Computational Methods in Neuroimaging: Advances and Challenges

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Computational Neuroscience and Neuroinformatics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2023) | Viewed by 3557

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Interests: modelling; computational neuroscience; imaging; cognitive neuroscience
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK
Interests: neuroscience; experimental and computational neuroscience

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

All brain imaging modalities actually provide visualizations of the effects of diseases with greater sensitivity than clinical observations. Therefore, imaging modalities offer significant capacities for the early detection of  diseases at their early stages that improve the effectiveness of disease management. Computational neuroscience has had significant impacts on neuroimaging over the last decade. Computational neuroscience integrates models of the brain functions (like perception, action and cognition) and computational (biophysical) models of neuronal dynamics. Neural networks inspired by brain nature and dynamics Modeling of neurological disorders have shown great potentials in medicine including diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment. These models have different applications such as  face recognition, image processing, voice recognition, medical diagnosis, and signal processing. However, the main challenge to the modeling and simulation of brain functions and neural networks is the growing amount of big data and its processing. Efficient processing of big data and developing appropriate neural biomarkers from abundant data require advanced methodologies to generate biological neural parameters from abundant data.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques, especially deep learning, have shown great promise in feature extraction, trait classification, and function fitting in imaging and visual recognition.

These techniques have been employed to address many complex problems in object detection and other fields. The ML strategies offer a robust approach to identifying and recognizing complex patterns and conducting different regression analyses to avoid the need for building the underlying physical models. Therefore, these technologies contribute significantly to the construction and optimization of computational neural models for imaging modalities.

This thematic issue will discuss recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives about computational models and methods along with neural networks used in neuroimaging for different applications. Researchers are invited to contribute original work related to this thematic issue, exploiting recent methodology using computational and mathematical techniques in neuroimaging, and addressing the challenges in developing dedicated systems for various clinical applications, while proposing new ideas and directions for future development. 

We welcome original research and review articles from systems/cognitive and computational neuroscience, to neuroimaging and neural signal processing. Original and review studies on the below topics are welcomed in this thematic issue:

  • Computational models and methods for the analysis of brain activities in any form, including signals recorded by any anatomical or functional imaging modalities (EEG, MEG, fNIRS, Eps, MRI, fMRI, SPECT, PET, ultrasound, event-related optical signal (EROS), diffusion optical imaging (DOI), etc.
  • Brain–computer/machine interfaces (all paradigms, transfer learning, multi-modal BCI, Neural Prostheses) powered by Fuzzy Systems and computational methods.
  • Neuro-robotics, Internet of Brain Things and Neuro-rehabilitation.
  • Computational methods for Neuroscience applications and the understanding of brain processes, Deep Computational Methods.

Dr. Ali Yadollahpour
Dr. Samaneh Rashidi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • computational neuroscience
  • neuroimaging
  • modelling
  • neural networks
  • artificial intelligence
  • machine learning
  • deep learning
  • biomarkers

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 871 KiB  
Article
Repeated Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Auditory Cortex for Tinnitus Treatment: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
by Ali Yadollahpour, Samaneh Rashidi, Nader Saki, Pramod Singh Kunwar and Miguel Mayo-Yáñez
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(4), 373; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14040373 - 12 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1943
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive and painless technique of brain neuromodulation that applies a low-intensity galvanic current to the scalp with the aim of stimulating specific areas of the brain. Preliminary investigations have indicated the potential therapeutic efficacy of multisession [...] Read more.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive and painless technique of brain neuromodulation that applies a low-intensity galvanic current to the scalp with the aim of stimulating specific areas of the brain. Preliminary investigations have indicated the potential therapeutic efficacy of multisession tDCS applied to the auditory cortex (AC) in the treatment of chronic tinnitus. The aim of this study was to explore the therapeutic effects of repeated sessions of bilateral tDCS targeting the AC on chronic tinnitus. A double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted on patients (n = 48) with chronic intractable tinnitus (>2 years duration). Participants were randomly allocated to two groups: one receiving tDCS (n = 26), with the anode/cathode placed over the left/right AC, and the other receiving a placebo treatment (n = 22). A 20 min daily session of 2 mA current was administered for five consecutive days per week over two consecutive weeks, employing 35 cm2 electrodes. Tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) scores, tinnitus loudness, and tinnitus distress were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and were assessed before intervention, immediately after, and at one-month follow-up. Anodal tDCS significantly reduced THI from 72.93 ± 10.11 score to 46.40 ± 15.36 after the last session and 49.68 ± 14.49 at one-month follow-up in 18 out of 25 participants (p < 0.001). The risk ratio (RR) of presenting an improvement of ≥20 points in the THI after the last session was 10.8 in patients treated with tDCS. Statistically significant reductions were observed in distress VAS and loudness VAS (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in the control group were observed. Variables such as age, gender, duration of tinnitus, laterality of tinnitus, baseline THI scores, and baseline distress and loudness VAS scores did not demonstrate significant correlations with treatment response. Repeated sessions of bilateral AC tDCS may potentially serve as a therapeutic modality for chronic tinnitus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Methods in Neuroimaging: Advances and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1877 KiB  
Article
Effect of T1 Slope on Disappearance of Cervical Lordosis after Posterior Cervical Double-Door Laminoplasty Based on Medical Informatics
by Yulin Zhao, Binglei Zhang and Baisheng Yuan
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(8), 1189; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13081189 - 11 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1067
Abstract
Cervical sagittal balance plays a pivotal role in spine surgeries as it has a significant impact on the clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. Image processing techniques have significantly improved the accuracy and precision of cervical surgical techniques. This study aims to investigate [...] Read more.
Cervical sagittal balance plays a pivotal role in spine surgeries as it has a significant impact on the clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. Image processing techniques have significantly improved the accuracy and precision of cervical surgical techniques. This study aims to investigate the effects of T1 slope (T1s) on the disappearance of cervical lordosis after posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty using medical informatics and radiographic measures. To do so, we determined and measured the loss of T1s and cervical lordosis during the postoperative follow-up period in patients with double-door posterior cervical laminoplasty. Patients (n = 40) who underwent posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty participated in this study. For all patients, the difference between the preoperative T1s (angle between the upper edge of T1 and the horizontal line) and preoperative and postoperative cervical lordosis (Cobb method) was estimated, and the linear relationship between the two was statistically analyzed to observe the influence of preoperative T1s on postoperative cervical lordosis disappearance. The average preoperative T1s was 23.54°, and the average preoperative cervical lordosis angle was 8.50°. After 1–20 months of follow-up (mean = 9.53 months), the average postoperative cervical lordosis was 8.50°, and the average loss of cervical lordosis was 0.22°. Twenty cases had different degrees of lordosis angle loss after the operation, with an average loss of 9.31°. All patients were divided into groups A and B, according to a mean value of T1s = 23.54°, of which T1S > 23.54° was group A and T1s < 23.54 was group B. Cervical lordosis was quantified by the C2–C7 Cobb angle. The Cobb angle difference of cervical lordosis was measured before and after the operation, and its correlation with preoperative T1s was assessed. The preoperative Cobb angle and cervical curvature changes in the two groups were statistically compared, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The group with a T1s > 23.54° had greater loss of preoperative Cobb angle and cervical curvature. In group A, the mean preoperative cervical disability index (NDI) was 32.4 ± 3.4, and the mean postoperative NDI score was 16.5 ± 2.1. The mean preoperative VAS scores of neck pain and neck pain were 5.41 ± 1.1 and 5.55 ± 0.3, respectively, and the improvement in neck pain was −0.2%. The mean preoperative NDI in group B was 30.1 ± 2.9, and the mean postoperative NDI score was 11.5 ± 3.1. The mean VAS score for preoperative neck pain was 5.11 ± 1.2, that for postoperative neck pain was 4.18 ± 0.7, and that for neck pain improved by 18%. There was a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). The disappearance of cervical lordosis after posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty is an important cause of postoperative cervical spine pain. The T1s is meaningful for predicting the loss of postoperative curvature in patients undergoing posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty. This is especially true for patients with good preoperative cervical curvature without ankylosis and kyphosis but with a wide T1s. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Methods in Neuroimaging: Advances and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop