%), (2) ice cream and cold desserts (0.38%), (3) sugared coatings for sweets and confectionery products (0.38%), (4) powders for the preparation of drinks (0.035 g in every 200 mL), (5) powders for the preparation of soups and sauces (0.50%), and (6) fruit preparation for yogurts (0.50%). The material published by the FDA [69] specifies that C-PC must be free from arsenic, mercury, and microcystin toxin impurities.
Ferrazzano et al. [70] have defined functional foods as technologically developed ingredients that amplify specific effects on human health. Promising sources of functional foods, such as C-PC from cyanobacteria, are a dietary resource for preventing diseases. The content below describes in vivo and in vitro studies regarding the effects of Spirulina and C-PC on health.
An et al. described using probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus subtilis to ferment Spirulina [71]. These probiotics improved Spirulina’s immunomodulatory activity, enhancing Kunming mice’s splenic lymphocyte cell proliferation compared with non-fermented Spirulina. Besides that, molecular metabolites were accumulated during Spirulina fermentation, and the fractions, called “peptides fermented Spirulina”, were characterized according to their size as low (L-PFS, <3 kDa), medium (M-PFS, 3–5 kDa), and high (H-PFS, 5–10 kDa). These studies demonstrate the initial potential and immunomodulatory advantages of Spirulina fermented food product development. However, further studies are necessary to understand the stability of fermented Spirulina as a food ingredient.
Researchers are evaluating Spirulina’s potential over other chronic diseases in the same line of work. The study developed by Aissaoui et al. [72] confirmed Spirulina’s antidiabetic potential by administering 0.1 g of Spirulina powder diluted in 1 mL of distilled water by oral gavage for 50 days in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. The investigation demonstrated that the Spirulina aqueous extract treatment comprised 16.54 ± 0.12% of C-PC. It showed a better antihyperglycemic effect when compared to the controls and a more powerful impact than metformin, the primary antihyperglycemic drug used in diabetes mellitus regulation [72]. The authors believed that the antihyperglycemic effect of Spirulina was either due to the presence of potent antioxidant bioactive molecules, mainly C-PC, chlorophyll, and carotenoids, which may help the increment of insulin secretion from the islet β-cells, or due to the promotion of blood glucose transport to the peripheral tissues [72,73]. The peptides and polypeptides generated by the digestion of Spirulina proteins could also be responsible for the antidiabetic effect, but these antihyperglycemic consequences were not elucidated.
Spirulina has gained notoriety for its anti-obesogenic potential as a dietary supplement. Moradi et al. [74] have summarized the effects of Spirulina supplementation in a systematic review and meta-analysis of five randomized clinical trials for weight management. Still, no statistical differences were seen in body mass index (BMI) or waist-to-hip ratio between groups divided into Spirulina and control, including 145 and 133 subjects, respectively. The findings on weight reduction regarding Spirulina supplementation showed better results in obese than overweight individuals. The possible mechanisms involving the Spirulina effect can be related to several aspects, such as their composition [75], the reduction in cholesterol absorption, microbial modulation by changing the gut microbiota composition, the decrease in insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and inflammatory conditions, mainly due to Spirulina bioactive compounds as C-PC and β-carotene, and appetite hormonal regulation [74].
Studies may need to be conducted longer to robustly prove Spirulina’s positive effect on body weight and other health responses. Zhao et al. [76] compared anti-obesity effects in mice fed a high-fat diet (45% of the calories from lipids) plus 2 g/kg per diet of Spirulina platensis (WSP), Spirulina platensis protein (SPP), or Spirulina platensis protein hydrolysate (SPPH). The results demonstrated that while SPP was the best for lowering glucose (39.6%), SPPH was the best for weight reduction (39.8%) and total cholesterol reduction (20.8%) among the three supplements. The authors highlighted that the compositional differences in protein fraction may explain the difference between WSP, SPP, and SPPH’s effects. These results were lower than those of Ragaza et al. [77], who reported 60–70% protein by dry weight of Spirulina biomass powder.
In addition to the compositional components, the gut–brain–liver axis has a vital role in understanding how the gene changes in brain and liver tissues are related to SPPH-treated obese mice, mainly after SPPH intervention, which have displayed different gene expressions that are associated with lipid metabolism, e.g., Acadm (acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase), Retn (resistin), Fabp4 (fatty acid binding protein 4), Ppard (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma), and Slc27a1 (solute carrier family 27 member 1) [76]. These inferences could also explain the results of the Yousefi et al. [75] study, which described the better effect of Spirulina supplementation on obese than overweight individuals.
Both obesity and overweight are recognized as disruptors of female fertility, mainly because neuroendocrine mechanisms interfere with ovarian functions and can affect the ovulation rate and endometrial receptivity [78]. Wen et al. [79] conducted the first study demonstrating that C-PC could help improve fertility in obese female mice by renewing ovary and oocyte quality. For experimental analysis, mice were divided into three groups: (1) control (CTRL): standardized regular diet (oral) with 0.4 mL of standard saline solution (administered intragastrically); (2) high-fat diet (HFD): standardized high-fat diet (oral); (3) high-fat diet with phycocyanin (HFD + PC): HFD (oral) plus C-PC administered intragastrically each day at a dose of 500 mg/kg/day (dissolved in ultrapure water at a concentration of 50 mg/mL). After C-PC administration, an increment in litter size and offspring survival rates, improvement of the level of ovarian antioxidant enzymes, and reduction in the occurrence of follicular atresia were observed, indicating a potential essential strategy for the clinical treatment of obesity-related infertility in females [79] by the modulation of food intake, one of the lifestyle factors that can positively or negatively impact fertility [78].
In the most recent study by Salgado et al. [11], in vitro and in silico trials were performed to understand the main anti-melanoma action exerted by C-PC at 4.01 analytical purity grade. The requirement for C-PC food application is at least 0.7, but the authors preferred to use 5.73 times higher than the required food purity grade in the experiments. C-PC from Spirulina had no cytotoxic effect on non-tumor cells at concentrations of 100, 200, or 400 μg/mL, maintaining cell viability, which is a great result since the normal cells were unaffected by C-PC. The authors affirmed that C-PC acts in the cell invasion pathway of melanoma cells by binding to essential proteins. One of them is N-cadherin, a cell adhesion molecule that potentiates the invasiveness of melanoma cells, decreasing cell migration and invasion [80]. It is assumed that the F-chain of C-PC is responsible for its antioxidant properties, showing interaction with most of the tested targets and being more stable with N-cadherin and Bcl-2 (a cellular protein that inhibits apoptosis). C-PC’s ability to bind to the main cellular targets was verified by online tools (NCBI Blast, PRISM, and Protein Data Bank) and software (UCSF Chimera X) [80].
Although, ideally, more studies should explore the great potential of Spirulina and C-PC to improve human health, considering all the available reports regarding the effect of C-PC and even the consumption of Spirulina biomass. It is a fact that these bioproducts are indeed a great ally. More than that, the regular consumption of products containing Spirulina could change the scenario of non-transmissible chronic diseases in a very positive way by preventing their impact on the human body and on the public and private healthcare systems.

3.3. Knowledge Gaps and Further Research

Environmental concerns, including climate change and ecosystem degradation, drive the transition towards more sustainable production and consumption methods. Circular and resource-efficient economic models are being adopted to promote reuse, waste reduction, and efficient resource utilization, replacing traditional linear models. The aim is to balance economic growth and environmental protection, leading to industry revitalization, the modernization of production systems, enhanced ecological conservation, and increased biodiversity. The concern towards sustainable industries benefits the environment and holds significant economic potential, with collaborations between businesses and organizations driving growth and change [81].
Harnessing valuable biomass such as cyanobacteria presents a promising alternative strategy to curb the environmental impact of human development while simultaneously enhancing the value of the end products. Cyanobacteria species like Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis exhibit remarkable metabolic flexibility, enabling them to synthesize beneficial compounds like lipids and antioxidants by adapting to specific environmental cues such as light intensity, salinity, nutrient availability, and pH levels [77]. Their unique ability to assimilate chemical oxygen demand and nutrients from certain wastewaters positions cyanobacteria as pivotal players in advancing circular economy applications [3].
The impact of climate change on food systems highlights the challenges posed by extreme climate events that threaten food production, availability, prices, quality, and safety. With almost half of the food currently produced breaching planetary boundaries, the projected global population growth and increased food demand present long-term challenges demanding sector transformation. A shift towards fair, healthy, and low-carbon food systems, advocating for a green business model involving carbon sequestration by farmers and producers, must be prioritized. Transitioning towards plant-based diets and innovative climate-resilient products like Spirulina and other algae and microalgae offer significant CO2 mitigation potential and environmental benefits. Carbon dioxide removal technologies, including carbon capture and utilization, are crucial in achieving carbon neutrality and limiting the rise in global temperature [82]. This information further reinforces how imperative it is to promote Spirulina and its components as ingredients in food and as a protagonist in biotechnological products.
As mentioned throughout the manuscript, C-PC is already applied in a few commercialized food products, mainly refrigerated, such as fruit and vegetable juices and smoothies, ice creams, and yogurts, as “Spirulina extract”. However, the blue color of C-PC is one feature that limits its application in food due to the “unnatural” aspect perceived by some consumers. For this reason, the products currently being developed and commercialized are aimed at younger consumers more interested in the innovative and health-improving aspects of food products. Nevertheless, marketing strategies could easily overcome this limitation, as they have in the case of Spirulina itself, for example. Many food products containing Spirulina are commercialized, emphasizing its health benefits, and its blue–green color indicates the presence of antioxidant ingredients.
More studies must report the sensory acceptance of Spirulina biomass and C-PC-added food products. Additionally, a sensory analysis with and without allegation must be conducted, creating market strategies based on the results.
Another aspect worth considering is the extraction and purification processes for C-PC obtainment. As Becker [83] mentioned, the consistency of the dry biomass of microalgae can be a significant drawback for its application in foods. Additionally, studies have shown that up to 50% of C-PC can be lost during its extraction from the dry biomass of Spirulina, possibly due to its poor thermal stability and peripheral position in the thylakoid membrane of the phycobilisome [84,85]. Therefore, it is recommended that C-PC is extracted from Spirulina’s fresh/wet biomass, ensuring the highest extraction yield and purity possible and minimizing the amount of biomass in the C-PC extract, which facilitates application or eventual purification processes that may be needed [5]. Moreover, using water or buffer as extraction solvents is suggested following green chemistry principles [9].
There is also an urge for more studies investigating the rheological properties of C-PC alone and when added to food matrices [28,32], which are crucial to characterize the stability of these products. Moreover, we have also identified gaps regarding evaluating the antioxidant activity of C-PC in food matrices after the digestion process, either in vitro or in vivo. This investigation is of the utmost importance in formulating food products with health benefit appeal since digestion can decrease the scavenging activities of cyanobacteria extracts [86].
Regarding technological options to deal with Spirulina biomass and C-PC in the food industry, micro- or nanoencapsulation and 3D printing are available. Along these lines, microencapsulated C-PC improved thermal stability at 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C [87] due to C-PC and sodium alginate electrostatic interactions, an alternative for protecting bioactive compounds [22].
Although the literature is still very scarce regarding the use of C-PC and Spirulina biomass for smart food packaging and 3D printing, more research is needed in this area to learn better strategies to improve the physical, structural, and mechanical properties of films and coatings, and the rheological properties and antioxidant activity of 3D-printed food.
Finally, it is essential to focus attention on the full use of Spirulina, i.e., fully utilizing the biomass after obtaining the great value-added C-PC; after all, other nutritionally exciting compounds such as carotenoids, proteins, and fatty acids [67] are present and cannot be prevented from contributing to the good nutrition of the population. The same fatty acids, if isolated, can be used to produce biodiesel, for example, creating opportunities for partnerships between companies from different sectors, respecting the circular economy and, consequently, optimizing the use of natural resources and reducing the production of waste in a challenging world scenario, as the preservation of the environment and food security for the population are significant concerns.

4. Conclusions

Over recent years, a surge of studies has focused on integrating Spirulina biomass into food products, yet notable gaps persist. Critical areas demanding attention include rheological characterization, antioxidant activity post-in vitro digestion, sensory assessments, and consumer acceptance of novel offerings. Similarly, C-PC utilization in food formulations and active packaging still needs to be explored. With blue-hued foods being a rarity, incorporating C-PC presents a gateway to introducing innovative products in a fiercely competitive market landscape. Noteworthy strides have been made in integrating C-PC into existing commercial products, showcasing the food industry’s potential for reinvention. Embracing the narrative of human health benefits through environmentally conscious production practices holds promise for garnering heightened consumer interest. The appeal initially resonates with younger demographics accustomed to vibrant-colored treats like candies and toppings. Refrigerated items are the primary avenue for incorporating C-PC as a natural blue dye, owing to its color stability under chilled conditions. This study is pivotal as it uncovers pathways to extend the application of C-PC as a natural dye to heat-processed food items. Enhancing C-PC’s stability through novel approaches, such as combining it with vegetable oils in baked goods, shows promise. At the same time, advanced technologies like nanotechnology and microencapsulation offer exciting avenues for bolstering stability and enabling novel applications such as smart food packaging.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B., C.F., M.C.A.d.A. and A.R.C.B.; methodology, M.B., C.F. and M.C.A.d.A.; formal analysis, M.B., C.F., M.C.A.d.A. and A.R.C.B.; investigation, M.B., C.F., M.C.A.d.A. and A.R.C.B.; resources, A.R.C.B.; data curation, M.B., C.F. and M.C.A.d.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B., C.F., M.C.A.d.A. and A.R.C.B.; writing—review and editing, M.B. and A.R.C.B.; funding acquisition, A.R.C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo-FAPESP” through the grants process 2023/00857-0, 2022/00772-2 and 2020/06732-7 and the authors also acknowledge CAPES grant number 88887.704047/2022-00, CAPES-PRINT, grant numbers 88887.979370/2024-00 and 88887.917438/2023-00 and CNPq for financial support.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Swinburn, B.A.; Kraak, V.I.; Allender, S.; Atkins, V.J.; Baker, P.I.; Bogard, J.R.; Brinsden, H.; Calvillo, A.; Larijani, B.; Lobstein, T.; et al. The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission Report. Lancet 2019, 393, 791–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arashiro, L.T.; Boto-Ordóñez, M.; Van Hulle, S.W.H.; Ferrer, I.; Garfí, M.; Rousseau, D.P.L. Natural Pigments from Microalgae Grown in Industrial Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 303, 122894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lim, H.R.; Khoo, K.S.; Chew, K.W.; Chang, C.K.; Munawaroh, H.S.H.; Kumar, P.S.; Huy, N.D.; Show, P.L. Perspective of Spirulina Culture with Wastewater into a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 284, 117492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. de Amarante, M.C.A.; Braga, A.R.C.; Sala, L.; Juliano Kalil, S. Colour Stability and Antioxidant Activity of C-Phycocyanin-Added Ice Creams after In Vitro Digestion. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. de Amarante, M.C.A.; Braga, A.R.C.; Sala, L.; Moraes, C.C.; Kalil, S.J. Design Strategies for C-Phycocyanin Purification: Process Influence on Purity Grade. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 252, 117453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakamoto, M.M.; Assis, M.; de Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Braga, A.R.C. Spirulina Application in Food Packaging: Gaps of Knowledge and Future Trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 133, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fratelli, C.; Burck, M.; Amarante, M.C.A.; Braga, A.R.C. Antioxidant Potential of Nature’s “Something Blue”: Something New in the Marriage of Biological Activity and Extraction Methods Applied to C-Phycocyanin. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 107, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silva-Neto, A.F.; Fratelli, C.; Pucci, V.G.; Boldarine, V.T.; Ferreira, Y.A.M.; Telles, M.M.; Braga, A.R.C.; Oyama, L.M. C-Phycocyanin Extracted from Spirulina Using a Green Solvent Approach Presents an Anti-Obesity Characteristic in Mice Fed a Hyperlipidic Diet. J. Funct. Foods 2023, 108, 105747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fratelli, C.; Bürck, M.; Silva-Neto, A.F.; Oyama, L.M.; De Rosso, V.V.; Braga, A.R.C. Green Extraction Process of Food Grade C-Phycocyanin: Biological Effects and Metabolic Study in Mice. Processes 2022, 10, 1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aladaileh, S.H.; Khafaga, A.F.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Al-Gabri, N.A.; Abukhalil, M.H.; Alfwuaires, M.A.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Alkahtani, S.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Aleya, L.; et al. Spirulina platensis Ameliorates the Sub Chronic Toxicities of Lead in Rabbits via Anti-Oxidative, Anti- Inflammatory, and Immune Stimulatory Properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 701, 134879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salgado, M.T.S.F.; Fernandes e Silva, E.; Matsumoto, A.M.; Mattozo, F.H.; de Amarante, M.C.A.; Kalil, S.J.; de Souza Votto, A.P. C-Phycocyanin Decreases Proliferation and Migration of Melanoma Cells: In Silico and In Vitro Evidences. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 122, 105757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wu, Q.; Liu, L.; Miron, A.; Klímová, B.; Wan, D.; Kuča, K. The Antioxidant, Immunomodulatory, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Spirulina: An Overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 1817–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Food and Drug Administration. Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 320; National Archives and Records Administration: College Park, MD, USA, 2001.
  14. Chen, X.H. Effect of PH on the Emulsifying Activity of C-Phycocyanin. Mod. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 36, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rodrigues, E.F.; Vendruscolo, L.P.; Bonfante, K.; Reinehr, C.O.; Colla, E.; Colla, L.M.; Fundo, P.; Reinehr, C.O. Phycocyanin as Substitute for Texture Ingredients in Ice Creams. Br. Food J. 2019, 122, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carocho, M.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Natural Food Additives: Quo Vadis? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramos-Souza, C.; Nass, P.; Jacob-Lopes, E.; Queiroz Zepka, L.; Rafaela Cavalcante Braga, A.; Vera De Rosso, V. Changing Despicable Me: Potential Replacement of Azo Dye Yellow Tartrazine for Pequi Carotenoids Employing Ionic Liquids as High-Performance Extractors. Food Res. Int. 2023, 174, 113593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. A.C. Nielsen Company. We Are What We Eat: Healthy Eating Trends around the World; Nielsen Company: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Oplatowska-Stachowiak, M.; Elliott, C.T. Food Colors: Existing and Emerging Food Safety Concerns. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 524–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Landim Neves, M.I.; Silva, E.K.; Meireles, M.A.A.; Neves, M.I.L.; Silva, E.K.; Meireles, M.A.A. Natural Blue Food Colorants: Consumer Acceptance, Current Alternatives, Trends, Challenges, and Future Strategies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernandes, A.S.; Neves, B.V.; Mazzo, T.M.; Longo, E.; Jacob-Lopez, E.; Zepka, L.Q.; de Rosso, V.V. Bigels as Potential Inks for Extrusion-Based 3d Food Printing: Effect of Oleogel Fraction on Physical Characterization and Printability. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 144, 108986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Giaconia, M.A.; dos Ramos, S.P.; Pereira, C.F.; Lemes, A.C.; De Rosso, V.V.; Braga, A.R.C. Overcoming Restrictions of Bioactive Compounds Biological Effects in Food Using Nanometer-Sized Structures. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 107, 105939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Citation-Based Clustering of Publications Using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics 2017, 111, 1053–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Costa, J.A.V.; Freitas, B.C.B.; Rosa, G.M.; Moraes, L.; Morais, M.G.; Mitchell, B.G. Operational and Economic Aspects of Spirulina-Based Biorefinery. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 121946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kuddus, M.; Singh, P.; Thomas, G.; Al-Hazimi, A. Recent Developments in Production and Biotechnological Applications of C-Phycocyanin. Biomed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 742859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Eriksen, N.T. Production of Phycocyanin—A Pigment with Applications in Biology, Biotechnology, Foods and Medicine. Appl Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ashaolu, T.J.; Samborska, K.; Lee, C.C.; Tomas, M.; Capanoglu, E.; Tarhan, Ö.; Taze, B.; Jafari, S.M. Phycocyanin, a Super Functional Ingredient from Algae; Properties, Purification Characterization, and Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 2320–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Braga, A.R.C.; da Figueira, F.S.; da Silveira, J.T.; de Morais, M.G.; Costa, J.A.V.; Kalil, S.J. Improvement of Thermal Stability of C-Phycocyanin by Nanofiber and Preservative Agents. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2016, 40, 1264–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fratelli, C.; Nunes, M.C.; De Rosso, V.V.; Raymundo, A.; Braga, A.R.C. Spirulina and Its Residual Biomass as Alternative Sustainable Ingredients: Impact on the Rheological and Nutritional Features of Wheat Bread Manufacture. Front. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 3, 1258219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martelli, F.; Cirlini, M.; Lazzi, C.; Neviani, E.; Bernini, V. Edible Seaweeds and Spirulina Extracts for Food Application: In Vitro and In Situ Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity towards Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria. Foods 2020, 9, 1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Stanic-Vucinic, D.; Minic, S.; Nikolic, M.R.; Velickovic, T.C. Spirulina Phycobiliproteins as Food Components and Complements. In Microalgal Biotechnology; InTechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Braga, A.R.C.; Nunes, M.C.; Raymundo, A. The Experimental Development of Emulsions Enriched and Stabilized by Recovering Matter from Spirulina Biomass: Valorization of Residue into a Sustainable Protein Source. Molecules 2023, 28, 6179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Utama-ang, N.; Kuatrakul, I.; Walter, P.; Rattanapitigorn, P.; Kawee-ai, A. Effect of Instant Jasmine Rice Coating Combining Spirulina with Edible Polymers on Physicochemical Properties, Textural Properties and Sensory Acceptance. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ismail, H.A.; El-Sawah, T.H.; Ayyash, M.; Adhikari, B.; Elkot, W.F. Functionalization of Ricotta Cheese with Powder of Spirulina platensis: Physicochemical, Sensory, and Microbiological Properties. Int. J. Food Prop. 2023, 26, 1968–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Elkot, W.F.; Elmahdy, A.; El-Sawah, T.H.; Alghamdia, O.A.; Alhag, S.K.; Al-Shahari, E.A.; AL-Farga, A.; Ismail, H.A. Development and Characterization of a Novel Flavored Functional Fermented Whey-Based Sports Beverage Fortified with Spirulina platensis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 258, 128999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pandey, V.K.; Singh, P.; Srivastava, S.; Zanwar, S.; Dar, A.H.; Singh, R.; Lal, A. Box–Behnken Design Based Statistical Modelling to Study the Effects of Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) Incorporation on Nutritional Standards of Vegan Snack Product. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rose, H.; Bakshi, S.; Kanetkar, P.; Lukose, S.J.; Felix, J.; Yadav, S.P.; Gupta, P.K.; Paswan, V.K. Development and Characterization of Cultured Buttermilk Fortified with Spirulina plantensis and Its Physico-Chemical and Functional Characteristics. Dairy 2023, 4, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, M.; Yin, Z.; Sun, W.; Zhong, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, M. Microalgae Play a Structuring Role in Food: Effect of Spirulina platensis on the Rheological, Gelling Characteristics, and Mechanical Properties of Soy Protein Isolate Hydrogel. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 136, 108244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gün, D.; Çelekli, A.; Bozkurt, H.; Kaya, S. Optimization of Biscuit Enrichment with the Incorporation of Arthrospira platensis: Nutritional and Sensory Approach. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Özbal, B.; Çelekli, A.; Gün, D.; Bozkurt, H. Effect of Arthrospira platensis Incorporation on Nutritional and Sensory Attributes of White Chocolate. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 28, 100544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Üstün-Aytekin, Ö.; Çoban, I.; Aktaş, B. Nutritional Value, Sensory Properties, and Antioxidant Activity of a Traditional Kefir Produced with Arthrospira platensis. J. Food Process Preserv. 2022, 46, e16380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Niccolai, A.; Venturi, M.; Galli, V.; Pini, N.; Rodolfi, L.; Biondi, N.; Granchi, L.; Tredici, M.R. Vegetable Oils Protect Phycocyanin from Thermal Degradation during Cooking of Spirulina-Based “Crostini”. LWT 2021, 138, 110776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sözeri Atik, D.; Gürbüz, B.; Bölük, E.; Palabıyık, İ. Development of Vegan Kefir Fortified with Spirulina platensis. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 101050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Uribe-Wandurraga, Z.N.; Igual, M.; García-Segovia, P.; Martínez-Monzó, J. Influence of Microalgae Addition in Formulation on Colour, Texture, and Extrusion Parameters of Corn Snacks. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2020, 26, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fradinho, P.; Niccolai, A.; Soares, R.; Rodolfi, L.; Biondi, N.; Tredici, M.R.; Sousa, I.; Raymundo, A. Effect of Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina) Incorporation on the Rheological and Bioactive Properties of Gluten-Free Fresh Pasta. Algal. Res. 2020, 45, 101743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Grahl, S.; Strack, M.; Mensching, A.; Mörlein, D. Alternative Protein Sources in Western Diets: Food Product Development and Consumer Acceptance of Spirulina-Filled Pasta. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 84, 103933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martelli, F.; Alinovi, M.; Bernini, V.; Gatti, M.; Bancalari, E. Arthrospira platensis as Natural Fermentation Booster for Milk and Soy Fermented Beverages. Foods 2020, 9, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mostolizadeh, S.; Moradi, Y.; Mortazavi, M.S.; Motallebi, A.A.; Ghaeni, M. Effects of Incorporation Spirulina platensis (Gomont, 1892) Powder in Wheat Flour on Chemical, Microbial and Sensory Properties of Pasta. Iran J. Fish Sci. 2020, 19, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pan-utai, W.; Iamtham, S. Extraction, Purification and Antioxidant Activity of Phycobiliprotein from Arthrospira platensis. Process Biochem. 2019, 82, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saharan, V.; Jood, S. Effect of Storage on Spirulina platensis Powder Supplemented Breads. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 978–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Niccolai, A.; Venturi, M.; Galli, V.; Pini, N.; Rodolfi, L.; Biondi, N.; D’Ottavio, M.; Batista, A.P.; Raymundo, A.; Granchi, L.; et al. Development of New Microalgae-Based Sourdough “Crostini”: Functional Effects of Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina) Addition. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Çelekli, A.; Alslibi, Z.A.; Bozkurt, H. üseyin Influence of Incorporated Spirulina platensis on the Growth of Microflora and Physicochemical Properties of Ayran as a Functional Food. Algal Res. 2019, 44, 101710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Barkallah, M.; Dammak, M.; Louati, I.; Hentati, F.; Hadrich, B.; Mechichi, T.; Ayadi, M.A.; Fendri, I.; Attia, H.; Abdelkafi, S. Effect of Spirulina platensis Fortification on Physicochemical, Textural, Antioxidant and Sensory Properties of Yogurt during Fermentation and Storage. LWT 2017, 84, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. da Costa, S.F.F.; dos Passos Ramos, S.; Bürck, M.; Braga, A.R.C. Development of Eco-Friendly Solid Shampoo Containing Natural Pigments: Physical-Chemical, Microbiological Characterization and Analysis of Antioxidant Activity. Ind. Biotechnol. 2023, 19, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. El Baky, H.H.A.; El Baroty, G.S.; Ibrahem, E.A. Functional Characters Evaluation of Biscuits Sublimated with Pure Phycocyanin Isolated from Spirulina and Spirulina Biomass. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 32, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mohammadi-Gouraji, E.; Soleimanian-Zad, S.; Ghiaci, M. Phycocyanin-Enriched Yogurt and Its Antibacterial and Physicochemical Properties during 21 Days of Storage. LWT 2019, 102, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Belén García, A.; Longo, E.; Bermejo, R. The Application of a Phycocyanin Extract Obtained from Arthrospira platensis as a Blue Natural Colorant in Beverages. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 3059–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hadiyanto, S.H.; Hadiyanto, H.; Suttrisnorhadi, S. Response Surface Optimization of Ultrasound Assisted Extraction (UAE) of Phycocyanin from Microalgae Spirulina platensis. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2016, 28, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Moraes, C.C.; de Burkert, J.F.M.; Kalil, S.J.; De Medeiros Burkert, J.F.; Kalil, S.J. C-Phycocyanin Extraction Process for Large-Scale Use. J. Food Biochem. 2010, 34, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chaiklahan, R.; Chirasuwan, N.; Bunnag, B. Stability of Phycocyanin Extracted from Spirulina sp.: Influence of Temperature, PH and Preservatives. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 659–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Martelli, G.; Folli, C.; Visai, L.; Daglia, M.; Ferrari, D. Thermal Stability Improvement of Blue Colorant C-Phycocyanin from Spirulina platensis for Food Industry Applications. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ramos, S.d.P.; Trindade, L.G.d.; Mazzo, T.M.; Longo, E.; Bonsanto, F.P.; de Rosso, V.V.; Braga, A.R.C. Electrospinning Composites as Carriers of Natural Pigment: Screening of Polymeric Blends. Processes 2022, 10, 2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Paramanya, A.; Oyesiji Abiodun, A.; Shamsul Ola, M.; Ali, A. Enhancing the Quality and Antioxidant Capacity of Phycocyanin Extracted from Spirulina platensis PCC 7345: A Quality-by-Design Approach. Arab. J. Chem. 2024, 17, 105653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sun, X.; Zhang, Z.; Li, W.; Tian, H.; Yuan, L.; Yang, X. Stability of High Internal-Phase Emulsions Prepared from Phycocyanin and Small-Molecule Sugars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2024, 104, 2917–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rekha, V.S.; Sankar, K.; Rajaram, S.; Karuppiah, P.; Dawoud, T.M.S.; Syed, A.; Elgorban, A.M. Unveiling the Impact of Additives on Structural Integrity, Thermal and Color Stability of C-Phycocyanin—Agar Hydrocolloid. Food Chem. 2024, 448, 139000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Faieta, M.; Chen, C.; Colaruotolo, L.A.; Huynh, L.; Corradini, M.G.; Pittia, P. High-Pressure Processing (HPP) of Phycocyanin Extract Solutions: Enhancing Stability through Molecular Interactions. LWT 2024, 198, 115965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Muys, M.; Sui, Y.; Schwaiger, B.; Lesueur, C.; Vandenheuvel, D.; Vermeir, P.; Vlaeminck, S.E. High Variability in Nutritional Value and Safety of Commercially Available Chlorella and Spirulina Biomass Indicates the Need for Smart Production Strategies. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 275, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. ANVISA Novos Alimentos, Novos Ingredientes, Probióticos e Enzimas Aprovados; Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária: Brasília, Brazil, 2019.
  69. FDA. Spirulina Extract. In 21 Code of Federal Legislations; FDA: White Oak, MD, USA, 2001; p. 73.1530. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ferrazzano, G.F.; Papa, C.; Pollio, A.; Ingenito, A.; Sangianantoni, G.; Cantile, T. Cyanobacteria and Microalgae as Sources of Functional Foods to Improve Human General and Oral Health. Molecules 2020, 25, 5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. An, J.; Feng, Y.; Zheng, J.; Addy, M.; Zhang, L.; Ren, D. The Immune-enhancing Potential of Peptide Fractions from Fermented Spirulina platensis by Mixed Probiotics. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Aissaoui, O.; Amiali, M.; Bouzid, N.; Belkacemi, K.; Bitam, A. Effect of Spirulina platensis Ingestion on the Abnormal Biochemical and Oxidative Stress Parameters in the Pancreas and Liver of Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Rats. Pharm. Biol. 2017, 55, 1304–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bitam, A.; Aissaoui, O. Spirulina platensis, Oxidative Stress, and Diabetes. In Diabetes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 325–331. [Google Scholar]
  74. Moradi, S.; Ziaei, R.; Foshati, S.; Mohammadi, H.; Nachvak, S.M.; Rouhani, M.H. Effects of Spirulina Supplementation on Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Complement. Ther. Med. 2019, 47, 102211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Yousefi, R.; Saidpour, A.; Mottaghi, A. The Effects of Spirulina Supplementation on Metabolic Syndrome Components, Its Liver Manifestation and Related Inflammatory Markers: A Systematic Review. Complement. Ther. Med. 2019, 42, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhao, B.; Cui, Y.; Fan, X.; Qi, P.; Liu, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, X. Anti-Obesity Effects of Spirulina platensis Protein Hydrolysate by Modulating Brain-Liver Axis in High-Fat Diet Fed Mice. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ragaza, J.A.; Hossain, M.S.; Meiler, K.A.; Velasquez, S.F.; Kumar, V. A Review on Spirulina: Alternative Media for Cultivation and Nutritive Value as an Aquafeed. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 2371–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Silvestris, E.; de Pergola, G.; Rosania, R.; Loverro, G. Obesity as Disruptor of the Female Fertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2018, 16, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wen, X.; Han, Z.; Liu, S.-J.J.; Hao, X.; Zhang, X.-J.J.; Wang, X.-Y.Y.; Zhou, C.-J.J.; Ma, Y.-Z.Z.; Liang, C.-G.G. Phycocyanin Improves Reproductive Ability in Obese Female Mice by Restoring Ovary and Oocyte Quality. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 595373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Mrozik, K.M.; Blaschuk, O.W.; Cheong, C.M.; Zannettino, A.C.W.; Vandyke, K. N-Cadherin in Cancer Metastasis, Itsemerging Role in Haematologicalmalignancies and Potential as a Therapeutictarget in Cancer. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cheirsilp, B.; Maneechote, W.; Srinuanpan, S.; Angelidaki, I. Microalgae as Tools for Bio-Circular-Green Economy: Zero-Waste Approaches for Sustainable Production and Biorefineries of Microalgal Biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 387, 129620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Fernández-Ríos, A.; Butnar, I.; Margallo, M.; Laso, J.; Borrion, A.; Aldaco, R. Carbon Accounting of Negative Emissions Technologies Integrated in the Life Cycle of Spirulina Supplements. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 890, 164362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Becker, E.W. Micro-Algae as a Source of Protein. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sala, L.; Moraes, C.C.; Kalil, S.J. Cell Pretreatment with Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid for Selective Extraction of C-Phycocyanin with Food Grade Purity. Biotechnol. Prog. 2018, 34, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sarada, R.; Pillai, M.G.; Ravishankar, G.A. Phycocyanin from Spirulina sp.: Influence of Processing of Biomass on Phycocyanin Yield, Analysis of Efficacy of Extraction Methods and Stability Studies on Phycocyanin. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 795–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ghosh, T.; Katiyar, V. Edible Food Packaging: An Introduction. In Nanotechnology in Edible Food Packaging; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  87. Pradeep, H.N.; Nayak, C.A. Enhanced Stability of C-Phycocyanin Colorant by Extrusion Encapsulation. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 4526–4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Innovative methods for reaching a competitive mark with new blue and green food colors.
Figure 1. Innovative methods for reaching a competitive mark with new blue and green food colors.
Biomass 04 00039 g001
Figure 2. Network visualization map resulting from Scopus keyword insertion “phycocyanin OR Spirulina AND food products development” (2012–2024) (A); image representing the keyword links of nutritional and technological food usage of phycocyanin from Spirulina (B)—data from VosViewer software version 1.6.13.
Figure 2. Network visualization map resulting from Scopus keyword insertion “phycocyanin OR Spirulina AND food products development” (2012–2024) (A); image representing the keyword links of nutritional and technological food usage of phycocyanin from Spirulina (B)—data from VosViewer software version 1.6.13.
Biomass 04 00039 g002
Table 1. Spirulina has been incorporated into food products in recent years.
Table 1. Spirulina has been incorporated into food products in recent years.
Food ProductTechnological FunctionSpirulina
Ratio
Physicochemical CharacteristicsAntioxidant
Activity
Main
Effects
Reference
Fermented whey-based sports beverageNutritional composition, probiotic profile, rheology, and sensory acceptance0.25%, 0.5%, and 0.75% (w/w)Total solids, protein, fiber, vitamins, and minerals were higher in the samples containing Spirulina and insignificant differences in fat or ash compared to the control samples1 TPC: 65.15, 68.19, and 70.05 mg 2 GAE/100 g in the samples loaded with Spirulina versus 60.75, 63.80 GAE/100 g in the control samples0.5% of Spirulina resulted in good sensory acceptance. Spirulina are directly related to textural quality of the final products and pH decrease. All fermented beverage samples presented more than 7 log CFU/mL probiotic bacteria throughout storage[35]
Vegan emulsionsNutritional composition, natural pigment, and stabilizing agent3% (w/w) proteins in the emulsions were composed by residual biomass (after extracting C-phycocyanin) at 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) and chickpea proteinPredominantly elastic behavior; shear tinning behavior typical of protein-stabilized emulsions. Emulsions with 100% residual biomass showed highest adhesiveness and firmness; at 75% and 50%, these parameters decreased; at 25%, no significant difference were assed compared to control. 3 DPPH ranged from 15.4 ± 0.16 to 43.0 ± 1.5 and 4 FRAP from 169.38 ± 5.75 to 343.91 ± 21.12, respectively Residual biomass led to a decrease in droplet sizes of the emulsions and improved the antioxidant activity of the formulations. The formulations’ color was stable alongside 30 days of tests[32]
Vegan snacksNutritional composition and sensorial attributes0%, 4%, and 8% combined with finger millet and gram flourMoisture content ranged from 1% to 3%; ash from 1% to 3.5%; from 2% to 4.5% in the extruded product. The percentage of protein increased with the addition of the Spirulina powder-Protein denaturation diminished with Spirulina incorporation in the snacks, observed after the frying process. Spirulina increased the protein and ash content while decreased the fat content due to high fiber and protein of the formulations. The shelf life that maintained the sensory attributes in acceptable scores was 90 days. The overall acceptability decreased as the storage time increased[36]
Ricotta cheeseNutritional composition, microstructure improvement, and sensorial attributes0%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1.0% (w/w)Total solids, protein, fat, ash, carbohydrate, fiber, minerals, and pH showed a significant increase; however, the acidity was comparatively lower compared to control samplesTPC: 7.03 ± 0.08 mg versus 5.11 ± 0.07 mg (GAE/g); DPPH: 20.27 ± 0.80% versus 15.25 ± 0.41% in the samples with Spirulina at 1% and control ricotta cheeseSpirulina led to increment in hardness at the start and the end of 21 days of storage, while decreased cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness values. Incorporation of 0.75% was the optimum concentration for structure and sensory acceptance[34]
ButtermilkNutritional composition and fermentation process improvement0%, 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1% Protein significantly increased from 1.71 to 1.83 g/100 g and fat was not affected comparing control and 0.25% Spirulina concentrationDPPH ranged from 41.99% to 48.19%; TPC ranged from 2.44 to 4.21 mg/g GAE both essays for control and 0.25% Spirulina loadedThe best sensory acceptance was achieved for buttermilk containing 0.25% Spirulina. The microbial findings from this study indicate that Spirulina might promote the proliferation of lactic acid bacteria for prebiotic algae-based[37]
Soy protein isolate hydrogelRheological properties and microstructure improvement0% to 8%Hydrogels presented predominantly elastic behavior and as the concentration of Spirulina increased, the entanglement of molecules within the hydrogel also rose-Pre-thermal treatment followed by high-speed shearing led to Spirulina cell wall damage, releasing protein and carbohydrates that formed dense hydrogels. Spirulina enhanced the rigidity and compactness of the hydrogels[38]
BiscuitTexture parameter improvement0%, 1%, 2.5%, and 4% Spirulina at 4% improved protein and amino acid content (e.g., alanine, lysine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, arginine, serine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine) of biscuits-Hardness and crispness of the biscuits were improved at 4% Spirulina incorporation. The same were observed in the color, aroma, taste, and texture parameters[39]
White chocolateNutritional composition and sensory attributes0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%Improved viscosity at all concentrations, except compared to control-No significant (p > 0.05) difference in sensory
acceptance compared to control
[40]
KefirNutritional composition and functional properties0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% (w/v)-DPPH: 22.2% for 1% concentration sampleThe overall acceptability decreased as the Spirulina ratio
increased
[41]
Rice coatingNutritional composition texture and sensorial attributes2% Spirulina, combined with 20% maltodextrin and 1% carboxymethyl cellulose (w/v)Spirulina incremented the protein content in 64.5% compared to control samples. Moisture content increased up to 67.4% because of the hydrophilic behavior of maltodextrin, carboxymethyl cellulose and proteins. TPC: 137.3 µg GAE/g and FRAP: 3.8 mg Fe2+/gHardness, adhesiveness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness decreased in the samples with Spirulina due to the presence of these other polymers. The softness was appreciated. Overall acceptability of 7.1, corresponding to like moderately. Unfavorable odor in the rice fortified with 3 to 5% (w/v) Spirulina[33]
CrostiniNutritional composition6%--C-PC was protected from thermal degradation by tocopherol[42]
Vegan kefir
(soy- or almond-milk-based)
Nutritional composition and functional properties0.25% and 0.50%No significant color differences (p > 0.05)DPPH: 12.03 ± 4.41 was the greatest value (soy milk at 0.5%)
5 ABTS: 46.90 ± 2.41 was the greatest value (soy milk at 0.25%)
Spirulina improved the prebiotic potential and bioactive quality of food[43]
EmulsionLow-fat oil-in-water food emulsions and coloring1% (Dunaliella; Chlorella or Spirulina)Spirulina: pH slightly decreased during storage; the emulsion were stable-Spirulina: greenish color differences from 25 to 60 days of storage were observed[44]
Gluten-free fresh pastaNutritional composition, rheological and functional properties, and appearance2 and 3%Higher antioxidant activity; high digestibility in vitro; good mechanical propertiesDPPH: 70.33% ± 4.36 and 6 VCEAC: 0.77 μg/g ± 0.02Spirulina biomass enhanced the nutritional quality of pasta without affecting its cooking and texture quality properties[45]
PastaNutritional composition10, 30, and 50% of Spirulina-soy-extrudate--Generally, pasta was accepted
Familiarity with Spirulina was related to acceptance
[46]
Milk and fermented soy beveragesBoost on fermentation0.25% and 0.50%The lightness was increased at both concentration-Spirulina improved lactic acid bacteria strains and viscosity at 0.25%[47]
PastaNutritional composition and rheological and functional properties0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1%Improved mineral content-Greater color, aroma, and overall acceptability of pasta (0.25% Spirulina) compared to the control[48]
YogurtNutritional composition, functional properties, and coloring0.1, 0.3, and 0.5% oven-dried biomass and 1, 5, and 10% fresh biomasspH decreased with biomass incorporation;
water-holding capacity ranged from 53 to 62%
-Yogurt products showed the ability to retain water after the fermentation process[49]
BreadNutritional composition2, 4, and 6%-DPPH: 16.51 ± 0.85 at 6% Spirulina biomass ratio was the greatest value The overall acceptability decreased as the Spirulina ratio increased [50]
CrostiniNutritional composition, functional properties, and appearance2%, 6% and 10%Improved protein, phycocyanin, and total phenolic contentDPPH: ranged from 57% to 61% and VCEAC: from 0.60 to 0.64 μg/g Color and global acceptance were greater at 2% Spirulina concentration and lower than the control[51]
Ayran (Yogurt)Boost on fermentation capability and probiotic bacteria0.25%, 0.5%, and 1%Improved protein at 1%. Viscosity decreased in the first seven days of storage, then it increased-Enhancement in the growth of probiotic bacteria and nutritional value of ayran[52]
YogurtNutritional composition, rheological properties, and coloring0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1%Higher antioxidant activity, protein, fat, and dietary fiber contents were reportedDPPH: 52.41 ± 2.61 at 0.25%
Spirulina
0.25% Spirulina concentration was the best formulation. The color showed no tendency to lighten during storage[53]
1 total phenolic compounds; 2 gallic acid equivalent; 3 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; 4 2,4,6-tri(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine; 5 2,2-azino-bis(ethylbenzo-thiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt; 6 vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bürck, M.; Fratelli, C.; Campos Assumpção de Amarante, M.; Braga, A.R.C. Unveiling the Potential of Spirulina Biomass—A Glimpse into the Future Circular Economy Using Green and Blue Ingredients. Biomass 2024, 4, 704-719. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4030039

AMA Style

Bürck M, Fratelli C, Campos Assumpção de Amarante M, Braga ARC. Unveiling the Potential of Spirulina Biomass—A Glimpse into the Future Circular Economy Using Green and Blue Ingredients. Biomass. 2024; 4(3):704-719. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4030039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bürck, Monize, Camilly Fratelli, Marina Campos Assumpção de Amarante, and Anna Rafaela Cavalcante Braga. 2024. "Unveiling the Potential of Spirulina Biomass—A Glimpse into the Future Circular Economy Using Green and Blue Ingredients" Biomass 4, no. 3: 704-719. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4030039

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop