applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Probabilistic Methods in Design of Engineering Structures

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Materials Science and Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 January 2022) | Viewed by 7841

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Structural Mechanics, Lodz University of Technology, 6 Politechniki Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
Interests: probabilistic methods; structural engineering; structural design lightweight structures; steel; reinforced concrete; timber; random loads

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

It is widely acknowledged that the deterministic approach to the safety of buildings, machines or transport equipment has dominated in the industry until recently. Nominal (normalized) values of material properties and loads have been used for design calculations.  High values of global safety factors, simplified calculation methods, and the general state of the art contributed to the belief that it is possible and required to design structures that are absolutely safe.  Today, it is accepted that a slight risk of fault of any structure is inevitable and fundamental variables considered in the design process are uncertain to various extents. Such uncertainties result from the natural variability in mechanical properties of building materials, loads, and geometrical dimensions of structural components. Other reasons might include a lack of comprehensive information on actual characteristics of fundamental variables and methods of collecting, processing and analyzing the results of observations and experimental research. A group of uncertainties is also related to mathematical models that reflect how structures react to actions. The random nature of loads, load-carrying capacities, and calculation errors lets us draw a somewhat obvious conclusion that deterministic methods of analyzing the reliability of structures are inadequate. We must bear in mind, however, that in the engineering practice, it is important to strike a balance between, on the one hand, making calculations that are sufficiently accurate and enable the optimal and, at the same time, safe design of a structure and, on the other, using methods that are easy to adopt and provide us relatively quickly with answers, despite rough results and large safety margins.

Theories and probabilistic models that make it possible to consider such randomness in analyses are currently developed.

As processing capabilities of computers and numerical algorithms are constantly increasing and designers are becoming more interested in optimizing a structure, while keeping it adequately safe. In this same way, more sophisticated methods are being used, also in engineering practice, to take into account the randomness in calculations related to structures and to assess their reliability. A characteristic of probabilistic models is, however, their considerable complexity when it comes to estimating the probability of a structural failure and developing a model that can be used for random analysis.

Therefore, in this Special Issue, in order to establish the state of the art concerning this subject and to identify new challenges for the near future, we invite the publication of research results in each of the following fields: design of structures or their components using probabilistic methods, reliability analyses of existing objects, handling the results of experimental research using statistical processing, optimizing and modeling a structure using stochastic methods, and any developments related to considering random parameters in the design of engineering structures.

Dr. Jacek Szafran
Prof. Marcin Kamiński
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • probabilistic methods
  • structural engineering
  • structural design lightweight structures
  • steel
  • reinforced concrete
  • timber
  • stochastic finite element method
  • stochastic reliability
  • random composites
  • random loads

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 7138 KiB  
Article
Analytical and Numerical Reliability Analysis of Certain Pratt Steel Truss
by Marcin Kamiński and Rafał Błoński
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(6), 2901; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062901 - 11 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2246
Abstract
The main aim of this paper was to propose a new reliability index for steel structure assessment and to check it using the example of a popular Pratt truss girder. Structural analysis was completed in the finite element method system Autodesk ROBOT, and [...] Read more.
The main aim of this paper was to propose a new reliability index for steel structure assessment and to check it using the example of a popular Pratt truss girder. Structural analysis was completed in the finite element method system Autodesk ROBOT, and probabilistic analysis was implemented in the computer algebra software MAPLE. The stochastic finite element method (SFEM) was contrasted here with the Monte Carlo simulation and the girder span was selected as the input structural uncertainty source. Both methods were based on the same structural polynomial response functions determined for extreme deformation, for extreme stresses and also for the structural joint exhibiting the largest effort. These polynomials were statistically optimized during the additional least squares method experiments. The first four basic probabilistic characteristics of the structural responses, the first-order reliability method (FORM) index, and as the new proposition for this index were computed and presented. This new index formula follows the relative probabilistic entropy model proposed by Bhattacharyya. The computer analysis results presented here show a very strong coincidence of both probabilistic numerical techniques and confirms the applicability of the new reliability index for the input coefficient of variation not larger than 0.15. These studies should be continued for other engineering systems’ reliability and, particularly, for large-scale and multiscale computer simulations. The results presented in this paper may serve in different applied sciences, from biology through to econometrics, experimental physics and, of course, various branches of engineering. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probabilistic Methods in Design of Engineering Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 9791 KiB  
Article
On Selecting Composite Functions Based on Polynomials for Responses Describing Extreme Magnitudes of Structures
by Bartłomiej Pokusiński and Marcin Kamiński
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(21), 10179; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110179 - 30 Oct 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1142
Abstract
The main aim of this work was to investigate a numerical error in determining limit state functions, which describe the extreme magnitudes of steel structures with respect to random variables. It was assisted here by the global version of the response function method [...] Read more.
The main aim of this work was to investigate a numerical error in determining limit state functions, which describe the extreme magnitudes of steel structures with respect to random variables. It was assisted here by the global version of the response function method (RFM). Various approximations of trial points generated on the basis of several hundred selected reference composite functions based on polynomials were analyzed. The final goal was to find some criterion—between approximation and input data—for the selection of the response function leading to relative a posteriori errors less than 1%. Unlike the classical problem of curve fitting, the accuracy of the final values of probabilistic moments was verified here as they can be used in further reliability calculations. The use of the criterion and the associated way of selecting the response function was demonstrated on the example of steel diagrid grillages. It resulted in quite high correctness in comparison with extended FEM tests. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probabilistic Methods in Design of Engineering Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1331 KiB  
Article
Sensitivity Analysis of Reliability of Low-Mobility Parallel Mechanisms Based on a Response Surface Method
by Qiang Yang, Hongkun Ma, Jiaocheng Ma, Zhili Sun and Cuiling Li
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(19), 9002; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199002 - 27 Sep 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1521
Abstract
Kinematic accuracy is a crucial indicator for evaluating the performance of mechanisms. Low-mobility parallel mechanisms are examples of parallel robots that have been successfully employed in many industrial fields. Previous studies analyzing the kinematic accuracy analysis of parallel mechanisms typically ignore the randomness [...] Read more.
Kinematic accuracy is a crucial indicator for evaluating the performance of mechanisms. Low-mobility parallel mechanisms are examples of parallel robots that have been successfully employed in many industrial fields. Previous studies analyzing the kinematic accuracy analysis of parallel mechanisms typically ignore the randomness of each component of input error, leading to imprecise conclusions. In this paper, we use homogeneous transforms to develop the inverse kinematics models of an improved Delta parallel mechanism. Based on the inverse kinematics and the first-order Taylor approximation, a model is presented considering errors from the kinematic parameters describing the mechanism’s geometry, clearance errors associated with revolute joints and driving errors associated with actuators. The response surface method is employed to build an explicit limit state function for describing position errors of the end-effector in the combined direction. As a result, a mathematical model of kinematic reliability of the improved Delta mechanism is derived considering the randomness of every input error component. And then, reliability sensitivity of the improved Delta parallel mechanism is analyzed, and the influences of the randomness of each input error component on the kinematic reliability of the mechanism are quantitatively calculated. The kinematic reliability and proposed sensitivity analysis provide a theoretical reference for the synthesis and optimum design of parallel mechanisms for kinematic accuracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probabilistic Methods in Design of Engineering Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 12302 KiB  
Article
Performance Assessment of an Energy–Based Approximation Method for the Dynamic Capacity of RC Frames Subjected to Sudden Column Removal Scenarios
by Luchuan Ding, Ruben Van Coile, Wouter Botte and Robby Caspeele
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(16), 7492; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167492 - 15 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2179
Abstract
The alternative load path method is widely used to assess the progressive collapse performance of reinforced concrete structures. As an alternative to an accurate non–linear dynamic analysis, an energy–based method (EBM) can also be adopted to approximately calculate the dynamic load–bearing capacity curve [...] Read more.
The alternative load path method is widely used to assess the progressive collapse performance of reinforced concrete structures. As an alternative to an accurate non–linear dynamic analysis, an energy–based method (EBM) can also be adopted to approximately calculate the dynamic load–bearing capacity curve or the dynamic resistance based on a static capacity curve. However, dynamic effects cannot be explicitly taken into account in the EBM. The model uncertainty associated with the use of the EBM for evaluating the dynamic ultimate capacity of structural frames has not yet been quantified. Knowledge of this model uncertainty is however necessary when applying EBM as part of reliability calculations, for example, in relation to structural robustness quantification. Hence, this article focuses on the evaluation of the performance of the EBM and the quantification of its model uncertainty in the context of reliability–based assessments of progressive or disproportionate collapse. The influences of damping effects and different column removal scenarios are investigated. As a result, it is found that damping effects have a limited influence on the performance of the EBM. In the case of an external column removal scenario, the performance of the EBM is lower as the response is not a single deformation mode according to the results in the frequency domain. However, a good performance is found in the case of an internal column removal scenario in which the assumption of a single deformation mode is found to be sufficiently adequate. Probabilistic models for the model uncertainties related to the use of the EBM compared to direct dynamic analyses are proposed in relation to both the resistances and the associated displacements. Overall, the EBM shows to be an adequate approximation, resulting in a small bias and small standard deviation for its associated model uncertainty. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probabilistic Methods in Design of Engineering Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop