Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
2.6
2.5
Journals
Behavioral Sciences
Special Issues
The Role of Behavioural Science in Improving Public Health
share announcement

The Role of Behavioural Science in Improving Public Health

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2024 | Viewed by 4303

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Gaby Judah

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
NIHR North West London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), Institute of Global Health Innovation (IGHI), Imperial College London, London, UK
Interests: behaviour change; predictors of health-related behaviours; cancer screening; medication adherence; improving patient safety
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Several public health challenges are caused by unhealthy behaviour, or lack of engagement with health behaviours. Examples of these behaviours are lack of healthy eating or exercise, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, poor mediation adherence, or lack of engagement with preventative healthcare (e.g., cancer screening and vaccination). These behaviours affect quality of life, health outcomes, and health inequalities.

Using behavioural science can help to effectively change behaviours affecting public health. This Special Issue is inviting manuscripts which describe the application of behavioural science to public health challenges.  Disciplinary approaches may include health psychology, decision making, user-centred design, and behavioural economics, or others as relevant.  Methodological approaches can include qualitative or quantitative work to understand potentially modifiable determinants of health-related behaviour, such as the barriers and facilitators that affect whether a behaviour is performed, as well as  work to design and test interventions to change behaviour in order to improve health of populations or segments of populations.

There is particular interest in papers applying theories and frameworks to inform the understanding of determinants of behaviours relevant to public health, and the design of interventions to change behaviour.

Dr. Gaby Judah
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • behavioural science
  • health behaviour change
  • behavioural determinants
  • behavioural interventions
  • public health
  • health psychology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

15 pages, 5238 KiB  
Article
What Is Behavioral Complexity? Lay Perceptions of Characteristics of Complex Behavior
by Indita Dorina, Barbara Mullan, Mark Boyes and Thomas McAlpine
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(8), 730; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14080730 - 22 Aug 2024
Viewed by 475
Abstract
A behavior’s complexity may impact habit formation, with implications for habit-based public health and environmental intervention designs. However, there are varying conceptualizations of behavioral complexity, hindering the synthesis of findings. To develop a unified definition, the aim of this study was to explore [...] Read more.
A behavior’s complexity may impact habit formation, with implications for habit-based public health and environmental intervention designs. However, there are varying conceptualizations of behavioral complexity, hindering the synthesis of findings. To develop a unified definition, the aim of this study was to explore perceptions of behavioral complexity and identify behaviors that exemplify aspects of complexity. Participants (N = 225) completed a questionnaire concerning the complexity of various health and environmental behaviors, the importance of complexity characteristics previously identified by researchers (novelty, difficulty, steps, planning, immediacy of reward, time, attention, skill, mental resources, self-efficacy, motivation for a behavior, and supportiveness of the context) and demographics. Participants considered all proposed characteristics to be important. Complex behaviors (e.g., abstaining from smoking and taking insulin shots), compared to simple behaviors (e.g., eating fruit and stretching), are more likely to be true to the previously identified characteristics. Perceived complexity is influenced by several salient characteristics. Results may contribute to a synthesized definition and underpin future research to better identify behavior change techniques to foster habitual behaviors of varying complexity. Hence, researchers, practitioners, and policymakers may identify common barriers and facilitators of behavior to target in interventions. However, further research is required to contextualize the findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Behavioural Science in Improving Public Health)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 967 KiB  
Article
Do Negative Self-Evaluative Emotions Enhance Healthier Food Choices? Exploring the Moderating Role of Self-Affirmation
by Jingwen Li, Yu Chen, Mingcong Tang and Shuangmiao Wang
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070538 - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1084
Abstract
Negative self-evaluative emotions arise when an individual engages in behavior that is perceived as inadequate or inconsistent with personal or societal norms and values, leading to feelings of inadequacy, shame, and dissatisfaction with oneself. These emotions are a central motivating force for changing [...] Read more.
Negative self-evaluative emotions arise when an individual engages in behavior that is perceived as inadequate or inconsistent with personal or societal norms and values, leading to feelings of inadequacy, shame, and dissatisfaction with oneself. These emotions are a central motivating force for changing unhealthy behaviors. However, negative evaluative emotions may also direct individuals towards defensive reactions such as reactance and avoidance. This can cause negative self-evaluative emotions to be less effective in reducing unhealthy behavior. More importantly, empirical evidence is needed to explore strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of interventions. In this study, we used an online experiment with 100 student participants to examine if increasing self-affirmation can increase the effectiveness of negative self-evaluative emotions in reducing unhealthy food consumption. We found that negative self-evaluative emotions can significantly increase healthy food consumption. However, our analysis did not reveal a significant moderating impact of self-affirmation on the effectiveness of negative self-evaluative emotions in reducing unhealthy consumption. This is the first study to explore the moderating impact of self-affirmation on the effectiveness of negative self-evaluative emotions on health behavioral change, which opens new avenues for studying how to apply the combination of stimulating negative self-evaluative emotions and increasing self-affirmation to induce behavioral change regarding healthy diets and even a broader range of fields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Behavioural Science in Improving Public Health)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 267 KiB  
Article
Users’ Experience of Public Cancer Screening Services: Qualitative Research Findings and Implications for Public Health System
by Maria Florencia González Leone, Anna Rosa Donizzetti, Marcella Bianchi, Daniela Lemmo, Maria Luisa Martino, Maria Francesca Freda and Daniela Caso
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(2), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020139 - 16 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1202
Abstract
Following the One Health approach, designing multidimensional strategies to orient healthcare in promoting health and preventive processes has become paramount. In particular, in the prevention domain, cancer screening attendance is still unsatisfactory in many populations and requires specific consideration. To this end, following [...] Read more.
Following the One Health approach, designing multidimensional strategies to orient healthcare in promoting health and preventive processes has become paramount. In particular, in the prevention domain, cancer screening attendance is still unsatisfactory in many populations and requires specific consideration. To this end, following a research-intervention logic, this study aims to investigate the experiences and meanings that users of public cancer screening services associate with prevention, particularly participation in the screenings. The experiences of 103 users (96 females; Mage = 54.0; SD = 1.24) of public cancer screening programs in the Campania region (Italy) were collected through interviews. The data collected were analysed following the Grounded Theory Methodology, supported by the software Atlas.ti 8.0. The text material was organised into eight macro-categories: Health and Body; Relationship with Cancer and Diseases; Health Facilities and Health Providers; The Affective Determinants of Cancer Screening Participation; Partners and Children; Physical Sensations and Emotions in the Course of Action; Protective Actions; Promotion and Dissemination. The core category was named Family and Familiarity. Respondents perceived prevention as an act of care for the family and themselves. Our findings support a shift from the idea of taking care of personal health as an individual matter toward considering it as a community issue, according to which resistance to act is overcome for and through the presence of loved ones. The results of this study contribute to a deeper understanding of the perspectives of southern Italian users on participation in cancer screening, and provide important insights to guide future actions to promote these public programmes based primarily on the emerging theme of family and familiarity related to screening programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Behavioural Science in Improving Public Health)

Other

Jump to: Research

9 pages, 225 KiB  
Brief Report
Can ‘Script Elicitation’ Methods Be Used to Promote Physical Activity? An Acceptability Study
by William Peer, Ruth R. Mathews, Xueli Ng, Winson Ho Chun Wong and Benjamin Gardner
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070572 - 5 Jul 2024
Viewed by 564
Abstract
Sustaining physical activity may require incorporating activity into everyday routines. Yet, many such routines are executed habitually, so people may not recognise physical activity opportunities. ‘Script Elicitation’—a novel intervention method whereby participants detail the content and structure of their routines and are supported [...] Read more.
Sustaining physical activity may require incorporating activity into everyday routines. Yet, many such routines are executed habitually, so people may not recognise physical activity opportunities. ‘Script Elicitation’—a novel intervention method whereby participants detail the content and structure of their routines and are supported to plan modifications to those routines—has not yet been applied to physical activity. This mixed-methods study assessed the acceptability of Script Elicitation for increasing physical activity among office workers. Eleven UK office workers completed the one-to-one Script Elicitation procedure, describing their typical before-, during-, or after-work routines and receiving guidance on incorporating activity into those routines. One week later, they rated the acceptability of the method and completed a semi-structured interview. Physical activity was self-reported at baseline and at the one-week follow-up. Acceptability was descriptively assessed on two quantitative criteria (no clear decrease in physical activity; above-midpoint acceptability scores) and qualitatively explored via Thematic Analysis. The acceptability criteria were met, and participants reported raised awareness of routines and physical activity increases. Script Elicitation appears potentially suitable for promoting activity within everyday routines. If effectiveness is shown in a more rigorous trial, future work will need to develop script-based methods for efficient delivery at scale as a public health intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Behavioural Science in Improving Public Health)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-4
Back to TopTop