Advances in the Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 March 2025 | Viewed by 3053

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, MO 66160, USA
Interests: oncologic surgery; gastrointestinal cancers; peritoneal surface malignancies; cytoreductive surgery; heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Peritoneal surface malignancies, whether primary or secondary, continue to be difficult to manage. Despite the fact that there have been significant successes in the treatment of hematologic-based metastases, the peritoneum surface remains relatively elusive due to a blood–peritoneal barrier. However, in combination with effective systemic therapies, progress has been made with the addition of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal therapy (CRS-HIPEC). In the case of colorectal cancer, patients with isolated metastatic peritoneal carcinomatosis can now achieve a survival rate of 40–50% in select patients who receive systemic therapy combined with CRS-HIPEC; this is similar to the survival of patients with isolated liver metastases.

The utilization of CRS-HIPEC remains controversial in some cases due to a lack of level one evidence showing a survival benefit for some primary disease sites. Cytoreductive surgery alone, especially when all gross disease is removed, consistently shows a survival advantage in the multimodality treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis for many disease sites. However, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been questioned as providing a survival advantage. Interestingly, in peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to cytoreductive surgery has consistently shown an inherent survival value in several large randomized prospective surgery studies despite this disease having only recently been studied for this approach.

The multimodality management of peritoneal surface malignancies remains in its infancy. Multiple variables require further research, and more clinical trials are needed. The use of CRS-HIPEC needs to become more standardized before it is universally accepted as an integral component in managing peritoneal surface malignancies from specific primary sites of origin. Important topics need to be addressed such as appropriate patient selection, including patient and tumor molecular correlates, that can lead to individualized care. Furthermore, the standardization of CRS-HPEC techniques needs to be fine-tuned, including delivery systems, agents, dosages, length of HIPEC administration, and temperatures. Importantly, ideal sequencing of CRS-HIPEC with systemic therapy needs to be established.

This Special Issue of Cancers aims to include original studies and reviews of the important topics in peritoneal surface malignancies and their treatment, including CRS-HIPEC and systemic therapy. The integration of surgery, systemic therapy, and other modalities will require cooperation between the various types of providers. Many in the field have strong opinions about the management of peritoneal surface malignancies, which could hinder progress. Providers in several fields need to remain open-minded. Finally, several studies have shown that only institutions with the appropriate resources and volume of cases should take on the more complex cases of peritoneal surface malignancies.

Prof. Dr. Mazin Al-Kasspooles
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • peritoneal surface malignancies
  • cytoreductive surgery
  • hyperthermic intraperitoneal therapy
  • systemic therapy
  • multimodality management

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

20 pages, 1594 KiB  
Article
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS): Age-Related Outcomes and a Look into the Future
by Salvador Aguirre, Jill K. Haley, Julie A. Broski, Jordan Baker, Luke V. Selby, Shahid Umar and Mazin F. Al-Kasspooles
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 486; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030486 - 1 Feb 2025
Viewed by 576
Abstract
Introduction: Peritoneal carcinomatosis presents significant treatment challenges. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) offers a promising therapeutic approach. Patient selection remains critical, and the role of age as an exclusion criterion requires further investigation. This study evaluates whether age influences postoperative [...] Read more.
Introduction: Peritoneal carcinomatosis presents significant treatment challenges. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) offers a promising therapeutic approach. Patient selection remains critical, and the role of age as an exclusion criterion requires further investigation. This study evaluates whether age influences postoperative outcomes in CRS-HIPEC patients. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospective comprehensive database of 271 CRS-HIPEC procedures performed between 2018 and 2023 was conducted. Logistic regression assessed the relationship between age and postoperative outcomes. Age groups (18–44, 45–69, ≥70 years) were compared based on demographic data, primary tumor site, Peritoneal Cancer Index scores, and key outcome measures. Results: Across the different age groups, there were no significant differences in PCI scores, recurrence, disease-free survival, 30-day morbidity, or mortality. Length of stay was longer in older patients (p = 0.009). Patients aged ≥70 had higher readmission rates (p = 0.041) and were more often discharged to transitional care facilities (p = 0.001). Older patients were also more likely to experience Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher complications (p = 0.008). Logistic regression confirmed these findings. Continuous age analysis yielded similar results and revealed significant differences in race and primary organ involvement. Conclusions: Age is not a significant predictor of 30-day morbidity, mortality, or survival outcomes in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC. However, older patients require closer attention to discharge planning and readmission risk management. This study highlights the importance of comprehensive patient assessment beyond age and underscores the need for further research to better understand factors influencing outcomes in this population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 241 KiB  
Article
Safety and Efficacy of Initiating Parenteral Nutrition at Home, Home Start PN, in Advanced Peritoneal Metastasis
by Chunmeng Zhang, Ujwal Yanala, Mounika Addula, Sherry Adams, Louise Ocken, Patricia Skiendziel, Tia Bodkins and Jason M. Foster
Cancers 2024, 16(24), 4272; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16244272 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 791
Abstract
Background: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis often experience intestinal failure throughout the course of their disease, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) can be used as a temporary solution or as a bridge to definitive cytoreductive surgery. Guidelines for TPN are well established for inpatients [...] Read more.
Background: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis often experience intestinal failure throughout the course of their disease, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) can be used as a temporary solution or as a bridge to definitive cytoreductive surgery. Guidelines for TPN are well established for inpatients and in 2014, guidelines were established for the initiation of TPN for outpatients in a home setting. However, the safety and efficacy of home start TPN in advanced oncology patients remain unknown. This study aims to explore the safety and efficacy of starting TPN in the home setting for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Method: Health records of advanced cancer patients receiving TPN during 2009–2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Data pertaining to diagnosis, demographics, nutritional parameters, and outcomes including hospital readmission rates were collected. Safety was measured based on catheter-related complications and hospital admissions related to electrolyte or fluid imbalance due to TPN. Efficacy was determined by weight gain/stability and pre-albumin and albumin levels. The Fisher’s exact and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Seventy TPN patients were identified, of which forty-two were home start (HS) and twenty-eight were in hospital (HP). The two groups were not significantly different in age, (HS: mean = 58.3 ± 13.9; HP: mean = 58.0 ± 13; p = 0.95), baseline body weight (p = 0.13), baseline albumin (p = 0.26) or pre-albumin (p = 0.48). At the end of treatment, the HS and HP groups had similar percentages of patients experiencing weight gain/stability (75% vs. 47%, p = 0.1), stable/increased pre-albumin (68% vs. 65%, p = 1), and stable/increased albumin levels (48% vs. 59%, p = 0.58). There was no difference in observed readmission between the groups (p = 0.79). At the end of treatment, 48% of the HS group and 36% of the HP group resumed an oral diet. Conclusions: This is the first study to present a comparison between home and hospital start TPN in advanced cancer patients, demonstrating that the initiation of outpatient TPN in the home setting is as safe and efficacious as TPN initiated in the hospital. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies)

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 951 KiB  
Review
Iterative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
by Fatemeh Tajik, Belain Eyob, Aaqil M. Khan, Vinodh Kumar Radhakrishnan and Maheswari Senthil
Cancers 2025, 17(2), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020289 - 17 Jan 2025
Viewed by 889
Abstract
Background/objectives: Despite the incremental improvement of survival with systemic therapy in metastatic gastric cancer (GC), the outcomes of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) remain poor. The limited effectiveness of systemic therapy is attributed to the blood–peritoneal barrier and anarchic intra-tumoral circulation, which reduce [...] Read more.
Background/objectives: Despite the incremental improvement of survival with systemic therapy in metastatic gastric cancer (GC), the outcomes of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) remain poor. The limited effectiveness of systemic therapy is attributed to the blood–peritoneal barrier and anarchic intra-tumoral circulation, which reduce the penetration of systemic therapy. Approaches that incorporate intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, in addition to systemic therapies, may be a viable alternate strategy. Therefore, we provide a review of biology of gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis and evidence for bidirectional iterative IP chemotherapy in GCPC. Methods: A comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to find the relevant articles and ongoing phase II/III clinical trials in iterative IP chemotherapy in GCPC. Results: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy leverages the blood–peritoneal barrier to allow for the administration of high concentrations of chemotherapy directly to the peritoneal metastases, with a significant reduction in the systemic toxicity and enhanced drug efficacy against peritoneal metastasis. This pharmacokinetic advantage of IP chemotherapy can be further enhanced by additional measures such as heat or aerosolization. There are three IP chemotherapy approaches, namely, heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC), and normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC). Recent evidence suggests that iterative IP chemotherapy combined with systemic therapy may offer significant survival benefits for patients with peritoneal metastasis. Furthermore, bidirectional treatment approaches may also increase the chances of surgical resection and survival. Conclusions: IP chemotherapy plays a pivotal role in the management of gastric carcinomatosis, particularly in combination with cytoreduction in highly selected patients. The combination of systemic and regional control may increase the chances of surgical resection and may ultimately lead to significant survival benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop