Treatment of Lung Cancer

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 December 2023) | Viewed by 7212

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2. Department of Biochemistry, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
Interests: lung cancer; pharmacology of anticancer; drug development; combination therapies; transporters; drug metabolism
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Head, Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy and Early Phase Clinical Trials Centre, Medical University of Gdańsk Ul, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland
Interests: treatment of lung cancer; phase I and II studies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The treatment of lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), has changed considerably in the last two decades. At the beginning of this century, standard chemotherapy consisted of various doublets, depending on the type of tumor (squamous, non-squamous), while there are also local differences. However, in general, the doublets consisted of gemcitabine/cisplatin, a taxane/cisplatin, and gemcitabine/pemetrexed. For these doublets, a number of potential predictive biomarkers have been investigated, usually focusing on the properties of the single drugs (e.g., drug metabolism, drug transport, DNA repair mechanism). This sometimes led to some extent of personalized therapy. However, with the recognition that many types of adenocarcinoma are addicted to a specific signaling pathway, new types of therapy, often called targeted therapy, have been introduced. The recognition of activation mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) led to the registration of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) erlotinib and gefitinib, and later afatinib and dacomitinib. Other resistance mutations led to the development of novel specific TKIs, such as osimertinib targeting, e.g., the T790M mutation. Various resistance mechanisms to osimertinib exist, such as the C797S mutation for which novel TKIs are being developed. Targeting the EML-ALK mutation with crizotinib was a game changer for patients with this mutation; resistance to crizotinib rapidly led to the introduction of novel TKIs, bypassing various resistance mechanisms, such as ceritinib, lorlatinib, and brigatinib. Other aberrations in adenocarcinoma are less frequent, but some specific TKIs are in development, such as exon20 insertions (poziotinib) and RET rearrangement (pralsetinib, selpercatinib). A major breakthrough in the development of novel TKIs are compounds that target RAS mutations. RAS mutations (e.g., G12C) are very common in NSCLC, and these tumors are not sensitive to EGFR TKIs. RAS was considered to be a non-targetable mutation, but with the introduction of various novel TKIs, such as sotorasib and adragrasib, there are now new possibilities. In current development, special emphasis is now also being given to the “non-target” properties of these novel TKIs, such as their metabolism, more efficient gut uptake and brain penetration. The last new developments in the treatment of lung cancer, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC), include the introduction of antibody-based immunotherapy, targeting either PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab), or CTLA4 (ipilimumab) These therapies are either given as neo-adjuvant or after surgery. PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors can be given together with CTLA-4 inhibitors, although combinations with conventional chemotherapy are also quite common. Some small molecules targeting metabolic pathways important for the immune response are also being evaluated. There is a rapid increase in the treatment of various lung cancers, which may be new game changers as well. However, insight into which type of therapy should be given to each patient is not always clear.

This Special Issue covers all of these aspects in the treatment of lung cancer.

Prof. Dr. Godefridus J. Peters
Prof. Dr. Rafal Dziadziuszko
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • lung cancer
  • new developments in conventional chemotherapy
  • novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors
  • non-small cell lung cancer
  • immunotherapy

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

Jump to: Other

24 pages, 879 KiB  
Review
An Updated Review of Management of Resectable Stage III NSCLC in the Era of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy
by Saurav Verma, Daniel Breadner, Abhenil Mittal, David A. Palma, Rahul Nayak, Jacques Raphael and Mark Vincent
Cancers 2024, 16(7), 1302; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16071302 - 27 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2626
Abstract
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have an established role in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ICIs have now entered the paradigm of early-stage NSCLC. The recent evidence shows that the addition of ICI to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the [...] Read more.
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have an established role in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ICIs have now entered the paradigm of early-stage NSCLC. The recent evidence shows that the addition of ICI to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival rate in early-stage resectable NSCLC and is now a standard of care option in this setting. In this regard, stage III NSCLC merits special consideration, as it is heterogenous and requires a multidisciplinary approach to management. As the neoadjuvant approach is being adopted widely, new challenges have emerged and the boundaries for resectability are being re-examined. Consequently, it is ever more important to carefully individualize the treatment strategy for each patient with resectable stage III NSCLC. In this review, we discuss the recent literature in this field with particular focus on evolving definitions of resectability, T4 disease, N2 disease (single and multi-station), and nodal downstaging. We also highlight the controversy around adjuvant treatment in this setting and discuss the selection of patients for adjuvant treatment, options of salvage, and next line treatment in cases of progression on/after neoadjuvant treatment or after R2 resection. We will conclude with a brief discussion of predictive biomarkers, predictive models, ongoing studies, and directions for future research in this space. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment of Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Review

9 pages, 760 KiB  
Perspective
Second-Line Treatment Options for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Light at the End of the Tunnel
by Fausto Meriggi
Cancers 2024, 16(2), 255; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16020255 - 5 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2657
Abstract
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a subtype of lung tumor characterized by rapid growth and early metastatic dissemination. It represents approximately 15% of all diagnosed lung cancers, with an annual incidence of over 200,000 cases worldwide. At the time of initial diagnosis, approximately [...] Read more.
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a subtype of lung tumor characterized by rapid growth and early metastatic dissemination. It represents approximately 15% of all diagnosed lung cancers, with an annual incidence of over 200,000 cases worldwide. At the time of initial diagnosis, approximately 75–80% of patients already have extrathoracic spread. Almost all patients with SCLC also relapse after achieving a complete response with first-line treatment. Outcomes achievable in second-line treatment are related to the length of time between completion of first-line therapy and disease progression. While first-line chemo-immunotherapy remains the standard of care for initial management, the role of second-line treatment strategies in SCLC has been a topic of significant research and discussion. Second-line treatment options are limited and the results are still disappointing. Several molecules are currently being studied in lines following the first, using immunological targets and cell cycle checkpoints. Among these, particular interest has been placed on anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death-1 protein) and anti-PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1) monoclonal antibodies, and DLL3 (Delta-like ligand 3), which are being evaluated alone or in combination. Tarlatamab is a novel promising therapeutic antibody currently under investigation for its potential use in previously treated SCLC patients. This mini-review will explore the current state of second-line treatment options for SCLC, their clinical efficacy, and future directions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment of Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2491 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Deniz Can Guven, Taha Koray Sahin and Saadettin Kilickap
Cancers 2024, 16(1), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16010156 - 28 Dec 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1552
Abstract
Background: After the success of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the benefit of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was compared with chemotherapy for localized NSCLC in several trials. However, the available studies had variable study designs, and study cohorts had [...] Read more.
Background: After the success of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the benefit of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was compared with chemotherapy for localized NSCLC in several trials. However, the available studies had variable study designs, and study cohorts had limited follow-up times. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with localized NSCLC. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for studies published until 5 December 2023. This protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (Registration Number: CRD42023466337). We performed the meta-analyses with the generic inverse-variance method with a fixed effects model. Results: Overall, 7 studies encompassing 2993 patients were included in the analyses. The use of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was associated with a 41% reduction in the risk of progression or death compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.52–0.66, p < 0.0001) and a lower risk of death (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55–0.82, p < 0.0001). The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy improved pCR rates compared to chemotherapy (21.8% vs. 3.8%, OR: 7.04, 95% CI: 5.23–9.47, p < 0.0001), while high-grade adverse events were higher with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.36, p = 0.0300). Conclusions: The available evidence demonstrates a statistically significant and clinically meaningful event-free survival benefit and possibly an overall survival benefit with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with a slight increase in high-grade toxicities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment of Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop