Advances in the Management of Pelvic Tumors

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 September 2025 | Viewed by 7115

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Urology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Milano, Italy
Interests: urology; oncology; robotic surgery

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Gynecology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Milano, Italy
Interests: ovarian cancer; uterine cancer; robotic and laparoscopic surgery; oncology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Pelvic tumors are quite frequent diseases and include prostate, bladder, uterine, ovarian, rectal and anal malignancies. The treatment of tumors occurring within the pelvis may be challenging.

This Special Issue will cover advances in the management of pelvic cancers, including surgical, medical and radiation treatments. It will focus on organ-confined and locally advanced diseases. Novel findings in robotic surgery as well as medical and personalized therapies are welcomed.

Dr. Maria Chiara Sighinolfi
Dr. Giorgia Gaia
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pelvic cancer
  • prostate cancer
  • bladder cancer
  • uterine cancer
  • ovarian cancer
  • rectal cancer
  • anal cancer

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 1127 KiB  
Article
Lethal Prostate Cancer in Mexico: Data from the Can.Prost Mexican Registry and a Project for Early Detection
by Miguel Angel Jimenez Rios, Anna Scavuzzo, Nancy Reynoso Noverón, Caleb García Arango, Ivan Calvo Vazquez, Alonso Hurtado Vázquez, Oscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodriguez, Miguel Angel Jimenez Davila, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi and Bernardo Rocco
Cancers 2024, 16(21), 3675; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213675 - 30 Oct 2024
Viewed by 958
Abstract
Introduction: Epidemiological data are crucial for adopting primary and secondary prevention strategies and to develop screening protocols against prostate cancer (PCa). Despite the comprehensive characterization of PCa across White and Black men, there is a lack of data from the Mexican population. This [...] Read more.
Introduction: Epidemiological data are crucial for adopting primary and secondary prevention strategies and to develop screening protocols against prostate cancer (PCa). Despite the comprehensive characterization of PCa across White and Black men, there is a lack of data from the Mexican population. This manuscript presents data from the Can.Prost registry that captures PCa trends over the past two decades in Mexico City; furthermore, we aimed to compare clinical differences and oncological outcomes before and after the promotion of early detection actions through a campaign against PCa that occurred in 2014. Methods: A retrospective observational study on newly diagnosed Mexican PCa patients was carried out at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan) in Mexico City. During 2014 and 2015, a project for the early diagnosis of PCa (“OPUS program”) was launched in the aforementioned tertiary hospital. Starting at the age of 45 years, all men were invited for a PSA measurement and a specialist urologist consultation. All individuals with clinical or biochemical suspicion of PCa (PSA > 4 ng/mL), in the context of age and prostate volume, underwent ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy. Then, patients with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer were stratified according to the year of diagnosis: Group A accounted for those diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 and Group B for those patients diagnosed in the timeframe of 2015–2021. Comparisons of PCa characteristics, treatment modalities and oncologic outcomes between Group A and B were performed. Results: Overall, we collected data from 2759 PCa patients from 2000 to 2021. The median PSA at baseline was 32 ng/mL, and 25% had a family history of PCa. Overall, 25.8% were asymptomatic and 46% had a non-metastatic presentation. After the OPUS campaign, PSA at diagnosis was significantly lower across all age groups. The incidence of PCa diagnosis in asymptomatic men was higher (31.4% vs. 19.9%) and a higher proportion of men were diagnosed with organ-confined, palpable disease (46% vs. 28%) (p < 0.001). The rate of patients eligible for active/radical treatment was higher after the OPUS campaign (patients who received surgery increased from 12.78% to 32.41%; patients who underwent radiation increased from 28.38% to 49.61%). The proportion of patients diagnosed with non-clinically significant disease was negligible and remained stable across time. Conclusions: PCa in Mexican patients displays aggressive features at diagnosis, whereas the rate of non-significant disease is negligible. The introduction of early detection strategies may lead to lower symptomatic and metastatic PCa and higher opportunities for radical treatment. This emphasizes the need for public awareness and for adjustment of screening strategies to the peculiarities of the Mexican population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Pelvic Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 674 KiB  
Article
Management of Ureteral Stricture Disease After Radiation Therapy for Pelvic Malignancies: A Retrospective, Multi-Institutional Analysis
by Marco Carilli, Valerio Iacovelli, Marta Signoretti, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Franco Gaboardi, Giovannalberto Pini, Mario Falsaperla, Roberto Falabella and Pierluigi Bove
Cancers 2024, 16(21), 3561; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213561 - 22 Oct 2024
Viewed by 501
Abstract
Objectives. A radiation-induced ureteral stricture (RIUS) is a challenging condition in urologic surgery, and the optimal surgical strategy is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to report post-operative outcomes of minimally invasive management of this condition from a [...] Read more.
Objectives. A radiation-induced ureteral stricture (RIUS) is a challenging condition in urologic surgery, and the optimal surgical strategy is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to report post-operative outcomes of minimally invasive management of this condition from a multi-institutional cohort. Methods. Data of patients with diagnoses of RIUS at five referral robotic centers between January 2017 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Pre-, intra- and post-operative variables were collected. Recurrence was defined as the presence of flank pain combined with imaging findings for obstruction, and requiring further management. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were built to identify predictors of ureteral stricture recurrence. Results. Fifty-three patients with a diagnosis of an RIUS were included. Primary pelvic malignancy was mostly cervical (42%). In 72% of cases (mostly mid-proximal and short strictures) endourological management was attempted, which was deemed successful in 74% of patients at stent removal. The endourology success rate at a median follow-up of 12 months was 59%. Twenty-five patients (47%) were scheduled for robotic surgery. The reconstructive techniques most often performed were end-to-end anastomosis (44%) and ureteral reimplantation (52%). Three low-grade Clavien-Dindo post-operative complications (12%) occurred. Robotic surgery was successful in all cases except one. Considering the entire cohort, eight patients (15%) developed recurrence at a median follow-up of 5 months. All patients with recurrence were managed by permanent drainage. A statistically significant improvement in eGFR with respect to baseline was found at a median follow-up of 12 months (p = 0.007). The univariate logistic regression model identified ureteral stricture length >2 cm (OR 6.4, 95% C.I. 1.1–36.9, p = 0.04) and concomitant chemotherapy (OR 8.9, 95% C.I. 1.6–49.9, p = 0.01) as predictors of recurrence. At multivariate analysis concomitant chemotherapy was confirmed as an independent predictor of recurrence (OR 7.8, 95% C.I. 1.3–49.0, p = 0.03). Conclusions. Endourological management of an RIUS is reasonable for short and mid-proximal ureteral strictures, while robotics is required in almost all the remaining cases. Up to 15% of recurrence develops within 6 months. Re-do reconstructive surgery is rarely performed, even in referral centers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Pelvic Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1126 KiB  
Article
Enhancing Prostate Cancer Staging: Association of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging with Histopathological Grading in Treatment-Naive Patients
by Oleksii Pisotskyi, Piotr Petrasz, Piotr Zorga, Marcin Gałęski, Pawel Szponar, Katarzyna Brzeźniakiewicz-Janus, Tomasz Drewa, Krzysztof Kaczmarek, Michał Cezary Czarnogórski and Jan Adamowicz
Cancers 2024, 16(20), 3526; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16203526 - 18 Oct 2024
Viewed by 720
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between 68Ga-PSMA uptake in PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer (PC) and its histopathological grading (Gleason score and ISUP grade). Additionally, we compared preoperative biopsy histopathological findings with definitive pathology results in radical prostatectomy (RP) [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between 68Ga-PSMA uptake in PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer (PC) and its histopathological grading (Gleason score and ISUP grade). Additionally, we compared preoperative biopsy histopathological findings with definitive pathology results in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 86 patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary PC staging, of which 40 patients later underwent radical prostatectomy. PET/CT results, including SUVmax values, were correlated with GS and PSA concentrations. Histopathology reports were analyzed and compared between biopsy and final pathology results following RP. Results: A significant positive correlation was observed between SUVmax and ISUP grades (Pearson’s ρ = 0.34, p < 0.001), with higher SUVmax values associated with more advanced grades. A cut-off SUVmax value of 5.64 was determined to predict upstaging in patients, yielding a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 60% (AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70–0.94). Additionally, 57.5% of patients experienced a grade shift following RP, with a 35% upgrade and 22.5% downgrade in ISUP grades. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting high-risk prostate cancer, particularly in patients with GS > 7 or PSA levels ≥ 10 ng/mL. The findings suggest that this imaging modality may be less effective for the staging of patients with lower GS or PSA values, that is, low-risk PCa. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate these results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Pelvic Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1842 KiB  
Article
Peritoneal Flap Following Lymph Node Dissection in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Novel “Bunching” Technique
by Ahmed Gamal, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Abdel Rahman Jaber, Shady Saikali, Marco Sandri, Ela Patel, Evan Patel, Travis Rogers and Vipul Patel
Cancers 2024, 16(8), 1547; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081547 - 18 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1737
Abstract
Background: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is recommended while performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for patients with localized intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. However, symptomatic lymphoceles can occur after surgery, adding significant morbidity to patients. Our objective is to describe a novel Peritoneal [...] Read more.
Background: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is recommended while performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for patients with localized intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. However, symptomatic lymphoceles can occur after surgery, adding significant morbidity to patients. Our objective is to describe a novel Peritoneal Bladder Flap Bunching technique (PBFB) to reduce the risk of clinically significant lymphoceles in patients undergoing RARP and PLND. Methods: We evaluated 2267 patients who underwent RARP with PLND, dividing them into two groups: Group 1, comprising 567 patients who had the peritoneal flap (PBFB), and Group 2, comprising 1700 patients without the flap; propensity score matching carried out at a 1:3 ratio. Variables analyzed included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, postoperative complications, lymphocele formation, and the development of symptomatic lymphocele. Results: The two groups exhibited similar preoperative characteristics after matching. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of lymphoceles between the flap group and the non-flap group, with rates of 24% and 20.9%, respectively (p = 0.14). However, none of the patients in the flap group (0%) developed symptomatic lymphoceles, whereas 2.2% of patients in the non-flap group experienced symptomatic lymphoceles (p = 0.01). Conclusion: We have demonstrated a modified technique for a peritoneal flap (PBFB) with the initial elimination of postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles and promising short-term outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Pelvic Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 245 KiB  
Article
Open versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for the Treatment of pT4a Bladder Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes
by Davide Perri, Bernardo Rocco, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Pierluigi Bove, Antonio L. Pastore, Alessandro Volpe, Andrea Minervini, Alessandro Antonelli, Stefano Zaramella, Antonio Galfano, Giovanni E. Cacciamani, Antonio Celia, Orietta Dalpiaz, Simone Crivellaro, Francesco Greco, Giovannalberto Pini, Angelo Porreca, Andrea Pacchetti, Tommaso Calcagnile, Lorenzo Berti, Carlo Buizza, Federica Mazzoleni and Giorgio Bozziniadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2024, 16(7), 1329; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16071329 - 28 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1136
Abstract
We compared the perioperative outcomes of open (ORC) vs. robot-assisted (RARC) radical cystectomy in the treatment of pT4a MIBC. In total, 212 patients underwent ORC (102 patients, Group A) vs. RARC (110 patients, Group B) for pT4a bladder cancer. Patients were prospectively followed [...] Read more.
We compared the perioperative outcomes of open (ORC) vs. robot-assisted (RARC) radical cystectomy in the treatment of pT4a MIBC. In total, 212 patients underwent ORC (102 patients, Group A) vs. RARC (110 patients, Group B) for pT4a bladder cancer. Patients were prospectively followed and retrospectively reviewed. We assessed operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay, transfusion rate, and oncological outcomes. Preoperative features were comparable. The mean operative time was 232.8 vs. 189.2 min (p = 0.04), and mean EBL was 832.8 vs. 523.7 mL in Group A vs. B (p = 0.04). An intraoperative transfusion was performed in 32 (31.4%) vs. 11 (10.0%) cases during ORC vs. RARC (p = 0.03). The intraoperative complications rate was comparable. The mean length of stay was shorter after RARC (12.6 vs. 7.2 days, p = 0.02). Postoperative transfusions were performed in 36 (35.3%) vs. 13 (11.8%) cases (p = 0.03), and postoperative complications occurred in 37 (36.3%) vs. 29 (26.4%) patients in Groups A vs. B (p = 0.05). The positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was lower after RARC. No differences were recorded according to the oncological outcomes. ORC and RARC are feasible treatments for the management of pT4a bladder tumors. Minimally invasive surgery provides shorter operative time, bleeding, transfusion rate, postoperative complications, length of stay, and PSM rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Pelvic Tumors)
13 pages, 1650 KiB  
Article
Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: A 15-Year Monocentric Retrospective Study
by Nando Fix, Sabrina Classen-von Spee, Saher Baransi, Verónica Luengas-Würzinger, Friederike Rawert, Ruth Lippert, Peter Mallmann and Björn Lampe
Cancers 2023, 15(19), 4725; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194725 - 26 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1168
Abstract
Treatment options for recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma are limited. In those cases, secondary surgical procedures such as pelvic exenteration form the only possible curative approach. The aim of this study was analyzing the outcomes of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration during the treatment of [...] Read more.
Treatment options for recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma are limited. In those cases, secondary surgical procedures such as pelvic exenteration form the only possible curative approach. The aim of this study was analyzing the outcomes of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration during the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer intending to identify prognostic factors. More than 300 pelvic exenterations were performed. Fifteen patients were selected that received pelvic exenteration for recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma. Data regarding patient characteristics, indication for surgery, complete cytoreduction, tumor grading and p53- and L1CAM-expression were collected and statistically evaluated. Univariate Cox regression was performed to identify predictive factors for long-term survival. The mean survival after pelvic exenteration for the whole patient population was 22.7 months, with the longest survival reaching up to 69 months. Overall survival was significantly longer for patients with a curative treatment intention (p = 0.015) and for patients with a well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (p = 0.014). Complete cytoreduction seemed favorable with a mean survival of 32 months in contrast to 10 months when complete cytoreduction was not achieved. Pelvic exenteration is a possible treatment option for a selected group of patients resulting in a mean survival of nearly two years, offering a substantial prognostic improvement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Pelvic Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop